Valorization of Mixed Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bioethanol Production Using Thermotolerant Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC90
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease the attachment file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
This manuscript contains a very large number of typographical errors. For more information, see the improvements as follows. When you resubmit the revised manuscript, please attach a certificate of English editing service by a native speaker.
Author Response
Respected editor
We would like to sincerely thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript entitled “Valorization of Mixed Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bioethanol Production using Thermotolerant Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae 90.” We truly appreciate your insightful and keen feedback, which has helped us to improve the quality and clarity of our work. Your comments have been invaluable in refining our methodology, strengthening our discussion, ad improving the overall presentation of our findings. We have carefully looked each of your comments and suggestions, and we have revised the manuscript accordingly. Below, we provide a detailed point-by-point response to each of your comments, indicating the changes made in the revised version of the manuscript.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsSome comments in the attached file
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Respected Editor
We would like to sincerely thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript entitled “Valorization of Mixed Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bioethanol Production using Thermotolerant Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae 90.” We truly appreciate your insightful and keen feedback, which has helped us to improve the quality and clarity of our work. Your comments have been invaluable in refining our methodology, strengthening our discussion, and improving the overall presentation of our findings. We have carefully incorporated each of your comments and suggestions, and we have revised the manuscript accordingly. Below, we provide a detailed point-by-point response to each of your comments, indicating the changes made in the revised version of the manuscript.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe resubmitted manuscript has been appropriately revised and requires no further revisions.
