Next Article in Journal
Postharvest Exogenous Melatonin Treatment of Table Grape Berry Enhances Quality and Maintains Bioactive Compounds during Refrigerated Storage
Next Article in Special Issue
Studies on the Identification of Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum (Schlecht.) in Different Genetic Backgrounds of Asparagus officinalis (L.) and Its Defense Responses
Previous Article in Journal
Iron Biofortification of Greenhouse Cherry Tomatoes Grown in a Soilless System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combining Ability and Heterosis for Market Yield in Green Asparagus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Variability Assessment of a Diploid Pre-Breeding Asparagus Population Developed Using the Tetraploid Landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’

Department of Genetics, University of Cordoba, Campus de Rabanales, C-5, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(10), 859; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100859
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Asparagus Production, Genomics and Breeding)

Abstract

:
Different studies have reported a narrow genetic base for garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) due to its common origin, a diploid population (‘Purple Dutch’). The present study focused on the development of new diploid plant material that may be useful to widen the genetic base of the crop by using a tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ (A. officinalis × A. maritimus). With this purpose, a diploid pre-breeding population (n = 1000) carrying introgressions of ‘Morado de Huétor’ has been obtained. This new population derived from crosses under open pollination of a parental collection (n = 77) that was developed in a previous study. The parental collection derived from the first backcrossing using different diploid cultivated plants as a recurrent parent and ‘Morado de Huétor’ as a donor. The genetic diversity of the pre-breeding population was assessed using a set of EST-SSR markers (AG7, AG8, TC1, TC3, TC7, TC9) in a collection of plants (n = 57), which was randomly sampled in the pre-breeding population. The results were compared to previous data obtained from the parental collection, a set of current diploid asparagus cultivars and the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’. The average of PICm (Polymorphic Information Content) values obtained in the pre-breeding population (0.75) resulted higher than the value obtained in the diploid cultivars (0.63) but lower than in ‘Morado de Huétor’ (0.83). Twenty-two alleles (52.4%) detected in the new diploid population were specific from ‘Morado de Huétor’. Principal Coordinate Analyses (PCoA) revealed that the new population had a genetic diversity distribution different from the current cultivars. This new population was also evaluated for different morpho-agronomic traits (earliness, stalk number, branching height and stalk thickness) for two years. Significant differences among plants (p < 0.001) were found for these five traits and, therefore, a genotype variation is suggested. As a result, 71 plants were selected to develop a breeding base population. The genetic variability of those selected plants was also analyzed and similar genetic variability to the pre-breeding population was obtained. The results obtained in this study show that this new population could be used to enlarge the genetic base of the current diploid asparagus cultivars.

1. Introduction

Garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L. 2n = 2x = 20) is an important horticultural crop worldwide, cultivated mainly in regions with a temperate or subtropical climate such as Asia, Europe and the American continents. The cultivated area of this species is similar to other important vegetable crops such as garlic, green bean or eggplant [1]. A. officinalis is the most economically important species of the Asparagus genus and the only one cultivated as vegetable [2]. Additionally, the young spears of some wild Asparagus spp., such as A. acutifolius L., A. albus L., A. verticillatus L., A. acerosus Thunb. ex Schult. & Schult. f. or A. laricinus Burch, among others, are collected for self-consumption or sold in local markets [3].
Several Asparagus spp. including A. officinalis have been used as medicinal plants since ancient times, even prior to their use as a vegetable [4,5]. Some pharmacological properties have been well documented in the cultivated species, highlighting the antioxidant, anti-cancer or diuretic effects [6,7]. According to the beneficial properties for health proposed for this species, it has been listed as a nutraceutical food [7].
Most current cultivars are diploid and derived from a Dutch population (‘Violet Duch’) developed in the 18th century [8,9]. This could explain the reduced genetic base of the current cultivars described in several studies employing different molecular markers such as isozymes [8,10,11] and DNA-derived markers such as RAPDs [12,13] or SNPs [14].
Several stresses cause economic losses in this crop including viruses and fungal diseases, mainly: crown and root rot, purple spot, rust and phytophthora root rot. Other abiotic stresses affecting this crop are salinity, drought or acidic soil. Tolerances or resistances to these stresses have been found in some wild Asparagus spp. such as A. maritimus (L.) Mill., A. acutifolius, A. prostratus Dumort, or A. verticillatus, among others [15,16,17]. Additionally, crop wild relative species could be a source of genes controlling bioactive compound profiles absent in current cultivars [18,19]. In this sense, there is currently an increasing demand for health-promoting foods that may reduce the risk of some diseases. Accordingly, these genetic resources may be useful in asparagus breeding for developing new cultivars that could respond to the present and future demands from farmers and consumers.
The use of wild relative species or landraces in the development of new asparagus cultivars has lagged behind other vegetable crops with similar economic importance. In this sense, new improved materials have been developed from landraces in green bean [20] or eggplant [21] through backcrossing or classical selection. Nowadays, the problems that might happen when these traditional plant breeding methods are employed, such as linkage drag, can be overcome by the biotechnological approaches available today [22] and others that will surely be devised in the future [23].
The studies aimed at the development of new germplasm suitable for the genetic improvement of this crop have been scarce so far (see review by Moreno et al. [24]). With this aim, Riccardi et al. [25], using the in vitro anther culture technique, developed new diploid (di-haploid) germplasm carrying introgressions from two wild tetraploid populations (A. acutifolius, A. maritimus) and a tetraploid landrace (‘Violetto d’Albenga’). Additionally, diploid plants carrying germplasm from the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ were obtained by backcrossing using the diploid cultivars as a recurrent parent by Castro et al. [26] and using in vitro anther culture by Regalado et al. [27]. More recently, Plath et al. [28] detected AV-1 resistant plants in the progenies resulting from the first backcrosses with different interspecific hybrids, which were obtained between A. officinalis and wild related species (A. maritimus (6x), A. pseudoscaber (6x), A. prostratus (4x)). The most comprehensive study aimed at developing new germplasm has been recently published [29]. These authors developed a hexaploid pre-breeding population carrying introgressions from a set of wild polyploid-related species (A. maritimus, A. pseudoscaber Grec., A. brachyphyllus Turz., A. machrorrizus Pedrol & al.) into ‘Morado de Huétor’, a land race obtained from a natural cross between garden asparagus (A. officinalis) and a wild relative species (A. maritimus) [30].
‘Morado de Huétor’ is a landrace cultivated in Granada (South of Spain) along the Genil river valley. This geographical area is characterized by its temperate climate with hot and dry summers. A high variability for important agronomic traits (earliness, yield, tolerances to different stresses) or morphological traits of interest in this crop, such as spear morphology, color, tastes or branching height, have been found in the farmers’ field where this landrace is cultivated [13,31]. In addition, higher profiles of bioactive compounds such as saponins and flavonoids than that obtained in some commercial hybrids have been detected in this landrace [32,33].
Considering all this information, the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ could be a valuable genetic resource for the genetic improvement of this crop. With this aim, first, our research group explored the possibility of developing triploid hybrids between plants of the tetraploid ‘Morado de Huétor’ and plants of diploid cultivars [34]. The first result of using this landrace in the development of new asparagus cultivars was an octoploid clonal hybrid (‘HT801’) that derived from a cross between two octoploid plants (female and male) found in two different farmers’ plots located in the area where this landrace is cultivated [35]. Differences for several important morpho-agronomic traits in this crop and higher bioactive compound profiles than in current cultivars have been described for this octoploid cultivar [35,36]. This study focused on the development of a pre-breeding diploid population carrying germplasm from the tetraploid ‘Morado de Huétor’. The genetic diversity of this population was also assessed employing a set of EST-SSR markers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

An experimental field trial plot established with 77 diploid plants with germplasm of the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ was employed in the development of a diploid population (n = 1000) (Figure 1). The parental collection (n = 77) of this new population was the result of a first backcrossing using diploid current cultivars (‘Atlas’, ‘Grande’, UC-157’ ‘Mary Washington’) as a recurrent male parent [26]. This parental collection was growing under open pollination conditions during the 2015 vegetative season. Seeds were picked up from all female plants (n = 31) in autumn. A similar number of seeds of these female plants was sown in a seedbed placed under greenhouse conditions. These seeds represent the second generation from the first backcrossing previously mentioned. In the spring of 2016, a balanced number of seedlings (n = 1000) was transplanted (0.5 m × 1.5 m) in an experimental field located in a Research Center (‘Alameda del Obispo’) belonging to the Regional Government of Andalusia (IFAPA), Córdoba (Spain).

2.2. SSR Marker Analysis

SSR marker analysis was carried out according to Garcia et al. [29]. Briefly, the assessment of the genetic variability of the population (n = 1000) obtained in this study was estimated using a sample of 57 individuals that were randomly chosen from the new population. The total genomic DNA of each individual plant was isolated using a modified CTAB method [37]. Six EST-SSR markers (AG7, AG8, TC1, TC3, TC7 and TC9) previously developed by Caruso et al. [38] were employed in the genetic variability study. These six markers were selected among a set of 12 markers because of their high polymorphic information content (PIC) and clear and reproducible peak pattern in all individuals. In previous studies, they were useful for analyzing asparagus cultivars as well as the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ [26,39,40]. The PCR products were separated using an automated capillary sequencer (ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems/HITACHI, Madrid, Spain). The results of the sample of 57 individuals obtained from the new diploid population were compared with the parental collection (n = 77), the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ (n = 38) and 63 diploid plants from different cultivars (around eleven plants per cultivar). ‘Atlas’, ‘Grande’, ‘UC157’, ‘Plaverd’, ‘Steline’ and ‘Thielim’ were the cultivars used [29,41]. The alleles were scored as presence (1) or absence (0) and a binary data matrix was created. The PIC (Polymorphic Index Content) marker values were calculated employing the formula PICm = 1 − Σ Pj 2, where Pj is the band frequency of the jth allele. A Principal Coordinate Analyses (PCoA) was carried out using GENALEX 6.5 software [42]. To estimate the genetic variation observed in the biplot from PCoA, the mean value of pairwise distance was calculated in each population. The smaller the mean distance, the smaller variation and vice versa. Student’s t-test was also employed to compare the mean values.

2.3. Assessment of Morpho-Agronomic Traits

The diploid population (n = 1000) was phenotyped for five morpho-agronomic traits for two years. The seedbed was sown in autumn 2015 and the field trial was stablished in early spring 2016. The traits and years of the evaluations are presented in Table 4. The evaluations were performed following the methodology described by Garcia et al. [29]. Briefly, earliness of each plant was assessed in a single day at the beginning of spring by both the spear production and the phenological stage reached by the spears. In autumn, the stalk number per plant, branching height and stalk thickness were assessed. An analysis of variance was carried out for the two years according to the model (xij = μ + Ai + Yj + eij) where xij is the individual date, μ the general mean, Ai the effect of ith plant, Yj the effect of jth year and eij is the residual error.
According to the results of the evaluations, 71 plants (50% female) were selected because of their superior morpho-agronomic performance. All these selected plants were crossed under open pollination with the aim of developing a breeding base population in the future. For that purpose, seeds from all female plants (n = 35) were harvested at the end of the vegetative season. A total of 67 of the 71 plants were analyzed using the set of the EST-SSR markers previously mentioned. The genetic diversity of the selected population was compared with the samples taken at random (n = 57) from the pre-breeding population developed in this study.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Diversity Analysis

The results of the genetic variability study of the new diploid population employing the set of EST-SSR markers is shown in Table 1. All six SSR markers resulted polymorphic and informative (PICm > 0.5). In the new diploid population, the number of alleles per marker varied from 4 to 11 for AG7 and TC3, respectively. Mean PICm was 0.75, with 0.61 (AG7) and 0.85 (TC3) as the lowest and highest values, respectively. Twenty-two alleles (52.4%) found in the diploid population (n = 57) were specific from ‘Morado de Huétor’, confirming the presence of germplasm of this landrace in this population.
Comparisons among the populations evaluated in this study pointed out that the total number of alleles detected in the new population (42 alleles) was higher than those detected in the current diploid cultivars (25 alleles) and lower than the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ (72 alleles). Additionally, the average PICm value of the new population (0.75) was higher than the value observed in the diploid cultivars (0.61) but lower than ‘Morado de Huétor’ (0.83) (Table 1). According to these results, the new diploid population displayed higher allelic diversity than the current cultivars. Principal Coordinates Analyses (PCoA) were applied to evaluate the genetic variability among the different genetic stocks: the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’, the diploid cultivars, the parental population and the new diploid population (Figure 2). Based on the PCoA analysis, 58.7% of the total variation is accounted for by the two main principal coordinates. The results of the PCoA analysis showed two well-defined groups: the diploid populations and the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’. Additionally, differences in the pattern of the genetic variability among diploid populations were observed in the biplot. The set of commercial cultivars showed less dispersion than the new diploid population developed in this study and the parental population. These results reveal a greater genetic variability for the new diploid population than for the diploid commercial cultivars, similar to the parental population. To estimate the genetic diversity observed in the biplot, the mean genetic distance between pairs of individuals within each population was estimated. A Student’s t-test was performed to assess the differences between the mean of the new population and the other ones included in the present study. As a result, the mean distance was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the new diploid population than in the current diploids, ‘Morado de Huétor’ and original parental populations (Table 2).

3.2. Phenotypic Evaluation

Five morpho-agronomic traits were evaluated in the new diploid population for two years. These traits displayed significant variation (p < 0.0001) between individuals. Accordingly, a genotypic variation for these five traits is suggested in this population (Table 3). As a result of the evaluations for the morpho-agronomic traits, 71 plants were selected in the new diploid population. These plants were allowed to flower in the experimental trial conducted under open pollination conditions. The seeds picked up from all female parents (n = 35) of these selected plants could be used to develop a breeding base population. The collection of selected parent plants displayed mean values higher than the mean of the total population (n = 1000) (Table 4). A total of 67 out of these 71 selected plants were also genotyped with the set of six EST-SSR markers. The genetic diversity of the selected plants was also compared to the whole population (n = 1000). PCoA results showed a similar genetic diversity between these two sets of samples selected in the new diploid population (random sampling and selected) (Figure 3). The mean distances were similar, 12.38 in the new population and 12.12 in the selected plants, although significant differences (p < 0.01) between them were found (Table 2). This result may be explained by the low mean standard error due to the high number of pairwise distances within each sample.
Table 3. Results of analysis of variance for two years for the morpho-agronomic traits evaluated in the new diploid population of cultivated asparagus carrying introgressions from the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’.
Table 3. Results of analysis of variance for two years for the morpho-agronomic traits evaluated in the new diploid population of cultivated asparagus carrying introgressions from the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’.
Traits bMean Square a
Year
df = 1
Individuals
df = 766
Error
df = 766
Spear number471.52 (<0.0001)27.71 (<0.0001)11.55
Phenological stage27.79 (<0.0001)1.97 (<0.0001)1.37
Stalk number18.23 (<0.0001)0.22 (<0.0001)0.11
Branching height3.61 (<0.0001)0.10 (<0.0001)0.06
Stalk thickness1.25 (0.0016)0.20 (<0.0001)0.06
a In brackets p value. b Traits evaluated according to Garcia et al. [29].
Table 4. Mean and standard deviation (SD) the five morpho-agronomic traits evaluated in a diploid population of cultivated asparagus with introgressions from the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ (A. officinalis × A. maritimus). Data from a set of selected plants (n = 71) are also presented.
Table 4. Mean and standard deviation (SD) the five morpho-agronomic traits evaluated in a diploid population of cultivated asparagus with introgressions from the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ (A. officinalis × A. maritimus). Data from a set of selected plants (n = 71) are also presented.
TraitPopulationYearNMean ± SESD
Spring
Spear numberTotal2017 841 5.4 ± 0.13 3.81
2018 823 4.4 ± 0.17 4.80
Selected2017 71 8.1 ± 0.60 5.06
2018 71 8.3 ± 0.80 6.72
Phenological stageTotal2017 791 2.3 ± 0.04 1.12
2018 793 2.0 ± 0.05 1.43
Selected2017 65 3.0 ± 0.11 0.87
2018 71 3.0 ± 0.11 0.94
Autumn
Stalk numberTotal2016 846 1.7 ± 0.01 0.39
2017 830 1.5 ± 0.01 0.38
Selected2016 71 1.8 ± 0.04 0.36
2017 71 1.8 ± 0.05 0.44
Branching heightTotal2016 846 1.5 ± 0.01 0.32
2017 829 1.4 ± 0.01 0.22
Selected2016 71 1.8 ± 0.04 0.34
2017 71 1.6 ± 0.02 0.20
Stalk thicknessTotal2016 846 1.5 ± 0.01 0.39
2017 829 1.5 ± 0.01 0.31
Selected2016 71 1.9 ± 0.05 0.40
2017 71 1.9 ± 0.03 0.29
Figure 3. Results of PCoA analysis carried out on two different sets of samples selected in the new diploid population: random sampling () superior morpho-agronomic performance ().
Figure 3. Results of PCoA analysis carried out on two different sets of samples selected in the new diploid population: random sampling () superior morpho-agronomic performance ().
Horticulturae 08 00859 g003

4. Discussion

Different studies have highlighted the reduced genetic variability of the asparagus crop so far [8,10,11,12,13,14]. This hypothesis may be explained by the common genetic origin proposed for most current diploid cultivars [8,9]. Given this scenario, there is a clear need to increase the gene pool of this crop that may facilitate its adaptation to the new scenarios gradually imposed by the unquestionable global climate change. To date, plant genetic resources have had an important role in different plant breeding programs of different crops because they have allowed the development of cultivars with tolerance or resistance to important biotic/abiotic stresses that may affect the crop or have new agro-morphological traits [43,44].
Despite the importance that the genetic resources may have in asparagus breeding, their use with this aim is far behind other vegetable crops [45]. This fact may be in part explained by the difficulty and/or time-consuming nature of working with polyploid genetic resources as a donor in plant breeding focused on the development of diploid cultivars. A huge number of genetic resources of this crop, including wild related species, landraces and wild populations of the cultivated species, are polyploids [16,41,46]. The tetraploid ‘Morado de Huétor’ is a genetic resource that may have an important role in the genetic improvement of garden asparagus due to its high genetic variability [8,13,32,36,41,47]. Using nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers’ polymorphisms, a natural interspecific origin for this landrace from crosses between A. officinalis and A. maritimus has been proposed [30]. The first attempt of using this landrace as a genetic resource was carried out by our group [34,48]. Our results showed heterosis in experimental triploid hybrids from crosses between plants of this landrace (as female) and plants of current diploid cultivars (4x * 2x). Additionally, to introgress the ’Morado de Huétor’ germplasm into diploid cultivars, triploid plants were backcrossed with diploid plants and diploid individuals were selected from their progenies by flow cytometry, and a collection of 77 diploid plants was obtained [26].
In this study, the progeny of that collection (n = 77) obtained under open pollination has been used to develop a diploid pre-breeding population carrying introgressions of ‘Morado de Huétor’. This new population has been genotyped by a set of EST-SSR markers and around 50% of the alleles detected are specific to the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’. Similar results were obtained in the parental collection of the new diploid population [26]. Despite this fact, the new population showed higher genetic variation than the parental collection. The greatest genetic variation detected in the new population compared to parental population could be explained by the new genetic combinations that occurred after the crosses among plants of the origin population. Our results confirm that the tetraploid ‘Morado de Huétor’ can be used to widen the genetic base of current diploid cultivars. Taking into account the proposed interspecific origin for this landrace, A. officinalis × A. maritimus, it can be considered that the new diploid population developed in this study carries introgressions from a wild species. Resistance to biotic (virus AV-1, rust) and abiotic stresses (salinity) has been found in A. maritimus [15,49,50]. Therefore, the new diploid population obtained in this study could be a good genetic resource for searching genes that may provide resistance for these important stresses in garden asparagus.
On the other hand, there is currently a growing demand for health-promoting foods that may reduce the risk of some diseases. In this sense, studies conducted with ’Morado de Huétor’ have shown higher profiles of bioactive compounds in this landrace than in some diploid commercial hybrids [32,33,36]. Jaramillo et al. [51] reported an anti-carcinogenic effect against human colon cancer cells employing steroidal saponins isolates from edible spears of the landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’. Accordingly, this breeding population may be useful in the development of new cultivars with different agro-morphological traits and/or higher bioactive compounds profiles.
As a result of the evaluations carried out in the new population for different morpho-agronomic traits, a set of plants was selected based on their superior morpho-agronomic performance. The genetic variability of this set of plants employing EST-SSR markers was similar to the pre-breeding population obtained in this study. Crosses under open pollination conditions were carried out among these selected plants. The seeds from all selected female plants were harvested to generate a diploid breeding base population in the future.

5. Conclusions

The diploid breeding population obtained in the present study may offer the opportunity to obtain new parents to be used in the genetic improvement of this crop, which could be helpful to respond to the new challenges of climate change, as well as to the growing consumer demand for health-promoting foods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. and R.M.; Formal analysis, V.G. and R.M.; Funding acquisition, T.M. and J.G.; Investigation, V.G., P.C. and R.M.; Project administration, J.G.; Supervision, J.G.; Validation, J.G. and R.M.; Visualization, V.G., P.C. and R.M.; Writing—original draft, V.G.; Writing—review and editing, P.C., T.M., J.G. and R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Spanish projects AGL2014–57575-R and PID2019-106991RB-100 financed in part by EU funds (ERDF).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/statistics/en/ (accessed on 10 February 2022).
  2. Kubota, S.; Konno, I.; Kanno, A. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Asparagus (Asparagaceae) explains interspecific crossability between the garden asparagus (A. officinalis) and other Asparagus species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pieroni, A. Gathering food from the wild. In The Cultural History of Plants; Prance, S.G., Nesbitt, M., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 29–44. ISBN 0203020901. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellison, J.H. Asparagus breeding. In Breeding Vegetables Crops; Bassett, M., Ed.; AVI Publishing Company: Westport, CT, USA, 1986; pp. 521–569. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cumo, C. Encyclopedia of Cultivated Plants: From Acacia to Zinnia: From Acacia to Zinnia; Cumo, C., Ed.; ABC-CLIO: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2013; ISBN 1598847759. [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo, Q.; Wang, N.; Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Lu, L.; Wang, C. The bioactive compounds and biological functions of Asparagus officinalis L.—A review. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 65, 103727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iqbal, M.; Bibi, Y.; Iqbal Raja, N.; Ejaz, M.; Hussain, M.; Yasmeen, F.; Saira, H.; Imran, M. Review on therapeutic and pharmaceutically important medicinal plant Asparagus officinalis L. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 2017, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Geoffriau, E.; Denoue, D.; Rameau, C. Assessment of genetic variation among asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) populations and cultivars: Agromorphological and isozymic data. Euphytica 1992, 61, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Knaflewski, M. Genealogy of asparagus cultivars. Acta Hortic. 1996, 415, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brettin, T.S.; Sink, K.C. Allozyme variation and genetics in asparagus. J. Hered. 1992, 83, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lallemand, J.; Briand, F.; Breuils, F.; Denoue, D.; Rameau, C. Identification of asparagus varieties by isozyme patterns. Euphytica 1994, 79, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khandka, D.K.; Nejidat, A.; Golan-Goldhirsh, A. Polymorphism and DNA markers for asparagus cultivars identified by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Euphytica 1996, 87, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moreno, R.; Espejo, J.A.; Cabrera, A.; Millán, T.; Gil, J. Ploidic and molecular analysis of “Morado de Huétor” asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) population; A Spanish tetraploid landrace. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2006, 53, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mercati, F.; Riccardi, P.; Harkess, A.; Sala, T.; Abenavoli, M.R.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Falavigna, A.; Sunseri, F. Single nucleotide polymorphism-based parentage analysis and population structure in garden asparagus, a worldwide genetic stock classification. Mol. Breed. 2015, 35, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nothnagel, T.; Budahn, H.; Krämer, I.; Schliephake, E.; Lantos, E.; Plath, S.; Krämer, R. Evaluation of genetic resources in the genus Asparagus for resistance to Asparagus virus 1 (AV-1). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1873–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kanno, A.; Yokoyama, J. Asparagus. In Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Vegetables; Kole, C., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 23–42. ISBN 978-3-642-20449-4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, H.; Lu, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, T.; Gao, J.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, S.; Xi, J.; Huang, X.; Guo, A.; et al. Induction of new tetraploid genotypes and heat tolerance assessment in Asparagus officinalis L. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 264, 109168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jaramillo-Carmona, S.; Rodriguez-Arcos, R.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; López, S.; Gil, J.; Moreno, R.; Guillén-Bejarano, R. Saponin profile of wild Asparagus species. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Regalado, J.J.; Moreno, R.; Castro, P.; Carmona-Martin, E.; Rodríguez, R.; Pedrol, J.; Larrañaga, N.; Guillén, R.; Gil, J.; Encina, C.L. Asparagus macrorrhizus Pedrol, Regalado et López-Encina, an endemic species from Spain in extreme extinction risk, is a valuable genetic resource for asparagus breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1581–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Almirall, A.; Bosch, L.; del Castillo, R.R.; Rivera, A.; Casañas, F. “Croscat” common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a prototypical cultivar within the “Tavella brisa” type. HortScience 2010, 45, 432–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prohens, J.; Muñoz-Falcón, J.E.; Rodríguez-Burruezo, A.; Ribas, F.; Castro, Á.; Nuez, F. ‘H15′, an Almagro-type pickling eggplant with high yield and reduced prickliness. HortScience 2009, 44, 2017–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nogué, F.; Mara, K.; Collonnier, C.; Casacuberta, J.M. Genome engineering and plant breeding: Impact on trait discovery and development. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 1475–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Casañas, F.; Simó, J.; Casals, J.; Prohens, J. Toward an evolved concept of landrace. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moreno, R.; Castro, P.; Die, J.V.; Gil, J. Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) Breeding. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Vegetable Crops; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 425–469. ISBN 978-3-030-66961-4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Riccardi, P.; Casali, P.E.; Mercati, F.; Falavigna, A.; Sunseri, F. Genetic characterization of asparagus doubled haploids collection and wild relatives. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castro, P.; Rubio, J.; Gil, J.; Moreno, R. Introgression of new germplasm in current diploid cultivars of garden asparagus from a tetraploid spanish landrace “Morado de Huétor”. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 168, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Regalado, J.J.; Martín, E.C.; Madrid, E.; Moreno, R.; Gil, J.; Encina, C.L. Production of “super-males” of asparagus by anther culture and its detection with SSR-ESTs. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 124, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Plath, S.; Krämer, R.; Lantos, E.; Nothnagel, T. Breeding programs to transmit Asparagus virus 1 resistance. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1223, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garcia, V.; Castro, P.; Turbet-Delof, M.; Gil, J.; Moreno, R. Development and diversity analysis of an hexaploid pre-breeding asparagus population with introgressions from wild relative species. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 287, 110273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moreno, R.; Espejo, J.A.; Cabrera, A.; Gil, J. Origin of tetraploid cultivated asparagus landraces inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers’ polymorphisms. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2008, 153, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moreno, R.; Espejo, J.A.; Moreno, M.T.; Gil, J. Collection and conservation of “Morado de Huétor” Spanish tetraploid asparagus landrace. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2008, 55, 773–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fuentes-Alventosa, J.M.; Rodríguez, G.; Cermeño, P.; Jiménez, A.; Guillén, R.; Fernández-Bolaños, J.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R. Identification of flavonoid diglycosides in several genotypes of asparagus from the Huétor-Tájar population variety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10028–10035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vázquez-Castilla, S.; Jaramillo-Carmona, S.; Fuentes-Alventosa, J.M.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Rodriguez-Arcos, R.; Cermeño-Sacristan, P.; Espejo-Calvo, J.A.; Guillén-Bejarano, R. Optimization of a method for the profiling and quantification of saponins in different green asparagus genotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 6250–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moreno, R.; Espejo, J.A.; Gil, J. Development of triploid hybrids in asparagus breeding employing a tetraploid landrace. Euphytica 2010, 173, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moreno, R.; Castro, P.; Rubio, J.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R.; Gil, J. Desarrollo de una nueva variedad de espárrago octoploide “HT-801”. Actas Hortic. 2012, 60, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiménez-Sánchez, C.; Pedregosa, F.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Segura-Carretero, A. Identification of bioactive compounds of Asparagus officinalis L.: Permutation test allows differentiation among “triguero” and hybrid green varieties. Molecules 2021, 26, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Torres, A.M.; Weeden, N.F.; Martín, A. Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993, 85, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Caruso, M.; Federici, C.T.; Roose, M.L. EST-SSR markers for asparagus genetic diversity evaluation and cultivar identification. Mol. Breed. 2008, 21, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moreno, R.; Carmona, E.; Lopez-Encina, C.; Rubio, J.; Gil, J. Aplicación de marcadores microsatélites en la mejora del espárrago. Actas Hortic. 2010, 55, 221–222. [Google Scholar]
  40. Amian, L.; Rubio, J.; Castro, P.; Gil, J.; Moreno, R. Introgression of wild relative Asparagus spp. germplasm into the Spanish landrace “Morado de Huétor”. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1223, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Castro, P.; Gil, J.; Cabrera, A.; Moreno, R. Assessment of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in Asparagus species related to Asparagus officinalis. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 1275–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dwivedi, S.L.; Ceccarelli, S.; Blair, M.W.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Are, A.K.; Ortiz, R. Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Newton, A.C.; Akar, T.; Baresel, J.P.; Bebeli, P.J.; Bettencourt, E.; Bladenopoulos, K.V.; Czembor, J.H.; Fasoula, D.A.; Katsiotis, A.; Koutis, K.; et al. Cereal landraces for sustainable agriculture. Sustain. Agric. 2011, 2, 147–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hajjar, R.; Hodgkin, T. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: A survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 2007, 156, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mousavizadeh, S.J.; Hassandokht, M.R.; Kashi, A.; Gil, J.; Cabrera, A.; Moreno, R. Physical mapping of 5S and 45S rDNA genes and ploidy levels of Iranian Asparagus species. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 211, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vázquez-Castilla, S.; Jaramillo-Carmona, S.; Fuentes-Alventosa, J.M.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R.; Cermeño-Sacristán, P.; Espejo-Calvo, J.A.; Guillén-Bejarano, R. Saponin profile of green asparagus genotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11098–11108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Moreno, R.; Rubio, J.; Gil, J. Transferencia de genes entre la variedad local de espárrago tetraploide Morado de Huétor y las variedades comerciales diploides. Actas Hortic. 2010, 55, 219–220. [Google Scholar]
  49. Venezia, A.; Soressi, G.; Falavigna, A. Aspects related to utilization of wild Asparagus species in Italy. Agric Ric 1993, 141, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nothnagel, T.; Budahn, H.; Krämer, I.; Schliephake, E.; Schreyer, L.; Krämer, R. Resistance to Asparagus virus 1 in the Wild Relative Asparagus amarus. J. Phytopathol. 2014, 162, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jaramillo, S.; Muriana, F.J.G.; Guillen, R.; Jimenez-Araujo, A.; Rodriguez-Arcos, R.; Lopez, S. Saponins from edible spears of wild asparagus inhibit AKT, p70S6K, and ERK signalling, and induce apoptosis through G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in human colon cancer HCT-116 cells. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Scheme of crosses and backcrosses carried out to develop the diploid pre-breeding population evaluated in this study. Seven tetraploid plants [HT056-HT433], one diploid (HT773) from the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ and 9 diploid plants from different diploid cultivars were employed in the crosses: CM010 (‘Baitoru’), CM019 (‘Atlas’), CM030 (‘M. Washington’), CM050 (‘Jaleo’), CM051 (‘UC-157’), CM064 (‘J. Marionnet 2001’), CM077, CM079 (‘Grande’) and CM107 (‘Haideru’).
Figure 1. Scheme of crosses and backcrosses carried out to develop the diploid pre-breeding population evaluated in this study. Seven tetraploid plants [HT056-HT433], one diploid (HT773) from the tetraploid landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’ and 9 diploid plants from different diploid cultivars were employed in the crosses: CM010 (‘Baitoru’), CM019 (‘Atlas’), CM030 (‘M. Washington’), CM050 (‘Jaleo’), CM051 (‘UC-157’), CM064 (‘J. Marionnet 2001’), CM077, CM079 (‘Grande’) and CM107 (‘Haideru’).
Horticulturae 08 00859 g001
Figure 2. Biplot resulted from the PCoA analysis carried out in the tetraploid landrace (), diploid cultivars (), diploid parental population (X) and the new diploid population ().
Figure 2. Biplot resulted from the PCoA analysis carried out in the tetraploid landrace (), diploid cultivars (), diploid parental population (X) and the new diploid population ().
Horticulturae 08 00859 g002
Table 1. Results of the genetic variability study. Polymorphic information content (PICm) and number of alleles detected in ‘Morado de Huétor’, asparagus cultivars, the parental population and the new population obtained in this study.
Table 1. Results of the genetic variability study. Polymorphic information content (PICm) and number of alleles detected in ‘Morado de Huétor’, asparagus cultivars, the parental population and the new population obtained in this study.
EST-SSR Locus‘Morado de Huétor’
(n = 38)
Diploid Cultivars
(n = 63)
Parental Popul.
(n = 77)
New Diploid Popul.
(n = 57)
No. AllelesPICmNo. AllelesPICmNo. AllelesPICmNo. AllelesPICm
AG780.7730.5240.6440.61
AG8140.8840.4970.6870.73
TC1 140.8730.6160.6660.73
TC3150.8450.74120.78110.85
TC7 80.8160.7270.7170.75
TC9130.8440.6270.8370.83
Total72 25 43 42
Mean12.00.834.20.617.20.727.00.75
Table 2. Mean of genetic distances between pairs of individuals obtained in the asparagus populations included in this study.
Table 2. Mean of genetic distances between pairs of individuals obtained in the asparagus populations included in this study.
PopulationN (1)Mean ± SE (2)
New diploid 57 12.38 ± 0.072
Parental diploid 77 10.93 ± 0.057 ***
Morado de Huétor 38 18.78 ± 0.157 ***
Diploid cultivars 63 8.31 ± 0.070 ***
Diploid selected plants 67 12.12 ± 0.061 **
**, *** Significantly different p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively from the new diploid population (bold) by t-Student test. (1) Number of individuals per population. (2) Standard error.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García, V.; Castro, P.; Millán, T.; Gil, J.; Moreno, R. Genetic Variability Assessment of a Diploid Pre-Breeding Asparagus Population Developed Using the Tetraploid Landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100859

AMA Style

García V, Castro P, Millán T, Gil J, Moreno R. Genetic Variability Assessment of a Diploid Pre-Breeding Asparagus Population Developed Using the Tetraploid Landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(10):859. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100859

Chicago/Turabian Style

García, Verónica, Patricia Castro, Teresa Millán, Juan Gil, and Roberto Moreno. 2022. "Genetic Variability Assessment of a Diploid Pre-Breeding Asparagus Population Developed Using the Tetraploid Landrace ‘Morado de Huétor’" Horticulturae 8, no. 10: 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100859

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop