Next Article in Journal
Screening of a Novel Fibrinolytic Enzyme-Producing Streptomyces from a Hyper-Arid Area and Optimization of Its Fibrinolytic Enzyme Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Autochthonous Microbes to Produce Ligurian Taggiasca Olives (Imperia, Liguria, NW Italy) in Brine
Previous Article in Journal
Attributes of Lactobacillus acidophilus as Effected by Carao (Cassia grandis) Pulp Powder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Achievements of Autochthonous Wine Yeast Isolation and Selection in Romania—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Underexplored Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Artisanal Cheese Making in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities

by
Bianca de Oliveira Hosken
1,
Gilberto Vinícius Melo Pereira
2,*,
Thamylles Thuany Mayrink Lima
1,
João Batista Ribeiro
3,
Walter Coelho Pereira de Magalhães Júnior
3 and
José Guilherme Prado Martin
1,*
1
Microbiology of Fermented Products Laboratory (FERMICRO), Department of Microbiology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil
2
Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil
3
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA), Unidade Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora 36038-330, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(5), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9050409
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 18 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Application of Starter Cultures)

Abstract

:
Artisanal cheeses are prepared using traditional methods with territorial, regional and cultural linkages. In Brazil, there is a great diversity of artisanal cheeses (BAC), which have historical, socioeconomic and cultural importance. The diversity of the BAC between producing regions is due to the different compositions of raw milk, the steps involved in the process and the maturation time. The crucial step for cheese differentiation is the non-addition of starter cultures, i.e., spontaneous fermentation, which relies on the indigenous microbiota present in the raw material or from the environment. Therefore, each BAC-producing region has a characteristic endogenous microbiota, composed mainly of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). These bacteria are responsible for the technological, sensory and safety characteristics of the BAC. In this review, the biotechnological applications of the LAB isolated from different BAC were evidenced, including proteolytic, lipolytic, antimicrobial and probiotic activities. In addition, challenges and opportunities in this field are highlighted, because there are knowledge gaps related to artisanal cheese-producing regions, as well as the biotechnological potential. Thus, this review may provide new insights into the biotechnological applications of LAB and guide further research for the cheese-making process.

1. Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a diverse group of Gram-positive bacteria that produce lactic acid as the main fermentation product of the carbohydrate metabolism. The term “LAB” is somewhat ambiguous and is often used to refer to bacteria applied in the production of fermented foods [1]. These include bacteria with high G+C (Bifidobacterium) and low G+C content (Firmicute such as Lactobacillus, Lactococcus and Streptococcus). They are acid-tolerant, meso-aerophilic, not mobile or spore-forming and either rod-shaped (bacilli) or spherical (cocci) [2]. The term LAB has a rather positive connotation, containing bacteria generally considered safe for human consumption, although some strains of enterococci raise concern due to the possible presence of virulence factors and the potential transfer of antibiotic resistance.
LAB are widely spread in the environment and play an important role in fermentation processes. They are employed in the production of pickles, sauerkraut, fermented meats, breads and especially dairy products [3]. Cheese making involves a process of fermentation by LAB. During this process, milk is coagulated by adding rennet or an acid. The acid may be produced by the fermentation of lactose by LAB. Artisanal cheeses are produced by indigenous LAB present in the raw material or from the environment [4]. For all processes, LAB are important for acidification and the ripening process. In addition, they produce key metabolites with antimicrobial activity, including organic acids, ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, CO2 and bacteriocins [5,6].
In recent years, Brazilian cheeses have been recognized for their quality in several awards, both at national [7] and international [8] levels. In general, the production of Brazilian artisanal cheeses (BAC) involves the use of raw milk and an endogenous ferment consisting of the whey collected the day before, which can be named according to the region, such as “pingo” for Artisanal Minas Cheeses (AMC), the most famous in the country, or “repique” for Porungo cheese, produced in São Paulo state. BAC produced with raw milk must be ripened in accordance with specific legislation in minimum periods in order to guarantee its safety [9,10].
Several studies have demonstrated the diversity of LAB in BAC, with emphasis on Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Weissella, Pediococcus and Leuconostoc genera [11,12,13]. Different biotechnological applications of LAB isolated from BAC were detected, including probiotic potential [11]; diacetyl [14] and exopolysaccharides (EPS) production [14]; and antimicrobial [5], proteolytic [15] and lipolytic activities [14]. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the biotechnological potential of LAB isolated from BAC. In this review, we present the main gaps detected, indicating the under-investigated artisanal cheese-producing regions, the opportunities for biotechnological exploration, as well as the need to organize a collection of LAB typical of BAC for the purpose of biotechnological research and exploitation. With an ultimate goal, this review provides new insights into the industrial applications of LAB isolated from BAC.

2. Brazilian Artisanal Cheeses (BAC)

In Brazil, there is a great diversity of artisanal cheeses with historical, socioeconomic and cultural importance. In general, cheese production takes place on small farms and includes raw milk and traditional methods, which has been transmitted over hundreds of years by generations of cheesemakers [16,17]. BAC are produced in different geographic regions (Figure 1), such as Marajó cheese in the north; Coalho and Manteiga cheeses in the northeast; Caipira cheese in the central region; Colonial, Serrano, KochKäse and Käschmier in the south; and in the southeast, Artisanal Minas Cheese (AMC), Cabacinha, Parmesan-type cheeses (Alagoa, Vale do Suaçuí and Mantiqueira de Minas), Porungo and Requeijão Moreno [4].
Minas Gerais state is responsible for half of all cheese produced in the country, whose importance is reinforced by the existence of several producing regions. Among them, AMC production is responsible for 50% of the national production [4]. It is produced in the micro-regions of Araxá, Campo das Vertentes, Canastra, Cerrado, Serra do Salitre, Serro, Triângulo Mineiro and, more recently, Serras do Ibitipoca and Entre Serras (Figure 1) [18,19]. The AMC production method has even been recognized as Brazilian intangible heritage. Its production steps consist of milking, filtration, the addition of rennet and endogenous ferment, coagulation, curd cutting, draining, molding, pressing, dry salting and ripening [20]. Its quality has been reinforced by several awards; in 2021, for example, Brazil was one of the leading countries in the ranking of the most famous world cheese contest, winning 57 medals; 4 of the 5 medals in the “super gold” modality were won by cheeses produced in Minas Gerais state [21]. In addition to the socio-cultural relevance of AMC, it has economic importance, representing the main source of income for thousands of rural producer families [22].

3. LAB and Food Industry

LAB produce lactic acid as the main fermentation product, generated from two fermentative metabolic pathways: homofermentative and heterofermentative. In cheese making, both LAB metabolisms are reported. Homofermentative LAB includes Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Weissella and Streptococcus which produce lactic acid as an end metabolite by Pentose Phosphate or the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway. Heterofermentative LAB includes Leuconosctoc and Oenococcus which produce several other products in addition to lactic acid, such as ethanol, acetic acid and CO2, from the conversion of lactose via the 6-P-gluconate/phosphoketolase pathway. Finally, Lactobacillus includes both homofermentative and heterofermentative species [23,24,25].
Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis and many lactobacilli grow in the presence of a maximum of 2% or eventually 4% of salt, in addition to tolerating environments with a low pH. LAB can also produce several types of glycolytic, lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes. These characteristics reinforce their importance for different applications in the food industry [26,27]. In addition, LAB contribute to the sensory development of various foods, especially flavor (as they produce volatile compounds) and texture (improved by the production of exopolysaccharides). The safety history of LAB contributes to the GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) or QPS (Qualified Assumption of Safety) status, enabling its use in food, either as starter cultures or probiotic strains [28]. For fermented foods produced from previously sanitized or pasteurized raw materials, the use of a LAB starter culture is necessary [27]. In addition, there are also non-starter LAB (NSLAB) that are especially important for cheese ripening, for example [26].
In recent years, several studies have explored the potential of LAB to be used as live vectors for in situ synthesis, i.e., the production and delivery of biomolecules at their site of use/application, without removing or transporting them to another site. This is only possible due to the GRAS status of the LAB strains. Another path consists of the direct application of compounds obtained by ex situ synthesis, which means applying the compounds in a place or environment outside their place of use or application [29]. However, in situ synthesis is advantageous as it allows the use of LAB strains instead of purified compounds, enabling the development of polyfunctional cultures, as well as reducing the costs of downstream isolation and purification steps. This strategy may also be better accepted by consumers, because purified compounds are considered food additives [30].
Recent studies have evaluated the use of in situ LAB for the synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) from L-glutamate—an amino acid released during milk fermentation. This non-essential amino acid plays an important role in the central nervous system as an inhibitory neurotransmitter. Its properties include antidepressant, anxiolytic and antihypertensive activity, as well as the ability to regulate hormone secretion [6]. The production of GABA by LAB appears to be directly related to the acid stress response; thus, LAB strains able to produce GABA could be employed for functional purposes, especially in foods with reduced pH values [31]. Challenges related to the use of LAB in situ include its ability to resist certain types of stress, especially the osmotic pressure resulting from the use of salts by the food industry [32]. In this context, the isolation of LAB from artisanal cheeses aiming at its in situ application is notoriously promising, given its survival in ripened cheeses, which generally have high amounts of salt [11]. Thus, it may represent, in the near future, a promising strategy for the food industry.
Finally, the biotechnological potential of LAB also includes the encapsulation of metabolites produced ex situ by them for the controlled release or application in active packaging. Microencapsulation technology allows food-grade ingredients or bioactive components to be adequately protected and released in a controlled manner over long periods, including at specific sites [33]. The microencapsulation of LAB with probiotic properties for use in livestock, for example, has already been demonstrated [34]. As for the active packaging, antibacterial bioplastic film incorporated with purified bacteriocin from Lactilactobacillus sakei was able to reduce the contamination of Coalho cheese by coagulase-positive staphylococci and thermotolerant coliforms [35].

4. LAB Isolated from BAC

In general, BAC are produced from raw milk, which presents a pH close to neutrality, high water activity and significant nutritional value. It also has rich microbiota, mainly composed of LAB [36,37], essential for the fermentation process and, consequently, for the cheese quality and safety [38,39]. The relevant sensory characteristics of artisanal cheeses are provided by the activity of autochthonous LAB, especially related to the production of organic acids, fatty acids and amino acids, as well as peptidases and lipases [40,41,42,43,44].
In BAC, the most frequently reported genera of LAB are Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Streptococcus and Weissella (Table 1). No data were found regarding the LAB isolated from Cabacinha, Parmesan-type cheeses, Porungo and KochKäse and Käschmier cheeses. It should also be noted that LAB also correspond to the majority group in an endogenous ferment used in the production of various types of BAC, in addition to the milking and production environment; therefore, the LAB diversity of BAC is influenced by the geographic location, climatic conditions and processing steps [15,43,44].
The importance of LAB in cheese production is due to the presence of starter cultures and NSLAB. Starter cultures, mainly Lc. lactis and S. thermophilus, are responsible for converting lactose into lactic acid at a controlled rate. This process results in a gradual decrease in pH, which has a significant impact on various aspects of cheese production and ultimately determines the cheese’s composition and quality. During the early stages of cheese ripening, Lb. delbrueckii and Lb. helveticus play a critical role, breaking down proteins, metabolizing lactose, producing aromatic compounds and providing substrates that can be further consumed by other microbial groups, such as NSLAB [60]. NSLAB mainly include the facultative heterofermentative Lactobacillus genus, followed by Pediococcus pentosaceus [61]. They can impact the cheese flavor and texture due to the production of compounds from the catabolism of amino acids, mainly methionine, aromatic amino acids and branched-chain amino acids, in addition to the synthesis of EPS [39,61,62,63]. In addition, bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl and CO2 are also produced by NSLAB, acting as biopreservatives and contributing to the cheese safety [5,11,64,65].

5. Biotechnological Potential of LAB Isolated from BAC

The self-sufficiency in inputs, the increasing demand for clean-label products and food production in the bioeconomy context have stimulated the development of research for bioprospecting microbial and bioactive compounds from different types of products, especially fermented foods [66,67]. Among them, dairy products stand out due to their recognized microbial diversity, especially LAB. In this context, artisanal cheeses have proved to be an important source for the isolation of microorganisms with biotechnological purposes [11].
Recent studies have demonstrated the potential for the industrial application of LAB, such as the production of enzymes, diacetyl, EPS, antimicrobial compounds, probiotic and prebiotic effects, among others, aimed mainly at improving food quality and safety [32,68,69]. In Brazil, research has been carried out to discover novel LAB strains isolated from BAC for industrial exploitation (Table 2). In the next sections, the main biotechnological applications of LAB identified in BAC by different studies published in recent years are discussed.

5.1. Bacteriocin Production

Bacteriocins are proteins or peptides ribosomally synthesized by Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, with recognized antimicrobial activity (bacteriostatic, bactericidal or bacteriolytic) against taxonomically related or unrelated microorganisms [84,85,86]. They can be broad spectrum, inhibiting a wide variety of bacteria, or narrow spectrum, inhibiting taxonomically close bacteria [86,87]. In general, they are cationic and exhibit amphipathic properties, with the cell membrane being, in most cases, the target of their activity [88]. The first studies about the antimicrobial activity of LAB date back to the 1920s, with the discovery of colicin V; the discovery of nisin, in 1969, intensified the search for bioactive peptides synthesized by LAB, more specifically bacteriocins. Its use by the food and medical industries represents an alternative to the use of chemical additives and antibiotics, respectively, which has stimulated the interest in novel research in the area [31,89,90,91].
The industrial application of bacteriocins has several advantages, such as the activity against pathogens and spoilage microorganisms in foods, relative stability in different pH and temperature values, possibility of use as natural preservatives in foods and selective toxicity and inactivation by digestive proteases, with little influence on gut microbiota. Furthermore, a genetic determinant is usually encoded by plasmids, which allows facilitated genetic manipulation [92,93]. In addition, bacteriocins produced by LAB are considered GRAS, which favors their industrial application. However, the only bacteriocin approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a preservative in foods is nisin, produced by Lactococcus lactis and commercially available as Nisaplin® [94]. Nisin can also be applied in veterinary practice, for example, in the treatment of mastitis as an alternative to conventional antibiotics [95,96]. However, the low stability and solubility of nisin at neutral pH, the hydrophobic nature and the selection of resistant bacteria reinforce the importance of studies focused on the discovery of new bacteriocins [97,98].
In this context, artisanal cheeses consist of an important source of bacteriocins [39]. A recent evaluation of the phylogenetic distribution of the LAB bacteriocin repertoire associated with artisanal cheeses reported bacteriocins not yet characterized, for example, two novel putative glycocins and one lasso peptide in the genome of some strains belonging to the E. faecalis species, reinforcing their relevance as a potential source [84]. Pediocins produced by four different strains of Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from AMC were able to inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes, a relevant foodborne pathogen [98]. The Pediococcus and Lactobacillus strains isolated from sheep cheese produced in southern Brazil and artisanal cheese produced in Minas Gerais state have also been identified as producing bacteriocins with anti-listeria activity [99,100]. In addition to this pathogen, Bacillus cereus, one of the most important causes of food poisoning, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, common spoilage bacteria, were inhibited by bacteriocins (not identified yet) produced by the LAB isolated from Colonial cheese produced in southern Brazil [101].

5.2. Acidification Capacity

The acidification capacity is a widely studied aspect in LAB isolated from artisanal cheeses and can vary significantly depending on the strain and substrate. LAB are mainly responsible for the acidification of the raw milk, resulting in the pH decreasing and, consequently, affecting the activity of the rennet. Acidification also contributes to the solubilization of calcium phosphate, impacting the cheese texture, as well as the syneresis process, with reflections on its centesimal composition. Finally, acidification plays an important role in the microbial succession during cheese ripening, favoring the enzymatic activity of NSLAB, with desirable effects on the cheese flavor and texture [62,102,103].
Furthermore, the decreasing pH resulting from the production of organic acids can inhibit the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms. The release of short-chain weak organic acids, especially lactic, acetic, sorbic and propionic, during the fermentation process corresponds to one of the main mechanisms of biopreservation in fermented foods [104]. The increase in the lipid solubility of organic acids under conditions of high acidity interferes with the cell membrane potential, impairing the metabolic functions of undesirable microorganisms [105].
The acidification capacity of LAB isolated from BAC varied according to the microbial species and producing region; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Levilactobacillus brevis were more efficient in acidifying the substrate under the LAB isolated from AMC, Coalho and Caipira cheeses and presented a high acidification capacity [11], which was attributed to the type of herd feeding, differences in the cheese pressing stage, as well as the higher proportion of carbohydrate in the cheese. A low acidification capacity was observed for Weissella spp. isolated from BAC [71], reinforcing that acidification depends on the LAB species. It is also worth mentioning that the acidification capacity may vary according to the culture medium used for isolation; LAB isolated from M17 agar showed a greater acidification capacity than those isolated from MRS agar, which makes it difficult to compare the results of LAB isolated from different culture media [43].

5.3. Probiotic Potential

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization [106], probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits on the host. The term prebiotic refers to substrates that, when metabolized by the host’s gut microbiota, result in health benefits. However, prebiotics can also be found in other sources, such as food, where they can stimulate the growth or activity of beneficial microorganisms [107]. The consumption of probiotics and/or prebiotics corresponds to one of the most efficient ways to maintain the balance of the intestinal microbiota (eubiosis) [108].
A probiotic strain must present some requirements, such as the ability to resist the acidic conditions, adhere to the gut environment, inhibit pathogens, modulate the immune system and confer benefits on the host’s health; in addition, it does not present virulence factors. Several LAB strains meet these requirements, which make them even more relevant for application by the food industry [109]. Regarding probiotic food, it must comply with legal rules, demonstrating that viable microorganisms confer health benefits and are in a sufficient minimum number until the expiration date. If the food does not meet all these requirements, it only contains probiotics but is not considered as a probiotic food. This is mainly applied for artisanal fermented foods, in which the microbial species present, as well as their quantities, are generally not known [110].
Several probiotic LAB strains are widely used by the food industry, especially in the production of functional foods. Recent studies have demonstrated different types of benefits of probiotic LAB and their respective functional applications [111,112,113]. Many of these properties are related to the increasing values of proteins, minerals and vitamins in foods. In addition, the releasing of products from microbial metabolism, such as peptides, GABA, conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) and EPS, can contribute to health promotion [114]. Other benefits of probiotic LAB include the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, diarrhea, allergies, certain types of cancer and immunomodulation, among others [115].
The probiotic potential of LAB isolated from BAC has been demonstrated by different studies. Strains isolated from Colonial cheese showed high resistance to gastric acidity, with significant potential for use as a probiotic [116]. In vitro and in vivo probiotic potential was demonstrated for a Lb. plantarum strain isolated from AMC produced in the Canastra region, Minas Gerais state [117]. Lb. plantarum and Lb. rhamnosus isolated from the same type of cheese have already been evaluated as probiotic cultures in fermented milk [76].
Regarding the prebiotic property of compounds produced by LAB, it is generally related to the production of EPS (as will be discussed further in the next section), because it can favor the growth of probiotic strains. In cheeses, the supplementation with prebiotics can increase the populations of viable probiotic microorganisms; for example, the use of galactooligosaccharides (GOS), fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and inulin as nutraceuticals has stimulated the growth, survival and activity of probiotic strains in cheeses [118]. In artisanal cheeses, lactulose promoted the growth of lactobacilli and induced the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in Portuguese Serpa cheese [29]. SCFA contribute to health benefits, such as the regulation of energy metabolism, protection against colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disorders and obesity prevention [119]. At this moment, the prebiotic potential of LAB isolated from artisanal cheeses still remains unexplored in Brazil.

5.4. Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Production

Exopolysaccharides are biopolymers produced by microorganisms, whose composition and production yield are strain-dependent, both impacted by fermentation conditions [120,121]. Xanthomonas campestris and Acetobacter xylinum are recognized as excellent EPS-producing species; however, for industrial use, it is preferable that the producing microorganisms are GRAS, which reduces costs with purification processes. Furthermore, the application of purified EPS results in different effects on food when compared to EPS produced in situ, with better results [120].
The production of EPS by LAB has already been reported for Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and Streptococcus genera [122,123,124]. Lb. rhamnosus and Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens are even recognized as excellent EPS-producing species [109]. Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus, for example, have already been identified as producing species of dextran and fructan homopolysaccharides, respectively [120]. In this sense, the EPS production by LAB is especially important for the food industry, mainly for obtaining viscosity, stabilizing, emulsifying or gelling agents [109,125].
In cheeses, the production of EPS by NSLAB results in curd strengthening and the reduction of syneresis as a result of its binding with water molecules in the casein network [126]; thus, it contributes especially for the improvement in appearance and texture attributes in cheeses. In addition, EPS can minimize the harmful effects of bacteriophages during the fermentation process of dairy products, as they make the virus adsorption on the surface of the microbial cell difficult [127]. In BAC, the potential for EPS production by LAB has been little explored, with the first results indicating the AMC from Canastra, Campo das Vertentes, Serro and Cerrado, as well as Serrano cheese, as a source of LAB for this purpose [39]. These authors reinforce that obtaining EPS from the LAB of BAC constitutes a cheap, natural and sustainable strategy, with lower exploration costs, aiming at application in dairies.
In addition to the technological properties of EPS, its prebiotic effect stands out, reinforcing the relevance of the LAB (Table 2). The EPS produced by LAB favor the tolerance of probiotic strains to gut stress conditions, resulting in increased viability [109,121]. Because they can be metabolized in the gut, EPS constitute a substrate for the growth of probiotic strains, favoring the health benefits already demonstrated for this microbial group. For example, EPS produced by Lb. plantarum favored the growth of probiotic bacteria [128], and it also showed a bifidogenic effect, reducing the damages related to putrefactive bacteria [109].

5.5. Diacetyl Production

Diacetyl (2,3-butanedione) is a volatile compound produced by some LAB species during the conversion of citrate to pyruvate in the fermentation process, although it is not an exclusive feature of LAB [74,129,130]. The presence of diacetyl in certain foods is desirable, contributing to the buttery aroma and flavor [39,131]. It also presents antimicrobial activity against food pathogens, for which the mechanism of action consists of blocking the binding site of the microbial enzyme responsible for the use of arginine, affecting protein synthesis [129,132].
The production of diacetyl by Lc. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis isolated from raw goat milk has already been reported [105]. In BAC, the LAB isolated from Marajó, Manteiga and AMC cheeses were able to produce diacetyl (Table 2). The Leuconostoc and Streptococcus strains isolated from Coalho cheese also showed this ability [74]. Finally, it was found that strains of Weissella cibaria and Weissella paramesenteroides isolated from cheeses produced in several regions of Brazil can produce diacetyl; W. paramesenteroides also stood out as an excellent producer of protease and had a high acidification capacity, desirable characteristics for cultures used in the dairy industry [71].
Interestingly, the occurrence of diacetyl-producing LAB may vary in BAC depending on the type of endogenous ferment used in the cheesemaking process. [78] evaluated the diacetyl production capacity in LAB isolated from “pingo” (the endogenous ferment used in the production of AMC) and from “rala”, a kind of alternative inoculant consisting of portions of grated cheese; 66% of the “rala” isolates were able to produce diacetyl, much higher compared to the “pingo” isolates (25%). This difference can be explained by the predominance of NSLAB in the “rala” (a group that includes the main producers of diacetyl), because it is obtained from cheeses ripened for 3 to 5 days, unlike the “pingo” which consists of the whey collected from the still-fresh cheese produced on the previous day.

5.6. Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activities

Microbial cultures presenting proteolytic activity are widely used in the food industry, such as in the production of several types of dairy products, including cheeses and fermented milks; in the meat industry, to improve its texture, aroma and color; in the bakery industry, to break down the gluten net, improving the bread texture; in the alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage industry, to reduce turbidity; and even in the production of animal feed [133].
In cheeses, proteolytic LAB play important roles for their quality, especially in ripened cheeses; therefore, the use of proteolytic cultures or purified enzymes is of great relevance for the cheese industry [134,135]. Proteolytic LAB strains can be used as adjunct cultures, acting on the peptide bonds of the matrix with the consequent release of amino acids and improvement in the cheese aroma, flavor and texture [70]. In addition, they can be used in the elaboration of dairy products with lower allergenic potential, reducing the risks for consumers with greater sensitivity to milk proteins [32].
Pediococcus acidilactici and Weissella viridescens proteolytic strains were isolated from ripened BAC [136], in addition to Enterococcus spp. isolates from AMC produced in the Campo das Vertentes, Serro and Cerrado regions, and from Coalho, Colonial, Serrano and Caipira cheeses [14]. The cheese-producing region can influence the microbial diversity of the product and, consequently, the occurrence of LAB with proteolytic activity. The LAB isolated from the AMC produced in the Campo das Vertentes region showed greater proteolytic activity than the LAB from cheeses produced in the Canastra region [43].
The contribution of LAB to the lipolysis processes in BAC is secondary, being more relevant for certain types of cheeses, such as blue cheeses (Gorgonzola and Roquefort) and cheddar [62]. However, lipases play an important role in the releasing of free fatty acids, precursors of volatile aromatic compounds that improve the sensory quality of the product [32,130]. It has been shown that BAC are good sources for the isolation of LAB with lipolytic activity, especially LAB isolated from AMC produced in the Araxá, Canastra and Serro regions, as well as from Colonial and Serrano cheeses, in addition to Pediococcus acidilactici isolated from Marajó cheese [11] and Enterococcus spp. isolated from AMC produced in the Araxá, Campo das Vertentes and Cerrado regions [14].

5.7. β-Galactosidase Activity

β-galactosidases are widely used for the hydrolysis of lactose by the food industry, with the aim of reducing its content in dairy products. This enzyme prevents crystallization and increased sweetness, flavor and solubility in several types of dairy products. In addition, the hydrolysis of lactose into D-glucose and D-galactose enables the development of lactose-free products, suitable for intolerant consumers, who correspond to about 70% of the world’s adult population [137]. β-galactosidases are also able to catalyze transgalactosylation reactions, being successfully applied in the synthesis of lactose-based prebiotics, such as GOS, lactulose and lactosaccharose [138].
Another application of β-galactosidases that has been evaluated in recent years is the increase in safety due to the reduction in pH during the fermentation process. The glucose released from its activity can be consumed by the microbiota with the consequent production of lactic acid, increasing acidification rates, and thus contributing to the inhibition of pathogens [73]. Furthermore, β-galactosidases have also been used for the treatment of whey. Its inadequate disposal has been shown to be a serious environmental problem, especially regarding the eutrophication of rivers and water courses. In this context, the application of β-galactosidases can help to mitigate the damage resulting from the disposal of whey, in addition to allowing its reuse for the production of ingredients to be used in confectionery and bakery products [139].
To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of the isolation of β-galactosidase-producing LAB from BAC. The production of β-galactosidase by strains of Lacticaseibacillus casei and Limosilactobacillus fermentum isolated from buffalo mozzarella has been demonstrated [140]; a strain of Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides with β–galactosidase activity, also from buffalo mozzarella, has been reported [141]. In BAC, only one study demonstrated the production of β-galactosidases in the strains of E. durans and E. faecium isolated from Coalho cheese [73].

6. Underexplored Biopotential and Opportunities for LAB from BAC

Brazil is one of the largest economies in the world, but it still depends on the import of inputs widely used in different industries, such as food, pharmaceuticals and biofuels, among others [142]. It is a paradox, given that the country has the greatest biodiversity on the planet and, therefore, a practically inexhaustible source for prospecting microorganisms with biotechnological potential. In this context, Brazilian fermented foods represent a relevant source of bacteria and fungi aimed at industrial exploitation; among these, BAC has stood out in recent years [11,66].
For this review, studies about LAB with biotechnological potential isolated from BAC were evaluated. Despite considerable progress in recent years, reinforced by the promising results presented here, there is still a gap to be filled by further studies. Most of the research carried out has focused mainly on the evaluation of antimicrobial activity, acidification capacity and enzyme and diacetyl production by LAB (Table 2). A few studies demonstrated the EPS production in different LAB isolated from BAC [39,71,78]. A similar situation was observed for the β-galactosidase synthesis, more specifically by LAB strains isolated from Coalho cheese [47,73]. As for prebiotics, there are no studies, so far, that have demonstrated their potential for use in LAB isolated from BAC.
In addition, most of the studies have been carried out in traditional and nationally recognized cheese-making regions, especially those involved in the production of AMC (Figure 2). Therefore, some types of cheese still lack information about their microbial diversity; for example, there are no studies of the isolation and identification of LAB isolated from Cabacinha cheeses, Parmesan-type cheeses, Porungo and KochKäse and Käschmier cheeses, produced in the south by German immigrants. It is, therefore, a niche opportunity for exploring the biotechnological potential of LAB; new insights into the genetic heritage of these traditional products can be provided from studies with cheesemakers in these regions.
Finally, it is worth to emphasize the urgent necessity to create and maintain a Brazilian collection of LAB that includes researchers from different regions in the country. Considering the continental dimension of Brazil, it is a complex and onerous effort. However, the articulation of researchers from universities and research institutions with public agents is essential to obtain human and financial resources aiming at the establishment of a national collection of LAB with scientific legitimacy and that becomes a reliable source of microorganisms for future research. We believe that this collection will have the potential to become a world reference in the cataloguing of LAB strains isolated from cheeses, with inestimable biotechnological value.

7. Conclusions

This review demonstrated the challenges and opportunities little explored for the application of LAB isolated from BAC. The discovery and characterization of new LAB strains isolated from BAC allow to increase the knowledge of the variety of compounds and enzymes produced by these bacteria and, consequently, expand the opportunities of applications. The use of producer strains or even isolated substances can be used for the elaboration of new functional foods, with improved sensorial and rheological characteristics, and also with greater microbiological safety.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.d.O.H.; Investigation and Writing—Original Draft Preparation, B.d.O.H. and T.T.M.L.; Writing—Reviewing and Editing, G.V.M.P., J.B.R. and J.G.P.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation and Visualization, W.C.P.d.M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The current study was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 357—Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferchichi, M.; Sebei, K.; Boukerb, A.M.; Karray-Bouraoui, N.; Chevalier, S.; Feuilloley, M.G.J.; Connil, N.; Zommiti, M. Enterococcus spp.: Is It a Bad Choice for a Good Use—A Conundrum to Solve? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gopal, P.K. Bacteria, Beneficial: Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria: An Overview, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 4, ISBN 9780128187661. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lindner, J.D.D.; Pereira, G.V.M.; Miotto, M. Culturas microbianas para aplicação em alimentos fermentados. In Microbiologia de Alimentos Fermentados, 1st ed.; Blucher: São Paulo, Brazil, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 137–162. ISBN 9786555061321. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lima, T.T.M.; Hosken, B.O.; Venturim, B.C.; Lopes, I.L.; Martin, J.G.P. Traditional Brazilian fermented foods: Cultural and technological aspects. J. Ethn. Foods 2022, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cavicchioli, V.Q.; Camargo, A.C.; Todorov, S.D.; Nero, L.A. Novel bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus hirae and Pediococcus pentosaceus strains with antilisterial activity isolated from Brazilian artisanal cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 2526–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fidan, H.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Simat, V.; Trif, M.; Tabanelli, G.; Kostka, T.; Montanari, C.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Ozogul, F. Recent developments of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria: Facts and gaps. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prêmio Queijo Brasil. Resultado V Prêmio Queijo Brasil. 2021. Available online: http://www.premioqueijobrasil.com.br (accessed on 15 July 2022).
  8. Mondial du Fromage. Concours International Produits. 2021. Available online: https://www.mondialdufromage.com/concours-produits.php/ (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  9. Dores, M.T.; Nobrega, J.E.; Ferreira, C.L.L.F. Room temperature aging to guarantee microbiological safety of brazilian artisan Canastra cheese. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martins, J.M.; Galinari, É.; Pimentel-Filho, N.J.; Ribeiro, J.I.; Furtado, M.M.; Ferreira, C.L.L. Determining the minimum ripening time of artisanal Minas cheese, a traditional Brazilian cheese. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 46, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Margalho, L.P.; Kamimura, B.A.; Brexó, R.P.; Alvarenga, V.O.; Cebeci, A.S.; Janssen, P.W.M.; Dijkstra, A.; Starrenburg, M.J.C.; Sheombarsing, R.S.; Cruz, A.G.; et al. High throughput screening of technological and biopreservation traits of a large set of wild lactic acid bacteria from Brazilian artisanal cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2021, 100, 103872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kamimura, B.A.; Filippis, F.; Sant’Anna, A.S.; Ercolini, D. Large-scale mapping of microbial diversity in artisanal Brazilian cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2019, 80, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Domingos-Lopes, M.F.P.; Santon, C.; Ross, P.R.; Dapkevicius, M.L.E.; Silva, C.G.C. Genetic diversity, safety and technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Pico cheese. Food Microbiol. 2017, 63, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Margalho, L.P.; Schalkwijk, S.; Bachmann, H.; Sant’Anna, A.S. Enterococcus spp. in Brazilian artisanal cheeses: Occurrence and assessment of phenotypic and safety properties of a large set of strains through the use of high throughput tools combined with multivariate statistics. Food Control 2020, 118, 107425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Carneiro, J.O.; Chaves, A.C.S.D.; Stephan, M.P.; Boari, C.A.; Koblitz, M.G.B. Artisan minas cheese of Serro: Proteolysis during ripening. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Monteiro, R.P.; Matta, V.M. Queijo Minas Artesanal: Valorizando a Agroindústria Familiar. 2018. Available online: https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/199625/1/Livro-Queijo-Minas-Artesanal-Ainfo.pdf (accessed on 19 August 2022).
  17. Roldan, B.B.; Revillion, J.P.P. Convenções de qualidade em queijos artesanais no Brasil, Espanha e Itália. Rev. Inst. Laticínios Cândido Tostes 2019, 74, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Instituto Mineiro de Agropecuária (IMA). Ordinance n° 2016. November 26th. Identifies the Serras da Ibitipoca Region as Producer of Minas Artesanal Cheese and Revokes IMA Ordinance No. 1834, of 4 July 2018. 2020. Available online: http://www.ima.mg.gov.br/institucional/portarias#ano-2020 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  19. Instituto Mineiro de Agropecuária (IMA). Ordinance n° 2.141, of 19 April 2022. Identifies the Entre Serras da Piedade ao Caraça Region as Producer of Minas Artisanal Cheese. Available online: http://ima.mg.gov.br/index.php?preview=1&option=com_dropfiles&format=&task=frontfile.download&catid=1829&id=19230&Itemid=1000000000000 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  20. Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico e Artístico Nacional (IPHAN). Certidão do Registro do Modo Artesanal de Fazer Queijo de Minas, nas Regiões do Serro e nas Serras da Canastra e do Salitre. 2008. Available online: http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/Certid%C3%A3o%20(Modo%20artesanal%20de%20fazer%20Queijo%20de%20Minas).pdf (accessed on 11 October 2022).
  21. Giannini, A. Queijos Brasileiros Conquistam 57 Medalhas em Concurso Mundial na França. 2021. Available online: https://veja.abril.com.br/gastronomia/queijos-brasileiros-conquistam-57-medalhas-em-concurso-mundial-na-franca/ (accessed on 3 September 2022).
  22. Pires, M.F.A. Queijo Artesanal Ganha Status, Internet e o Mundo. In Anuário do Leite 2019; Texto Comunicação Corporativa: São Paulo, Brazil, 2019; Available online: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1109959 (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  23. Abdel-Rahman, M.L.; Sonomoto, K. Opportunities to overcome the current limitations and challenges for efficient microbial production of optically pure lactic acid. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 236, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. König, H.; Unden, G.; Fröhlich , J. Lactic acid bacteria. In Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine; Spring: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, W.; Pang, H.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Y. Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria. In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Fundamentals and Practice; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; ISBN 978-94-017-8840-3. [Google Scholar]
  26. Settanni, L.; Moschetti, G. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria used to improve cheese quality and provide health benefits. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Widyastuti, Y.; Rohmatussolihat, Y.; Febrisiantosa, A. The role of lactic acid bacteria in milk fermentation. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 5, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Diana, M.; Tres, A.; Quílez, J.; Llombart, M.; Rafecas, M. Spanish cheese screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria with high gamma-aminobutyric acid production. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 56, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Santos, M.T.P.G.; Galván, A.I.; Merchán, A.V.; González, E.; Córdoba, M.G.; Benito, M.J. Screening of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria strains from artisanal soft cheese: Probiotic characteristics and prebiotic metabolism. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 114, 108388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. O’Connor, P.M.; Kuniyoshi, T.M.; Oliveira, R.P.S.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; Cotter, P.D. Antimicrobials for food and feed; a bacteriocin perspective. Curr.Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mayo, B.; Rodríguez, J.; Vázquez, L.; Flórez, A.B. Microbial Interactions within the Cheese Ecosystem and Their Application to Improve Quality and Safety. Foods 2021, 10, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xin, L.; Lin, K.; Yi, H.; Han, X. Technological characterization of Lactobacillus in semihard artisanal goat cheeses from different Mediterranean areas for potential use as nonstarter lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 2887–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chawda, P.J.; Shi, J.; Xue, S.; Quek, S.Y. Co-encapsulation of bioactives for food applications. Food Qual. Saf. 2017, 1, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pupa, P.; Apiwatsiri, P.; Sirichokchatchawan, W.; Pirarat, N.; Muangsin, N.; Shah, A.A.; Prapasarakul, N. The efficacy of three double-microencapsulation methods for preservation of probiotic bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Contessa, C.R.; Souza, N.B.; Gonçalo, G.B.; Moura, C.M.; Rosa, G.S.; Moraes, C.C. Development of active packaging based on agar-agar incorporated with bacteriocin of Lactobacillus sakei. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pellegrino, M.S.; Frola, I.D.; Natanael, B.; Gobelli, D.; Nader-Macias, M.E.F.; Bogni, C.I. In vitro characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from bovine milk as potential probiotic strains to prevent bovine mastitis. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vanniyasingam, J.; Kapilan, R.; Vasantharuba, S. Isolation and characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from cow milk and milk products. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 13, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Djadouni, F.; Kihal, M. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria and the spectrum of their biopeptides against spoiling germs in foods. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2012, 55, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Margalho, L.P.; Feliciano, M.D.E.; Silva, C.E.; Abreu, J.S.; Piran, M.V.F.; Sant’Anna, A.S. Brazilian artisanal cheeses are rich and diverse sources of nonstarter lactic acid bacteria regarding technological, biopreservative, and safety properties—Insights through multivariate analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 7908–7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castro, R.D.; Oliveira, L.G.; Sant’Anna, F.M.; Luiz, L.M.P.; Sandes, S.H.C.; Silva, C.I.F.; Silva, A.M.; Nunes, A.C.; Penna, C.F.A.M.; Souza, M.R. Lactic acid microbiota identification in water, raw milk, endogenous starter culture, and fresh Minas artisanal cheese from the Campo das Vertentes region of Brazil during the dry and rainy seasons. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 6086–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Matera, J.; Luna, A.S.; Batista, D.B.; Pimentel, T.C.; Moraes, J.; Kamimura, B.A.; Ferreira, M.V.S.; Silva, H.L.A.; Mathias, S.P.; Esmerino, E.A.; et al. Brazilian cheeses: A survey covering physicochemical characteristics, mineral content, fatty acid profile and volatile compounds. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wilkinson, M.G.; Lapointe, G. Invited review: Starter lactic acid bacteria survival in cheese: New perspectives on cheese microbiology. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10963–10985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Campagnollo, F.B.; Margalho, L.P.; Kamimura, B.A.; Feliciano, M.D.; Freire, L.; Lopes, L.S.; Alvarenga, V.O.; Cadavez, V.A.P.; Gonzales-Barron, U.; Schaffner, D.W.; et al. Selection of indigenous lactic acid bacteria presenting anti-listerial activity, and their role in reducing the maturation period and assuring the safety of traditional Brazilian cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2018, 73, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perin, L.M.; Sardaro, M.L.S.; Nero, L.A.; Neviani, E.; Gatti, M. Bacterial ecology of artisanal Minas cheeses assessed by culture-dependent and -independent methods. Food Microbiol. 2017, 65, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bruno, L.M.; Marcó, M.B.; Capra, M.L.; Carvalho, J.D.G.; Meinardi, C.; Quiberoni, A. Wild Lactobacillus strains: Technological characterisation and design of Coalho cheese lactic culture. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2017, 70, 572–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Medeiros, N.C.; Abrantes, M.R.; Medeiros, J.M.S.; Campêlo, M.C.S.; Rebouças, M.O.; Costa, M.G.A.; Silva, J.B.A. Quality of milk used in informal artisanal production of coalho and butter cheeses. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2017, 38, 1955–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lima, C.P.; Dias, G.M.P.; Soares, M.T.C.V.; Bruno, L.M.; Porto, A.L.F. Queijo coalho como fonte de bactérias ácido láticas probióticas. Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, e266984958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kothe, C.I.; Mohellibi, N.; Renault, P. Revealing the microbial heritage of traditional Brazilian cheeses through metagenomics. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Figueiredo, E.L.; Andrade, N.J.; Pires, A.C.S.; Peña, W.E.L.; Figueiredo, H.M. Caracterização do potencial tecnológico e identificação genética de bactérias ácido láticas isoladas de queijo do marajó, tipo creme, de leite de búfala. Rev. Bras. Prod. Agroind. 2016, 18, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Almeida, T.T.; Andretta, M.; Ferreira, L.R.; Carvalho, A.F.; Nero, L.A. The complex microbiota of artisanal cheeses interferes in the performance of enumeration protocols for lactic acid bacteria and staphylococci. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 109, 104791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Camargo, A.C.; Costa, E.A.; Fusieger, A.; Freitas, R.; Nero, L.A.; de Carvalho, A.F. Microbial shifts through the ripening of the “Entre Serras” Minas artisanal cheese monitored by high-throughput sequencing. Food Res. Int. 2020, 139, 109803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lima, C.D.L.C.; Lima, L.A.; Cerqueira, M.M.O.P.; Ferreira, E.G.; Rosa, C.A. Bactérias do ácido lático e leveduras associadas com o queijo de minas artesanal produzido na região da Serra do Salitre, Minas Gerais. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2009, 61, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Luiz, L.M.P.; Castro, R.D.; Sandes, S.H.C.; Silva, J.G.; Oliveira, L.G.; Sales, G.A.; Nunes, A.C.; Souza, M.R. Aislamiento e identificación de las bacterias ácido-lácticas del queso brasileño Minas artesanal. CYTA—J. Food 2017, 15, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Resende, M.F.S.; Costa, H.H.S.; Andrade, E.H.P.; Acúrcio, L.B.; Drummond, A.F.; Cunha, A.F.; Nunes, A.C.; Moreira, J.L.S.; Penna, C.F.A.M.; Souza, M.R. Queijo de minas artesanal da Serra da Canastra: Influência da altitude das queijarias nas populações de bactérias ácido lácticas. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2011, 63, 1567–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sant’Anna, F.M.; Wetzels, S.U.; Cicco, S.H.S.; Figueiredo, R.C.; Sales, G.A.; Figueiredo, N.C.; Nunes, C.A.; Schmitz-Esser, S.; Mann, E.; Wagner, M.; et al. Microbial shifts in Minas artisanal cheeses from the Serra do Salitre region of Minas Gerais, Brazil throughout ripening time. Food Microbiol. 2019, 82, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Delamare, A.P.L.; Andrade, C.C.P.; Mandelli, F.; Almeida, R.C.; Echeverrigaray, S. Microbiological, physico-chemical and sensorial characteristics of Serrano, an artisanal Brazilian cheese. Food Nutr. Sci. 2012, 3, 1068–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rosa, T.D.; Wassermann, G.E.; Souza, C.F.V.; Caron, D.; Carlini, C.R.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Microbiological and physicochemical characteristics and aminopeptidase activities during ripening of Serrano cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2008, 61, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Souza, C.F.V.; Rosa, T.D.; Ayub, M.A.Z. Changes in the microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of Serrano cheese during manufacture and ripening. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2003, 34, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattarelli, P.; O’toole, P.W.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A Taxonomic Note on the Genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 Novel Genera, Emended Description of the Genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and Union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Powell, I.B.; Broome, M.C.; Limsowtin, G.K.Y. Cheese: Starter Cultures: General Aspects. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Broadbent, J.R.; Budinich, M.F.; Steele, J.L. Cheese: Non-Starter lactic acid bacteria. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Blaya, J.; Barzideh, Z.; LaPointe, G. Symposium review: Interaction of starter cultures and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria in the cheese environment. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3611–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gobbetti, M.; Di Cagno, R.; Calasso, M.; Neviani, E.; Fox, P.F.; De Angelis, M. Drivers that establish and assembly the lactic acid bacteria biota in cheeses. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Campagnollo, F.B.U.; Gonzales-Barron, V.A.; Pilão, C.A.S.; Sant’Ana, D.W.S. Quantitative risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in traditional Minas cheeses: The cases of artisanal semi-hard and fresh soft cheeses. Food Control 2018, 92, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Melini, F.; Melini, V.; Luziatelli, F.; Ruzzi, M. Raw and heat-treated milk: From public health risks to nutritional quality. Beverages 2017, 3, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bortolomedi, B.M.; Paglarini, C.S.; Brod, F.C.A. Bioactive compounds in kombucha: A review of substrate effect and fermentation conditions. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kocabaş, D.S.; Lyne, J.; Ustunol, Z. Hydrolytic enzymes in the dairy industry: Applications, market and future perspectives. Trends in Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ağagündüz, D.; Şahin, T.Ö.; Ayten, Ş.; Yılmaz, B.; Güneşliol, B.E.; Russo, P.; Spano, G.; Özogul, F. Lactic acid bacteria as pro-technological, bioprotective and health-promoting cultures in the dairy food industry. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sanlibaba, P.; Çakmak, G.A. Exopolyssacharide production by lactic acid bacteria. App. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 1000115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Martins, M.C.F. Diversidade de bactérias láticas e identificação molecular de Lactococcus isolados de ambientes lácteos e não lácteos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brasil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  71. Teixeira, C.G.; Fusieger, A.; Martins, E.; Freitas, R.; Vakarelova, M.; Nero, L.A.; de Carvalho, A.F. Biodiversity and technological features of Weissella isolates obtained from Brazilian artisanal cheese-producing regions. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 147, 111474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Margalho, L.P.; Jorge, G.P.; Noleto, D.A.P.; Silva, C.E.; Abreu, J.S.; Piran, M.V.F.; Brocchi, M.; Sant’Anna, A.S. Biopreservation and probiotic potential of a large set of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Brazilian artisanal cheeses: From screening to in product approach. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Brito, L.P.; Silva, E.C.; Calaça, P.R.A.; Medeiros, R.S.; Soares, M.T.C.V.; Porto, A. Bactérias ácido láticas isoladas de queijo de Coalho do nordeste brasileiro na produção de laticínios: Uma triagem para aplicação tecnológica. Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, e5249108457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dias, G.M.P.; Silva, A.B.; Granja, N.M.C.; Silva, T.N.; Lima, G.V.M.; Cavalcanti, M.T.H.; Porto, A.L.F. Can Coalho cheese lactic microbiota be used in dairy fermentation to reduce foodborne pathogens? Sci. Plena 2019, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mareze, J.; Ramos-Pereira, J.; Santos, J.A.; Beloti, V.; López-Díaz, T.M. Identification and characterisation of lactobacilli isolated from an artisanal cheese with antifungal and antibacterial activity against cheese spoilage and mycotoxigenic Penicillium spp. Int. Dairy J. 2022, 130, 105367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Acurcio, L.B.; Sandes, S.H.C.; Bastos, R.W.; Sant’Anna, F.M.; Pedroso, S.H.S.P.; Reis, D.C.; Nunes, Á.C.; Cassali, G.D.; Souza, M.R.; Nicoli, J.R. Milk fermented by Lactobacillus species from Brazilian artisanal cheese protect germ-free-mice against Salmonella Typhimurium infections. Beneficial Microbes 2017, 8, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Andrade, C.R.G.; Souza, M.R.; Penna, C.F.A.M.; Acurcio, L.B.; Sant’Anna, F.M.; Castro, R.D.; Oliveira, D.L.S. Propriedades probióticas in vitro de Lactobacillus spp. isolados de queijos minas artesanais da Serra da Canastra—MG. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2014, 66, 1592–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Brumano, E.C.C. Impacto do tipo de fermento endógeno na qualidade e tempo de maturação de queijo Minas artesanal produzido em propriedades cadastradas pelo IMA (Instituto Mineiro de Agropecuária) na região do Serro—MG. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brasil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  79. Costa, H.H.S.; Souza, M.R.; Acúrcio, L.B.; Cunha, A.F.; Resende, M.F.S.; Nunes, Á.C. Potencial probiótico in vitro de bactérias ácido-láticas isoladas de queijo-de-minas artesanal da Serra da Canastra, MG. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2013, 65, 1858–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sant’Anna, F.M.; Acúrcio, L.B.; Alvim, L.B.; Castro, R.D.; Oliveira, L.G.; Silva, A.M.; Nunes, A.C.; Nicoli, J.R.; Souza, M.R. Assessment of the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Minas artisanal cheese produced in the Campo das Vertentes region, Brazil. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2017, 70, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Todorov, S.D.; Holzapfel, W.; Nero, L.A. Safety evaluation and bacteriocinogenic potential of Pediococcus acidilactici strains isolated from artisanal cheeses. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 139, 110550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tulini, F.L.; Winkelströter, L.K.; Martinis, E.C.P. Identification and evaluation of the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus paraplantarum FT259, a bacteriocinogenic strain isolated from Brazilian semi-hard artisanal cheese. Anaerobe 2013, 22, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Valente, G.L.C.; Acúrcio, L.B.; Freitas, L.P.V.; Nicoli, J.R.; Silva, A.M.; Souza, M.R.; Penna, C.F.A.M. Short communication: In vitro and in vivo probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum B7 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus D1 isolated from Minas artisanal cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 5957–5961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gontijo, M.T.P.; Silva, J.S.; Vidigal, M.P.; Martin, J.G.P. Phylogenetic distribution of the bacteriocin repertoire of lactic acid bacteria species associated with artisanal cheese. Food Res. Int. 2020, 128, 108783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Perez, R.H.; Zendo, T.; Sonomoto, K. Circular and leaderless bacteriocins: Biosynthesis, mode of action, applications and prospects. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Silva, C.C.G.; Silva, S.P.M.; Ribeiro, S.C. Application of bacteriocins and protective cultures in dairy food preservation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mills, S.; Serrano, L.; Griffin, C.; O’Connor, P.M.; Schaad, G.; Bruining, C.; Hills, C.; Ross, R.; Meijer, W.C. Inhibitory activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum LMG P-26358 against Listeria innocua when used as an adjunct starter in the manufacture of cheese. Microb. Cell Fact. 2011, 10, S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ogaki, M.B.; Furlaneto, M.C.; Maia, L.F. Revisão: Aspectos gerais das bacteriocinas. Braz. J. Food Technol. 2015, 18, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Balciunas, E.M.; Martinez, F.A.C.; Todorov, S.D.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Converti, A.; Oliveira, R.P.S. Novel biotechnological applications of bacteriocins: A review. Food Control 2013, 32, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Coelho, M.C.; Silva, C.C.G.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Dapkevicius, M.L.N.E.; Rosa, H.J.D. Control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh cheese using protective lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 191, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Montel, M.C.; Buchin, S.; Mallet, A.; Delbes-Paus, C.; Vuitton, D.A.; Desmasures, N.; Berthier, F. Traditional cheeses: Rich and diverse microbiota with associated benefits. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 177, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Galvéz, A.; Abriquel, H.; López, R.L.; Omar, N.B. Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Heredia-Castro, P.Y.; Hérnández-Mendoza, A.; González-Córdova, A.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B. Bacteriocinas de bacterias ácido lácticas: Mecanismos de acción y actividad antimicrobiana contra patógenos en quesos. Interciencia 2017, 42, 340–346. Available online: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/339/33951621002/html/ (accessed on 21 May 2021).
  94. Yang, S.C.; Lin, C.H.; Sung, C.T.; Fang, J.Y. Antibacterial activities of bacteriocins: Application in foods and pharmaceuticals. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ahmad, V.; Khan, M.S.; Jamal, Q.M.S.; Alzohairy, M.A.; Karaawi, M.A.A.; Siddiqui, M.U. Antimicrobial potential of bacteriocins: In therapy, agriculture and food preservation. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 49, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Godoy-Santos, F.; Pinto, M.S.; Barbosa, A.A.T.; Brito, M.A.V.P.; Mantovani, H.C. Efficacy of a ruminal bacteriocin against pure and mixed cultures of bovine mastitis pathogens. Indian J. Microbiol. 2019, 59, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Ibarra-Sánchez, L.A.; El-Haddad, N.; Mahmoud, D.; Miller, M.J.; Karam, L. Invited review: Advances in nisin use for preservation of dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Gutiérrez-Cortés, C.; Suarez, H.; Buitrago, G.; Nero, L.A.; Todorov, S.D. Characterization of bacteriocins produced by strains of Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from Minas cheese. Ann. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 383–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nespolo, C.R.; Brandelli, A. Production of bacteriocin-like substances by lactic acid bacteria isolated from regional ovine cheese. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Winkelströter, L.K.; Tulini, F.L.; De Martinis, E.C.P. Identification of the bacteriocin produced by cheese isolate Lactobacillus paraplantarum FT259 and its potential influence on Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pegoraro, K.; Sereno, M.J.; Cavicchioli, V.Q.; Viana, C.; Nero, L.A.; Bersot, L.S. Bacteriocinogenic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal colonial type—Cheese. Arch. Vet. Sci. 2020, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Paula, J.C.J.; Carvalho, A.F.; Furtado, M.M. Princípios básicos de fabricação de queijo: Do histórico à salga. Rev. Inst. Latícinios Cândido Tostes 2009, 64, 19–25. Available online: https://www.revistadoilct.com.br/rilct/article/view/76/82 (accessed on 17 May 2021).
  103. Pontarolo, G.H.; Melo, F.D.; Martini, C.L.; Wildemann, P.; Alessio, D.R.M.; Sfaciotte, R.; Neto, A.T.; Vaz, E.K.; Ferraz, S.M. Quality and safety of artisan cheese produced in the serrana region of Santa Catarina. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2017, 38, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Martin, J.G.P.; Lindner, J.D. Alimentos fermentados: Passado, presente e futuro. In Microbiologia de Alimentos Fermentados, 1st ed.; Blucher: São Paulo, Brazil, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 29–62. ISBN 9786555061321. [Google Scholar]
  105. Souza, J.V.; Dias, F.S. Protective, technological, and functional properties of select autochthonous lactic acid bacteria from goat dairy products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Food and agriculture organization of united nations (FAO); World health organization (WHO). Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. In Probiotics in Food; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2001; ISSN 0254-4725. [Google Scholar]
  107. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, S.J.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Foods 2019, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ferreira, C.L.L.F.; Carvalho, M.M.; Píccolo, M.P. Alimentos probióticos. In Microbiologia de Alimentos Fermentados, 1st ed.; Blucher: São Paulo, Brazil, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 163–221. ISBN 9786555061321. [Google Scholar]
  109. Caggianiello, G.; Kleerebezem, M.; Spano, G. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: From health-promoting benefits to stress tolerance mechanisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 3877–3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Marco, M.L.; Sanders, M.E.; Gänzle, M.; Arrieta, M.C.; Cotter, P.D.; De Vuyst, L.; Hill, C.; Holzapfel, W.; Leeber, S.; Merenstein, D.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on fermented foods. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, J.; Feng, S.; Yu, L.; Zhao, J.; Tian, F.; Chen, W.; Zhai, Q. Capsular polysaccharides of probiotics and their immunomodulatory roles. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2022, 11, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Marquez, A.; Andrada, E.; Russo, M.; Bolondi, M.L.; Fabersani, E.; Medina, R.; Gauffin-Cano, P. Characterization of autochthonous lactobacilli from goat dairy products with probiotic potential for metabolic diseases. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mohd-Zubri, N.S.; Ramasamy, K.; Abdul-Rahman, N.Z. Characterization and potential oral probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum FT 12 and Lactobacillus brevis FT 6 isolated from Malaysian fermented food. Arch Oral Biol. 2022, 143, 105515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Evivie, S.E.; Huo, G.C.; Igene, J.O.; Bian, X. Some current applications, limitations and future perspectives of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 61, 1318034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Tarique, M.; Abdalla, A.; Masad, R.; Al-Sbiei, A.; Kizhakkayil, J.; Osaili, T.; Olaimat, A.; Liu, S.-Q.; Fernandez-Cabezudo, M.; Ramadi, B.; et al. Potential probiotics and postbiotic characteristics including immunomodulatory effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional yogurt-like products. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 159, 113207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Agostini, C.; Eckert, C.; Vincenzi, A.; Machado, B.L.; Jordon, B.C.; Kipper, J.P.; Dullius, A.; Dullius, C.H.; Lehn, D.N.; Sperotto, R.A.; et al. Characterization of technological and probiotic properties of indigenous Lactobacillus spp. from south Brazil. 3 Biotech. 2018, 8, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Borges, L.; Bastos, R.; Sandes, S.; Guimarães, A.C.C.; Alves, A.G.; Reis, D.C.; Wuyts, S.; Nunes, A.C.; Cassali, G.; Lebeer, S.; et al. Protective effects of milk fermented by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum B7 from Brazilian artisanal cheese on a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in BALB/c mice. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 33, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chourasia, R.; Abedin, M.M.; Phukon, L.C.; Sahoo, D.; Singh, S.P.; Rai, A.K. Biotechnological approaches for the production of designer cheese with improved functionality. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 960–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chambers, E.S.; Preston, T.; Frost, G.; Morrison, D.J. Role of gut microbiota-generated short-chain fatty acids in metabolic and cardiovascular health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2018, 7, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Behare, P.V.; Singh, R.; Kumar, M.; Prajapati, J.B.; Singh, R.P. Exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 46, 1–11. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261474901 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  121. Zhou, Y.; Cui, Y.; Qu, X. Exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria: Structure, bioactivity and associations: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Angmo, K.; Kumari, A.; Savitri; Bhalla, T.C. Probiotic characterisation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented foods and beverage of Ladakh. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 66, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Breyer, G.M.; Arechavaleta, N.N.; Siqueira, F.M.; Motta, A.S. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria in raw buffalo milk: A screening for novel probiotic candidates and their transcriptional response to acid stress. Probiotics Antimicro. Proteins 2021, 13, 468–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kumari, A.; Angmo, K.; Monika; Bhalla, T.C. Probiotic attributes of indigenous Lactobacillus spp. isolated from traditional fermented foods and beverages of north-western Himalayas using in vitro screening and principal component analysis. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2463–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lynch, K.M.; Zanini, E.; Coffey, A.; Arendt, E.K. Lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides in foods and beverages: Isolation, properties, characterization and health benefits. Annu Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Ren, H.; Liu, L.; Ma, L.; Li, M.; Bi, W. Impact of using exopolysaccharides (EPS)- Producing strain on qualities of half-fat cheddar cheese on qualities of half-fat cheddar cheese. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 1546–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Badel, S.; Bernardi, T.; Michaud, P. New perspectives for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Das, D.; Baruah, R.; Goyal, A. A food additive with prebiotic properties of an α-d-glucan from Lactobacillus plantarum DM5. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 69, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Antonio, M.B.; Borelli, B.M. A importância de bactérias láticas na segurança e qualidade dos queijos Minas artesanais. Rev. Inst. Laticínios Cândido Tostes 2020, 75, 204–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bintsis, T. Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 665–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hernandez-Valdes, J.A.; Solopova, A.; Kuipers, O.P. Development of Lactococcus lactis Biosensors for Detection of Diacetyl. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1032. (accessed on 1 September 2021). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Kamarinou, C.S.; Papadopoulou, O.S.; Doulgeraki, A.I.; Tassou, C.C.; Galanis, A.; Chorianopoulos, N.G.; Argyri, A.A. Mapping the key technological and functional characteristics of indigenous lactic acid bacteria isolated from greek traditional dairy products. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kieliszek, M.; Pobiega, K.; Piwowarek, K.; Kot, A.M. Characteristics of the Proteolytic Enzymes Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Molecules 2021, 26, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bachmann, H.P.; Fröhlich-Wyder, M.T.; Jakob, E.; Roth, E.; Wechsler, D.; Beuvier, E.; Buchin, S. Cheese: Raw milk cheeses. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 652–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Coolbear, T.; Weimer, B.; Wilkinson, M.G. Lactic acid bacteria: Lactic acid bacteria in flavor development. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Biscola, V.; Choiset, Y.; Rabesona, H.; Chobert, J.-M.; Haertlé, T.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Brazilian artisanal ripened cheeses as sources of proteolytic lactic acid bacteria capable of reducing cow milk allergy. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Barbosa, N.E.A.; Ferreira, N.C.J.; Vieira, T.L.E.; Brito, A.P.S.O.; Garcia, H.C.R. Intolerância à lactose: Revisão sistemática. Para Res. Med. J. 2020, 4, e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Silvério, S.C.; Macedo, E.A.; Teixeira, J.A.; Rodrigues, L.R. New β- galactosidase producers with potential for prebiotic synthesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Saqib, S.; Akram, A.; Halim, S.A.; Tassaduq, R. Sources of β-galactosidase and its applications in food industry. Biotechnol 2017, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Souza, B.M.S.; Borgonovi, T.F.; Casarotti, S.N.; Todorov, S.D.; Penna, A.L.B. Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus fermentum Strains Isolated from Mozzarella Cheese: Probiotic Potential, Safety, Acidifying Kinetic Parameters and Viability under Gastrointestinal Tract Conditions. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Paula, A.T.; Jeronymo-Ceneviva, A.B.; Silva, L.F.; Todorov, S.D.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Penna, A.L.B. Leuconostoc Mesenteroides SJRP55: A Potential Probiotic Strain Isolated from Brazilian Water Buffalo Mozzarella Cheese. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Confederação Nacional da Indústria (CNI). Mercado de Insumos e Matérias Primas. 2021. Available online: https://static.portaldaindustria.com.br/portaldaindustria/noticias/media/filer_public/58/3b/583b1a48-b74e-4c31-8600-9dbad69f802f/sondagem_especial_-_insumos_e_materias-primas.pdf (accessed on 22 August 2022).
Figure 1. Brazilian artisanal cheeses: types and regions in 2022. In the detail at the bottom left, the producing regions of AMC and the most famous BAC are highlighted.
Figure 1. Brazilian artisanal cheeses: types and regions in 2022. In the detail at the bottom left, the producing regions of AMC and the most famous BAC are highlighted.
Fermentation 09 00409 g001
Figure 2. Studies about biotechnological potential from LAB isolated from BAC. (A) Number of studies about LAB in BAC published last 10 years; (B) Distribution of the studies according to biotechnological potential of LAB.
Figure 2. Studies about biotechnological potential from LAB isolated from BAC. (A) Number of studies about LAB in BAC published last 10 years; (B) Distribution of the studies according to biotechnological potential of LAB.
Fermentation 09 00409 g002
Table 1. LAB isolated from BAC produced in several producing regions.
Table 1. LAB isolated from BAC produced in several producing regions.
BACLAB *References
CaipiraEnterococcus sp., E. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. hermanniensis, Lactococcus, Lb. plantarum subsp. plantarum, Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lb. casei.[12,39]
CoalhoEnterococcus sp., E. faecium, E. casseliflavus, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. gallinarum, E. italicus, E. hermanniensis, Lactobacillus sp., Lb. acidophilus, Lb. curvatus, Lb. fermentum, Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lb. plantarum subsp. plantarum, Lb. rhamnosus , Lactococcus sp., Lc. lactis, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis, Lc. garvieae, Leuconostoc sp., Lc. mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides, Streptococcus sp., S. infantarius, subsp. infantarius, S. lutetiensis, S. macedonicus, S. waiu, Weisella sp., W. paramesenteroides[12,39,45,46,47]
ColonialE. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis,, E. hermanniensis, Lactococcus sp., Lc. lactis, Lc. piscium, Lc. raffinolactis group, Lactobacillus sp., Lb. brevis, Lb. casei-paracasei, Leuconostoc sp., S. equinus-lutetiensis, S. parauberis, S. porcorum/sanguinis[12,39,48]
ManteigaE. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. hermanniensis, Lactobacillus sp., Lactococcus sp., Leuconostoc sp., Streptococcus sp[12,39]
MarajóE. durans, E. faecium, E. faecalis, E. gilvus, E. hermanniensis, Lactobacillus sp., Lactococcus sp., Leuconostoc sp., Streptococcus sp[12,39,49]
Artisanal MinasEnterococcus spp., E. durans, E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. gilvus, E. hermanniensis, E. raffinosus, E. rivorum, Lactobacillus sp., Lb. casei, Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lb. plantarum subsp. plantarum, Lb. paraplantarum, Lb. rhamnosus, Lb. hilgardii, Lb. brevis, Lb. buchneri subsp. buchneri, Lb. parabuchneri, Lb. acidipiscis, Lactococcus spp., Lc. lactis, Lc. garvieae, Leuconostoc sp., Ln. mesenteroides, Pediococcus sp., P. acidilactici, Streptococcus sp., S. agalactiae, S. macedonicus, S. porcorum/sanguinis, S. thermophilus, S. infantarius, W. paramesenteroides[39,40,44,48,50,51,52,53,54,55]
SerranoEnterococcus sp., E. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. hermanniensis. Lactobacillus sp., Lb. casei, Lb. plantarum subsp. plantarum, Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lb. rhamnosus, Lb. acidophilus, Lb. curvatus, Lb. fermentum, Lactococcus sp., Lc. lactis, Lc. piscium, Lc. raffinolactis, Leuconostoc sp., Ln. mesenteroides, Streptococcus sp., S. equinus-lutetiensis-infantarius, S. parauberis, S. porcorum/sanguinis.[39,56,57,58]
* Lactobacillus species updated according to the reclassification [59]. E. = Enterococcus, Lc. = Lactococcus, Lb. = Lactobacillus, Ln = Leuconostoc, S. = Streptococcus, P. = Pediococcus, W. = Weissella.
Table 2. Biotechnological potential of LAB isolated from BAC.
Table 2. Biotechnological potential of LAB isolated from BAC.
BACBiotechnological PotentialReferences
MarajóAntimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes, St. aureus and Es. coli, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, diacetyl production[11,14,49,70,71]
ManteigaAntimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes and St. aureus, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, diacetyl production, probiotic potential[11,14,39,72]
CoalhoAntimicrobial activity against Listeria sp., B. cereus, B. subtilis, E. faecalis, St. aureus, Es. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, probiotic potential, β-galactosidase synthesis[11,14,39,47,72,73,74]
SerranoAntimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes, St.aureus, Es. coli, S. enterica and Penicillium, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, diacetyl production, probiotic potential[11,14,39,72,75]
CaipiraAntimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes and St.aureus, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, diacetyl production, probiotic potential[11,14,39,72]
AMCAntimicrobial activity against Listeria sp., Enterococcus sp., St. aureus, S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, diacetyl production, probiotic potential, EPS production[11,14,39,43,72,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83]
ColonialAntimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes and St. aureus, lipolytic activity, proteolytic activity, acidification capacity, diacetyl production, probiotic potential[11,14,39,72]
L. = Listeria, St. = Staphylococcus, Es. = Escherichia, K. = Klebsiella, P. = Pseudomonas, B. = Bacillus, S. = Salmonella.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hosken, B.d.O.; Melo Pereira, G.V.; Lima, T.T.M.; Ribeiro, J.B.; Magalhães Júnior, W.C.P.d.; Martin, J.G.P. Underexplored Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Artisanal Cheese Making in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation 2023, 9, 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9050409

AMA Style

Hosken BdO, Melo Pereira GV, Lima TTM, Ribeiro JB, Magalhães Júnior WCPd, Martin JGP. Underexplored Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Artisanal Cheese Making in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation. 2023; 9(5):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9050409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hosken, Bianca de Oliveira, Gilberto Vinícius Melo Pereira, Thamylles Thuany Mayrink Lima, João Batista Ribeiro, Walter Coelho Pereira de Magalhães Júnior, and José Guilherme Prado Martin. 2023. "Underexplored Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Artisanal Cheese Making in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities" Fermentation 9, no. 5: 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9050409

APA Style

Hosken, B. d. O., Melo Pereira, G. V., Lima, T. T. M., Ribeiro, J. B., Magalhães Júnior, W. C. P. d., & Martin, J. G. P. (2023). Underexplored Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Artisanal Cheese Making in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities. Fermentation, 9(5), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9050409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop