Next Article in Journal
Establishment of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Method for the Detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. momordicae
Previous Article in Journal
Mycofilters and the Effectiveness of Mycofiltration in the Removal of Contaminants in Water—A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multifunctional Roles of Autophagy in Fungi

Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children’s Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2026, 12(5), 377; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050377
Submission received: 11 April 2026 / Revised: 14 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Cell Biology, Metabolism and Physiology)

Abstract

Autophagy, also referred to as the “self-eating machinery”, is a crucial process where organisms maintain intracellular homeostasis through recycling or degrading non-essential and damaged cellular components. It is important in numerous biological functions such as cellular differentiation, aging, nutrient sensing, stress response, tissue homeostasis, immunity, and programmed cell death. Autophagy induction occurs with the formation of a double-layered membrane structure called “autophagosome”. The autophagosome wraps damaged organelles or proteins and transports them to the vacuole or lysosome for degradation. Autophagy is beneficial to organisms, and it should be optimally regulated because elevated or decreased levels are detrimental for survival. To date, more than 40 autophagy-related genes (ATGs) have been identified in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with most having homologs in fungi and higher eukaryotes. Majority of the ATGs in industrial and pathogenic fungal species have been characterized and known to play vital roles in growth, development, and virulence. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of ATGs in various fungal species and highlight how autophagy is regulated and controls various functions in plant, human, and industrial fungal species.

1. Introduction

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process where cytosolic material, including organelles and autophagy-related proteins, is sequestered by structures called “autophagosomes” and subsequently delivered to vacuoles as autophagic bodies [1]. Autophagy may be broadly classified into non-selective and selective autophagy based on the type of cellular material that is directed for degradation. Non-selective autophagy, also called the cargo-independent process, is induced under starvation conditions to recycle bulk cytosolic materials [2]. On the other hand, selective autophagy, also referred to as cargo-dependent autophagy, is independent of starvation to selectively degrade and recycle damaged organelles or proteins and maintain intracellular homoeostasis [3]. While non-selective and selective autophagy processes utilize the same mechanism to form autophagosomes, the latter relies on specific autophagic factors that recognize cargos and membrane components.
In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, autophagy has been extensively studied and occurs either non-selectively or selectively with at least 40 autophagy-related genes (ATGs) [4]. Proteins related to autophagy from the plant and the human fungal pathogens and other industrially useful fungi are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, in selective autophagy process the autophagosome formation occurs via the assembly of a pre-autophagosomal structure (PAS), where organelles such as mitochondria (mitophagy), nuclei (nucleophagy), and peroxisomes (pexophagy) are encapsulated by a double membrane envelope derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Figure 1). Subsequently, the autophagosomes fuse with the vacuoles, and autophagic degradation is mediated by vacuolar hydrolytic enzymes [5]. After the membranes of autophagic bodies are broken down by hydrolytic enzymes, degraded products are channeled back to the cytoplasm for reuse in metabolic and biosynthetic pathways [6]. ATGs that mediate non-selective and selective autophagy are classified into various groups based on their functions in the formation of phagophores and their maturation into autophagosomes [7]. This group includes the ATG1-ATG13-ATG17 complex which comprises Atg1, Atg11, Atg13, Atg17, Atg29, and Atg31, whose function is to scaffold essential sites required for autophagosome initiation at the phagophore. The second group is vital for phagophore expansion and is a membrane delivery system including Atg2, Atg9, and Atg18. The third group is mainly for vesicle nucleation and is part of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex (Vps34, Vps15, Vps30/Atg6, and Atg14). Finally, the vesicle expansion group is a ubiquitin-like conjugation system including Atg5, Atg7, Atg10, Atg12, and Atg16. In this review we provide an overview of the multiple roles of autophagy (macroautophagy) in various fungi including the plant, human, and industrial fungal species and summarize the functions of characterized ATGs in various fungal species.

2. Selective Autophagy Mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In S. cerevisiae the cytoplasm-to-vacuole (Cvt) pathway transports hydrolases, specifically aminopeptidase I (Ape1), from the cytoplasm to the vacuole as part of the selective autophagy mechanism. The Ape1 complex binds to the Atg19 receptor to form the Cvt complex, and the Atg19 receptor interacts with the adaptor protein Atg11. Atg11 accumulates on PAS by interacting with Atg1 and Atg9. During mitophagy induction, the transmembrane mitophagy receptor Atg32, localized on the mitochondrial outer membrane [60,61,62], interacts with Atg11. Atg11 tethers the mitochondria to the PAS for the selective sequestration of the mitochondria by the isolation membrane (Figure 1A). The endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES) complex acts as a physical tether between the ER and mitochondria and aids in expanding the isolation membrane to provide lipid sources from ER and extension of the isolation membrane, leading to mitophagosome formation and its eventual fusion with the vacuole for degradation by vacuolar hydrolases.
While the factors participating in the autophagic degradation of nuclear components in other organisms remain largely unknown, S. cerevisiae has a unique nucleophagy transmembrane receptor protein, Atg39, localized on the nuclear envelope [63] (Figure 1B). Atg39 interacts with Atg8 through an Atg8-interacting motif in its N-terminal cytosolic tail, and upon nucleophagy induction, it binds to Atg8 puncta in an Atg8-dependent manner to form the nucleophagosome [64]. While Atg39 is essential for the selective autophagy of proteins within the outer and inner nuclear membrane, nucleolus, and nucleoplasm [63,64], it is not required for the autophagic degradation of nuclear pore components [65,66,67]. Instead, recent studies have identified nucleoporin Nup159 as an Atg8-binding protein that promotes the autophagic degradation of nuclear pore components [65,66].
The crucial importance of pexophagy in degrading impaired peroxisomes is exemplified by the fact that peroxisomes maintain cellular homeostasis in response to oxidative stress and play major role in lipid metabolism, including fatty acid β-oxidation [68,69]. In S. cerevisiae, the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 acts as a peroxisomal ligand and is central to initiating pexophagy by facilitating the recruitment of the Atg36 receptor protein to the peroxisomal membrane (Figure 1C). Atg36 binds to the adaptor protein Atg11 and recruits peroxisomal fission complexes containing the dynamin-related GTPases Dnm1 and Vps1 to target peroxisomes, thereby facilitating their sequestration by phagophores [70].
In addition to the above established canonical selective autophagic pathways, a Golgi membrane-dependent intracellular proteolytic process called the Golgi membrane-associated degradation (GOMED) pathway has also been reported [71]. Previously, GOMED was classified as alternative autophagy due to its morphological and functional similarities with canonical autophagy. However, recent studies have shown differences between the two processes in terms of the protein machinery involved and the degraded substrates and their biological roles [72].

3. Autophagy Genes Regulate Multiple Processes in Plant and Human Pathogenic Fungi, and Industrial Fungi

3.1. ATG1-ATG13-ATG17 Complex of Autophagy Genes

ATG1-ATG13-ATG17 complex autophagy genes include Atg1, Atg11, Atg13, Atg17, and Atg29 and are known to regulate the induction of autophagosome formation. Most of these genes have been characterized in fungi and have been shown to control various fungal developmental processes. In the plant fungal pathogens Magnaporthe oryzae, Ustilago maydis, Botrytis ceinerea, and Sclerotina sclerotiorum, Atg1 was reported to be crucial for autophagy and essential for fungal developmental processes including conidiation, conidial germination, turgor generation, and fungal pathogenesis [8,10,11,26,73]. However, in Fusarium graminearum, although there was severe defect in autophagy, the ΔFgAtg1 mutant strain still caused infection in wheat [9]. In the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus, the ΔAfAtg1 deletion strain was attenuated in sporulation but retained virulence in a murine aspergillosis infection model [19]. However, in C. neoformans Ding et al. reported Atg1 as being indispensable for virulence in a murine cryptococcosis model [17]. The exact role of Candida albicans Atg1 in conidiation and virulence is unclear, although its importance has been demonstrated for biofilm formation [74]. Atg11, Atg13, Atg17, and Atg29 genes also have been shown to perform various functions in fungal developmental processes. In M. oryzae, the MoAtg13 mutant strain had no effects on appressorial penetration; however, it exhibited reduced virulence. While the ΔMoAtg11 and ΔMoAtg29 mutant strains sporulated and remained pathogenic like the wild-type strain, ΔMoAtg17 had penetration defects, but it still remained nonpathogenic [26]. While in S. sclerotiorum loss of SsAtg17 impaired sclerotia development and fungal virulence [28], in F. graminearum the ΔFgAtg17 deletion strain remained virulent on the host plant [9]. In U. Maydis, UmAtg11 was reported to be involved in mitophagy, but similar to the ΔMoAtg11 mutant, the ΔUmAtg11 mutant strain remained unaffected in its ability to cause infection in the host plant [21]. However, in the human fungal pathogens C. albicans and C. neoformans, Atg11 deletion strains displayed contrasting function as the deletion of Atg11 in C. albicans remarkably reduced conidiation and pathogenesis [25] and completely abolished pathogenesis in C. neoformans [24]. These studies indicate various roles for the Atg1/ULK complex autophagy genes in fungal developmental and pathogenesis.
Figure 2 illustrates general autophagy process in funsgi and its multifunctional roles in fungal morphogenetic events, and nutrient recycling and homeostasis.

3.2. The Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PtdIns3K) Complex of Autophagy Genes

The (PI3K) complex comprises genes such as Atg6, Atg14, Vps15, and Vps34 that are important for the induction of autophagosome formation, extension, and expansion of phagosomes. Also in this category are the Vps38 and Vps15 genes that are involved in the endocytic pathway. In M. oryzae, deletion of the (PI3K) complex genes Atg6 and Atg14 resulted in conidiation defects, and the ΔMoAtg6 and ΔMoAtg14 mutant strains appressoria lost the ability to penetrate the host plant and eventually led to loss of virulence [26]. Similarly, Liu et al. showed that Botrytis cinerea BcAtg6 is important in the regulation of autophagy, and its deletion contributed to defects in mycelial growth, conidiation, and sclerotia formation [29]. Furthermore, silencing of Phytophthora sojae PsAtg6a significantly reduced sporulation and pathogenicity with the PsAtg6a-silenced strain displaying haustoria formation defects [30]. In other fungi such as F. graminearum, Ustilaginoidea virens and C. neoformans, Atg14 was reported to impact fungal conidiation and pathogenesis [9,24,32]. These findings suggest that Atg6 and Atg14 have conserved roles in controlling fungal developmental processes.

3.3. ATG9 Trafficking Autophagy Genes

The ATG9 trafficking autophagy genes are important for phagophore expansion, and the Atg2, Atg9, and Atg18 genes have also been shown to be critical for fungal developmental processes. In M. oryzae, deletion of MoAtg2, MoAtg9, and MoAtg18 impaired fungal conidiation and pathogenesis [26]. Also, in other fungal pathogens such as S. sclerotiorum, F. graminearum, and B. cinerea, loss of function of Atg2 led to defects in conidiation and pathogenesis as their deletion mutants exhibited reduced sporulation and virulence [9,16,33]. Although the function of Colletotrichum fructicola Atg9 in growth and conidiation remains unknown, loss of function of the CfAtg9 gene caused defects in mitosis and attenuated appressoria formation, appressoria turgor pressure, and virulence, indicating its importance for autophagy and pathogenicity [35]. Just as in plant pathogenic fungi, the Atg9 genes have been reported in the human fungal pathogen C. neoformans to control conidiation and pathogenesis [36].

3.4. Ubiquitin-like System of Autophagy Genes

The ubiquitin-like system of autophagy-related genes play crucial roles in the extension and expansion of autophagosomes and include Atg3, Atg5, Atg7, Atg8, Atg10, Atg12, and Atg16 genes. Majority of the ubiquitin-like system genes have been reported to be involved in non-selective autophagy in the plant fungal pathogen M. oryzae [26]. Knockout mutants of MoAtg3, MoAtg5, MoAtg7, MoAtg8, MoAtg10, MoAtg12, MoAtg16 displayed defects in host penetration and lost virulence [26,75]. In a genome-wide association study, 28 ATGs were identified in F. graminearum [9]. Deletion of ubiquitin-like system genes FgAtg3, FgAtg5, FgAtg7, FgAtg8, FgAtg10, FgAtg12, and FgAtg16 significantly reduced sporulation and virulence [9]. B. cinerea, BcAtg3 and BcAtg7, and BcAtg8 were also reported to be crucial for the autophagy process as both single and deletion mutant strains; ΔBcAtg3, ΔBcAtg7, and ΔBcAtg8 were defective in mycelial growth, conidiation, sclerotia formation, and pathogenesis [38,76]. In other plant fungal pathogens Aspergillus flavus, S. sclerotiorum, Colletotrichum species, and the industrial fungus Aspergillus oryzae, Atg8, which is an important marker of autophagy, is pivotal for various processes including conidiation, appressoria formation, appressoria turgor pressure, and virulence [41,47,48,49,77]. The role of the ubiquitin-like system of autophagy-related genes has also been elucidated in human fungal pathogens. Zhao et al. generated 22 ATG deletion strains in C. neoformans and established that the mutant strains including ΔAtg5, ΔAtg7, ΔAtg8, ΔAtg12 and ΔAtg16, were attenuated in virulence [24]. In addition, C. neoformans Atg8 RNAi knockdown mutant strain was also reported to be reduced in virulence in a murine model [51]. Based on these studies, it is evident that the ubiquitin-like system of autophagy genes plays almost similar roles in controlling growth, conidiation, and virulence in different fungal species.

4. Multifunctional Roles for Autophagy in Fungi

4.1. Autophagy in Nutrient Recycling, Homeostasis, Cellular Differentiation, and Degradation

As detailed in Section 3, the various groups of autophagy genes involved in the formation of the autophagosome, membrane delivery, and vesicle nucleation and expansion regulate multiple functions in diverse fungi. In addition to key processes involving growth and differentiation, autophagy genes have also been shown to be essential for pathogenic traits involving host penetration and infection. During these processes, the stress induced by host factors may be a contributing factor to the induction of autophagy.
In addition to controlling the morphogenetic and developmental aspects in various fungal species, autophagy also plays a critical role in nutrient recycling pathways in several fungal species. For instance, in M. oryzae when the ΔMoAtg1 mutant with blocked autophagy was cultured on nutrient-deficient minimal media, including nitrogen and carbon, the mutant was attenuated in growth when compared to the wild-type strain [8]. Also, the ΔMoAtg8 mutant of M. oryzae was significantly reduced in sporulation, which was restored upon the addition of alternative carbon sources, glucose or sucrose, or glucose-6-phosphate [78,79]. The Aspergillus fumigatus ΔAfAtg1 mutant that was deficient in autophagy exhibited limited growth on nutrient starvation medium (i.e., water-agarose) when compared with the wild-type strain and the complemented strains that exhibited normal growth on the starvation medium [19]. However, when the mutant strain was transferred back to rich medium, growth was restored, indicating that the growth defect was due to lack of nutrients.
In addition to nutrient recycling, metal ion homeostasis impacts autophagy. For instance, depletion of cations such as zinc, manganese, and iron induces autophagy [19]. These studies offer clear evidence on the role of autophagy-dependent nutrient recycling and metal ion homeostasis in fungal growth and development. In eukaryotes, autophagy serves as the key process for protein degradation, where long-lived proteins and whole damaged or obsolete organelles are degraded [80]. Unlike animals, filamentous fungi lack lysosomes; therefore, vacuoles play similar role in the degradation process. In A. oryzae, hyphal vacuolation was reported to rapidly increase in the mycelia of A. oryzae under nutrient-starved conditions [81]. In A. fumigatus and M. oryzae, autophagic bodies were present in the vacuoles of their respective wild-type strains upon autophagy induction but absent in ΔAfAtg1 and ΔMoAtg1 [8,19]. Lastly, during deletion of MoYpt7, the Rab GTPase, and MoMon1, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ypt7 blocked autophagy and altered vacuole assembly and vacuole fusion in the ΔMoMon1 and ΔMoYpt7 deletion strains [82,83]. These studies provide supportive evidence on the role of autophagy in cellular degradation.
Autophagy plays a key role in cellular differentiation, and mutants blocked in autophagy display various defects in growth and development. In M. oryzae, the autophagy-deficient ΔMoAtg8 mutant strain was attenuated in sporulation and conidiation, being significantly suppressed upon supplementation of exogenous glucose or sucrose; however, appressoria lost the ability to penetrate the plant tissue [78]. Deletion of MoAtg1, MoAtg4, and MoAtg5 resulted in reduced conidiation, impaired germination, reduced appressorium turgor pressure, with the appressoria of ΔMoAtg1, ΔMoAtg4, and ΔMoAtg5 mutant strains losing their ability to penetrate the host plant tissue [8,75,84]. Loss of Atg8 function in C. orbiculare led to defects in germination and appressoria development [46]. In B. cinerea, deletion of BcAtg1 led to defects in growth, conidiation, sclerotial development, appressoria formation, and penetration [11]. Perithecia formation during sexual reproduction is affected by deletion of the autophagy-related vacuolar protease (PspA) gene in the plant fungal pathogen Podospora anserina [85]. Autophagy has been shown to cause and prevent cell death in different fungi. For instance, in the plant pathogenic fungus M. oryzae, deletion of MoAtg14 blocked autophagy, and staining of the ΔMoAtg14 mutant strain spores with fluorescein diacetate to verify spore viability showed that a high percentage of ΔMoAtg14 mutant cells were still alive compared to the wild-type strain, indicating that MoAtg14 contributes to conidial cell death [31]. In addition, the DNA-binding E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Snt2 deletion in M. oryzae affected autophagy homeostasis and fungal cell death, with ΔMoSnt1 compromising development of infection structure, conidiation, oxidative stress tolerance, and cell wall integrity. [86]. Also, in Magnaporthe grisea, autophagy was shown to be indispensable for spore collapse (cell death) during in planta infection [79]. However, in P. anserina autophagy is dispensable for cell death, though it tends to be stimulated during cell death by incompatibility [87]. Moreover, autophagy is linked to autolysis, which is a natural self-degradation process orchestrated by endogenous hydrolases, and prolonged autolysis has been shown to result in cell death [88].

4.2. Autophagy in Antifungal Drug Resistance and Response Mechanisms

Antifungal drugs specifically target the key components of the fungal cells, the cell wall, and the cell membrane, compromise their integrity, and induce cellular damage [89]. Autophagy can be activated as a protective response to drug stress, degrading damaged cellular components, and mitigating oxidative stress, thereby promoting drug tolerance [90,91]. Due to the established roles for autophagy in fungal stress adaptation, it has recently gained significance in antifungal drug resistance processes. Antifungal drug resistance is a complex process that evolves through a multitude of factors, resulting in fungal adaptation to antifungal drug exposure [92]. Enhanced activity of drug efflux systems, including membrane transport proteins, overexpression of drug resistance-related genes involved in ergosterol and glucan synthesis, the key components of fungal cell membranes and cell walls, respectively, and biofilm formation to counteract the stress imposed by antifungals, are the major components operating to induce resistance. For instance, previous studies in the autophagy-deficient strains of C. albicans have shown reduced expression of Cdr1 and Mdr1 efflux pump genes, indicating the impact of autophagic processes on drug efflux activity [93].
Antifungals induce cellular stress that results in autophagic response. In this regard, the azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole), the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B, and the DNA synthesis inhibitor nystatin have been shown to induce the formation of autophagosomes in C. albicans biofilms [94]. Interestingly, Huang et al. recently showed that a combination of antifungals (amphotericin B or 5-fluorocytosine) with aspirin suppressed biofilm formation by activating autophagy and inhibiting TOR signaling [74]. Strategies to target autophagy-related processes/proteins that are fungal-specific are necessary to overcome the challenges of increasing drug resistance observed with current clinical antifungals, including the azoles and echinocandins. Previous studies have shown promise in this direction of designing specific inhibitors to autophagy proteins. During autophagy induced by starvation or rapamycin, a selective inhibitor, autophinib, has been established to target Vps34 [95]. Another autophagy modulator, berberine, has been shown to synergize with fluconazole treatment and cause growth inhibition of an azole-resistant strain of C. albicans [96].

5. Regulation of Autophagy

5.1. Kinase-Phosphatase Modules Regulating Autophagy Machinery

Thus far, three kinases including TOR kinase, Atg1, and protein kinase A (PKA) have been identified to phosphorylate a set of autophagy-related proteins in S. cerevisiae. TOR is a multifunctional Ser/Thr protein kinase regulating cellular growth and development, nutrient acquisition, and protein synthesis and is important for nutrient signaling and autophagy. TORC1 phosphorylates S. cerevisiae Atg1, Atg13 and Atg29 proteins. During normal growth conditions, active TOR phosphorylates Atg13, which in turn modulates Atg1 activity. However, under nitrogen starvation conditions, TOR is inactivated, resulting in reduced phosphorylation of Atg13, leading to an increased affinity of Atg13 for Atg1 and stimulating the formation of Atg1–Atg13 complex required for autophagy induction [97,98]. Atg1 is also a Ser/Thr protein kinase and functions downstream of TOR, regulating different steps in autophagosome formation. Atg1 is autophosphorylated [99] and has been shown to phosphorylate other autophagy proteins including Atg4, Atg9, Atg13 and Atg29. For instance, Atg1-dependent phosphorylation of Vps34 is required for robust autophagy activity in S. cerevisiae, and Vps34-dependent atg1 phosphorylation was shown to be important for full autophagy activation and cell survival [100]. Similarly, Atg9 was reported to be phosphorylated by Atg1, and this phosphorylation of Atg9 is crucial for regulation of early stages in autophagy through efficient recruitment of Atg8 and Atg18 to the site of autophagosome formation and subsequent expansion of the isolation membrane [101]. Although Atg1-mediated phosphorylation of Vps34 and Atg9 promotes the autophagy process, Sanchez et al. showed that phosphorylation of Atg4 by Atg1 blocks autophagy orchestrated by Atg4 [102]. These results demonstrate that Atg1-mediated phosphorylation of autophagy-related genes regulates autophagy in a positive and negative manner.
In contrast to S. cerevisiae, not much is known about the kinases regulating the phosphorylation of ATG proteins in filamentous fungi. We previously reported PKA-dependent phosphorylation of several autophagy-related proteins, including ATG proteins Atg20 and Atg24, and the vacuolar sorting proteins, including Vps1 (VpsA), Vps15, Vps17, Vac8, and Vtc4 [58]. Vps1 is a dynamin-like GTPase that plays a critical role in the transport of Atg9-containing vesicles to the pre-autophagosomal structure, and its role in pexophagy has also been reported [103]. Vps15 is a regulatory protein of Vps34 and is referred to as a pseudokinase as it does not contain the characteristic catalytic domain residues present in protein kinases. Although Vps15 does not phosphorylate Vps34, it forms a complex with it and is required for Vps34 activity in autophagy. Vac8 is a vacuolar armadillo repeat protein shown to be required for efficient induction of nonselective autophagy in S. cerevisiae. Localization of Vac8 to the vacuole is required for Atg1 initiation complex recruitment and pre-autophagosomal structure assembly at the vacuoles. Vac8 acts as an anchor at the vacuole and binds to Atg13, which forms an assembly hub for the recruitment of the initiation complex. Interestingly, the deletion of Vac8 in S. cerevisiae did completely abolish autophagy but significantly impacted autophagic activity [104]. Vtc4 belongs to the vacuolar transport chaperone complex of proteins that have recently been found to negatively regulate endocytosis and autophagy [105]. In M. oryzae, MoYck1, which encodes casein kinase, a Ser/Thr protein kinase, was shown to negatively regulate the autophagy process. Loss of Moyck1 function affected growth, conidiation, conidial germination, and appressorium formation and penetration. Examination of GFP-MoAtg8 revealed a faster degradation in the ΔMoyck1 background compared with the wild-type strain. Furthermore, GFP-MoATG8 showed elevated levels in the ΔMoyck1 background, indicating MoYck1 negatively controls autophagy [106]. Type PP2C phosphatases, Ptc2 and Ptc3, have also been shown to regulate autophagy in the yeast through interaction and dephosphorylation of the Atg1 complex. Loss of function of these phosphatases inhibits starvation-induced macroautophagy and the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting pathway via impairing the assembly of the essential autophagy machinery to the phagophore [107]. Similarly, Kondo et al. showed that Cdc14 protein phosphatase plays an important role in the induction of autophagy following starvation and the target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) kinase inactivation through rapid dephosphorylation of Atg13 [108]. Also, Cdc14 was necessary for effective induction of ATG8 and ATG13 expression [108]. These studies clearly demonstrate that autophagy is regulated through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in fungal species.

5.2. Other Effectors Involved in the Regulation of Autophagy

Besides phosphorylation, autophagy is also regulated through acetylation. The Sin3 histone deacetylase complex (Sin3-HDAC) was shown as a transcriptional repressor of ATGs. Sin3 thus negatively regulates autophagy induction in M. oryzae [109]. Loss of function of Sin3 resulted in upregulations of ATGs and promoted autophagy. Moreover, Wu et al. established that Sin3 negatively regulated the transcription of Atg1, Atg13, and Atg17 through direct occupancy and histone acetylation. During nutrient starvation conditions, the transcription of Sin3 was downregulated, and the reduced occupancy of Sin3 from those ATGs resulted in hyperacetylation and activated their transcription which subsequently promoted autophagy.
In addition, dynamins, which are a large superfamily of GTPase proteins and function as motor proteins, have also shown to be important for autophagy. In M. oryzae, MoDnm1 was found to localize in the peroxisomes and mitochondria and is essential for vegetative growth, conidiogenesis, and full pathogenicity [110]. MoDnm1 was also shown to interact with the mitochondrial fission protein MoFis1 and the WD adaptor protein MoMdv1. The importance of the MoFis1, MoMdv1 and MoDnm1 complexes in autophagy was analyzed by monitoring Pex14 (pexophagy marker), Porin (mitophagy marker), and Atg8 (autophagy marker). Fewer stable Pex14 and porin proteins were observed in the ΔMoDnm1, ΔMoFis1, and ΔMoMdv1 mutant strains relative to the wild-type strain. Furthermore, the expression of Atg8-GFP to visualize autophagic bodies in the background of these three mutations revealed lesser accumulation of autophagic bodies in the lumen of their vacuoles in comparison to the wild-type, confirming their roles in autophagy.

6. Summary and Future Prospects

Research on autophagy in fungi has been extensively undertaken in the past two decades following the identification of ATGs in yeast [111]. Majority of these studies have clearly elucidated the involvement of autophagy processes in fungal development and pathogenicity. In this review, we broadly reviewed the roles of various ATGs in a wide variety of fungal species, including plant and human pathogenic fungi and industrially useful fungi. More importantly, majority of the ATGs have a conserved role in different fungal species and can be exploited for antifungal design. Although most of the studies have only evaluated their involvement in fungal development and pathogenesis, observations on how autophagy regulates fungal development and pathogenesis and the molecular mechanism involved remain unclear and call for further investigation, if autophagy has to be exploited for therapeutic purposes.

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the NIH/NIAID (R01 AI179593; R21 AI180334).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mizushima, N.; Klionsky, D.J. Protein turnover via autophagy: Implications for metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2007, 27, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zaffagnini, G.; Martens, S. Mechanisms of Selective Autophagy. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 1714–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lamark, T.; Johansen, T. Mechanisms of Selective Autophagy. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 32, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yamamoto, H.; Zhang, S.; Mizushima, N. Autophagy genes in biology and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023, 24, 382–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhu, X.-M.; Li, L.; Wu, M.; Liang, S.; Shi, H.-B.; Liu, X.-H.; Lin, F.-C. Current opinions on autophagy in pathogenicity of fungi. Virulence 2019, 10, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parzych, K.R.; Klionsky, D.J. Vacuolar hydrolysis and efflux: Current knowledge and unanswered questions. Autophagy 2019, 15, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kraft, C.; Martens, S. Mechanisms and regulation of autophagosome formation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, X.H.; Lu, J.P.; Lin, F.C. Autophagy during conidiation, conidial germination and turgor generation in Magnaporthe grisea. Autophagy 2007, 3, 472–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lv, W.; Wang, C.; Yang, N.; Que, Y.; Talbot, N.J.; Wang, Z. Genome-wide functional analysis reveals that autophagy is necessary for growth, sporulation, deoxynivalenol production and virulence in Fusarium graminearum. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nadal, M.; Gold, S.E. The autophagy genes atg8 and atg1 affect morphogenesis and pathogenicity in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, W.; Zhang, Z.; Shao, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Chen, C. The autophagy-related gene BcATG1 is involved in fungal development and pathogenesis in Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, M.; Ma, L.; Lyu, Z.; Trushina, N.K.; Sharon, A. Autophagy and the Mitochondrial Lon1 Protease Are Necessary for Botrytis cinerea Heat Adaptation. Mol. Microbiol. 2025, 124, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nitsche, B.M.; Burggraaf-Van Welzen, A.M.; Lamers, G.; Meyer, V.; Ram, A.F.J. Autophagy promotes survival in aging submerged cultures of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 8205–8218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ying, S.H.; Liu, J.; Chu, X.L.; Xie, X.Q.; Feng, M.G. The autophagy-related genes BbATG1 and BbATG8 have different functions in differentiation, stress resistance and virulence of mycopathogen Beauveria bassiana. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, N.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Ren, W. Involvement of the Autophagy Protein Atg1 in Development and Virulence in Botryosphaeria dothidea. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Weerasinghe, T.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Gao, J.; Tian, L.; Xu, Y.; Gong, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.; et al. Autophagy-Related Proteins (ATGs) Are Differentially Required for Development and Virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ding, H.; Caza, M.; Dong, Y.; Arif, A.A.; Horianopoulos, L.C.; Hu, G.; Johnson, P.; Kronstad, J.W. ATG genes influence the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans through contributions beyond core autophagy functions. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00069-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, Q.; Jia, C.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, B.; Xiao, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, B.; et al. Candida albicans autophagy, no longer a bystander: Its role in tolerance to ER stress-related antifungal drugs. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 81, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Richie, D.L.; Fuller, K.K.; Fortwendel, J.; Miley, M.D.; McCarthy, J.W.; Feldmesser, M.; Rhodes, J.C.; Askew, D.S. Unexpected link between metal ion deficiency and autophagy in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 2437–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dong, B.; Liu, X.H.; Lu, J.P.; Zhang, F.S.; Gao, H.M.; Wang, H.K.; Lin, F.C. MgAtg9 trafficking in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2009, 5, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nieto-Jacobo, F.; Pasch, D.; Basse, C.W. The mitochondrial Dnm1-like fission component is required for lga2-induced mitophagy but dispensable for starvation-induced mitophagy in Ustilago maydis. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1154–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  22. Wagner-Vogel, G.; Lämmer, F.; Kämper, J.; Basse, C.W. Uniparental mitochondrial DNA inheritance is not affected in Ustilago maydis ΔAtg11 mutants blocked in mitophagy. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Kikuma, T.; Kitamoto, K. Analysis of autophagy in Aspergillus oryzae by disruption of Aoatg13, Aoatg4, and Aoatg15genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 316, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, X.; Feng, W.; Zhu, X.; Li, C.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Zhu, X.; Wei, D. Conserved Autophagy Pathway Contributes to Stress Tolerance and Virulence and Differentially Controls Autophagic Flux Upon Nutrient Starvation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cui, L.; Zhao, H.; Yin, Y.; Liang, C.; Mao, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Li, M. Function of Atg11 in non-selective autophagy and selective autophagy of Candida albicans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kershaw, M.J.; Talbot, N.J.; Briggs, S.P. Genome-wide functional analysis reveals that infection-associated fungal autophagy is necessary for rice blast disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 15, 15967–15972. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, S.; Jiang, L.; Miao, H.; L.v, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, M.; Duan, W.; Huang, Y.; Wei, X. Autophagy regulation of ATG13 and ATG27 on biofilm formation and antifungal resistance in Candida albicans. Biofouling 2022, 38, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, G.; Zuo, Q.; Liu, S.; Zheng, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Rollins, J.A.; Liu, J.; Pan, H. A FOX transcription factor phosphorylated for regulation of autophagy facilitates fruiting body development in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. New Phytol. 2025, 246, 2683–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, N.; Zhou, S.; Li, B.; Ren, W. Involvement of the Autophagy Protein Atg6 in Development and Virulence in the Gray Mold Fungus Botrytis cinerea. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 798363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Geng, X.; Shi, Y.; Na, R.; Dou, D.; Li, H. Network and role analysis of autophagy in Phytophthora sojae. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, X.H.; Zhao, Y.H.; Zhu, X.M.; Zeng, X.Q.; Huang, L.Y.; Dong, B.; Su, Z.Z.; Wang, Y.; Lu, J.P.; Lin, F.C. Autophagy-related protein MoAtg14 is involved in differentiation, development and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40018. [Google Scholar]
  32. He, X.; Yu, J.; Pan, X.; Cao, H.; Yu, M.; Song, T.; Qi, Z.; Du, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liang, D.; et al. Autophagy-related protein UvAtg14 contributes to mycelial growth, asexual reproduction, virulence and cell stress response in rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Phytopathol. Res. 2022, 4, 11. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, N.; Lian, S.; Li, B.; Ren, W. The autophagy protein BcAtg2 regulates growth, development and pathogenicity in the gray mold fungus Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathol. Res. 2022, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lv, L.; Yang, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, T.; Luo, M.; Yu, G.; Chen, Q. Autophagy-related protein PlATG2 regulates the vegetative growth, sporangial cleavage, autophagosome formation, and pathogenicity of peronophythora litchii. Virulence 2024, 15, 2322183. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, S.; Guo, Y.; Li, S.; Li, H. Histone Acetyltransferase CfGcn5-Mediated Autophagy Governs the Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum fructicola. mBio 2022, 13, e0195622. [Google Scholar]
  36. Palmer, G.E.; Kelly, M.N.; Sturtevant, J.E. Autophagy in the pathogen Candida albicans. Microbiology 2007, 153, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wen, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Yin, X.; Gong, S.; Yin, J. Deletion of FgAtg27 decreases the pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum through influence autophagic process. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 297, 139818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ren, W.; Sang, C.; Shi, D.; Song, X.; Zhou, M.; Chen, C. Ubiquitin-like activating enzymes BcAtg3 and BcAtg7 participate in development and pathogenesis of Botrytis cinerea. Curr. Genet. 2018, 64, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Han, W.; Han, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yu, G.; Jiang, X.; Yang, Q.; Liu, N.; Wang, C.; Li, B.; Lian, S.; et al. Involvement of the E2-like enzyme Atg3 in fungal development and virulence of Botryosphaeria dothidea. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1590359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rehman Khalid, A.; Lv, X.; Naeem, M.; Mehmood, K.; Shaheen, H.; Dong, P.; Qiu, D.; Ren, M. Autophagy related gene (ATG3) is a key regulator for cell growth, development, and virulence of Fusarium oxysporum. Genes 2019, 10, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Guo, S.; Zhang, S. The Cysteine Protease CfAtg4 Interacts with CfAtg8 to Govern the Growth, Autophagy and Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum fructicola. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, R.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Chen, F.; Qiu, J.; Bai, L.; Chen, B. The Autophagy-Related Gene CpAtg4 Is Required for Fungal Phenotypic Traits, Stress Tolerance, and Virulence in Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Roberto, T.N.; Lima, R.F.; Pascon, R.C.; Idnurm, A.; Vallim, M.A. Biological functions of the autophagy-related proteins Atg4 and Atg8 in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, J.; He, X.; Xu, C.; Yu, M.; Song, T.; Cao, H.; Pan, X.; Qi, Z.; Du, Y.; Zhang, R.; et al. Autophagy-related protein UvAtg7 contributes to mycelial growth, virulence, asexual reproduction and cell stress response in rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2022, 159, 103668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Oliveira, D.L.; Fonseca, F.L.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, J.; Pereira, M.D.; Reuwsaat, J.C.V.; Schrank, A.; Staats, C.; Kmetzsch, L.; et al. The putative autophagy regulator Atg7 affects the physiology and pathogenic mechanisms of Cryptococcus neoformans. Future Microbiol. 2016, 11, 1405–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Takano, Y.; Asakura, M.; Sakai, Y. Atg26-mediated pexophagy and fungal phytopathogenicity. Autophagy 2009, 5, 1041–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, K.H.; Gumilang, A.; Fu, T.; Kang, S.W.; Kim, K.S. The Autophagy Protein CsATG8 is Involved in Asexual Development and Virulence in the Pepper Anthracnose Fungus Colletotrichum scovillei. Mycobiology 2022, 50, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Geng, Q.; Hu, J.; Xu, P.; Sun, T.; Qiu, H.; Wang, S.; Song, F.; Shen, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; et al. The Autophagy-Related Protein Atg8 Orchestrates Asexual Development and AFB1 Biosynthesis in Aspergillus flavus. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kikuma, T.; Ohneda, M.; Arioka, M.; Kitamoto, K. Functional analysis of the ATG8 homologue AoAtg8 and role of autophagy in differentiation and germination in Aspergillus oryzae. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1328–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Corral-Ramos, C.; Roca, M.G.; Di Pietro, A.; Roncero, M.I.G.; Ruiz-Roldán, C. Autophagy contributes to regulation of nuclear dynamics during vegetative growth and hyphal fusion in Fusarium oxysporum. Autophagy 2015, 11, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, G.; Hacham, M.; Waterman, S.R.; Panepinto, J.; Shin, S.; Liu, X.; Gibbons, J.; Valyi-Nagy, T.; Obara, K.; Jaffe, H.A.; et al. PI3K signaling of autophagy is required for starvation tolerance and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 1186–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Werner, A.; Herzog, B.; Frey, S.; Pöggeler, S. Autophagy-associated protein SmATG12 is required for fruiting-body formation in the filamentous ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cheng, H.; Huang, Z.; Xie, J.; He, E.; Wang, Q.; An, B.; He, C.; Luo, H. The CgATG16 Was Involved in Growth, Development and Virulence Through Autophagy Modulation in the Rubber Tree Anthracnose Fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yan, Y.; Tang, J.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Liu, H.; Huang, J.; Bao, C.; Hsiang, T.; Zheng, L. Mitochondrial prohibitin complex regulates fungal virulence via ATG24-assisted mitophagy. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nguyen, L.N.; Bormann, J.; Le, G.T.T.; Stärkel, C.; Olsson, S.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Giese, H.; Schäfer, W. Autophagy-related lipase FgATG15 of Fusarium graminearum is important for lipid turnover and plant infection. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011, 48, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tadokoro, T.; Kikuma, T.; Kitamoto, K. Functional analysis of AoAtg11 in selective autophagy in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kikuma, T.; Tadokoro, T.; Maruyama, J.I.; Kitamoto, K. AoAtg26, a putative sterol glucosyltransferase, is required for autophagic degradation of peroxisomes, mitochondria, and nuclei in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shwab, E.K.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Shaheen, S.K.; Allen, J.; Waitt, G.; Soderblom, E.J.; Asfaw, Y.G.; Moseley, M.A.; Steinbach, W.J. Protein Kinase A Regulates Autophagy-Associated Proteins Impacting Growth and Virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Keats Shwab, E.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Waitt, G.; Shaheen, S.; Allen, J.; Soderblom, E.J.; Bobay, B.G.; Asfaw, Y.G.; Moseley, M.A.; Steinbach, W.J. The protein kinase a-dependent phosphoproteome of the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus reveals diverse virulence-associated kinase targets. mBio 2020, 11, e02880-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kanki, T.; Wang, K.; Cao, Y.; Baba, M.; Klionsky, D.J. Atg32 Is a Mitochondrial Protein that Confers Selectivity during Mitophagy. Dev. Cell 2009, 17, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kanki, T.; Klionsky, D.J. Mitophagy in yeast occurs through a selective mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 32386–32393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Innokentev, A.; Kanki, T. Mitophagy in yeast: Molecular mechanism and regulation. Cells 2021, 10, 3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mochida, K.; Oikawa, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Kirisako, H.; Hirano, H.; Ohsumi, Y.; Nakatogawa, H. Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature 2015, 522, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mochida, K.; Otani, T.; Katsumata, Y.; Kirisako, H.; Kakuta, C.; Kotani, T.; Nakatogawa, H. Atg39 links and deforms the outer and inner nuclear membranes in selective autophagy of the nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 2022, 221, e202103178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, C.W.; Wilfling, F.; Ronchi, P.; Allegretti, M.; Mosalaganti, S.; Jentsch, S.; Beck, M.; Pfander, B. Selective autophagy degrades nuclear pore complexes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 22, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tomioka, Y.; Kotani, T.; Kirisako, H.; Oikawa, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Hirano, H.; Ohsumi, Y.; Nakatogawa, H. TORC1 inactivation stimulates autophagy of nucleoporin and nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 219, e201910063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chandra, S.; Mannino, P.J.; Thaller, D.J.; Ader, N.R.; King, M.C.; Melia, T.J.; Lusk, C.P. Atg39 selectively captures inner nuclear membrane into lumenal vesicles for delivery to the autophagosome. J. Cell Biol. 2021, 220, e202103030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wei, X.; Manandhar, L.; Kim, H.; Chhetri, A.; Hwang, J.; Jang, G.; Park, C.; Park, R. Pexophagy and Oxidative Stress: Focus on Peroxisomal Proteins and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Signaling Pathways. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ding, L.; Sun, W.; Balaz, M.; He, A.; Klug, M.; Wieland, S.; Caiazzo, R.; Raverdy, V.; Pattou, F.; Lefebvre, P.; et al. Peroxisomal β-oxidation acts as a sensor for intracellular fatty acids and regulates lipolysis. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 1648–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, X.; Wen, X.; Klionsky, D.J. Endoplasmic Reticulum–Mitochondria Contacts Are Required for Pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Contact 2019, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yamaguchi, H.; Arakawa, S.; Kanaseki, T.; Miyatsuka, T.; Fujitani, Y.; Watada, H.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Shimizu, S. Golgi membrane-associated degradation pathway in yeast and mammals. EMBO J. 2016, 35, 1991–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Noguchi, S.; Shimizu, S. Molecular mechanisms and biological roles of GOMED. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 7213–7220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jiao, W.; Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Xiao, K.; Jia, D.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, H. The SsAtg1 Activating Autophagy Is Required for Sclerotia Formation and Pathogenicity in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Huang, Y.; Miao, H.; Lv, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, S.; Wei, X. Aspirin Combined with Antifungal Drugs Suppresses Candida albicans Biofilm by Activating Autophagy. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 35, e2411060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, T.B.; Liu, X.H.; Lu, J.P.; Zhang, L.; Min, H.; Lin, F.C. The cysteine protease MoAtg4 interacts with MoAtg8 and is required for differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2010, 6, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ren, W.; Liu, N.; Sang, C.; Shi, D.; Zhou, M.; Chen, C.; Qin, Q.; Chen, W. The autophagy gene BcATG8 regulates the vegetative differentiation and pathogenicity of Botrytis cinerea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02455-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Lai, W.; Huang, K.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, A. SsATG8 and SsNBR1 mediated-autophagy is required for fungal development, proteasomal stress response and virulence in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2021, 157, 103632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yi, Z.D.; Ramos-Pamplona, M.; Naqvi, N.I. Autophagy-assisted glycogen catabolism regulates asexual differentiation in Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2009, 5, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vaneault-Fourrey, C.; Barooah, M.; Egan, M.; Wakley, G.; Talbot, N.J. Autophagic fungal cell death is necessary for infection by the rice blast fungus. Science 2006, 312, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Klionsky, D.J.; Emr, S.D. Autophagy as a Regulated Pathway of Cellular Degradation. Science 2000, 290, 1717–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pollack, J.K.; Li, Z.J.; Marten, M.R. Fungal mycelia show lag time before re-growth on endogenous carbon. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, X.H.; Chen, S.M.; Gao, H.M.; Ning, G.A.; Shi, H.B.; Wang, Y.; Dong, B.; Qi, Y.Y.; Zhang, D.M.; Lu, G.D.; et al. The small GTPase MoYpt7 is required for membrane fusion in autophagy and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 4495–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gao, H.M.; Liu, X.G.; Shi, H.B.; Lu, J.P.; Yang, J.; Lin, F.C.; Liu, X.H. MoMon1 is required for vacuolar assembly, conidiogenesis and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Res. Microbiol. 2013, 164, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lu, J.P.; Liu, X.H.; Feng, X.X.; Min, H.; Lin, F.C. An autophagy gene, MgATG5, is required for cell differentiation and pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr. Genet. 2009, 55, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pinan-Lucarré, B.; Paoletti, M.; Dementhon, K.; Coulary-Salin, B.; Clavé, C. Autophagy is induced during cell death by incompatibility and is essential for differentiation in the filamentous fungus Podospora anserina. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. He, M.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Luo, Y.; Lv, Y.; Su, J.; Kershaw, M.J.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Yin, J.; et al. MoSnt2-dependent deacetylation of histone H3 mediates MoTor-dependent autophagy and plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Autophagy 2018, 14, 1543–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pinan-Lucarré, B.; Balguerie, A.; Clavé, C. Accelerated cell death in Podospora autophagy mutants. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. White, S.; McIntyre, M.; Berry, D.R.; McNeil, B. The autolysis of industrial filamentous fungi. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2002, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Puumala, E.; Fallah, S.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Advancements and challenges in antifungal therapeutic development. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2024, 37, e0014223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bashiri, H.; Tabatabaeian, H. Autophagy: A Potential Therapeutic Target to Tackle Drug Resistance in Multiple Myeloma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kroemer, G.; Mariño, G.; Levine, B. Autophagy and the Integrated Stress Response. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Perlin, D.S.; Shor, E.; Zhao, Y. Update on Antifungal Drug Resistance. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2015, 2, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Schubert, S.; Barker, K.S.; Znaidi, S.; Schneider, S.; Dierolf, F.; Dunkel, N.; Aïd, M.; Boucher, G.; Rogers, P.D.; Raymond, M.; et al. Regulation of efflux pump expression and drug resistance by the transcription factors Mrr1, Upc2, and Cap1 in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2212–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shen, J.; Ma, M.; Duan, W.; Huang, Y.; Shi, B.; Wu, Q.; Wei, X. Autophagy Alters the Susceptibility of Candida albicans Biofilms to Antifungal Agents. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Robke, L.; Laraia, L.; Carnero Corrales, M.A.; Konstantinidis, G.; Muroi, M.; Richters, A.; Winzker, M.; Engbring, T.; Tomassi, S.; Watanabe, N.; et al. Phenotypic identification of a novel autophagy inhibitor chemotype targeting lipid kinase VPS34. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8153–8157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Ma, K.; Shi, P.; Liu, W.; Huang, Z. Fluconazole inhibits cellular ergosterol synthesis to confer synergism with berberine against yeast cells. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 13, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kamada, Y.; Funakoshi, T.; Shintani, T.; Nagano, K.; Ohsumi, M.; Ohsumi, Y. Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150, 1507–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kamada, Y.; Yoshino, K.; Kondo, C.; Kawamata, T.; Oshiro, N.; Yonezawa, K.; Ohsumi, Y. Tor Directly Controls the Atg1 Kinase Complex To Regulate Autophagy. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 30, 1049–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Yeh, Y.Y.; Wrasman, K.; Herman, P.K. Autophosphorylation within the Atg1 activation loop is required for both kinase activity and the induction of autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2010, 185, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lee, Y.; Kim, B.; Jang, H.S.; Huh, W.K. Atg1-dependent phosphorylation of Vps34 is required for dynamic regulation of the phagophore assembly site and autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy 2023, 19, 2428–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Papinski, D.; Schuschnig, M.; Reiter, W.; Wilhelm, L.; Barnes, C.A.; Maiolica, A.; Hansmann, I.; Pfaffenwimmer, T.; Kijanska, M.; Stoffel, I.; et al. Early Steps in Autophagy Depend on Direct Phosphorylation of Atg9 by the Atg1 Kinase. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sánchez-Wandelmer, J.; Kriegenburg, F.; Rohringer, S.; Schuschnig, M.; Gómez-Sánchez, R.; Zens, B.; Abreu, S.; Hardenberg, R.; Hollenstein, D.; Gao, J.; et al. Atg4 proteolytic activity can be inhibited by Atg1 phosphorylation. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hu, Y.; Reggiori, F. The yeast dynamin-like GTPase Vps1 mediates Atg9 transport to the phagophore assembly site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy Rep. 2023, 2, 2247309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gatica, D.; Wen, X.; Cheong, H.; Klionsky, D.J. Vac8 determines phagophore assembly site vacuolar localization during nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy. Autophagy 2021, 17, 1636–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, X.; Liang, Y. Vtc4 Promotes the Entry of Phagophores into Vacuoles in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Snf7 Mutant Cell. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shi, H.B.; Chen, N.; Zhu, X.M.; Su, Z.Z.; Wang, J.Y.; Lu, J.P.; Liu, X.H.; Lin, F.C. The casein kinase MoYck1 regulates development, autophagy, and virulence in the rice blast fungus. Virulence 2019, 10, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Memisoglu, G.; Eapen, V.V.; Yang, Y.; Klionsky, D.J.; Haber, J.E. PP2C phosphatases promote autophagy by dephosphorylation of the Atg1 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 1613–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kondo, A.; Mostofa, M.G.; Miyake, K.; Terasawa, M.; Nafisa, I.; Yeasmin, A.M.S.T.; Waliullah, T.M.; Kanki, T.; Ushimaru, T. Cdc14 Phosphatase Promotes TORC1-Regulated Autophagy in Yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 2018, 430, 1671–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wu, Z.; Shi, H.; Li, Y.; Yan, F.; Sun, Z.; Lin, C.; Xu, M.; Lin, F.; Kou, Y.; Tao, Z. Transcriptional Regulation of Autophagy-Related Genes by Sin3 Negatively Modulates Autophagy in Magnaporthe oryzae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0017123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhong, K.; Li, X.; Le, X.; Kong, X.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, X.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Z. MoDnm1 Dynamin Mediating Peroxisomal and Mitochondrial Fission in Complex with MoFis1 and MoMdv1 Is Important for Development of Functional Appressorium in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ohsumi, Y. Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Selective autophagy mechanisms showing autophagic degradation of mitochondria, nuclei, and peroxisomes. (A) Following mitochondrial fission, the mitophagy transmembrane receptor Atg32 localized on the mitochondrial outer membrane interacts with Atg11. Atg11 tethers the mitochondria to the PAS for selective sequestration of mitochondria. The endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES) complex acts as a tether between the ER and mitochondria. Extension of the isolation membrane leads to mitophagosome formation and fusion with the vacuole for degradation by vacuolar hydrolases. The degraded products are released for recycling of cellular material. (B) During nucleophagy, Atg39 receptor interacts with Atg8 through an Atg8 interacting motif in its N-terminal cytosolic tail, and upon nucleophagy induction, it binds to Atg8 puncta to form the nucleophagosome destined for degradation of nuclear material. (C) In the pexophagy process, the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 acts as a peroxisomal ligand and recruits the Atg36 receptor protein to the peroxisomal membrane. Atg36 binds to Atg11 and recruits peroxisomal fission complexes containing the dynamin-related GTPases Dnm1 and Vps1 to target peroxisomes, thereby facilitating their sequestration by phagophores. Following pexophagosome formation, fusion with the vacuolar membrane releases peroxisomes into the vacuolar lumen for degradation. Note: Panels illustrated do not show complete stages in the autophagic degradation process. Individual components in the “core autophagy machinery” are not shown. “Core autophagy machinery” comprises the initial ATG1-ATG13-ATG17 complex including Atg1, Atg11, Atg13, Atg17, Atg29 and Atg31 proteins which regulate the induction of autophagosome formation, the Atg9 and its cycling system including Atg2, Atg9 and Atg18 proteins that function in membrane delivery to the expanding phagophore, the PtdIns 3-kinase (PtdIns3K) complex including Vps34, Vps15, Vps30/Atg6, and Atg14 proteins that function in vesicle nucleation, and the ubiquitin-like conjugation systems including the Atg12 (Atg5, Atg7, Atg10, Atg12 and Atg16) and Atg8 (Atg3, Atg4, Atg7 and Atg8) conjugation systems involved in vesicle expansion.
Figure 1. Selective autophagy mechanisms showing autophagic degradation of mitochondria, nuclei, and peroxisomes. (A) Following mitochondrial fission, the mitophagy transmembrane receptor Atg32 localized on the mitochondrial outer membrane interacts with Atg11. Atg11 tethers the mitochondria to the PAS for selective sequestration of mitochondria. The endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES) complex acts as a tether between the ER and mitochondria. Extension of the isolation membrane leads to mitophagosome formation and fusion with the vacuole for degradation by vacuolar hydrolases. The degraded products are released for recycling of cellular material. (B) During nucleophagy, Atg39 receptor interacts with Atg8 through an Atg8 interacting motif in its N-terminal cytosolic tail, and upon nucleophagy induction, it binds to Atg8 puncta to form the nucleophagosome destined for degradation of nuclear material. (C) In the pexophagy process, the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 acts as a peroxisomal ligand and recruits the Atg36 receptor protein to the peroxisomal membrane. Atg36 binds to Atg11 and recruits peroxisomal fission complexes containing the dynamin-related GTPases Dnm1 and Vps1 to target peroxisomes, thereby facilitating their sequestration by phagophores. Following pexophagosome formation, fusion with the vacuolar membrane releases peroxisomes into the vacuolar lumen for degradation. Note: Panels illustrated do not show complete stages in the autophagic degradation process. Individual components in the “core autophagy machinery” are not shown. “Core autophagy machinery” comprises the initial ATG1-ATG13-ATG17 complex including Atg1, Atg11, Atg13, Atg17, Atg29 and Atg31 proteins which regulate the induction of autophagosome formation, the Atg9 and its cycling system including Atg2, Atg9 and Atg18 proteins that function in membrane delivery to the expanding phagophore, the PtdIns 3-kinase (PtdIns3K) complex including Vps34, Vps15, Vps30/Atg6, and Atg14 proteins that function in vesicle nucleation, and the ubiquitin-like conjugation systems including the Atg12 (Atg5, Atg7, Atg10, Atg12 and Atg16) and Atg8 (Atg3, Atg4, Atg7 and Atg8) conjugation systems involved in vesicle expansion.
Jof 12 00377 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of fungal autophagy process and its roles in morphogenetic events and nutrient homeostasis. Center panel—Following the induction of autophagy, from the pre-autophagosomal structure a cup-shaped double-membrane phagophore is formed that eventually seals to form a mature autophagosome, with the cellular cargo material destined for degradation, and matures into an autophagosome. Following fusion of the autophagosome with the vacuole, the vacuolar enzymes hydrolyze the cellular cargo, and the degraded products are recycled in the cell. Right side panel—The conversion of complex cellular proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates into simpler compounds including amino acids, fatty acids, nucleotides, and monosaccharides, respectively. Left side panel—The various morphogenetic events, including growth and differentiation processes of conidiation, appressoria, sclerotia and perithecia formation, that are impacted by autophagy.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of fungal autophagy process and its roles in morphogenetic events and nutrient homeostasis. Center panel—Following the induction of autophagy, from the pre-autophagosomal structure a cup-shaped double-membrane phagophore is formed that eventually seals to form a mature autophagosome, with the cellular cargo material destined for degradation, and matures into an autophagosome. Following fusion of the autophagosome with the vacuole, the vacuolar enzymes hydrolyze the cellular cargo, and the degraded products are recycled in the cell. Right side panel—The conversion of complex cellular proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates into simpler compounds including amino acids, fatty acids, nucleotides, and monosaccharides, respectively. Left side panel—The various morphogenetic events, including growth and differentiation processes of conidiation, appressoria, sclerotia and perithecia formation, that are impacted by autophagy.
Jof 12 00377 g002
Table 1. List of autophagy-related genes characterized in plant, human and industrial fungi.
Table 1. List of autophagy-related genes characterized in plant, human and industrial fungi.
Gene NameOrganismConidiationPathogenesisReference
ATG1-ATG13-ATG17 Complex
MoAtg1Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedReduced[8]
FgAtg2Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
UmAtg1Ustilago maydisNo effectReduced[10]
BcAtg1Botrytis cinereaReducedReduced[11,12]
AnAtg1Aspergillus nigerReducedNA[13]
BbAtg1Beauveria bassianaReducedReduced[14]
BdAtg1Botryosphaeria dothideaReducedReduced[15]
SsAtg1Sclerotinia sclerotiorumReducedReduced[16]
CnAtg1Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[17]
CaAtg1Candida albicansUnknownUnknown[18]
AfAtg1Aspergillus fumigatusReducedNormal [19]
MoAtg11Magnaporthe oryzaeNo effectNo effect[20]
UmAtg11Ustilago maydisUnknownNo effect[21,22]
AoAtg11Aspergillus oryzaeUnknownNA[23]
CnAtg11Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownAbolished[24]
CaAtg11Candida albicansReduced Reduced[25]
MoAtg13Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
AoAtg13Aspergillus oryzaeReduced NA[23]
CaAtg13Candida albicansUnknownUnknown[27]
MoAtg17Magnaporthe oryzaeNo effectNo effect[26]
FgAtg17Fusarium graminearumNo effectReduced[9]
SsAtg17Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUnknownReduced[28]
AnAtg17Aspergillus nigerNo effectNA[13]
PtdIns3K Complex
FgAtg6Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
BcAtg6Botrytis cinereaReducedReduced[29]
PsAtg6aPhytophthora sojaeReducedReduced[30]
CnAtg6Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownAbolished[24]
MoAtg14Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[31]
FgAtg14Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
UvAtg14Ustilaginoidea virensReducedReduced[32]
CnAtg14-03Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownAbolished[24]
ATG9 Trafficking Complex
MoAtg2Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
FgAtg2Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
BcAtg2Botrytis cinereaReducedAbolished[33]
PlAtg2Peronophythora litchiiReducedReduced[34]
SsAtg2Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUnknownReduced[16]
MoAtg9Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[20]
CfAtg9Colletotrichum fructicolaUnknownReduced [35]
FgAtg9Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
CaAtg9Candida albicansUnknownNormal [36]
FgAtg18Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
FgAtg27Fusarium graminearumNo effectNo effect[37]
Ubiquitin-like system Complex
MoAtg3Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
FgAtg3Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
BcAtg3Botrytis cinereaReducedReduced[38]
BdAtg3Botryosphaeria dothideaReducedReduced[39]
FoAtg3Fusarium oxysporumReducedReduced[40]
MoAtg4Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
CfAtg4Colletotrichum fructicolaReducedReduced[41]
FgAtg4Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
AoAtg4Aspergillus oryzaeAbolishedNA[23]
CpAtg4Cryphonectria parasiticaReducedReduced[42]
SsAtg4Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUnknownReduced[16]
CnAtg4Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownUnknown[43]
MoAtg5Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
FgAtg5Fusarium graminearumReducedNo effect [9]
SsAtg5Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUnknown Reduced[16,28]
CnAtg5Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
MoAtg7Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
FgAtg7Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
BcAtg7Botrytis cinereaReducedReduced[38]
UvAtg7Ustilaginoidea virensReducedReduced[44]
CnAtg7Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[17,45]
MoAtg8Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
CoAtg8Colletotrichum orbiculareUnknownAbolished[46]
CfAtg8Colletotrichum fructicolaUnknownAbolished[35]
CsAtg8Colletotrichum scovilleiReducedReduced[47]
FgAtg8Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
UmAtg8Ustilago maydisNo effectReduced[10]
BcAtg8Botrytis cinereaReducedReduced[38]
AfAtg8Aspergillus flavusReducedReduced mycotoxin [48]
AoAtg8Aspergillus oryzaeAbolishedNA[49]
UmAtg8Ustilago maydisNo effectReduced[10]
BcAtg8Botrytis cinereaReducedReduced[38]
AfAtg8Aspergillus flavusReducedReduced mycotoxin [48]
AnAtg8Aspergillus nigerReducedNA[13]
FoAtg8Fusarium oxysporumReducedReduced[50]
AnAtg8Aspergillus nigerReducedNA[13]
FoAtg8Fusarium oxysporumReducedReduced[50]
CnAtg8Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[51]
MoAtg10Magnaporthe oryzaeReducedAbolished[26]
FgAtg10Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
FgAtg12Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
SmAtg12Sordaria macrosporaReducedUnknown [52]
SsAtg12Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUnknownReduced[28]
CnAtg12Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
CgAtg16Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesReducedReduced[53]
FgAtg16Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[9]
CnAtg16Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
Other groups
CoAtg26Colletotrichum orbiculareNot explainedAbolished[46]
ChAtg24Colletotrichum higginsianumReduced Reduced[54]
FgAtg15Fusarium graminearumReducedReduced[55]
AoAtg15Aspergillus oryzaeNo effectNA[56]
AoAtg26Aspergillus oryzaeReduced NA[57]
CnAtg15Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
CnAtg20Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
CnAtg24Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
CnAtg15Cryptococcus neoformansUnknownReduced[24]
CaAtg27Candida albicansUnknownUnknown[27]
AfAtg20Aspergillus fumigatusReducedReduced[58]
AfAtg24Aspergillus fumigatusReducedReduced[59]
Footnote: NA is Not Applicable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osakina, A.; Steinbach, W.J.; Juvvadi, P.R. Multifunctional Roles of Autophagy in Fungi. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050377

AMA Style

Osakina A, Steinbach WJ, Juvvadi PR. Multifunctional Roles of Autophagy in Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(5):377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osakina, Aron, William J. Steinbach, and Praveen R. Juvvadi. 2026. "Multifunctional Roles of Autophagy in Fungi" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 5: 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050377

APA Style

Osakina, A., Steinbach, W. J., & Juvvadi, P. R. (2026). Multifunctional Roles of Autophagy in Fungi. Journal of Fungi, 12(5), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12050377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop