Next Article in Journal
Stability Assessment of a Submersible Net Cage with Vertical Buoyancy Columns Under Steady Currents
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Restriction and Thermal Stress as Independent Inducers of Sexual Reproduction and Ephippia Production in Daphnia magna
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemical and Metabolic Characterization of the Manila Clam Ruditapes philippinarum in Response to Different Frozen Concentrated Microalgal Diets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Disinfection Strategies for Euplotes spp. Control in Marine Copepod Cultures

Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1408 24th Street SE, Ruskin, FL 33570, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2026, 11(2), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11020091
Submission received: 19 December 2025 / Revised: 23 January 2026 / Accepted: 26 January 2026 / Published: 2 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zooplankton Production Applied to Aquaculture)

Abstract

Marine copepods are an essential live feed for the culture of many marine ornamental fish and other finfish species, yet their production is frequently constrained by contamination from free-living ciliates. To address this challenge, the efficacy of three disinfectants (sodium hypochlorite, iodine, and hydrogen peroxide) was evaluated for ciliate removal in cultures of two copepod species, Parvocalanus crassirostris and Oithona colcarva. Appropriate ranges of disinfectant concentrations and exposure durations were identified through a preliminary trial assessing the toxicity to Euplotes spp. over a 5-min period. Subsequent experiments tested three doses of each disinfectant to quantify ciliate removal success and egg hatch rates for each copepod species. Ciliate presence/absence showed no variation (100% in controls, 0% after disinfection), precluding statistical analysis except for one variable iodine trial, which was analyzed using Fisher’s Exact Test. Hatch and recovery rates were analyzed using binomial GLMMs with treatment as a fixed effect and replicate as a random effect, with Tukey-adjusted pairwise comparisons and α = 0.05. Sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide consistently removed all ciliates across tested concentrations, whereas iodine only achieved complete removal at the highest dose. The effects on hatch rate differed between species, with hydrogen peroxide producing the highest hatch rates in P. crassirostris (approximately 44 to 46% at 50–100 g/L for one minute) and sodium hypochlorite supporting the highest hatch in O. colcarva (up to 92% at 250 mg/L for one minute). These findings demonstrate that disinfectant performance is species-specific and that species-specific disinfection protocols are warranted to improve the reliability of copepod production in marine aquaculture.
Key Contribution: Ciliate removal: Surface disinfection of copepod eggs results in the removal of Euplotes spp. ciliates from live feed cultures while preserving the viability of the eggs. Removal of this common contaminant aids in the development of reliable copepod production methods for the marine aquaculture industry.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture of marine finfish has expanded in the past few decades, in part due to the development of live-feed culture for early rearing of altricial larvae. After the endogenous yolk reserves are depleted, altricial larvae feed on zooplankton for an extended period while undergoing developmental milestones, such as swim bladder inflation, rapid skeletal growth, and notochord flexion. This larval stage is often characterized by substantial mortality, especially if nutritional requirements are not met. Significant improvements in survivorship during this period have been observed in larvae fed live feeds rather than inert diets [1]. Rotifers (Brachionus spp.) and Artemia spp. nauplii have been widely used as live feeds during marine fish larviculture. However, both rotifers and Artemia spp. nauplii can be too large for the limited mouth gape of first-feeding marine larvae [1,2]. Additionally, the nutritional profiles of these live feeds are often incomplete for marine larvae that require specific quantities and ratios of readily digestible, highly unsaturated fatty acids.
To address these limitations, marine copepod nauplii are used during early larviculture of marine finfish, as they are a natural prey item for fish larvae in the wild [3]. Pelagic copepods within the orders Calanoida and Cyclopoida produce nauplii that are small and nutrient-dense, making them an ideal prey item for the smaller larvae of high-value ornamental finfish. Observed improvements in growth and survival of marine fish larvae offered copepods at first feeding have been attributed to beneficial ratios of docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid inherent to copepods when compared with rotifers and Artemia spp. nauplii [4,5]. Despite this, the use of copepods as live feeds have been limited by challenges in developing reliable mass-culture techniques. Some key limitations to the mass production of copepods include their requirement for live microalgae, their sensitivity to water quality parameters, and their susceptibility to contamination from bacterial blooms and other zooplankton groups [3,4,6]. Large reductions in fecundity and survival have been observed in calanoid copepods when exposed to high concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3 > 0.40 mg/L) and low dissolved oxygen (d.o. < 1.0 mg/L) [7,8,9,10]. Additionally, contamination by other zooplankton groups, such as motile ciliates, can be detrimental to a copepod culture, as ciliates are often more tolerant of suboptimal water quality and can rapidly overpopulate [11]. Intensive culture methods for copepod production have been developed to improve reliability; however, contamination remains a frequent issue even under controlled conditions.
Protists such as hypotrich ciliates Euplotes spp. are a common contaminant in live feed cultures and can quickly outcompete copepods, resulting in mortality of adults and decreased egg production [12,13]. Similar impacts on production have been observed in rotifer cultures contaminated with non-target protozoa [14,15]. Euplotes spp. can thrive on microalgae and commercial rotifer feeds, reproducing rapidly in intensive culture systems, primarily through binary fission. Under optimal conditions, they exhibit log phase growth, with populations nearly doubling every 24 h [16,17,18]. In contrast, most copepods reproduce sexually and, under optimal conditions, exhibit a minimum generation time of approximately one week, with some species exhibiting prolonged development rates that depend on environmental factors such as temperature, salinity, and food supply [3]. Ciliate blooms often result in degraded water quality. However, Euplotes spp. are largely tolerant of these conditions, with studies showing continued population growth in the presence of high unionized ammonia (0.7–7.1 mg/L), low dissolved oxygen (d.o. < 0.3 mg/L), and wide salinity ranges (15–35 g/L) [11,19]. Thus, maintaining ciliate-free cultures is paramount to preserving reliable naupliar production.
Traditional ciliate removal methods include manual sieving of contaminated cultures through a mesh screen intended to catch copepods while allowing ciliates to fall through, or starving the population to slow ciliate growth. However, these methods rarely result in complete ciliate removal [3]. The removal of contaminants through chemical surface disinfection via bath immersion of eggs is a common biosecurity practice in marine finfish aquaculture, though less commonly used in live-feed culture. Industry-standard disinfectants for finfish eggs include household bleach (sodium hypochlorite), iodophors, hydrogen peroxide, and formaldehyde [20,21,22]. The use of surface disinfectants has been studied in a limited number of copepod and rotifer species (Table 1). Næss and Bergh [23] significantly reduced the bacterial load on resting eggs of two Calanoid copepod species through the use of the iodophor FAM-30TM (Evans Vanodine, Preston, Lancashire, UK) and glutaraldehyde as surface disinfectants. Douillet [24] reportedly obtained axenic rotifer cysts using sodium hypochlorite and sterile filtration. Daw et al. [25] investigated the use of sodium hypochlorite to remove ciliates from Calanoid copepod eggs with success. However, significant decreases in hatch were observed for many of the concentrations and durations applied to Parvocalanus spp. eggs.
Due to the reported variability of ciliate removal success and hatch success, more research is needed to develop species-specific copepod culture disinfection protocols to remove nuisance ciliates while maintaining acceptable hatch rates. This study aims to build on the methods of Daw et al. [25] by investigating the efficacy of iodine, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hypochlorite for the removal of Euplotes spp. ciliates from stock cultures of the Calanoid copepod Parvocalanus crassirostris and Cyclopoid copepod Oithona colcarva, while preserving egg viability. For each of the disinfectants, a range-finding trial was conducted to determine concentrations and exposure durations that would result in complete mortality of free-living ciliates. These results were then used to inform the concentrations and exposure times of each disinfectant tested in three subsequent experiments. In these, eggs of P. crassirostris and O. colcarva were exposed to three different concentrations of each disinfectant, and the resulting hatch rates were assessed to evaluate their effect on the viability of eggs from these copepod species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ciliate and Copepod Culture

Euplotes spp. ciliates were isolated from rotifer (Brachionus plicatilis) cultures at the University of Florida’s Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory, in Ruskin, FL. Ciliates were isolated by sieving culture water through a 35 μm mesh screen to retain rotifers, with subsequent sieving of the filtrate through a 20 μm mesh screen to retain ciliates. The isolated ciliates were cultured in 20 L static containers with moderate aeration at 28 ± 1 °C and 32 ± 1 g/L salinity. Ciliate cultures were fed RotiGrow Plus® (Reed Mariculture Inc., Campbell, CA, USA) daily per manufacturer’s recommendation. For experimental trials, ciliates were concentrated into 1 L containers, and the population density was estimated via manual counting using a Sedgewick–Rafter cell (1 mL). Counts were repeated n = 3–6 times, and an average population density was obtained.
Copepod eggs were obtained from stock cultures of Parvocalanus crassirostris and Oithona colcarva housed at the UF/IFAS Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory. Cultures were maintained in static tanks with moderate aeration at 25 ± 1 °C and 30 ± 1 g/L salinity. P. crassirostris adults were fed a live microalgae diet comprising Tisochrysis lutea and Chaetoceros muelleri. O. colcarva adults were fed a diet of Tetraselmis chuii and T. lutea. Eggs from P. crassirostris were isolated from the stock culture by sieving the culture water through a 75-micron screen to remove copepodite and adult stages, then sieving the filtrate through a 40-micron screen to retain eggs and nauplii, which were rinsed down into a graduated pitcher of seawater. The negatively buoyant eggs were then pipetted off the bottom of the container after a brief period without aeration and transferred to a 1000 mL graduated beaker of sterile seawater. O. colcarva eggs were isolated from the stock culture by rinsing egg-bearing adults vigorously over a 100-micron screen, forcing the egg sacs to fall off the adults and through the screen. The egg sacs were then collected on a 55-micron screen and rinsed down into a 1000 mL graduated beaker of sterile seawater. Copepod eggs were enumerated as previously described for Euplotes spp. An average egg density was obtained by counting three to six subsamples drawn with a pipette after vigorous resuspension. Because O. colcarva eggs are produced within an ovisac, the eggs in each sac were counted individually to ensure homogeneity of the quantity used in each experiment.

2.2. Disinfectants and Seawater

Artificial seawater used in this study was made with Instant Ocean® salt (Instant Ocean Spectrum Brands, Blacksburg, VA, USA) and reverse osmosis water. Seawater was prepared in batches using a YSI® EcoSense® EC300M handheld meter (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA) to ensure the salinity was adjusted to 30 g/L. The water was then autoclaved in one-liter batches for one hour at 121 °C the day prior to use.
The disinfectants used in this study are standard in the aquaculture industry and reasonably accessible to producers. HDX Germicidal Bleach (KIK International LLC, Concord, ON, Canada), containing 7.13% available chlorine, was used as the source of sodium hypochlorite. For the bleach trials, a 10,000 mg/L available chlorine stock solution was prepared by diluting bleach in sterile seawater per the manufacturer’s guide. The stock solution was then used to prepare disinfectant baths by further diluting with sterile seawater. OVADINE® (PVP Iodine) fish egg disinfectant (Syndel, Ferndale, WA, USA) was used as the source of iodine. Fisher Bioreagents Hydrogen Peroxide 30% in water (CAT# BP2633500; Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used as the source of hydrogen peroxide. Iodine and hydrogen peroxide disinfectant baths were prepared fresh for each experiment by pipetting the full-strength chemicals directly into sterile seawater, according to the concentration guides provided by the manufacturer.

2.3. Range Finding Trials

Preliminary trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various doses of sodium hypochlorite (25–200 mg/L), iodine (2.5–5 mg/L), and hydrogen peroxide (25–132 g/L) for ciliate removal. A range of doses for each disinfectant was added to a 24-well plate with n = 6 replicates per dose. To achieve a final volume of 500 μL per well, the appropriate volume of Euplotes spp. stock culture (approximately 100 ciliates/mL) was added, and the movement of ciliates was monitored continuously under a dissection microscope (Olympus SZ61 Stereo Microscope, Evident Scientific Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Time to total ciliate mortality (s) was monitored and recorded for each well for a maximum of 5 min. Successful disinfection was defined as the time at which all ciliates in the well plate visibly stopped moving. Once a range of successful concentrations and exposure times was established, subsequent trials were conducted to ensure complete ciliate removal after a 24-h of incubation. These trials examined Euplotes spp. ciliates exposed to three treatments of each disinfectant, where the doses and exposure durations were determined by the range-finding experiment, compared to a control of sterile seawater. For each treatment, six replicates of approximately 1500 ciliates were pipetted into 30 mL cups with 20-micron screen bottoms and submerged in individual disinfectant baths. After the exposure period, each cup was rinsed with sterile seawater, then nested in a larger cup containing sterile seawater, sealed with parafilm, and incubated for 24 h at 27 °C (Thermo Scientific IMC18 Heratherm Bench Top Incubator, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After the incubation period, each replicate cup was examined under a dissecting scope for any surviving free-swimming ciliates. If live ciliates were observed, subsequent trials repeated these steps with progressively higher disinfectant concentrations until complete mortality was achieved 24 h post-exposure. Once treatments that resulted in complete ciliate mortality were determined for each disinfectant, preliminary trials ceased, and these treatments were used in subsequent trials with copepod eggs.

2.4. Copepod Egg Disinfection Experiments

The doses and exposure durations of sodium hypochlorite, iodine, and hydrogen peroxide chosen for the evaluation of their effect on the hatch rate and recovery of both P. crassirostris and O. colcarva eggs were determined through the trials described in Section 2.3. For each disinfectant, three successful concentrations and exposure times were selected and are summarized in Table 2. Treatment baths were prepared as described above according to the manufacturer’s provided concentration guide. Approximately 200 eggs and 1500 ciliates were pipetted into each 30 mL replicate cup (n = 6 per treatment) with a 20-micron screen bottom and partially submerged in a disinfectant bath. After the exposure period, the cups were rinsed with sterile seawater, nested in 50 mL cups of sterile seawater, sealed with parafilm, and incubated for 18 h at 27 °C. For the P. crassirostris trials, after the incubation period, each replicate cup was carefully rinsed into a Bogorov counting chamber and assessed under a dissection microscope. The total number of eggs and nauplii was recorded, and free-living ciliates were noted as either present or absent. Hatch rate (%) was calculated for each replicate as the proportion of nauplii relative to the total number of nauplii and unhatched eggs counted after disinfection:
H a t c h R a t e % = n a u p l i i u n h a t c h e d e g g s + n a u p l i i × 100
Percent recovery was calculated as the number of eggs and nauplii counted after disinfection relative to the number of eggs stocked prior to disinfection:
R e c o v e r y % = # r e c o v e r e d e g g s + n a u p l i i i n i t i a l # e g g s × 100
In cases where recovery exceeded 200, the initial number of eggs stocked per replicate was adjusted to 200 to account for sampling error [25].
Due to the smaller size and greater translucency of O. colcarva nauplii compared to P. crassirostris, evaluation of replicates using a dissection microscope was ineffective. Consequently, an alternative enumeration protocol was used for the O. colcarva trials. Following incubation, each replicate cup was carefully rinsed down into a 10 mL graduated cylinder, and a 1 mL subsample was enumerated under a compound microscope using a Sedgewick–Rafter counting cell. The total number of eggs and nauplii was recorded for each subsample, and a volumetric estimate was calculated to determine the total number of eggs and nauplii for each replicate. Hatch rate, percent recovery, and ciliate presence/absence for each replicate were calculated as described above.

2.5. Data Analysis

Ciliate presence/absence was recorded as a binary response (1 = present, 0 = absent) for each replicate following disinfection. Because all disinfectants exhibited complete elimination of ciliates (0% prevalence), while controls consistently showed 100% prevalence, the data displayed no variation; therefore, no statistical analysis was conducted for these data. However, a single trial (O. colcarva iodine) did show variability of ciliate presence/absence among treatments. For this trial, differences in ciliate prevalence were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact Test (‘fisher.test’) and pairwise Fisher’s Exact Tests (‘pairwise.fisher.test’) with Bonferroni-adjusted p-values for pairwise comparisons (R package ‘fmsb’).
Hatch rate and recovery data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) using the ‘glmer’ function in the ‘lme4’ R package. Hatch rate was modeled using a binomial GLMM with a logit link, with treatment set as the fixed factor and replicate set as the random factor. Recovery data were modeled similarly, except the response was specified as the number of recovered and unrecovered eggs/nauplii (200—recovered). Pairwise comparisons were made using estimated marginal means with a Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons (‘emmeans’ R package). Statistical significance was accepted at α = 0.05. All analyses were conducted in R (version 2024.12.0+467; R Core Team, 2024). Figures were generated in GraphPad Prism 10 (version 10.3.1) with error bars representing the standard error of the mean.

3. Results

All replicates for the P. crassirostris trials exposed to a disinfectant yielded zero motile ciliates 18 h after disinfection. All control replicates in the P. crassirostris trials yielded motile ciliates at the experimental endpoint. This pattern was also found for O. colcarva bleach and hydrogen peroxide trials. For the O. colcarva iodine trial, ciliate prevalence differed among treatments (Fisher’s Exact Test; p = 0.005; Figure 1).

3.1. Sodium Hypochlorite

Sodium hypochlorite treatments had a significant effect on hatch rate of P. crassirostris eggs (GLMM, p < 0.001), where the highest hatch rate was found in the control (65.0 ± 7.90%). Hatch rate was significantly reduced by approximately 42% when any sodium hypochlorite concentration and corresponding exposure duration was used compared to the control (p < 0.001; Figure 2A). Percent recovery was also affected by sodium hypochlorite treatment (GLMM; p < 0.0001), where recovery was lowest in the control (10.1 ± 1.57%) and highest in the 150 mg/L (75.1 ± 6.05%) and 250 mg/L treatments (79.3 ± 13.4%; Figure 2B).
When O. colcarva eggs were exposed to sodium hypochlorite, hatch rate was significantly affected (GLMM; p < 0.001), where hatch rate was lower in the 50 mg/L (88.6 ± 4.32%) and 150 mg/L (88.1 ± 5.23%) treatments compared to the control (95.2 ± 3.94%) and the 250 mg/L (92.1 ± 6.82%) treatment (Figure 2C). The highest hatch rates were greater than the lowest hatch rates by approximately 5.7%. Percent recovery data displayed a decreasing trend with increasing sodium hypochlorite concentration (GLMM; p > 0.001). Percent recovery in the highest two sodium hypochlorite treatments was approximately 19.6% lower than that of the control (97.5 ± 1.71%; p < 0.0001; Figure 2D).

3.2. Iodine

When P. crassirostris eggs were exposed to different concentrations of iodine, the hatch rate was significantly affected (GLMM; p < 0.0001), where exposure to any concentration of iodine significantly reduced hatch. The highest hatch rate was found in the control (87.8 ± 3.64%; p < 0.001; Figure 3A). All iodine treatments were approximately 85% lower compared to the control, and hatch rates did not differ among the iodine treatment groups (p > 0.108). Percent recovery was significantly reduced in the control (44.5 ± 14.6%) compared to all other treatments (p < 0.001). Eggs exposed to 50 mg/L iodine had the highest percent recovery (92.1 ± 14.6%), while recovery decreased at 100 mg/L (75.8 ± 9.21%) and 200 mg/L (72.3 ± 2.08%; Figure 3B). Percent recovery did not differ between the 100 and 200 mg/L treatments (p = 0.210).
Exposure of O. colcarva eggs to different iodine concentrations had a significant effect on hatch rate (GLMM; p < 0.001). The highest hatch rate was found in the 100 mg/L (86.0 ± 4.07) treatment, which was approximately 7% higher than the hatch rates from the control (80.0 ± 4.78%) and the 200 mg/L (80.2 ± 7.12%) treatment (Figure 3C). Percent recovery decreased with exposure to iodine, with the control (93.3 ± 4.22%) having approximately 14% higher recovery compared to the remainder of the treatments (p < 0.0001; Figure 3D).

3.3. Hydrogen Peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide dose significantly affected the hatch rate of P. crassirostris nauplii (GLMM; p < 0.001). Hatch rate was lowest in the control treatment (23.4 ± 3.68%; p < 0.002) and the highest hatch rates were found in groups treated with 50 g/L (46.4 ± 2.38%) or 100 g/L (43.9 ± 3.55%) hydrogen peroxide (Figure 4A). Eggs treated with 150 g/L hydrogen peroxide showed reduced hatch rate (37.3 ± 5.02%) compared to the other hydrogen peroxide treatments. Percent recovery was also affected by hydrogen peroxide dose (GLMM; p < 0.001), where recovery values were lowest in the control treatment (24.0 ± 6.39%; p < 0.001; Figure 4B). Percent recovery values in the 50 g/L and 100 g/L treatments were approximately 2.8× higher than the control.
Exposing O. colcarva eggs to various doses of hydrogen peroxide significantly reduced hatch rate compared to the control (GLMM; p < 0.0001). Hatch rates for hydrogen peroxide treatments were all significantly lower than that of the control (79.7 ± 4.39%), but hatch rates for the 100 g/L (5.70 ± 2.19%) and 150 g/L (6.09 ± 2.85%) treatments were not different from each other (p = 0.851; Figure 4C). Percent recovery was affected by hydrogen peroxide exposure; however, percent recovery was greatest in the higher hydrogen peroxide treatments (GLMM; p < 0.0001). Percent recovery in the 100 g/L (90.0 ± 4.36%) and 150 g/L (90.8 ± 4.36%) treatments was approximately 7% higher compared to the control (84.2 ± 10.0%) and approximately 16% higher than that of the 50 g/L treatment (77.5 ± 10.2%; Figure 4D).

4. Discussion

All disinfectants used in this study were effective at eliminating Euplotes spp. depending upon concentration and exposure time. Treatment with either sodium hypochlorite or hydrogen peroxide at any tested concentration and exposure duration resulted in complete ciliate removal, as validated 18 h post-exposure. The lowest sodium hypochlorite dose and exposure time (1 min at 50 mg/L NaClO or approximately 24 mg/L total chlorine) resulted in complete ciliate removal, which is not consistent with the findings of Daw et al. [25], who observed that the minimum chlorine dose required to eliminate Euplotes spp. from P. crassirostris and A. tonsa cultures was 55 mg/L total chlorine with a 5-min exposure time. Daw et al. [25] also found that ciliates were not successfully removed using 55 mg/L total chlorine with a 15-s exposure in A. tonsa cultures. These differences suggest that exposure time is likely a critical factor to consider when using sodium hypochlorite as a ciliate removal method. Similarly, Wang et al. [17] found that sodium hypochlorite levels below 20 mg/L resulted in some ciliate survival after twenty-four hours, mirroring observations made in the range-finding portion of this study, where sodium hypochlorite doses below 50 mg/L consistently failed to remove ciliates. Out of the disinfectants tested in this study, iodine was the least effective at total removal of ciliates, with only the highest dose tested (200 mg/L) resulting in total ciliate removal after 18 h. The failure to remove ciliates at the 50 and 100 mg/L doses may indicate a need for a longer exposure duration at lower doses. Although all disinfectants tested in this study are oxidizers, the PVP iodine mechanism of action is different compared to sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide. PVP iodine is a form of iodine that slowly releases the iodine molecule and requires adequate time for oxidation of proteins to occur [27]. Therefore, further research is necessary to elucidate whether increasing the exposure time of the lower doses of iodine may result in total ciliate removal.
Euplotes spp. ciliates exhibit a vegetative life stage known as encystment under conditions of environmental stress, such as low food availability [28]. These cysts possess a thickened cell wall, which may allow them to survive greater concentrations of chemical exposure compared to free-swimming life stages. The efficacy of the disinfectants on the inactivation of Euplotes spp. cysts was not assessed in this study. The survival of ciliates in some of the replicate cups after chemical exposure could be the result of encysted specimens potentially present in the Euplotes spp. stock culture at the time of the trials. Euplotes spp. cysts complete excystment often within five hours of being placed into a new medium [28]. If encysted specimens were present in the stock culture, it is likely that they would have begun the process of excystment after being introduced to the fresh sterile seawater used for this study, thereby allowing them to survive chemical exposure, with fully free-swimming specimens appearing in the treatments after the 18 h incubation period. Research exploring the inactivation of Euplotes spp. cysts could help further elucidate the efficacy of surface disinfectants for ciliate removal.
Percent recovery was calculated to determine whether disinfectant exposure influenced the retention or degradation of eggs after 18 h. For P. crassirostris, all tested disinfectants in the present study had a positive effect on the recovery of eggs and nauplii compared to the control. This increase in recovery may have been due to the reduction in microbiota (e.g., bacteria and fungi) that could have degraded eggs over the incubation period, thus resulting in a higher number of countable eggs in treated groups compared to the control. [29]. The effects of each disinfectant on the hatch rate of P. crassirostris followed a more variable pattern. Hydrogen peroxide was found to be the least inhibitive of hatching success in the P. crassirostris trials, with the highest hatch rate being observed in treatments exposed to 50 g/L (46.4%) and 100 g/L (43.9%) for one minute. This was in contrast to the control hatch rate, which was significantly lower than the hydrogen peroxide treatments at just 25.4%. The low hatch rate in the control treatment was inconsistent with the hatch rates of the controls in the other disinfectant trials, suggesting that there may have been differences in the levels of bacterial and fungal colonization on the surface of the copepod eggs across the various trials. Iodine was found to be the most inhibitive of hatching success, with hatch rates significantly reduced in even the lowest concentrations used. Sodium hypochlorite exposure resulted in hatch success of approximately 38.0 ± 1.8% across all treatments, which was significantly reduced when compared with controls. This pattern was consistent with that of Daw et al. [25], who hypothesized that the relatively short embryonic development period of P. crassirostris, along with a thin outer envelope, may cause the eggs of this species to be more sensitive to chemical treatments. The present study suggests that hydrogen peroxide can be used to remove Euplotes spp. ciliates from P. crassirostris eggs with an expected outcome of close to 50% hatch. Further research into refining exposure durations and concentrations of hydrogen peroxide as a ciliate removal method for P. crassirostris cultures may help further improve copepod hatch rate and survival.
Eggs of O. colcarva exhibited contrasting responses to each disinfectant when compared to P. crassirostris, which indicates that the sensitivity to different disinfectants may be species-specific. Percent recovery was consistently higher in the control compared to the disinfectant-treated eggs, except for the higher doses of hydrogen peroxide. This pattern suggests that the eggs of O. colcarva may be less affected by degradation via bacteria and fungi compared to P. crassirostris and that a balanced microbiome may be beneficial for O. colcarva incubation. Though the disinfectants had a negative effect on the recovery of O. colcarva eggs in the iodine and sodium hypochlorite trials as compared to the control, the average hatch rates were at times higher, if not statistically similar to the control treatments. The highest hatch rate observed for O. colcarva eggs was found in the sodium hypochlorite trial, with a concentration of 250 mg/L and an exposure duration of one minute, resulting in 92% hatch, markedly different from the effects of this disinfectant on P. crassirostris hatch rate. Iodine was also effective in preserving the viability of the eggs, with some treatments exhibiting a higher hatch rate than the control. This result, however, was tempered by the survival of some Euplotes spp. ciliates in the 50 and 100 mg/L iodine treatments. Conversely, hatch was significantly reduced in all treatments of O. colcarva eggs exposed to hydrogen peroxide (2.28–6.09%). These results suggest that sodium hypochlorite is most suited for the removal of Euplotes spp. ciliates from O. colcarva cultures while preserving egg viability.
Throughout the study, O. colcarva exhibited higher average hatch rates than those of P. crassirostris after chemical exposure, with the exclusion of hydrogen peroxide. The hatch rates of O. colcarva in the control treatments were also generally higher than those of P. crassirostris. The species-specific responses to each disinfectant observed in this study may be due to various factors, including biological differences in embryonic development and varying susceptibility to different modes of oxidation presented by each disinfectant. The ovisac of O. colcarva may provide a greater barrier of protection against mechanical and chemical degradation than the individual envelopes encasing P. crassirostris eggs, though more research is needed to confirm this. O. colcarva also exhibits a longer embryonic stage, with eggs typically hatching within 36 h of spawning, while the embryonic duration of P. crassirostris is typically less than 24 h [30,31]. Differences in the diel periodicity of egg production may exist between the two species as well; O. colcarva females follow a consistent diel rhythm, producing egg sacs in the morning with hatching occurring the following day in the afternoon. Little research exists on the diel variability of Parvocalanus spp. reproduction. Some calanoid species reproduce continuously while others have been documented to follow a nightly spawning pattern [32]. These factors could have resulted in the eggs of P. crassirostris being further along in development than O. colcarva at the time of chemical exposure, potentially resulting in greater mortality. Additionally, although the oxidative pathways are not fully understood in copepods, each disinfectant utilized in this study interacts differently with cellular membranes, proteins, and other biomolecules, leading to distinct toxicity profiles [33]. Fundamental biological differences in reproductive strategy and egg characteristics among calanoid and cyclopoid copepods, such as variability in egg structure and developmental physiology, may contribute to the species-specific responses to chemical exposure.
Although the disinfection trials produced generally consistent patterns in ciliate removal and egg viability, several logistical constraints should be noted. The disinfectants were evaluated in separate experiments due to limited egg availability and space, which prevented a fully integrated statistical comparison. Additionally, logistical constraints associated with manual counting of copepod eggs required volumetric stocking of the replicates, likely increasing variability in the replicate estimates. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insight into potential improvements in the reliability of copepod production for the aquaculture industry. Future studies exploring the impacts of egg disinfection on the survivorship of nauplii post-hatch could provide further insight into the efficacy of surface egg disinfection for copepod production.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that chemical disinfection can be an effective strategy for managing Euplotes spp. contamination in marine copepod cultures, although disinfection efficacy depends on disinfectant type, dose, exposure duration, and copepod species. Sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide reliably eliminated ciliates at the tested concentrations, whereas iodine required higher doses and longer exposure times for complete removal. The impacts of these disinfectants on egg hatch rate differed markedly between P. crassirostris and O. colcarva, demonstrating the importance of species-specific optimization. P. crassirostris exhibited greater sensitivity to sodium hypochlorite and iodine, while O. colcarva was most sensitive to hydrogen peroxide. These species-specific variations were likely influenced by differences in egg structure, developmental timing, and susceptibility to oxidative stress. Together, these findings highlight the need to refine disinfection protocols to the biological characteristics of cultured copepod species. Establishing effective, species-appropriate disinfection methods will improve the reliability of copepod production and enhance the overall efficiency of live-feed systems in aquaculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and M.D.; methodology, C.M., M.W. and M.D.; investigation, C.M., M.W., G.M., C.T., O.M. and B.L.; data curation, G.M. and C.T.; resources, B.L., M.W. and M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, M.W., O.M., B.L. and M.D.; supervision, M.D.; project administration, C.M.; formal analysis, C.M.; visualization, C.M.; funding acquisition, C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Florida Sea Grant Summer Internship Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study did not require institutional approval because it did not involve the use of vertebrate animals or human subjects.

Data Availability Statement

Datasets are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Eric Cassiano for contributing his expertise on microalgae and copepod culture techniques. We also thank Spectrum Brands and SeaWorld Conservation Fund for contributing resources to this study. During the preparation of this manuscript/study, the authors used GPT-5.2 for the purposes of reviewing and editing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bengston, D.A. Status of marine aquaculture in relation to live prey: Past, present and future. In Live Feeds in Marine Aquaculture; Støttrup, J.G., McEvoy, L.A., Eds.; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Léger, P.; Bengtson, D.A.; Sorgeloos, P.; Simpson, K.L.; Beck, A.D. The nutritional value of Artemia: A review. Artemia Res. Its Appl. 1987, 3, 357–372. [Google Scholar]
  3. Støttrup, J.G. Production and Nutritional Value of Copepods. In Live Feeds in Marine Aquaculture; Støttrup, J.G., McEvoy, L.A., Eds.; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 145–195. [Google Scholar]
  4. McKinnon, A.D.; Duggan, S.; Nichols, P.D.; Rimmer, M.A.; Semmens, G.; Robino, B. The potential of tropical paracalanid copepods as live feeds in aquaculture. Aquaculture 2003, 223, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Drillet, G.; Jørgensen, N.; Sørensen, T.; Ramløv, H.; Hansen, B. Biochemical and technical observations supporting the use of copepods as live feed organisms in marine larviculture. Aquac. Res. 2006, 37, 756–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kline, M.D.; Laidley, C.W. Development of intensive copepod culture technology for Parvocalanus crassirostris: Optimizing adult density. Aquaculture 2015, 435, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buttino, I. The effect of low concentrations of phenol and ammonia on egg production rates, fecal pellet production and egg viability of the calanoid copepod Acartia clausi. Mar. Biol. 1994, 119, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sullivan, B.K.; Ritacco, P.J. Ammonia toxicity to larval copepods in eutrophic marine ecosystems: A comparison of results from bioassays and enclosed experimental ecosystems. Aquat. Toxicol. 1985, 7, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jepsen, P.M.; Andersen, C.V.B.; Schjelde, J.; Hansen, B.W. Tolerance of un-ionized ammonia in live feed cultures of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa Dana. Aquac. Res. 2015, 46, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stalder, L.; Marcus, N. Zooplankton responses to hypoxia: Behavioral patterns and survival of three species of calanoid copepods. Mar. Biol. 1997, 127, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, H.; Song, W.; Warren, A. An investigation of the tolerance to ammonia of the marine ciliate Euplotes vannus (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Hydrobiologia 2004, 519, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Drillet, G.; Dutz, J. Dealing with the presence of the ciliate Euplotes sp. in cultures of the copepod Acartia tonsa. Aquac. Int. 2014, 22, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Drillet, G.; Frouël, S.; Sichlau, M.H.; Jepsen, P.M.; Højgaard, J.K.; Joarder, A.K.; Hansen, B.W. Status and recommendations on marine copepod cultivation for use as live feed. Aquaculture 2011, 315, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reguera, B. The effect of ciliate contamination in mass cultures of the rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. O.F. Müller. Aquaculture 1984, 40, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Araujo, A.B.; Hagiwara, A.; Snell, T.W. Effect of unionized ammonia, viscosity and protozoan contamination on reproduction and enzyme activity of the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis. Hydrobiologia 2001, 446/447, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wichterman, R. Mating Types, Breeding System, Conjuàtion and Nuclear Phenomena in the Marine Ciliate Euplotes cristatus Kahl from the Gulf of Naples. J. Protozool. 1967, 14, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Eustance, E.; Castillo-Keller, M.; Sommerfeld, M. Evaluation of chemical treatments for control of ciliate grazers in algae cultures: A site study. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 2761–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Freitas Côrtes, G.; Tsuzuki, M.Y.; Melo, E.M.C. Monoculture of the ciliate protozoan Euplotes sp. (Ciliophora; Hypotrichia) fed with different diets. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 2013, 35, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. da Annunciação, W.F.; Ohs, C.L.; Tsuzuki, M.Y. Influence of food concentration and abiotic parameters on population density growth of the ciliated marine protozoan Euplotes sp. under controlled conditions. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Swaef, E.; Van den Broeck, W.; Dierckens, K.; Decostere, A. Disinfection of teleost eggs: A review. Rev. Aquac. 2016, 8, 321–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yanong, R.P.E.; Erlacher-Reid, C. Biosecurity in Aquaculture, Part 1: An Overview; (SRAC Publication No. 4707); Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Extension Publication; Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salvesen, I.; Vadstein, O. Surface disinfection of eggs from marine fish: Evaluation of four chemicals. Aquac. Int. 1995, 3, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Næss, T.; Bergh, Ø. Calanoid copepod resting eggs can be surface-disinfected. Aquac. Eng. 1994, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Douillet, P. Disinfection of rotifer cysts leading to bacteria-free populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1998, 224, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Daw, A.L.; Sarkisian, B.L.; Blaylock, R.B.; Saillant, E.A.L. Removal of Free-Living Ciliates from Stock Cultures of Two Calanoid Copepods with Sodium Hypochlorite. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2021, 83, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Balompapueng, M.D.; Munuswamy, N.; Hagiwara, A.; Hirayama, K. Effect of disinfectants on the hatching of marine rotifer resting eggs Brachionus plicatilis Müller. Aquac. Res. 1997, 28, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoo, H.Y. Review of disinfection and sterilization—Back to the basics. Infect. Chemother. 2018, 50, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wichterman, R. Description and life cycle of Euplotes neapolitanus sp. nov. (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Hypotrichida) from the Gulf of Naples. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 1964, 83, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nagasawa, S.; Nemoto, T. The bacterial adhesion to copepods in coastal waters in different parts of the world. La Mer 1986, 24, 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ambler, J.W.; Ferrari, F.D.; Fornshell, J.A.; Buskey, E.J. Diel cycles of molting, mating, egg sac production and hatching in the swarm forming cyclopoid copepod Dioithona oculata. Plankton Biol. Ecol. 1999, 46, 120–127. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lawson, T.J.; Grice, G.D. The developmental stages of Paracalanus crassirostris Dahl, 1894 (Copepoda, Calanoida). Crustaceana 1973, 24, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pagano, M.; Kouassi, E.; Arfi, R.; Bouvy, M.; Saint-Jean, L. In situ spawning rate of the calanoid copepod Acartia clausi in a tropical lagoon (Ebrie, Cote d’lvoire): Diel variations and effects of environmental factors. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 244–254. [Google Scholar]
  33. McDonnell, G.; Russell, A.D. Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 147–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ciliate prevalence (%) 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of iodine or a sterile seawater control for O. colcarva. Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (Fisher’s Exact Test; p < 0.001; α = 0.05). No error bars are present because ciliate prevalence was calculated as the proportion of replicates exhibiting ciliates (a single binomial proportion per treatment).
Figure 1. Ciliate prevalence (%) 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of iodine or a sterile seawater control for O. colcarva. Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (Fisher’s Exact Test; p < 0.001; α = 0.05). No error bars are present because ciliate prevalence was calculated as the proportion of replicates exhibiting ciliates (a single binomial proportion per treatment).
Fishes 11 00091 g001
Figure 2. Mean hatch rate (±SEM) and mean percent recovery (±SEM) of copepod eggs 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite or a sterile seawater control for P. crassirostris (A,B) and O. colcarva (C,D). Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (GLMM; p < 0.001; α = 0.05).
Figure 2. Mean hatch rate (±SEM) and mean percent recovery (±SEM) of copepod eggs 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite or a sterile seawater control for P. crassirostris (A,B) and O. colcarva (C,D). Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (GLMM; p < 0.001; α = 0.05).
Fishes 11 00091 g002
Figure 3. Mean hatch rate (±SEM) and mean percent recovery (±SEM) of copepod eggs 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of iodine or a sterile seawater control for P. crassirostris (A,B) and O. colcarva (C,D). Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (GLMM; p < 0.001; α = 0.05).
Figure 3. Mean hatch rate (±SEM) and mean percent recovery (±SEM) of copepod eggs 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of iodine or a sterile seawater control for P. crassirostris (A,B) and O. colcarva (C,D). Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (GLMM; p < 0.001; α = 0.05).
Fishes 11 00091 g003
Figure 4. Mean hatch rate (±SEM) and mean percent recovery (±SEM) of copepod eggs 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide or a sterile seawater control for P. crassirostris (A,B) and O. colcarva (C,D). Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (GLMM; p < 0.001; α = 0.05).
Figure 4. Mean hatch rate (±SEM) and mean percent recovery (±SEM) of copepod eggs 18 h after exposure to three different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide or a sterile seawater control for P. crassirostris (A,B) and O. colcarva (C,D). Letters above bars indicate which treatments are statistically different from each other (GLMM; p < 0.001; α = 0.05).
Fishes 11 00091 g004
Table 1. Disinfectants previously studied on live feeds and their effect.
Table 1. Disinfectants previously studied on live feeds and their effect.
Disinfectant TypeProduct/
Chemicals Used
ConcentrationApplication TimeTarget
Organisms
Host
Organisms
Effect on TargetEffect on HostReference
IodineBuffodine1% (v/v)10 minbacteriaAcartia clausi45.8% reduction100% hatch[23]
Buffodine1% (v/v)10 minbacteriaEurytemora affinis75.0% reduction83.3% hatch[23]
FAM-301% (v/v)10 minbacteriaAcartia clausi83.3% reduction95.8% hatch[23]
FAM-301% (v/v)10 minbacteriaEurytemora affinis79.2% reduction37.5% hatch[23]
GlutaraldehydeGlutaraldehyde250 ppm3 minbacteriaAcartia clausi83.3% reduction95.8% hatch[23]
Glutaraldehyde250 ppm3 minbacteriaEurytemora affinis91.7% reduction79.2% hatch[23]
FormaldehydeFormalin0.5 ppm60 minbacteriaBrachionus plicatilisNot Evaluated32% hatch[26]
ChlorineSodium Hypochlorite1 ppm60 minbacteriaBrachionus plicatilisNot Evaluated48% hatch[26]
Sodium Hypochlorite5000 ppm3 minbacteriaBrachionus plicatilis100% removalNo significant effect[24]
Sodium Hypochlorite25 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Parvocalanus crassirostrisEuplotes spp. present88.3–5.2% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite25 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Acartia tonsaEuplotes spp. present−absent98.2–68.3% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite55 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Parvocalanus crassirostris100% removal86.0–0% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite55 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Acartia tonsaEuplotes spp. present−absent99.8–38.5% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite105 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Parvocalanus crassirostris100% removal74.9–0% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite105 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Acartia tonsa100% removal96.0–7.1% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite205 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Parvocalanus crassirostris100% removal66.5–0% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite205 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Acartia tonsa100% removal86.2–3% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite405 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Parvocalanus crassirostris100% removal59.8–0% hatch[25]
Sodium Hypochlorite405 mg/L Total Cl215 s–15 minEuplotes spp.Acartia tonsa100% removal94.6–0% hatch[25]
Table 2. Disinfectant types, doses, and exposure durations used during the copepod egg disinfection trials. Doses and durations were chosen from preliminary data collected during the range-finding trials.
Table 2. Disinfectant types, doses, and exposure durations used during the copepod egg disinfection trials. Doses and durations were chosen from preliminary data collected during the range-finding trials.
DisinfectantDose (mg/L)Duration (s)
Sodium060
Hypochlorite5060
15030
25015
Dose (mg/L)Duration (min)
010
Iodine5010
10010
20010
Dose (g/L)Duration (min)
01
Hydrogen501
Peroxide1001
1501
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wichterman, M.; McCranie, G.; Taylor, C.; Markham, O.; Lacy, B.; DiMaggio, M.; Murray, C. Disinfection Strategies for Euplotes spp. Control in Marine Copepod Cultures. Fishes 2026, 11, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11020091

AMA Style

Wichterman M, McCranie G, Taylor C, Markham O, Lacy B, DiMaggio M, Murray C. Disinfection Strategies for Euplotes spp. Control in Marine Copepod Cultures. Fishes. 2026; 11(2):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11020091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wichterman, Maribeth, Grace McCranie, Chase Taylor, Olivia Markham, Brittney Lacy, Matthew DiMaggio, and Casey Murray. 2026. "Disinfection Strategies for Euplotes spp. Control in Marine Copepod Cultures" Fishes 11, no. 2: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11020091

APA Style

Wichterman, M., McCranie, G., Taylor, C., Markham, O., Lacy, B., DiMaggio, M., & Murray, C. (2026). Disinfection Strategies for Euplotes spp. Control in Marine Copepod Cultures. Fishes, 11(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11020091

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop