Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Application of Directed Vat Set Indigenous Freeze-Drying Lentilactobacillus hilgardii Q19 Starter in Winemaking
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Ultrasonication on African Oil Bean (Pentaclethra macrophylla Benth) Protein Extraction and Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical and Functional Changes in Lotus Root Polysaccharide Associated with Noncovalent Binding of Polyphenols
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genus Brassica By-Products Revalorization with Green Technologies to Fortify Innovative Foods: A Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Polyphenol-Dietary Fiber Conjugates from Fruits and Vegetables: Nature and Biological Fate in a Food and Nutrition Perspective

Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde (LAQV-REQUIMTE), Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(5), 1052; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051052
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023

Abstract

:
In the past few years, numerous studies have investigated the correlation between polyphenol intake and the prevention of several chronic diseases. Research regarding the global biological fate and bioactivity has been directed to extractable polyphenols that can be found in aqueous-organic extracts, obtained from plant-derived foods. Nevertheless, significant amounts of non-extractable polyphenols, closely associated with the plant cell wall matrix (namely with dietary fibers), are also delivered during digestion, although they are ignored in biological, nutritional, and epidemiological studies. These conjugates have gained the spotlight because they may exert their bioactivities for much longer than extractable polyphenols. Additionally, from a technological food perspective, polyphenols combined with dietary fibers have become increasingly interesting as they could be useful for the food industry to enhance technological functionalities. Non-extractable polyphenols include low molecular weight compounds such as phenolic acids and high molecular weight polymeric compounds such as proanthocyanidins and hydrolysable tannins. Studies concerning these conjugates are scarce, and usually refer to the compositional analysis of individual components rather than to the whole fraction. In this context, the knowledge and exploitation of non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates will be the focus of this review, aiming to access their potential nutritional and biological effect, together with their functional properties.

1. Introduction

In recent years, epidemiological studies and related meta-analysis established an association between the long-term consumption of fruit and vegetable-rich diets and the health benefits towards a vast array of human diseases (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic inflammation, degenerative diseases, or metabolic disorders such as type II diabetes) [1,2]. The health benefits arise mainly from the non-nutritive bioactives present in fruit and vegetable foodstuffs, commonly named phytochemicals. Among these, polyphenols have stood out as nutraceuticals and functional ingredients [3]. In this sense, the comprehensive knowledge of the total content of polyphenols in foods and diets is a critical step for biological, epidemiological, and clinical studies, addressing their potential health effects [4].
Polyphenol absorption on the food matrix has been increasingly understood over the years. The concept of “food matrix” points towards the fact that bioactives are part of a larger complex set of cellular origin (in fruits and vegetables) or even structures produced during food processing, where they may interact at different length scales [5,6]. Due to these interactions, an appreciable amount of non-extractable polyphenols can still remain in the solid residues, absorbed to dietary fibers [7]. Although non-extractable polyphenols are an important fraction in plant-based foods, they are usually neglected in bioavailability and metabolism studies, as well as in clinical trials and nutritional studies. Additionally, the therapeutic use of non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates through diet is missing, particularly related to the topics of bioaccessibility, pharmacokinetics, and bioavailability of polyphenols, which could influence the real use of these bioactives by the human organism. While extractable polyphenols are dissolved in the stomach and small intestine where they can be partially absorbed, non-extractable polyphenols cannot be absorbed at the small intestine [8]. They reach the lower gastrointestinal tract almost intact in association with the vegetable cell wall. There, they exert systematic bioactive effects before or after being catabolized by colonic microbiota, yielding different metabolites that may counteract the effects of dietary pro-oxidants, and promoting colonic homeostasis [9,10,11]. These compounds can also modulate the gut microbiota, resulting in a healthier profile that could be a potential tool to counteract several chronic diseases related to intestinal dysbiosis such as diabetes, obesity, and inflammatory bowel diseases [10,12].
In this context, research priority should be directed towards the non-extractable fraction in plant-derived foods as well as in agri-food wastes and by-products, promoting their integral valorization and reincorporation to the food supply chain, as an innovative material that combines the properties of both polyphenols and dietary fibers.
This review summarizes the relevance of polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates in a food technology and health perspective, as many of the pathways sustaining the potential of these conjugates remain largely unexplored, including, for instance, their bioavailability, metabolism in the human digestive track, or microbiota modulatory potential. This review will lay the foundations for future studies aiming to unravel the applicability of non-extractable polyphenols in functional foods development and in nutraceutical fields as dietary supplements.

2. Polyphenols

Polyphenols are secondary plant metabolites with fundamental roles in plant physiology and morphology [13]. They can be found in fruits, vegetables, and cereals, thus representing an essential part of the human daily diet. In plant-based foodstuff, polyphenols can be associated with major sensorial properties, such as color, flavor, and taste (e.g., sweet and bitter taste), and to astringency perception [14,15,16]. More notably, polyphenols have been in the spotlight of recent research exploiting their potential as functional ingredients in diverse food systems due to their therapeutic and health promoting properties.
The general structure of polyphenols includes two aromatic nuclei with one or more hydroxyl substituent. They are commonly divided into two main classes, the flavonoids, characterized by a C6-C3-C6 flavanic core, and the nonflavonoids with a C1-C6, C3-C6 or a C6-C2-C6 core. Flavonoids account for nearly two-thirds of dietary polyphenols and, depending on the type of heterocycle present and its substitution pattern, they may be subdivided into anthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, and chalcones [3]. Phenolic acids (hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids) and stilbenes are amongst the most common dietary non-flavonoids [17] (Figure 1). Moreover, polyphenols are also present in the polymeric form in plants. Lignins are polymers of monolignols, such as p-coumaric and sinapic acid, while tannins may exist as hydrolysable and condensed tannins (or proanthocyanidins). Hydrolysable and condensed tannins are made of saccharide esters derived from gallic/ellagic acids or flavan-3-ols units, respectively (Figure 2), and they are particularly important as they can attain high molecular weights and complex polymeric structures [18].
Although polyphenols can be found practically in all plant-derived foodstuffs, their distribution and quantities are extremely variable [19], ranging from more than 15 g per 100 g in cloves to 7.8 mg per 100 mL in rosé wine [20]. Other external factors can also regulate the polyphenolic content in plants and derived foodstuff, such as genetic, environmental (e.g., type of soil, sun exposure, stage of ripeness), and technological factors (e.g., industrial processing, storage, or culinary preparation) [21,22]. Furthermore, their total content in fruits and vegetables are, most of the time, underestimated as they only include extractable polyphenols that can be easily recovered with aqueous-organic solvents. Compounds entrapped within the plant cell walls (non-extractable polyphenols or macromolecular antioxidants) are usually overlooked and not even considered in nutritional, clinical, and epidemiological studies, resulting in great dissimilarities between the estimated and ingested content [4,23].

3. Extractable and Non-Extractable Polyphenols

Polyphenols can be found either in extractable (soluble-free) and non-extractable form (insoluble or bound), distributed in various tissues/organs of the plant body [24]. The concept of extractable vs. non-extractable polyphenols is related to their extractability in aqueous and organic solvents, although non-extractable polyphenols can also be released and extracted after proper chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis [25]. Most of the extractable polyphenols are located in the vacuoles of plant cells and do not interact physically or chemically with other plant macromolecules, being easily extracted after plant tissue disruption with polar aqueous/organic solvents [14,26]. Flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and lignans are some of the phenolics that can be found in extractable form.
Non-extractable polyphenols, including high-molecular weight proanthocyanins, hydrolysable tannins, flavonoids, and low-molecular weight phenolics, can be virtually found in all types of plant-derived foods [27]. Non-extractable polyphenols can be found cross-linked to cell wall structural components such as cellulose, pectin, hemicellulose (e.g., arabinoxylans), lignin, and structural proteins through covalent bonds (ester bonds with hydroxyl groups of cell wall substances via carboxylic groups, ether linkages with the aromatic hydroxyl groups, or by C-C bonds) [24,28]. These phytochemicals play a major role in the connection of cell wall substances, enhancing cell wall mechanical strength and structural rigidity, being also involved in the protection against UV radiation and harmful organisms (pathogens, insects, and herbivores) [29,30], with antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant functions.
Phenolic acids are the most common bound phenolic compounds in natural sources. Hydroxycinnamic acids (e.g., ferulic acid) are covalently linked to arabinogalactans in sugar beet [31] or spinach [32], as well as to arabinoxylans in wheat [33], bamboo [34], and maize [35]. Additionally, polysaccharides can form covalent bonds with polyphenols during food processing [36]. For instance, heat treatment and acid conditions may cause polyphenol depolymerization and the formation of carbocations, being able to randomly react with cell wall nucleophilic compounds through covalent bonds [37,38,39]. In addition, oxidation of polyphenols in damaged tissues may occur [39].
However, it should be emphasized that the concept of non-extractable polyphenols is a broader concept than the term “bound phenolics”, which is usually associated with phenolic acids covalently linked to cell walls [7]. The type of chemical interactions between non-extractable polyphenols and dietary fibers also includes the formation of ordered junctions stabilized by arrays of non-covalent interactions (e.g., hydrogen bonding, ionic bond, electrostatic interaction, and hydrophobic effect), during or after physical damage and the senescence of plants [40]. Furthermore, polyphenols may be physically entrapped in various cellular structures or entrapped by a surface adsorption phenomenon or by encapsulation in hydrophobic pockets within the biopolymer network and porous structures (particularly for dietary fibers) embedded into intact cellular structures [14,24]. This mechanism is particularly notorious with pectic polysaccharides due to their higher structural flexibility [41,42]. As these bonds are individually weak, these interactions are stable only above a minimum critical length, and their formation and disruption often occur as sharp and cooperative processes [43].

3.1. Types and Content of Non-Extractable Polyphenols in Foods

Non-extractable polyphenols include several classes of polyphenols, either polymeric or single, linked to plant macromolecules, and can be found in fruits, vegetables, legumes, cereal grains, and seeds. In fruits and vegetables, non-extractable polyphenols encompass an average of 24% of the total amount [4,44,45]. For instance, banana (Musa acuminate), orange (citrus sinensis), and apple (Malus domestica) have nearly 33, 24, and 7% of non-extractable polyphenols, respectively [44]. Carrots (Daucus carota) and onions (Allium cepa) have about 38 and 10% of non-extractable polyphenols, respectively [46,47]. On the other hand, cereals, such as brown rice, present 80–90% of total polyphenols in the bound form [48]. Plant-based food by-products, such as peals, pomace, and seeds, also possess high amounts of non-extractable polyphenols. Cranberry pomace (Vaccinium macrocarpon) has approximately 76% of non-extractable polyphenols [49].
Phenolic acids (mostly ferulic acid derivatives) are the most abundant non-extractable polyphenols, being covalently bound (by ester, ether, or C-C bonds) to the cell wall matrix [50]. Other phenolic acids may be found to be associated with cell wall polysaccharides such as p-hydroxyphenyl, syringyl, or p-coumaroyl moieties. They are mostly found in cereals but are also present in other plant-based foodstuffs such as spinach and sugar beet (ferulic and p-coumaric acids), orange flavedo (ferulic, sinapic, and p-coumaric acids), and lentils (p-coumaric acid) [51].
Proanthocyanidins with a higher degree of polymerization can be found in the non-extractable fractions, including both proanthocyanidins bound to cell wall polysaccharides and proteins. Interactions between proanthocyanidins and cell walls occur mostly through non-covalent binding, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic effect, or van der Waals forces. It is becoming clear that the adsorption mechanism between proanthocyanidins and cell wall constituents is affected by a multitude of factors, including environmental parameters (e.g., pH, temperature, ionic strength) and the physicochemical properties of the interacting partners: morphology (surface area, porosity, pore shape), chemical composition (sugar ratio, solubility, branching complexity), molecular weight, and polyphenol molecular architecture (polymerization degree, contributing to the increase of hydroxyl and aryl groups available to form hydrogen bonds and to establish hydrophobic interactions, respectively, degree of methylation and acetylation, degree of galloylation/hydroxylation, conformation) [40]. Furthermore, higher proportions of pectic polysaccharides impart higher flexibility to the structure, thus allowing for a higher contact surface area, while higher proportions of lignin and cellulose, with higher structural rigidity, allow for fewer adsorption interactions [39,52].
Most hydrolysable tannins have been detected in water-organic extracts, although significant amounts can also be found in the resulting solid residues [27]. The way by which hydrolysable tannins are associated with the food matrix has not yet been established. In addition, no information about individual tannins was obtained, as the current method for their determination causes tannin depolymerization [53,54,55].
Flavonols, including rutin, isoquercitrin, quercitrin, and quercetin were also found in the non-extractable fraction of tropical or subtropical fruits or leaves, tomato peel (also flavanones in this source), wine, beer, Hibiscus sabdariffa flowers, and tropical and subtropical fruits or leaves [56,57,58,59,60]. However, the exact nature of the interactions between flavonoids and the solid cell wall matrix has not been properly addressed. Regarding anthocyanins, studies are somehow controversial as the data reported for the non-extractable anthocyanins determined after acid hydrolysis may correspond to the hydrolysis of proanthocyanidins [61,62]. Thus, the presence of a fraction of non-extractable anthocyanidins remains to be properly established. Additionally, there are several limitations in the methodology for the extraction of these pigments from the food matrix. For instance, the use of glycosidases or acid hydrolysis to release anthocyanins may cause the formation of less stable aglycones [56]. In a previous work, an anthocyanidin molecule (malvidin aglycone) associated with macromolecular material has been reported [63], suggesting, as reported for melanoidins, the covalent linkage of anthocyanins to the polymeric material [64], specially to pectic polysaccharides.
In this sense, non-extractable polyphenols represent a very important fraction to be considered in a nutritional and health perspective. They may be slowly and continuously released in the human gastrointestinal tract and during colonic fermentation, which can improve bioaccessibility and potential bioavailability and exert high bioactivity on tissues and cells for a longer time.

3.2. Release of Non-Extractable Polyphenols from Dietary Fibers

Although non-extractable polyphenols can be regarded as an important fraction of phenolic compounds in plant-based foods [7], the challenge is that their chemical composition analysis requires several isolation steps, as they cannot be detected with the usual analytical procedures for either fibers or extractable polyphenols (e.g., HPLC analysis). However, the extraction methods are often not systematically optimized and greatly dependent on the chemical and physical nature of the food plants [65], giving rise to different recovery yields. Furthermore, the accuracy of the results may be questionable, as some of the methodologies employed to release and assess non-extractable polyphenols are often destructive and inefficient. Depending on the chosen methodology, on the extraction methodology order applied, or on the plant matrix, degradation or incomplete release may occur, resulting in underestimated values [25].
Extraction methods to recover non-extractable polyphenols from the cell matrix for further analyzes in the corresponding hydrolysates include chemical (acid or alkali) [28,66], physical (e.g., microwave-, ultrasound-assisted hydrolysis, pressurized solvent/liquid extractions, far-infrared (FIR) radiation-assisted, or pulsed electric field-assisted) [67,68,69,70,71,72,73], or enzymatic hydrolysis, with carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes such as cellulases, hemicellulases, pectinases, proteases, glucanases, or bacterial enzymes [74,75]. While alkaline hydrolysis is more effective in promoting the disruption of both ester and ether bonds, linking polyphenols to cell wall constituents [66], acid hydrolysis mainly promotes the disruption of glycosidic bonds, generally leaving ester bonds intact. Compared to acid or alkaline hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis allows a lower loss of phenolic compounds as a moderate pH is used during the extraction procedure. Additionally, carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes may also induce the production of aglycone moieties due to the presence of β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, or α-L-arabinoside activities, which can be detrimental to the stability of several flavonoids, such as anthocyanins [76]. In addition to the carbohydrases, esterases have also been shown to be efficient in the release of non-extractable polyphenols [77].
Given the specificity of each hydrolytic system, a single methodology is probably inadequate to perform the full assessment of non-extractable polyphenols. Thus, a combination of different hydrolytic systems may provide more complete information regarding the non-extractable fraction.
Food processes such as fermentation an germination, as well as thermomechanical processes such as extrusion, have also been shown to be effective non-thermal food processing methods for the release of non-extractable phenolics from the cell wall matrix [78,79]. Abdel-Aty, 2019 [80] reported the improved phenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of garden cress seeds, using solid-state fermentation. However, other works have also reported the decrease in the levels of phenolic compounds, which can be attributed to the degradation and hydrolysis of phenolic compounds [81]. Several works have shown the increased content of non-extractable phenolics due to germination [82,83]. This bioprocess induces the activation of cell metabolism, which results in the release of hydrolytic enzymes, thus affecting phenolic compound content [84].
Other food processes such as roasting, extrusion, or boiling have shown potential to release phenolic compounds associated with cell walls [85,86]. These thermal processes involve the use of high temperatures and/or pressure, leading to the disruption of the cell wall matrix of foods through the depolymerization of pectins and hemicelluloses, thus enhancing the release of bound phenolics. On the other hand, the high energy extrusion conditions degrade bioactive phenolic compounds, with a consequent reduction of the antioxidant capacity [87,88,89,90]. Hydrothermal treatments such as boiling have also been shown to cause chemical reactions between phenolic compounds and other compounds, such as proteins, forming irreversible covalent bonds that are not hydrolyzed during the extraction process [91,92].

4. Biological Activity of Non-Extractable Polyphenol-Dietary Fibers

Over the past few years, several biological activities have been attributed to non-extractable polyphenols (either isolated or rich matrices), combining in vitro models, cell cultures, animal models, or human trials [7]. However, it is important to note that non-extractable polyphenols have been previously subjected to a hydrolytic process to release polyphenolic compounds from the carbohydrate or protein moiety, following extraction and analysis of specific phenolic compounds in the corresponding hydrolysates and the assessment of their bioactivities similarly to extractable polyphenols [25]. For instance, antioxidant capacity, antiproliferative and apoptotic effect on cancer cells, inhibition of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism enzymes, or anti-inflammatory activity are some of the bioactivities that have been described [93,94,95,96]. Additionally, the released single phenolic acids and flavonoids have been extensively examined for their biological activities against diabetes, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease, and cancers in cell lines and in vivo models [97,98,99].
After ingestion, a significant part of the non-extractable polyphenols reaches the colon, playing a major role in the reduction of local oxidative stress and boosting anti-inflammatory mechanisms and immunity through a chemical action in the gut environment [100]. On the other hand, besides acting as carriers for polyphenols, thus affecting their bioaccessibility and potential bioavailability [41], cell wall polysaccharides can also influence host wellbeing and health through a variety of mechanisms, depending on their dietary source, physicochemical structure, fermentability, and physiological properties in the gut [101], modulating intestinal microflora, improving gastrointestinal health, and regulating brain signals, affecting the gut–brain axis. There is also evidence suggesting that polyphenol-dietary fiber interaction can modulate the fermentation of polyphenols in the gut [102,103,104]. Dietary fibers are also associated with favorable body weight and overall metabolic health, being also associated with a reduced risk for the development of cardiovascular disease [105], some forms of cancer [106], and depression [107,108].
However, the specific biological activity of non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates is not well established due to the insoluble nature of these compounds. For instance, the measurement of the antioxidant activity has been limited most of the time to soluble materials, with the extraction procedure being considered a critical step [8]. However, many of the insoluble components cannot be solubilized without altering their molecular nature by chemical or enzymatic treatment. Thus, direct methodologies to assess the antioxidant activity of insoluble material have been developed [109,110]. The QUENCHER methodology has been shown to accurately measure the antioxidant capacity of antioxidants (e.g., ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, ORAC, CUPRAC) bound to insoluble matrices [111,112,113,114], without extraction and hydrolysis processes, by a surface reaction phenomenon. The QUENCHER concept was also adapted to the methodologies that evaluate the scavenging capacity of superoxide, hydroxyl, and lipid peroxyl radicals [115]. On the other hand, all antioxidant compounds are present in a dynamic system where radicals and antioxidant compounds react continuously with each other, with the coexistence of multiple antioxidants possibly resulting in additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions [116]. Previous studies have shown that the antioxidant activity of non-extractable antioxidants bound to dietary fibers can be regenerated by extractable antioxidants in the liquid phase, as the extractable ones can provide electrons or hydrogen atoms to the formers, regenerating them [117,118]. Consequently, non-extractable ingredients with an increased antioxidant capacity can be obtained, as during the digestion process, they can react with the free radicals and at the same time being regenerated by extractable compounds [111], a promising framework in the development of functional foods.
Furthermore, non-extractable polyphenols and dietary fibers have shown to positively affect SCFA production, with rats fed with dietary fibers enriched with polyphenols extracts showing a higher SCFA production compared with only fibers [119]. Mice supplemented with apple pomace flour showed a lower body weight gain and improved glucose tolerance [120]. The daily intake of grape pomace consumed in bread, biscuits, or directly mixed with water improved blood pressure, glycaemia, postprandial insulin, and antioxidant defense [121]. Finally, its consumption in burgers supplemented with wine pomace improved fasting glucose, insulin resistance, plasma antioxidant levels, and oxidative damage markers [122]. The same pomace contributed to a decrease on inflammation markers [123].

5. Non-Extractable Polyphenol-Dietary Fiber Fate through the Human Gut

Bioavailability of a compound can be defined as the fraction that can reach systematic circulation after administration, so that they can exert bioactivity [124]. Thus, bioavailability represents one of the most relevant aspects for the potential therapeutic effects of the ingested compounds. With respect to in vivo potential, non-extractable polyphenols are essentially considered non-bioavailable as they can reach the colon still covalently linked or chemically adsorbed or entangled within the fiber matrix, with their absorption mechanisms in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract greatly depending on their release from the food matrix. From a nutritional point of view, non-extractable polyphenols are a relevant group of compounds for two main reasons: (a) most of the non-extractable polyphenols are not affected by the acidic conditions at the gastric phase or by the enzymes of small intestine [111]. Only a small percentage (about 5–10%), can be partially released from the food matrix, namely the water soluble non-extractable polyphenols, due to their poor structure. In this case, polyphenols may be absorbed through the small intestine mucosa by direct solubilization in the intestinal fluids in physiological conditions (37 °C, pH 1–7, mobility, transit time) and after ester bond cleavage, by the action of mucosa cell esterases [28]. Glucuronidation, sulfation, or methylation may also occur at the level of intestinal mucosa [125,126]; (b) the remaining non-absorbed polyphenols, connected to cell wall macromolecules, can reach the lower gut intact, where they play a major role in the reduction of local oxidative stress and in modifying the microbiota composition, thus improving gut permeability and boosting the anti-inflammatory mechanisms and immunity [100]. There, they undergo fermentation by the colonic microbiota, releasing absorbable metabolites or by the action of some intestinal enzymes able to break covalent bonds, such as esterases [127,128]. Colonic microorganisms, including, for instance, Bifidobacterium spp., Clostridium spp., and Lactobacillus spp., secrete a variety of extracellular enzymes such as carbohydrolases, protease, and other types of enzymes, leading to the disruption of the cell wall matrix and hydrolysis of covalent bonds or release of entangled polyphenols, and producing metabolites. Additionally, colonic microbiota cleaves the glycosidic linkage and breaks down the flavonoid structure of the unabsorbed phenolics, releasing aglycones as well as converting them into small molecules [129].
On the other hand, the action of the microbiome on macromolecules, mainly carbohydrate and protein, produces mainly short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) (acetic, propionic, butyric) and gases from carbohydrates, along with nitrogen compounds from proteins and low molecular weight phenolic compounds and some phenolic metabolites (hydroxyphenylacetic, hydroxyphenylvaleric, and hydroxyphenylpropionic acids or urolithin) from non-extractable and also from extractable phenolic compounds that were not absorbed in the small intestine and which have been implicated in the suppression of intestinal inflammation and improvement of the intestinal microenvironment [130].
The released polyphenols (aglycones and small molecules) in the gut lumen render a myriad of health benefits that influence the fermentation environment of the colon by decreasing pH, enhancing the intestinal antioxidant status, which may protect against dietary prooxidants and free radical and prevent the growth of cancer-inducing microorganisms [28,131,132]. Once free in the gut lumen, polyphenols and their metabolites can pass the colon mucosa and be absorbed into the bloodstream, through passive diffusion and/or active transport by transporters, such as glucose transporters, ATP-binding cassette transporters, and monocarboxylic acid transporters in the intestinal epithelium [133]. Through the portal vein, polyphenols arrive in the liver where they are mainly metabolized as glucuronides metabolites and, to a minor extent, as sulfated and methylated compounds. These metabolites may return to the digestive tube through the bile, or pass into the bloodstream, reaching tissues and organs, allowing protection against chronic diseases [12] (Figure 3). Colonic phenolic acids may also influence the regulation of the immune system response at the epithelial level or modulate colonic microbiome, through the activation of SCFA excretion, promoting gut health, thus presenting a prebiotic effect [134]. On the other hand, SCFA have also been shown to affect and to enhance the uptake of phenolic metabolites [135].
The metabolites produced by colonic fermentation from the free and non-extractable polyphenols during digestion were shown to be similar. However, the specific characteristics of non-extractable polyphenols, such as high molecular weight and/or association with other macromolecules present in the food matrix, cause two specific features in the colonic transformation. From the delay of polyphenol levels observed in the plasma after intake, comparing non-extractable-rich matrices and free phenolics-rich matrices, it could be concluded that the metabolites derived from non-extractable polyphenols circulate for longer periods in the human body than those produced from free phenolics, exerting their effects much longer than extractable polyphenols in a living organism [130,136]. In fact, non-extractable polyphenols and other phenolic metabolites may persist in the human plasma for up to 3–4 days after ingestion, playing key bioactive roles, such as modulators of low-grade inflammation and cell-signaling pathway mediators [8,137]. According to Vitaglione et al., 2008, the slow and continuous release of non-extractable polyphenols may favorably act in vivo, quenching the soluble radicals that are continuously formed in the intestinal tract, as opposed to the extractable polyphenols that are immediately absorbed and metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract [8], thus allowing a continuous protection. In this sense, dietary fibers may act as natural delivery carriers, improving not only polyphenol chemical stability and solubility but also modulating its bioavailability throughout the gastrointestinal tract [138]. In sum, the presence of macromolecular components in non-extractable polyphenols might affect polyphenol bioaccessibility in the small intestine, by decreasing it. At the same time, they may potentially increase the polyphenol amount that reaches the lower parts of the digestive tract [139], being released and bio-transformed into catabolites.

6. Non-Extractable Polyphenol-Dietary Fibers: A Potential Functional Ingredient

Single polyphenols and dietary fibers have been widely used as functional ingredients in foodstuffs due to their well-recognized physiological roles. For instance, dietary fibers have been associated with an increase of the volume of fecal bulk, decrease of the intestinal transit time, reduction of cholesterol and postprandial blood sugar levels, stimulation of intestinal microflora proliferation, such as Bifidobacterium (bacteria associated with colon, stomach, breast, and prostate cancer prevention [140]), and promote the formation of SCFA, reducing luminal pH, which helps to prevent colonization and infections from pathogenic bacteria [141]. Moreover, some bioactive polysaccharides possess other health-promoting properties (e.g., antimicrobial, antitumoral, and immunostimulating effects) [142]. These bioactivities are mainly associated with polysaccharide physicochemical and conformational properties [143].
On the other hand, polyphenols are attracting more attention due to their antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial, anti-carcinogenic, and anti-inflammatory activity in the human body [144]. They also exhibit an inhibition effect on digestive enzymes, such as lipase, amylase, and glucosidase [63,145]. Polyphenols can also act as prebiotics due to their inhibitory effect against pathogens and stimulation effects on beneficial bacteria [134,146].
From a technological perspective, dietary fibers may affect the technological properties of food related to texture, due to water and fat-holding ability, gelling and swelling capacity, emulsion stability, increased viscosity, and foam capacity and stability, as well as solvent retention capacities (e.g., lactic acid, sodium carbonate, sucrose) [147,148]. The viscosity of dietary fibers is due to physical interaction between fiber particles, strongly associated with fiber microstructure [149]. Additionally, they may be used as non-caloric bulking agents for partial replacement of flour, fat, or sugar. Polyphenols, on the other hand, have been used as natural dyes, preservatives in food formulations (antimicrobial, antioxidants, and antibacterial activity), favoring, thickening agents, and prebiotic ingredients [66,150]. In this sense, non-extractable polyphenols associated with dietary fibers have assumed an increasingly significance, as they hold the promise to provide physiological and technological properties (e.g., texture, color, health benefits, or stability during shelf-life) of both substances in a single material [144,151].
Hence, the search for innovative non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber materials to the food industry has been emerging, also representing an opportunity to apply sustainable circular economy models. However, it should also be taken into consideration that the supramolecular structure and physical properties of dietary fibers (e.g., rheology, encapsulation efficiency, water solubility, and structural stability) can be altered through polyphenol interaction [152,153]. For instance, previous studies have shown that polyphenols may induce a viscosity decrease and the pseudoplastic (Newtonian) behavior of polysaccharide solutions through the formation of polysaccharide–polyphenol aggregates (e.g., β-glucan, galactomannan, guar, and xanthan gum) [154,155]. Another study showed that phenolic acids and flavonoids can alter the gelatinization, retrogradation, and digestibility of starch. Procyanidins, on the other hand, can increase the crystallinity, bonding temperature, and maximum viscosity of starch [156].
In a food concept, non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fibers can be defined as a dietary fiber concentrate with significant amounts of associated natural polyphenols [157]. Furthermore, there are certain requirements that must be observed so that the material can be considered as a potential food ingredient, namely the dietary fiber content should be higher than 50% in a dry weight basis and the antioxidant capacity must be an intrinsic property of the material, deriving from the natural constituents and should not be related to added antioxidants or any other constituents released through chemical or enzymatic treatment of the original components. Regarding the antioxidant capacity, 1000 mg of antioxidant dietary fibers should inhibit lipid oxidation equivalent to at least 200 mg of vitamin E and present a free radical scavenging capacity equivalent to at least 50 mg of vitamin E [144,158].
The fruit and vegetable industry generates high amounts of wastes and by-products that can be reused in different applications. Multifunctional polyphenol-dietary fiber ingredients, with higher health-promoting effects (source of bioactive compounds, such as vitamins, minerals, and polyphenolic compounds) and technological functionalities represents a suitable alternative to valorize these residues. For instance, olive pomace has been reported as an antioxidant, antimicrobial, and prebiotic ingredient, with potential beneficial effects on the gut microbiota and with functional properties (solubility and water and oil-holding capacity) [159,160]. The most commonly prepared fruit and vegetable dietary fibers with associated polyphenols that could be employed as sources to develop functional ingredients are obtained from guava, açai and mango fruits, chokeberries, apples, cranberries, carrot peels, pineapple shells, cocoa, and cabbage leaves, or they are by-products of Vitis vinifera L. grapes (pomaces) or apple pomace [161,162,163,164,165] (Table 1). Cereals, particularly bran and husk, are also a rich source, with a high proportion of non-extractable polyphenols associated with dietary fibers [166].
Polyphenol-dietary fiber materials are available in various forms, such as granules, seeds, hulls, shells, or grains, as well as in the form of powdered ingredient [183]. Typically, these preparations are subjected to a washing and stabilization step (normally by heat treatment) to inactivate microorganisms and enzymes [184]. Decontamination with sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by rinsing with water, can be applied to guarantee food safety [185]. Depending on the vegetable source, separation of liquid and solid fractions may be required, which allows a reduction of the drying time and the caramelization extent of the free sugars during drying [186]. Additionally, this process allows one to obtain a solid residue with lower water content and to collect a liquid part rich in water soluble compounds, allowing a wider valorization of the raw material. Typically, these preparations have been prepared with low water activity, obtained after drying and grinding. These two parameters can affect the techno-functional properties of the powdered ingredient. While drying temperature can be managed to increase phenolic compounds and consequent health benefits of the by-products, grinding and the particle size affect the technological properties of the flours, particularly the hydration properties. At lower particle size, dietary fiber water holding capacity, water retention capacity, and swelling capacity increase. However, further decreases lead to a decrease on the hydration properties, possibly due to soluble and insoluble fiber content [187].
In recent years, the presence of a specific type of naturally occurring water-soluble polyphenol-polysaccharide conjugates has been described in the flowering parts and leaves of many traditional medicinal plants [188] and some food crops (e.g., grape pomace, lingonberry, or rice), with these conjugates being the focus of several studies. Despite their relatively lower purity and higher heterogeneity, some common and characteristic structural features (consisting of two parts, a polyphenolic and a polysaccharide moiety) and biological activities have been identified. Purification methods are similar to those applied for polysaccharides due to their macromolecular nature, including anion exchange chromatography and gel filtration chromatography. In general, polyphenol glycoconjugates exhibit several biological activities, including anticoagulant, antioxidant, radioprotective, anti-platelet, antitussive, and bronchodilatory activity [189,190,191,192,193,194]. More notably, naturally occurring polyphenol-polysaccharide conjugates were also shown to have a bright prospect in the field of food and nutraceuticals, presenting an antiglycation and antihiperglycemic effect, digestive enzymes inhibitory effect, anti-obesity, and regulation of gut microbiota [63,195,196,197]. Glucose transport in Caco-2 cells was also found to be significantly inhibited by water soluble polyphenol-polysaccharide treatments [63]. Recovery of these conjugates through conventional solvent extraction techniques (hot water or alkaline extraction) [189] require long extraction time, high energy consumption, and organic solvents, which may cause negative effects on human health upon ingestion due to their residue in the final product. Among modern extraction methods, subcritical water extraction (SWE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) have shown the potential to replace conventional extraction techniques [198,199].
Besides naturally occurring polyphenol-dietary fibers, synthesized conjugates may also play a fundamental role in the development of new functional ingredients, with improved physicochemical and bioactive properties, compared to the unmodified polyphenols and polysaccharides. Phenolic acids, including caffeic, gallic, ferulic, vanillic, and coumaric acids, have been covalently grafted onto chitosan [200], starch [201], curdlan [202], pectin [203], and gum arabic [204]. Other flavonoids, such as catechin, rutin, quercetin, hesperidin, curcumin, naringenin, and proanthocyanindins, have also been successfully grafted onto polysaccharides [205,206,207,208,209]. The grafting reactions can be achieved by carbodiimide-mediated coupling reaction, free-radical induced reaction, or enzyme-mediated polyphenols-polysaccharide conjugation reactions (e.g., laccase, tyrosinase, horseradish peroxidase, and choroperoxidase) [210]. Wheat bran, a source of dietary fibers, was shown to reacted with polyphenols from different sources (green and black tea and white and red wine) under alkaline conditions with free amino groups available on the surface of wheat bran, followed by polymerization of the soluble antioxidants [211]. Synthetic conjugates have also shown several bioactive properties, such as antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic activity, which could allow their application in the food industry, such as in food preservation and packaging or in active nanocarriers for delivery of active ingredients [211]. Thus, understanding the synthetic strategy, purification methodology, and the knowledge of the functional and physiological properties of polyphenol-polysaccharide conjugates is fundamental for the development of innovative food ingredients.

7. Non-Extractable Polyphenol-Dietary Fibers: An Approach in Food Industry and Innovation Potential

Non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fibers are promising ingredients to bring innovation and functionality to the food industry, affecting polyphenol bioavailability and promoting high bioactivity on tissues and cells, while potentiating the technological functionalities of both dietary fibers and polyphenols. In fact, non-extractable-dietary fiber conjugates can be seen as innovative delivery systems, acting as polyphenol carriers, and at the same time modulating gut microbiota [7]. On the other hand, using food by-products and wastes to obtain new ingredients that can be re-introduced into the industrial chains can be considered as a solution to mitigate the economic, environmental, and social impact caused by food wastes, bringing innovation to the food sector [65].
After the validation of the potential of non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates as functional ingredients, there are some aspects that must be globally considered in the next steps of the development of food products, particularly production processes (as it may impact the texturizing properties), raw-material availability, stability, and storage conditions, including shelf-life, microbiological safety regarding the presence of pesticides and other contaminants from agriculture, and physical hazards. Finally, it should be taken into consideration that the valorization of these bioactive compounds should occur at competitive prices, so that they can be used [212].
Non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fibers from fruits and vegetables have been incorporated into food products, preferably into cereals, as this material presents a better nutritional profile due to the significant content of associated bioactive compounds, lower phytic acid content, and caloric value. Additionally, this material presents a balanced dietary fiber composition (higher fiber content, IDF:SDF ratio) and technological functionalities, namely as thickeners, gelling agents, fillers, and as water and oil holding retainers, as well as in the production of edible films [213,214].
Literature has shown the application of this ingredient in different food products, enhancing the bioactive compound level (antioxidants and dietary fiber) in finished food products, and increasing their technological behavior [215]. In bakery products, dried fruit and vegetable pomaces can be added to replace flour, sugar, or fat, thus reducing energy load, while enhancing fiber and antioxidant contents. On the other hand, techno-functional interactions may occur, affecting the physicochemical and sensory properties of the finished product [216]. For instance, pasta fortified with mango peel powder showed a dietary fiber and polyphenol increase of about two and four times, respectively, resulting in an improved storage stability without changing the textural, cooking, and sensory attributes [163]. In addition, the replacement of 20% of wheat flour with mango peel in soft dough biscuits led to a phenolic content increase of up to eight times, compared to the control [183]. Cakes prepared with watermelon and melon peel powders, as a dietary fiber rich in phenolic compounds, showed improved nutritional and antioxidant properties [217], while muffins have been successfully fortified with dried apple peel [218]. Probiotic yogurt fortified with 1% fiber-rich pineapple peel powder was produced, remarkably reducing the fermentation time of milk. However, a loss in firmness and storage modulus could be observed [219]. Other examples of non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber application can be found in a large variety of food products, including meat products, bread, cereals, pasta, dressings, cookies, biscuits, and extruded or dairy products [183,219,220,221].

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The increasing awareness of lifestyle in human well-being has resulted in a great interest in the health-promoting aspects of food. In this sense, the food industry needs to translate nutritional information into consumer demand through the development of natural food products that provide not only appealing sensorial features and gastronomic innovation but also nutritional and health benefits.
In recent years, the attention on polyphenols research regarding human health benefits has expanded from extractable compounds to non-extractable ones. Non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates are a promising natural bio-ingredient, which have been increasingly recognized as important players in food development, nutrition, and human health. There is a new trend and opportunity to investigate more deeply how non-extractable polyphenols bound to dietary fibers are implicated in the prevention or evolution of different chronic diseases and how they can be used in the development of innovative functional foods. Their application as a global entity, having dual properties, shows a great potential for how functional food development can be used to produce innovative food products with improved techno-functional properties. Moreover, these ingredients can be used to improve the nutritional content of food products or be targeted to consumers with a high risk of human health problems (e.g., type II diabetes, obesity, or cardiovascular disease) or to enable personalized nutrition.
Although non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fibers present high potential applications for the development of innovative functional ingredients and foods, contributing at the same time to the valorization and exploitation of agri-food by-products and wastes for non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fibers recovery, they have not been implemented on a big scale. Future research should be directed towards the global exploitation of plant-based by-products, which could lead to the generation of new business, revenues streams, and jobs. Thus, the focus should be addressed towards updating the methodological approach for the obtainment of non-extractable polyphenol-dietary fibers in a multidisciplinary and innovative design. An improved understanding regarding this fraction may allow the establishment of a new bridge between their chemical composition, bioavailability, and their ultimate biological function, contributing for the design of sensorial and texture appealing, healthier, and sustainable foods, with this opening up new possibilities for the food industry to address consumer demands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.; validation, N.M. and V.d.F.; investigation, A.F. resources, A.F.; data curation, A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.; writing—review and editing, N.M. and V.d.F.; visualization, N.M. and V.d.F.; supervision, V.d.F.; project administration, V.d.F.; funding acquisition, V.d.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the AgriFood XXI I&DT project (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000041), project NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000052, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through the NORTE 2020 (Programa Operacional Regional do Norte 2014/2020), and by FCT/MCTES through research contract (CEECIND/00029/2018/CP1545/CT0010) and research unit LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020), by national funds and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Saura-Calixto, F. Macromolecular antioxidants or non-extractable polyphenols in fruit and vegetables: Intake in four European countries. Food Res. Int. 2015, 74, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Koch, W. Dietary Polyphenols-Important Non-Nutrients in the Prevention of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases. A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dias, R.; Pereira, C.B.; Pérez-Gregorio, R.; Mateus, N.; Freitas, V. Recent advances on dietary polyphenol’s potential roles in Celiac Disease. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 107, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arranz, S.; Saura-Calixto, F.; Shaha, S.; Kroon, P.A. High contents of nonextractable polyphenols in fruits suggest that polyphenol contents of plant foods have been underestimated. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 7298–7303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Qin, C.; Dong, L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.; Liu, L.; Yang, J.O.; Liu, L. Whole grain benefit: Synergistic effect of oat phenolic compounds and β-glucan on hyperlipidemia via gut microbiota in high-fat-diet mice. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 12686–12696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dong, L.; Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, L. Oat phenolic compounds regulate metabolic syndrome in high fat diet-fed mice via gut microbiota. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 101946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saura-Calixto, F. Concept and health-related properties of nonextractable polyphenols: The missing dietary polyphenols. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11195–11200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Serpen, A.; Capuano, E.; Fogliano, V.; Gökmen, V. A New Procedure To Measure the Antioxidant Activity of Insoluble Food Components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 7676–7681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ren, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.; Liu, L. The positive correlation of antioxidant activity and prebiotic effect about oat phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 2023, 402, 134231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mosele, J.I.; Macià, A.; Motilva, M.J. Metabolic and Microbial Modulation of the Large Intestine Ecosystem by Non-Absorbed Diet Phenolic Compounds: A Review. Molecules 2015, 20, 17429–17468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Quatrin, A.; Pauletto, R.; Maurer, L.H.; Minuzzi, N.; Nichelle, S.M.; Carvalho, J.F.C.; Maróstica, M.R.; Rodrigues, E.; Bochi, V.C.; Emanuelli, T. Characterization and quantification of tannins, flavonols, anthocyanins and matrix-bound polyphenols from jaboticaba fruit peel: A comparison between Myrciaria trunciflora and M. jaboticaba. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 78, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Díaz-Rubio, M.E.; Saura-Calixto, F. Non-extractable polyphenols, a major dietary antioxidant: Occurrence, metabolic fate and health effects. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2013, 26, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Khalid, M.; Saeed Ur, R.; Bilal, M.; Huang, D.-f. Role of flavonoids in plant interactions with the environment and against human pathogens—A review. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Le Bourvellec, C.; Renard, C.M. Interactions between polyphenols and macromolecules: Quantification methods and mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 213–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soares, S.; Brandão, E.; Guerreiro, C.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V. Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste. Molecules 2020, 25, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soto-Vaca, A.; Gutierrez, A.; Losso, J.N.; Xu, Z.; Finley, J.W. Evolution of Phenolic Compounds from Color and Flavor Problems to Health Benefits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6658–6677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manach, C.; Scalbert, A.; Morand, C.; Remesy, C.; Jimenez, L. Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 727–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pérez-Gregorio, R.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V. Bioactive Peptides and Dietary Polyphenols: Two Sides of the Same Coin. Molecules 2020, 25, 3443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Crozier, A.; Jaganath, L.B.; Clifford, M.N. Dietary phenolics: Chemistry, bioavailability and effects on health. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 1001–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Neveu, V.; Vos, F.; Scalbert, A. Identification of the 100 richest dietary sources of polyphenols: An application of the Phenol-Explorer database. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, S112–S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Heimler, D.; Romani, A.; Ieri, F. Plant polyphenol content, soil fertilization and agricultural management: A review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hellström, J.K.; Törrönen, A.R.; Mattila, P.H. Proanthocyanidins in Common Food Products of Plant Origin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 7899–7906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Ge, S.; Lin, S. Review of Distribution, Extraction Methods, and Health Benefits of Bound Phenolics in Food Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3330–3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Deng, Z.; Tsao, R. A review on insoluble-bound phenolics in plant-based food matrix and their contribution to human health with future perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beckman, C.H. Phenolic-storing cells: Keys to programmed cell death and periderm formation in wilt disease resistance and in general defence responses in plants? Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2000, 57, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Torres, J.L. Analysis of nonextractable phenolic compounds in foods: The current state of the art. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 12713–12724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shahidi, F.; Yeo, J.D. Insoluble-Bound Phenolics in Food. Molecules 2016, 21, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nicholson, R.L.; Hammerschmidt, R. Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Disease Resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1992, 30, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jansen, M.A.; van den Noort, R.E.; Tan, M.Y.; Prinsen, E.; Lagrimini, L.M.; Thorneley, R.N. Phenol-oxidizing peroxidases contribute to the protection of plants from ultraviolet radiation stress. Plant Physiol 2001, 126, 1012–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rombouts, F.M.; Thibault, J.-F. Feruloylated pectic substances from sugar-beet pulp. Carbohydr. Res. 1986, 154, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fry, S.C. Feruloylated pectins from the primary cell wall: Their structure and possible functions. Planta 1983, 157, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tuyet Lam, T.B.; Iiyama, K.; Stone, B.A. Cinnamic acid bridges between cell wall polymers in wheat and phalaris internodes. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ishii, T. Isolation and characterization of a diferuloyl arabinoxylan hexasaccharide from bamboo shoot cell-walls. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 219, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Grabber, J.H.; Hatfield, R.D.; Ralph, J.; Zoń, J.; Amrhein, N. Ferulate cross-linking in cell walls isolated from maize cell suspensions. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Eran Nagar, E.; Okun, Z.; Shpigelman, A. Digestive fate of polyphenols: Updated view of the influence of chemical structure and the presence of cell wall material. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 31, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fernandes, P.A.R.; Le Bourvellec, C.; Renard, C.M.G.C.; Nunes, F.M.; Bastos, R.; Coelho, E.; Wessel, D.F.; Coimbra, M.A.; Cardoso, S.M. Revisiting the chemistry of apple pomace polyphenols. Food Chem. 2019, 294, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ferreira, D.; Guyot, S.; Marnet, N.; Delgadillo, I.; Renard, C.M.; Coimbra, M.A. Composition of phenolic compounds in a Portuguese pear (Pyrus communis L. var. S. Bartolomeu) and changes after sun-drying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4537–4544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Le Bourvellec, C.; Guyot, S.; Renard, C.M.G.C. Interactions between apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) polyphenols and cell walls modulate the extractability of polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 75, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, X.; Le Bourvellec, C.; Renard, C.M.G.C. Interactions between cell wall polysaccharides and polyphenols: Effect of molecular internal structure. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3574–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Saura-Calixto, F. Dietary Fiber as a Carrier of Dietary Antioxidants: An Essential Physiological Function. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Renard, C.M.G.C.; Watrelot, A.A.; Le Bourvellec, C. Interactions between polyphenols and polysaccharides: Mechanisms and consequences in food processing and digestion. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 60, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Palafox-Carlos, H.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; González-Aguilar, G.A. The role of dietary fiber in the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of fruit and vegetable antioxidants. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, R6–R15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sun, J.; Chu, Y.F.; Wu, X.; Liu, R.H. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7449–7454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Saura-Calixto, F. Fruit peels as sources of non-extractable polyphenols or macromolecular antioxidants: Analysis and nutritional implications. Food Res. Int. 2018, 111, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chu, Y.F.; Sun, J.; Wu, X.; Liu, R.H. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6910–6916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Peričin, D.; Krimer, V.; Trivić, S.; Radulović, L. The distribution of phenolic acids in pumpkin’s hull-less seed, skin, oil cake meal, dehulled kernel and hull. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, Z.; Robards, K.; Helliwell, S.; Blanchard, C. The distribution of phenolic acids in rice. Food Chem. 2004, 87, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. White, B.L.; Howard, L.R.; Prior, R.L. Release of Bound Procyanidins from Cranberry Pomace by Alkaline Hydrolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 7572–7579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yuan, Y.; Xiang, J.; Zheng, B.; Sun, J.; Luo, D.; Li, P.; Fan, J. Diversity of phenolics including hydroxycinnamic acid amide derivatives, phenolic acids contribute to antioxidant properties of proso millet. LWT 2022, 154, 112611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Clifford, M.N. Chlorogenic acids and other cinnamates—Nature, occurrence and dietary burden. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 362–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fernandes, P.A.R.; Silva, A.M.S.; Evtuguin, D.V.; Nunes, F.M.; Wessel, D.F.; Cardoso, S.M.; Coimbra, M.A. The hydrophobic polysaccharides of apple pomace. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 223, 115132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cerdá, B.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Espín, J.C. Metabolism of antioxidant and chemopreventive ellagitannins from strawberries, raspberries, walnuts, and oak-aged wine in humans: Identification of biomarkers and individual variability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, L.; Tsao, R.; Yang, R.; Liu, C.; Zhu, H.; Young, J.C. Polyphenolic Profiles and Antioxidant Activities of Heartnut (Juglans ailanthifolia Var. cordiformis) and Persian Walnut (Juglans regia L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8033–8040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. John, J.A.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa). J. Funct. Foods 2010, 2, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kapasakalidis, P.G.; Rastall, R.A.; Gordon, M.H. Effect of a cellulase treatment on extraction of antioxidant phenols from black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) pomace. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4342–4351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Navarro-González, I.; García-Valverde, V.; García-Alonso, J.; Periago, M.J. Chemical profile, functional and antioxidant properties of tomato peel fiber. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Díaz-Rubio, M.E.; Saura-Calixto, F. Dietary Fiber Complex in Beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2009, 67, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G.; Arranz, S.; Serrano, J.; Goñi, I. Dietary fiber content and associated antioxidant compounds in Roselle flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) beverage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 7886–7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, G.-L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.-G.; Han, M.-D.; Gao, Y.-Q. Antioxidant activities and contents of free, esterified and insoluble-bound phenolics in 14 subtropical fruit leaves collected from the south of China. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 30, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Drossard, C.; Fröhling, B.; Dietrich, H.; Kersting, M. Anthocyanin analysis in banana fruit-a mistake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 865–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Cassidy, A.; Kay, C.; Rimm, E.B. Reply to C Drossard et al. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 866–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Campos, F.; Peixoto, A.F.; Fernandes, P.A.R.; Coimbra, M.A.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V.; Fernandes, I.; Fernandes, A. The Antidiabetic Effect of Grape Pomace Polysaccharide-Polyphenol Complexes. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Coelho, C.; Ribeiro, M.; Cruz, A.C.; Domingues, M.R.; Coimbra, M.A.; Bunzel, M.; Nunes, F.M. Nature of phenolic compounds in coffee melanoidins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7843–7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ding, Y.; Morozova, K.; Scampicchio, M.; Ferrentino, G. Non-Extractable Polyphenols from Food By-Products: Current Knowledge on Recovery, Characterisation, and Potential Applications. Processes 2020, 8, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Acosta-Estrada, B.A.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O. Bound phenolics in foods, a review. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jokić, S.; Cvjetko, M.; Božić, Đ.; Fabek, S.; Toth, N.; Vorkapić-Furač, J.; Redovniković, I.R. Optimisation of microwave-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from broccoli and its antioxidant activity. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 2613–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Herrera, M.C.; Luque de Castro, M.D. Ultrasound-assisted extraction for the analysis of phenolic compounds in strawberries. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 379, 1106–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Buranov, A.U.; Mazza, G. Extraction and purification of ferulic acid from flax shives, wheat and corn bran by alkaline hydrolysis and pressurised solvents. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Đurović, S.; Nikolić, B.; Luković, N.; Jovanović, J.; Stefanović, A.; Šekuljica, N.; Mijin, D.; Knežević-Jugović, Z. The impact of high-power ultrasound and microwave on the phenolic acid profile and antioxidant activity of the extract from yellow soybean seeds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 122, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, X.; Sun, K.; Zhuang, K.; Ding, W. Comparison and Optimization of Different Extraction Methods of Bound Phenolics from Jizi439 Black Wheat Bran. Foods 2022, 11, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wanyo, P.; Meeso, N.; Siriamornpun, S. Effects of different treatments on the antioxidant properties and phenolic compounds of rice bran and rice husk. Food Chem. 2014, 157, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lohani, U.C.; Muthukumarappan, K. Application of the pulsed electric field to release bound phenolics in sorghum flour and apple pomace. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 35, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stalikas, C.D. Extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 3268–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zheng, H.Z.; Hwang, I.W.; Chung, S.K. Enhancing polyphenol extraction from unripe apples by carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2009, 10, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Landbo, A.K.; Meyer, A.S. Enzyme-assisted extraction of antioxidative phenols from black currant juice press residues (Ribes nigrum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3169–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Arranz, S.; Saura-Calixto, F. Proanthocyanidin content in foods is largely underestimated in the literature data: An approach to quantification of the missing proanthocyanidins. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1381–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mencin, M.; Jamnik, P.; Mikulič Petkovšek, M.; Veberič, R.; Terpinc, P. Enzymatic treatments of raw, germinated and fermented spelt (Triticum spelta L.) seeds improve the accessibility and antioxidant activity of their phenolics. LWT 2022, 169, 114046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abdel-Aty, A.M.; Barakat, A.Z.; Bassuiny, R.I.; Mohamed, S.A. Improved production of antioxidant-phenolic compounds and certain fungal phenolic-associated enzymes under solid-state fermentation of chia seeds with Trichoderma reesei: Response surface methodology-based optimization. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 3488–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Abdel-Aty, A.M.; Bassuiny, R.I.; Barakat, A.Z.; Mohamed, S.A. Upgrading the phenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of garden cress seeds using solid-state fermentation by Trichoderma reesei. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1454–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Adebo, O.A.; Njobeh, P.B.; Adebiyi, J.A.; Kayitesi, E. Co-influence of fermentation time and temperature on physicochemical properties, bioactive components and microstructure of ting (a Southern African food) from whole grain sorghum. Food Biosci. 2018, 25, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ti, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Deng, Y.; Liu, L.; Ma, Y. Dynamic changes in the free and bound phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of brown rice at different germination stages. Food Chem. 2014, 161, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yeo, J.D.; Shahidi, F. Critical Evaluation of Changes in the Ratio of Insoluble Bound to Soluble Phenolics on Antioxidant Activity of Lentils during Germination. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Miyahira, R.F.; Lopes, J.O.; Antunes, A.E.C. The Use of Sprouts to Improve the Nutritional Value of Food Products: A Brief Review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2021, 76, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xiang, Z.; Deng, J.; Yang, K.; Zhu, Y.; Xia, C.; Chen, J.; Liu, T. Effect of processing on the release of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity during in vitro digestion of hulless barley. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, Y.; Ma, Y.; Dong, L.; Jia, X.; Liu, L.; Huang, F.N.; Chi, J.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, R. Extrusion and fungal fermentation change the profile and antioxidant activity of free and bound phenolics in rice bran together with the phenolic bioaccessibility. LWT 2019, 115, 108461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ee, K.Y.; Agboola, S.; Rehman, A.; Zhao, J. Characterisation of phenolic components present in raw and roasted wattle (Acacia victoriae Bentham) seeds. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ragaee, S.; Seetharaman, K.; Abdel-Aal, E.-S.M. The Impact of Milling and Thermal Processing on Phenolic Compounds in Cereal Grains. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cardoso, L.d.M.; Pinheiro, S.S.; de Carvalho, C.W.P.; Queiroz, V.A.V.; de Menezes, C.B.; Moreira, A.V.B.; de Barros, F.A.R.; Awika, J.M.; Martino, H.S.D.; Pinheiro-Sant’Ana, H.M. Phenolic compounds profile in sorghum processed by extrusion cooking and dry heat in a conventional oven. J. Cereal Sci. 2015, 65, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Burgos, G.; Amoros, W.; Muñoa, L.; Sosa, P.; Cayhualla, E.; Sanchez, C.; Díaz, C.; Bonierbale, M. Total phenolic, total anthocyanin and phenolic acid concentrations and antioxidant activity of purple-fleshed potatoes as affected by boiling. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013, 30, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ozdal, T.; Capanoglu, E.; Altay, F. A review on protein–phenolic interactions and associated changes. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 954–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yeo, J.D.; Shahidi, F. Effect of hydrothermal processing on changes of insoluble-bound phenolics of lentils. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 38, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Antunes-Ricardo, M.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; López-Pacheco, F.; Alvarez, M.M.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O. In vivo anti-inflammatory effects of isorhamnetin glycosides isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill cladodes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Chen, P.X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, R.H.; Tsao, R. Bound Phenolics of Quinoa Seeds Released by Acid, Alkaline, and Enzymatic Treatments and Their Antioxidant and α-Glucosidase and Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitory Effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1712–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Antunes-Ricardo, M.; Moreno-García, B.E.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; Aráiz-Hernández, D.; Alvarez, M.M.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O. Induction of Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cells Treated with Isorhamnetin Glycosides from Opuntia Ficus-indica Pads. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2014, 69, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wang, H.; Guo, X.; Hu, X.; Li, T.; Fu, X.; Liu, R.H. Comparison of phytochemical profiles, antioxidant and cellular antioxidant activities of different varieties of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Food Chem. 2017, 217, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Eitsuka, T.; Tatewaki, N.; Nishida, H.; Kurata, T.; Nakagawa, K.; Miyazawa, T. Synergistic inhibition of cancer cell proliferation with a combination of δ-tocotrienol and ferulic acid. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liao, W.; Chen, L.; Ma, X.; Jiao, R.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.-M. Protective effects of kaempferol against reactive oxygen species-induced hemolysis and its antiproliferative activity on human cancer cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 114, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Narasimhan, A.; Chinnaiyan, M.; Karundevi, B. Ferulic acid regulates hepatic GLUT2 gene expression in high fat and fructose-induced type-2 diabetic adult male rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 761, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Papillo, V.A.; Vitaglione, P.; Graziani, G.; Gokmen, V.; Fogliano, V. Release of antioxidant capacity from five plant foods during a multistep enzymatic digestion protocol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4119–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cui, J.; Lian, Y.; Zhao, C.; Du, H.; Han, Y.; Gao, W.; Xiao, H.; Zheng, J. Dietary Fibers from Fruits and Vegetables and Their Health Benefits via Modulation of Gut Microbiota. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1514–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Phan, A.D.T.; Williams, B.A.; Netzel, G.; Mikkelsen, D.; D’Arcy, B.R.; Gidley, M.J. Independent fermentation and metabolism of dietary polyphenols associated with a plant cell wall model. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 2218–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tarko, T.; Duda-Chodak, A. Influence of Food Matrix on the Bioaccessibility of Fruit Polyphenolic Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1315–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Le Bourvellec, C.; Bagano Vilas Boas, P.; Lepercq, P.; Comtet-Marre, S.; Auffret, P.; Ruiz, P.; Bott, R.; Renard, C.M.G.C.; Dufour, C.; Chatel, J.-M.; et al. Procyanidin—Cell Wall Interactions within Apple Matrices Decrease the Metabolization of Procyanidins by the Human Gut Microbiota and the Anti-Inflammatory Effect of the Resulting Microbial Metabolome In Vitro. Nutrients 2019, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Threapleton, D.E.; Greenwood, D.C.; Evans, C.E.; Cleghorn, C.L.; Nykjaer, C.; Woodhead, C.; Cade, J.E.; Gale, C.P.; Burley, V.J. Dietary fibre intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013, 347, f6879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Terry, P.; Giovannucci, E.; Michels, K.B.; Bergkvist, L.; Hansen, H.; Holmberg, L.; Wolk, A. Fruit, Vegetables, Dietary Fiber, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Swann, O.G.; Kilpatrick, M.; Breslin, M.; Oddy, W.H. Dietary fiber and its associations with depression and inflammation. Nutr. Rev. 2020, 78, 394–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, R.T.; Walsh, R.F.L.; Sheehan, A.E. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 102, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gökmen, V.; Serpen, A.; Fogliano, V. Direct measurement of the total antioxidant capacity of foods: The ‘QUENCHER’ approach. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tufan, A.N.; Celik, S.E.; Ozyürek, M.; Güçlü, K.; Apak, R. Direct measurement of total antioxidant capacity of cereals: QUENCHER-CUPRAC method. Talanta 2013, 108, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cömert, E.D.; Gökmen, V. Antioxidants Bound to an Insoluble Food Matrix: Their Analysis, Regeneration Behavior, and Physiological Importance. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 382–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Abderrahim, F.; Huanatico, E.; Segura, R.; Arribas, S.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Condezo-Hoyos, L. Physical features, phenolic compounds, betalains and total antioxidant capacity of coloured quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from Peruvian Altiplano. Food Chem. 2015, 183, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Serpen, A.; Gökmen, V.; Fogliano, V. Total antioxidant capacities of raw and cooked meats. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Condezo-Hoyos, L.; Abderrahim, F.; Arriba, S.M.; Carmen González, M. A novel, micro, rapid and direct assay to assess total antioxidant capacity of solid foods. Talanta 2015, 138, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Del Pino-García, R.; García-Lomillo, J.; Rivero-Pérez, M.D.; González-SanJosé, M.L.; Muñiz, P. Adaptation and Validation of QUick, Easy, New, CHEap, and Reproducible (QUENCHER) Antioxidant Capacity Assays in Model Products Obtained from Residual Wine Pomace. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 6922–6931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Apak, R.; Özyürek, M.; Güçlü, K.; Çapanoğlu, E. Antioxidant Activity/Capacity Measurement. 1. Classification, Physicochemical Principles, Mechanisms, and Electron Transfer (ET)-Based Assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 997–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Çelik, E.E.; Gökmen, V.; Fogliano, V. Soluble Antioxidant Compounds Regenerate the Antioxidants Bound to Insoluble Parts of Foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10329–10334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Çelik, E.E.; Gökmen, V. Investigation of the interaction between soluble antioxidants in green tea and insoluble dietary fiber bound antioxidants. Food Res. Int. 2014, 63, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kosmala, M.; Zduńczyk, Z.; Karlińska, E.; Juśkiewicz, J. The effects of strawberry, black currant, and chokeberry extracts in a grain dietary fiber matrix on intestinal fermentation in rats. Food Res. Int. 2014, 64, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gorjanović, S.; Micić, D.; Pastor, F.; Tosti, T.; Kalušević, A.; Ristić, S.; Zlatanović, S. Evaluation of Apple Pomace Flour Obtained Industrially by Dehydration as a Source of Biomolecules with Antioxidant, Antidiabetic and Antiobesity Effects. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Urquiaga, I.; D’Acuña, S.; Pérez, D.; Dicenta, S.; Echeverría, G.; Rigotti, A.; Leighton, F. Wine grape pomace flour improves blood pressure, fasting glucose and protein damage in humans: A randomized controlled trial. Biol. Res. 2015, 48, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Urquiaga, I.; Troncoso, D.; Mackenna, M.J.; Urzúa, C.; Pérez, D.; Dicenta, S.; De la Cerda, P.M.; Amigo, L.; Carreño, J.C.; Echeverría, G.; et al. The Consumption of Beef Burgers Prepared with Wine Grape Pomace Flour Improves Fasting Glucose, Plasma Antioxidant Levels, and Oxidative Damage Markers in Humans: A Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Rivera, K.; Salas-Pérez, F.; Echeverría, G.; Urquiaga, I.; Dicenta, S.; Pérez, D.; de la Cerda, P.; González, L.; Andia, M.E.; Uribe, S.; et al. Red Wine Grape Pomace Attenuates Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Damage and Increases Survival in Association with Improved Plasma Antioxidant Activity in a Murine Model of Lethal Ischemic Heart Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Di Lorenzo, C.; Colombo, F.; Biella, S.; Stockley, C.; Restani, P. Polyphenols and Human Health: The Role of Bioavailability. Nutrients 2021, 13, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhao, Z.; Egashira, Y.; Sanada, H. Digestion and absorption of ferulic acid sugar esters in rat gastrointestinal tract. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5534–5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Andreasen, M.F.; Kroon, P.A.; Williamson, G.; Garcia-Conesa, M.-T. Esterase Activity Able To Hydrolyze Dietary Antioxidant Hydroxycinnamates Is Distributed along the Intestine of Mammals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5679–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kroon, P.A.; Faulds, C.B.; Ryden, P.; Robertson, J.A.; Williamson, G. Release of Covalently Bound Ferulic Acid from Fiber in the Human Colon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Andreasen, M.F.; Kroon, P.A.; Williamson, G.; Garcia-Conesa, M.T. Intestinal release and uptake of phenolic antioxidant diferulic acids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cardona, F.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Tulipani, S.; Tinahones, F.J.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I. Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Saura-Calixto, F.; Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Touriño, S.; Serrano, J.; Fuguet, E.; Torres, J.L.; Goñi, I. Proanthocyanidin metabolites associated with dietary fibre from in vitro colonic fermentation and proanthocyanidin metabolites in human plasma. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yi, W.; Fischer, J.; Krewer, G.; Akoh, C.C. Phenolic compounds from blueberries can inhibit colon cancer cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7320–7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Touriño, S.; Fuguet, E.; Vinardell, M.P.; Cascante, M.; Torres, J.L. Phenolic Metabolites of Grape Antioxidant Dietary Fiber in Rat Urine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 11418–11426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Han, F.; Yang, P.; Wang, H.; Fernandes, I.; Mateus, N.; Liu, Y. Digestion and absorption of red grape and wine anthocyanins through the gastrointestinal tract. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 83, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kawabata, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Terao, J. Role of Intestinal Microbiota in the Bioavailability and Physiological Functions of Dietary Polyphenols. Molecules 2019, 24, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Van Rymenant, E.; Abrankó, L.; Tumova, S.; Grootaert, C.; Van Camp, J.; Williamson, G.; Kerimi, A. Chronic exposure to short-chain fatty acids modulates transport and metabolism of microbiome-derived phenolics in human intestinal cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 39, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Rondini, L.; Peyrat-Maillard, M.N.; Marsset-Baglieri, A.; Fromentin, G.; Durand, P.; Tomé, D.; Prost, M.; Berset, C. Bound ferulic acid from bran is more bioavailable than the free compound in rat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4338–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. González-Sarrías, A.; Espín, J.C.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Non-extractable polyphenols produce gut microbiota metabolites that persist in circulation and show anti-inflammatory and free radical-scavenging effects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, Y.; Dong, L.; Liu, L.; Wu, Z.; Pan, D.; Liu, L. Recent Advances of Stimuli-Responsive Polysaccharide Hydrogels in Delivery Systems: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6300–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Jakobek, L.; Matić, P. Non-covalent dietary fiber—Polyphenol interactions and their influence on polyphenol bioaccessibility. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 83, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Veiga, M.; Costa, E.M.; Silva, S.; Pintado, M. Impact of plant extracts upon human health: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 873–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Holscher, H.D. Diet Affects the Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Health. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2020, 120, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Yong, H.; Kan, J.; Jin, C. Recent advances in flavonoid-grafted polysaccharides: Synthesis, structural characterization, bioactivities and potential applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 1011–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, J.; Liu, W.; Chen, Z.; Chen, H. Physicochemical characterization of the oolong tea polysaccharides with high molecular weight and their synergistic effects in combination with polyphenols on hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed. Pharm. 2017, 90, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Quirós-Sauceda, A.E.; Palafox-Carlos, H.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.G.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Bello-Perez, L.A.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E.; de la Rosa, L.A.; González-Córdova, A.F.; González-Aguilar, G.A. Dietary fiber and phenolic compounds as functional ingredients: Interaction and possible effect after ingestion. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sulaiman, S.F.; Ooi, K.L. Antioxidant and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities of 40 Tropical Juices from Malaysia and Identification of Phenolics from the Bioactive Fruit Juices of Barringtonia racemosa and Phyllanthus acidus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 9576–9585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Pereira, A.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Marcelino, F.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Seabra, R.; Estevinho, L.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Phenolic Compounds and Antimicrobial Activity of Olive (Olea europaea L. Cv. Cobrançosa) Leaves. Molecules 2007, 12, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar]
  147. Gowd, V.; Xie, L.; Zheng, X.; Chen, W. Dietary fibers as emerging nutritional factors against diabetes: Focus on the involvement of gut microbiota. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 524–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ahmad, M.; Wani, T.A.; Wani, S.M.; Masoodi, F.A.; Gani, A. Incorporation of carrot pomace powder in wheat flour: Effect on flour, dough and cookie characteristics. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 3715–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Padayachee, A.; Day, L.; Howell, K.; Gidley, M.J. Complexity and health functionality of plant cell wall fibers from fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 59–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. de Araújo, F.F.; de Paulo Farias, D.; Neri-Numa, I.A.; Pastore, G.M. Polyphenols and their applications: An approach in food chemistry and innovation potential. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Madane, P.; Das, A.K.; Pateiro, M.; Nanda, P.K.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Jagtap, P.; Barba, F.J.; Shewalkar, A.; Maity, B.; Lorenzo, J.M. Drumstick (Moringa oleifera) Flower as an Antioxidant Dietary Fibre in Chicken Meat Nuggets. Foods 2019, 8, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Dobson, C.C.; Mottawea, W.; Rodrigue, A.; Buzati Pereira, B.L.; Hammami, R.; Power, K.A.; Bordenave, N. Chapter Three—Impact of molecular interactions with phenolic compounds on food polysaccharides functionality. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research; Ferreira, I.C.F.R., Barros, L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Volume 90, pp. 135–181. [Google Scholar]
  153. Jin, W.; Xiang, L.; Peng, D.; Liu, G.-S.; He, J.; Cheng, S.; Li, B.; Huang, Q. Study on the coupling progress of thermo-induced anthocyanins degradation and polysaccharides gelation. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 105, 105822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Tudorache, M.; Bordenave, N. Phenolic compounds mediate aggregation of water-soluble polysaccharides and change their rheological properties: Effect of different phenolic compounds. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 97, 105193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tudorache, M.; McDonald, J.-L.; Bordenave, N. Gallic acid reduces the viscosity and water binding capacity of soluble dietary fibers. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 5866–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Du, J.; Yao, F.; Zhang, M.; Khalifa, I.; Li, K.; Li, C. Effect of persimmon tannin on the physicochemical properties of maize starch with different amylose/amylopectin ratios. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 1193–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Saura-Calixto, F. Antioxidant Dietary Fiber Product:  A New Concept and a Potential Food Ingredient. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4303–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Das, A.K.; Nanda, P.K.; Madane, P.; Biswas, S.; Das, A.K.; Zhang, W.; Lorenzo, J.M. A comprehensive review on antioxidant dietary fibre enriched meat-based functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ribeiro, T.B.; Costa, C.M.; Bonifácio-Lopes, T.; Silva, S.; Veiga, M.; Monforte, A.; Nunes, J.; Vicente, A.A.; Pintado, M. Prebiotic effects of olive pomace powders in the gut: In vitro evaluation of the inhibition of adhesion of pathogens, prebiotic and antioxidant effects. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ribeiro, T.B.; Oliveira, A.; Coelho, M.; Veiga, M.; Costa, E.M.; Silva, S.; Nunes, J.; Vicente, A.A.; Pintado, M. Are olive pomace powders a safe source of bioactives and nutrients? J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 1963–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yapo, B.M.; Besson, V.; Koubala, B.B.; Koffi, K.L. Adding Value to Cacao Pod Husks as a Potential Antioxidant-Dietary Fiber Source. Am. J. Food Nutr. 2013, 1, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jiménez-Escrig, A.; Rincón, M.; Pulido, R.; Saura-Calixto, F. Guava fruit (Psidium guajava L.) as a new source of antioxidant dietary fiber. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5489–5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Ajila, C.M.; Aalami, M.; Leelavathi, K.; Rao, U.J.S.P. Mango peel powder: A potential source of antioxidant and dietary fiber in macaroni preparations. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2010, 11, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chantaro, P.; Devahastin, S.; Chiewchan, N. Production of antioxidant high dietary fiber powder from carrot peels. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1987–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Vergara-Valencia, N.; Granados-Pérez, E.; Agama-Acevedo, E.; Tovar, J.; Ruales, J.; Bello-Pérez, L.A. Fibre concentrate from mango fruit: Characterization, associated antioxidant capacity and application as a bakery product ingredient. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Vitaglione, P.; Napolitano, A.; Fogliano, V. Cereal dietary fibre: A natural functional ingredient to deliver phenolic compounds into the gut. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Noor, S.A.A.; Siti, N.M.; Mahmad, N.J. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activity and Functional Properties of Mango (Mangifera indica L. var Perlis Sunshine) Peel Flour (MPF). Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 754–755, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Malav, O.P.; Sharma, B.D.; Kumar, R.R.; Talukder, S.; Ahmed, S.R.; A, I. Antioxidant potential and quality characteristics of functional mutton patties incorporated with cabbage powder. Nutr. Food Sci. 2015, 45, 542–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rufino, M.d.S.M.; Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Arranz, S.; Alves, R.E.; de Brito, E.S.; Oliveira, M.S.P.; Saura-Calixto, F. Açaí (Euterpe oleraceae) ‘BRS Pará’: A tropical fruit source of antioxidant dietary fiber and high antioxidant capacity oil. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 2100–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Sánchez-Alonso, I.; Jiménez-Escrig, A.; Saura-Calixto, F.; Borderías, A.J. Effect of grape antioxidant dietary fibre on the prevention of lipid oxidation in minced fish: Evaluation by different methodologies. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Sudha, M.L.; Baskaran, V.; Leelavathi, K. Apple pomace as a source of dietary fiber and polyphenols and its effect on the rheological characteristics and cake making. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Tagliani, C.; Perez, C.; Curutchet, A.; Arcia, P.; Cozzano, S. Blueberry pomace, valorization of an industry by-product source of fibre with antioxidant capacity. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Salama, M.F.; Abozed, S.S.; Abozeid, W.M. Potentiality of Local Wastes as a Source of Natural Antioxidant Dietary Fibers on Dry Pasta. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 19, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Recovery of Phenolic Antioxidants and Functional Compounds from Coffee Industry By-Products. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Llobera, A.; Cañellas, J. Dietary fibre content and antioxidant activity of Manto Negro red grape (Vitis vinifera): Pomace and stem. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Garau, M.C.; Simal, S.; Rosselló, C.; Femenia, A. Effect of air-drying temperature on physico-chemical properties of dietary fibre and antioxidant capacity of orange (Citrus aurantium v. Canoneta) by-products. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1014–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Fernández-López, J.A.; Sendra-Nadal, E.; Navarro, C.; Sayas, E.; Viuda-Martos, M.; Alvarez, J.A.P. Storage stability of a high dietary fibre powder from orange by-products. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Agama-Acevedo, E.; Sañudo-Barajas, J.A.; Vélez De La Rocha, R.; González-Aguilar, G.A.; Bello-Peréz, L.A. Potential of plantain peels flour (Musa paradisiaca L.) as a source of dietary fiber and antioxidant compound. CyTA-J. Food 2016, 14, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Polka, D.; Podsędek, A.; Koziołkiewicz, M. Comparison of Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Fruit, Flower and Bark of Viburnum opulus. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2019, 74, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Zafra-Rojas, Q.; Cruz-Cansino, N.; Delgadillo-Ramírez, A.; Alanís-García, E.; Añorve-Morga, J.; Quintero-Lira, A.; Castañeda-Ovando, A.; Ramírez-Moreno, E. Organic Acids, Antioxidants, and Dietary Fiber of Mexican Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) Residues cv. Tupy. J. Food Qual. 2018, 2018, 5950761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Martínez, R.; Torres, P.; Meneses, M.A.; Figueroa, J.G.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Chemical, technological and in vitro antioxidant properties of mango, guava, pineapple and passion fruit dietary fibre concentrate. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1520–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Meena, L.; Neog, R.; Yashini, M.; Sunil, C.K. Pineapple pomace powder (freeze-dried): Effect on the texture and rheological properties of set-type yogurt. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Nieto Calvache, J.; Cueto, M.; Farroni, A.; de Escalada Pla, M.; Gerschenson, L.N. Antioxidant characterization of new dietary fiber concentrates from papaya pulp and peel (Carica papaya L.). J. Funct. Foods 2016, 27, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Ajila, C.M.; Leelavathi, K.; Prasada Rao, U.J.S. Improvement of dietary fiber content and antioxidant properties in soft dough biscuits with the incorporation of mango peel powder. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Santos, D.; Lopes da Silva, J.A.; Pintado, M. Fruit and vegetable by-products’ flours as ingredients: A review on production process, health benefits and technological functionalities. LWT 2022, 154, 112707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Araújo-Rodrigues, H.; Santos, D.; Campos, D.A.; Ratinho, M.; M. Rodrigues, I.; E. Pintado, M. Development of Frozen Pulps and Powders from Carrot and Tomato by-Products: Impact of Processing and Storage Time on Bioactive and Biological Properties. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Campos, D.A.; Coscueta, E.R.; Valetti, N.W.; Pastrana-Castro, L.M.; Teixeira, J.A.; Picó, G.A.; Pintado, M.M. Optimization of bromelain isolation from pineapple byproducts by polysaccharide complex formation. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 792–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Liu, J.; Bai, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Kan, J.; Jin, C. Isolation, structural characterization and bioactivities of naturally occurring polysaccharide-polyphenolic conjugates from medicinal plants—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 2242–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Elleuch, M.; Bedigian, D.; Roiseux, O.; Besbes, S.; Blecker, C.; Attia, H. Dietary fibre and fibre-rich by-products of food processing: Characterisation, technological functionality and commercial applications: A review. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Pawlaczyk-Graja, I. Polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates from flowers and fruits of single-seeded hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.): Chemical profiles and mechanisms of anticoagulant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Szejk, M.; Poplawski, T.; Czubatka-Bienkowska, A.; Olejnik, A.K.; Pawlaczyk-Graja, I.; Gancarz, R.; Zbikowska, H.M. A comparative study on the radioprotective potential of the polyphenolic glycoconjugates from medicinal plants of Rosaceae and Asteraceae families versus their aglycones. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017, 171, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Saluk-Juszczak, J.; Pawlaczyk, I.; Olas, B.; Kołodziejczyk, J.; Ponczek, M.; Nowak, P.; Tsirigotis-Wołoszczak, M.; Wachowicz, B.; Gancarz, R. The effect of polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates from selected medicinal plants of Asteraceae family on the peroxynitrite-induced changes in blood platelet proteins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Kolodziejczyk-Czepas, J.; Bijak, M.; Saluk, J.; Ponczek, M.B.; Zbikowska, H.M.; Nowak, P.; Tsirigotis-Maniecka, M.; Pawlaczyk, I. Radical scavenging and antioxidant effects of Matricaria chamomilla polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Bijak, M.; Saluk, J.; Tsirigotis-Maniecka, M.; Komorowska, H.; Wachowicz, B.; Zaczyńska, E.; Czarny, A.; Czechowski, F.; Nowak, P.; Pawlaczyk, I. The influence of conjugates isolated from Matricaria chamomilla L. on platelets activity and cytotoxicity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 61, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Šutovská, M.; Capek, P.; Fraňová, S.; Pawlaczyk, I.; Gancarz, R. Antitussive and bronchodilatory effects of Lythrum salicaria polysaccharide-polyphenolic conjugate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Ross, K.A.; Godfrey, D.; Fukumoto, L. The chemical composition, antioxidant activity and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of water-extractable polysaccharide conjugates from northern Manitoba lingonberry. Cogent Food Agric. 2015, 1, 1109781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Zhang, X.; Dong, L.; Jia, X.; Liu, L.; Chi, J.; Huang, F.N.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, R. Bound Phenolics Ensure the Antihyperglycemic Effect of Rice Bran Dietary Fiber in db/db Mice via Activating the Insulin Signaling Pathway in Skeletal Muscle and Altering Gut Microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4387–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Chen, G.-L.; Xie, M.; Wan, P.; Chen, D.; Dai, Z.; Ye, H.; Hu, B.; Zeng, X.; Liu, Z. Fuzhuan Brick Tea Polysaccharides Attenuate Metabolic Syndrome in High-Fat Diet Induced Mice in Association with Modulation in the Gut Microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2783–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Ho, T.C.; Kiddane, A.T.; Sivagnanam, S.P.; Park, J.-S.; Cho, Y.-J.; Getachew, A.T.; Nguyen, T.-T.T.; Kim, G.-D.; Chun, B.-S. Green extraction of polyphenolic-polysaccharide conjugates from Pseuderanthemum palatiferum (Nees) Radlk.: Chemical profile and anticoagulant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 157, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wu, D.-T.; Liu, W.; Xian, M.-L.; Du, G.; Liu, X.; He, J.-J.; Wang, P.; Qin, W.; Zhao, L. Polyphenolic-Protein-Polysaccharide Complexes from Hovenia dulcis: Insights into Extraction Methods on Their Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioactivities. Foods 2020, 9, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Chatterjee, N.S.; Panda, S.K.; Navitha, M.; Asha, K.K.; Anandan, R.; Mathew, S. Vanillic acid and coumaric acid grafted chitosan derivatives: Improved grafting ratio and potential application in functional food. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 7153–7162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Wen, Y.; Ye, F.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, G. Corn starch ferulates with antioxidant properties prepared by N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole-mediated grafting procedure. Food Chem. 2016, 208, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Cai, W.-D.; Zhu, J.; Wu, L.-X.; Qiao, Z.-R.; Li, L.; Yan, J.-K. Preparation, characterization, rheological and antioxidant properties of ferulic acid-grafted curdlan conjugates. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Wang, C.-K.; Cai, W.-D.; Yao, J.; Wu, L.-X.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Yan, J.-K. Conjugation of ferulic acid onto pectin affected the physicochemical, functional and antioxidant properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5352–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Vuillemin, M.E.; Michaux, F.; Adam, A.A.; Linder, M.; Muniglia, L.; Jasniewski, J. Physicochemical characterizations of gum Arabic modified with oxidation products of ferulic acid. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 107, 105919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Ahn, S.; Halake, K.; Lee, J. Antioxidant and ion-induced gelation functions of pectins enabled by polyphenol conjugation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 101, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Cirillo, G.; Puoci, F.; Iemma, F.; Curcio, M.; Parisi, O.I.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Altimari, I.; Picci, N. Starch-quercetin conjugate by radical grafting: Synthesis and biological characterization. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2012, 17, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Mundlia, J.; Ahuja, M.; Kumar, P.; Pillay, V. Improved antioxidant, antimicrobial and anticancer activity of naringenin on conjugation with pectin. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Mundlia, J.; Ahuja, M.; Kumar, P. Enhanced biological activity of polyphenols on conjugation with gellan gum. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2021, 70, 712–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Jing, Y.; Huang, J.; Yu, X. Preparation, characterization, and functional evaluation of proanthocyanidin-chitosan conjugate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 194, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Guo, Q.; Xiao, X.; Lu, L.; Ai, L.; Xu, M.; Liu, Y.; Goff, H.D. Polyphenol-Polysaccharide Complex: Preparation, Characterization, and Potential Utilization in Food and Health. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 59–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Doğan, E.; Gökmen, V. Mechanism of the interaction between insoluble wheat bran and polyphenols leading to increased antioxidant capacity. Food Res. Int. 2015, 69, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ribeiro, T.B.; Oliveira, A.L.; Costa, C.M.; Nunes, J.; Vicente, A.A.; Pintado, M. Total and Sustainable Valorisation of Olive Pomace Using a Fractionation Approach. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Singh, J.P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, N. Development of eggless gluten-free rice muffins utilizing black carrot dietary fibre concentrate and xanthan gum. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Föste, M.; Verheyen, C.; Jekle, M.; Becker, T. Fibres of milling and fruit processing by-products in gluten-free bread making: A review of hydration properties, dough formation and quality-improving strategies. Food Chem. 2020, 306, 125451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Angulo-López, J.E.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Ascacio-Valdes, J.A.; Contreras Esquivel, J.C.; Torres-León, C.; Rúelas-Chácon, X.; Aguilar, C.N. Antioxidant Dietary Fiber Sourced from Agroindustrial Byproducts and Its Applications. Foods 2023, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Quiles, A.; Campbell, G.M.; Struck, S.; Rohm, H.; Hernando, I. Fiber from fruit pomace: A review of applications in cereal-based products. Food Rev. Int. 2018, 34, 162–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Al-Sayed, H.M.A.; Ahmed, A.R. Utilization of watermelon rinds and sharlyn melon peels as a natural source of dietary fiber and antioxidants in cake. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2013, 58, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Rupasinghe, H.P.V.; Wang, L.-J.; Huber, G.M.; Pitts, N.L. Effect of baking on dietary fibre and phenolics of muffins incorporated with apple skin powder. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Sah, B.N.P.; Vasiljevic, T.; McKechnie, S.; Donkor, O.N. Physicochemical, textural and rheological properties of probiotic yogurt fortified with fibre-rich pineapple peel powder during refrigerated storage. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 65, 978–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Tseng, A.; Zhao, Y. Wine grape pomace as antioxidant dietary fibre for enhancing nutritional value and improving storability of yogurt and salad dressing. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the major nonflavonoids and flavonoids subclasses (aglycones).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the major nonflavonoids and flavonoids subclasses (aglycones).
Foods 12 01052 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of some representative polymeric phenolic compounds.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of some representative polymeric phenolic compounds.
Foods 12 01052 g002
Figure 3. Overview of the metabolic fate of polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates through the gut. 1—polyphenols can be ingested both in free form and conjugated to the dietary fibers components of plant cell walls; 2—only a small percentage of polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates can be absorbed through the small intestine mucosa. Others reach the lower gut intact, reducing the local oxidative stress and modifying the microbiota composition; 3—non-absorbed polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates reach the lower gut where they are fermented by the colonic microbiota, releasing absorbable polyphenols and producing absorbable metabolites. The action of the microbiome on dietary fibers produces mainly SCFA and gases; 4—polyphenols and their metabolites can be absorbed into the bloodstream, through passive diffusion and/or active transport, reaching tissues and organs and exerting biological activities.
Figure 3. Overview of the metabolic fate of polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates through the gut. 1—polyphenols can be ingested both in free form and conjugated to the dietary fibers components of plant cell walls; 2—only a small percentage of polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates can be absorbed through the small intestine mucosa. Others reach the lower gut intact, reducing the local oxidative stress and modifying the microbiota composition; 3—non-absorbed polyphenol-dietary fiber conjugates reach the lower gut where they are fermented by the colonic microbiota, releasing absorbable polyphenols and producing absorbable metabolites. The action of the microbiome on dietary fibers produces mainly SCFA and gases; 4—polyphenols and their metabolites can be absorbed into the bloodstream, through passive diffusion and/or active transport, reaching tissues and organs and exerting biological activities.
Foods 12 01052 g003
Table 1. Examples of polyphenol-dietary fibers from fruit and vegetable by-products. Adapted from [158].
Table 1. Examples of polyphenol-dietary fibers from fruit and vegetable by-products. Adapted from [158].
By-ProductTotal Dietary FiberTotal Phenolic ContentReference
(%)(mg GAE/100 g)
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)54.22170 (TPC)[167]
peel flour
Cabbage powder36.7322 (TAE)[168]
Guava (Psidium guajava) peel48.555871 (TEP)[162]
Guava (Psidium acutangulum) peel51.55870 (TEP)[162]
Açaí (Euterpe oleraceae) pulp71.21500 (TEP)[169]
Red grape pomace.74.05.63 (TPC)[170]
Apple pomace51.11016 (TPC)[171]
Blueberry pomace powder26.228.514 (TPC)[172]
Carrot (Daucus carota) peels45.41371 (TPC)[164]
Banana (peels)41.67168.5 (TPC)[173]
Coffee (pulp, husk, silver, skin, 28.0–80.01020–1480 (TPC)
and spent coffee)
Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) pomace74.52630 (TEP)[174]
Orange (Citrus aurantium) peel33.1–36.50.51 (TPC)[175]
Orange by-product 71.640.7 *[176]
(albedo,flavedo, and pulp)
Plantain peel flour37.6771 (TEP)[177]
Viburnum opulus (fruits)38.43730 (TPC)[178]
Cacao pod husk products59.06893 (SD)[161]
Mexican Blackberry 44.34016 (TPC)[179]
(Rubus fruticosus) residues
Passion fruit seeds (DCF)81.5 41.2 *[180]
Pineapple (DFC)75.8 129 *[181]
Papaya pulp (DFC)59.80.47 *[182]
Tomato peel86.1158.1 (TPC)[57]
GAE, gallic acid equivalent; TPC, total phenolic compounds; TAE, tannic acid equivalents; TEP, total extractable phenolics; SD, soluble phenolics; DFC, dietary fibers concentrate; * mg GAE/g.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, A.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V. Polyphenol-Dietary Fiber Conjugates from Fruits and Vegetables: Nature and Biological Fate in a Food and Nutrition Perspective. Foods 2023, 12, 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051052

AMA Style

Fernandes A, Mateus N, de Freitas V. Polyphenol-Dietary Fiber Conjugates from Fruits and Vegetables: Nature and Biological Fate in a Food and Nutrition Perspective. Foods. 2023; 12(5):1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Ana, Nuno Mateus, and Victor de Freitas. 2023. "Polyphenol-Dietary Fiber Conjugates from Fruits and Vegetables: Nature and Biological Fate in a Food and Nutrition Perspective" Foods 12, no. 5: 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop