Next Article in Journal
Nesting and Reproductive Behavior of the Sand-Dwelling Goby Hazeus ammophilus (Gobiidae) with Radial Ditches Around Its Nest
Previous Article in Journal
Gonadal Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Sex-Related Genes and Regulatory Pathways in Spotted Longbarbel Catfish (Hemibagrus guttatus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Dietary Proline on the Growth Performance, Collagen Deposition, and Texture Quality of Sea Cucumbers’ Body Wall (Apostichopus japonicus)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives: Insights from the Special Issue

by
Adolfo Jatobá
* and
Delano Dias Schleder
Aquaculture Laboratory, Federal Institute Catarinense–Campus Araquari, BR 280-km 27, Araquari 89245-000, SC, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2026, 11(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11010044
Submission received: 18 December 2025 / Accepted: 23 December 2025 / Published: 9 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives)

1. Introduction

Aquaculture continues to expand globally and is now responsible for providing more than half of the aquatic products consumed worldwide. It continues to grow as a vital contributor to global food security and the blue economy. Alongside this expansion, there is an increasing demand for feeding strategies that optimize performance while minimizing environmental impacts. Feed additives have emerged as key nutritional tools capable of improving animal health, digestive efficiency, immune competence, and overall resilience, supporting a transition toward more sustainable and responsible aquaculture practices [1,2]. These compounds—ranging from probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes, and plant extracts to organic acids and functional proteins—have been widely recognized for their potential to enhance nutrient utilization, modulate the gut microbiome, and reduce reliance on chemotherapeutic agents [3,4].
Over the past decade, technological and conceptual advances have deepened our understanding of how bioactive dietary compounds influence fish physiology. New insights from molecular biology, metabolomics, and microbiome research have provided evidence that the interactions between diet, host, and environment are highly dynamic and context-dependent [5,6]. Within this evolving landscape, the Special Issue “Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives” compiles studies addressing nutritional, physiological, and practical dimensions of feed additive use, offering perspectives that contribute to both scientific and applied innovation in aquaculture nutrition (Articles 1–9).

2. SI Contributions and Challenges in the Development and Application of Feed Additives

The articles gathered in this Special Issue reflect the diversity and complexity of current research on aquaculture feed additives. Rather than summarizing each study individually, the collection highlights several overarching trends shaping the field. One enduring challenge in aquaculture nutrition is the reduction in dependence on finite marine resources such as fishmeal and fish oil, while maintaining or improving growth performance and product quality. Studies in this SI, together with recent reviews [7,8], demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating sustainable ingredients and functional additives that enhance nutrient use, health, and environmental outcomes.
Beyond ingredient substitution, the SI emphasizes the multifaceted role of additives as modulators of gut health, immune function, and stress resilience—attributes increasingly vital in intensive production systems [3,4,9]. However, biological responses to additives remain highly variable and species-specific. Their effects depend on numerous factors, including age, diet composition, rearing conditions, and environmental stressors. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying additive-induced physiological changes are often only partially understood, making it difficult to predict outcomes in large-scale production environments [5]. This complexity reinforces the need for integrative approaches that combine nutritional, physiological, and molecular assessments.
Another key challenge concerns the translation of research into practice. Although many additives show consistent benefits under experimental conditions, the transition from laboratory to industry is often slow and fragmented [2]. Scientific development in this field frequently outpaces industry adoption; by the time an additive has demonstrated robust efficacy and safety, newer compounds or combinations are already under evaluation. Consequently, promising innovations risk being underutilized before reaching commercial maturity. Logistical limitations, regulatory frameworks, cost-effectiveness, and the heterogeneity of production systems further contribute to this gap between scientific advances and field implementation. Bridging this divide is essential to ensure that academic progress translates into tangible benefits for producers and consumers.
By addressing these challenges collectively, this Special Issue contributes to a more comprehensive and operational understanding of feed additive development and application. The studies emphasize that successful additive strategies require a multidisciplinary perspective—encompassing nutrition, physiology, microbiology, environmental management, and economics—to ensure solutions that are not only effective and sustainable but also feasible for large-scale aquaculture.

3. Future Perspectives for Aquaculture Feed Additives

Despite substantial progress, several research and practical gaps remain. Optimizing inclusion levels and understanding potential interactions among multiple additives are recurrent challenges [8]. Future studies should explore synergistic effects among bioactive compounds and the ways in which these combinations influence metabolic and immunological pathways. Multi-omics tools—including transcriptomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics—offer valuable opportunities to clarify mechanisms of action and to design precision feeding strategies tailored to specific species, production stages, and rearing conditions [5,6].
Sustainability will continue to be a central theme. Increasing attention is being given to valuing agro-industrial by-products, microbial biomass, and marine macroalgae as promising sources of functional ingredients for aquaculture feeds [1]. Circular economy principles encourage the identification of additive sources that provide both nutritional and ecological value. In parallel, reducing the use of chemotherapeutic agents in aquaculture is an urgent global priority. Functional feed additives that improve immune competence, gut integrity, and stress tolerance represent viable and increasingly validated alternatives, supporting antimicrobial resistance mitigation efforts and aligning with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 2—Zero Hunger, SDG 12—Responsible Consumption and Production, SDG 14—Life Below Water, SDG 15—Life on Land).
Ultimately, progress in feed additive research will depend not only on innovation but also on effective collaboration between academia, industry, and regulatory bodies. Strengthening knowledge transfer mechanisms, promoting transparency in additive evaluation, and fostering co-development with producers are key to accelerating adoption. The collective findings presented in this Special Issue, in concert with ongoing global research efforts, offer valuable guidance toward the responsible and sustainable use of feed additives in aquaculture.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data related to this research are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the grants to A. Jatobá (308661/2023-0) and D. D. Schleder (310247/2025-0); FAPESC (2023/TR001478).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Xu, R.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, R.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Ding, J.; Chang, Y.; Zuo, R. Effect of Dietary Proline on the Growth Performance, Collagen Deposition, and Texture Quality of Sea Cucumbers’ Body Wall (Apostichopus japonicus). Fishes 2025, 10, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10100482.
  • Candela-Maldonado, Y.; Megder, I.; Tefal, E.; Peñaranda, D.S.; Martínez-Llorens, S.; Tomás-Vidal, A.; Jover-Cerdá, M.; Jauralde, I. Four Organic Protein Source Alternatives to Fish Meal for Pacific White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Feeding. Fishes 2025, 10, 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10080384.
  • Dias, M.; Marmelo, I.; António, C.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Marques, A.; Diniz, M.S.; Maulvault, A.L. Asparagopsis taxiformis Feed Supplementation as a Tool to Improve the Resilience of Farmed Diplodus sargus to Marine Heatwave Events—A Metabolomics Approach. Fishes 2025, 10, 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070350.
  • Di, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zuo, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Ding, J.; Chang, Y.; Zuo, R. Effects of Dietary β-Carotene on the Gonadal Color, Pigmentation, and Regulation Mechanisms in Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Fishes 2025, 10, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10070304.
  • Zehra, S.; Abul Kasim, A.S.; Saleh, R.; De Mello, P.; Alshaikhi, A.; Laranja, J.; Alhafedh, Y.; Glencross, B.D.; Alghamdi, M.A.; Mohamed, A.W. Evaluation of Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Novel and Conventional Feed Ingredients in Sobaity Seabream (Sparidentex hasta) for Sustainable Aquaculture. Fishes 2025, 10, 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060265.
  • Wu, C.; Yang, H.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Lv, W.; Ayana, G.U.; Li, M.; Su, D.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, Q. Dietary Supplementation of Astragalus Polysaccharides Modulates Growth Physiology, Metabolic Homeostasis, and Innate Immune Responses in Rice Field Eels (Monopterus albus). Fishes 2025, 10, 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10050213.
  • Athira, A.; Nishiguchi, H.; Hayashi, D.; Otsu, Y.; Miura, C.; Suryadi, I.B.B.; Ali, M.F.Z.; Miura, T. Influence of the Silkworm-Derived (Bombyx mori) Functional Substance (Silkrose-BM) on the Fish Meat Quality of Yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata). Fishes 2025, 10, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10030130.
  • Jatobá, A.; Pereira, M.O.; Jesus, G.F.A.; Dutra, S.A.P.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Owatari, M.S.; Schleder, D.D. Effects of Blending Curcuma longa Hydrolate and Lactobacillus plantarum on the Growth and Health of Nile Tilapia. Fishes 2024, 9, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9120503.
  • Okon, E.; Iyobhebhe, M.; Olatunji, P.; Adeleke, M.; Matekwe, N.; Okocha, R. Feed Additives in Aquaculture: Benefits, Risks, and the Need for Robust Regulatory Frameworks. Fishes 2025, 10, 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10090471.

References

  1. Midhun, S.J.; Arun, D. Alternative feed technology in aquaculture. In Recent Advances in Aquaculture Microbial Technology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zuberi, A.; Kamran, M.; Younus, N.; Abdel-Tawwab, M. Functional feed additives: Current trends. Front. Aquac. 2024, 3, 1385508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mustafa, S.A.; Sanaa, A.; Al-Faragi, J.K. Supplementation of feed additives on aquaculture feeds: A review. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2021, 13, 561–567. [Google Scholar]
  4. Maurya, N.K.; Dubey, S.; Samal, K.; Ramachandra Naik, A.T.; Lakshmipathi, M.T.; Khalasi, B.R.; Shinglai, C.; Singh, K.; Chaturvedi, P.; Yadav, B. Biotechnology in Fisheries and Aquaculture: A Holistic Review of Innovations in Health, Nutrition, and Production. J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol. 2025, 28, 175–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, X.; Ma, W.; Zhang, D.; Tian, Z.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hong, Y. Application of natural antioxidants as feed additives in aquaculture: A review. Biology 2025, 14, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Martin Samuel, A.M.; Król, E. Nutrigenomics and immune function in fish: New insights from omics technologies. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017, 75, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Elumalai, P.; Kurian, A.; Lakshmi, S.; Faggio, C.; Esteban, M.A.; Ringø, E. Herbal immunomodulators in aquaculture. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 2020, 29, 33–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Osei, S.A.; Ayisi, C.L.; Boamah, G.A.; Mensah, G.D. The Circular Economy in Aquaculture and Fisheries: Enhancing Sustainability and Food Security. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2025, 5, 4565–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Moraes, A.V.; Owatari, M.S.; da Silva, E.; de Oliveira Pereira, M.; Piola, M.; Ramos, C.; Farias, D.R.; Scheleder, D.D.; Jesus, G.A.F.; Jatobá, A. Effects of microencapsulated probiotics-supplemented diet on growth, non-specific immunity, intestinal health and resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2022, 287, 115286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jatobá, A.; Schleder, D.D. Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives: Insights from the Special Issue. Fishes 2026, 11, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11010044

AMA Style

Jatobá A, Schleder DD. Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives: Insights from the Special Issue. Fishes. 2026; 11(1):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11010044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jatobá, Adolfo, and Delano Dias Schleder. 2026. "Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives: Insights from the Special Issue" Fishes 11, no. 1: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11010044

APA Style

Jatobá, A., & Schleder, D. D. (2026). Advances in Aquaculture Feed Additives: Insights from the Special Issue. Fishes, 11(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11010044

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop