Next Article in Journal
Performance of Wild Tomato Accessions and Elucidation of Resistance against Invasive Pest Phthorimaea absoluta Damage under Tropical Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
The Stability of Important Fruit Traits in Strawberry in Queensland
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Strobilurins and Carboxamides Improves the Physiology and Productivity of Tomato Plants in a Protected Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wood Fiber-Based Growing Media for Strawberry Cultivation: Effects of Incorporation of Peat and Compost
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/horticulturae9020142
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Global Warming on the Yields of Strawberry in Queensland: A Mini-Review

by
Christopher Michael Menzel
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, P.O. Box 5083, SCMC, Nambour, QLD 4560, Australia
Horticulturae 2023, 9(2), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020142
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection New Challenges in Productivity of Berry Fruits)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Light, temperature and rainfall affect the growth and yield of strawberry plants (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). The objective of this review was to determine the impact of global warming on the yields of strawberry in a temperate (summer crop) and subtropical environment (winter crop) in southern Queensland, Australia. Information was collected on the changes in temperature over five decades in two locations in this area. The relationship between relative yield and temperature from published data was used to determine the impact of global warming on productivity in the two locations. Finally, the impact of elevated concentrations of CO2 and temperature on yield was examined from studies in the literature. The average daily mean temperature has increased by 2 °C over the season on the Sunshine Coast (winter crop) since 1967 (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.69). The impact of global warming has been less severe on the Granite Belt (summer crop), with a 1 °C increase in temperature (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.37). Information was collected from the literature on the yield in individual temperature regimes in an experiment and these data were compared with the maximum yield in the same experiment (relative yield). There was a negative linear relationship between relative yield and temperature in most of the published literature. The mean (± s.d. or standard deviation) estimate of the slope from the regression was −0.14 (± 0.14), the median was −0.11 and the range was from −0.51 to 0.11 (n = 14 studies). Increases in temperature were associated with a decrease in yield of 14% to 28% in the two areas in Queensland. The results of other research indicated that elevated concentrations of CO2 do not benefit productivity when combined with elevated temperatures. Further decreases in yield are expected in the next few decades in the absence of heat-tolerant cultivars or other mitigating strategies.

1. Introduction

Global production of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is about 9 million tonnes each year [1,2,3]. The crop is important in China and the United States and throughout much of Europe. The plant is adapted to a wide range of environments, with commercial production in areas with a cool or warm temperate climate, a cool or warm subtropical climate or a Mediterranean climate [4,5,6,7,8].
The main scenarios for global climate change include an increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and an increase in average temperatures. Several studies suggest that yield and fruit quality in strawberry will decrease with climate change [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Modelling in California demonstrated that productivity will decrease by 10% by 2050 and by 40% by 2099 [14,15]. In these investigations, low yields under climate change were associated with high temperatures and drought.
Strawberry growers in Australia produce 90,000 tonnes of fruit worth AUD 450 million each year. The main production centers are in Queensland (42%), Victoria (36%) and Western Australia (10%). There are smaller industries in South Australia (7%), Tasmania (4%) and New South Wales (1%). Eighty-seven per cent of the supply goes to the retail sector and thirteen per cent to the food service sector. There are two principal growing areas in Queensland, each with a different production season. The bulk of the winter crop is produced from May to October on the Sunshine Coast. The summer crop is produced from October to May at elevation on the Granite Belt.
The objective of this review was to determine the impact of global warming on the yields of strawberry in a temperate (summer crop) and subtropical environment (winter crop) in southern Queensland, Australia. There is no information on the impact of global warming on the yields of strawberry in Queensland or the relationship between yield and temperature under field conditions in this area. Data were collected on the changes in temperature over the past five decades on the Sunshine Coast (winter crop) and the Granite Belt (summer crop). The relationship between yield and temperature from published data was used to assess the impact of global warming on productivity in the two areas. Finally, the impact of elevated concentrations of CO2 and temperature on yield was examined from studies in the literature.

2. Data Collection

Long-term weather data were collected for Nambour on the Sunshine Coast (latitude 26.6° S, longitude 152.9° E and elevation 29 m) and Applethorpe on the Granite Belt (latitude 28.6° S, longitude 151.9° E and elevation 872 m) (www.bom.gov.au) accessed on 30 October 2022. These data included long-term monthly average daily maximum and minimum temperatures, daily solar radiation and total monthly rainfall. Data were also collected on daily maximum and minimum temperatures from 1967 to 2021. Additional information was collected on the changes in the average temperature for Australia (www.bom.gov.au) and the globe (www.climate.nasa.gov) accessed on 30 October 2022.
The relationship between yield and temperature in strawberry from published data was used to assess the impact of global warming on productivity in the two areas in Queensland. Information was collected from the literature on the yield in an individual temperature regime in an experiment and these data were compared with the maximum yield in the same experiment (relative yield). The relationship between relative yield and temperature in each experiment was analyzed by linear or quadratic regression using GenStat (Version 21; VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK).
Additional data were collected from the literature on the yields of strawberry under elevated CO2 and elevated temperatures.

3. Changes in Temperature

There are differences in climate between the two main strawberry areas in Queensland. It is warmer and wetter at Nambour on the Sunshine Coast than at Applethorpe on the Granite Belt, whereas solar radiation levels are similar. Average yearly maximum temperatures are 26.1 °C and 20.9 °C in the two areas, average minimum temperatures are 15.9 °C and 9.0 °C, total yearly rainfall is 1,698 and 756 mm and average daily solar radiation is 17.9 and 18.4 MJ per m2, respectively.
The average daily mean temperature from May to October at Nambour has increased from 16.0 °C in 1967 to 18.0 °C in 2021, equivalent to a rise of 0.45 °C per decade (Figure 1; p < 0.001, R2 = 0.69). The maximum has increased by 0.17 °C per decade (p = 0.001, R2 = 0.17), while the minimum has increased by 0.73 °C per decade (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.66).
The average daily mean temperature over the season at Applethorpe has increased, but not as much as in Nambour (Figure 1). The mean temperature from October to May has increased from 16.8 °C in 1967 to 17.8 °C in 2021, equivalent to a rise of 0.24 °C per decade (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.37). The maximum has increased by 0.38 °C per decade (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.35), while the minimum has increased by 0.09 °C per decade (p = 0.029, R2 = 0.08).
The average daily mean temperature from January to December at Nambour has increased by 0.34 °C per decade (Figure 2; p < 0.001, R2 = 0.74). The mean temperature over the year at Applethorpe has increased by 0.25 °C per decade (Figure 2; p < 0.001, R2 = 0.47).
The average daily mean temperature in Australia from January to December has increased by 0.24 °C per decade (Figure 2; p < 0.001, R2 = 0.53). The average temperature across the globe has increased by 0.18 °C per decade (Figure 2; p < 0.001, R2 = 0.91). The temperature for Nambour has increased at a faster rate than for Australia and the globe. The temperature for Applethorpe has increased at a similar rate as for Australia and at a faster rate than for the globe.
Temperatures across the globe have increased over the past fifty years [23]. The rate of warming varies from one region to the next and there are differences between winter and summer and between days and nights.
Climate change is associated with increases in temperature in southern Queensland. Olesen [24] studied warming in coastal northern New South Wales, Australia and found that winter temperatures had increased by 1.5 °C from 1963 to 2009, whereas summer ones were largely unchanged. Frederiksen and Osbrough [25] showed that the shifts in temperature in Australia had mainly occurred in the past 20 years. Mean and maximum temperatures are projected to increase by 2 °C around mid-century in many areas of the globe [26].

4. Relationship between Yield and Temperature

The relationship between productivity and temperature in strawberry was assessed from published data (Table 1; n = 26 studies). There was a negative linear relationship between relative yield (yield in a specific temperature regime/maximum yield in an experiment) and temperature in most of the studies. The mean (± s.d. or standard deviation) estimate of the slope from the regression was −0.14 (± 0.14), the median was −0.11 and the range was from −0.51 to 0.11 (Figure 3; n = 14 studies). This means that on average, yield decreased by 14% for each degree increase in temperature. There are no data available on the effect of temperature on the productivity of strawberry in Australia from either glasshouse or field studies.
Table
Table 1. Relationship between relative yield and daily mean temperature in strawberry. Data from the sources shown in the table. CE = controlled environment; s.e. = standard error.
Table 1. Relationship between relative yield and daily mean temperature in strawberry. Data from the sources shown in the table. CE = controlled environment; s.e. = standard error.
ReferenceType of Exp.Range in Mean Temp.Range in Yield
(g per plant)		Regression between Yield and Temp.p Value from RegressionR2 Value from
Regression		Slope from Linear Regression (± s.e.)
Bjurman [27]Field13 °C to 17 °C33 to 315Linear0.656--
Kumakura and Shishido [28]CE15 °C to 25 °C26 to 132Linear<0.0010.86−0.0616 (0.0087)
Le Mière et al. [29]CE12 °C to 28 °CAbout 31 to 230Linear<0.0010.85−0.0519 (0.0038)
Kadir et al. [30]CE20 °C to 30 °C3.0 to 9.0Linear0.0870.75−0.5110 (0.0161)
Wagstaffe and Battey [31]CE15 °C to 27 °C889 to 1497Linear0.650--
Krüger et al. [32]Field13 °C to 16 °C112 to 797Linear0.723--
Krüger et al. [32]Field15 °C to 21 °C112 to 797Linear0.0430.310.1088 (0.0462)
Palencia et al. [33]Field9 °C to 15 °CAbout 5 to 75Linear<0.050.86-
Palencia et al. [33]Field9 °C to 15 °CAbout 5 to 120Quadratic>0.05--
Cocco et al. [34]Field12 °C to 14 °C317 to 1139Linear0.0010.52−0.2241 (0.0556)
Cocco et al. [34]Field11 °C to 14 °C317 to 1139Linear0.0060.41−0.1292 (0.0396)
Taghavi et al. [35]Field15 °C to 20 °C67 to 314Linear0.532--
Rahman et al. [36]Field15 °C to 20 °C222 to 480Linear0.0190.51−0.1531 (0.0677)
Rahman et al. [36]Field19 °C to 22 °C250 to 650Linear0.1010.53−0.1832 (0.0781)
Rahman et al. [36]Field20 °C to 23 °C172 to 414Linear0.0360.75−0.2264 (0.0626)
Rahman et al. [36]Field18 °C to 22 °C78 to 175Linear0.0180.84−0.1983 (0.0421)
Condori et al. [37]Field-0 to 80Linear<0.0010.28-
Condori et al. [37]Field-0 to 80Linear<0.0010.26-
Condori et al. [37]Field-0 to 80Linear<0.0010.18-
Condori et al. [37]Field-0 to 80Linear<0.0010.08-
Sønsteby and Heide [38]CE9 °C to 27 °C0 to 372Linear0.586--
Maskey et al. [20]Field9 °C to 21 °CAbout 3 to 109Linear-0.45−0.0755
Maskey et al. [20]Field8 °C to 24 °CAbout 12 to 870Linear-0.27−0.0939
Butare [39]CE20 °C to 30 °C195 to 1131Linear0.2480.71−0.0837 (0.0339)
Rivero et al. [40]CE9 °C to 27 °C590 to 1594Linear0.0770.10−0.0308 (0.0663)
Zhang et al. [41]CE8 °C to 17 °C106 to 871Linear0.1020.71-
Information was collected on the effect of temperature on productivity from studies in growth chambers and in the field. There are issues with both types of experiments. Yields and light levels are low in growth chambers and there are limited or inappropriate replication [42]. Temperature is often correlated with solar radiation in the field, making it difficult to separate the importance of the two factors on growth and yield [33].
A few studies were excluded from the analysis. This was because the plants were grown at relatively low temperatures below 17 °C [41] or there was a strong correlation between temperature and solar radiation in the field [33,37]. Le Mière et al. [29] investigated the effect of temperature on yield in glasshouses in the United Kingdom. The chambers were set at temperatures from 12 °C to 28 °C. There was a strong negative linear relationship between relative yield and temperature (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.85). Relative yield decreased by 5.2% for each degree increase in temperature (Table 1).

5. Effect of Global Warming on Yields in Queensland

The daily mean temperature has increased by 2 °C at Nambour over the past five decades. There has been a smaller change at Applethorpe, with the daily mean increasing by 1 °C. The analysis detailed above (Table 1; Figure 3) suggests a decrease in yield of 28% on the Sunshine Coast over this period, and a decrease of 14% on the Granite Belt.

6. Interaction between Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Yield

Increases in temperature with climate change are coupled with increases in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. The concentration of CO2 in the lower atmosphere in 2021 was 415 ppm [43]. There is an initial increase in yield with climate change due to higher photosynthesis under elevated CO2. However, eventually the impacts of high temperatures on growth override the benefits of higher photosynthesis in many species [44,45,46].
Environmental conditions affect photosynthesis in strawberry leaves. Net CO2 assimilation increases with increasing concentrations of CO2 and is saturated with an external concentration of CO2 (Ca) of 600 to 1,500 ppm [47,48,49]. The leaves can adapt to elevated CO2 over the long-term, with the response to higher CO2 diminishing over weeks or months [50]. Temperature also affects photosynthesis. There is a broad optimum for maximum net CO2 assimilation, with photosynthesis decreasing only under extreme conditions. The optimum range varies with cultivar and growing conditions and is usually from 20 °C to 30 °C [49,50,51,52]. Carlen et al. [53] examined the effect of temperature on CO2 assimilation in Switzerland. The optimum temperature for photosynthesis was 25 °C to 35 °C, with lower photosynthesis at lower or higher temperatures. Net CO2 assimilation was adapted to a wide range of conditions and was 60% of maximum values at 40 °C. The optimum temperature range typically increases when the plants are grown at higher temperatures [54].
Several studies have demonstrated that elevated concentrations of CO2 increase the yield of strawberry compared with ambient conditions [55,56,57,58,59,60]. This response suggests that higher concentrations of CO2 under climate change will counteract the impacts of higher temperatures. However, the limited data available indicate that elevated concentrations of CO2 are not beneficial when combined with elevated temperatures [61,62].
In the study of Balasooriya et al. [61] in Australia, net CO2 assimilation was higher at concentrations of CO2 of 650 or 900 ppm than at 400 ppm (Table 2). In contrast, temperature only had a small effect on CO2 assimilation. Yields were higher at intermediate CO2 and lower at 30 °C than at 25 °C. The highest yields were obtained at 25 °C with CO2 levels of 400 or 650 ppm. Sun et al. [62] examined the effect of CO2 and temperature on the yields of strawberry in growth chambers in China. Control plants under ambient CO2 (360 ppm) and temperatures (20 °C/15 °C) had similar yields as those under ambient CO2 and elevated temperatures (25 °C/20 °C) or under elevated CO2 (720 ppm) and elevated temperatures (10.5 to 12.0 g dry weight per plant; p > 0.05). The plants at elevated CO2 and ambient temperatures had higher yields than the other treatments (25 g dry weight per plant; p < 0.05). These results suggest that high CO2 under climate change is not likely to override the impact of global warming on productivity.
Yuan et al. [63] modelled the changes in productivity of several field crops in Oklahoma, United States. They found that the yields of soybean, sorghum, wheat and canola decreased by 5.7% to 19.2% under climate change. Elevated concentrations of CO2 increased photosynthesis, but this benefit was dissipated by the impacts of hot and dry weather on growth.
Table
Table 2. The effect of elevated CO2 and temperature on net CO2 assimilation and yield of strawberry in glasshouses in Melbourne, Australia. Data are the means (±s.e. or standard error) of two cultivars. Data were retrieved from Balasooriya et al. [61].
Table 2. The effect of elevated CO2 and temperature on net CO2 assimilation and yield of strawberry in glasshouses in Melbourne, Australia. Data are the means (±s.e. or standard error) of two cultivars. Data were retrieved from Balasooriya et al. [61].
TemperatureConcentration of CO2Net CO2 Assimilation
(µmol per m2 per s)		Yield
(g per plant)
25 °C400 ppm10.3 ± 0.346.9 ± 9.3
25 °C650 ppm15.1 ± 0.252.3 ± 5.1
25 °C950 ppm15.0 ± 0.139.2 ± 1.5
30 °C400 ppm11.1 ± 0.7 8.3 ± 0.9
30 °C650 ppm 14.2 ± 0.0335.6 ± 1.6
30 °C950 ppm12.0 ± 0.123.2 ± 4.8
Means
Temperature (25 °C) 13.5 ± 1.346.2 ± 3.1
Temperature (30 °C) 12.4 ± 3.722.4 ± 6.5
CO2 (400 ppm) 10.7 ± 0.327.6 ± 13.7
CO2 (650 ppm) 14.7 ± 0.343.9 ± 5.9
CO2 (950 ppm) 13.5 ± 1.131.2 ± 5.7

7. Conclusions

The main scenarios for global climate change include increases in the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and average temperatures. The daily mean temperature has increased by 2 °C on the Sunshine Coast over the past five decades. The impact of global warming has been less severe on the Granite Belt, with a 1 °C increase in temperature. These increases in temperature are associated with a decrease in yield of 14% to 28% in the two areas. There will be further decreases in yield in the next few decades in the absence of heat-tolerant cultivars or other mitigating strategies.

Funding

The Queensland Government funded this research through the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. The research received funds from the Florida Strawberry Growers’ Association (FSGA) to support the project “Strawberry Production in Queensland and Florida under a Warming Climate”.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the author.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Gary Hopewell, Jodi Hufer and Anton Zbonak (DAF) and to Tiffany Dale and Kenneth Parker (FSGA). Special thanks to Pat Abbott and Zalee Bates from the DAF library for supplying much of the literature.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nishizawa, T. Current status and future prospect of strawberry production in East Asia and Southeast Asia. Acta Hortic. 2021, 1309, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. de Tommaso, N.; López Aranda, J.M.; Greco, N.; Saporiti, M.; Maccarini, C.; Myrta, A. Sustainability of strawberry nurseries and fruit production in relation to fumigation practices in Europe. Acta Hortic. 2021, 1309, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clark, S.; Mousavi-Avval, S.H. Global warming potential of organic strawberry production under unheated high tunnels in Kentucky, USA. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Enciso-Garay, C.R.; Santacruz-Oviedo, V.R.; Garcia, D.; Guillén, O. Prolificity of strawberry genotypes in subtropical climate. Idesia 2020, 38, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Morkeliüne, A.; Rasiukevičiüte, N.; Valiuškaitè, A. Meteorological conditions in a temperate climate for Colletotrichum acutatum, strawberry pathogen distribution and susceptibility of different cultivars to anthracnose. Agriculture 2021, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saridaş, M.A. Seasonal variation of strawberry fruit quality in widely grown cultivars under Mediterranean climate condition. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 97, 103733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sønsteby, A.; Sadojevic, M.; Heide, O.M. Production methods for high yielding plants of everbearing strawberry in the Nordic climate. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hughes, B.R.; Fisher, P.; Jamieson, A.R. Comparison of nine clones of ‘Jewel’ strawberry in Ontario and Nova Scotia. Internat. J. Fruit Sci. 2013, 13, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Estrella, N.; Sparks, T.H.; Menzel, A. Trends and temperature response in the phenology of crops in Germany. Glob. Change Biol. 2007, 13, 1737–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lobell, D.B.; Cahill, K.N.; Field, C.B. Historical effects of temperature and precipitation on California crop yields. Clim. Change 2007, 81, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dale, A. How climate change could influence breeding and modern production systems in berry crops. Acta Hortic. 2009, 838, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Døving, A. Climate change and strawberry season in Norway. Acta Hortic. 2009, 842, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esitken, A.; Ercisli, S.; Yildiz, H.; Orhan, E. Does climate change have an effect on strawberry yield in colder growing areas? Acta Hortic. 2009, 838, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deschenes, O.; Kolstad, C. Economic impacts of climate change on California agriculture. Clim. Change 2011, 109, 365–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lobell, D.B.; Field, C.B. California perennial crops in a changing climate. Clim. Change 2011, 109, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Neri, D.; Baruzzi, G.; Massetani, F.; Faedi, W. Strawberry production in forced and protected culture in Europe as a response to climate change. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 92, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bethere, L.; Sïle, T.; Seņņikovs, J.; Bethers, U. Impact of climate change on the timing of strawberry phenological processes in the Baltic States. Est. J. Earth Sci. 2016, 65, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kerr, A.; Dialesandro, J.; Steenwerth, K.; Lopez-Brody, N.; Elias, E. Vulnerability of California specialty crops to projected mid-century temperature changes. Clim. Change 2018, 148, 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pathak, T.B.; Maskey, M.L.; Dahlberg, J.A.; Kearns, F.; Bali, K.M.; Zaccaria, D. Climate change trends and impacts on California agriculture: A detailed review. Agronomy 2018, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Maskey, M.L.; Pathak, T.B.; Dara, S.K. Weather based strawberry yield forecasts at field scale using statistical and machine learning models. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Heide, O.M.; Sønsteby, A. Climate-photothermographs, a tool for ecophysiological assessment of effects of climate warming in crop plants: Examples with three berry crops. J. Berry Res. 2020, 10, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hong, C.; Mueeler, N.D.; Burney, J.A.; Zhang, Y.; AghaKouchak, A.; Moore, F.C.; Qin, Y.; Tong, D.; Davis, S.J. Impacts of ozone and climate change on yields of perennial crops in California. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hansen, J.; Ruedy, R.; Glascoe, J.; Sato, M. GISS analysis of surface temperature change. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104, 30997–31022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olesen, T. Late 20th century warming in a coastal horticultural region and its effects on tree phenology. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2011, 39, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Frederiksen, J.S.; Osbrough, S.L. Tipping points and changes in Australia climate and extremes. Climate 2022, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pereira, S.C.; Carvalho, D.; Rocha, A. Temperature and precipitation extremes over the Iberian Peninsula under climate change scenarios: A review. Climate 2021, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bjurman, B. Environmental influence on the vegetative and generative development of the strawberry plant. Swed. J. Agric. Sci. 1975, 5, 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumakura, H.; Shishido, Y. The effect of daytime, nighttime, and mean diurnal temperatures on the growth of ‘Morioka-16′ strawberry fruit and plants. J. Jap. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1994, 62, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Le Mière, P.; Hadley, P.; Darby, J.; Battey, N.H. The effect of thermal environment, planting date and crown size on growth, development and yield of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Elsanta. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 1998, 73, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kadir, S.; Sidhu, G.; Al-Khatib, K. Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) growth and productivity as affected by temperature. HortScience 2006, 41, 1423–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wagstaffe, A.; Battey, N.H. The optimum temperature for long-season cropping in the everbearing strawberry ‘Everest’. Acta Hortic. 2006, 708, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kruger, E.; Josuttis, M.; Nestby, R.; Toldam-Andersen, T.B.; Carlen, C.; Mezzetti, B. Influence of growing conditions at different latitudes of Europe on strawberry growth performance, yield and quality. J. Berry Res. 2012, 2, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Palencia, P.; Martínez, F.; Medina, J.J.; López-Medina, J. Strawberry yield efficiency and its correlation with temperature and solar radiation. Hortic. Bras. 2013, 31, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Cocco, C.; Magnani, S.; Maltoni, M.L.; Quacquarelli, I.; Cacchi, M.; Antunes, L.E.C.; D’Antuono, L.F.; Faedi, W.; Baruzzi, G. Effects of site and genotype on strawberry fruits quality traits and bioactive compounds. J. Berry Res. 2015, 5, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Taghavi, T.; Dale, A.; Hughes, B.; Zandstra, J. The performance of dayneutral strawberries differs between environments in Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 96, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rahman, M.M.; Saha, M.G.; Islam, M.N.; Ullah, M.A.; Quamruzzaman, A.K.M. Phenology and yield of strawberry as influenced by planting time and genotypes in sub-tropical region. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. Ser. B Biol Sci. 2016, 59, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Condori, B.; Fleisher, D.H.; Lewers, K. Relationship of strawberry yield with microclimate factors in open and covered raised-bed production. Trans. ASABE 2017, 60, 1511–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sønsteby, A.; Heide, O.M. Flowering performance and yield of established and recent strawberry cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa) as affected by raising temperature and photoperiod. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 92, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Butare, D. Effect of temperature on plant growth and yield in ever-bearing strawberry Fragaria × ananassa, cv. Florentina. Master’s Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnap, Sweden, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rivero, R.; Remberg, S.F.; Heide, O.M.; Sønsteby, A. Effect of temperature and photoperiod preconditioning on flowering and yield performance of three everbearing strawberry cultivars. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Q.; Yao, M.; Yang, Z. Characteristics of compound low-temperature and limited-light events in southern China and their effects on greenhouse grown strawberry. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2022, 150, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Poorter, H.; Fiorani, F.; Pieruschka, R.; Wojciechowski, T.; van der Putten, W.; Kleyer, M.; Schurr, U.; Postma, J. Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 838–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Abdussamatov, H.I. Climate sensitivity to an increase in the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere decreases with an increase in the water vapor concentration upon warming. Geomagn. Aeron. 2021, 61, 978–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ruiz-Vera, U.M.; Siebers, M.; Gray, S.B.; Drag, D.W.; Rosenthal, D.M.; Kimball, B.A.; Ort, D.R.; Bernacchi, C.J. Global warming can negate the expected CO2 stimulation in photosynthesis and productivity for soybean grown in the Midwestern United States. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 410–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, W.; Cai, C.; He, J.; Gu, J.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, J.; Liu, G. Yield, dry matter distribution and photosynthetic characteristics of rice under elevated CO2 and increased temperature conditions. Field Crops Res. 2020, 248, 107605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ainsworth, E.A.; Long, S.P. 30 years of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): What have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? Glob. Change Biol. 2021, 27, 27–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Keutgen, N.; Chen, K.; Lenz, F. Responses of strawberry leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and macronutrient contents to elevated CO2. J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 150, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mochizuki, Y.; Iwasaki, Y.; Funayama, M.; Ninomiya, S.; Fuke, M.; Nwe, Y.Y.; Yamada, M.; Ogiwara, I. Analysis of a high-yielding strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivar ‘Benihoppe’ with focus on dry matter production and leaf photosynthetic rate. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2013, 82, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bunce, J.A. Seasonal patterns of photosynthetic response and acclimation to elevated carbon dioxide in field-grown strawberry. Photosynth. Res. 2001, 68, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oda, Y. Effects of light intensity, CO2 concentration and leaf temperature on gas exchange of strawberry plants—Feasibility studies on CO2 enrichment in Japanese conditions. Acta Hortic. 1997, 439, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wada, Y.; Soeno, T.; Inaba, Y. Effects of light and temperature on photosynthetic enhancement by high CO2 concentration of strawberry cultivar Tochiotome leaves under forcing or half-forcing culture. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 2010, 79, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jun, H.; Jung, H.; Imai, K. Gas exchange characteristics of a leading cultivar of Korean strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa, ‘Sulhyang’). Sci. Hortic. 2017, 221, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carlen, C.; Potel, A.M.; Ançay, A. Photosynthetic response of strawberry leaves to changing temperatures. Acta Hortic. 2009, 838, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chabot, B.F.; Chabot, J.F. Effects of light and temperature on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis in Fragaria vesca. Oecologia 1977, 26, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sung, F.J.M.; Chen, J.J. Gas exchange rate and yield response of strawberry to carbon dioxide enrichment. Sci. Hortic. 1991, 48, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Deng, X.; Woodward, F.I. The growth and yield responses of Fragaria ananassa to elevated CO2 and N supply. Ann. Bot. 1998, 81, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Itani, Y.; Hara, T.; Phun, W.; Fujime, Y.; Yoshida, Y. Effects of CO2 enrichment and planting density on the yield, fruit quality and absorption of water and mineral nutrients in strawberry grown in peat bag culture. Environ. Control Biol. 1999, 37, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hidaka, K.; Nakahara, S.; Yasutake, D.; Zhang, Y.; Okayasu, T.; Dan, K.; Kitano, M.; Sone, K. Crop-load CO2 enrichment improves strawberry yield and fuel use efficiency in protected cultivations. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 301, 111104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mochizuki, Y.; Murakami, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Worarad, K.; Yonezu, Y.; Umeda, H.; Okayama, T.; Inoue, E. Local CO2 application within strawberry plant canopy increased dry matter production and fruit yield in summer and autumn. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2022, 22, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tagawa, A.; Ehara, M.; Ito, Y.; Araki, T.; Ozaki, Y.; Shishido, Y. Effects of CO2 enrichment on yield, photosynthetic rate, translocation and distribution of photoassimilates in strawberry ‘Sagahonoka’. Agronomy 2022, 12, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Balasooriya, H.N.; Dassanayake, K.B.; Seneweera, S.; Ajlouni, S. Interaction of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) growth and fruit yield. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2018, 12, 279–287. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sun, P.; Mantri, N.; Lou, H.; Hu, Y.; Sun, D.; Zhu, Y.; Dong, T.; Lu, H. Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on yield and fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) at two levels of nitrogen application. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Yuan, L.; Zhang, X.-C.; Busteed, P.; Flanagan, D.C. Simulating the potential effects of elevated CO2 concentration and temperature coupled with storm intensification on crop yield, surface runoff, and soil loss based on 25 GCMs ensemble: A site-specific case study in Oklahoma. Catena 2022, 214, 106251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Horticulturae 09 00142 g001 550
Figure 1. Changes in average daily mean temperature at Nambour from May to October and at Applethorpe from October to May from 1967 to 2021. Data are from www.bom.gov.au. For Nambour: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0451 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.69). For Applethorpe: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0236 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.37).
Figure 1. Changes in average daily mean temperature at Nambour from May to October and at Applethorpe from October to May from 1967 to 2021. Data are from www.bom.gov.au. For Nambour: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0451 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.69). For Applethorpe: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0236 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.37).
Horticulturae 09 00142 g001
Horticulturae 09 00142 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in average daily mean temperature during the year for Nambour, Applethorpe, Australia and the globe from 1967 to 2021. Data are from www.bom.gov.au and www.climate.nasa.gov. For Nambour: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0339 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.74). For Applethorpe: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0247 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.47). For Australia: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0240 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.53). For Globe: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0184 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.91).
Figure 2. Changes in average daily mean temperature during the year for Nambour, Applethorpe, Australia and the globe from 1967 to 2021. Data are from www.bom.gov.au and www.climate.nasa.gov. For Nambour: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0339 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.74). For Applethorpe: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0247 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.47). For Australia: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0240 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.53). For Globe: Temperature (°C) = Intercept + 0.0184 × Year (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.91).
Horticulturae 09 00142 g002
Horticulturae 09 00142 g003 550
Figure 3. Box plot for the slope from the linear regression between relative yield and average daily mean temperature in strawberry (n = 14 studies). Data are from the citations shown in Table 1.
Figure 3. Box plot for the slope from the linear regression between relative yield and average daily mean temperature in strawberry (n = 14 studies). Data are from the citations shown in Table 1.
Horticulturae 09 00142 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Menzel, C.M. Effect of Global Warming on the Yields of Strawberry in Queensland: A Mini-Review. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020142

AMA Style

Menzel CM. Effect of Global Warming on the Yields of Strawberry in Queensland: A Mini-Review. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(2):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Menzel, Christopher Michael. 2023. "Effect of Global Warming on the Yields of Strawberry in Queensland: A Mini-Review" Horticulturae 9, no. 2: 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020142

APA Style

Menzel, C. M. (2023). Effect of Global Warming on the Yields of Strawberry in Queensland: A Mini-Review. Horticulturae, 9(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop