1. Introduction
The incorporation of zootechnical additives in broiler diets is a strategy that not only reduces costs but also enhances poultry productivity [
1]. These additives, which can either replace or be used in conjunction with antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs), contribute to weight gain and improved feed efficiency [
2].
Among these additives, organic acids have gained prominence as a viable alternative for balancing the intestinal microbiota and promoting animal welfare [
3]. Recognized as safe for use in animal nutrition, organic acids can be administered individually or in combination, showing beneficial effects in reducing pathogenic microorganisms in animals’ intestines [
4].
Another important group of additives is essential oils, which are aromatic compounds extracted from various plant parts. These bioactive substances exhibit a range of biological effects. Several plants, including cinnamon (
Cinnamomum spp.), oregano (
Origanum spp.), orange (
Citrus sinensis L.), sage (
Salvia officinalis L.), rosemary (
Rosmarinus officinalis L.), and cashew trees (
Anacardium occidentale L.), have been identified as potential supplements for broiler chickens [
5].
In addition, probiotics and prebiotics play crucial roles in regulating intestinal immunity and modulating the mRNA expression of junction proteins in broiler chickens [
6]. Studies suggest that dietary supplementation with probiotic blends can significantly enhance intestinal barrier function. Probiotics have demonstrated their ability to adhere to the intestinal epithelium, resist acidic conditions, and competitively antagonize and eliminate certain pathogens in vivo [
7].
Nutrition plays a vital role in regulating the immune system of poultry, as its proper function depends on the availability of energy and essential nutrients required for the formation of immune cells and other defense-related substances [
8]. Consequently, immunonutrition has gained increasing importance and is defined as the ability to increase the body’s resistance to diseases through the use of immunomodulatory nutrients [
4]. Zootechnical additives such as probiotics and acidifiers often lead to beneficial changes in intestinal morphology and overall poultry performance [
9].
However, some conflicting and inconsistent findings have raised concerns regarding the precise mechanisms or modes of action of probiotics and acidifiers, highlighting a gap in scientific knowledge [
10]. It is believed that probiotics influence not only local mucosal immunity but also systemic immune responses. Phagocytosis, for example, triggers the release of a wide array of chemical mediators, leading to the recruitment of immunocompetent cells and the development of a systemic immune response [
11]. During the first weeks of life, the activation of lymphoid tissues enhances nonspecific immune responses, which contribute to overall immunity and even improve vaccine efficacy [
12].
Considering the importance of zootechnical additives, their inclusion in poultry diets can support both the integrity and development of the intestinal mucosa [
13]. This results in improved digestibility, enhanced nutrient absorption, and, consequently, better overall performance and product quality [
14].
Given the extensive evidence supporting the benefits of zootechnical additives, further research is essential to expand our knowledge of their positive effects on intestinal health and immune modulation [
3]. This includes evaluating the inside index, intestinal histomorphometry in the small intestine, phagocytic activity, and leukocyte differential counts in broiler chickens.
Hematological parameters serve as key indicators of an animal’s health status and are critical for diagnosing pathologies. Variations in these parameters may signal adverse reactions to specific dietary additives, inadequate management, or disease outbreaks within poultry flocks. For example, an increased leukocyte count is often associated with the body’s immune response to infection [
11].
Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of zootechnical additives, prebiotics, probiotics, essential oils, and organic acids when combined with AGPs on the performance, leukocyte differential, phagocytic activity, inside index, and intestinal histomorphometry of broiler chickens.
3. Results
The use of additives affected the feed intake (
p < 0.0001), weight gain (
p < 0.0001), and feed conversion ratio (
p < 0.0001) of the broilers from 1 to 8 days of age (
Table 3). The lowest feed intake was observed in the essential oil treatment group, particularly compared with the treatment group without AGPs and the treatment with the combination of prebiotics 1 and 2. With respect to weight gain and the feed conversion ratio, the birds that received the diet without AGPs presented the worst performance.
The use of additives also affected the feed intake (
p < 0.0001), weight gain (
p < 0.0001), and feed conversion ratio (
p < 0.0001) of the broilers from 9 to 21 days of age (
Table 3). The lowest feed intake was observed in the treatment without AGPs, followed by the essential oil treatment. The highest weight gain and best feed conversion ratios were recorded in all the treatments with AGPs compared with those in the treatment without AGPs. Similarly, additives affected the feed intake (
p < 0.0001), weight gain (
p < 0.0001), and feed conversion ratio (
p < 0.0001) of the broilers from 22 to 39 days of age (
Table 4).
The lowest feed intake was observed in the birds from the treatment without AGPs compared with those from the other treatments. Compared with those in the treatment without AGPs, the weight gain was greater and the feed conversion ratio was the best in the AGP treatment group. No effect of additive use was observed on broiler performance from 40 to 44 days of age (p > 0.05).
For the overall period from 1 to 44 days of age, the use of additives affected the feed intake (
p < 0.0001), weight gain (
p < 0.0001), the feed conversion ratio (
p < 0.0001), viability (
p < 0.0001), and the productive efficiency index (
p < 0.0001) (
Table 5).
The lowest feed intake, weight gain, and productive efficiency index were observed in the birds from the treatment without AGPs. In terms of the feed conversion ratio, the best results were obtained in the birds fed diets with AGP + zootechnical additives, with the best value recorded for the AGP + essential oil treatment, compared with the treatments without AGPs and with AGPs but without additives. An effect (p < 0.0001) was observed for livability; however, the mean comparison test did not reveal significant differences among the treatments.
An effect (
p < 0.05) was observed on the percentage, occurrence frequency, and phagocytosis index of monocytes in broilers at 6 days of age (
Table 6). The highest values for percentage and occurrence frequency were observed in the AGP + essential oil and AGP + butyric acid treatments, whereas the highest phagocytosis index values were recorded in the treatments without AGPs and with AGPs.
In terms of the phagocytic profile of heterophils, a significant effect (
p < 0.05) was observed for the percentage and occurrence frequency, with the highest values found in the AGP + butyric acid treatment group, with no difference in percentage between the groups receiving AGP + essential oil, AGP + probiotic, and AGP + prebiotic 1 and without AGPs and with no difference in the occurrence frequency compared with the treatment group without AGPs. No effects of the treatments were observed on the total leukocytes (
p > 0.05) (
Table 6).
An effect (p < 0.05) was observed for the percentage and occurrence number of phagocytic monocytes at 21 days of age. The highest monocyte percentage was found in the treatment without AGPs, which did not differ statistically from the treatments with AGP and AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2. Similarly, the highest occurrence frequency of phagocytic monocytes was recorded in the treatment without AGPs, differing only from the AGP + prebiotic 1 treatment.
For heterophils at 21 days of age, an effect (p < 0.05) was observed for the percentage, occurrence frequency, and phagocytosis index. The highest heterophil percentage was found in the AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2 treatment, which did not differ from the AGP + prebiotic 1 treatment. The highest occurrence frequencies of phagocytic heterophils were observed in the AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2 and AGP + prebiotic 1 treatments, which differed only from the AGP + organic acid treatment, which showed the lowest value. Regarding the phagocytosis index, the highest values were observed in the AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2 and AGP + prebiotic 1 treatments, which differed significantly only from the treatment without AGPs.
No treatment effects were observed on the total leukocyte count (
p > 0.05) (
Table 7).
No effects of the AGPs or zootechnical additives were detected on the total leukocyte count; the percentages of heterophils, lymphocytes, or monocytes; or the heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (
p > 0.05) in birds at 6 and 21 days of age. No effects of the treatments on the birds’ intestinal histomorphometry were observed at 6 days of age (
p > 0.05). However, an effect was found for the villus height and duodenal wall thickness at 21 days of age (
p < 0.0001), with a greater villus height and wall thickness observed in the AGP treatment (
Table 8).
An effect was observed for the villus height (p < 0.0193) and crypt diameter (p < 0.0130) in the jejunum at 6 days of age and for the villus height (p < 0.0003) and wall thickness (p < 0.0085) at 21 days of age. At 6 days, a greater villus height was observed in the birds that received only AGP than in those that received the other treatments, except for the AGP + probiotic group. A greater crypt diameter was found in the birds fed diets without AGPs, with AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2, with AGP + organic acid, and with AGP + essential oil than in the birds fed only AGP or AGP + prebiotic 1. At 21 days of age, a greater villus height was observed in the birds fed AGP diets than in the birds that did not receive AGPs or those fed AGP + probiotics.
Additionally, a greater wall thickness at 21 days was observed in the birds fed AGP diets than in those that did not receive AGP or in the birds fed AGP + probiotic or AGP + essential oil (
Table 9). An effect was observed for the villus height (
p < 0.0008) and wall thickness (
p < 0.0058) in the ileum at 6 days of age, as well as for the villus height (
p < 0.0083) and wall thickness (
p < 0.0138) at 21 days of age. At 6 days, a greater villus height was observed in the birds fed AGP diets.
A greater wall thickness was recorded in the birds fed AGP than in the birds fed AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2. At 21 days of age, a greater villus height was observed in the birds that received AGP than in those that received the other treatments, except for the birds that were fed AGP + organic acid. A greater wall thickness was observed in the birds fed AGP and AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2, which did not differ from the other treatments, except for the birds fed AGP + organic acids (
Table 10).
An effect was observed for inflammatory infiltration (p < 0.0001), congestion (p < 0.0001), desquamation (p < 0.0001), cysts (p < 0.0115), edema (p < 0.0001), and hemorrhage (p < 0.0197) in the duodenum of broilers at 6 days of age. Reduced inflammatory infiltration was recorded in the birds fed diets with AGP and AGP + essential oil. The lowest level of congestion was observed in the birds fed AGP, which did not differ from those receiving AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2 or AGP + essential oil.
Desquamation was lowest in the birds receiving only AGP. A lower degree of crypt cyst formation was observed in the birds receiving treatments without AGPs, with AGP + prebiotic 1, and with AGP + essential oil than in the birds receiving AGP and AGP + probiotic. A lower level of edema was recorded in the birds fed AGP than in those fed diets without AGPs, AGP + essential oil, or AGP + organic acid. Hemorrhaging was reduced in all the treatment groups except for the AGP + organic acid group (
Table 11).
At 21 days, the inside index for the duodenum had effects on inflammatory infiltration (
p < 0.0001) and desquamation (
p < 0.0100). Reduced inflammatory infiltration was observed in the birds receiving diets with AGP, AGP + probiotic, AGP + essential oil, or AGP + organic acid. The lowest desquamation levels were recorded in the duodenum of the birds fed AGP (
Table 11).
For the inside index in the jejunum at 6 days of age, an effect was observed for inflammatory infiltration (p < 0.0001), congestion (p < 0.0001), desquamation (p < 0.0001), necrosis (p < 0.0001), and edema (p < 0.0058). Reduced inflammatory infiltration was found in the birds fed diets with AGP, AGP + essential oil, or AGP + organic acid. Congestion was lowest in the birds fed AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2, without differing from those receiving AGP and AGP + prebiotic 1.
A lower degree of desquamation was observed in the birds fed AGP, which did not differ from those receiving AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2, AGP + prebiotic 1, or AGP + essential oil. Less edema in the jejunum was recorded in the birds fed AGP, AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2, AGP + prebiotic 1, and AGP + probiotic (
Table 12).
At 21 days of age, the inside index for the jejunum had effects only on inflammatory infiltration (
p < 0.0003), with all the treatments reducing this parameter except for the birds that did not receive AGPs (
Table 12).
For the inside index in the ileum at 6 days of age, an effect was observed for inflammatory infiltration (p < 0.0001), congestion (p < 0.0013), desquamation (p < 0.0001), necrosis (p < 0.0001), and edema (p < 0.0103). Reduced inflammatory infiltration was found in the birds fed AGP diets. The lowest congestion values were observed in the birds fed AGP, which did not differ from those receiving AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2 and AGP + prebiotic 1.
A lower degree of desquamation was recorded in the birds fed AGP and AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2 than in those receiving AGP + prebiotic 1 or AGP + essential oil. The treatments with AGP reduced necrosis in the ileum, regardless of the addition of zootechnical additives. The lowest edema values were observed in the birds fed AGP + prebiotic 1, which did not differ from the other treatments except for the group receiving AGP + organic acid (
Table 13).
At 21 days of age, an effect on inflammatory infiltration (
p < 0.0020), congestion (
p < 0.0028), desquamation (
p < 0.0274), necrosis (
p < 0.0226), and edema (
p < 0.0005) in the ileum was detected. The treatments reduced inflammatory infiltration and necrosis in the ileum, except when the birds did not receive AGPs. A lower level of congestion was recorded in the birds fed AGP than in those not fed AGP, AGP + prebiotics 1 and 2, AGP + prebiotic 1, and AGP + essential oil. Desquamation was reduced in all the treatments except for the birds receiving AGP + organic acid. Necrosis was also reduced by the various treatments, except in the birds fed AGP + essential oil (
Table 13).
4. Discussion
An analysis of the broiler performance results indicated that the use of AGPs provided benefits in terms of weight gain, feed intake, the feed conversion ratio, and the productive efficiency index across all studied phases, regardless of whether they were used alone or in combination with zootechnical additives. However, over the entire period (1 to 44 days of age), the feed conversion ratio was greater in the treatments in which AGPs were combined with zootechnical additives, with a reduction of 0.09 points observed in the AGP + essential oil treatment compared to the AGP treatment without additives.
Recent studies have focused on the importance of zootechnical additives as modulators of the intestinal microbiota in broilers, hypothesizing that this effect enhances intestinal absorption, increases digestive enzyme secretion, reduces nitrogen excretion, and neutralizes enterotoxins, leading to significant improvements in both performance and bird welfare [
27,
28].
Moraes et al. [
29] reported that the inclusion of castor bean and cashew nutshell extracts (0.15%) in broiler diets from 1 to 28 days of age improved bird performance, yielding results comparable to those obtained with monensin. This effect was attributed to the antimicrobial properties of these additives, which act as intestinal microbiota modulators, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria such as Clostridium perfringens and Staphylococcus aureus.
In animal nutrition, two key mechanisms highlight the potential of these additives: the stimulation of endogenous enzyme production and regulation of the intestinal microbiota. Both contribute to maintaining poultry health and performance, as essential oils prevent pathogenic bacteria from colonizing the intestinal mucosa [
30]. In a study using essential oils, Bess et al. [
31] reported improvements in broiler performance (weight gain and the feed conversion ratio), attributing these benefits to the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils.
Since the 1940s, AGPs have been widely used to increase the immunocompetence of birds against diseases and as growth promoters. However, their prophylactic use can contribute to the development of drug-resistant bacteria [
32]. Therefore, studies evaluating the effects of zootechnical additives, both alone and in combination with AGPs, are crucial for developing efficient nutritional strategies aimed at reducing the use of AGPs in broiler nutrition [
3,
10,
30].
At 6 days of age, the phagocytic profile analysis revealed a greater percentage of monocytes in the groups treated with AGP + essential oil and AGP + butyric acid. However, these treatments resulted in a lower phagocytosis index for monocytes, likely due to the mechanism of action of these additives, reinforcing their immunomodulatory capacity when combined with AGP. Zootechnical additives can be used as tools to enhance acquired immune responses in poultry, thereby improving performance by reducing challenges from infectious agents [
33].
Moraes et al. [
34] reported that the inclusion of castor bean and cashew nut shell extracts (0.15%) in broiler diets increased the expression of interferon (IFN), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), whereas the control group presented an increased expression of cyclooxygenase (COX) and interleukin 1 (IL-1). This modulated the inflammatory response against
Eimeria spp., leading the authors to conclude that the evaluated essential oils were effective tools for modulating the immune system in birds affected by coccidiosis [
34].
In addition to essential oil and butyric acid combined with AGP, treatments with prebiotics or probiotics also resulted in a lower phagocytosis index at 6 days of age. Prebiotics promote the growth of two lactic-acid-producing bacteria (
Bifidobacterium and
Lactobacillus), which are beneficial for intestinal health. The proliferation of these bacteria aids in the production of bacteriocins, which inhibit the development of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of poultry [
35]. This mechanism may explain the lower phagocytosis index observed in birds fed prebiotics.
At 22 days of age, the birds receiving additives + AGP or AGP alone presented a lower percentage of monocytes, although the phagocytosis index remained unaffected. For heterophils, a greater percentage was observed in the treatments with one or two prebiotics; however, the highest heterophil activation (phagocytosis index) occurred in all the treatments with AGP, regardless of the presence of zootechnical additives. Thus, in the initial phase, the positive effects of additives on phagocytic activity were more evident, even in the absence of AGPs, a trend that was not observed during the grower phase. The obtained values indicate that the birds were in good health, as they were within the normal reference ranges.
The results of this study demonstrate that the association of additives with AGP is more relevant during the initial phase than during the grower phase. This finding is supported by Song et al. [
36], who evaluated the development of the immune system in broilers according to age and reported that immunological indicators continue to increase until 34 days of age. These findings suggest that during this period, the immune system of broilers is still maturing.
Moreover, epidemiological studies have provided evidence that immune system development is closely linked to the role of the intestinal microbiota [
37]. The early use of AGP can negatively affect this microbiota, potentially impairing immune system function later in life [
37]. Therefore, the immune system can be adjusted during the early grower phase through immunomodulatory nutrition strategies that incorporate zootechnical additives, promoting rapid immune development and maturation in broilers.
With respect to the intestinal histomorphometry and inside index evaluations, the results indicate that the use of zootechnical additives combined with AGP led to improvements. However, these effects were not superior to those observed in the birds fed AGP alone. These findings suggest that the dosage and supplementation period of zootechnical additives should be optimized to maximize their effects on the intestinal health of broilers. Depending on the dosage, additives may have either beneficial or detrimental effects on animals [
38].
In a study conducted by Stefanello et al. [
39], the authors concluded that broilers fed diets containing AGPs presented improved performance, digestibility, and intestinal integrity compared with those of birds not receiving AGPs. The beneficial effects of AGPs on broiler performance and intestinal health are well documented in the literature [
40], likely due to their role in reducing the severity of intestinal diseases, stabilizing microbial populations, lowering inflammatory responses, and suppressing bacterial pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract [
40,
41]. However, with increasing restrictions on AGP use in poultry production, concerns regarding the incidence of intestinal diseases are increasing. As a result, investing in research in this field is essential for developing strategies to address this ongoing challenge for the poultry industry.
The I See Inside (ISI) methodology, according to Belote et al. [
25], indicates that inflammatory parameters can evolve even in the absence of specific pathogens, emphasizing the influence of diet and environmental factors. In uncontrolled environments, variations in these parameters may occur, suggesting that maintaining gastrointestinal tract balance is crucial for pathogen control, microbiota stability, and reducing the incidence of enteric diseases [
42].
The results of this study highlight the importance of zootechnical additives as complementary tools to AGPs in broiler production, especially in enhancing immune function and optimizing feed conversion. While AGPs continue to be effective in promoting intestinal health and performance, the strategic use of additives can further support gut microbiota balance and immune modulation. The growing restrictions on antimicrobial use in poultry production reinforce the need for continued research to develop alternative strategies that maintain bird performance and health while reducing reliance on antibiotics.