Next Article in Journal
pH and Heat Pretreatments with Zero-Valent Iron Addition to Enhance Biogas Production from Cassava Pulp Wastewater: Optimization and Comparison of Mathematical Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Flavour Characteristics of Fermented Meat Products in China: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Control of Chemolithotrophic Cultivation of Cupriavidus necator: Optimization of Oxygen Supply for Enhanced Bioplastic Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Quality and Safety of Fermented Foods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Microbial and Mycotoxin Contamination in Korean Traditional Soybean Paste and Soy Sauce Production with and without Starter

1
Food Standard Research Center, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fermentation 2023, 9(7), 621; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070621
Submission received: 20 April 2023 / Revised: 21 June 2023 / Accepted: 23 June 2023 / Published: 29 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment of the Quality and Safety of Fermented Foods 2.0)

Abstract

:
Doenjang and ganjang are traditional, Korean fermented foods. They are manufactured by fermenting jangs, either through the traditional natural fermentation, using straw, or the commercial inoculating starter cultures. However, both Bacillus cereus and aflatoxins have been detected in jangs, compromising their safety. Aflatoxins have been detected on numerous occasions. However, studies are yet to be conducted on whether these safety issues differ depending on the manufacturing method. In this study, we evaluated whether the manufacturing methods of doenjang and ganjang alter their safety. Samples of traditional and commercial doenjang and ganjang were analyzed for aflatoxin and B. cereus contamination. Microbiome taxonomic profiling was performed to assess microbial composition. The experimental methodology involved sample collection from various stages of production, including the use of starter cultures and natural fermentation processes. Aflatoxin levels were determined using regulatory limits, and B. cereus content was evaluated against specific thresholds. Aflatoxins were detected in both traditional and commercial doenjang and ganjang, with either the total aflatoxin (15 μg/kg) or aflatoxin B1 (10 μg/kg) exceeding the regulatory limits. However, ochratoxin A was not detected in any of the samples. B. cereus was detected in some samples, within the regulatory limit (4 log CFU/g), and was not influenced by the manufacturing method. Analysis at the production stage showed that aflatoxin increased alongside the fermentation time in traditional doenjang. However, in ganjang, no significant differences were associated with the fermentation period. When using starter cultures, the fermentation period did not affect the toxin level in both foods. Both methods showed lower aflatoxin content in the initial doenjang and ganjang samples than in meju. B. cereus was not detected in either method, as its content decreased over the fermentation period. Microbiome taxonomic profiling confirmed that even when using starter cultures, B. cereus was not a dominant species and was considerably affected by the environment. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas, pathogenic in nature, were detected in products manufactured using the traditional method; hence, the potential risk of this method was higher than that of the commercial method. The experimental methodology employed in this study contributes to understanding the microbial composition and toxin contamination levels in doenjang and ganjang, contributing to the overall knowledge of their safety and quality control.

1. Introduction

Doenjang and ganjang are fermented foods made from soybeans and are traditionally consumed in Korea. These products are often used in seasoning for their specific flavor and taste. Soybeans have a high protein content (38% protein) and represent a major source of protein in the grain-oriented diets common to Asia [1]. Boiled soybeans are used to make meju. This is then soaked in brine, the liquid of which is separated and processed into ganjang. The resulting solid can be ripened further to produce doenjang [2,3,4].
There are two main methods used to manufacture these fermented products. The traditional method of meju manufacture involves weaving rice straw, whose naturally occurring bacteria contribute to the fermentation process. As a result, meju manufactured using natural fermentation intrinsically contains a variety of microorganisms. Owing to the metabolism of these microorganisms during fermentation and maturation, the resulting food product exhibits the unique taste and aroma of soybean paste. However, the combination of the microorganisms naturally found in the straw and the long manufacturing period renders challenges in controlling the growth of microorganisms during fermentation, giving rise to numerous potential safety issues [5,6].
Therefore, the identification of the strains involved in the fermentation of jang is an important topic of study. Owing to the advances in science and technology, the manufacture of jang by fermenting meju via seed treatment without a straw is gaining popularity. This method, known as the commercial method, involves inoculating a starter culture or using koji, which can be produced using the starter culture. Since the fermentation period of the commercial method is shorter than that of the traditional method, standardization is easier, and the production of products of a certain quality, in addition to the advantage of controlling the safety of the products, is possible [7,8].
The long manufacturing period of doenjang and ganjang increases the chances of contamination by microorganisms and mycotoxins, which can be harmful to humans when ingested. To assess food safety, the microbiological quality of food must be analyzed. The presence of pathogenic organisms such as S. aureus, Escherichia coli, and B. cereus in food is a cause of concern as it can lead to several foodborne diseases, as well as food poisoning [9]. At present, quantitative standards have only been introduced for the presence of B. cereus in soybeans in Korea. Owing to the lack of established standards for other harmful microorganisms, a need to investigate the degree of contamination of other microorganisms, in addition to B. cereus, has gained significance.
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by mold that cause diseases and abnormal physiological effects in humans and livestock. Among these, aflatoxin is produced by fungi of the Aspergillus genus. Aflatoxins (AFs) are comprised of over 20 types of toxins, among which aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) has been reported as the most toxic, inducing liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. Aflatoxin is classified as a Group 1 (carcinogenic to humans) carcinogen, as designated by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [10,11,12]. Ochratoxin is another secondary metabolite produced by fungi such as Aspergillus ochraceus and Penicillium verrucosum, and is a known carcinogen. The most prevalent and toxic ochratoxin is ochratoxin A (OTA). The IARC is responsible for identifying and classifying substances that are potentially carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) (IARC, 2020). Studies have found that aflatoxin and ochratoxin have optimal growth conditions at 30 °C and 15–30 °C, respectively [13,14]. Notably, the optimum temperature for mold growth is similar to the temperature of meju during fermentation (15–30 °C). Contaminated meju carries a high risk of mold growth during the manufacturing process, and therefore the regulation of the process is required to mitigate this risk. In Korea, the regulatory limits for total AF, AFB1, and OTA are 15 μg/kg, 10 μg/kg, and 20 μg/kg, respectively.
Previous studies have reported the presence of harmful microorganisms, such as B. cereus, and mycotoxins, particularly aflatoxins, in fermented food products, exceeding regulatory limits. Researchers have aimed to enhance the productivity, safety, and quality of doenjang and ganjang production in response. However, limited research exists on the effect of using starters, or of their absence, on the safety of soybean paste and soy sauce. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of microbial and mycotoxin contamination based on the use of starters in the production of traditional Korean soybean paste and soy sauce.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Supplementary Figure S1 presents the traditional preparation method for soy sauce and soybean paste, along with the commercial method that utilizes starters [2]. Monitoring samples were collected through visits to markets, online retailers, and companies. The samples were then divided into groups for processing using either the commercial method, using starter cultures, or the traditional method of natural fermentation, which involved the use of starter cultures, or the traditional method of natural fermentation, which involved the use of straw. A total of 24 samples of domestic doenjang and ganjang were obtained for this study. To examine the influence of starter culture on the manufacturing process of doenjang and ganjang, both methods with and without starter culture were employed for direct production. The production stage sample was obtained from a company located in Sunchang-gun, Jeollabuk-do. Among the samples used in the previous experiment, two companies employing the commercial method and two companies employing the traditional method were selected. All meju was manufactured in November, and samples were collected for each production cycle. Experiments were conducted based on these samples.

2.2. Measuring Aflatoxins and Ochratoxin A in Doenjang and Ganjang

2.2.1. Standards and Reagents

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade water, acetonitrile (CAN), and methanol were obtained from Avantor (Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA), ensuring their high purity and quality. Phosphoric acid and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as mobile phase additives for chromatographic separation. Aflatoxin standard mixtures (B1, B2, G1, and G2) were purchased from Romer Labs (Tulln, Austria) to serve as calibration standards. Ochratoxin A standard was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolved in acetonitrile to prepare the corresponding standard solution. To maintain their stability, all standard solutions were carefully stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

2.2.2. Sample Preparation

The sample (4 g of doenjang, 6 mL of water, 10 g of ganjang) was accurately weighed and transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube to initiate the extraction process. To facilitate mycotoxin extraction, 10 mL of 1% formic acid in acetonitrile, QuEChERS powder, and two ceramic homogenizers were added to the sample. The mixture was vigorously shaken for 1 minute, ensuring proper extraction. Subsequently, centrifugation was performed at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes to separate the supernatant.
Following centrifugation, 5 mL of the acetonitrile (ACN) supernatant was carefully transferred to a dSPE tube (dispersive solid-phase extraction) and subjected to another round of shaking for 1 minute. After an additional centrifugation step at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes, 2 mL of the purified supernatant was collected and transferred to a 2 mL EP tube.
To concentrate the sample, the ACN extract was evaporated using a speed Vac apparatus under air-dry conditions at 40 °C. Subsequently, 500 μL of rehydration solution (20% ACN:TFA [8:2]) was added to the concentrated sample. The mixture was allowed to react in the dark for 20 minutes, followed by filtration using a 0.45 μm filter [15].
Finally, the analysis was conducted using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection, utilizing the conditions described in Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Measuring Microbial Contamination Levels in Doenjang and Ganjang

For microbiological analysis, 30 g of each sample was collected, and to initiate the dilution process, 90 g of sterile water was added, resulting in a peptone water dilution. To detect aerobic bacteria, 1 mL of the pre-treated sample was inoculated on a dry film medium for aerobic bacteria (3M, Saint Paul, MI, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The subsequent step involved counting the number of red colonies generated. Similarly, to detect E. coli, 1 mL of the pre-treated sample was inoculated on a dry film medium for E. coli (3M, Saint Paul, MI, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The colonies that formed bubbles around the newly created blue colonies were counted.
For coliform detection, 1 mL of the pre-treated sample was inoculated on a dry film medium for coliforms (3M, Saint Paul, MI, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The resulting red colonies and colonies that formed bubbles were counted. For B. cereus identification, 0.1 mL of the diluted sample was spread on the surface of a mannitol-egg-yolk-polymyxin agar (MYP) plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h, after which the resulting colonies were counted. Lastly, for S. aureus analysis, 0.1 mL of each sample was spread on the surface of a Baird Parker agar (BPA) plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The colonies exhibiting typical S. aureus morphology were counted.

2.4. Microbial Taxonomic Profiling

Total DNA was extracted using the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed using the extracted DNA and fusion primers targeting the V3 to V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. To amplify the bacteria, fusion primers 341F and 805R were used. The fusion primers were constructed in the following order: P5 (P7) graft binding, i5 (i7) index, Nextera consensus, sequencing adaptor, and target region sequence. The amplifications were performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, with a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was confirmed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized using a Gel Doc system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The amplified products were purified using CleanPCR (CleanNA). Equal concentrations of purified products were pooled together, and short fragments (non-target products) were removed using CleanPCR (CleanNA). The quality and product size were assessed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using a DNA 7500 chip. Mixed amplicons were pooled, and the sequencing was carried out at Chunlab, Inc. (Seoul, Korea), using the Illumina MiSeq Sequencing system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The EzBioCloud 16S rRNA database was used for a taxonomic assignment using the usearch_global command of VSEARCH, followed by a more precise pairwise alignment. Chimeric reads were filtered on reads with <97% similarity with reference-based chimeric detection using UCHIME algorithm6 and the non-chimeric 16S rRNA database from EzBioCloud. After chimeric filtering, reads that were not identified to the species level (with <97% similarity) in the EzBioCloud database were compiled, and cluster_fast command2 was used to perform de novo clustering to generate additional OTUs. The sequenced data were analyzed using the EzBioCloud database.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Monitoring the Risk Factors of Commercial Products according to the Manufacturing Methods

3.1.1. Detection of Aflatoxins and Ochratoxin A in Doenjang and Ganjang

As shown in Table 1, in traditional doenjang, 1.64–87.67 μg/kg of total aflatoxins was detected in 14 samples (60.9%). In addition, 1.43–8.45 μg/kg of aflatoxin B1 was detected in 12 samples (52.2%). The mean concentration was 3.84 and 8.22 for AFB1 and total AFs, respectively, in the samples. One sample (4.3%) exceeded the regulatory limits for total AFs (15 μg/kg). In the commercial doenjang, aflatoxin was detected in three samples (16.7%) out of eighteen samples, and AFB1 was present in the range of 3.14–16.68 μg/kg, with an average of 10.20 μg/kg. Among these, two samples (11.1%) exceeded the regulatory limits for AFB1 (10 μg/kg). Aflatoxins were detected in 12 samples (54.5%) of traditional ganjang and were contaminated to 0.20–35.75 μg/kg. The AFB1 content was 3.39–5.07 μg/kg in one sample (9.1%). The average detection concentration was 4.33 μg/kg for AFB1 and 7.80 μg/kg for total AFs, and three samples (13.6%) exceeded the regulatory limits for total AFs (15 μg/kg). In commercial ganjang, aflatoxin was detected in 13 (76.5%) out of 17 samples and was detected at a level of 1.57–14.24 μg/kg only in AFB1. It was detected at an average concentration of 6.57 μg/kg, and exceeded the regulatory limit (10 μg/kg) in four samples (23.5%). Ochratoxin A was not detected in any sample. The manufacturing method did not significantly affect contamination in the commercial product.

3.1.2. Measuring Microbial Contamination Levels in Doenjang and Ganjang

As shown in Table 2, the results of the microbial analysis of 20 samples of doenjang did not indicate any incidence of E. coli or E. coli groups. As for harmful microorganisms, S. aureus colony was not found, but B. cereus colony was detected. Therefore, we performed a test for B. cereus. Ganjang was not analyzed because it involves sterilization or heating in the production process, with little risk of microbial contamination [2,16]. B. cereus was detected in the range of 0–2.49 log CFU/g in five samples (20.8%) of traditional doenjang. In commercial doenjang, it was detected in the range of 0.81–3.23 log CFU/g in three samples (16.7%). In traditional ganjang, it was detected in the range of 0–0.62 log CFU/g in two samples (8.3%). In commercial ganjang, B. cereus was not detected in any of the 17 samples. The use of starter cultures did not create a significant difference in either doenjang or ganjang, and all samples were within the regulatory limits (4 log CFU/g) and evaluated to be safe.

3.2. Analysis of Risk Factors according to the Production Stages

3.2.1. Detection of Mycotoxins according to the Production Stage

The microbial community can change during fermentation, subsequently affecting the final product. Therefore, we evaluated the degree of mycotoxin contamination according to the production stage of doenjang and ganjang. As a result, ochratoxin A was not detected in any stage. Aflatoxins were not detected in soybeans from traditionally manufactured products. However, in meju, it was detected at the levels of 2.19 ± 0.08 and 1.34 ± 0.56 μg/kg during the fermentation period, which slightly decreased as the fermentation progressed. In doenjang, aflatoxin levels were 0.74 ± 0.35, 2.03 ± 0.74, and 5.32 ± 0.16 μg/kg during the fermentation period, indicating that mycotoxins increased as the aging period increased. In ganjang, no significant difference was observed during the fermentation period (0.24 ± 0.10, 0.26 ± 0.09, 0.22 μg/kg). Aflatoxins were not detected in soybeans from commercial products. Significant differences were not observed in meju (1.07 ± 0.26 and 1.11 ± 0.10 μg/kg) during the fermentation period. In the case of doenjang, 0.56 ± 0.07, 1.1 ± 0.18, and 1.11 ± 0.04 μg/kg were found, indicating an increase over the fermentation period. In ganjang, the toxin level gradually decreased to 0.97 ± 0.07, 0.6, and 0.3 ± 0.01 μg/kg (Figure 1). In both methods, the aflatoxin content was lower in the initial doenjang and ganjang samples than in meju. The reduction in toxin levels can be attributed to the inability of the mold to grow after soaking in brine during the ripening process [17,18].

3.2.2. Occurrence of B. cereus according to the Production Stage

The level of B. cereus in soybean was 0.63 ± 0.01 in the traditional method, while the levels were 4.32 ± 0.30 and 1.10 ± 0.57 μg/kg in meju, indicating a decrease with aging. In the initial doenjang sample, 2.61 ± 0.47 μg/kg was found, but B. cereus was not detected after ripening. In the initial ganjang sample, 0.36 ± 0.12 μg/kg was found, but it was not detected after aging. The amount of B. cereus was 3.25 ± 0.15 μg/kg in soybeans fermented using the commercial method and only 2.1 μg/kg in the initial meju samples. In the initial doenjang samples, 2.37 ± 0.79 μg/kg was found and was not detected thereafter. By contrast, B. cereus was not detected in ganjang at all (Figure 2).

3.2.3. Microbial Taxonomic Profiling

To analyze the microbial communities, companies A and B used the traditional method, while companies C and D used the commercial method (Figure 3). At the species level, Leuconostoc lactis (77.7%) and Leuconostoc citreum (4.2%) were found in meju, while Pseudomonas putida (27.74%) and Weissella confusa (20.46%) were found in brine for company A. Leuconostoc mesenteroides (35.41%) and Chromohalobacter marismortui (29.42%) were dominant in doenjang. After ripening in doenjang, C. marismortui (35.34%) and Chromohalobacter beijerinckii (25.12%) were found to be dominant, in this order. In ganjang, C. marismortui (39.45% and 47.63%) and C. beijerinckii (26.63% and 29.10%) were abundant. In company B, Bacillus licheniformis (41.1%) and Bacillus thermoamylovorans (21.84%) were dominant in meju, and C. beijerinckii (52.84%) and Tetragenococcus halophilus (15.87%) were dominant in the brine. T. halophilus (48.8%) and Bacillus licheniformis (14.7%) were the dominant species in doenjang before ripening. After ripening, S. aureus (27.9%) and T. halophilus (14.7%) were found to be the most dominant. C. beijerinckii (52.82% and 38.92%) and T. halophilus (14.49% and 16.98%) were abundant in both ganjang and fermented ganjang. Halomonas halmophila (27.74%) was also abundant in fermented ganjang. In company C, we found Enterococcus faecium (33.8% and 55.0% and 61.7%) to be dominant in meju and doenjang, followed by W. confusa (26.7% and 13.9%), while Pediococcus acidilactici (22.4%) was found in fermented doenjang. In brine, Staphylococcus succinus (52.18%) and Kushneria konosiri (33.82%) were abundant. Staphylococcus saprophyticus (57.90%) was dominant in ganjang, followed by W. confusa (15.72%). P. acidilactici (26.29%) and W. confusa (21.41%) were abundant in fermented ganjang. In company D, we found E. faecium to be abundantly present at concentrations of 51.85%, 7.74%, 55.88%, 76.24%, and 24.99% in meju, brine, doenjang, fermented doenjang, and ganjang, respectively. W. confusa (43.1% and 54.91%) was abundant in meju and ganjang, while P. acidilactici (39.4% and 16.0%) was abundant in doenjang. In brine, Bacillus subtilis (61.87%) was the dominant species, and Lentibacillus kimchi (90.59%) was the most dominant in fermented ganjang.
Companies C and D used A. oryzae and B. subtilis in starter cultures. However, none of the strains in the starter culture appeared as the dominant species in either of the samples produced by these two companies. Although microbial diversity was found to be reduced when the starter culture was used, its use can be considered to be advantageous owing to the absence of the pathogenic bacteria S. aureus and Pseudomonas. The overall microbial distribution appeared to be greatly influenced by the environment. Although the microbial distribution of the starter cultures used by the companies was similar, additional studies are needed to confirm these results owing to the small number of comparative samples included in the present study.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the two manufacturing methods did not create a significant difference in the toxin levels of doenjang and ganjang. However, as the fermentation period increased in the traditional process of doenjang preparation, aflatoxin levels increased. In addition, by confirming the presence of Pseudomonas and the pathogenic bacteria S. aureus in the product made using the traditional method, it is ascertained that the potential risk of this method is high; however, additional studies are required to authenticate the findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation9070621/s1. Supplementary Figure S1. Methods for the manufacture of Doenjang and Ganjang. Supplementary Table S1. Conditions for HPLC-FLD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K., J.-C.K., M.J. and H.L.; data curation, J.K., J.J., M.J. and H.L.; formal analysis, J.K. and H.L.; methodology, J.-C.K. and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K. and H.L.; writing—review and editing, J.J. and J.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Study on Standardization for Korean Traditional Foods (G0221400-01) of the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the support of the Study on Standardization for Korean Traditional Foods of the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS).

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Kim, S.L.; Lee, Y.H.; Chi, H.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, S.J. Diversity in lipid contents and fatty acid composition of soybean seeds cultivated in Korea. Korean J. Crop Sci. 2007, 52, 348–357. [Google Scholar]
  2. Park, K.Y.; Hwang, K.M.; Jung, K.O.; Lee, K.B. Studies on the Standardization of Doenjang (Korean Soybean Paste) 1. Standardization of Manufacturing Method of Doenjang by Literatures. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2002, 31, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jeon, H.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y. Quality characteristics of modified doenjang and traditional doenjang. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 45, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, S.; Park, S.Y.; Hong, S.; Lim, S.D. Quality characteristics of regional traditional and commercial soy sauce (Ganjang). KoreanW J. Food Cook. Sci. 2017, 33, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lee, H.T.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.S. Analysis of microbiological contamination and biogenic amines content in traditional and commercial doenjang. J. Food Hyg. S. Afr. 2009, 24, 102–109. [Google Scholar]
  6. Seon, Y.K.; Park, J.S.; Yang, E.J. Isolation of microorganism with high protease activity from doenjang and production of doenjang with isolated strain. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 50, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, Y.S.; Jeong, D.Y.; Hwang, Y.T.; Uhm, T.B. Bacterial community profiling during the manufacturing process of traditional soybean paste by Pyrosequencing method. Korean J. Microbiol. 2011, 47, 275–280. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee, E.J.; Hurh, B.S.; Lee, I. Development of ready-to-use starters for the production of doenjang. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2019, 47, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nyenje, M.E.; Odjadjare, C.E.; Tanih, N.F.; Green, E.; Ndip, R.N. Foodborne pathogens recovered from ready-to-eat foods from roadside cafeterias and retail outlets in Alice, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: Public health implications. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2608–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Kim, J.G.; Roh, W.S. Changes of aflatoxins during the ripening of Korean soy paste and soy sauce and the characteristics of the changes—Part 1. J. Food Hyg. Saf. 1998, 13, 313–317. [Google Scholar]
  11. Abdin, M.Z.; Ahmad, M.M.; Javed, S. Advances in molecular detection of Aspergillus: An update. Arch. Microbiol. 2010, 192, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Reddy, K.R.N.; Salleh, B.; Saad, B.; Abbas, H.K.; Abel, C.A.; Shier, W.T. An overview of mycotoxin contamination in foods and its implications for human health. Toxin Rev. 2010, 29, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Murphy, P.A.; Hendrich, S.; Landgren, C.; Bryant, C.M. Food mycotoxins: An update. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, R51–R65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mousa, W.; Ghazali, F.M.; Jinap, S.; Ghazali, H.M.; Radu, S. Modelling the effect of water activity and temperature on growth rate and aflatoxin production by two isolates of Aspergillus flavus on paddy. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 1262–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Luh, B.S. Industrial production of soy sauce. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 14, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nagarajan, V.; Bhat, R.V.; Tulpule, P.G. Aflatoxin production in some varieties of soybeans (Glycine max L.). Experientia 1973, 29, 1302–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jeong, S.E.; Chung, S.H.; Hong, S.Y. Natural occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in meju and soybean paste produced in South Korea. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2019, 62, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Park, J.W.; Yoo, M.S.; Kuk, J.H.; Ji, Y.; Lee, J.H. Simultaneous determination and Mornitoring of aflatoxin and ochratoxin A in food. J. Food Hyg. S. Afr. 2013, 28, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Total aflatoxin contamination levels at the production stage in (A) traditional method and (B) commercial method (S: soybean, M1: meju, M2: fermented meju, D1: doenjang, D2: doenjang fermented for 2 months, D3: doenjang fermented for 4 months, G1: ganjang, G2: ganjang fermented for 2 months, and G3: ganjang fermented for 4 months). Significance (p < 0.05) are presented as different letters.
Figure 1. Total aflatoxin contamination levels at the production stage in (A) traditional method and (B) commercial method (S: soybean, M1: meju, M2: fermented meju, D1: doenjang, D2: doenjang fermented for 2 months, D3: doenjang fermented for 4 months, G1: ganjang, G2: ganjang fermented for 2 months, and G3: ganjang fermented for 4 months). Significance (p < 0.05) are presented as different letters.
Fermentation 09 00621 g001
Figure 2. B. cereus contamination levels at the production stage in (A) traditional method and (B) commercial method (S: soybean, M1: meju, M2: fermented meju, D1: doenjang, D2: doenjang fermented 2 months, D3: doenjang fermented 4 months, G1: ganjang, G2: ganjang fermented 2 months, and G3: ganjang fermented 4 months). Significance (p < 0.05) are presented as different letters.
Figure 2. B. cereus contamination levels at the production stage in (A) traditional method and (B) commercial method (S: soybean, M1: meju, M2: fermented meju, D1: doenjang, D2: doenjang fermented 2 months, D3: doenjang fermented 4 months, G1: ganjang, G2: ganjang fermented 2 months, and G3: ganjang fermented 4 months). Significance (p < 0.05) are presented as different letters.
Fermentation 09 00621 g002
Figure 3. Microbial taxonomic classification at the species level. (A,B) Traditional methods; (C,D) commercial methods. (M: meju, B: brine, D1: doenjang, D2: fermented doenjang, G1: ganjang, and G2: fermented ganjang).
Figure 3. Microbial taxonomic classification at the species level. (A,B) Traditional methods; (C,D) commercial methods. (M: meju, B: brine, D1: doenjang, D2: fermented doenjang, G1: ganjang, and G2: fermented ganjang).
Fermentation 09 00621 g003
Table 1. Occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in doenjang and ganjang.
Table 1. Occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in doenjang and ganjang.
SampleNumber of SamplesNumber of Positive SamplesRangeMean
AFB1 (ug/kg)AFG1 (ug/kg)Total Afs (ug/kg)OTA (ug/kg)Total Afs (ug/kg)
DoenjangTraditional24141.43–8.452.10–87.671.64–87.67ND8.22
Commercial24123.14–16.680.25–35.750.25–35.75ND10.20
GanjangTraditional1833.39–5.07ND3.14–16.68ND7.80
Commercial17131.57–14.24ND1.57–14.24ND6.57
ND: Not detected.
Table 2. Bacillus cereus contamination levels in doenjang and ganjang.
Table 2. Bacillus cereus contamination levels in doenjang and ganjang.
SampleNo. of SamplesNo. of Positive SamplesRange (LogCFU/g)Positive Mean (LogCFU/g)
DoenjangTraditional2450–2.490.58
Commercial2430.81–3.231.79
GanjangTraditional1820–0.620.18
Commercial170NDND
ND: Not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Jeong, J.; Jang, M.; Kim, J.-C.; Lee, H. Comparative Analysis of Microbial and Mycotoxin Contamination in Korean Traditional Soybean Paste and Soy Sauce Production with and without Starter. Fermentation 2023, 9, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070621

AMA Style

Kim J, Jeong J, Jang M, Kim J-C, Lee H. Comparative Analysis of Microbial and Mycotoxin Contamination in Korean Traditional Soybean Paste and Soy Sauce Production with and without Starter. Fermentation. 2023; 9(7):621. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jinkwi, Jiyoun Jeong, Mi Jang, Jong-Chan Kim, and Heeyoung Lee. 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Microbial and Mycotoxin Contamination in Korean Traditional Soybean Paste and Soy Sauce Production with and without Starter" Fermentation 9, no. 7: 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop