Next Article in Journal
Embryo Rescue Breeding of New Cold-Resistant, Seedless Grapes
Next Article in Special Issue
Response of Dahlia Photosynthesis and Transpiration to High-Temperature Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Dormancy Characteristics of Euphorbia maculata L. Seeds and Strategies for Their Effective Germination
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of Fatty Acyl-CoA Reductase (FAR) Genes in Dendrobium catenatum and Their Response to Drought Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A B-Box Transcription Factor CoBBX24 from Camellia oleifera Delays Leaf Senescence and Enhances Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis

Institute of Jiangxi Oil-Tea Camellia, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(9), 991; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9090991
Submission received: 24 July 2023 / Revised: 30 August 2023 / Accepted: 31 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023

Abstract

:
Plants face various biotic and abiotic stress factors during their growth and development, among which, drought is a serious adverse factor that affects yield and quality in agriculture and forestry. Several transcription factors are involved in regulating plant responses to drought stress. In this study, the B-box (BBX) transcription factor CoBBX24 was cloned from Camellia oleifera. This gene encodes a 241-amino-acid polypeptide containing two B-box domains at the N-terminus. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that CoBBX24 and CsBBX24 from Camellia sinensis are in the same branch, with their amino acid sequences being identical by 96.96%. CoBBX24 was localized to the nucleus and acted as a transcriptional activator. The overexpression of CoBBX24 in Arabidopsis heightened its drought tolerance along with a relatively high survival rate, and the rate of water loss in the OX-CoBBX24 lines was observably lower than that of the wild-type. Compared to the wild-type, the root lengths of the OX-CoBBX24 lines were significantly inhibited with abscisic acid. Leaf senescence was delayed in the OX-CoBBX24 lines treated with abscisic acid. The expression of genes related to leaf senescence and chlorophyll breakdown (e.g., SAG12, SAG29, NYC1, NYE1, and NYE2) was downregulated in the OX-CoBBX24 lines. This study indicated that CoBBX24 positively regulates the drought tolerance in Arabidopsis through delayed leaf senescence.

1. Introduction

Leaves are the main photosynthetic organs for energy production and nutrient assimilation during plant growth and development [1]. Leaf senescence is the last developmental stage of plant growth and is accompanied by the yellowing of leaves owing to a loss of chlorophyll [2]. In addition to genetic factors, leaf senescence is regulated by environmental factors and phytohormones. For example, darkness, drought, salt stress, and high temperatures can induce leaf senescence [3,4,5,6]. Phytohormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene, are positive regulators of leaf senescence induction [2,7,8,9]. ABA plays a positive role in leaf senescence, with exogenous ABA promoting it [2]. Senescence-associated genes (SAGs) are upregulated during ABA-induced senescence [10]. ABF4, an ABA-responsive element binding factor (ABF), induces SAG29 expression by directly binding to its promoter [11]. The expression of ABF3/4 increases in senescing leaves and induces the expression of SAG12 and SAG29 [11,12,13]. SAG29 is a key molecule involved in environmental stress responses during senescence [14]. NON-YELLOWING (NYE), an Mg-dechelatase, catabolizes the first step of chlorophyll a breakdown [15]. The functional loss of NYE1 and NYE2 results in an almost complete retention of chlorophyll during leaf senescence and produces green seeds in Arabidopsis [16]. NON-YELLOW COLORING 1 (NYC1) is a chlorophyll b reductase that mediates the breakdown of chlorophyll b [17]. The transcript and protein levels of NYC1 are low in green leaves, but increase during darkness-induced senescence [18].
Plants develop complex drought mechanisms by interacting with the external environment to respond to drought stress. Plant responses to drought stress comprise morphological, physiological, and biochemical mechanisms [19,20]. After sensing water-scarcity signals, plants induce the expression of drought-regulated and functional genes [21]. These genes include transcription and signaling factors and stress-inducing, protein-related, osmoregulatory, and antioxidant metabolism-related genes [20,22]. Many transcription factors are related to drought tolerance in plants, including the bZIP, DREB, ABF, MYC, MYB, NAC, WRKY, ERF, bHLH, and BBX proteins [22,23]. The mechanism of BBX family involvement in the drought response of plants has received much attention in recent years.
BBX proteins are a kind of zinc-finger transcription factor comprising one or two B-box domains at the N-terminus; some members have a CONSTANS, CO-like, and TOC1 (CCT) domain at the C-terminus [24,25]. BBX proteins are key regulators of plant growth and developmental processes, involved in seedling morphogenesis, the photoperiodic regulation of flower formation, shading response, anthocyanin accumulation, and responses to biological and abiotic stresses [7,26,27,28,29]. Several BBX transcription factors play critical roles in the drought stress response of plants [30,31]. The rice BBX gene, Ghd2, confers drought sensitivity by upregulating senescence-associated genes (SAGs) in transgenic lines [32]. The heterologous expression of sweet potato IbBBX28 in Arabidopsis decreases the activities of the antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase, in IbBBX28-OX lines, indicating that IbBBX28 negatively regulates drought tolerance [30]. CmBBX22 mediates the ABA response to regulate the drought tolerance in chrysanthemum [33]. BBX plays a pivotal role in chlorophyll breakdown and leaf senescence [34,35]. In apples, MdBBX22 negatively regulates chlorophyll breakdown and leaf senescence by downregulating the transcript levels of MdNYE1 and MdNYC1 [34]. MdBBX37 interacts with MdbHLH93 to promote the expression of MdSAG18 and subsequently induce leaf senescence [35].
Previous reports have shown that AtBBX24 negatively regulates the photomorphogenesis of the UV-B responses in Arabidopsis through interacting with COP1 and HY5 [36]. In addition, BBX24 plays an important role in abiotic stress. It has been reported that AtBBX24 enhances drought and salinity tolerance through ABA signaling in Arabidopsis seeds [37]. The chrysanthemum CmBBX24 confers drought and freezing tolerance by influencing the genes that mediate stress responses and GA biosynthesis [38]. In conclusion, the findings of these studies suggest that BBX genes are involved in regulating the abiotic stress responses in plants, especially the response to drought.
Oil tea tree (Camellia oleifera Abel.), a woody oil tree, is an ornamental and edible plant. They are mainly planted in hilly areas, and their growing environment limits their access to water. As a result, studies on the drought tolerance of oil tea tree and the identification of drought-tolerant genes may help in generating new drought-tolerant species, which have theoretical and practical significance for promoting the development of agriculture and forestry. In this study, we cloned a BBX gene that responds to drought stress and found that the ectopic expression of CoBBX24 enhanced the drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating the expression of SAGs and chlorophyll catabolic genes (CCGs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

In this study, two-year-old oil tea trees (C. oleifera Abel. cv. ‘changlin 4’) were used. Uniform plants were selected, and the third fully expanded leaf from the top was collected and stored at −80 °C after treatment with liquid nitrogen. For the drought treatment, plants in soil were watered well, followed by the withdrawal of water for 15 d. The control group was cultured normally.
Col-0 wild-type (WT) ecotype Arabidopsis was used for genetic transformation. Arabidopsis seeds were sown in 1/2 MS medium, imbibed at 4 °C for three days in the dark, and then cultured at 22/18 °C for 10 d within a light incubator (day/night, 14/10 h). The seedlings were transferred to a planter (peat soil:vermiculite, 1:2) and grown for two weeks. Water was provided before the drought treatment, and then we stopped watering the four-week-old plants for the subsequent 15 d. After re-watering for seven days, the survival rate of the plants was determined. To detect the water loss in the OX-CoBBX24 transgenic lines and WT plants, whole rosettes of 21-day-old plants were cut from the base and placed at room temperature to make them lose water naturally, then weighed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h to calculate the percentage of their weight reduction in 0 h. The experiment was repeated three times, with each replicate consisting of ten plants per genotype.

2.2. RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

The total RNA was extracted from the Arabidopsis or oil tea tree tissues using a StarSpin Plant RNA Kit (GenStar, Beijing, China) and reverse-transcribed using HiScript III RT SuperMix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). qPCR was used to analyze the expression of genes using an SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Actin2 and Tub3α were served as the reference genes for normalization in the Arabidopsis and oil tea trees, severally. The reaction mixture contained 1 μL of cDNA, 10 μL of 2× ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR master mix, and 4 pmol of each primer. Fold changes in expression were computed using the 2−ΔΔCt method [39]. The experiment included three biological replicates. Each sample was run in three technical replicates with the following parameters: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. All the primers are listed in Supplemental Table S1.

2.3. Isolation and Sequence Analysis of CoBBX24

The open reading frame (ORF) of CoBBX24 from the oil tea trees was cloned into a pMD19-T (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) vector using PCR with the primers CoBBX24-ORF-F/R (Table S1). The CoBBX24 sequence was aligned with nine homologous sequences from other species by the means of the DNAMAN version 6.0 software, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA 5 software based on the neighbor-joining method and 1000 bootstrap replicates.

2.4. Subcellular Localization Analysis of CoBBX24

The ORF of CoBBX24 was amplified using primers containing EcoRI and NotI sites. The amplicons and pORE-R4-35SAA vector were digested using EcoRI and NotI, and the products were ligated using a T4 DNA ligase (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) to generate pORE-R4-35SAA-CoBBX24 fusions [40]. The p35S::D53-RFP construct, as a nuclear marker, was co-transformed with pORE-R4-35SAA-CoBBX24 (35S::GFP-CoBBX24) [41]. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying these constructs was injected into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves for transient expression. The infiltrated leaves were observed after 72 h using a ZEISS LSM 780 microsystem (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.5. Transactivation Activity Analysis of CoBBX24

To examine the transcriptional activity of CoBBX24, the ORF of CoBBX24 was amplified using primers containing EcoRI and BamHI sites. Both amplicons and the pGBKT7 vector were digested using EcoRI and BamHI, and the products were ligated using a T4 DNA ligase (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) to generate pGBKT7-CoBBX24 fusions. pCL1 and pGBKT7 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively (pCL1 is a positive-control plasmid that encodes the full-length, wild-type GAL4 protein). Plasmids were introduced into the Y2H Gold strain (Coolaber, Beijing, China). The experimental method was according to Matchmaker™ GAL4 Two-Hybrid System 3 & Libraries User Manual. pGBKT7-CoBBX24 or pGBKT7 transformants were cultivated on the medium lack of Tryptophan (Trp) amino acid, whereas pCL1 was cultivated on the medium lack of Leucine (Leu) amino acid for three days at 30 °C. The selected clones were then transferred to the medium lack of Histidine (His) and Adenine (Ade), with or without X-α-Gal, to observe the cell growth and blue appearance.

2.6. Transformation of Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis transformants were generated by introducing pORE-R4-35SAA-CoBBX24 into the Col-0 ecotype using the floral dip way. Transgenic plants were chosen via the germination of seeds on 1/2 MS medium containing 10 mg/L of kanamycin. The screened plants with true leaves were transplanted into soil, and the genome of the Arabidopsis leaves was extracted after two weeks of growth. The primers CoBBX24-F/R were used to analyze the transfer of CoBBX24. Semiquantitative PCR detected the expression of CoBBX24 in the transformants of the T3 generation using the primers RT-CoBBX24-F/R.

2.7. ABA Treatment of Transgenic Arabidopsis

For the ABA treatments, Arabidopsis seeds were sown on 1/2 MS plates for four days and then transplanted to media containing 3 μM of ABA. Root length was surveyed after the sixth day. Detached leaves were taken from four-week-old plants and incubated in water or 20 mL of 100 μM ABA solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) under dark conditions. After two days of treatment, the leaves were transferred to clean plates for photography. For the ABA treatment of attached leaves, four-week-old plants were sprayed on their leaves with 100 μM of ABA, and samples were collected after 24 h [11].

2.8. Determination of Chlorophyll Content

The leaves from four-week-old Arabidopsis plants in soil were detached and soaked in a 100 μM ABA solution for two days. The fresh weights of the samples were determined, and their chlorophyll was extracted with 95% ethanol for 48 h in the dark and measured spectrophotometrically at 663 and 645 nm [37]. The chlorophyll concentration was calculated as described previously [11].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS v.20 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01) was used to decide striking differences in the results of the water loss assays in Arabidopsis, and Duncan’s multiple-range test (p < 0.05) was used to analyze striking differences in the other results.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of CoBBX24

The BBX transcription factor gene, CoBBX24, isolated from oil tea trees, encodes a 241-amino-acid protein with a calculated molecular weight of 26.83 kDa. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that CoBBX24 was highly similar to CsBBX24 from Camellia sinensis (Figure 1A). Phylogenetic tree clustering showed that CoBBX24 was grouped with AtBBX24 in Arabidopsis (Figure S1). A BLASTP search showed that CoBBX24 was similar to the BBX proteins from several plant species and contained the characteristics of the structure group IV members of the BBX family. A sequence analysis demonstrated that CoBBX24 had two conserved B-box domains in the N-terminus, but no CCT domain in the C-terminus (Figure 1B).

3.2. Subcellular Localization, Transcriptional Activation, and Transcriptional Profiling of CoBBX24

We determined the fluorescence signals of the CoBBX24 fused with green fluorescent protein (35S::GFP-CoBBX24) following its transient expression in the leaves of N. benthamiana. The green fluorescent signals of the 35S::GFP-CoBBX24 fusion protein were detected in the nucleus and colocalized with the sites of the deposition of the red fluorescent signal of the positive nuclear marker protein (35S::D53-RFP) (Figure 2C). This indicated that CoBBX24 is localized in the nucleus, similar to other transcription factors.
Next, we implemented a transactivation assay using yeast cells. Sequences encoding the ORF of CoBBX24 were inserted into the expression vector pGBKT7, and the construct was transformed into the yeast Y2H Gold strain. The yeast cells harboring the positive control pCL1 and pGBKT7-CoBBX24 construct grew well on SD/-His-Ade medium and turned blue on the SD/-Ade-His medium supplemented with X-α-gal; however, the yeast cells containing the negative control pGBKT7 were unable to grow on the SD/-His-Ade medium. These findings imply that CoBBX24 acts as a transcriptional activator in yeast cells (Figure 2B).
qRT-PCR was performed to investigate the transcriptional profile of CoBBX24 in oil tea trees. The expression levels of CoBBX24 were decreased at the 3 and 12 h points (Figure S2A), which is consistent with natural drought in soil for a long time. After 12 d of drought stress, the expression of the CoBBX24 transcript demonstrated a 5.6-fold decrease relative to the untreated plants (Figure 2A). The expression levels of CoBBX24 were decreased at the 6 and 12 h points with ABA treatment (Figure S2B).

3.3. Overexpression of CoBBX24 Confers Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis

To study the function of CoBBX24 in Arabidopsis, three homozygous T3 lines with ectopic expression (OX-CoBBX24-1#, 3#, and 4#) were selected for a phenotypic analysis. The levels of CoBBX24 expression in each transgenic line were detected (Figure S3). The OX-CoBBX24 lines exhibited an improved drought tolerance. Under drought conditions, almost all the OX-CoBBX24 lines demonstrated mild damage following vigorous growth, whereas most WT plants died (Figure 3A). In one experiment, the survival rate of the WT seedlings was 25%, and those of the OX-CoBBX24-1#, 3#, and 4# lines were 52.78%, 83.33%, and 72.22%, respectively (Figure 3B). The water loss rate of the leaves was obviously lower in the OX-CoBBX24 lines than that in the WT plants (Figure 3C). The findings imply that CoBBX24 increases the drought tolerance of transgenic plants.

3.4. Overexpression of CoBBX24 in Arabidopsis Improves ABA Sensitivity

ABA is a stress hormone that plays a critical role in drought stress responses. To assess whether the drought tolerance of the overexpression lines was related to ABA, the main root lengths of the WT and OX-CoBBX24 plants were measured after outside ABA treatment. No striking difference in root lengths was observed between the WT and overexpression plants when the medium was free of exogenous ABA (Figure 4A). Growth on a medium containing 3 μM of ABA resulted in a more severe inhibition of root growth in the OX-CoBBX24 plants compared to the WT plants (Figure 4B). The seed germination rate and proportion of green cotyledon in the OX-CoBBX24 plants were lower than those in the WT plants under ABA treatment, while 55% of the WT cotyledons turned green, the proportion for the three OE lines was much lower, and the rates of green cotyledon of the OX-CoBBX24 plants were 25%, 30%, and 40% (Figure S4), indicating that the overexpression of CoBBX24 in Arabidopsis increases ABA sensitivity.

3.5. Overexpression of CoBBX24 Reduces ABA-Induced Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis

ABA is a key regulator of the drought stress response in plants and an active regulator of leaf senescence [42,43]. Exogenously applied ABA can facilitate chlorophyll breakdown [44]. To explore the phenotypic effects of ABA treatment on OX-CoBBX24 and WT Arabidopsis plants, detached leaves were treated with 100 μM of ABA after being maintained for 2 d under dark conditions. The leaves of the OX-CoBBX24 lines were maintained green, whereas the WT leaves turned significantly yellow (Figure 5A). In compliance with these visible phenotypes, the chlorophyll content in the OX-CoBBX24 leaves was higher than that in the WT leaves (Figure 5B).

3.6. CoBBX24 Regulates the Transcription of SAGs and CCGs in Arabidopsis

We observed that the transgenic leaves exhibited a delayed senescence phenotype under ABA treatment. Given that the products of SAG12, SAG29, NYE1, NYE2, and NYC1 were labels of leaf senescence, we examined the transcript levels of these genes in the OX-CoBBX24 lines and WT plants using qRT-PCR. The transcript levels of these genes were downregulated in the transgenic plants with ABA treatment (Figure 6), which is consistent with the observation that the leaves showed delayed senescence in the OX-CoBBX24 lines. The transcription factor ABF4 can directly induce SAG29 expression [11]. The abundance of the ABF4 transcript was downregulated in the transgenic plants. Our findings indicate that CoBBX24 negatively regulates the transcript levels of ABF4, SAG12, SAG29, NYE1, NYE2, and NYC1, delaying chlorophyll breakdown and leaf senescence in Arabidopsis.

4. Discussion

BBX proteins are a kind of zinc-finger transcription factor comprising one or two B-box domains, with some members also having a CCT domain. In Arabidopsis, the B-box family consists of 32 proteins and is divided into five subgroups according to their structural domains [45,46]. CoBBX24 contains two B-box domains belonging to the fourth subgroup. BBX24 was originally cloned from Arabidopsis as a Salt-Tolerant Protein (STO) [47]. It fully complements the phenotype of the yeast mutant and enhances the salt tolerance of WT yeast [47]. In Arabidopsis, the overexpression of BBX24 (STO) enhances salt tolerance compared to that observed in WT [48]. Transgenic chrysanthemum lines with a suppressed expression of CmBBX24 (CmBBX24-RNAi) demonstrate a decreased tolerance to drought stress and reduced transcript levels of the genes related to carbohydrate metabolism and soluble substances [38]. In this study, we observed that the ectopic expression of CoBBX24 enhanced the drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating the expressions of SAGs and CCGs. In our previous report, the heterologous expression of CmBBX22 in Arabidopsis led to delayed leaf senescence and an improved drought tolerance [33]. BBX22 and BBX24 are members of the fourth subfamily, and these findings indicate a conserved role for BBX genes in plant drought responses. Interestingly, the CoBBX24 expression was down-regulated in the oil tea trees with drought stress, which was consistent with previous reports. The amounts of SsBBX24 transcript decreased in the leaves of 2-week-old phytotron-grown, water-deprived S. sogarandinum plants [49]. The expression of AtBBX24 decreased in Arabidopsis seeds is strongly repressed by PEG stress [37]. It is very interesting that the BBX24 expression was down-regulated, but it positively regulates the drought tolerance in plants.
Leaf senescence is the last developmental stage of plant growth, and a feature of leaf senescence is chloroplast breakdown [50]. CCGs, including NYC1, NYE1/SGR1, NYE2/SGR2, and PHEOPHORBIDE a OXYGENASE (PaO), play key roles in regulating chlorophyll breakdown [51]. Drought-induced leaf senescence happens gradually, and previous studies have shown that some genes are involved in senescence and also play crucial roles in stress response [52,53]. The overexpression of GhTZF1 enhanced drought tolerance and delayed drought-induced leaf senescence through regulating the expression of antioxidant genes and SAGs in transgenic Arabidopsis [54]. The overexpression of GhWRKY91 delayed leaf senescence and improved drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [55]. NtNAC028 loss-of-function tobacco plants showed delayed leaf senescence and an increased tolerance to drought stress [56]. It has been hypothesized that these genes integrate different signaling pathways and play important roles between stress responses and senescence. Kim et al. (2018) reported that transcription factors critically contribute to leaf senescence [51]. Several transcription factors, including NAC, NAP, bHLH, MYC, and BBX, are involved in leaf senescence through regulating the expression of SAGs [57,58,59,60]. In this study, we identified the role of CoBBX24 in leaf senescence and found that the plants overexpressing CoBBX24 had relatively low rates of ABA-induced leaf senescence and chlorophyll degradation, consistent with the relatively high tolerance of plants overexpressing CoBBX24 to drought stress. MdBBX22 interacted with MdABI5 in apples to suppress the transcriptional activity of MdNYE1 and MdNYC1, thereby negatively regulating chlorophyll degradation and leaf senescence [7]. It is speculated that CoBBX24 may have a similar function, but additional research is needed to obtain a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CoBBX24 in drought response.
ABA plays an active role in regulating leaf senescence. ABFs are critically involved in initiating the ABA response [61]. ABF4 promotes chlorophyll breakdown and leaf senescence by increasing the expressions of CCGs and SAGs in Arabidopsis through an ABA-dependent pathway [11]. Exogenous ABA promotes the transcription of NYC1, NYE1, and PaO, implying that multiple genes are involved in regulating chlorophyll breakdown during ABA-induced leaf senescence [58]. SAGs are upregulated during ABA-induced senescence, and SAG29 is a molecular link that integrates environmental stress responses with the senescence process [10,14]. The transcript levels of ABF4, SAG12, SAG29, NYE1, NYE2, and NYC1 were decreased in the OX-CoBBX24 plants under ABA treatment (Figure 6), which was consistent with the observation of delayed leaf senescence in the OX-CoBBX24 lines. DREB2A is one of the main regulators of drought, and the expression level of DREB2A in the OX-CoBBX24 plants was significantly higher than that in the WT plants after the drought treatment (Figure S5). The expression of the CoDREB2A transcript in the oil tea trees also increased after 12 d of drought stress (Figure S2C). However, the mechanism of CoBBX24 repressed under drought stress remains to be explored.
ABA is a stress-related signaling molecule that regulates stress responses, including drought stress in higher plants [62]. The response to drought stress during the vegetative growth period correlates with the sensitivity of seedlings to ABA. During germination and seedling growth, the constitutive expression of VvNAC17 in Arabidopsis enhances its sensitivity to ABA, which heightens its stomatal closure and reduces its water loss, increasing its drought tolerance [63]. The constitutive expression of TaNTL1 in Arabidopsis enhances its drought tolerance, and the germination of transgenic seeds was hypersensitive to ABA [64]. However, the relationship between ABA sensitivity in seedlings and drought response during the vegetative growth stage is not always relevant. In Arabidopsis, the abo3 mutant is hypersensitive to ABA during seedling establishment and seedling growth; however, this mutant is less drought-tolerant than the WT [65]. In the present study, the root growth of the OX-CoBBX24 lines was inhibited more severely than that of the WT plants (Figure 4B), and the proportion of green cotyledon in the OX-CoBBX24 plants was lower than that of the WT on a medium containing 0.2 µM of ABA. (Figure S4). These findings indicate that CoBBX24 regulates ABA signaling during seedling growth.
Overall, CoBBX24 plays a pivotal role in drought stress responses by regulating ABA signaling, SAGs, and CCGs. The downregulation of ABF4, SAG12, SAG29, NYE1, NYE2, and NYC1 in OX-CoBBX24 lines delays chlorophyll breakdown and leaf senescence. This functional characterization of CoBBX24 provides new insights into drought stress responses and their underlying regulatory networks.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the function of a BBX gene that responds to drought stress and found that the ectopic expression of CoBBX24 enhanced the drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating the expressions of SAGs and CCGs. Our results suggest that CoBBX24 plays an important role in drought tolerance and ABA-induced leaf senescence, identifying an excellent drought tolerance gene for the molecular breeding of oil tea trees. This functional characterization of CoBBX24 provides a new point of view on drought stress responses and their underlying regulatory networks.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae9090991/s1, Figure S1: The phylogenetic tree of the Arabidopsis BBX family and CoBBX24; Figure S2: Transcriptional profiling of CoBBX24 and CoDREB2A under drought stress or ABA treatment; Figure S3: RT-PCR analysis of CoBBX24 expression in WT and transgenic lines; Figure S4: Overexpression of CoBBX24 in Arabidopsis enhanced seedling sensitivity to ABA treatment; Figure S5: qRT-PCR assay to examine the expression of genes in CoBBX24ox and WT plants under drought treatment; Table S1: List of primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Y.L. wrote the manuscript; S.Y. and W.L. conceived the experiments; Y.L. implemented the experiments; Z.Z. review the manuscript; Y.G. and C.Y. provided technical support; L.Z. contributed to plants transformation; Y.W. data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Jiangxi Youth Science Foundation (20202BABL215016 to Y.L.), Jiangxi Science and Technology Research Project of Education (GJJ2201934 to Y.L.), Jiangxi Youth Science Foundation (20202BAB215007 to S.Y.), and Jiangxi Science and Technology Research Project of Education (GJJ201822 to Y.G.).

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data is available from the NCBI, CoBBX24 accession: OR419731.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woo, H.R.; Kim, H.J.; Lim, P.O.; Nam, H.G. Leaf senescence: Systems and dynamics aspects. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 347–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, I.C.; Hong, S.W.; Whang, S.S.; Lim, P.O.; Nam, H.G.; Koo, J.C. Age-dependent action of an ABA-inducible receptor kinase, RPK1, as a positive regulator of senescence in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Z.R.; Gao, M.; Li, Y.F.; Zhang, J.L.; Su, H.; Cao, M.; Liu, Z.J.; Zhang, X.C.; Zhao, B.; Guo, Y.D.; et al. The transcription factor SlWRKY37 positively regulates jasmonic acid- and dark-induced leaf senescence in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 6207–6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Janack, B.; Sosoi, P.; Krupinska, K.; Humbeck, K. Knockdown of WHIRLY1 affects drought stress-induced leaf senescence and histone modifications of the senescence-associated gene HvS40. Plants 2016, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, S.J.; Guo, Y.S.; Joan, H.I.; Tu, Y.G.; Adil, M.F.; Sehar, S.; Zhao, D.G.; Shamsi, I.H. iTRAQ-based comparative proteomic analysis reveals high temperature accelerated leaf senescence of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) during flue-curing. Genomics 2020, 112, 3075–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dong, S.W.; Sang, L.J.; Xie, H.L.; Chai, M.F.; Wang, Z.Y. Comparative transcriptome analysis of salt stress-induced leaf senescence in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 666660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. An, J.P.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, X.W.; Bi, S.Q.; You, C.X.; Hao, Y.J. MdBBX22 regulates UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis through regulating the function of MdHY5 and is targeted by MdBT2 for 26S proteasome-mediated degradation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 2231–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Quirino, B.F.; Noh, Y.S.; Himelblau, E.; Amasino, R.M. Molecular aspects of leaf senescence. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smith, L.M. Salicylic acid, senescence, and heterosis. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.H.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.C.; Peng, J.Y.; Guo, H.W.; Luo, J.C. LSD 2.0: An update of the leaf senescence database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 1200–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, S.; Gao, J.; Zhu, X.Y.; Song, Y.; Li, Z.P.; Ren, G.D.; Zhou, X.; Kuai, B.K. ABF2, ABF3, and ABF4 promote ABA-mediated chlorophyll degradation and leaf senescence by transcriptional activation of chlorophyll catabolic genes and senescence-associated genes in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1272–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, Y.; Chan, Z.L.; Gao, J.H.; Xing, L.; Cao, M.J.; Yu, C.M.; Hu, Y.L.; You, J.; Shi, H.T.; Zhu, Y.F.; et al. ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, G.Y.; Cheng, Q.; Zhao, Y.T.; Wu, F.F.; Mu, B.B.; Gao, J.P.; Yang, L.; Yan, J.L.; Zhang, H.F.; Cui, X.; et al. The abscisic acid-responsive element binding factors MAPKKK18 module regulates abscisic acid-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2023, 299, 103060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seo, P.J.; Park, J.M.; Kang, S.K.; Kim, S.G.; Park, C.M. An Arabidopsis senescence-associated protein SAG29 regulates cell viability under high salinity. Planta 2011, 233, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Z.P.; Wu, S.X.; Chen, J.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Gao, J.; Ren, G.D.; Kuai, B.K. NYEs/SGRs-mediated chlorophyll degradation is critical for detoxification during seed maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2017, 92, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, S.X.; Li, Z.P.; Yang, L.F.; Xie, Z.K.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, T.Q.; Gao, S.; Gao, J.; Zhu, Y.H.; et al. NON-YELLOWING2 (NYE2), a close paralog of NYE1, plays a positive role in chlorophyll degradation in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 624–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sato, Y.; Morita, R.; Katsuma, S.; Nishimura, M.; Tanaka, A.; Kusaba, M. Two short-chain dehydrogenase/reductases, NON-YELLOW COLORING 1 and NYC1-LIKE, are required for chlorophyll b and light-harvesting complex II degradation during senescence in rice. Plant J. 2009, 57, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jia, T.; Ito, H.; Hu, X.Y.; Tanaka, A. Accumulation of the NON-YELLOW COLORING 1 protein of the chlorophyll cycle requires chlorophyll b in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2015, 81, 586–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, J.; Peng, Y.F.; Xu, W.F. Crop root responses to drought stress: Molecular mechanisms, nutrient regulations, and interactions with microorganisms in the rhizosphere. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Anjum, S.A.; Xie, X.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Saleem, M.F.; Man, C.; Lei, W. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 2026–2032. [Google Scholar]
  21. Marias, D.E.; Meinzer, F.C.; Still, C. Impacts of leaf age and heat stress duration on photosynthetic gas exchange and foliar nonstructural carbohydrates in Coffea arabica. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1297–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fang, Y.J.; Xiong, L.Z. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol. Life. Sci. 2015, 72, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Crocco, C.D.; Botto, J.F. BBX proteins in green plants: Insights into their evolution, structure, feature and functional diversification. Gene 2013, 531, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, H.L.; Marquardt, K.; Indorf, M.; Jutt, D.; Kircher, S.; Neuhaus, G. Nuclear localization and interaction with COP1 are required for STO/BBX24 function during photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1772–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ding, L.; Wang, S.; Song, Z.T.; Jiang, Y.; Han, J.J.; Lu, S.J.; Li, L.; Liu, J.X. Two B-Box domain proteins, BBX18 and BBX23, interact with ELF3 and regulate thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 1718–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Valverde, F.; Mouradov, A.; Soppe, W.; Ravenscroft, D.; Samach, A.; Coupland, G. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 2004, 303, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Crocco, C.D.; Holm, M.; Yanovsky, M.J.; Botto, J.F. AtBBX21 and COP1 genetically interact in the regulation of shade avoidance. Plant J. 2010, 64, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, H.; Gao, S.P.; Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.T.; Huo, J.X.; Ren, Z.T.; Zhao, N.; et al. IbBBX24 promotes the jasmonic acid pathway and enhances fusarium wilt resistance in sweet potato. Plant Cell. 2020, 32, 1102–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, J.J.; Zhao, C.L.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.C.; He, L.H.; Tang, R.M.; Wang, W.B.; Jia, X.Y. The sweet potato B-box transcription factor gene IbBBX28 negatively regulates drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 1077958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Gao, X.R.; Dai, Z.R.; Cui, Y.F.; Zhi, Y.H.; Liu, Q.C.; Zhai, H.; Gao, S.P.; et al. The IbBBX24-IbTOE3-IbPRX17 module enhances abiotic stress tolerance by scavenging reactive oxygen species in sweet potato. New Phytol. 2002, 233, 1133–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, J.H.; Shen, J.Q.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.H.; Xiao, J.H.; Xiong, L.Z. Ghd2, a CONSTANS-like gene, confers drought sensitivity through regulation of senescence in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5785–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, Y.N.; Cheng, H.; Cheng, P.L.; Wang, C.M.; Li, J.Y.; Liu, Y.; Song, A.P.; Chen, S.M.; Chen, F.D.; Wang, L.K.; et al. The BBX gene CmBBX22 negatively regulates drought stress tolerance in chrysanthemum. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. An, J.P.; Zhang, X.W.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, J.C.; Wang, X.F.; You, C.X.; Hao, Y.J. MdABI5 works with its interaction partners to regulate abscisic acid-mediated leaf senescence in apple. Plant J. 2021, 105, 1566–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. An, J.P.; Zhang, C.L.; Li, H.L.; Wang, G.L.; You, C.X. Apple SINA E3 ligase MdSINA3 negatively mediates JA-triggered leaf senescence by ubiquitinating and degrading the MdBBX37 protein. Plant J. 2022, 111, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.F.; Björn, L.O.; He, J.X.; Li, S.S. Arabidopsis STO/BBX24 negatively regulates UV-B signaling by interacting with COP1 and repressing HY5 transcriptional activity. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 1046–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chiriotto, T.S.; Saura-Sánchez, M.; Barraza, C.; Botto, J.F. BBX24 increases saline and osmotic tolerance through ABA signaling in Arabidopsis seeds. Plants 2023, 12, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, Y.J.; Ma, C.; Xu, Y.J.; Wei, Q.; Imtiaz, M.; Lan, H.B.; Gao, S.; Cheng, L.N.; Wang, M.Y.; Fei, Z.J.; et al. A zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in chrysanthemum by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2038–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Coutu, C.; Brandle, J.; Brown, D.; Brown, K.; Miki, B.; Simmonds, J.; Hegedus, D.D. pORE: A modular binary vector series suited for both monocot and dicot plant transformation. Transgenic Res. 2007, 16, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, T.; Qu, Y.X.; Wang, H.B.; Wang, J.J.; Song, A.P.; Hu, Y.H.; Chen, S.M.; Jiang, J.F.; Chen, F.D. The heterologous expression of a chrysanthemum TCP-P transcription factor CmTCP14 suppresses organ size and delays senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. He, P.; Osaki, M.; Takebe, M.; Shinano, T.; Wasaki, J. Endogenous hormones and expression of senescence-related genes in different senescent types of maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1117–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dong, H.Z.; Niu, Y.H.; Li, W.J.; Zhang, D.M. Effects of cotton rootstock on endogenous cytokinins and abscisic acid in xylem sap and leaves in relation to leaf senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Breeze, E.; Harrison, E.; McHattie, S.; Hughes, L.; Hickman, R.; Hill, C.; Kiddle, S.; Kim, Y.S.; Penfold, C.A.; Jenkins, D.; et al. High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 873–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khanna, R.; Kronmiller, B.; Maszle, D.R.; Coupland, G.; Holm, M.; Mizuno, T.; Wu, S.H. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3416–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gangappa, S.N.; Botto, J.F. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lippuner, V.; Cyert, M.S.; Gasser, C.S. Two classes of plant cDNA clones differentially complement yeast calcineurin mutants and increase salt tolerance of wild-type yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 12859–12866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nagaoka, S.; Takano, T. Salt tolerance-related protein STO binds to a Myb transcription factor homologue and confers salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2231–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kiełbowicz-Matuk, A.; Rey, P.; Rorat, T. Interplay between circadian rhythm, time of the day and osmotic stress constraints in the regulation of the expression of a Solanum Double B-box gene. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Woo, H.R.; Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Lim, P.O. Plant senescence: How plants know when and how to die. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, J.; Kim, J.H.; Lyu, J.I.; Woo, H.R.; Lim, P.O. New insights into the regulation of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Guo, Y.F.; Gan, S.S. Convergence and divergence in gene expression profiles induced by leaf senescence and 27 senescence-promoting hormonal, pathological and environmental stress treatments. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 644–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jan, S.; Abbas, N.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmad, P. Roles of potential plant hormones and transcription factors in controlling leaf senescence and drought tolerance. Protoplasma 2019, 256, 313–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, T.; Yang, X.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.L. GhTZF1 regulates drought stress responses and delays leaf senescence by inhibiting reactive oxygen species accumulation in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 85, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gu, L.J.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.C.; Wei, H.L.; Wang, H.T.; Yu, S.X. The cotton GhWRKY91 transcription factor mediates leaf senescence and responses to drought stress in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 29, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wen, C.L.; Liu, T.; Deng, Z.C.; Zhang, Z.L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, W.F.; Li, W.; Guo, Y.F. Characterization of NAC transcription factor NtNAC028 as a regulator of leaf senescence and stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 941026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, S.; Gao, J.; Yao, L.Y.; Ren, G.D.; Zhu, X.Y.; Gao, S.; Qiu, K.; Zhou, X.; Kuai, B.K. The role of ANAC072 in the regulation of chlorophyll degradation during age- and dark-induced leaf senescence. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 1729–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, J.D.; Worley, E.; Udvardi, M. A NAP-AAO3 regulatory module promotes chlorophyll degradation via ABA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4862–4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qi, T.C.; Wang, J.J.; Huang, H.; Liu, B.; Gao, H.; Liu, Y.L.; Song, S.S.; Xie, D.X. Regulation of jasmonate-induced leaf senescence by antagonism between bHLH subgroup IIIe and IIId factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1634–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cao, J.; Liu, H.R.; Tan, S.Y.; Li, Z.H. Transcription factors-regulated leaf senescence: Current knowledge, challenges and approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Soon, F.F.; Ng, L.M.; Zhou, X.E.; West, G.M.; Kovach, A.; Tan, M.H.; Suino-Powell, K.M.; He, Y.; Xu, Y.; Chalmers, M.J.; et al. Molecular mimicry regulates ABA signaling by SnRK2 kinases and PP2C phosphatases. Science 2012, 335, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lim, C.; Kang, K.; Shim, Y.; Yoo, S.C.; Paek, N.C. Inactivating transcription factor OsWRKY5 enhances drought tolerance through abscisic acid signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 1900–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ju, Y.L.; Yue, X.F.; Min, Z.; Wang, X.H.; Fang, Y.L.; Zhang, J.X. VvNAC17, a novel stress-responsive grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) NAC transcription factor, increases sensitivity to abscisic acid and enhances salinity, freezing, and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sun, H.M.; Xie, Y.Z.; Yang, W.B.; Lv, Q.; Chen, L.P.; Li, J.T.; Meng, Y.; Li, L.Q.; Li, X.J. Membrane-bound transcription factor TaNTL1 positively regulates drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 182, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ren, X.Z.; Chen, Z.Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.R.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Q.; Hong, X.H.; Zhu, J.K.; Gong, Z.Z. ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 63, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic characteristics and structural domains of CoBBX24. (A) Phylogenetic evaluation of CoBBX24 and other plant BBX proteins. The phylogenetic trees were derived using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with a bootstrap value of 1000 replicates. Bootstrap values indicate the divergence of each branch, with the scale representing the branch length. Red triangle indicate the protein sequence from Camellia oleifera. (B) Alignment of the deduced polypeptide sequences of CoBBX22 with those of other plant BBXs. Red lines indicate the conserved B1 and B2 B-box domains. The accession numbers of the proteins are: CsBBX24 (XP_028122857.1), VvBBX25 (XP_028122857.1), RcBBX24 (XP_024193584.1), ZjBBX24 (XP_015900039.1), PeBBX24 (XP_015900039.1), PmBBX24 (XP_008222603.1), CaBBX24 (XP_027061493.1), JrBBX24 (XP_018839979.2), and MdBBX24 (XP_028956746.1).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic characteristics and structural domains of CoBBX24. (A) Phylogenetic evaluation of CoBBX24 and other plant BBX proteins. The phylogenetic trees were derived using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with a bootstrap value of 1000 replicates. Bootstrap values indicate the divergence of each branch, with the scale representing the branch length. Red triangle indicate the protein sequence from Camellia oleifera. (B) Alignment of the deduced polypeptide sequences of CoBBX22 with those of other plant BBXs. Red lines indicate the conserved B1 and B2 B-box domains. The accession numbers of the proteins are: CsBBX24 (XP_028122857.1), VvBBX25 (XP_028122857.1), RcBBX24 (XP_024193584.1), ZjBBX24 (XP_015900039.1), PeBBX24 (XP_015900039.1), PmBBX24 (XP_008222603.1), CaBBX24 (XP_027061493.1), JrBBX24 (XP_018839979.2), and MdBBX24 (XP_028956746.1).
Horticulturae 09 00991 g001
Figure 2. Transcriptional profiling of CoBBX24 under drought stress, transactivation analysis, and subcellular localization of CoBBX24. (A) Relative expression of CoBBX24 under drought. Camellia oleifera Tub3α was used as the reference gene for normalization. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD); n = 3. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). (B) Transactivation activity analysis of the CoBBX24 protein in yeast cells. pCL1 served as a positive control, and pGBKT7 served as a negative control. (C) Subcellular localization of CoBBX24 in tobacco (N. benthamiana) cells. 35S::D53-RFP was used as a nuclear marker. Bars: 20 μm.
Figure 2. Transcriptional profiling of CoBBX24 under drought stress, transactivation analysis, and subcellular localization of CoBBX24. (A) Relative expression of CoBBX24 under drought. Camellia oleifera Tub3α was used as the reference gene for normalization. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD); n = 3. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). (B) Transactivation activity analysis of the CoBBX24 protein in yeast cells. pCL1 served as a positive control, and pGBKT7 served as a negative control. (C) Subcellular localization of CoBBX24 in tobacco (N. benthamiana) cells. 35S::D53-RFP was used as a nuclear marker. Bars: 20 μm.
Horticulturae 09 00991 g002
Figure 3. Overexpression of CoBBX24 enhanced the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis under drought stress. (A) Phenotypes of 3-week-old CoBBX24 transgenic and WT plants withheld water for 15 d followed by recovery for 7 d with regular watering. Three independent assays were performed with similar findings. (B) Survival rates of CoBBX24 transgenic and WT plants after 7 d of re-watering following a 15 d drought treatment. Three independent experiments were performed, a total of 118 plants were counted for each genotype. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.01). (C) Water loss from detached leaves of CoBBX24 transgenic lines and WT plants. The data are presented as means ± SD of three replicates. * represents a significant difference compared with WT; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 in the Student’s test.
Figure 3. Overexpression of CoBBX24 enhanced the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis under drought stress. (A) Phenotypes of 3-week-old CoBBX24 transgenic and WT plants withheld water for 15 d followed by recovery for 7 d with regular watering. Three independent assays were performed with similar findings. (B) Survival rates of CoBBX24 transgenic and WT plants after 7 d of re-watering following a 15 d drought treatment. Three independent experiments were performed, a total of 118 plants were counted for each genotype. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (p < 0.01). (C) Water loss from detached leaves of CoBBX24 transgenic lines and WT plants. The data are presented as means ± SD of three replicates. * represents a significant difference compared with WT; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 in the Student’s test.
Horticulturae 09 00991 g003
Figure 4. The constitutive expression of CoBBX24 in A. thaliana enhanced root length sensitivity to ABA treatment. (A) Seedlings grown on 1/2 MS plates for 4 d followed by transfer to media containing 3 μM ABA; Bars: 1 cm. (B) The root length measured on the 6th d post-transfer. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. The constitutive expression of CoBBX24 in A. thaliana enhanced root length sensitivity to ABA treatment. (A) Seedlings grown on 1/2 MS plates for 4 d followed by transfer to media containing 3 μM ABA; Bars: 1 cm. (B) The root length measured on the 6th d post-transfer. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Horticulturae 09 00991 g004
Figure 5. The phenotypic effect of ABA treatment on CoBBX24ox and WT Arabidopsis plants. (A) Detached leaves of 4-week-old transgenic plants after maintaining them for 2 d under dark conditions. (B) The chlorophyll content of the leaves shown in (A); significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 5. The phenotypic effect of ABA treatment on CoBBX24ox and WT Arabidopsis plants. (A) Detached leaves of 4-week-old transgenic plants after maintaining them for 2 d under dark conditions. (B) The chlorophyll content of the leaves shown in (A); significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Horticulturae 09 00991 g005
Figure 6. qRT-PCR assay revealed the expression of (A) AtABF4, (B) AtSAG29, (C) AtSAG12, (D) AtNYC1, (E) AtNYE1, and (F) AtNYE2 in CoBBX24ox and WT plants under ABA treatment. The Arabidopsis Actin2 gene was used as the reference gene for normalization. Error bars indicate the SD; n = 3. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Figure 6. qRT-PCR assay revealed the expression of (A) AtABF4, (B) AtSAG29, (C) AtSAG12, (D) AtNYC1, (E) AtNYE1, and (F) AtNYE2 in CoBBX24ox and WT plants under ABA treatment. The Arabidopsis Actin2 gene was used as the reference gene for normalization. Error bars indicate the SD; n = 3. Significant differences were determined by Duncan’s test (** p < 0.01).
Horticulturae 09 00991 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, C.; Ye, S.; Liu, W. A B-Box Transcription Factor CoBBX24 from Camellia oleifera Delays Leaf Senescence and Enhances Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9090991

AMA Style

Liu Y, Zhu Z, Wu Y, Gao Y, Zhang L, Yu C, Ye S, Liu W. A B-Box Transcription Factor CoBBX24 from Camellia oleifera Delays Leaf Senescence and Enhances Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(9):991. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9090991

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yanan, Zhiguo Zhu, Yang Wu, Yinxiang Gao, Lisha Zhang, Changshuai Yu, Sicheng Ye, and Wenxin Liu. 2023. "A B-Box Transcription Factor CoBBX24 from Camellia oleifera Delays Leaf Senescence and Enhances Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis" Horticulturae 9, no. 9: 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9090991

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop