Next Article in Journal
Preharvest Applications of Oxalic Acid and Salicylic Acid Increase Fruit Firmness and Polyphenolic Content in Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of an Efficient Direct Shoot Induction System and Histological Evaluation of Shoot Formation in Cucurbita maxima Duch
Previous Article in Journal
Symbiosis of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Lycium barbarum L. Prefers NO3 over NH4+
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Morphogenesis and In Vitro Production of Five Hyacinthus orientalis Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Growth and Biomass of Centella asiatica Using a Twin-Bottle Temporary Immersion Bioreactor

by
Thanakorn Wongsa
1,
Anupan Kongbangkerd
2,3 and
Boworn Kunakhonnuruk
2,*
1
Program in Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University, Kamphaeng Phet 62000, Thailand
2
Plant Tissue Culture Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
3
Center for Agricultural Biotechnology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(6), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060638
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Revised: 27 May 2023 / Accepted: 27 May 2023 / Published: 29 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Application of Tissue Culture to Horticulture)

Abstract

:
Centella asiatica or gotu kola has long been used as a traditional medicinal plant. Here, immersion times and culture systems on growth and biomass production of C. asiatica were investigated using a twin-bottle, temporary immersion system. Results indicated that all immersion times gave 100% survival, with a 5 min immersion 12 times/day, providing the highest number of new shoots (3.6 shoots/explant), leaves (10.2 leaves/explant), roots (8.3 roots/explant), and fresh and dry weights of clumps (5.06 g fresh weight and 0.48 g dry weight/clump). The temporary immersion system resulted in more than a three-fold increase in biomass accumulation, with the highest average number of new shoots, leaves, and roots compared to a semi-solid system.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Centella asiatica, commonly referred to as gotu kola or pennywort, is an herbaceous perennial plant that originated from Asia, Australia, and South Africa [1] and has been traditionally used for medicinal purposes for centuries to treat a wide range of health conditions. Ayurvedic and traditional Chinese medicine have utilized the healing properties of this plant for skin diseases, wound healing, and even memory enhancement [1,2]. Bioactive compounds such as triterpenoids, flavonoids, and asiaticoside identified in C. asiatica exhibit anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, antiulcer, and anticancer activities [3,4,5,6,7]. The potential skin rejuvenating properties of C. asiatica have led to its incorporation as an ingredient in anti-aging products [8] that promote collagen synthesis, increase skin hydration, and improve the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles [9,10]. Conventional methods for propagating C. asiatica involve stem cuttings or dividing rhizomes, but these techniques have limitations for cultivation on farms. The plant is difficult to propagate in large quantities, requires specific environmental conditions, and has also shown potential for accumulating heavy metals from the soil [11,12]. To overcome these limitations, alternative propagation methods such as tissue culture and micropropagation for fast mass production of high-quality plant material have recently attracted increased interest.
Plant tissue culture technique is now widely recognized as a successful method for propagating valuable plants and has been used to produce significant quantities of pharmaceutically active compounds without the need for extensive cultivation [13]. The micropropagation of C. asiatica has been extensively studied [14,15,16,17,18]. However, the potential for large-scale propagation of plant-derived pharmaceuticals is hindered by high costs, substantial area requirements, and low production efficiency [19]. Cultivation methods for large-scale propagation must be improved. Plant bioreactors have now become essential biotechnological engineering systems for up-scaling the propagation of valuable medicinal plants [20]. The temporary immersion system (TIS) is a plant tissue culture technique that facilitates automated propagation under sterile conditions by growing plant material in a liquid medium with recurrent immersions the aeration of the bioreactor vessel facilitate growth [21,22]. The twin-bottle TIS is a widely used commercially and it is effective for large-scale propagation of numerous medicinal plants [23,24]. The efficacy of the TIS technique is heavily reliant on the appropriate adjustment of the frequency and duration of immersion in the medium, that determine a precise protocol for plant growth, development, and yield [25,26,27]. However, limited studies have been conducted to optimize immersion periods and improve the production efficiency of C. asiatica. Therefore, this study explored timing and frequency of immersion intervals to maximize large-size production of C. asiatica using a twin-bottle TIS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Explant Preparation

Stolon shoot tips of C. asiatica were pretreated for 15 min with 1% captan® and 1% carbendazim®, before rinsing with running tap water for 10 min. The explants were sterilized by immersion in 95% ethanol for 30 s, then soaked in 10% sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 min and rinsed trice with sterilized distilled water. After that, the sterilized shoot tips were cultured in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [28] supplemented with 15 g L−1 sucrose and 0.05 g L−1 myo-inositol. The medium pH was changed to 5.8 before sterilization by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. After 2–3 weeks of culture, the new shoots arising that emerged from the buds were utilized as the initial materials for subsequent experiments. In vitro multiplication of the shoots was performed in semi-solid medium composed by the same medium up to the achievement of the sufficient number of shoots to make TIS experiments.

2.2. Effect of Immersion Time on Growth and Biomass Production of Centella asiatica

Combinations of immersion frequencies and durations were investigated for propagation efficiency and biomass production of C. asiatica using a twin-bottle TIS, which was developed by the Plant Tissue Culture Research Unit at Naresuan University. Medium feeding times as 3, 6, or 12 immersions/day for 1, 5, or 10 min regulated by a digital timer were evaluated. Fifteen explants of C. asiatica were placed into each TIS vessels (1 L glass bottle; Ø 80 cm wide mouth; DURAN®, Wertheim, Germany) and 400 mL of MS medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, 0.1 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 1.0 mg L−1 6-Benzylaminopurine (BA), 1.0 mg L−1 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 0.25 mg L−1 Gibberellic acid (GA) was added in each medium reservoir. The medium pH was changed to 5.8 before autoclaving at the same previous condition. Each TIS set was connected to air tube lines attached with solenoid valves. The liquid medium dislocated by air pressure was transported from medium reservoir to plant vessel. The air pressure from the air pump (oil-free air compressor, 1000 W, 30 L) was sterilized by a membrane air filter (0.2 μm pore; PTFE; Acro®50, New York, NY, USA), connected with the silicone tube on top of each container. Small glass beads (3 mm diameter) were added in the plant chamber as a supportive material for the trig explants. All treatments were cultured under warm-white LED lamps (T8, 18 W, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) at 40 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity for a 12 h photoperiod. All TIS vessels remained in a growth room where the temperature was maintained at 25 ± 2 °C for a duration of 5 weeks. All experiments were accomplished with three replicates. Biomass accumulation of C. asiatica was monitored after 5 weeks of culture.

2.3. Comparison of Different Culture Systems on Growth and Biomass Production of Centella asiatica

Semi-solid system (SSS) and temporary immersion system (TIS) were investigated to compare the propagation efficiency of C. asiatica. MS medium supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, 0.1 mg L−1 myo-inositol, 1.0 mg L−1 BA, 1.0 mg L−1 NAA, and 0.25 mg L−1 GA was used as propagation medium. pH of the medium was changed to 5.8 by 1 N NaOH or HCl and the medium was sterilized by autoclaving at the same conditions mentioned above. For the SSS treatment, two explants were placed in 4 oz glass bottles containing 20 mL of semi-solid medium, solidified with 2.0 g L−1 of gelrite. For the TIS treatment, fifteen explants were cultured into vessels containing 400 mL of liquid medium in the medium reservoir. TIS treatment was set to feed 12 times/day for 5 min/time. Each experiment was undertaken in three replicates, one set of TIS and thirty bottles of SSS/replicate. The culture systems were maintained in a growth room at 25 ± 2 °C and a 12 h photoperiod using warm-white LED lamps with 40 μmol m−2 s−1 of light intensity. After 5 weeks of incubation, the growth and biomass production of C. asiatica were evaluated and compared.

2.4. Experimental Design and Data Analysis

All experiments were performed using a completely randomized design. To evaluate significant differences between each parameter, one-way ANOVA was employed, followed by Duncan’s new multiple range test (DMRT) with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

Different growth rates of C. asiatica were observed in TIS after 5 weeks of culture (Figure 1). All TIS treatments showed 100% survival rate (Table 1). Results indicated that the propagation and elongation of C. asiatica were influenced by the flooding frequency and duration, with a 5 min immersion 12 times/day the highest number of new shoots (3.6 shoots/explant), leaves (10.2 leaves/explant), and roots (8.3 roots/explant) were recorded (Table 1). Decreased frequency of immersion (3–6 times/day) led to reduced growth (Table 1 and Figure 1), while increase in immersion duration generally resulted in a high rate of shoot proliferation, except when using the highest immersion frequency (12 times/day) (Table 1). Using 12 immersions/day resulted in the most significant leaf elongation, exceeding 10 cm/leaf (Table 1 and Figure 1), while decrease in immersion frequency and duration resulted in decline of these growth parameters. About the parameters related to biomass production, the fresh and dry weights demonstrated similar trends to plantlet leaf elongation. The highest fresh and dry weights were achieved using 12 immersions/day for 5 min each (5.06 g fresh weight and 0.48 g dry weight/clump) (Table 1). For the total amount of dry weight obtained from each culture container, using 12 immersions/day for 5 min each time provided the highest achievable dry weight/container at 7.27 g (Table 1). The total dry weight obtained/container was highest when using 5 min of immersion compared to the other immersion times (Table 1 and Figure 1).
To determine the optimal cultivation system for biomass production of C. asiatica, semi-solid and temporary immersion systems were compared. After 5 weeks of culture, results indicated that C. asiatica seedlings responded differently to diverse culture systems (Figure 2). Survival rates were 100% in both culture systems (Table 1). The TIS treatment demonstrated the highest average number of C. asiatica seedling new shoots, leaves, and roots with 3.6 shoots/explant, 10.2 leaves/explant, and 8.3 roots/explant, which was three-fold higher than in the semi-solid medium (Table 1). In the TIS treatment, leaf elongation was over 10.2 cm and significantly higher than the semi-solid medium (3.3 cm/leaf) (Table 1). Biomass accumulation was also statistically significantly different, with the highest values recorded in the TIS treatment for clump fresh and dry weights at 5.06 g and 0.48 g, respectively. Total dry weight of 7.27 g/container was also obtained from the TIS treatment (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Temporary immersion system (TIS) has now become a successful alternative plant propagation method to traditional plant bioreactors for large-scale production of horticultural crops using plant tissue culture techniques [29,30,31]. The plant material is periodically immersed in a liquid medium, and the optimal immersion time promotes nutrient uptake with increased plant multiplication rates. The critical parameters for the efficiency of TIS in terms of multiplication rate and yield are the frequency and duration of immersion [21,23,32]. Many researchers have attempted to establish the optimal procedures for the mass propagation and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants such as Eurycoma longifolia [33], Rhododendron tomentosum [34], Lucas aspera [35], Stevia rebaudiana [36], and Anthurium andreanum [37].
Different TIS immersion frequencies and durations had no effect on the survival rate of C. asiatica. Results indicated that C. asiatica showed optimal growth and biomass at high immersion frequency of 12 times/day for 5 min each compared with the other feeding conditions. Frequent immersion of the culture vessel creates a microenvironment with specific conditions such as humidity and liquid pressure that promote growth and development of the shoot. By contrast, previous research indicated that the incidence of physiological disorders was observed to rise when explants were frequently immersed in the liquid medium [26]. Both the frequency and duration of the immersion process had an impact on the absorption of nutrients and the renewal of gases within the internal culture vessel [21]. Perez-Alonso et al. [38] improved growth and secondary metabolite production in Digitalis purpurea using TIS. Their results confirmed that fresh and dry weight varied during culture under different immersion frequencies. Likewise, high immersion frequency (every 3 h) led to a higher multiplication growth rate, whereas a shorter frequency of immersion (every 7 h) promoted the height of the shoot in Musa AAB plantlets [39]. Kunakhonnuruk et al. [24] and Vendrame et al. [40] indicated that the biomass of plantlets cultivated with frequent and prolonged immersion times demonstrated significantly higher growth compared to other feeding times. It is possible that this is because the plantlets have more time to contact with the culture medium, allowing them to accumulate and absorb nutrients, sugars, and water.
To evaluate the effect of the culture system on the in vitro mass propagation efficiency of C. asiatica, a comparison was made between the semi-solid and temporary immersion systems. The use of microcontainers for large-scale production of medicinal plants is not a cost-effective option, whereas bioreactors are expensive for mass production [29,41]. The experiments showed that TIS was an optimized culture system for large-scale production of C. asiatica due to its ability to increase growth and biomass accumulation. Shoots obtained from TIS showed improved, leaf, and root numbers, with increased biomass compared to conventional culture systems. The TIS micropropagation technique has been shown to be advantageous for growing various plant species. The intermittent contact between the liquid medium and explants provides essential nutrients and oxygen, reduces the accumulation of toxic gases and hydrodynamic forces, and enhances the overall quality of the plants [25,42,43]. Bayrakter [36] improved growth of Stevia rebaudiana shoot using TIS more than in a small culture container. TIS micropropagation of Lessertia frutescens L. provided a suitable multiplication rate of shoot compared with a continuous immersion system (CIS) and SSS [44], while SSS growth in microcontainers obstructed shoot proliferation and elongation of C. asiatica. Escalona et al. [45] found that the periodic exchange of gases within the culture vessel and intermittent contact between the explants and liquid medium in TIS improved photosynthesis in the plants. Improved aeration and CO2 concentration within culture containers were also found in TIS than in SSS systems [29,41]. Zhao et al. [46] informed that the utilization of TIS with forced ventilation was found to be effective in reducing morphological disorders, enhancing shoot quality and increasing the multiplication rate of medicinal plants, Rhodiola cremulata, while Aragon et al. [47] and Jova et al. [48] found that TIS resulted in a higher photosynthetic rate and optimal growth of the plantlets, as compared to continuous immersion. The TIS technique combined the benefits of both gelling and liquid media, leading to an overall improvement in the growth of the plantlets [21,24,49].

5. Conclusions

This is the first report providing important information on C. asiatica cultivation using a temporary immersion bioreactor. The temporary immersion system generated a large biomass in a small space, with optimal immersion times, stimulating growth and multiplication, giving improved biomass production of C. asiatica in an in vitro culture. Growth and biomass C. asiatica using the temporary immersion system method was higher than the conventional propagation technique in a microcontainer. Moreover, this study reported that the TIS could be a promising approach for large-scale commercial production of C. asiatica to meet the increasing demand in the pharmaceutical industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.; Data curation, B.K.; Formal analysis, A.K. and B.K.; Investigation, A.K.; Methodology, B.K.; Resources, T.W.; Validation, T.W.; Writing—original draft, T.W. and B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Natural Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) (R2565B060) and Global and Frontier Research University Fund, Naresuan University (R2566C051) form Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Naresuan University (NU) and the Natural Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) (R2565B060). We would like to thank the Plant Tissue Culture Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Thailand, for generously providing the necessary facilities. The third author acknowledges financial assistance from the Global and Frontier Research University Fund, Naresuan University (R2566C051).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belwal, T.; Andola, H.C.; Atanssova, M.S.; Joshi, B. Gotu Kola (Centella asiatica) in Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements; Nabavi, S.M., Silva, A.S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 265–275. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oyenihi, A.B.; Ahiante, B.O.; Oyenihi, O.R.; Masola, B. Centella asiatica: Its Potential for the Treatment of Diabetes in Diabetes, 2nd ed.; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinkhaus, B.; Lindner, M.; Schuppan, D.; Hahn, E.G. Chemical, pharmacological and clinical profile of the East Asian medical plant C. asiatica . Phytomedicine 2000, 7, 427–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, R.H.; Singh, L. Studies on the anti-anxiety effects of the medhya rasayana drug Bacopa monniera (L.) Wettst. International J. Ayurveda Pharm. Res. 1980, 1, 33–148. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gohil, K.; Jagruti, A.P.; Anuradha, K.G. Pharmacological Review on Centella asiatica: A Potential Herbal Cure-all. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 72, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bandara, S.M.; Lee, E.L.; Thomas, J.E. Goti kola (Centella aiatica L.): An Under-utilized Herb. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 5, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Prakash, V.; Jaiswal, N.; Srivastava, M.A. review on medicinal properties of Centella asiatica . Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sudhakaran, M.V. Botanical pharmacognosy of Centella asiatica (Linn.) urban. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2017, 9, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Diniz, L.R.L.; Calado, L.L.; Duarte, A.B.S.; Sousa, D.P. Centella asiatica and Its Metabolite Asiatic Acid: Wound Healing Effects and Therapeutic Potential. Metabolites 2023, 13, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arribas-López, E.; Zand, N.; Ojo, O.; Snowden, M.J.; Kochhar, T. A systematic review of the effect of Centella asiatica on wound healing. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2022, 19, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ong, G.H.; Wong, L.S.; Tan, A.L.; Yap, C.K. Effects of metal-contaminated soils on the accumulation of heavy metals in gotu kola (Centella asiatica) and the potential health risks: A study in Peninsular Malaysia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Biswas, T.; Parveen, O.; Pandey, V.P.; Mathur, A.; Dwivedi, U.N. Heavy metal accumulation efficiency, growth and centelloside production in the medicinal herb Centella asiatica (L.) urban under different soil concentrations of cadmium and lead. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Haque, S.M.; Chakraborty, A.; Dey, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Nayak, S.; Ghosh, B. Improved micropropagation of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. (Plantaginaceae) and antimicrobial activity of in vitro and ex vitro raised plants against multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of urinary tract infecting (UTI) and respiratory tract infecting (RTI) bacteria. Clin. Phytosci. 2017, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nath, T.K.; Chandra, S.N.; Tiwari, V.; Deo, S.B. Micropropagation of Centella asiatica (L.), a valuable medicinal herb. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2000, 63, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Loc, N.H.; An, N.T.T. Asiaticoside production from centella (Centella asiatica L. Urban) cell culture. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2010, 15, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Naidu, T.B.; Rao, S.N.; Mani, N.S.; Mohan, Y.J.; Pola, S. Conservation of an endangered medicinal plant Centella asiatica through plant tissue culture. Drug Invent. Today 2010, 2, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gallego, A.; Ramirez-Estrada, K.; Vidal-Limon, H.R.; Hidalgo, D.; Lalaleo, L.; Khan Kayani, W.; Palazon, J. Biotechnological production of centellosides in cell cultures of Centella asiatica (L) Urban. Eng. Life Sci. 2014, 14, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rahayu, S.; Roostika, I.; Bermawie, N. The effect of types and concentrations of auxins on callus induction of Centella asiatica . Nus. Biosci. 2016, 8, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Watt, M.P. The status of temporary immersion system (TIS) technology for plant micropropagation. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 14025–14035. [Google Scholar]
  20. Valdiani, A.; Hansen, O.K.; Nielsen, U.B.; Johannsen, V.K.; Shariat, M.; Georgiev, M.I.; Abiri, R. Bioreactor-based advances in plant tissue and cell culture: Challenges and prospects. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Georgiev, V.; Schumann, A.; Pavlov, A.; Bley, T. Temporary immersion systems in plant Biotechnology. Eng. Life Sci. 2014, 14, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Berthouly, M.; Etienne, H. Temporary immersion system: A new concept for use liquid medium in mass propagation. In Liquid Culture Systems for In Vitro Plant Propagation; Eide, A.K.H., Preil, W., Eds.; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 165–195. [Google Scholar]
  23. Carlo, A.; Tarraf, W.; Lambardi, M.; Benelli, C. Temporary immersion system for production of biomass and bioactive compounds from medicinal plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kunakhonnuruk, B.; Inthima, P.; Kongbangkerd, A. Improving bacoside yield of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Wettst. in temporary immersion system by increasing immersion time and lowering the intervals. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 191, 115859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Etienne, H.; Berthouly, M. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 69, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frometa, O.M.; Morgado, M.M.E.; Silva, J.A.T.; Morgado, D.T.P.; Gradaille, M.A.D. In vitro propagation of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex Hooker f. in a temporary immersion bioreactor. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 129, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, B.; Song, L.; Bekele, L.D.; Shi, J.; Jia, Q.; Zhang, B. Optimizing factors affecting development and propagation of Bletilla striata in a temporary immersion bioreactor system. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 232, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 437–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Paek, K.Y.; Chakrabarty, D.; Hahn, E.J. Application of bioreactor systems for large scale production of horticultural and medicinal plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2005, 81, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Distabanjong, C.; Distabanjong, K.; Woo, J.G.; Jang, S.W. Production of phytoplasma-free plants in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) using temporary immersion bioreactor. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1205, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gianguzzi, V.; Inglese, P.; Barone, E.; Sottile, F. In vitro regeneration of Capparis spinosa L. by using a temporary immersion system. Plants 2019, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carvalho, L.S.O.; Ozudogru, E.A.; Lambardi, M.; Paiva, L.V. Temporary immersion system for micropropagation of tree species: A bibliographic and systematic review. Not. Bot. Hortic. Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2019, 47, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ibrahim, R. The potential of bioreactor technology for large-scale plant micropropagation. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1155, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jesionek, A.; Kokotkiewicz, A.; Wlodarska, P.; Zabiegala, B.; Bucinski, A.; Luczkiewicz, M. Bioreactor shoot cultures of Rhododendron tomentosum for a large-scale production of bioactive volatile compounds. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 131, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vijendra, P.D.; Jayanna, S.G.; Kumar, V.; Gajula, H.; Rajashekar, J.; Sannabommaji, T.; Anuradha, C.M. Rapid in vitro propagation of Lucas aspera Spreng. A potential multipurpose Indian medicinal herb. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 107, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bayraktar, M. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using RITA bioreactor. HortScience 2019, 54, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martínez-Estrada, E.; Islas-Luna, B.; Pérez-Sato, J.A.; Bello-Bello, J.J. Temporary immersion improves in vitro multiplication and acclimatization of Anthurium andreanum Lind. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 249, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Perez-Alonso, N.; Wilken, D.; Gerth, A.; Jahn, A.; Nitzsche, H.M.; Kerns, G. Cardiotonic glycosides from biomass of Digitalis purpurea L. cultured in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 99, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roels, S.; Escalona, M.; Cejas, I.; Noceda, C.; Rodrıguez, R.; Canal, M.J.; Sandoval, J.; Debergh, P. Optimization of plantain (Musa AAB) micropropagation by temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2005, 82, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vendrame, W.A.; Xu, J.; Beleski, D.G. Micropropagation of Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. using SETIS™ bioreactor. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 153, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ilczuk, A.; Winkelmann, T.; Richartz, S.; Witomska, M.; Serek, M. In vitro propagation of Hippeastrum × chmielii Chm.–influence of flurprimidol and the culture in solid or liquid medium and in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2005, 83, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vives, K.; Andújar, I.; Lorenzo, J.C.; Concepción, O.; Hernández, M.; Escalona, M. Comparison of different in vitro micropropagation methods of Stevia rebaudiana . Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 131, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bello-Bello, J.J.; Cruz-Cruz, C.A.; Perez-Guerra, J.C. A new temporary immersion system for commercial micropropagation of banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine). Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2019, 55, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shaik, S.; Dewir, Y.H.; Singh, N.; Nicholas, A. Micropropagation and bioreactor studies of the medicinally important plant Lessertia (Sutherlandia) frutescens L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Escalona, M.; Aragon, C.; Capote, I.; Pina, D.; Cejas, I.; Rodríguez, R. Physiology of effects of temporary immersion bioreactor (TIB) on micropropagated plantlets. Acta Hortic. 2007, 748, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, Y.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y.; Saxena, P.K.; Liu, C.Z. Improved mass multiplication of Rhodiola crenulate shoots using temporary immersion bioreactor with forced ventilation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Aragon, C.; Escalona, M.; Rodriguez, R.; Canal, M.; Capote, I.; Pina, D.; Gonzalez-Olmedo, J. Effect of sucrose, light, and carbon dioxide on plantain micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2010, 46, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jova, M.C.; Kosky, R.G.; Cuellar, E.E. Effect of liquid media culture systems on yam growth (Dioscorea alata L. ‘Pacala Duclos’). Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2011, 15, 515–521. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kunakhonnuruk, B.; Kongbangkerd, A.; Inthima, P. Improving large-scale biomass and plumbagin production of Drosera communis A. St.-Hil. by temporary immersion system. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 137, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth and development of Centella asiatica shoots after 5 weeks of cultivation under different immersion frequencies and durations. One bottle contained 15 explants; scale bar = 5 cm for comparison of individual plantlet.
Figure 1. Growth and development of Centella asiatica shoots after 5 weeks of cultivation under different immersion frequencies and durations. One bottle contained 15 explants; scale bar = 5 cm for comparison of individual plantlet.
Horticulturae 09 00638 g001
Figure 2. Growth and development of Centella asiatica after 5 weeks of cultivation using semi-solid or temporary immersion systems supporting material with small glass beads in the bottom. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Figure 2. Growth and development of Centella asiatica after 5 weeks of cultivation using semi-solid or temporary immersion systems supporting material with small glass beads in the bottom. Scale bar = 5 cm.
Horticulturae 09 00638 g002
Table 1. Survival and growth parameters of Centella asiatica after 5 weeks of cultivation.
Table 1. Survival and growth parameters of Centella asiatica after 5 weeks of cultivation.
FactorsSurvivalNumber/Explant aLeaf Length aClump (g/Clump) aTotal Dry Weight b
(%)ShootsRootsLeaves(cm)Fresh WeightDry Weight(g/Replication)
Temporary immersion
3 times/day for 1 min100 ± 0.0 ns2.6 ± 0.0 abc3.7 ± 0.0 c6.2 ± 0.1 bc7.2 ± 0.1 cd2.05 ± 0.02 d0.18 ± 0.02 c2.75 ± 0.87 c
5 min100 ± 0.02.2 ± 0.0 bc3.4 ± 0.1 c7.0 ± 0.1 b8.6 ± 0.2 bc3.22 ± 0.10 bc0.31 ± 0.02 b4.72 ± 1.03 b
10 min100 ± 0.0 2.6 ± 0.1 abc3.8 ± 0.6 c6.6 ± 0.2 b7.1 ± 0.3 cd2.05 ± 0.15 d0.17 ± 0.01 c2.60 ± 0.70 c
6 times/day for 1 min100 ± 0.01.5 ± 0.1 c4.6 ± 0.5 bc4.2 ± 0.1 c5.8 ± 0.1 d0.81 ± 0.09 e0.07 ± 0.00 d1.02 ± 0.14 d
5 min100 ± 0.02.5 ± 0.1 abc10.9 ± 0.3 a8.4 ± 0.1 ab9.4 ± 0.2 ab4.20 ± 0.11 ab0.44 ± 0.01 a6.54 ± 0.43 a
10 min100 ± 0.03.1 ± 0.2 ab3.7 ± 0.2 c8.1 ± 0.3 ab9.2 ± 0.1 ab3.12 ± 0.05 bcd0.32 ± 0.00 b4.74 ± 0.24 b
12 times/day for 1 min100 ± 0.03.6 ± 0.3 a4.8 ± 0.4 bc8.4 ± 0.6 ab7.5 ± 0.2 c2.48 ± 0.29 cd0.23 ± 0.02 bc3.39 ± 1.29 bc
5 min100 ± 0.03.6 ± 0.2 a8.3 ± 1.2 ab10.2 ± 0.2 a10.7 ± 0.2 a5.06 ± 0.13 a0.48 ± 0.01 a7.27 ± 0.60 a
10 min100 ± 0.0 3.2 ± 0.1 ab4.6 ± 0.5 bc7.8 ± 0.6 b9.3 ± 0.4 ab4.60 ± 0.27 a0.43 ± 0.02 a6.44 ± 1.17 a
Culture systems
Temporary immersion100 ± 0.0 ns3.6 ± 0.2 *8.3 ± 1.2 *10.2 ± 0.2 *10.7 ± 0.2 *5.06 ± 0.13 *0.48 ± 0.01 *7.27 ± 0.60 *
Semi-solid 100 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.0 3.6 ± 0.0 3.3 ± 0.0 0.46 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.00 0.68 ± 0.11
The same letters within a row are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to DMRT. ns; not significantly different. a Values are mean ± SE of three replications (15 explants/replication). b Values are mean ± SD of three replications (15 explants/replication). * Significant differences between culture systems of each parameter according to the independent t test at p ≤ 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wongsa, T.; Kongbangkerd, A.; Kunakhonnuruk, B. Optimal Growth and Biomass of Centella asiatica Using a Twin-Bottle Temporary Immersion Bioreactor. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060638

AMA Style

Wongsa T, Kongbangkerd A, Kunakhonnuruk B. Optimal Growth and Biomass of Centella asiatica Using a Twin-Bottle Temporary Immersion Bioreactor. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(6):638. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wongsa, Thanakorn, Anupan Kongbangkerd, and Boworn Kunakhonnuruk. 2023. "Optimal Growth and Biomass of Centella asiatica Using a Twin-Bottle Temporary Immersion Bioreactor" Horticulturae 9, no. 6: 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop