Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Chicken Meat Quality with User-Friendly Decontamination Wipes
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Emerging Contaminants (Sucralose) at Relevant Concentrations on Functional Properties in Fish Muscle of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Silent Revolution of Brewer’s Spent Grain: Meat/Food Innovations Through Circularity, Resource Recovery, and Nutritional Synergy—A Review

by
Daniela Tapia
1,2,
John Quiñones
2,3,
Ailin Martinez
2,4,
Erika Millahual
5,
Paulo Cezar Bastianello Campagnol
6,
Néstor Sepúlveda
2,3 and
Rommy Diaz
2,3,*
1
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Agroalimentarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
2
Centro de Tecnología e Innovación de la Carne CTI-Carne, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
3
Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
4
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Mención Biología Celular y Molecular Aplicada, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
5
Carrera de Biotecnología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
6
Department of Technology and Food Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105900, RS, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(19), 3389; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14193389
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 14 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 30 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Research in Brewing: Ingredients, Brewing and Quality Improvement)

Abstract

Brewer’s spent grain enhances nutritional quality by increasing fiber and plant-based proteins and reducing the need for synthetic additives. Technologies such as extrusion and fermentation transform BSG into functional ingredients that improve texture and stability. A significant increase in antioxidant capacity was observed in enriched foods; for example, in burgers, BSG improved fiber and protein levels, while decreasing fat and calories without negatively affecting sensory acceptance. In sausages, substituting 5% of pork with BSG achieved acceptance similar to traditional formulations, and hybrid formulations with BSG maintained improved protein content while preserving texture. However, concentrations above 20% may negatively impact sensory and technological properties, by introducing undesirable flavors or altering texture. Thus, BSG is a promising source of high-value functional ingredients that contribute to the circular economy and healthier, sustainable foods. Nonetheless, more in vivo studies are needed to validate the health benefits, understand the interactions in complex matrices, assess the shelf life, and evaluate the long-term sensory perception. The “Silent Revolution” of BSG requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates science, technology, sustainability, and effective communication with consumers.

1. Introduction

Brewer’s spent grain (BSG) accounts for approximately 85% of the total solid waste generated by the brewing industry. It is estimated that for every 100 L of beer produced, approximately 20 kg of fresh BSG or 14 kg on a dry weight basis is generated [1]. Owing to its high content of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and proteins, this by-product has been identified as a valuable resource for food industry applications [2,3]. However, its high moisture content (~70%) and rapid microbial degradation pose significant challenges for its handling and storage [1,4].
Despite these limitations, BSG emerges as a sustainable ingredient with significant economic potential. Recent studies have highlighted its successful incorporation into snacks and bakery products in response to the increasing demand for functional and environmentally friendly foods [5,6,7,8,9]. Concurrently, global demand for meat has increased substantially, driven by population growth and rising average incomes. Projections indicate an additional increase of 48 million tons by 2027, bringing the total to 367 million tons, primarily in developing countries [10]. This trend has fostered a transformation within the meat industry toward more convenient, ready-to-eat formats, adapting to emerging consumption patterns outside the home and fragmented and evolving consumer behaviors [11,12].
In the context of food production, the concept of a silent revolution refers to a gradual and often imperceptible process of social and productive transformation that despite lacking abrupt or confrontational shifts, ultimately reconfigures the agri-food system [13]. Alternative food initiatives—such as sustainable farming practices, short supply chains, and the valorization of by-products—can be understood as “seeds of social change.” These initiatives may not trigger immediate radical upheavals; however, through steady and incremental progress, they quietly reshape the established agri-food landscape. This ongoing evolution fosters a more sustainable and equitable food system, propelled by growing community engagement and a collective commitment.
Within this framework, the incorporation of functional ingredients into processed meat products has emerged as a key strategy to enhance their nutritional, technological, and safety properties [14,15]. These ingredients enable diversification and innovation of product offerings, addressing emerging consumer demands, particularly in terms of flavor, texture, and health benefits. Despite the appreciation for the sensory quality of meat, concerns remain regarding its fat and sodium content and the use of synthetic additives [16,17].
The valorization of agro-industrial by-products rich in bioactive compounds, such as BSG, is emerging as an effective approach to address global challenges related to food security, waste, and the circular economy. Owing to its versatile composition, BSG has garnered interest not only in the food industry but also in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, bioenergy, and nutraceuticals. This review aims to analyze valorization strategies for BSG, focusing on its application in meat products. The first section provides an updated overview of its composition and processing technologies, while the second section concentrates on its incorporation into meat products, hybrid formulations, and analogs, highlighting recent advances and the potential for industrial scale-up.

2. Origin and Generation of Brewer’s Spent Grain

2.1. Brewing Process, Yield, and Production

Beer has been an integral component of the human diet for millennia and currently represents the most widely consumed alcoholic beverage. Its production is predominantly driven by markets in Asia and the Americas, with China emerging as the leading consumer, accounting for approximately 42,035 kiloliters. This is followed by the United States (20,378 kiloliters), Brazil (14,932 kiloliters), Germany (7827 kiloliters), and the United Kingdom (4587 kiloliters). The global market is estimated to be valued at approximately USD 674 billion [18]. It is projected that this market will exceed USD 797 billion by the year 2032 [19].
Beer brewing involves the transformation of starch-rich grains, primarily barley, through a series of processes including malting, milling, mashing, and boiling. During mashing, malted grains are combined with water in a ratio of approximately 3:1 at temperatures between 60 °C and 65 °C. This temperature range activates enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of starches into fermentable sugars [20]. Subsequently, the wort is rinsed to recover residual sugars, resulting in a solid residue composed of husks, pericarp, and endosperm fragments. This by-product is known as brewer’s spent grain or BSG [21].
The clarified wort is then boiled with hops, which are responsible for the characteristic aroma and bitterness. Yeast is then inoculated to facilitate the fermentation, during which sugars are converted into ethanol, carbon dioxide, and secondary metabolites. After fermentation, the product undergoes clarification, maturation, and packaging.
The utilization of BSG can reduce waste management costs and create new revenue opportunities through alternative industrial applications [22]. It is noteworthy that disposal of BSG in landfills can produce up to 513 kg of CO2 equivalent per ton, while the treatment of its wastewater generates approximately 83 kg of CO2 equivalent per ton [23], highlighting the need for sustainable strategies for its reuse.

2.2. Chemical Composition

BSG is primarily composed of fragments of the husk, pericarp, and seed coat of barley, along with remnants of the endosperm and aleurone cell walls [24]. Its chemical composition varies depending on the type of barley, the brewing style, and the processing conditions. Among its most abundant components is total dietary fiber, which ranges from 30 to 70 g per 100 g. This includes insoluble fiber (2.9 to 8.5 g per 100 g) and soluble fiber (29 to 40 g per 100 g) [25]. Hemicellulose, primarily composed of arabinoxylans, ranges from 20 to 40 g per 100 g and is the predominant non-amylose polysaccharide in BSG. This is followed by cellulose (15–30 g per 100 g) and lignin (11–20 g per 100 g) [26,27,28,29].
The protein content ranged from 12 to 31 g per 100 g. The significant fractions identified include hordeins, glutelins, globulins, and albumins, with high concentrations of amino acids such as glutamine, proline, and leucine. However, their limited solubility may restrict certain technological applications [30,31]. The lipid or total fat content ranges from 3 to 13 g per 100 g [32,33]. Notably, triglycerides comprise approximately 55–67% of the lipid fraction, followed by free fatty acids (18–30%). The lipid profile is characterized by a high proportion of linoleic acid (18:2), palmitic acid (16:0), and oleic acid (18:1) [34,35,36].
Regarding mineral content, brewer’s spent grain contains approximately 6000 mg/kg of phosphorus, 3600 mg/kg of calcium, and 1900 mg/kg of magnesium [3]. In addition, BSG contains substantial amounts of phenolic compounds, such as ferulic acid (ranging from 1860 to 1948 mg/g) and p-coumaric acid (ranging from 565 to 794 mg/g), which contribute to its notable antioxidant capacity [37,38]. The starch content can vary between 3 and 37 g per 100 g, depending on the type of beer and malting conditions [39,40,41]. Additionally, β-glucan levels have been reported to range from 0.74% to 3.5% on a dry basis [42,43,44]. This is summarized in Figure 1.
The observed variations in the composition of BSG can be attributed to factors such as barley variety, the type of beer produced, and even the malting process. Several authors concur with this assertion; for example, Castro & Colpini [45] indicate that minimally modified malts tend to retain a higher amount of residual starch, reaching up to 26.64%. This can be advantageous for certain applications but may also limit the availability of fermentable sugars in the wort. Conversely, extended malting can reduce arabinoxylan levels by degrading cell wall components, enhancing nutrient accessibility. However, this may also lead to the loss of beneficial compounds in BSG, such as dietary fiber [46].

2.3. Thermal Processing and Drying

The composition of BSG positions it as a versatile and functional ingredient. However, its effective utilization necessitates overcoming technological challenges related to preservation, extraction of valuable compounds, and functional application. The stabilization of BSG is crucial for its storage and efficient use in food applications. Among the most common preservation technologies are various drying methods, which are essential for reducing microbial growth and enzymatic degradation [4].
Traditional drying methods include freeze drying, freezing, oven drying, superheated steam drying, and rotary drum drying [35,47,48,49,50]. Additionally, combinations of pressing and drying techniques, as well as chemical treatments with organic acids or potassium sorbate, have been employed to enhance preservation. Another technology is freeze drying, or lyophilization, which involves first freezing the BSG and then removing the water through sublimation. This process optimally preserves the nutritional and sensory quality of the product, allowing for the retention of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity [1,50,51,52]. However, freeze drying is an expensive process that requires significant energy input, limiting its feasibility for large-scale industrial applications [42,53,54].
Among the emerging technologies, infrared drying (IRD) stands out, patented by the ReGrained, Inc. group [55]. This method offers faster drying, greater energy efficiency, and produces products with a crispy texture, toasted aroma, and safe water activity levels [55,56]. Conversely, atomization converts BSG into a liquid suspension that is sprayed into a hot air chamber, resulting in a powdered product that can be produced rapidly [57,58]. This method offers advantages such as short drying times and good solubility of the resulting product. However, high temperatures can negatively impact heat-sensitive compounds, such as polyphenols and certain proteins, which tend to decrease in activity at temperatures above 165 °C [59].
When comparing oven drying with other methods such as freeze drying and atomization, it is evident that oven drying tends to be less effective in preserving the nutritional qualities of BSG. For instance, freeze drying better preserves sensitive compounds such as polyphenols and proteins, whereas oven drying can result in a significant reduction in antioxidant activity and phenolic content. Therefore, oven drying may be a preferable option when seeking a rapid, cost-effective, and easily accessible solution.

2.4. Technologies for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds

BSG is a valuable source of bioactive compounds with potential applications in the food, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical industries [60,61]. Its complex lignocellulosic matrix contains fibers, proteins, lipids, non-starch polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and micronutrients [62,63]. The efficient valorization of these constituents necessitates the application of suitable extraction technologies that can effectively liberate, preserve, and concentrate functional ingredients with antioxidant, prebiotic, anti-inflammatory, and other biological activities [64,65,66].
Various methodologies have been developed depending on the target compound, desired yield, chemical stability, and technological requirements of the final product [29,67,68,69,70]. The advantages and limitations of the technologies used in the extraction of BSG are shown in the Table 1. The following sections describe the main extraction strategies for the phenolic, protein, polysaccharide, lipid, and vitamin fractions of brewer’s spent grain.

2.4.1. Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites characterized by one or more aromatic rings bearing hydroxyl (-OH) groups. They are widely recognized for their antioxidant capacity and their beneficial effects on human health, including anti-inflammatory, anti-carcinogenic, and cardioprotective properties [71,72]. Their demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and anticancer activities justify their application in functional foods and nutraceuticals, highlighting their potential to contribute to disease prevention and health promotion [73,74].
BSG is a rich source of phenolic acids, particularly in bound form associated with cell wall structures. Ferulic, p-coumaric, and caffeic acids are notable among these. The extraction of these compounds is challenging because of the complex structure of the plant matrix, which limits their release and recovery [50,75]. To release these compounds, various techniques have been implemented, including conventional solid–liquid extraction, microwave-assisted or ultrasound-assisted extraction, and alkaline or enzymatic hydrolysis [75]. However, some methods present limitations: high temperatures can degrade heat-sensitive compounds, and prolonged contact times may reduce extraction efficiency [76]. In response, innovative techniques such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized hot water extraction, and ohmic heating have gained attention because of their efficiency and reduced impact on the structural integrity of the compounds [77,78,79].
The total phenolic content (TPC) in spent brewer’s grain (SBG) varies significantly depending on the extraction method and solvent used, reflecting the advantages and limitations of each approach. For example, Bonifácio-Lopes et al. [80] reported a TPC of 10.44 mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of BSG when using 80% ethanol and 11.57 mg/g with 60% ethanol, demonstrating the effectiveness of common alcohols as solvents. In addition, solid–liquid extraction (SLE) with the same ethanol concentrations yielded higher values (11.25 mg/g and 13.26 mg/g), showing an improvement in mass transfer and extraction of specific phenols compared to liquid-liquid extraction [80].
In contrast, alkaline hydrolysis has notable limitations, with yields ranging from 1.26 to 4.53 mg/g [81], indicating relatively low efficiency compared to other methods and restricting its large-scale application without further optimization of the process. In contrast, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) has shown significantly higher yields, reaching values between 15 and 20 mg/g [82], positioning it as an advantageous technique compared to conventional methods. However, its scalability is limited by equipment costs and challenges in achieving uniform heat distribution, which can affect reproducibility in industrial processes.
Among the most efficient technologies, subcritical water extraction (SCW) at 185 °C stands out for its high efficiency, with a CFT close to 33 mg/g [83], highlighting its ability to break down the BSG matrix and effectively release phenolic compounds. However, this technique requires equipment capable of operating at high temperatures and pressures, thereby increasing the operational complexity and associated costs. In contrast, aqueous extractions with a variable pH allow the influence of pH on phenol release to be studied; however, their advantages are not clearly defined, as the reported CFT values are very low (0.18–2.76 mg/g) [84], suggesting limited effectiveness and critical dependence on pH to obtain useful results.
Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as promising alternatives, in some cases outperforming traditional methods such as methanol–water extraction and are presented as sustainable and environmentally friendly options [85]. However, their main limitation is the need for industrial-scale validation to confirm their viability and scalability in commercial processes. Emerging and hybrid technologies offer advantages such as higher yields and better preservation of the functional activity of phenols, with the potential to combine the benefits of different approaches to improve efficiency, selectivity, and sustainability. However, the lack of validation or implementation at an industrial scale remains a major challenge, requiring further studies to ensure their commercial viability, safety, and sustainability on a large scale [84,85].
Various studies have explored innovative strategies to optimize the extraction of bioactive compounds to enhance the yield, selectivity, and sustainability of the process. Connolly et al. [84] employed aqueous extracts with varying pH levels, resulting in notably low TPC values ranging from 0.18 to 2.76 mg/g of BSG. Additionally, microwave-assisted extraction using deep eutectic solvents has shown promising results, surpassing traditional methods such as methanol–water extraction [86]. These green solvents represent a sustainable alternative; however, they still require validation at an industrial scale. In this context, the efficiency of phenolic compound recovery of BSG is critically dependent on the extraction method, operational conditions (solvent, temperature, time), and the nature of the target compound. Emerging and hybrid technologies offer significant advantages over conventional methods, enhancing both extraction yield and the preservation of functional activity.

2.4.2. Bioactive Proteins and Peptides

Proteins are essential macromolecules that are fundamental to cellular structure and function. They catalyze enzymatic reactions, regulate metabolic processes, and participate in immune defense mechanisms [86,87]. BSG contains a substantial proportion of proteins, with concentrations ranging from 12% to 30% on a dry basis, surpassing many other lignocellulosic agro-industrial residues [1]. This variability depends on the barley type, additives used, and brewing process employed during beer production [88].
The most abundant protein fractions in BSG are hordeins, glutenins, globulins, and albumins [89]. A predominance of amino acids, such as glutamine and proline, along with leucine, phenylalanine, valine, isoleucine, and threonine, have been observed in the protein extracts [30,62,90,91]. Special attention was given to lysine, an essential amino acid often limited in cereals, which is present in concentrations of approximately 3%. It fulfills about 80% of the daily human requirement [90].
The extraction and valorization of proteins from BSG focuses on their transformation into bioactive peptides through enzymatic hydrolysis. In particular, the use of proteases such as alcalase has significantly improved the solubility, stability, and antioxidant capacity of protein extracts [92,93]. The peptides produced exhibit significant functional properties, including antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antihyperglycemic, antihypertensive, and antimicrobial effects [94].
In the industrial sector, a notable example is the development of commercial products such as EverPro® by EverGrain (Wilmington, DE, USA). This product offers protein concentrates with a protein content of >85%. It is obtained through enzymatic hydrolysis followed by micro- and nanofiltration, producing highly soluble ingredients intended for use in functional beverages and foods [94,95]. Peptides derived from BSG have potential as functional ingredients in both human foods and animal supplements. However, additional studies, particularly in vivo experiments and clinical trials, are necessary to confirm their biological efficacy, safety, and bioaccessibility under actual physiological conditions [36,96].

2.4.3. Polysaccharides and Dietary Fiber

Non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs) are complex carbohydrates that are indigestible by human enzymes and are composed of long chains of monosaccharides linked by glycosidic bonds that are different from those found in starch. Their primary function is structural, forming part of the cell walls in plants, and they constitute a key component of dietary fiber [97,98,99]. BSG contains significant amounts of NSPs, notably β-glucan (1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan) and arabinoxylans. Both exhibit valuable techno-functional and nutritional properties, particularly because of their prebiotic effects and ability to modulate the gut microbiota.
Enzymatic hydrolysis is one of the most widely used techniques for the degradation of polysaccharides, such as cellulose and hemicellulose, present in BSG. Mussatto et al. [1] demonstrated that the use of specific enzymes, such as cellulases and xylanases, allows for the efficient release of fermentable sugars and soluble dietary fiber. This technique is highly selective and does not generate toxic by-products, making it ideal for applications in the food and biofuel industries.
Physical and chemical pretreatments are essential for modifying the lignocellulosic structure of CSB and facilitating polysaccharide extraction. For example, microwave-assisted pretreatment (MAE) has shown promising results in this regard. Alkaline pretreatment using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) is effective in reducing lignin content and improving the accessibility of polysaccharides, as highlighted by [100]. Although this method is economical, it generates corrosive by-products.
Subcritical water extraction (SCW) is an emerging technology that operates at high temperatures and pressures to break down the lignocellulosic matrix of the BSG. Kumar et al. [57] reported significant yields of polysaccharides and dietary fiber, highlighting its efficiency in releasing bioactive compounds. However, this technique requires specialized equipment and incurs high operating costs, which limit its large-scale application.
Microbial fermentation is a sustainable alternative for BSG processing. Microorganisms, such as fungi and bacteria, can degrade polysaccharides and produce compounds of interest, such as bioethanol, organic acids, and enzymes. Aliyu & Bala [47] showed that this technique is viable to produce biofuels and bioproducts, although its efficiency depends on the culture conditions and the microbial strain used.
Deep eutectic solvents (DES) have emerged as green and sustainable alternatives for extracting polysaccharides and dietary fiber from BSG. Procentese et al. [101] have shown that these solvents improve the solubility and selectivity of the compounds of interest, in some cases outperforming traditional methods such as methanol–water extraction. However, their implementation on an industrial scale requires validation and parameter optimization.
Finally, emerging and hybrid technologies, notably as the combination of ultrasound with enzymes or the integration of physical and biological processes, have shown significant advantages in terms of efficiency and sustainability of extraction. Moreira et al. [82] have demonstrated that ultrasound improves the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis, thereby reducing processing time and increasing sugar yield.
Overall, the processing of polysaccharides and dietary fiber from BSG has advanced significantly owing to the development of various technologies. While methods such as enzymatic hydrolysis and chemical pretreatments are widely used, emerging techniques such as SCW and DESs offer advantages in terms of sustainability and efficiency. However, industrial-scale implementation remains a challenge, particularly in terms of cost and technical validation. Future studies should focus on optimizing these processes to maximize their commercial viability and contribute to a circular economy.
β-Glucans
The β-glucans in BSG are composed of β-D-glucopyranose residues linked primarily by β (1→4) bonds, which are interrupted by β (1→3) linkages. This structural arrangement directly influences their solubility and viscosity [102,103]. This polysaccharide has been associated with beneficial metabolic effects, such as the reduction in postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses and has been validated by regulatory agencies such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [104,105,106].
The functional activity of β-glucan depends on its molecular weight (MW) and degree of polymerization (DP). It has been reported that MWs exceeding 50 kDa are more effective in exerting hypocholesterolemic and prebiotic effects [94,95]. Recently, Kobelev et al. [104] employed enzymatic extraction using cellulases and xylanases, resulting in β-glucans and arabinoxylans with molecular weights between 200 and 300 kDa and purity levels exceeding 85%, making them suitable for nutraceutical applications. However, the scalability of this method is limited by the high cost of enzymes and the need for precise control over operational parameters.
In contrast, Steiner et al. [43] applied a simple hydrothermal treatment (80–100 °C for 1–3 h) and achieved high yields (~20%) but resulted in lower molecular weights (50–100 kDa), which are more suitable for basic, low-cost food products. Jantason et al. [42] combined hot water extraction with enzymatic treatment, optimizing the conditions using response surface methodology (RSM). This approach achieved an extraction yield of 18%, with molecular weights between 150 and 250 kDa and purity levels exceeding 90%. Thus, this strategy represents an optimal balance between product quality and technical feasibility.
From an analytical perspective, Zielke et al. [44] characterized β-glucans from BSG using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) and observed their association with proteins, which influences their solubility and rheological behavior. These findings are crucial for optimizing the extraction conditions and formulation strategies for functional ingredients.
Arabinoxylans
Arabinoxylans (AX), composed of xylose and arabinose, are dietary fibers found in BSG. Their structure features a β-(1→4)-xylopyranose backbone with arabinofuranose side chains that can be esterified with ferulic acid. The structural variability depends on the plant source and extraction method [107,108,109,110]. The recovery of AX from BSG is challenging because of its association with cellulose microfibrils via hydrogen bonds and diferulic acid cross-links. Enzymatic hydrolysis alone is often insufficient to disrupt these bonds, limiting the extraction efficiency [109].
The potential of BSG as a source of AX has been extensively explored because of its industrial viability and functional benefits. Recent studies have demonstrated that AX from BSG can modulate gut microbiota, promote beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and increase short-chain fatty acid production [108,111]. These properties highlight AX’s role as a prebiotic ingredient, although further in vivo validation in humans is necessary.
Several innovative extraction techniques have been developed. Methods like particle size reduction, enzymatic treatment, solid-state fermentation, and hydrothermal processes have been shown to enhance AX solubility, yield, and functional properties, including antioxidant capacity [107,110,112,113]. These approaches are scalable but require optimization to reduce costs and processing time. Chemical modifications, such as carboxymethylation, improve functional traits like emulsification capacity, broadening industrial applications [104,108,109,111]. Physical treatments, including ultrasonication and nixtamalization, have achieved recovery rates exceeding 70%, offering practical options for large-scale implementation [108,109,111].
The valorizing of BSG as a source of AX involves a spectrum of strategies tailored to different objectives—ranging from cost-effective hydrothermal methods to high-value enzymatic or chemical modifications. Integrating these processes within a circular economy framework requires ongoing optimization, health impact assessments, and considerations of environmental and economic sustainability. Future research should focus on in vivo validation, industrial scaling, and life cycle analysis to fully realize the potential of AX from BSG in food and nutraceutical applications.

2.4.4. Lipids

Recent research has placed a particular emphasis on the recovery of high-value lipid fractions from BSG. This by-product contains a complex matrix of neutral and polar lipids, whose structural and bioactive properties may offer significant nutritional and technological advantages in advanced formulations [108].
Conventional solid–liquid extraction techniques, based on organic solvents of varying polarity, remain the initial approach for isolating triacylglycerols, phospholipids, and free fatty acids. Additionally, alkaline hydrolysis protocols and enzymatic processes have demonstrated effectiveness in releasing lipid fractions bound to proteinaceous or fibrous matrices [109]. However, the selectivity towards specific compounds and the energy efficiency of these methods necessitate optimization to ensure the preservation of the functional integrity of the extracted lipids.
To overcome these limitations, advanced extraction methods have been incorporated, including supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) using CO2, microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasound-assisted extraction. These technologies facilitate the disruption of cellular structures and enhance lipid solubilization, resulting in reduced solvent consumption and shorter processing times. Specifically, CO2-based SFE, optimized at 313 K and 35 MPa on ground BSG, has demonstrated not only maximum yield in recovering neutral fractions but also the preservation of sensitive polyunsaturated fatty acids [75,111].
BSG exhibits an approximate lipid content of 10–12%, comprising a mixture of triacylglycerols, phospholipids, and free fatty acids. Among these, linoleic and oleic acids are particularly prominent, along with small proportions of short-chain fatty acids that may impart emulsifying and nutraceutical properties to the extracts. The prior application of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has also been described as an effective pretreatment, enhancing subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and facilitating the production of low-molecular-weight lipids with specific functional activities [83,114].
The lipid fractions recovered from brewer’s spent grain (BSG) offer a diverse range of applications in high-value industries. In the food sector, they serve as emulsifying ingredients or sources of essential fatty acids; in cosmetics, their emollient and antioxidant properties are exploited; and in pharmaceutical formulations, they can be incorporated as lipid carriers for active compounds. Additionally, their use in packaging materials or biodegradable coatings introduces new opportunities toward circular and sustainable processing approaches [114].
Recent research has explored various techniques for extracting valuable compounds from BSG, a significant by-product of the brewing industry. Conventional methods include solid–liquid extraction using organic solvents, as well as alkaline and enzymatic hydrolysis processes [109]. Advanced techniques such as pressurized fluid extraction, supercritical CO2 extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasound-assisted extraction have demonstrated significant promise in enhancing extraction yields and process efficiency [75,109]. Supercritical CO2 extraction, optimized at 313 K and 35 MPa using ground BSG, has demonstrated economic feasibility [111].

2.4.5. Vitamins and Minerals

Vitamins, essential organic compounds, function as coenzymes in critical metabolic processes, including energy production, tissue synthesis, and antioxidant defense mechanisms [115]. Recent studies have highlighted cereals and their derivatives, such as BSG, as promising sources of B-complex micronutrients. Hassani et al. [116] identified that germinated grains significantly increase the concentration of water-soluble vitamins, an effect attributed to enzymatic activation during germination. For example, in beer, Hucker et al. [117] reported variations in thiamine (B1: 0.02–0.15 mg/L) and riboflavin (B2: 0.03–0.12 mg/L), depending on the raw materials and malting conditions.
According to Diósi and Nagy [118], for every 100 g of dry BSG, there are between 0.8 and 1.2 mg of B vitamins (on a dry basis), with notable levels of thiamine (B1: 0.4 mg/100 g) and riboflavin (B2: 0.3 mg/100 g), which are essential for energy metabolism and neuronal function. However, fat-soluble vitamins such as A, D, and E are present in marginal concentrations (<0.3 mg/100 g), limiting their direct nutritional contribution. In contrast, van Bokhorst-van de Veen et al. [119] demonstrated that fermentation with Propionibacterium freudenreichii can increase vitamin B12 content in BSG from 0.2 µg/100 g (raw) to 2.8 µg/100 g, along with a 15% improvement in protein digestibility and a 40% reduction in phytates, thus enhancing its nutritional value.
The bioaccessibility of vitamins varies dramatically depending on the food matrix. Farcaș et al. [63] reported in vitro bioavailability values of 72.45% for thiamine, compared to 16.47% for pyridoxine (B6), underscoring the importance of optimizing extraction methods. Techniques such as enzymatic hydrolysis (using xylanases and cellulases), ultrasound, and supercritical fluids have demonstrated effectiveness in releasing bioactive compounds, with critical parameters including temperature (37–60 °C), pH (4.0–6.5), and liquid-to-solid ratios (10:1–20:1) [114,120]. Additionally, extracts obtained from BSG using gentle methods contain non-cytotoxic phenolic compounds (e.g., catechin: 12 mg/g; vanillin: 0.8 mg/g) at concentrations ≤1 mg/mL, suitable for functional applications [80].
Therefore, the extraction methodologies or techniques employed to obtain various bioactive compounds significantly influence the retention of micronutrients. Afify et al. [121] observed a reduction of 40–60% in total phenolics, flavonoids, and vitamin E following grain maceration. Conversely, Hassani et al. [116] highlighted that higher degrees of maceration (35–41%) can increase the content of riboflavin (B2) and prebiotic arabinoxylans, suggesting a balance between thermal losses and enzymatic activation.

3. Use of BSG in Food Production

The research has encompassed a wide range of food products, exploring various methods of utilizing BSG with diverse objectives. The incorporation of BSG into bread is a major focus due to its high global consumption. Studies primarily aim to enhance the nutritional value, particularly by increasing fiber and zinc content, as well as improving the sustainability of baked goods [7]. Various methods have been explored for incorporating BSG, such as partial substitution of flour with dried BSG flour [122,123], as shown in Figure 2.
The addition of BSG in the form of a fermenting agent has also been investigated as a method to enhance its functional properties and facilitate its integration into various food products [124], or direct inclusion into the dough. The studied incorporation levels vary considerably, ranging from low levels of 2–8% [123] and up to 10% substitution aimed at enhancing nutritional content and overall product quality [125], and at higher levels, up to 20% in steamed bread or 40% and 60% in chocolate cakes, to achieve a greater nutritional impact [7,122]. Additionally, the impact of BSG derived from different styles of craft beer and non-conventional brewing processes has been evaluated regarding the sensory properties, composition, and nutritional value of bread [126,127,128].
In pasta products, BSG is primarily used to enhance the protein and fiber content, while also incorporating antioxidants and potentially reducing the glycemic index. Various forms of BSG have been investigated, including direct BSG incorporation, to evaluate their effects on product quality and nutritional profile [5,129,130], fermented BSG [129], BSG bioprocessed [131], derived from BSG, EverVita Fiber (EVF), and EverVita Pro (EVP) were developed by Anheuser-Busch InBev (Leuven, Belgium), where EVF is BSG-enhanced to have a higher fiber content, while EVP is enriched to have a higher protein concentration. Ingredients derived from brewer’s spent grain (BSG) are enriched in fiber (EVF) or protein (EVP) [132]. The levels of direct incorporation of BSG in noodles and pasta vary, with percentages of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% in noodles [5], and 5% and 10% in general pasta [130] having been studied. Specific concentrations, such as 5 g and 10 g of BSG per 100 g of semolina, have been used in buckwheat pasta (Neylon et al. 2021), as well as a 10% inclusion of barley-derived BSG in pasta formulations [133].
The incorporation of BSG into cookies aimed to improve their physicochemical, nutritional, and sensory profiles. Studies have investigated how the composition and percentage of BSG influence chemical and sensory properties, with substitution levels of flour ranging from 30% to 40% [6]. Additionally, the effects of partial flour substitution on physical, chemical, and sensory properties at levels up to 75% have been investigated [134]. Furthermore, the impact on postprandial glycemic response in individuals with metabolic syndrome has been evaluated using a 30% substitution of wheat flour with BSG treated by autoclaving or fermentation [135]. The use of fermented solid-state BSG has also been studied in biscuits at levels of 15% and 30% to improve the nutritional profile, antioxidant properties, and digestibility [136]. In bread biscuits, a 30% partial replacement of flour with BSG was explored, enriched with oats, aiming to valorize the by-product and develop functional foods [128].
In this context, the fortification of muffins with BSG primarily aims to enhance their nutritional and functional properties, such as antioxidant and antidiabetic activities, as well as increasing fiber and protein content. Different forms of BSG are employed, including hydrolyzed BSG protein at levels of 2%, 4%, and 6% [52], enzymatically hydrolyzed BSG incorporated as a substitution in the mixture at 5%, 10%, and 15% [137], or dried BSG flours replacing part of the flour at 10%, 15%, and 20% [8].
The incorporation levels of BSG vary depending on the formulation, with studied percentages of 8.5%, 12.7%, and 21.2% in honey-based bars, and 3.9%, 7.7%, and 15.5% in chocolate-based bars [138]. Additionally, malt bagasse has been used at levels of 19% and 24% to develop high-fiber bars [139]. Conversely, studies have suggested that increasing the concentration of BSG in flour blends leads to significant improvements in protein content, dietary fiber, lipids, and ash levels [140]. Specifically, incorporating BSG at levels ranging from 5% to 40% in formulations such as bread, muffins, cookies, and pasta results in increased content of proteins (2–25%), ash (2.5–65%), and dietary fiber.
Regarding protein content, although a general increase is observed with BSG addition, specific studies have revealed variable effects depending on the inclusion level and product type [140]. Some research found no significant differences in protein content at up to 10% BSG in bread, breadsticks, and pizza preparation [141], 15% in muffins [137], 30% in bread [9], and 5–20% in pasta formulations [142]. However, significant differences were reported when inclusion exceeded 10% in other studies [8,140,143].
The particle size of BSG flour also plays a critical role in protein content. Czubaszek et al. [140] reported that cookies prepared with medium and coarse particles (425–850 µm) contained lower protein levels (13–21%) compared to those made with fine flour (212–425 µm). In contrast, Öztürk et al. [144] obtained a protein content of 31% for cookies made with fine flour. Similarly, BSG flour exhibited a decrease in protein content from 28.2% at a particle size of 0.21 mm to 22.7% at 0.60 mm [145]. The influence of particle size on protein content remains underexplored.
The addition of BSG has an even more pronounced impact on dietary fiber content [140]. Studies have shown that adding 15–20% BSG in rye or wheat bread and pasta increased fiber content by 4 to 5.5 times [131,140,146]. In the same way, Fărcaş et al. [35] found that incorporating 5% BSG into wheat bread doubled the dietary fiber, while a 20% addition increased it fivefold. Comparable improvements in fiber content have been observed in muffins [8,137], bread [140,146], and pasta formulations [142,147]. Fermentation and enzymatic treatments further enhance fiber content [129,148]. The addition of spray-dried fermented BSG with LAB increased fiber from 2 to 6.5 g/100 g [129].
Similarly, enzymatic hydrolysis of BSG-based bread resulted in fiber levels 2.5 times higher compared to control bread [148]. Microbial enzymes and enzyme blends present in fermented BSG may contribute to the solubilization of dietary fiber, especially arabinoxylans [129]. As with protein, BSG particle size influences fiber levels in enriched products; cookies made with coarser BSG particles (425–850 µm) showed higher total dietary fiber than those with fine (<212 µm) or medium (212–425 µm) sizes [144]. Fine BSG particles contain less fiber than medium or coarse sizes [144]. Additionally, the addition and modification of fiber significantly affect food texture, stability, and water retention during processing, along with health benefits such as reduced digestibility and improved gut health [144,149,150].
In another context, it has been reported that incorporating BSG into various food formulations results in notable enhancements in antioxidant profiles and phenolic compound content. Specifically, pasta, cookies, muffins, and beverages enriched with BSG demonstrated increases in total phenolic content, total flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity measured through assays such as ABTS and DPPH.
For example, in muffins, the addition of 20% BSG flour increased total phenolics by 76% and enhanced antioxidant activity (RSA: 185%) [8]. In cookies, using 30% BSG raised antioxidant activity by 28% (ABTS) and increased DPPH radical scavenging capacity sevenfold [143], while another study noted a fourfold increase in TPC and a 19% rise in antioxidant activity [151]. In pasta, incorporating 20% BSG improved overall antioxidant capacity by approximately 13% [142]. Bioprocessed BSG (FBSG, 15%) stood out with a 70% increase in TPC and improvements of 23–40% in antioxidant activity [131]. Lastly, extruded snacks containing 40% BSG showed dramatic increases: 4–7 times in TPC, 19 times in DPPH radical scavenging, and 5 times in FRAP assay results [152]. These findings underscore the potential of BSG as a functional ingredient to enrich foods with antioxidant and nutraceutical properties.
Specifically, significant increases in particular phenolic acids have been observed. Cookies enriched with up to 30% BSG showed notable elevations in phenolic acids such as p-coumaric acid (from undetectable levels to 709.3 µg/g) and ferulic acid (from 419.2 to 3054.4 µg/g) [143]. Similar increases in ferulic acid content were reported in bioprocessed bread with FBSG, rising from 1.32 to 2.60 mg/100 g [153]. The main factor contributing to the high soluble ferulic acid levels in these breads was enzymatic bioprocessing; enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of BSG, along with the presence of acids such as p-coumaric, ferulic, sinapic, and caffeic acid, as well as bioactive peptides, contributed to increased phenolic activity and antioxidant capacity [8,131,151].
Ferulic acid is particularly significant due to its antioxidant activity comparable to vitamin C, which aids in food preservation by preventing oxidation [151]. As evidenced in these studies, particle size notably influences the final composition of enriched products. Finer particles favor higher protein content [145,154], whereas coarser particles optimize dietary fiber content [154]. This highlights the importance of developing milling techniques to adjust granulometry for maximizing specific nutrients based on the type of food product.
Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have proven effective tools for increasing the solubilization of bioactive compounds such as arabinoxylans and phenolic acids [129,148]. However, scaling these processes to industrial levels presents challenges, particularly regarding costs, control of fermentation parameters, and maintaining functional properties in final products.
Despite the nutritional and functional benefits of BSG, its inclusion in food products can present sensory and technological challenges, especially when used in concentrations above 20%. One of the main problems is the alteration of texture and stability, as BSG can affect the structure of breadcrumbs, reduce their volume, and modify their alveolar architecture [155]. In addition, its water retention capacity can negatively influence the process stability, particularly in baked and extruded products. In terms of organoleptic profile, the incorporation of WBS can introduce bitter or earthy flavors, as well as color changes, which could limit its acceptance by consumers [149,156,157]. To mitigate these undesirable effects, strategies such as encapsulation of active compounds or mixing with other ingredients have been proposed, which could improve the sensory acceptance of BSG-enriched products, including bread.
In addition to these challenges, the consumption of SGF-fortified foods offers significant health benefits. First, the insoluble fiber present in the SGF acts as a prebiotic, promoting colonic fermentation and modulating the gut microbiota, which contributes to improved digestive health. A recent clinical study evaluated the effect of cookies formulated with BSG on gastrointestinal well-being, demonstrating that these cookies are not only safe and well-tolerated but also significantly improve intestinal health compared to commercial cookies [69]. Second, BSG can help regulate postprandial glycemic responses. A clinical study with 40 normoglycemic subjects demonstrated that a dietary supplement based on BSG extract, rich in soluble dietary fiber and bioaccessible ferulic acid, restored baseline blood glucose and insulin levels at 120 min, thus reducing postprandial increases in subjects with mild insulin resistance [158]. In addition, BSG-enriched cookies showed higher nutritional values than commercial wheat-based cookies, suggesting that they may be an effective option for regulating the glycemic response in individuals with metabolic syndrome [144].
However, although the prebiotic and antioxidant effects of BSG are promising, the clinical evidence remains limited. In vivo studies and controlled trials are essential to confirm its impact on metabolic health and gut microbiota. The interactions between BSG and other food ingredients during processing (flours, emulsifiers) have not been thoroughly explored, particularly regarding their effects on texture, stability, and nutrient release. While BSG is an abundant and cost-effective by-product, implementing bioprocessing and milling techniques at an industrial scale requires comprehensive feasibility analyses considering economic viability and environmental sustainability. The development of BSG-enriched products offers an opportunity to promote sustainability within the food industry by valorizing waste by-products of brewing and enhancing nutritional profiles. Nonetheless, the successful integration of this functional ingredient depends on a balanced approach that combines technological innovation, sensory optimization, and scientific validation of health benefits.

4. Development of Meat Products Incorporating BSG

The meat industry is increasingly interested in integrating functional ingredients to enhance the nutritional profile of its products. In this context, BSG has emerged as a promising additive, notable for its high fiber and protein content. For example, Kim et al. [159] evaluated the effect of dietary fiber extracts from BSG on the quality characteristics of chicken burgers. After extraction, the total fiber content of the extracts increased from 58.11% to 68.57%, and these extracts were incorporated into the burgers at concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4%. The results indicated that a 3% dietary fiber extract from BSG could serve as an effective source of fiber to improve the quality properties of chicken burgers.
In another study, the stability of smoked sausages was evaluated over a storage period of 7 and 15 days, along with their physicochemical and microbiological characteristics, using different concentrations of brewer’s spent grain (1%, 3%, 5%, and 6% w/w). The results showed that storage time had a significant impact on the physicochemical and microbiological properties of the smoked sausages. Among the samples tested, the smoked sausage containing a mixture of 3% BSG and 8% fungi was the most preferred by the panelists [160].
A preliminary study conducted by Fogarasi et al. [161] evaluated the substitution of different levels of pork meat with brewer’s spent grain (5%, 10%, 15%) in smoked sausages to assess consumer acceptability compared to 100% pork sausages. The results indicated that sausages containing 5% BSG received a similar level of acceptance as the control, which was made solely with pork meat. Saraiva et al. [162] assessed the antioxidant activity, physicochemical properties, sensory attributes, and cooking performance of burgers enriched with BSG. The inclusion of BSG increased the fiber and protein content while reducing fat and caloric value. Although the hardness and chewiness values rose, the antioxidant activity of the burgers improved significantly. Importantly, consumers did not perceive statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between formulations with and without BSG, indicating that the product was well accepted.
A study by Campos et al. [163] evaluated the substitution of pork meat with BSG and concluded that this did not significantly alter texture properties, nor did it prevent oxidation in the sausage or exhibit antimicrobial activity. However, an increase in dietary fiber and protein content was observed, contributing to an improved nutritional profile of the product. The total phenolic compounds were also determined, which may indicate a potential antioxidant capacity, inferred from the measured phenolic content.
As previously reviewed, BSG has been highlighted as a rich source of dietary fiber, proteins, and bioactive compounds across a variety of food products. Particularly in the context of meat products, incorporating BSG into their development contributes to creating healthier and more sustainable foods. For example, in plant-based products, the partial substitution of meat with BSG, broccoli, and insects in the production of hybrid sausages has achieved a significant increase in protein content, while maintaining a texture similar to that of traditional sausages and ensuring sensory acceptance [164]. This demonstrates that BSG can be used in hybrid formulations to balance nutritional quality and functionality. Similarly, in products such as burgers and frankfurter-type sausages, replacing fat with BSG has enabled caloric reduction, increased fiber content, and improvements in textural parameters without compromising sensory quality [162,165] (Table 2). These findings are especially relevant for the development of low-fat meat products aligned with current consumer demands for health and sustainability.
Brewer’s spent grain not only enriches products nutritionally but also enhances key technological properties such as water retention capacity (WRC) and texture. In chicken burgers, the addition of BSG fiber increased moisture retention and resulted in a firmer texture, especially during baking in a convection oven [159]. In low-fat chicken sausages, BSG fiber also contributed to improved cohesion and a better textural profile [167]. Furthermore, incorporating BSG into traditional sausages at concentrations of 2–4% helped maintain physicochemical stability and extended shelf life up to 21 days, highlighting its potential as a stabilizing agent [156].
The inclusion of BSG in meat analogs and extruded snacks has shown significant progress, as it improves the fibrous texture and nutritional profile, making these products more similar to meat in terms of cohesion and bite [168,169]. Likewise, blending BSG with flours derived from poultry meat enabled the development of high-protein, high-fiber snacks with good sensory acceptance, demonstrating its versatility in high-temperature systems [155].
Studies by Curutchet et al. [170] emphasize that communicating the environmental benefits of using BSG in enriched products can significantly increase consumer acceptance. The willingness to purchase fiber-enriched burgers made from BSG extracts varied considerably depending on label information and brand. All consumers showed interest in buying these products if they were from a leading brand; additionally, 85% expressed they would also purchase them if the brand was artisanal. While brand influence significantly affected purchase intention, the results also reveal a segment of consumers with a positive attitude towards the concept of a “sustainable burger,” which the food industry could leverage to position such products [170].
Partial replacement of meat or fat with BSG, as in hybrid sausages and frankfurters [164,165], helps reduce the carbon footprint associated with animal production—a particularly relevant action given that the meat industry is one of the major greenhouse gas emitters. However, BSG can introduce undesirable flavors or textures in some products, especially at high concentrations (>20%). For example, in extruded snacks and meat analogs, balancing BSG functionality with sensory perception is essential to ensure commercial success [155,168].
Although technologies such as extrusion and microencapsulation have proven effective for incorporating BSG into food products, scaling up faces technical and economic challenges that have not yet been fully evaluated. Optimization of processes like milling and enzymatic treatment requires further research to maximize BSG’s functionality without significantly increasing costs. Additionally, while BSG improves texture and nutritional content in certain products, its interactions with animal proteins and emulsifiers have not been sufficiently studied—an aspect critical for ensuring stability and quality in complex products like sausages and burgers. Finally, the potential health benefits of BSG, such as improved digestion and modulation of gut microbiota, remain largely unexplored within the context of meat products. Long-term clinical studies are needed to validate these effects and to investigate possible interactions between its bioactive components and meat matrices.
In recent years, the research on BSG valorization has shifted toward greener, more integrated extraction strategies that maximize yield while minimizing environmental impact. Subcritical water extraction (SWE) has emerged as a leading approach for phenolic recovery, offering tunable extraction parameters to balance yield and bioactivity while avoiding organic solvents [83]. This method also facilitates partial solubilization of polysaccharides, although cellulose purity and process scalability remain areas for further optimization.
Natural deep eutectic solvents (DESs/NADESs), composed of biodegradable components such as choline chloride and organic acids, have shown high selectivity for phenolics and proteins, particularly when coupled with ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) or microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) [85,171,172]. These hybrid approaches reduce extraction time, enhance mass transfer, and operate under mild conditions, preserving thermo-labile compounds. Adjusting DES viscosity with controlled water addition has been identified as critical for large-scale processing [173].
Parallel advances have been made in biorefinery cascade processes that valorize wet BSG without energy-intensive drying. Sequential fractionation (often combining enzymatic hydrolysis with hydrothermal treatment) has achieved protein yields of up to 65% and oligosaccharide recovery above 90%, while preserving antioxidant activity [174,175]. This integrated approach aligns with circular economy principles by maximizing value recovery from a single raw material stream.
On the application side, extrusion technology is gaining prominence as a means of enhancing the techno–functional properties of high-fiber BSG, enabling its incorporation into snacks and meat analogues without compromising texture [176,177,178]. In bakery systems, strategies involving particle size adjustment, hydrocolloid inclusion, and pre-fermentation have maintained or improved bread quality at inclusion levels up to 20% BSG, mitigating the volume loss and crumb hardening often reported at higher concentrations [129].
Beyond food, BSG-derived phenolic extracts have been successfully incorporated into active packaging films for controlled antioxidant release [179] and fermentation-derived BSG fractions are being explored for cosmeceutical applications due to their skin-protective bioactivity [180]
Regarding sensory challenges, particularly the bitterness and earthy flavors associated with high BSG inclusion, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation has demonstrated the potential to modify phenolic and peptide profiles, attenuating undesirable notes while enhancing antioxidant potential [181,182] Additionally, metabolic engineering of flavor pathways in LAB has been proposed to generate desirable aroma compounds, such as acetoin, that can mask harsh flavors in BSG-based products [182,183].
Collectively, these advances highlight a transition toward sustainable, multifunctional valorization routes for BSG, where extraction technology is strategically coupled with product formulation and sensory optimization. Future research should focus on scaling up SWE and DES-based systems, validating multi-step biorefineries at an industrial scale, and conducting long-term sensory and consumer acceptance studies for BSG-enriched products across different food categories.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

BSG is the main solid by-product of the brewing industry, accounting for approximately 85% of its waste and generating approximately 20 kg for every 100 L of beer produced. This high availability positions it as a strategic resource for recovering high-value compounds, making a tangible contribution to the circular economy and reducing food waste and CO2 emissions. Its potential lies in its remarkable nutritional and bioactive composition, which includes up to 70% dietary fiber, 12–31% protein, polysaccharides such as arabinoxylans and β-glucans, phenolic compounds (ferulic and p-coumaric acids), and essential minerals such as phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium.
In recent decades, various technologies have been explored to maximize its use, ranging from drying methods for stabilization, such as freeze drying, which preserves thermosensitive compounds, or infrared drying, which optimizes energy use, to enzymatic hydrolysis and supercritical fluid extraction, which can release and concentrate bioactive peptides with antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties.
The incorporation of BSG has proven to be versatile across multiple food matrices, including bakery products, pasta, cookies, muffins, cereal bars, meat products (burgers, sausages, nuggets), and meat analogs. Its addition not only enriches the nutritional profile by increasing the fiber, protein, and mineral content, but also improves technological properties such as texture, stability, and water-holding capacity, while maintaining or even enhancing sensory acceptance when used in controlled proportions (typically below 20%). Furthermore, BSG particle size is a key factor: fine fractions promote higher protein content, whereas coarser particles optimize the dietary fiber contribution.
Nevertheless, large-scale implementation still faces significant challenges. These include the high perishability of fresh BSG, compositional variability depending on raw materials and brewing processes, regulatory requirements, and consumer acceptance, particularly at higher inclusion levels, which may alter flavor or texture. In addition, there is a pressing need for in vivo studies and clinical trials to confirm the health benefits, bioaccessibility, and safety of its compounds under real physiological conditions, as well as to evaluate their behavior in complex food matrices and assess the economic feasibility of industrial-scale processing.
Looking ahead, the valorization of BSG as a functional ingredient is strongly aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to responsible production, industrial innovation, and food security. Its use in meat and hybrid products offers a tangible opportunity to move toward more resilient, inclusive, and circular food systems. However, consolidating this “silent revolution” will require a multidisciplinary approach integrating science, technology, sustainability, and effective consumer communication.
Strengthening collaborations among the brewing industry, food sector, research centers, and regulatory bodies will be essential to overcome technical and legal barriers and establish safe, economically viable, and environmentally responsible production models. In this scenario, technological advances in drying, controlled fermentation, enzymatic hydrolysis, and assisted extraction will continue to play a central role, not only in preserving and enhancing BSG’s functional value but also in expanding its applications to new market niches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.T. and R.D.; methodology, D.T. and J.Q.; software, J.Q.; validation, A.M., P.C.B.C. and N.S.; formal analysis, D.T.; investigation, E.M.; resources, D.T.; data curation, E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.T. and R.D.; writing—review and editing, P.C.B.C. and N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ANID National Doctoral Scholarship, grant number N°21231645 (D.T.).

Acknowledgments

Ailín Martínez (A.M.) thanks the ANID National Doctoral Scholarship N°21231033. Néstor Sepúlveda is member of the HealthyMeat network, funded by CYTED (Ref.119RT0568).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mussatto, S.I.; Dragone, G.; Roberto, I.C. Brewers’ Spent Grain: Generation, Characteristics and Potential Applications. J. Cereal Sci. 2006, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heinen, G.D.; Garzón, A.G.; Cian, R.E.; Drago, S.R. Gastrointestinal and Colonic Bioaccessibility of Calcium and Ferulic Acid from Microcapsules Made with Brewer Spent Grain Arabinoxylans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 292, 139237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Meneses, N.G.; Martins, S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Mussatto, S.I. Influence of Extraction Solvents on the Recovery of Antioxidant Phenolic Compounds from Brewer’s Spent Grains. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 108, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Robertson, J.A.; I’Anson, K.J.A.; Treimo, J.; Faulds, C.B.; Brocklehurst, T.F.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Waldron, K.W. Profiling Brewers’ Spent Grain for Composition and Microbial Ecology at the Site of Production. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Anisha, A.; Kaushik, D.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Proestos, C.; Khan, M.R.; Elobeid, T.; Kaur, J.; Oz, F. Volarisation of Brewer’s Spent Grain for Noodles Preparation and Its Potential Assessment against Obesity. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 3154–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baiano, A.; Fiore, A.; Rutigliano, M.; Gatta, B.L. Application of a Multivariate Approach to the Study of Chemometric and Sensory Profiles of Cookies Fortified with Brewers’ Spent Grain. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 62, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paiva, C.F.; Almeida, T.S.F.D.; Arelhano, G.E.; Alvarado, A.V.R.; Menezes, M.B.D.; Argandoña, E.J.S.; Gomes, I.L.D.A.; Moya, A.M.T.M.; Filho, P.S.L.; Santos, E.F.D. Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain as a Nutritional Ingredient in Bakery Products. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2024, 80, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shih, Y.-T.; Wang, W.; Hasenbeck, A.; Stone, D.; Zhao, Y. Investigation of Physicochemical, Nutritional, and Sensory Qualities of Muffins Incorporated with Dried Brewer’s Spent Grain Flours as a Source of Dietary Fiber and Protein. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 3943–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stojceska, V.; Ainsworth, P.; Plunkett, A.; İbanoğlu, S. The Recycling of Brewer’s Processing By-Product into Ready-to-Eat Snacks Using Extrusion Technology. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 47, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2025–2034; OECD Publishing: Paris, France; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, A.; Sanwal, N.; Bareen, M.A.; Barua, S.; Sharma, N.; Joshua Olatunji, O.; Prakash Nirmal, N.; Sahu, J.K. Trends in Functional Beverages: Functional Ingredients, Processing Technologies, Stability, Health Benefits, and Consumer Perspective. Food Res. Int. 2023, 170, 113046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lin-Schilstra, L.; Fischer, A.R. Paradoxical Consumers in Four European Countries: Meat-Eating Justification and Willingness to Pay for Meat from Animals Treated by Alternatives to Surgical Castration. Meat Sci. 2022, 188, 108777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Allen, P.; FitzSimmons, M.; Goodman, M.; Warner, K. Shifting Plates in the Agrifood Landscape: The Tectonics of Alternative Agrifood Initiatives in California. J. Rural Stud. 2003, 19, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fletcher, D. Further Processing of Poultry. In Poultry Meat Processing and Quality; Mead, G., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2004; pp. 108–134. ISBN 978-1-85573-727-3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Misra, S.; Pandey, P.; Mishra, H.N. Novel Approaches for Co-Encapsulation of Probiotic Bacteria with Bioactive Compounds, Their Health Benefits and Functional Food Product Development: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. de Araújo, P.D.; Araújo, W.M.C.; Patarata, L.; Fraqueza, M.J. Understanding the Main Factors That Influence Consumer Quality Perception and Attitude towards Meat and Processed Meat Products. Meat Sci. 2022, 193, 108952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiménez-Colmenero, F.; Delgado-Pando, G. Fibre-enriched meat products. In En Fibre-Rich and Wholegrain Foods: Improving Quality; Delcour, J., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 329–330. ISBN 978-0-85709-578-7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Conway, J. Annual Consumption of Beer Worldwide in 2022, by Country (in 1,000 Kiloliters). Statista. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/271358/annual-consumption-of-beer-in-selected-countries/ (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  19. Conway, J. Worldwide Beer Production 2021. Statista. 2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/270275/worldwide-beer-production/ (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  20. Palmer, J.J. How to Brew: Everything You Need to Know to Brew Great Beer Every Time; Brewers Publications: Boulder, CO, USA, 2017; ISBN 1-938469-36-4. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mussatto, S.I.; Roberto, I.C. Acid Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Brewer’s Spent Grain to Produce Xylitol. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 2453–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. dos Santos Mathias, T.R.; Alexandre, V.M.F.; Cammarota, M.C.; de Mello, P.P.M.; Sérvulo, E.F.C. Characterization and Determination of Brewer’s Solid Wastes Composition. J. Inst. Brew. 2015, 121, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fernandes, A.R.A.C.; Baêta, B.E.L.; Damgaard, A. Life-Cycle Assessment as a Prospection Stage for the Biochemical Methane Potential of Pretreated Lignocellulosic Biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 386, 129584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. MacLeod, A.M. The Physiology of Malting—A Review. J. Inst. Brew. 1967, 73, 146–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jin, Z.; Lan, Y.; Ohm, J.-B.; Gillespie, J.; Schwarz, P.; Chen, B. Physicochemical Composition, Fermentable Sugars, Free Amino Acids, Phenolics, and Minerals in Brewers’ Spent Grains Obtained from Craft Brewing Operations. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 104, 103413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Assefa, Y.; Jabasingh, S.A. Lactic acid production from brewer’s spent grain by Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 8014. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2020, 79, 610–613. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361114927_Lactic_acid_production_from_Brewer’s_Spent_Grain_by_Lactobacillus_plantarum_ATCC_8014 (accessed on 25 August 2025). [CrossRef]
  27. Gbenebor, O.P.; Olanrewaju, O.A.; Usman, M.A.; Adeosun, S.O. Lignin from Brewers’ Spent Grain: Structural and Thermal Evaluations. Polymers 2023, 15, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mussatto, S.I.; Fernandes, M.; Roberto, I.C. Lignin Recovery from Brewer’s Spent Grain Black Liquor. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 70, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parchami, M.; Agnihotri, S.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Aqueous Ethanol Organosolv Process for the Valorization of Brewer’s Spent Grain (BSG). Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 362, 127764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Connolly, A.; Piggott, C.O.; FitzGerald, R.J. Characterisation of Protein-Rich Isolates and Antioxidative Phenolic Extracts from Pale and Black Brewers’ Spent Grain. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 1670–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Connolly, A.; Cermeno, M.; Crowley, D.; O’Callaghan, Y.; O’Brien, N.; FitzGerald, R. Characterisation of the in Vitro Bio-active Properties of Alkaline and Enzyme Extracted Brewers’ Spent Grain Protein Hydrolysates. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Farjami, T.; Slizyte, R.; Jensen, I.-J.; Falch, E. Effect of Moderate Heating during Alkaline Extraction on Composition and Functional Properties of Brewer’s Spent Grain Protein Concentrates. Food Biosci. 2024, 61, 104604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. González-Díaz, R.L.; Saldarriaga-Hernandez, S.; Ramírez-Aguirre, M.D.; Guerrero-Higareda, S.; García-Cayuela, T.; García-Amezquita, L.E.; Carrillo-Nieves, D. Valorization of Brewer’s Spent Grains through Ganoderma lucidum Cultivation: Functional Food Ingredients and Bread Prototypes. LWT 2024, 214, 117131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. del Río, J.C.; Prinsen, P.; Gutiérrez, A. Chemical Composition of Lipids in Brewer’s Spent Grain: A Promising Source of Valuable Phytochemicals. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 58, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fărcaş, A.C.; Socaci, S.A.; Dulf, F.V.; Tofană, M.; Mudura, E.; Diaconeasa, Z. Volatile Profile, Fatty Acids Composition and Total Phenolics Content of Brewers’ Spent Grain By-Product with Potential Use in the Development of New Functional Foods. J. Cereal Sci. 2015, 64, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ikram, S.; Huang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Yin, M. Composition and Nutrient Value Proposition of Brewers Spent Grain. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2232–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crowley, D.; O’Callaghan, Y.; McCarthy, A.L.; Connolly, A.; Fitzgerald, R.J.; O’Brien, N.M. Aqueous and Enzyme-Extracted Phenolic Compounds from Brewers’ Spent Grain (BSG): Assessment of Their Antioxidant Potential. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rahman, M.J.; Malunga, L.N.; Eskin, M.; Eck, P.; Thandapilly, S.J.; Thiyam-Hollander, U. Valorization of Heat-Treated Brewers’ Spent Grain Through the Identification of Bioactive Phenolics by UPLC-PDA and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant Activities. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Castanho, M.N.; de Souza do Prado, K.; de Paiva, J.M.F. Developing Thermoplastic Corn Starch Composites Filled with Brewer’s Spent Grain for Applications in Biodegradable Films. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ludka, F.R.; Klosowski, A.B.; Camargo, G.A.; Justo, A.S.; Andrade, E.A.; Beltrame, F.L.; Olivato, J.B. Brewers’ Spent Grain Extract as Antioxidants in Starch-Based Active Biopolymers. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parchami, M.; Ferreira, J.A.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Starch and Protein Recovery from Brewer’s Spent Grain Using Hydrothermal Pretreatment and Their Conversion to Edible Filamentous Fungi—A Brewery Biorefinery Concept. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jantason, N.; Suphantharika, M.; Wipatanawin, A.; Chansong, S.; Payongsri, P. Valorization of Spent Grains from Beer Production through β-Glucan Extraction. Foods 2024, 13, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Steiner, J.; Kupetz, M.; Becker, T. Influence of Hydrothermal Treatment of Brewer’s Spent Grain on the Concentration and Molecular Weight Distribution of 1,3-1,4-β-D-Glucan and Arabinoxylan. Foods 2023, 12, 3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zielke, C.; Teixeira, C.; Ding, H.; Cui, S.; Nyman, M.; Nilsson, L. Analysis of β-Glucan Molar Mass from Barley Malt and Brewer’s Spent Grain with Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (AF4) and Their Association to Proteins. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Castro, L.E.N.; Colpini, L.M.S. All-around Characterization of Brewers’ Spent Grain. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 3013–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mendis, M.; Simsek, S. Arabinoxylans and Human Health. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 42, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aliyu, S.; Bala, M. Brewer’s Spent Grain: A Review of Its Potentials and Applications. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 324–331. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bartolomé, B.; Santos, M.; Jiménez, J.; Del Nozal, M.; Gómez-Cordovés, C. Pentoses and Hydroxycinnamic Acids in Brewer’s Spent Grain. J. Cereal Sci. 2002, 36, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lynch, K.M.; Steffen, E.J.; Arendt, E.K. Brewers’ Spent Grain: A Review with an Emphasis on Food and Health. J. Inst. Brew. 2016, 122, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Santos, M.; Jiménez, J.J.; Bartolomé, B.; Gómez-Cordovés, C.; del Nozal, M.J. Variability of Brewer’s Spent Grain within a Brewery. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. González, M.; Barrios, S.; Budelli, E.; Pérez, N.; Lema, P.; Heinzen, H. Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds in Fresh and Freeze-Dried Vitis Vinifera Cv Tannat Grape Pomace. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 124, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bazsefidpar, N.; Ghandehari Yazdi, A.P.; Karimi, A.; Yahyavi, M.; Amini, M.; Ahmadi Gavlighi, H.; Simal-Gandara, J. Brewers Spent Grain Protein Hydrolysate as a Functional Ingredient for Muffins: Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, and Sensory Evaluation. Food Chem. 2024, 435, 137565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bhosale, S.; Kumbhar, P.; Patil, O.; Landage, K.; Kabade, R.; Manjappa, A.; Disouza, J. Lyophilization: Principle, Methods, and Applications. Drug Pharm. Sci. Arch. 2021, 1, 10–14. Available online: https://dap.sciencearchives.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Drug-and-Pharmaceutical-Science-Archives-2021-Vol.-1-1-10-14.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  54. ElNaker, N.A.; Daou, M.; Ochsenkühn, M.A.; Amin, S.A.; Yousef, A.F.; Yousef, L.F. A Metabolomics Approach to Evaluate the Effect of Lyophilization versus Oven Drying on the Chemical Composition of Plant Extracts. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McHugh, T.H.; Bustillos, R.D.A.; Olson, D.A.; Pan, Z.; Kurzrock, D.J.; Schwartz, J.L. Intermittent Infrared Drying for Brewery-Spent Grain. Unpublished/Tech Report. 2020. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f9/e3/bd/52c1685aca895b/US20190301797A1.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  56. Thai, S.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Alves, P.; Pan, J.; Osorio-Ruiz, A.; Miller, J.; Tam, C.; Rolston, M.R.; Teran-Cabanillas, E.; Yokoyama, W.H.; et al. Influence of Drying Methods on Health Indicators of Brewers Spent Grain for Potential Upcycling into Food Products. Anim. Feed Res. 2022, 2, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kumar, M.; Anisha, A.; Kaushik, D.; Kaur, J.; Shubham, S.; Rusu, A.V.; Rocha, J.M.; Trif, M. Combinations of Spent Grains as Sources of Valuable Compounds with Highly Valuable Functional and Microbial Properties. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kumari, B.; Tiwari, B.K.; Walsh, D.; Griffin, T.P.; Islam, N.; Lyng, J.G.; Brunton, N.P.; Rai, D.K. Impact of Pulsed Electric Field Pre-Treatment on Nutritional and Polyphenolic Contents and Bioactivities of Light and Dark Brewer’s Spent Grains. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 54, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Özdemir, E.E.; Görgüç, A.; Gençdağ, E.; Yılmaz, F.M. Physicochemical, Functional and Emulsifying Properties of Plant Protein Powder from Industrial Sesame Processing Waste as Affected by Spray and Freeze Drying. LWT 2022, 154, 112646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xiros, C.; Christakopoulos, P. Biotechnological Potential of Brewers Spent Grain and Its Recent Applications. Waste Biomass Valorization 2012, 3, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Akin, M.; Jukic, M.; Lukinac, J.; Yilmaz, B.; Özogul, F.; Rocha, J. Valorization and Functionalization of Cereal-Based Industry By-Products for Nutraceuticals. In Nutraceutics from Agri-Food By-Products; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2025; pp. 173–222. [Google Scholar]
  62. Waters, D.M.; Jacob, F.; Titze, J.; Arendt, E.K.; Zannini, E. Fibre, Protein and Mineral Fortification of Wheat Bread through Milled and Fermented Brewer’s Spent Grain Enrichment. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 235, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fărcaș, A.C.; Socaci, S.A.; Chiș, M.S.; Martínez-Monzó, J.; García-Segovia, P.; Becze, A.; Török, A.I.; Cadar, O.; Coldea, T.E.; Igual, M. In Vitro Digestibility of Minerals and B Group Vitamins from Different Brewers’ Spent Grains. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Merten, D.; Erman, L.; Marabelli, G.; Leners, B.; Ney, Y.; Nasim, M.; Jacob, C.; Tchoumtchoua, J.; Cajot, S.; Bohn, T. Potential Health Effects of Brewers’ Spent Grain as a Functional Food Ingredient Assessed by Markers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Following Gastro-Intestinal Digestion and in a Cell Model of the Small Intestine. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 5327–5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Olvera-Ortiz, A.; Hernández-Rodríguez, L.; Sandoval-Castilla, O.; Lobato-Calleros, C.; Cuevas-Bernardino, J.C. Impact of Spontaneous Fermentation and Heat Treatment on the Physicochemical, Functional and Antioxidant Properties of BSG. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2025, 19, 1124–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kaur, N.; Pandey, S.; Bhushan, K. Recent Developments in Extraction, Molecular Characterization, Bioactivity, and Application of Brewers Spent Grain Arabinoxylans. J. Food Sci. 2025, 90, e70239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Devnani, B.; Moran, G.C.; Grossmann, L. Extraction, Composition, Functionality, and Utilization of Brewer’s Spent Grain Protein in Food Formulations. Foods 2023, 12, 1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Barrios, C.; Fernández-Delgado, M.; López-Linares, J.C.; García-Cubero, M.T.; Coca, M.; Lucas, S. A Techno-Economic Perspective on a Microwave Extraction Process for Efficient Protein Recovery from Agri-Food Wastes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 186, 115166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gutierrez-Barrutia, M.B.; Cozzano, S.; Arcia, P.; del Castillo, M.D. An Insight into the Use of Extruded Brewers’ Spent Grain as a Healthy Human Snack Ingredient. Effects on Food Structure, Sensory Quality, Satiety and Gastrointestinal Tolerance. Food Biosci. 2025, 63, 105583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Macias-Garbett, R.; Serna-Hernández, S.O.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Parra-Saldívar, R. Phenolic Compounds from Brewer’s Spent Grains: Toward Green Recovery Methods and Applications in the Cosmetic Industry. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 681684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Quideau, S.; Deffieux, D.; Douat-Casassus, C.; Pouységu, L. Plant Polyphenols: Chemical Properties, Biological Activities, and Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 586–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Shahidi, F.; Ambigaipalan, P. Phenolics and Polyphenolics in Foods, Beverages and Spices: Antioxidant Activity and Health Effects—A Review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 820–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cory, H.; Passarelli, S.; Szeto, J.; Tamez, M.; Mattei, J. The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant Polyphenols as Dietary Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bonifácio-Lopes, T.; Teixeira, J.A.; Pintado, M. Toxicity and Antihypertensive Activity of Brewer’s Spent Grain Extracts. In Proceedings of the Conference: Food Chemistry, Sevilla, España, 17–19 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  76. Jesus, M.S.; Ballesteros, L.F.; Pereira, R.N.; Genisheva, Z.; Carvalho, A.C.; Pereira-Wilson, C.; Teixeira, J.A.; Domingues, L. Ohmic Heating Polyphenolic Extracts from Vine Pruning Residue with Enhanced Biological Activity. Food Chem. 2020, 316, 126298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Galanakis, C.M. Functionality of Food Components and Emerging Technologies. Foods 2021, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kovačević, D.B.; Barba, F.J.; Granato, D.; Galanakis, C.M.; Herceg, Z.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Putnik, P. Pressurized Hot Water Extraction (PHWE) for the Green Recovery of Bioactive Compounds and Steviol Glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni Leaves. Food Chem. 2018, 254, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sarfarazi, M.; Jafari, S.M.; Rajabzadeh, G.; Galanakis, C.M. Evaluation of Microwave-Assisted Extraction Technology for Separation of Bioactive Components of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 111978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bonifácio-Lopes, T.; Vilas-Boas, A.; Machado, M.; Costa, E.M.; Silva, S.; Pereira, R.N.; Campos, D.; Teixeira, J.A.; Pintado, M. Exploring the Bioactive Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain Ohmic Extracts. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 76, 102943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McCarthy, A.L.; O’Callaghan, Y.C.; Piggott, C.O.; FitzGerald, R.J.; O’Brien, N.M. Brewers’ Spent Grain: Bioactivity of Phenolic Component, Its Role in Animal Nutrition and Potential for Incorporation in Functional Foods—A Review. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013, 72, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Moreira, M.M.; Morais, S.; Carvalho, D.O.; Barros, A.A.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Guido, L.F. Brewer’s Spent Grain from Different Types of Malt: Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity and Identification of the Major Phenolic Compounds. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Alonso-Riaño, P.; Sanz, M.; Benito-Román, O.; Beltrán, S.; Trigueros, E. Subcritical Water as Hydrolytic Medium to Recover and Fractionate the Protein Fraction and Phenolic Compounds from Craft Brewer’s Spent Grain. Food Chem. 2021, 351, 129264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Connolly, A.; Cermeño, M.; Alashi, A.M.; Aluko, R.E.; FitzGerald, R.J. Generation of Phenolic-Rich Extracts from Brewers’ Spent Grain and Characterisation of Their in Vitro and in Vivo Activities. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 68, 102617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. López-Linares, J.C.; Campillo, V.; Coca, M.; Lucas, S.; García-Cubero, M.T. Microwave-Assisted Deep Eutectic Solvent Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Brewer’s Spent Grain. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dill, K.A.; MacCallum, J.L. The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On. Science 2012, 338, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lehninger, A.L.; Nelson, D.L.; Cox, M.M. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4th ed.; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2005; ISBN 0-7167-4339-6. [Google Scholar]
  88. Qin, F.; Johansen, A.Z.; Mussatto, S.I. Evaluation of Different Pretreatment Strategies for Protein Extraction from Brewer’s Spent Grains. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 125, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Celus, I.; Brijs, K.; Delcour, J.A. The Effects of Malting and Mashing on Barley Protein Extractability. J. Cereal Sci. 2006, 44, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jaeger, A.; Sahin, A.W.; Nyhan, L.; Zannini, E.; Arendt, E.K. Functional Properties of Brewer’s Spent Grain Protein Isolate: The Missing Piece in the Plant Protein Portfolio. Foods 2023, 12, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, C.; Tian, Z.; Chen, L.; Temelli, F.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y. Functionality of Barley Proteins Extracted and Fractionated by Alkaline and Alcohol Methods. Cereal Chem. 2010, 87, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Frederix, S.; Greden, K. Protein Powder. U.S. Patent US20220295824A1, 22 September 2022. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20220295824A1/en?assignee=evergrain&oq=evergrain (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  93. Vieira, M.C.; Brandelli, A.; Thys, R.C.S. Evaluation of the Technological Functional Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Protein Hydrolysate Obtained from Brewers’ Spent Grain. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ribeiro-Oliveira, R.; Martins, Z.; Faria, M.; Sousa, J.; Ferreira, I.; Diniz, C. Protein Hydrolysates from Brewing By-Products as Natural Alternatives to ACE-Inhibitory Drugs for Hypertension Management. Life 2022, 12, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Izydorczyk, M.S.; Dexter, J.E. Barley β-Glucans and Arabinoxylans: Molecular Structure, Physicochemical Properties, and Uses in Food Products—A Review. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 850–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kupetz, M.; Procopio, S.; Sacher, B.; Becker, T. Critical Review of the Methods of β-Glucan Analysis and Its Significance in the Beer Filtration Process. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 241, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission. The State of Food and Agriculture 1992. In Codex Alimentarius; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 1992; ISBN 92-5-103629-2. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a2f148a-9c72-4e31-9d80-161b70a1dc63/content (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  98. Cummings, J.; Stephen, A. Carbohydrate Terminology and Classification. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, S5–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. World Health Organization. Understanding the Codex Alimentarius; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2018; ISBN 92-5-109236-2. [Google Scholar]
  100. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. Exploitation of Food Industry Waste for High-Value Products. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Procentese, A.; Raganati, F.; Olivieri, G.; Russo, M.E.; De La Feld, M.; Marzocchella, A. Agro Food Wastes and Innovative Pretreatments to Meet Biofuel Demand in Europe. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2019, 42, 954–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lam, K.-L.; Ko, K.-C.; Li, X.; Ke, X.; Cheng, W.-Y.; Chen, T.; You, L.; Kwan, H.-S.; Cheung, P.C.-K. In Vitro Infant Faecal Fermentation of Low Viscosity Barley β-Glucan and Its Acid Hydrolyzed Derivatives: Evaluation of Their Potential as Novel Prebiotics. Molecules 2019, 24, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kobelev, K.V.; Gribkova, I.N.; Kharlamova, L.N.; Danilyan, A.V.; Zakharov, M.A.; Lazareva, I.V.; Kozlov, V.I.; Borisenko, O.A. Study of Brewer’s Spent Grain Environmentally Friendly Processing Ways. Molecules 2023, 28, 4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liu, L.; Yang, H.; Coldea, T.E.; Zhao, H. Improving the Emulsifying Capacity of Brewers’ Spent Grain Arabinoxylan by Carboxymethylation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 258, 128967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lynch, K.M.; Strain, C.R.; Johnson, C.; Patangia, D.; Stanton, C.; Koc, F.; Gil-Martinez, J.; O’Riordan, P.; Sahin, A.W.; Ross, R.P. Extraction and Characterisation of Arabinoxylan from Brewers Spent Grain and Investigation of Microbiome Modulation Potential. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 4393–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Calvete-Torre, I.; Sabater, C.; Montilla, A.; Moreno, F.; Riestra, S.; Margolles, A.; Ruiz, L. Physicochemical Characterization and Microbiota Modulatory Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain and Arabinoxylan-Derived Fractions: A Valorization Study. LWT 2023, 185, 115107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chu, H.-Y.I.; Miri, T.; Onyeaka, H. Valorization of Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Brewer’s Spent Grain (BSG) for Sustainable Food Waste Recycling. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guido, L.F.; Moreira, M.M. Techniques for Extraction of Brewer’s Spent Grain Polyphenols: A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1192–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Severini, C.; Azzollini, D.; Jouppila, K.; Laaksonen, J.; Derossi, A.; De Pilli, T. Effect of Enzymatic and Technological Treatments on Solubilisation of Arabinoxylans from Brewer’s Spent Grain. J. Cereal Sci. 2015, 65, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fernandez, A.; Torres-Giner, S.; Lagaron, J.M. Novel Route to Stabilization of Bioactive Antioxidants by Encapsulation in Electrospun Fibers of Zein Prolamine. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1427–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Martínez-Encinas, E.G.; Carvajal-Millán, E.; Calderón de la Barca, A.M.; Rascón-Chu, A.; Martínez-Porchas, M.; Márquez-Escalante, J.A.; Islas-Rubio, A.R. Extraction and Characterization of Arabinoxylans Obtained from Nixtamalized Brewers’ Spent Grains. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2023, 29, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Reis, S.F.; Coelho, E.; Coimbra, M.A.; Abu-Ghannam, N. Improved Efficiency of Brewer’s Spent Grain Arabinoxylans by Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 24, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chetrariu, A.; Dabija, A. Spent Grain from Malt Whisky: Assessment of the Phenolic Compounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Combs, G.F., Jr.; McClung, J.P. The Vitamins: Fundamental Aspects in Nutrition and Health, 5th ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-0-12-802965-7. [Google Scholar]
  116. Hassani, A.; Procopio, S.; Becker, T. Influence of Malting and Lactic Acid Fermentation on Functional Bioactive Components in Cereal-Based Raw Materials: A Review Paper. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hucker, B.; Wakeling, L.; Vriesekoop, F. Vitamins in Brewing: Presence and Influence of Thiamine and Riboflavin on Wort Fermentation. J. Inst. Brew. 2016, 122, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nagy, V.; Diósi, G. Using Brewer’s Spent Grain as a Byproduct of the Brewing Industry in the Bakery Industry. Élelmiszervizsgálati Közlemények 2021, 67, 3339–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. van Bokhorst-van de Veen, H.; Berendsen, L.; Helmond, M.; Nierop Groot, M. In Situ Fortification of Protein-Enriched Brewer’s Spent Grain with Vitamin B12 by Fermentation with Priestia megaterium and Propionibacterium freudenreichii. LWT 2024, 205, 116520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Andres, A.I.; Petron, M.J.; Lopez, A.M.; Timon, M.L. Optimization of Extraction Conditions to Improve Phenolic Content and In Vitro Antioxidant Activity in Craft Brewers’ Spent Grain Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Foods 2020, 9, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Afify, A.E.-M.M.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; El-Salam, S.M.A.; Omran, A.A. Biochemical Changes in Phenols, Flavonoids, Tannins, Vitamin E, β–Carotene and Antioxidant Activity during Soaking of Three White Sorghum Varieties. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, Y.; Wei, X.; Bao, J.; Xu, K.; Chen, X.; Guo, M. Applicability of Wheat Brewer’s Spent Grain in Steamed Bread-Making Based on Physicochemical and Visual Profiles Assessment of Doughs and Breads. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2024, 10820132241260453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. 123 Tu, C.; Wang, Q.; Liang, X.; Li, N.; Zhao, R.; Jiao, L.; Ran, J.; Huang, J. Effect of Dried Distillers Grains on Quality of Dough and Bread. J. Funct. Foods 2025, 124, 106629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ghendov-Mosanu, A.; Ropciuc, S.; Dabija, A.; Saitan, O.; Boestean, O.; Paiu, S.; Rumeus, I.; Leatamborg, S.; Lupascu, G.; Codină, G.G. Effect of Brewers’ Spent Grain Addition to a Fermented Form on Dough Rheological Properties from Different Triticale Flour Cultivars. Foods 2024, 14, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pereira de Freitas, F.P.; da Silva Lannes, S.C. Composition and Sensory Properties of Breads Supplemented with Brewers’ Spent Grain from Three Different Craft Beer Styles. Cereal Chem. 2024, 101, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Păcală, M.-L.; Sîrbu, A.; Șipoș, A. Non-Conventional Brewers’ Spent Grains, an Alternative Raw Material in Bread-Making. Foods 2024, 13, 3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Pereira de Freitas, F.P.; Steel, C.J.; da Silva Lannes, S.C. Brewers’ Spent Grain from Three Styles of Craft Beer: Characterization and Their Rheological Effects on Wheat Flour Dough. Cereal Chem. 2023, 100, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sileoni, V.; Alfeo, V.; Bravi, E.; Belardi, I.; Marconi, O. Upcycling of a By-Product of the Brewing Production Chain as an Ingredient in the Formulation of Functional Shortbreads. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 98, 105292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Neylon, E.; Arendt, E.K.; Zannini, E.; Sahin, A.W. Fermentation as a Tool to Revitalise Brewers’ Spent Grain and Elevate Techno-Functional Properties and Nutritional Value in High Fibre Bread. Foods 2021, 10, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nocente, F.; Natale, C.; Galassi, E.; Taddei, F.; Gazza, L. Using Einkorn and Tritordeum Brewers’ Spent Grain to Increase the Nutritional Potential of Durum Wheat Pasta. Foods 2021, 10, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Schettino, R.; Verni, M.; Acin-Albiac, M.; Vincentini, O.; Krona, A.; Knaapila, A.; Di Cagno, R.; Gobbetti, M.; Rizzello, C.G.; Coda, R. Bioprocessed Brewers’ Spent Grain Improves Nutritional and Antioxidant Properties of Pasta. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sahin, A.; Hardiman, K.; Atzler, J.; Vogelsang-O’Dwyer, M.; Valdeperez, D.; Münch, S.; Cattaneo, G.; O’Riordan, P.; Arendt, E. Rejuvenated Brewer’s Spent Grain: The Impact of Two BSG-Derived Ingredients on Techno-Functional and Nutritional Characteristics of Fibre-Enriched Pasta. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 68, 102633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nguyen, Q.C.; Castura, J.C.; Nguyen, D.D.L.; Varela, P. Identifying Temporal Sensory Drivers of Liking of Biscuit Supplemented with Brewer’s Spent Grain for Young Consumers. Food Res. Int. 2023, 170, 113049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nicolai, M.; Palma, M.L.; Reis, R.; Amaro, R.; Fernandes, J.; Gonçalves, E.M.; Silva, M.; Lageiro, M.; Charmier, A.; Maurício, E.; et al. Assessing the Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain to Enhance Cookie Physicochemical and Nutritional Profiles. Foods 2025, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Xu, Y.; Leong, Z.N.; Zhang, W.; Jin, X.; Kong, J.W.; Chan, G.C.; Kim, J.E. Impact of Brewers’ Spent Grain-Containing Biscuit on Postprandial Glycaemic Response in Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome: A Crossover Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2024, 16, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wang, K.; Cong, L.; Mirosa, M.; Hou, Y.; Bremer, P. Food Technology Neophobia Scales in Cross-National Context: Consumers’ Acceptance of Food Technologies between Chinese and New Zealand. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 3551–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cermeño, M.; Dermiki, M.; Kleekayai, T.; Cope, L.; McManus, R.; Ryan, C.; Felix, M.; Flynn, C.; FitzGerald, R.J. Effect of Enzymatically Hydrolysed Brewers’ Spent Grain Supplementation on the Rheological, Textural and Sensory Properties of Muffins. Future Foods 2021, 4, 100085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Paciulli, M.; Sogari, G.; Rodolfi, M.; Parenti, O.; Andreani, G.; Chiavaro, E. Fostering Circular Economy: Brewing By-Products as Innovative Ingredients for Cereal Bar Formulation. Foods 2024, 13, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Tombini, C.; Dacoreggio, M.V.; Kempka, A.P.; Feltes, M.M.C.; De Mello, J.M.M.; Dalcanton, F. High-Dietary Fibers Cereal Bars Containing Malt Bagasse by-Product from the Brewing Industry. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 61, 1326–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Czubaszek, A.; Wojciechowicz-Budzisz, A.; Spychaj, R.; Kawa-Rygielska, J. Effect of Added Brewer’s Spent Grain on the Baking Value of Flour and the Quality of Wheat Bread. Molecules 2022, 27, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Amoriello, T.; Mellara, F.; Galli, V.; Amoriello, M.; Ciccoritti, R. Technological Properties and Consumer Acceptability of Bakery Products Enriched with Brewers’ Spent Grains. Foods 2020, 9, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Nocente, F.; Taddei, F.; Galassi, E.; Gazza, L. Upcycling of Brewers’ Spent Grain by Production of Dry Pasta with Higher Nutritional Potential. LWT 2019, 114, 108421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Heredia-Sandoval, N.G.; Granados-Nevárez, M.d.C.; Calderón de la Barca, A.M.; Vásquez-Lara, F.; Malunga, L.N.; Apea-Bah, F.B.; Beta, T.; Islas-Rubio, A.R. Phenolic Acids, Antioxidant Capacity, and Estimated Glycemic Index of Cookies Added with Brewer’s Spent Grain. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2020, 75, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ozturk, I.; Sagdic, O.; Tornuk, F.; Yetim, H. Effect of Wheat Sprout Powder Incorporation on Lipid Oxidation and Physicochemical Properties of Beef Patties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tran, T.; Ton, N.; Le, N.; Le, V. Addition of Brewing Spent Grains from Malt and Rice Adjunct to the Formulation of High Fiber Biscuit: Effects of Particle Size of Brewing Spent Grains on the Product Quality. Food Res 2020, 4, 1480–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Czubaszek, A.; Wojciechowicz-Budzisz, A.; Spychaj, R.; Kawa-Rygielska, J. Baking Properties of Flour and Nutritional Value of Rye Bread with Brewer’s Spent Grain. LWT 2021, 150, 111955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cuomo, F.; Trivisonno, M.C.; Iacovino, S.; Messia, M.C.; Marconi, E. Sustainable Re-Use of Brewer’s Spent Grain for the Production of High Protein and Fibre Pasta. Foods 2022, 11, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Báez, J.; Fernández-Fernández, A.M.; Briozzo, F.; Díaz, S.; Dorgans, A.; Tajam, V.; Medrano, A. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis of brewer’s spent grain on bioactivity, techno-functional properties, and nutritional value when added to a bread formulation. Foods 2021, 6, 100. [Google Scholar]
  149. Hernández-Pinto, F.J.; Miranda-Medina, J.D.; Natera-Maldonado, A.; Vara-Aldama, Ó.; Ortueta-Cabranes, M.P.; del Mercado-Pardiño, J.A.V.; El-Aidie, S.A.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Castro-Munoz, R. Arabinoxylans: A Review on Protocols for Their Recovery, Functionalities and Roles in Food Formulations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 259, 129309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zannini, E.; Bravo Núñez, Á.; Sahin, A.W.; Arendt, E.K. Arabinoxylans as Functional Food Ingredients: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Fărcas, A.; Socaci, S.; Chis, M.; Pop, O.; Fogarasi, M.; Paucean, A.; Igual, M.; Michiu, D. Reintegration of Brewers Spent Grains in the Food Chain: Nutritional, Functional and Sensorial Aspects. Plants 2021, 10, 2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ktenioudaki, A.; Chaurin, V.; Reis, S.F.; Gallagher, E. Brewer’s Spent Grain as a Functional Ingredient for Breadsticks. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 1765–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. dos Santos Costa, R.; de Almeida, S.S.; Cavalcanti, E.; d’Avila, C.; Freire, D.M.G.; Moura-Nunes, N.; Monteiro, M.; Perrone, D. Enzymes Produced by Solid State Fermentation of Agro-Industrial by-Products Release Ferulic Acid in Bioprocessed Whole-Wheat Breads. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 109843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Öztürk, S.; Özboy, Ö.; Cavidoğlu, İ.; Köksel, H. Effects of Brewer’s Spent Grain on the Quality and Dietary Fibre Content of Cookies. J. Inst. Brew. 2002, 108, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Delić, J.; Peulić, T.; Radmilo Čolović, P.I.; Peulić, T.; Jokanović, M.; Slađana Rakita, V.B. Mechanically Deboned Poultry Meat and Brewer’s Processing by-Product as Promising Ingredients for Nutritionally Valuable Extruded Snacks. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2020, 32, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mastanjević, K.; Perković, I.; Škrivanko, M.; Kovačević, D.; Biondić, H.; Habschied, K. Effect of the Addition of Brewers’ Spent Grain (BSG) on the Physicochemical and Consumer Liking Attributes of Croatian Indigenous Cooked Sausage “Bijela Krvavica”. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Gutiérrez-Silva, G.; Vásquez-Lara, F.; Heredia-Sandoval, N.G.; Islas-Rubio, A.R. Effect of High-Protein and High-Fiber Breaders on Oil Absorption and Quality Attributes in Chicken Nuggets. Foods 2023, 12, 4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ullah, H.; Esposito, C.; Piccinocchi, R.; De Lellis, L.F.; Santarcangelo, C.; Minno, A.D.; Baldi, A.; Buccato, D.G.; Khan, A.; Piccinocchi, G.; et al. Postprandial Glycemic and Insulinemic Response by a Brewer’s Spent Grain Extract-Based Food Supplement in Subjects with Slightly Impaired Glucose Tolerance: A Monocentric, Randomized, Cross-Over, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Kim, H.; Hwang, K.; Song, D.; Lee, S.; Choi, M.; Lim, Y.; Choi, J.; Choi, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, C. Effects of Dietary Fiber Extracts from Brewer’s Spent Grain on Quality Characteristics of Chicken Patties Cooked in Convective Oven. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2013, 33, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Nagy, M.; Semeniuc, C.A.; Socaci, S.A.; Pop, C.R.; Rotar, A.M.; Sălăgean, C.D.; Tofană, M. Utilization of Brewer’s Spent Grain and Mushrooms in Fortification of Smoked Sausages. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 37, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Fogarasi, M.; Socaci, S.A.; Tofană, M.; Semeniuc, C.; Sălăgean, D.; Țibulcă, D.; Muresan, C. Evaluation of Sensory and Physical-Chemical Properties of Smoked Sausage Based On Food Waste Sources. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol 2018, 24, 219–223. Available online: https://journal-of-agroalimentary.ro/admin/articole/17045XL32_Melinda_Fogarasi_2018_24(3)_219-222.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  162. Saraiva, B.; Agustinho, B.; Vital, A.; Staub, L.; Pintro, P. Effect of Brewing Waste (Malt Bagasse) Addition on the Physicochemical Properties of Hamburgers. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, 14135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. de Campos, K.C.G.; de Farias, A.K.N.; Becker, G.; de Britto, G.C.S.; Soares, W.P.; Nascimento, E.; Scabora, M.H.; Rodrigues, E.C.; Picanço, N.F.M.; de Faria, R.A.P.G. Quality Measurements of Cuiabana-Type Pork Sausages Added with Brewing by-Product Flours. Meat Sci. 2021, 179, 108441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Talens, C.; Llorente, R.; Simo-Boyle, L.; Odriozola-Serrano, I.; Tueros, I.; Ibarguen, M. Hybrid Sausages: Modelling the Effect of Partial Meat Replacement with Broccoli, Upcycled Brewer’s Spent Grain and Insect Flours. Foods 2022, 11, 3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Özvural, E.B.; Vural, H.; Gökbulut, İ.; Özboy-Özbaş, Ö. Utilization of Brewer’s Spent Grain in the Production of Frankfurters. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Spinelli, S.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. Microencapsulation of Extracted Bioactive Compounds from Brewer’s Spent Grain to Enrich Fish-Burgers. Food Bioprod. Process. 2016, 100, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Choi, M.-S.; Hwang, K.-E.; Song, D.-H.; Choi, Y.-S.; Kim, C.-J. Effects of brewer’s spent grain dietary fiber on quality characteristics of low-fat chicken sausages. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2014, 34, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. da Silva, A.M.M.; Lima, M.A.; Koksel, F.; Sato, A.C.K. Incorporation of Brewer’s Spent Grain into Plant-Based Meat Analogues: Benefits to Physical and Nutritional Quality. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 3870–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Fan, Y.; Annamalai, P.K.; Bhandari, B.; Prakash, S. Characteristics of Faba Bean Protein-Based High-Moisture Meat Analogues Incorporating Brewers’ Spent Grain through Extrusion. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2025, 100, 103919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Curutchet, A.; Arcia, P.; Prisco, F.; Tarrega, A. Brewer’s Spent Grain Used in Fiber-Enriched Burgers—Influence of Sustainability Information on Consumer Responses. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Antoun, K.; Tabib, M.; Salameh, S.J.; Koubaa, M.; Ziegler-Devin, I.; Brosse, N.; Khelfa, A. Isolation and Structural Characterization of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent Lignin from Brewer’s Spent Grains. Polymers 2024, 16, 2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hadinoto, K.; Ling, J.K.-U.; Park, J.-W.; Tran, T.-T.; Pu, S. Extraction of Brewer’s Spent Grain Protein Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent Compared to Alkaline Extraction: Evaluating Their Yields, Physicochemical Characteristics, and Functionalities. Food Bioprod. Process. 2025, 150, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Airouyuwa, J.O.; Mostafa, H.; Riaz, A.; Stathopoulos, C.; Maqsood, S. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Microwave-Assisted Green Extraction for Efficient Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from by-Products of Date Fruit (Phoenix Dactylifera L.) Processing: Modeling, Optimization, and Phenolic Characterization. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023, 16, 824–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Belardi, I.; Marrocchi, A.; Alfeo, V.; Sileoni, V.; De Francesco, G.; Paolantoni, M.; Marconi, O. Sequential Extraction and Attenuated Total Reflection–Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring in the Biorefining of Brewer’s Spent Grain. Molecules 2023, 28, 4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Carvalheiro, F.; Esteves, M.P.; Parajó, J.C.; Pereira, H.; Gírio, F.M. Production of Oligosaccharides by Autohydrolysis of Brewery’s Spent Grain. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 91, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Brito, A.D.; Jisaka, J.S.; Pereira, A.C.; Steel, C.J. Thermoplastic Extrusion Technology as a Tool for Adding Value to Brewer’s by-Products. LWT 2023, 189, 115487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Nascimento, T.A.; Calado, V.; Carvalho, C.W. Effect of Brewer’s Spent Grain and Temperature on Physical Properties of Expanded Extrudates from Rice. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 79, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Thokachichu, S. Optimization of Brewers Spent Grain Fortification to Develop Value-Added Breakfast Cereal Using a Single Screw Extrusion Process Based on Physicochemical, Nutritional, and Sensory Properties. 2023. Available online: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/84862 (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  179. Qazanfarzadeh, Z.; Masek, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Kumaravel, V. Development of Brewer’s Spent Grain-Derived Bio Nanocomposites through a Multiproduct Biorefinery Approach for Food Packaging. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 220, 119226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Juárez, S.A.; Fermentation Using A. Evaluation of in Vitro Bioactive Properties of Protein Hydrolysates of Brewers’ Spent Grain (BSG) Obtained through Solid-State Fermentation Using A. oryzae and Functional Characteriation of BSG. 2022. Available online: https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7716528 (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  181. Verni, M.; Pontonio, E.; Krona, A.; Jacob, S.; Pinto, D.; Rinaldi, F.; Verardo, V.; Díaz-de-Cerio, E.; Coda, R.; Rizzello, C.G. Bioprocessing of Brewers’ Spent Grain Enhances Its Antioxidant Activity: Characterization of Phenolic Compounds and Bioactive Peptides. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Lalić, A.; Jagelavičiūtė, J.; Rezić, T.; Trivunović, Z.; Žadeikė, D.; Bašinskienė, L. From Bakery Leftovers to Brewing Sustainability: Fermentation of Spent Grain with Yarrowia lipolytica and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Sustainability 2025, 17, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Gutierrez-Barrutia, M.; Cozzano, S.; Arcia, P.; del Castillo, M. In Vitro Digestibility and Bioaccessibility of Nutrients and Non-Nutrients Composing Extruded Brewers’ Spent Grain. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Proximal chemical composition of BSG.
Figure 1. Proximal chemical composition of BSG.
Foods 14 03389 g001
Figure 2. Applications of BSG in food production.
Figure 2. Applications of BSG in food production.
Foods 14 03389 g002
Table 1. Advantages and limitations of the technologies used in the extraction of BSG.
Table 1. Advantages and limitations of the technologies used in the extraction of BSG.
TechnologyTarget CompoundsAdvantagesLimitations
Conventional Solid–Liquid ExtractionPhenolic compounds, lipidsSimple, well-established, relatively low cost; suitable for various solvents (e.g., ethanol, methanol).Low selectivity; long extraction times; possible degradation of heat-sensitive compounds; high solvent use and disposal concerns.
Microwave-Assisted ExtractionPhenolics, proteins, polysaccharidesHigh extraction efficiency in a short time; reduced solvent use; effective cell wall disruption.Non-uniform heating can reduce reproducibility; high equipment cost; limited scalability.
Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Phenolics, polysaccharides, proteinsEnhance mass transfer; low temperature process preserves bioactivity; relatively low cost.Possible degradation of sensitive compounds due to cavitation; scalability challenges for uniform energy distribution.
Enzymatic HydrolysisProteins (bioactive peptides), polysaccharides (β-glucans, arabinoxylans)Highly selective; mild processing preserves functional properties; generates high-purity extracts.High cost of enzymes; requires precise control of pH and temperature; potential long processing times.
Alkaline HydrolysisBound phenolics, proteinsEfficient for breaking ester bonds and releasing bound phenolics; relatively inexpensive.May degrade sensitive bioactives; environmental concerns from alkaline waste; reduced suitability for food applications without purification.
Supercritical Fluid ExtractionLipids, non-polar compoundsSolvent-free extracts; preserves thermo-labile compounds; environmentally friendly; tunable selectivity via pressure/temperature.High capital and operating costs; not ideal for highly polar compounds without co-solvents.
Pressurized Hot Water Extraction (PHWE/Subcritical Water Extraction)Phenolics, polysaccharidesHigh efficiency; avoids organic solvents; eco-friendly; effective release from lignocellulosic matrix.Requires high-pressure, high-temperature equipment; risk of thermal degradation of heat-sensitive compounds.
Deep Eutectic Solvent ExtractionPhenolics, polysaccharidesGreen, biodegradable solvents; high solubility for phenolics; potential to replace hazardous solvents.Limited industrial validation: viscosity of solvents may hinder large-scale processing.
Infrared Drying + Milling Pre-treatmentGeneral compounds (preparation step)Reduces drying time and energy; preserves aroma and color; improves downstream extraction efficiency.Requires investment in specialized equipment; it may not be suitable for all bioactives.
Table 2. Incorporation of BSG in meat and analog products.
Table 2. Incorporation of BSG in meat and analog products.
Type of Product AnalyzedBSG OnboardingFunctionality TechnologyMain FindingAuthor
Sausage HybridsPartial meat substitution (35%) with BSG, broccoli and insectsModeling with simplex design and optimization by desirability functionProtein enhancement, traditional sausage-like texture, sensory acceptance[164]
Cuiabana sausagePartial replacement of meat with BSG meal (up to 6%)Physical–chemical and microbiological analysisIncreased fiber and protein, no lipid oxidation[163]
BurgersFat replacement with malt bagasse (up to 3%)Antioxidant evaluation and textureHigher fiber, lower calories, improved cooking parameters[162]
FrankfurtersBSG Fat replacementTextural and compositional analysisImproved texture and fat reduction without affecting quality[165]
Fish burgersMicroencapsulation of BSG bioactive compoundsBioactive enrichmentIncrease in bioactive compounds without altering sensory properties[166]
Low-fat chicken sausagesReplacing Fat with BSG Dietary FiberTextural and nutritional profile analysisBetter nutritional quality and texture in reduced-fat products[167]
Chicken burgersAddition of BSG Dietary FiberConvective oven cookingBetter moisture retention and firm texture[159]
Vegetable meat analoguesIncorporation of BSG as an ingredient (up to 20%)Extrusion in vegetable mixturesImproved fibrous texture and nutritional profile (protein and fiber)[168]
Extruded snacksMixing BSG with poultry mealHigh temperature extrusionSnacks rich in fiber and protein, acceptable for consumption[155]
Bean meat analoguesAddition of enzymatically treated BSGTexture improvement using enzymesMore meat-like structure, better cohesion and bite[169]
Enriched burgersBSG as a source of fiber (3.6%)Sustainability Perception SurveyIncreased acceptance when communicating environmental benefits[170]
Traditional cooked sausageAddition of BSG (2–4%)Stability analysis during storageMaintenance of physicochemical quality and shelf life of 21 days[156]
Chicken NuggetsUsing BSG as a High-Fiber BreaderOil Absorption EvaluationReduction in absorbed oil, higher nutritional quality[157]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tapia, D.; Quiñones, J.; Martinez, A.; Millahual, E.; Campagnol, P.C.B.; Sepúlveda, N.; Diaz, R. The Silent Revolution of Brewer’s Spent Grain: Meat/Food Innovations Through Circularity, Resource Recovery, and Nutritional Synergy—A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14193389

AMA Style

Tapia D, Quiñones J, Martinez A, Millahual E, Campagnol PCB, Sepúlveda N, Diaz R. The Silent Revolution of Brewer’s Spent Grain: Meat/Food Innovations Through Circularity, Resource Recovery, and Nutritional Synergy—A Review. Foods. 2025; 14(19):3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14193389

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tapia, Daniela, John Quiñones, Ailin Martinez, Erika Millahual, Paulo Cezar Bastianello Campagnol, Néstor Sepúlveda, and Rommy Diaz. 2025. "The Silent Revolution of Brewer’s Spent Grain: Meat/Food Innovations Through Circularity, Resource Recovery, and Nutritional Synergy—A Review" Foods 14, no. 19: 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14193389

APA Style

Tapia, D., Quiñones, J., Martinez, A., Millahual, E., Campagnol, P. C. B., Sepúlveda, N., & Diaz, R. (2025). The Silent Revolution of Brewer’s Spent Grain: Meat/Food Innovations Through Circularity, Resource Recovery, and Nutritional Synergy—A Review. Foods, 14(19), 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14193389

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop