Next Article in Journal
Exogenous Phytohormones: Effects on Lettuce Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Response and Growth
Next Article in Special Issue
Methyl Jasmonate Elicitation for In Vitro Lycorine Accumulation in Three Zephyranthes Species and Comparative Analysis of Tissue-Cultured and Field Grown Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Advancements in Lily Viruses Management: Challenges and Solutions in Elimination and Detection
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Growth and Regeneration of Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes: A Decade of Research
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/horticulturae9070791
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production of Tetraploid Plants from Cotyledons of Diploid Melia volkensii Gürke

by
Constantin Dushimimana
1,2,*,
Katrijn Van Laere
3,
Titus Magomere
2,
Guy Smagghe
1 and
Stefaan P. O. Werbrouck
1,*
1
Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653 and Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Kangemi, Nairobi P.O. Box 29053-00625, Kenya
3
Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food Research (ILVO), Caritasstraat 39, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(7), 791; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070791
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 3 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A New Decade in the Propagation of Horticultural and Medicinal Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polyploidy was induced in Melia volkensii (Mukau), a valuable native tree from the semi-arid regions of East Africa. Cotyledons of diploid M. volkensii (2n = 2x = 28) were treated with oryzalin for 0 (control), 1, 2, or 3 h with or without pretreatment with 1.1 µM thidiazuron. Cotyledons treated with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin for three hours yielded 40% tetraploids. Pretreatment of cotyledons with thidiazuron for 18 days followed by treatment with oryzalin increased tetraploid plant production to 52.5%, but this also yielded more mixoploids. Compared to diploid M. volkensii, the tetraploid in vitro and young potted plants were compacter, with thicker stems, wider leaves, and a low density of longer and wider stomata. In the coming years, tetraploid M. volkensii plants will be observed in field trials and serve as a basis for further breeding efforts.

1. Introduction

Traditional tree breeding methods necessitate a large space, and young trees require a significant amount of vegetative growth before flowering [1]. Furthermore, differences in reproductive cycles in trees [2], particularly in Melia volkensii (Mukau) species of the meliaceae family, which lacks seasonality in flowering [3], may make crosses difficult. Chromosome doubling is an essential technique for tree species breeding because it enriches germplasm banks and breeding programs with synthetic polyploids in a relatively short period of time [4,5].
The development of polyploid plants also offers opportunities to breed new genotypes with improved vigor and quality that are not categorized as genetically modified organisms. The process of chromosome doubling may make it possible to use sterile hybrids as a means to obtain fertile plants [6]. Polyploidization often leads to changes in the size of plant organs and improved tolerance to stress factors [7]. For example, under salt stress conditions, tetraploids of Poncirus trifoliata showed less leaf drop and chlorosis than diploid plants [8]. Autotetraploid plants of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. var. spinosa showed drought tolerance and improved photosynthetic system [9]. Tetraploid Ficus carica L. plants had superior morphological and physiological characteristics, higher phytohormones, phenolic compound content, total soluble sugars and proteins, and low antioxidants [10]. Fetouh et al. [11] reported that tetraploid Ligustrum japonicum showed significant changes in plant growth, leaf morphology, foliage, and alterations in rooting. Tetraploid plants can be distinguished from diploid plants by more chloroplasts and a darker green color [12,13]. The tetraploid Populus had significantly longer and wider stomata and lower stomatal density than the diploid [14,15,16,17]. In Eucalyptus urophylla, chromosome duplication resulted in slower-growing trees with a higher net photosynthetic rate, more giant cells, thicker leaves, and a higher concentration of specific secondary metabolites [18]. The three-year-old tetraploid Melia azedarach developed faster than the diploid and had a bigger trunk and smaller, dark-green leaves [19]. Leaves of tetraploid Mangifera indica had larger chloroplasts, mesophyll cells, and stomatal guard cells, resulting in higher leaf elastic modulus and lower desiccation rates. The enlargement of the xylem and phloem cells resulted in lower hydraulic resistance [20].
In nature, polyploidization occurs through deviations in the sexual reproductive process [21]. Genomic duplications can also be artificially induced by treating explants in vitro or the meristems of plants in the field with antimitotic agents [22]. The most commonly used antimitotic agents are colchicine, oryzalin, and trifluralin [13,23,24]. During mitotic cell division, these antimitotic chemicals act by binding to an essential component for chromosome polar migration during mitosis called microtubules [25,26]. The effectiveness of these drugs in vivo or in vitro is influenced by propagation mechanisms, concentrations, exposure time, explant, and the presence of cells in mitosis [27]. Oryzalin is one of the most effective in promoting chromosome duplication in plants in vitro [13,28,29] and seed treatment in nurseries [30]. Oryzalin concentrations of 200 to 300 µM were effective in doubling chromosomes in pears [31]. The rate of tetraploid induction in Platycladus orientalis, Thuja occidentalis, and T. plicata treated with oryzalin was related to the duration of treatment [32].
Polyploid trees, Melia volkensii among others, may be of interest for forest plantations for providing better wood quality and performance under stress conditions compared to diploid trees [33,34]. Tetraploid Acacia mangium clones that were eight years old had pulp with longer and wider fibers, higher mass, porosity, and tear strength than diploid Acacia mangium clones that were the same age [35]. The polyploid Betula platyphylla resulted in significant increases in the wood’s density as well as its characteristics, lignin content, and cellulose content in comparison to the diploid Betula platyphylla [36]. Tetraploid and triploid Eucalyptus spp. had wider stems and crowns, longer stems, and higher wood density than the diploid [37]. However, no cases of polyploid production have been reported in M. volkensii, which is a multi-purpose tree grown in semi-arid regions in Kenya. Therefore, it is essential to develop a method to induce polyploidy in M. volkensii. The first generation may have interesting morphology and physiology. Subsequent tetraploid or triploid generations may yield novel gene combinations that may provide physiological novelties. An experiment was set up to investigate the effects of oryzalin on the in vitro induction of tetraploid in M. volkensii trees and to compare the characteristics of diploid and tetraploid trees. We describe here a method to produce polyploid M. volkensii plants. To this end, we take advantage of the ease with which adventitious shoots can be induced on cotyledons in vitro [38]. Tetraploid plants were then morphologically evaluated for their potential added value for further breeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Initiation

Melia volkensii seeds were obtained from Better Globe Forestry Ltd. (BGF), Kenya. The seeds were rinsed with 70% ethanol for one minute, sterilized externally with 15% bleach (5% sodium hypochlorite) plus 0.005% detergent (Teepol) for 15 min and then rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. The seed coats were removed with forceps and a scalpel, and seeds were then transferred into a tube containing 10 mL of basic medium consisting of Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) macro- and micro-salts and vitamins [39] supplemented with 30 g·L−1 sucrose and 7 g·L−1 plant agar (Duchefa, 2003 RV Haarlem, The Netherlands). The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 with 1 M KOH and 1 M HCL before autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. The cultures were kept in a growth chamber at 22 ± 1 °C and a photoperiod of 16/8 h light/dark. After two weeks, the cotyledons were collected and subsequent subculturing of the germinated shoots occurred every four weeks.

2.2. Chromosome Counting

Chromosome numbers of some Melia species have already been reported, but not for Melia volkensii. This led to the necessity of performing chromosome counting. The root tips of diploid plants were harvested from acclimatized M. volkensii plants in vitro. The root tips were pretreated for one hour at 4 °C in 0.1% colchicine plus 20 µL of 500× 8-hydroxyquinoline [40]. Then the root tips were fixed 3:1 ethanol:acetic acid for 60 min. Cell suspension and slide preparation were made according to the “SteamDrop” procedure of Kirov et al. [41]. Root tips were incubated at 37 °C for 60 min in a 0.6% enzyme mixture (0.6% cellulase and 0.6% pectolyase in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH = 4.6). As fixatives, 1:1 and 2:1 ethanol:acetic acid were used to prepare the slides. The slides were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (100 µg/mL) and analyzed using a fluorescence microscope (AxioImager M2, Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Belgium; 1000× magnification) equipped with an Axiocam MRm camera and ZEN software (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Zaventem, Belgium). Chromosome counting was performed on nine metaphases using ImageJ (imagej.net).

2.3. Polyploidization

In the first experiment, cotyledons from two-week-old in vitro seedlings (Figure 1a) were treated with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin (dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 1, 2, and 3 h. The concentration of oryzalin was selected based on the internal protocol of the Applied In Vitro Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University. After this treatment, the cotyledons were transferred to MS with 1.1 µM TDZ for 18 days and then transferred to basal MS medium with 1 µM indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 2 µM 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) or 5 µM meta-Topolin Riboside (mTR). All cultures were incubated in a growth chamber with 16 h/8 h day/night provided with PURPL® LED PANEL LIGHT (LED type: 4014, model: PAN-3000K-30X120). Twenty-one days after transfer, cultures were transferred to a medium containing 2 µM BAP or 5 mM mTR but without IAA.
In the second experiment, two weeks after seeds were sown in vitro, cotyledons were detached from the seedlings and transferred to Petri dishes containing basal medium supplemented with 1.1 µM Thidiazuron (TDZ). The cotyledons began to respond to TDZ after 18 days by turning green (Figure 1b). Then, cotyledons were treated with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin for 1, 2, and 3 h, washed twice in sterile distilled water, and transferred into Petri dishes containing MS medium containing 1.1 µM TDZ for 21 days. For each treatment, a total of fourteen cotyledons were used, and the experiment was repeated three times. Shoot meristem formation was observed after 21 days, and at that time the cotyledons were transferred to MS supplemented with 1 µM Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 2 µM 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), according to Mulanda et al. [38] or with 5 µM meta-Topolin Riboside (mTR). Shoots from cotyledons that had not received oryzalin treatment were used as controls. Conditions in the growth chamber were similar to those of the first experiment. Twenty-one days after transfer, regenerated shoots were propagated on a medium containing 2 µM BAP or 5 mM mTR without IAA. The regenerated microshoots were grown in 10 mL tubes of MS medium containing 1 µM mTR.

2.4. Ploidy Determination

Ploidy content of regenerated shoots with three leaves was determined by flow cytometry. For each treatment shoots resulting from eight cotyledons and five shoots per cotyledon were analyzed, as well as twenty control plants measured as external control. Sample preparation and staining were performed with CystainTM PI absolute P (REF: 05-5022) (Sysmex Partec GmbH, Görlitz, Germany) kit. Approximately 0.5 cm2 of the leaf was placed in a Petri dish to which extraction buffer was added. The leaf tissue was chopped with a sharp razor blade. The sample was filtered through a 50 µM CellTricsTM filter. Then, 1 mL of staining solution was added with 20 mL of buffer, 120 µL of propidium iodide, and 60 µL of RNase A stock solution. Before analysis, the sample was incubated for 60 min in the dark at room temperature. The amplification of the instrument (CyTecs, GmbH, Amflugplatz 13, D-02828 Görlitz) was tuned to a scale of 362 channels, with channel 100 roughly corresponding to the peak. Samples were analyzed using the same instrument settings to obtain comparable relative fluorescence intensity values. The reference fluorescence of stained nuclei was set by scanning untreated M. volkensii (2n = 2x = 28) plants and a known diploid Paulownia tomentosa (2n = 2x = 40) prior to scanning any samples.

2.5. In Vitro Propagation of the Tetraploid Melia volkensii Plants

The identified tetraploid shoots were micropropagated using the basal medium supplemented with 5 µM mTR as described by Dushimimana et al. [42] with minor modifications. Six shoots with one node and two leaves per shoot were grown in 720 mL plastic vessels (Eco2Box with XXL green filter, Duchefa, The Netherlands) filled with 150 mL basal medium with 5 µM mTR. Diploid shoots were grown as controls on the same medium.

2.6. Morphological Characteristics of the Tetraploid Melia volkensii in Comparison of Diploids

After four weeks in the culture medium, morphological analysis was performed on 15 clusters of one diploid and four tetraploid genotypes (T192-1, T482-2, T432-1, and T841-1). Therefore, the number of shoots per explant, shoot length (cm), shoot diameter (mm), number of leaves per shoot, shoot internode length (mm), and number of leaflets per leaf of the most elongated shoots were measured and compared between diploids and tetraploids. In addition, leaf morphology of tetraploid plants was compared with that of diploid plants using three leaves from each tetraploid and diploid plantlet. Leaf length and width (cm) and leaf area (cm2) were assessed on four-week-old shoots. Leaf epidermis was collected with clear nail polish, which was taped with tape after drying [43]. Observations of the stomata were performed with a light microscope (VisiScope, TL384P, VWR, Avantor, PA, USA) and software (Olympus EPviewTM v2.9.6_20201224: http://www.olympus-sis.com/ (accessed on 29 August 2022)). Stomatal length and width (µm) were assessed using 75 stomata from diploid or tetraploid plantlets. Stomatal density was analyzed by counting stomata in five microscopic fields at 400× magnification, as described by Li et al. [44]. The leaf area was determined after four weeks in the culture medium. Photographs of three fully expanded leaves per plant were used to determine leaf area using image analysis (ImageJ, Downloads (imagej.net)). For acclimatized polyploid M. volkensii, the leaf morphology of three-month-old plants was assessed from three leaves of two acclimatized tetraploid or diploid plants. Stomatal length and width were evaluated as described above.

2.7. Statistical Analysis of Data

Data were analyzed using IBM® SPSS® statistics (version 28), (Armonk, New York 10504-1722, NY, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for significant differences between treatments, and a post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% was used to separate means.

3. Results

3.1. Chromosome Counting

Chromosome counting of diploid M. volkensii plants was performed before oryzalin treatment. This was done because the total number of chromosomes in these plants was unknown. Well-spread chromosomes in metaphase (Figure 2) with clear centromeres were observed in cells from the root tips of acclimatized plants, showing a chromosome number of M. volkensii of 2n = 2x = 28 (Figure 2).

3.2. Induction of Tetraploidy

Shoot growth was observed in both control cotyledons and cotyledons treated with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin. After 21 days in the growth medium, shoots from oryzalin-treated cotyledons were less vigorous than those from untreated cotyledons (Figure 3).
No tetraploids or mixoploids were detected in the control treatments. When oryzalin was applied following TDZ pretreatment for 18 days, incubation for three hours in 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin was the most favorable. In the trial where TDZ was not used as a pretreatment, forty percent of the induced shoots were tetraploid (Table 1), whereas only 4.8% were mixoploid plants. Cotyledons treated with TDZ for 18 days followed by 1, 2, and 3 h of treatment with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin resulted in 32.5%, 40%, and 52.5% polyploid plants, respectively (Table 1). A lot of mixoploidy (20%) was also observed. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclei from leaves of diploid M. volkensii plants showed a large peak (2x) of diploid nuclei, while the tetraploid peak (4x) was shifted twice (Figure 4) compared to the diploid peak in logarithmic scale of three, FL3 (log3). The mixoploid plants showed both large diploid and tetraploid peaks.

3.3. Morphological Characteristics of In Vitro Tetraploid Melia volkensii

The number of regenerated shoots per explant, leaves per leaf, and shoot internode length did not differ significantly between diploid and tetraploid in vitro plants. During the in vitro phase (Figure 5), polyploidization significantly affected shoot length, shoot diameter, shoot internode length (Table 2), leaf area, and stomatal size (Figure 6). Tetraploid genotypes had significantly (p < 0.001) shorter shoots with larger shoot diameters and fewer leaves with much larger leaf area (4.49 cm2) than diploids (2.96 cm2). The leaf length of diploid and tetraploid plants was not significantly different. Tetraploid M. volkensii had longer and wider stomata compared to diploid M. volkensii (Figure 6B), which were much larger (Figure 7), with an average length of 389.7 µm and a width of 289.1 µm versus a length of 219.9 µm and a width of 188.7 µm in diploids.

3.4. Leaf and Stomatal Morphology of Tetraploid and Diploid Melia volkensii under Greenhouse Conditions

The greenhouse-acclimated tetraploid potted plants showed promising growth. Compared to the diploid plant, the tetraploid plant showed distinct leaf and stomatal characteristics (Table 3). The tetraploid plant was short and thick, with broad leaves of 75.74 cm2, 19.96 cm of leaf length, and a short petiole of 6.13 cm compared to a leaf area of 57.54 cm2, leaf length of 22.35 cm and petiole of 8.58 cm for diploid M. volkensii (Figure 8). Diploid M. volkensii developed significantly (p < 0.05) longer leaves with elongated petioles than tetraploid M. volkensii. Image analysis of stomata showed that the length and width of tetraploid stomata were significantly different from those of diploid M. volkensii. On average, stomatal density was lower in tetraploid leaves than in diploid leaves.

4. Discussion

Before performing the M. volkensii chromosomal doubling assay, the chromosome number was counted to ensure that the correct number for diploid was known and to establish a baseline for tracking changes after the assay. In accordance with the “SteamDrop” method [41], our chromosome counts indicate that diploid M. volkensii plants have 2n = 2x = 28 chromosomes. To our knowledge, this has never been reported before in the M. volkensii species. This number of chromosomes of 2n = 28 is consistent with those of other Meliaceae, such as Melia azedarach, Trichilia connaroides, Walsura trifolia [45], Walsura piscida [46], Azadirachta indica [45,46,47]. In contrast, Swietenia macrophylla (2n = 54), S. mahogani (2n = 54), Toona ciliata (2n = 56), and Aglaia adorate (2n = 168), also belonging to the Meliaceae, are probably autopolyploids [46]. Based on the number of chromosomes found in diploid M. volkensii, it was hypothesized that the tetraploid plants resulting from polyploidization of this species would have 2n = 4x = 56 chromosomes.
With references to diploid M. volkensii and P. tomentosa, flow cytometry results showed that tetraploid M. volkensii was successfully generated from cotyledons treated with oryzalin. For the induction of polyploidy, cells in mitosis are essential [48] and the type of mitosis inhibitor also plays a role. Jambhale et al. [19] could obtain polyploid M. azedarach with 0.5% colchicine. However, treatment with oryzalin resulted in more polyploid plants than with colchicine [23,26,49]. The number of polyploid M. volkensii plants obtained varied with the duration of oryzalin treatment. Similar findings were reported by Miguel and Leonhardt [50] who showed that the duration of oryzalin treatment increased the number of polyploid plants produced in orchids. The highest polyploid induction of 52.5% was recorded in cotyledons of M. volkensii that were pretreated with TDZ for 18 days and then treated with oryzalin for three hours. However, the disadvantage was that more ploidy chimeras were formed. The increased production of tetraploids and mixoploids may be a result of oryzalin hitting the dividing cells of the developing adventitious bud in cotyledons treated with TDZ. Thidiazuron has been reported to increase the induction of adventitious bud during in vitro propagation [38,51,52,53]. The mixoploids obtained were not considered for propagation because creating of homogeneous tetraploids out of these mixoploids would require another adventitious shoot regeneration step [16]. The findings indicate that treating a responding cell with oryzalin increases the number of polyploid plants produced.
The tetraploid M. volkensii had remarkably shorter leaves, larger shoot diameter, and wider leaves than the diploid specimens. This is consistent with previous reports in Juncus effusus [54] and Gerbera jamesonii Bolus cv. Sciella [55] and Ligustrum japonicum [11]. In contrast, Jambhale et al. [19] stated that the polyploid M. azedarach had smaller leaves than the diploid variety. There was no significant difference in leaf length between tetraploid and diploid plants. Li et al. [44] reported similar findings for the leaf length of Bletilla striata in vitro culture. In contrast, there was a slightly significant difference in leaf length between tetraploid and diploid M. volkensii plants in pots. This variation in leaf length could be due to species and growing conditions. Similar findings regarding the leaf length of diploid and tetraploid Escallonia species were reported by Denaeghel et al. [29]. Stomata of the tetraploid M. volkensii were significantly larger with greater length and width than those of the diploid. Similar results of larger stomata in tetraploids than in diploids have been reported in Paulownia tomentosa [56] and Gerbera jamesonii Bolus cv. Sciella [55], Eucommia ulmoides [57] and apple [28]. Similar findings were reported by Tang et al. [56], who reported that tetraploid P. tomentosa plants could be distinguished from diploid ones by virtue of their longer stomata and reduced stomata frequency.
Tetraploid Mukau trees probably will perform better in a variety of environmental conditions than their relative diploid. In addition, polyploid Mukau could produce timber with superior wood quality and properties. In an 18-year field trial and growth chamber experiment, it was observed that polyploid Acacia senegal (L.) showed not only large leaf and stomata but also an adaptive advantage in drought tolerance with greater height and trunk diameter [33]. Drought tolerance in an autotetraploid apple clone (Redchief) was reported with only minimal variation in growth, and it also showed superior resistance to fire blight [58]. Tetraploid Robinia pseudoacacia L. clones adapted to drought by reducing intercellular CO2, net photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance more than diploid clones [59]. Tetraploid F. carica clones showed higher tolerance to water stress by maintaining relative water content while producing high levels of stress hormones, enhancing the enzymatic defense system, and adjusting osmotic pressure [60]. Polyploid eucalyptus hybrids are larger in size, have more fibers, and have thicker walls compared to diploid relatives [61]. It is also possible that tetraploid M. volkensii plants possess higher quantities of medicinal and biopesticides chemicals than diploid plants. Navrátilová et al. [62] discovered that tetraploid Ajuga reptans plants have a higher concentration of phytochemicals than diploid ones.

5. Conclusions

The altered morphology of these tetraploid trees could be very interesting and will be followed under field conditions for many years. The future will show to what extent their wood quality will change and if their stress resistance will be affected. We expect that the plants produced in this study will form the basis for new breeding programs and produce trees with a new phenotype.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D. and S.P.O.W.; methodology, C.D., S.P.O.W. and K.V.L.; software, C.D. and S.P.O.W.; validation, K.V.L. and T.M.; formal analysis, C.D. and S.P.O.W.; investigation, C.D.; resources, T.M., G.S. and S.P.O.W.; data curation, C.D.; writing—original draft preparation, C.D.; writing—review and editing, T.M., G.S., S.P.O.W. and K.V.L.; supervision, T.M., G.S. and S.P.O.W.; project administration, T.M., G.S. and S.P.O.W.; funding acquisition, S.P.O.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

VLIR-UOS: Ref KE2018TEA465A103.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Laura Schelfhout, ILVO for her help in cell suspension preparation and chromosome counting. The authors would also like to thank Tony Ruyssen for his support with flow cytometry. The financial support granted by VLIR-UOS, Ref KE2018TEA465A103 is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Assis, T.F.; de Resende, M.D.V. Genetic Improvement of Forest Tree Species. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tsujii, Y.; Sakai, S.; Ushio, M.; Aiba, S.; Kitayama, K. Variations in the Reproductive Cycle of Bornean montane Tree Species along Elevational Gradients on Ultrabasic and Non-Ultrabasic Soils. Biotropica 2022, 55, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Orwa, C.; Mutua, A.; Kindt, R.; Jamnadass, R.; Simons, A. Agroforestree Database: A Tree Reference and Selection Guide Version 4.0: Melia Volkensii; World Agroforestry Centre: Nairobi, Kenya, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson, L.P.V. The Breeding of Forest Trees. For. Chron. 1939, 15, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, A.J.; Carvalho, C.R.; Clarindo, W.R. Chromosome Set Doubling and Ploidy Stability in Synthetic Auto- and Allotetraploid of Eucalyptus: From in Vitro Condition to the Field. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 138, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kuang, Y.; Lu, C.H.; Hsu, F.C. Restoring Fertility for Novel Interspecific Hybrids between Kalanchoe garambiensis and K. Nyikae Using Colchicine Treatment. Plants 2021, 10, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Z.; Fan, G.; Dong, Y.; Zhai, X.; Deng, M.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, W.; Cao, Y. Implications of Polyploidy Events on the Phenotype, Microstructure, and Proteome of Paulownia australis . PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saleh, B.; Allario, T.; Dambier, D.; Ollitrault, P.; Morillon, R. Tetraploid Citrus Rootstocks Are More Tolerant to Salt Stress than Diploid. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, M.; Zhang, C.; Hou, L.; Yang, W.; Liu, S.; Pang, X.; Li, Y. Multiple Responses Contribute to the Enhanced Drought Tolerance of the Autotetraploid Ziziphus jujuba Mill. Var. Spinosa. Cell Biosci. 2021, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdolinejad, R.; Shekafandeh, A.; Jowkar, A. In Vitro Tetraploidy Induction Creates Enhancements in Morphological, Physiological and Phytochemical Characteristics in the Fig Tree (Ficus carica L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fetouh, M.I.; Kareem, A.; Knox, G.W.; Wilson, S.B.; Deng, Z. Induction, Identification, and Characterization of Tetraploids in Japanese Privet (Ligustrum Japonicum). HortScience 2016, 51, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ewald, D.; Ulrich, K.; Naujoks, G.; Schröder, M.B. Induction of Tetraploid Poplar and Black Locust Plants Using Colchicine: Chloroplast Number as an Early Marker for Selecting Polyploids in Vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 99, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Castillo, A.; López, V.; Tavares, E.; Santiñaque, F.; Dalla Rizza, M. Polyploid Induction of Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden to Generate Variability in Breeding Programs. Agrociencia Urug. 2020, 24, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, M.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Kang, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y. Induction of Tetraploidy Using High Temperature Exposure during the First Zygote Division in Populus denopoda Maxim. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 72, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, J.; Sang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, P. Colchicine in Vitro Tetraploid Induction of Populus hopeiensis from Leaf Blades. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 141, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, W.; Song, S.; Li, D.; Lu, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Isolation of Diploid and Tetraploid Cytotypes from Mixoploids Based on Adventitious Bud Regeneration in Populus . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 140, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H. Induction and Characterization of Tetraploids in Poplar. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 146, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Qiu, B.; Ma, Z.; Lu, T.; Kang, X.; Yang, J. Induction and Characterization of Tetraploid Through Zygotic Chromosome Doubling in Eucalyptus urophylla . Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 870698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jambhale, N.D.; Patil, S.C.; Pawar, S.V. Induction of Polyploidy in Pride-of-India (Melia azedarach Linn), an Agroforestry Tree. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2002, 62, 245–247. [Google Scholar]
  20. Barceló-Anguiano, M.; Holbrook, N.M.; Hormaza, J.I.; Losada, J.M. Changes in Ploidy Affect Vascular Allometry and Hydraulic Function in Mangifera indica Trees. Plant J. 2021, 108, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Storme, N.; Geelen, D. Sexual Polyploidization in Plants—Cytological Mechanisms and Molecular Regulation. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 670–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shi, Q.H.; Liu, P.; Liu, M.J.; Wang, J.R.; Xu, J. A Novel Method for Rapid in Vivo Induction of Homogeneous Polyploids via Calluses in a Woody Fruit Tree (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 121, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eeckhaut, T.G.R.; Werbrouck, S.P.O.; Leus, L.W.H.; Van Bockstaele, E.J.; Debergh, P.C. Chemically Induced Polyploidization in Spathiphyllum wallisii Regel through Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 78, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dhooghe, E.; Grunewald, W.; Leus, L.; Van Labeke, M.C. In Vitro Polyploidisation of Helleborus Species. Euphytica 2009, 165, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Correia, J.J. Effects of Antimitotic Agents on Tubulin-Nucleotide Interactions. Pharmacol. Ther. 1991, 52, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dhooghe, E.; Denis, S.; Eeckhaut, T.; Reheul, D.; Van Labeke, M.C. In Vitro Induction of Tetraploids in Ornamental Ranunculus . Euphytica 2009, 168, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eng, W.H.; Ho, W.S. Polyploidization Using Colchicine in Horticultural Plants: A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 246, 604–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hias, N.; Leus, L.; Davey, M.W.; Vanderzande, S.; Van Huylenbroeck, J.; Keulemans, J. Effect of Polyploidization on Morphology in Two Apple (Malus × Domestica) Genotypes. Hortic. Sci. 2017, 44, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Denaeghel, H.E.R.; Van Laere, K.; Leus, L.; Lootens, P.; Van Huylenbroeck, J.; Van Labeke, M.C. The Variable Effect of Polyploidization on the Phenotype in Escallonia . Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mori, S.; Yahata, M.; Kuwahara, A.; Shirono, Y.; Ueno, Y.; Hatanaka, M.; Honda, Y.; Sugiyama, K.; Murata, N.; Okamoto, Y.; et al. Morphological Characterization of Tetraploids of Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Produced by Oryzalin Treatment of Seeds. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bouvier, L.; Guérif, P.; Djulbic, M.; Durel, C.E.; Chevreau, E.; Lespinasse, Y. Chromosome Doubling of Pear Haploid Plants and Homozygosity Assessment Using Isozyme and Microsatellite Markers. Euphytica 2002, 123, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Contreras, R.N. A Simple Chromosome Doubling Technique Is Effective for Three Species of Cupressaceae. HortScience 2012, 47, 712–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Diallo, A.M.; Nielsen, L.R.; Kjær, E.D.; Petersen, K.K.; Ræbild, A. Polyploidy Can Confer Superiority to West African Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. Trees. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Le, S.; Griffin, R.A.; Harwood, C.E.; Vaillancourt, R.E.; Harbard, J.L.; Price, A.; Nghiem, C.Q.; Koutoulis, A.; Nguyen, K.D. Breeding Polyploid Varieties of Acacia: Reproductive and Early Growth Characteristics of the Allotetraploid Hybrid (Acacia mangium × A. auriculiformis) in Comparison with Diploid Progenitors. Forests 2021, 12, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Griffin, A.R.; Twayi, H.; Braunstein, R.; Downes, G.M.; Son, D.H.; Harwood, C.E. A Comparison of Fibre and Pulp Properties of Diploid and Tetraploid Acacia mangium Grown in Vietnam. Appita Technol. Innov. Manuf. Environ. 2014, 67, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, C.; Liu, G.; Fang, G.; Jiang, C.; Jiang, J. Comparison of Tetraploid Betula platyphylla Wood Fiber Traits and Selection of Superior Seed Trees. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2017, 39, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Longui, E.L.; Custódio, G.H.; Amorim, E.P.; da Silva Júnior, F.G.; Oda, S.; Souza, I.C.G. Differences in Wood Properties among Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla with Different Degrees of Ploidy. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10, e395101624035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mulanda, E.S.; Adero, M.O.; Wepukhulu, D.K.; Amugune, N.O.; Akunda, E.; Kinyamario, J.I. Thidiazuron-Induced Somatic Embryogenesis and Shoot Regeneration in Cotyledon Explants of Melia volkensii Gürke. Propag. Ornam. Plants 2014, 14, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  39. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Akbarzadeh, M.; Van Laere, K.; Leus, L.; De Riek, J.; Van Huylenbroeck, J.; Werbrouck, S.P.O.; Dhooghe, E. Can Knowledge of Genetic Distances, Genome Sizes and Chromosome Numbers Support Breeding Programs in Hardy Geraniums? Genes 2021, 12, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kirov, I.; Divashuk, M.; Van Laere, K.; Soloviev, A.; Khrustaleva, L. An Easy “SteamDrop” Method for High Quality Plant Chromosome Preparation. Mol. Cytogenet. 2014, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dushimimana, C.; Magomere, T.; Mulatya, J.; Vandenabeele, J.; Olubayo, F.; Smagghe, G.; Werbrouck, S.P.O. Variation of Morphological Traits and Quality Indices of Micropropagated Melia volkensii Gürke Clones before Field Planting. Forests 2022, 13, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fetter, K.C.; Eberhardt, S.; Barclay, R.S.; Wing, S.; Keller, S.R. StomataCounter: A Neural Network for Automatic Stomata Identification and Counting. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 1671–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, M.; Ding, B.; Huang, W.; Pan, J.; Ding, Z.; Jiang, F. Induction and Characterization of Tetraploids from Seeds of Bletilla striata (Thunb.) Reichb.F. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 3246398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Khosla, P.K.; Styles, B.T. Karyological Studies and Chromosome Evolution in Meliaceae. Silvae Genet. 1975, 24, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  46. Datta, P.C.; Samanta, P. Cytotaxonomy of Meliaceae. Cytologia 1977, 42, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jha, T.B. Somatic Chromosomes of Aegle marmelos and Azadirachta indica through EMA Method. Nucleus 2014, 57, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mo, L.; Chen, J.-H.; Chen, F.; Xu, Q.-W.; Tong, Z.-K.; Huang, H.-H.; Dong, R.-H.; Lou, X.-Z.; Lin, E.-P. Induction and Characterization of Polyploids from Seeds of Rhododendron fortunei Lindl. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 2016–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bouvier, L.; Fillon, F.R.; Lespinasse, Y. Oryzalin as an Efficient Agent for Chromosome Doubling of Haploid Apple Shoots in Vitro. Plant Breed. 1994, 113, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miguel, T.P.; Leonhardt, K.W. In Vitro Polyploid Induction of Orchids Using Oryzalin. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mundhara, R.; Rashid, A. Stimulation of Shoot-Bud Regeneration on Hypocotyl of Linum Seedlings, on a Transient Withdrawal of Calcium: Effect of Calcium, Cytokinin and Thidiazuron. Plant Sci. 2002, 162, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mundhara, R.; Rashid, A. TDZ-Induced Triple-Response and Shoot Formation on Intact Seedlings of Linum, Putative Role of Ethylene in Regeneration. Plant Sci. 2006, 170, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mulwa, R.M.S.; Bhalla, P.L. In Vitro Plant Regeneration from Immature Cotyledon Explants of Macadamia (Macadamia tetraphylla L. Johnson). Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xu, L.; Najeeb, U.; Naeem, M.S.; Daud, M.K.; Cao, J.S.; Gong, H.J.; Shen, W.Q.; Zhou, W.J. Induction of Tetraploidy in Juncus effusus by Colchicine. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gantait, S.; Mandal, N.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Das, P.K. Induction and Identification of Tetraploids Using in Vitro Colchicine Treatment of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus Cv. Sciella. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 106, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tang, Z.Q.; Chen, D.L.; Song, Z.J.; He, Y.C.; Cai, D.T. In Vitro Induction and Identification of Tetraploid Plants of Paulownia tomentosa . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 102, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tokumoto, Y.; Kajiura, H.; Takeno, S.; Harada, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Hosaka, T.; Gyokusen, K.; Nakazawa, Y. Induction of Tetraploid Hardy Rubber Tree, Eucommia ulmoides, and Phenotypic Differences from Diploid. Plant Biotechnol. 2016, 33, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wójcik, D.; Marat, M.; Marasek-Ciołakowska, A.; Klamkowski, K.; Buler, Z.; Podwyszyńska, M.; Tomczyk, P.P.; Wójcik, K.; Treder, W.; Filipczak, J. Apple Autotetraploids—Phenotypic Characterisation and Response to Drought Stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Sheng, Y.B.; Luo, X.F. Effects of Water Stress on Biomass and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Tetraploid Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) Clones. For. Res. 2010, 23, 920–923. [Google Scholar]
  60. Abdolinejad, R.; Shekafandeh, A. Tetraploidy Confers Superior in Vitro Water-Stress Tolerance to the Fig Tree (Ficus carica) by Reinforcing Hormonal, Physiological, and Biochemical Defensive Systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 796215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Da Silva Souza, T.; Daolio, M.F.; Mori, F.A.; Ramalho, M.A.P.; Mingossi, F.B.; Missiaggia, A.A.; Techio, V.H. Polyploidy as a Strategy to Improve the Industrial Quality of Eucalypt Wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Navrátilová, B.; Ondřej, V.; Vrchotová, N.; Tříska, J.; Horník, Š.; Pavela, R. Impact of Artificial Polyploidization in Ajuga reptans on Content of Selected Biologically Active Glycosides and Phytoecdysone. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 09 00791 g001 550
Figure 1. Melia volkensii cotyledons. (a) Two-week-old cotyledons under basal MS medium during initiation. Scale bar = 1 cm. (b) Cotyledons change color after 18 days in medium containing 1.1 µM TDZ.
Figure 1. Melia volkensii cotyledons. (a) Two-week-old cotyledons under basal MS medium during initiation. Scale bar = 1 cm. (b) Cotyledons change color after 18 days in medium containing 1.1 µM TDZ.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g001
Horticulturae 09 00791 g002 550
Figure 2. Chromosome number of Melia volkensii. Well spread metaphase (2x = 28).
Figure 2. Chromosome number of Melia volkensii. Well spread metaphase (2x = 28).
Horticulturae 09 00791 g002
Horticulturae 09 00791 g003 550
Figure 3. Multiple shoot formation on detached cotyledons after 21 days treatment with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin. (a) Induced shoots on untreated cotyledons. (b) Induced shoots on oryzalin-treated cotyledons for one hour. (c) Induced shoots on oryzalin-treated cotyledons for two hours. (d) Induced shoots on oryzalin-treated cotyledons for three hours.
Figure 3. Multiple shoot formation on detached cotyledons after 21 days treatment with 10 mg·L−1 oryzalin. (a) Induced shoots on untreated cotyledons. (b) Induced shoots on oryzalin-treated cotyledons for one hour. (c) Induced shoots on oryzalin-treated cotyledons for two hours. (d) Induced shoots on oryzalin-treated cotyledons for three hours.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g003
Horticulturae 09 00791 g004 550
Figure 4. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclei from references and tetraploid M. volkensii. (a) diploid (2x) Paulownia tomentosa. (b) Diploid (2x) Melia volkensii. (c) Tetraploid (4x) Melia volkensii. (d) Mixoploid Melia volkensii.
Figure 4. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclei from references and tetraploid M. volkensii. (a) diploid (2x) Paulownia tomentosa. (b) Diploid (2x) Melia volkensii. (c) Tetraploid (4x) Melia volkensii. (d) Mixoploid Melia volkensii.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g004
Horticulturae 09 00791 g005 550
Figure 5. Morphological observation of tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii after 4 weeks in culture medium. T841-1, T192-1, T482-1, and T432-1 are tetraploid genotypes.
Figure 5. Morphological observation of tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii after 4 weeks in culture medium. T841-1, T192-1, T482-1, and T432-1 are tetraploid genotypes.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g005
Horticulturae 09 00791 g006 550
Figure 6. A comparison of tetraploid and diploid leaf and stomata of Melia volkensii after four weeks of in vitro propagation. (A) Tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii leaf area and length. (B) Tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii stomata length and width. Data are reported as mean ± standard error. Note: In the figure, different letters within variables indicate significant differences at 5%.
Figure 6. A comparison of tetraploid and diploid leaf and stomata of Melia volkensii after four weeks of in vitro propagation. (A) Tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii leaf area and length. (B) Tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii stomata length and width. Data are reported as mean ± standard error. Note: In the figure, different letters within variables indicate significant differences at 5%.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g006
Horticulturae 09 00791 g007 550
Figure 7. Melia volkensii stomata during in vitro propagation. (a) diploid; (b) tetraploid. Photographs were taken under a microscope at 400× magnification.
Figure 7. Melia volkensii stomata during in vitro propagation. (a) diploid; (b) tetraploid. Photographs were taken under a microscope at 400× magnification.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g007
Horticulturae 09 00791 g008 550
Figure 8. Leaf morphology of tetraploid and diploid M. volkensii plantlets after three months of growth under greenhouse conditions. The leaf image was taken from the third leaf of a tetraploid or diploid plant.
Figure 8. Leaf morphology of tetraploid and diploid M. volkensii plantlets after three months of growth under greenhouse conditions. The leaf image was taken from the third leaf of a tetraploid or diploid plant.
Horticulturae 09 00791 g008
Table
Table 1. Effect of oryzalin on polyploid induction during incubation of fresh and pretreated (TDZ) Melia volkensii cotyledons at different time intervals.
Table 1. Effect of oryzalin on polyploid induction during incubation of fresh and pretreated (TDZ) Melia volkensii cotyledons at different time intervals.
TDZ Concentration *Oryzalin Treatment (Hours) DurationAnalyzedplantsTetraploid Percentage (%)Mixoploid Percentage (%)
0200.00.0
14012.50.0
0 µM2402.50.0
34040.04.8
14032.520.0
1.1 µM24040.05.0
34052.520.0
* The concentrations of 0 µM TDZ represents the first experiment in which no TDZ pretreatment was performed, while 1.1 µM TDZ represents the second experiment in which 18 days of TDZ pretreatment were performed prior to oryzalin treatment.
Table
Table 2. Morphological comparisons of tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii during propagation after 4 weeks in culture medium.
Table 2. Morphological comparisons of tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii during propagation after 4 weeks in culture medium.
GenotypesNumber of ShootsShoot Length (cm)Shoot Diameter (mm)Number of Leaves Per ShootNumber of Leaflets Per LeafletShoot Internode Length (mm)
Diploid4.73 ± 0.304.41 ± 0.27 b2.36 ± 0.08 a7.60 ± 0.27 c7.67 ± 0.255.4153 ± 0.24
T192-14.73 ± 0.333.37 ± 0.19 a3.14 ± 0.11 b5.80 ± 0.30 b7.27 ± 0.274.8360 ± 0.23
T482-25.07 ± 0.383.69 ± 0.16 a3.10 ± 0.11 b5.40 ± 0.21 ab7.60 ± 0.234.6500 ± 0.27
T432-15.73 ± 0.544.33 ± 0.28 b3.32 ± 0.15 bc6.07 ± 0.25 b7.27 ± 0.184.2147 ± 0.43
T841-15.33 ± 0.483.26 ± 0.15 a3.58 ± 0.19 c4.87 ± 0.29 a7.00 ± 0.284.5987 ± 0.39
p-value0.388<0.001<0.001<0.0010.2990.129
Note: Means followed by the same letters within a column are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s multiple range test at 5%).
Table
Table 3. Leaf and stomatal morphological characteristics of acclimated tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii plants.
Table 3. Leaf and stomatal morphological characteristics of acclimated tetraploid and diploid Melia volkensii plants.
Morphological CharacteristicsDiploidTetraploid
Leaf area (cm2)57.54 ± 4.3275.74 ± 5.09 *
Leaf length (cm)22.35 ± 0.5019.96 ± 0.86 *
Petiole length (cm)8.58 ± 0.276.13 ± 0.34 ***
Stomata length (µm)1024.70 ± 14.121360 ± 14.56 ***
Stomata Width (µm)735.65 ± 10.58913.12 ± 10.18 ***
Stomata density (per unit area)22.80 ± 2.5211.60 ± 2.25 *
* Mean values are significant at p < 0.05, *** Mean values are significant at p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dushimimana, C.; Van Laere, K.; Magomere, T.; Smagghe, G.; Werbrouck, S.P.O. Production of Tetraploid Plants from Cotyledons of Diploid Melia volkensii Gürke. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070791

AMA Style

Dushimimana C, Van Laere K, Magomere T, Smagghe G, Werbrouck SPO. Production of Tetraploid Plants from Cotyledons of Diploid Melia volkensii Gürke. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(7):791. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dushimimana, Constantin, Katrijn Van Laere, Titus Magomere, Guy Smagghe, and Stefaan P. O. Werbrouck. 2023. "Production of Tetraploid Plants from Cotyledons of Diploid Melia volkensii Gürke" Horticulturae 9, no. 7: 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070791

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop