Next Article in Journal
Influence of Composition and Network Formation Sequence on the Responsive Behavior of Double-Network Hydrogels
Previous Article in Journal
Cell-Laden Gel Biomimetic Skin Promotes Full-Thickness Skin Wound Regeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploration of Natural Adsorbents for Applications in Pollution-Reducing Cosmetic Formulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hydrogel Development, Processing and Applications in Agriculture: A Review

by
Carmen Mª. Granados-Carrera
1,2,*,
Victor M. Perez-Puyana
3,
Mercedes Jiménez-Rosado
4 and
Alberto Romero
1,*
1
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Sevilla, 41011 Sevilla, Spain
3
Departamento de Ingeniería y Ciencia de los Materiales y del Transporte, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
4
Grupo de Ingeniería Química, Ambiental y Bioprocesos, Instituto I4, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2026, 12(3), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12030259
Submission received: 26 February 2026 / Revised: 13 March 2026 / Accepted: 18 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Gels: Structure, Properties, and Emerging Applications)

Abstract

Hydrogels have emerged as promising functional materials for improving water management and nutrient delivery in agriculture, particularly under conditions of increasing water scarcity and declining soil fertility. However, most commercially available superabsorbent hydrogels are based on petroleum-derived polymers, raising concerns regarding their persistence in soils, potential microplastic formation and long-term environmental impact. In response, significant research efforts are being directed toward the development of biodegradable hydrogels derived from renewable biopolymers. This review provides a critical overview of recent advances in hydrogel systems designed for agricultural applications, with a particular focus on biopolymer-based materials. First, the current landscape of hydrogel technologies used as soil conditioners and controlled-release systems for agrochemicals is contextualized, highlighting the limitations of conventional synthetic hydrogels. Subsequently, the main classes of natural polymers explored for hydrogel fabrication, including polysaccharides (e.g., chitosan, alginate, cellulose and starch) and proteins (e.g., gelatin, keratin and soy protein), are analyzed in terms of raw material sources, gelation mechanisms and structure–property relationships. Their performance in key agricultural functions, such as water retention, controlled nutrient release, soil conditioning and enhancement of plant growth, is also discussed. Finally, the review identifies major challenges that currently hinder large-scale implementation, including mechanical stability, degradation behavior in complex soil environments, nutrient release control and economic scalability. By integrating recent progress and outlining emerging research directions, this work aims to support the rational design of next-generation biodegradable hydrogels capable of contributing to sustainable agriculture and circular bioeconomy strategies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The world population is expected to reach 10 billion by 2050, increasing global food demand and the yields required from crops, thereby threatening food security [1]. Thus, agricultural activities are the main producers and are essential for the development of sustainable food systems [2,3,4]. However, agriculture is a sector that consumes about 70% of the planet’s freshwater [5]; concomitantly, about 63% of this water is lost through evaporation and runoff [6]. Moreover, climate change is promoting extreme conditions (abiotic stress), including extreme temperatures, drought and an increase in carbon dioxide levels [7]. These changes are particularly detrimental to plants that fail to adapt to environmental shifts, impacting their growth and development [8]. Additionally, the prevalence of pests and diseases is rising, often necessitating an overuse of agrochemical products to maintain crop productivity [9,10,11,12], while trying to maintain safe and sustainable production [13,14].
Conventional fertilizers provide essential nutrients to sustain soil fertility and enhance crop production. However, their efficiency is limited due to rapid leaching in the soil [15,16], which contributes to groundwater contamination, soil pollution and adversely affects human health and the environment [11,17]. Nowadays, there are several conventional fertilizers, such as solid and liquid fertilizers; however, they are required in large amounts, causing damage and water pollution [18,19]. Therefore, there are several approaches to address the direct application of fertilizers, such as regenerative agriculture [20], organic fertilizer [21,22] green manuring [23] or biofertilizers [24,25].
However, nowadays, scientists are focusing on the development of materials that incorporate agrochemical products into a matrix that acts as a vehicle, increasing fertilization efficiency [26,27,28]. Consequently, controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs) are the latest application for bioplastics and hydrogels. Bioplastics are capable of carrying agrochemicals and releasing them in different ways, featuring low-cost and easily industrialized processes [27,29]. They offer the possibility of carrying out biofortification processes, improving the quality of the food produced [30,31,32,33]. However, they possess poor water absorption properties and limited mechanical strength [34,35].
Hydrogels, in contrast, are three-dimensional polymer networks with remarkable water absorption capacity due to hydrophilic groups [36,37,38,39], combined with advantageous characteristics like porosity and swelling features, among others [40,41,42,43]. These materials have multiple applications, such as tissue engineering, dye biosorption and food additives [44,45,46,47]. From an agricultural perspective, hydrogels possess the ability to improve soil properties, facilitate the oxygenation of seeds and plant roots, are environmentally friendly, promote root growth, enhance seed germination and possess tunable mechanical properties [36,48,49,50]. Thus, hydrogels provide a long list of benefits, such as reducing irrigation frequency, decreasing water run-off and acting as a controlled release system [51,52], which makes them stand out [53,54,55,56]. Today, some hydrogels are commercially available, as shown in Table 1, which are primarily based on the utilization of synthetic polymers and exhibit superabsorbent behavior, dominating the market due to the increase in crop productivity and fertility [57]. For example, Control Garden is a brand that fabricates superabsorbent polymers based on potassium polyacrylate and is used for irrigation optimization, enhancing crop development (due to their ability to release nutrients), and acting in adverse conditions [58]. Similarly, Plara synthesized a controlled release of water and nutrient systems using potassium polyacrylate, highlighting these polymers as a defense against soil salinization due to the absence of sodium in their structure [59]. Nonetheless, these systems have a detrimental effect on the environment due to their lack of biodegradability, which impacts soil fertility (i.e., formation of microplastics) and plant health [60,61]. Specifically, these hydrogels are mainly derived from acrylic and acrylamide derivatives, and as reported by Krasnopeeva et al. [57], the residual monomers can alter human health due to the formation of dangerous neurotoxins and have a negative impact on agriculture and the environment due to the accumulation of saturated water in soil. Moreover, their production processes are complex, tending to create expensive products that are not affordable for farmers, necessitating regulatory frameworks that incentivize their use [62].
There is a special interest in the replacement of synthetic polymers with biopolymers, helping in the reduction of waste and providing effective utilization of natural resources [70]. This highlights waste and by-products derived from diverse sources that can be used as raw materials, promoting a more sustainable living environment as well as a circular economy [71,72,73]. Hence, biopolymer-based hydrogels enhance soil organic matter because of their biodegradation, addressing the problem related to the presence of organic matter in soils, which is threatened due to decomposition, deforestation and the uncontrolled use of liquid fertilizers instead of organic fertilizers [74,75]. Similarly, they are capable of mitigating long-term negative impacts on the environment while boosting sustainability, resilience to drought and pests, and productivity [76].
This review aims to contextualize the current state of hydrogel applications in agriculture and identify the key challenges in the development and deployment of these materials. We summarize recent advances in commercial hydrogels, raw materials selection, gelation methods and emerging applications, including some agricultural performance metrics related to these applications. Particularly, biopolymer-based materials are highlighted for their potential to replace non-biodegradable petrochemical products, which are well-established for polysaccharides at the laboratory scale, whereas proteins require extensive evaluation. This features hydrogels as an innovative material in agriculture. An overview of this purpose is depicted in Figure 1.

2. Raw Materials for Hydrogels Applied in Agriculture

Hydrogels can be classified according to different criteria, such as their source, crosslinking type or biodegradability. In this case, this review will focus on classification based on their origin, distinguishing between synthetic polymers and natural polymers (also referred to as biopolymers) (Table 2) [76,77], whose major advantages and disadvantages are displayed in Table 3.

2.1. Synthetic Polymers

Synthetic polymers derive from petrochemicals and possess durability, gel strength and absorption capacity [57,78,79]. However, their disadvantages include their degradation rate, potential toxicity, and the possibility of the formation of microplastics after their degradation [80,81,82].
Among the synthetic polymers used in soils as hydrogels for the enhancement of their physical properties, polyacrylamide, polyacrylates and their derivatives are the most prevalent. These polymers exhibit a high degree of swelling in water due to the presence of hydrophilic groups that facilitate water absorption. The most commercially available superabsorbent hydrogels are based on acrylic acid (AA) (Table 1), a synthetic monomer that enables the controlled release of agrochemical compounds while also providing excellent mechanical properties [83]. Regarding their fabrication, hydrogels can be prepared via chemical crosslinking, typically using ammonium persulfate as an initiator and, subsequently, different crosslinkers (for instance, N, N’-methylenebis(acrylamide) (NMBA), Fe3+ ions) [84,85] or via irradiation-induced crosslinking methods such as gamma irradiation [86,87]. However, these reagents are expensive and generate undesired residues, which are toxic to soils and plants [84,85]. A solution is their combination with other polymers such as carboxymethyl cellulose or acrylamide [84,86,88,89,90,91,92].
On the other hand, acrylamide (AM), one of the most widely employed polymers for the development of smart hydrogels, can be obtained via chemical modifications, employing crosslinkers (such as NMBA, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate), or via irradiation-induced crosslinking modifications such as gamma irradiation [85,93]. Among its derivatives, polyacrylamide (PAM) is traditionally used as a soil conditioner by enhancing the water retention capacity of soils because of the concatenation of acrylamide monomers [91,92,94,95,96,97,98], while methacrylic acid (MAA) forms pH-sensitive hydrogels with a high degree of swelling [99,100,101,102,103,104].
Moreover, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) are synthetic polymers that form hydrogels through diverse physical or chemical crosslinking methods, including freeze–thaw cycles, irradiation and the utilization of different crosslinkers, such as glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and their derivatives [105]. Specifically, these polymers are extensively employed as a substrate for promoting plant growth due to their low toxicity, mechanical stability and high water absorption [106,107,108,109,110,111,112].
Other alternative polymers include hydrophilic polyurethane (PU) and polyethylene glycol (PEG), which exhibit hydrophilicity and excellent mechanical properties. However, PU can be toxic to human health and the environment, while PEG is non-hazardous. Thus, current research focuses on optimizing PEG gelation processes to develop hydrogel materials with potential applications in water retention capacity [113,114,115].

2.2. Natural Polymers

Natural polymers (biopolymers) are derived from renewable sources and possess several desirable attributes, including biodegradability, abundance, and affordable price. These properties render them an excellent candidate for hydrogel fabrication (Table 4 and Table 5) while promoting the sustainable utilization of natural resources. However, researchers are attempting to develop new approaches to optimize their limited stability and mechanical properties [76,116,117]. They can be divided into polysaccharides and proteins, as described above.

2.2.1. Polysaccharides

Polysaccharides comprise a diverse array of monosaccharide units linked by glycosidic bonds and are particularly well-suited for agricultural purposes due to their hydrophilicity, availability and low cost [118,119]. Therefore, they are more commonly employed in CRFs and to reduce irrigation frequency, owing to their stability and the high water affinity of their hydrophilic functional groups [76,120]. Nevertheless, several challenges remain to be overcome to optimize their capacity to manufacture superabsorbent materials.
Chitin
Chitin is a polysaccharide that is the second most abundant biopolymer in nature. It is sourced from a diverse range of organisms, including crustaceans, insects and invertebrate animals [121,122]. Several studies have focused on the development of hydrogels based on this biopolymer, which can exhibit biodegradability, non-toxicity, as well as antibacterial and antiviral properties [121,123,124]. The results demonstrate that chitin is highly effective for use in soil culture media, facilitating the germination and growth of plants [125,126]. Moreover, incorporating nitrogen into soils due to its biodegradation is essential for these processes [126].
Table 4. Characteristics of different biopolymers used (polysaccharides and proteins) for the development of hydrogels in agriculture.
Table 4. Characteristics of different biopolymers used (polysaccharides and proteins) for the development of hydrogels in agriculture.
BiopolymersCharacteristicsReferences
PolysaccharidesChitin
  • Non-toxicity
  • Antibacterial and antiviral properties
[121,122,125,126,127]
Chitosan
  • Easily soluble in several organic acids
  • Antiviral, antibacterial and antifungal properties
  • Non-toxicity
  • Gelation methods: chemical crosslinkers (glutaraldehyde, epichlorohydrin), ionic compounds (lithium chloride) and pH change
[121,123,124,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145]
Sodium alginate
  • Poor mechanical properties at hydrated state
  • Enhancement in mechanical properties with divalent ions (i.e., Ca2+)
  • Distinctive water absorption capacity, allowing superabsorbent materials
[76,109,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163]
Agar
  • Mainly, combined with synthetic polymers (AA, MA …)
  • Renewability
  • Adequate response under drought conditions
[112,164,165,166,167,168,169,170]
K-carrageenan
  • Obtention from red algae
  • Gelation methods: cooling or presence of metallic ions
[171,172,173,174,175]
Starch
  • Abundance in plants
  • Inexpensive
  • Non-toxic
  • Good water retention
  • Gelation in 3 steps: (1) hydration, (2) destruction of granules, (3) cooling
  • Crosslinking with citric acid
[76,137,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184]
Cellulose
  • Most abundant polysaccharide
  • Presence of hydroxyl groups in its structure, allowing a hydrophilic nature
  • Gelation methods: chemical crosslinkers (epichlorohydrin, citric acid or iron (III) chloride hexahydrate)
  • Possibility of employing environmentally friendly crosslinkers
[54,76,171,173,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196]
Lignin
  • High thermal stability
  • Non-toxicity
  • Ease of availability
[82,151,197,198]
Xanthan gum
  • Gelation: chemical reagents (citric acid, sodium trimetaphosphate, tannic acid)
[199,200,201,202,203,204,205]
Guar gum
  • Hydrophilic nature
  • Benignity
[206,207,208,209]
ProteinsCollagen
  • Poor mechanical properties
  • Resistance to enzymatic degradation
  • Source of organic nitrogen for improvement in plant germination
[118,210,211,212]
Gelatin
  • Affordability
[140,146,213,214,215]
Keratin
  • Mechanical stability
[216,217,218]
Soy protein
  • Formation of superabsorbent materials due to the presence of aspartic and glutamic acids in its structure
[219,220,221]
Table 5. Applications of different biopolymers used (polysaccharides and proteins) for the development of hydrogels in agriculture.
Table 5. Applications of different biopolymers used (polysaccharides and proteins) for the development of hydrogels in agriculture.
BiopolymersApplicationReferences
PolysaccharidesChitin
  • Plant growth regulator, promoting seed germination
  • Nitrogen source in soils through biodegradation
[121,122,125,126,127]
Chitosan
  • Plant nutrients
  • Water reservoir
  • CRF
  • Antimicrobial properties
  • Enhancement of the diffusion coefficient of fertilizers
[121,123,124,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145]
Sodium alginate
  • Soil conditioner, reducing potassium and nitrogen ions
  • CRF through electrostatic interactions
[76,109,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163]
Agar
  • Water reservoir
  • Enhances microbial degradation
  • Promotion of crop growth
[112,164,165,166,167,168,169,170]
K-carrageenan
  • Plant stimulant, improving plant productivity and root development
  • Water reservoir
  • Metallic cations retainer
  • Encapsulation and controlled release of bioactive substances
[171,172,173,174,175]
Starch
  • Active agent carrier
  • Soil conditioner
[76,137,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184]
Cellulose
  • Nutrient-controlled release
  • Thermal stability
  • Soil water retention
[54,76,171,173,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196]
Lignin
  • Extends soil water retention, particularly in arid zones
  • Enhancement of the photosynthetic capacity of plants
[82,151,197,198]
Xanthan gum
  • CRF
  • Soil conditioner
  • Biostimulant
[199,200,201,202,203,204,205]
Guar gum
  • Water reservoir
  • Soil conditioner
[206,207,208,209]
ProteinsCollagen
  • Water reservoir
  • CRF
[118,210,211,212]
Gelatin
  • Improvement in shoot and root length under extreme conditions
  • Water reservoir
  • Nitrogen management
[140,146,213,214,215]
Keratin
  • CRF
  • Improvements in plant growth
[216,217,218]
Soy protein
  • Improvements in plant growth
  • CRF
  • Water reservoir
[219,220,221]
Chitosan
Chitosan is a polysaccharide derived from chitin, obtained through partial deacetylation (66–95%) of the aforementioned polymer. In particular, the degree of deacetylation is an essential characteristic, as it is intimately associated with the functionality of the biopolymer. Moreover, chitosan is easily soluble in several organic acids, such as acetic acid and formic acid, among others [121,124]. Its antiviral, antibacterial or antifungal properties, along with its renewability, biodegradability and non-toxicity, make it an essential component in soil fertilizers, particularly in the case of low molecular weight chitosan [121,123,124]. The production of hydrogels using chitosan can be achieved through different approaches: (i) the use of chemical crosslinkers such as glutaraldehyde [136] or epichlorohydrin [125], (ii) the incorporation of ionic compounds such as lithium chloride [126], and (iii) the application of a pH change using NaOH [142].
Thus, this biopolymer has been widely used, and its use in hydrogels promotes the controlled release of fertilizers. For instance, Suratman et al. (2020) [136] and Ladeira et al. (2021) [138] developed hydrogels based on chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan, which release 30% of NPK in 24 h. Similarly, Yuan et al. (2023) [140] synthesized hydrogels based on gelatin, chitosan and polylactic acid, which exhibited enhanced diffusion in comparison with pure urea, with a diffusion coefficient 1350 times longer.
Sodium Alginate
Sodium alginate is a polysaccharide derived from algae and bacteria and is a significant biopolymer used in agricultural applications. This biopolymer is notable for its properties, including non-toxicity, biodegradability and sustainability [76,161,222]. Specifically, alginate can be crosslinked by incorporating Ca2+. However, the utilization of this biopolymer is limited by several disadvantages, including its poor mechanical properties, particularly when the hydrogels are hydrated [161,162]. Most scientists have concentrated their efforts on the development of hydrogels using divalent ions, such as calcium instead of magnesium. This is due to the enhancement in mechanical properties that occurs when calcium ions are incorporated [162,163,223]. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that alginate-based hydrogels can be effectively employed in agricultural soils due to their rapid water absorption and ability to gradually release fertilizers by reducing potassium and nitrogen ions [109,160,224]. Similarly, Lv et al. (2024) [157] developed hydrogels by combining sodium alginate with starch, which enhanced the controlled release of urea by incorporating –OH groups that interact with urea and create electrostatic interactions with the soil. In addition, this type of hydrogel also exhibits another distinctive property, namely its capability to absorb water, which enables the production of superabsorbent materials [225]. In this sense, Song et al. (2020) [151] synthesized hydrogels by combining sodium alginate and konjac flour, demonstrating how these renewable hydrogels promoted vigorous growth in tomato plants, extending the growth cycle of these plants by 9–14 days under drought conditions.
Agar
Agar is a renewable resource derived from algae (mainly red and brown varieties). It can dissolve in water at temperatures around 83–85 °C. Specifically, this sulfated polysaccharide has been extensively employed as a gelling, thickening and stabilizing agent in the food industry [170,226]. However, this biopolymer has also been employed as a water reservoir in agriculture due to its biodegradability, non-toxicity, controlled release of agrochemicals and responsiveness to microbial degradation [112]. In this instance, this polysaccharide has been extensively used in conjunction with synthetic polymers such as acrylic acid, methacrylamide or methyl acrylate, using gelation methods based on free radical copolymerization with N, N-methylenebis(acrylamide) (crosslinker) and ammonium persulfate (initiator) [112,165]. However, to avoid the implications of non-renewable polymers, scientists such as Dissanayake et al. (2024) [166] have developed 3D-printed hydrogels that can release urea in a controlled manner for 72 h. Another alternative for enhancing their properties is blending with other biopolymers, such as sodium alginate, as reported by Singh et al. (2025) [227] for the controlled release of glyphosate herbicide. For instance, Merino et al. (2023) [169] combined agar with limonene and orange peel to produce a biopesticide, allowing for up to 5 cycles of swelling-deswelling and acting as a water source for tomato plants under drought conditions.
K-Carrageenan
K-carrageenan is a linear anionic polysaccharide extracted from red algae. It has been widely used as a plant stimulant, increasing plant productivity and root development [173,174,203]. The gelation of this biopolymer can be facilitated by cooling conditions or the presence of metallic ions, which are generally incorporated with other biopolymers, producing hybrid hydrogels [175]. Other applications include the encapsulation and release of bioactive substances. For example, Pandya et al. (2024) [172] developed chitosan-based hydrogels incorporating k-carrageenan, which exhibit a controlled release of urea, acting as a promising vehicle for agrochemical products as well as a soil conditioner. Similarly, Akalin et al. (2020) [173] elaborated hydrogels based on carboxymethyl cellulose and K-carrageenan, allowing a controlled release of zinc and showing good performance in wheatgrass growth. These results are related to the existence of carbohydrate molecules, comprising carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, which can be used for energy generation and incorporated into plant growth.
Starch
Starch is a polysaccharide whose structure is composed of a combination of amylose and amylopectin, which can be described as linear and non-linear forms of starch, respectively. This carbohydrate is abundant, inexpensive, non-toxic, and biodegradable, enabling the formation of hydrogels in agriculture that exhibit beneficial properties (such as good water retention and biodegradability) [76,182,228]. This compound is abundant in plants such as corn, rice, and potatoes, and its gelation can be developed through three relatively simple steps. The first step is initial hydration, during which the granules of starch absorb large amounts of water. The second step is the destruction of the granules as a result of their dissolution in water. Finally, cooling is performed to complete the gelation process [182,183,184,229]. There are studies in which this biopolymer has been combined with synthetic polymers such as acrylic acid or acrylamide through graft polymerization [110,181]. These studies have demonstrated that the incorporation of small quantities of acrylamide enhances the swelling ratio of the hydrogels (the highest value is 780 g/g), facilitating their utilization as water reservoirs in arid conditions and the development of pH-sensitive systems for the controlled delivery of agrochemical products [177]. Similarly, Gungula et al. (2021) [179] developed a starch-based hydrogel using borax as a crosslinking agent, demonstrating excellent water absorption and retention capacities and a controlled release of urea for 37.5 days. On the other hand, alternative methods for the formation of starchy hydrogels exist, such as chemical crosslinking using citric acid, which facilitates the controlled release of potassium and nitrogen [178].
Cellulose and Its Derivatives
Cellulose is one of the most abundant polysaccharides on Earth, and it can be found in cotton, wood, and numerous other plants. Specifically, this biopolymer is distinguished by the presence of multiple hydroxyl groups in its structure, which exhibit hydrophilic behavior, allowing for the absorption and retention of significant quantities of water [76,186,230]. Hydrogels can be prepared through physical crosslinking (hydrogen bonding) [231] or through chemical crosslinking, for example, using epichlorohydrin [193,194], citric acid [54,185,190,191] or iron (III) chloride hexahydrate [173,196]. Cellulose is a subject of considerable research interest, although it is possible to find studies that utilize cellulose derivatives due to its biocompatibility, the possibility of formation of hydrogels through physical or chemical crosslinking, its ability to disperse in water, and the possibility of using environmentally friendly crosslinkers [232,233,234,235]. One notable example is the study conducted by Shang et al. (2023) [189], in which carboxymethyl cellulose/acrylamide-based hydrogels were developed. These hydrogels exhibited excellent temperature sensitivity and swelling capability (up to 2056%), releasing 98% of the urea loaded over 6 h. On the other hand, Ahmad et al. (2023) [194] synthesized a controlled-release fertilizer using cellulose as a matrix and epichlorohydrin as a crosslinker, exhibiting a high swelling capacity, rendering it suitable for use in soil water retention. Moreover, another potential alternative for enhancing the mechanical properties of these hydrogels is through the combination with other biopolymers. This approach was exemplified in the research conducted by Charoenchaitrakool et al. (2024) [188], who synthesized hydrogels by blending carboxymethyl cellulose and gelatin, using glutaraldehyde as a crosslinker. This hydrogel demonstrated a promising application due to its sustainable release of urea over 17 cycles (considering a cycle as the procedure that consists of spilling an amount of 50 mL of deionized water on the hydrogel charged with urea and measuring the amount of urea released in the filtrate dissolution), optimizing urea retention. Finally, other studies have concentrated on the development of hydrogels using non-toxic and eco-friendly crosslinkers, such as citric acid. This approach was employed by Durpekova et al. (2020) [236] due to the ability of citric acid to generate hydrogels with the necessary rigidity to maintain their shape and a high swelling ratio.
Lignin
Lignin is the second most abundant biopolymer, following cellulose, and it provides rigidity and mechanical strength to plants, facilitating the transportation of nutrients. Its advantages include high thermal stability, biodegradability, non-toxicity, biocompatibility and ease of availability [82,151,198]. Therefore, this compound has been employed in agricultural applications as a soil conditioner in arid zones. The development of lignin-based hydrogels using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a crosslinker has demonstrated good swelling capacity, although it is lower than that of commercial acrylate-based hydrogels (34 g/g vs. 100 g/g) [197]. Moreover, most lignin-based hydrogels are produced through the blending of biopolymers, such as sodium alginate [151], which have been demonstrated to enhance the photosynthetic capacity of plants under drought conditions.
Xanthan Gum
Xanthan gum is a water-soluble, anionic and microbial polysaccharide widely used in plant regeneration due to its bio-stimulatory behavior [203]. The gelation process can be developed using different chemical agents, such as citric acid, sodium tri-metaphosphate (STMP) or tannic acid. These substances promote the formation of an esterification reaction between the crosslinker and the hydroxyl groups present in the xanthan gum structure [204,205]. The potential of xanthan gum-based hydrogels as soil conditioners for promoting plant growth has been previously investigated by Sorze et al. (2023) [201], who combined xanthan gum with cellulose fibers to develop hydrogels with enhanced water absorption and superior performance compared to commercial ones. On the other hand, Das et al. (2023) [202] developed hydrogels based on gelatin and xanthan gum using a cooling process that promoted a controlled release of urea for 32.5 days and demonstrated the ability to absorb high amounts of water after 5 cycles of reswelling. Moreover, these hydrogels were proposed as effective soil conditioners due to the results in the growth measurements of Okra plants.
Guar Gum
Guar gum is a non-ionic polymer with a high molecular weight extracted from the seeds of the guar plant, which belongs to the Leguminosae family. The hydrophilic nature, benignity, biocompatibility and biodegradability of this inexpensive polymer are among its most notable properties [208,209]. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been demonstrated to be an effective agent for the polymerization of guar gum-based hydrogels in combination with methyl methacrylate (MMA). This approach has been employed by Songara et al. (2021) [206] to create superabsorbent hydrogels with high swelling capabilities (52–110 g/g), which have been shown to confer drought tolerance to plants. Furthermore, the combination of guar gum with synthetic polymers is also possible, such as acrylic acid (as sought by Thombare et al. (2018)) [207], using ethylene glycol dimethacrylic acid (EGDMA) as a crosslinking agent to form water retention systems due to the high values for the swelling degree (470.2–806.2 g/g, depending on the solvent used).

2.2.2. Proteins

Proteins are a wide range of biological molecules that provide amino acids and bioactive peptides, and they have potential as alternatives to conventional petroleum-based synthetic polymers, being safe for humans and environmentally friendly [237]. In comparison to polysaccharides, their chemical structure is composed of numerous functional groups, which makes them more sensitive to external changes and capable of chemical modification [238].
Particularly, proteins can be mainly derived from animals and plants, highlighting the preference for plant-based products due to people’s concerns about health and diets as well as their potential alignment with sustainable sources not derived from animal ingredients [239]. On the one hand, animal proteins include different products such as collagen, gelatin, keratin, etc., whereas plant proteins include protein derived from zein, soy or wheat gluten, among others [240].
Generally, the gelling of animal proteins is higher than that of plant proteins; however, acting parameters such as pH, ionic strength and protein concentration affect the gelation properties [241]. Nevertheless, plant-derived proteins possess several advantages, such as low cost and the possibility of being obtained from available biomass, such as residues and by-products derived from agri-food waste [242]. Their gelation processes are mainly affected by the unfolding of the native protein [238], which can be achieved through relatively simple methods, including hydrophobic or electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds or heat treatment (Section 4) [51,116]. However, in general, these biopolymers are often combined with synthetic polymers or other biopolymers to form hybrid hydrogels [51]. Moreover, the use of proteins can enhance plant growth due to the presence of nitrogen in their structure and facilitate photosynthesis [243]. Nevertheless, protein-based hydrogels for agricultural applications are not widely explored, presenting opportunities for investigation [220].
Collagen (Gelatin)
Collagen is a protein that is naturally obtained from bone and animal skin. It displays poor mechanical properties and resistance to enzymatic degradation. Nevertheless, this element has been employed in several fields, such as tissue engineering, wound healing or food membranes [211,212,244]. Nowadays, there is a growing interest in the application of this compound for soil remediation purposes, particularly as a source of organic nitrogen, to enhance plant germination [212]. On the other hand, gelatin is a natural polymer derived from collagen that has also been widely used in the wound healing or cosmetic industries [76]. It possesses efficacious characteristics, such as biodegradability, affordability, and the capacity to form gels with ease [213].
Several studies involve the utilization of these compounds. For instance, Tzoumani et al. (2019) [210] developed hydrogels combining collagen with different polyacrylic acid derivatives, which demonstrated a controlled release of fertilizer.
Furthermore, an alternative method for the formation of hybrid hydrogels involves the blending of components such as polysaccharides with proteins. This approach was employed by El-diehy et al. (2024) [214], who researched the development of sodium alginate/gelatin-based hydrogels combined with polyacrylamide and produced by gamma irradiation. Specifically, these hydrogels exhibit enhanced swelling properties and are capable of retaining water for up to 36 days. Similarly, López-Velázquez et al. (2019) [215] developed hydrogels based on gelatin, starch and poly (vinyl alcohol), using a pH change followed by a decrease in temperature for the development of the gelation procedure, enhancing the water uptake capacity (10.8–12 g/g) and optimizing the biodegradation rates after 28 days.
Keratin
Keratin is a protein with a high percentage of amino acids that promotes numerous advantages, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability and mechanical stability. Thus, Wattie et al. (2018) [218] evaluated the properties of acrylic acid/keratin-based hydrogels obtained by graft polymerization, demonstrating their high swelling capacity in distilled water (pH = 7), with values between 335.47 and 501.58 g/g. Moreover, some works support the existence of hydrogels sensitive to external stimuli [216]. For example, two studies evaluated the optimization of the blending conditions of acrylic acid/keratin mixtures to obtain hydrogels with high swelling capacity. One study reported a swelling capacity of 1430.7% [216], while another reported a value of 666.67 g/g [217]. In both cases, the same initiator (ammonium persulfate) and the same crosslinker (NMBA) were used.
Soy Protein
Soy protein is a plant protein that contains a high proportion of aspartic and glutamic acids, which facilitates the formation of hydrogen bonds and enables the creation of superabsorbent materials [245]. This raw material has been widely used for the formation of bioplastic matrices for the controlled release of zinc [246]. However, there are only a few studies that have evaluated its use for the formation of hydrogels, with different gelation processes, such as thermal treatment [247] or the use of divalent ions [248]. Ardra Ashok et al. (2024) [220] conducted a study evaluating the behavior of soy protein as a hydrogel, developing polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and soy protein isolate (SPI) hydrogels using citric acid as both a crosslinker and a structuring agent. These hydrogels were able to control the release of urea over 28 days, with 74.1% of the total urea amount released.

2.3. Additives

A variety of additives (Figure 2) is available, depending on different classifications. Particularly, in this review article, 4 sections are distinguished, including organic and inorganic compounds, biological additives and nanomaterials.

2.3.1. Organic Additives

Firstly, the aforementioned synthetic and natural polymers can be employed as additives in the formulation, as well as other polymers such as PVA or PEG. However, interesting organic compounds include humic substances as well as compost. On the one hand, compost has been used for years as an organic amendment due to its potential to enhance soil properties while serving as organic matter. There is special interest in its combination with hydrogels using the compounds formed through the composting process [249]. Hence, one of the most novel materials added to hydrogels is humic substances, which are heterogeneous high-molecular-weight compounds formed during the composting of different residues, presenting a large number of functional groups that endow these substances with multiple characteristics (acid–base properties, amphiphilic nature, etc.) that are essential for the regulation of plant growth. As the majority of these functional groups are free in aqueous media, hydrogels can interact with these types of substances, participating in bonds and acting as natural pesticides while improving nutrient preservation or tolerance to drought stress [250,251]. For instance, Zeng et al. (2025) [252] modified gelatin hydrogels with the incorporation of humic substances, showing an increase in the swelling percentage of the material and maintaining moisture levels.

2.3.2. Inorganic Additives

Inorganic additives include a wide variety of materials such as minerals, zeolite, biochar, silicates, etc. Firstly, one alternative is hydroxyapatite, a phosphorus-containing mineral that is biocompatible, non-polluting and environmentally friendly. The primary investigations aim to develop a material for the controlled release of phosphorus, achieved through the slow release of PO43−, which enriches soil conditions and promotes plant growth, thereby avoiding eutrophication [253]. For example, Nooeaid et al. (2024) [254] developed materials based on alginate and incorporating hydroxyapatite, demonstrating an enhancement in plant growth.
On the other hand, alternative options include silicates and their derivatives. Silica, characterized by a tetrahedral structure, biocompatibility, high melting point, and good adsorption properties, is used in Portland cement, as an additive in food production and preservation, hydraulics, and pharmaceutical packaging [255]. In the agricultural field, silica modifies the physical, mechanical, and swelling characteristics of materials by introducing hydrophilic hydroxyl groups that can interact with other groups, forming physically crosslinked hydrogels and thereby reinforcing the mechanical strength of the hydrogel [256]. For instance, Ren et al. (2023) [257] modified a copper-alginate/chitosan hybrid hydrogel to use silica as a reinforcement for a soil fumigant that encapsulates fertilizer, improving the water-holding and retention capacity of the systems and helping in plant disease management and the maintenance of soil water conditions. Similarly, Hafezi et al. (2023) [258] developed a slow-release hydrogel that incorporated silicate derivatives (nano-clay) to enhance strength, resistance to chemical environments and long-term durability while reducing degradation rates.
Zeolite, a non-toxic crystalline aluminum silicate, has the capacity to promote the controlled release of agrochemical products due to an increase in the interactions between the hydrogel and the fertilizer [259,260]. For instance, Tanaka et al. (2023) [261] developed a hydrogel combining zeolite with chitosan or methylcellulose, promoting swelling values between 2.6 and 4.4 g/g in acidic pH while limiting fertilizer release. It is also possible for it to be incorporated into synthetic polymer-based hydrogels, such as the one synthesized by Songara et al. (2022) [262], who combined guar gum and acrylic acid, elaborating a hydrogel that could be used for soil conditioners, nutrient delivery vehicles and water reservoirs.
Moreover, addressing challenges such as climate change and increasing food demand, especially in developing countries, requires the incorporation of essential nutrients into soils [51]. In this sense, nitrogen is one of the principal and depleted nutrients in agricultural soils. It is typically supplied in the form of urea, which contains around 46 wt.% of nitrogen and is relatively cost-effective [16,263]. However, less than 50% of the applied nitrogen is effective due to surface runoff, leaching or vaporization, contributing to global warming and climate change [16,263,264,265]. Other essential nutrients include phosphorus, a critical component for plant growth. However, together with nitrogen, they can cause eutrophication, which not only results in environmental pollution but also poses health risks [16,264,265,266]. Thus, scientists have developed many researchers who have incorporated this nutrient, increasing the efficiency of controlled release of agrochemicals in a range of 6–30 days [159,193,267]. Other alternative options are hybrid fertilizers, which combine the elements with a limited number of secondary nutrients, such as calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), among others [268].
On the other hand, micronutrients are essential for several plant metabolic reactions (including amino acid production or photosynthesis). Hence, some studies focus on the utilization of copper oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles as nano-fertilizers, which can be easily absorbed by plants and provide controlled release of these elements in water and soil [269]. For example, Shang et al. (2021) [270] enhanced nutrient supply and lettuce plant growth by incorporating copper oxide into hydrogels while mitigating the environmental and health risks associated with high concentrations through controlled release.

2.3.3. Nanomaterials

Nanomaterials include nanoparticles, nanofibers and nanotubes, which are materials that can promote an enhancement in agricultural hydrogels through different crosslinking strategies and the incorporation of different nutrients [43,51,271]. However, due to the mainly hydrophobic nature of many nanomaterials, their incorporation into hydrogels for agricultural applications has not yet been extensively explored [43,271].
Although hydrogels have many attractive properties, their mechanical performance can be improved through various reinforcement methods, such as incorporating strong fibers and nanoparticles into the matrix [54,272]. Specifically, cellulose nanofibers are a promising material due to their nanometer diameter and increase specific surface area, exhibiting a high absorption capacity (an essential characteristic for water retention in agriculture) [193]. In fact, several studies incorporate different reinforcing materials, like those by Das et al. (2023) [54], who prepared cellulose-based hydrogels reinforced with nanofibers to improve mechanical strength and maintain soil vitality. Liu et al. (2021) [109] developed hydrogels based on sodium alginate, polyvinyl alcohol and cellulose nanofibers, significantly modifying the mechanical properties of the materials while allowing the controlled release of agrochemical compounds.
Graphene and other derivative compounds are highlighted due to their exceptional mechanical strength. Moreover, stabilization on the surface of the hydrogel is achieved for the controlled release of fertilizers and nutrients by incorporating these materials [114]. For instance, Liu et al. (2017) [273] elaborated on graphene oxide/cellulose-based hydrogels that possess both high thermal stability and good adsorption properties. In this line, Azeem et al. (2023) [114] combined guar gum and PEG, incorporating graphene oxide, forming a hydrogel that displays an enhancement in water retention, sustained boron release over 30 days and biodegradability.
However, there are other improvements in incorporating nanoparticles for crop protection, specifically through the nanoencapsulation of soil compounds like zein, which is a prolamin protein extracted from maize [274,275]. Specifically, the incorporation of these compounds provides active agents that possess a repellent activity, as shown by de Oliveira et al. (2020) [276], who prepared cellulose derivative-based hydrogels with zein nanoparticles, showing high repellent activity against the major agricultural pests.

2.3.4. Biological Additives

Finally, a recent trend involves the encapsulation or immobilization of microorganisms (including bacteria, fungi, among others) into hydrogel systems to achieve successful plant growth, protecting them against pests and pathogens while increasing soil quality because of their ability to secrete phytohormones that increase nutrient availability, phosphate solubility and nitrogen fixation. Moreover, at the same time, the hydrogel acts as a capsule that protects microorganisms against abiotic stress, thereby improving the moisture retention capacity of inoculants and serving as a biofertilizer [277,278]. For instance, Lima-Tenório et al. (2024) [279] encapsulated bacteria into synthetic-based hydrogels combined with gum arabic, which protected plants from adverse soil conditions while enhancing the fresh weight of maize shoots and roots due to a better associative relationship between the plant and bacteria. Similarly, Valle et al. (2025) [280] developed carboxymethylcellulose-based hydrogels that incorporated bacteria and provided safer storage of inoculants, achieving the supply of S while maintaining cell viability.
These innovative approaches not only demonstrate the versatility of hydrogels in sustainable agriculture but also open new avenues for research focused on optimizing microbial encapsulation for enhanced soil health, nutrient cycling and crop productivity.

3. Gelation Process of Hydrogels: Mechanisms and Stimuli for Gelation

The structural architecture of hydrogels is defined by interconnected polymeric networks, which are formed through the assembly of diverse polymer chains. Thus, gelation represents the process of polymeric networks forming in a solution of monomers or polymers [36,43,231]. This process may be further refined by utilizing different strategies, which include physical crosslinking, chemical crosslinking and irradiation-induced crosslinking techniques [281] (Figure 3).
In general, physical crosslinking occurs due to (i) hydrogen bonds, (ii) ionic interactions, (ii) hydrophobic interactions or crystallization, among others. These are weak interactions that can be changed by physical changes and do not promote modifications in chemical structure [6,282]. For instance, electrostatic interactions (also known as ionic interactions) can cause the stabilization of different networks [43,283]. This is evidenced by prior studies in which divalent ions (Ca2+) were added to alginate solutions [153] or trivalent ions (Fe3+) were employed in the formation of a hydrogel with carboxymethylcellulose [200].
In contrast, chemical crosslinking involves the formation of covalent bonds between polymer chains using different crosslinking reagents. For example, cellulose-based hydrogels can be prepared via physical or chemical crosslinking using compounds such as epichlorohydrin or citric acid [36,231,282,284]. Additional strategies for hydrogel network formation include different crosslinking strategies to reticulate different networks, such as the utilization of chemical elements as crosslinkers, like glutaraldehyde, for the preparation of gelatin [140], chitosan [136] or polylactic acid hydrogels, or the incorporation of epichlorohydrin in chitin solutions [125]. Another approach involves the addition of nanomaterials (e.g., montmorillonite, copper oxide nanoparticles, zein nanoparticles, cellulose nanofibers, among others) which allows the incorporation of these materials as additives (i.e., these materials do not prevent the incorporation of different crosslinkers) and promotes a modification of different properties (such as controlled agrochemical release, enhancement of mechanical properties or modification of absorption capacity) by the formation of different hydrogen bonds or van der Waals interactions [129,270,276,285]. An enzyme addition, such as transglutaminase, is also an alternative that can catalyze hydrogel crosslinking reactions; however, its application in agricultural hydrogels is limited due to stringent pH and temperature requirements [286].
Finally, an advanced technology is irradiation-induced crosslinking, which uses different sources of radiation (including gamma, electron bean or ultraviolet radiation), forming versatile materials [281].
However, there are different stimuli (Figure 3) that allow the formation of hydrogels such as temperature, electricity, light, magnetic field application, pH, enzymes, etc. [287]. The influence of temperature has been explored through the implementation of heating and cooling cycles, which promote the formation of non-covalent networks. For instance, gelatin is a compound that can form a hydrogel by decreasing the temperature by 5 °C, and similarly, drying–freezing cycles can be used to develop hydrogels using starch and cellulose as biopolymers [136,288]. Additionally, pH variations can trigger gelation in acid or base-induced gelation, as in the case of collagen and chitosan-based hydrogels, which undergo network formation upon the addition of NaOH; this system promotes the formation of a hydrogel network by linking hydrogen bonding [142,283]. Finally, ultraviolet and visible light, as well as irradiation, are widely used for the photoinitiation of molecules that absorb the incident radiation and trigger the formation of polymer networks. This approach has been primarily applied to synthetic polymers such as acrylic acid [89], vinyl polymers [109] and acrylamide [289], as shown in the literature.

4. Applications of Hydrogels in Agriculture

Among the main applications of hydrogels in agriculture, they are notable for their capacity to enable the controlled release of fertilizers, act as soil conditioners, improve water retention, and act as matrices for biostimulation and biofortification.

4.1. Controlled Release of Agrochemical Compounds

Firstly, one application of hydrogels in agriculture is the controlled release of agrochemical compounds, which needs to be synchronized with plant demand to optimize crop yield while reducing environmental contamination and providing economic benefits such as saving labor, time and energy. Particularly, the performance of CRFs is influenced by the presence of several hydrophilic groups, which can introduce functionality as well as factors including water solubility, microbiological decay, environmental temperature, particle size, and moisture content. Controlling these variables is essential for effective nutrient management, highlighting the differences in behavior in water compared to soil [290,291,292,293,294]. For instance, Supare et al. (2022) [137] developed chitosan–starch hydrogels that retarded the release of atrazine when compared with a commercial hydrogel, achieving a viability of 500 h. Table 6 summarizes selected studies on hydrogels incorporating fertilizers and herbicides. As observed, the main agrochemical studied is urea, which shows a longer controlled-release period when biopolymers such as starch or sodium alginate are employed, due to the possibility of crosslinking, thereby avoiding hazardous chemical emissions [295].
However, several mechanisms must be considered for the controlled release of agrochemical compounds. As described by Zanino et al. (2024) [301], the controlled release can be developed as a result of four mechanisms: (i) diffusion through water-filled pores, (ii) diffusion through the polymer network, (iii) matrix erosion and (iv) osmosis. Mainly, the first mechanism is typically found, and it is divided into three stages: (i) a lag phase, in which the agrochemical compound is released due to moisture entering the cavities; (ii) a steady-state phase, which occurs due to the swollen hydrogel from the diffusion of the concentration of the solution, promoting an immediate release; and (iii) a degradation stage, during which most of the compounds have been released [293,302,303]. This process can be influenced by multiple factors, such as the thickness of the material’s membrane or its water solubility. However, osmosis processes must also be considered, as they play a role in heterogeneous matrices such as soils, where water absorption is modified due to pressure that promotes pore expansion [278]. Optimizing the release time in relation to the time needed for the plant is necessary, which hinders the manufacturing process due to the broad number of possible plants and soils [304].
In any case, materials must possess good biodegradability to mitigate the contamination of soils by the formation of products such as organic matter, carbon dioxide and water [36]. This is important for petrochemical-based materials and synthetic polymers, which can form toxic products as well as microplastics; it is necessary to control polymerization to produce lower molecular weight hydrogels with reduced environmental impact [74]. On the other hand, natural polymers are decomposed by soil enzymes or microorganisms, resulting in structural changes [117]. The degradation rate is influenced by different factors, including pH, temperature, oxygen content, humidity, the presence of enzymes, heat, sunlight or the availability of nutrients [36,305]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the long-term accumulation of these types of materials in the soil, aiming to reduce their ecotoxicity and health risks, due to the existence of multiple studies at the lab scale, as displayed in Table 7.

4.2. Soil Conditioner and Water Retainer

Another typical application of this type of matrix is as a soil conditioner, due to its ability to mitigate the effects of salinity while promoting plant growth and maintaining soil structure. Specifically, hydrogels are materials that improve porosity, density, structure, permeability and aeration, reducing compaction and improving microbial activity, which are essential for mitigating the degradation of soils caused by conventional fertilizers [308,309,310]. Therefore, these materials have an important impact on plant growth, as shown in the studies displayed in Table 8, which particularly focus on the increase in root weight, number of fruits, extension of the growth cycle, etc. However, as observed, these types of analyses are mainly developed under laboratory conditions, making their translation to real crops necessary to ensure the correct behavior for transitioning from conventional soil conditions to hydrogels [295].
This property is generally related to their ability to act as water retainers, a property that is crucial for ensuring water conservation in agricultural activities under drought conditions. Their water retention capacity, however, can be modified due to the multitude of soil characteristics, including hydraulic properties, aggregate stability and textures. In this context, researchers generally evaluate their swelling capacity (Table 9), which is influenced by a multitude of factors, such as pH and ionic strength. Qin et al. (2022) [311] synthesized cellulose-based hydrogels that functioned as soil amendments, increasing water uptake in wheat plants by 94.7% and improving the average number of leaves in comparison to potassium polyacrylate.
Table 8. Effect of hydrogels on plant growth, including information about the main polymer used.
Table 8. Effect of hydrogels on plant growth, including information about the main polymer used.
Main PolymerEffect on Plant GrowthReference
Cellulose and polylactic acidEnhanced the growth and survival rate of Raphanus sativus and Phaseolus vulgaris by 20%[300]
Starch, polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl alcoholImprovement in chili plant growth[110]
Carboxymethyl celluloseMore significant cucumber seed germination[186]
Carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl celluloseHydrogels tripled the time during which the soil remained humid [312]
Gum arabic, acrylic acidA 20% increase in the diameter and volume of roots in maize plants[279]
Carboxymethyl cellulose, acrylic acidHydrogels promoted plant growth and germination in 28 days[88]
Gelatin, methacrylamide, agarEnhancement of the retention of water in chickpea plants[165]
Agar, activated carbonPlants with hydrogels showed better and more uniform growth than those without hydrogels[164]
Chitosan, polyvinyl alcoholThe implementation of hydrogels increased the stem length and diameter by approximately 20% in watermelon[313]
Sodium alginate, lignosulfonate, konjacUnder extreme conditions, hydrogels were able to extend the growth cycle of the plant by 9–14 days[151]
ChitinSeeds germinated very quickly when using soilless culture media[125]
Sodium alginateHydrogels promoted the growth of maize seedlings by continuously providing water and nutrients that the plant needs[157]

4.3. Enhancers of the Soil Biological Activity

Finally, these materials can also be applied for biostimulation purposes because of their ability to stimulate soil biological activity [314,315]. For instance, de Carvalho et al. (2024) [316] developed a gelatin-based hydrogel coated with urea, which exhibited a notable effect on lettuce seeds, resulting in significant improvements in germination and plant growth. Similarly, Nuzzo et al. (2020) [317] reported the development of hydrogels incorporating different humic-like substances, highlighting their potential for direct use as plant biostimulants. As a matter of fact, hydrogels can also be utilized for crop biofortification, which is based on enriching food with essential dietary micronutrients. For instance, Afnan et al. (2024) [318] reported the use of hydrogels to enhance the availability of vitamin C. Similarly, Mikula et al. (2020, 2024) [319,320] developed different biobased hydrogels containing zinc, manganese and copper as micronutrients, promising their application for the development of biofortified foods through the generation of sprouts enriched with these elements.
Table 9. Water swelling capacity (WSC) of different hydrogels, including information on the main polymer used and the conditions of the experiment.
Table 9. Water swelling capacity (WSC) of different hydrogels, including information on the main polymer used and the conditions of the experiment.
Main PolymerConditionsWSC (g/g)Reference
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcoholDistilled water at a media temperature between 10 and 40 °C5.00–18.40[321]
Xanthan gum, gelatinDistilled water at 25 °C9.80–25.00[202]
Gelatin, chitosan, polyvinyl alcoholDistilled water10.80–12.00[215]
LigninDistilled water34.00[197]
AlginateDeionized water3.09[322]
Cellulose, carboxymethyl celluloseDistilled water at 26 °C14.50–20.55[194]
ChitosanDistilled water2.49–3.25[323]
Starch, poly(vinyl alcohol)pH 7 and 25 °C5.0–12.00[324]
Carboxymethyl cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidoneDistilled water at room temperature130.00–144.00[325]
Carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl celluloseDistilled water30.00–80.00[312]
ChitosanpH 1 at room temperature0.80–0.90[136]
Chitosan, gelatin, polylactic acidDeionized water at 25 °C44.48[140]

5. Challenges

Hydrogels have gained special interest within the methods employed in sustainable agriculture due to a multitude of their characteristics compared to other conventional materials. Thus, it is possible to distinguish different advantages in their use, such as:
  • Their water absorption capacity is much higher than that of other organic mulches, charcoal or other conventional plastic mulches [51].
  • Intelligent systems capable of responding to stimuli highlight their ability to modulate the delivery of such nutrients compared to conventional fertilizers or those with controlled release [295].
  • Soil properties and microbial activity improve, since they are environmentally friendly, provide a fixed content of organic matter and lack of pathogens compared to organic amendments or the carbon trapping caused by charcoal [74].
However, despite their multiple advantages, hydrogels present several challenges that researchers must address.
  • Firstly, it is necessary to optimize the appropriate amount of polymer, aiming to achieve an adequate degree of crosslinking while avoiding negative effects. This concentration will vary depending on the type of biopolymer as well as its chemical properties (e.g., molecular weight, viscosity, among others). Nonetheless, the combination of different formulations must be considered to enhance the synergistic effects of the compounds, such as the combination of polysaccharides with proteins as a source of nitrogen. Likewise, the incorporation of different crosslinkers for the development of chemically and enzymatically crosslinked hydrogels must be considered to avoid toxicity and potential harm to soils [326].
  • Moreover, the key properties of hydrogels that enable them to act as water reservoirs are their ability to retain water and saline solutions. Therefore, it is necessary to measure these properties and their release into soils, particularly given the ability of cryogels (which are a special type of hydrogel) to undergo multiple swelling–shrinking cycles under different external stimuli. Another alternative is their utilization as matrices for the controlled release of agrochemical compounds, whose incorporation must be characterized to ensure a proper response, allowing their release in soil and being directly linked to the characteristics of the hydrogel. Importantly, release profiles should align with peak plant nutrient demands to prevent leaching or depletion [327,328,329].
  • With respect to their incorporation into soils, it is necessary to evaluate the properties of soils before and after the incorporation of the matrices, aiming to avoid pollution due to various possible causes (acidification or alkalinization of soils, which can alter the availability of macronutrients and micronutrients; formation of carbonates; and a decrease in organic matter content, which worsens due to the overuse of chemical fertilizers and which needs to be maintained in equilibrium to support soil development, etc.). Nonetheless, biodegradability into non-toxic products must be achieved to prevent environmental contamination, as well as characterization of the effects of microorganisms present in soils [36,43,330].
  • It is also essential to evaluate the effects of hydrogels on plants. Although the incorporation of a porous gelled matrix into soils will not be detrimental to plant growth, several factors must be considered to ensure agricultural production. Thus, the germination rate, number of leaves, total biomass, presence of different nutrients in the fruits and overall crop yield must be evaluated. Additionally, toxicity tests are required to prevent potential risks to human health [331,332].
  • Moreover, the stability of micronutrients in the soil, their absorption by roots, interactions with other nutrients, and possible losses due to leaching are essential to evaluate for biofortification applications [333,334].
  • Industrially, a cost–benefit balance is essential. Hydrogels can be produced from treated residues and by-products from agricultural, industrial and marine sources, which can be treated to obtain different biopolymers [335,336,337]. However, their cost is often prohibitive for smallholder farmers in comparison with other traditional methods, such as mulching or composting [62], highlighting the need for scalable methods for their manufacture [338].
  • It is necessary to take into consideration the existence of laws that ensure safe use of biopolymers and nanomaterials; particularly in Europe, the main regulating laws are Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 and REACH for chemical substances, while EFSA develops specific guidelines for assessing the risks of nanomaterials in the food chain. Hence, these regulations limit the use of hydrogels by evaluating their toxicity, biodegradability, ecotoxicity, as well as persistence in soils [339].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

This review contextualizes the state-of-the-art of hydrogels applied in agriculture, which has undergone significant advancements in recent years. Current research primarily focuses on developing biopolymer-based hydrogels that exhibit unique properties due to their non-toxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable nature, thereby highlighting the potential for promoting a circular economy in which agri-food waste and by-products can find new applications. Moreover, the combination of these biopolymers with other established compounds is being explored to enhance their intrinsic characteristics and reduce reliance on synthetic polymers, whose biodegradation rate is relatively slow. Numerous studies have demonstrated that hydrogels have the potential to serve as effective carriers for nutrients and water, thereby promoting plant growth in drought conditions or enhancing soil quality.
However, there are still some challenges with the development of these multifaceted materials that scientists should focus on:
  • Hydrogel composition and performance. The composition of biopolymer-based hydrogels must be carefully evaluated to avoid negative impacts. Therefore, because of their ability to be modified by external factors (pH, temperature or ion concentration), it is necessary to assess the changes in their efficiency under unfavorable conditions (high temperatures, soil compaction or salinization). This includes in-depth studies of the mechanical properties of the hydrogels to optimize their water retention capacity while maintaining ease of handling and application.
  • Soil compatibility. The survival of soil microorganisms must be ensured, requiring a thorough evaluation of hydrogel–soil interactions by studying multiple characteristics such as soil texture, soil composition, biodegradation rates and changes in microbial populations to ensure compatibility and environmental safety.
  • Nutrient release. Nutrient release has been widely studied for macronutrients (such as nitrogen and phosphorus), but it must be expanded to include micronutrients (like zinc, copper, etc.), particularly those that are deficient in the population, to encourage crop biofortification strategies.
  • Plant response optimization. The effectiveness of hydrogels must be assessed through parameters such as germination rate, root and shoot length, biomass, crop yield or seed composition. The need for hydrogels depends on the specific requirements of each plant species.
  • Industrial considerations. Scaling up hydrogel production is necessary to optimize production processes, reduce costs and improve scalability, thereby enabling practical and economically viable field applications.
In conclusion, the synthesis and application of hydrogels for agricultural purposes remain a dynamic and challenging area of research, necessitating significant advancements in several areas, including the development of innovative strategies for creating superabsorbent materials to address water scarcity, the use of protein as raw material and primary source of nitrogen for fertilization, the integration of nanomaterials to enhance the mechanical and functional properties of the hydrogels and the establishment of in vivo studies to evaluate their impact on plant growth. Additionally, standardized testing protocols for agricultural hydrogels, long-term field trials, cost analyses, farmer adoption, and regulatory harmonization across regions are needed. Furthermore, expanding hydrogel applications to biofortified crops could play a critical role in combating malnutrition and improving global food security. With continued innovation and a commitment to sustainable development, hydrogels represent a transformative tool for sustainable agriculture, capable of enhancing water efficiency, nutrient delivery, and crop resilience, while contributing to a circular bioeconomy and global food security.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.-R. and C.M.G.-C.; Methodology, C.M.G.-C.; Validation, M.J.-R. and A.R.; Formal analysis, V.M.P.-P.; Investigation, C.M.G.-C.; Resources, M.J.-R. and A.R.; Data curation, C.M.G.-C.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.M.G.-C.; Writing—review and editing, V.M.P.-P., M.J.-R. and A.R.; Visualization, C.M.G.-C.; Supervision, V.M.P.-P. and A.R.; Project administration, V.M.P.-P. and A.R.; Funding acquisition, A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support for project ref. PID2024-155967OB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF(EU). Moreover, this article’s research is part of the applied research and innovation project “Desarrollo de matrices proteicas para la liberación controlada de nutrientes y agua en horticultura (SOL2024-31712)”, co-funded by UE—Ministerio de Hacienda y Función Pública—Fondos Europeos—Junta de Andalucía—Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data were generated during this review article.

Acknowledgments

During manuscript preparation, the authors used Grammarly (https://www.grammarly.com/ accessed on 13 March 2026) for grammar checks, which were rigorously reviewed, edited, and validated by the authors, who assume full responsibility for the work’s integrity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO/Marco Longari. Better Land, Soil and Water Management Key to Feeding 10 Billion People, FAO Warns. Available online: https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/better-land--soil-and-water-management-key-to-feeding-10-billion-people--fao-warns/en (accessed on 7 March 2026).
  2. Relf, D. Human Issues in Horticulture. Horttechnology 1992, 2, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050. Available online: https://www.fao.org/global-perspectives-studies/food-agriculture-projections-to-2050/en/ (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  4. Maroto Borrego, J.V. Elementos de Horticultural General, 3rd ed.; Ediciones Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 2008; ISBN 978-84-8476-3413. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghobashy, M.M. The Application of Natural Polymer-Based Hydrogels for Agriculture. In Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 329–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grabowska-Polanowska, B.; Garbowski, T.; Bar-Michalczyk, D.; Kowalczyk, A. The Benefits of Synthetic or Natural Hydrogels Application in Agriculture: An Overview Article. J. Water Land Dev. 2021, 51, 139032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chaudhry, S.; Sidhu, G.P.S. Climate Change Regulated Abiotic Stress Mechanisms in Plants: A Comprehensive Review. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Agrimonti, C.; Lauro, M.; Visioli, G. Smart Agriculture for Food Quality: Facing Climate Change in the 21st Century. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Pajač Živković, I.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. Effect of Climate Change on Introduced and Native Agricultural Invasive Insect Pests in Europe. Insects 2021, 12, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Subedi, B.; Poudel, A.; Aryal, S. The Impact of Climate Change on Insect Pest Biology and Ecology: Implications for Pest Management Strategies, Crop Production, and Food Security. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Penuelas, J.; Coello, F.; Sardans, J. A Better Use of Fertilizers Is Needed for Global Food Security and Environmental Sustainability. Agric. Food Secur. 2023, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mahmud, A.A.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Srivastava, A.K.; Bhojiya, A.A. Biofertilizers: A Nexus between Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity under Abiotic Stress. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 3, 100063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. López Dávila, E.; Martínez Castro, Y.; Romero Romero, O. Características y Consecuencias Adversas a La Salud Humana de Agroquímicos Usados En La Agricultura Cubana. Rev. Cub. Salud Publica 2022, 48, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meena, R.; Kumar, S.; Datta, R.; Lal, R.; Vijayakumar, V.; Brtnicky, M.; Sharma, M.; Yadav, G.; Jhariya, M.; Jangir, C.; et al. Impact of Agrochemicals on Soil Microbiota and Management: A Review. Land 2020, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Skrzypczak, D.; Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; Dawiec-Liśniewska, A.; Moustakas, K.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. New Directions for Agricultural Wastes Valorization as Hydrogel Biocomposite Fertilizers. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vejan, P.; Khadiran, T.; Abdullah, R.; Ahmad, N. Controlled Release Fertilizer: A Review on Developments, Applications and Potential in Agriculture. J. Control. Release 2021, 339, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, T.; Mei, Y.; Xu, L.; Yu, H.; Chen, Y. Application of Question Answering Systems for Intelligent Agriculture Production and Sustainable Management: A Review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 204, 107497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ashitha, A.; Rakhimol, K.R.; Jyothis, M. Fate of the Conventional Fertilizers in Environment. In Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 25–39. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sardarmehni, M.; Levis, J.W.; Barlaz, M.A. What Is the Best End Use for Compost Derived from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Choudhury, D.; Kumar, P.; Zhimo, V.Y.; Sahoo, J. Crop Rotation Patterns and Soil Health Management. In Bioremediation of Emerging Contaminants from Soils; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 565–589. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shaji, H.; Chandran, V.; Mathew, L. Organic Fertilizers as a Route to Controlled Release of Nutrients. In Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 231–245. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bergstrand, K.-J. Organic Fertilizers in Greenhouse Production Systems—A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 295, 110855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Baddeley, J.A.; Pappa, V.A.; Pristeri, A.; Bergkvist, G.; Monti, M.; Reckling, M.; Schläfke, N.; Watson, C.A. Legume-Based Green Manure Crops. In Legumes in Cropping Systems; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2017; pp. 125–138. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ali, S.S.; Kornaros, M.; Manni, A.; Al-Tohamy, R.; El-Shanshoury, A.E.-R.R.; Matter, I.M.; Elsamahy, T.; Sobhy, M.; Sun, J. Advances in Microorganisms-Based Biofertilizers: Major Mechanisms and Applications. In Biofertilizers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 371–385. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ibáñez, A.; Garrido-Chamorro, S.; Vasco-Cárdenas, M.; Barreiro, C. From Lab to Field: Biofertilizers in the 21st Century. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Perez-Puyana, V.; Guerrero, A.; Romero, A. Bioplastic Matrices for Sustainable Agricultural and Horticultural Applications. In Bioplastics for Sustainable Development; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 399–429. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Castro-Criado, D.; Rubio-Valle, J.F.; Perez-Puyana, V.M.; Romero, A. Biodegradable Soy Protein-Based Tablets for the Controlled Release of Zinc. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 211, 118261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cárceles Rodríguez, B.; Durán-Zuazo, V.H.; Soriano Rodríguez, M.; García-Tejero, I.F.; Gálvez Ruiz, B.; Cuadros Tavira, S. Conservation Agriculture as a Sustainable System for Soil Health: A Review. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Zarate-Ramírez, L.S.; Romero, A.; Bengoechea, C.; Partal, P.; Guerrero, A. Bioplastics Based on Wheat Gluten Processed by Extrusion. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 117994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Agrahar-Murugkar, D. Food to Food Fortification of Breads and Biscuits with Herbs, Spices, Millets and Oilseeds on Bio-Accessibility of Calcium, Iron and Zinc and Impact of Proteins, Fat and Phenolics. LWT 2020, 130, 109703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Di Foggia, M.; Rosignoli, S.; Guerrero, A.; Rombolà, A.D.; Romero, A. Effect of Zinc and Protein Content in Different Barley Cultivars: Use of Controlled Release Matrices. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2023, 38, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Felix, M.; Perez-Puyana, V.; Romero, A.; Guerrero, A. Development of Protein-based Bioplastics Modified with Different Additives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alonso-González, M.; Felix, M.; Romero, A.; Sergi, C.; Bavasso, I.; Sarasini, F. Lab-Scale Biocomposite Manufacturing: Exploring Rice Bran-Based Bioplastics Reinforced with Natural Fillers through Extrusion and Injection Molding. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 212, 107990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Perez-Puyana, V.; Rubio-Valle, J.F.; Guerrero, A.; Romero, A. Evaluation of Superabsorbent Capacity of Soy Protein-Based Bioplastic Matrices with Incorporated Fertilizer for Crops. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 2661–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alonso-González, M.; Ramos, M.; Bengoechea, C.; Romero, A.; Guerrero, A. Evaluation of Composition on Processability and Water Absorption of Wheat Gluten-Based Bioplastics. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 1434–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaur, P.; Agrawal, R.; Pfeffer, F.M.; Williams, R.; Bohidar, H.B. Hydrogels in Agriculture: Prospects and Challenges. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 3701–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aswathy, S.H.; Narendrakumar, U.; Manjubala, I. Commercial Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Varaprasad, K.; Raghavendra, G.M.; Jayaramudu, T.; Yallapu, M.M.; Sadiku, R. A Mini Review on Hydrogels Classification and Recent Developments in Miscellaneous Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 79, 958–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ho, T.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chan, H.P.; Chung, T.W.; Shu, C.W.; Chuang, K.P.; Duh, T.H.; Yang, M.H.; Tyan, Y.C. Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules 2022, 27, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, X.; Gong, J.P. Design Principles for Strong and Tough Hydrogels. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2024, 9, 380–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Y.; Bae, J.; Fang, Z.; Li, P.; Zhao, F.; Yu, G. Hydrogels and Hydrogel-Derived Materials for Energy and Water Sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7642–7707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, S.S.; Ji, S.M.; Park, M.J.; Suneetha, M.; Uthappa, U.T. Pectin Based Hydrogels for Drug Delivery Applications: A Mini Review. Gels 2022, 8, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Qin, C.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Qi, Y.; Wu, N.; Zhang, S.; Xu, W. Recent Advances of Hydrogel in Agriculture: Synthesis, Mechanism, Properties and Applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 219, 113376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sahranavard, M.; Zamanian, A.; Ghorbani, F.; Shahrezaee, M.H. A Critical Review on Three Dimensional-Printed Chitosan Hydrogels for Development of Tissue Engineering. Bioprinting 2020, 17, e00063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhu, J.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Ye, Y.; Cao, M.; Gao, L.; Jiao, T. Preparation of PdNPs Doped Chitosan-Based Composite Hydrogels as Highly Efficient Catalysts for Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 611, 125889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Das, S.K.; Ghosh, G.K. Hydrogel-Biochar Composite for Agricultural Applications and Controlled Release Fertilizer: A Step towards Pollution Free Environment. Energy 2022, 242, 122977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Z.; Rahman, F.; Rumi, S.S.; Turner, C.; Abidi, N. Repurposing Cottonseed Meal as Dye Biosorbent. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 208, 107711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kratochvílová, R.; Kráčalík, M.; Smilková, M.; Sedláček, P.; Pekař, M.; Bradt, E.; Smilek, J.; Závodská, P.; Klučáková, M. Functional Hydrogels for Agricultural Application. Gels 2023, 9, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ding, C.; Zhang, S.; Fu, X.; Liu, T.; Shao, L.; Fei, M.; Hao, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhong, W.H. Robust Supramolecular Composite Hydrogels for Sustainable and “Visible” Agriculture Irrigation. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2021, 9, 24613–24621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Singh, N.; Agarwal, S.; Jain, A.; Khan, S. 3-Dimensional Cross Linked Hydrophilic Polymeric Network “Hydrogels”: An Agriculture Boom. Agric. Water Manag. 2021, 253, 106939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, G. Hydrogels as Water and Nutrient Reservoirs in Agricultural Soil: A Comprehensive Review of Classification, Performance, and Economic Advantages. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 26, 24653–24685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Palanivelu, S.D.; Armir, N.A.Z.; Zulkifli, A.; Hair, A.H.A.; Salleh, K.M.; Lindsey, K.; Che-Othman, M.H.; Zakaria, S. Hydrogel Application in Urban Farming: Potentials and Limitations—A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cai, J.; Zhang, D.; Xu, W.; Ding, W.P.; Zhu, Z.Z.; He, J.R.; Cheng, S.Y. Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels Derived from Cellulose: The Architecture Change from Nanofibers to Hydrogels for a Putative Dual Function in Dye Wastewater Treatment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9725–9732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Das, D.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Bhaladhare, S. Preparation of Cellulose Hydrogels and Hydrogel Nanocomposites Reinforced by Crystalline Cellulose Nanofibers (CNFs) as a Water Reservoir for Agriculture Use. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 2895–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Badgar, K.; Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Prokisch, J. Sustainable Applications of Nanofibers in Agriculture and Water Treatment: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yousef, S.; Hamdy, M.; Tatariants, M.; Tuckute, S.; El-Abden, S.Z.; Kliucininkas, L.; Baltusnikas, A. Sustainable Industrial Technology for Recovery of Cellulose from Banknote Production Waste and Reprocessing into Cellulose Nanocrystals. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Krasnopeeva, E.L.; Panova, G.G.; Yakimansky, A.V. Agricultural Applications of Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. GrowMania HidroGel Retenedor de Agua Control Garden. Available online: https://www.growmania.es/sustrato-para-plantas/hidrogel-retenedor-de-agua-1kg-control-garden.html (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  59. Plara Hidrogel Para Plantas 1KG de Retención de Agua|Control de Humedad Para Sustrato Para Plantas|Gel de Riego No Tóxicas de Liberación Lenta|Agua En Gel Ecológicos. Available online: https://www.amazon.es/dp/B0DF7SG7KK/ref=sspa_mw_detail_0?ie=UTF8&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9waG9uZV9kZXRhaWwp13NParams&th=1 (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  60. Ali, K.; Asad, Z.; Agbna, G.H.D.; Saud, A.; Khan, A.; Zaidi, S.J. Progress and Innovations in Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Okeke, E.S.; Okoye, C.O.; Atakpa, E.O.; Ita, R.E.; Nyaruaba, R.; Mgbechidinma, C.L.; Akan, O.D. Microplastics in Agroecosystems-Impacts on Ecosystem Functions and Food Chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 177, 105961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Agbna, G.H.D.; Zaidi, S.J. Hydrogel Performance in Boosting Plant Resilience to Water Stress—A Review. Gels 2025, 11, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alquera Ciencia SL Hidrogel Para Plantas. Available online: https://www.alquera.com/hidrogel/?attribute_pa_cantidad=5kg (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  64. Qingdao SOCO New Material Co., Ltd. Potassium Polyacrylate—SOCO. Available online: https://www.socopolymer.com/potassium-polyacrylate.html (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  65. Chemtex Speciality Ltd. Alsta Hydrogel—Super Absorbent Polymer for Agriculture. Available online: https://hydrogelagriculture.wordpress.com/ (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  66. Novingrecons SLU Cubo 05 Kg Retenedor Agua Gel. Grano Micro 660. Available online: https://novingrecons.com/shop/8437017064190-cubo-05-kg-retenedor-agua-gel-grano-micro-660-1754#attr= (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  67. ILSA The Green Evolution. AGROGEL—Gelatine for Agricultural Use. Available online: https://www.agrogel.it/en/agrogel-gelatine-for-agricultural-use/ (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  68. Ahmad Bhat, S.; Nazir, B.; Nissar, N.; Salam, S.; Mehraj Ud Din, S.; Ahmed Bahar, F.; Ahmad Raja, W. The Critical Necessity of the Future: Pusa Hydrogel, A Novel Approach to Convert Desert into Farmland. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 2022, 7, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar]
  69. Acuro Organics Limited Super Absorbent Polymer for Agriculture, Packaging Type: Bag, Packaging Size: 25 Kg. Available online: https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/super-absorbent-polymer-for-agriculture-6266691512.html?srsltid=AfmBOoqsvv6Dj07HvnOaDHinwSToosr8R9OCUG7vz_lJp2EaRxPtB-0s (accessed on 13 March 2026).
  70. Zhu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wen, Y.; Song, X.; Tan, W.K.; Ong, C.N.; Li, J. Recent Advances in Superabsorbent Hydrogels Derived from Agro Waste Materials for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 22399–22419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gong, L.; Passari, A.K.; Yin, C.; Kumar Thakur, V.; Newbold, J.; Clark, W.; Jiang, Y.; Kumar, S.; Gupta, V.K. Sustainable Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Waste Bioresources for Bioplastics Production. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 44, 236–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Morone, P.; Koutinas, A.; Gathergood, N.; Arshadi, M.; Matharu, A. Food Waste: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing the Emerging Bio-Economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 221, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Devre, P.V.; Gore, A.H. Agro-Waste Valorization into Carbonaceous Eco-Hydrogel: A Circular Economy and Zero Waste Tactic for Doxorubicin Removal in Water/Wastewater. Langmuir 2024, 40, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Adjuik, T.A.; Nokes, S.E.; Montross, M.D. Biodegradability of Bio-based and Synthetic Hydrogels as Sustainable Soil Amendments: A Review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, e53655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gupta, S.K.; Panwar, P.; Banyal, R.; Ramanan, S.S. Forest Soils. In Textbook of Forest Science; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 165–189. [Google Scholar]
  76. Tariq, Z.; Iqbal, D.N.; Rizwan, M.; Ahmad, M.; Faheem, M.; Ahmed, M. Significance of Biopolymer-Based Hydrogels and Their Applications in Agriculture: A Review in Perspective of Synthesis and Their Degree of Swelling for Water Holding. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 24731–24754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pettinelli, N. Desarrollo de Nuevos Hidrogeles Para Aplicaciones Biomédicas. Ph.D Thesis, Universidade da Coruña, Coruña, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  78. Behera, S.; Mahanwar, P.A. Superabsorbent Polymers in Agriculture and Other Applications: A Review. Polym. Plast. Technol. Mater. 2020, 59, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahmed, E.M. Hydrogel: Preparation, Characterization, and Applications: A Review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dhiman, A.; Sharma, A.K.; Agrawal, G. Polymer Based Engineered Materials for Sustainable Agriculture. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 693–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Satchanska, G.; Davidova, S.; Petrov, P.D. Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Polymers 2024, 16, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kaur, R.; Sharma, R.; Chahal, G.K. Synthesis of Lignin-Based Hydrogels and Their Applications in Agriculture: A Review. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 4465–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhong, M.; Liu, Y.-T.; Liu, X.-Y.; Shi, F.-K.; Zhang, L.-Q.; Zhu, M.-F.; Xie, X.-M. Dually Cross-Linked Single Network Poly(Acrylic Acid) Hydrogels with Superior Mechanical Properties and Water Absorbency. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 5420–5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cheng, D.; Liu, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhang, A. Water- and Fertilizer-Integrated Hydrogel Derived from the Polymerization of Acrylic Acid and Urea as a Slow-Release N Fertilizer and Water Retention in Agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5762–5769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sennakesavan, G.; Mostakhdemin, M.; Dkhar, L.K.; Seyfoddin, A.; Fatihhi, S.J. Acrylic Acid/Acrylamide Based Hydrogels and Its Properties—A Review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2020, 180, 109308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghobashy, M.M.; El-Damhougy, B.K.; El-Wahab, H.A.; Madani, M.; Amin, M.A.; Naser, A.E.M.; Abdelhai, F.; Nady, N.; Meganid, A.S.; Alkhursani, S.A.; et al. Controlling Radiation Degradation of a CMC Solution to Optimize the Swelling of Acrylic Acid Hydrogel as Water and Fertilizer Carriers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bhuyan, M.M.; Chandra Dafader, N.; Hara, K.; Okabe, H.; Hidaka, Y.; Rahman, M.M.; Mizanur Rahman Khan, M.; Rahman, N. Synthesis of Potato Starch-Acrylic-Acid Hydrogels by Gamma Radiation and Their Application in Dye Adsorption. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2016, 2016, 9867859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, H.; Wang, B.; Feng, Y. Hydrochar-Embedded Carboxymethyl Cellulose-g-Poly(Acrylic Acid) Hydrogel as Stable Soil Water Retention and Nutrient Release Agent for Plant Growth. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2022, 7, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jabbari, E.; Nozari, S. Swelling Behavior of Acrylic Acid Hydrogels Prepared by γ-Radiation Crosslinking of Polyacrylic Acid in Aqueous Solution. Eur. Polym. J. 2000, 36, 2685–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Choudhary, S.; Sharma, K.; Bhatti, M.S.; Sharma, V.; Kumar, V. DOE-Based Synthesis of Gellan Gum-Acrylic Acid-Based Biodegradable Hydrogels: Screening of Significant Process Variables and in Situ Field Studies. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 4780–4794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chaudhuri, S.D.; Dey, A.; Upganlawar, S.; Chakrabarty, D. Influence of Clay Concentration on the Absorption and Rheological Attributes of Modified Cellulose /Acrylic Acid Based Hydrogel and the Application of Such Hydrogel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 282, 125942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, M.; Ni, Z.; Shen, Y.; Xiang, G.; Xu, L. Reinforced Swelling and Water-Retention Properties of Super-Absorbent Hydrogel Fabricated by a Dual Stretchable Single Network Tactic. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 602, 125133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Saraydın, D.; Karadağ, E.; Işıkver, Y.; Şahiner, N.; Güven, O. The Influence of Preparation Methods on the Swelling and Network Properties of Acrylamide Hydrogels with Crosslinkers. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2004, 41, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nascimento, C.D.V.; Simmons, R.W.; de Andrade Feitosa, J.P.; Dias, C.T.D.S.; Costa, M.C.G. Potential of Superabsorbent Hydrogels to Improve Agriculture under Abiotic Stresses. J. Arid Environ. 2021, 189, 104496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kernosenko, L.; Samchenko, K.; Goncharuk, O.; Pasmurtseva, N.; Poltoratska, T.; Siryk, O.; Dziuba, O.; Mironov, O.; Szewczuk-Karpisz, K. Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Enriched with Amber for In Vitro Plant Rooting. Plants 2023, 12, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dhanapal, V.; Subhapriya, P.; Nithyanandam, K.P.; Kiruthika, M.V.; Keerthana, T.; Dineshkumar, G. Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of N,N1-Methylenebisacrylamide Crosslinked Smart Polymer Hydrogel for the Controlled Release of Water and Plant Nutrients in Agriculture Field. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 2491–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. El Idrissi, A.; El Gharrak, A.; Achagri, G.; Essamlali, Y.; Amadine, O.; Akil, A.; Sair, S.; Zahouily, M. Synthesis of Urea-Containing Sodium Alginate-g-Poly(Acrylic Acid-Co-Acrylamide) Superabsorbent-Fertilizer Hydrogel Reinforced with Carboxylated Cellulose Nanocrystals for Efficient Water and Nitrogen Utilization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ersen Dudu, T.; Alpaslan, D.; Aktas, N. Superabsorbent Hydrogels Based on N,N-Dimethylacrylamide and Maleic Acid for Applications in Agriculture as Water Purifier and Nitrogen Carrier. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 8551–8573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sani Mamman, I.; Teo, Y.Y.; Misran, M. Synthesis, Characterization and Rheological Study of Arabic Gum-Grafted-Poly (Methacrylic Acid) Hydrogels. Polym. Bull. 2021, 78, 3399–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ninciuleanu, C.M.; Ianchiş, R.; Alexandrescu, E.; Mihăescu, C.I.; Scomoroşcenco, C.; Nistor, C.L.; Preda, S.; Petcu, C.; Teodorescu, M. The Effects of Monomer, Crosslinking Agent, and Filler Concentrations on the Viscoelastic and Swelling Properties of Poly(Methacrylic Acid) Hydrogels: A Comparison. Materials 2021, 14, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ninciuleanu, C.M.; Ianchiș, R.; Alexandrescu, E.; Mihăescu, C.I.; Burlacu, S.; Trică, B.; Nistor, C.L.; Preda, S.; Scomoroscenco, C.; Gîfu, C.; et al. Adjusting Some Properties of Poly(Methacrylic Acid) (Nano)Composite Hydrogels by Means of Silicon-Containing Inorganic Fillers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Dhanapal, V.; Subhapriya, P.; Sennappan, M.; Govindaraju, K.M. Controlled Release Characteristics of Methylenebisacrylamide Crosslinked Superabsorbent Polymer for Water and Fertilizer Conservation in Agriculture Sector. J. Polym. Res. 2022, 29, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kaur, K.; Jindal, R.; Saini, D. Synthesis, Optimization and Characterization of PVA-Co-Poly(Methacrylic Acid) Green Adsorbents and Applications in Environmental Remediation. Polym. Bull. 2020, 77, 3079–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Junior, C.R.; Fernandes, R.D.; de Moura, M.R.; Aouada, F.A. On the Preparation and Physicochemical Properties of PH-Responsive Hydrogel Nanocomposite Based on Poly(Acid Methacrylic)/Laponite RDS. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 23, 100936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Malka, E.; Margel, S. Engineering of PVA/PVP Hydrogels for Agricultural Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Malka, E.; Dombrovsky, A.; Margel, S. Preparation and Characterization of a Novel PVA/PVP Hydrogel Containing Entrapped Hydrogen Peroxide for Agricultural Applications. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jungsinyatam, P.; Suwanakood, P.; Saengsuwan, S. Multicomponent Biodegradable Hydrogels Based on Natural Biopolymers as Environmentally Coating Membrane for Slow-Release Fertilizers: Effect of Crosslinker Type. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 843, 157050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kareem, S.A.; Dere, I.; Gungula, D.T.; Andrew, F.P.; Saddiq, A.M.; Adebayo, E.F.; Tame, V.T.; Kefas, H.M.; Joseph, J.; Patrick, D.O. Synthesis and Characterization of Slow-Release Fertilizer Hydrogel Based on Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose, Polyvinyl Alcohol, Glycerol and Blended Paper. Gels 2021, 7, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liu, S.; Wu, Q.; Sun, X.; Yue, Y.; Tubana, B.; Yang, R.; Cheng, H.N. Novel Alginate-Cellulose Nanofiber-Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogels for Carrying and Delivering Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Chemicals. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tanan, W.; Panichpakdee, J.; Suwanakood, P.; Saengsuwan, S. Biodegradable Hydrogels of Cassava Starch-g-Polyacrylic Acid/Natural Rubber/Polyvinyl Alcohol as Environmentally Friendly and Highly Efficient Coating Material for Slow-Release Urea Fertilizers. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 101, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Torres-Figueroa, A.V.; de los Santos-Villalobos, S.; Rodríguez-Félix, D.E.; Moreno-Salazar, S.F.; Pérez-Martínez, C.J.; Chan-Chan, L.H.; Ochoa-Meza, A.; del Castillo-Castro, T. Physically and Chemically Cross-Linked Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Humic Acid Hydrogels for Agricultural Applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 44784–44795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Chaudhary, J.; Thakur, S.; Sharma, M.; Gupta, V.K.; Thakur, V.K. Development of Biodegradable Agar-Agar/Gelatin-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogel as an Efficient Moisture-Retaining Agent. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tanasić, J.; Erceg, T.; Tanasić, L.; Baloš, S.; Klisurić, O.; Ristić, I. The Influence of Reaction Conditions on Structural Properties and Swelling Kinetics of Polyurethane Hydrogels Intended for Agricultural Purposes. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 169, 105085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Azeem, M.K.; Islam, A.; Khan, R.U.; Rasool, A.; Anees Ur Rehman Qureshi, M.; Rizwan, M.; Shuib, R.K.; Rehman, A.; Sadiqa, A. Guar Gum/Poly Ethylene Glycol/Graphene Oxide Environmentally Friendly Hybrid Hydrogels for Controlled Release of Boron Micronutrient. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2023, 10, 231157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ghosh, A.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Dutta, R.; Babu, R.; Rumbo, C.; Dasgupta, N.; Mukherjee, P.; Das, N.C.; Ranjan, S. Polyurethane Chemistry for the Agricultural Applications—Recent Advancement and Future Prospects; Cheng, H.N., Gross, R.A., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  116. Klein, M.; Poverenov, E. Natural Biopolymer-based Hydrogels for Use in Food and Agriculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2337–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Maksimova, Y.G.; Shchetko, V.A.; Malsimov, A.Y. Polymer Hydrogels in Agriculture (Review). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biol. 2023, 58, 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Manzoor, A.; Dar, A.H.; Pandey, V.K.; Shams, R.; Khan, S.; Panesar, P.S.; Kennedy, J.F.; Fayaz, U.; Khan, S.A. Recent Insights into Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels and Their Potential Applications in Food Sector: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 213, 987–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Qureshi, M.A.; Nishat, N.; Jadoun, S.; Ansari, M.Z. Polysaccharide Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels and Their Methods of Synthesis: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2020, 1, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tomadoni, B.; Casalongué, C.; Alvarez, V.A. Biopolymer-Based Hydrogels for Agriculture Applications: Swelling Behavior and Slow Release of Agrochemicals. In Polymers for Agri-Food Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 99–125. [Google Scholar]
  121. Jia, X.; Ma, P.; Wei, C.-I.; Wang, Q. Chitin and Chitosan: Pioneering Sustainable Substrates for next-Generation Soilless Vertical Farming. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 150, 104599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sun, H.; Liu, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Fan, Y.; Ouyang, J. Removal of Inhibitory Furan Aldehydes in Lignocellulosic Hydrolysates via Chitosan-Chitin Nanofiber Hybrid Hydrogel Beads. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 346, 126563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Michalik, R.; Wandzik, I. A Mini-Review on Chitosan-Based Hydrogels with Potential for Sustainable Agricultural Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Maddaloni, M.; Vassalini, I.; Alessandri, I. Green Routes for the Development of Chitin/Chitosan Sustainable Hydrogels. Sustain. Chem. 2020, 1, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Tang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hu, L.; Zhang, L. Application of Chitin Hydrogels for Seed Germination, Seedling Growth of Rapeseed. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Truong, T.T.C.; Le, B.T.; Duong, N.T.T.; Le Thi, A.P.; Nguyen, K.D. Preparation and Properties of Chitin Hydrogel Applied as Moisture-Supporter for Seed Germination. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2024, 58, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Jiang, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Satio, T.; Isogai, A. Preparation and Hydrogel Properties of PH-Sensitive Amphoteric Chitin Nanocrystals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 11372–11379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jamnongkan, T.; Kaewpirom, S. Potassium Release Kinetics and Water Retention of Controlled-Release Fertilizers Based on Chitosan Hydrogels. J. Polym. Environ. 2010, 18, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Dou, Z.; Bini Farias, M.V.; Chen, W.; He, D.; Hu, Y.; Xie, X. Highly Degradable Chitosan-Montmorillonite (MMT) Nano-Composite Hydrogel for Controlled Fertilizer Release. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2023, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ritonga, H.; Basri, M.; Rembon, F.; Ramadhan, L.O.A.; Nurdin, M. High Performance of Chitosan-Co-Polyacrylamide-TiO2 Crosslinked Glutaraldehyde Hydrogel as Soil Conditioner for Soybean Plant (Glycine Max). Soil Sci. Annu. 2020, 71, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Said, M.; Atassi, Y.; Tally, M.; Khatib, H. Environmentally Friendly Chitosan-g-Poly(Acrylic Acid-Co-Acrylamide)/Ground Basalt Superabsorbent Composite for Agricultural Applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 3937–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wu, L.; Liu, M. Preparation and Properties of Chitosan-Coated NPK Compound Fertilizer with Controlled-Release and Water-Retention. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhatkanbayev, Y.; Zhatkanbayeva, Z.; Iskakova, Z.; Kolpek, A.; Serikov, A.; Moldagulova, N.; Danlybayeva, G.; Sarsenova, A.; Anuarbekova, S. Application of Chitosan-Based Hydrogel Obtained from Insects in Pine Planting. Int. J. Biomater. 2023, 2023, 8175405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Dhiman, A.; Bhardwaj, D.; Goswami, K.; Deepika; Agrawal, G. Biodegradable Redox Sensitive Chitosan Based Microgels for Potential Agriculture Application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 313, 120893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Liu, H.; Huang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Cai, T.; Miao, Q.; Gao, Z.; Cui, Z. Lightweight PH-Responsive Chitosan Hydrogel Iron Fertilizer: Efficient Performance, Controlled-Release, and Tomato Application. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Suratman, A.; Purwaningsih, D.R.; Kunarti, E.S.; Kuncaka, A. Controlled Release Fertilizer Encapsulated by Glutaraldehyde-Crosslinked Chitosan Using Freeze-Drying Method. Indones. J. Chem. 2020, 20, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Supare, K.; Mahanwar, P. Starch-Chitosan Hydrogels for the Controlled-Release of Herbicide in Agricultural Applications: A Study on the Effect of the Concentration of Raw Materials and Crosslinkers. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 2448–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ladeira, N.M.B.; Donnici, C.L.; de Mesquita, J.P.; Pereira, F.V. Preparation and Characterization of Hydrogels Obtained from Chitosan and Carboxymethyl Chitosan. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Arafa, E.G.; Sabaa, M.W.; Mohamed, R.R.; Elzanaty, A.M.; Abdel-Gawad, O.F. Preparation of Biodegradable Sodium Alginate/Carboxymethylchitosan Hydrogels for the Slow-Release of Urea Fertilizer and Their Antimicrobial Activity. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 174, 105243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yuan, W.; Li, S.; Guan, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yu, Y.; Chen, X. Preparation and Properties of a Novel Biodegradable Composite Hydrogel Derived from Gelatin/Chitosan and Polylactic Acid as Slow-Release N Fertilizer. Polymers 2023, 15, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Arafa, E.G.; Sabaa, M.W.; Mohamed, R.R.; Kamel, E.M.; Elzanaty, A.M.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Abdel-Gawad, O.F. Eco-Friendly and Biodegradable Sodium Alginate/Quaternized Chitosan Hydrogel for Controlled Release of Urea and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, H.; Wang, J.; Luo, Y.; Bai, B.; Cao, F. PH-Responsive Eco-Friendly Chitosan–Chlorella Hydrogel Beads for Water Retention and Controlled Release of Humic Acid. Water 2022, 14, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sarhan, N.; Arafa, E.G.; Elgiddawy, N.; Elsayed, K.N.M.; Mohamed, F. Urea Intercalated Encapsulated Microalgae Composite Hydrogels for Slow-Release Fertilizers. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wu, X.; Sun, L.; Qin, B.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Fu, Y. Novel Antimicrobial Polysaccharide Hydrogel with Fertilizer Slow-Release Function for Promoting Sesamum Indicum L. Seeds Germination. Polymer 2024, 311, 127491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jabrail, F.H.; Mutlaq, M.S. Controlled Delivery System for NPK Agrochemical Release from Chitosan Copolymer Hydrogels. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2022, 19, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yetilmezsoy, K.; Kıyan, E.; Ilhan, F. Synthesis of Agro-Industrial Wastes/Sodium Alginate/Bovine Gelatin-Based Polysaccharide Hydrogel Beads: Characterization and Application as Controlled-Release Microencapsulated Fertilizers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Barrientos-Sanhueza, C.; Cargnino-Cisternas, D.; Díaz-Barrera, A.; Cuneo, I.F. Bacterial Alginate-Based Hydrogel Reduces Hydro-Mechanical Soil-Related Problems in Agriculture Facing Climate Change. Polymers 2022, 14, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Shen, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wei, H.; Li, J. Synthesis and Characterization of Double-Network Hydrogels Based on Sodium Alginate and Halloysite for Slow Release Fertilizers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Feng, D.; Bai, B.; Wang, H.; Suo, Y. Novel Fabrication of Biodegradable Superabsorbent Microspheres with Diffusion Barrier through Thermo-Chemical Modification and Their Potential Agriculture Applications for Water Holding and Sustained Release of Fertilizer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5896–5907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. El Bouchtaoui, F.-Z.; Ablouh, E.-H.; Kassem, I.; Kassab, Z.; Sehaqui, H.; El Achaby, M. Slow-Release Fertilizers Based on Lignin–Sodium Alginate Biopolymeric Blend for Sustained N–P Nutrients Release. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2022, 19, 1551–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Song, B.; Liang, H.; Sun, R.; Peng, P.; Jiang, Y.; She, D. Hydrogel Synthesis Based on Lignin/Sodium Alginate and Application in Agriculture. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 144, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Singh, J.; Singh, B. Vishavnath Designing Starch–Alginate Hydrogels for Controlled Delivery of Fungicide for the Alleviation of Environmental Pollution. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Di Martino, A.; Khan, Y.A.; Durpekova, S.; Sedlarik, V.; Elich, O.; Cechmankova, J. Ecofriendly Renewable Hydrogels Based on Whey Protein and for Slow Release of Fertilizers and Soil Conditioning. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Skrzypczak, D.; Jarzembowski, Ł.; Izydorczyk, G.; Mikula, K.; Hoppe, V.; Mielko, K.A.; Pudełko-Malik, N.; Młynarz, P.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Hydrogel Alginate Seed Coating as an Innovative Method for Delivering Nutrients at the Early Stages of Plant Growth. Polymers 2021, 13, 4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Stanley, N.; Mahanty, B. Preparation and Characterization of Biogenic CaCO3-Reinforced Polyvinyl Alcohol–Alginate Hydrogel as Controlled-Release Urea Formulation. Polym. Bull. 2020, 77, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chen, Y.S.; Phang, S.W.; Shuib, A.S.; Tee, J.L. Release Behavior and Biodegradability of Controlled-release Potassium Fertilizer Encapsulated in Starch–Alginate Matrix. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 18, e2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lv, Q.; Xiao, T.; Dong, G.; Tan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, M.; Zhu, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, W. Preparation and Characterization of Starch Carbamate Modified Natural Sodium Alginate Composite Hydrogel Blend Formulation and Its Application for Slow-Release Fertilizer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tiamwong, S.; Yukhajon, P.; Noisong, P.; Subsadsana, M.; Sansuk, S. Eco-Friendly Starch Composite Supramolecular Alginate–Ca2+ Hydrogel as Controlled-Release P Fertilizer with Low Responsiveness to Multiple Environmental Stimuli. Gels 2023, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. El Idrissi, A.; Tayi, F.; Dardari, O.; Essamlali, Y.; Jioui, I.; Ayouch, I.; Akil, A.; Achagri, G.; Dänoun, K.; Amadine, O.; et al. Urea-Rich Sodium Alginate-Based Hydrogel Fertilizer as a Water Reservoir and Slow-Release N Carrier for Tomato Cultivation under Different Water-Deficit Levels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 272, 132814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. van der Merwe, R.D.; Goosen, N.J.; Pott, R.W.M. Macroalgal-Derived Alginate Soil Amendments for Water Retention, Nutrient Release Rate Reduction, and Soil PH Control. Gels 2022, 8, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Martínez-Cano, B.; Mendoza-Meneses, C.J.; García-Trejo, J.F.; Macías-Bobadilla, G.; Aguirre-Becerra, H.; Soto-Zarazúa, G.M.; Feregrino-Pérez, A.A. Review and Perspectives of the Use of Alginate as a Polymer Matrix for Microorganisms Applied in Agro-Industry. Molecules 2022, 27, 4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hurtado, A.; Aljabali, A.A.A.; Mishra, V.; Tambuwala, M.M.; Serrano-Aroca, Á. Alginate: Enhancement Strategies for Advanced Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lee, H.; Shin, S.; Han, H.; Hyun, J. In-Situ Printing of an Oxygen-Generating Tubular Alginate Hydrogel Embedding Chlorella Vulgaris. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 421, 132146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Cao, L.; Li, N. Activated-Carbon-Filled Agarose Hydrogel as a Natural Medium for Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Singh, J.; Singh, B. Vishavnath Agar-Gelatin-Derived Hydrogel-Based Controlled Delivery Devices for Linuron Herbicide to Prevent Environmental Hazards. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2024, 6, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Dissanayake, W.; Najaf Zadeh, H.; Nazmi, A.; Stevens, C.; Huber, T.; Abhayawardhana, P. Exploring the Potential of 3D-Printable Agar–Urea Hydrogels as an Efficient Method of Delivering Nitrogen in Agricultural Applications. Polysaccharides 2024, 5, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wang, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhu, J.; Chen, Q.; Li, N. Agarose Hydrogel Doped with Soluble Se-Chitosan for Se-Enriched Cultivation of Sprouts. Adv. Agrochem 2023, 2, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Cao, L.; Zhu, J.; Li, N. Selenium-Agarose Hybrid Hydrogel as a Recyclable Natural Substrate for Selenium-Enriched Cultivation of Mung Bean Sprouts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 194, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Merino, D.; Mansilla, A.Y.; Salcedo, M.F.; Athanassiou, A. Upcycling Orange Peel Agricultural Waste for the Preparation of Green Hydrogels as Active Soil Conditioners. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 10917–10928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Cebrián-Lloret, V.; Martínez-Abad, A.; López-Rubio, A.; Martínez-Sanz, M. Exploring Alternative Red Seaweed Species for the Production of Agar-Based Hydrogels for Food Applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 146, 109177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Akalin, G.O.; Pulat, M. Preparation and Characterization of κ-Carrageenan Hydrogel for Controlled Release of Copper and Manganese Micronutrients. Polym. Bull. 2020, 77, 1359–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Pandya, J.; Mungray, A.A. Novel Biopolymeric Chitosan-Urea-Based Core-Shell Hydrogel for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 41, 110402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Akalin, G.O.; Pulat, M. Controlled Release Behavior of Zinc-Loaded Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Carrageenan Hydrogels and Their Effects on Wheatgrass Growth. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Jíménez-Arias, D.; Morales-Sierra, S.; Silva, P.; Carrêlo, H.; Gonçalves, A.; Ganança, J.F.T.; Nunes, N.; Gouveia, C.S.S.; Alves, S.; Borges, J.P.; et al. Encapsulation with Natural Polymers to Improve the Properties of Biostimulants in Agriculture. Plants 2022, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Berton, S.B.R.; de Jesus, G.A.M.; Sabino, R.M.; Monteiro, J.P.; Venter, S.A.S.; Bruschi, M.L.; Popat, K.C.; Matsushita, M.; Martins, A.F.; Bonafé, E.G. Properties of a Commercial κ-Carrageenan Food Ingredient and Its Durable Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 487, 107883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Bora, A.; Karak, N. Starch and Itaconic Acid-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels for Agricultural Application. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 176, 111430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kalendova, P.; Svoboda, L.; Hroch, J.; Honcova, P.; Drobna, H.; Slang, S. Hydrogels Based on Starch from Various Natural Sources: Synthesis and Characterization. Starch-Stärke 2021, 73, 2100051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chamorro, A.F.; Palencia, M.; Arrieta, Á.A. Development of High-Efficiency Fertilizer by Hydrogels Obtained from Cassava Starch and Citric Acid for Slow Release of Ammonium and Potassium. Gels 2024, 10, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Gungula, D.T.; Andrew, F.P.; Joseph, J.; Kareem, S.A.; Barminas, J.T.; Adebayo, E.F.; Saddiq, A.M.; Tame, V.T.; Dere, I.; Ahinda, W.J.; et al. Formulation and Characterization of Water Retention and Slow-Release Urea Fertilizer Based on Borassus Aethiopum Starch and Maesopsis Eminii Hydrogels. Results Mater. 2021, 12, 100223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Dudu, T.E.; Alpaslan, D.; Aktas, N. Synthesis of Controlled Release Hydrogels from Dimethylacrylamide/Maleic Acid/Starch and Its Application in Lettuce Cultivation. J. Polym. Res. 2022, 29, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Li, J.; Lu, J.; Li, Y. Carboxylmethylcellulose/Bentonite Composite Gels: Water Sorption Behavior and Controlled Release of Herbicide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Qamruzzaman, M.; Ahmed, F.; Mondal, M.I.H. An Overview on Starch-Based Sustainable Hydrogels: Potential Applications and Aspects. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 19–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Apostolidis, E.; Kioupis, D.; Kakali, G.; Stoforos, N.G.; Mandala, I. Effect of Starch Concentration and Resistant Starch Filler Addition on the Physical Properties of Starch Hydrogels. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 5340–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Cui, C.; Jia, Y.; Sun, Q.; Yu, M.; Ji, N.; Dai, L.; Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Xiong, L.; Sun, Q. Recent Advances in the Preparation, Characterization, and Food Application of Starch-Based Hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Das, D.; Prakash, P.; Rout, P.K.; Bhaladhare, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Superabsorbent Cellulose-Based Hydrogel for Agriculture Application. Starch-Stärke 2021, 73, 1900284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Bauli, C.R.; Lima, G.F.; de Souza, A.G.; Ferreira, R.R.; Rosa, D.S. Eco-Friendly Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogels Filled with Nanocellulose or Nanoclays for Agriculture Applications as Soil Conditioning and Nutrient Carrier and Their Impact on Cucumber Growing. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 623, 126771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Ghobashy, M.M.; Amin, M.A.; Ismail, M.A.; Nowwar, A.I.; El-diehy, M.A.; Gayed, H.M. Radiation Cross-Linked Ultra-Absorbent Hydrogel to Rationalize Irrigation Water and Fertilizer for Maize Planting in Drought Conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 252, 126467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Charoenchaitrakool, M.; Tulathon, P.; Meesangnil, W.; Niamnuy, C.; Seubsai, A.; Nunta, S.; Sudsakorn, K. Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Gelatin Composite Hydrogel for Environmentally Friendly Urea Delivery. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 690, 133774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Shang, H.; Yang, X.; Liu, H. Temperature-Responsive Hydrogel Prepared from Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Stabilized N-Vinylcaprolactam with Potential for Fertilizer Delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 313, 120875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Durpekova, S.; Di Martino, A.; Dusankova, M.; Drohsler, P.; Sedlarik, V. Biopolymer Hydrogel Based on Acid Whey and Cellulose Derivatives for Enhancement Water Retention Capacity of Soil and Slow Release of Fertilizers. Polymers 2021, 13, 3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Kassem, I.; Ablouh, E.-H.; El Bouchtaoui, F.-Z.; Kassab, Z.; Hannache, H.; Sehaqui, H.; El Achaby, M. Biodegradable All-Cellulose Composite Hydrogel as Eco-Friendly and Efficient Coating Material for Slow-Release MAP Fertilizer. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 162, 106575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Mohamed, R.R.; Fahim, M.E.; Soliman, S.M.A. Development of Hydrogel Based on Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) for Controlled Releasing of Fertilizers. BMC Chem. 2022, 16, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Priya, E.; Akash, J.; Sudipta, S.; Pradip, K.M. A Urea-Loaded Hydrogel Comprising of Cellulose Nanofibers and Carboxymethyl Cellulose: An Effective Slow-Release Fertilizer. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 434, 140215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ahmad, D.F.B.A.; Wasli, M.E.; Tan, C.S.Y.; Musa, Z.; Chin, S.-F. Eco-Friendly Cellulose-Based Hydrogels Derived from Wastepapers as a Controlled-Release Fertilizer. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2023, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Petre, M.; Zarnea, G.; Adrian, P.; Gheorghiu, E. Biodegradation and Bioconversion of Cellulose Wastes Using Bacterial and Fungal Cells Immobilized in Radiopolymerized Hydrogels. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1999, 27, 309–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Akalin, G.O.; Pulat, M. Preparation and Characterization of Nanoporous Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogel Beads. J. Nanomater. 2018, 2018, 9676949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Mazloom, N.; Khorassani, R.; Zohuri, G.H.; Emami, H.; Whalen, J. Development and Characterization of Lignin-Based Hydrogel for Use in Agricultural Soils: Preliminary Evidence. Clean 2019, 47, 1900101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Manu; Kumar, D.; Gupta, R.K. Natural Polymers-Humic Acid and Lignin Based Hydrogels: In Agriculture, Environment and Energy Storage. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 219, 119029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Mahmoud, U.; Aly, A.; Ismail, M. Preparing Expandable Graphite from Biomass Waste and Its Application as Fire-Retardant Agent in Epoxy Resin. Egypt. J. Chem. 2024, 67, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Yadav, R.; Ayush; Manu; Rani, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Xanthan Gum and Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium Salt Based Ionic Crosslinked Hydrogels for Agricultural Application. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 55, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Sorze, A.; Valentini, F.; Dorigato, A.; Pegoretti, A. Development of a Xanthan Gum Based Superabsorbent and Water Retaining Composites for Agricultural and Forestry Applications. Molecules 2023, 28, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Das, S.; Dalei, G. In Situ Forming Dialdehyde Xanthan Gum-Gelatin Schiff-Base Hydrogels as Potent Controlled Release Fertilizers. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 875, 162660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Salachna, P.; Pietrak, A. Evaluation of Carrageenan, Xanthan Gum and Depolymerized Chitosan Based Coatings for Pineapple Lily Plant Production. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Sorze, A.; Valentini, F.; Burin Mucignat, M.; Pegoretti, A.; Dorigato, A. Multifunctional Xanthan Gum/Wood Fibers Based Hydrogels as Novel Topsoil Covers for Forestry and Agricultural Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 7, 100520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Patel, J.; Maji, B.; Moorthy, N.S.H.N.; Maiti, S. Xanthan Gum Derivatives: Review of Synthesis, Properties and Diverse Applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 27103–27136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Songara, J.C.; Patel, J.N. Synthesis of Guar Gum-Based Hydrogel for Sugarcane Field Solid Conditioning. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Thombare, N.; Mishra, S.; Siddiqui, M.Z.; Jha, U.; Singh, D.; Mahajan, G.R. Design and Development of Guar Gum Based Novel, Superabsorbent and Moisture Retaining Hydrogels for Agricultural Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 185, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Songara, J.C.; Patel, J.N. Impact of Guar Gum-based Hydrogel on Yield and Economics for Sugarcane Crops. Agron. J. 2023, 115, 2533–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Mandal, S.; Chi, H.; Moss, R.E.; Dhital, P.; Babatunde, E.O.; Gurav, R.; Hwang, S. Seed Gum-Based Polysaccharides Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 263, 130339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Tzoumani, I.; Lainioti, G.C.; Aletras, A.J.; Zainescu, G.; Stefan, S.; Meghea, A.; Kallitsis, J.K. Modification of Collagen Derivatives with Water-Soluble Polymers for the Development of Cross-Linked Hydrogels for Controlled Release. Materials 2019, 12, 4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Niculescu, M.-D.; Epure, D.-G.; Lasoń-Rydel, M.; Gaidau, C.; Gidea, M.; Enascuta, C. Biocomposites Based on Collagen and Keratin with Properties for Agriculture and Industrie Applications. Eurobiotech J. 2019, 3, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Niculescu, M.D.; Gaidau, C.; Epure, D.G.; Gidea, M. Experimental Observations about Improving the Properties of Collagen Extracts for Applications in Agriculture. Rev. De Chim. 2018, 69, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Manzoor, E.; Majeed, Z.; Nawazish, S.; Akhtar, W.; Baig, S.; Baig, A.; Fatima Bukhari, S.M.; Mahmood, Q.; Mir, Z.; Shaheen, S. Wood Ash Additive for Performance Improvement of Gelatin-Based Slow-Release Urea Fertilizer. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. El-diehy, M.A.; Farghal, I.I.; Amin, M.A.; Ghobashy, M.M.; Nowwar, A.I.; Gayed, H.M. Radiation Synthesis of Sodium Alginate/Gelatin Based Ultra-Absorbent Hydrogel for Efficient Water and Nitrogen Management in Wheat under Drought Stress. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 19463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. López-Velázquez, J.C.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R.; Espinosa-Andrews, H.; Qui-Zapata, J.A.; García-Morales, S.; Navarro-López, D.E.; Luna-Bárcenas, G.; Vassallo-Brigneti, E.C.; García-Carvajal, Z.Y. Gelatin–Chitosan–PVA Hydrogels and Their Application in Agriculture. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 3495–3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Arican, F.; Uzuner-Demir, A.; Sancakli, A.; Ismar, E. Synthesis and Characterization of Superabsorbent Hydrogels from Waste Bovine Hair via Keratin Hydrolysate Graft with Acrylic Acid (AA) and Acrylamide (AAm). Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 6601–6610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Zhang, F.; Chen, H.; Yang, H.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Song, P.; Wang, R. Waste Feather Keratin Composited Geopolymer Hydrogels for Improving Plant Water Retention and N Nutrients Utilization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 682, 132925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Wattie, B.; Dumont, M.-J.; Lefsrud, M. Synthesis and Properties of Feather Keratin-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Yan, J.; Jia, X.; Yan, W.; Yin, L. Double-Network Hydrogels of Corn Fiber Gum and Soy Protein Isolate: Effect of Biopolymer Constituents and PH Values on Textural Properties and Microstructures. Foods 2021, 10, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Ardra Ashok, K.P.; Saeed, P.A.; Smitha, M.; Sujith, A. Polyvinyl Alcohol-Soy Protein Isolate Hydrogels: Controlled Release of Fertilizer and Matrix Nutrients for Sustainable Agriculture. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 451, 141827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wang, L.; Ji, X.; Cheng, Y.; Tao, Y.; Lu, J.; Du, J.; Wang, H. All-Biodegradable Soy Protein Isolate/Lignin Composite Cross-Linked by Oxidized Sucrose as Agricultural Mulch Films for Green Farming. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Moraes Schambeck, C.; Ribeiro da Costa, R.H.; Derlon, N. Phosphate Removal from Municipal Wastewater by Alginate-like Exopolymers Hydrogels Recovered from Aerobic Granular Sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 333, 125167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Kumar, A.; Hart, P.; Thakur, V.K. Seaweed Based Hydrogels: Extraction, Gelling Characteristics, and Applications in the Agriculture Sector. ACS Sustain. Resour. Manag. 2024, 1, 1876–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. El Idrissi, A.; Dardari, O.; Metomo, F.N.N.N.; Essamlali, Y.; Akil, A.; Amadine, O.; Aboulhrouz, S.; Zahouily, M. Effect of Sodium Alginate-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogel on Tomato Growth under Different Water Deficit Conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Niu, C.; Lin, Z.; Fu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, L. An Eco-Friendly Versatile Superabsorbent Hydrogel Based on Sodium Alginate and Urea for Soil Improvement with a Synchronous Chemical Loading Strategy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 327, 121676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Baranovskii, V.Y.; Ganev, V.G.; Petkova, V.B.; Voicheva, K.C.; Dimitrov, M.V. Hydrogels Based on Polycarboxylic Acid-Agar-Agar Complexes. Colloid J. 2012, 74, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Singh, J.; Vishavnath; Sharma, V.; Singh, B. Development of Agar-Alginate Marine Polysaccharides-Based Hydrogels for Agricultural Applications to Reduce Environmental Hazards. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 295, 139659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Kolya, H.; Kang, C.-W. Synthesis of Starch-Based Smart Hydrogel Derived from Rice-Cooked Wastewater for Agricultural Use. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 226, 1477–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Peng, G.; Xu, S.; Peng, Y.; Wang, J.; Zheng, L. A New Amphoteric Superabsorbent Hydrogel Based on Sodium Starch Sulfate. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Moharrami, P.; Motamedi, E. Application of Cellulose Nanocrystals Prepared from Agricultural Wastes for Synthesis of Starch-Based Hydrogel Nanocomposites: Efficient and Selective Nanoadsorbent for Removal of Cationic Dyes from Water. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Shen, X.; Shamshina, J.L.; Berton, P.; Bandomir, J.; Wang, H.; Gurau, G.; Rogers, R.D. Comparison of Hydrogels Prepared with Ionic-Liquid-Isolated vs Commercial Chitin and Cellulose. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Xuan, Y.; Zhang, S. Synthesis and Applications of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogels. Gels 2022, 8, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Chang, C.; Zhang, L. Cellulose-Based Hydrogels: Present Status and Application Prospects. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Capanema, N.S.V.; Mansur, A.A.P.; de Jesus, A.C.; Carvalho, S.M.; de Oliveira, L.C.; Mansur, H.S. Superabsorbent Crosslinked Carboxymethyl Cellulose-PEG Hydrogels for Potential Wound Dressing Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 1218–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Del Valle, L.; Díaz, A.; Puiggalí, J. Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Cellulose, Chitosan, and Protein/Peptide Derivatives. Gels 2017, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Durpekova, S.; Filatova, K.; Cisar, J.; Ronzova, A.; Kutalkova, E.; Sedlarik, V. A Novel Hydrogel Based on Renewable Materials for Agricultural Application. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 2020, 8363418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Rajendran, S.; Al-Samydai, A.; Palani, G.; Trilaksana, H.; Sathish, T.; Giri, J.; Saravanan, R.; Lalvani, J.I.J.; Nasri, F. Replacement of Petroleum Based Products With Plant-Based Materials, Green and Sustainable Energy—A Review. Eng. Rep. 2025, 7, e70108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Malik, B.; Chawla, R.; Khatkar, S.K. Protein Hydrogels: A Concise Review of Properties and Applications. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2023, 29, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Tan, M.; Nawaz, M.A.; Buckow, R. Functional and Food Application of Plant Proteins—A Review. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 2428–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Katona, G.; Sipos, B.; Csóka, I. Advancements in the Field of Protein-Based Hydrogels: Main Types, Characteristics, and Their Applications. Gels 2025, 11, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. De Berardinis, L.; Plazzotta, S.; Manzocco, L. Optimising Soy and Pea Protein Gelation to Obtain Hydrogels Intended as Precursors of Food-Grade Dried Porous Materials. Gels 2023, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Liang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xing, M.; Wang, X.; Dong, Y.; Yang, Y.; Du, N.; Gu, H.; Meng, L.; Peng, W.; et al. Improving Properties of Soy Protein–Based Hydrogel Composites by Incorporating Bamboo Biochar towards Slow Release and Water Retention of Fertilizers and Enhanced Plant Growth. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2025, 8, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Alhaj Hamoud, Y.; Shaghaleh, H.; Chang, T.; Zhang, K.; Al-Rejaie, S.S. Physio-Biochemical Responses of Rice to Smart Nitrogen Fertilizer Nano-Hydrogel under Drought Stress and Flooding Alternation: An Eco-Friendly Innovative Approach to Enhance the Grain Quality. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 168, 270–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Perez-Puyana, V.; Romero, A.; Guerrero, A. Influence of Collagen Concentration and Glutaraldehyde on Collagen-based Scaffold Properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2016, 104, 1462–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Bouroudian, E.; Perez-Puyana, V.; Guerrero, A.; Romero, A. Evaluation of Different Strengthening Methods in the Mechanical and Functional Properties of Soy Protein-Based Bioplastics. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Pérez-Puyana, V.; Cordobés, F.; Romero, A.; Guerrero, A. Development of Soy Protein-Based Matrices Containing Zinc as Micronutrient for Horticulture. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 121, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Zhao, J.; Sun, F.; Li, Y.; Liu, Q.; Kong, B. Modification of Gel Properties of Soy Protein Isolate by Freeze-Thaw Cycles Are Associated with Changes of Molecular Force Involved in the Gelation. Process Biochem. 2017, 52, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Wang, X.; Luo, K.; Liu, S.; Adhikari, B.; Chen, J. Improvement of Gelation Properties of Soy Protein Isolate Emulsion Induced by Calcium Cooperated with Magnesium. J. Food Eng. 2019, 244, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Cruz-Barrera, M.; Chaparro, M.; Mendoza, J.; Torres-Cuesta, D.; Gómez, M.; Estrada-Bonilla, G.A. Hydrogel Capsules as Carriers for PGPB Consortia Enhance Compost Efficacy and Nutrient Uptake in Oat (Avena Sativa) Fertilization. Plant Soil 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Bezuglova, O.; Klimenko, A. Application of Humic Substances in Agricultural Industry. Agronomy 2022, 12, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Guo, X.; Liu, H.; Wu, S. Humic Substances Developed during Organic Waste Composting: Formation Mechanisms, Structural Properties, and Agronomic Functions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Zeng, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Hou, C.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L. Modification of Gelatin Hydrogel for Soil Water Retention: Physical Blending or Chemical Combination with Humic Substance Extracted from Compost. Eur. Polym. J. 2025, 230, 113884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Hu, X.; Ma, W.; Pasang, L.; Li, J.; Chen, H. Gel-Embedded Biochar and Hydroxyapatite Composite for the Improvement of Saline-Alkali Soil and Plant Growth Promotion. Gels 2024, 10, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Nooeaid, P.; Cha-aim, K.; Chuysinuan, P.; Pengsuk, C.; Thanyacharoern, T.; Sophonputtanaphoca, S.; Techasakul, S. Nutrient Controlled Release Behaviors and Plant Growth of NPK Encapsulated Hydroxyapatite/Alginate Biocomposite toward Agricultural and Environmental Sustainability. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11, 035310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Singh, J.; Boddula, R.; Digambar Jirimali, H. Utilization of Secondary Agricultural Products for the Preparation of Value Added Silica Materials and Their Important Applications: A Review. J. Solgel Sci. Technol. 2020, 96, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Olad, A.; Zebhi, H.; Salari, D.; Mirmohseni, A.; Reyhani Tabar, A. Slow-Release NPK Fertilizer Encapsulated by Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Nanocomposite with the Function of Water Retention in Soil. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 90, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Ren, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, D.; Fang, W.; Yan, D.; Wang, Q.; Jin, X.; Li, Y.; Cao, A. Silica Modified Copper-Based Alginate/Chitosan Hybrid Hydrogel to Control Soil Fumigant Release, Reduce Emission and Enhance Bioactivity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 244, 125132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Hafezi, M.; Khorasani, S.N.; Khalili, S.; Neisiany, R.E. Self-Healing Interpenetrating Network Hydrogel Based on GelMA/Alginate/Nano-Clay. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Naik, D.A.; Iyer, D.J. Applications of Hydrogel/Zeolite Composites: A Review. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2018, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Gholamhoseini, M.; Habibzadeh, F.; Ataei, R.; Hemmati, P.; Ebrahimian, E. Zeolite and Hydrogel Improve Yield of Greenhouse Cucumber in Soil-Less Medium under Water Limitation. Rhizosphere 2018, 6, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Tanaka, F.C.; Yonezawa, U.G.; de Moura, M.R.; Aouada, F.A. Obtention, Characterization, and Herbicide Diquat Carrier/Release Properties by Nanocomposite Hydrogels Based on the Polysaccharides and Zeolite for Future Use in Agriculture. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2023, 20, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Songara, J.C.; Patel, J.N.; Mungray, A.A. Preparation and Characterization of PAA/ GG-Zeolite Nano-Composite Hydrogel for Agricultural Applications. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Liu, M.; Liang, R.; Zhan, F.; Liu, Z.; Niu, A. Synthesis of a Slow-Release and Superabsorbent Nitrogen Fertilizer and Its Properties. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2006, 17, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Suddick, E.C.; Whitney, P.; Townsend, A.R.; Davidson, E.A. The Role of Nitrogen in Climate Change and the Impacts of Nitrogen-Climate Interactions in the United States: Foreword to Thematic Issue. Biogeochemistry 2013, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Erisman, J.W.; Galloway, J.; Seitzinger, S.; Bleeker, A.; Butterbach-Bahl, K. Reactive Nitrogen in the Environment and Its Effect on Climate Change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2011, 3, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Johnston, A.E.; Poulton, P.R.; Fixen, P.E.; Curtin, D. Phosphorus. Its Efficient Use in Agriculture. Adv. Agron. 2014, 123, 177–228. [Google Scholar]
  267. Chen, F.; Miao, C.; Duan, Q.; Jiang, S.; Liu, H.; Ma, L.; Li, Z.; Bao, X.; Lan, B.; Chen, L.; et al. Developing Slow Release Fertilizer through In-Situ Radiation-Synthesis of Urea-Embedded Starch-Based Hydrogels. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 191, 115971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Fageria, N.K.; Baligar, C.; Clark, R.B. Micronutrients in Crop Production. Advances in Agronomy 2002, 77, 185–268. [Google Scholar]
  269. Ekanayake, S.A.; Godakumbura, P.I. Synthesis of a Dual-Functional Nanofertilizer by Embedding ZnO and CuO Nanoparticles on an Alginate-Based Hydrogel. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 26262–26272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Shang, H.; Ma, C.; Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Elmer, W.; White, J.C.; Xing, B. Copper Oxide Nanoparticle-Embedded Hydrogels Enhance Nutrient Supply and Growth of Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa) Infected with Fusarium Oxysporum f. Sp. Lactucae. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 13432–13442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Rani Sarkar, M.; Rashid, M.H.; Rahman, A.; Kafi, M.A.; Hosen, M.I.; Rahman, M.S.; Khan, M.N. Recent Advances in Nanomaterials Based Sustainable Agriculture: An Overview. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 18, 100687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Guancha-Chalapud, M.A.; Serna-Cock, L.; Tirado, D.F. Hydrogels Are Reinforced with Colombian Fique Nanofibers to Improve Techno-Functional Properties for Agricultural Purposes. Agriculture 2022, 12, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Liu, Z.; Li, D.; Dai, H.; Huang, H. Enhanced Properties of Tea Residue Cellulose Hydrogels by Addition of Graphene Oxide. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 244, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Yuan, D.; Huang, X.; Meng, Q.; Ma, J.; Zhao, Y.; Ke, Q.; Kou, X. Recent Advances in the Application of Zein-Based Gels: A Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 179, 111557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Vinzant, K.; Rashid, M.; Khodakovskaya, M.V. Advanced Applications of Sustainable and Biological Nano-Polymers in Agricultural Production. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1081165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. de Oliveira, J.L.; Campos, E.V.R.; Camara, M.C.; Della Vechia, J.F.; de Matos, S.T.S.; de Andrade, D.J.; Gonçalves, K.C.; Nascimento, J.; Polanczyk, R.A.; de Araújo, D.R.; et al. Hydrogels Containing Botanical Repellents Encapsulated in Zein Nanoparticles for Crop Protection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Ali, M.; Cybulska, J.; Frąc, M.; Zdunek, A. Application of Polysaccharides for the Encapsulation of Beneficial Microorganisms for Agricultural Purposes: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 244, 125366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Antunes, D.R.; Forini, M.M.L.H.; Biscalchim, É.R.; Lima, P.H.C.; Cavalcante, L.A.F.; Teixeira Filho, M.C.M.; Tripathi, D.K.; Caballero, J.P.; Grillo, R. Polysaccharide-Based Sustainable Hydrogel Spheres for Controlled Release of Agricultural Inputs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Lima-Tenório, M.K.; Karas, L.P.; Furmam-Cherobim, F.; Guerlinguer, E.; Rubira, A.F.; Steffens, M.B.R.; Galvão, C.W.; Tenório-Neto, E.T.; Etto, R.M. Encapsulation of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria with Gum Arabic Hydrogels: A Potential System for Sustainable Agriculture. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 5702–5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Valle, S.F.; Giroto, A.S.; Guimarães, G.G.F.; Ribeiro, C. Encapsulation of Acidithiobacillus Thiooxidans in Sulfur-Loaded Hydrogel Films for Increased Nutrient Uptake by Plants. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2025, 5, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Ahmed, M.S.; Islam, M.; Hasan, M.K.; Nam, K.-W. A Comprehensive Review of Radiation-Induced Hydrogels: Synthesis, Properties, and Multidimensional Applications. Gels 2024, 10, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Sánchez-Cid, P.; Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Romero, A.; Pérez-Puyana, V. Novel Trends in Hydrogel Development for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Gulrez, S.K.H.; Al-Assaf, S.; O Phillips, G. Hydrogels: Methods of Preparation, Characterisation and Applications; Carpi, A., Ed.; Intech: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 9533072687. [Google Scholar]
  284. Nele, V.; Wojciechowski, J.P.; Armstrong, J.P.K.; Stevens, M.M. Tailoring Gelation Mechanisms for Advanced Hydrogel Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Yue, Y.; Han, J.; Han, G.; French, A.D.; Qi, Y.; Wu, Q. Cellulose Nanofibers Reinforced Sodium Alginate-Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogels: Core-Shell Structure Formation and Property Characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Liu, Y.; Weng, R.; Wang, W.; Wei, X.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, F.; Li, Y. Tunable Physical and Mechanical Properties of Gelatin Hydrogel after Transglutaminase Crosslinking on Two Gelatin Types. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Zhang, Y.; Dong, L.; Liu, L.; Wu, Z.; Pan, D.; Liu, L. Recent Advances of Stimuli-Responsive Polysaccharide Hydrogels in Delivery Systems: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6300–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Mehdi-Sefiani, H.; Granados-Carrera, C.M.; Romero, A.; Chicardi, E.; Domínguez-Robles, J.; Perez-Puyana, V.M. Chitosan–Type-A-Gelatin Hydrogels Used as Potential Platforms in Tissue Engineering for Drug Delivery. Gels 2024, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Sayed, A.; Mohamed, M.M.; Abdel-Raouf, M.; Adel, G. Radiation Green Synthesis of Guar Gum -Pectin/ Polyacrylamide/ Zinc Oxide Superabsorbent Hydrogel Composites for Sustainable Agriculture. Res. Sq. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Singh, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, K.; Katoch, K.; Zaeen, A.A.; Birhan, D.A.; Singh, A.; Sandhu, H.S.; Singh, H.; Sahrma, L.K. Smart Fertilizer Technologies: An Environmental Impact Assessment for Sustainable Agriculture. Smart Agric. Technol. 2024, 8, 100504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Abbas, A.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, P.; She, D. Lignin-Based Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1801–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Lawrencia, D.; Wong, S.K.; Low, D.Y.S.; Goh, B.H.; Goh, J.K.; Ruktanonchai, U.R.; Soottitantawat, A.; Lee, L.H.; Tang, S.Y. Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review on Coating Materials and Mechanism of Release. Plants 2021, 10, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Salimi, M.; Channab, B.E.; El Idrissi, A.; Zahouily, M.; Motamedi, E. A Comprehensive Review on Starch: Structure, Modification, and Applications in Slow/Controlled-Release Fertilizers in Agriculture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 322, 121326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Chamorro, A.F.; Palencia, M.; Combatt, E.M. Starch Hydrogels for Slow and Controlled-Release Fertilizers: A Review. Polymers 2025, 17, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Mansouri, H.; Ait Said, H.; Noukrati, H.; Oukarroum, A.; Ben youcef, H.; Perreault, F. Advances in Controlled Release Fertilizers: Cost-Effective Coating Techniques and Smart Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2023, 7, 2300149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Ghobashy, M.M.; El-Damhougy, B.K.; Nady, N.; El-Wahab, H.A.; Naser, A.M.; Abdelhai, F. Radiation Crosslinking of Modifying Super Absorbent (Polyacrylamide/Gelatin) Hydrogel as Fertilizers Carrier and Soil Conditioner. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 3981–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Singh, B.; Sharma, D.K.; Negi, S.; Dhiman, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Agar-Starch Based Hydrogels for Slow Herbicide Delivery Applications. Int. J. Plast. Technol. 2015, 19, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Phang, S.W.; Sin, L.T.; Bee, S.-T.; Low, J.Y.; Tee, T.-T. Release Behaviour Study on Controlled-Release Phosphorous Fertilizer Encapsulated by Starch-Alginate Superabsorbent Composite. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2018, 13, 82–94. [Google Scholar]
  299. Huang, J.; Chen, L.; Huang, M.; Liu, M. Urea Intercalated Halloysite/Sodium Alginate Composite Hydrogels for Slow-Release Fertilizers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2023, 242, 107041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Durpekova, S.; Bergerova, E.D.; Hanusova, D.; Dusankova, M.; Sedlarik, V. Eco-Friendly Whey/Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogel with Poly(Lactic Acid) for Improvement of Agricultural Soil Quality and Plant Growth. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 212, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Zanino, A.; Pizzetti, F.; Masi, M.; Rossi, F. Polymers as Controlled Delivery Systems in Agriculture: The Case of Atrazine and Other Pesticides. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 203, 112665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Trenkel, M.E. Slow-and Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers: An Option for Enhancing Nutrient Efficiency in Agriculture; IFA: Bristol, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  303. Jariwala, H.; Santos, R.M.; Lauzon, J.D.; Dutta, A.; Wai Chiang, Y. Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRFs) for Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices: A Comprehensive Review on Release Mechanism, Materials, Methods of Preparation, and Effect on Environmental Parameters. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 53967–53995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Davidson, D.; Gu, F.X. Materials for Sustained and Controlled Release of Nutrients and Molecules To Support Plant Growth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Firmanda, A.; Fahma, F.; Syamsu, K.; Sari, Y.W.; Suryanegara, L.; Wood, K.; Saito, Y. Factors Influencing the Biodegradability of Agro-Biopolymer Based Slow or Controlled Release Fertilizer. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 1706–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Hu, Z.-Y.; Chen, G.; Yi, S.-H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, R. Multifunctional Porous Hydrogel with Nutrient Controlled-Release and Excellent Biodegradation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Sayed, A.; Mohamed, M.M.; Abdel-raouf, M.E.-S.; Mahmoud, G.A. Radiation Synthesis of Green Nanoarchitectonics of Guar Gum-Pectin/Polyacrylamide/Zinc Oxide Superabsorbent Hydrogel for Sustainable Agriculture. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2022, 32, 4589–4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Oladosu, Y.; Rafii, M.Y.; Arolu, F.; Chukwu, S.C.; Salisu, M.A.; Fagbohun, I.K.; Muftaudeen, T.K.; Swaray, S.; Haliru, B.S. Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Ilyasov, L.O.; Panova, I.G.; Kushchev, P.O.; Belov, A.A.; Maksimova, I.A.; Smagin, A.V.; Yaroslavov, A.A. Sparsely Cross-Linked Hydrogel with Starch Fragments as a Multifunctional Soil Conditioner. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Costa, M.C.G.; Freire, A.G.; Lourenço, D.V.; Sousa, R.R.; Feitosa, J.P.D.A.; Mota, J.C.A. Hydrogel Composed of Potassium Acrylate, Acrylamide, and Mineral as Soil Conditioner under Saline Conditions. Sci. Agric. 2022, 79, e20200235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Qin, C.-C.; Abdalkarim, S.Y.H.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, H.-Y.; He, X. Ultrahigh Water-Retention Cellulose Hydrogels as Soil Amendments for Early Seed Germination under Harsh Conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 370, 133602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Demitri, C.; Scalera, F.; Madaghiele, M.; Sannino, A.; Maffezzoli, A. Potential of Cellulose-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels as Water Reservoir in Agriculture. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013, 2013, 435073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. González Gómez, H.; Ramírez Godina, F.; Ortega Ortiz, H.; Benavides Mendoza, A.; Robledo Torres, V.; Cabrera De la Fuente, M. Use of Chitosan-PVA Hydrogels with Copper Nanoparticles to Improve the Growth of Grafted Watermelon. Molecules 2017, 22, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Wójcik, M. Biostimulation and Biofortification of Crop Plants—New Challenges for Modern Agriculture. Acta Agrobot. 2019, 72, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Rodríguez Declet, A.; Negri, P.; Guerrero, A.; Romero, A.; Domenico Rombolà, A. Use of Protein-Based Matrices as Amino Acids Source in in-Vitro Grapevine. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 99, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. de Carvalho, F.V.; Junior, F.G.; Filho, S.T.; Alberton, M.D.; Barcellos, I.O.; Gomes, S.F.L. Synthesis And Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Gelatin-Urea Delivery System for Biostimulation Purposes. Macromol. Symp. 2024, 413, 2300118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Nuzzo, A.; Mazzei, P.; Savy, D.; Di Meo, V.; Piccolo, A. Bio-Based Hydrogels Composed of Humic Matter and Pectins of Different Degree of Methyl-Esterification. Molecules 2020, 25, 2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Afnan, F.; Kashem, M.N.H.; Joshi, R.; Simpson, C.; Li, W. Growth of Romaine Lettuce in Eggshell Powder Mixed Alginate Hydrogel in an Aeroponic System for Water Conservation and Vitamin C Biofortification. Gels 2024, 10, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; Skrzypczak, D.; Mironiuk, M.; Moustakas, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Chojnacka, K. Controlled Release Micronutrient Fertilizers for Precision Agriculture—A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 712, 136365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; Mironiuk, M.; Szopa, D.; Chojnacka, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Selection of Matrix Material for Hydrogel Carriers of Plant Micronutrients. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 3031–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Fabian, D.R.C.; Durpekova, S.; Dusankova, M.; Hanusova, D.; Bergerova, E.D.; Sedlacik, M.; Skoda, D.; Sedlarik, V. Renewable Whey-Based Hydrogel with Polysaccharides and Polyvinyl Alcohol as a Soil Amendment for Sustainable Agricultural Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 259, 129056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Tay, J.; Hoddle, M.S.; Mulchandani, A.; Choe, D. Development of an Alginate Hydrogel to Deliver Aqueous Bait for Pest Ant Management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 2028–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Ritonga, H.; Nurfadillah, A.; Rembon, F.S.; Ramadhan, L.O.A.N.; Nurdin, M. Preparation of Chitosan-EDTA Hydrogel as Soil Conditioner for Soybean Plant (Glycine Max). Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 9, 100277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Pang, S.C.; Chin, S.F.; Tay, S.H.; Tchong, F.M. Starch–Maleate–Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogels with Controllable Swelling Behaviors. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Raafat, A.I.; Eid, M.; El-Arnaouty, M.B. Radiation Synthesis of Superabsorbent CMC Based Hydrogels for Agriculture Applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2012, 283, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Djafaripetroudy, S.; Fatehi, P.; El Idrissi, A.; Kang, K.; Abidi, N.; McLaren, B. Advancing Agricultural Efficiency and Sustainability: Bio-Inspired Superabsorbent Hydrogels for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 977, 179366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Park, J.; Guan, W.; Yu, G. Smart Hydrogels for Sustainable Agriculture. EcoMat 2025, 7, e70011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Ungureanu, E.; Mikhailidi, A.; Tofanica, B.-M.; Fortună, M.E.; Rotaru, R.; Ungureanu, O.C.; Samuil, C.; Popa, V.I. Sustainable Gels from Polysaccharides in Agriculture. Polysaccharides 2025, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Ma, K.; Uddin, N.; Jin, H.; Ullah, M.W.; Shah, S.W.A.; Sakrabani, R.; Zhu, D. Lignin-Based Cryogels for Advancing Sustainable Crop Production via Enhanced Nutrient Accessibility and Growth Efficiency. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 287, 138613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Wan Anuar, W.A.N.; Ramli, R.A.; El-Sayed, M.M.; Warkar, S.G. Recent Study on Biodegradable Hydrogels for Agriculture Application: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 115679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Lerma, T.A.; Chamorro, A.F.; Palencia, M. Effect of Soil Conditioners Based on Geomimetic Materials on Plant Growth in Degraded Soils: Poly(Acrylic Acid)/Bentonite. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Luligo-Montealegre, W.E.; Prado-Alzate, S.; Ayala-Aponte, A.; Tirado, D.F.; Serna-Cock, L. Aloe Vera Cuticle: A Promising Organic Water-Retaining Agent for Agricultural Use. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Sethi, G.; Behera, K.K.; Sayyed, R.; Adarsh, V.; Sipra, B.S.; Singh, L.; Alamro, A.A.; Behera, M. Enhancing Soil Health and Crop Productivity: The Role of Zinc-Solubilizing Bacteria in Sustainable Agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, 105, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Kaur Takkar, M.; Gumber, K. Agro-Nanocarriers: An Emerging Trend for Better Plant Nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 2024, 47, 332–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Yan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lai, B.; Wang, C.; Wu, H. Recent Advances in Marine-Derived Protein/Polysaccharide Hydrogels: Classification, Fabrication, Characterization, Mechanism and Food Applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 151, 104637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Li, S.; Chen, G. Agricultural Waste-Derived Superabsorbent Hydrogels: Preparation, Performance, and Socioeconomic Impacts. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 251, 119669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Ni, N.; Dumont, M.-J. Protein-Based Hydrogels Derived from Industrial Byproducts Containing Collagen, Keratin, Zein and Soy. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Lee, P.; Lin, X.; Khan, F.; Bennett, A.E.; Winter, J.O. Translating Controlled Release Systems from Biomedicine to Agriculture. Front. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 1, 1011877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. European Parliament. Council of the European Union Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 Laying down Rules on the Making Available on the Market of EU Fertilising Products and Amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003. 2019. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1009/oj (accessed on 13 March 2026).
Figure 1. General perspective of hydrogel research in agriculture: main problems, possible raw materials, applications, advantages and drawbacks.
Figure 1. General perspective of hydrogel research in agriculture: main problems, possible raw materials, applications, advantages and drawbacks.
Gels 12 00259 g001
Figure 2. Overview of different additives for hydrogel modification in agriculture, classified as biological, nanomaterials, and inorganic and organic additives.
Figure 2. Overview of different additives for hydrogel modification in agriculture, classified as biological, nanomaterials, and inorganic and organic additives.
Gels 12 00259 g002
Figure 3. Mechanism of gelation and stimuli involved in the formation of hydrogels in agricultural applications.
Figure 3. Mechanism of gelation and stimuli involved in the formation of hydrogels in agricultural applications.
Gels 12 00259 g003
Table 1. List of commercially available hydrogel products used in agriculture, including the raw materials, key properties and manufacturers.
Table 1. List of commercially available hydrogel products used in agriculture, including the raw materials, key properties and manufacturers.
Raw MaterialsCommercial
Hydrogel
PropertiesManufacturerReferences
Potassium polyacrylate
(KPA)
Plant Hydrogel; Potassium
Polyacrylate
Absorbs 300 times its weight in water
Enhances seed germination and root development
Increases soil water retention
Enhances the utilization of organic matter within the soil
Decreases the loss of fertilizers
Alquera Ciencia SL (Spain)[63]
TRPSORBTMHigh water absorption capacity and controlled release of nutrients
Long life cycle (1–3 years)
Significantly increases seedling survival rate
Qingdao SOCO New Material Co., Ltd.[64]
Control GardenOptimizes water use
Suitable for hot climates
Facilitates the growth of roots
GrowMania SL (Spain)[58]
PlaraIncreases plant drought resistance
Ensures a stable water supply for plants
Improves the quality and size of fruits and vegetables
Plara Sp.z.o.o (Poland)[59]
ALSTA HydrogelAbility to absorb up to 500 times its weight in water
Compatible with all soil and plant types
Chemtex SL (India)[65]
Potassium-based polymerAgua GelBiodegradable
Decrease water irrigation cycles
Increase soil porosity
Novingrecons SLU (Spain)[66]
Hydrolyzed gelatinAgrogel Enables complexation of macronutrients
Controlled release of nitrogen via microbial activity
Ability to absorb between 150–200% of deionized water
ILSA S.p.A (Italy)[67]
Carboxymethyl cellulose-grafted anionic polyacrylate polymerPusa HydrogelHigh fluid absorption in the presence of fertilizers
Maintains water absorption capacity at high temperatures
Slow release of water
Employment for an extended time
IARI, New Delhi[68]
Acrylate/Acrylamide copolymerWaterlock 93NAbsorbs 100 times the water during multiple cycles
Moisture environment
Biodegrades into CO2, H2O, nitrogen, etc.
Can be used for 2–3 years
Acuro Organics Ltd., New Delhi[69]
Table 2. Raw materials for hydrogels applied to agriculture depend on their origin, including synthetic polymers and natural polymers.
Table 2. Raw materials for hydrogels applied to agriculture depend on their origin, including synthetic polymers and natural polymers.
RAW MATERIALS
FOR HYDROGELS IN AGRICULTURE
SYNTHETIC POLYMERSAcrylic acid and acrylic derivatives
Vinyl polymers
Polyethylene glycol and polyurethanes
NATURAL POLYMERSBased on polysaccharidesChitin and chitosan
Sodium alginate
Agar
K-carrageenan
Starch
Cellulose
Lignin
Xanthan gum
Guar gum
Based on proteinsCollagen and gelatin
Keratin
Soy protein
Table 3. Major advantages and disadvantages of synthetic polymer-based and natural polymer-based hydrogels.
Table 3. Major advantages and disadvantages of synthetic polymer-based and natural polymer-based hydrogels.
Classification of HydrogelsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Synthetic polymer hydrogels
  • High water absorption capacity
  • Durability
  • Tunable mechanical properties
  • Tunable swelling properties
  • Effectiveness under drought conditions
  • Poor biodegradability
  • Possible presence of residual monomers
  • Potential toxicity
Natural polymer hydrogels
  • Biodegradability
  • Environmentally friendly
  • Derived from renewable resources
  • Non-toxic
  • Lower water absorption capacity
  • Rapid degradation in soil
  • Weak mechanical properties
Table 6. Hydrogels for controlled release of agrochemical products, including information on the main polymer used, the agrochemical, and the release time.
Table 6. Hydrogels for controlled release of agrochemical products, including information on the main polymer used, the agrochemical, and the release time.
Main PolymerAgrochemical (AC)Release TimeReference
Sodium alginate, acrylic acid, acrylamideUrea100% within 20 days[97]
Gelatin, polyacrylamideUrea100% within 6 days[296]
P2O5
K2SO4
Agar, StarchAtrazine100% after 6 days[297]
Gelatin, methacrylamide, agarLinuron100% after 3 days[165]
Sodium alginate, carboxymethyl chitosanUrea75–90% after 26 days[139]
Sodium alginate, starchDiammonium hydrogen phosphate10–12 wt% after 30 days[298]
Halloysite, sodium alginateUrea100% after 36–60 h[299]
Bentonite, sodium carboxymethyl celluloseMetolachlor50% after 158 h[181]
Starch, chitosanAtrazine750 mg/0.5 g hydrogel after 750 h[137]
StarchUrea80–90% after 42 h[267]
StarchUrea80–90% after 30 days[176]
Sodium alginate, starchUrea100% after more than 50 days[157]
Cellulose, polylactic acidPotassium nitrate85% within 96 h[300]
Starch, polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl alcoholUrea35–75% within 30 days[110]
Carboxymethyl cellulose, acrylic acidUrea210–220 mg/dL hydrogel for 144 h[86]
Carboxymethyl celluloseNPK fertilizer72 h[186]
Carboxymethyl cellulose, polyacrylic acidPhosphorus27–32% after 150 min[88]
Table 7. Biodegradability of different hydrogels, including information about the main polymer used, the conditions and the days for biodegradation.
Table 7. Biodegradability of different hydrogels, including information about the main polymer used, the conditions and the days for biodegradation.
Main PolymerConditionsRange of Days of BiodegradationReference
Sodium alginate, carboxymethyl celluloseRoom temperature for 30 days21.4–25.5% of degradation after 30 days[139]
Sodium alginate, chitosanRoom temperature for 30 days30.2716–33.5697% of degradation after 30 days[141]
Lignin and PEDGERoom temperature for 40 days15–82% of degradation for 40 days[197]
Xanthan gum, gelatinRoom temperature for 40 days65–70% mass loss after 60 days[202]
Soy protein isolate, polyvinyl alcoholRoom temperature for 100 days65.18% mass loss after 100 days[220]
Gelatin, polyvinyl alcoholRoom temperature for 28 days40–47% mass loss after 28 days[215]
Sodium alginate, polyvinyl alcoholRoom temperature for 120 days36.9–47.4% weight loss after 120 days[149]
Acrylic acid30 °C for 60 days63% weight loss after 60 days[306]
Guar gum, pectin, acrylamideFor 30 days45% of the mass was degraded after 30 days[307]
Sodium alginateRoom temperature for 60 days6% of the mass was in the first 60 days and 14% after the second 60 days[151]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Granados-Carrera, C.M.; Perez-Puyana, V.M.; Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Romero, A. Hydrogel Development, Processing and Applications in Agriculture: A Review. Gels 2026, 12, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12030259

AMA Style

Granados-Carrera CM, Perez-Puyana VM, Jiménez-Rosado M, Romero A. Hydrogel Development, Processing and Applications in Agriculture: A Review. Gels. 2026; 12(3):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12030259

Chicago/Turabian Style

Granados-Carrera, Carmen Mª., Victor M. Perez-Puyana, Mercedes Jiménez-Rosado, and Alberto Romero. 2026. "Hydrogel Development, Processing and Applications in Agriculture: A Review" Gels 12, no. 3: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12030259

APA Style

Granados-Carrera, C. M., Perez-Puyana, V. M., Jiménez-Rosado, M., & Romero, A. (2026). Hydrogel Development, Processing and Applications in Agriculture: A Review. Gels, 12(3), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12030259

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop