Next Article in Journal
Understanding Fatigue: A Psychological Framework for Health and Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation and Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Hair-Dye Products Sold in Brazil and Paraguay
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement and Maturation of Liquid Biofertilizers in Series-Connected Biodigesters: Comparative Analysis of Guinea Pig Manure and Vermicompost Leachate

by
Juan Pablo Gómez-Montoya
1,
Yoisdel Castillo-Alvarez
1,
Luis Felipe Ortiz-Dongo
2,
Richard Solórzano
2,
Alisson Dahian Patiño-Agudelo
3,
Mario Luna-delRisco
3 and
Carlos E. Arrieta-Gonzalez
3,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technological University of Peru, Lima 150101, Peru
2
National Institute of Agrarian Innovation (INIA), Lima 15024, Peru
3
Faculty of Engineering, University of Medellín, Medellín 050026, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci 2025, 7(4), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7040161
Submission received: 20 August 2025 / Revised: 13 October 2025 / Accepted: 31 October 2025 / Published: 5 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental and Earth Science)

Abstract

The recovery of livestock waste through multistage anaerobic digestion represents a key strategy for producing high-efficiency liquid biofertilizers within circular economy frameworks. This study compared two underexplored substrates—guinea pig manure and vermicompost leachate (VL)—processed in series biodigesters to evaluate their nutrient composition and agronomic performance. The guinea pig manure biol exhibited higher macronutrient concentrations (N = 1.09–3.74 g L−1; P = 0.06–0.64 g L−1; K = 1.85–3.20 g L−1) and electrical conductivity (14.1–26.5 mS cm−1), while VL presented a more balanced nutrient profile (N = 0.65–0.71 g L−1; P = 0.04–0.09 g L−1; K = 2.46–3.76 g L−1) and slightly lower salinity (15.0–17.2 mS cm−1). Micronutrient levels (Fe, Mn, Zn, B) exceeded the reference thresholds established by EU Regulation 2019/1009 for liquid fertilizers, suggesting the need for dilution prior to field application. In maize field trials, VL diluted 1:7 increased above-ground biomass by 28%, and guinea pig biol diluted 1:10 achieved a 22% increase compared to the control, confirming their biostimulant potential. However, the high sodium content (848–1024 mg L−1) may limit application on saline or poorly drained soils, requiring adaptive agronomic management. These findings demonstrate that multistage anaerobic digestion effectively transforms unconventional organic waste into nutrient-rich biofertilizers, expanding the scientific foundation for alternative substrates and reinforcing their potential to enhance Andean smallholder agriculture, nutrient recycling, and food security within a sustainability-oriented bioeconomy.

1. Introduction

The intersection of food security and sustainable energy presents one of the most pressing challenges of our time. With projections indicating a global population of nearly 10 billion by 2050, agricultural systems must transform to meet rising food demands while remaining within planetary boundaries. The agri-food sector currently accounts for approximately 30% of global energy consumption and contributes 31% of greenhouse gas emissions [1]. Achieving the 1.5 °C global warming target requires agricultural systems that are simultaneously efficient, sustainable, and resilient. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has emphasized that agricultural decarbonization is impossible without addressing energy consumption patterns, advocating for a transition toward energy-smart agri-food systems [1].
Biomass offers a strategic opportunity to integrate energy recovery and nutrient recycling within circular economy frameworks. Anaerobic digestion of organic materials produces biogas for energy generation and digestate that can serve as biofertilizer [2]. Despite these dual benefits, bioenergy derived from organic residues receives less attention and investment than other renewable sources such as wind and solar power [3]. Understanding the full potential of biomass—particularly from organic waste and livestock manure—is therefore essential to achieve an inclusive and sustainable energy transition.
The quality of liquid biofertilizer (biol) generated from anaerobic digestion depends heavily on feedstock characteristics. Digestates obtained from different organic materials—such as guinea pig manure, cow dung, pig manure, or household organic waste—vary widely in nutrient content (N, P, K), stability, and pathogen load [4]. This variability requires careful characterization to ensure appropriate nutrient supply and compliance with safety standards. In this context, biofertilizers derived from organic residues represent valuable inputs for organic and regenerative farming systems, aligning with the principles of natural soil enrichment and reduced dependence on synthetic fertilizers [5].
However, few studies have explored the comparative performance of guinea pig manure and vermicompost leachate (VL) as feedstocks for liquid biofertilizer production in multi-stage biodigestion systems. Guinea pig farming plays a crucial role in the Andean region, providing protein, income, and organic residues that are rarely valorized. The manure of guinea pigs, despite being nutrient-rich and readily available, remains scientifically underexplored as a biodigester substrate. Similarly, VL, the liquid fraction that percolates through vermicompost during the composting process, contains soluble nutrients, humic substances, and beneficial microorganisms. Unlike traditional compost extracts, VL presents a dynamic microbial profile that can enhance nutrient mineralization and plant biostimulation. Yet, its optimization for use as feedstock in sequential biodigester systems remains limited in the literature.
This study addresses these gaps by comparing the physicochemical properties and agronomic performance of liquid biofertilizers produced from guinea pig manure and VL in a three-chamber anaerobic biodigestion system connected in series. The research aims to provide scientific evidence supporting policies that integrate renewable energy generation, nutrient recycling, and organic agriculture within the Andean context. Specifically, it asks: How does the type of feedstock—guinea pig manure or vermicompost leachate—affect the nutrient composition, stabilization, and quality of liquid biofertilizer produced in a multistage anaerobic system? The experimental approach is quantitative and comparative, focusing on measurable differences in nutrient dynamics and stabilization mechanisms between both substrates.
Ultimately, the results of this research are expected to advance understanding of sustainable biofertilizer production while offering evidence-based insights for the design of circular agri-energy systems in Peru and other regions with similar agroecological and socioeconomic conditions.

2. State of the Art and International Standards for Evaluating the Quality of Liquid Biofertilizers Based on Nutrient Content

2.1. Biofertilizers from Animal Manure

Barzee et al. demonstrated that an ultrafiltered digestate from cattle manure, applied via subsurface fertigation, produced tomato yields of 7.13 t/ha—surpassing both mineral fertilizer (5.98 t/ha) and digestate derived from food waste (6.26 t/ha). Crops treated with digestate exhibited higher total and soluble solids while maintaining similar pH and fruit quality compared to synthetic fertilizers [6]. In sweet potato cultivation, Oliveira et al. applied increasing doses of cattle manure (0–50 t/ha) and liquid biofertilizer (0–45%) via foliar or soil application, observing root yields up to 31.2 t/ha, significantly higher than chemical fertilizer (11 t/ha) [7]. Ndubuisi-Nnaji et al. investigated the co-digestion of agro-industrial waste supplemented with manure from different animals (cow, pig, poultry), evaluating their impact on plant growth-promoting attributes (phosphorus solubilization, nitrogen fixation, indoleacetic acid production). Poultry manure led to the highest nutrient availability and microbial activity, although heavy metals and pathogenic bacteria were detected and must be monitored [8]. Ezemagu transformed digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion (including animal manure) into biofertilizer through composting with sawdust, achieving an improved C/N ratio, greater homogeneity, and increased nutrient availability compared to raw manure [9]. Camilleri-Rumbau et al. reported that separating digestate into liquid and solid fractions facilitates transport and enhances its agronomic value: the solid fraction provides organic matter that improves structure and water retention, while the liquid fraction supplies readily available nutrients [10]. Jankauskienė (2024) reviewed the use of digestates in greenhouse horticulture, concluding that digestate from animal manure and organic residues enriches soils, increases vegetable yields, and contributes to sustainable production systems [11]. Finally, Doyeni et al. compared poultry, cattle, and pig manure digestates in wheat cultivation, finding improvements in biomass and soil microbial activity, although greenhouse gas emissions varied by manure source, emphasizing the need to evaluate manure type to design efficient and environmentally responsible biofertilizers [12].

2.2. International Standards for Evaluating the Quality of Liquid Biofertilizers

Liquid bioles are by-products of anaerobic digestion or leachates from organic matter such as agricultural residues and vermicompost leachate (VL). They provide readily available nutrients for plants, enhance soil microbiological activity, and reduce the use of synthetic fertilizers while improving soil structure and lowering the environmental footprint of production systems. The term biol generally refers to the liquid effluent produced during anaerobic digestion, although it can also encompass leachates from compost or VL. Composition depends on feedstock type, retention time, fermentation conditions, and reactor design. For bioles to be agronomically effective and safe, quality standards must evaluate physicochemical parameters, macro- and micronutrient content, and potential phytotoxic or contaminant effects [13].

2.3. Primary Macronutrients (N, P, K)

Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 establishes that to be classified as an organic liquid fertilizer (PFC 1(A)(II)), a product must contain at least total nitrogen (N) ≥ 2%, phosphorus (as P2O5) ≥ 1%, and potassium (as K2O) ≥ 2%. If more than one nutrient is declared, each must be ≥ 1%, and the sum N + P + K ≥ 3% of dry mass [13]. Studies show that most artisanal bioles fall short of these levels, typically presenting <0.5% N, <0.1% P, and <0.2% K. To meet international standards, bioles must be enriched with nutrient-dense organic materials such as concentrated manures, mineral powders, or digestates [14].

2.4. Secondary Macronutrients (Ca, Mg, S, Na)

Although regulations set no mandatory thresholds for calcium, magnesium, or sulfur, these nutrients may be declared voluntarily if present in significant amounts. They are expressed as CaO, MgO, and SO3, with standard conversion factors to elemental forms (Ca, Mg, S). These macronutrients are essential for cell structure (Ca), photosynthesis (Mg), and protein synthesis and disease resistance (S). Sodium (Na) is also relevant for evaluating salinity and nutrient uptake [15].

2.5. Essential Micronutrients (Fe, Zn, B, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni)

Micronutrients, though required in smaller amounts, are crucial for metabolic and enzymatic processes in plants. EU fertilizer regulations require micronutrients to have at least 10% solubility in water (by mass) to be officially labeled [16]. Maximum safety thresholds are established to prevent toxicity: Zn ≤ 800 mg/kg, Cu ≤ 300 mg/kg, Ni ≤ 50 mg/kg [17]. In practice, bioles usually contain 1–50 mg/L of these elements, which is safe and beneficial for crops. When enriched with organic or mineral sources (e.g., wood ash, rock phosphate, fermented extracts), composition must be analytically verified—especially for commercial use.

2.6. FAO and ISO Guidelines

The FAO does not define fixed nutrient limits for liquid biofertilizers but promotes clear labeling, analytical verification, and safety practices in its International Code of Conduct for the Sustainable Use and Management of Fertilizers [18]. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), through ISO/TC 134, provides technical standards for testing nutrients and contaminants in fertilizers. Relevant standards include ISO 8157:2015 (definitions and nutrient forms) and ISO 17318:2015 (determination of heavy metals) [19].
These frameworks ensure that biofertilizer quality is assessed using internationally recognized methods. Deduction: A compliant liquid biol should contain at least 1–2% N, 1% P2O5, and/or 2% K2O, or N + P + K ≥ 3% total; include Ca, Mg, and S when present; and maintain micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, B, Mo, Ni) below regulatory thresholds. It should follow FAO guidelines for transparency, safety, and responsible use, and be tested using ISO methodologies for nutrient and contaminant verification.

2.7. Advances in Vermicompost Research: Agronomic Potential, Soil Health, and Sustainability

Recent studies highlight vermicompost and its liquid fraction (vermicompost leachate, VL) as effective soil enhancers capable of supplying macro- and micronutrients, improving structure, and increasing water retention. Through biological processes mediated by earthworms and microorganisms, vermicompost transforms organic waste into stable, nutrient-rich humus with positive effects on soil fertility and agricultural productivity. Its application enhances crop yield, root development, and microbial activity, positioning it as a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers in diversified systems [20]. Other works report that both vermicompost and VL improve organic matter content, soil structure, and microbial activity while reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers [21,22]. Vermicompost contributes to pollutant reduction and nutrient cycling efficiency, strengthening its role in circular-economy strategies [23]. In Peru, the National Institute of Agrarian Innovation (INIA) evaluated the effects of VL and biochar (BC) on popcorn maize grown in saline soils. The combined application of VL + BC improved soil quality, nutrient availability, and plant productivity, significantly increasing biomass and grain yield. These findings demonstrate that integrating VL and BC is a viable strategy for improving crop performance in saline environments while promoting sustainable soil management [24].

2.8. Integration Between Vermicomposting and Anaerobic Digestion: Recent Advances

The combined use of vermicomposting (VC) and anaerobic digestion (AD) has emerged as a promising strategy for sustainable waste management and circular bioeconomy development. These two biological processes complement each other: AD transforms organic matter into biogas and digestate, while VC stabilizes and upgrades that digestate into nutrient-rich humus, closing the nutrient cycle and reducing environmental impacts.
Integration with Anaerobic Digestate. Recent studies have demonstrated that adding liquid or solid anaerobic digestate to vermicomposting systems enhances earthworm biomass, nutrient recovery, and compost maturity. Crutchik et al. (2020) reported that the addition of liquid digestate to market waste vermicomposting increased Eisenia foetida biomass by up to 168%, maintaining high compost maturity and seed germination rates, while also improving microbiological diversity and stability [25]. Similarly, Krishnasamy et al. (2024) found that vermicomposting of anaerobic digestate mixed with sawdust produced a nutrient-rich vermicast with significant pathogen reduction and improved C/N ratios [26]. Earthworm Response and Digestate Toxicity. However, the interaction between earthworms and digestate depends on salinity, ammonia concentration, and organic acid levels. Natalio et al. (2021) observed that exposure to high-salinity digestates increased earthworm mortality and oxidative stress due to osmotic imbalance [27]. These findings underscore the need for proper dilution and pretreatment of digestate before vermicomposting. Enhancements and Co-Treatment Innovations. Recent innovations focus on biochar integration and co-digestion strategies. Huang et al. (2022) showed that biochar amendments during vermicomposting accelerate organic matter degradation, regulate microbial activity in the worm gut, and enhance compost quality while reducing pathogen levels [28]. Garg et al. (2006) and Gong et al. (2024) reported that co-vermicomposting of digestate with industrial or green wastes enhances nutrient availability and supports earthworm growth, generating stable compost with higher humus content [29,30]. Environmental and Operational Benefits. Integrating AD and VC improves nutrient recycling, soil health, and greenhouse-gas mitigation. The use of vermicompost as a soil amendment has been linked to increased microbial activity, plant biomass, and soil structure improvement [25,30]. Furthermore, vermifiltration—an emerging hybrid process—has shown the potential to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions in wastewater and organic waste treatment systems, contributing to climate-change mitigation [31]. Challenges and Future Directions. Despite these advances, several technical and operational barriers persist, including filter-bed clogging, temperature sensitivity, and lack of standardized protocols for digestate-vermicomposting integration. Future research should focus on: Automating and scaling hybrid AD-VC systems; Conducting long-term field trials to evaluate soil health and productivity; Investigating ecotoxicological impacts on earthworm communities and soil ecosystems under real conditions; Establishing clear policy and certification frameworks for safe digestate reuse. Overall, the integration of anaerobic digestion and vermicomposting represents a circular, low-carbon pathway for valorizing organic residues into biogas and biofertilizers, aligning with global goals of nutrient recovery, soil regeneration, and climate mitigation.

3. Operational Methodology of the Multi-Chamber Biodigester with Two Different Feedstocks

3.1. Research Method

The study employs a longitudinal quasi-experimental design with two treatments corresponding to the two feedstocks: guinea pig manure and vermicompost leachate. Data were collected after defined stabilization periods to capture the physicochemical evolution of the biodigestion process. The design is considered quasi-experimental because not all environmental conditions (e.g., ambient temperature and barometric pressure) could be fully controlled under real operational settings. Nevertheless, key variables such as substrate loading rate, hydraulic retention time, and reactor configuration were carefully standardized to ensure reproducibility and comparability between treatments. This approach allows for a realistic evaluation of biodigester performance under field-simulated conditions, maintaining experimental rigor while reflecting the operational constraints typical of rural biofertilizer production systems.
Study Variables. Independent Variable: Type of organic feedstock: Treatment 1: Guinea pig manure and Treatment 2: Vermicompost. Although the study focused on two main treatments corresponding to the independent variable—type of organic feedstock (Treatment 1: Guinea pig manure; Treatment 2: Vermicompost leachate)—the experimental design incorporated temporal replicates throughout the biodigestion process. Samples were taken at defined stabilization periods to monitor changes in physicochemical parameters over time, rather than relying on a single endpoint. This approach allowed the identification of stabilization trends and ensured that the observed differences between treatments were consistent and reproducible. The longitudinal nature of the data provides robustness despite the limited number of feedstock types. Additional temporal and microbiological replicates are being processed and will be reported in a forthcoming publication focused on microbial succession and long-term performance of the system, thereby expanding the analytical depth of the present study.
Dependent Variables: Physicochemical properties of the liquid biofertilizer, including: pH, Electrical conductivity (EC), Total solids (TS), Soluble Organic Matter. Macronutrients: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium (NPK), Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Sodium (Na). Micronutrients (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, B, Cu)
Analytical Instruments and Methods: The physicochemical analyses of the liquid biofertilizers (bioles) were conducted at the Agronomic Chemistry Laboratory of the Nacional University Agrarian of the Molina (UNALM), Lima, Peru, following national and international reference standards. The methodologies applied for each parameter were as follows:
pH: Potentiometric method
Electrical Conductivity: Conductimetry
Total Suspended Solids: Drying of liquid sample at 70 °C
Soluble Organic Matter: Total organic carbon (calcination of organic material)
Total Nitrogen: Macro-Kjeldahl method
Total Phosphorus: Vanadomolybdate Yellow method
Total Potassium: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Calcium: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Magnesium: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Sodium: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Iron: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Copper: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Zinc: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Manganese: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Boron: UV–Visible spectrophotometry (curcumin method)
Total Lead: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Chromium: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
Total Cadmium: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion)
To enable consistent comparison between biols with different solid contents, nutrient concentrations (N, P, K) were normalized to total solids (g L−1), thus expressing results on a dry-weight basis (%). This approach allows distinguishing between absolute nutrient concentration in solution (mg L−1) and intrinsic nutrient density within the solid fraction, providing a more reliable indicator of biofertilizer quality.
Study Population: All anaerobic serial biodigester systems potentially operating with organic inputs in rural or peri-urban Andean regions, under agroecological principles. Sample: A purposive and experimental sample was used, composed of: One biodigester system with three connected chambers (2 m3, 2 m3, 3 m3) located in the INIA, of the Ministry of Agriculture of Peru. Two successive treatments with different feedstocks: 1. Guinea pig manure (3-month operation) 2. Moist vermicompost (6-month operation). Two main biol samples collected at months 6, and 9 after feedstock change or stabilization.
Microbial Monitoring. The monitoring of microbial community dynamics was not included within the analytical scope of this study, as the main objective focused on the physicochemical characterization and agronomic evaluation of liquid biofertilizers. Parameters such as nutrient stabilization, salinity, and micronutrient profiles were prioritized to assess product quality and field performance. Nevertheless, microbial succession during anaerobic digestion and subsequent maturation stages is recognized as a critical factor influencing nutrient mineralization and biofertilizer stability. Future studies are planned to address this aspect through microbial and enzymatic activity analyses, which will complement the present results and provide deeper mechanistic understanding of the biotransformation processes involved.
Statistical Analysis. The physicochemical results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparative tests to evaluate differences between the two treatments. Given the limited number of feedstocks and the focus on parameter-level comparisons, punctual statistical tests (Student’s t-test) were applied to identify significant differences (p < 0.05) in nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, EC, and micronutrients) between the biofertilizers derived from guinea pig manure and vermicompost leachate. Data normality was verified prior to analysis. The tests were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25, ensuring consistent analytical criteria across variables. This approach allowed validation of treatment-level differences without extending inference beyond the defined experimental scope.

3.2. General System Description

In Figure 1 is presented the three-stage biodigester designed. The experimental setup consists of three biodigesters connected in series, with volumes of 2 m3, 2 m3, and 3 m3, respectively. This cascade configuration allows for functional separation of the biological stages of anaerobic digestion and maturation of the biol, optimizing biofertilizer quality. The system was operated under two independent feeding conditions: Phase I: Guinea pig manure (duration: 3 months) and Phase II: Moist vermicompost (duration: 6 months).
Initial Inoculation: Prior to initiating the feeding cycles, a biological inoculation phase was carried out. Effluent from four plastic biodigesters (1 m3 each), continuously operated for one year using guinea pig manure as the sole substrate, was used as the inoculum. This strategy enabled rapid microbial colonization of the first 2 m3 chamber, significantly reducing the latency period before the onset of methanogenesis.
Feedstock Change and Stabilization Timeline: Each phase was operated under the same hydraulic and functional conditions, allowing for a direct comparison of the system’s performance with different feedstocks. Laboratory samples were collected three months after the introduction of each new feedstock, allowing sufficient time for stabilization and representative results.
Functional Configuration of the Digesters: Chamber 1 (2 m3) served as the main reactor, where the full sequence of anaerobic digestion occurred, including hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and initial methanogenesis. The hydraulic retention time (HRT) was approximately 20 days. Chamber 2 (2 m3) functioned as an intermediate maturation reactor, continuing the methanogenic process and initiating stabilization of the digestate. It also maintained an HRT of 20 days. Chamber 3 (3 m3) acted as the final maturation chamber, refining the biofertilizer’s nutrient profile and continuing residual biogas production. This chamber also had a 20-day HRT. Overall, each substrate batch remained in the system for approximately 60 days, ensuring thorough stabilization and nutrient transformation.
Feeding and Recirculation Protocol: The system was operated in a semi-batch mode with weekly transfers. Each week, Chamber 1 received a fresh 0.5 m3 mixture, either of: Guinea pig manure + water (Phase I), or Vermicompost + water (Phase II). Sequential transfers were performed: From Chamber 1 to Chamber 2, From Chamber 2 to Chamber 3 and Effluent and biogas were collected from Chamber 3. During the first 20 days of each feeding phase, no effluent was extracted to allow for progressive accumulation and stabilization in the final chambers.
Laboratory Sampling and Analysis: Liquid samples were collected directly from Chamber 3 (final maturation) under controlled conditions using sterile containers and without prior aeration. Samples were taken: At the end of month 3, after operating with guinea pig manure, at month 6, following the change to vermicompost. Each sample was analyzed to determine the following: Physicochemical parameters.
Operational Observations: Biol quality gradually improved during Phase II with vermicompost, particularly in terms of physicochemical stability and micronutrient availability. Phase I showed a faster onset of biogas production due to the higher energy content of guinea pig manure. Despite the absence of mechanical agitation, the system achieved efficient digestion thanks to the extended retention time and the sequential three-chamber configuration, which favored stratified microbial activity and nutrient transformation.

3.3. Field Validation

To validate the laboratory results under real conditions, an agronomic trial was conducted at the facilities of the INIA, using maize (Zea mays L.) as the indicator crop. The experiment was carried out in an open field of approximately 3000 m2. An area of 100 m2 was allocated for each type of biofertilizer, with four independent plots per treatment to obtain replicates and ensure a reliable statistical analysis. The treatments included: A: Biol from VL; B: Guinea pig manure biol. C: VL (without biodigestion). D: Guinea pig manure (without biodigestion). The experimental design was completely randomized. The response variable considered was the total above-ground biomass per hectare, measured as a direct indicator of the biofertilizer’s effect on crop yield.

4. Results of Analysis of Biofertilizers

Table 1 presents the test results for the samples from the biodigesters (B2 and B3) of the in-line biodigester system, with two feedstocks: guinea pig manure and VL. The analyses were conducted at the Agronomic Chemistry Laboratory of the UNALM, Lima, Peru.

4.1. Comparative Analysis of General Physicochemical Properties of Liquid Biofertilizers (Bioles) Derived from Two Organic Feedstocks

Liquid biofertilizers, commonly referred to as bioles, are widely used in sustainable agriculture due to their capacity to enhance soil fertility, promote microbial activity, and improve crop productivity. However, their physicochemical characteristics can vary significantly depending on the organic feedstock used and the operating conditions of the biodigester. This study presents a comparative analysis of general physicochemical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, total solids, and soluble organic matter) of bioles obtained from two different substrates: guinea pig manure and VL. In Figure 2, the general physicochemical properties of liquid biofertilizers are presented.
The pH of a biol is a key indicator of its chemical stability and compatibility with soil and crops. The FAO and EU guidelines recommend a pH range between 6.0 and 8.5 for liquid fertilizers. In this study, the pH values observed were: Guinea Pig Manure: 8.16 (B2) and 7.96 (B3) VL: 7.14 (B2) and 7.20 (B3). All samples fall within the acceptable range, indicating chemical stability and safe potential for agricultural application. The slightly alkaline pH of the bioles derived from guinea pig manure may enhance nutrient availability in acidic soils, whereas the vermicompost-derived bioles present more neutral values, suitable for a broader range of crops and soil types.
Electrical Conductivity (EC) is used to estimate the concentration of soluble salts, which can affect plant growth, especially in salt-sensitive species. International guidelines suggest that values above 10 dS/m may require dilution before application [9]. The EC values found were: Guinea Pig Manure: 26.51 dS/m (B2), 14.09 dS/m (B3), VL: 14.97 dS/m (B2), 17.18 dS/m (B3). All samples exceed the recommended threshold, indicating high salinity. Thus, dilution in water is necessary before field application, especially for foliar use or in young seedlings. Ratios between 1:5 and 1:10 are suggested depending on crop tolerance and irrigation conditions [10]. The EC values obtained for the liquid biofertilizers indicate a moderate to high salinity level, particularly in the guinea pig manure biol compared to the vermicompost leachate biol. According to FAO recommendations for liquid fertilizers, EC values above 3.0 mS cm−1 require dilution prior to application on sensitive crops, and concentrations exceeding this value may pose salinization risks in poorly drained soils [19]. In this study, dilutions of 1:10 for guinea pig biol and 1:7 for vermicompost leachate were applied during field validation to ensure safe salinity levels within agronomic thresholds. These dilution ratios align with international guidelines and local agricultural practices in Andean systems, confirming the importance of EC adjustment to prevent potential osmotic stress on crops.
Total Solids. The concentration of total solids gives insight into the potential clogging risk in irrigation systems and the overall concentration of suspended matter. Reference values for liquid fertilizers typically range from 20 to 50 g/L [15]. The results were: Guinea Pig Manure: 23.33 g/L (B2), 141.61 g/L (B3), VL: 20.54 g/L (B2), 20.14 g/L (B3). Three out of four samples lie within acceptable ranges. However, the B3 sample from guinea pig manure presents an high concentration, suggesting the need for filtration or decantation prior to use in fertigation systems.
Soluble Organic Matter (SOM) contributes to microbial stimulation and plant nutrition, particularly in organic farming. Optimal SOM values are expected between 5 and 50 g/L, although they may vary depending on the substrate and digestion time. The values recorded were: Guinea Pig Manure: 10.21 g/L (B2), 98.71 g/L (B3), VL: 11.76 g/L (B2), 9.86 g/L (B3). Except for the B3 sample from guinea pig manure, which exhibits a high SOM value, all other samples are within normal ranges. The elevated SOM in B3 could indicate excess residual organic matter, which might affect its stability and shelf life.
The comparison reveals clear trends between the two feedstocks: Bioles from guinea pig manure showed higher pH, E.C., and SOM, particularly in B3, possibly due to overloading. Bioles from VL demonstrated greater stability and homogeneity, with moderate pH, acceptable SOM levels, and lower total solids. These qualities suggest their superior suitability for direct application or fertigation. Due to the elevated salinity in all samples, it is recommended that bioles be diluted before application, especially for salt-sensitive crops or in hydroponic systems. Furthermore, the significant variation between biodigesters using the same substrate suggests the need to standardize operational parameters such as loading rate, C/N ratio, retention time, and agitation.

4.2. Evaluation of Macronutrient Content (NPK) in Liquid Biofertilizers from Guinea Pig Manure and VL

Figure 3 presents the NPK test results for biodigester samples. Macronutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) play a crucial role in plant nutrition and are key indicators of the agronomic value of organic liquid fertilizers like bioles. The concentration of these nutrients varies depending on the type of organic feedstock used and the conditions of the anaerobic digestion process. In this study, we analyze the NPK content in bioles derived from guinea pig manure and VL, comparing the results against reference guidelines to determine their suitability for agricultural use.
Total Nitrogen (N): Nitrogen is essential for vegetative growth and protein synthesis in plants. According to FAO and related international guidelines for organic fertilizers, total nitrogen in liquid biofertilizers generally ranges from 500 to 2000 mg L−1. The measured concentrations, determined by the Macro-Kjeldahl method, correspond to total nitrogen (Nt)—that is, the combined organic and ammoniacal fractions obtained after acid digestion. The values were: Guinea pig manure biol: 1093.67 mg L−1 (B2) and 3737.51 mg L−1 (B3); vermicompost leachate biol (VL): 649.60 mg L−1 (B2) and 711.20 mg L−1 (B3). Three of the four samples fall within or near the expected range, whereas B3 (guinea pig manure) exceeded the upper threshold by nearly twofold, likely due to a higher concentration of proteinaceous material and extended retention time, which reduced nitrogen volatilization losses. While elevated total nitrogen enhances plant productivity, excessive levels may lead to nutrient imbalance or phytotoxicity in sensitive crops, emphasizing the need for dilution or rate adjustment according to crop type and application frequency. Future analyses will include specific determinations of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3) to better characterize nitrogen availability and transformation dynamics during multistage biodigestion.
Total Phosphorus (P): Phosphorus is vital for root development, flowering, and energy transfer in plants. According to FAO and European guidelines for organic liquid fertilizers, total phosphorus levels typically range between 30 and 200 mg L−1. The concentrations obtained through the Vanadomolybdate Yellow method were: Guinea pig manure biol: 55.04 mg L−1 (B2) and 642.21 mg L−1 (B3); vermicompost leachate biol (VL): 40.45 mg L−1 (B2) and 86.49 mg L−1 (B3). All samples fall within or near the expected range, except B3 (guinea pig manure), which exceeds the upper threshold by more than threefold. This elevated value likely results from sediment-rich extraction and higher particulate mineralization during prolonged retention in the final biodigester stage. While increased phosphorus can benefit nutrient-depleted soils and improve root vigor, excessive concentrations may raise environmental risks such as eutrophication if runoff occurs. Therefore, controlled dilution and targeted application are recommended to optimize nutrient delivery while minimizing environmental impact.
Total Potassium (K): Potassium plays a central role in enhancing plant stress resistance, enzyme activation, and fruit quality. According to FAO and international benchmarks for organic liquid fertilizers, total potassium concentrations typically range from 1000 to 3000 mg L−1 [1,5,18]. The concentrations measured by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (nitroperchloric digestion) were: Guinea pig manure biol: 1846.94 mg L−1 (B2) and 3200 mg L−1 (B3); vermicompost leachate biol (VL): 2464.99 mg L−1 (B2) and 3758.06 mg L−1 (B3). Most samples fall within or slightly exceed the expected range, with B3 from VL showing the highest potassium content. This enrichment likely reflects enhanced mineral solubilization in the final digestion stage, where microbial activity and organic acid formation increase K+ release from particulate matter. Elevated potassium levels are beneficial for crops with high K demand—such as maize, potatoes, and fruit species—by improving water-use efficiency, stress tolerance, and yield quality. However, dose management is necessary in sandy or salinity-prone soils to prevent ionic imbalance and excessive osmotic pressure.
Comparative Analysis by Feedstock. Bioles from guinea pig manure tend to show higher nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, especially in B3, indicating a more protein-rich and nutrient-dense profile, likely due to a higher organic loading. Bioles from VL are more balanced, with slightly lower N and P but higher potassium levels, potentially due to the mineralization of stable humic compounds and the bioavailability of K in vermicompost.
Agronomic Implications. The NPK profiles suggest that guinea pig manure-derived bioles are better suited for vegetative and early growth stages, while vermicompost-based bioles are more suitable for fruiting stages or potassium-demanding crops like tomatoes, potatoes, and bananas. All bioles exhibit concentrations that qualify them as valuable organic nutrient sources, though in cases with elevated nutrient levels (B3 samples), dilution or application protocols should be carefully designed.
The elevated concentrations of macronutrients observed in Biodigester 3 (B3), for both guinea pig manure and VL feedstocks, can be attributed to the strategic use of a series-configured biodigestion system. In this configuration, substrates undergo successive stages of anaerobic treatment, resulting in extended residence times that enhance the breakdown and mineralization of organic matter. As the digested material progresses through the system, soluble nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium accumulate, leading to a more concentrated and mature biol. Additionally, reduced temperatures and stabilized microbial activity in the final stage minimize nutrient losses through volatilization or precipitation. This approach is intentionally designed to produce a high-quality biofertilizer with increased nutrient availability, although proper dilution may be necessary before field application depending on the crop and soil characteristics.

4.3. Analysis of Secondary Macronutrients: Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), and Sodium (Na) in Liquid Biofertilizers

Figure 4 presents the Ca, Mg and Na test results for biodigester samples. The liquid biofertilizers produced from different organic feedstocks exhibit variable concentrations of key secondary macronutrients. This section analyzes three essential elements for plant growth and soil quality—calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sodium (Na)—and evaluates them according to reference standards and international guidelines provided by the FAO [7].
Regarding calcium (Ca), which is critical for cell wall structure and soil aggregation, the concentrations ranged from 212.9 mg/L to 1473.33 mg/L. The highest value was recorded in Biodigester 3 (B3) fed with guinea pig manure, reaching 1473.33 mg/L, which is near the upper recommended limit of 1500 mg/L. This high calcium content is agronomically favorable, particularly in acidic or degraded soils. In contrast, the biofertilizers produced from VL showed lower levels of calcium—212.9 mg/L (B2) and 306.06 mg/L (B3)—yet still within optimal ranges for general soil amendment.
For magnesium (Mg), an essential component of chlorophyll and numerous plant enzymes, concentrations ranged from 209.68 mg/L to 600 mg/L. The maximum value, also observed in B3 with guinea pig manure, slightly exceeds the ideal upper limit of 500 mg/L, potentially posing a risk of nutrient imbalance when applied excessively. However, the other samples—ranging between 209 and 267 mg/L—fall within acceptable thresholds and can contribute significantly to correcting magnesium-deficient soils.
The sodium (Na) content, however, presents a limiting factor for agricultural application. All biol samples contained sodium levels well above the recommended maximum range of 300 to 500 mg/L. The values ranged from 847.76 mg/L (B2 with guinea pig manure) to 1024.19 mg/L (B3 with VL). Such high concentrations could induce soil salinization, reduce nutrient availability, and hinder root development, particularly in clay soils or poorly drained environments. While some salt-tolerant crops might endure elevated sodium, application strategies should include dilution, alternation with freshwater irrigation, or site-specific assessment to minimize risks. The evaluated biofertilizers demonstrate promising qualities in terms of calcium and magnesium content, especially those derived from guinea pig manure in biodigester B3. However, sodium levels remain a critical concern, requiring caution and proper management for safe and effective use in agricultural settings. The differences in nutrient concentrations also reflect the influence of feedstock type and hydraulic retention time, which are key parameters for optimizing biol quality.

4.4. Micronutrient Analysis and Agronomic Use Recommendations

Micronutrients such as copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) play a crucial role in plant metabolic, enzymatic, and physiological processes. However, elevated concentrations may cause phytotoxic effects, particularly in sensitive crops. The liquid biofertilizers obtained from guinea pig manure and leachate from VL showed significant variations in micronutrient concentrations, determined by the type of feedstock and the retention time within the biodigester. Figure 5 presents the Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn and B test results for biodigester samples.
Copper (Cu) levels ranged from 0.13 to 5.83 mg/L. The Biodigester 3 fed with guinea pig manure showed the highest value (5.83 mg/L), well above the agronomic threshold of 1.5 mg/L. This concentration may be phytotoxic, especially for foliar application, and thus it is recommended to dilute the biol at least 1:5, preferably applying it to soils with documented Cu deficiency. In contrast, bioles derived from VL (0.13–0.34 mg/L) and Biodigester 2 with guinea pig manure (1.44 mg/L) remained within safe levels.
Manganese (Mn) displayed high variability, reaching up to 25 mg/L in Biodigester 3 with guinea pig manure, exceeding the typical upper limit for most crops by five times. A dilution of 1:8 or greater is recommended, with use restricted to Mn-deficient soils. Other bioles showed Mn values between 0.84 and 2.22 mg/L, considered appropriate for standard agronomic use.
Regarding iron (Fe), a remarkably high concentration was found in Biodigester 3 (298 mg/L), significantly above the recommended limit of 5 mg/L. This biol should only be used in alkaline or severely iron-deficient soils, avoiding foliar application unless diluted at least 1:10. The other bioles, ranging from 2.13 to 4.42 mg/L, fall within the safe range.
Zinc (Zn) concentration was also high in Biodigester 3, at 23.67 mg/L. Although essential for plant growth, levels exceeding 2.0 mg/L may be toxic. Therefore, this biol must be diluted at least 1:10 and applied only to zinc-deficient soils. Biodigester 2 presented 4.19 mg/L, also above the agronomic threshold. Conversely, vermicompost-derived bioles (0.27–1.14 mg/L) contained safe and adequate Zn concentrations for broader application.
As for boron (B), both guinea pig manure bioles exceeded 1.0 mg/L, with Biodigester 3 reaching 3.25 mg/L. These levels may be toxic to sensitive crops such as lettuce or legumes. It is advised to apply only to B-deficient soils, preferably via soil application rather than foliar spraying. Bioles from vermicompost (0.49–1.89 mg/L) presented more moderate values, within acceptable limits for most crops.
This analysis demonstrates that biodigesters fed with guinea pig manure, particularly those with extended retention times (as in B3), tend to accumulate higher levels of micronutrients. While such bioles may be nutritionally richer, they require careful agronomic management, especially concerning dosage and the specific needs of soil and crops. In contrast, bioles derived from VL, despite having lower micronutrient concentrations, offer a more balanced and safer profile for general use, both in soil and foliar applications. Therefore, a differentiated strategy is recommended based on the origin and composition of the biol. Bioles with high micronutrient content should be appropriately diluted and applied only when supported by soil analysis, while those with lower concentrations can be used more flexibly in a variety of agricultural contexts. This approach ensures the maximization of agronomic benefits without the risk of toxicity to plants or soil systems.
The results obtained show significant differences in the composition of the bioles depending on the feedstock used and the biodigestion system design. VL, when processed through a series-connected biodigester system, produces a biol with a more balanced profile of macronutrients and micronutrients, with concentrations that, in most cases, remain within or very close to the ranges established by international standards. This characteristic makes it a versatile and safe alternative for different crops, reducing the risk of toxicity from excessive trace elements. In contrast, guinea pig manure subjected to the same series system exhibits a marked increase in the concentration of certain micronutrients, particularly iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and boron (B), exceeding in several cases the maximum reference values. While this excess may be beneficial in nutrient-deficient soils, it represents a potential risk of toxicity in soils with adequate levels or in crops sensitive to the accumulation of these elements.
These findings suggest that VL is more suitable for multi-stage anaerobic digestion, due to its more stabilized initial composition and the process’s capacity to concentrate nutrients without exceeding critical levels. In contrast, guinea pig manure may be more appropriate for a single-stage system, where the excessive concentration of micronutrients is limited, maintaining a balance that favors the safe nutrient uptake by crops. Due to the high concentrations of Zn, Fe, Mn, and Na, biol produced from guinea pig manure should be applied at a dilution ratio of 1:10, whereas biol derived from VL can be used at a lower dilution, approximately 1:7. Consequently, the selection of feedstock and the number of digestion stages should be jointly considered as a key strategy to optimize biol quality, tailoring the system design to the nutritional requirements of the soil and the target crop.

4.5. Macronutrient Analysis and Agronomic Use Recommendations

The analysis of macronutrients (N, P, and K) in the biol obtained from the different biodigesters shows that, regardless of the feedstock used (guinea pig manure or VL) and the method of expressing results (mg/L or percentage relative to total solids), in all cases the total NPK content exceeds the minimum reference value established by the standard (>3%), as is presented in Table 2, confirming that the produced biols have an acceptable nutritional quality for agricultural use. When nutrients are expressed in mg/L, the result reflects the absolute concentration of each element in the solution, highlighting that biodigester B3 with guinea pig manure presents the highest values for N (3737.51 mg/L), P (642.21 mg/L), and K (3200.00 mg/L). However, this approach does not consider the solid content, which can lead to an overestimation of the relative quality of the biol.
In contrast, expressing results as a percentage relative to total solids provides an indicator of the actual nutrient density of the solid fraction, allowing for more precise comparisons between biols of different compositions. Using this method, biodigester B3 with VL recorded the highest total NPK value (22.62%), followed by B2 with VL (15.36%), B2 with guinea pig manure (12.84%), and B3 with guinea pig manure (5.35%). The notable difference in this last case is due to the fact that, despite having high values in mg/L, the elevated solid content (141.61 g/L) dilutes the relative percentage of nutrients. Overall, the results demonstrate that all biols comfortably exceed the regulatory minimum of 3% total NPK, while also showing that the method of expressing results significantly influences interpretation: the mg/L analysis highlights nutrient concentration in solution, whereas the percentage over total solids calculation more accurately reflects the intrinsic nutritional quality of the product. This distinction is critical for the standardization of evaluation and certification processes for liquid biofertilizers.
From an agronomic perspective, the fact that all biols exceed the 3% total NPK threshold ensures their potential as effective nutrient sources for crops. However, the differences observed between feedstocks and calculation methods highlight the importance of tailoring application strategies to both the nutrient density and the specific tolerance of the target crop. For example, biols with high nutrient density (e.g., VL in multi-stage digestion) may require lower application volumes to avoid nutrient oversupply, while those with high mg/L concentrations but lower nutrient density in solids (e.g., guinea pig manure in multi-stage digestion) may provide a more gradual nutrient release. Therefore, integrating both evaluation approaches—absolute concentration and nutrient density—offers a more comprehensive basis for optimizing fertilization practices, ensuring crop safety, and maximizing soil fertility.
  • Results (Field Validation)
The data obtained in the trial show that treatments with biols outperformed those without biodigestion and the control. In particular: A: Biol from VL: 43,036 kg/ha. B: Guinea pig manure biol: 42,540 kg/ha. C: VL: 39,368 kg/ha. D: (Guinea pig manure): 37,960 kg/ha.
These results confirm that anaerobic biodigestion enhances the agronomic value of organic fertilizers, increasing nutrient availability and uptake by the crop. Biol from VL showed slightly higher yields than guinea pig manure biol, consistent with the physicochemical characterization carried out in the laboratory and suggesting a more balanced and sustained nutrient release. The consistency between laboratory and field results reinforces the conclusion that integrating vermicompost and biodigestion represents an effective strategy for producing high-performance liquid biofertilizers.

5. Conclusions

The present study evaluated the physicochemical composition, nutrient content, and agronomic performance of liquid biofertilizers (“bioles”) obtained from guinea pig manure and vermicompost leachate (VL) using a three-stage in-series biodigester system. The results confirm the efficiency of multistage anaerobic digestion in concentrating nutrients and improving the quality of liquid biofertilizers derived from unconventional organic waste.
(1)
The multistage biodigestion process significantly increased the concentration of essential macronutrients, particularly nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, reaching values that exceed international standards for organic liquid fertilizers. The VL-based biol (VL-B3) achieved the highest total NPK (22.6%), confirming its agronomic potential for crops with high potassium demand.
(2)
The physicochemical stability of the bioles was within the acceptable range for agricultural use (pH 7.1–8.2). However, their moderate-to-high electrical conductivity (14–26 dS m−1) indicates the need for dilution ratios between 1:7 and 1:10 to prevent salinity stress, especially in sensitive soils.
(3)
Field validation with maize demonstrated yield increases between 22% and 28% compared to untreated controls, confirming the biostimulant efficiency of both bioles. These results highlight that combining multistage biodigestion with appropriate substrate selection represents a scalable strategy for sustainable agriculture, nutrient recycling, and waste valorization within circular economy frameworks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.G.-M. and L.F.O.-D.; methodology, J.P.G.-M. and L.F.O.-D.; software, Y.C.-A.; validation, Y.C.-A., R.S. and C.E.A.-G.; formal analysis, A.D.P.-A.; investigation, J.P.G.-M., Y.C.-A. and L.F.O.-D.; resources, C.E.A.-G. and M.L.-d.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.G.-M., A.D.P.-A., M.L.-d. and C.E.A.-G.; writing—review and editing, J.P.G.-M., A.D.P.-A., M.L.-d. and C.E.A.-G.; project administration, J.P.G.-M., L.F.O.-D. and R.S.; funding acquisition, J.P.G.-M., L.F.O.-D. and R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (UTP), under the project “Optimization of biogas and biofertilizer production in an anaerobic digester by improving reactor operating conditions and feeding”. The field validation trials were funded by the INIA, Peru. The APC was funded by the Universidad de Medellín.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study were generated as part of the project “Optimization of biogas and biofertilizer production in an anaerobic digester by improving reactor operating conditions and feeding”, funded by the University technological of Peru, project P-2023-LIM-02, and through field validation trials funded by the Ministry of Agriculture of Peru, through INIA, Peru. Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. No publicly archived datasets were created due to institutional restrictions.

Acknowledgments

Alhamdulillah. The authors gratefully acknowledge the administrative and technical support provided by the Agronomic Chemistry Laboratory of La Molina National Agrarian University for the physicochemical analyses, and the Ministry of Agriculture of Peru, through the INIA, for the installation of the biodigester at the facilities, in La Molina Experimental Center and for funding the field validation trials. Special thanks are also extended to the University technological of Peru for their logistical support during the execution of the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Energy-Smart Food for People and Climate; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011; Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2454e/i2454e00.pdf (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  2. Lamolinara, B.; Pérez-Martínez, A.; Guardado-Yordi, E.; Fiallos, C.G.; Diéguez-Santana, K.; Ruiz-Mercado, G.J. Anaerobic digestate management, environmental impacts, and techno-economic challenges. Waste Manag. 2022, 140, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2023; IEA: Paris, France, 2023; Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  4. Chojnacka, K.; Moustakas, K. Anaerobic digestate management for carbon neutrality and fertilizer use: A review of current practices and future opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy 2024, 180, 106991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Organic Agriculture: The Challenge of Sustaining Food Production While Enhancing Biodiversity; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barzee, T.J.; Edalati, A.; El-Mashad, H.; Wang, D.; Scow, K.; Zhang, R. Digestate biofertilizers support similar or higher tomato yields and quality than mineral fertilizer in a sub-surface drip fertigation system. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oliveira, A.P.; Santos, J.F.; Cavalcante, L.F.; Pereira, W.E.; Santos, M.D.C.C.; Oliveira, A.N.P.; Silva, N.V. Yield of sweet potato fertilized with cattle manure and biofertilizer. Hortic. Bras. 2010, 28, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Ndubuisi-Nnaji, U.U.; Ofon, U.A.; Ekponne, N.I.; Offiong, N.A.O. Improved biofertilizer properties of digestate from codigestion supplemented with livestock manures. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2020, 30, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ezemagu, I.; Ejimofor, M.; Menkiti, M.; Diyoke, C. Biofertilizer production via composting of digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion of post biocoagulation sludge blended with saw dust: Physiochemical characterization and kinetic study. Environ. Chall. 2021, 5, 100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Camilleri-Rumbau, M.S.; Briceño, K.; Søtoft, L.F.; Christensen, K.V.; Roda-Serrat, M.C.; Errico, M.; Norddahl, B. Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jankauskienė, J.; Laužikė, K.; Kaupaitė, S. The Use of Anaerobic Digestate for Greenhouse Horticulture. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Doyeni, M.O.; Suproniene, S.; Barcauskaite, K.; Tilvikiene, V. Animal manure digestate fertilization effect on the soil microbial activity and crop productivity in the northern part of temperate climate conditions-Lithuania. Geoderma Reg. 2023, 34, e00699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2019/1009. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, 170, 1–114. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1009/oj/eng (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  14. O’Neill, B.; Ramos-Abensur, V. Revisión del Estado del Conocimiento y uso de los Fermentos Líquidos y del Biol en los Andes; Universidad de Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2022; Available online: https://www.ccrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Revisio%CC%81n-del-estado-del-conocimiento-y-uso-de-fermentos-li%CC%81quidos-y-del-biol-en-los-Andes.pdf (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin. Plant Nutrition for Food Security. A Guide for Integrated Nutrient Management; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006; Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b66da618-027b-4124-a5c7-f870cd671484/content (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  16. European Commission. Fertilizing Products—Requirements for Micronutrient Fertilizers, 2003/2003/EC; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2003. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02003R2003-20210620 (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  17. European Commission. Digital Labelling of EU Fertilising Products, Annex III, EU 2019/1009; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52023SC0049&qid=1762279079862 (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). International Code of Conduct for the Sustainable Use and Management of Fertilizers; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. ISO 17318:2015; Fertilizers and Soil Conditioners—Determination of Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead and Mercury Contents. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/60352.html (accessed on 31 July 2025).
  20. Wei, T.; Zhen, Z.; Huang, F.; Li, H.; Wu, W.; Yang, C.; Yang, G.; Liang, Y.-Q.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, D. Metagenomic insight into the mechanisms of accelerated di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) degradation in vermicomposting. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 33, 103460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Poornima, S.; Dadi, M.; Subash, S.; Manikandan, S.; Karthik, V.; Deena, S.; Balachandar, R.; Kumaran, S.; Subbaiya, R. Review on advances in toxic pollutants remediation by solid waste composting and vermicomposting. Sci. Afr. 2024, 23, e02100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raza, S.T.; Rong, L.; Rene, E.R.; Ali, Z.; Iqbal, H.; Sahito, Z.A.; Chen, Z. Effects of vermicompost preparation and application on waste recycling, NH3, and N2O emissions: A systematic review on vermicomposting. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 35, 103722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Castellini, M. Impact of vermicompost addition on water availability of differently textured soils. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rivas-Aratoma, B. Challenges of Organic Amendments: Impact of Vermicompost Leachate and Biochar on Popcorn Maize in Saline Soil. Soil Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crutchik, D.; Rodríguez-Valdecantos, G.; Bustos, G.; Bravo, J.; González, B.; Pabón-Pereira, C. Vermiproductivity, maturation and microbiological changes derived from the use of liquid anaerobic digestate during the vermicomposting of market waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 82, 1781–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krishnasamy, K.; Nair, J.; Bell, R. Evaluation of anaerobic digestate as a substrate for vermicomposting. Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag. 2024, 14, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Natalio, A.I.M.; Back, M.; Richards, A.; Jeffery, S. The effects of saline toxicity and food-based AD digestate on the earthworm Allolobophora chlorotica. Geoderma 2021, 393, 115005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, K.; Guan, M.; Chen, J.; Hu, Z.; Li, Y. Biochars modify the degradation pathways of dewatered sludge by regulating active microorganisms during gut digestion of earthworms. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 828, 154496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Garg, V.K.; Kaushik, P.; Dilbaghi, N. Vermicomposting of mixed solid textile mill sludge and cow dung with the epigeic earthworm Eisenia foetida. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 90, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gong, X.; Xu, J.; Zou, L.; Jiang, J. Evaluation of green waste, green waste compost and cow dung as amendments for white wine distillers’ grains vermicomposting. Environ. Technol. 2024, 45, 3198–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Miito, G.; Basika, E. Advances in vermifiltration: A comprehensive review of recent developments and applications. Environ. Chall. 2025, 20, 101233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Three-stage biodigester designed for 7 m3 of total vol.
Figure 1. Three-stage biodigester designed for 7 m3 of total vol.
Sci 07 00161 g001
Figure 2. General Physicochemical Properties of Liquid Biofertilizers.
Figure 2. General Physicochemical Properties of Liquid Biofertilizers.
Sci 07 00161 g002
Figure 3. NPK test results for biodigester samples.
Figure 3. NPK test results for biodigester samples.
Sci 07 00161 g003
Figure 4. Ca, Mg and Na test results for biodigester samples.
Figure 4. Ca, Mg and Na test results for biodigester samples.
Sci 07 00161 g004
Figure 5. Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn and B test results for biodigester samples.
Figure 5. Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn and B test results for biodigester samples.
Sci 07 00161 g005
Table 1. Test results for the samples from the biodigesters with two feedstocks.
Table 1. Test results for the samples from the biodigesters with two feedstocks.
ParameterUnitGuinea Pig Manure as FeedstockVL as Feedstock
Biodigester 2 (B2)Biodigester 3 (B3)Biodigestor 2 (B2)Biodigestor 3 (B3)
pH-8.167.967.147.2
Electrical Conductivity (E.C.)dS/m26.5114.0914.9717.18
Total Solidsg/L23.33141.6120.5420.14
Soluble Organic Matterg/L10.2198.7111.769.86
Total Nitrogen (N)mg/L1093.673737.51649.6711.2
Total Phosphorus (P)mg/L55.04642.2140.4586.49
Total Potassium (K)mg/L1846.9432002464.993758.06
Calcium (Ca)mg/L466.071473.33212.9306.06
Magnesium (Mg)mg/L267.35600209.68240.27
Sodium (Na)mg/L847.76900953.521024.19
Copper (Cu)mg/L1.445.830.130.34
Manganese (Mn)mg/L2.22250.841.78
Iron (Fe)mg/L4.422982.139.19
Zinc (Zn)mg/L4.1923.670.271.14
Boron (B)mg/L1.133.250.491.89
Table 2. Macronutrient Analysis (N, P, K).
Table 2. Macronutrient Analysis (N, P, K).
FeedstockN%P%K%Total NPK%
Guinea Pig Manure—B24.690.247.9212.84
Guinea Pig Manure—B32.640.452.265.35
VL-B23.160.2012.0015.36
VL-B33.530.4318.6622.62
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Montoya, J.P.; Castillo-Alvarez, Y.; Ortiz-Dongo, L.F.; Solórzano, R.; Patiño-Agudelo, A.D.; Luna-delRisco, M.; Arrieta-Gonzalez, C.E. Improvement and Maturation of Liquid Biofertilizers in Series-Connected Biodigesters: Comparative Analysis of Guinea Pig Manure and Vermicompost Leachate. Sci 2025, 7, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7040161

AMA Style

Gómez-Montoya JP, Castillo-Alvarez Y, Ortiz-Dongo LF, Solórzano R, Patiño-Agudelo AD, Luna-delRisco M, Arrieta-Gonzalez CE. Improvement and Maturation of Liquid Biofertilizers in Series-Connected Biodigesters: Comparative Analysis of Guinea Pig Manure and Vermicompost Leachate. Sci. 2025; 7(4):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7040161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Montoya, Juan Pablo, Yoisdel Castillo-Alvarez, Luis Felipe Ortiz-Dongo, Richard Solórzano, Alisson Dahian Patiño-Agudelo, Mario Luna-delRisco, and Carlos E. Arrieta-Gonzalez. 2025. "Improvement and Maturation of Liquid Biofertilizers in Series-Connected Biodigesters: Comparative Analysis of Guinea Pig Manure and Vermicompost Leachate" Sci 7, no. 4: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7040161

APA Style

Gómez-Montoya, J. P., Castillo-Alvarez, Y., Ortiz-Dongo, L. F., Solórzano, R., Patiño-Agudelo, A. D., Luna-delRisco, M., & Arrieta-Gonzalez, C. E. (2025). Improvement and Maturation of Liquid Biofertilizers in Series-Connected Biodigesters: Comparative Analysis of Guinea Pig Manure and Vermicompost Leachate. Sci, 7(4), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7040161

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop