Next Article in Journal
Toxicological Effects of Combined Exposure of Cadmium and Enrofloxacin on Zebrafish
Previous Article in Journal
Persistence and Recovery of Polystyrene and Polymethyl Methacrylate Microplastic Toxicity on Diatoms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health Risk for Non-Dietary Children’s Exposure to Heavy Metals in Postindustrial Areas in Upper Silesia, Poland

by
Grzegorz Dziubanek
1,*,
Joanna Furman
1,
Danuta Rogala
2,
Klaudia Gut-Pietrasz
2,
Małgorzata Ćwieląg-Drabek
1,
Monika Rusin
1,
Joanna Domagalska
1,
Agata Piekut
3,
Renata Baranowska
2,
Anna Niesler
3 and
Weronika Osmala-Kurpiewska
3
1
Department of Environmental Health Risk Factors, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 18 Piekarska Street, 41-902 Bytom, Poland
2
Analytical Laboratory of Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 18 Piekarska Street, 42-902 Bytom, Poland
3
Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 18 Piekarska Street, 42-902 Bytom, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2025, 13(5), 377; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050377
Submission received: 12 March 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 2 May 2025 / Published: 6 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Exposome Analysis and Risk Assessment)

Abstract

Heavy metal exposure is a significant public health problem, especially among children, who are a particularly vulnerable group. This study investigates the non-dietary exposure of children to lead, cadmium, and zinc and the associated health risk in three selected locations near the former non-ferrous metal smelters. Soil samples were collected from schools, parks, playgrounds, and other recreational places where children spend their free time in three districts of such towns as Katowice, Świętochłowice, and Piekary Śląskie. The contents of Cd, Pb, and Zn in the surface soil samples had the following ranges: 4.09–20.94 mg Cd/kg d.m., 161.70–1027.68 mg Pb/kg d.m., and 577.76–1475.93 mg Zn/kg d.m., respectively. The threshold doses of Cd, Zn, and Pb are 0.001 mg × kg−1 × day−1, 0.3 mg × kg−1 × day−1, and 0.0035 mg × kg−1 × day−1. A significant health risk was estimated as a result of non-dietary exposure of children to lead. The greatest non-cancer health risk in the population of children <6 years of age and in younger school children (<12 years of age) was shown. The problem was especially concerning in the scenario that assumed ingestion of soil particles in the areas most heavily contaminated with lead in the Katowice—Szopienice district. The public health policy should aim to monitor the current exposure of the local population to Pb and educate them on effective prophylactic methods to minimize environmental health risks.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Environmental exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) poses a significant health risk to the population. Exposure to these elements occurs primarily through the digestive tract. The inhalation route of exposure is much less important [1,2,3,4,5]. Children are mainly at particular health risk from exposure to heavy metals. The greater sensitivity of children versus adults results from such physiological conditions as lower bod-y weight, increased lung ventilation, higher metabolic rate, shorter height, and the related location of the nostrils at a lower height above the ground where the concentration of many pollutants is higher, consumption of a larger mass of food per kilogram of body weight, development of the immune system, formation of the blood-brain barrier, lower pH in the stomach, etc. In the case of small children, the most important source of exposure to lead and other heavy metals is the non-dietary route, including, among others, behaviors typical of this population group resulting from the lack of established hygiene habits and the tendency to put contaminated hands and objects into the mouth [6,7,8,9]. Non-dietary exposure of children to lead or cadmium is common in industrialized and urbanized areas. The problem is particularly noticeable in the areas affected by mining and processing plants of non-ferrous metal ores, landfills for waste originating from such plants, and areas where electronic waste is stored [10,11,12]. Exposure results from children swallowing dust or soil particles containing heavy metals. The threat is significant when soils are heavily contaminated with metals, as high doses of these pollutants can enter the body. The extent of children’s exposure to metals also depends largely on their diet, as the amount of calcium and other elements influencing the absorption of metals in the digestive tract is important [13]. Also important in this respect is the fact that children consume meals or snacks while playing on playgrounds, playing fields, or in yards. During consumption, soil particles found on the surface of dirty hands may be swallowed along with food [14]. Therefore, we should pay attention to the need to feed our children before going outside and to clean their hands regularly while playing. Health hazards posed by heavy metals commonly found in industrial and urban areas are associated with a wide range of negative health effects. For example, exposure to cadmium may cause, among others, kidney damage, atherosclerotic changes, skeletal dysfunctions, and malignant tumors, e.g., lung, prostate, kidney, and pancreatic cancer [15,16,17]. Exposure to cadmium during childhood may lead to growth retardation, as well as neurobehavioral and immunological disorders [18,19,20]. In turn, chronic exposure to lead, even at low concentrations, leads to irreversible damage to the central nervous system in children, manifested by a decrease in IQ, difficulties in learning, behavioral disorders, and problems with concentration, and it may also lead to speech and hearing disorders [17,18,21]. Lead also has a hepatotoxic effect, causes anemia, rickets, and lead colic, weakens male fertility, and disturbs calcium metabolism [17,22,23]. In turn, zinc supplied to the body in high doses disturbs the homeostasis of metal ions, may lead to immunosuppression and erythropoiesis disorders, and may also affect the metabolism of other microelements such as copper and iron, causing their deficiencies in the body [24,25,26].
The region of Poland with the highest environmental contamination with heavy metals is Upper Silesia. This area is historically associated with intensive industrial activity, including metallurgy and the extraction and processing of non-ferrous metal ores. As a result of many years of activity in these economic sectors, the natural environment in Upper Silesia has been polluted with cadmium, lead, zinc, and other metals [27,28]. Even though over the last few decades, due to intensive economic and systemic changes, the emission of these elements into the environment in the region has been significantly reduced, their concentrations, especially in soils, are still very high because soil is the place where metal compounds accumulate [29,30]. Historically, the largest emitters of heavy metals in Upper Silesia included plants such as the Bolesław Mining and Metallurgy Plant in Bukowno, the Non-Ferrous Metals Smelter in Katowice—Szopienice, and the Orzeł Biały Mining and Metallurgy Plant in Bytom.
The currently operating plant emitting significant amounts of metal-bearing dust into the environment is the zinc smelter “Miasteczko Śląskie” [31]. The administrative area of Upper Silesia covers a relatively small area of 12.3 thousand km2, constituting 3.9% of the area of Poland, and is inhabited by 4.4 million people, which translates into a high population density (357 people/km2 in 2021). Contamination of the local environment with heavy metals is therefore a source of exposure for a large population [32,33,34]. The groups at greatest health risk in society are the most vulnerable, including children, as well as residents with the lowest socio-economic status. Particular attention is paid to the problem of the highest exposure to heavy metals among children from the poorest districts of the cities of the industrial agglomeration of Upper Silesia, such as Lipiny in Świętochłowice, Szopienice in Katowice, and Brzeziny in Piekary Śląskie. The problem of health-threatening exposure of children to lead in the region was first noticed in the 1970s by Dr. Jolanta Wadowska-Król in the area affected by the Non-Ferrous Metal Smelter “Szopienice”. Thanks to her activity and persistence, the treatment of many children in sanatoriums was started, the purchase of milk was financed, the houses standing closest to the steelworks were demolished, etc. [35,36]. The above-mentioned districts of the cities of Upper Silesia are the focus of socio-economic problems resulting from the economic transformation that took place in the 1990s and was associated with the liquidation of large industrial plants employing the local population and a sharp increase in unemployment. The effects of those changes are still visible today, as the districts in question struggle with many problems, such as alcohol addiction, high crime rates, and joblessness. In the case of some children growing up in such conditions, unfortunately, the principles of hygiene and prevention of exposure to heavy metals were not taught from an early age. Therefore, assessing the exposure and health risks of children living in these areas is crucial for developing effective health prevention programs [37,38].
The research undertaken in this paper aimed to assess heavy metal contamination of playgrounds, primary school grounds, and their premises in Katowice—Szopienice, Świętochłowice—Lipiny, and Piekary Śląskie—Brzeziny, in the aspect of non-nutritional exposure of children to lead, cadmium, and zinc and the associated health risk. An additional aim of the work was to analyze the results of the eighth-grade examination of children in the studied schools compared with the results obtained in the entire Silesia Province and schools located in other districts of the towns under consideration.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Location of the Study Area

The research material consisted of soil samples collected from schools, parks, playgrounds, etc., in Katowice (KT)—Szopienice district, Świętochłowice (SW)—Lipiny district, and Piekary Śląskie (PS)—Brzeziny Śląskie district. A total of N = 77 soil samples were collected from playgrounds (N = 51), sports fields and gyms (N = 15), and other recreational places where children spend their free time (N = 11). Detailed characteristics of the sampling sites along with geolocation data are presented in Table S1 (Supplementary Material). The location of the study area is presented in Figure 1.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Soil samples from playing fields, playgrounds, gyms, and other recreational areas were collected in places where intensive dust generation from the ground occurs, i.e., near sports goals, swings, slides, and sandboxes. In the case of places where the surface was, for example, covered with grass or a polyurethane surface, samples were taken from the roadside. To prepare a representative 0.5 kg soil sample, several individual samples were taken from the topsoil (to a depth of 0.25 m) using a shovel and mixed thoroughly. The collected soil samples were placed in zip-lock bags. The samples prepared in this way were transferred to a cuvette, cleaned of visible stones and plant debris, and placed in a laboratory dryer SLW 75 SMART (POL-EKO-APARATURA, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland). The samples were dried at 105 °C until dry mass was obtained. To prepare a homogeneous sample, the dried soil samples were sieved through a sieve with a mesh size of <2 mm using an EML200 Pure HAVER&BOECKER (VWR, Oelde, Germany) sieve screen. From the prepared samples, a 0.5 g (±0.015 g) weight was prepared using a precision laboratory balance, model PS 750/X (RADWAG, Mazowieckie (Masovian) Voivodeship, Poland). The samples were transferred to a Teflon vessel to which 10 mL of 65% ultrapure nitric acid (Merck, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) and 1 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide (Stanlab, Lublin, Poland) were added and then placed in a multi-station microwave mineralizer ETHOS UP (Milestone, Sorisole, Italy) and subjected to a three-stage mineralization process:
  • Mineralization time: 20 min, temperature: 210 °C, generator power: 1800 W;
  • Mineralization time: 15 min, temperature: 210 °C, generator power: 1800 W;
  • Sample cooling: 30 min.
The mineralized soil samples were filtered into volumetric flasks and made up with ultrapure water to a previously determined volume.

2.3. Chemical Analysis of Heavy Metal Concentration in the Tested Samples

The concentrations of cadmium, lead, and zinc in the mineralized soil samples were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) using an ICP-OES Ultima Expert spectrometer from Horiba Scientific (Palaiseau, France). The studies were conducted in the Analytical Laboratory (AB1717) of the Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, accredited by the Polish Centre for Accreditation (PCA). The obtained results were presented in mg/kg of dry mass (d.m.), and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.18 mg/kg of dry mass for cadmium, 15.0 mg/kg of dry mass for lead, and 3.9 mg/kg of dry mass for zinc.

2.4. Quality Control and Quality Assurance

To maintain measurement traceability, certified reference materials (CRMs) were used to determine the calibration curve and to confirm the correctness of the measurements performed. To prepare the calibration curve for cadmium, lead, and zinc, certified reference materials from CPAchem (Bogomilovo, Bulgaria) were used at a concentration of 1000 mg/L in 2% HNO3 and with the following reference numbers: lead—C041.2NP.L1, cadmium—C010.2NP.L1, and zinc—C069.2NP.L1. The correctness of the conducted research was checked using the clay soil CRM (Trace Metals—Clay 1, CRM046-50G) manufactured by Sigma Aldrich (Laramie, WY, USA). The validation of the method is outlined in Table 1.

2.5. Assessment of Children’s Exposure and Health Risks

The non-dietary exposure of children to zinc, cadmium, and lead contained in soil and dust samples was estimated by calculating the average daily dose (ADD) of the metals using the formula recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) [39].
ADD = (MC × IR × CF)/BW,
where the following are used:
MC—Metal Concentration (mg/kg dry mass).
IR—Ingestion Rate by children (mg/day).
CF—Conversion Factor (10−6 kg/mg).
BW—Body weight (kg).
The calculated doses of exposure of children were used to estimate the non-cancer health risk. For this purpose, the hazard quotient (HQ) was calculated using the following formula:
HQ = ADD/RfD,
Reference dose (RfD) values for individual heavy metals were found in toxicology databases. The following RfD values were used in the calculations: 0.001 mg × kg−1 × day−1 for cadmium [40], 0.3 mg × kg−1 × day−1 for zinc [41]. Due to the lack of current recommendations for the reference dose for lead, a value of 0.0035 mg × kg−1 × day−1 [42] was calculated for this study by dividing the historically used PTWI (Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake) by seven, which is a common practice in estimating the health risk of people exposed to lead (Table 2).
The risk assessment results were interpreted in such a way that if the value of the estimated hazard quotient was equal to or higher than 1 (HQ ≥ 1), the health risk to children was considered significant, and if HQ was less than 1 (HQ < 1), the result was interpreted as not posing a significant health risk. Additionally, the hazard index (HI) value was calculated by summing up the health risk posed by individual metals in total.
HI = HQPb + HQCd + HQZn,
Values for HI lower than one (HI < 1.0) indicate that no potential negative impact on human health has to be considered and there are no impacts or risks of non-carcinogenic effects.
Because, in Poland, primary school is attended by children aged 7 to 15 years, the assessment of exposure and non-cancer health risk was carried out in two scenarios, taking into account children aged 6 to <12 years (younger children) and adolescents aged 12 to 15 years (older children). In each group, three variants of potential exposure were assumed:
  • Scenario 1 (S1) assumes exposure of children to the lowest demonstrated concentrations of metals;
  • Scenario 2 (S2) assumes exposure of children to average concentrations of the tested metals;
  • Scenario 3 (S3) assumes exposure of children to the highest demonstrated metal concentrations.
To assess the exposure of children from the studied localities to heavy metals, the exposure indicator values recommended by the US EPA were used in the calculations [9]. The recommended body weight values do not coincide with the daily soil and dust ingestion values in the individual age groups [43]. Therefore, for this study, a lower body mass value was assumed for children aged 11–12 years, which, however, does not pose a risk of underestimating the research results. Similarly, in the case of preschool children, the recommended body weight for children aged 3 to <6 years was assumed, assuming the amount of soil consumption established for the age group from 1 to <6 years (Table 3).
An additional component of the present study comprised an evaluation of children’s inhalation and dermal exposure to heavy metals. The following formula was used to calculate the dermal exposure (the exposure factors used in the calculation [9,44,45] are shown in Table 4):
ADD = (Csoil × CF × SA × AF × ABS × EF × ED)/(BW × AT)
where the following are used:
C—Concentration of metal in soil (mg/kg).
CF—Conversion factor (10−6 kg/mg).
AF—Soil-to-skin adherence factor (mg/cm2).
ABS—Absorption factor (unitless).
SA—Skin surface area available for contact (cm2/event).
EF—Exposure frequency (events/year).
ED—Exposure duration (years).
BW—Body weight (kg).
AT—Averaging time (days/years).
In order to calculate the inhalation exposure of children to metals, data from the National Environmental Monitoring (Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection) network were used [46]. The only station in the region that tests the concentration of lead and cadmium in particulate matter (PM10) is located in Katowice. However, it should be noted that the concentrations of zinc in these samples have not been tested. The mean annual values of Cd and Pb concentrations for the years 2023 and 2024 were obtained from the National Environmental Monitoring database. The quantity of inhalational exposure experienced by children was determined on these grounds. As demonstrated in Table 5, the calculations were based on the exposure factors [9,47] and heavy metal air contents. The following formula was used for calculations:
ADD = Cair × InhR/BW
where the following are used:
CairConcentration of metal in PM10 (Cd ng/m3; Pb µg/m3).
InhR—Inhalation Rate (m3 day−1).
BW—Body weight (kg).
According to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), a quantitative estimate of carcinogenic risk to lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and zinc (Zn) is not currently available. The values of CSF are not subject to assessment within the framework of the IRIS Program. Consequently, the carcinogenic risk was not calculated.

2.6. Obtaining Data on the School Achievements of Children in Contaminated Areas

Due to the neurotoxic effects of children’s exposure to lead proven in scientific literature, which results in, among others, a deterioration in school achievements, for this study, a comparison of the results of the eighth-grade exam was made among children from three studied schools, i.e., Primary School No. 42 in KT, Primary School No. 19 in SW, and Primary School No. 15 in PS. The results obtained in these schools in 2019, 2021, and 2024 were compared with provincial and national data. The eighth-grade exam is a compulsory exam taken in written form at the end of eight years of primary school. Children taking the exam are fifteen years old. The exam is a summary of the knowledge acquired throughout the education process. The basic terms take place in May and last three consecutive days. The exam paper contains closed and open-ended tasks. It comprises three subjects: Polish, mathematics, and a modern foreign language, the most frequently chosen of which is English. The Polish language exam lasts 120 min, the mathematics exam 100 min, and the foreign-language exam 90 min. The results for each subject separately are a percentage result for the percentage of points rounded to a whole number. Additionally, the result is also presented on a percentile scale. The results of the eighth-grade exam were obtained from publicly available databases of the Central Examination Commission (CEC) in Warsaw and the District Examination Commission (DEC) in Jaworzno [48,49]. The results were expressed as a percentage of the arithmetic mean, standard deviation, and median.

2.7. Statistical Analysis of Results

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 13.3 software (StatSoft, Kraków, Poland). The normality of the distribution of variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Due to the lack of normality for the variables of cadmium, lead, and zinc concentration in soil samples (Shapiro–Wilk test: p < 0.05), nonparametric tests, i.e., Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA ranks and the Mann–Whitney U test, were used in further statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Cd, Pb, and Zn Content in Soil Samples

The obtained results indicate varied heavy metal contamination of soils originating from playgrounds and recreational and sports facilities located in the studied cities. Polish legislation does not specify the maximum permissible concentrations of heavy metals in soils in children’s playgrounds. Therefore, reference was made to the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) specified in the Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 1 September 2016 on the method of assessing soil contamination, which in the case of cadmium, lead, and zinc is 2 mg Cd/kg d.m., 200 mg Pb/kg d.m., and 500 mg Zn/kg d.m., respectively [50]. Of the 77 soil samples collected, 65 of them (84.42%) exceeded the normative value for at least one of the three heavy metals analyzed. The MPC value was exceeded for Cd in 58 samples (75.32%), for Pb in 46 samples (59.74%), and for Zn in 44 samples (57.14%). In the case of 35 samples (45.45%), the determined concentrations exceeded the MPC for all three elements (Table S1—Supplementary Material).
The average concentrations of all three analyzed elements indicate that the most contaminated soil samples were collected from squares, parks, and green areas. The average concentrations of Cd, Pb, and Zn were 12.26 mg Cd/kg d.m., 554.51 mg Pb/kg d.m., and 1800.21 mg Zn/kg d.m., respectively. All average values exceeded the MPC, even several times, and the maximum concentrations even a dozen or so times. The lowest average concentrations of the analyzed metals, in the case of Cd and Zn, were found in playgrounds (7.10 mg Cd/kg d.m. and 799.92 mg Zn/kg d.m., respectively), while in the case of lead, in school playing fields or gyms (285.45 mg Pb/kg d.m.). Although these were the lowest average concentrations, these values also exceeded the MPC (Table 6).
The obtained results, taking into account the three studied localities, indicate that the average contents of Cd, Pb, and Zn in samples taken from recreational areas are in the ranges of 4.09–20.94 mg Cd/kg d.m., 161.70–1027.68 mg Pb/kg d.m., and 577.76–1475.93 mg Zn/kg d.m., respectively. The most contaminated playgrounds with Cd and Pb are located in KT (7.75 mg Cd/kg d.m. and 554.51 mg Cd/kg d.m.), while in the case of Zn, the dominant average concentrations were recorded in PS (1077.80 mg Zn/kg d.m.). Soil samples taken from playing fields or gyms containing the most Cd and Pb came from PS (10.19 mg Cd/kg d.m. and 323.95 mg Pb/kg d.m.), while the most Zn was determined in samples from SW (1598.53 mg Zn/kg d.m.). The highest concentrations of all three analyzed elements were determined in soil samples collected from squares, parks, and green areas (category “other”) located in PS (20.94 mg Cd/kg d.m., 1027.68 mg Pb/kg d.m., and 2859.65 mg Zn/kg d.m., respectively) (Table 7). Table 6 and Table 7 also compare soil contamination with the FAO/WHO maximum permissible limits [51].
Despite the differences in the concentration of the tested metals in individual locations, the statistical analysis of the results did not confirm their significance (Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA ranks: p > 0.05) (Table 8). The probable cause is the large variation in contamination of the tested samples within individual categories, which also resulted in high values of standard deviations.

3.2. Children’s Non-Dietary Exposure and Health Risks

The conducted health risk assessment showed the greatest health risk in the youngest age group, i.e., in the population of children <6 years of age. A significant non-cancer health risk was estimated as a result of non-dietary exposure of children to lead. The problem concerned scenario S3, which assumed ingestion of soil particles in the areas most heavily contaminated with lead in Katowice—Szopienice. Lead exposure was more than three times the threshold dose. A lower, although still worrying, risk was shown in scenario S3 in Piekary Śląskie-Brzeziny, as the calculated HQ = 0.98, i.e., it was close to the threshold dose, the exceedance of which may be associated with the development of health disorders. In general, the average value of exposure of preschool children living in the studied localities of the Silesia Province to lead through the non-dietary route (S2) was about half of the reference dose, in the HQ range from 0.2 to 0.56, respectively, in SW–KT. Exposure of preschool children to cadmium and zinc was low enough not to pose a significant health risk (Table 9). The exposure of school children <12 years of age to the tested metals was significantly lower compared with preschool children. A significant health risk was found in the scenario assuming exposure to lead at the most contaminated playground in Katowice—Szopienice (HQ = 1.33) (Table 10). It is also worth noting the high, although lower than the reference dose, exposure to lead in Piekary Śląskie (HQ = 0.43). However, no significant non-cancer health risk was found as a result of exposure of younger school children to cadmium and zinc. In the group of the oldest school children, no health-threatening exposure to the tested metals was recorded, regardless of the exposure scenario considered and the place of residence. The highest hazard quotient value (HQ = 0.25) was shown in scenario S3, assuming non-dietary exposure of children to lead in Katowice—Szopienice. In turn, the non-dietary exposure of children aged 12–15 to cadmium and zinc was so low that it did not translate into a serious health risk (Table 11).
As part of this study, the total health risk resulting from the combined exposure of children to cadmium, lead, and zinc was also calculated. It was shown that the exposure of children from Upper Silesia to metals decreases with age. Therefore, the hazard index values can be ranked in the following order: preschool children > younger school children > older school children. Among preschool children in scenario S3, the hazard index value indicating significant health risk was shown in Katowice (HI = 3.15) and Piekary Śląskie (HI = 1.07). The lowest risk was estimated for preschool children in Świętochłowice (HI = 0.61). Taking into account the type of sites examined in general, the risk level can be ranked in the following order: playgrounds > other > playing fields. However, the order cited differed depending on the city studied (Table 12). In the group of school children aged 6 to <12 years, the combined exposure to cadmium, lead, and zinc results in a significant health risk in scenario S3 (HI = 1.38). A more detailed analysis showed that the problem concerned children spending their free time on playgrounds in Katowice. An increased index value (HI = 0.74) was estimated in scenario S3 in the areas classified as “other” in Katowice (Table 13). For older school children aged 12–15 years, no significant health risk was identified in any of the exposure scenarios analyzed. The highest index value (HI = 0.26) was estimated in scenario S3, and the highest exposure to metals occurred in the playground in Katowice—Szopienice (Table 14).

3.3. Children’s Dermal and Inhalation Exposure to Heavy Metals

The estimated doses of cadmium, lead, and zinc that reached the bodies of children in Upper Silesia via the dermal route were found to be negligible, thereby confirming the insignificant role of this route in the total exposure to heavy metals (Table 15).
The findings of research conducted to date indicate that the inhalation exposure of children to cadmium and lead is at a low level. Nevertheless, the findings of this study demonstrate that the respiratory route accounts for greater exposure of children from Upper Silesia to heavy metals than the dermal route (Table 16).

3.4. School Achievements of Children from the Studied Areas Contaminated with Heavy Metals

Due to the proven neurotoxic properties of lead, the influence of this metal on the weakening of cognitive abilities, and the weakening of school results of children and adolescents, it was decided to compare the results of the state examination of children finishing primary school. The results of children attending three selected schools located in the studied districts of KT, SW, and PS were compared with the average for these three cities, for the Silesia administrative area, and with the national data. It was found that in 2019, 2021, and 2024, the results of the Polish language, mathematics, and English language exams among children from the analyzed primary schools in Katowice—Szopienice and Świętochłowice—Lipiny were significantly lower than the average results in these two cities, in Silesia Province, and in Poland. The poorest results were achieved in Primary School No. 19 in SW, located in the postindustrial district of Lipiny. The results of children attending school at PS are interesting compared with other schools. In 2019 and 2021, graduates of the school in the Brzeziny district achieved much better results than their peers from the entire city, region, and Poland, while in 2024, the average exam results were much lower (Table 17). The presented data on school achievements correspond with the demonstrated local problem of children’s non-dietary exposure to lead. It is therefore very likely that soil contamination with heavy metals in children’s recreation areas in the cities studied is, in addition to socio-economic conditions, one of the most important reasons for poor educational results among children.

4. Discussion

The research conducted as part of this work confirmed the relevance of the problem of soil contamination in recreation areas for children and youth in three postindustrial districts of cities located in the Silesia agglomeration. The average concentrations of cadmium, lead, and zinc exceeded the maximum permissible concentrations in all cities studied, regardless of the nature of the analyzed recreational area. Even though many years have passed since the cessation of operations of metallurgical plants, which were the main source of non-ferrous metal emissions into the environment, very high concentrations of heavy metals have currently been demonstrated in the topsoil. This situation may pose a significant health risk to the local community, especially children. The dynamic processes of industrial and energy transformation in the region, as well as the development of postindustrial areas for recreational and housing purposes, mean that the inhabitants of Silesia, and especially the youngest generations, are not aware of the existing threat. The youngest residents live in cities where the landscape is currently devoid of steelworks, mines, and other plants, as well as postindustrial dumps. Therefore, there may be a false sense of security when staying in recreational areas, e.g., playing fields, playgrounds, parks, or squares. In turn, soil contamination in such places may constitute a significant health risk factor as a result of non-dietary exposure. The results of studies conducted in three selected cities show that the biggest problem currently is the exposure of children to lead. The doses of this metal entering the body through ingested soil particles are so high that they exceed safe exposure thresholds. This study confirmed that the younger the children, the greater the health risk. The most exposed and at the same time the highest health risk concerned preschool children, followed by younger school children >12 years of age. The strongest exposure may occur on playgrounds located in the Szopienice district of Katowice. In the youngest age group of children < 6 years, exposure to lead was more than three times higher than the reference dose. The findings of this research suggest that the inhalation and dermal exposure of children to metals pose negligible non-cancer risk. The relative proportions of particular exposure pathways were as follows: ingestion > inhalation > dermal. The demonstrated health risk associated with non-dietary exposure of children is the result of high concentrations of the tested metals in the most contaminated sites. A significantly lower, negligible risk was identified in the study by Mohammadi et al. (2020) conducted in the Khayyam industrial zone in Iran [52], where cadmium and lead soil concentrations were lower than in Upper Silesia. Similarly, children in kindergartens and parks in Bratislava (Slovakia) were also much less exposed to cadmium, lead, zinc, and other metals. As a result, the hazard index was below the threshold values in all the locations studied [53]. The highest non-cancer risk of heavy metals among different age groups in the coastal industrial region of the Yangtze River Delta, focusing on children. The inhabitants experienced the greatest exposure to As and Pb. The maximum HQ values for children in case of As, Pb, Cd, and Zn exposure were as follows: 2.03, 0.57, 0.078, and 0.02, respectively [54]. This result indicates a local problem of soil contamination with arsenic, and, to a lesser extent, with metals that are most commonly occurring in Upper Silesia. Penteado et al. (2021) conducted research in urban parks in Rio Grande City, southern Brazil, which revealed elevated non-carcinogenic risk concerns for children who use recreational spaces due to exposure to lead and, to a lesser extent, mercury [55]. These results indicate that exposure of children to heavy metals in urban and industrialized areas is a global public health problem. The magnitude of the problem is defined by the degree of environmental pollution and the type of metals present. As demonstrated in the case study of Upper Silesia, the health risks to children in this region are significantly elevated in comparison to other areas that have been documented in the existing literature as having challenges with exposure to heavy metals.

4.1. Soil Contamination with Heavy Metals in the Central Part of Upper Silesia Province as a Significant Environmental Health Risk Factor for the Local Population

The problem of soil contamination with heavy metals in the cities of the Silesia agglomeration is confirmed by the results of studies by other authors. For example, in the work of Piekut et al. [27], the normative concentrations of at least one of the tested metals (cadmium, lead, zinc) were exceeded in one-third of the analyzed samples from playgrounds and sports fields in Silesia cities such as Sosnowiec and Bytom. The estimated non-dietary exposure of children to the analyzed contaminants posed a significant health risk [27]. Moreover, the highest permissible concentrations of cadmium, lead, and zinc were also found to be exceeded in soils from residential estates, kindergartens, school playing fields, sandboxes, playgrounds, and lawns in various cities of the Silesia agglomeration [56,57]. Contamination of arable land in Silesia, where edible plants are grown, with heavy metals was found in the studies by Ćwieląg-Drabek et al. [58] and Dziubanek et al. [59]. Therefore, the population of Silesia residents, including children, may experience exposure to heavy metals also through the digestive tract. Therefore, the total doses of metals reaching the body as a result of combined exposure occurring through individual routes may be hazardous to the health of the local community. Currently, the only active non-ferrous metal ore processing plant in the Silesia Province is the zinc smelter in Miasteczko Śląskie. The plants are located north of the Silesia agglomeration, which means that densely populated cities are not within the direct range of the smelter’s impact. The results of Kicińska et al.’s research [60] indicate that the current contamination of soils with heavy metals in this region is much higher than the values recorded in the same places 20 years ago. These results confirm that the process of metal accumulation in the environment is still ongoing [60]. In turn, the studies conducted in these areas by Niezgoda et al. [61] showed that the consumption of mushrooms and blueberries from the surrounding forests may be associated with a significant health risk for both children and adults. Exposure to lead in the Upper Silesia region is confirmed by the results of measurements of the content of this metal in blood conducted in the years 1999–2013 in a population of 4882 children aged 3 to 18, living in twelve cities of the Silesia agglomeration. Studies have shown that the average blood lead level (BLL) in children was 28.67 µg/L, with the concentration range reaching 6.0–360.0 µg/L. It has also been shown that the factors influencing the increased level of lead in the blood of children included: lower level of education of parents, unemployment, occupational exposure of parents to lead, poor socio-economic status of the family, smoking at home, living on the ground floor of buildings, eating locally grown vegetables and fruits, spending longer time playing outdoors in a polluted environment, and male gender [62]. Increased exposure of children to heavy metals is a significant public health problem in many countries around the world. This applies to both developed and developing countries. According to the results of a study by Zhao et al. [63] conducted near mining areas in Chenzhou and Hengyang cities, located in the Hunan Province of China, the main source of population exposure to lead was accidental ingestion of household dust, while the most important source of exposure of the local community to arsenic and cadmium was the consumption of contaminated rice [63]. A significant non-cancer health risk has also been estimated in the population of children exposed to lead from soils from playgrounds and public parks in the capital of Ghana, Accra. Soil contamination in Ghana is primarily due to the long-term use of leaded fuel before its complete ban on 1 January 2004 [64]. In the U.S., an attempt has been made to develop an action plan to reduce children’s exposure to lead [65]. The concentrations of lead in soil in residential areas and dust that could result in BLL for children aged 1 to <2 years and 2 to <6 years were estimated at 5 μg/dL and 3.5 μg/dL, respectively. It was shown that depending on the age group, population percentile, and assumed BLL, the permissible lead concentrations in soils ranged from 70 mg/kg to 220 mg/kg. In the case of dust, the permissible lead concentrations ranged from 110 mg/kg to 240 mg/kg [65]. These types of preventive measures are important because they protect children from negative health effects, especially neurotoxic effects, which are measured by reduced intelligence quotient (IQ). The average global IQ decline attributable to dietary lead exposure in 2015 was estimated to be 1.1. The total disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to IQ reduction were estimated at 5.2 million DALYs, with an uncertainty range of 0–31 million DALYs [66].

4.2. Summary of Findings and Recommendations

The results of state examinations presented in this paper among children finishing education in selected primary schools in postindustrial districts of cities in the Silesia agglomeration are, in most cases, much lower than the average number of points obtained in individual cities, in the province, and the country. On this basis, it can be assumed that one of the determinants of this situation may be the problem of the increased exposure of children from the studied districts to lead. In this context, it is necessary to implement preventive measures. First of all, educational activities should be implemented, aimed at both parents and children themselves. Residents of areas burdened with postindustrial pollution should develop habits in their daily lives that will minimize exposure to lead, e.g., hand hygiene, frequent washing of toys, furniture, floors, and objects with which children come into contact, and avoiding eating locally grown edible plants. Local government representatives should ensure children’s safety on sports fields, playgrounds, and other recreational areas, e.g., by securing surfaces against secondary dusting, frequent replacement of sand in sandboxes, etc. [67,68]. Moreover, it is also advisable to monitor the concentration of heavy metals in soils in places where children spend time [69]. The effects of protective measures can bring many social and financial benefits, as evidenced by the experience of the Flanders region in Belgium in the prevention of lead exposure [70]. The implemented actions allowed saving as much as EUR 7176 million in social costs related to the reduction in IQ loss over 15 years [70]. In connection with the above, and in light of the results presented in this work, it is extremely important to regularly remind the society of Upper Silesia about the problem of population exposure to heavy metals and the related health risk, especially for children. It is unfortunate that the local and governmental authorities in Poland currently lack awareness of the gravity of the issue. The monitoring of BLL in children across the Upper Silesia region is exclusively conducted by the ‘Miasteczko Śląskie’ Foundation for Children, a non-governmental organization. The Foundation also develops educational materials, which are primarily distributed in local schools. It is also necessary to monitor educational, recreational, and residential facilities, as well as to include content on the prevention of exposure to heavy metals in school and kindergarten curricula. In addition, social campaigns dedicated to the general population should be implemented to remind people about the problem and to indicate simple measures for managing health risks at an individual level. Due to the nature of the problem, research on the exposure of children from postindustrial districts of the Silesia agglomeration to lead and other heavy metals is being continued. The next work being prepared will present the results of the exposure of school children to metals contained in dust found inside and outside the premises of local primary schools.

5. Conclusions

This study assessed the health risk of lead, cadmium, and zinc exposure of preschool and school children from postindustrial districts of the Silesia Province. The elevated concentrations of metals, which exceed the maximum permissible concentrations, on the surfaces of sports fields, playgrounds, and other recreational areas have been identified as a contributing factor to the non-dietary exposure to lead in preschool children (aged <6 years) and younger school children (aged <12 years). This exposure has been associated with a significant non-cancer health risk. In the scenario where children are exposed to the highest demonstrated metal concentrations, the risk among preschool children is very high, with a measured hazard quotient (HQ) of 3.12. Children’s dermal and inhalation exposure to heavy metals was much lower, indicating the particular role of non-nutritional exposure in postindustrial areas like Upper Silesia.
Significantly lower results in state examinations at the end of primary school education were observed among students in schools located in postindustrial districts of cities in the Silesia agglomeration, which may be due, among other things, to increased exposure of children to lead. It is necessary to continue monitoring the quality of the living environment of the society in Upper Silesia in terms of heavy metal pollution. Education to prevent exposure to heavy metals from local sources should also be provided to both children and adults.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics13050377/s1, Table S1: Characteristics of soil sampling sites (numbered).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D.; methodology, G.D., D.R., K.G.-P., A.P., and R.B.; software, G.D., M.Ć.-D., and A.N.; validation, M.Ć.-D. and A.N.; formal analysis, M.Ć.-D.; investigation, A.P.; resources, A.P. and M.Ć.-D.; data curation, J.F., D.R., K.G.-P., R.B., M.R., J.D., A.N., and W.O.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D., J.F., D.R., K.G.-P., R.B., M.R., J.D., A.P., and A.N.; writing—review and editing, G.D., M.Ć.-D., J.F., and W.O.-K.; visualization, M.Ć.-D., D.R., K.G.-P., A.N., and W.O.-K.; supervision, G.D. and M.Ć.-D.; project administration, G.D.; funding acquisition, G.D. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA IN KATOWICE, POLAND, grant numbers PCN-1-063/N/2/Z and BNW-1-162/N/4/Z.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADDAverage daily dose
BWBody weight
CECCentral Examination Commission
CFConversion Factor
DALYsDisability-adjusted life years
DECDistrict Examination Commission
d.m.Dry mass
HIHazard Index
HQHazard quotient
ICP-OESInductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy
IQIntelligence quotient
IRIngestion Rate by children
KTKatowice—Szopienice
KWKruskal–Wallis test
LOQLimit of quantification
MAXMaximum value
MCMetal Concentration
MEMedian
MINMinimum value
MPCMaximum permissible concentration
PCAPolish Centre for Accreditation
PSPiekary Śląskie—Orzeł Biały
PSCPrimary School
PTWIProvisional Tolerable Weekly Intake
RfDReference dose
SDStandard deviation
SWŚwiętochłowice—Lipiny
US EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
x ¯ Arithmetic mean

References

  1. Mitra, S.; Chakraborty, A.J.; Tareq, A.M.; Bin Emran, T.; Nainu, F.; Khusro, A.; Idris, A.M.; Khandaker, M.U.; Osman, H.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; et al. Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: Novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: Environmental persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abd Elnabi, M.K.A.; Elkaliny, N.E.; Elyazied, M.M.; Azab, S.H.; Elkhalifa, S.A.; Elmasry, S.; Mouhamed, M.S.; Shalamesh, E.M.; Alhorieny, N.A.; Elaty, A.E.A.; et al. Toxicity of Heavy Metals and Recent Advances in Their Removal: A Review. Toxics 2023, 11, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahmoud, N.; Al-Shahwani, D.; Al-Thani, H.; Isaifan, R.J. Risk assessment of the impact of heavy metals in urban traffic dust on human health. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.F.; Deng, C.B.; Sunahara, G.; Yin, J.; Xu, G.P.; Zhu, K.X. Risk assessments of heavy metals to children following non-dietary exposures and sugarcane consumption in a rural area in Southern China. Expo. Health 2020, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nabgha-E-Amen; Eqani, S.A.M.A.S.; Khuram, F.; Alamdar, A.; Tahir, A.; Shah, S.T.A.; Nasir, A.; Shen, H. Environmental exposure pathway analysis of trace elements and autism risk in Pakistani children population. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 712, 136471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ferguson, A.; Penney, R.; Solo-Gabriele, H. A Review of the Field on Children’s Exposure to Environmental Contaminants: A Risk Assessment Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. US EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final Report); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/052F; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=236252 (accessed on 29 October 2024).
  10. Shabanda, I.S.; Koki, I.B.; Low, K.H.; Zain, S.M.; Khor, S.M.; Abu Bakar, N.K. Daily exposure to toxic metals through urban road dust from industrial, commercial, heavy traffic, and residential areas in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: A health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 37193–37211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mendoza-Cano, O.; Lugo-Radillo, A.; Ríos-Silva, M.; Gonzalez-Curiel, I.E.; Bricio-Barrios, J.A.; Camacho-Delacruz, A.A.; Romo-García, M.F.; Cuevas-Arellano, H.B.; Quintanilla-Montoya, A.L.; Solano-Barajas, R.; et al. Exploring Heavy Metal and Metalloid Exposure in Children: A Pilot Biomonitoring Study near a Sugarcane Mill. Toxics 2024, 12, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Spychała, A.; Klita, W.; Gut, K. Non-dietary exposure of children and adolescents to heavy metals in soils of recreational areas in the Silesia region–Księża Góra in Radzionków. Environ. Med. 2019, 22, 65–70. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ayodeji-Fapohunda, G.N.; Ugwoha, E.; Nwaichi, E.O. Nutrition as A Therapeutic Intervention for Metal Toxicity. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2023, 42, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Medgyesi, D.N.; Brogan, J.M.; Sewell, D.K.; Creve-Coeur, J.P.; Kwong, L.H.; Baker, K.K. Where children play: Young child exposure to environmental hazards during play in public areas in a transitioning internally displaced persons community in Haiti. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, D.; Wang, P.; Zhao, F.J. Dietary cadmium exposure, risks to human health and mitigation strategies. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 53, 939–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pirzaman, A.T.; Ebrahimi, P.; Niknezhad, S.; Vahidi, T.; Hosseinzadeh, D.; Akrami, S.; Ashrafi, A.M.; Velayatimehr, M.M.; Hosseinzadeh, R.; Kazemi, S. Toxic mechanisms of cadmium and exposure as a risk factor for oral and gastrointestinal carcinomas. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2023, 42, 09603271231210262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shetty, S.S.; Sonkusare, S.; Naik, P.B.; Madhyastha, H. Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zheng, K.; Zeng, Z.; Tian, Q.; Huang, J.; Zhong, Q.; Huo, X. Epidemiological evidence for the effect of environmental heavy metal exposure on the immune system in children. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 868, 161691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ding, M.; Shi, S.; Qie, S.; Li, J.; Xi, X. Association between heavy metals exposure (cadmium, lead, arsenic, mercury) and child autistic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1169733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bhattacharyya, K.; Sen, D.; Laskar, P.; Saha, T.; Kundu, G.; Chaudhuri, A.G.; Ganguly, S. Pathophysiological effects of cadmium (II) on human health-a critical review. J. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2023, 34, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. WHO. Exposure to Lead: A Major Public Health Concern. Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/372293/9789240078130-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 29 October 2024).
  22. Raj, K.; Das, A.P. Lead pollution: Impact on environment and human health and approach for a sustainable solution. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2023, 5, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Larsen, B.; Sánchez-Triana, E. Global health burden and cost of lead exposure in children and adults: A health impact and economic modelling analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2023, 7, e831–e840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stiles, L.I.; Ferrao, K.; Mehta, K.J. Role of zinc in health and disease. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 24, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kiouri, D.P.; Tsoupra, E.; Peana, M.; Perlepes, S.P.; Stefanidou, M.E.; Chasapis, C.T. Multifunctional role of zinc in human health: An update. EXCLI J. 2023, 22, 809–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Skalny, A.V.; Rink, L.; Ajsuvakova, O.P.; Aschner, M.; Gritsenko, V.A.; Alekseenko, S.I.; Svistunov, A.A.; Petrakis, D.; Spandidos, D.A.; Aaseth, J.; et al. Zinc and respiratory tract infections: Perspectives for COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 46, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Piekut, A.; Gut, K.; Ćwieląg-Drabek, M.; Domagalska, J.; Marchwińska-Wyrwał, E. The relationship between children’s non-nutrient exposure to cadmium, lead and zinc and the location of recreational areas—Based on the Upper Silesia region case (Poland). Chemosphere 2019, 223, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Baranyai, N.; Lux, G. Upper Silesia: The revival of a traditional industrial region in Poland. Reg. Stat. 2015, 4, 126–144. Available online: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73962/1/MPRA_paper_73962.pdf (accessed on 29 October 2024). [CrossRef]
  29. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wieczorek, K.; Turek, A.; Szczesio, M.; Wolf, W.M. Comprehensive evaluation of metal pollution in urban soils of a post-industrial city—A case of Łódź, Poland. Molecules 2020, 25, 4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dulias, R. Physical Geography of the Silesia Upland; University of Silesia Publishing House: Katowice, Poland, 2018. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  32. Góralczyk, M.; Panasiuk, E.; Przybyła, M. Śląskie Voivodship statistically–History and Present; Central Statistical Office in Katowice: Katowice, Poland, 2018. Available online: https://katowice.stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/katowice/en/defaultaktualnosci/667/3/1/1/wojewodztwo_slaskie_statystycznie_3.pdf (accessed on 29 October 2024).
  33. Central Statistical Office. The Size and Demographic Structure of the Population and the Number of Buildings and Apartments in the Silesia Voivodeship—Final Results of the 2021 National Census; Central Statistical Office in Katowice: Katowice, Poland, 2022. Available online: https://katowice.stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/katowice/pl/defaultaktualnosci/1265/5/1/1/nsp_2021_-_wyniki_ostateczne.pdf (accessed on 29 October 2024). (In Polish)
  34. Mathiarasan, S.; Hüls, A. Impact of Environmental Injustice on Children’s Health—Interaction between Air Pollution and Socioeconomic Status. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lange, A.; Wadowska-Król, J. The history of the Szopienice lead epidemic and the contemporary problem of environmental pollution in Silesia. Aleksandra Lange talks to Doctor Jolanta Wadowska-Król. In From Theory and Practice of Teaching the Polish Language; University of Silesia Publishing House: Katowice, Poland, 2022; Volume 31, pp. 1–9. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wadowska-Król, J.; Sadzikowska, L. „I was just working”. Lucyna Sadzikowska talks to Jolanta Wadowska-Król. In Narrations of the Shoah; special issue, 17–40; University of Silesia Publishing House: Katowice, Poland, 2021. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liao, L.; Du, M.; Chen, Z. Environmental pollution and socioeconomic health inequality: Evidence from China. SCS 2023, 95, 104579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. WHO. Environmental Health Inequalities. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/environmental-health-inequalities (accessed on 20 October 2024).
  39. US EPA. Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment (EPA/100/B-19/001); Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  40. US EPA. Cadmium; CASRN 7440-43-9; Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  41. US EPA. Zinc and Compounds; CASRN 7440-66-6; Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  42. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives of the United Nations; World Health Organization (JECFA). Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants: Twenty-Ninth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; JECFA: Geneva, Switzerland, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  43. US EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook Chapter 5 (Update): Soil and Dust Ingestion; U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/384F; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  44. U.S. EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume 1 Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment); EPA/540/R/99/005, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  45. U.S. EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook (1997, Final Report); EPA/600/P-95/002F a-c; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection. Available online: https://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/ (accessed on 23 April 2025).
  47. U.S. EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook (2011 Edition) Chapter 6: Inhalation Rates; U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Central Examination Board. Eighth-Grade Examination. 2024. Available online: https://cke.gov.pl/egzamin-osmoklasisty/ (accessed on 10 September 2024). (In Polish)
  49. OKE. District Examination Board in Jaworzno. Results—Eighth-Grade Exam. 2024. Available online: https://oke.jaworzno.pl/www3/2020/03/19/wyniki-e8/ (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  50. The Online Legal Database. Regulation of the Minister of the Climate and Environment of 13 November 2024 amending the regulation on the method of conducting the assessment of land Surface contamination. J. Laws 2024, 1657. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20240001657/O/D20241657.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2025). (In Polish).
  51. Chiroma, T.M.; Ebewele, R.O.; Hymore, F.K. Comparative assessment of heavy metal levels in soil, vegetables and urban grey waste water used for irrigation in Yola and Kano. Int. Ref. J. Eng. Sci. 2014, 3, 01–09. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mohammadi, A.A.; Zarei, A.; Esmaeilzadeh, M.; Taghavi, M.; Yousefi, M.; Yousefi, Z.; Sedighi, F.; Javan, S. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution and Human Health Risks Assessment in Soils Around an Industrial Zone in Neyshabur, Iran. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 195, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hiller, E.; Mihaljevič, M.; Filová, L.; Lachká, L.; Jurkovič, Ľ.; Kulikova, T.; Fajčíková, K.; Šimurková, M.; Tatarková, V. Occurrence of selected trace metals and their oral bioaccessibility in urban soils of kindergartens and parks in Bratislava (Slovak Republic) as evaluated by simple in vitro digestion procedure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hu, B.; Wang, J.; Jin, B.; Li, Y.; Shi, Z. Assessment of the potential health risks of heavy metals in soils in a coastal industrial region of the Yangtze River Delta. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 19816–19826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Penteado, J.O.; Brum, R.L.; Ramires, P.F.; Garcia, E.M.; Dos Santos, M.; da Silva Júnior, F.M.R. Health risk assessment in urban parks soils contaminated by metals, Rio Grande city (Brazil) case study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nieć, J.; Baranowska, R.; Dziubanek, G.; Rogala, D. Children’s exposure to heavy metals in the soils of playgrounds, sports fields, sandpits and kindergarten grounds in the region of Upper Silesia. J. Ecol. Health 2013, 17, 55–62. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  57. Dziubanek, G.; Baranowska, R.; Oleksiuk, K. Heavy metals in the soils of Upper Silesia—A problem from the past or a present hazard? J. Ecol. Health 2012, 16, 169–176. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  58. Ćwieląg-Drabek, M.; Piekut, A.; Gut, K.; Grabowski, M. Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting past. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dziubanek, G.; Piekut, A.; Rusin, M.; Baranowska, R.; Hajok, I. Contamination of food crops grown on soils with elevated heavy metals content. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 118, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kicińska, A. Environmental risk related to presence and mobility of As, Cd and Tl in soils in the vicinity of a metallurgical plant—Long-term observations. Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Niezgoda, M.; Dziubanek, G.; Rogala, D.; Niesler, A. Health risks for consumers of forest ground cover produce contaminated with heavy metals. Toxics 2024, 12, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pelc, W.; Pawlas, N.; Dobrakowski, M.; Kasperczyk, S. Environmental and socioeconomic factors contributing to elevated blood lead levels in children from an industrial area of Upper Silesia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 2597–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhao, D.; Wang, J.-Y.; Tang, N.; Yin, D.-X.; Luo, J.; Xiang, P.; Juhasz, A.L.; Li, H.-B.; Ma, L.Q. Coupling bioavailability and stable isotope ratio to discern dietary and non-dietary contribution of metal exposure to residents in mining-impacted areas. Environ. Int. 2018, 120, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kyene, M.O.; Gbeddy, G.; Mensah, T.; Acheampong, C.; Kumi-Amoah, G.; Ketemepi, H.K.; Brimah, A.K.; Akyea-Larbi, K.; Darko, D.A. Bioaccessibility and children health risk assessment of soil-laden heavy metals from school playground and public parks in Accra, Ghana. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zartarian, V.G.; Xue, J.; Gibb-Snyder, E.; Frank, J.J.; Tornero-Velez, R.; Stanek, L.W. Children’s lead exposure in the U.S.: Application of a national-scale, probabilistic aggregate model with a focus on residential soil and wdust lead (Pb) scenarios. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 167132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Carrington, C.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Gibb, H.J.; Bolger, P.M. Global burden of intellectual disability resulting from dietary exposure to lead 2015. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nielsen, J.B.; Kristiansen, J. Remediation of soil from lead-contaminated kindergartens reduces the amount of lead adhering to children’s hands. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2005, 15, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Aleksander-Kwaterczak, U.; Rajca, A. Urban soil contamination with lead and cadmium in the playgrounds located near busy streets in Cracow (South Poland). Geol. Geophys. Environ. 2015, 41, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Parlak, M.; Tunçay, T.; Botsou, F. Heavy metals in soil and sand from playgrounds of Çanakkale City (Turkey), and related health risks for children. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Remy, S.; Hambach, R.; Van Sprundel, M.; Teughels, C.; Nawrot, T.S.; Buekers, J.; Cornelis, C.; Bruckers, L.; Schoeters, G. Intelligence gain and social cost savings attributable to environmental lead exposure reduction strategies since the year 2000 in Flanders, Belgium. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location of the study area.
Figure 1. Location of the study area.
Toxics 13 00377 g001
Table 1. Validation of the research method.
Table 1. Validation of the research method.
Characteristics of the MethodICP-OES
ElementsZnPbCd
Line [nm]206.201220.353228.802
Linearity—correlation coefficient:
R2 ≥ 0.995
0.9990.9990.999–1.000
Accuracy—RSD < 10% standards0.62–2.500.49–4.300.37–2.90
Repeatability—R < 20% 1.5–6.490.84–8.211.75–18.57
LOQ [mg/kg]3.2812.680.15
LOD [mg/kg]1.435.800.06
Recovery CRM
(Trace Metals—Silt Clay 1; CRM045-50G) [75–125%]
81–10592–11887–99
Table 2. The reference dose values used in the present study.
Table 2. The reference dose values used in the present study.
Heavy MetalsReference Dose (RfD)
Cadmium0.001 mg × kg−1 × day−1
Lead0.0035 mg × kg−1 × day−1
Zinc0.3 mg × kg−1 × day−1
Table 3. Exposure factors used in the study.
Table 3. Exposure factors used in the study.
Exposure Factors1 to <6 Years6 to <12 Years12–15 Years
Soil ingestion (mg/day)403010
Body weight (kg)18.6 kg *31.8 kg **56.8 kg ***
* recommended for 3 to <6 years. ** recommended for 6 to <11 years. *** recommended for 11 to <16 years.
Table 4. The exposure factors used in the dermal exposure assessment.
Table 4. The exposure factors used in the dermal exposure assessment.
FactorsPreschool
Children
Younger School ChildrenOlder School Children
Soil-to-skin adherence factor (mg/cm2) 0.04
Absorption factor of metals 0.001
Skin surface area available for contact (cm2/event) Boys: 0.728
Girls: 0.711
Booth gender:
1.16
Boys: 1.49
Girls: 1.48
Exposure frequency (events/year)365/year
Exposure duration (years)1 year
Body weight (kg) 18.631.856.8
Averaging time (days/years)365 days/year
Table 5. The exposure factors used in the inhalation exposure assessment.
Table 5. The exposure factors used in the inhalation exposure assessment.
FactorsPreschool ChildrenYounger School ChildrenOlder School Children
InhR (m3/d) 10.112.015.2
BW (kg) 18.631.856.8
Annual air concentration of heavy metals 20232024
Cd (ng/m3)
Min0.100.10
x ¯ 0.630.76
MAX1.714.72
Pb (µg/m3)
Min0.0010.003
x ¯ 0.0250.021
MAX0.0940.083
Table 6. Heavy metal content in soil samples from urban squares, playgrounds, gyms, sports fields, and primary school surroundings.
Table 6. Heavy metal content in soil samples from urban squares, playgrounds, gyms, sports fields, and primary school surroundings.
Recreational AreaN
Samples
Concentration of Toxic Elements (mg/kg d.m.)
CdPbZn
MINMAX x ¯ SDMEMINMAX x ¯ SDMEMINMAX x ¯ SDME
playground510.2330.407.107.593.517.504930.10379.33737.16160.8443.663528.37799.92722.34519.44
field/gym151.0640.258.919.997.4844.82952.77285.45242.64235.18123.874743.331166.611193.501107.36
other112.1427.9712.269.5910.2785.101594.04554.51470.24470.24353.924616.601800.211516.221454.10
all samples770.2340.258.198.474.867.504930.10386.07635.28196.8543.664743.331014.251016.36720.65
MPC 2.00200.00500.00
FAO/WHO 3.00100.00300.00
MPC—maximum permissible concentration. FAO/WHO—Maximum Permissible Limits of FAO/WHO. x ¯ —arithmetic mean. MIN—minimum value. MAX—maximum value. ME—median. SD—standard deviation.
Table 7. Content of heavy metals in soil samples in individual cities depending on the nature of the recreational area.
Table 7. Content of heavy metals in soil samples in individual cities depending on the nature of the recreational area.
Recreational
Area
LocationN
Samples
Concentration of Toxic Elements (mg/kg d.m.)
CdPbZn
MINMAX x ¯ SDMEMINMAX x ¯ SDMEMINMAX x ¯ SDME
playgroundKT240.4330.408.508.763.6119.864930.10513.671019.67181.2659.192462.85778.99656.69539.36
SW140.2313.964.094.302.327.50658.42161.70173.47121.0743.662028.63577.76555.69480.79
PS130.7222.737.757.625.3823.981334.00365.70383.56266.5350.433528.371077.80933.22773.72
field/gymKT91.0640.258.4612.593.5444.82952.77274.10293.97183.20123.874743.331007.441475.93373.01
SW36.3611.928.952.808.58196.85407.19280.97111.31238.881126.732022.951598.53449.991645.90
PS32.9017.4510.197.2710.21110.29561.17323.95226.36300.40338.931942.521212.23811.301355.22
otherKT25.2518.1811.729.1511.72221.75762.23491.99382.18491.99750.492192.231471.361019.471471.36
SW62.1424.518.118.534.2185.10850.20338.76353.59139.44353.924616.601380.19353.59139.44
PS311.5727.9720.948.4423.28735.111594.041027.68490.56753.911454.104159.052859.651355.592965.81
all samplesin the townKT350.4340.258.679.603.8119.864930.10450.83859.73199.8859.194743.33877.30931.08594.40
SW230.2324.515.775.733.567.50850.20223.45232.13139.2543.664616.60920.211007.75509.96
PS190.7227.9710.228.725.6023.981594.04463.63440.13282.3150.434159.051380.371137.301345.92
MPC 2.00200.00500.00
FAO/WHO 3.00100.00300.00
KT—Katowice—Szopienice, SW—Świętochłowice—Lipiny, PS—Piekary Śląskie—Orzeł Biały. MPC—maximum permissible concentration. FAO/WHO—Maximum Permissible Limits of FAO/WHO. x ¯ —arithmetic mean. MIN—minimum value. MAX—maximum value. ME—median. SD—standard deviation.
Table 8. Results of statistical analysis of heavy metal concentration variation in the tested soil samples depending on the sampling location.
Table 8. Results of statistical analysis of heavy metal concentration variation in the tested soil samples depending on the sampling location.
Dependencies Studiedp-Value
CadmiumLeadZincTest Used
KT vs. SW vs. PS0.260.130.12KW
playgrounds vs. field/gym vs. other0.100.140.05KW
playgrounds (KT vs. SW vs. PS)0.210.240.19KW
field/gym (KT vs. SW vs. PS)0.430.630.15KW
other (KT vs. SW vs. PS)0.130.160.33KW
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie. KW—Kruskal–Wallis test.
Table 9. The non-dietary exposure to heavy metals and health risks of preschool children.
Table 9. The non-dietary exposure to heavy metals and health risks of preschool children.
Metals/Samples from All Types of LocationsScenarioTotal SamplesKTSWPS
Dose (µg/kg/Day)HQDose (µg/kg/Day)HQDose (µg/kg/Day)HQDose (µg/kg/Day)HQ
CdS10.00050.00050.00090.00090.00050.00050.00150.0015
S20.01760.01760.01860.01860.01240.01240.02200.0220
S30.08660.08660.08660.08660.05270.05270.06020.0602
PbS10.01610.00460.04270.01220.01610.00460.05160.0147
S20.83030.23720.96950.27700.48050.13730.99710.2849
S310.60243.029210.60243.02921.82840.52243.42800.9794
ZnS10.09600.00030.12730.00040.09390.00030.10850.0004
S22.18120.00731.88670.00631.97890.00662.96850.0099
S310.20070.034010.20070.03409.92820.03318.94420.0298
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie.
Table 10. The non-dietary exposure to heavy metals and health risks of younger school children.
Table 10. The non-dietary exposure to heavy metals and health risks of younger school children.
Metals/Samples from All Types of
Locations
ScenarioTotal SamplesKTSWPS
Dose
(µg/kg/Day)
HQDose
(µg/kg/Day)
HQDose
(µg/kg/Day)
HQDose
(µg/kg/Day)
HQ
CdS10.00020.00020.00040.00040.00020.00020.00070.0007
S20.00770.00770.00820.00820.00540.00540.00960.0096
S30.03800.03800.03800.03800.02310.02310.02640.0264
PbS10.00710.00200.01870.00540.00710.00200.02260.0065
S20.36420.10410.42530.12150.21080.06020.43740.1250
S34.65101.32894.65101.32890.80210.22921.50380.4297
ZnS10.04210.00010.05580.00020.04120.00010.04760.0002
S20.95680.00320.82760.00280.86810.00291.30220.0043
S34.47480.01494.47480.01494.35530.01453.92360.0131
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie.
Table 11. The non-dietary exposure to heavy metals and health risks of older school children.
Table 11. The non-dietary exposure to heavy metals and health risks of older school children.
Metals/Samples from All Types of LocationsScenarioTotal SamplesKTSWPS
Dose
(µg/kg/Day)
HQDose (µg/kg/Day)HQDose (µg/kg/Day)HQDose
(µg/kg/Day)
HQ
CdS10.000040.000040.000080.000080.000040.000040.000130.00013
S20.001440.001440.001530.001530.001010.001010.001790.00179
S30.007090.007090.007090.007090.004320.004320.004920.00492
PbS10.00130.00040.00350.00100.00130.00040.00420.0012
S20.06800.01940.07940.02270.03930.01120.08160.0233
S30.86800.24800.86800.24800.14970.04280.28060.0802
ZnS10.007860.000030.010420.000030.007690.000030.008880.00003
S20.178570.000600.154450.000510.162010.000540.243020.00081
S30.835090.002780.835090.002780.812780.002710.732230.00244
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie.
Table 12. Total non-cancer health risk of preschool children non-dietary exposed to Cd, Pb, and Zn.
Table 12. Total non-cancer health risk of preschool children non-dietary exposed to Cd, Pb, and Zn.
LocationScenarioHazard Index (HI)
Total SamplesKTSWPS
samples from
all types of locations
S10.1130.0140.0050.017
S20.2620.3020.1560.317
S33.1503.1500.6081.069
playgroundS10.0050.0140.0050.017
S20.2540.3390.1120.256
S33.1203.1120.4490.894
field/gymS10.0310.0310.1430.076
S20.2030.1940.2030.230
S30.7060.7060.2900.396
otherS10.0590.1530.0590.487
S20.3800.3380.2350.697
S31.0730.5230.6081.069
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie.
Table 13. Total non-cancer health risk of younger school children non-dietary exposed to Cd, Pb, and Zn.
Table 13. Total non-cancer health risk of younger school children non-dietary exposed to Cd, Pb, and Zn.
LocationScenarioHazard Index (HI)
Total SamplesKTSWPS
samples from
all types of locations
S10.0490.0060.0020.007
S20.1150.1320.0690.139
S31.3821.3820.2670.469
playgroundS10.0020.0060.0020.007
S20.1110.1490.0490.109
S31.3691.3650.1970.392
field/gymS10.0130.0130.0630.034
S20.0890.0850.0890.101
S30.3100.3100.1270.174
otherS10.0260.2170.0260.214
S20.1670.4800.1030.306
S30.4710.7430.2670.469
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie.
Table 14. Total non-cancer health risk of older school children non-dietary exposed to Cd, Pb, and Zn.
Table 14. Total non-cancer health risk of older school children non-dietary exposed to Cd, Pb, and Zn.
LocationScenarioHazard Index (HI)
Total SamplesKTSWPS
samples from
all types of locations
S10.00920.00110.00040.0014
S20.02150.02470.01280.0259
S30.25790.25790.04980.0875
playgroundS10.00040.00110.00040.0014
S20.02080.02780.00920.0204
S30.25540.25480.03680.0732
field/gymS10.00250.00250.01170.0063
S20.01660.01590.01660.0188
S30.05780.05780.02380.0324
otherS10.00490.01250.00490.0399
S20.03110.02770.01930.0571
S30.08780.04280.04980.0875
KT—Katowice. SW—Świętochłowice. PS—Piekary Śląskie.
Table 15. Range of the daily dose of the dermal exposure to heavy metals of children living in the central part of the Upper Silesia region.
Table 15. Range of the daily dose of the dermal exposure to heavy metals of children living in the central part of the Upper Silesia region.
Cd
µg/kg/d
Pb
µg/kg/d
Zn
mg/kg/d
Preschool children3.5 × 10−10—6.3 × 10−81.15 × 10−8–7.72 × 10−66.83 × 10−11–7.43 × 10−9
Younger school children3.3 × 10−10–5.87 × 10−81.09 × 10−8–7.19 × 10−66.52 × 10−11–6.92 × 10−9
Older school children2.4 × 10−10–4.2 × 10−87.82 × 10−9–5.17 × 10−64.65 × 10−11–4.98 × 10−9
Table 16. Inhalation exposure to heavy metals of children from Upper Silesia in the years 2023 and 2024.
Table 16. Inhalation exposure to heavy metals of children from Upper Silesia in the years 2023 and 2024.
Cd ng/kg/dPb µg/kg/d
Years2023202420232024
Preschool children
Min0.0540.0540.00050.002
x ¯ 0.3440.4110.0140.011
MAX0.9282.5630.0510.045
Younger school children
Min0.0380.0380.00040.001
x ¯ 0.2390.2850.0090.008
MAX0.6451.7810.0360.031
Older school children
Min0.0270.0270.00030.001
x ¯ 0.1700.2020.0070.005
MAX0.4581.2630.0250.022
Table 17. Results of the eighth-grade exam in 2024, 2021, and 2019.
Table 17. Results of the eighth-grade exam in 2024, 2021, and 2019.
CitySubject Exam
Polish Language
x ¯ ± SD (ME) (%)
Mathematica
x ¯ ± SD (ME) (%)
English Language
x ¯ ± SD (ME) (%)
The Year 2024
Katowice (N = 55)61.71 ± 22.39 (67)57.31 ± 29.89 (60)73.9 ± 28.12 (28.1)
Katowice—Szopienice PSC No. 4251.52 ± 18.35 (53)31.36 ± 25.32 (20)45.04 ± 28.49 (33)
Świętochłowice (N = 7)50.44 ± 21.86 (52)40.23 ± 28.53 (32)58.69 ± 31.41 (58)
Świętochłowice—Lipiny PSC No. 1931.1 ± 14.5 (36)22.1 ± 16.64 (16)43.38 ± 29.5 (27)
Piekary Śląskie (N = 10)52.14 ± 22.71 (56)42.54 ± 27.84 (36)63.31 ± 30.53 (69)
Piekary Śląskie—Brzeziny PSC No. 1544.4 ± 25.23 (45.5)20.8 ± 17.87 (16)45.82 ± 31.74 (27)
Silesia Province58.00 *49.54 *66.48 *
Poland61 ± 21 (64)52 ± 29 (48)66 ± 30 (76)
the year 2021
Katowice (N = 51)64.79 ± 18.84 (69)51.17 ± 27.04 (48)72.37 ± 28.34 (85)
Katowice—Szopienice PSC No. 4242.94 ± 19.6 (43)29.67 ± 23.71 (24)42.94 ± 29.61 (28)
Świętochłowice (N = 8)57.31 ± 20.95 (60)40.38 ± 23.85 (36)59.93 ± 30.11 (64)
Świętochłowice—Lipiny PSC No. 1933.49 ± 17.86 (27)21.77 ± 13.12 (20)33.12 ± 24.33 (22)
Piekary Śląskie (N = 11)56.57 ± 19.95 (60)42.62 ± 24.27 (36)62.28 ± 29.59 (67)
Piekary Śląskie—Brzeziny PSC No. 1571.8 ± 15.06 (78)49.2 ± 21.91 (50)60.36 ± 30.83 (51)
Silesia Province60.57 *46.74 *66.98 *
Poland60 ± 19 (62)47 ± 26 (44)66 ± 29 (73)
the year 2019
Katowice (N = 59)67.68 ± 20.09 (72)48.69 ± 26.68 (47)67.01 ± 28.68 (77)
Katowice—Szopienice PSC No. 4247.06 *23.80 *41.45 *
Świętochłowice (N = 9)63.81 ± 19.84 (68)42.55 ± 24.74 (40)56.11 ± 29.12 (55)
Świętochłowice—Lipiny PSC No. 1942.13 *22.06 *25.67 *
Piekary Śląskie (N = 10)63.37 ± 20.64 (68)43.17 ± 26.07 (37)57.73 ± 28.43 (58)
Piekary Śląskie—Brzeziny PSC No. 1570.82 *50.24 *66.76 *
Silesia Province64.13 *44.74 *60.24 *
Poland63 ± 20 (66)45 ± 26 (40)59 ± 29 (60)
Source: Own elaboration based on [48,49]. x ¯ ± SD (ME)—arithmetic mean, standard deviation, median. PSC—primary school. * Databases do not include all sub-data (hence missing SD values).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dziubanek, G.; Furman, J.; Rogala, D.; Gut-Pietrasz, K.; Ćwieląg-Drabek, M.; Rusin, M.; Domagalska, J.; Piekut, A.; Baranowska, R.; Niesler, A.; et al. Health Risk for Non-Dietary Children’s Exposure to Heavy Metals in Postindustrial Areas in Upper Silesia, Poland. Toxics 2025, 13, 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050377

AMA Style

Dziubanek G, Furman J, Rogala D, Gut-Pietrasz K, Ćwieląg-Drabek M, Rusin M, Domagalska J, Piekut A, Baranowska R, Niesler A, et al. Health Risk for Non-Dietary Children’s Exposure to Heavy Metals in Postindustrial Areas in Upper Silesia, Poland. Toxics. 2025; 13(5):377. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dziubanek, Grzegorz, Joanna Furman, Danuta Rogala, Klaudia Gut-Pietrasz, Małgorzata Ćwieląg-Drabek, Monika Rusin, Joanna Domagalska, Agata Piekut, Renata Baranowska, Anna Niesler, and et al. 2025. "Health Risk for Non-Dietary Children’s Exposure to Heavy Metals in Postindustrial Areas in Upper Silesia, Poland" Toxics 13, no. 5: 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050377

APA Style

Dziubanek, G., Furman, J., Rogala, D., Gut-Pietrasz, K., Ćwieląg-Drabek, M., Rusin, M., Domagalska, J., Piekut, A., Baranowska, R., Niesler, A., & Osmala-Kurpiewska, W. (2025). Health Risk for Non-Dietary Children’s Exposure to Heavy Metals in Postindustrial Areas in Upper Silesia, Poland. Toxics, 13(5), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop