Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Age Gelation in UHT Milk
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Oak Fragments during the Aging of Red Wines. Effect on the Phenolic, Aromatic, and Sensory Composition of Wines as a Function of the Contact Time with the Wood
Previous Article in Journal
Technical Report—Applying Physics and Sensory Sciences to Spirits Nosing Vessel Design to Improve Evaluation Diagnostics and Drinking Enjoyment
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Strategies to Improve Sensorial Quality of White Wines by Wood Contact
Article Menu

Export Article

Beverages 2018, 4(4), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4040094

Review
Different Woods in Cooperage for Oenology: A Review
1
Department of Analytical Chemistry, UVaMOX-Higher Tech. Col. of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad de Valladolid, 34001 Palencia, Spain
2
Department of Agroforestry Engineering, UVaMOX-Higher Tech. Col. of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad de Valladolid, 34001 Palencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 October 2018 / Accepted: 19 November 2018 / Published: 23 November 2018

Abstract

:
Contact of wine with wood during fermentation and ageing produces significant changes in its chemical composition and organoleptic properties, modifying its final quality. Wines acquire complex aromas from the wood, improve their colour stability, flavour, and clarification, and extend their storage period. New trends in the use of barrels, replaced after a few years of use, have led to an increased demand for oak wood in cooperage. In addition, the fact that the wine market is becoming increasingly saturated and more competitive means that oenologists are increasingly interested in tasting different types of wood to obtain wines that differ from those already on the market. This growing demand and the search for new opportunities to give wines a special personality has led to the use of woods within the Quercus genus that are different from those used traditionally (Quercus alba, Quercus petraea, and Quercus robur) and even woods of different genera. Thus, species of the genus Quercus, such as Quercus pyrenaica Willd., Quercus faginea Lam., Quercus humboldtti Bonpl., Quercus oocarpa Liebm., Quercus frainetto Ten, and other genera, such as Robinia pseudoacacia L. (false acacia), Castanea sativa Mill. (chestnut), Prunus avium L. and Prunus cereaus L. (cherry), Fraxinus excelsior L. (European ash), Fraxinus americana L. (American ash), Morus nigra L, and Morus alba L. have been the subject of several studies as possible sources of wood apt for cooperage. The chemical characterization of these woods is essential in order to be able to adapt the cooperage treatment and, thus, obtain wood with oenological qualities suitable for the treatment of wines. This review aims to summarize the different species that have been studied as possible new sources of wood for oenology, defining the extractable composition of each one and their use in wine.
Keywords:
traditional oaks; different oaks; other woods; ellagitannins; low molecular phenols; volatile compounds

1. Introduction

The wine trade controlled mainly by Greeks and Romans (2000 BCE) used earthenware jars and amphora, although these containers were fragile, heavy, and difficult to handle. Faced with this problem of transporting wines from the production to the consumption areas, wooden containers were created. The study of archaeological findings and written testimonies allows us to establish how wooden barrels displaced clay amphorae for wine transport and storage: a revolution. There are many references to the use of wooden containers for wine. The best-known reference is possibly that of Julius Caesar in “The Gallic Wars” (51 BCE) [1,2]. From the 5th century onwards, the term ‘barrel’ was used to designate these wooden containers. Since then, oak has been one of the main woods for this purpose, being a resistant, flexible, easy to handle, and not very permeable material. Specifically, the European species, mainly Quercus petraea and Quercus robur, were used as they were abundant near the areas where wine was made.
In the mid-twentieth century, the use of wood was notably abandoned due to the proliferation of other materials (cement and stainless steel). However, from the 1990s onwards, the use of wooden barrels re-emerged rather significantly and became a world fashion [2,3,4]. In addition, this resurgence also led to a change in their use. Nowadays, wine ageing has changed with the use of newer oak barrels because with their use the extractability of the oak compounds decreases. For this reason, in recent years, an imbalance between the amount of oak available and the number of barrels produced has been detected in France [5]. Moreover, the price of cooperage logs is increasing steadily with a concomitant decrease in the quality/price ratio. Given the growing demand for French oak barrels (Quercus petraea and Quercus robur) and the increase in price, some cooperages also work with oak from Eastern Europe (Romania, Hungary, Russia), as it is the same species with characteristics similar to those of French oak. Many oenologists have used barrels of this type of oak, as the results obtained are comparable to those of ageing wine in French oak. For these reasons, over the last few years, there has been a proliferation of studies on European oaks of the same species but of different origins. In recent years, the literature has offered studies about Slovenian oak [6], Spanish oaks [7,8,9,10,11], Hungarian oaks [12,13], Russian oaks [13,14], Romanian, Ukrainian, and Moldavian oaks [15], Romanian oak [16,17], among others. These studies of the same species but different origin showed similar characteristics to American and French oaks, suggesting that they are suitable for barrel production for quality wines. Some authors even state that these origins have intermediate characteristics between French and American oaks [7,9,15].
Singleton mentions different woods within cooperage, from both the United States (white oak, red oak, chestnut oak, red or sweet gum, sugar maple, yellow or sweet birch, white ash, Douglas fir, beech, black cherry, sycamore, redwood, spruce, bald cypress, elm, and basswood) and Europe (white oak, chestnut, fir, spruce, pine, larch, ash, mulberry), and a number of additional species imported from Africa, South America, and Australia (acacia, karri: Eucalyptus diversicolor; jarrah: Eucalyptus marginata; stringybark: Eucalyptus obliqua and Eucalyptus gigantea; and she oak: Casuarina fraseriana). However, this long list of woods rapidly diminishes when considering only those that are suitable for ageing different alcoholic beverages [18]. As the number of wood species declined, oak and chestnut became the most widely used varieties in barrel-making and so were already those most used from the 16th century onwards [19,20,21]. They were chosen because they modified the gustatory and olfactory characteristics of the different wines and spirits favourably [21]. These two woods (Quercus and Chestnut) are the only ones approved today by the Organzation of Vine and Wine (OIV) (Resolution OENO 4/2005).
The typical anatomy of oak offers greater resistance, flexibility, easy handling, and low permeability in relation to those provided by other woods [22]. At present, oak (Quercus) is the preferred material for the manufacture of barrels for ageing alcoholic beverages, especially wines. Oak belongs to the genus Quercus, which is made up of more than 250 species, although this figure is controversial as some authors cite up to 600 [21,23]. Most of these are to be found in the temperate zones of the northern hemisphere as far as south to Central America and Ecuador. The number of species increases from East to West, from Europe and Africa to the North American Pacific coast, Mexico being the country with the greatest diversity of species. The Quercus genus is subdivided into two subgenera, Cyclobalanopsis and Euquercus: the first includes tropical species and some from Asia and Malaysia not used in the manufacture of barrels for oenological use, while those within the subgenera Euquercus are used in cooperage [21]. Within these species, few meet all of the requirements, and those most used belong to the group of white oaks [5]. According to Vivas [21], some of the species used in cooperage in the USA and Europe are Quercus alba, Quercus garryana, Quercus macrocarpa, and Quercus stellata, and only in Europe Quercus cerris, Quercus suber, Quercus coccifera, Quercus lanuginosa, Quercus petraea, and Quercus robur. The main species used for wine ageing belong to the genus Oersted (formerly Lepidobalanus): Quercus petraea L. (Quercus sessilis) and Quercus robur (Quercus pedunculata) growing in Europe and Quercus alba growing in different areas of the United States.
In America, white oak has only been associated with Q. Alba for years; however, strictly speaking, the classification of “white oak” includes many other species, such as: Q. alba, Q. garryana, Q. macrocarpa M., Q. stellata Wan., Quercus lyrata Walt., Quercus prinus, Quercus muehlenbergii E., Quercus michauxi Nutt, Quercus bicolor Willd., Quercus lobata Née, Quercus montana Willd, and Quercus virginiana L. [24,25]. Thus, in cooperage, Q. alba, a majority species in the eastern United States, has been associated with numerous species resulting in confusion, as is the case for: Q. prinus, Q. muehlenbergii, Q. bicolor, Q. stellata, Q. macrocarpa, Q. lyrrata, and Quercus durandii [18,26].
In Europe, the largest forests producing high-quality oaks are found in France. Forests cover 27% of the total area of France, and approximately 9% of these are oak forests. The regions of Le Fôret du Centre, Nevers, Tronçais, Allier, and Limousin in the Massif Central and Vosges in the northeast of the country are particularly important producers. Although French oak is the most highly valued in Europe, other producer regions include Hungary, Poland, Russia, Italy, and, in the Iberian Peninsula, the Basque Country. In fact, until the 1930s, the oak that was most widely used in the châteaux of Bordeaux came from Russia rather than France. However, Q. petraea and Q. robur are associated with France and not the rest of Europe.
In general, American oaks differ from European species because they have higher density and resistance and lower porosity and permeability than European species [25]. In addition, American woods have larger tylosis, which allows this wood to be cut by sawing without compromising the watertightness, which leads to a better use of wood. Heartwood of Quercus is composed of macromolecules that are polymers of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, representing 90% of dry wood. In addition, there is an extractable fraction that are soluble compounds released to wine during aging; this part represents approximately 10% of dry wood and is variable depending on species. The extractable fraction (ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds and volatile compounds) in wood depends not only on variety but also on many other factors, such as sylvocultural factors, geographic origin, and individual tree and cooperage processing, with high variability in content (Table 1 and Table 2). In general, Q. robur has the highest content of ellagitannins followed by Q. petraea and finally Q. alba. In addition, Q. alba also tends to have lower content of low molecular weight compounds (Table 1) and Q. robur lower aromatic compounds (Table 2).
Furthermore, the use of oak barrels in the production of quality wines implies long periods and a high economic cost for wineries. For this reason, alternative techniques to ageing in oak barrels have been used for over 15 years and these were developed to give wood characteristics to the wine in a faster, cheaper, and simpler way. They are based on the addition to the wine of pieces of wood of very different sizes and shapes (splinters, cubes, staves). These alternative products have been widely used for a long time in the producing countries of the New World, but their use has spread, above all, since the main wine producer, Europe, changed its legislation to admit their use. This maturation practice was approved by the International Oenological Codex of the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV) (OENO 9/2001) and by the Official Journal of the European Union (CE 1507/2006).

2. Oak Species Not Traditionally Used in Cooperage

The use and/or study of alternative oaks (other species of the genus Quercus) is proposed as a solution to the search for new sources of quality wood for cooperage that provide wines with differentiated notes appreciated by the consumer. For this reason, a market opportunity has arisen for oak species not traditionally used in cooperage, such as Quercus pyrenaica, Quercus faginea, Quercus frainetto, Quercus oocarpa, and Quercus humboldtii and others that are less well-known, such as Quercus serrata, Quercus mongolica or Quercus denta (Figure 1).

2.1. Pyrenaica Oak (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd)

It is distributed throughout the western Atlantic–Mediterranean regions (West France, Portugal, Spain, and North Morocco) through a wide range of altitudes, from sea level to over 2000 m. This wood is known as “rebollo” or “melojo”, and is mostly located in Spain (Allué, 1995) with a forest mass of 1,090,716 ha, the majority of which is found in the region of Castilla y León [61] (Figure 2). Traditionally, this wood has been used in Spain for railway sleepers and ships and, in recent years, especially as firewood from low forest cover, an arboreal mass composed of feet coming from buds or roots. This has resulted in a progressive degradation of the characteristics of some of these forest areas, such as a high percentage of trees with a diameter of <40 cm and knotty, twisted, or short-boled trees. Therefore, their use for manufacturing barrels is very limited due to the high number of poor quality trees for cooperage. However, its structural properties (mesh, grain, density, and permeability) are also appropriate for oenological use [27].
Various studies from 1996 to the present place value on this wood’s content of ellagitannins, low weight, and aromas [7,8,27,28,29,30,31,32,34,35,46,50,51,52,53,55,58,59,63,64,65], as well as its use for containers of alcoholic drinks, such as brandy and other spirits [66,67,68,69,70] and wines [9,10,58,60,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. However, the supply of quality wood for the manufacture of barrels is insufficient, so this wood can be used for the manufacture of alternative products in the short and medium term. With proper management, these forests could supply wood for the manufacture of barrels in the future. Consequently, most studies on the behaviour of this wood during wine ageing have been carried out with alternative products (in particular chips or staves) [58,60,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,79], observing that wines aged with this wood present good final characteristics. The resulting wines are closer to those aged with French oak than those aged with American oak, thus meaning this wood is suitable for producing quality wines [9,10,74]. In addition, peculiarities have been reported, such as that wines aged with barrels of this oak species had high levels of eugenol, guaiacol, and other volatile phenols, while the contents of cis-β-methyl-γ-octalactone or maltol are similar to those of wines aged with Q. alba [76]. However, Fernandez de Simón et al. [60] observed that the Tinta del País variety, in addition to having a higher concentration of eugenol, also had a higher content of cis-β-methyl-γ-octalactone than the same wine treated with French and American oak, especially when staves were used. In tasting, wines aged in Q. pyrenaica wood barrels are more appreciated than the same ones aged in American or French oak barrels [76]. Gallego et al. 2012 [79] also observed that the wines aged with chips and staves from Q. pyrenaica oak were better considered than American or French ones, showing higher aromatic intensity and complexity, and woody, balsamic, and cocoa notes. Connick et al. [77] carried out a sensorial analysis and found that wine aged in contact with Q. pyrenaica chips only differed to wine aged with Q. petraea for woody character and attained a higher score. However, a wine from two Portuguese red grape varieties (Tinta Roriz, 80% and Touriga Nacional, 20%), aged with chips of Q. petraea versus Q. pyrenaica, reported that, from a sensory point of view, the wine with French oak chips showed a tendency for higher aroma scores than those aged in contact with Q. pyrenaica oak [71]. As regards oxygen, a very important factor in the ageing of wines, Del Álamo et al. [73] reported that the same red Tempranillo variety aged with Q. pyrenaica required less oxygen than the same one aged with traditional oak species (Q. petraea and Q. alba). Similarly, Gonalves and Jordão 2009 [75] recorded that Syrah wines aged in contact with Q. pyrenaica oak species had higher antioxidant activity values than those aged in contact with the American oak species.

2.2. Quercus Faginea Lam

A wood studied from 1996 [30] to the present [80] for oenological purposes. This species is endemic to the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa. Its common name is Quejigo, with about 269,000 ha distributed mainly in Castilla-La Mancha, Castilla y León, Aragón, and Cataluña on the peninsula [61,81] (the protected surface area is under 4%, due to its dispersion and abundance in Spain [81]). It is a medium-sized deciduous or semi-evergreen tree growing to a height of 20 m and a diameter of 80 cm. This species once covered (during the 15th and 16th centuries) much of the Iberian Peninsula, and the wood was valued and intensively exploited for naval construction [82]. It was traditionally used for the production of charcoal, and it has also been used in the manufacture of beams for construction due to its strength and resistance. Q. faginea wood has a white yellowish sapwood and brown yellowish heartwood, high density, and considerable mechanical strength [80]. Its composition in ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds, and volatile compounds in wood has been studied [7,8,10,28,29,30,51,63,80], as well as its interaction with wine [9,10,78]. The antioxidant activity is very high, with an IC50 of 3.3 μg/mL for heartwood, as compared to standard antioxidants (an IC50 of 3.8 μg/mL for Trolox) [80]. Miranda et al. [80] reported that Q. faginea is a very good candidate for cooperage due to it being a source of compounds with antioxidant properties. However, after studying the volatile composition of different species of Spanish oak, both in traditional species (Q. robur and Q. petraea) and new species (Q. faginea and Q. pyrenaica), Cadahía et al. [51] propose that, while Q. pyrenaica may be considered suitable for wine ageing, Q. faginea is not. In addition, a wine was in contact with this oak for 21 months and then compared with other species, especially traditional ones, and it was observed that wine aged with Q. faginea was the least preferred by the tasting panel and always the one that obtained the lowest scores in almost all descriptors [10]. Fernández de Simón et al. 2003 [9] studied the low molecular weight phenolic compounds in red Rioja wine aged during 21 months in barrels made of Q. Faginea oak and other woods (Q. pyrenaica, Q. robur, Q. petraea, and Q. alba), showing by means of a discriminant analysis that wines aged with Q. faginea could be discriminated from the rest by function 2, which was related to trans-resveratrol, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, syringic acid, ellagic acid, and 5–HMF.

2.3. Quercus Frainetto Ten

This species is native to the Balkan Peninsula and also present in South Italy and Northwest Turkey (Figure 3). Despite also being known as Hungarian oak, its presence in Hungary is sporadic [83]. In Greece, it is a vital timber tree and frequently managed as coppice forest for both firewood and timber in combination with grazing. In the other countries in which it grows, it is most often used for firewood, although the quality of the wood is similar to Q. petraea. Because of the rather high durability of its wood, Q. frainetto has sometimes been used as construction material in civil engineering and mining. Vivas [21] is studying this species with the aim of using it in cooperage. This wood has an ultra-structure that is comparable to French oaks, and its lindens are similar to those of Q. alba. However, in the manufacture of barrels with Q. frainetto, the staves have been found to need longer heating during taming, which could be due to their high density [21]. This species also has a high content in ellagitannins [36]. As regards the gustatory quality of the wood extracts of this species, it has high bitterness and particular and indefinable aromas, but both attributes can be cushioned by the natural drying and toasting of the wood [21].

2.4. Quercus Oocarpa Liebm

This species is also used in wine ageing [36] and extends naturally from Veracruz, Mexico, through Chiriquí, Panama, Guatemala, and Costa Rica, where it is found in Monteverde, Puntarenas; Cordilleras de Tilarán and Central; Escazú, San José; Muñeco, Cartago; and the Cordillera de Talamanca [84]. Vivas [21] proposes this as a new species when observing that it presents an ultra-structure that is comparable to French oaks with a clear succession of early and late wood, forming an annual growth and, with respect to its lime trees, observed that Q. oocarpa was comparable to Q. alba. This species presents only monomers of ellagitannins, since during its analysis no dimer was found [36]. Regarding the gustatory quality of the extracts of these woods, the quality of the Q. oocarp was similar to that of Q. petraea [21].

2.5. Quercus Humboldtii Bonpl

This is one of the main forest species in the woods of Colombia [85]. This white oak is a neotropical species found in the Three Mountains range, from 750 m to 3450 m above sea level, in 18 departments of the Colombian Andes (Antioquia, Bolívar, Boyacá, Caldas, Caquetá, Cauca, Chocó, Cundinamarca, Huila, Quindío, Risaralda, Nariño, North of Santander, Santander, Tolima, Valle del Cauca, Cesar, and Córdoba) [85]. The hardwood is hard, heavy, and easy to work and its density is 0.9–1 g/cm3. Traditionally, it has been used for making posts, railroad ties, handles for tools, wooden rollers, charcoal, and firewood [86]. In addition, this species is normally used in barrel-making; specifically, it has been utilised by two companies since the middle of the 20th century. Cooperage products made from this “White oak” have normally been used to age alcoholic beverages, such as rum [87] or brandy. Recently, three studies on the composition of this oak when green and before and after toasting have been published [16,17,88]. The phenolic composition (ellagitannins and low molecular weight phenols) of green Q. humboldtii was characterized and compared to traditional oak wood species, with the most abundant phenolic acids, aldehydes, and ellagitannins being the same as in Q. alba and Q. petraea, and with a phenolic composition closer to that of the American ones [16]. The study on syringaldehyde and vanillin contents showed a similar vanillin concentration to Q. Faginea in toasted wood and a balanced syringaldehyde/vanillin relationship, a marker usually used to characterize oak wood quality [88], when seasoned and toasted. Q. humbolditti had comparable low molecular weight phenols to woods of Q. petraea and Q. alba. Its ellagitannin composition was similar to that in Q. alba, and its volatile composition differed from that of Q. petraea and Q. alba, since it had the highest concentration of 5-methyl furfural, furfuryl alcohol, guaiacol, 4-ethylguaiacol, 4-vinylguaiacol, cis and trans-isoeugenol, and syringol and the lowest furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and cis-β-methyl-γ-octalactone concentrations [17]. When this wood is used as an alternative for ageing wines compared to traditional species, the wines macerated with Q. humboldtii chips showed higher concentrations of 5-methylfurfural, guaiacol, isoeugenol, trans-isoeugenol, and syringol and lower furfural, 5–HMF, trans-β-methyl-γ-octalactone, and cis-β-methyl-γ-octalactone content [89]. In the sensorial analysis, there were no negative comments from the tasters about the wine macerated with Colombian oak; in addition, few significant differences in the sensorial analysis were observed in these wines compared to those aged with traditional oaks. Therefore, Q. humboldtii oak has an interesting oenological potential as an alternative species for coopering [89].

3. Woods Not Traditionally Used in Cooperage Different to Oak

The growing demand for wood for cooperage and the search for new opportunities to give wines and their derivatives a special personality have led to the use of woods other than oak, some of which have been used for many years. This is how wood from species such as Castanea sativa Mill. (chestnut), Robinia pseudoacacia L. (false acacia), Prunus avium L. and Prunus cereasus L. (cherry), Fraxinus excelsior L. and F. americana L. (European ash and F. americana L.). (European and American ash, respectively), and Morus alba L. and Morus nigra L. (Mulberry) have been proposed as alternatives to oak (Figure 1). In addition to those mentioned above, experiments in wines have been made with other types of wood, such as Juglans regia, Juniperus communis, Pinus heldreichii var. Leucodermis, Prunus armeniaca, Fagus Syvatica, and Alnus glutinosa [48,90], but, to date, few trials have been carried out. Moreover, many producers prefer using local woods in order to reduce costs [43], and, recently, some wine cellars have ordered barrels with some non-oak staves included from cooperages.

3.1. Castanea Sativa Mill

This species of the Fagaceae family can be found in southern Europe and Asia (China) (Figure 4). Chestnut is widely cultivated for its tasty edible fruits. Its starch is used in industrial applications, such as paper, plastics, textiles, food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics, and its wood is of interest for the manufacture of stakes. Moreover, this species has been widely used for oenological purposes in the Mediterranean area in the past due to its widespread availability and low cost [91]. As mentioned above, it is the only species alongside Quercus that has been accepted for use by the OIV. It seems that there is a growing interest in the use of this wood in the ageing of different drinks, which is why numerous studies have been carried out on the characteristics of this wood [31,33,34,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,47,51,53,54,92,93] and its use for the purpose of ageing spirits [36,67,68,69,70,91,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103], vinegars [53,104,105], and wines [57,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113]. Chestnut wood barrels prove to be suitable for the ageing of wine liqueurs, as they improve the chemical composition and the sensory properties of the alcohol of the aged wine, showing higher content of total phenolics and of low molecular weight compounds and higher antioxidant activities [100]. The sensory properties found in spirits aged in chestnut wood demonstrate the potential of this wood for the ageing of alcoholic beverages [69], with the heat treatment in cooperage having a very significant influence on the majority of low molecular weight extractable compounds by brandies aged two years in chestnut barrels [39]. Chestnut wood proved to be a suitable alternative to Limousin oak for ageing brandies, showing a high quality, with a faster evolution of brandies and more economical ageing as the price is lower [91]. However, chestnut does not seem to be the most suitable for vinegar ageing, as the best results are found when oak or cherry are used [104,105]. Regarding the ageing of wine in barrels made of this wood, it has been observed that they are suitable for short periods, but not for prolonged ageing, due to the high porosity [108,109,110,111,112,113]. Thus, Rosso et al. [113] observed a low content of oxidizable polyphenols in wines aged with chestnut, indicating that this type of wood causes a more oxidative environment than oak and is, therefore, less suitable for prolonged ageing. Alañon et al. [108] reported that wines aged for long periods in chestnut present off-flavours (4-ethylphenol and 4-ethylguaiacol) and oxidation problems. However, chestnut is an excellent flavouring wood for short periods of ageing in barrels, as very balanced wines are obtained [108]. Arfelli et al. [106] observed that red Sangiovese wine aged in old chestnut barrels were more fruited and tannic than in Allier, while the latter were less astringent, more balanced, and had more vanilla notes.

3.2. Robinia Pseudoacacia L., (False Acacia)

This species, originating in the eastern United States and introduced into Europe, is often referred to as acacia, but its proper name is robinia [42] (Figure 5). It is considered a rapid-growth species with adaptive plasticity compared to others [114]. Traditionally, it has been used for the production of poles and pulp, as well as for other uses, such as erosion control and fodder. It has now been proposed for cooperage purposes, as robinia barrels are approximately 10% cheaper than French oak though still more expensive than American oak. Acacia wood is hard, with a low porosity [115]. In the last 10 years, research papers have been published focusing on the characterization of this wood for cooperage purposes and its use with alcoholic beverages, especially wines [71,110,111,112,113,116,117,118,119] and vinegars [104,105,120]. Red wines aged in acacia barrels have higher notes of smoky, spicy, and fruity, and may be related to their richness in mono and dimethoxyphenols, acetosyringone, and ethyl vanillate [111,121]. Fernández de Simón et al. [111] observed that, after the use of barrels of the species cherry, chestnut, acacia, ash, and oak, the wines with the highest scores were those aged with acacia and oak [111]. Acacia barrels also had a positive influence on the quality of Istria wines, as they were the best-rated with the highest amount of simple volatile phenol compounds [116]. In the case of white wines, the preference of this wood over others, such as cherry and even over American and French oak, was also observed [119]. The use of acacia for vinegar ageing is increasing due to the air transfer efficiency that favours a good rate of acetification [122], since, of all of the woods studied, the acacia barrels were observed to be those with the highest oxygen permeability. However, regarding the aromatic notes of the vinegars aged with wood, Callejon et al. [105] suggest that the best woods are cherry and oak, not acacia.

3.3. Prunus

The cherry species studied for this purpose are Prunus avium L. and Prunus cerasus L., related to each other and native to Europe and western Asia (Figure 6). The cherry has been extensively studied in recent years in order to know its characteristics [31,43,44,55,56,57,92,124] and the effect it provides during the ageing of different drinks, such as wine, distillates, and vinegars [40,48,71,105,110,111,112,113,117,119,125,126]. This wood has a high porosity and oxygen permeation, and is usually used for short ageing times [40]. Fernández de Simón et al. [110], after studying white, rosé, and red wines aged using barrels and chips, observed that 6 (aromadendrin, naringenin, taxifolin, isosakuranetin, eriodictyol, and prunin) of the 68 identified nonanthocyanic phenolic compounds were only identified in wines aged with cherry wood. Thus, the nonanthocyanic phenolic profile could be a useful tool to identify wines aged in contact with this wood. In addition, significant differences were found in certain compounds with respect to Q. petraea and Q. alba. Delia et al. [119] showed that the white wine aged in contact with cherry chips showed similar overall appreciation scores to those obtained for the wines aged with Q. alba and Q. petraea chips. De Rosso et al. [113] also found some special characteristics in wines aged in untoasted cherry barrels compared to other woods (acacia, chestnut, mulberry, and oak), suggesting that this wood allows for greater oxygen penetration through its staves. However, Torrija et al. [122] observed that the most permeable to oxygen was acacia. Cerezo et al. [104] observed that vinegars from red wines after their acetification with better scores in the sensory analysis were those from ageing with this wood together with oak, presenting better notes of global impression and red fruits. De Rosso et al. [113] also found some special characteristics in wines aged in a cherry-barrel compared to other woods (acacia, chestnut, mulberry, and oak), suggesting greater oxygen penetration through their staves; and, therefore, proposed their use for shorter ageing times.

3.4. Fraxinus

This genus of the family of oleaceae, generally known as ash, is found in the geographical area of the Fraxinus excelsior L. extending throughout Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa, preferably in oceanic climates (Figure 7). It reaches heights of up to 40 m, and specimens from 20 to 30 m are common. This species only grows properly in areas where the climate and soil conditions provide a good water supply throughout the year. Ash is highly appreciated. The highest quality logs are destined for the veneer industry, where they reach their maximum price. Ash is also highly valued in the sawmill and cabinet-making industries. Fraxinus americana, L. a native of North America, is found mainly in the eastern United States and has been introduced in Cuba and Romania [127,128]. It is a large tree approximately 36 m high and 182 centimetres in diameter, and is highly appreciated thanks to the qualities of its wood, which is moderately heavy, strong, rigid, hard, and resistant to shocks. Because of these characteristics, it is mainly used for handles, ropes, oars, vehicle parts, baseball bats, and other sporting goods, as well as for veneers, sawn wood, and canoes. Heartwood from Fraxinus, both excelsior and American, has been considered as a possible source of wood for ageing wines [57,110,111], so its composition has been studied from the oenological point of view [43,45,48,124]. Wines aged in ash barrels differed from the rest due to their high content of 3-ethyl and 3,5-dimethylcyclotene, o-cresol, α-methylcrotonalactone, and vanillin and their low content of furanic derivatives, the latter like wines aged in cherry [111]. In spite of showing greater quantities of vanillin, after a sensorial analysis, the wine aged with oak had the highest scoring vanilla notes [111]. The polyphenolic profile of wines aged in contact with ash has not shown any specific polyphenols provided by this wood, with no unusual compounds being found when the wine was aged with oak [110], although ash has shown to have compounds not present in oak [45].

3.5. Morus (Mulberry)

The mulberry species that have been considered as possible new woods in wine ageing have been Morus alba L. (known as white mulberry) and Morus nigra L. (known as black mulberry). Morus alba L. is a native of China but widely planted and naturalized in many warm temperate regions. Morus nigra L. is a native of western Asia but mostly cultivated in Europe and Asia [129]. In general, Morus L. (Moraceae) is found in Asia, Africa, Europe, and North, Central, and South America [130] and grows in various forest types from sea level up to 2500 m [131]. Morus species are economically important to the silk industry, as they are host plants for the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) larvae [132]. Additionally, species have been cultivated in many parts of the world for their edible fruits and as ornamental trees. Moreover, M. alba is the main species for making traditional bowl-shaped musical instruments [133]. Karami et al. [133] studied the anatomical differences and similarities between these two species of wood, showing that small differences exist between them in vessel distribution and frequency and the existence of aliform axial parenchyma cells. The main differences reported by these authors were a semi-ring porous distribution of vessels in M. alba, and fewer vessels and a lower presence of aliform parenchyma in M. nigra. The wood of these species is tender and elastic, with medium porosity, and is characterized by the low release of compounds [134]. These species have been less-studied from the point of view of their characterization and use for the ageing of beverages than those previously mentioned. Rosso et al. [92] studied extracts (50% water/ethanol v/v) with 60 g/L of different woods (acacia, chestnut, cherry, mulberry, and oak) and observed that the lowest contents of volatile compounds were found in mulberry, with little eugenol and no methoxyeugenol though high (negative) fatty acids. Flamini et al. [56] extracted the compounds from the same woods and in the same dosage as in the previous study, not only with a 50% water/ethanol solution but also with model wine (12% ethanol with tartrate buffer pH 3.2), showing that the mulberry wood extract had a low presence of volatile benzene compounds and is probably more suitable for ageing wines.
Gortzi et al. [90] studied two Greek red wines (Syrah and Cabernet) aged with white Mulberry wood chips. They observed that the total polyphenol content (mg/L) in Syrah wines aged with M. alba was lower than those aged with Q. alba when the dosage of alternatives was 1 g and very similar when it was 2 g. The opposite occurred when the grape variety used was Cabernet. Gortzi et al. [90] saw that the concentration of resveratrol and catechin in all of the wines studied was much higher when aged with M. alba chips than when aged with Q. alba. The sensory test showed that, after 20 days’ ageing with M. alba, Syrah wines presented better scores than the same ones aged with Q. alba; however, the scores of the Cabernet wines after ageing with these two woods were similar [90]. Mulberry extract (M. nigra heartwood) (2 g/L of wood in 40% water-ethanol) had higher a polyphenol content and antioxidant activity than the extracts from the Quercus robur, Robinia pseudoacacia L., and Cotinus coggygria Scop wood species [116]. Rosso et al. [113] observed that a red wine (Raboso Piave var.) aged during 9 months in blackberry (M. alba) 225-L barrels presented a significant decrease in fruity-note ethyl esters and ethylguaiacol and the high cession of ethylphenol (a horsey-odour defect). Therefore, these authors concluded that this wood is hardly suitable for wine ageing.

4. Chemical Composition of the Extractable Fraction of the Different Woods

The chemical composition, especially the extractable fraction, of oak wood can decisively condition its oenological quality, as it contributes to characteristics such as the colour, smell, flavour, and body of the final wine. Ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds, and volatile compounds are the main constituents of this fraction in oak. Table 1 shows the total concentration of ellagitannins and the total content of low molecular weight phenolic compounds in green, dried, and toasted wood of Quercus specimens but of different species than the traditional ones (Quercus: pyrenaica, faginea, frainetto, oocarpa, and humboldtti) and woods other than oak (castanea sativa, robina pseudoacacia, prunus avium, prunus cereaus fraxinus americana, and fraxinus excelsior). In general, the ranges found for total ellagitannins and low molecular weight phenolic compounds in the same species are broad due to factors such as the type of treatment and the intensity and variability within the species, and are shown in Table 1.
As can be seen in Table 1, the species Robinia pseudoacacia (acacia), fraxinus americana (ash), and fraxinus excelsior (ash) do not contain ellagitannins in their composition. With regard to cherry, no studies have been found on the species Prunus cereaus. The ellagitannins in Prunus avium were not detected in the studies by Sanz et al. [43,44], with only very small quantities of castalagina (0.04 mg/g) and vescalagina (4.19 µg/g) being detected in the work of Alañon et al. [31], insignificant quantities with respect to the habitual contents that exist in the woods used in cooperage. As regards woods other than oak, the eight ellagitannins have only been found in the species Castanea sativa Mill (chestnut). The ranges of ellagitannins in dried chestnut are between 4.74 and 76.3 mg/g and in toasted vary from 0.66 to 10.51 mg/g (Table 1). As with oak [17,32,135], toasting decreases the concentration of these ellagitannins. In general, the total concentration in ellagitannins is similar to that found in traditional oaks. In addition to ellagitannins, other hydrolysable tannins not present in oak have been found in chestnut. In addition, cherry and acacia have condensed tannins, never found in oak, in their composition. All this means that there is an important qualitative difference between these different woods and Quercus with respect to the composition of the traditional oak used in wine ageing. The main phenolic components analyzed specially in the green and seasoned wood of these new species of Quercus were ellagitannins (Table 1), with similar results to those found in other oaks traditionally used in oenology. Drying and toasting degrade these compounds as well as traditional Quercus woods. The eight ellagitannins identified in the traditional oaks were found in all the new species of Quercus, except in the case of the Q. oocarpa, which did not present dimer ellagitannins (A, B, C, and D Roburins) in its composition. Q. pyrenaica, Q. faginea, and Q. oocarpa had a similar range of total ellagitannin concentration among them; moreover, ellagitannins of these species were between Q. robur and Q. alba, and more similar to Q. petraea. However, Q. humboldtii showed a lower concentration than the other new species and more similar to Q. alba. On the other hand, Q. frainetto is distinguished especially from the other species by its higher content of pentosylated dimers, and a monomer concentration that is similar to the rest of Quercus, which makes it the species with the highest content in ellagitannins (108 mg/g). Unlike ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds during drying and toasting increase their concentration in both Quercus and other woods, just like traditional oaks. Castanea sativa Mill. wood has the highest low molecular weight phenolic (LMWP) content (Table 1). In general, the total LMWP contents found in the acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), cherry (Prunus), and ash (Fraxinus) woods are lower than in the others, especially after drying. Ellagic and gallic acids are the main LMWPs in Q. pyrenaica, Q. faginea, Q. humboldtii, and Castanea sativa as in traditional oaks. Only in the toasted wood of Q. humboldtii does this not occur, as the majority were coniferaldehyde and sinapaldehyde. This behaviour has also been observed in traditional woods, especially in the species Q. alba and/or Q. robur [7,17,47,48], although the most common profile is that mentioned above. In Q. oocarpa and Q. frainetto, only the ellagic and gallic acids were studied [36], probably because they are the majority in this species. Furthermore, there is more ellagic acid than gallic acid in Q. pyrenaica, Q. faginea, Q. humbolditti, and Q. oocarpa, as usually occurs in traditional oaks; however, in Q. frainetto and Castanea sativa, this relationship was reversed. Compared to traditional oak, the most different woods were acacia, cherry, and ash, as in none of the three were these acids the majority. With the exception of the dry wood of P. cereaus, the majority component of which was ellagic acid, gallic acid was not detected [40]. Similarly, neither gallic acid nor ellagic acid were detected in the wood of the considered Fraxinus species [43].
Table 2 represents the concentration of some of the most representative volatile compounds of traditional oak for their aromatic contribution to wine during the ageing process analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) in green wood and dried and toasted specimens of the genus Quercus, but of different species to the traditional ones (Quercus: pyrenaica, faginea, and humboldtti) and woods other than oak (castanea sativa, robina pseudoacacia, prunus, and fraxinus excelsior and american). This table does not list Q. oocarpa and Q. frainetto, as no work has been found with the concentrations of these volatile compounds. Only Vivas [21] shows the presence of vanillin and eugenol β-Methyl-γ-octalactone in these species as well as Q. alba, Q. petraea, and Q. robur and oxo-3-retro-α-ionol in addition to Q. alba. Regarding cherry, in Table 2 the species is not indicated since it was not identified in the studies found. In addition, as these compounds are formed during drying and especially during toasting, only one work in green wood has been found that studied the species Q. pyrenaica. The concentration of the volatile species represented in Table 2 shows that the majority of the green and dried wood of Q. pyrenaica is cis-β-Methyl-γ-octalactone, 59 and 68 µg/g, respectively; in the dry wood of Q. faginea it is furfural with 17.6 µg/g, and in Q. humbolditti it is eugenol with 2.65 µg/g. However, the majority in non-Quercus woods after drying is vanillin. As for the wood after toasting, which is usually used in the processes of ageing wines, in almost all species the content of furfural is higher than that of the other five aromas as generally occurs in traditional oaks [17,51,55,60], with the exception of Q. faginea, Fraxinus american, and Fraxinus excelsior, with vanillin content being the highest. The guaiacol levels in medium-toasted ash woods were much higher than those detected in the other toasted woods, even those normally found in traditional oak, so a more pronounced smoke character can be expected when using toasted ash wood in ageing wines. In some studies, the concentrations of eugenol found in Q. pyrenaica were very high, especially when they were subjected to light toasting, much more so than in those normally found in traditional oaks, so that when using these woods we would have more spicy wines, especially with notes of clove. In general, Table 2 shows that woods not belonging to the genus Quercus do not have either β-Methyl-γ-octalactone or cis-β-Methyl-γ-octalactone in their composition. Only the study by Caldeira et al. [53] found small amounts of these isomers in chestnut (0.23 and 0.34 µg/g in the isomer trans and cis, respectively), but using 55% ethanol to extract them. The two isomers of β-Methyl-γ-octalactone have a high sensory impact on the wines after wood maturation [136], giving the wines coconut, toasted, and wood notes; moreover, theses isomers allow French and American oaks to be differentiated [59,137,138]. Q. humboldtii also presented very low concentrations of these two isomers. Regarding the species Q. faginea, the concentration of these two isomers in its wood has only been found in the work of Cadahía et al. [51], in which they also study the traditional oak species, observing that the concentrations in this species are within the usual values found in the traditional species (Q. robur, Q. petraea, and Q. alba). The wood of Q. pyrenaica has been more widely studied, so we find wider ranges of concentrations, depending on the origin, drying, and toasting. In general, we could say that some woods have higher concentrations than those found in traditional woods, especially the cis isomer.
Many options for woods to be used in cooperage are available and suitable and there may be more. However, with the exception of the species Q. pyrenaica, there have not been many studies carried out on the aforementioned woods and the corresponding treatments in cooperage. Therefore, it is considered of great interest to know more about the aromatic composition of these woods, thus offering more information to coopers and oenologists about the wood they can use for their wines, thus providing that distinctive sought-after seal.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.d.A.-S. and I.N.; Funding acquisition, I.N. and M.d.A.-S.; Methodology, I.N.; Supervision, M.d.A.-S.; Visualization, A.M.-G.; Writing—original draft, A.M.-G. and R.S.-G.; Writing—review & editing, A.M.-G., I.N. and M.d.A.-S.

Funding

This work was financed by Junta de Castilla y León (VA028U16), MINECO (AGL2014-54602-P), FEDER, and the Interreg España-Portugal Programme (Iberphenol). R.S.G. thanks Iberphenol for his contract.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ann Holliday for her services in revising the English.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Gautier, J.F. Histoire et Actualité Du Tonneau. Rev. Française D’oenologie 2000, 181, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gautier, J.F. Le Tonneau à Travers Les âGes. Rev. Oenologues Tech. Vitivinic. Oenologicques 2003, 30, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vivas, N.; Saint-Cricq de Gaulejac, N. The useful lifespan of new barrels and risk related to the use of old barrels. Aust. N. Z. Wine Ind. J. 1999, 14, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Singleton, V.L. Le Stockage Des Vins En Barriques: Utilisation et Variables Significatives. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnellerie 2000, 6, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E. Utilización Del Roble Español en el Envejecimiento de Vinos: Comparación con Roble Francés y Americano; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: Madrid, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chira, K.; Teissedre, P.-L. Chemical and sensory evaluation of wine matured in oak barrel: Effect of oak species involved and toasting process. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 240, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cadahía, E.; Muñoz, L.; De Simón, B.F.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Changes in low molecular weight phenolic compounds in Spanish, French, and American oak woods during natural seasoning and toasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1790–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cadahía, E.; Varea, S.; Muñoz, L.; Fernández de Simón, B.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Evolution of ellagitannins in Spanish, French, and American oak woods during natural seasoning and toasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3677–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fernández de Simón, B.; Hernández, T.; Cadahía, E.; Dueñas, M.; Estrella, I. Phenolic compounds in a Spanish red wine aged in barrels made of Spanish, French and American oak wood. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003, 216, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández De Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Jalocha, J. Volatile compounds in a Spanish red wine aged in barrels made of Spanish, French, and American oak wood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7671–7678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Sanz, M.; Poveda, P.; Colio, J. Chemical and chromatic characteristics of Tempranillo, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot wines from DO Navarra aged in Spanish and French oak barrels. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guchu, E.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; González-Viñas, M.A.; Ibáñez, M.D.C. Volatile composition and sensory characteristics of chardonnay wines treated with American and Hungarian oak chips. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Guchu, E.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; de Torres, C.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Aroma-active compounds of American, French, Hungarian and Russian oak woods, Studied by GC–MS and GC–O. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mosedale, J.R.; Ford, A. Variation of the flavour and extractives of european oak wood from two French forests. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1996, 70, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Prida, A.; Puech, J.-L. Influence of geographical origin and botanical species on the content of extractives in American, French, and East European oak woods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8115–8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Martínez-Gil, A.M.; Cadahía, E.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Nevares, I.; Alamo-Sanza, M. Quercus Humboldtii (Colombian Oak): Characterization of oak heartwood phenolic composition with respect to traditional oak woods in oenology. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2017, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martínez-Gil, A.; Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Nevares, I.; del Álamo-Sanza, M. Phenolic and volatile compounds in Quercus Humboldtii Bonpl. Wood: Effect of toasting with respect to oaks traditionally used in cooperage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singleton, V.L. Some aspects of the wooden container as a factor in wine maturation. Chem. Winemak. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1974, 137, 254–277. [Google Scholar]
  19. Taransaud, J. Le Livre de La Tonnellerie; La Roue à Livres Diffusion: París, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cazenave de la Roche, A. La Tonelería En El Contexto Marítimo de La Época Del Renacimiento: Estudio de Un Cargamento de Toneles Hallado En El Pecio de Villefranche s/Mer (1516). In Actas de la XIVa Conferencia Nacional de Arqueología Argentina; Universidad Nacional de Tucumán: Rosario, Argentina, 2004; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vivas, N. Manual De Tonelería: Destinado A Usuarios De Toneles; Mundi, Pre: Madrid, Spain, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. Feuillat, F.; Keller, R. Variability of Oak Wood (Quercus Robur L., Quercus Petraea Liebl.) Anatomy relating to cask properties. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1997, 48, 502–508. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Poveda, P.; Sanz, M. Utilización de Quercus Pyrenaica Willd. de Castilla y León En El Envejecimiento de Vinos. Comparación Con Roble Francés y Americano; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: Madrid, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Timbal, J.; Kremer, A. Caractères Botaniques, Morphologiques et Clorologiques. In Le chêne rouge d´Amérique; Dremer, J.T., Le Goff, A., Nepveu, G., Eds.; INRA: París, France, 1994; pp. 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernández-Golfín, J.I.; Cadahía, E. Características Físicas y Químicas de La Madera de Roble En La Fabricación de Barricas; Gobierno de la Rioja: L. La Rioja, Spain, 1999; pp. 11–66. [Google Scholar]
  26. Philp, J. Cask Quality and Warehouse Conditions. In The Science and Technology of Whiskies; Piggott, J.R., Sharp, R., Duncan, R.E.B., Eds.; Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, Essex, UK, 1989; pp. 264–294. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernández de Simón, B.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Poveda, P.; Broto, M. Chemical characterization of oak heartwood from Spanish forests of Quercus Pyrenaica (Wild.). Ellagitannins, Low Molecular Weight Phenolic, and Volatile Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8314–8321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Evolution of phenolic compounds of Spanish oak wood during natural seasoning. First Results. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1687–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Ellagitannins in woods of Spanish, French and American oaks. Holzforschung 1999, 53, 147–150. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Low molecular weight phenolic compounds in Spanish oak woods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 1507–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alañón, M.E.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I.; Gordon, M.H.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of different woods used in cooperage. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O. Ellagitannins from Portuguese Oak Wood (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.) Used in Cooperage: Influence of geographical origin, coarseness of the grain and toasting level. Holzforschung 2007, 61, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Castro-Vázquez, L.; Alañón, M.E.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; Laureano, O. Study of phenolic potential of seasoned and toasted Portuguese wood species (Quercus Pyrenaica and Castanea Sativa). J. Int. des Sci. la Vigne du Vin 2013, 47, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Canas, S.; Leandro, M.C.; Spranger, M.I.; Belchior, A.P. Influence of botanical species and geographical origin on the content of low molecular weight phenolic compounds of woods used in Portuguese cooperage. Holzforschung 2000, 54, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Canas, S.; Grazina, N.; Belchior, A.P.; Spranger, M.I.; de Sousa, R.B.; Sousa, R.B.D. Modelisation of heat treatment of Portuguese oak wood (Quercus Pyrenaica L.). Analysis of the behaviour of low molecular weight phenolic compounds. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2000, 15, 75–94. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vivas, N.; Glories, Y.; Bourgeois, G.; Vitry, C. The heartwood ellagitannins of different oaks (Quercus Sp.) and chestnut species (Castanea Sativa Mill.). Quantity analysis of red wines aging in barrels. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnelerie 1996, 2, 25–75. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, Á.M.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I. Phenolic compounds in chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) heartwood. Effect of toasting at cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9631–9640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Viriot, C.; Scalbert, A.; Hervé du Penhoat, C.L.M.; Moutounet, M. Ellagitannins in woods of sessile oak and sweet chestnut dimerization and hydrolysis during wood ageing. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Canas, S.; Leandro, M.C.; Spranger, M.I.; Belchior, A.P. Low molecular weight organic compounds of chestnut wood (Castanea Sativa L.) and corresponding aged brandies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 5023–5030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Soares, B.; Garcia, R.; Freitas, A.M.C.; Cabrita, M.J. Phenolic compounds released from oak, cherry, chestnut and robinia chips into a syntethic wine: Influence of toasting level. Ciência Técnica Vitivinic 2012, 27, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  41. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Mateus, A.M.; Belchior, A.P.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno-de-Sousa, R. Effect of natural seasoning on the chemical composition of chestnut wood used for barrel making. Ciência Técnica Vitivinic 2006, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanz, M.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; Cadahía, E.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I.; Pinto, E. Effect of toasting intensity at cooperage on phenolic compounds in acacia (Robinia Pseudoacacia) heartwood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3135–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sanz, M.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, Á.M.; Teresa Hernández, M.; Estrella, I. Polyphenolic profile as a useful tool to identify the wood used in wine aging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 732, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, M.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I. Phenolic compounds in cherry (Prunus avium) heartwood with a view to their use in cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4907–4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sanz, M.; De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I.; Pinto, E. LC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS study of phenolic compounds in ash (Fraxinus Excelsior L. and F. Americana L.) heartwood. effect of toasting intensity at cooperage. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 47, 905–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  46. Jordão, A.M.; Lozano, V.; Correia, A.C.; Ortega-Heras, M.; González-SanJosé, M.L. Comparative analysis of volatile and phenolic composition of alternative wood chips from cherry, acacia and oak for potential use in enology. BIO Web Conf. 2016, 7, 02012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  47. Canas, S.; Belchior, A.P.; Falcão, A.; Gonçalves, J.A.; Spranger, M.I.; Bruno-De-Sousa, R. Effect of heat treatment on the thermal and chemical mofifications of oak and chestnut wood used in brandy ageing. Ciência Técnica Vitivinic 2007, 22, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  48. Madrera, R.R.; Valles, B.S.; García, Y.D.; Argüelles, P.D.V.; Lobo, A.P. Alternative woods for aging distillates -an insight into their phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 19, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sanz, M.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, Á.M.; Cadahía, E.; Teresa Hernández, M.; Estrella, I.; Martinez, J. Polyphenols in red wine aged in acacia (Robinia Pseudoacacia) and oak (Quercus Petraea) wood barrels. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 732, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cadahía, E.; De Simón, B.F.; Vallejo, R.; Sanz, M.; Broto, M. Volatile compound evolution in Spanish oak wood (Quercus Petraea and Quercus Pyrenaica) during natural seasoning. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2007, 58, 163–172. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Jalocha, J. Volatile compounds in Spanish, French, and American oak woods after natural seasoning and toasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5923–5932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Alañón, M.E.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; Díaz-Maroto, I.J.; Martín-Alvarez, P.J.; Vila-Lameiro, P.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C. Influence of geographical location, site and silvicultural parameters, on volatile composition of Quercus Pyrenaica Willd. Wood used in wine aging. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caldeira, I.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno De Sousa, R.; Belchior, A.P. Volatile composition of oak and chestnut woods used in brandy ageing: Modification induced by heat treatment. J. Food Eng. 2006, 76, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jordao, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O. Comparison of volatile composition of cooperage oak wood of different origins (Quercus Pyrenaica vs. Quercus Alba and Quercus Petraea). Mitteilungen Klosterneubg. 2005, 55, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  55. De Simon, B.F.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, À.M.; Cadahía, E.; Sanz, M. Volatile compounds in acacia, chestnut, cherry, ash, and oak woods, with a view to their use in cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 3217–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Flamini, R.; Dalla Vedova, A.; Cancian, D.; Panighel, A.; De Rosso, M. GC/MS-positive ion chemical ionization and MS/MS study of volatile benzene compounds in five different woods used in barrel making. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 42, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. Fernández De Simõn, B.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M. Nontargeted GC-MS approach for volatile profile of toasting in cherry, chestnut, false acacia, and ash wood. J. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 49, 353–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I. Effect of size, seasoning and toasting in the volatile compounds in toasted oak wood and in a red wine treated with them. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 660, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fernández De Simón, B.; Muiño, I.; Cadahía, E. Characterization of volatile constituents in commercial oak wood chips. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9587–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Muiño, I.; del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I. Volatile composition of toasted oak chips and staves and of red wine aged with them. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 61, 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  61. III-IFE (Inventario Forestal Español) (Ed.) Ministerio de Medio Ambiente; Direccíon General de Conservación de la Naturaleza: Madrid, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  62. Caudullo, G.; Welk, E.; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. Chorological Maps for the Main European Woody Species. Data Brief 2017, 12, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Ellagitannins in woods of Spanish oaks. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnellerie 1998, 4, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  64. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Low molecular weight phenolic compounds in woods of Spanish, French and American oak. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnelerie 1996. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O.; Adams, A.; Demyttenaere, J.; Verhé, R.; De Kimpe, N. Volatile composition analysis by solid-phase microextraction applied to oak wood used in cooperage (Quercus Pyrenaica and Quercus Petraea): Effect of botanical species and toasting process. J. Wood Sci. 2006, 52, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Canas, S. Phenolic composition and related properties of aged wine spirits: Influence of barrel characteristics. A Review. Beverages 2017, 3, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Canas, S.; Silva, V.; Belchior, A.P. Wood related chemical markers of aged wine brandies. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2008, 23, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  68. Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno De Sousa, R. Aroma profile of Portuguese brandies aged in chestnut and oak woods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 458, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Caldeira, I.; de Sousa, R.B.; Belchior, A.P.; Climaco, M.C. A Sensory and chemical approach to the aroma of wooden agend lourinha wine brandy. Ciencia Tecnica 2008, 23, 97–110. [Google Scholar]
  70. Carvalho, E.; Belchior, A.P.; Costa, S.; Caldeira, I.; Tralhao, I. Incidência Da Origem e Queima Da Madeira de Carvalho (“Q. Pyrenaica, Q. Robur, Q. Sessiliflora, Q. Alba/Q. Stellata + Q. Lyrata/Q.Bicolor”) e de Castanho (“C. Sativa”) Em Características Físico-Químicas e Organolépticas de Aguardentes Lourinha Em Envelhecim. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 1998, 13, 107–119. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tavares, M.; Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M. Impact of cherry, acacia and oak chips on red wine phenolic parameters and sensory profile. OENO ONE 2017, 51, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Nevares, I.; Martínez-Gil, A.; del Alamo-Sanza, M. Oxygen consumption by red wines under different micro-oxygenation strategies and Q. Pyrenaica chips. Effects on color and phenolic characteristics. Beverages 2018, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I.; Gallego, L.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E. Micro-oxygenation strategy depends on origin and size of oak chips or staves during accelerated red wine aging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 660, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Rodríguez-Bencomo, J.J.; Ortega-Heras, M.; Pérez-Magariño, S.; González-Huerta, C. Volatile compounds of red wines macerated with Spanish, American, and French oak chips. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6383–6391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gonalves, F.J.; Jordao, A.M. Changes in antioxidant activity and the proanthocyanidin fraction of red wine aged in contact with Portuguese (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.) and American (Quercus Alba L.) oak wood chips. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2009, 21, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
  76. De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E.; Sanz, M.; Poveda, P.; Perez-Magariño, S.; Ortega-Heras, M.; González-Huerta, C. Volatile compounds and sensorial characterization of wines from four Spanish denominations of origin, aged in Spanish rebollo (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.) oak wood barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 9046–9055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Coninck, G.D.E.; Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O. Evolution of phenolic composition and sensory properties in red wine aged in contact with Portuguese. J. Int. des Sci. de la vigne et du vin 2006, 40, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  78. Fernández De Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I. Evolution of oak-related volatile compounds in a Spanish red wine during 2 years bottled, after aging in barrels made of Spanish, French and American oak wood. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 563, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gallego, L.; Del Alamo, M.; Nevares, I.; Fernández, J.A.; De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E. Phenolic Compounds and Sensorial Characterization of Wines Aged with Alternative to Barrel Products Made of Spanish Oak Wood (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.). Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2012, 18, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Miranda, I.; Sousa, V.; Ferreira, J.; Pereira, H. Chemical characterization and extractives composition of heartwood and sapwood from Quercus Faginea. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ministerio de Medioambiente. Plan Forestal Español; Ministerio de Medioambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2002.
  82. Reboredo, F.; Pais, J. Evolution of forest cover in Portugal: A review of the 12th–20th centuries. J. For. Res. 2014, 25, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mauri, A.; Enescu, C.M.; Houston Durrant, T.; de Rigo, D.; Caudullo, G. Quercus Frainetto in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage and Threats. In European Atlas of Forest Tree Species; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A., Eds.; Publication Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016; pp. 1–78. [Google Scholar]
  84. Madrigal-Jiménez, T.A. Fenología y Ecofisiología Del Quercus Oocarpa (Fagaceae), Cartago, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 1996, 44, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  85. Andrés, A.M.; Luis Mario, C.C. Conservation and Sustainable Use of Oak Forests in the Conservation Corridor Guantiva-La Rusia—Iguaque, Santander and Boyac, Colombia. Colomb. For. 2010, 13, 5–30. [Google Scholar]
  86. Argoti, J.C.; Salido, S.; Linares-Palomino, P.J.; Ramírez, B.; Insuasty, B.; Altarejos, J. Antioxidant activity and free radical-scavenging capacity of a selection of wild-growing colombian plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 2399–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. González, R.E.; Baleta, L.C. Quantification and comparison of ageing markers substances of accelerated aging rums and in oak (Quercus Humboldtii Bonpland) barrels. Rev. Venez. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2010, 1, 170–183. [Google Scholar]
  88. González, R.E.; Calderón, L.S.; Cabeza, R.A. Quantification of aging markers substances in Quercus Humboldtii through high efficiency liquid chromatography. Temas Agrar. 2008, 13, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Martínez-Gil, A.M.; del Alamo-Sanza, M.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Moreno-Simunovic, Y.; Nevares, I. Volatile composition and sensory characteristics of Carménère wines macerating with Colombian (Quercus Humboldtii) oak chips compared to wines macerated with American (Q. Alba) and European (Q. Petraea) oak chips. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Gortzi, O.; Metaxa, X.; Mantanis, G.; Lalas, S. Effect of artificial ageing using different wood chips on the antioxidant activity, resveratrol and catechin concentration, sensory properties and colour of two greek red wines. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2887–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P. Extraction/Oxidation kinetics of low molecular weight compounds in wine brandy resulting from different ageing technologies. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2460–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. De Rosso, M.; Cancian, D.; Panighel, A.; Dalla Vedova, A.; Flamini, R. Chemical compounds released from five different woods used to make barrels for aging wines and spirits: Volatile compounds and polyphenols. Wood Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Peng, S.; Scalbert, A.; Monties, B. Insoluble ellagitannins in castanea sativa and quercus petraea woods. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Sensory Impact of alternative ageing technology for the production of wine brandies. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2017, 32, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Caldeira, I.; Santos, R.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Anjos, O.; Mira, H.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Kinetics of odorant compounds in wine brandies aged in different systems. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Anjos, O.; Carmona, C.; Caldeira, I.; Canas, S. Variation of extractable compounds and lignin contents in wood fragments used in the aging of wine brandies. BioResources 2013, 8, 4484–4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Effect of alternative ageing systems on the wine brandy sensory profile. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2013, 28, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  98. Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Portal, V.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Sensory and chemical modifications of wine-brandy aged with chestnut and oak wood fragments in comparison to wooden barrels. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 660, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P. Comparison of alternative systems for the ageing of wine brandy. Oxygenation and wood shape effect. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2009, 24, 91–99. [Google Scholar]
  100. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P.; Spranger, M.I.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno-de-Sousa, R. Chestnut Wooden Barrels for the Ageing of Wine Spirits; OIV: París, France, 2018; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  101. Canas, S.; Belchior, A.P.; Mateus, A.M.; Spranger, M.I.; Bruno-de-Sousa, R. Kinetics of impregnation/evaporation and release of phenolic compounds from wood to brandy in experimental model. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2002, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  102. Belchior, A.P.; Caldeira, I.; Costa, S.; Lopes, C.; Tralhão, G.; Ferrão, A.F.M.; Mateus, A.M.; Carvalho, E. Evolução Das Características Fisico-Químicas e Organolépticas de Aguardentes Lourinhã Ao Longo de Cinco Anos de Envelhecimento Em Madeiras de Carvalho e de Castanheiro. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2001, 16, 81–94. [Google Scholar]
  103. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Lino, J.; Soares, A.; Pedro Belchior, A. Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of wine brandies aged using oak and chestnut wood simultaneously in wooden barrels and in stainless steel tanks with staves. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 2537–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cerezo, A.B.; Tesfaye, W.; Torija, M.J.; Mateo, E.; García-Parrilla, M.C.; Troncoso, A.M. The phenolic composition of red wine vinegar produced in barrels made from different woods. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Callejón, R.M.; Torija, M.J.; Mas, A.; Morales, M.L.; Troncoso, A.M. Changes of volatile compounds in wine vinegars during their elaboration in barrels made from different woods. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Arfelli, G.; Sartini, E.; Corzani, C.; Fabiani, A.; Natali, N. Impact of wooden barrel storage on the volatile composition and sensorial profile of red wine. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2007, 13, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gambuti, A.; Capuano, R.; Lisanti, M.T.; Strollo, D.; Moio, L. Effect of aging in new oak, one-year-used oak, chestnut barrels and bottle on color, phenolics and gustative profile of three monovarietal red wines. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alañón, M.E.; Schumacher, R.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; Díaz-Maroto, I.J.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Enological potential of chestnut wood for aging Tempranillo wines part I: Volatile compounds and sensorial properties. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Alañón, M.E.; Schumacher, R.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Enological potential of chestnut wood for aging Tempranillo wines part II: Phenolic compounds and chromatic characteristics. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fernández De Simón, B.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Martínez, J.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; De Simón, B.F.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Martínez, J.; et al. Polyphenolic compounds as chemical markers of wine ageing in contact with cherry, chestnut, false acacia, ash and oak wood. Food Chem. 2014, 143, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  111. Fernández De Simón, B.; Martínez, J.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M. Volatile compounds and sensorial characterisation of red wine aged in cherry, chestnut, false acacia, ash and oak wood barrels. Food Chem. 2014, 147, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  112. Palomero, F.; Bertani, P.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Benito, S.; Morata, A.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Wood impregnation of yeast lees for winemaking. Food Chem. 2015, 171, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. De Rosso, M.; Panighel, A.; Dalla Vedova, A.; Stella, L.; Flamini, R. Changes in chemical composition of a red wine aged in acacia, cherry, chestnut, mulberry, and oak wood barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1915–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Keil, G.; Spavento, E.; Murace, M.; Millanes, A. The influence of natural seasoning on the concentration of eugenol, vanillin and cis and trans-β-methyl-γ-octalactone extracted from French and American oak wood. For. Syst. 2011, 20, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  115. Citron, G. Uso Del Legno in Enologia: Specie Botaniche Utiliz- Zate, Anatomia e Classifi Cazione. L’Informatore Agrar. 2005, 59, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kozlovic, G.; Jeromel, A.; Maslov, L.; Pollnitz, A.; Orlić, S. Use of acacia barrique barrels—Influence on the quality of malvazija from Istria wines. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Psarra, C.; Gortzi, O.; Makris, D.P. Kinetics of polyphenol extraction from wood chips in wine model solutions: Effect of chip amount and botanical species. J. Inst. Brew. 2015, 121, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Alañón, M.E.; Marchante, L.; Alarcón, M.; Díaz-Maroto, I.J.; Pérez-Coello, S.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C. Fingerprints of acacia aging treatments by barrels or chips based on volatile profile, sensorial properties, and multivariate analysis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Delia, L.; Jordao, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M. Influence of different wood chips species (oak, acacia and cherry) used in a short period of aging on the quality of encruzado white wines. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 2017, 67, 84–96. [Google Scholar]
  120. Cerezo, A.B.; Espartero, J.L.; Winterhalter, P.; García-Parrilla, M.C.; Troncoso, A.M. (+)-Dihydrorobinetin: A marker of vinegar aging in acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia) wood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9551–9554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Chatonnet, P.; Dubourdie, D.; Boidron, J.; Pons, M. The Origin of ethylphenols in wines. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992, 60, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Torija, M.-J.; Mateo, E.; Vegas, C.-A.; Jara, C.; González, Á.; Poblet, M.; Reguant, C.; Guillamon, J.-M.; Mas, A. Effect of wood type and thickness on acetification kinetics in traditional vinegar production. Int. J. Wine Res. 2009, 1, 155–160. [Google Scholar]
  123. Elbert, L.; Little, J. USGS Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center: Digital Representations of Tree Species Range Maps from “Atlas of United States Trees”; Elbert, L., Little, J., Eds.; U.S. Department of the Interior/U.S. Geological Survey: Lakewood, CO, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  124. Culleré, L.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Ferreira, V.; Hernández-Orte, P.; Cacho, J. Characterization by gas chromatography-olfactometry of the most odor-active compounds in extracts prepared from acacia, chestnut, cherry, ash and oak woods. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 53, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chinnici, F.; Natali, N.; Sonni, F.; Bellachioma, A.; Riponi, C. Comparative changes in color features and pigment composition of red wines aged in oak and cherry wood casks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6575–6582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Chinnici, F.; Natali, N.; Bellachioma, A.; Versari, A.; Riponi, C. Changes in phenolic composition of red wines aged in cherry wood. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Prieto, R.O.; González-Oliva, L. Lista Nacional de Plantas Invasoras y Potencialmente Invasoras En La República de Cuba. Bissea Boletín Sobre Conserv. Plantas del Jardín Botánico Nac. Cuba 2015, 9, 5–90. [Google Scholar]
  128. Culiţă, S.; Adrian, O.; Pavol Jun, E.; Peter, F. New contribution to the study of alien flora in Romania. J. Plant Dev. 2011, 18, 121–134. [Google Scholar]
  129. Azizian, D.; Azizian, D. Morphology and distribution of trichomes in some genera (Morus, Ficus, Broussonetia and Maclura) of Moraceae. Iran. J. Bot. 2002, 9, 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  130. Nepal, M.; Ferguson, C.J.; Carolyn, J. Phylogenetics of Morus (Moraceae) inferred from ITS and TrnL-TrnF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 2012, 37, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Koek-Noorman, J.; Topper, S.M.C.; ter Welle, B.J.H. The systematic wood anatomy of the Moraceae (Urticales) V. Genera of the tribe moreae without urticaceous stamens. IAWA J. 1986, 7, 175–193. [Google Scholar]
  132. Watanabe, T. Substances in mulberry leaves which attract silkworm larvae (Bombyx mori L.). Nature 1958, 182, 325–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Karami, E.; Pourtahmasi, K.; Shahverdi, M. Wood anatomical structure of Morus alba L. and Morus nigra L., native to Iran. Not. Sci. Biol. 2010, 2, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pasheva, M.; Nashar, M.; Pavlov, D.; Slavova, S.; Ivanov, D.; Ivanova, D. Antioxidant Capacity of Different Woods Traditionally Used for Coloring Hard Alcoholic Beverages in Bulgaria. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  135. Chatonnet, P.; Boidron, J.N. Influence Du Traitement Thermique Du Bois de Chine Sur Sa Composition Chimique 1 e Partie: Définition Des Parametres Thermiques de La Chauffe Des F0ts En Tonnellerie. Connaiss. Vigne Vin 1989, 23, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  136. Boidron, J.N.; Chatonnet, P.; Pons, M. Influence Du Bois Sur Certaines Substances Odorantes Des Vins. Connaiss. Vigne Vin 1988, 22, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sefton, M.A.; Francis, I.L.; Pocock, K.F.; Williams, P. The Influence of natural seasoning on the concentration of eugenol, vanillin and cis and trans-β-methyl-γ-octalactone extracted from French and American oak wood. Sci. Aliments 1993, 13, 629–644. [Google Scholar]
  138. Waterhouse, A.L.; Towey, J.P. Oak lactone isomer ratio distinguishes between wine fermented in american and french oak barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 1971–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross-sections of some of the non-standard species in cooperage in comparison with Q. sessilis.
Figure 1. Cross-sections of some of the non-standard species in cooperage in comparison with Q. sessilis.
Beverages 04 00094 g001
Figure 2. Quercus pyrenaica Willd distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_pyrenaica_range.svg.
Figure 2. Quercus pyrenaica Willd distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_pyrenaica_range.svg.
Beverages 04 00094 g002
Figure 3. Quercus frainetto Ten. distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_frainetto_range.svg.
Figure 3. Quercus frainetto Ten. distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_frainetto_range.svg.
Beverages 04 00094 g003
Figure 4. Castanea sativa Mill. distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Castanea_sativa_range.svg.
Figure 4. Castanea sativa Mill. distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Castanea_sativa_range.svg.
Beverages 04 00094 g004
Figure 5. Robinia pseudoacacia L. distribution map [123]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=29169867.
Figure 5. Robinia pseudoacacia L. distribution map [123]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=29169867.
Beverages 04 00094 g005
Figure 6. Prunus avium L. distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prunus_avium_range.svg.
Figure 6. Prunus avium L. distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prunus_avium_range.svg.
Beverages 04 00094 g006
Figure 7. Fraxinus excelsior distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fraxinus_excelsior_range.svg.
Figure 7. Fraxinus excelsior distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fraxinus_excelsior_range.svg.
Beverages 04 00094 g007
Table 1. The range of ellagitannins and low molecular weight phenolic (LMWP) compounds found in green, seasoned, and toasted wood. * sum of castalagin, vescalagin, granidin, and A, B, C, D, and E roburins; ** sum of acids (ellagic, gallic, syringic, vanillic, and ferulic), aldehydes (coniferaldehyde, sinapaldehyde, syringaldehyde, and vanillin) and cumarins (scopoletin and aesculetin); *** sum of gallic acid and elagic acids.
Table 1. The range of ellagitannins and low molecular weight phenolic (LMWP) compounds found in green, seasoned, and toasted wood. * sum of castalagin, vescalagin, granidin, and A, B, C, D, and E roburins; ** sum of acids (ellagic, gallic, syringic, vanillic, and ferulic), aldehydes (coniferaldehyde, sinapaldehyde, syringaldehyde, and vanillin) and cumarins (scopoletin and aesculetin); *** sum of gallic acid and elagic acids.
TreatmentSpeciesConcentration Range Ellagitannins (mg/g) *ReferencesConcentration Range LMWP (µg/g) *References
Untreated (green wood)Quercus pyrenaica Willd.28.12–32.72[27,28,29]265–1061[23,27,28,30]
Quercus faginea Lam.32.51[28,29]407[28,30]
Quercus frainetto Ten.----
Quercus oocarpa Liebm.----
Quercus humboldtti Bonpl.1.94[16]365[16]
Castanea sativa Mill.----
Robinia pseudoacacia L.----
Prunus avium L.----
Prunus cereaus L.----
Fraxinus americana L----
Fraxinus excelsior L.----
Quercus petraea8.65–32.10[16,28,29]225–752[16,28,30]
Quercus robur28.41–44.01[28,29]310–647[28,30]
Quercus alba3.48–5.96[16,29]237–486[5,16]
SeasonedQuercus pyrenaica Willd.2.81–77.9[8,31,32,33]475–4304[7,28,31,33,34,35]
Quercus faginea Lam.24.11–26.97[8,28]760–1422[7,28]
Quercus frainetto Ten.108[36]3800 ***[36]
Quercus oocarpa Liebm.33.9[36]5500 ***[36]
Quercus humboldtti Bonpl.1.61[17]832[17]
Castanea sativa Mill.4.74–76.3[31,33,36,37,38]1155–14,430[31,32,33,34,36,37,38,39,40,41]
Robinia pseudoacacia L.nd[42,43]41–408[40,42]
Prunus avium L.nd–0.04[31,43,44]6–620[31,44]
Prunus cereaus L.--228[40]
Fraxinus americana L.nd[43,45]98[45]
Fraxinus excelsior L.nd[43,45]53[45]
Quercus petraea1.98–80.62[8,17,28,31,32,36,38]368–3400[7,17,28,31,34,38]
Quercus robur3.93–87.4[8,31,32,36]647–4166[7,28,31,34,45]
Quercus alba0.88–35.64[8,17,31,32,36]469–1064[7,17,31]
ToastedQuercus pyrenaica Willd.4.32–47.05[8,32,33,46]607–20,500[7,33,35]
Quercus faginea Lam.9.34[8]2132[7]
Quercus frainetto Ten.----
Quercus oocarpa Liebm.----
Quercus humboldtti Bonpl.0.12[17]2464[17]
Castanea sativa Mill.0.66–10.51[33,37]1353–35,282[7,33,35,37,40,47,48]
Robinia pseudoacacia L.nd[42,49]6–2496[40,42,44,46]
Prunus avium L.nd[43,46]90–3378[44,46,48]
Prunus cereaus L.--445–1578[40]
Fraxinus americana L.nd[43,45]1915–3062[45]
Fraxinus excelsior L.nd[43,45]1922–3585[45]
Quercus petraea3.53–56.76[8,17,32,46]856–4420[7,17,32,46]
Quercus robur7.72–11[8]2067–8225[7,40,47,48]
Quercus alband–5.89[8,17,32,46]460–3620[7,17,32,46,47]
nd: not detected.
Table 2. The range of volatile compounds expressed as µg/g wood found in green, seasoned, and toasted wood.
Table 2. The range of volatile compounds expressed as µg/g wood found in green, seasoned, and toasted wood.
TreatmentSpeciesGuaiacolEugenolFurfuralTrans-β-Methyl-γ-OctalactoneCis-β-Methyl-γ-OctalactoneVanillinReferences
Untreated (green wood)Q. pyrenaica Willd.0.16–0.241.47–5.711.35–2.560.84–29.3714.35–593.42[27,50]
Q. petraea0.092.051.1918.436.92.19[50]
SeasonedQ. pyrenaica Willd.nd–1.25nd–7.281.94–19.7nd–33.85.3–68.21.6–25.24[27,51,52,53,54,55]
Q. faginea Lam.0.291.9817.61.7415.510.6[51]
Q. humboldtti Bonpl.0.12.65ndnd0.021.97[17]
Castanea sativa Mill.nd–0.380.71–4.472.27–6.72nd–0.23nd–0.342.90–24.40[53,55,56,57]
Robinia pseudoacacia L.nd–0.86nd–0.210.45–0.92ndnd1.65–3.48[55,56,57]
Prunus L.nd–0.53nd–0.110.49–0.66ndnd0.13–2.42[55,56,57]
Fraxinus americana L.0.08–0.130.19–0.570.54–0.8ndnd7.25–10.3[55,57]
Fraxinus excelsior L.0.11–0.220.44–0.941.21–1.31ndnd1.39–14.7[55,57]
Q. petraeand–1.30.57–6.53.4–19.90.09–14.70.42–55.92.0–18.8[50,51,53,54,55]
Q. robur0.08–0.111.01–1.584.51–10.82.87–3.982.83–22.91.21–15.9[51,53]
Q. alba0.04–3.31.38–5.91.2–4.682.52–5.022.3–32.56.8–7.9[51,54,55]
ToastedQ. pyrenaica Willd.0.11–8.91nd–14.619.6–4082nd–58.60.10–2128.69–235[51,54,55,58,59,60]
Q. faginea Lam.0.362.35961.083.25258[51]
Q. humboldtti Bonpl.3.743.34533.530.060.322.36[17]
Castanea sativa Mill.0.46–5.302.13–3.23431–1675ndnd7.15–143[55,57]
Robinia pseudoacacia L.0.52–6.050.40–2.3620.7–840ndnd19.2–106[55,57]
Prunus L.0.91–1.710.74–1.5023–175ndnd45–91.7[55,57]
Fraxinus americana L.5.97–11.91.58–3.0026.5–63.6ndnd76.1–160[55,57]
Fraxinus excelsior L.6.47–14.071.59–3.2126.5–82ndnd76.3–187[55,57]
Q. petraea0.17–3.40.83–4.010.3–9630.01–14.60.05–22.83.0–370[51,54,55,60]
Q. robur0.17–0.531.01–1.378.90–10.83.41–3.982.83–22.9130–172[51]
Q. alba1.22–7.31.29–11.64.04–15393.29–7.416.1–45.57.5–102[51,54,55,60]

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Beverages EISSN 2306-5710 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top