City Sovereignty: Urban Resistance and Rebel Cities Reconsidered
AbstractThe article argues for an increase in de facto already claimed city sovereignty. It situates the discussion, first in the historical context of city-state relationships, and second, in the current urban crises in the United States tied to the sanctuary city movement, then examines legal grounds for devolution of power to cities, before discussing the legal concepts of “urban commons” and “city power”, finally outlining constraints facing increasingly sovereign cities. The article argues that current legal literature on “urban commons” and “city power” needs a stronger normative lens and better conceptualization of urban inequality, redistribution, and publicness. Moreover, if cities are to assume greater capacity to govern and to ensure life, liberty, and the sustainability of their populations, they have to overcome serious constraints in the four domains outlined in the article: (1) surveillance and control of urban space, (2) privatization of public space, (3) the rise of the luxury city, large-scale developments, megaprojects, and (4) homelessness. View Full-Text
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.
Share & Cite This Article
Filipcevic Cordes, V. City Sovereignty: Urban Resistance and Rebel Cities Reconsidered. Urban Sci. 2017, 1, 22.
Filipcevic Cordes V. City Sovereignty: Urban Resistance and Rebel Cities Reconsidered. Urban Science. 2017; 1(3):22.Chicago/Turabian Style
Filipcevic Cordes, Vojislava. 2017. "City Sovereignty: Urban Resistance and Rebel Cities Reconsidered." Urban Sci. 1, no. 3: 22.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.