Next Article in Journal
A Rapid Screening Program for Histoplasmosis, Tuberculosis, and Cryptococcosis Reduces Mortality in HIV Patients from Guatemala
Next Article in Special Issue
Aequorin as a Useful Calcium-Sensing Reporter in Candida albicans
Previous Article in Journal
Stimulatory Effects of Oleci Acid and Fungal Elicitor on Betulinic Acid Production by Submerged Cultivation of Medicinal Mushroom Inonotus obliquus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental Clonal Spread of Azole-Resistant Candida parapsilosis with Erg11-Y132F Mutation Causing a Large Candidemia Outbreak in a Brazilian Cancer Referral Center
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 4
10.3390/jof7040267
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiology of Candidemia: Three-Year Results from a Croatian Tertiary Care Hospital

by
Ivana Mareković
1,*,
Sanja Pleško
1,
Violeta Rezo Vranješ
1,
Zoran Herljević
1,
Tomislav Kuliš
2 and
Marija Jandrlić
1
1
Department of Clinical and Molecular Microbiology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(4), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040267
Submission received: 28 February 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 29 March 2021 / Published: 31 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives for Candidiasis)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Invasive candidosis is the most common invasive fungal infection in hospitalized patients and is associated with a high mortality rate. This is the first study from a Croatian tertiary care hospital describing epidemiology, risk factors and species distribution in patients with candidemia. A three-year retrospective observational study, from 2018 to 2020, was performed at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. A total of 160 patients with candidemia (n = 170 isolates) were enrolled. Candidemia incidence increased from 0.47 to 0.69 per 1000 admissions in 2018 and 2020, respectively. Ninety-five patients (58.38%) were in the intensive care unit. The main risk factors for candidemia were central venous catheter (CVC) (84.38%), previous surgical procedure (56.88%) and invasive mechanical ventilation (42.50%). Candida albicans was identified in 43.53% of isolates, followed by C. parapsilosis (31.76%) and C. glabrata (12.36%), C. krusei (5.29%), C. tropicalis (2.35%) and C. lusitaniae (2.35%). The study discovered a shift to non-albicans Candida species, particularly C. parapsilosis, and made it possible to determine the main tasks we should focus on to prevent candidemia in the hospital, these being mainly infection control measures directed towards prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections, specifically comprising hand hygiene and CVC bundles of care. The potential benefit of fluconazole prophylaxis in certain populations of surgical patients could also be considered.

1. Introduction

Invasive candidosis (IC) is the most common invasive fungal infection in hospitalized patients, especially in tertiary care hospitals. Despite advances in the medical care of critically ill patients, IC is still considered difficult to diagnose, causes prolonged hospitalization and a mortality rate ranging from 20% to 40% and poses a significant financial burden for hospital healthcare systems. Although IC refers to bloodstream infections and deep-seated infections, including intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis or osteomyelitis, the majority of epidemiological surveys on IC are still based solely on documented bloodstream infections—candidemia. This may be because this is the most common form of IC but also due to the difficulties in diagnosing deep-seated infections without candidemia [1].
The majority of invasive infections are caused by five pathogens: Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis and Candida krusei. C. albicans continues to be the most prevalent Candida spp. in both adult and pediatric populations. However, over the last decades, species distribution has been changing, with a decrease in a proportion of C. albicans and an increase in C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata as a consequence of antifungal use and specific patients’ risk factors. This shift from C. albicans to non-albicans Candida spp. has been observed in epidemiological studies worldwide, where non-albicans Candida spp. represent >50% of the bloodstream isolates [2,3,4,5,6].
The global incidence of candidemia has increased in the last decade and is dependent upon geographical location and patient population. Recent global estimates have suggested that roughly 700,000 cases of invasive candidiasis occur annually. There are studies from many European countries analyzing the epidemiology of candidemia, showing differences between countries and underscoring the necessity of surveillance. These data are sometimes difficult to compare because there is extensive population-based surveillance performed in some countries while in others there are only small studies with patient days, patient discharges, hospital admissions or ICU admissions used as denominators. However, knowing the local incidence, risk patient populations and species distribution is a basis for adequate management of candidemia, including empirical antifungal treatment, prophylaxis and infection prevention and control measures [7].
Different well-described risk factors have been recognized to be associated with candidemia: patient in intensive care unit (ICU) with or without assisted ventilation, central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition, diabetes, renal replacement therapy, multiple abdominal surgery, necrotizing pancreatitis, etc. [8,9]. Identification of risk factors is necessary because this is the key to successful prevention and empirical treatment of candidemia in patients with the above mentioned risk factors, especially those who have been treated previously with broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Candida spp. rank in the top three or four pathogens causing health-care-associated bloodstream infections. COVID-19 extensively influenced patient care in the year 2020. Many studies have been published describing the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as outcomes, of COVID-19 patients, including those in ICUs. However, little is known about infectious complications, including bloodstream infections, caused by other pathogens and their influence on the outcome of COVID-19 patients, especially those in ICUs. The interaction between COVID-19 and incidence of candidemia is currently under investigation. It is obvious that every study about the epidemiology of candidemia that includes the year 2020 should have an observation regarding the impact of COVID-10 on the incidence of candidemia [10].
Data on the epidemiology of candidemia in Croatia, either from tertiary care hospitals or at the national level, are scarce at the moment. This is the first study from Croatia, specifically from its largest tertiary care hospital, describing incidence, risk factors and species distribution in patients with candidemia.

2. Materials and Methods

This three-year retrospective observational study was performed at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, a 1795-bed tertiary care hospital, from January 2018 to December 2020. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Centre Zagreb.
Candidemia was defined as at least one positive blood culture for Candida spp., from at least one peripheral or central line blood culture, in patients with signs or symptoms of infection. Collected demographic and clinical patient data included age, gender, underlying diseases and risk factors for candidemia.
Isolation of Candida spp. from blood was undertaken with one of two blood culture systems, BACT/ALERT®VIRTUO (BioMerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) and BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NY, USA), using aerobe and anaerobe blood cultures with incubation in the instrument for up to five days. Bottles flagged positive were subjected to Gram staining. Direct identification from positive blood culture was done with peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) (AdvanDx, Woburn, MA, USA) and identification of isolates grown after subculture on solid media was performed with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) to the species level.
Susceptibility testing to antifungal agents was performed by reference method broth microdilution and interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [11]. Only Candida spp. isolates from the period 2019–2020 were tested with this reference method because the method was introduced in the routine praxis of the lab during 2018. Statistical analysis included descriptive frequency tables and calculation of incidence per 1000 admissions. To analyze risk factors associated with specific Candida species, a multivariate logistic regression model was applied. A backward stepwise logistic regression was used, and selected variables were analyzed in the model using a cut-off p value of 0.10. Results are reported with the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p value. Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc for Windows, version 19.7.2 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). Patients with mixed candidemia were not included in logistic regression statistical analysis.

3. Results

During the three-year study period a total of 160 patients with candidemia (n = 170 isolates) were identified in our hospital and the overall candidemia incidence increased from 0.47 to 0.69 per 1000 admissions in 2018 and 2020, respectively (Table 1).
The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are shown in Table 2. Out of 160 patients with candidemia, 54.38% were male and 45.62% were female. The median age was 62 (mean age 51.65 years, range 0–86 years). Infants younger than 1 year of age accounted for 6.25% (10/160) and patients older than 70 years for 23.75% (38/160) of patients. Ninety-five of 160 patients (58.38%) were at the ICU at the time when candidemia was detected.
The main risk factors for candidemia were the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) (84.38%), being in the intensive care unit (59.38) and having had a previous surgical procedure (56.88%). Among the 91 patients who had undergone a surgical procedure, 24.38% had abdominal surgery. Repeated surgical procedure was necessary in 54 patients (33.75%), mainly after abdominal surgery (23/54, 42.59%).
During the three-year period, C. albicans was identified in 43.53% of isolates, followed by C. parapsilosis (31.76%), C. glabrata (12.36%), C. krusei (5.29%), C. tropicalis (2.35%) and C. lusitaniae (2.35%) (Table 3). Other species represented < 1% of isolates. Mixed infections due to combinations of two different Candida spp. occurred in nine patients (5.63%). The combinations were C. albicans and C. glabrata (n = 2); C. albicans and C. tropicalis (n = 1); C. albicans and C. lusitaniae (n = 1); C. lusitaniae and C. parapsilosis (n = 1); C. albicans and C. parapsilosis (n = 1); C. fabianii, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis (n = 1); C. albicans and C. guillermondii (n = 1); and C. albicans and C. krusei (n = 1).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for candidemia with the three most frequently isolated Candida spp. is shown in Table 4. The proportion rate of C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species during the three-year study period is shown in Figure 1.
The results of susceptibility testing of the three most frequently isolated Candida spp. to antifungal agents are shown in Table 5. Susceptibility dose-dependent or resistance to fluconazole was detected in 52 (51.49%) of the isolates, mainly in C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata. Resistance to the three echinocandins was found in six C. albicans isolates and one C. parapsilosis isolate. All Candida spp. isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B.

4. Discussion

This is the first study describing incidence, species distribution and risk factors in patients with candidemia in Croatia; it was performed retrospectively at the largest Croatian tertiary care hospital over a three-year period.
Studies from several European countries demonstrated an increase in the incidence of candidemia during the last decade, as was shown in our study for the last three-year period [3,4,5,6]. There is a reasonable explanation for this: the increasing number of complex surgical procedures, solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell transplantations, implantations of indwelling devices and patients treated with antineoplastic and immunosuppressive therapy, as well as the increasing number of elderly patients with underlying diseases. In a recent study analyzing the epidemiology of candidemia in Europe, the incidence rate for the total hospital-based setting was 0.83 per 1000 admissions per year, varying from 0.17 in Finland to 2.19 in Portugal [7]. Incidence rates observed in our study were within European frames. The functioning of healthcare systems, including hospitals, in 2020 was largely determined by the COVID-19 pandemic. According to published data, it is still not clear whether COVID-19 patients show a higher incidence of candidemia. Also, there is still no comparison of clinical presentation and outcomes between patients with and without COVID-19 available [12,13,14]. In our study in the year 2020, there were no COVID-19 patients among the patients with candidemia because the ward and intensive care unit for COVID-19 patients did not exist in the hospital until the end of 2020 and during our study period COVID-19 patients were transferred to other COVID-19-dedicated hospitals.
In various surveys conducted in Europe, about 40–50% of patients were at the ICU at the time of candidemia. Many studies that have discussed patients hospitalized in ICUs and determined risk factors for candidemia [15,16,17,18,19,20]. More than half of patients with candidemia (59.38%) in our study were ICU patients. Having a central venous catheter or previous surgical procedure were the most frequently present clinical characteristics, found in 135 (84.38%) and 91 (56.88%) patients with candidemia, respectively.
The significance of previous surgical procedures as a risk factor for candidemia, especially abdominal surgery, has been demonstrated in many previous publications [21,22,23,24]. Among 160 patients with candidemia in our study, 91 (56.88%) had undergone a previous surgical procedure, predominantly an abdominal type of surgery. According to current ESCMID guidelines, fluconazole prophylaxis is recommended in patients who have recently undergone abdominal surgery and have recurrent gastrointestinal perforations or anastomotic leakages. In our hospital setting, fluconazole prophylaxis is not routinely administered in this patient population [25].
Although C. albicans was the most common species isolated in our patients (43.53%) throughout the three-year period, there was also a high incidence of the second-ranked C. parapsilosis, accounting for a total of 31.76% of all isolates, followed by C. glabrata (12.35%). The proportion of C. albicans in our study dropped to less than 50% of all Candida spp. isolates, showing the shift to non-albicans Candida species. This finding has important clinical implications, as C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata show decreased susceptibility to azoles and echinocandins, respectively. Epidemiology studies from European countries show that this shift is not yet a universal characteristic as there are still countries in which C. albicans is the predominant species [26,27]. Our results show a Candida spp. distribution typical for southern Europe, with C. parapsilosis ranked second and C. glabrata third in frequency. A high percentage of C. parapsilosis, similar to our study, can also be found in Latin America and Africa. In studies from Italy and Spain, the incidence of this species ranged from 14.8 to 46.8% [15,28,29]. The explanation for this distribution is unknown, although it may be a consequence of climate influence, antifungal policy or central venous catheter care procedures [30]. In contrast, in northern Europe, the USA and Australia, C. albicans has been gradually replaced by C. glabrata, which ranks second in these geographical areas [31,32].
In our study, diabetes mellitus and invasive mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for C. albicans candidemia. Several mechanisms provide the basis for the predisposition of diabetic patients for candidemia: yeast adhesion to epithelial cell surfaces, higher salivary glucose levels, reduced salivary flow, microvascular degeneration and impaired candidacidal activity of neutrophils. Some authors have also suggested that there is also higher C. albicans colonization of the oral cavity and intestines in these patients [33]. In patients on long-term mechanical ventilation, there are many coexisting factors (broad-spectrum antibiotics, intravenous steroids, etc.), making these patients prone to fungal colonization or invasive fungal disease. However, the routine and universal administration of antifungal prophylaxis in critically ill patients is not recommended [34,35].
Younger age and CVC were independent risk factors for C. parapsilosis candidemia. It is well-known that C. parapsilosis is a fungal agent that mostly affects patients with CVC hospitalized in ICUs, as well as the pediatric population, especially neonates. This species can be isolated from patients’ skin, the hands of healthcare workers and the hospital environment and is associated with colonization of catheters. Furthermore, C. parapsilosis genotypes recovered from hands were also found in blood samples, thus suggesting that the infections caused by C. parapsilosis might be, in part, attributable to horizontal transmission of this species by hospital staff [36,37]. In previous studies, prior antibiotic therapy parenteral nutrition, prior surgery, prior immunosuppressive therapy, malignancy, caspofungin treatment and transplant receipt have all been identified as risk factors for C. parapsilosis candidemia, showing that the rise of C. parapsilosis may be considered a consequence of advances in healthcare [38].
Older age and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were independent risk factors for C. glabrata candidemia. C. glabrata has already been found to be more frequent in the elderly in previous studies, and there is not a clear explanation for this finding [30,39]. Regarding TPN, the data in the literature are so far inconclusive—there are studies showing the association of TPN with both C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species [40,41].
The most prominent finding regarding antifungal susceptibility was the high rate of fluconazole resistance of 83.33% (30/36) in C. parapsilosis. The emergence of fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis has been increasingly reported recently. Furthermore, according to previous studies, patients with candidemia due to resistant isolates had poorer outcomes in comparison to those with susceptible ones [42].
This is the first study from a Croatian tertiary care hospital describing the epidemiology of candidemia. As knowledge of candidemia epidemiology in Europe is based on the individual engagements of researchers in the field of mycology and microbiology, our study presents a significant contribution, as data from Croatia were missing so far on the candidemia map of Europe. The main contributions of this study are the discovered shift to non-albicans species, particularly C. parapsilosis, and the high rate of fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis. Although the epidemiology of candidemia is specific to each hospital/center, and even to each ward, this study may be an indicator of what we can expect in future studies published from other Croatian hospitals. Our results also make it possible to determine the main tasks we should focus on in order to prevent candidemia in the hospital. Specific tasks include further improvements in the implementation of infection control measures directed towards prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections, specifically comprising hand hygiene and CVC bundles of care. Physicians should also be aware of the risk of candidemia in patients on long-term mechanical ventilation. The potential benefit of fluconazole prophylaxis in certain populations of surgical patients can also be considered. Further surveillance of epidemiological characteristics and candidemia rates in our hospital as well as at the national level is needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M. and S.P.; methodology, M.J.; software, Z.H. and T.K.; validation, M.J., V.R.V. and Z.H.; formal analysis, S.P.; investigation, V.R.V.; resources, I.M.; data curation, Z.H. and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.; writing—review and editing, M.J.; visualization, V.R.V.; supervision, I.M.; project administration, V.R.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Centre Zagreb (protocol code Klasa: 8.1-21/26-2; Broj: 02/21 AG, date of approval 8 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived as no individual patients’ names or surnames, age or gender were mentioned in the paper and only routine clinical and microbiological data were collected.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pappas, P.G.; Lionakis, M.S.; Arendrup, M.C.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Kullberg, B.J. Invasive candidiasis. Nat. Rev. 2018, 4, 10026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schroeder, M.; Weber, T.; Denker, T.; Winterland, S.; Wichmann, S.; Rohde, H.; Ozga, A.-K.; Fischer, M.; Kluge, S. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of candidemia in critically ill patients in Germany: A single-center retrospective 10-year analysis. Ann. Intensive Care 2020, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tortorano, A.M.; Peman, J.; Bernhardt, H.; Klingspor, L.; Kibbler, C.C.; Faure, O.; Biraghi, E.; Canton, E.; Zimmermann, K.; Seaton, S.; et al. the ECMM Working Group on Candidaemia. Epidemiology of Candidaemia in Europe: Results of 28-Month European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Hospital-Based Surveillance Study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 23, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tortorano, A.M.; Prigitano, A.; Lazzarini, C.; Passera, M.; Deiana, M.L.; Cavinato, S.; De Luca, C.; Grancini, A.; Lo Cascio, G.; Ossi, C.; et al. A 1-year prospective survey of candidemia in Italy and changing epidemiology over one decade. Infection 2013, 41, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tadec, L.; Talarmin, J.P.; Gastinne, T.; Bretonniere, C.; Miegeville, M.; La Pape, P.; Morio, F. Epidemiology, risk factor, species distribution, antifungal resistance and outcome of candidemia at a single French hospital: A 7 year study. Mycoses 2016, 59, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koehler, P.; Stecher, M.; Cornely, O.A.; Koehler, D.; Vehreschild, M.J.G.T.; Bohlius, J.; Wisplinghoff, H.; Vehreschild, J.J. Morbidity and mortality of candidaemia in Europe: An epidemiologic meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 1200–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, O.; Denning, D.W. Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases—Estimate Precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Poissy, J.; Damonti, L.; Bignon, A.; Khanna, N.; Von Kietzell, M.; Boggian, K.; Neofytos, D.; Vuotto, F.; Coiteux, V.; Artru, F.; et al. The FUNGINOS and Allfun French Study Groups. Risk factors for candidemia: A prospective matched case-control study. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Berdal, J.-E.; Haagensen, R.; Ranheim, T.; Bjørnholt, J.V. Nosocomial Candidemia; Risk Factors and Prognosis Revisited; 11 Years Experience from a Norwegian Secondary Hospital. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Giacobbe, D.R.; Battaglini, D.; Ball, L.; Brunetti, I.; Bruzzone, B.; Codda, G.; Crea, F.; de Maria, A.; Dentone, C.; Di Biagio, A.; et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 50, e13319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. CLSI. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Standard, 4th ed.; CLSI Document M27; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mastrangelo, A.; Germinario, B.N.; Ferrante, M.; Frangi, C.; Li Voti, R.; Muccini, C.; Ripa, M.; On behalf of COVID-BioB Study Group. Candidemia in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: Incidence and Characteristics in a Prospective Cohort Compared with Historical Non–COVID-19 Controls. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. White, P.L.; Dillon, R.; Healy, B.; Wise, M.P.; Backs, M. Candidemia in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Link to Disease Pathology or Increased Clinical Pressures? Infect. Dis. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arastehfar, A.; Carvalho, A.; Nguyen, M.H.; Hedayati, M.T.; Netea, M.G.; Perlin, D.S.; Hoenigl, M. COVID-19-Associated Candidiasis (CAC): An Underestimated Complication in the Absence of Immunological Predispositions? J. Fungi 2020, 6, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bassetti, M.; Merelli, M.; Righi, E.; Diaz-Martin, A.; Rosello, E.M.; Luzzati, R.; Parra, A.; Trecarichi, E.M.; Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; et al. Epidemiology, Species Distribution, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Outcome of Candidemia across Five Sites in Italy and Spain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 4167–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, R.; Luan, Z.; Ma, X. Risk of invasive candidiasis with prolonged duration of ICU stay: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e036452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hankovszky, P.; Társy, D.; Öveges, N.; Molnár, Z. Invasive Candida Infections in the ICU:Diagnosis and Therapy. J. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 1, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Eliakim-Raz, N.; Babaoff, R.; Yahav, D.; Yanai, S.; Shaked, H.; Bishara, J. Epidemiology, microbiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of candidemia in internal medicine wards—a retrospective study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 52, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Bassetti, M.; Giacobbe, D.R.; Vena, A.; Trucchi, C.; Ansaldi, F.; Antonelli, M.; Adamkova, V.; Alicino, C.; Almyroudi, M.-P.; Atchade, E.; et al. Incidence and outcome of invasive candidiasis in intensive care units (ICUs) in Europe: Results of the EUCANDICU project. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tortorano, A.M.; Dho, G.; Prigitano, A.; Breda, G.; Grancini, A.; Emmi, V.; Cavanna, C.; Marino, G.; Morero, S.; Ossi, C.; et al. Invasive fungal infections in the intensive care unit: A multicentre, prospective, observational study in Italy (2006–2008). Mycoses 2011, 55, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brotfain, E.; Sebbag, G.; Friger, M.; Kirshtein, B.; Borer, A.; Koyfman, L.; Frank, D.; Bichovsky, Y.; Peiser, J.G.; Klein, M. Invasive Candida Infection after Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery for Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, W.; Song, X.; Wu, H.; Zheng, R. Epidemiology, species distribution, and predictive factors for mortality of candidemia in adult surgical patients. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Klingspor, L.; Tortorano, A.M.; Peman, J.; Willinger, B.; Hamal, P.; Sendid, B.; Velegraki, A.; Kibbler, C.; Meis, J.F.; Sabino, R.; et al. Invasive Candida infections in surgical patients in intensive care units: A prospective, multicentre survey initiated by the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) (2006–2008). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 87.e1–87.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Aguilar, G.; Delgado, C.; Corrales, I.; Izquierdo, A.; Gracia, E.; Moreno, T.; Romero, E.; Ferrando, C.; Carbonell, J.A.; Borrás, R.; et al. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in a surgical intensive care unit: An observational study. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Cornely, O.A.; Bassetti, M.; Calandra, T.; Garbino, J.; Kullberg, B.J.; Lortholary, O.; Meersseman, W.; Akova, M.; Arendrup, M.C.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; et al. for the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group (EFISG) ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: Non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Goemaere, B.; Becker, P.; Van Wijngaerden, E.; Maertens, J.; Spriet, I.; Hendrick, M.; Lagrou, K. Increasing candidaemia incidence from 2004 to 2015 with a shift in epidemiology in patients preexposed to antifungals. Mycoses 2018, 61, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sasso, M.; Roger, C.; Sasso, M.; Poujo, H.; Barbar, S.; Lefrant, J.-L.; Lachaud, L. Changes in the distribution of colonising and infecting Candida spp. isolates, antifungal drug consumption and susceptibility in a French intensive care unit: A 10-year study. Mycoses 2017, 60, 770–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Montagna, M.T.; Caggiano, G.; Lovero, G.; De Giglio, O.; Coretti, C.; Cuna, T.; Iatta, R.; Giglio, M.; Dalfino, L.; Bruno, F.; et al. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infections in the intensive care unit: Results of a multicenter Italian survey (AURORA Project). Infection 2013, 41, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Quindos, G. Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guinea, J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ericsson, J.; Chryssanthou, E.; Klingspor, L.; Johansson, A.G.; Ljungman, P.; Svensson, E.; Sjolin, J. Candidemia in Sweden: Nationwide prospective observational survey. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, E218–E221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lamoth, F.; Lockhart, S.R.; Berkow, E.L.; Calandra, T. Changes in the epidemiology landscape of invasive candidiasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, i4–i13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rodrigues, C.F.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Henriques, M. Candida sp. Infections in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Chakraborti, A.; Jaiswal, A.; Kumar Verma, P.; Singhal, R. A Prospective Study of Fungal Colonization and Invasive Fungal Disease in Long-Term Mechanically Ventilated Patients in a Respiratory Intensive Care Unit. Ind. J. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 22, 597–601. [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin-Loeches, I.; Antonelli, M.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Dimopoulos, G.; Einav, S.; De Waele, J.J.; Garnacho-Montero, J.; Kanj, S.; Machado, F.R.; Montravers, P.; et al. ESICM/ESCMID task force on practical management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2019, 45, 789–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Walsh, T.J.; Katragkou, A.; Chen, T.; Salvatore, C.M.; Roilides, E. Invasive Candidiasis in Infants and Children: Recent Advances in Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Delfino, D.; Scordino, F.; Pernice, I.; Lo Pass, C.; Galbo, R.; David, A.; Barberi, I.; Criseo, G.; Cascio, A.; Romero, O. Potential association of specific Candida parapsilosis genotypes, bloodstream infections and colonization of health workers’ hands. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O946–O951, 101111/1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Trofa, D.; Gacser, A.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Candida parapsilosis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 21, 606–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Malani, A.N.; Psarros, G.; Malani, P.N.; Kauffman, C.A. Is age a risk factor for Candida glabrata colonisation? Mycoses 2011, 54, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhank, W.; Song, X.; Wu, H.; Zheng, R. Epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of Candida albicans vs. non-albicans candidaemia in adult patients in Northeast China. Epidemiol. Infect. 2019, e277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Guducuoglu, H.; Gultepe, B.; Otlu, B.; Bektas, A.; Yıldırım, O.; Tuncer, O.; Berktas, M. Candida albicans outbreak associated with total parenteral nutrition in the neonatal unit. Ind. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 34, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pristov, K.E.; Ghannoum, M.A. Resistance of Candida to azoles and echinocandins worldwide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 07 00267 g001 550
Figure 1. Proportion rate of C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species during the three-year study period.
Figure 1. Proportion rate of C. albicans and non-albicans Candida species during the three-year study period.
Jof 07 00267 g001
Table
Table 1. Number of patients with candidemia, Candida spp. isolates, hospital admissions and incidence rates in three-year study period (2018–2020).
Table 1. Number of patients with candidemia, Candida spp. isolates, hospital admissions and incidence rates in three-year study period (2018–2020).
201820192020
Number of patients with candidemia505852
Number of Candida spp. isolates545858
Hospital admissions106,18688,00375,023
Incidence per 1000 admissions0.470.660.69
Table
Table 2. Demographic data and clinical characteristics of 160 patients with candidemia.
Table 2. Demographic data and clinical characteristics of 160 patients with candidemia.
Median:Mean (Range) or n (%)
Age (years)62:51.65 (0–86)
Gender (male)87 (54.38)
Clinical characteristic a
Central venous catheter135 (84.38)
Intensive care unit95 (59.38)
Previous surgical procedure91 (56.88)
Type of surgical procedure
Abdominal39 (24.38)
Cardiac13 (8.13)
Thoracic14 (8.75)
Vascular11 (6.88)
Neurosurgery7 (4.38
Orthopedic2 (1.25)
Multiple trauma0
Solid organ transplant1 (0.63)
Other6 (3.75)
Repeated surgery54 (33.75)
Invasive mechanical ventilation68 (42.50)
Total parenteral nutrition56 (35.00)
Solid tumor40 (25.00)
Hematological malignancy23 (14.38)
Dialysis at presentation23 (14.38)
Diabetes mellitus22 (13.75)
Pancreatitis 4 (2.50)
Burns0
Human immunodeficiency virus0
a some patients had more than one clinical characteristic.
Table
Table 3. Species distribution of Candida isolates in the three-year study period (2018–2020).
Table 3. Species distribution of Candida isolates in the three-year study period (2018–2020).
201820192020Total
C. albicans24 (44.45%)24 (41.38%)26 (44.83%)74 (43.53%)
C. parapsilosis19 (35.19%)21 (36.20%)14 (24.15%)54 (31.76%)
C. glabrata7 (12.96%)7 (12.07%)7 (12.07%)21 (12.36%)
C. krusei1 (1.85%)4 (6.90%)4 (6.90%)9 (5.29%)
C. tropicalis1 (1.85%)03 (5.17%)4 (2.35%)
C. lusitaniae2 (3.70%)2 (3.45%)04 (2.35%)
C. dubliniensis001 (1.72%)1 (0.59%)
C. fabianii001 (1.72%)1 (0.59%)
C. guilliermondii001 (1.72%)1 (0.59%)
C. kefyr001 (1.72%)1 (0.59%)
Total545858170
Table
Table 4. Independent risk factors associated with the three most frequently isolated Candida spp. (n = 151).
Table 4. Independent risk factors associated with the three most frequently isolated Candida spp. (n = 151).
C. albicans (n = 67)C. parapsilosis (n = 51)C. glabrata (n = 19)
OR95% CIpOR95% CIpOR95% CIp
Age 0.980.97–1.00.0111.051.01–1.080.011
Diabetes mellitus (21)4.211.48–12.30.007
Total parenteral nutrition (53)0.380.15–0.970.042 5.091.24–20.840.024
Invasive mechanical ventilation (64)2.170.88–5.400.094 0.200.05–0.860.030
Central venous catheter (126)0.400.16–1.050.0636.071.60–23.010.008
OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval; the cut-off p value for variables selected in the backward stepwise logistic regression was 0.10.; patients with mixed infections were not included in the analysis.
Table
Table 5. Susceptibility to antifungal agents of the three most frequently isolated Candida spp. in the period 2019–2020.
Table 5. Susceptibility to antifungal agents of the three most frequently isolated Candida spp. in the period 2019–2020.
Number (%) of Isolates
Species
(Number of Isolates)		Antifungal AgentSusceptibleSusceptible Dose-DependentResistant
C. albicans (51)Fluconazole49 (96.08)02 (3.92)
Anidulafungin49 (96.08)1 (1.96)1 (1.96)
Caspofungin48 (94.12)03 (5.88)
Micafungin49 (96.08)02 (3.92)
Amphotericin B51 (100.0)00
C. parapsilosis (36)Fluconazole6 (16.67)6 (16.67)30 (83.33)
Anidulafungin30 (83.33)5 (13.89)1 (2.78)
Caspofungin36 (100.0)00
Micafungin34 (94.4)2 (5.56)0
Amphotericin B36 (100.0)00
C. glabrata (14)Fluconazole010 (71.43)4 (28.57)
Anidulafungin14 (100.0)00
Caspofungin13 (92.86)1 (7.14)0
Micafungin14 (100.0)00
Amphotericin B14 (100.0)00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mareković, I.; Pleško, S.; Rezo Vranješ, V.; Herljević, Z.; Kuliš, T.; Jandrlić, M. Epidemiology of Candidemia: Three-Year Results from a Croatian Tertiary Care Hospital. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040267

AMA Style

Mareković I, Pleško S, Rezo Vranješ V, Herljević Z, Kuliš T, Jandrlić M. Epidemiology of Candidemia: Three-Year Results from a Croatian Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(4):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mareković, Ivana, Sanja Pleško, Violeta Rezo Vranješ, Zoran Herljević, Tomislav Kuliš, and Marija Jandrlić. 2021. "Epidemiology of Candidemia: Three-Year Results from a Croatian Tertiary Care Hospital" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 4: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop