Bioconversion of Spent Green Tea Residues via Gamma Irradiation and Yeast Fermentation: Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emissions
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection and Processing of Spent Green Tea Residues
2.2. Treatments
2.3. Chemical Analyses
2.4. Rumen Fluid Collection and In Vitro Fermentation
2.5. Gas Production and Fermentation Kinetics
2.6. Fermentation End Products, Nutrient Degradation, and Energy Utilization
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Chemical Composition
3.2. In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emissions
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| A | Potential gas production |
| Ac | Acetate |
| Ac/Pr | Acetate-to-propionate ratio |
| ADF | Acid detergent fiber |
| ADL | Acid detergent lignin |
| Ash | Inorganic residue (ash content) |
| Bu | Butyrate |
| C | Fractional gas production rate |
| CH4_DM | Methane yield per gram dry matter incubated |
| CH4_DMD | Methane yield per gram dry matter degraded |
| CH4_prop | Methane as percentage of total gas |
| CH4 | Methane |
| CP | Crude protein |
| CPD | Crude protein degradability |
| CT | Condensed tannins |
| DM | Dry matter |
| DMD | Dry matter degradability |
| EE | Ether extract |
| γ | Gamma irradiation |
| γ + SC | Gamma irradiation followed by solid-state fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| Lag | Lag time |
| ME | Metabolizable energy |
| NDF | Neutral detergent fiber |
| NDFD | Neutral detergent fiber degradability |
| NEL | Net energy for lactation |
| NFC | Non-fiber carbohydrates |
| NH3–N | Ammonia nitrogen |
| NS | Not significant |
| OMD | Organic matter degradability |
| Pr | Propionate |
| SC | Solid-state fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| SEM | Standard error of the mean |
| TP | Total phenolics |
| TT | Total tannins |
| TVFA | Total volatile fatty acids |
References
- Almahdawi, M. Using Tea Waste as A Source of Protein in the Ration and Its Impact on Productive Performance, Growth and Some Blood Parameters of Awassi Lambs. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2018, 6, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malenica, D.; Kass, M.; Bhat, R. Sustainable Management and Valorization of Agri-Food Industrial Wastes and By-Products as Animal Feed: For Ruminants, Non-Ruminants and as Poultry Feed. Sustainability 2022, 15, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, D.; Meng, T. Nutritional Value Evaluation and Processing Technology of Feed and Nutrition Regulation Measures for Ruminants. Animals 2024, 14, 3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmed, E.; Gaafar, A.; Nishida, T. Agro-industrial By-products as Ruminant Feed: Nutritive Value and in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Evaluation. Anim. Sci. J. 2024, 95, e13974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statista. Global: Annual Tea Consumption 2018–2025; Statista Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2026. [Google Scholar]
- Hussain, S.; Anjali, K.P.; Hassan, S.T.; Dwivedi, P.B. Waste Tea as a Novel Adsorbent: A Review. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kondo, M.; Kita, K.; Yokota, H. Feeding Value to Goats of Whole-Crop Oat Ensiled with Green Tea Waste. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 113, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seth, D.; Athparia, M.; Singh, A.; Rathore, D.; Venkatramanan, V.; Channashettar, V.; Prasad, S.; Maddirala, S.; Sevda, S.; Kataki, R. Sustainable Environmental Practices of Tea Waste—A Comprehensive Review. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 32, 7449–7467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sundod, R.; Poothong, S.; Nuengjamnong, C. Substitution Effect of Protein Source with Tea Waste on Productive Performances and Ruminal Fermentation in Crossbred Saanen Lactating Goats. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 22, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramdani, D.; Chaudhry, A.S. Can Green Tea Leaf Supplementation of Ensiled Grass-Consuming Lambs Impact Their Growth and Nutrient Digestibility. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2025, 53, 2576074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begum, J.; Reza, A.; Islam, M.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Zaman, M.S. Effect of Supplementation of Different Levels of Tea Waste on the Performance of Growing Calves. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 9, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramdani, D.; Jayanegara, A.; Chaudhry, A.S. Biochemical Properties of Black and Green Teas and Their Insoluble Residues as Natural Dietary Additives to Optimize In Vitro Rumen Degradability and Fermentation but Reduce Methane in Sheep. Animals 2022, 12, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ishihara, N.; Chu, D.-C.; Akachi, S.; Juneja, L.R. Improvement of Intestinal Microflora Balance and Prevention of Digestive and Respiratory Organ Diseases in Calves by Green Tea Extracts. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 68, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sezmis, G.; Kaya, A.; Kaya, H.; Macit, M.; Erten, K.; Palangi, V.; Lackner, M. Comparison of Black Tea Waste and Legume Roughages: Methane Mitigation and Rumen Fermentation Parameters. Metabolites 2023, 13, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasehi, M.; Torbatinejad, N.M.; Rezaie, M.; Ghoorchi, T. Effects of Partial Substitution of Alfalfa Hay with Green Tea Waste on Growth Performance and in Vitro Methane Emission of Fat-Tailed Lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2018, 168, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassaan, M.S.; Soltan, M.A.; Abdel-Moez, A.M. Nutritive Value of Soybean Meal after Solid State Fermentation with Saccharomyces Cerevisiae for Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis Niloticus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 201, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Ouyang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y.; Tang, S.; Ma, Z.; Tan, Z.; Zhu, N.; Teklebrhan, T.; Han, X. Sweet Corn Stalk Treated with Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Alone or in Combination with Lactobacillus Plantarum: Nutritional Composition, Fermentation Traits and Aerobic Stability. Animals 2019, 9, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aslaniyan, A.; Ghanbari, F.; Kouhsar, J.B.; Shahraki, B.K. Comparing the Effects of Gamma Ray and Alkaline Treatments of Sodium Hydroxide and Calcium Oxide on Chemical Composition, Ruminal Degradation Kinetics and Crystallinity Degree of Soybean Straw. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2023, 191, 110524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abid, K. Effects of Gamma Irradiation Pretreatment and Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzyme Supplementation on the Ruminal Fermentation and Nutritional Value of Typha Latifolia. Fermentation 2025, 11, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, H.R.; Sadeghi, A.A.; Shawrang, P.; Raisali, G. Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Ruminal DM and NDF Degradation Kinetics of Alfalfa Hay. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 11, 1165–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Al-Masri, M.R.; Zarkawi, M. Changes in Digestible Energy Values of Some Agricultural Residues Treated with Gamma Irradiation. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 50, 883–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abid, K. Biotechnological Valorization of Almond Hulls via Solid-State Fermentation with Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Fibrolytic Enzyme Supplementation: Enhancing Ruminal Fermentation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Fermentation 2026, 12, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sechrist, E. Investigating the Potential of Almond Hulls as a Feedstock for Fermented Cattle Feed. Master’s Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis; AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 2001; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
- Cosmulescu, S.; Trandafir, I.; Nour, V.; Botu, M. Total Phenolic, Flavonoid Distribution and Antioxidant Capacity in Skin, Pulp and Fruit Extracts of Plum Cultivars: Phenolic, Flavonoids, Antioxidant Capacity in Plum. J. Food Biochem. 2015, 39, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkowni, R.; Jaradat, N.; Fares, S. Total Phenol, Flavonoids, and Tannin Contents, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Vital Digestion Enzymes Inhibitory and Cytotoxic Activities of Verbascum Fruticulosum. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2023, 60, 102256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makkar, H.P.S.; Francis, G.; Becker, K. Bioactivity of Phytochemicals in Some Lesser-Known Plants and Their Effects and Potential Applications in Livestock and Aquaculture Production Systems. Animal 2007, 1, 1371–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Menke, K.H.; Steingass, H. Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and in Vitro Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 1988, 28, 7–55. [Google Scholar]
- Galyean, M.L. Laboratory Procedures in Animal Nutrition Research; Department of Animal and Food Sciences Texas Tech University: Lubbock, TX, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- López-García, A.; Saborío-Montero, A.; Gutiérrez-Rivas, M.; Atxaerandio, R.; Goiri, I.; García-Rodríguez, A.; Jiménez-Montero, J.A.; González, C.; Tamames, J.; Puente-Sánchez, F.; et al. Fungal and Ciliate Protozoa Are the Main Rumen Microbes Associated with Methane Emissions in Dairy Cattle. GigaScience 2022, 11, giab088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spanghero, M.; Braidot, M.; Fabro, C.; Romanzin, A. A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Protozoa Counts in In Vitro Batch Experiments. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2022, 293, 115471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, P.M.T.; Moreira, G.D.; Sakita, G.Z.; Natel, A.S.; Mattos, W.T.; Gimenes, F.M.A.; Gerdes, L.; McManus, C.; Abdalla, A.L.; Louvandini, H. Nutritional Evaluation of the Legume Macrotyloma axillare Using In Vitro and In Vivo Bioassays in Sheep. Anim. Physiol. Nutr. 2018, 102, e669–e676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rey, M.; Enjalbert, F.; Monteils, V. Establishment of Ruminal Enzyme Activities and Fermentation Capacity in Dairy Calves from Birth through Weaning. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 1500–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abid, K.; Jabri, J.; Yaich, H.; Malek, A.; Rekhis, J.; Kamoun, M. Improving the Nutritional Value and Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Sesame Seed Coats Through Bioconversion Approach Using Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes Produced by Trichoderma Longibrachiatum. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2023, 13, 14917–14925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, T.M.; Bhat, K.M. Methods for Measuring Cellulase Activities. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988; Volume 160, pp. 87–112. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, M.J.; Biely, P.; Poutanen, K. Interlaboratory Testing of Methods for Assay of Xylanase Activity. J. Biotechnol. 1992, 23, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Masri, M.R.; Zarkawi, M. Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Chemical Compositions of Some Agricultural Residues. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1994, 43, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapoor, K.; Tyagi, A.K.; Diwan, R.K. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Recovery of Total Reducing Sugars from Delignified Sugarcane Bagasse. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 170, 108643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradi, M.; Afzalzadeh, A.; Behgar, M.; Norouzian, M.A. Effects of Electron Beam, NaOH and Urea on Chemical Composition, Phenoliccompounds, In Situ Ruminal Degradability and In Vitro Gas Production Kineticsof Pistachio by-Products. Vet. Res. Forum Int. Q. J. 2015, 6, 111–116. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Masri, M.R.; Zarkawi, M. Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Cell-Wall Constituents of Some Agricultural Residues. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1994, 44, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behgar, M.; Ghasemi, S.; Naserian, A.; Borzoie, A.; Fatollahi, H. Gamma Radiation Effects on Phenolics, Antioxidants Activity and In Vitro Digestion of Pistachio (Pistachia vera) Hull. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, K.; Were, L. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Total Phenolic Content Yield and Antioxidant Capacity of Almond Skin Extracts. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 932–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahyono, T.; Lelananingtyas, N.; Sihono, S. Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Ruminal Degradation of Samurai 1 Sweet Sorghum Bagasse. At. Indones. 2017, 43, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Li, J.; Guan, F.; Liu, P.; Ma, H.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Y.; Mao, S.; Xiang, X.; Jin, W. Effects of Dietary NDF/NFC Ratios on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, Methane Emission, and Microbial Community Composition. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 1588357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shawrang, P.; Nikkhah, A.; Zare-Shahneh, A.; Sadeghi, A.A.; Raisali, G.; Moradi-Shahrebabak, M. Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Protein Degradation of Soybean Meal in the Rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 134, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghinejad-Roudbaneh, M.; Kazemi-Bonchenari, M.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Kholif, A.E. Influence of Roasting, Gamma Ray Irradiation and Microwaving on Ruminal Dry Matter and Crude Protein Digestion of Cottonseed. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 15, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagaew, G.; Cherdthong, A.; Wongtangtintharn, S.; Wanapat, M.; Suntara, C. Manipulation of In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation and Feed Digestibility as Influenced by Yeast Waste-Treated Cassava Pulp Substitute Soybean Meal and Different Roughage to Concentrate Ratio. Fermentation 2021, 7, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.-Q.; Long, R.-J.; Yang, H.; Yang, H.-J.; Shen, X.-H.; Shi, R.-F.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Du, J.-G.; Qi, X.-J.; Ye, Q.-H. Fiber Degradation Potential of Natural Co-Cultures of Neocallimastix frontalis and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium Isolated from Yaks (Bos grunniens) Grazing on the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. Anaerobe 2016, 39, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goel, G.; Makkar, H.P.S. Methane Mitigation from Ruminants Using Tannins and Saponins. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012, 44, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pazla, R.; Antonius, A.; Mohd-Aris, A.; Ikhlas, Z.; Fitri, Y.; Bansi, H.; Dewi, Y.; Hadiatry, M.; Qomariyah, N.; Wahyuwardani, S.; et al. The Role of Tannin-Based Products in Mitigating Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock: A Review. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2026, 13, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dijkstra, J.; Van Gastelen, S.; Dieho, K.; Nichols, K.; Bannink, A. Review: Rumen Sensors: Data and Interpretation for Key Rumen Metabolic Processes. Animal 2020, 14, s176–s186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirsalami, S.M.; Mirsalami, M. Impact of Solid-State Fermentation Utilizing Saccharomyces Boulardii on the Chemical Composition and Bioactive Constituents of Rice Husk. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 15, 100957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, H.A.; Martin, S.A. Effects of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Culture and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Live Cells on In Vitro Mixed Ruminal Microorganism Fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 2603–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]


| Item | Control | γ | SC | γ + SC | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP | 325 b | 320 b | 328 b | 383 a | 8.2 | ** |
| EE | 30 b | 31 b | 33 b | 49 a | 6.1 | *** |
| NDF | 379 a | 336 b | 368 a | 326 b | 8.4 | ** |
| ADF | 277 a | 244 b | 260 a | 238 b | 5.9 | ** |
| ADL | 88 | 85 | 88 | 84 | 3.8 | NS |
| Ash | 32 b | 44 a | 35 b | 50 a | 5.8 | * |
| NFC | 234 b | 269 a | 236 b | 192 c | 7.1 | *** |
| TP | 89 a | 75 b | 86 a | 74 b | 5.6 | * |
| TT | 79 a | 68 b | 76 a | 66 b | 4.3 | * |
| CT | 51 a | 44 b | 50 a | 42 b | 3.0 | * |
| Item | γ | SC | γ + SC | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | −3.86 a | −5.99 b | −11.60 c | 0.21 | *** |
| CP | −5.34 b | −5.12 b | 4.18 a | 0.23 | *** |
| EE | −0.65 c | 3.42 b | 44.39 a | 0.29 | *** |
| NDF | −14.76 b | −8.71 a | −23.96 c | 0.20 | *** |
| ADF | −15.31 b | −11.75 a | −24.04 c | 0.19 | *** |
| ADL | −7.13 a | −5.99 a | −15.61 b | 0.21 | *** |
| Ash | 32.20 b | 2.83 c | 38.13 a | 0.28 | *** |
| NFC | 10.52 a | −5.18 b | −27.46 c | 0.20 | *** |
| TP | −18.98 b | −9.15 a | −26.50 c | 0.19 | *** |
| TT | −17.24 b | −9.56 a | −26.14 c | 0.19 | *** |
| CT | −17.05 b | −7.83 a | −27.20 c | 0.19 | *** |
| Item | Control | γ | SC | γ + SC | SEM | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gas kinetics | ||||||
| A | 158 c | 165 b | 160 c | 184 a | 5.5 | ** |
| C | 3.26 b | 3.37 a | 3.24 b | 3.35 a | 0.042 | * |
| Lag | 1.21 | 1.12 | 1.22 | 1.18 | 0.109 | NS |
| Fermentation parameters | ||||||
| pH | 6.63 | 6.62 | 6.61 | 6.63 | 0.052 | NS |
| NH3–N | 108 a | 96 b | 111 a | 99 b | 4.5 | * |
| TVFA | 47 b | 49 b | 50 b | 57 a | 2.5 | * |
| Ac | 58.8 b | 60.1 a | 58.1 b | 60.9 a | 1.09 | ** |
| Pr | 26.0 a | 24.8 b | 26.2 a | 23.9 b | 0.54 | ** |
| Bu | 15.1 | 15 | 15.6 | 15 | 0.43 | NS |
| Ac/Pr | 2.25 b | 2.43 a | 2.21 b | 2.53 a | 0.085 | ** |
| Degradability | ||||||
| DMD | 52.6 b | 53.3 b | 54.1 b | 63.1 a | 3.1 | ** |
| OMD | 54.1 b | 55.3 b | 55.9 b | 64.3 a | 3.3 | ** |
| NDFD | 38.9 b | 46.1 a | 40.1 b | 47.2 a | 2.9 | ** |
| CPD | 53.4 a | 48.8 b | 55.1 a | 54.6 a | 2.1 | * |
| Energy utilization | ||||||
| ME | 4.72 b | 4.86 b | 4.78 b | 5.56 a | 0.302 | ** |
| NEL | 2.32 b | 2.43 b | 2.37 b | 3.02 a | 0.212 | ** |
| Enzyme activities | ||||||
| Endoglucanase | 4.45 | 4.59 | 4.41 | 4.68 | 0.212 | NS |
| Exoglycanase | 27.33 b | 30.20 a | 27.01 b | 31.04 a | 1.331 | ** |
| Xylanase | 1.43 b | 1.65 a | 1.48 b | 1.71 a | 0.106 | * |
| Microbiota | ||||||
| Protozoa | 3.32 | 3.22 | 3.42 | 3.4 | 0.35 | NS |
| Methane emissions | ||||||
| CH4 proportion in total gas | 12.4 b | 13.3 a | 12.3 b | 13.0 ab | 0.51 | * |
| CH4 yield per gram DM | 19.2 c | 21.2 b | 19.4 c | 23.4 a | 0.92 | * |
| CH4 yield per gram DMD | 36.5 b | 39.2 a | 35.9 b | 37.0 b | 1.56 | * |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Abid, K. Bioconversion of Spent Green Tea Residues via Gamma Irradiation and Yeast Fermentation: Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emissions. Fermentation 2026, 12, 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080372
Abid K. Bioconversion of Spent Green Tea Residues via Gamma Irradiation and Yeast Fermentation: Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emissions. Fermentation. 2026; 12(8):372. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080372
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbid, Khalil. 2026. "Bioconversion of Spent Green Tea Residues via Gamma Irradiation and Yeast Fermentation: Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emissions" Fermentation 12, no. 8: 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080372
APA StyleAbid, K. (2026). Bioconversion of Spent Green Tea Residues via Gamma Irradiation and Yeast Fermentation: Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, Degradability, and Methane Emissions. Fermentation, 12(8), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12080372

