Next Article in Journal
Dry-Cured Bísaro Ham: Differences in Physicochemical Characteristics, Fatty Acid Profile and Volatile Compounds Between Muscles
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Surface Color and Delaying Softening of Peach by Minimizing the Harmful Effects of Ethylene in the Package
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Chia and Flaxseed Meal as an Ingredient of Fermented Vegetable-Based Spreads to Design Their Nutritional Composition and Sensory Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbial Fermentation Affects the Structure–Activity Relationship of Bioactive Compounds in Ginseng and Its Applications in Fermentation Products: A Review

1
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Department of Institute of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(14), 2473; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142473
Submission received: 12 June 2025 / Revised: 7 July 2025 / Accepted: 11 July 2025 / Published: 15 July 2025

Abstract

Microbial fermentation technology has emerged as a pivotal approach for enhancing ginseng efficacy through the transformation of active ingredient molecular structures. This paper reviews the impact of microbial fermentation on the structure–activity relationship of ginseng bioactive compounds and advances in its application. Bibliometric analysis indicates that Panax species (Panax ginseng, Panax notoginseng) are primarily fermented using lactic acid bacteria and Aspergillus spp., with research predominantly focused on conversion efficiency to rare ginsenosides (Compound K, Rg3, and Rh2). Specifically, this review details the biotransformation pathways of these rare ginsenosides and the resultant bioactivity enhancements. Additionally, it summarizes the effects of other microorganisms, such as fungal fruiting bodies, on additional ginseng constituents like polysaccharides and polyphenols. Microbial fermentation has been successfully implemented in functional products, including ginseng vinegar, wine, and fermented milk. This review subsequently examines these applications, emphasizing fermentation’s potential to enhance product functionality. However, challenges remain in strain screening, process standardization, and analysis of multi-component synergistic mechanisms. In summary, this review synthesizes recent advancements in understanding the mechanisms of microbial fermentation on ginseng and its translational applications in functional foods and pharmaceuticals.

1. Introduction

Panax ginseng, a traditional medicinal herb widely utilized in East Asia [1,2], exhibits pharmacological effects, including immune enhancement, anti-fatigue, and anti-aging properties via telomerase activation or ROS reduction [3,4,5]. Its bioactive components, such as ginsenosides, polysaccharides, and polyphenols, are key active substances [6]. However, natural prototype compounds like ginsenosides Rb1 and Rg1 face absorption challenges [7,8,9] due to their complex glycosylation structures and high polarity, which result in low intestinal absorption rates and significant disparity between theoretical activity and practical efficacy. Modern biotechnology plays a pivotal role in overcoming these limitations and advancing ginseng’s therapeutic applications.
Microbial fermentation technology facilitates the transformation of traditional medicinal materials into modern functional products [10,11], offering significant advantages in ginseng fermentation. Common strains include lactic acid bacteria, Aspergillus spp., yeasts, Bacillus spp., and macrofungi [12], each exhibiting distinctive mechanism of action. Lactic acid bacteria enhance flavor through organic acid production while facilitating ginsenoside transformation [13,14]. Bidirectional solid-state fermentation by large fungi (such as Ganoderma lucidum and Cordyceps sinensis) and ginseng synergistically enhances levels of active components, promoting saponin conversion while increasing levels of fungal polysaccharides (such as Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides) [15,16,17] and specialized metabolites (such as cordycepin) [18,19,20]. Aspergillus spp. secrete β-glucosidase, pectinase, and cellulase, which efficiently decompose the plant cell walls [21,22], significantly improving saponin dissolution and transformation efficiency [23]. Although yeasts and Bacillus spp. are less frequently employed, they demonstrate unique capabilities for enriching active components, such as rare saponins and total flavonoids [24,25].
The enzyme system generated through microbial fermentation and metabolism enables targeted modification of ginseng’s active components [26,27,28,29,30], converting them into rare derivatives with enhanced bioavailability and potentiated pharmacological activity [31,32]. For example, β-glucosidase and α-L-rhamnosidase specifically catalyze the deglycosylation of ginsenosides to yield low-glycosylated rare saponins [29,33], significantly augmenting their anti-tumor, immunomodulatory, and neuroprotective functions [34,35]. Furthermore, fermentation reshapes the structure–activity relationship of other bioactive components. This process increases uronic acid and total flavonoid content [36] while enhancing the immunomodulatory efficacy of ginseng polysaccharides and the antioxidant activity of polyphenols [37,38].
Concurrently, growing demand for natural and health-promoting products [39,40] is stimulating the functional diversification of ginseng fermentation products. The product range has expanded beyond traditional forms, such as powders and oral liquids, to novel fermented applications, including dairy products, wines, and vinegars [12,41,42]. These products not only retain the natural properties of ginseng but also acquire new functional properties through microbial metabolism, including enhanced bioactive compound bioavailability and improved flavor profiles [43]. However, current regulatory frameworks governing fermented botanicals, particularly the FDA’s New Dietary Ingredient requirements (21 CFR § 190.6) and the EMA’s reflection paper on fermentation in herbal products (EMA/HMPC/250629/2012), maintain a cautious stance toward novel fermentation methodologies. This necessitates a strategic balance between regulatory compliance and technological innovation.
This article explores the theme of “microbial fermentation affects the structure–activity relationship of bioactive compounds in ginseng and its applications in fermentation products” by providing a systematic review of the latest research progress in this field. Through analyzing the structural modifications and functional enhancements in components such as ginsenosides, polysaccharides, and polyphenols achieved via microbial fermentation, we explored their potential for developing functional products. Using bibliometric analysis and case studies, the paper clarifies the fermentation characteristics by strains of lactic acid bacteria, Aspergillus spp., and macrofungi, along with their impact on active components. Current research limitations regarding strain adaptability, metabolic pathway analysis, and standardized processes are highlighted, while future research directions integrating artificial intelligence, bioinformatics, and defined fermentation technologies are proposed. It also proposes future research directions that integrate artificial intelligence (e.g., machine learning for strain selection), bioinformatics, and reference fermentation technology [44,45]. This work provides a theoretical foundation for basic research and industrial applications of microbially fermented ginseng. It also drives the modernization of traditional medicinal materials and advances the big health industry in alignment with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) through technological innovation and green production models.

2. Bibliometric Analysis of Ginseng Fermentation

Bibliometric analysis aggregates and interprets data from peer-reviewed publications to provide an objective framework for delineating research hotspots and developmental trajectories within specialized scientific domains [46,47]. This study employs bibliometric methodologies to conduct a systematic quantitative evaluation of the ginseng fermentation literature, thereby identifying core research domains—including but not limited to ginseng cultivars, microbial consortia, and bioactive phytoconstituents—while mapping the field’s current intellectual architecture and innovation frontiers.
The Web of Science Core Collection database was systematically searched for publications pertaining to the topics “ginseng fermented,” “Panax quinquefolius fermentation,” “Pnax ginseng fermentation,” and related variants. The search covered the period from 1 January 2000 to 1 April 2025. Conference proceedings, newspaper articles, and publications deemed to have low relevance to the research topic were excluded from consideration. Duplicate records were also eliminated, resulting in a final dataset comprising 770 pertinent publications. CiteSpace (v6.3.R1) was utilized for visualization and analysis purposes. The software parameters were configured as follows: a time slicing interval of three years; node type set to Keyword; top N limited to 50; and both Pathfinder and Pruning algorithms applied for network pruning within the merged network. Cluster analysis was conducted using the Log-Likelihood Ratio (LLR) algorithm. Keywords with a frequency of ≥13 were selected to generate a keyword co-occurrence map (Figure 1). In this map, nodes of varying colors—representing distinct clusters—are interconnected by lines. Each node corresponds to a keyword, with node size reflecting its frequency in the literature [48].
Based on the CiteSpace (v6.3.R1) analysis, we performed statistical profiling of ginseng varieties, microorganisms, and active components. As depicted in Figure 1 and Table 1, Panax ginseng, Panax notoginseng, and American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) constitute the three most extensively studied Panax species in fermentation research. Regarding microorganisms, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Aspergillus species, and Ganoderma lucidum predominate, with LAB applications constituting nearly 50% of reported cases. Research primarily focuses on key ginseng constituents, particularly ginsenosides, where Compound K and Rb1 emerge as major investigative targets. Beyond ginsenosides, a subset of studies examines additional active compounds, including ginseng polysaccharides and polyphenols.

3. Utilization of Different Microorganisms in Ginseng Fermentation

The microorganisms employed in the fermentation of ginseng encompass lactic acid bacteria, Aspergillus spp., yeasts, and macrofungi, as shown in Table 2. Among these microorganisms, lactic acid bacteria (comprising Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus helveticus, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, amongst others) demonstrate the most extensive utilization. Aspergillus spp. and macrofungi represent the next most prevalent taxa, whereas yeasts and Bacillus spp. exhibit comparatively limited application in ginseng fermentation, which may be attributed to the safety concerns associated with probiotics derived from Bacillus spp., as well as the influence of metabolic by-products produced by yeasts, such as ethanol, on the fermentation products [49,50]. Strain selection must align with specific fermentation objectives and methodologies. The current focus of research in the field of microbial fermentation is primarily directed toward enhancing the content of ginseng active ingredients, such as rare ginsenosides and total polyphenols, thereby enhancing the pharmacological activity of ginseng both in vivo and in vitro [51,52].

3.1. Lactic Acid Bacteria

Owing to their potential probiotic traits, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) serve as essential starters in fermenting dairy products (e.g., fermented milk and cheese) and vegetables (e.g., kimchi) [40,53,54,55]. Their recent application in ginseng fermentation has garnered increasing attention. LAB fermentation significantly elevates both the content and bioavailability of the active compounds found in ginseng [56]. Ginsenosides serve as the principal bioactive constituents of ginseng, yet the major forms naturally present in plants exhibit limited bioavailability due to poor absorption in humans [7,9]. During fermentation, β-glucosidase secreted by lactic acid bacteria can hydrolyze major ginsenosides, such as Rb1 and Rg1, into rare ginsenosides, like Rg3, F2, and Rh2 [38,57,58], which demonstrate superior absorption. The increase in the concentrations of rare ginsenosides significantly enhances the physiological activities of ginseng, including anti-tumor effects, antioxidant properties, neuroprotection, and immune regulation [3,4,6]. This process further improves the bioavailability of ginseng [59,60,61].
Furthermore, lactic acid bacteria generate substantial quantities of lactic acid and other organic acids during fermentation [62,63,64]. These acidic compounds can mitigate the bitterness of ginseng and enhance the palatability of ginseng-based fermented products, as confirmed by sensory evaluation from consumer panels [12,13,65,66,67], thereby offering innovative perspectives for the development of functional ginseng products.
In conclusion, lactic acid bacterial fermentation not only enhances the nutritional value of ginseng but also opens up new avenues for its use in functional foods and pharmaceuticals. However, screening and optimizing lactic acid bacteria strains, standardizing fermentation processes, and precisely regulating metabolic products (such as detecting saponin isomers and monitoring metabolic dynamics) remain key areas for future research.

3.2. Aspergillus spp.

As a significant industrial microorganism, Aspergillus spp. exhibits unique metabolic advantages and biotransformation potential in ginseng fermentation [23]. Currently, the Aspergillus species utilized in ginseng fermentation include Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus tubingensis, and Aspergillus oryzae, with Aspergillus niger being the most widely employed [12]. These fungi secrete highly active enzymes, such as pectinase, cellulase, and xylanase [68,69,70,71]. During fermentation, these enzymes decompose the plant cell walls on the surface of ginseng, releasing bioactive compounds like saponins and polysaccharides that are encapsulated within [72,73,74]. Additionally, β-glucosidase secreted by Aspergillus spp. can convert primary ginsenosides into rare ginsenosides, thereby significantly enhancing the anti-tumor and immune-regulating properties of fermented ginseng [23,75,76,77]. For example, Ramadhania et al. found that fermentation of black ginseng by Aspergillus niger KHNT-1 resulted in significantly enhanced anti-melanogenesis, anti-wrinkle, and antioxidant activities [78].
Although the Aspergillus spp. enzyme system is rich [68,69] and shows unique advantages in the fermentation of ginseng, it is difficult to separate the mycelium produced after fermentation from the substrate [79], and the process for extracting the target product is rather complex. Furthermore, the spores produced by Aspergillus spp. are highly heat-resistant and difficult to inactivate [80], potentially remaining in the final product and causing secondary fermentation or deterioration. In light of the aforementioned limitations, it may be beneficial to explore solid-state fermentation technology and inert carriers in future endeavors [81,82]. These approaches could enhance mycelium separation and broaden the application scope of Aspergillus spp. in ginseng fermentation [83].

3.3. Macrofungal

Bidirectional solid fermentation of macrofungi, such as Ganoderma lucidum, Cordyceps militaris, and Schizophyllum spp., in combination with ginseng has emerged as a significant research area in recent years [12,84]. Bidirectional fermentation alters the profile of ginsenosides and elevates the levels of active components within the fungi, creating a synergistic effect between the fungi and ginseng constituents. For example, co-fermentation of Ganoderma lucidum with ginseng promotes the enrichment of various secondary metabolites, such as polysaccharides and triterpenoids, in Ganoderma lucidum [85]. These fungal metabolites subsequently synergize with the active components of ginseng to augment physiological functions, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immune-regulatory properties [85,86,87]. Similarly, co-fermentation of Cordyceps militaris with ginseng not only increases the content of rare ginsenosides but also promotes the synthesis of cordycepin, resulting in multiple combined physiological effects [18,88,89].
This bidirectional fermentation system can significantly increase the yield of active ingredients or generate new metabolites through the synergistic effect of fungi and medicinal plants, providing new ideas for the development of functional foods and drugs, but problems such as slow mycelial growth rate and long fermentation cycles still need to be solved through process optimization. In future endeavors, metabolic engineering techniques could be employed to modify fungal strains to improve utilization efficiency and product specificity within this fermentation system [90].
Table 2. Microbial fermentation of ginseng substrates and its products.
Table 2. Microbial fermentation of ginseng substrates and its products.
MicroorganismsSubstratesProductsOutputsReferences
Aspergillus tubingensis KCTC 14,166American ginseng extractC-K8.06 g/L[23]
Rhizopus oligosporusWild GinsengTotal saponins2299 mg/kg[91]
Total phenolic5.65 ± 0.72 mM GAE/g
L-Carnitine630 mg/kg
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei B16NY2107 and B04WI2501 Panax ginsengRg392.981 ± 3.188 mg/L[92]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae F6Ginsenoside extractRh42.65 mg/g[93]
Rg52.56 mg/g
Cordyceps militaris KCCM 60304Red ginsengRb39.16%[18]
Rd513.93%
Rg263.12%
Rg3 (20S)101.17%
Rg3 (20R)112.53%
cordycepin34.8 mg/kg
Bacillus subtilis CCTCC M 2,020,002 and Trichoderma reese CICC 2626Ginseng powderTotal saponins21.79 mg/g[94]
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum B1Ginseng extractC-K0.7706 mg/kg[38]
Rk10.7348 mg/kg
Rh43.3924 mg/kg
Rg51.3648 mg/kg
Saccharomyces cerevisiae GIW-1Panax ginsengUronic acid-[36]
Acidic polysaccharide-
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KCCM 11613PPanax ginseng MeyerRd55.74 ppm[52]
Total phenolic37.67 ± 0.37 mg GAE/g
Aspergillus awamoriBlack ginsengAcidic polysaccharide74.2%[77]
Rg3, Rg5, and Rk14.13 mg/g
Bacillus licheniformis IDCK 30 and Bacillus subtilis IDCK 40Mountain-cultivated ginsengRg3166.90 μg/g[95]
C-K231.33 μg/g
Aspergillus tubingensis KCTC 14166American ginseng extractC-K17.1 mg/L/h[76]
Leuconostoc mesenteroides KCCM 12010PHydroponic ginsengTotal phenolic107.19%[96]
Total flavonoid645.59%
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MB11ginsenoside extractRh262.37 mg/g[97]
Cordyceps militaris KCCM 60304Korean red ginsengRd2.23 ± 0.28 mg/g[89]
Rg33.50 ± 0.29 mg/g
Monascus pilosus KMU103Red ginsengRh1, Rh2, Rg3838.7 mg/kg[98]
Monacolin K3089 mg/kg
Chaetomium sp. F24-W and Aspergillus nigerPanax notoginsengRg3108.95 mg/L[99]
“-” indicates absence.

4. Biotransformation and Structure–Activity Relationship of Bioactive Compounds in Fermented Ginseng

Biotransformation refers to the process of converting substrates into higher-value products through the utilization of biological catalysts, including enzymes, microorganisms, and animal or plant cells [100,101,102]. The predominant focus of microbial fermentation in ginseng processing is the biotransformation of ginsenosides. Through the process of microbial fermentation, the main ginsenoside in ginseng can be transformed into rare ginsenosides, which possess higher physiological activity. Furthermore, the impact of microbial fermentation on the structure–activity relationship of other bioactive substances, including polysaccharides and polyphenols, remains underexplored.

4.1. Ginsenoside

Ginsenosides are triterpenoid compounds constituting the primary bioactive constituents of Panax plants [103]. Their core structures are characterized as dammarane or oleanane types [7,104]. Glycosylation modifications yield diverse derivatives, which are categorized into two classes based on sugar moiety composition: prototype ginsenosides (e.g., Rb1 and Rg1) and rare ginsenosides (e.g., Rg3, Rh2, and F2) [56,105]. Studies indicate that both the number and positional configuration of glycosides attached at different sites on the aglycone skeleton critically determine biological activity [56,103]. Specifically, reduced glycosylation (as in monoglycosides) and terminal glycoside hydrolysis products (rare ginsenosides) consistently demonstrate enhanced pharmacological effects and superior bioavailability [8,9]. For instance, ginsenoside Rh2 (a monosaccharide) demonstrates markedly greater anti-tumor activity than Rg3 (a disaccharide), primarily attributable to Rh2’s superior cell membrane permeability and ability to disrupt cancer cell signaling pathways [106,107].
Owing to the limited natural abundance of rare ginsenosides with superior bioactivity (e.g., Rg3 and CK) in Panax plants [103,107], microbial fermentation technology has garnered significant research interest for converting major ginsenosides (such as Rb1) into these high-value derivatives [56]. This bioprocess addresses the growing demand for clinical applications by enhancing ginsenoside bioactivity. The transformation mechanism primarily involves microbial secretion of β-glucosidases and β-arabinofuranosidases, which selectively hydrolyze glycosyl groups at C3, C6, and C20 positions on the aglycone core, thereby facilitating rare saponin biosynthesis [108,109].
Damaran-type (DM-type), oleanolic acid-type (OA-type), and oxytetracycline-type (OCT-type) ginsenosides are the three main structural types of ginsenosides at present, among which damaran-type ginsenosides account for the vast majority, and the latter two structural types of ginsenosides are rarely found in nature [103,109]. According to the differences in glycosides and hydroxyl ligands at C3, C6, and C20, the DM-type ginsenosides can be divided into proto-panaxanadiol type (PPD-type) ginsenosides and protopanaxtriol type (PPT-type) ginsenosides [56]. PPD-type ginsenosides are formed by the combination of β-OH and a glycogroup at C3 or C20 of PPD, mainly including Ra1, Ra2, Ra3, Rb1, Rb2, Rb3, Rc, Rd, Rg3, and Rh2. PPT-type ginsenosides are formed by the combination of α-OH at C6 of PPT or β-OH at C20 with glycogroups, mainly including Re, Rf, Rg1, Rg2, Rh1, F1, R1, and R2 [56,110].
(1)
PPD type
Rb1 is the most prevalent compound in the biotransformation of PPD-type ginsenosides, primarily due to its higher abundance in ginseng extracts [30]. Undergoing deglycosylation by β-glucosidase, Rb1 can be converted into various secondary ginsenosides through distinct hydrolysis pathways, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 2, ultimately yielding the aglycone protopanaxadiol (PPD) upon complete conversion. The types and activities of β-glucosidases produced during metabolism vary depending on different microbial species [111]. Based on linkage location, residue structure, and enzyme activity, glucosidases can be classified into four categories [112]: Type I glucosidase is capable of simultaneously hydrolyzing the glycosyl groups linked at the C3 and C20 positions of PPD ginsenosides; Type II glucosidase specifically targets the glycosyl group at the C20 position of either PPD or PPT ginsenosides; Type III glucosidase acts on glucose located at the lateral C3 junction of PPD ginsenoside; and lastly, Type IV glucosidase hydrolyzes the glycogroup linked to the C6 in PPT ginsenoside [56,112].
Most current studies focus on microbial conversion of Rb1 to the rare ginsenosides Rg3, Rh2, or C-K. For example, crude β-glucosidase URN103L from Lactobacillus buchneri can convert Rb1 to Rg3 [111], and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum OG-05, Leuconostoc citreum LH1, and Lactobacillus brachys THK-D57 can convert Rb1 to C-K via pathway 4 [113,114,115]. As indicated in Table 3, ginsenoside C-K can also be produced from Rb1 via pathway 2. Leuconostoc mesenteroides DC102 and Leuconostoc lactis DC201 co-cultures and Companilactobacillus paralimentarius LH4 can degrade Rb1 to ginsenoside C-K through intermediates Gyp17 and F2 [116,117]. In addition, some studies have reported that Rb1 cannot be completely converted to C-K in the process of microbial fermentation, resulting instead in the accumulation of intermediates ginsenosides, such as Rd or Gyp17. Bifidobacterium dentium and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG were only able to convert Rd or Gyp17 during the fermentation of Rb1 [118,119], suggesting that the β-glucosidase activity in these bacteria is limited to the hydrolysis of the β-D-glucoside linkage at either C3 or C20, rather than both positions.
(2)
PPT type
The content of PPT-type ginsenosides in natural Panax plants is significantly lower than that of PPD-type ginsenosides [56], so there are relatively few research reports on the fermentation transformation of PPT-type ginsenosides. Ginsenoside Re and Rg1 are the predominant initial substrates for PPT-type ginsenoside biotransformation [120]. Notably, Rg1 can be derived from Re through hydrolysis of the terminal α-L-rhamnose moiety at the C6 position of ginsenoside Re by α-L-rhamnosidase. [107]. Figure 3 and Table 4 provide a comprehensive summary of the various transformation pathways of ginsenoside Re. Most reports show that ginsenosides Re and Rg1 are mainly converted to the rare ginsenoside Rh1 via glycosidase hydrolysis. For example, the conversion rate of ginsenoside Rh1 produced by ginsenoside Rg1 after fermentation with Cordyceps sinensis from different sources can reach 54.9% and 82.5% [121,122]. The co-culture of Leuconostoc mesenteroides YLB8, Lactobacillus helveticus KII13, and Pediococcus pentosaceus KID7 can convert ginsenoside Re to Rh1 via pathway 1 [123,124].
In conclusion, microbial fermentation can significantly modulate the structure–activity relationship of ginsenosides. Table 5 provides a comprehensive summary of the transformation pathways associated with various types of ginsenosides. Rare ginsenosides generated through microbial fermentation and transformation, such as C-K, Rg3, and Rh1, contain fewer glycosides and are more easily absorbed and utilized by the human body. These ginsenosides demonstrate more significant neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-tumor activities [120,125,126]. Subsequently, we can use gene editing and synthetic biology techniques to optimize the key enzymes in the strain that convert ginsenosides. This will enhance the synthesis efficiency of rare ginsenosides and accelerate their industrial-scale production.

4.2. Ginseng Polysaccharide

In recent years, alongside the research focus on core active ingredient ginsenosides, the structure–activity relationship of ginseng polysaccharides has gained increasing attention. Ginseng polysaccharides primarily comprise ginseng pectin and ginseng amyloid substances. Ginseng pectin is recognized as the principal active component within ginseng polysaccharides [137]. It predominantly consists of an acidic heteropolysaccharide mixture that includes galactose (Gal), galacturonic acid (GalA), rhamnose (Rha), and arabinoxylan (AX), among others. This mixture encompasses arabinogalactan (AG), rhamnogalacturonic acid (RG), and homogalacturonic acid (HG). The main constituent of ginseng starch is amyloid glucan, which is composed of α-D-(1,4)-glucan, 6-branched α-D-(1,4)-glucan, 3-branched α-D-(1,6)-glucan, and non-side chain α-D-(1,6)-glucan [138]. Currently identified types of ginseng polysaccharides include water-soluble polysaccharide (GR-4), acidic polysaccharides (SA, SB, PA, PB, ginseng-I A; ginseng-II A, GR-5AUL, GR-5AUH, and PG-F2), and alkali-soluble polysaccharides (GRA-3 and GRA-4) [139].
The bioactivity of ginseng polysaccharides is modulated by their compositional profile, structural features, and concentration [140]. For example, Chen et al. [141] demonstrated that ginseng aerial part-derived polysaccharides exhibit significantly higher antioxidant activity than subterranean part-derived counterparts, with neutral polysaccharides > acidic polysaccharides in efficacy. Furthermore, Zhang et al. [142] demonstrated that arabinogalactan (AG) side chains in Panax ginseng-derived polysaccharide WGPA-2-RG critically mediate nitric oxide secretion and lymphocyte proliferation.
Microbial fermentation significantly modulates the structure–activity relationship of ginseng polysaccharides. Kim et al. [143] fermented ginseng using Hericium erinaceum mycelia, revealing that crude polysaccharides from fermented ginseng (FG-HE-CP) exhibit superior immunomodulatory activities, including enhanced splenocyte proliferation, macrophage activation, and gut immunoregulation, compared to unfermented extracts. Critically, this study demonstrated the essential role of hydroxyl groups in polysaccharide immunogenicity [143]. Furthermore, fermentation of ginseng polysaccharides by Saccharomyces GIW-1 enhanced antioxidant activity through improved hydroxyl radical scavenging, superoxide anion elimination, and total antioxidant capacity [36]. These fermented products also alleviated lipopolysaccharide-induced liver inflammation in mice, with Ai et al. attributing this hepatoprotective effect to increased glucuronic acid content [36]. Similarly, You et al. [144] fermented Panax notoginseng with Saccharomyces cerevisiae CGMCC 17452, significantly increasing the polysaccharide yield. The resulting fermented notoginseng polysaccharide (FPNP) inhibited H2O2-induced damage to collagen and elastic proteins by activating the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway, thereby protecting against oxidative stress [144].
Currently, over 80 distinct sugar moieties have been isolated from ginseng polysaccharides [145], many exhibiting significant immunomodulatory [146], antioxidant [147], and anti-tumor properties [148,149]. However, due to the high molecular weight of ginseng polysaccharides, elucidating their complete structures using chemical and spectral techniques remains challenging. Consequently, the structure–activity relationship of ginseng polysaccharides is not yet fully understood; extensive research is required in the future to determine their structural characteristics. Future research should integrate molecular dynamics simulations with metabolomics to establish quantitative correlations between specific sugar chain modifications and their biological activities.

4.3. Polyphenols

In addition to the significant presence of saponins and polysaccharides, Panax plants also contain various polyphenols, including flavonoids. Although these compounds are present in relatively low concentrations, they play crucial roles in the biological activity of ginseng, contributing notably to its antioxidant [150] and hypoglycemic properties [16].
Polyphenols in plants can also undergo biotransformation following microbial fermentation [151]. For instance, certain flavonoids exist as glycosides, such as quercetin and kaempferol [152]. The β-glucosidase secreted by microorganisms can hydrolyze the glycosidic bond and release aglycones. For instance, quercetin glycoside is converted to quercetin by microbial fermentation, and its 3-OH and 4′-OH free hydroxyl groups significantly enhance the ability to scour free radicals [48]. Studies confirm that aglycone flavonoids exhibit 2–3 times greater antioxidant activity than their glycosylated forms. [153].
Current research reports demonstrate that elevated total phenol and flavonoid levels during ginseng fermentation enhance antioxidant activity through improved free radical scavenging capabilities [95,154,155]. For instance, Liu et al. conducted a fermentation of ginseng extract using Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, and their findings revealed that the concentrations of total phenol and total flavone in the ginseng extract increased post-fermentation, resulting in a fermented ginseng extract with markedly stronger antioxidant activity [38].
Current research on ginseng polyphenols remains limited, leaving the specific mechanisms through which fermentation modulates the structure–activity relationships incompletely characterized. Future studies should combine with metabolomics and molecular docking technology to accurately analyze the mechanism of action of key active groups and to explore synthetic biology methods for the directed synthesis of highly active compounds.

5. Ginseng Fermented Products

With the advancement of microbial fermentation technology, the application of ginseng in health food has progressively transitioned from basic products, such as ginseng powder, ginseng honey slices, and ginseng oral liquid, to more sophisticated functional fermented products, including ginseng fermented wine, ginseng fermented milk, ginseng vinegar, and ginseng fermented beverages, as shown in Table 6. This evolution contributes to improved utilization of ginseng while supporting increased added value and expanded market potential.

5.1. Ginseng Fermented Wine

The current market features diverse fermented ginseng wines, including rice wine, beer, fruit wine, and soju. Ginseng fermented wine not only maximizes the retention of ginseng’s original benefits and is rich in nutrients but also contains a moderate alcohol content. It boasts a smooth taste along with the unique aroma and flavor of ginseng, making it refreshing and enjoyable for a wide range of consumers. Park et al. developed ginseng beer by incorporating red ginseng extract fermented with S. cerevisiae Saflager W-34/70 as the fermentation agent [156]. Sensory evaluation results indicated that fermentation at 4 °C for 21 days yielded the highest scores in terms of flavor, taste, and overall acceptability. Pyo et al. [157] fermented Panax ginseng sprouts with brewing yeasts to produce ginseng fermented wine (GFW) and analyzed its physicochemical properties. Fermentation increased acidity, total phenol content, and ABTS radical scavenging activity, whereas pH and the reducing sugar content decreased. Notably, ginsenoside Re was the predominant ginsenoside in GFW, followed by Rg1 and Rh1; other ginsenosides were present in trace amounts [157]. Therefore, ginseng fermented wine not only preserves its original flavor but also offers antioxidant properties and other beneficial functions. As health-conscious consumer demand grows, future product development should target specialized segments through optimized fermentation protocols.

5.2. Ginseng Fermented Milk

Ginseng is extensively incorporated into dairy products, particularly fortified milk, fermented milk, and cheese, with ginseng fermented milk being the predominant fermented variant. Jung et al. [158] produced fermented milk supplemented with red ginseng extract (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%) using Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus and found that the antioxidant effect of the fermented milk was directly proportional to the concentration of red ginseng extract. Lee et al. [66] developed a variant of ginseng fermented milk using hydroponic ginseng (HG). The results showed that the sensory scores of color, flavor, texture, taste, and overall acceptability of fermented milk with 0.5% HG addition had no significant difference from that of the fermented without HG addition (control), but the fermented milk fortified with HG extract exhibited higher antioxidant activity than the control group [66]. In another study, Cimo et al. [159] produced fermented milk containing American ginseng roots, and the results indicated that ginseng enhanced the survival rate of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1, while the starter culture increased the content of ginsenosides Rg1, Re, Rb1, and Rb2 in ginseng [159]. The aforementioned studies underscore that ginseng can be effectively integrated into high-value dairy products while serving as a health supplement endowed with bioactive properties within the food industry.

5.3. Ginseng Vinegar

Ginseng vinegar represents another prominent type of ginseng fermentation product. The traditional production process of ginseng vinegar is mostly vinegar soaking, but the introduction of modern fermentation technology has greatly improved its ingredient utilization and functional properties. Baik et al. [160] used rice wine and red ginseng concentrate (RGC) as substrates to produce red ginseng vinegar by adding Acetobacter aceti. The sensory evaluation results showed that the flavor, taste, and overall preference of red ginseng vinegar received high scores. In another study, Yeo et al. [161] used hydroponic ginseng to develop hydroponic ginseng vinegar (HGV) containing ginsenoside Rg2. Compared with the control group, the level of ginsenoside Rg2 increased 4.0-fold in acetic acid-fermented HGV, and HGV had significant anti-obesity and anti-hyperlipidemic effects. The health benefits of traditional vinegar are somewhat limited. However, the addition of ginseng vinegar endows it with the attribute of “food and medicine sharing the same origin,” and its antioxidant properties can extend the shelf-life of food while enhancing the nutritional value of dishes.
Table 6. Ginseng fermented products.
Table 6. Ginseng fermented products.
Product NamesStarter CulturesFunctionsReferences
Ginseng wineSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHepatoprotective effect[162]
Ginseng alcoholic drinkSaccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus-[163]
Ginseng wineSaccharomyces cerevisiae,
Saccharomyces carlsbergensis
-[164]
Red ginseng wineSaccharomyces cerevisiae-[165]
Panax ginseng sprout wineSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAntioxidant[157]
Ginseng beerSaccharomyces cerevisiae-[156]
Ginseng makgeolliSaccharomyces cerevisiae-[166]
Ginseng rice wineKefir grain-[167]
Ginseng makgeolliSaccharomyces cerevisiae-[168]
Ginseng-cactus wineSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnti-fatigue[169]
Ginseng fermented milkLactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus thermophilusAntioxidant[158]
Ginseng fermented milkLactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum, Streptococcus thermophilusAntioxidant[66]
Ginseng fermented milkLacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Streptococcus thermophilus-[159]
Ginseng fermented milkLactiplantibacillus plantarum NK181, Streptococcus thermophilusAntioxidant[170]
Ginseng fermented milkLactiplantibacillus plantarum SY46, Levilactobacillus brevis SY65Antioxidant[171]
Ginseng fermented milkLactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidumAntioxidant[172]
Ginseng fermented milkBifidobacterium minimum KK-1, Bifidobacterium cholerium KK-2-[173]
Ginseng fermented milkLactobacillus acidophilus KCTC3150, Ligilactobacillus salivarius ssp. CNU27-[174]
Ginseng vinegarAcetobacter aceti-[160]
Ginseng vinegarAcetobacter acetiAnti-obesity[161]
Ginseng persimmon vinegarAcetobacter acetiLipid-lowering effect[175]
Ginseng vinegarMix microbial powder-[176]
Ginseng vinegarAcetobacter pasteurianus JBA190503Anti-inflammatory effect[42]
Ginseng vinegarAcetobacter acetiAntioxidant[177]
Ginseng fruit vinegarAcetobacter aceti-[178]
Ginseng-prunus mume fruit vinegarAcetobacter acetiAnti-fatigue effect[179]
Effervescent tablets of lactobacilliLactobacillus acidophilus
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
-[180]
Ginseng cheeseLactobacillus acidophilus-[181]
Ginseng cheeseFlora Danica (Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris)-[182]
Ginseng fermented milkLigilactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilusAntioxidant[183]
Ginseng fermented milkLactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum, Streptococcus thermophilusAntibacterial effect[184]
“-” indicates absence.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

As illustrated in Figure 4, this paper provides a systematic summary of the characteristics of lactic acid bacteria, Aspergillus spp., and macrofungi involved in ginseng fermentation, integrating findings from bibliometric analysis with experimental research progress. It examines the impact of fermentation on the structure–activity relationship of key active ginseng components, including ginsenosides, ginseng polysaccharides, and polyphenols. Additionally, the paper summarizes and generalizes fermented ginseng products, including ginseng wine, fermented milk, and vinegar.
However, current research continues to face numerous challenges. Firstly, there is a lack of systematic framework for the screening of microbial strains and metabolic regulation. The transformation efficiency of different strains when utilizing the same substrate exhibits considerable variation, and the mechanisms underlying the generation of intermediate products remain poorly understood. Secondly, existing studies primarily focus on individual active ingredients, such as ginsenosides, with limited exploration of the synergistic effects and structure–activity relationship among multiple components, like polysaccharides and polyphenols. This limitation hinders the development of synergistic products. Additionally, the standardization of fermentation processes remains low; there is a lack of established norms governing strain growth conditions, substrate pretreatment, and product stability control. These factors collectively hinder industrial-scale production.
Against the backdrop of rapidly advancing AI, AI holds significant potential for accelerating future research. These models can expedite the breeding of highly efficient transformation strains (such as high-yield β-glucosidase bacteria), elucidate the pathway for intermediate products, and reduce the research and development cycle by orders of magnitude. Furthermore, by integrating synthetic biology and machine learning, AI can facilitate analysis of the structure–activity relationship and the synergistic effects of multiple components, like polysaccharides and polyphenols, thereby advancing the development of functional products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z., J.B., and W.L.; methodology, M.J. and B.P.; software, M.J. and Y.Z. (Ying Zhu); validation, Y.Z. (Ying Zhu), J.Z., and Z.Z.; formal analysis, Y.Z. (Yansheng Zhao); investigation, W.L.; resources, X.X.; data curation, J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z., and J.B.; visualization, W.L.; supervision, B.P.; project administration, X.X.; funding acquisition, J.B., and X.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202050), Zhenjiang Science and Technology Plan Project Application (GJ2024011), and Zhenjiang Innovation Capacity Construction Plan-Discipline Key Laboratory Construction (SS2024005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, H.B.; Lu, X.Y.; Hu, Y.; Fan, X.H. Chemical constituents of Panax ginseng and Panax notoginseng explain why they differ in therapeutic efficacy. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 161, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yao, K.S.; Sun, J.; Tang, N.Q.; Xu, M.; Cao, Y.; Fu, L.H.; Zhou, X.; Wu, X.H. Nondestructive detection for Panax notoginseng powder grades based on hyperspectral imaging technology combined with CARS-PCA and MPA-LSSVM. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.J.; Liu, Y.; An, C.; Liu, C.; Ma, S.J.; Zhang, Q.W.; Ding, H.; Shao, J.J.; Xue, W.J. Protective Effect of Ginsenoside CK against Autoimmune Hepatitis Induced by Concanavalin A. Foods 2023, 12, 4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Feng, S.W.; Li, T.; Wei, X.R.; Zheng, Y.F.; Zhang, Y.M.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y.Q. The Antioxidant and Anti-Fatigue Effects of Rare Ginsenosides and γ-Aminobutyric Acid in Fermented Ginseng and Germinated Brown Rice Puree. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhang, R.; Shen, X. Anti-aging Effect of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma:A Review. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2024, 30, 196–207. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, G.L.; Wang, C.Z.; Mohammadi, S.; Sawadogo, W.R.; Ma, Q.E.; Yuan, C.S. Pharmacological Effects of Ginseng: Multiple Constituents and Multiple Actions on Humans. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2023, 51, 1085–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Geng, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, J. Research progress on chemical diversity of saponins in Panax ginseng. Chin. Herb. Med. 2024, 16, 529–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, B.; Zhang, C.; Song, K.; Lu, W. Research Progress in Biosynthesis of Rare Ginsenosides. Chin. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 71–88. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Q.L.; Wang, Y.P.; Xie, Y.J.; Adu-Frimpong, M.; Wei, C.M.; Yang, X.; Cao, X.; Deng, W.W.; Toreniyazov, E.; Ji, H.; et al. Nonionic surfactant vesicles as a novel drug delivery system for increasing the oral bioavailability of Ginsenoside Rb1. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tuly, J.A.; Ma, H.L. Bioconversion of food industrial waste okara by microbial fermentation: Scope of omics study and possibility. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 146, 104391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, Y.Y.; Bai, Q.; Tao, H.X.; Bin, X. Prospects for the application of traditional Chinese medicine network pharmacology in food science research. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 5183–5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, Q.; Guo, L.; Du, X. Research progress on probiotic fermentation of ginseng and its products. Food Ferment. Ind. 2022, 48, 311–319. [Google Scholar]
  13. Park, S.E.; Seo, S.H.; Lee, K.I.; Na, C.S.; Son, H.S. Metabolite profiling of fermented ginseng extracts by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 42, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, Y.Q.; Tang, Y.Q.; Liu, T.; Liu, H.C.; Yang, J.G.; Meng, L. Optimization of Rare Ginsenosides and Antioxidant Activity Quality of Ginseng Jiaosu Based on Probiotic Strains and Fermentation Technology. J. Food Qual. 2023, 2023, 5686929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jang, G.Y.; Joung, E.M.; Lee, S.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Hwang, B.Y.; Hong, J.T.; Lee, J.; Jeong, H.S. Isolation and identification of antiproliferative substances from ginseng fermented using Ganoderma lucidum mycelia. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 24, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hsu, B.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Lu, T.J.; Pan, M.H.; Ho, C.T.; Hwang, L.S.; Hung, W.L. Bioconversion of Ginsenosides in American Ginseng Extraction Residue by Fermentation with Ganoderma lucidum Improves Insulin-like Glucose Uptake in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Fermentation 2021, 7, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.Y.; Cui, F.J.; Sun, L.; Zan, X.Y.; Sun, W.J. Recent advances in Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides: Structures/ bioactivities, biosynthesis and regulation. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, Y.S.; Lim, J.M.; Ku, B.H.; Cho, H.R.; Choi, J.S. Alteration in ginsenoside and cordycepin content by solid-state fermentation of red ginseng with Cordyceps militaris. Czech J. Food Sci. 2021, 39, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, L.; Zuo, J.H.; Yi, F.; Yang, Y.L.; Dong, Y.M.; Li, Q.Y.; Li, M.H. Improved bioactivity and composition of Cordyceps militaris cultured with Panax ginseng. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 41, 660–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Z.C.; Terry, N. Optimization of Polysaccharide Production from Cordyceps militaris by Solid-State Fermentation on Rice and Its Antioxidant Activities. Foods 2019, 8, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siva, D.; Srivethi, G.; Vasan, P.T.; Rajesh, D.; Alfarhan, A.; Rajagopal, R. Enhanced cellulase enzyme production by Aspergillus niger using cellulase/iron oxide magnetic nano-composites. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Odoch, M.; Buys, E.M.; Taylor, J.R.N. Solid-State Fermentation of Cassava Roots Using Cellulolytic-Type Alkaliphilic Bacillus spp. Cultures to Modify the Cell Walls and Assist Starch Release. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 191, 1395–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, Y.I.; Song, W.S.; Oh, D.K. Enhanced production of ginsenoside compound K by synergistic conversion of fermentation with Aspergillus tubingensis and commercial cellulase. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2025, 12, 1538031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Choi, H.J.; Kim, E.A.; Kim, D.H.; Shin, K.S. The Bioconversion of Red Ginseng Ethanol Extract into Compound K by Saccharomyces cerevisiae HJ-014. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. You, X.; Li, Y.; Bu, Q.; Ren, G. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rd by fermentation of ginseng rhizome by Bacillus subtilis LM 4-2. Food Ferment. Ind. 2024, 50, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yao, M.J.; Yang, Y.; Fan, J.; Ma, C.M.; Liu, X.F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Sun, Z.H.; McClements, D.J.; Zhang, J.X.; et al. Production, purification, and functional properties of microbial fibrinolytic enzymes produced by microorganism obtained from soy-based fermented foods: Developments and challenges. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 3725–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yuan, J.; Ravikumar, Y.; Zhang, G.Y.; Yun, J.H.; Zhang, Y.F.; Zabed, H.M.; Qi, X.H. L-arabinose isomerase from Lactobacillus parabuchneri and its whole cell biocatalytic application in D-tagatose biosynthesis from D-galactose. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 101034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, G.H.; Feng, W.W.; Wu, X.Y.; Yang, L.Q. Biotransformation and metabolism of three mulberry anthocyanin monomers by rat gut microflora. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, S.Y.; Lee, H.N.; Hong, S.J.; Kang, H.J.; Cho, J.Y.; Kim, D.; Ameer, K.; Kim, Y.M. Enhanced biotransformation of the minor ginsenosides in red ginseng extract by Penicillium decumbens β-glucosidase. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2022, 153, 109941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, P.Y.; Bae, K.H.; Cho, S.; Park, B.C.; Shin, H.; Park, S.G. Ginsenoside Rb1 is Transformed into Rd and Rh2 by Microbacterium trichothecenolyticum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 23, 1802–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, J.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Fu, R.; Duan, Z.; Fan, D. Recent advances in biotransformation of ginsenosides. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2021, 40, 1238–1247. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, W.N.; Fan, D.D. Biocatalytic strategies for the production of ginsenosides using glycosidase: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 3807–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jiang, M.X.; Zhu, L.; Xie, S.H.; Ren, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, M.J.; Yin, G.S. Transcriptome Profiling, Cloning, and Characterization of An Glu04478, a Ginsenoside Hydrolyzing β-Glucosidase from Aspergillus niger NG1306. Curr. Microbiol. 2025, 82, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.W.; Gong, Y.Y.; Jiang, Q.Y.; Ma, C.; Si, L.B.; Zhang, T.H.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Z. Ginsenoside CK ameliorates tumor growth in lung cancer mice via inhibiting EGFR. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 121, 106446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, C.F.; Zhang, Q.P.; Cheng, J.; Xu, G.H.; Zhu, J.X.; Yi, L.T. Role of ginsenoside Rb1 in attenuating depression-like symptoms through astrocytic and microglial complement C3 pathway. Metab. Brain Dis. 2024, 39, 1039–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ai, Z.Y.; You, Y.; Li, W.C.; Fan, J.J.; Wang, Y.H.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Liu, J.S. Enhanced uronic acid content, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities of polysaccharides from ginseng fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae GIW-1. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, S.W.; Zhang, G.Y.; Han, Y.Q.; Ma, J.W.; Bai, B.; Gao, J.J.; Zhang, Z.M. Ginsenosides and Polysaccharides from Ginseng Co-Fermented with Multi-Enzyme-Coupling Probiotics Improve In Vivo Immunomodulatory Effects. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, S.; Liu, S.; Mi, Q.; Yin, P.; Xue, T.; Yu, X.; Meng, X.; Wang, L.; Bi, Y. Changes in Active Components and Antioxidant Properties of Ginseng Fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum. Food Sci. 2023, 44, 252–259. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shishir, M.R.I.; Saifullah, M.; Hashim, S.B.H.; Aalim, H.; Bilal, M.; Khan, S.; Marappan, G.; Tahir, H.E.; Zhihua, L.; Zhai, X.D.; et al. Micro and nano-encapsulated natural products in yogurt: An emerging trend to achieve multifunctional benefits in product quality and human health. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 154, 110124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farag, M.A.; Jomaa, S.A.; Abd El-Wahed, A.; El-Seedi, H.R. The Many Faces of Kefir Fermented Dairy Products: Quality Characteristics, Flavour Chemistry, Nutritional Value, Health Benefits, and Safety. Nutrients 2020, 12, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jung, J.; Lee, N.K.; Paik, H.D. Bioconversion, health benefits, and application of ginseng and red ginseng in dairy products. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1155–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Moon, K.E.; Oh, H.H.; Jeong, D.Y.; Soo, K.Y. Ginsenoside Conversion and Anti-Inflammatory Effect on RAW 264.7 Cells of Ginseng Extract Vinegar. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 50, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, M.E.; Lee, J.S. The Potential of Korean Bioactive Substances and Functional Foods for Immune Enhancement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gao, Y.Q.; Liu, M. Application of machine learning based genome sequence analysis in pathogen identification. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1474078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jamka, K.; Wróblewska-Luczka, P.; Adamczuk, P.; Zawadzki, P.; Bojar, H.; Raszewski, G. Methodology for preparing a cosmetic sample for the development of Microorganism Detection System (SDM) software and artificial intelligence learning to recognize specific microbial species. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2021, 28, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zheng, Z.W.; Li, H.T.; Wang, X.; Yang, S.Y.; Li, X.K. Trends and Hotspots of Starch Fermentation Research: Bibliometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace. Starch-Starke 2023, 75, 2200216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ren, M.N.; Yu, X.J.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Yagoub, A.A.; Chen, L.; Zhou, C.S. Visualizing the knowledge domain of pulsed light technology in the food field: A scientometrics review. Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 74, 102823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zeng, T.X.; Pei, J.; Miao, Y.J.; Zheng, Y.; Gu, S.J.; Zhao, L.; Huang, L.F. Current Status and Research Trends of Panax Between 1900-2019: A Bibliometric Analysis. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2022, 28, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, S.J.; Zhao, L.J.; Li, M.Y.; Zhu, Y.D.; Liang, D.; Ma, Y.Y.; Sun, L.X.; Zhao, G.M.; Tu, Q.C. Probiotic Bacillus as fermentation agents: Status, potential insights, and future perspectives. Food Chem. X 2024, 22, 101465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, N.K.; Kim, W.S.; Paik, H.D. Bacillus strains as human probiotics: Characterization, safety, microbiome, and probiotic carrier. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, F.; Wu, Z.X.; Sui, X. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 with wild Cordyceps sinensis and Ascomycota sp. and its antihyperlipidemic effects on the diet-induced cholesterol of zebrafish. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jung, J.; Jang, H.J.; Eom, S.J.; Choi, N.S.; Lee, N.K.; Paik, H.D. Fermentation of red ginseng extract by the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum KCCM 11613P: Ginsenoside conversion and antioxidant effects. J. Ginseng Res. 2019, 43, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, L.; Deng, K.W.; Zhang, Y. Isolation and screening of high-quality lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains in kefir grains and preparation of kefir compound fermentation starter. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shi, C.; Chen, Y.Y.; Li, C.Z.; Al-Asmari, F.; Cui, H.Y.; Lin, L. Potential Application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Food Bio-preservation—A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on the Antibacterial and Anti-Virulence Effects on Foodborne Pathogens. Food Rev. Int. 2024, 40, 2993–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Virk, M.S.; Virk, M.A.; He, Y.F.; Tufail, T.; Gul, M.; Qayum, A.; Rehman, A.; Rashid, A.; Ekumah, J.N.; Han, X.; et al. The Anti-Inflammatory and Curative Exponent of Probiotics: A Comprehensive and Authentic Ingredient for the Sustained Functioning of Major Human Organs. Nutrients 2024, 16, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vasquez, R.; Song, J.H.; Park, Y.S.; Paik, H.D.; Kang, D.K. Application of probiotic bacteria in ginsenoside bioconversion and enhancing its health-promoting benefits: A review. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2025, 34, 1631–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lee, H.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Shin, E.C.; Cho, D.Y.; Jung, J.G.; Kim, M.J.; Jeong, J.B.; Kang, D.; Kang, S.S.; Cho, K.M. Changes in Chemical Compositions and Antioxidant Activities from Fresh to Fermented Red Mountain-Cultivated Ginseng. Molecules 2022, 27, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, J.; Qian, Y.; Wu, Q.; Cui, J.; Lin, G.; Li, R.; Li, L.; Chen, S. Screening of ginseng fermented bacteria strains and research on transformation abilities of ginsenoside. Food Ferment. Ind. 2023, 49, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ban, M.S.; Kim, Y.; Lee, S.; Han, B.; Yu, K.S.; Jang, I.J.; Chung, H.K.; Lee, S. Pharmacokinetics of Ginsenoside Compound K From a Compound K Fermentation Product, CK-30, and From Red Ginseng Extract in Healthy Korean Subjects. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2021, 10, 1358–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shin, M.B.; Kim, S.A.; Lee, S.; Shim, W.S.; Lee, K.T.; Lee, S.K.; Yim, S.V.; Kim, B.H. Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Ginsenosides between Fermented and Non-Fermented Red Ginseng in Healthy Volunteers. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, H.K. Pharmacokinetics of ginsenoside Rb1 and its metabolite compound K after oral administration of Korean Red Ginseng extract. J. Ginseng Res. 2013, 37, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Boasiako, T.A.; Yinka, A.A.; Yuqing, X.; Boateng, I.D.; Ma, Y.K. Tri-cultured lactic-acetic acid co-fermentation improves stored jujube puree functionality, physicochemical, volatile compounds, and sensory characteristics. Food Biosci. 2024, 57, 103534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kwaw, E.; Ma, Y.K.; Tchabo, W.; Apaliya, M.T.; Xiao, L.L.; Wu, M. Effect of lactic acid fermentation on the phytochemical, volatile profile and sensory attributes of mulberry juice. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 56, 305–317. [Google Scholar]
  64. Shin, N.R.; Bose, S.; Choi, Y.; Kim, Y.M.; Chin, Y.W.; Song, E.J.; Nam, Y.D.; Kim, H. Anti-Obesity Effect of Fermented Panax notoginseng Is Mediated Via Modulation of Appetite and Gut Microbial Population. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 665881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, S.-H.; Woo, H.-G.; Choi, Y.-R.; Lee, C.-M.; Jeong, J.-H.; Lee, D.-H.; Lee, C.-Y.; Oh, I.-K.; Ha, H.-K.; Kim, J.-S. Quality characteristics of yakju added with lactic acid bacteria-fermented ginseng sprouts. Food Sci. Preserv. 2022, 29, 263–275. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee, H.S.; Song, M.W.; Kim, K.T.; Hong, W.S.; Paik, H.D. Antioxidant Effect and Sensory Evaluation of Yogurt Supplemented with Hydroponic Ginseng Root Extract. Foods 2021, 10, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yoon, E.K.; Hong, J.H.; Lê, S.; Kim, K.O. Sensory Characteristics and Consumer Acceptability of Red Ginseng Extracts Produced with Different Processing Methods. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, S270–S279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tu, T.T.; Ren, Y.; Gong, W.F.; Huang, J.Y.; Zhu, C.Y.; Salah, M.; Zhao, L.N.; Xia, X.S.; Wang, Y. Endoglucanase H from Aspergillus westerdijkiae Plays an Important Role in the Virulence on Pear Fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 8415–8422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mamy, D.; Boateng, I.D.; Chen, X.M. Two-pot optimization of nutrient sources to enhance antioxidants in Citrus reticulata peel powder through solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger CGMCC 3.6189. Food Biosci. 2024, 59, 104145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gao, X.L.; Yin, Y.Y.; Zhou, C.S. Purification, characterisation and salt-tolerance molecular mechanisms of aspartyl aminopeptidase from Aspergillus oryzae 3.042. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mamy, D.; Boateng, I.D.; Chen, X.M. Ultrasound-assisted solid-state fermentation by Aspergillus niger increased phenolics and antioxidants’ accumulation in Citrus reticulata peels. Food Biosci. 2025, 63, 105699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jang, J.H.; Bayaraa, U.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, O.R. Overexpression of the patatin-related phospholipase A gene, PgpPLAIIIf3, in ginseng adventitious roots reduces lignin and ginsenoside content while increasing fatty acid content. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Feng, L.; Zhao, G.J.; Sun, R.; Wang, J.F.; Sun, T.X.; Xing, S.Y.; Lian, W.H.; Zhao, Y. Dynamic changes in cell wall-degrading enzymes and physio-biochemistry of ginseng in response to fusarium oxysporum infection. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2023, 165, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Akpabli-Tsigbe, N.D.K.; Osabutey, J.; Mintah, B.K.; Tano-Debrah, K.; Ma, Y.K. Cleavage of macromolecule (protein/polysaccharide)-phenolic bond in soybean cell wall through Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus helviticus mixed culture solid-state fermentation for chlorogenic acid extraction. Food Biosci. 2023, 55, 102903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jeong, E.B.; Kim, S.A.; Shin, K.C.; Oh, D.K. Biotransformation of Protopanaxadiol-Type Ginsenosides in Korean Ginseng Extract into Food-Available Compound K by an Extracellular Enzyme from Aspergillus niger. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Song, W.S.; Kim, M.J.; Shin, K.C.; Oh, D.K. Increased Production of Ginsenoside Compound K by Optimizing the Feeding of American Ginseng Extract during Fermentation by Aspergillus tubingensis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 32, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shon, M.Y.; Kim, Y.-S. Analysis of Acidic Polysaccharide and Biological Activitiesof Fermented Stichopus japonicus and Black Ginseng. J. Chitin Chitosan 2021, 26, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ramadhania, Z.M.; Yang, D.U.; Moektiwardojo, M.; Han, Y.; Park, J.K.; Rupa, E.J.; Yang, D.C.; Lee, S.J.; Kang, S.C. Enhanced Anti-Skin Aging Effects of Fermented Black Ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) by Aspergillus nige KHNT-1. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mamy, D.; Boateng, I.D.; Chen, X.M. Metabolomic changes in Citrus reticulata peel after conventional and ultrasound-assisted solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger: A focus on flavonoid metabolism. Food Chem. 2025, 467, 142224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pouris, J.; Kolyva, F.; Bratakou, S.; Vogiatzi, C.A.; Chaniotis, D.; Beloukas, A. The Role of Fungi in Food Production and Processing. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Vásquez-Bonilla, J.N.; Barranco-Florido, J.E.; Ponce-Alquicira, E.; Rincón-Guevara, M.A.; Loera, O. Improvement of beauvericin production by Fusarium oxysporum AB2 under solid-state fermentation using an optimised liquid medium and co-cultures. Mycotoxin Res. 2022, 38, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, X.Q.; Yu, Y.F.; Shi, Y.J. Evaluation of inert and organic carriers for Verticillium lecanii spore production in solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, L.; Lin, X.C.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Chen, H.Z. Porous inert material as promising carrier enhanced cellulase production from Trichoderma reesei in solid-state fermentation. Process Biochem. 2022, 122, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fu, X.; Zan, X.Y.; Sun, L.; Tan, M.; Cui, F.J.; Liang, Y.Y.; Meng, L.J.; Sun, W.J. Functional Characterization and Structural Basis of the β-1,3-Glucan Synthase CMGLS from Mushroom Cordyceps militaris. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 8725–8737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Meng, X.Y.; Yang, Y.L.; Wu, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zhou, W.Q.; Guo, M.M.; Li, L. Inflammatory factor expression in HaCaT cells and melanin synthesis in melanocytes: Effects of Ganoderma lucidum fermentation broth containing Chinese medicine. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 1604–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.; Guo, M.; Li, L.; Zhou, W. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and antioxidant activity of lyophilized powder of Ganoderma lucidum bidirectional fermentation broth. Food Ferment. Ind. 2023, 49, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  87. Yang Hsu, B.; Hui Chen, C.; Jang Lu, T.; Sun Hwang, L. Bioconversion of ginsenosides in the american ginseng ( xi yang shen) extraction residue by fermentation with lingzhi ( ling zhi, ganoderma lucidum). J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2013, 3, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rae, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, M.R.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Suh, H.J. Changes of Ginsenoside Content by Mushroom Mycelial Fermentation in Red Ginseng Extract. J. Ginseng Res. 2011, 35, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  89. Choi, S.Y.; Park, J.S.; Shon, C.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Ryu, J.M.; Son, D.J.; Hwang, B.Y.; Yoo, H.S.; Cho, Y.C.; Lee, J.; et al. Fermented Korean Red Ginseng Extract Enriched in Rd and Rg3 Protects against Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease through Regulation of mTORC1. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yan, M.C.; Chen, Y.; Feng, Y.; Saeed, M.; Fang, Z.; Zhen, W.; Ni, Z.; Chen, H.Y. Perspective on Agricultural Industrialization: Modification Strategies for Enhancing the Catalytic Capacity of Keratinase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 12915–12929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, G.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; Lim, T.Y.; Lim, J.; Park, B.; Lee, S.; Mok, I.K.; Pal, K.; Lim, S.; Kim, D. Fermented Wild Ginseng by Rhizopus oligosporus Improved l-Carnitine and Ginsenoside Contents. Molecules 2020, 25, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yan, J.; Lu, L.; Fu, S.; Fang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. Processing technology of fermentation transformation of Ginsenoside Rg3 by lactic acid bacteria. Food Ferment. Ind. 2023, 49, 222–230. [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu, S.N.; Wang, H.Y.; Liu, S.W.; Yin, P.; Song, S.X.; Xiong, B.Y.; Wang, L.N.; Bi, Y.F.; Yu, L. Fermented Ginsenosides Alleviate Acute Liver Injury Induced by CCl4 in Mice by Regulating the AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway. J. Med. Food 2024, 27, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Xie, G.; Guo, B.Q.; Li, X.M.; Liu, S.; Liu, H.X.; Wang, Y.Z. Enhancement of biotransformation of ginsenosides in white ginseng roots by aerobic co-cultivation of Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 8265–8276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Seong, J.; Lee, H.Y.; Jeong, J.B.; Cho, D.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, G.Y.; Jang, M.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, K.M. Comparison in Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Cheonggukjang Containing Mountain-Cultivated Ginseng Using Two Bacillus Genus. Foods 2024, 13, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hwang, J.E.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Improved Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, and Anti-adipogenic Properties of Hydroponic Ginseng Fermented by Leuconostoc mesenteroides KCCM 12010P. Molecules 2019, 24, 3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shen, Y.J.; Gao, Y.S.; Yang, G.; Zhao, Z.J.; Zhao, Y.J.; Gao, L.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.Y. Transformation of Ginsenosides by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MB11 Fermentation: Minor Ginsenosides Conversion and Enhancement of Anti-Colorectal Cancer Activity. Molecules 2024, 29, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hong, S.Y.; Oh, J.H.; Lee, I. Simultaneous Enrichment of Deglycosylated Ginsenosides and Monacolin K in Red Ginseng by Fermentation with Monascus pilosus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2011, 75, 1490–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qi, G.Y.; Ji, B.Y.; Zhang, Y.A.; Huang, L.Q.; Wang, J.; Gao, W.Y. Microbiome-based screening and co-fermentation of rhizospheric microorganisms for highly ginsenoside Rg3 production. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 261, 127054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ji, T.L.; Liaqat, F.; Khazi, M.I.; Liaqat, N.; Nawaz, M.Z.; Zhu, D.C. Lignin biotransformation: Advances in enzymatic valorization and bioproduction strategies. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 216, 118759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Y.H.; Shi, T.; Bao, Y.L.; Tan, Y.Q.; Luo, Y.K.; Hong, H. Exploring Release, Isomerization, and Absorption of Cypermethrin in Pacific Oysters (Crassostrea gigas) with Different Processing Methods during In Vivo Digestion: Insights from a Gastrointestinal Tract Quantitative Tracing Method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 14364–14374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, W.J.; Ding, Y.Y.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, M.; Mao, G.H.; Feng, W.W.; Wu, X.Y.; Yang, L.Q. Bioaccessibility and biotransformation of anthocyanin monomers following in vitro simulated gastric-intestinal digestion and in vivo metabolism in rats. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 6052–6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tanko, A.I.; Hosawi, S.; Moglad, E.; Afzal, M.; Ghaboura, N.; Alzareaa, S.I.; Osman, A.; Nadeem, M.S.; Kazmi, I. Ginsenoside Rg3 in Cancer Research: Current Trends and Future Prospects—A Review. Curr. Med. Chem. 2025, 32, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cao, J.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, Z.; Shao, J. Research progress on large-scale preparation biological activity of ginsenoside, C.K. Food Ferment. Ind. 2025, 51, 371–379. [Google Scholar]
  105. Piao, X.M.; Huo, Y.; Kang, J.P.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Zhang, H.; Yang, D.U.; Kim, M.; Yang, D.C.; Kang, S.C.; Wang, Y.P. Diversity of Ginsenoside Profiles Produced by Various Processing Technologies. Molecules 2020, 25, 4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, L.F.; Li, J.; Hou, N.N.; Han, F.; Sun, X.D.; Li, Q.Y. 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing angiogenesis and the GPC3-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Acta Biochim. Et Biophys. Sin. 2024, 56, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhao, X.; Yuan, W.Q.; Yang, L.C.; Yan, F.; Cui, D.J. Ginsenoside Rh2 suppresses ferroptosis in ulcerative colitis by targeting specific protein 1 by upregulating microRNA-125a-5p. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2024, 29, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Chu, L.L.; Huy, N.Q.; Tung, N.H. Microorganisms for Ginsenosides Biosynthesis: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives. Molecules 2023, 28, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, W.; Gu, Q.; Yu, X. Protopanaxadiol-type ginsenoside hydrolases and their application in the preparation of ginsenoside Compound K: A review. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 978–992. [Google Scholar]
  110. Jiang, Y.Y.; Li, W.N.; Fan, D.D. Biotransformation of Ginsenoside Rb1 to Ginsenoside CK by Strain XD101: A Safe Bioconversion Strategy. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 2110–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Renchinkhand, G.; Magsar, U.; Bae, H.C.; Choi, S.H.; Nam, M.S. Identification of β-Glucosidase Activity of Lentilactobacillus buchneri URN103L and Its Potential to Convert Ginsenoside Rb1 from Panax ginseng. Foods 2022, 11, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Shin, K.C.; Oh, D.K. Classification of glycosidases that hydrolyze the specific positions and types of sugar moieties in ginsenosides. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 1036–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lee, J.-S.; Choi, S.-W. Changes in effective components of the fermented ginseng berry extract using lactic acid bacteria. Curr. Top. Lact. Acid Bact. Probiotics 2023, 9, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Quan, L.H.; Piao, J.Y.; Min, J.W.; Yang, D.U.; Lee, H.N.; Yang, D.C. Bioconversion of ginsenoside Rb1 into compound K by Leuconostoc citreum LH1 isolated from kimchi. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yi, E.-J.; Lee, J.-M.; Yi, T.-H.; Cho, S.-C.; Park, Y.-J.; Kook, M.-C. Biotransformation of Ginsenoside by Lactobacillus brevis THK-D57 Isolated from Kimchi. Korean J. Food Nutr. 2012, 25, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Piao, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Quan, L.-H.; Yang, D.-U.; Min, J.-W.; Son, S.-H.; Kim, S.-M.; Yang, D.-C. Bioconversion of Ginsenoside Rb1 to Compound K using Leuconostoc lactis DC201. Korean J. Plant Reources 2011, 24, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Quan, L.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Li, G.H.; Choi, K.T.; Yang, D.C. Microbial transformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to compound K by Lactobacillus paralimentarius. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhou, K.L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y.K.; Xu, M.H.; Yu, S.S. Production of Gypenoside XVII from Ginsenoside Rb1 by Enzymatic Transformation and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro and In Vivo. Molecules 2023, 28, 7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ku, S.; You, H.J.; Park, M.S.; Ji, G.E. Whole-Cell Biocatalysis for Producing Ginsenoside Rd from Rb1 Using Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 1206–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hu, Y.B.; Li, Y.M.; Cao, Y.; Shen, Y.Z.; Zou, X.J.; Liu, J.X.; Zhao, J. Advancements in enzymatic biotransformation and bioactivities of rare ginsenosides: A review. J. Biotechnol. 2024, 392, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, F.; Huang, Q.; Sui, X.; Xie, Y. Activities of beta-Glucosidase and alpha-L-Arabinofuranosidase from Cordyceps militaris and Their Applications in the Transformation of Ginsenoside Rg1 and Rc. Food Sci. 2023, 44, 152–161. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sui, X.; Liu, J.S.; Xin, Y.; Qu, M.; Qiu, Y.; He, T.Z.; Luo, H.M.; Wang, W.N.; Qiu, Z.D. Highly regioselective biotransformation of ginsenoside Rg1 to 25-OH derivatives of 20(S/R)-Rh1 by Cordyceps Sinensis. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Shim, K.-S.; Park, G.-G.; Park, Y.-S. Bioconversion of Puffed Red Ginseng Extract Using β-Glucosidase-producing Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food Eng. Prog. 2014, 18, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Palaniyandi, S.A.; Le, B.; Kim, J.-M.; Yang, S.H. Fermentative transformation of ginsenosides by a combination of probiotic Lactobacillus helveticus and Pediococcus pentosaceus. Korean J. Microbiol. 2018, 54, 436–441. [Google Scholar]
  125. Jiang, M.C.; Chi, J.X.; Qiao, Y.F.; Wang, J.P.; Zhang, Z.X.; Liu, J.; Sheng, X.H.; Yuan, L.J. Ginsenosides Rg1, Rb1 and rare ginsenosides: Promising candidate agents for Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease and network pharmacology analysis. Pharmacol. Res. 2025, 212, 107578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zheng, Y.F.; Tan, H.Y.; Chai, J.Y.; Han, L.L.; Zhai, C.Z.; Lee, J.J.; Li, X.M.; Zhao, Y.Q. Ginseng fruit rare saponins (GFRS) improved inflammatory response: In vitro and in vivo assessment. Fitoterapia 2024, 179, 106244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.Y.; Gu, M.M.; Liu, Z.Z.; Zhang, J.Y.; Zeng, Q.; Zhu, D.H. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rc to Rd by endophytic bacterium Bacillus sp. G9y isolated from Panax quinquefolius. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 2021, 114, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Cui, X.; Shao, L.; Lou, D.; Yang, X. Screening of a strain for ginsenoside Rb1 transformation and analysis of its saponin products. Microbiol. China 2023, 50, 2127–2136. [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang, P.H.; Gao, Y.S.; Yang, G.; Zhao, Y.J.; Zhao, Z.J.; Gao, G.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.Y. Enhancing the inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in H22 hepatoma cells through biotransformation of notoginsenoside R1 by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum S165 into 20(S/R)-notoginsenoside R2. Rsc Adv. 2023, 13, 29773–29783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Renchinkhand, G.; Cho, S.H.; Park, Y.W.; Song, G.Y.; Nam, M.S. Biotransformation of Major Ginsenoside Rb1 to Rd by Dekkera anomala YAE-1 from Mongolian Fermented Milk (Airag). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 1536–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, X.; Xie, Y.F.; Dai, Z.P.; Liang, Y.; Zhu, C.Y.; Su, C.; Song, L.S.; Wang, K.P.; Li, J.; Wei, X.Y. Gypenoside biotransformation into ginsenoside F2 by endophytic Aspergillus niger from Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 38, 3086–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Fu, Y. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to Gyp-XVII and minor ginsenoside Rg3 by endophytic bacterium Flavobacterium sp. GE 32 isolated from Panax ginseng. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fu, Y.; Yin, Z.H.; Wu, L.P.; Yin, C.R. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to ginsenoside C-K by endophytic fungus Arthrinium sp GE 17-18 isolated from Panax ginseng. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 63, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Ten, L.N.; Chae, S.M.; Yoo, S.A. Biotransformation of Ginsenosides Re and Rg1 by the Bacterium Microbacterium sp GT35. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2015, 51, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Liu, X.; Qiao, L.R.; Xie, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, J.H.; Chen, X.G.; Dai, J.G. Microbial transformation of ginsenoside-Rg1 by Absidia coerulea and the reversal activity of the metabolites towards multi-drug resistant tumor cells. Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 1313–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hu, Y.B.; Wang, N.; Yan, X.C.; Yuan, Y.; Luo, F.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Zhou, Y.F. Ginsenoside Re impacts on biotransformation products of ginsenoside Rb1 by Cellulosimicrobium cellulans sp. 21 and its mechanisms. Process Biochem. 2019, 77, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Guo, M.K.; Shao, S.; Wang, D.D.; Zhao, D.Q.; Wang, M.X. Recent progress in polysaccharides from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 494–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ghosh, R.; Bryant, D.L.; Farone, A.L. Panax quinquefolius (North American Ginseng) Polysaccharides as Immunomodulators: Current Research Status and Future Directions. Molecules 2020, 25, 5854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Yu, S.; Yin, F. Physicochemical Properties and Biological Effects of Ginseng Polysaccharide and Its Application in Animal Production. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 36, 7626–7634. [Google Scholar]
  140. Lee, S.J.; In, G.; Han, S.T.; Lee, M.H.; Lee, J.W.; Shin, K.S. Structural characteristics of a red ginseng acidic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan I with immunostimulating activity from red ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2020, 44, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chen, F.; Huang, G.L. Antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from different sources of ginseng. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 906–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, X.; Li, S.S.; Sun, L.; Ji, L.; Zhu, J.J.; Fan, Y.Y.; Tai, G.H.; Zhou, Y.F. Further analysis of the structure and immunological activity of an RG-I type pectin from Panax ginseng. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kim, H.; Suh, H.J.; Kwon, K.H.; Hwang, J.H.; Yu, K.W. Immunostimulation activity of a polysaccharide from fermented ginseng with Hericium erinaceum mycelia in solid-state culture. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. You, S.Q.; Shi, X.Q.; Yu, D.; Zhao, D.; An, Q.; Wang, D.D.; Zhang, J.C.; Li, M.; Wang, C.T. Fermentation of Panax notoginseng root extract polysaccharides attenuates oxidative stress and promotes type I procollagen synthesis in human dermal fibroblast cells. Bmc Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Zhao, B.; Lv, C.N.; Lu, J.C. Natural occurring polysaccharides from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer: A review of isolation, structures, and bioactivities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Xu, M.R.; Ren, J.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Zhou, S.; Wang, E.P.; Li, H.; Wu, W.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, J.; Jiao, L.L. Structural characterization and immunostimulant activities of polysaccharides fractionated by gradient ethanol precipitation method from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1388206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kang, J.; Zhao, J.; He, L.F.; Li, L.X.; Zhu, Z.K.; Tian, M.L. Extraction, characterization and anti-oxidant activity of polysaccharide from red Panax ginseng and Ophiopogon japonicus waste. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1183096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhao, Q.; Bai, L.; Zhu, D.W.; Li, T.Y.; Xu, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, X.M. Clinical efficacy and potential mechanism of ginseng polysaccharides in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer based on meta-analysis associated with network pharmacology. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ai, J.; Bao, B.; Battino, M.; Giampieri, F.; Chen, C.; You, L.J.; Cespedes-Acuña, C.L.; Ognyanov, M.; Tian, L.M.; Bai, W.B. Recent advances on bioactive polysaccharides from mulberry. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 5219–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chung, Y.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, J.E.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Antioxidant Activity and Inhibitory Effect on Nitric Oxide Production of Hydroponic Ginseng Fermented with Lactococcus lactis KC24. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhang, D.; Du, M.Z.; Wei, Y.; Wang, C.T.; Shen, L.Q. A review on the structure-activity relationship of dietary flavonoids for protecting vascular endothelial function: Current understanding and future issues. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Elmeligy, S.; Hathout, R.M.; Khalifa, S.A.M.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Farag, M.A. Pharmaceutical manipulation of citrus flavonoids towards improvement of its bioavailability and stability. A mini review and a meta-analysis study. Food Biosci. 2021, 44, 101428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Rauf, A.; Ahmad, Z.; Formanowicz, D.; Ribaudo, G.; Alomar, T.S. Editorial: Antioxidant potential of polyphenolic and flavonoid compounds. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1463755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Song, M.W.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Fermentative effects by probiotic Lactobacillus brevis B7 on antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of hydroponic ginseng. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 32, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Yoo, J.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, Y.G.; Baek, S.; Kim, M.R. Enhanced production of compound K in fermented ginseng extracts by Lactobacillus brevis. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Park, J.-W.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, Y.-A.; Kim, W.J. Fermentation properties of beer produced from Korean two-row barley or malt (Gwangmaek) supplemented with Korean red ginseng extracts and Bokbunja (Rubus coreanus Miquel) juice. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 51, 596–603. [Google Scholar]
  157. Pyo, M.-J.; Cho, A.-R.; Kang, M.-J.; Kim, G.-W.; Shin, J.-H. Physicochemical characteristics and ginsenoside content of Korean traditional wine produced by fermentation of Panax ginseng sprouts. Food Sci. Preserv. 2018, 25, 659–667. [Google Scholar]
  158. Jung, J.; Paik, H.D.; Yoon, H.J.; Jang, H.J.; Jeewanthi, R.K.C.; Jee, H.S.; Li, X.; Lee, N.K.; Lee, S.K. Physicochemical Characteristics and Antioxidant Capacity in Yogurt Fortified with Red Ginseng Extract. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Cimo, A.; Soltani, M.; Lui, E.; Hekmat, S. Fortification of probiotic yogurt with ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) extract. Food Nut Disord. 2013, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  160. Kim, D.-K.; Baik, M.-Y.; Kim, H.-K.; Hahm, Y.-T.; Kim, B.-Y. Manufacture of the Red Ginseng Vinegar Fermented with Red Ginseng Concentrate and Rice Wine, and its Quality Evaluation. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 44, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Oh, Y.-J.; Kwon, S.-H.; Choi, K.B.; Kim, T.-S.; Yeo, I.-H. Effect of Vinegar Made with Hydroponic-cultured Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer on Body Weight and Lipid Metabolism in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 46, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Li, K.; Wang, L.; Zhou, R.; Fan, H.; Sui, J. Amelioration of alcohol-induced liver injury in mice by ginsenosides in ginseng wine. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 54, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Heon-Sang, J.; Tae-Su, K.; Koan-Sik, W.; Kee-Yeoup, P.; Kee-Won, Y.; Seung-Joon, Y. Effects of cultured wild ginseng roots on the alcoholic fermentation. Food Sci. Preserv. 2005, 12, 402–410. [Google Scholar]
  164. Jang, M.; Min, J.-W.; Yang, D.-U.; Jung, S.-K.; Kim, S.-Y.; Yang, D.-C. Ethanolic fermentation from red ginseng extract using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kim, S.-H.; Kang, B.-H.; Noh, S.-G.; Kim, J.-G.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, J.-M. Monitoring on Alcohol Fermentation Properties of Red Ginseng Extracts. J. Life Sci. 2008, 18, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Choi, K.H.; Sohn, E.-H.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, J.-H.; Jang, K.-H. Physicochemical characteristics and ginsenosides compositions of Makgeolli added with mountain ginsengs. J. East Asian Soc. Diet. Life 2013, 23, 437–443. [Google Scholar]
  167. Chu, Q.; Piao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Liu, J.; Li, P. Optimization of fermentation technique of ginseng rice wine by kefir grain. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 39, 343–348. [Google Scholar]
  168. Sung, J.-H.; Han, M.-J. Quality characteristics of Jeungpyun manufactured by ginseng Makgeolli. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2008, 24, 837–848. [Google Scholar]
  169. Zheng, F.; Zhang, Y.; Han, M.; Qiao, M.; Dai, Y.; Yue, H.; Liu, S. Study on the Change of Ginsenosides in Fermenting Fresh Ginseng and Prickly Pear by RRLC-Q-TOF MS. J. Chin. Mass Spectrom. Soc. 2018, 39, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Jang, H.J.; Jung, J.; Yu, H.S.; Lee, N.K.; Paik, H.D. Evaluation of the Quality of Yogurt Using Ginseng Extract Powder and Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum NK181. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2018, 38, 1160–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Park, S.-Y.; Hwang, U.-S.; You, C.-B.; Lee, E.-S.; Park, H. Quality Characteristics of Red Ginseng Yogurt Produced with Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Kimchi. Curr. Top. Lact. Acid Bact. Probiotics 2021, 7, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lee, S.B.; Ganesan, P.; Kwak, H.S. Comparison of Nanopowdered and Powdered Ginseng-added Yogurt on Its Physicochemical and Sensory Properties during Storage. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2013, 33, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Kim, N.-Y.; Han, M.-J. Development of ginseng yogurt fermented by Bifidobacterium spp. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2005, 21, 575–584. [Google Scholar]
  174. Hyoung-Churl, B.; Myoung-Soo, N. Properties of the Mixed Fermentation Milk Added with Red Ginseng Extract. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2006, 26, 127–135. [Google Scholar]
  175. Seo, H.; Jeon, B.-D.; Ryu, S. Persimmon vinegar ripening with the mountain-cultivated ginseng ingestion reduces blood lipids and lowers inflammatory cytokines in obese adolescents. J. Exerc. Nutr. Biochem. 2015, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Supeno, D.; Kwon, S.; Sung-Won, C.; Goo, K.S.; JongMin, P.; Kim, J.; Choi, W. A Study on the Vinegar Fermentation Processes of Fresh Korean Ginseng Extract Using Mix Microbial Yinkin. J. Korean Soc. Ind. Converg. 2017, 20, 345–350. [Google Scholar]
  177. Ahn, C.H.; Yang, B.W.; Sung-Kwon, K. Functional Ingredients and Antioxidant Activity of Korean Traditional Wild Simulated Ginseng Vinegar and Red Ginseng Vinegar. Food Eng. Prog. 2021, 25, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Nie, Y.S.; Sun, G.R.; Zhang, X.L. Design of Green Processing Chain for Processing of Ginseng Fruit Vinegar. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 933, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Park, W.-L.; Kim, J.-H.; Seo, K.-I. Anti-fatigue effect of a beverage mixture containing red ginseng and Prunus mume fruit vinegar on high-intensity exercised rats. Food Sci. Preserv. 2023, 30, 514–525. [Google Scholar]
  180. Zhao, F.; Li, M.; Meng, L.L.; Yu, J.H.; Zhang, T.H. Characteristics of Effervescent Tablets of Lactobacilli Supplemented with Chinese Ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer) and Polygonatum sibiricum. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Park, J.-H.; Moon, H.-J.; Oh, J.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Jung, H.-K.; Choi, K.-M.; Cha, J.-D.; Lim, J.-Y.; Han, S.-B.; Lee, T.-B. Changes in the functional components of Lactobacillus acidophilus-fermented red ginseng extract and its application to fresh cheese production. J. Dairy Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  182. Choi, K.-H.; Min, J.-Y.; Ganesan, P.; Bae, I.-H.; Kwak, H.-S. Physicochemical and sensory properties of red ginseng extracts or red ginseng hydrolyzates-added asiago cheese during ripening. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. You, W. The Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Activity, and Sensory Evaluation of Red Ginseng Added to Greek Yogurt Made With Cow’s Milk. Master’s Thesis, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  184. Eom, S.J.; Hwang, J.E.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Antibacterial Effects against Various Foodborne Pathogens and Sensory Properties of Yogurt Supplemented with Panax ginseng Marc Extract. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2017, 37, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Jiang, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Mu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, T.; Wu, J.; Tang, H.; Zheng, S.; Liu, Y.; et al. Generic Diagramming Platform (GDP): A comprehensive database of high-quality biomedical graphics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D1670–D1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Co-occurrence network of keywords in ginseng fermentation researchers. Node size represents keyword frequency; the thickness of the lines connecting the nodes indicates the degree of association between the keywords.
Figure 1. Co-occurrence network of keywords in ginseng fermentation researchers. Node size represents keyword frequency; the thickness of the lines connecting the nodes indicates the degree of association between the keywords.
Foods 14 02473 g001
Figure 2. The biotransformation pathway of Rb1.
Figure 2. The biotransformation pathway of Rb1.
Foods 14 02473 g002
Figure 3. The biotransformation pathway of Re.
Figure 3. The biotransformation pathway of Re.
Foods 14 02473 g003
Figure 4. The impact of microbial fermentation on the active ingredients of ginseng and its fermented products. Figure was created with BioGDP.com [185].
Figure 4. The impact of microbial fermentation on the active ingredients of ginseng and its fermented products. Figure was created with BioGDP.com [185].
Foods 14 02473 g004
Table 1. Keyword occurrence frequency statistics.
Table 1. Keyword occurrence frequency statistics.
ClassificationKeywordFrequency
GinsengPanax ginseng270
Red ginseng62
Korean red ginseng28
Fermented red ginseng27
Panax notoginseng64
Notoginseng6
American ginseng23
Panax quinquefolius8
Black ginseng5
Fermented black ginseng5
MicroorganismLactic acid bacteria20
Lactobacillus4
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum13
Limosilactobacillus fermentum3
Aspergillus niger16
Aspergillus tubingensis5
Ganoderma lucidum10
Saccharomyces cerevisiae7
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens3
Bacillus subtilis3
Active ingredientCompound k181
Ginsenoside compound k11
C K7
Ginsenosides105
Rb1134
Ginsenoside Rb126
Rd31
Ginsenoside Rd17
Rg330
Ginsenoside Rg32
Rh29
20(s) ginsenoside Rh22
F211
Ginsenoside Rb22
Rc5
Panax notoginseng saponins11
Polysaccharides19
Phenolic compounds12
Table 3. Transformation pathways of Rb1.
Table 3. Transformation pathways of Rb1.
NO.Transformation Pathway
1Rb1→Gyp17→Gyp75→C-K→PPD
2Rb1→Gyp17→F2→C-K→PPD
3Rb1→Gyp17→F2→Rh2→PPD
4Rb1→Rd→F2→C-K→PPD
5Rb1→Rd→F2→Rh2→PPD
6Rb1→Rd→Rg3→Rh2→PPD
Table 4. Transformation pathways of ginsenoside Re.
Table 4. Transformation pathways of ginsenoside Re.
NO.Transformation Pathway
1Re→Rg1→Rh1→PPT
2Re→Rg1→F1→PPT
3Re→Rg2→Rh1→PPT
Table 5. Transformation pathways of different types of ginsenosides.
Table 5. Transformation pathways of different types of ginsenosides.
MicroorganismsSubstratesConversion RatesTransformation PathwaysReferences
Aspergillus niger XD101Rb194.4%Rb1→Rd→F2→C-K[110]
Endophytic bacterium G9yRc98%Rc→Rd[127]
Pestalotiopsis biciliataRb1-Rb1→Rd→F2→C-K[128]
Cordyceps militaris C03Rg154.9%Rg1→Rh1[121]
Rg1→F1
Rc83.44%Rc→Rd→Rg3→CK
Rc→CMc
Lentilactobacillus buchneri URN103LRb1-Rb1→Rd→Rg3[111]
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum S165R182.85%R1→20(S/R)-R2[129]
Dekkera anomala YAE-1Rb1-Rb1→Rd[130]
Aspergillus niger JGL8Gypenoside-Gyp-V→Rd→F2[131]
Gyp-XVII→F2
Penicillium decumbensRb1-Rb1→Gyp17→F2→C-K[29]
Rb1→Rd→F2→C-K
Rb1→Rd→Rg3→Rh2
Flavobacterium sp. GE 32Rb1-Rb1→Gyp-XVII[132]
Rb1→Rd→Rg3
Microbacterium trichothecenolyticum KCTC 19343Rb1-Rb1→Rd→Rh2[30]
Endophytic fungi GE 17-18Rb1-Rb1→Rd→F2→C-K[133]
Microbacterium sp. GT35Re72%Re→Rg2[134]
Rg1-Rg1→Rh1
Absidia coerulea AS 3.2462Rg1-Rg1→F1[135]
Cordyceps Sinensis CICC14017Rg182.5%Rg1→20(S/R)-Rh1→25-OH-20(S/R)-Rh1[122]
Cellulosimicrobium cellulans sp. 21Rb1-Rb1→Rd→Rg3→Rh2→PPD[136]
“-” indicates absence.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, J.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, W.; Jang, M.; Pan, B.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, X. Microbial Fermentation Affects the Structure–Activity Relationship of Bioactive Compounds in Ginseng and Its Applications in Fermentation Products: A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142473

AMA Style

Bai J, Zhu Z, Luo W, Jang M, Pan B, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Xiao X. Microbial Fermentation Affects the Structure–Activity Relationship of Bioactive Compounds in Ginseng and Its Applications in Fermentation Products: A Review. Foods. 2025; 14(14):2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Juan, Zixian Zhu, Wei Luo, Miran Jang, Beibei Pan, Ying Zhu, Jiayan Zhang, Yansheng Zhao, and Xiang Xiao. 2025. "Microbial Fermentation Affects the Structure–Activity Relationship of Bioactive Compounds in Ginseng and Its Applications in Fermentation Products: A Review" Foods 14, no. 14: 2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142473

APA Style

Bai, J., Zhu, Z., Luo, W., Jang, M., Pan, B., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., & Xiao, X. (2025). Microbial Fermentation Affects the Structure–Activity Relationship of Bioactive Compounds in Ginseng and Its Applications in Fermentation Products: A Review. Foods, 14(14), 2473. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop