Next Article in Journal
Mediterranean Extensive Green Roof Self-Sustainability Mediated by Substrate Composition and Plant Strategy
Next Article in Special Issue
Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma asperellum CMT10 against Strawberry Root Rot Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Dissecting the Role of Cell Wall Changes in Chilling Injury-Induced Gel Formation, Rubberiness, and Mealiness in Apricots
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Isolation, Identification, and Insecticidal Activities of Indigenous Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernema carpocapsae) and Their Symbiotic Bacteria (Xenorhabdus nematophila) against the Larvae of Pieris brassicae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Potential Biocontrol Isolates of Trichoderma asperellum for Management of Collar Rot Disease in Tomato

1
Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
2
Division of Agricultural Chemicals, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
3
Division of Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology (CPCT), ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
4
Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
5
Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(10), 1116; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101116
Submission received: 20 July 2023 / Revised: 12 August 2023 / Accepted: 19 August 2023 / Published: 10 October 2023

Abstract

:
Bio-control agents are the best alternative to chemicals for the successful management of plant diseases. Among them, Trichoderma is commonly used as a biological control agent in plant disease management due to its ability to suppress soil-borne plant pathogens. In the present study, 20 Trichoderma asperellum isolates were collected from different geographical locations and confirmed using morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic inferences based on combined ITS and β-tubulin sequences. All twenty isolates were screened for their antagonism against the collar rot pathogen under in vitro and in planta conditions. The isolates were evaluated through dual culture and volatile methods in an in vitro study. Isolate A10 inhibited the test pathogen Agroathelia rolfsii at 94.66% in a dual culture assay and 70.95% in a volatile assay, followed by the isolates A11 and A17, which recorded 82.64% and 81.19% in dual culture assay and 63.75% and 68.27% in the volatile assay respectively. An in planta study was conducted under greenhouse conditions in tomato var. pusa ruby by pre- and post-inoculation of T. asperellum isolates in the A. rolfsii infected soil to evaluate their antagonistic potential against the disease. The A10 isolate was found effective under both pre- and post-inoculation conditions, with a disease inhibition percent of 86.17 and 80.60, respectively, followed by the isolates A11 and A17, which exhibited inhibition of 77.80% and 75.00% in pre-inoculation and 72.22% and 69.44% in post-inoculation, respectively. Further, biochemical analysis was conducted to determine the specific activity of hydrolytic enzymes produced by T. asperellum during interaction with A. rolfsii. We found that isolate A10 produces more hydrolytic enzymes with the specific activity of 174.68 IU/mg of β-1,3 glucanase, 183.48 IU/mg of β-1, 4 glucanase, 106.06 IU/mg of protease, followed by isolate A17, A11 respectively. In GC-MS analysis, we observed maximum anti-microbial volatile organic compounds from the isolate A10, including 2H-Pyran-2-one (17.39%), which was found to be most abundant, followed by dienolactone (8.43%), α-pyrone (2.19%), and harziandione (0.24%) respective retention time of 33.48, 33.85, 33.39, and 64.23 min, respectively, compared to other isolates. In the TLC assay, we observed that a greater number of bands were produced by the A10 and A17 isolates in the Hexane: Ethyl Acetate (1:1) solvent system than in the 9:1 solvent system, which represents the presence of major metabolites in the ethyl acetate extract.

1. Introduction

Agroathelia rolfsii (Sacc.) Redhead and Mullineux (Agaricomycetes: Amylocorticiales) is a destructive, necrotrophic, soil-borne plant pathogen that causes collar rot or southern blight disease [1]. It was first reported in Florida in 1892 by Rolfs on tomatoes. They have an extremely wide host range that includes more than 600 plant species across 100 plant families, such as groundnut, green bean, lima bean, onion, garden bean, pepper, potato, sweet potato, tomato, and watermelon [2,3,4], causing huge losses worldwide. It causes significant losses in various crops in India, including peanuts, soybeans, tomatoes, peppers, and many others. In peanut and tomato crops, the losses due to A. rolfsii in India have been estimated to be around 30–40% of the total crop yield [5,6,7]. Management is not successful in the field because of the soil-borne nature of the pathogen.
Moreover, it produces prolific growth and can produce persistent sclerotia, which plays a key role in the disease cycle. Like many other soil-borne fungal diseases, A. rolfsii continues to be a difficult pathogen to control due to its wide host range, abundant persistent sclerotia, and genetic variability among populations [8]. Biological control is an environmentally sound and effective means of managing plant diseases. Recently, the use of potential biocontrol agents has gained importance for the management of pests and diseases because of their cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and eco-friendly nature.
The genus Trichoderma is a group of fungi that is well-known for their biocontrol potential against a range of plant pathogens, including A. rolfsii [9,10,11,12]. Trichoderma spp. are natural antagonists that can compete with plant pathogens via various mechanisms, viz., space and nutrients, production of enzymes, and secondary metabolites that can inhibit or kill the pathogens [13,14] and confrontation through mycoparasitism or either by inducing resistance and plant defense reactions [15,16,17].
However, Trichoderma asperellum (Sordariomycetes; Hypocreaceae) possesses a dual activity of both biocontrol and plant growth-promoting properties [18,19,20]. The colonization of the Arabidopsis root by T. asperellum SKT-1 and its culture filtrate elicit an ISR (Induced Systemic Resistance) against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 through the increased expression of JA (Jasmonic Acid)/ET (Ethylene) and SA (Salicylic Acid) inducing genes [21]. Similar to Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), T. asperellum- ISR is activated by the JA/ET signaling pathway [22]. For instance, T. asperellum was used by a number of nations to stop crown rot, root rot, and damping off [23]. Swollenin production is induced in plants as a result of T. asperellum colonization of the roots to provide a local defense [24]. The ethylene and H2O2-mediated plant defense responses against Rhizoctonia solani attacks were induced by the synthesis of T. asperellum xylanases in plants [25].
There were many secondary metabolites like 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one (6-PP), 2,4-ditert-butyl phenol, propenyl phenyl methyl ester, heptanes, viridin, and harzianolides were reported from Trichoderma spp. [26]. More importantly, metabolites, like 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one, have antifungal activity against various plant pathogens [27]. The isolates of T. asperellum were known to produce several hydrolytic enzymes like cellulase, β-1,3-glucanases, β-1,4-glucanases, chitinase, and protease with antifungal ability by degrading the cell wall components of the various plant pathogens [28,29,30,31].
Therefore, the present study was carried out to evaluate T. asperellum isolates for their antagonistic activity against the collar rot pathogen under in vitro and in planta conditions and to characterize the bioactive compounds produced by this bio-control agent. This information will facilitate extensive applications of formulation in the field of bio-control in the future for the successful management of collar rot disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Isolation of the Fungus

In 2022, from March to October, 20 soil and rootsamples were collected from the nine states of India (New Delhi, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Gujarat, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh). Isolation of the potential fungal biocontrol isolates from soil samples was performed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) according to the procedure described by [32]. Plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 5–7 days. The Trichoderma growth was obtained after 5–7 days and further purified by sub-culturing. The purified fungal isolates were maintained on PDA slants at 4°C. All the twenty obtained isolates were deposited in the Indian Type Culture Collection (ITCC) at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. A highly virulent isolate A. rolfsii (Sr38), obtained during our previous work (ITCC Code: 8665, Accession number: OR192927), was used to evaluate the biocontrol potential of the obtained twenty T. asperellum isolates.

2.2. Morphological Observations

Morphological identification of the twenty potential biocontrol T. asperellum isolates was performed under the compound microscope along with camera attachment (ProgRes capture pro2.7- JENOPTIK). Isolates were identified based on microscopic features, including conidiophores branching, the shape and size of the phialides, and the conidia.

2.3. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis

DNA from all the twenty isolates was extracted using a CTAB (Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide), procedure given by Cullings [33]. The amplification of the ITS region was carried out using universal primers ITS1 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′ and ITS4 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′ [34], Β-tubf1-F 5′-CAGCTCGAGCGTATGAACGTCT-3′and B-tubr1-R 5′-TGTACCAATGCAAGAAAGCCTT-3′ primers were used for the amplification of β-tubulin region [35]. A total volume of 25 µL PCR mixture consisted of 12.5 µL DreamTaq Green PCR master mix (Thermo Scientific, Pune, India) (including 0.25 mM each of dNTP, 2mM MgCl2, and Taq DNA polymerase), 9.5 µL nuclease-free water, 1 µL (10 Pmol/ µL of each forward and reverse primer), and 1 µL (100 ng/ µL) of fungal DNA. PCR was performed with initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature at 57 °C for 1 min, primer extension at 72 °C for 2 min, and final primer extension at 72 °C for 5 min for the ITS region. The PCR for β-tubulin was performed with initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature at 61 °C for 40 s, primer extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and final primer extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The electrophoresis was performed using 1.2% agarose gel with 0.5 mg/µL ethidium bromide in 1xTAE buffer (100 V, 400 mA for 30 min) to visualize the PCR products. The 1 kb DNA marker (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to estimate the size of the PCR products, and further, the samples were sequenced through outsourcing. The NCBI Nucleotide BLAST was done on all the sequences to confirm the species' identity. The phylogenetic analysis and the tree were constructed by combining sequences of ITS (550 bp) and β-tubulin (1025 bp) using MEGA version 11 with the maximum likelihood method. The ex-type strain of T. asperellum CBS 433.97 (NR130668, XM024905825) as a reference sequence, Chaetomium globosumCBS 160.62 (NR144851, KT214742) as an outgroup, and other closely related species includes T. pubescens (KF294849, KF609264), T. harzianum (MK886859, MK895942), T. hamatum (LT707583, LT707606), T. longibrachiatum (JN039058, KF595268), T. virens (HM046563, KF595234) were used to construct the tree. To assess the stability of branches, a bootstrap analysis with 1000 replications was performed.

2.4. In Vitro Antagonistic Assay

The twenty T. asperellum isolates were tested for their in vitro antagonistic activity against A. rolfsii using a dual culture assay. All the T. asperellum isolates, and A. rolfsii isolate Sr38 were grown on PDA plates for 7 days at 28 ± 2 °C. On the PDA plate, a 5 mm disc of T. asperellum and the test pathogen (A. rolfsii) were placed immediately opposite one another, 2 cm from the edge, and cultured for 7 days at 28 ± 2 °C. As a control, separate petri plates containing only the pathogen (A. rolfsii) were kept. Three replications of each treatment were used for the whole experiment. Following Garcia’s formula [36], which measures Inhibition (%) = 100 [(C − T)/C], the radial growth (mm) and percent inhibition were measured and calculated. C represents the growth of the pathogen in the control plate, and T represents the growth of the pathogen in the dual culture plate (treatment) [37]. The impact of antibiotics generated by antagonistic fungi (Trichoderma) was investigated using a volatile assay [38,39]. A 5 mm T. asperellum mycelial disc was centered on the PDA plate, and another plate had the pathogen A. rolfsii inoculated in the same way. Each petri dish pair was sealed together with cellophane adhesive tape with the antagonist plate down and the pathogen plate on the upside and incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 7 days. As a control, Petri dishes were used with the pathogen on the top plate and without the antagonist on the bottom plate. According to Garcia, the percentage of mycelial growth inhibition was calculated 7 days after inoculation.

2.5. In Planta Bio-Control Assay

An in planta study was conducted on one-month-old tomato plants (var. Pusa Ruby) by pre- and post-inoculation approach of T. asperellum isolates in the A. rolfsii infected soil to evaluate their antagonistic potential against the disease. The experiment was carried out at the Center for Protected Cultivation Technology (CPCT), IARI, New Delhi. The experiment was conducted by keeping four treatments for all the isolates, viz., control (treated with distilled water), biocontrol treated, pathogen treated, and pathogen + biocontrol-treated plants to compare the effect.
Sorghum grains were used to multiply the test pathogen A. rolfsii. The grains were initially soaked in water overnight and then drained off the excess water, filled 100 g sorghum grains in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, plugged with non-absorbent cotton, and autoclaved at 15 psi at 121 °C for 30 min. After cooling at room temperature, the flasks were inoculated with mycelial discs of the 7-day-old culture of A. rolfsii under aseptic conditions and incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 7 days until the sorghum grains were completely covered with A. rolfsii growth. The evaluation was conducted by mixing 10 g of A. rolfsii inoculums/ kg of soil to make the infected soil.
The seven-day-old pure culture of T. asperellum isolates was used after culturing on PDA plates upon incubation at 28 ± 2 °C. To prepare the spore suspension, 5 mL of sterile distilled water was added to each plate, and the spores were then scraped off with a sterile spatula; the spore suspensions were filtered, and the concentrations were adjusted to 108 spores/ ml for all the isolates. The evaluation was carried out through pre- and post-inoculation approaches by applying 100 mL of T. asperellum spore suspension per pot as a drench and seedling root dip.
In the case of the post-inoculation approach, each T. asperellum isolate’s spore suspension was then added separately for each isolate evaluation after 5 days of transplanting plants in the infected soil in the pot. Dipping the seedlings in T. asperellum spore suspension for 60 min and then transplanting the plants in the soil, which is already drenched with T. asperellum spore suspensions in the infected soil in case of the pre-inoculation approach.
After 10 days, the disease severity index was calculated according to the scale, which includes 0 = no disease symptoms; 1 = disease symptoms without visible fungal outgrowth; 2 = disease symptoms with visible fungal growth; 3 = partial wilting of the plant; and 4 = complete wilting and plant death. The experiment was conducted thrice, with three replications of each treatment, using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The data collected from the pathogen + biocontrol treatment from all the isolate’s evaluation and the disease severity index (DSI) was calculated for both pre- and post-inoculation conditions. The disease severity index was calculated using the following formula,
DSI   % = Σ Severity   score × Number   of   infected   plants   having   the   sames   core Total   number   of   plants   observed × Maximum   rating   scale   number × 100

2.6. Biochemical Analysis

The specific activity of the hydrolytic enzymes (cellulase, β-1,3 glucanase, β-1,4 glucanase, protease, and chitinase) in association with A. rolfsii was investigated for all the isolates of T. asperellum. The enzyme assay was conducted in a minimal synthetic medium supplemented with colloidal chitin at 0.05% (w/v) as sole carbon source by inoculation with 1 mL spore suspension of T. asperellum isolates (2 × 108 cfu/mL) and test pathogen (A. rolfsii) in a 50 mL medium and incubated in a BOD cum rotary shaker at 150 rpm at 28 ± 2 °C for 7 days. The mycelial mat was separated to obtain the culture filtrate by running it through Whatman no. 42 filter paper before centrifuging at 6000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was immediately tested for enzyme activity after being collected into a sterilized conical flask. Enzyme activity was expressed in specific activity as IU/mg protein. The approach utilized by Bradford [40] was used to calculate the protein content of each treatment’s culture supernatants. Non-enzymatic controls were performed using boiled enzymes and were subtracted from the enzymatic values. The details of substrates and standards used are given in Table 1. The amount of enzyme required to create one micromole of reducing sugar per minute per milliliter of culture supernatants was the definition of unit activity.

2.6.1. Cellulase Assay

A total of 1 mL of 0.5% cellulose was suspended in 50 mM (0.05 M) citrate phosphate buffer (pH 4.8), and 1 mL of culture filtrates from various T. asperellum isolates were used separately in the assay mixture taken in 15 mL test tubes. At 50 °C, the reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min. A 3 mL solution of 1% DNS (Dinitrosalicylate) reagent was added to stop the reaction. It was then heated for 10 min at 100 °C to produce the reddish-brown coloration. In place of culture filtrate, distilled water was used to create the blanks. The amount of reducing sugar released was calculated using the standard glucose curve, and the absorbance was measured at 530 nm [41].

2.6.2. β-1,3 Glucanase Assay

The assay mixture contains 0.5 mL laminarin (3.2 mg/mL distilled water), 1 mL of 0.05 M citrate buffer, and 0.5 mL of culture filtrates of various T. asperellum isolates separately. At 40 °C, the reaction mixture was incubated for 60 min. The reaction was stopped by mixing 2 mL of DNS and incubating in a boiling water bath for 15 min. The absorbance was measured at 530 nm and calculated using the standard glucose curve [42].

2.6.3. β-1,4 Glucanase Assay

A mixture of 1.0 mL of culture filtrate, 2.0 mL of 0.05 M citrate buffer (pH 4.8), and 1 mL of 1.0% carboxy methyl cellulose was combined and incubated at 55 °C for 30 min in a water bath with periodic shaking. By boiling the mixture and adding 4.0 mL of the dinitro salicylic acid reagent to terminate the reaction, the absorbance was measured at 575 nm, and the enzyme activity was calculated using a standard glucose curve [43].

2.6.4. Chitinase Assay

Preparation of Colloidal Chitin

The colloidal chitin was made from crude chitin from shrimps using the process described by Vessey and Pegg [44]:
A total of 30 g of crude chitin (Himedia-GRM1356) were ground and washed in 500 mL of distilled water. After decanting the water, the residue was combined with 505 mL of acidified ethanol- ether combination (ethanol: diethyl ether: Hcl = 250:250:5 mL). The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 5 °C at 12,000 rpm, and the residue was recovered. At 0 °C, 10 mL acetone was added, followed by concentrated HCl until the residues were completely dissolved. The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 5 °C at 12,000 rpm, and the supernatant was collected. 1.5 L distilled water and ice was added to the supernatant, and chitin was allowed to precipitate for 2 h at 0 °C. Chitin was washed three times with 1 L of distilled water, and each time it was centrifuged. The last residue was collected, and this colloidal form of chitin was stored in an airtight container at 0 °C for subsequent use.

Enzyme Assay

A total of 1.0 mL of Mcllvaine’s buffer (pH 4.0), 0.5 mL of culture filtrate (an enzyme source), and 0.5 mL of colloidal chitin suspension were added to the reaction mixture. This mixture was properly mixed before being incubated at 37 °C for 20 min in a water bath with occasional shaking. By boiling the mixture for three minutes in a water bath, the process was stopped. 3.0 mL of potassium ferric cyanide reagent was added and warmed in a boiling water bath for 15 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture at 420 nm was used to calculate the amount of N-acetyl glucosamine (NAG) released using the standard NAG curve [45].

2.6.5. Protease Assay

The substrate (1% casein in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) was denatured in a water bath at 100 °C for 15 min before cooling to room temperature. Later a reaction mixture consisting of 1 mL of the substrate and 1 mL of enzyme solution was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. To that reaction mixture, 3 mL of tri-chloro acetic acid (TCA) was added to settle down. The tubes were left at 4 °C for an hour to allow the precipitation of undigested protein. At 280 nm, the absorbance of liberated tyrosine in the filtrate was measured.

2.7. Secondary Metabolites Profiling

2.7.1. Extraction and Separation of Antifungal Metabolites

Seven T. asperellum isolates (A8, A10, A11, A12, A15, A17, and A20) were chosen according to their efficiency for the secondary metabolites profiling. They were then cultured in 100 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB). Following inoculation, the medium was incubated for 15 days at 28 ± 2 °C while being continuously shaken at 160 rpm in an incubator shaker. The mycelial biomass was then separated by passing it through a Whatman no. 1 filter, and the filtrates were then successively extracted three times using a separating funnel with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The extracted fractions were evaporated to produce a concentrate of ethyl acetate using a rotary evaporator (IKA® RV 10; Staufen, Germany). The remaining polar filtrates were passed through anhydrous sodium sulfate (10 g) to remove the excess water and stored for further analysis. The ethyl acetate concentrate was diluted to prepare a 5 µg/mL solution in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) grade ethyl acetate and subjected to analysis for volatile organic compounds.

2.7.2. GC-MS Analysis

Volatile organic compounds produced by each of the seven tested isolates were analyzed on 6850C Agilent GC-MS (Agilent Technologies®, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Following their separation by an Agilent HP-5MS column (30 m, 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 µm), the components was identified by the mass spectrometer based on their retention index and molecular weights. Helium gas (>99.99% purity) was utilized as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a pressure of 10 psi. Each sample (1 µL) was injected using a built-in auto-injector with a 20:1 split ratio into the gas chromatograph (GC). A GC-MS temperature program was developed that started at 40 °C, increased by 3 °C each minute to 130 °C, and then held that temperature for 2 min. In addition, the temperature increased by 5 °C every minute until it reached 210 °C and stayed there for two minutes. The temperature was then increased by 10 °C/min to 350 °C. The total run time for each sample was 64 min. The following settings were used for the MS acquisition parameters: a solvent delay of 2 min, an E.M. voltage of 1214 V, an ion source temperature of 200 °C, electron ionization energy of 70 eV, a transfer line temperature of 200 °C, and full scan mode (50–550 amu). Identification of the compounds from their respective spectrum was done using the NIST library, matching with their accurate mass and retention index.

2.8. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Assay

The TLC assay was conducted to identify the number of spots present in the ethyl acetate extract, which could give preliminary knowledge about the major components present in the isolates. For primary component partition, thin layer chromatography was done on Merck TLC Silica gel60 F254 plates (Product number: 1.05554.0007). Seven metabolite extracts of T. asperellum isolates were spotted using capillary tubes at a height of one inch above the plate’s bottom. Two different solvent systems, viz., Hexane: Ethyl Acetate (9:1) and Hexane: Ethyl Acetate (1:1) was used for the analysis to determine the best mobile phase to separate the components. Various spots were detected in the TLC plate, and the number of spots was identified using visualizing agents like iodine and UV light at 350 nm [46].

2.9. Data Analysis

The statistical program WASP 1.0 (Web Agri Stat Package) (https://ccari.icar.gov.in/waspnew.html) (accessed on 15 June 2023) was used to analyze the data using ANOVA to determine whether there were any differences in parameter values. Three replications of each treatment were used in the experiments. At a 5% level of significance, changes between treatments were assessed using Duncan’s multiple-range test. The SRplot (Science and Research Online Plot) (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/en (accessed on 15 June 2023)) was used to create the heat maps by statistically analyzing the GC-MS data. The NTSYSpc-2.20e version was used to create the dendrogram by analyzing the TLC banding patterns from the metabolite profiles of seven T. asperellum isolates.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Identification of T. asperellum Isolates

On the PDA medium, by incubating at 28 ± 2 °C, all the isolates grew faster, and the mycelial colonies were initially white three days after incubation (DAI) and turned greenish after sporulation on 7DAI (Table 2, Figure S1). The microscopic observation resulted in branched, mostly paired conidiophores, ampuliform phialides, and slightly ovoidal to globose light green conidia (Figure 1).

3.2. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis

The amplified products of ITS and β-tubulin gene primers were confirmed using agarose gel electrophoresis (Figures S2 and S3) and then sequenced using the Sanger technique by outsourcing (Anuvanshiki (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.). All sequences were submitted to GenBank, and accession numbers obtained are listed in Table 2. All isolate’s taxonomic identities were established by NCBI blast, and phylogenetic analysis of combined partial ITS and β-tubulin sequences was performed using the maximum likelihood method (Figure 2). The phylogenetic tree represents that the isolates A10, A8, A9, A13, A20, A7, A3, A14, A19, A1, A16, and A6 forms a clade. The isolates A5, A11, A15, A18, A4, A17, A2, and A12 form a separate clade, which shows the genetic diversity among the isolates between the above two clades. The outcome revealed that all the 20 isolates share the highest homology with T. asperellum Type strain CBS 433.97 followed by T. pubescens, T. harzianum, T. hamatum, T. virens, T. longibrachiatum with Chetomium globosum CBS 160.62 used as an outgroup.

3.3. In Vitro Antagonistic Assay

Under the dual culture assay, the mycelial growth of A. rolfsii was significantly inhibited by all the T. asperellum isolates, with the percent inhibition ranging from 20.87% to 94.66% (p < 0.05). Among them, the A10 isolate showed maximum inhibition of 94.66%, followed by A11 and A17, which exhibited 82.64% and 81.19% inhibition, respectively, 7 days post-inoculation. The volatile compounds produced by the T. asperellum isolates showed 11.55% to 70.95% mycelial inhibition. Among them, the A10 isolate showed maximum inhibition of 70.95%, followed by A17 and A11, which showed 68.27% and 63.75% inhibition, respectively (Table 3, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The isolates A12 and A15 showed the least inhibition in both assays, which shows that they have low antagonistic potential, and the remaining isolates showed moderate mycelial growth inhibition. The comparison of the treatment means was evaluated using Duncan’s multiple-range test.

3.4. In Planta Bio-Control Assay

In the greenhouse pot assay, twenty T. asperellum isolates were evaluated against collar rot in tomatoes using a completely randomized design, and the disease severity index was recorded. The disease was significantly inhibited by all the T. asperellum isolates ranging from a maximum of 86.17% and 80.60 % disease inhibition from the A10 isolate to the minimum disease inhibition of 11.11% and 8.33% from the isolate A15 during pre- and post-inoculation treatment. The isolates A10 (13.83%), A11 (22.20%), and A14 (27.67%) treated plants on the A. rolfsii infected soil showed lower disease incidence as compared to pathogen alone treated when applied as a pre-inoculation approach against A. rolfsii. Pathogen treatment was maintained by inoculating only with A. rolfsii, which exhibited complete wilting and plant death, to compare the effect. The efficiency of T. asperellum isolates was also assessed by the post-inoculation approach of T. asperellum against A. rolfsii. The lowest percent of disease incidence was observed from the evaluation of A10 (19.40%), followed by A11 (27.78%) and A14 (33.33%), respectively, in post-inoculation conditions. Notably, the A15 isolate-treated plants on the infected soil recorded a maximum disease incidence of 88.89% in pre-inoculation and 91.67% in post-inoculation. The standard deviation was recorded from each measurement to analyze the variance (Table 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).

3.5. Enzyme Assay

The results revealed that all the tested isolates of T. asperellum significantly produced different hydrolytic enzymes during their interaction with the test pathogen. The isolate A10 (174.68 IU/mg) produced the highest amount of β-1,3 glucanase, followed by A11 (149.08 IU/mg), A14 (134.68 IU/mg), and the least in A15 (24.79 IU/mg). The isolate A10 (183.48 IU/mg) showed the highest production of β-1, 4 glucanase followed by A11 (159.60 IU/mg) and A14 (147.25 IU/mg), and the least production was observed in A15 (51.28 IU/mg). The isolate A17 (80.92 IU/mg) produced the highest production of cellulase, followed by A14 (77.94 IU/mg), A16 (77.82 IU/mg), and the least production in A15 (20.84). In protease production, isolate A10 (106.06 IU/mg) showed the highest production, followed by A17 (103.08 IU/mg), and the least production was recorded in isolate A15 (15.60 IU/mg). In chitinase production, A17 (53.09 IU/mg) recorded the maximum yield, followed by A16 (52.17), and the least was observed in A15 (13.07 IU/mg) (Table 5, Figure 7).

3.6. Comparative Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds of T. asperellum Isolates

In the present investigation, it was revealed that the culture filtrates of the seven isolates of T. asperellum (A8, A10, A11, A12, A15, A17 and A20) showed the presence of many secondary metabolites at different retention times (Rt). The anti-microbial compounds were found highest from the isolate A10, 2H-pyran-2-one (17.39%) was found to be most abundant in it, followed by dienolactone (8.43%), α-pyrone (2.19%), and harziandione (0.24%) with the respective Rt of 33.48, 33.85, 33.39, and 64.23 min. 2H-Pyran-2-one (9.87%) was observed to be the most abundant in isolate A11, followed by 2,3-butanediol (7.24%) and harziandione (6.70%) with Rt of 18.65, 42.67 and 63.77 min, respectively. The isolate A17 showed many metabolites, like hexadecanoic acid (9.42%), octadecanoic acid (3.87%), hexadecane (3.83%), docosene (4.07%), and (E)-6-pen-1-enylpyran-2-one (2.18%) with the Rt of 13.67, 23.90, 19.55, 32.55 and 15.35 min respectively. 2,3-butanediol (23.41%), (E)-6-Pent-1-enyl pyran-2-one (5.88%), and 2H-pyran-2-one (2.49%) with the corresponding Rt of 64.5, 13.8 and 15.7 min respectively, were recorded to be the major compounds, followed by long-chain hydrocarbons from the isolate A8. Few anti-microbial compounds, like dimethyl disulfoxide were also observed from the isolate A12 (0.79%) and A20 (0.30%) with the respective Rt of 33.70 and 24.45 min. No major anti-microbial compounds were detected from isolate A15, suggesting that this isolate does not produce many bioactive volatile metabolites.
From the ethyl acetate fractions of T. asperellum isolates, the predominant compounds were identified and grouped into various functional groups with varying content ranges among isolates, including alcohols (23.68%) from the isolate A8, ketones (20.78%) from isolate A20, and acids (18.23%) from the isolate A17. Among the alcohols, 2, 3-butanediol (23.41%) was observed to be most abundant from the isolate A8. Among the Ketones having anti-microbial compounds, 2H-pyran-2-one (17.39%) was observed as the most abundant from the isolate A10, (E)-6-pent-1-enylpyran-2-one (5.88%) from the isolate A8, and α-pyrone (5.14) from the isolate A20. Among the acids, the highest content of hexadecanoic acid (9.42%) was found in the isolate A17, followed by acetic acid (3.99%) in A10, octadecanoic acid (3.87%) in A17, and 9, 12-octadecadienoic acid (2.83%) in A10. Among the lactones, δ-2,4-dienolactone (8.43%) was recorded at the maximum from isolate A10.
We observed more hydrocarbons viz., dodecane, 1-tetradecene, tetradecane, 1-hexadecene, hexadecane, cyclohexadecane, tetracosane, hexacosane, heptadecane, 1-octadecene, octadecane, docosene, tetracosahexaene from various isolates. Among them, hexadecane (3.83%) and docosene (4.07%) were observed at the highest content in the isolate A17, whereas diterpenes, namely, harziandione (6.70%), were abundant in the isolate A11. The list of identified compounds in the ethyl acetate fraction from various T. asperellum isolates is listed in Table 6.
The total ion chromatograms for all the isolates are shown in Figures S4–S10. Furthermore, a heat map was generated to compare the visualization and interpretation of changes in the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) profile among the isolates (Figure 8). The area showing the red color in the heat map indicates the presence of that particular volatile organic compound having the maximum area-wise among the isolates. The most important anti-microbial compounds like 2H-pyran-2-one are abundant among the isolates A11, A12, A10, and A20. The 2,3-butanediol presence is more in the isolates A11, A12, and A8. The isolate A17 has high hexadecanoic acid. The presence of harziandione is more in the isolates A11 and A20. The isolates A20 and A10 contain high α-pyrone and 2,4 dienolactone, respectively.

3.7. TLC Assay

We observed that there were more bands in Hexane: Ethyl Acetate (1:1) solvent system than in the 9:1 solvent system. The A10 isolate produced nine bands in a 1:1 system, followed by the isolates A17 and A11, which produced seven bands that represent the presence of major metabolites in the ethyl acetate extract. The least number of bands observed from isolate A15 was 4 (Figure S11). Using the UPGMA (Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) method in NTSYSpc-2.02e, a dendrogram was performed based on the unique banding patterns from each isolate of the T. asperellum metabolome. Two clades were obtained viz., A17, A10, and A11 (more promising isolates) forming one, and A8, A20, A12, and A15 (moderate to less promising isolates) forming the other, as seen in the dendrogram (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

In our study, 20 isolates were used as antagonists and were confirmed as T. asperellum based on morphological and molecular characteristics. The studied morphological characteristics, such as colony characteristics like a faster growth rate, globose conidia, mostly paired branches, and an ampulliform phialides nature, were also confirmed with the previous reports [47,48]. Conventional morphological approaches may not perform well for accurate identification. So, combining the morphological and molecular strategies is an ideal tool [49]. Using the ITS and β-tubulin markers, the precise species identification of T. asperellum was achieved, demonstrating the efficacy of the molecular markers in ensuring reliable species determination.
Further, these isolates were tested against the collar rot pathogen, A. rolfsii, indicating that T. asperellum is an effective biocontrol agent. In the In vitro antagonistic assay, isolate A10 recorded a maximum inhibition of A. rolfsii growth (94.66%) in the dual plate assay and 70.95% in the volatile assay. These results are in parallel with the previous reports, showing that most temperature-tolerant T. asperellum isolates showed a 50–68% reduction of hyphal growth of A. rolfsii under in vitro [50], and T. asperellum caused significant reduction in mycelial growth of 43.57%, 38.16%, and 54.87% obtained for Pythium aphanidermatum, Pythium debaryanum, and A. rolfsii Sr3 respectively [51]. The Tricho05 and Tricho06 isolates also recorded the maximum inhibition of A. rolfsii mycelial growth of 70.37% and 63.33%, respectively [52]. The In planta study carried out using tomato plant var. pusa ruby suggests that the application of T. asperellum to the soil prior to the development of the disease will reduce the incidence of collar rot significantly, whereas the pathogen alone treated plants showed 100% disease incidence with prominent symptoms. The isolate A10 application on the infected soil observed lower disease incidence (13.83%) in pre-inoculation and 19.40% in post-inoculation as compared to pathogen-alone treatment. These are correlated with previous studies reports that the presence of T. asperellum reduced the severity of disease symptom caused by A. rolfsii in onion [53], and T. asperellum strains mixture treated cucumber plants showed the highest reduction of Fusarium root and stem rot disease incidence and severity [54].
This indicates that the biocontrol agent, T. asperellum inhibits the pathogen by various mechanisms, including the competing nature of space and nutrients and the production of volatile metabolites, thereby restricting the growth of the pathogen [55,56,57] and providing resistance against pathogens by inducing defense responses in the plants [58,59,60,61].
The production of hydrolytic enzymes to dissolve the fungal mycelial cell wall has been attributed to biocontrol activity. According to Inbar and Chet [62], the antagonistic action of Trichoderma species against soil-borne diseases may be related to their synthesis of these enzymes. In the present investigation, the T. asperellum isolates were evaluated for their potential to produce various extracellular enzymes against A. rolfsii. Extracellular enzyme activity was observed in all the isolates. The isolate A10 observed the maximum production of hydrolytic enzymes by the production of β-1,3 glucanase (174.68 IU/mg), β-1,4 glucanase (183.48 IU/mg), and protease (106.06 IU/mg), which correlates with the previous studies showed that T. asperellum isolates Ts39, Ts12, Ts42, Ts9, Ts32, Ts36 possessed the wide range of hydrolytic enzyme activities exhibiting chitinase 8.7–10.3 Pmol/s/mL and β-1,3 glucanase (1.4–1.98 nmol/s/mL) [63] and T. asperellum CCTCC-RW0014 reported that the production of various hydrolytic enzymes with higher enzyme activity viz., chitinase (87.5 ± 3.21%), protease (52.9 ± 1.23%), cellulase (84.8 ± 2.56%) and β-1.3 glucanase (60.5 ± 2.32%) [64] and Trichoderma isolates T2, T8, T9, T10, T11, T16, T17, and T20 recorded the strong production of chitinase, β-1,3 glucanase, protease, and cellulase that exhibited high inhibitory activity against A. rolfsii in dual culture [65]. The T. virens isolates V-19, and V-21 exhibited the highest enzyme activities like cellulase (30.31 IU/mg, 16.75 IU/mg), β-1,3 glucanase (19.01 IU/mg, 16.46 IU/mg), chitinase (24.21 IU/mg, 22.71 IU/mg), protease (17.13 IU/mg, 18.20 IU/mg) respectively, and T. harzianum isolate H10 also possessed the highest enzyme activity viz., cellulase (18.09 IU/mg), β-1,3 glucanase (16.44 IU/mg), β-1,4 glucanase (17.81 IU/mg), Chitinase (88.80 IU/mg), Protease (23.88 IU/mg) recorded during interation with A. rolfsii [66].
It is known that Trichoderma spp. produces a variety of bioactive secondary metabolites with anti-microbial properties against a variety of phytopathogens, primarily soil-borne pathogens [67]. In the present study, secondary metabolites were profiled using GC-MS analysis from seven T. asperellum isolates selected based on the bio-efficacy tested. 2H-Pyran-2-one, dienolactone, α-pyrone, and harziandione are the volatile secondary metabolites that have antifungal activity and are produced by Trichoderma spp. From our GC-MS study, we found that the maximum production of antifungal VOCs from isolate A10 is 2H-pyran-2-one, dienolactone, α-pyrone, and harziandione. Among them, 2H-Pyran-2-one is the most important compound, having antifungal activity against various plant pathogens as per the previous studies. The compound 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one (6-PP), an important volatile compound recorded from the T. asperellum isolates Ta2, Ta12, Ta17, Ta20, and Ta45 through GC-MS analysis having the peculiar character of coconut odor with anti-microbial activity [68]. The 6-PP recorded from the T. asperellum possessing a powerful antifungal compound against Magnaporthiopsis maydis and the purified 6-PP compound (30µg/seed) used in seed coating, and the treatments reduced the symptoms (up to 20%), pathogen infection (94–98%) and improved plant biomass by 90–120% and cob weight by 60% [69]. The 6-PP has a significant inhibitory effect on turf dollar spot and recorded good control efficacy recorded both in in-vitro and in-vivo studies [70]. The 6-PP reported from T. asperellum PT-15 showed the antifungal effects by applying a nutrient solution containing 25 mg/L 6-PP significantly suppressed the fusarium wilt with 70.71% efficacy and a 27.23% disease index [71].
A TLC assay was conducted to identify the number of bands present in the ethyl acetate extract and to analyze the metabolites produced by the biocontrol agents under two solvent systems [72,73]. TLC results exhibited many bands from tested isolates representing major metabolites present in the ethyl acetate extract. Among the two solvent systems used for the purpose, hexane: ethyl acetate (1:1) was found to be suitable for the separation of the metabolites, which correlates with the previous report confirmed the presence of metabolites using hexane: ethyl acetate (1:1) solvent system and verified the detection of carboxylic acid as it formed as yellow spot when sprayed using bromocresol green in laccase mediated Reactive Black 5 biodegradation by the T. atroviride F03 [74].
This solvent system is then recommended for the isolation of the metabolites for further structural elucidation using various spectrometric techniques. However, from the TLC analysis, we observed the formation of two clusters, viz., high promising isolates as one cluster and moderate to low promising isolates as another cluster, in the dendrogram generated based on banding patterns among the isolates. We may conclude from these findings that there is a high correlation between metabolite profiles, hydrolytic enzyme production, space, nutrient competitiveness, priming of defenses in plants, and their potential as biological agents against A. rolfsii.

5. Conclusions

In recent years, biological control has received increasing attention as a promising alternative to chemical control of plant pathogens. In the present study, T. asperellum isolate A10 was found to be a promising antagonist for the management of A. rolfsii when tested under lab and greenhouse conditions. Our study also suggested that the application of T. asperellum before the establishment of the disease reduces the incidence of collar rot significantly. GC-MS analysis revealed the production of various antifungal secondary metabolites such as 2H-Pyran-2-one, dienolactone, α-pyrone, harziandione, butanediol, and dimethyl disulfoxide involved in the antagonistic mechanism. We found that isolate A10 produced the 2H-Pyran-2-one with the maximum relative area and retention time, playing a pivotal role in the antagonistic activity. We also observed that isolate A10 produced the maximum production of various hydrolytic enzymes like β-1,3 glucanase, β- 1, 4 glucanase, and protease, which are involved in antagonistic effects on A. rolfsii. Our findings collectively imply that T. asperellum and its anti-microbial substances have great potential to successfully manage collar rot diseases. Since BCAs perform differently under varied climatic conditions, there is a need to evaluate their efficacy at multiple locations and across multiple crops to confirm their robustness and potential.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae9101116/s1, Figure S1: Growth characteristics of different isolates of Trichoderma asperellum on potato dextrose agar (PDA) after 7 days of incubation at 28 ± 2 °C; Figure S2: PCR amplification patterns in ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 with ITS1/ITS4 primers from 20 Trichoderma asperellum isolates; L is 1000-bp DNA ladder; Figure S3: PCR amplification patterns in β-tubulin with B-tubf1-F / B-tubr1-R primers from 20 Trichoderma asperellum isolates; L is 1000-bp DNA ladder; Figure S4–S10: GC-MS chromatogram of secondary metabolites from T. asperellum isolates; Figure S11: TLC plates showing many spots of metabolites (A) Long UV light range (B) Short UV light range in the solvent system: Hexane: Ethyl acetate (9:1) (C) Long UV light range (D) Short UV light range in the solvent system: Hexane: Ethyl acetate (1:1).

Author Contributions

C.S., D.K. and R.G. (Robin Gogoi) were involved in the conceptualization of the project, study design, and critical inputs. C.S. contributed to the lab work and statistical analysis and wrote the first draft. C.S., D.K., A.K., A.D. and R.G. (Robin Gogoi) finalized the outline and prepared schematics. P.K.S., Z.H. and A.D. helped in carry out an in-vivo experiment. C.S. and A.K. carried out GC-MS work and analysis. C.S., P.R.S., M.C. and R.G. (R. Gangaraj) were helped with statistical analysis and editing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the NAHEP-CAAST project on “Genomics assisted crop improvement and management”. C. Shanmugaraj received Junior and Senior Research Fellowships from the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) for pursuing the Ph.D. program at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

C. Shanmugaraj offers sincere thanks to the ICAR for financial support in the form of Junior and Senior Research Fellowships for the Ph.D. program. C. Shanmugaraj and Deeba Kamil are grateful to NAHEP-CAAST for financial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nalim, F.A.; Starr, J.L.; Woodard, K.E.; Segner, S.; Keller, N.P. Mycelial compatibility groups in Texas peanut field populations of Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology 1995, 85, 1507–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aycock, R. Stem Rot and Other Diseases Caused by Sclerotium Rolfsii or the Status of Rolf’s Fungus after 70 Years; North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin No.175; North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station: Salisbury, NC, USA, 1966; pp. 1–202. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cilliers, A.; Herselman, L.; Pretorius, Z. Genetic variability within and among mycelial compatibility groups of Sclerotium rolfsii in South Africa. Phytopathology 2000, 90, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Harlton, C.E.; Uvesque, C.A.; Punja, Z.K. Genetic diversity in Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii and related species. Phytopathology. 1995, 85, 1269–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bera, S.K.; Kasundra, S.V.; Kamdar, J.H.; Ajay, B.C.; Lal, C.; Thirumalasmy, P.P. Variable response of interspecific breeding lines of groundnut to Sclerotium rolfsii infection under field and laboratory conditions. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 2014, 5, 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosamia, T.C.; Dodia, S.M.; Mishra, G.P.; Ahmad, S.; Joshi, B.; Thirumalaisamy, P.P.; Kumar, N.; Rathnakumar, A.L.; Sangh, C.; Kumar, A.; et al. Unraveling the mechanisms of resistance to Sclerotium rolfsii in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using comparative RNA-Seq analysis of resistant and susceptible genotypes. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mahato, A.; Biswas, M.K.; Patra, S. Prevalence of collar rot of tomato caused by Sclerotium rolfsii (Sacc.) under the red and lateritic zone of West Bengal, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 3231–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Punja, Z.K. The biology, ecology and control of Sclerotium rolfsii. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1985, 23, 97–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Kumar, A.; de Los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Parra-Cota, F.I.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C.; Fadiji, A.E.; Hyder, S.; Babalola, O.O.; Santoyo, G. Trichoderma species: Our best fungal allies in the biocontrol of plant diseases—A review. Plants 2023, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sood, M.; Kapoor, D.; Kumar, V.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Landi, M.; Araniti, F.; Sharma, A. Trichoderma: The secrets of a Multitalented Biocontrol Agent. Plants 2020, 7, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Verma, M.; Brar, S.K.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Valéro, J.R. Antagonistic Fungi, Trichoderma Spp.: Panoply of Biological Control. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 37, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Woo, S.L.; Hermosa, R.; Lorito, M.; Monte, E. Trichoderma: A multipurpose, plant-beneficial microorganism for eco-sustainable agriculture. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hjeljord, L.; Tronsmo, A.; Harman, G.E.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma and Gliocladium in biological control: An overview. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Applications; Kubicek, C.P., Harman, G.E., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 1998; pp. 131–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kubicek, C.P.; Pentilla, M.E. Regulation of production of plant polysaccharide degrading enzymes by Trichoderma. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Vol.2. Enzymes, Biological Control and Commercial Applications; Harman, G.E., Kubicek, C.P., Eds.; Taylor and Francis Ltd.: London, UK, 1998; pp. 49–71. [Google Scholar]
  15. Howell, C.R. The role of antibiosis in bio-control. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium; Harman, G.E., Kubicek, C.P., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  16. Howell, C.R. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paparizas, G.C. Trichoderma and Gliocladium: Biology, ecology and potential for bio-control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1985, 23, 23–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Narasimha Murthy, K.; Nirmala Devi, D.; Srinivas, C. Efficacy of Trichoderma asperellum against Ralstonia solanacearum under greenhouse conditions. Ann. Plant Sci. 2013, 2, 342–350. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, Q.; Sun, R.; Ni, M.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, C.; Dou, K.; Ren, J.; Chen, J. Identification of a novel fungus, Trichoderma asperellum GDFS1009, and comprehensive evaluation of its bio-control efficacy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moussa, Z.; Alanazi, Y.F.; Khateb, A.M.; Eldadamony, N.M.; Ismail, M.M.; Saber, W.I.; Darwish, D.B.E. Domiciliation of Trichoderma asperellum Suppresses Globiosporangium ultimum and Promotes Pea Growth, Ultrastructure, and Metabolic Features. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoshioka, Y.; Ichikawa, H.; Naznin, H.A.; Kogure, A.; Hyakumachi, M. Systemic resistance induced in Arabidopsis thaliana by Trichoderma asperellum SKT-1, a microbial pesticide of seed borne diseases of rice. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 68, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shoresh, M.; Yedidia, I.; Chet, I. Involvement of jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling pathway in the systemic resistance induced in cucumber by Trichoderma asperellum T203. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Herrera, W.; Valbuena, O.; Pavone-Maniscalco, D. Formulation of Trichoderma asperellum TV190 for biological control of Rhizoctonia solani on corn seedlings. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2020, 30, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brotman, Y.; Briff, E.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I. Role of swollenin, an expansin-like protein from Trichoderma, in plant root colonization. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, R.; Ji, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z. Trichoderma asperellum xylanases promote growth and induce resistance in poplar. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 248, 126767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Srinivasa, N.; Sriram, S.; Singh, C.; Shivashankar, K.S. Secondary metabolites approach to study the bio-efficacy of Trichoderma asperellum isolates in India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 1105–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Degani, O.; Khatib, S.; Becher, P.; Gordani, A.; Harris, R. Trichoderma asperellum secreted 6-Pentyl-α-Pyrone to control Magnaporthiopsis maydis, the maize late wilt disease agent. Biology 2021, 10, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Geraldine, A.M.; Lopes, F.A.C.; Carvalho, D.D.C.; Barbosa, E.T.; Rodrigues, A.R.; Brandão, R.S.; Ulhoa, C.J.; Junior, M.L. Cell wall-degrading enzymes and parasitism of sclerotia are key factors on field bio-control of white mold by Trichoderma spp. Biol. Control. 2013, 67, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qualhato, T.F.; Lopes, F.A.C.; Steindorff, A.S.; Brandao, R.S.; Jesuino, R.S.A.; Ulhoa, C.J. Mycoparasitism studies of Trichoderma species against three phytopathogenic fungi: Evaluation of antagonism and hydrolytic enzyme production. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 1461–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saravanakumar, K.; Yu, C.; Dou, K.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, J. Synergistic effect of Trichoderma-derived antifungal metabolites and cell wall degrading enzymes on enhanced bio-control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Biol. Control. 2016, 94, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Silva, B.D.S.; Ulhoa, C.J.; Batista, K.A.; Yamashita, F.; Fernandes, K.F. Potential fungal inhibition by immobilized hydrolytic enzymes from Trichoderma asperellum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8148–8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Snehal, D.F. Isolation and identification of fungi from contaminated soil to build biological resource as biocontrol activity. Macromol. Ind. J. 2017, 12, 105. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cullings, K.W. Design and testing of a plant-specific PCR primer for ecological and evolutionary studies. Mol. Ecol. 1992, 1, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  35. Thokala, P.; Narayanasamy, P.; Kamil, D.; Choudhary, S.P. Polyphasic taxonomy of Indian Trichoderma species. Phytotaxa 2021, 502, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garcia, E.F. Screening of fungal antagonist to control Sclerotium cepivorum. In New Approaches in Biological Control of Soil Borne Diseases; Jensen, D.F., Ed.; IOBCM/PRS Bull.: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1991; pp. 79–81. [Google Scholar]
  37. Morton, D.T.; Stroube, N.H. Antagonistic and stimulatory effect of microorganism upon Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology 1955, 45, 419–420. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dennis, C.; Webster, J. Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma. II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 1971, 57, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Quimio, A.J.; Cumagun, C.J. Workbook on Tropical fungi: Collection, Isolation and Identification; The Mycological Society of the Philippines, Inc.: Laguna, Philippines, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nelson, N.A. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 1944, 153, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Thrane, C.; Jensen, D.F.; Tronsmo, A. Substrate colonization, strain competition, enzyme production in vitro, and bio-control of Pythium ultimum by Trichoderma spp. isolates P1 and T3. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2000, 106, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vessey, J.C.; Pegg, G.F. Autolysis and chitinase production in cultures of Verticillium albo-atrum. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1973, 60, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sahai, A.S.; Manocha, M.S. Chitinases of fungi and plants: Their involvement in morphogenesis and host-parasite interaction. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1993, 11, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chaithra, M.; Prameeladevi, T.; Prasad, L.; Kundu, A.; Bhagyasree, S.N.; Subramanian, S.; Kamil, D. Metabolomic diversity of local strains of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and their efficacy against the cassava mite, Tetranychustruncatus Ehara (Acari: Tetranychidae). PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pandian, R.T.P.; Raja, M.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, P. Morphological and molecular characterization of Trichoderma asperellum strain Ta13. Indian Phytopathol. 2016, 69, 297–303. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sriram, S.; Savitha, M.J.; Rohini, H.S.; Jalali, S.K. The most widely used fungal antagonist for plant disease management in India, Trichoderma viride is Trichoderma asperellum as confirmed by oligonucleotide barcode and morphological characters. Curr. Sci. 2013, 2023, 1332–1340. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chaithra, M.; Prameeladevi, T.; Bhagyasree, S.N.; Prasad, L.; Subramanian, S.; Kamil, D. Multilocus sequence analysis for population diversity of indigenous entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and its bio-efficacy against the cassava mite, Tetranychus truncatus Ehara (Acari: Tetranychidae). Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1007017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Poosapati, S.; Ravulapalli, P.D.; Tippirishetty, N.; Vishwanathaswamy, D.K.; Chunduri, S. Selection of high temperature and salinity tolerant Trichoderma isolates with antagonistic activity against Sclerotium rolfsii. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Manjunath, M.; Singh, A.; Tripathi, A.N.; Prasanna, R.; Rai, A.B.; Singh, B. Bioprospecting the fungicides compatible Trichoderma asperellum isolate effective against multiple plant pathogens in vitro. J. Environ. Biol. 2017, 38, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Akash, A.U.; Ramya, V.; Uma Devi, G.; Pushpavalli, S.N.C.V.L.; Triveni, S. Antagonist activities of native rhizosphere micro-flora against groundnut stem rot pathogen, Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2022, 32, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guzman-Valle, P.; Bravo-Luna, L.; Montes-Belmont, R.; Guigon-Lopez, C.; Sepulveda-Jimenez, G. Induction of resistance to Sclerotium rolfsii in different varieties of onion by inoculation with Trichoderma asperellum. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 138, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. El-Komy, M.H.; Al-Qahtani, R.M.; Ibrahim, Y.E.; Almasrahi, A.A.; Al-Saleh, M.A. Soil application of Trichoderma asperellum strains significantly improves Fusarium root and stem rot disease management and promotes growth in cucumbers in semi-arid regions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 162, 637–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ayyandurai, M.; Akila, R.; Manonmani, K.; Harish, S.; Mini, M.L.; Vellaikumar, S. Deciphering the mechanism of Trichoderma spp. consortia possessing volatile organic compounds and antifungal metabolites in the suppression of Sclerotium rolfsii in groundnut. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 125, 102005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Harman, G.E. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Yang, K.; Wang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Liang, Z. Transcriptomic and metabonomic insights into the bio-control mechanism of Trichoderma asperellum M45a against watermelon Fusarium wilt. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Degani, O.; Rabinovitz, O.; Becher, P.; Gordani, A.; Chen, A. Trichoderma longibrachiatum and Trichoderma asperellum confer growth promotion and protection against late wilt disease in the field. J. Fungi. 2021, 7, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. El-Komy, M.H.; Saleh, A.A.; Ibrahim, Y.E.; Hamad, Y.K.; Molan, Y.Y. Trichoderma asperellum strains confer tomato protection and induce its defense-related genes against the Fusarium wilt pathogen. Tropical Plant Pathol. 2016, 41, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Karuppiah, V.; He, A.; Lu, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, J. Trichoderma asperellum GDFS1009-mediated maize resistance against Fusarium graminearum stalk rot and mycotoxin degradation. Biol. Control. 2022, 174, 105026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rivera-Mendez, W.; Obregon, M.; Moran-Diez, M.E.; Hermosa, R.; Monte, E. Trichoderma asperellum bio-control activity and induction of systemic defenses against Sclerotium cepivorum in onion plants under tropical climate conditions. Biol. Control. 2020, 141, 104145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Inbar, J.; Chet, I. The role of recognition in the induction of specific chitinases during mycoparasitism by Trichoderma harzianum. Microbiology 1995, 141, 2823–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. El-Komy, M.H.; Saleh, A.A.; Eranthodi, A.; Molan, Y.Y. Characterization of novel Trichoderma asperellum isolates to select effective bio-control agents against tomato Fusarium wilt. Plant Pathol. J. 2015, 31, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Samuels, G.J.; Lieckfeldt, E.L.K.E.; Nirenberg, H.I. Trichoderma asperellum, a new species with warted conidia, and redescription of T. viride. Sydowia 1999, 51, 71–88. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kangjam, V.; Pongener, N.; Singh, R.; Banik, S.; Daiho, L.; Ao, N.T. In vitro Screening for Potential Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma Isolates against Sclerotium rolfsii Causing Collar Rot of French Bean. Environ. Ecol. 2023, 41, 623–632. [Google Scholar]
  66. Srinivasa, N.; Kamil, D.; Singh, C.; Singode, A.; Gupta, D. Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of Potential Isolates of Trichoderma Species Effective against Soil-Borne Pathogens. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 3132–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bhardwaj, N.R.; Kumar, J. Characterization of volatile secondary metabolites from Trichoderma asperellum. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2017, 9, 954–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Scudeletti, D.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Bossolani, J.W.; Moretti, L.G.; Momesso, L.; Servaz Tubana, B.; De Castro, S.G.Q.; De Oliveira, E.F.; Hungria, M. Trichoderma asperellum inoculation as a tool for attenuating drought stress in sugarcane. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 645542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Degani, O.; Gordani, A. New Antifungal Compound, 6-Pentyl-α-Pyrone, against the Maize Late Wilt Pathogen, Magnaporthiopsis maydis. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Man, L.I.U.; Qichen, N.I.U.; Shuxia, Y.I.N.; Ziyue, W.A.N.G. Inhibitory activity of 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one against the pathogenesis fungi of dollar spot and its control efficacy. J. Pestic. Sci. 2023, 25, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hao, J.; Wuyun, D.; Xi, X.; Dong, B.; Wang, D.; Quan, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H. Application of 6-Pentyl-α-Pyrone in the Nutrient Solution Used in Tomato Soilless Cultivation to Inhibit Fusarium oxysporum HF-26 Growth and Development. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aggarwal, R.; Tewari, A.K.; Srivastava, K.D.; Singh, D.V. Role of antibiosis in the biological control of spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) of wheat by Chaetomium globosum. Mycopathologia 2004, 157, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Saputra, H.; Puspota, F.; Tjandrawati, T. Production of an antibacterial compound against the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora by the bio-control strain Gliocladium sp. TN C73. J. Agric. Tech. 2013, 9, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar]
  74. Adnan, L.A.; Sathishkumar, P.; Yusoff, A.R.M.; Hadibarata, T. Metabolites characterisation of laccase mediated Reactive Black 5 biodegradation by fast growing ascomycete fungus Trichoderma atroviride F03. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 104, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of T. asperellum. (A) Colony growth on potato dextrose agar. (B) Microscopic images showing conidiophores structures and branching pattern (magnification at 40×). (C) Phialides arrangement with conidia (magnification at 40×). (D) Conidia (magnification at 100×).
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of T. asperellum. (A) Colony growth on potato dextrose agar. (B) Microscopic images showing conidiophores structures and branching pattern (magnification at 40×). (C) Phialides arrangement with conidia (magnification at 40×). (D) Conidia (magnification at 100×).
Horticulturae 09 01116 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on concatenated Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and β-tubulin sequences of the 20 T. asperellum test isolates and its related species and reference T. asperellum Type strain CBS 433.97 retrieved from the NCBI database. The tree was rooted using Chaetomium globosum CBS 160.62 as an outgroup.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on concatenated Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and β-tubulin sequences of the 20 T. asperellum test isolates and its related species and reference T. asperellum Type strain CBS 433.97 retrieved from the NCBI database. The tree was rooted using Chaetomium globosum CBS 160.62 as an outgroup.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g002
Figure 3. Effect of T. asperellum isolates on A. rolfsii growth through the bio efficacy tests. (A) Dual culture assay. (B) Volatile assay.
Figure 3. Effect of T. asperellum isolates on A. rolfsii growth through the bio efficacy tests. (A) Dual culture assay. (B) Volatile assay.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g003
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the effect of T. asperellum isolates on the growth inhibition of A. rolfsii.
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the effect of T. asperellum isolates on the growth inhibition of A. rolfsii.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g004
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the effect of T. asperellum isolates against collar rot disease in tomato.
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the effect of T. asperellum isolates against collar rot disease in tomato.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g005
Figure 6. Effect of the T. asperellum isolate A10 on percent disease inhibition of A. rolfsii through the in planta evaluation.
Figure 6. Effect of the T. asperellum isolate A10 on percent disease inhibition of A. rolfsii through the in planta evaluation.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g006
Figure 7. Graphical representation of the specific activity of hydrolytic enzymes produced by T. asperellum isolates during the interaction with A. rolfsii.
Figure 7. Graphical representation of the specific activity of hydrolytic enzymes produced by T. asperellum isolates during the interaction with A. rolfsii.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g007
Figure 8. Heat map clustering of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) profiles from T. asperellum isolates.
Figure 8. Heat map clustering of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) profiles from T. asperellum isolates.
Horticulturae 09 01116 g008
Figure 9. Dendrogram of seven T. asperellum isolates based on bioactive compounds using thin layer chromatography (Hexane: Ethyl Acetate (1:1) solvent system and long UV light range).
Figure 9. Dendrogram of seven T. asperellum isolates based on bioactive compounds using thin layer chromatography (Hexane: Ethyl Acetate (1:1) solvent system and long UV light range).
Horticulturae 09 01116 g009
Table 1. Details of the selected enzymes used in this study.
Table 1. Details of the selected enzymes used in this study.
EnzymesSubstratesSupplier and Product NumberStandards
(1 mg/mL Stock)
OD (in nm)
CellulaseCellulose (0.5%)Sigma-Aldrich—435236Glucose530
β-1,3 glucanaseLaminarin (3.2 mg/mL distilled water)Sigma-Aldrich—L9634Glucose530
β-1,4 glucanaseCarboxy methyl cellulose (1%)Himedia—GRM329Glucose575
ChitinaseColloidal chitin (0.5%)Himedia—GRM1356NAG420
ProteaseCasein (1%)Sigma-Aldrich—C9801Tyrosine280
Table 2. Collection, identification, and NCBI GenBank accession numbers of the twenty T. asperellum isolates.
Table 2. Collection, identification, and NCBI GenBank accession numbers of the twenty T. asperellum isolates.
Isolates CodeCollection Source and LocationGPS LocationITS aβ-Tubulin aColony Characteristics
LatitudeLongitude
A1Soil, IARI28°38′ N77°10′ EOR133614OR193716Abundant mycelium with dark green spores
A2Soil, IARI28°38′ N77°10′ EOQ892293OR193717Abundant mycelium with yellowish-green spores
A3Rhizosphere, Guntur16°18′ N80°27′ EOR133699OR193718Less aerial mycelium with dark green centered spores
A4Groundnut field, TN11°39′ N78°12′ EOR133720OR193707Abundant mycelium with yellowish-green spores
A5Vegetable field, TN11°3′ N77°17′ EOR133722OR193719Dense dark green spores with less aerial mycelium form rings
A6Soil, IIHR, KA13°7′ N72°29′ EOR133723OR193720Dense dark green spores with cottony mycelium
A7Soil, Akola20°42′ N76°59′ EOR133724OR193721Cottony mycelium with light green spores
A8Soil, Tirupathi13°37′ N79°25′ EOR133725OR193708Dark green spores forming rings with cottony mycelium
A9Soil, Navsari20°57′ N72°55′ EOR133728OR193709Dense light to dark greenish spores with aerial mycelium
A10Soil, Navsari20°57′ N72°55′ EOR137590OR193710Fast-growing, dense dark green spores with aerial mycelium
A11Soil, Jaipur26°55′ N75°49′ EOR133981OR193711Fast-growing, abundant cottony mycelium forms spores at later
A12Veg. field, IARI28°38′ N77°10′ EOR134019OR193712Dark green-centered spores with aerial mycelium
A13Chilli field, IARI28°38′ N77°10′ EOR134022OR193722Aerial mycelium with abundant yellowish to light green spores
A14Soil, Lucknow26°50′ N80°55′ EOR134094OR193723Abundant aerial mycelium with dense dark green spores
A15Soil, Varanasi25°19′ N82°58′ EOR134235OR193713Less mycelium, slow growing with very less spores
A16Soil, Barracpore22°45′ N88°22′ EOR134238OR193714Dense light green spores with aerial mycelium
A17Soil, IIHR13°7′ N72°29′ EOR134254OR193724Fast-growing, dense aerial mycelium forms spores at later
A18Soil, Navsari20°57′ N72°55′ EOR134258OR193725Dense light green spores abundant throughout the plate
A19Soil, Navsari20°57′ N72°55′ EOR134337OR193715Dense yellowish to light green spores with less mycelium
A20Soil, NBPGR28°38′ N77°10′ EOR134338OR193726Dense dark green spores with less aerial mycelium
a GenBank accession number.
Table 3. Effect of T. asperellum isolates on radial growth inhibition of A. rolfsii on PDA at 28 ± 2 °C at 7 days after inoculation (DAI).
Table 3. Effect of T. asperellum isolates on radial growth inhibition of A. rolfsii on PDA at 28 ± 2 °C at 7 days after inoculation (DAI).
IsolatesPercent Inhibition of A. rolfsii Growth
Dual Culture AssayVolatile Assay
R1R2R3AverageSDR1R2R3AverageSD
A164.5864.2264.1564.32 f0.2340.6141.5041.8541.32 k0.64
A264.6264.5063.6664.26 f0.5245.2044.0044.5044.57 j0.60
A366.6966.2065.9066.26 e0.4048.1546.2046.5046.95 i1.05
A468.6267.5068.2268.11 d0.5750.1648.2648.8049.07 h0.98
A568.8967.8266.9567.89 d0.9750.8849.6049.2249.90 h0.87
A650.6151.2052.3351.38 h0.8728.0626.3026.7527.04 m0.91
A767.1067.8568.4567.80 d0.6851.6650.2049.2450.37 gh1.22
A869.2368.5068.0068.58 d0.6253.2451.7651.9052.30 f0.82
A962.3160.5061.4561.42 g0.9146.3246.9046.1546.46 i0.39
A1095.2394.6094.1594.66 a0.5472.1070.1570.6070.95 a1.02
A1182.6480.6984.5982.64 b1.9565.7263.1662.3863.75 c1.75
A1230.5831.2231.0030.93 i0.3322.6422.5521.8022.33 n0.46
A1370.5471.6671.5071.23 c0.6160.5061.2561.8061.18 d0.65
A1470.1271.5070.8870.83 c0.6960.1259.0059.2559.46 e0.59
A1522.8218.9220.8720.87 j1.9511.2012.3011.1511.55 op0.65
A1668.2367.7768.0068.00 d0.2359.8858.2056.3058.13 e1.79
A1780.4682.1081.0081.19 b0.8469.2167.2468.3568.27 b0.99
A1865.9165.2564.2065.12 ef0.8652.6551.6051.2551.83 fg0.73
A1968.7068.4568.0068.38 d0.3550.1249.4550.0049.86 h0.36
A2052.3551.0053.7052.35 h1.3531.2229.4528.6029.76 l1.34
CD @ 5% 1.497 1.603
SEm ± 0.823 0.943
CV (%) 1.411 2.034
SD—Standard Deviation, CD—Critical Difference, SEm—Standard Error of mean, CV—Coefficient of variation, Different letters after values are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Effect of T. asperellum isolates against collar rot disease in tomato plants var. pusa ruby in pot condition.
Table 4. Effect of T. asperellum isolates against collar rot disease in tomato plants var. pusa ruby in pot condition.
Isolates% Disease Severity Index (DSI)
Pre-Inoculation TreatmentPost-Inoculation Treatment
R1R2R3AverageSDR1R2R3AverageSD
A15041.6741.6744.454.81505058.3352.784.81
A2505041.6747.224.815058.3358.3355.554.81
A341.6741.6733.3338.894.8258.3341.6741.6747.229.62
A450505050.000.0058.3358.3341.6752.789.62
A5502533.336.1112.7358.335033.347.2212.75
A666.6766.6758.3363.894.8266.6766.677569.454.81
A741.6741.6741.6741.670.0050505050.000.00
A8502533.336.1112.7358.335033.3747.2212.71
A95041.6741.6744.484.815058.335052.784.81
A1016.68.316.613.834.7916.616.62519.404.85
A11252516.622.204.85252533.3327.784.81
A1266.6783.3383.3377.779.6266.6791.6791.6783.3314.43
A135041.672538.8912.7333.33505044.449.62
A1425253327.674.6233.3333.3333.3333.330.00
A1591.6791.6783.3388.894.8291.6791.6791.6791.670.00
A1641.6741.673338.785.0141.6741.675044.454.81
A1725252525.000.00252541.6730.569.62
A1841.6741.6733.3338.894.8241.6741.675044.454.81
A1941.6741.6741.6741.670.0041.6741.6758.3347.229.62
A2066.6766.6758.3363.894.8266.677558.3366.678.34
Table 5. Specific activity of hydrolytic enzymes produced by T. asperellum isolates during the interaction with A. rolfsii.
Table 5. Specific activity of hydrolytic enzymes produced by T. asperellum isolates during the interaction with A. rolfsii.
IsolatesSpecific Activity in IU/mg
β-1,3
Glucanase
β-1,4
Glucanase
CellulaseProteaseChitinase
AvgSDAvgSDAvgSDAvgSDAvgSD
A178.25 i2.0079.60 k2.3073.00 cde2.3071.53 f2.8045.07 bcd1.28
A290.25 h2.0079.93 k2.4070.94 ef2.7074.53 ef1.6037.33 fg2.32
A3111.00 ef0.25123.13 g1.8075.44 bcd2.5055.81 h0.807.02 j0.77
A4112.75 e0.25109.56 h2.9068.09 fg1.8077.83 d2.4045.85 bc2.96
A5125.50 d2.00124.18 fg1.7062.47 h3.0065.33 g2.4045.17 bcd2.60
A659.50 j2.0052.10 m2.2052.04 i1.9044.85 i0.8039.88 ef2.13
A7111.58 ef1.50124.28 fg2.7061.92 h2.3063.38 g1.7036.07 g1.62
A8122.92 d1.80127.68 ef2.5076.04 bc2.1066.08 g0.9034.85 gh1.24
A962.40 j1.7088.25 j2.1070.87 efg2.4074.53 ef2.5044.37 bcd2.52
A10174.68 a2.30183.48 a2.4077.09 b1.80106.06 a1.9041.87 de2.54
A11149.08 b2.40159.60 b1.3067.26 g0.7082.33 bc2.4046.82 b2.39
A1237.93 l2.8030.73 n0.9034.99 j1.6053.53 h0.9037.65 fg1.76
A13108.96 fg1.80129.58 e1.4076.75 b2.9085.13 b2.4042.40 de1.77
A14134.68 c2.10147.25 c2.6077.94 ab1.5042.03 i1.2050.81 a2.32
A1524.79 m2.9051.28 m1.9020.84 k1.9015.53 j1.3013.07 i1.52
A16107.64 g2.50112.95 h1.8077.82 ab2.6081.35 c2.2052.17 a1.95
A17133.18 c2.40136.85 d1.6080.92 a2.90103.08 a1.5753.09 a1.85
A1860.91 j1.60133.43 d2.4072.04 de2.5075.43 de2.4142.12 de1.88
A19112.36 e1.90102.83 i1.8061.75 h1.8082.05 c1.2331.77 h1.98
A2043.10 k1.8058.38 l2.9072.02 de1.6077.15 de1.2643.22 cd1.33
CD @ 5%3.318 3.543 3.651 3.052 3.315
SEm ±4.044 4.609 4.896 3.421 4.035
CV (%)2.050 1.992 3.327 2.647 5.082
Avg—Average value of three replications, SD—Standard Deviation, CD—Critical difference, SEm—Standard error of the mean, CV—Coefficient of variation, Different letters after values are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 6. Characteristic features of secondary metabolites isolated from T. asperellum isolates by GC-MS.
Table 6. Characteristic features of secondary metabolites isolated from T. asperellum isolates by GC-MS.
CompoundsFunctional GroupMolecular FormulaIsolates
A10A17A12A15A8A11A20
* RA %RT *** RA %RT *** RA %RT ***RA %RT *** RA %RT *** RA %RT *** RA %RT **
Acetic acidAcidCH3COOH3.99 ± 1.125.682.35 ± 0.424.830.53 ± 0.036.881.47 ± 0.3912.530.15 ± 0.029.431.28 ± 0.6216.520.40 ± 0.028.24
n-Propyl acetateEsterC5H10O20.21 ± 0.065.82----0.40 ± 0.0213.05------
2,3-ButanediolAlcoholC4H10O24.99 ± 1.078.27--6.57 ± 1.32 --23.41 ± 4.5664.57.24 ± 1.6442.67--
2-Furan
carboxaldehyde
AldehydeC5H4O20.12 ± 0.0310.55--0.97 ± 0.05 --0.90 ± 0.0214.21.88 ± 0.5124.52--
5-Methyl furfuralAldehydeC6H6O20.12 ± 0.0110.550.07 ± 0.0212.650.97 ± 0.06 ----0.94 ± 0.1118.97--
DodecaneHydrocarbonC12H260.04 ± 0.0118.92------------
1-TetradeceneHydrocarbonC14H280.12 ± 0.0427.33----------0.18 ± 0.0110.32
TetradecaneHydrocarbonC14H300.27 ± 0.1327.650.68 ± 0.1426.451.41 ± 0.4212.35--0.31 ± 0.0118.90.89 ± 0.0710.580.44 ± 0.0211.47
α- PyroneKetoneC5H4O22.19 ± 0.8233.390.11 ± 0.0312.880.12 ± 0.0118.43--0.04 ± 0.0112.71.43 ± 0.2220.345.14 ± 1.9422.25
δ-2,4-DienolactoneLactoneC7H128.43 ± 1.5333.850.06 ± 0.018.691.23 ± 0.4715.30--0.21 ± 0.058.42.76 ± 0.1312.760.13 ± 0.047.86
2H-Pyran-2-oneKetoneC5H4O217.39 ± 3.4533.481.24 ± 0.3213.805.23 ± 1.9419.21--2.49 ± 0.8615.79.87 ± 2.4118.658.89 ± 2.3220.34
(E)-6-Pent-1-enylpyran-2-oneKetoneC21H26O20.43 ± 0.0534.552.18 ± 0.4815.350.1 ± 0.0217.33--5.88 ± 1.2313.80.59 ± 0.0418.432.26 ± 0.9113.66
1-HexadeceneHydrocarbonC16H320.12 ± 0.0235.49----0.09 ± 0.0115.920.49 ± 0.0327.31.09 ± 0.3218.601.11 ± 0.0715.97
HexadecaneHydrocarbonC16H320.33 ± 0.0835.743.83 ± 0.7119.552.07 ± 0.7214.730.08 ± 0.0115.950.99 ± 0.1227.61.91 ± 0.6219.71--
CyclohexadecaneHydrocarbonC16H320.25 ± 0.0249.101.09 ± 0.3212.75--0.11 ± 0.0315.91------
1-EicoseneEsterC20H400.25 ± 0.0449.105.63 ± 1.795.680.86 ± 0.0628.450.19 ± 0.045.43--1.03 ± 0.0429.561.18 ± 0.1124.70
1-DocosanolAlcoholC22H46O0.25 ± 0.0149.10------0.27 ± 0.0711.3--0.46 ± 0.0626.85
EicosaneHydrocarbonC20H420.25 ± 0.0249.28----0.14 ± 0.048.351.40 ± 0.098.252.10 ± 0.9028.98--
Hexadecanoic acidAcidC16H32O24.12 ± 1.2350.299.42 ± 2.9613.67----------
9,12-Octa
decadienoic acid
AcidC18H32O22.83 ± 0.9055.192.59 ± 0.4124.560.37 ± 0.088.430.04 ± 0.0118.90------
Ethyl linoleateEsterC20H36O20.35 ± 0.1254.41--0.14 ± 0.0412.560.04 ± 0.0113.50------
TetracosaneHydrocarbonC24H500.11 ± 0.0260.651.06 ± 0.0213.800.26 ± 0.0313.45--0.33 ± 0.046.761.37 ± 0.4613.080.58 ± 0.0427.59
HarziandioneKetoneC20H30O20.24 ± 0.0164.23--------6.70 ± 1.9463.774.49 ± 2.0758.88
HexacosaneHydrocarbonC26H540.05 ± 0.0165.710.57 ± 0.1211.650.14 ± 0.0119.580.03 ± 0.012.560.15 ± 0.0312.340.33 ± 0.0419.420.25 ± 0.0315.20
HeptadecaneHydrocarbonC17H36--0.32 ± 0.0813.09------0.56 ± 0.0518.910.12 ± 0.0210.24
1-OctadeceneHydrocarbonC18H36--0.83 ± 0.2712.600.41 ± 0.0213.080.09 ± 0.0214.290.44 ± 0.0614.0--0.46 ± 0.078.65
OctadecaneHydrocarbonC18H36--2.23 ± 1.0112.600.62 ± 0.0315.480.20 ± 0.039.201.91 ± 0.2313.22.16 ± 0.9116.771.07 ± 0.3818.55
DocoseneHydrocarbonC22H44--4.07 ± 1.5332.550.24 ± 0.0311.350.06 ± 0.0112.11--1.86 ± 0.1115.690.98 ± 0.2313.34
Octadecanoic acidAcidC18H36O20.95 ± 0.2355.703.87 ± 1.2523.900.75 ± 0.1111.870.13 ± 0.027.88--0.07 ± 0.017.24--
TetracosahexaeneHydrocarbonC24H38--0.72 ± 0.0924.760.15 ± 0.0118.68------1.44 ± 0.7114.21
Dimethyl SulfoxideOrganosulfurC2H6OS----0.79 ± 0.0633.70------0.30 ± 0.0624.45
Chemical groupsContent (%)
Acids11.8918.231.651.640.151.350.40
Esters0.815.631.00.63-1.031.18
Alcohols5.24-6.57-23.687.240.46
Aldehydes0.240.071.94-0.902.82-
Hydrocarbons1.5415.45.30.806.0212.276.63
Ketones20.253.535.45-8.4118.5920.78
Lactones8.430.061.23-0.212.760.13
Organosulfur--0.79---0.30
Total48.4042.9223.933.0739.3746.0629.88
* RA %—Relative Area %; ** RT—Retention time (min.) of each volatile compound eluted through HP 5MS column in GC-MS.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shanmugaraj, C.; Kamil, D.; Kundu, A.; Singh, P.K.; Das, A.; Hussain, Z.; Gogoi, R.; Shashank, P.R.; Gangaraj, R.; Chaithra, M. Exploring the Potential Biocontrol Isolates of Trichoderma asperellum for Management of Collar Rot Disease in Tomato. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101116

AMA Style

Shanmugaraj C, Kamil D, Kundu A, Singh PK, Das A, Hussain Z, Gogoi R, Shashank PR, Gangaraj R, Chaithra M. Exploring the Potential Biocontrol Isolates of Trichoderma asperellum for Management of Collar Rot Disease in Tomato. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(10):1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shanmugaraj, C., Deeba Kamil, Aditi Kundu, Praveen Kumar Singh, Amrita Das, Zakir Hussain, Robin Gogoi, P. R. Shashank, R. Gangaraj, and M. Chaithra. 2023. "Exploring the Potential Biocontrol Isolates of Trichoderma asperellum for Management of Collar Rot Disease in Tomato" Horticulturae 9, no. 10: 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101116

APA Style

Shanmugaraj, C., Kamil, D., Kundu, A., Singh, P. K., Das, A., Hussain, Z., Gogoi, R., Shashank, P. R., Gangaraj, R., & Chaithra, M. (2023). Exploring the Potential Biocontrol Isolates of Trichoderma asperellum for Management of Collar Rot Disease in Tomato. Horticulturae, 9(10), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop