Next Article in Journal
Production of Fumaric Acid by Rhizopus arrhizus NRRL 1526: A Simple Production Medium and the Kinetic Modelling of the Bioprocess
Next Article in Special Issue
Probiotics-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Protect Oxidative Stress against H2O2 Induction in Placental Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Phytochemical Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Two Irradiated Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Monech) Cultivars during the Fermentation and Cooking of Traditional Sudanese Asida
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Microbiological Quality and Biochemical Parameters of Traditional Hard Xinotyri Cheese Made from Raw or Pasteurized Goat Milk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Characterization of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 from Fermented Idly Batter

by
Harika Katepogu
1,
Young-Jung Wee
2,
Khalid S. Almaary
3,
Yahya B. Elbadawi
3,
Ramachawolran Gobinath
4,
Suresh V. Chinni
5,* and
Veeranjaneya Reddy Lebaka
1,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa 516005, India
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-719, Korea
3
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Foundation, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus, No 4, Jalan Sepoy Lines, Georgetown 10450, Malaysia
5
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, AIMST University, Bedong 08100, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2022, 8(2), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020061
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 25 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 30 January 2022

Abstract

:
The aim of the present study is the isolation and characterization of the lactic acid bacteria from idly batter, a traditional Indian fermented product. To achieve the aim, 10 idly batter samples were selected from different regions of Kadapa district. In the primary isolation and screening process, 50 lactic-acid-producing bacteria were isolated, and from them, six strains were selected based on their lactic acid yielding capacity for further evaluation. The selected cultures were studied for their phenotypic characters, and all cultures were Gram positive, cocci, and catalase negative. All the six strains were tested for their growth and lactic acid production at above 35 °C, and finally, one strain that showed good growth at 50 °C was selected for further characterization. Molecular characterization by 16S rRNA gene analysis and BLAST analysis revealed 99% similarity with Pediococcus pentosaceus Ni1142. The isolated culture was named as Pediococcus sp. HLV1, and the sequence was submitted to the NCBI databank as accession number MH921241. The isolated strain is able to utilize a wide range of carbohydrate substrates including glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, maltose, and xylose. The major fermentation product from glucose is lactic acid. Pediococcus sp. HLV1 showed optimum growth and production of lactic acid with glucose as carbon source (10%) and yeast extract as nitrogen source (0.3%) at pH 7.0 and 40 °C. As well-known probiotic bacteria, the isolated Pediococcus spp. also showed antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and more specifically inhibited Gram-positive Bacillus. Using the above optimal conditions, lactic acid from a fresh mango peel extract was studied, and at the end of the fermentation, 5.2% (v/v) of lactic acid was produced. In conclusion, the isolated LAB Pediococcus sp. strain HLV1 is able to grow and produce lactic acid at a high temperature (45 °C) and to survive at 50 °C. Mango peel, a by-product of mango pulp industries, can be utilized as one of the economically cheap feedstocks for industrial production of lactic acid by the Pediococcus sp. strain HLV1.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lactic acid (2-hydroxypropanoic acid, CH3-CH(OH)-COOH) is a versatile natural organic acid having no color and can be clearly dissolved in water and alcohol. It has wide applications in the food, agriculture, medical, and pharmaceutical industries. Lactic acid (LA) is one of the very important and valuable metabolites produced through fermentation and selected as one of the most promising value-added microbial products. Its world market is estimated to cross USD 8.77 billion by 2025 with 18.7% annual growth [1].
In LA production, microorganisms play an important role, and they are present in soil and natural and fermented food products. Selection of an appropriate lactic acid bacterial (LAB) strain is very important to produce pure and enantioselective L(+)/D(−) lactic acid. Microorganisms are able to produce pure L(+) or D(−) lactic acid. To reduce the production cost through fermentation, microbes must have the ability to rapidly ferment low-cost crude materials, to require a limited quantity of nutrients, and to produce high yields of lactic acid under conditions of low pH and high temperature for the production of a low number of by-products [2,3]. There are a lot of organisms from bacteria, yeast, and fungi for lactic acid fermentation. Most of the industrial lactic acid is produced by using lactic acid bacteria [4,5]. Lactic acid bacteria have been isolated from a variety of sources. In most fermented foods, especially foods of/in India, the fermentation relates to cereals and legumes by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Idly batter contains dehulled black gram and milled/powdered rice, and the preparation method is different in different regions of South India mainly in the ratio of rice and black gram or in the time of soaking of the components and the fermentation period of the final batter [6]. In the leavening process of batter and acid production, heterofermentative Leuconostoc mesenteroides and homofermentative Streptococcus faecalis and probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus lactis, and Pediococcus pentosaceus are major lactobacillus candidate organisms that are present in idly batter [7].
As LA has a high demand in chemical and biomedical manufacturing sectors, it is very essential to search for economically cheap feedstock for its production [8]. Various studies were carried out on lactic production from different agroindustrial residues, such as sugarcane bagasse, date juice, and coffee mucilage [9,10,11]. India is the largest producer of mango with 22 million tons per annum production, and most amount is consumed fresh, another amount is used in the preparation of mango pulp/puree, and rest is used to export to many countries in the world. In the pulp preparation process, mango peel and kernels are generated as by-products. During processing, 25% to 40% is generated as waste byproduct, and usually, it is dumped in open areas by factories, causing environmental pollution. Mango peel is one of the rich sources of fermentable sugars, and it has proved to be one of the economically cheap and feasible feedstocks for ethanol and butanol production [12,13]. Reports on the utilization of mango peel for LA are very scarce [14,15]. Hence, the present study aims for the isolation and characterization of LAB from idly batter.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria

For the isolation of LAB, 1 gm of idly batter was taken and serially diluted using sterile distilled water. These diluted samples were plated using the spread plate technique on deMan Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. White and clear elevated colonies were selected, and the CaCO3 method with bromocresol purple was used to select acid-producing bacteria. Isolates that produce acids form a clear zone around them, which were further purified through repeated streaking on MRS agar plates. The purified and acid-producing stains were maintained on MRS agar medium at 4 °C for short-term storage, and the resuspended culture vials in 20% (v/v) glycerol at −80 °C for long-term storage.

2.2. Morphological and Physiological Characterization

The colonies were identified based on Gram staining, size, shape, and motility of the organism by using a microscope (Leica, Mumbai, India). The physiological characteristics were determined according to different biochemical tests, such as catalase, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), indole, urease, methyl red, and Voges–Proskauer. For sugar assimilation tests, specific sugars, such as glucose, sucrose, lactose, mannose, fructose, and maltose, were added to the carbohydrate media, and the acid production was identified by color change. Based on phenotypic and biochemical characteristics, preliminary identification was performed using Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology.

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

For SEM analysis, 1 mL of well-grown (24 h) isolated culture was taken, and the cells were separated by centrifuge at 10,000× g rpm for 10 min. Then the obtained cell pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered solution (PBS). To the clear pellet, 1 mL of glutaraldehyde (2–3%) was added. It was incubated at 4 °C for 4 h and pelleted the cells at 10,000 rpm. The pellet was further washed with 10–100% alcohol in a graded manner, and the dehydrated cells were sputter-coated with gold at 25 mA for 250 s and observed by a scanning electron microscope (JSM-6460 LV; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 5.0 kV and at 20 KX magnification [16].

2.3. Molecular Identification

By using morphological and physiological characteristics, preliminary identification was performed on the isolates. For the molecular identification and characterization, fresh cultures were prepared, and DNA was isolated from fully grown culture. For the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, amplification reaction was carried out using PCR with Taq DNA polymerase, 27 forward primer (5′ AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG 3′), and 1492 reverse primer (3′ GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T 5′). Initial denaturation was carried out at 95 °C for 10 min, and then 30 cycles of amplification were followed by secondary denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min. Primer annealing was performed at 58 °C for 1 min, which was then allowed for primer extension at 72 °C for 2 min. Amplified DNA was checked by using 1% agarose gel, and concentration was quantified by using a spectrophotometer. The amplified PCR product was purified with a Qiagen kit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, UK). BLAST and the multiple alignment program Clustal W were used for the data sequence analysis. MEGA7 software was used for the construction of a phylogenetic tree and knowing the percentage of similarity between related microorganisms [16].

2.4. Optimization of Fermentation Factors

MRS medium was used for preliminary optimization studies of LA fermentation. The parameters tested were carbon sources (glucose, lactose, fructose, sucrose, xylose, and soy flour), nitrogen sources (peptone, yeast extract, beef extract, yeast extract + beef extract, yeast extract + peptone, and beef extract + peptone), pH (5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0), and temperature (20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 °C), respectively, to create the optimized conditions for good yield of LA by one factor using one-time method. Growth, change in pH, and the lactic acid yield were evaluated during all the experiments.

2.5. Antimicrobial Activity

To evaluate the antimicrobial potential of the isolated culture, a cell-free supernatant was prepared by centrifuging the culture broth at 10,000× g rpm for 5 min. Different doses (10, 20, 50, and 100 µL) of the cell-free supernatant were tested for antimicrobial activity against both Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive (B. subtilis) bacteria through the well-plate method. Bacterial culture suspension grown overnight was evenly spread on preprepared agar Petri plates. Then wells were prepared using a 6 mm agar medium borer and placed above the prepared cell-free suspension of the selected culture. The plates were incubated for 16 h at 37 °C and measured the inhibition zone diameter in millimeters using a Vernier caliper [17].

2.6. Lactic Acid Production from Mango Peel

Mango peel was collected from Varsha Fruit Pulp Industries Ltd., Koduru, Kadapa, India. It was macerated using a mixer (Panasonic mixer, Model: 340) and treated with 1% (v/v) pectinase, Trizyme 50 (Triton Chemicals, Mysore, India). Liquid containing sugars was extracted with the help of a cheesecloth by squeezing after the enzymatic digestion. The extract was subjected to analysis of reducing sugar and juice yield. The pH of the extract used as a culture medium for lactic acid production was adjusted to 7.0, and it was supplemented with peptone (0.3%) to assess the effect of the nutrients on the fermentation process using an unsupplemented medium as the control [12].

2.7. Analysis

Reducing sugars present in fresh mango peel and pectinase extract were quantified by DNS (3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid) method [18]. The cell concentration was measured by using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (1800; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 600 nm. The cell count was calculated using an Improved Neubauer counting chamber for bacteria. pH change was tested by using a pH meter. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for the estimation of the amount of LA present in fermented samples. For estimation, samples were collected at 24, 48, and 72 h after inoculation and diluted to 1:10 with distilled water. The diluted samples were centrifuged and filtered through a 0.45× g µm PTFE membrane. The analysis was performed with a reverse-phase C18 column using an injection volume of 20 µL and detection at 210 nm using the chromatographic system (LC10A; Shimadzu, Japan) coupled with a UV detector. The mobile phase employed was 0.008 M sulfuric acid at a flow rate of 1 mL/min in an isocratic mode of elution. Each sample was injected two times, and quantification was performed using sodium lactate standards (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments and analyses were conducted in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). All statistical analyses were carried out using statistical differences among different factors, which were determined using ANOVA.

3. Results and Discussion

Lactic acid bacteria were isolated from the overnight fermented idly batter samples. A total of 50 isolates of lactic acid bacteria were selected through preliminary screening. From those, 6 isolates that have more clear zones with bromocresol purple and CaCO3 were selected for further screening and characterization. All 6 isolated cultures were Gram-positive, cocci, arranged in tetrads and pairs, and catalase-negative. Table 1 and Figure 1 show the results of the morphological and physiological characteristics of the isolated strains. Most of the previous investigators used fermented batters, fruits, vegetables, and milk products for the isolation of lactic-acid-producing microorganisms [19,20,21]. Mostly lactic acid bacteria are nonmotile, cocci, or rod in shape and homo- or heterofermentative and catalase-negative [22].
Biochemical properties and sugar utilization tests of the isolates were conducted, and respective results are shown in Table 1. Based on biochemical and sugar utilization, six isolates were primarily identified as the Pediococcus group. As regards the sugar fermentation, all six isolated strains shown are able to ferment glucose, sucrose, galactose, mannose, xylose, fructose, and maltose but not able to ferment arabinose, glycerol, sorbitol, and CMC (carboxymethylcellulose). Color change after 48 h of incubation confirmed acid production of LAB isolates. Fermenting ability of maltose sugar is the specific quality of the Pediococcus genus [23]. The strain (isolate 1) that showed the highest growth and production at higher temperatures and antimicrobial activity was further selected for molecular identification.

3.1. Molecular Identification

The selected culture was subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. The DNA of the isolated strain was subjected to PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene, and a 649 bp nucleotide sequence was obtained. The obtained sequences were analyzed by comparison with the GenBank database [24]. The isolated culture showed 99% similarity with strain Pediococcus pentosaceus Ni1142 (accession no. AB598962.1) in BLAST analysis (Figure 2). The isolated culture was named Pediococcus sp. HLV1, and the sequence was submitted to the NCBI databank, and the accession number is MH921241.1.

3.2. Optimization Studies

In optimization studies, we tested the isolated LAB to evaluate the type of carbon and nitrogen sources, pH, and temperatures as well as fermentation conditions that affect and support optimal/maximum growth and LA yield.

3.2.1. Carbon Source

The type of carbon source is very crucial in the LA fermentation process. This affects the yield and rate of fermentation and the total economics of the process because it shares 50–60% in fermentation medium cost. Here we tested different carbon sources for lactic acid production. As shown in Figure 3A, the highest LA production was obtained with glucose (5.06%), followed by lactose (4.74%), fructose (4.61%), and sucrose (4.10%). The isolated culture was able to utilize xylose to produce LA and obtained comparable concentrations of lactic acid, 3.45 %. The lowest lactic acid production was observed in the medium with soy flour, 2.21%. In the case of glucose, the LA yield was approximately 65% based on the amount of glucose consumed. From this, it can be concluded that glucose and lactose were the preferable sugars for the maximum yield (5.06% and 4.74%) of LA by the isolated Pediococcus sp. HLV1.

3.2.2. Nitrogen Source

Lactic acid bacteria require assimilable nitrogen and vitamin supplementation for good growth and lactic acid production, and the cost of such nitrogen sources (yeast extract and peptone) is very high [25]. In this study, experiments were carried out with different nitrogen sources (peptone, yeast extract, beef extract, yeast extract + beef extract, yeast extract + peptone, and beef extract + peptone) to get the knowledge on required nitrogen source for growth and LA production. As shown in Figure 3B, the highest LA production was obtained in medium with 0.3% peptone (5.11%), followed by yeast extract (4.62%) and beef extract (4.50%). The combination experiments of nitrogen sources produced less lactic acid than the single-nitrogen sources. In previous studies, Nancib et al. [10,26] found that yeast extract is the best supplement in their investigations and suggested that this could be due to the presence of B complex vitamins [27]. On the contrary, the isolated Pediococcus sp. HLV1 preferably utilizes peptone when compared with yeast extract.

3.2.3. pH

The initial pH of the medium is one of the important factors in the screening and selection process of LAB. It is a very critical parameter, and optimum pH is very essential for better cell growth and LA yield [28]. To investigate the optimum pH for growth and lactic acid production for the isolated culture fermentation, the pH of the media was adjusted to different pH’s (5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0). The maximum lactic acid production (4.3%) was obtained for the medium with an initial pH of 7.0 (Figure 3C). The final pH of the medium was decreased to 3.8 from the initial pH of 7.0. From these results, Pediococcus sp. HLV1 seemed to be a useful LA producer due to its optimum pH at 7.0 as other LAB, but it has the ability to grow and produce comparable amounts of lactic acid at an acidic pH of 5.0. This ability of the isolated strain Pediococcus sp. HLV1 is beneficial to avoid the risk of both contamination and neutralization [29,30,31].

3.2.4. Temperature

In lactic acid fermentation, operating temperature is very crucial because it affects not only the growth of microorganisms but also the yield of the product. It is very essential to know the favorable temperature because the different LAB strain has its optimal temperature. To find the optimum temperature for better cell growth and lactic acid production by Pediococcus sp. HLV1, fermentation was carried out at temperatures of 18, 25, 30, 37, and 40 °C. The lactic acid production was increased gradually from 20 to 40 °C (Figure 3D). The highest production was found at 40 °C (5.23%). Isolated culture showed the best growth at 40 °C. Interestingly, a slight decrease in the amount of lactic acid and growth was observed at 45 °C. Growth and lactic acid production were sharply decreased and recorded the lowest lactic acid yield at 50 °C (1.20%). These results were comparable with those of Alam et al. [32]. However, the isolated strain survived up to 50 °C, and no acid production was detected (data not presented).

3.3. Antibacterial Activity

P. pentosaceus is a well-known probiotic organism and shows antipathogen activity towards several harmful bacteria, which is one of the important prerequired characteristics of probiotic organisms. For example, the antimicrobial activity of P. pentosaceus was reported against E. coli [33], L. monocytogenes [34], Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [35], and Salmonella typhimurium [36]. The isolated culture was preliminarily tested for is antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (Bacillus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria. It exhibited good performance against both tested bacteria, E. coli (14 mm) and Bacillus (21 mm) (Figure 4A,B). From Figure 4, it is very clear that the inhibition was dose dependent, and the maximum inhibition was shown at 50 µL of cell-free suspension. The culture showed a higher inhibition zone for Gram-positive bacteria, B. subtilis, than the Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli. Generally, many antimicrobials work better towards thin peptidoglycan consisting of Gram-negative bacteria than thick peptidoglycan consisting of Gram-positive bacteria. Very few compounds specifically work on Gram-positive bacteria [17]. Apart from medicines, bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances, such as P. pentosaceus-specific exopolysaccharides, were also identified as special function metabolites in P. pentosaceus. Yu et al. [37] determined the production of 3-phenyl acetic acid with broad-spectrum antibacterial (against food-borne pathogens) properties with P. pentosaceus SK25, which is isolated from Chinese traditional fermented food.

3.4. Lactic Acid Production from Mango Industrial Waste

Lactic acid production from fresh mango peel was carried out with a newly isolated LAB strain. The fresh mango peel contained 25% total solids and 7.2% reducing sugars. Pectinase enzyme treatment significantly increased the yield of the extract from mango peel, and 550 and 850 mL of extract were obtained from untreated and enzyme-treated 1 kg mango peel, respectively. At the end of fermentation, 5.2% (v/v) LA was produced in the mango peel extract medium supplemented with 0.2% peptone and 3.2% in the un-supplemented medium (Figure 5A). This shows that the isolated strain requires an additional nitrogen source for the effective utilization and production of LA from mango peel. The nutrient supplementation would provide required nutrients to overcome nutrient deficiencies and support to produce more fermentation metabolites by keeping the microorganism in the log phase for longer periods. The clear idea on the influence of nutrient supplementation required more experiments with different nutrients at different amounts and using different feeding methods. In a nutrient unsupplemented medium, the fermentation and utilization of carbohydrates are slow because of insufficient growth nutrients in the peel medium. Jawad et al. [14] investigated the production of LA from mango peel and reported a very low yield, 17.4 g/L, through spontaneous anaerobic fermentation with the indigenous microbial consortium and with direct fermentation of blended mango peel. Changes in pH and growth of microorganisms were depicted in Figure 5B. Decrease in pH was rapid in the case of supplemented medium (3.2), and the pH was recorded to be 5.2 in the case of control medium. Similarly, the growth of the culture was increased rapidly and reached to 0.8 OD in peptone-supplemented medium. The data clearly support how high LA was produced in peptone-added medium when compared with control. In addition to the optimization of the fermentation factors pH, temperature, and fermentation time, the medium composition is one factor that plays a crucial role in the production of LA [38].

4. Conclusions

Lactic-acid-producing bacteria were successfully isolated from fermented idly batter, and based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the isolate showed 99% homology with Pediococcus pentosaceus Ni1142 and was named Pediococcus sp. HLV1. The isolated strain showed better growth and LA production with 10% glucose as carbon source and 0.3% peptone as nitrogen source under initial medium at pH 7.0 and 40 °C, resulting in a production of 5.5% (w/v) LA. The isolated strain was effectively inhibited by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in a preliminary evaluation. Mango peel extract was effectively utilized and produced 5.2% (w/v) of LA by the supplementation of peptone. Peptone supplementation enhanced cell growth and subsequently helped in higher LA production. In conclusion, the isolated LAB, Pediococcus sp. HLV1, thermophilic in nature, was able to grow and produce LA at a high temperature (45 °C) and had survivability at 50 °C. The present study also revealed that the isolated strain is able to utilize mango peel as agro-industrial biomass and could be useful for lactic acid production using various renewable substrates.

Author Contributions

H.K. conducted the literature survey and investigation; V.R.L. and S.V.C. were involved in the conceptualization, experiment design, and MS preparation; Y.-J.W., K.S.A., Y.B.E. and R.G. reviewed and edited the MS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support for project number RSP-2021/189, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Available online: http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industryanalysis/lactic-acid-and-poly-lactic-acid-market (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  2. Ghaffar, T.; Irshad, M.; Anwar, Z.; Aqil, T.; Zulifqar, Z.; Tariq, A.; Kamran, M.; Ehsan, N.; Mehmood, S. Recent trends in lactic acid biotechnology: A brief review on production to purification. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fevria, R.; Hartanto, I. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus sp.) from strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Int. J. Phys Conf. Ser. 2009, 1371, 012086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Cui, F.; Li, Y.; Wan, C. Lactic acid production from corn stover using mixed cultures of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lacto-bacillus brevis. Biores. Technol. 2011, 102, 1831–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nancib, A.; Nancib, N.; Boudrant, J. Production of lactic acid from date juice extract with free cells of single and mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 1423–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Agaliya, P.J.; Jeevaratnam, K. Molecular characterization of lactobacilli isolated from fermented idli batter. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 1199–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sathe, G.B.; Mandal, S. Fermented products of India and its implication: A review. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2016, 35, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Tashiro, Y.; Sonomoto, K. Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 877–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sakdaronnarong, C.; Srimarut, N.; Lucknakhul, N.; Na-songkla, N.; Jonglertjunya, W. Two-step acid and alkaline methanolysis/alkaline peroxide fractionation of sugarcane bagasse and rice straw for production of polylactic acid precursor. Bio-Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 85, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nancib, N.; Nancib, A.; Boudjelal, A.; Benslimane, C.; Blanchard, F.; Boudrant, J. The effect of supplementation by different nitrogen sources on the production of lactic acid from date juice by Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 78, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Neu, A.-K.; Pleissner, D.; Mehlmann, K.; Schneider, R.; Puerta-Quintero, G.I.; Venus, J. Fermentative utilization of coffee mucilage using Bacillus coagulans and investigation of down-stream processing of fermentation broth for optically pure l(+)-lactic acid production. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 211, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reddy, L.V.; Reddy, O.V.S.; Wee, Y.J. Production of ethanol from mango (Mangifera indica L.) peel by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CFTRI101. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 4183–4189. [Google Scholar]
  13. Avula, S.V.; Reddy, S.; Reddy, L.V. The Feasibility of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Peel as an Alternative Substrate for Butanol Production. BioResources 2015, 10, 4453–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jawad, A.H.; Alkarkhi, A.F.; Jason, O.C.; Easa, A.M.; Norulaini, N.N. Production of the lactic acid from mango peel waste—Factorial experiment. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2013, 25, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sreedhara, M.M.; Vijaya, S.R.O. Lactic Acid Production Using Mango Peel: Studies on Lactic Acid Production Using Mango Peel and Its Use in Bio-Film Preparation; LAP Lambert Academic Publishing: Sunnyvale, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Reddy, L.V.; Sreeveda, A.; Park, I.H.; Wee, Y.J. Isolation and characterization of Clostridia from the feces of wild rabbit and swine for hemicellulosic acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) production. BioResources 2019, 14, 5832–5844. [Google Scholar]
  17. Srihasam, S.; Thyagarajan, K.; Korivi, M.; Lebaka, V.R.; Mallem, S.P.R. Phytogenic Generation of NiO Nanoparticles Using Stevia Leaf Extract and Evaluation of Their In-Vitro Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Miller, G.L. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. 1954, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pal, V.; Jamuna, M.; Jeevaratnam, K. Isolation and characterization of bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria from a south Indian special dosa (Appam) batter. J. Cult. Collect. 2005, 4, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruiz Rodriguez, L.G.; Mohamed, F.; Bleckwedel, J.; Medina, R.; De Vuyst, L.; Hebert, E.M.; Mozzi, F. Diversity and functional properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wild fruits and flowers present in Northern Argentina. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Patil, M.M.; Pal, A.; Anand, T.; Ramana, K.V. Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from curd and cucumber. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  22. Olasupo, N.A.; Schillinger, U.; Holzapfel, W.H. Studies on some technological properties of predominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from nigerian fermented foods. Food Biotechnol. 2001, 15, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garvie, E.I. Genus Pediococcus. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; Sneath, P.H.A., Mair, N.S., Sharpe, M.E., Holt, J.G., Eds.; The Williams & Wilkins Co.: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1986; Volume 2, pp. 1075–1079. [Google Scholar]
  24. NCBI Resources Genbank. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 19 September 2012).
  25. Leh, M.B.; Charles, M. Lactic acid production by batch fermentation of whey permeate: A mathematical model. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1989, 4, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nancib, N.; Nancib, A.; Boudjelal, A.; Benslimane, C.; Blanchard, F.; Boudrant, J. Joint effect of nitrogen sources and B vitamin supplementation of date juice on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cheng, P.; Muller, S.; Bajpai, R.; Lannotti, E.L. Lactic acid production from enzyme thinned corn starch using Lactobacillus amylovorus. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1991, 7, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Sonomoto, K. Opportunities to overcome the current limitations and challenges for efficient microbial production of optically pure lactic acid. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 236, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Åkerberg, C.; Hofvendahl, K.; Zacchi, G.; Hahn-Hägerdal, B. Modelling the influence of pH, temperature, glucose and lactic acid concentrations on the kinetics of lactic acid production by Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis ATCC 19435 in whole-wheat flour. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 49, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Calabia, B.P.; Tokiwa, Y.; Aiba, S. Fermentative production of l-(+)-lactic acid by an alkaliphilic marine microorganism. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ding, S.; Tan, T. l-lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei fermentation using different fed-batch feeding strategies. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 1451–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alam, M.T.; Mahato, A.K.; Kumari, L.; Singh, R.S. Fermentative study on optimization of lactic acid production from cane sugar by Lactobacillus spp. Eur. J. Molec. Clin. Med. 2021, 8, 712–723. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nze, U.C.; Beeman, M.G.; Lambert, C.J.; Salih, G.; Gale, B.K.; Sant, H.J. Hydrodynamic cavitation for the rapid separation and electrochemical detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 135, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Orsi, R.H.; Wiedmann, M. Characteristics and distribution of Listeria spp., including Listeria species newly described since 2009. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5273–5287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lele, V.; Zelvyte, R.; Monkeviciene, I.; Kantautaite, J.; Stankevicius, R.; Ruzauskas, M.; Sederevicius, A.; Antanaitis, R.; Bartkiene, E. Milk production and ruminal parameters of dairy cows fed diets containing Lactobacillus sakei KTU05-6 and Pediococcus pentosaceus BaltBio02. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 22, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Nanasombat, S.; Treebavonkusol, P.; Kittisrisopit, S.; Jaichalad, T.; Phunpruch, S.; Kootmas, A.; Nualsri, I. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw and fermented pork products: Identification and characterization of catalase-producing Pediococcus pentosaceus. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yu, S.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, B.; Mu, W. Short communication: 3-phenyllactic acid production in milk by Pediococcus pentosaceus SK25 during laboratory fermentation process. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Reddy, L.V.; Kim, Y.-M.; Yun, J.-S.; Ryu, H.-W.; Wee, Y.-J. l-Lactic acid production by combined utilization of agricultural bioresources as renewable and economical substrates through batch and repeated-batch fermentation of Enterococcus faecalis RKY1. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 209, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopic images of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 at 20 KX magnification.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopic images of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 at 20 KX magnification.
Fermentation 08 00061 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood method by MEGA7.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood method by MEGA7.
Fermentation 08 00061 g002
Figure 3. Production with different carbon sources by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (A), production with different nitrogen sources by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (B), production with different pH’s by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (C), and production with different temperatures by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (D).
Figure 3. Production with different carbon sources by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (A), production with different nitrogen sources by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (B), production with different pH’s by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (C), and production with different temperatures by Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1 (D).
Fermentation 08 00061 g003aFermentation 08 00061 g003b
Figure 4. Antibacterial activity of culture-free supernatant E. coli and Bacillus subtilis (A,B) of Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1.
Figure 4. Antibacterial activity of culture-free supernatant E. coli and Bacillus subtilis (A,B) of Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1.
Fermentation 08 00061 g004
Figure 5. (A) Lactic acid production from mango peel by Pediococcus sp. HLV1; (B) pH and growth kinetics in lactic acid production from mango peel (peptone added) by Pediococcus sp. HLV1.
Figure 5. (A) Lactic acid production from mango peel by Pediococcus sp. HLV1; (B) pH and growth kinetics in lactic acid production from mango peel (peptone added) by Pediococcus sp. HLV1.
Fermentation 08 00061 g005aFermentation 08 00061 g005b
Table 1. Morphological, physiological, biochemical characteristics and sugar fermentation of isolated lactic acid bacteria.
Table 1. Morphological, physiological, biochemical characteristics and sugar fermentation of isolated lactic acid bacteria.
TestsIsolate 1Isolate 2Isolate 3Isolate 4Isolate 5Isolate 6
Cell morphologyCocciCocciCocciCocciCocciCocci
Gram test++++++
Motility------
Catalase------
Biochemical characteristics
Gelatin------
Indole------
Methyl red++++--
Vogues–Proskauer------
Citrate------
H2S production------
Glycerol------
Fermentation of carbohydrates
Glucose++++++
Sucrose++++++
Fructose++++++
Mannose++++++
Xylose++++++
Arabinose------
Maltose------
Galactose++++++
Sorbitol------
CMC------
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katepogu, H.; Wee, Y.-J.; Almaary, K.S.; Elbadawi, Y.B.; Gobinath, R.; Chinni, S.V.; Lebaka, V.R. Isolation and Characterization of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 from Fermented Idly Batter. Fermentation 2022, 8, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020061

AMA Style

Katepogu H, Wee Y-J, Almaary KS, Elbadawi YB, Gobinath R, Chinni SV, Lebaka VR. Isolation and Characterization of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 from Fermented Idly Batter. Fermentation. 2022; 8(2):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katepogu, Harika, Young-Jung Wee, Khalid S. Almaary, Yahya B. Elbadawi, Ramachawolran Gobinath, Suresh V. Chinni, and Veeranjaneya Reddy Lebaka. 2022. "Isolation and Characterization of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 from Fermented Idly Batter" Fermentation 8, no. 2: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020061

APA Style

Katepogu, H., Wee, Y. -J., Almaary, K. S., Elbadawi, Y. B., Gobinath, R., Chinni, S. V., & Lebaka, V. R. (2022). Isolation and Characterization of Pediococcus sp. HLV1 from Fermented Idly Batter. Fermentation, 8(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop