Abstract
Globally, the use of ethnoveterinary medicine as remedies for animal health among different ethnic groups justify the need for a systematic exploration to enhance their potential. In addition, the increasing popularity and utilisation of woody plants remain common in traditional medicine, which may be attributed to their inherent benefits. The current review was aimed at analysing ethnoveterinary surveys, biological activities, and secondary metabolites/phytochemical profiles of the woody plants of South Africa. Eligible literature (period: 2000 to 2020) were retrieved from different databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Sabinet, and Science Direct. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 ethnoveterinary surveys were eligible and were subjected to further analysis. We identified 104 woody plant species from 44 plant families that are used in the treatment of different diseases in animals, particularly cattle (70%) and goats (20%). The most mentioned (with six citations) woody plants were Terminalia sericea Burch. ex DC and Ziziphus mucronata Willd., which were followed by plants with five (Cussonia spicata Thunb., Pterocarpus angolensis DC and Vachellia karroo (Hayne) Banfi & Galasso) or four (Acokanthera oppositifolia (Lam.) Codd, Cassia abbreviata Oliv., and Strychnos henningsii Gilg) individual mentions. The most dominant families were Fabaceae (19%), Apocynaceae (5.8%), Rubiaceae (5.8%), Anacardiaceae (4.8%), Combretaceae (4.8%), Euphorbiaceae (4.8%), Malvaceae (4.8%), Rhamnaceae (4.8%), and Celastraceae (3.8%). Bark (33%), leaves (29%), and roots (19%) were the plant parts dominantly used to prepare remedies for ethnoveterinary medicine. An estimated 20% of woody plants have been screened for antimicrobial, anthelmintic, antioxidant, and cytotoxicity effects. Phytochemical profiles established a rich pool of valuable secondary metabolites (phenolic, flavonoids and condensed tannins) that may be responsible for the exerted biological activities. Overall, the significant portion of woody plants lacking empirical evidence on their biological effects indicates a major knowledge gap that requires more research efforts.
1. Introduction
Globally, many animals, especially cattle, goats, and horses, play diverse role in human life, ranging from being a source of food, income and cultural wealth, touristic attraction, and job creation [,,,,,]. The rearing of animals is well-embedded in the culture of many ethnic groups, which justifies the popularity of indigenous knowledge and practice for managing the health and well-being of animals [,,,,,]. Relative to ethnobiology/ethnobotany, this is currently considered as a distinct field known as ethnoveterinary medicine, a word coined by the American anthropologist Constance McCorkle []. It is defined as “the systematic study and application of folk knowledge and beliefs, practices that relate to any aspects of animal health” []. Based on increasing evidence [,], the field has the capacity to develop into a huge industry in the future. Although animal species and plant species are utilised in ethnoveterinary medicine, the latter is often more popular among many ethnic groups globally [,]. Particularly in South Africa, the importance of plants for the management of animal health and well-being cannot be over-emphasized [].
South Africa has a huge flora diversity and is recognised as a mega-diverse country with three global biodiversity hotspots []. The country has an estimated 24,000 species distributed among 368 families, which accounts for approximately 10% of the world’s flora []. As a result, South Africans have tapped into the healing powers of these floras since time immemorial, and this knowledge has been retained and has continuously evolved through generations []. In some cases, the choice of plants is based on an indigenous experimental process, cultural beliefs, and the biodiversity in a particular area [,,,].
In Africa, woody plants (trees and shrubs) are an important defining feature of the landscapes [,]. They are widely recognised for their diverse uses by humans since ancient times [,,]. Particularly in traditional medicine, woody plant species have essential roles that are easily exemplified, as they represent about 65% of the top 51 most important African medicinal plants []. Recent studies from different African countries including South African have reiterated the vital role of woody plants in human and animal healthcare as well as the need for more concerted efforts for their conservation [,,,,]. An important attribute of woody plants is the wide range of their organs (leaves, bark, roots, fruits, and flowers) that is available for use as remedies in folk medicine [,]. Relative to herbaceous plants with short life cycles, woody plants are often dominant in ecosystems, thereby making them apparent to foraging animals and for utilisation by humans [,]. In the current review, we aim to provide an appraisal on the existing ethnoveterinary knowledge, biological activities, and secondary metabolites/phytochemical profiles of woody plants used for managing animal health in South Africa. The review is expected to identify existing research gap(s) in an attempt to explore the potential of woody plants as an alternative remedy for managing animal health.
2. Materials and Methods
The literature search strategy was facilitated using keywords such as woody plants, ethnoveterinary medicine, livestock, and animal health. In addition, phytochemical, antioxidant, phenolic, and antibacterial effect were examples of terms used to generate data for the biological activity and phytochemical aspects of this review. These keywords were used singly and in combination to identify suitable literature from several databases, namely Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science Direct, and Sabinet. We focused on peer-reviewed papers published from 2000 to 2020 on South African woody plants.
Screening of the research outputs from the databases was conducted in two stages. Firstly, the title and abstract of the papers were screened against the inclusion criteria. A publication needed to provide the Latin name for the woody plant to be eligible for inclusion. Articles reporting on ethnoveterinary uses, biological activities, and phytochemical analyses of the woody plants fulfilled the inclusion criteria (e.g., specified time duration, woody species, and South African studies). Review papers and studies not involving South African medicinal woody plants were excluded. Based on the selection criteria, 20 papers were selected and were analysed in order to generate an inventory of woody plants (Table 1). Subsequently, analyses on plant families, mode of preparation, plant parts used to treat animals/livestock diseases, biological activities, and phytochemicals were conducted. Based on the significance of scientific names [,], the botanical names were validated via multi-databases, such as PlantZAfrica (http://pza.sanbi.org/ (accessed on 29 September 2021)), The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 29 September 2021)), and The World Flora Online (http://www.worldfloraonline.org/ (accessed on 29 September 2021)).
Table 1.
An overview of ethnoveterinary surveys with evidence on the use of woody plants in South Africa from 2000–2020.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Overview of Eligible Literature and Ethnoveterinary Studies
The eligible studies were conducted in five of the nine provinces in South Africa. These included the Eastern Cape (45%), Limpopo (30%), North West (15%) Mpumalanga (5%), and KwaZulu-Natal (5%) provinces (Table 1). The majority of these aforementioned provinces are regarded as predominantly rural-based, which may explain the continuous dependence on woody plants for veterinary needs. In a recent review of the ethnoveterinary plants of South Africa, McGaw et al., [] indicated a similar distribution pattern relating to the use of medicinal plants as remedies for animals/livestock in South Africa. In Pakistan, a rich ethnoveterinary knowledge was recorded in communities residing in remote areas with limited access to conventional veterinary services, which often forced the inhabitants to rely on the natural resources within their immediate environment to meet the health needs of their livestock [].
The data collection methods included the use of questionnaires, interviews, field observations, and Rapid Rural Appraisal (Table 1). Data on ethnoveterinary medicine was collected from diverse participants such as farmers, cattle headers, indigenous knowledge holders, and traditional healers. In terms of number, the number of participants ranged from 15 [] to 180 [] while about 30% of the studies had no indication of the sample size involved in the ethnobotanical survey. Given that the primary focus of these surveys was not on woody plants, varying portions (11–100%) of woody species were identified in the recorded plants (Table 1). In the survey in the Eastern Cape by Dold and Cocks [], approximately 40% of the 53 recorded plants with ethnoveterinary value were woody plant species. A similar trend was evident in other ethnoveterinary surveys in the Eastern Cape [,,] and Limpopo [] provinces. In North West province, the portion of woody plants ranged from 26% [,] to 32% []. In an attempt to understand the basis for the selection and utilisation of plants by local communities, several theories and hypotheses exist []. In the current situation, the ecological apparency hypothesis likely accounts for the use of woody plants for ethnoveterinary medicine among local communities. Even though South Africa is recognized as being rich in biodiversity and diverse vegetation-types, it remains highly susceptible due to rapid development, habitat loss, and overexploitation []. Increasing evidence supported the dynamic nature of the existing vegetation in South Africa, which is associated with the effects of climate change []. On this basis, it is often difficult to predict the pattern for the use of woody plants in ethnoveterinary medicine.
3.2. Inventory of Woody Plants with Ethnoveterinary Uses
The high reliance on plants for managing livestock/animals among local communities, especially in developing countries, remains a common trend [,]. This popularity has often been attributed to the limited access to convention veterinary drugs and the existence of vast indigenous knowledge for managing livestock in rural communities [,,]. Several studies have revealed that traditional medicines are mostly used because they are regarded as effective and readily available as well as accessible. As often indicated by participants in ethnoveterinary surveys, dependence on traditional medicines is common because western veterinary facilities are inaccessible and are too costly for resource-poor livestock farmers [,,].
Based on the 20 eligible studies from the literature, we generated 104 woody plants with diverse ethnoveterinary uses in South Africa (Table 2). Terminalia sericea Burch. Ex DC and Ziziphus mucronata Willd were the most common plants, with six mentions. Furthermore, Cussonia spicata Thunb., Pterocarpus angolensis DC., and Vachellia karroo (Hayne) Banfi & Galasso (five citations) and Cassia abbreviata Oliv. and Strychnos henningsii Gilg (four citations) were popular within the 20 analysed studies from the literature. On the other hand, the majority (86%, i.e., 89 plants) of the 104 woody plants had limited (1–2) mentions.
Table 2.
Inventory of woody plants used for ethnoveterinary purposes among communities in South Africa. Botanical names were validated using PlantZAfrica (http://pza.sanbi.org/ (accessed on 29 September 2021)), The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 29 September 2021)), and The World Flora Online (http://www.worldfloraonline.org/ (accessed on 29 September 2021)). Syn = synonym; ns = not specified.
In terms of plant families (Figure 1), most of the identified plants were from the Fabaceae (19%), Apocynaceae (5.8%), Rubiaceae (5.8%), Anacardiaceae (4.8%), Combretaceae (4.8%), Euphorbiaceae (4.8%), Malvaceae (4.8%), Rhamnaceae (4.8%), and Celastraceae (3.8%) families. Even though 44 families were recorded, the majority (estimated 64%) of the families were represented by one woody plant. Based on the analysis of approximately 4576 vascular plants representing 192 families (from the 254 African families) with medicinal value in sub-Saharan African, the dominance of Fabaceae remains evident in African traditional medicine []. Furthermore, Fabaceae was the most represented plant family for plants used against cattle diseases in South Africa [].
Figure 1.
Frequency of the 44 families of woody plants used in South African ethnoveterinary medicine. # = number of mention.
Plant parts used to prepare herbal remedies included bark, leaves, fruits, roots, and flowers (Figure 2). However, the most commonly used plant parts for remedy preparations were bark (33%) followed by leaves (29%) and roots (19%). The dominance of plant parts such as bark and roots may not be sustainable overtime, as their indiscriminate harvesting is often of great conservation concerns for the survival of the plant []. Thus, conscious efforts remain essential to ensure good harvesting practices and the long-term sustainability of these valuable woody plants.
Figure 2.
Distribution of different parts of woody plants used in the preparation of ethnoveterinary remedies in South Africa. Others denote parts such as seeds, fruits, flowers, and twigs. (n = 184).
3.3. Overview of Animals/Livestock and Diseases
As shown in Figure 3, cattle were the major (61%) animal/livestock treated with the woody plants. In South Africa, the importance of cattle among different cultural groups cannot be overemphasized [,]. Van der Merwe et al., [] documented the use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in cattle by the Setswana-speaking people in the Madikwe area of the North West Province. The most important diseases treated were retained placenta, diarrhoea, fractures, fertility enhancement, general gastrointestinal problems, and pneumonia. A high proportion of the woody plants were used for diarrhoea. Some of the plants documented during the study are used elsewhere in the Eastern Cape to treat different livestock diseases. These include Vachellia karroo, Vachellia tortilis, Cussonia spicata, Rhoicissus tridentata, and Ziziphus mucronata.
Figure 3.
Distribution of animals identified in ethnoveterinary surveys for woody plants in South Africa. (n = 189).
3.4. In Vitro Biological Screening of Woody Plants
The increasing incidence of drug resistance in most pathogenic bacteria and parasites that cause economic loss in animals/livestock production calls for the development of new sources for medication [,]. Among to the 104 woody plants with ethnoveterinary uses in South Africa (Table 2), approximately 20% were screened for their relevant biological activities (e.g., antibacterial, anthelmintic, and antioxidant) and safety (cytotoxicity) level. However, the current review included woody plants that have been screened for biological activities without evidence of their ethnoveterinary use in South Africa. This approach may increase the success rate of bio-prospecting for therapeutic woody plants for ethnoveterinary needs in South Africa []. As highlighted by Eloff [], no statistically significant difference was observed in the antimicrobial activity of plants with ethnobotanical knowledge when compared to randomly selected plants. Hence, the most promising biological activity may not correlate with the most popular plants with existing ethnobotanical knowledge [,].
3.4.1. Antibacterial Activity
Even though the antibacterial effects of 39 woody plants were reported (Table 3), approximately 56% of the 39 plants lacked ethnoveterinary applications in the eligible studies that were recorded (Table 1 and Table 2). In terms of the assay-type, approximately 95% of the studies were conducting using the micro-plate dilution method, which is considered as a more robust and reliable assay relative to agar diffusion [,]. Based on the recorded antibacterial activity (Table 3), Gram-positive bacteria were more dominant (57% of the 14 organisms) than Gram-negative bacterial strains. Although a diverse range of bacterial strains was tested, the relevance and justification for their selection were unclear in most of the studies. Researchers need to be cognizant of the bacteria type in order to demonstrate the clinical relevance of the anti-bacterial effect of the tested plant extracts [,].
Table 3.
Examples of in vitro antibacterial activity of woody plants with ethnoveterinary applications in South Africa. # Plant species: denotes woody plants with ethnoveterinary uses in Table 2; MIC—minimum inhibitory concentration, ns—not specified.
On the basis on the number of reports, five woody plants namely Alsophila dregei (Kunze) R.M.Tryon, Cussonia spicata Thunb, Indigofera frutescens L.f., Leucosidea sericea Eckl. and Zeyh, and Maesa lanceolata Forssk were the most studied woody plants in terms of their antibacterial effects (Table 3). The most noteworthy (MIC = 20–40 μg/mL) antibacterial effect (exerted against Bacillus anthracis) was demonstrated by acetone extracts of Bolusanthus speciosus (Bolus) Harms, Morus mesozygia Stapf, and Maesa lanceolata Forssk []. Likewise, Salmonella typhimurium was highly susceptible (MIC = 40 μg/mL) to acetone extracts from Crotalaria capensis leaves []. Furthermore, the acetone extract from Maesa lanceolata leaves exerted a broad-spectrum antibacterial effect by significantly (MIC = 160–630 μg/mL) inhibiting both Gram-positive (Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium) bacterial strains []. Similar broad-spectrum antibacterial activity was demonstrated by the acetone leaf extracts of Indigofera frutescens L.f. (MIC = 80–310 μg/mL) and Leucosidea sericea (MIC = 20–80 μg/mL), as indicated by different authors [,,].
Leaves/aerial parts (77%) and bark (17%) were the most common parts of the woody plants that were evaluated for their antibacterial activity. Remarkable differences in the antibacterial effect of woody plant parts were evident in Leucosidea sericea [], Schotia brachypetala Sond, Searsia lancea (L.f.) F.A.Barkley (Rhus lanceas), and Ziziphus mucronata Willd []. Particularly in Schotia brachypetala and Ziziphus mucronata, the leaf extracts had remarkable antibacterial effects against the tested bacterial strains while the bark extracts were ineffective. Furthermore, the type of solvent used for extracting the plant parts strongly influenced the resultant antibacterial response (Table 3). Despite the popularity of water as the most commonly used solvent in traditional medicine, water extracts often exhibit weaker antibacterial effects relative to many organic solvents [].
3.4.2. Anthelmintic Activity
As highlighted by Aremu et al., [], evaluating anthelmintic potential is often conducted using (i) developmental and behavioural assays (DBA) and (ii) colorimetric assays (CA). Following treatment and incubation with plant extracts, the assays measure the survival and/or reproductive potential (DBA) or metabolic response using the appropriate marker (CA). A total of 48 woody plants have been tested for their anthelmintic activity, which was mainly (90%) assessed using DBA (Table 4). However, only 42% of these woody plants had existing indigenous knowledge related to the management of animal health among local communities in South Africa. Alsophila dregei (Kunze) R.M.Tryon, Leucosidea sericea, and Sclerocarya birrea were identified as the most commonly evaluated woody plants in terms of their anthelmintic effect. Using pre-defined anthelmintic effect categories [], the organic solvent extracts of Leucosidea sericea had high (minimum lethal concentration, MLC = 0.26–0.52 mg/mL) anthelmintic activity against Caenorhabditis elegans []. Likewise, Fouche et al., [] demonstrated that Maerua angolensis stem extract exerted 65% inhibition, which was noteworthy among all of the evaluated woody plants. Furthermore, extracts from Heteromorpha trifoliata, Maesa lanceolate, and Leucosidea sericea using an egg hatch assay (e.g., of DBA) exhibited significant anthelmintic activity against Haemonchus contortus and killed 100% of the parasites when administered at the dosages of 12.50, 6.25, and 3.13 mg/mL []. Fouche et al., [] investigated the acetone extracts of various woody plants for their anthelmintic activity against Haemonchus contortus, and the stem of Maerua angolensis had a mean inhibition rate of 65%, which was noteworthy compared to the other plants tested and included in the review.
Table 4.
Examples of anthelmintic effects of woody plants with ethnoveterinary applications in South Africa. # Plant species: denotes woody plants with ethnoveterinary uses in Table 2; $ Assay type: CA—colourimetric assay, DBA—developmental and behavioral assay; * Findings: EHA—egg hatch assay; LDT—larval development test; MLC—minimum lethal concentration.
Caenorhabditis elegans (63%), Haemonchus contortus (35%), and Trichostrongylus colubriformis (2%) have been the widely used organisms for assessing the anthelmintic effects of woody species (Table 4). In recent times, the use of free-living nematodes, particularly, have remained common due to their inherent benefits [,,]. Caenorhabditis elegans is regarded as the best representative of a large phylum that contains several parasites []. However, the use of Caenorhabditis elegans as a test organism has resulted in limited success in terms of the discovery of valuable new leads [,,]. Hence, Caenorhabditis elegans should only serve as a screening tool for the rapid identification of promising plant extracts that will be further subjected to more appropriate test model(s).
The type of solvents used for plant extraction has a critical influence on the anthelmintic effect of woody plants (Table 4). For instance, the ethyl acetate extract of Combretum apiculatum exhibited strong lethality, killing 70–80% of nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans) while the water extract had a 10–20% killing rate at 1 mg/mL []. Furthermore, Searsia lancea hexane extract had higher (50%) in vitro anthelmintic activity against Caenorhabditis elegans than the methanol and water extracts did []. The in vitro anthelmintic efficacy of several woody plants against Caenorhabditis elegans revealed that ethanol extracts possessed higher anthelmintic activity than water extracts [].
Contrary to the majority of studies focusing on an single test organism (Table 4), Shai et al., [] evaluated the anthelmintic activity of Curtisia dentata against parasitic (Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus) and the free-living (Caenorhabditis elegans) nematodes. The acetone and dichloromethane extracts were active against all of the nematodes at concentrations as low as 160 μg/mL. This finding clearly highlights the anthelmintic potential of Curtisia dentata, which requires further experiments, especially in terms of its in vivo response.
3.4.3. Antioxidant Activity
Antioxidants are free radical scavengers and often possess the ability to reverse or repair the damage caused by free radicals in animal cells []. Recently, there has been increasing interest in determining the antioxidant potential of plants used for medicinal purposes []. It is generally known that damages caused by reactive oxygen species are often a contributing factor to many diseases []. As shown in Table 5, the antioxidant potential of the 24 woody plants have mainly been evaluated via in vitro assays including ABTS—2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), DPPH—1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl, and FRAP -ferric reducing antioxidant power. Relative to the inventory in Table 2, only six woody plants show antioxidant activity.
Table 5.
Examples of in vitro antioxidant effect of woody plants used for ethnoveterinary medicine in South Africa. # Plant species: denotes woody plants with ethnoveterinary uses in Table 2. ABTS—2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), DPPH—1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl, FRAP—ferric reducing antioxidant power, TEAC—trolox equivalent antioxidant assay.
Given that these bio-analytical assays differ in terms of reaction mechanisms, oxidant, and target species as well as reaction conditions [], it is often beneficial to evaluate plant extracts in multi-assays. Based on the DPPH assay, the most promising (EC50 < 5 μg/mL) antioxidant activity was exerted by woody plants such as Alsophila dregei, Apodytes dimidiata, Brachylaena discolor, Burkea africana, Clausena anisata, Combretanum zeyheri, Millettia grandis, Strychnos mitis, Volkameria glabra, and Zanthoxylum capense. Similar noteworthy antixodant effects was observed in the ABTS assay for Burkea africana and Combretum zeyheri []. However, moderate antioxidant activity ranging from 68–579 µg/mL was demonstrated among the eight evaluated woody plants. These aforementioned antioxidant tests were in vitro-based, thereby limiting the clinical relevance of the current findings. Hence, it will be pertinent to establish the in vivo antioxidant activity of woody plants with noteworthy response.
3.4.4. Cytotoxicity
The safety of medicinal plants remains essential toward the drive to incorporate these valuable natural resources as part of healthcare for animals. Evidence of the cytotoxicity levels for 39 woody plants were recorded in the current review (Table 6). Approximately 51% of these woody plants have explicit applications in South African ethnoveterinary medicine (Table 2). Particularly, the safety of different organs from three plants namely Calpurnia aurea, Maesa lanceolata, and Sclerocarya birrea were assessed in more than one study [,,,].
Table 6.
Cytotoxic activity of woody plants used for ethnoveterinary purposes in South Africa. # Plant species: denotes woody plants with ethnoveterinary uses in Table 2; * Test system: MTT—3–5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide.
According to the United States National Cancer Institute (NCI), the criteria for the cytotoxicity of crude extracts, extracts with an LC50 value that is less than 20 µg/mL are classified as cytotoxic. On this basis, Apodytes dimidiate, Brachylaena discolour, Calpurnia aurea, Elaeodendron croceum, Maesa lanceolata, and Strychnos mitis exerted varying degrees of cytotoxicity (LC50 = 3.32–19.9 μg/mL), and caution needs to be taken during their utilisation for ethnoveterinary medicine [,,]. Furthermore, McGaw et al., [] assessed the cytotoxicity activity of the hexane, methanol, and water extracts of the selected woody plants against the larvae of Artemia salina (brine shrimp). From the results, the water extracts from Searsia lancea and Ziziphus mucronata leaves displayed strong lethality to the tested organism. On the other hand, moderate cytotoxicity was demonstrated by the acetone and water extracts of Vachellia nilotica bark against Vero monkey cell assays, and these extracts exhibited toxic effects on the cells with LC50 = 33.2 μg/mL and LC50 = 27.8 μg/mL, respectively. This was closely-followed by the acetone extracts from Tetradenia riparia, leaf with LC50 = 51.3 μg/mL [].
3.5. Phytochemical Analysis of Plants Used for Ethnoveterinary Purposes
Phytochemical screening is important when investigating medicinal plants given that bioactive compounds can be responsible for their resultant biological activities [,]. In particular, the phenolic compounds in plants serve as defense mechanisms against pathogens and may be explored for therapeutic purposes []. The 20 woody plants recorded exhibit a diverse range of phytochemicals (Table 7), an indication of their potential benefits as ethnoveterinary medicine. For instance, 12 selected woody plant extracts had a rich source of phenols that ranged from 100 to 428 mg GAE/g, and Lippia javanica had the highest phenolic content while Englerophytum magaliesmontanum had the lowest content []. In addition, the flavonoid content varied from 6–159 mg QE/g, as contained in Ehretia rigida (lowest) and Leucaena leucocephala (highest). Olaokun et al., [] quantified the total phenolic and flavonoid contents in Curtisia dentata and Pittosporum viridiflorum. The results indicated that Curtisia dentata extract yielded the higher phenolics (125.12 mg/g GAE) and flavonoids (27.69 mg/g GAE) compared to the extract from Pittosporum viridiflorum.
Table 7.
Phytochemical analysis (based on spectrophotometric method) of woody plants used in ethnoveterinary medicine. # Plant species: denotes woody plants with ethnoveterinary uses in Table 2; GAE—gallic acid equivalents, TPC—total phenolic content, TFC—total flavonoid content, CT—condensed tannin, GC—gallotannin content, LCE—leucocyanidin equivalents, CTE—catechin equivalents, QE—quercetin equivalents.
In recent times, increasing evidence from several studies on polyphenolic compounds from medicinal plants support their biological and pharmaceutical importance in maintaining animal health and overall productivity []. For example, betulinic acid and lupeol were successfully isolated from Curtisia dentata [], which is one of the woody plants recorded in our inventory (Table 2). Subsequently, both compounds demonstrated a moderate degree of an anthelmintic effect (200 and 1 000 μg/mL) against parasitic nematodes. However, the relatively higher concentration required for the compounds to be effective limits their clinical relevance as an anthelmintic for livestock.
4. Conclusions
The current review entailed an overview of the role and contributions of woody plants in ethnoveterinary medicine in South Africa. We highlighted the richness of South Africa’s flora as a medicinal resource and the effectiveness of woody plants used in ethnoveterinary medicine. Terminalia sericea and Ziziphus mucronata were the most commonly utilised woody plants based on existing indigenous knowledge. The extensive utilisation of some plant parts (e.g., bark and roots) remain a major concern due to the potential detrimental effects of the indiscriminate harvesting of such parts may have on the survival and sustainability of the woody plants. The majority (80%) of woody plants with indigenous knowledge related to their applications in the management of animal health remain poorly evaluated in terms of their biological efficacy and phytochemical composition. Nevertheless, some of the woody plants (e.g., Alsophila dregei, Cussonia spicata, Indigofera frutescens, Leucosidea sericea, and Maesa lanceolata) have demonstrated promising biological activities, mainly in antibacterial and anthelminthic assays. Given the pre-dominantly in vitro based assays currently being utilised, there is an urgent need to evaluate woody plants with promising biological effect in appropriate in vivo models. The test organisms need to have direct relevance to prevailing health challenges facing livestock in rural areas where the use of woody plants have been widely documented. In terms of the phytochemical profiles, South African woody plants have a rich pool of chemicals with potential therapeutic effects.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.M.S. and A.O.A.; formal analysis, K.M.S., J.A.A. and A.O.A.; investigation, K.M.S., J.A.A. and A.O.A.; writing—original draft preparation K.M.S., J.A.A. and A.O.A.; writing—review and editing, J.A.A., M.S., R.V.N. and A.O.A.; supervision, M.S., R.V.N., and A.O.A.; project administration, A.O.A.; funding acquisition, A.O.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was wholly funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF, Indigenous Knowledge Systems Research Grant, UID: 118585) Pretoria, South Africa. We thank North-West University for additional financial support for the project. AOA appreciates the financial support from North-West University UCDG: Staff Development—Advancement of Research Profiles: Mobility Grant (NW 1EU0130) for outgoing academic visits. The Article Processing Charge (APC) was paid by the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, South Africa. We appreciate the institutional support from North-West University, South Africa.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data are included as part of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate institutional support from North-West University.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The National Research Foundation had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Comaroff, J.L.; Comaroff, J. Goodly beasts, beastly goods: Cattle and commodities in a South African context. Am. Ethnol. 1990, 17, 195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mapiye, O.; Chikwanha, O.C.; Makombe, G.; Dzama, K.; Mapiye, C. Livelihood, food and nutrition security in Southern Africa: What role do indigenous cattle genetic resources play? Diversity 2020, 12, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suroowan, S.; Javeed, F.; Ahmad, M.; Zafar, M.; Noor, M.J.; Kayani, S.; Javed, A.; Mahomoodally, M.F. Ethnoveterinary health management practices using medicinal plants in South Asia—A review. Vet. Res. Commun. 2017, 41, 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lans, C.; Sant, C.; Georges, K. Ethnoremedies used for horses in British Columbia and Trinidad and Tobago. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine: Present and Future Concepts; McGaw, L.J., Abdalla, M.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borges, A.K.M.; Barboza, R.R.D.; Souto, W.M.S.; Alves, R.R.N. Natural remedies for animal health in Latin America. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine: Present and Future Concepts; McGaw, L.J., Abdalla, M.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 311–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, M.; Zbinden, M.; Vogl, C.R.; Ivemeyer, S.; Meier, B.; Amorena, M.; Maeschli, A.; Hamburger, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Swiss ethnoveterinary knowledge on medicinal plants—A within-country comparison of Italian speaking regions with north-western German speaking regions. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galaty, J.G. Being “Maasai”; being “People-of-cattle”: Ethnic shifters in East Africa. Am. Ethnol. 1982, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazancı, C.; Oruç, S.; Mosulishvili, M. Ethnoveterinary and fodder plants used among transhumant communities around Georgia-Turkey border, in the Western Lesser Caucasus. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2021, 21, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCorkle, C.M. Back to the future: Lessons from ethnoveterinary RD&E for studying and applying local knowledge. Agric. Hum. Values 1995, 12, 52–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, K.; Rahman, I.U.; Calixto, E.S.; Ali, N.; Ijaz, F. Ethnoveterinary therapeutic practices and conservation status of the medicinal flora of Chamla valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shrubok, A. Belarusian ethnoveterinary medicine: Ritual practices and traditional remedies. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine: Present and Future Concepts; McGaw, L.J., Abdalla, M.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zorloni, A. Toward a better understanding of African ethnoveterinary medicine and husbandry. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine: Present and Future Concepts; McGaw, L.J., Abdalla, M.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCorkle, C.M. An introduction to ethnoveterinary research and development. J. Ethnobiol. 1986, 6, 129–149. [Google Scholar]
- Aziz, M.A.; Khan, A.H.; Pieroni, A. Ethnoveterinary plants of Pakistan: A review. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2020, 16, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGaw, L.J.; Famuyide, I.M.; Khunoana, E.T.; Aremu, A.O. Ethnoveterinary botanical medicine in South Africa: A review of research from the last decade (2009 to 2019). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 257, 112864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoveka, L.N.; van der Bank, M.; Davies, T.J. Evaluating the performance of a protected area network in South Africa and its implications for megadiverse countries. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 248, 108577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germishuizen, G.; Meyer, N. Plants of Southern Africa: An Annotated Checklist; National Botanical Institute Pretoria: Pretoria, South Africa, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Van Staden, J. Ethnobotany in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 329–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, T.C.; da Silva, J.M.; Ramos, M.A. What factors guide the selection of medicinal plants in a local pharmacopoeia? A case study in a rural community from a historically transformed atlantic forest landscape. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 2018, 2519212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muleba, I.; Yessoufou, K.; Rampedi, I.T. Testing the non-random hypothesis of medicinal plant selection using the woody flora of the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 4162–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Albuquerque, U.P.; Farias Paiva de Lucena, R. Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 2005, 30, 506–510. [Google Scholar]
- Douwes, E.; Crouch, N.R.; Edwards, T.J.; Mulholland, D.A. Regression analyses of southern African ethnomedicinal plants: Informing the targeted selection of bioprospecting and pharmacological screening subjects. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daru, B.H.; Berger, D.K.; Wyk, A.E. Opportunities for unlocking the potential of genomics for African trees. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 772–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venter, F.; Venter, J.-A. Making the Most of Indigenous Trees; Briza Publications: Pretoria, South Africa, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Van Wyk, A.S.; Prinsloo, G. A review of the ethnobotanical uses, pharmacology, toxicology, management and cultivation of selected South African protected multi-purpose tree species. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moyo, M.; Aremu, A.O.; Van Staden, J. Medicinal plants: An invaluable, dwindling resource in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 174, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yaoitcha, A.S.; Houehanou, T.D.; Fandohan, A.B.; Houinato, M.R.B. Prioritization of useful medicinal tree species for conservation in Wari-Maro Forest Reserve in Benin: A multivariate analysis approach. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 61, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yirgu, A.; Mohammed, K.; Geldenhuys, C.J. Useful medicinal tree species of Ethiopia: Comprehensive review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahoyo, C.C.; Houéhanou, T.D.; Yaoïtcha, A.S.; Prinz, K.; Glèlè Kakaï, R.; Sinsin, B.A.; Houinato, M.R.B. Traditional medicinal knowledge of woody species across climatic zones in Benin (West Africa). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 265, 113417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Andel, T.; Myren, B.; van Onselen, S. Ghana’s herbal market. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 140, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera, D.; Allkin, R.; Obón, C.; Alcaraz, F.; Verpoorte, R.; Heinrich, M. What is in a name? The need for accurate scientific nomenclature for plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 152, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weckerle, C.S.; de Boer, H.J.; Puri, R.K.; van Andel, T.; Bussmann, R.W.; Leonti, M. Recommended standards for conducting and reporting ethnopharmacological field studies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 210, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chitura, T.; Muvhali, P.; Shai, K.; Mushonga, B.; Kandiwa, E. Use of medicinal plants by livestock farmers in a local municipality in Vhembe district, South Africa. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2018, 16, 6589–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dold, A.P.; Cocks, M.L. Traditional veterinary medicine in the Alice district of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2001, 97, 375–379. [Google Scholar]
- Kambizi, L. Indigenous plants for ethnoveterinary uses in the Pondoland, South Africa. In Proceedings of the XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes: V World Congress on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants and International Symposium on Plants, as Factories of Natural Substances, Edible and Essential Oils, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 17 August 2014; pp. 309–314. [Google Scholar]
- Khunoana, E.T.; Madikizela, B.; Erhabor, J.O.; Nkadimeng, S.M.; Arnot, L.F.; Van Wyk, I.; McGaw, L.J. A survey of plants used to treat livestock diseases in the Mnisi community, Mpumalanga, South Africa, and investigation of their antimicrobial activity. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 126, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luseba, D.; Tshisikhawe, M. Medicinal plants used in the treatment of livestock diseases in Vhembe region, Limpopo province, South Africa. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 593–601. [Google Scholar]
- Luseba, D.; Van der Merwe, D. Ethnoveterinary medicine practices among Tsonga speaking people of South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2006, 73, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magwede, K.; Tshisikhawe, M.P.; Luseba, D.; Bhat, R.B. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in treatment of ticks. Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 83, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
- Mahlo, S.M. Antibacterial Activity of Selected Plants Used in Ethnoveterinary Medicine. Master’s Thesis, University of Limpopo (Turfloop Campus), Turfloop, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Maphosa, V.; Masika, P.J. Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants: A survey of plants used in the ethnoveterinary control of gastro-intestinal parasites of goats in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Pharm. Biol. 2010, 48, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mkwanazi, M.V.; Ndlela, S.Z.; Chimonyo, M. Utilisation of indigenous knowledge to control ticks in goats: A case of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020, 52, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moichwanetse, B.I.; Ndhlovu, P.T.; Sedupane, G.; Aremu, A.O. Ethno-veterinary plants used for the treatment of retained placenta and associated diseases in cattle among Dinokana communities, North West Province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 132, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moyo, B.; Masika, P.J. Tick control methods used by resource-limited farmers and the effect of ticks on cattle in rural areas of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009, 41, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mthi, S.; Rust, J.; Morgenthal, T.; Moyo, B. An ethno-veterinary survey of medicinal plants used to treat bacterial diseases of livestock in three geographical areas of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. J. Med. Plants Res. 2018, 12, 240–247. [Google Scholar]
- Mwale, M.; Masika, P.J. Ethno-veterinary control of parasites, management and role of village chickens in rural households of Centane district in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009, 41, 1685–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ndou, R.V. A Study of Ethnoveterinary medicIne in the North West Province, South Africa. Master’s Thesis, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ramovha, L.I.; Van Wyk, A.E. Ethnoveterinary practices of the Vhavenḓa, South Africa, in the treatment of redwater (mali) in cattle. Indilinga Afr. J. Indig. Knowl. Syst. 2016, 15, 314–327. [Google Scholar]
- Rwodzi, M. Alternative Remedies Used by Resource-Limited Farmers in the Treatment and Manipulation of the Reproductive System of Non-Descript Goats in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Master’s Thesis, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Sanhokwe, M.; Mupangwa, J.; Masika, P.J.; Maphosa, V.; Muchenje, V.; Masika, P.J. Medicinal plants used to control internal and external parasites in goats. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2016, 83, a1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soyelu, O.T.; Masika, P.J. Traditional remedies used for the treatment of cattle wounds and myiasis in Amatola Basin, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2009, 76, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van der Merwe, D.; Swan, G.E.; Botha, C.J. Use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in cattle by Setswana-speaking people in the Madikwe area of the North West Province of South Africa. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2001, 72, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaoue, O.G.; Coe, M.A.; Bond, M.; Hart, G.; Seyler, B.C.; McMillen, H. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Econ. Bot. 2017, 71, 269–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyvärinen, O.; Timm Hoffman, M.; Reynolds, C. Vegetation dynamics in the face of a major land-use change: A 30-year case study from semi-arid South Africa. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 2019, 36, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yirga, G.; Teferi, M.; Gidey, G.; Zerabruk, S. An ethnoveterinary survey of medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Seharti-Samre district, Northern Ethiopia. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 6, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
- McCorkle, C.M.; Mathias-Mundy, E. Ethnoveterinary Medicine in Africa. Afr. J. Int. Afr. Inst. 1992, 62, 59–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nchu, F.; Nana, P.; Msalya, G.; Magano, S.R. Ethnoveterinary practices for control of ticks in Africa. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine: Present and Future Concepts; McGaw, L.J., Abdalla, M.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 99–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Wyk, B.E. A family-level floristic inventory and analysis of medicinal plants used in Traditional African Medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 249, 112351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakale, M.V.; Mwanza, M.; Aremu, A.O. Ethnoveterinary knowledge and biological evaluation of plants used for mitigating cattle diseases: A critical insight into the trends and patterns in South Africa. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eloff, J.N.; McGaw, L.J. Application of plant extracts and products in veterinary infections. In New Strategies Combating Bacterial Infection; Ahmad, I., Aqil, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2009; pp. 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, M.A.; McGaw, L.J. Introduction. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine: Present and Future Concepts; McGaw, L.J., Abdalla, M.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eloff, J.N.; McGaw, L.J. Plant extracts used to manage bacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections in Southern Africa. In Modern Phytomedicine: Turning Medicinal Plants into Drugs; Ahmad, I., Aqil, F., Owais, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; pp. 97–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eloff, J.N. Avoiding pitfalls in determining antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and publishing the results. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Vuuren, S.; Holl, D. Antimicrobial natural product research: A review from a South African perspective for the years 2009–2016. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 208, 236–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinrich, M.; Appendino, G.; Efferth, T.; Fürst, R.; Izzo, A.A.; Kayser, O.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Viljoen, A. Best practice in research—Overcoming common challenges in phytopharmacological research. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elisha, I.L.; Dzoyem, J.-P.; Botha, F.S.; Eloff, J.N. The efficacy and safety of nine South African medicinal plants in controlling Bacillus anthracis Sterne vaccine strain. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dzoyem, J.P.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. In vitro antibacterial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of acetone leaf extracts of nine under-investigated Fabaceae tree species leads to potentially useful extracts in animal health and productivity. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adamu, M.; Naidoo, V.; Eloff, J.N. The antibacterial activity, antioxidant activity and selectivity index of leaf extracts of thirteen South African tree species used in ethnoveterinary medicine to treat helminth infections. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aremu, A.O.; Fawole, O.A.; Chukwujekwu, J.C.; Light, M.E.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. In vitro antimicrobial, anthelmintic and cyclooxygenase-inhibitory activities and phytochemical analysis of Leucosidea sericea. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 131, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGaw, L.J.; Van der Merwe, D.; Eloff, J.N. In vitro anthelmintic, antibacterial and cytotoxic effects of extracts from plants used in South African ethnoveterinary medicine. Vet. J. 2007, 173, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aremu, A.O.; Ndhlala, A.R.; Fawole, O.A.; Light, M.E.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. In vitro pharmacological evaluation and phenolic content of ten South African medicinal plants used as anthelmintics. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masika, P.J.; Afolayan, A.J. Antimicrobial activity of some plants used for the treatment of livestock disease in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 83, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luseba, D.; Elgorashi, E.; Ntloedibe, D.; Van Staden, J. Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and mutagenic effects of some medicinal plants used in South Africa for the treatment of wounds and retained placenta in livestock. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aremu, A.O.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Potential of South African medicinal plants used as anthelmintics—Their efficacy, safety concerns and reappraisal of current screening methods. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 82, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fouche, G.; Sakong, B.M.; Adenubi, O.T.; Pauw, E.; Leboho, T.; Wellington, K.W.; Eloff, J.N. Anthelmintic activity of acetone extracts from South African plants used on egg hatching of Haemonchus contortus. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2016, 83, a1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Adamu, M.; Naidoo, V.; Eloff, J.N. Efficacy and toxicity of thirteen plant leaf acetone extracts used in ethnoveterinary medicine in South Africa on egg hatching and larval development of Haemonchus contortus. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Githiori, J.B.; Athanasiadou, S.; Thamsborg, S.M. Use of plants in novel approaches for control of gastrointestinal helminths in livestock with emphasis on small ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 139, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bürglin, T.R.; Lobos, E.; Blaxter, M.L. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for parasitic nematodes. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geary, T.G.; Thompson, D.P.; Klein, R.D. Mechanism-based screening: Discovery of the next generation of anthelmintics depends upon more basic research. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGaw, L.J.; Rabe, T.; Sparg, S.G.; Jäger, A.K.; Eloff, J.N.; Van Staden, J. An investigation on the biological activity of Combretum species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 75, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shai, L.J.; Bizimenyera, E.S.; Bagla, V.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. Curtisia dentata (Cornaceae) leaf extracts and isolated compounds inhibit motility of parasitic and free-living nematodes. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2009, 76, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gülçin, İ. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: An overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 345–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granato, D.; Shahidi, F.; Wrolstad, R.; Kilmartin, P.; Melton, L.D.; Hidalgo, F.J.; Miyashita, K.; Camp, J.v.; Alasalvar, C.; Ismail, A.B.; et al. Antioxidant activity, total phenolics and flavonoids contents: Should we ban in vitro screening methods? Food Chem. 2018, 264, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houghton, P.J.; Howes, M.J.; Lee, C.C.; Steventon, G. Uses and abuses of in vitro tests in ethnopharmacology: Visualizing an elephant. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 110, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzoyem, J.P.; Eloff, J.N. Anti-inflammatory, anticholinesterase and antioxidant activity of leaf extracts of twelve plants used traditionally to alleviate pain and inflammation in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 160, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sserunkuma, P.; McGaw, L.J.; Nsahlai, I.V.; Van Staden, J. Selected southern African medicinal plants with low cytotoxicity and good activity against bovine mastitis pathogens. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.; Baharlouei, A.; Watson, D.G.; Lightfoot, D.A. Phytochemicals: Extraction, isolation, and identification of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. Plants 2017, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gálvez, M.; Martín-Cordero, C.; Ayuso, M.J. Pharmacological activities of iridoids biosynthesized by route II. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Attaur, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
- Brielmann, H.L.; Setzer, W.N.; Kaufman, P.B.; Kirakosyan, A.; Cseke, L.J. Phytochemicals: The chemical components of plants. In Natural Products from Plants, 2nd ed.; Cseke, L.J., Kirakosyan, A., Kaufman, P.B., Warber, S.L., Duke, J.A., Brielmann, H.L., Eds.; Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Olaokun, O.O.; Mkolo, N.M.; Mogale, M.A.; King, P.H. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and glucose utilization activities of three South African plants used traditionally to treat diseases. Biol. Med. 2017, 9, 1000412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajam, Y.A.; Rai, S.; Kumar, R.; Bashir, M.; Malik, J.A. Phenolic compounds from medicinal herbs: Their role in animal health and diseases—A new approach for sustainable welfare and development. In Plant Phenolics in Sustainable Agriculture; Lone, R., Shuab, R., Kamili, A.N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).