Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Questionnaire
2.3. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Sample Characteristics and Behaviors
3.2. The Factors Explain Preferences of Respondents
3.3. Cluster Analysis: Potential Consumer Profiling
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Çakiroǧlu, F.P.; Uçar, A. Consumer attitudes towards purchasing functional products. Prog. Nutr. 2018, 20, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, S. Functional foods: The Food and Drug Administration perspective. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 1735S–1738S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Troszyńska, A.; Estrella, I.; López-Amóres, M.L.; Hernández, T. Antioxidant activity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed coat acetone extract. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 35, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasuda, A.; Kuraya, E.; Touyama, A.; Higa, O.; Hokamoto, K.; Itoh, S. Underwater shockwave pretreatment process for improving carotenoid content and yield of extracted carrot (Daucus carota L.) Juice. J. Food Eng. 2017, 211, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilić, J.D.; Nikolovski, B.G.; Petrović, L.B.; Kojić, P.S.; Lončarević, I.S.; Petrović, J.S. The garlic (A. sativum L.) extracts food grade W1/O/W2 emulsions prepared by homogenization and stirred cell membrane emulsification. J. Food Eng. 2017, 205, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laiño, J.E.; Juarez del Valle, M.; Savoy de Giori, G.; LeBlanc, J.G.J. Development of a high folate concentration yogurt naturally bio-enriched using selected lactic acid bacteria. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Scalia, G.; Micale, R.; Cannizzaro, L.; Marra, F.P. A sustainable phenolic compound extraction system from olive oil mill wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 3782–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perito, M.A.; Di Fonzo, A.; Sansone, M.; Russo, C. Consumer acceptance of food obtained from olive by-products: A survey of Italian consumers. Br. Food J. 2019, 122, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bech-Larsen, T.; Grunert, K.G. The perceived healthiness of functional foods: A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers’ perception of functional foods. Appetite 2003, 40, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frewer, L.; Scholderer, J.; Lambert, N. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Issues for the future. Br. Food J. 2003, 105, 714–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saher, M.; Arvola, A.; Lindeman, M.; Lähteenmäki, L. Impressions of functional food consumers. Appetite 2004, 42, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urala, N.; Lähteenmäki, L. Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. Nutr. Food Sci. 2003, 33, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micale, R.; Giallanza, A.; Enea, M.; La Scalia, G. Economic assessment based on scenario analysis for the production of a new functional pasta. J. Food Eng. 2018, 237, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasler, C.M.; Brown, A.C. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Functional foods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 735–746. [Google Scholar]
- Bech-Larsen, T.; Scholderer, J. Functional foods in Europe: Consumer research, market experiences and regulatory aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahl, J.; Załęcka, A.; Ploeger, A.; Bügel, S.; Huber, M. Functional food and organic food are competing rather than supporting concepts in europe. Agriculture. 2012, 2, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menrad, K. Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. J. Food Eng. 2003, 56, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias-Aranda, D.; Romerosa-Martínez, M.M. Innovation in the functional foods industry in a peripheral region of the European Union: Andalusia (Spain). Food Policy 2010, 35, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oniszczuk, A.; Wójtowicz, A.; Oniszczuk, T.; Matwijczuk, A.; Dib, A.; Markut-Miotła, E. Opuntia fruits as food enriching ingredient, the first step towards new functional food products. Molecules 2020, 25, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Décordé, K.; Teissèdre, P.; Auger, C.; Cristol, J.; Rouanet, J. Phenolics from purple grape, apple, purple grape juice and apple juice prevent early atherosclerosis induced by an atherogenic diet in hamsters. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galati, E.M.; Tripodo, M.M.; Trovato, A.; d’Aquino, A.; Monforte, M.T. Biological activity of Opuntia ficus indica cladodes II: Effect on experimental hypercholesterolemia in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2003, 41, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Mostafa, K.; El Kharrassi, Y.; Badreddine, A.; Andreoletti, P.; Vamecq, J.; El Kebbaj, M.S.; Latruffe, N.; Lizard, G.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M. Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules 2014, 19, 14879–14901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreu-Coll, L.; Cano-Lamadrid, M.; Noguera-Artiaga, L.; Lipan, L.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Rocamora-Montiel, B.; Legua, P.; Hernández, F.; López-Lluch, D. Economic estimation of cactus pear production and its feasibility in Spain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, C.M.G.; Gazarini, L.C.; Ribeiro, M.M. Fruit production from Opuntia ficus-indica ecotypes in comparison to commercial Italian clones. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 45, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albano, C.; Negro, C.; Tommasi, N.; Gerardi, C.; Mita, G.; Miceli, A.; De Bellis, L.; Blando, F. Betalains, phenols and antioxidant capacity in cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] fruits from Apulia (South Italy) genotypes. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, R.; De Ita, A.; Vaca, M. Drying of prickly pear cactus cladodes (Opuntia ficus indica) in a forced convection tunnel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouazizi, S.; Montevecchi, G.; Antonelli, A.; Hamdi, M. Effects of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) peel flour as an innovative ingredient in biscuits formulation. LWT 2020, 124, 109155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micale, R.; Giallanza, A.; Russo, G.; La Scalia, G. Selection of a sustainable functional pasta enriched with Opuntia using ELECTRE III methodology. Sustainability 2017, 9, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiello, A.; Di Bona, D.; Candore, G.; Carru, C.; Zinellu, A.; Di Miceli, G.; Nicosia, A.; Gambino, C.M.; Ruisi, P.; Caruso, C. Targeting aging with functional food: Pasta with Opuntia single-arm pilot study. Rejuvenation Res. 2018, 21, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altamore, L.; Bacarella, S.; Columba, P.; Chironi, S. The Italian Consumers’ Preferences for Pasta: Does Environment Matter? Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017, 58, 859–864. [Google Scholar]
- Defrancesco, E.; Perito, M.A.; Bozzolan, I.; Cei, L.; Stefani, G. Testing consumers’ preferences for environmental attributes of pasta. Insights from an ABR approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altamore, L.; Ingrassia, M.; Columba, P.; Chironi, S.; Bacarella, S. Italian Consumers’ Preferences for Pasta and Consumption Trends: Tradition or Innovation? J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2019, 32, 337–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Simeone, M.; Russo, C.; Angela, M. Profiling young consumers’ perceptions of GMO products: A case study on Italian undergraduate students. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 21, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Lupi, C. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: Some hints from Italy. Br. Food, J. 2020, 123, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Macrì, M.C.; Lupi, C. Exploring consumers’ willingness to eat insects in Italy. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2937–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Forleo, M.B. The potential of edible seaweed within the western diet. A segmentation of Italian consumers. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 20, 100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Latterini, F.; Pari, L. The eucalyptus firewood: Understanding consumers’ behaviour and motivations. Agriculture 2020, 10, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Pari, L. Italian consumers’ willingness to pay for eucalyptus firewood. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A. Consumers’ Willingness to Consume Sustainable and Local Wine in Italy. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 222–233. [Google Scholar]
- Palmieri, N.; Pesce, A.; Verrascina, M. Market Opportunities for Hay Milk: Factors Influencing Perceptions among Italian Consumers. Animals 2021, 11, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, W. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 39, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chironi, S.; Bacarella, S.; Altamore, L.; Columba, P.; Ingrassia, M. Study of product repositioning for the Marsala Vergine DOC wine. Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus. 2017, 32, 118–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaur, A.S.; Gaur, S.S. Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS; Sage: New Delhi, India, 2006; ISBN 0761935029. [Google Scholar]
- De Lillo, A. Analisi Multivariata per le Scienze Sociali; Pearson Italia Spa: Milano, Italy, 2007; ISBN 8871923766. [Google Scholar]
- Team, R.C. Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Arsham, H.; Lovric, M. Bartlett’s Test; Miodrag Lovric; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Macdiarmid, J.I. Seasonality and dietary requirements: Will eating seasonal food contribute to health and environmental sustainability? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2014, 73, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coderoni, S.; Perito, M.A.; Cardillo, C. Consumer behaviour in Italy. Who spends more to buy a Mediterranean Diet? New Medit 2017, 16, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
- ISTAT Statbase: L’accesso ai Principali Dati. Available online: www.istat.it (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Conto, F.; Antonazzo, A.P.; Conte, A.; Cafarelli, B. Consumers perception of traditional sustainable food: An exploratory study on pasta made from native ancient durum wheat varieties. Ital. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2016, 71, 325–337. [Google Scholar]
- Ellison, B.; Brooks, K.; Mieno, T. Which livestock production claims matter most to consumers? Agric. Hum. Values 2017, 34, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darby, M.R.; Karni, E. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econ. 1973, 16, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Childs, N.M. Foods that help prevent disease: Consumer attitudes and public policy implications. J. Consum. Mark. 1997, 14, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annunziata, A.; Vecchio, R. Functional foods development in the European market: A consumer perspective. J. Funct. Foods 2011, 3, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grahl, S.; Strack, M.; Mensching, A.; Mörlein, D. Alternative protein sources in Western diets: Food product development and consumer acceptance of spirulina-filled pasta. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 84, 103933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sessa L Il Giornale del Cibo Conoscere, Scoprire, Gustare. Available online: https://www.ilgiornaledelcibo.it/fico-d-india-ricette-piatti/ (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Giraitalia Sagre in Italia. Available online: https://www.giraitalia.it/sagre/ (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Van Trijp, J.C.M.; Steenkamp, J. Consumer-oriented new product development: Principles and practice. Innov. Agri Food Syst. 2005, 87–124. [Google Scholar]
- De Albuquerque, J.G.; de Souza Aquino, J.; de Albuquerque, J.G.; de Farias, T.G.S.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B.; Bosquez-Molina, E.; Azoubel, P.M. Consumer perception and use of nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica): A cross-cultural study between Mexico and Brazil. Food Res. Int. 2019, 124, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | % |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 38.60 |
Female | 61.40 |
Total | 100.00 |
Education | |
Low education | 11.40 |
High education | 88.60 |
Total | 100.00 |
Status | |
Unmarried | 23.68 |
Married | 64.47 |
Separated/divorced | 11.85 |
Total | 100.00 |
Annual income (Euros) | |
<10,000 | 4.39 |
10,001–20,000 | 13.60 |
20,001–30,000 | 35.08 |
30,001–40,000 | 28.07 |
40,001–50,000 | 11.84 |
>50,001 | 7.02 |
Total | 100.00 |
Variables | % |
---|---|
Frequency of consumption | |
never | 2.19 |
Once a month | 5.26 |
Once a week | 14.91 |
Twice a week | 20.18 |
More than twice a week | 35.08 |
Every day | 22.38 |
Total | 100.00 |
Places of consumption | |
At home | 58.77 |
Out of home (bars and restaurants) | 2.19 |
Both | 39.04 |
Total | 100.00 |
Frequency of Consumption | Integral Pasta | Fresh Pasta | Organic Pasta | Stuffed Pasta | Egg Pasta | Frozen Pasta Cooked | Pasta Cooked | Pasta with Added Vitamins | Kamut® Wheat Pasta |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Never | 35.96 | 13.60 | 64.03 | 25.88 | 18.42 | 89.91 | 90.79 | 94.74 | 81.58 |
Once a month | 32.89 | 55.26 | 21.93 | 57.46 | 54.82 | 8.33 | 7.02 | 2.63 | 14.03 |
Once a week | 17.54 | 28.95 | 7.01 | 15.35 | 25.00 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 2.19 | 3.07 |
Twice a week | 6.14 | 1.75 | 2.19 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.44 | 0.88 |
More than twice a week | 3.95 | 0.44 | 3.51 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
Every day | 3.52 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 10.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Variables | % |
---|---|
I do not know | 16.22 |
Wheat cultivated only in Italy | 53.96 |
Wheat cultivated only in Southern Italy | 8.33 |
Wheat cultivated abroad | 0.00 |
Wheat cultivated both in Italy and abroad | 21.49 |
Total | 100.00 |
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | Factor 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health aspects (α = 0.95) ** | |||||||
Health effects | 0.87 | ||||||
Proteic | 0.78 | ||||||
Caloric | 0.86 | ||||||
Fat | 0.84 | ||||||
Hygienic | 0.84 | ||||||
Geographic | 0.76 | ||||||
Seasons | 0.77 | ||||||
Traditions | 0.69 | ||||||
Environmental impact | 0.80 | ||||||
Social impact | 0.77 | ||||||
Production method | 0.76 | ||||||
Food neophobia (α = 0.99) ** | |||||||
New * | 0.72 | ||||||
Different culture * | 0.95 | ||||||
New food * | 0.78 | ||||||
Ethnic restaurant * | 0.82 | ||||||
Food technology neophobia (α = 0.76) ** | |||||||
No technology | 0.74 | ||||||
Environmental benefits overestimated | 0.88 | ||||||
World hunger overestimated | 0.87 | ||||||
Low quality | 0.77 | ||||||
Good enough | 0.75 | ||||||
Unknown effect on health | 0.56 | ||||||
Type of pasta (α = 0.75) ** | |||||||
Fresh pasta | 0.57 | ||||||
Stuffed pasta | 0.66 | ||||||
Egg pasta | 0.62 | ||||||
Italian pasta tradition (α = 0.91) ** | |||||||
Origin as quality indicator | 0.64 | ||||||
Italian wheat | 0.69 | ||||||
Southern Italy wheat | 0.52 | ||||||
Recycled packaging | 0.60 | ||||||
Info health benefits | 0.75 | ||||||
Info production | 0.82 | ||||||
Territorial brand | 0.80 | ||||||
Low impact | 0.86 | ||||||
Quality certification | 0.85 | ||||||
Health certification | 0.83 | ||||||
Ethical certification | 0.81 | ||||||
Attributes of pasta (α = 0.91) ** | |||||||
Method | 0.73 | ||||||
Type | 0.73 | ||||||
Origin | 0.80 | ||||||
Pasta brand | 0.73 | ||||||
Labeled nutrition | 0.82 | ||||||
Color | 0.68 | ||||||
Time | 0.67 | ||||||
Cooking method | 0.63 | ||||||
Quality certification | 0.77 | ||||||
Price | 0.48 | ||||||
Functional pasta (α = 0.87) ** | |||||||
Curiosity | 0.74 | ||||||
Health benefits | 0.86 | ||||||
More nutrients | 0.81 | ||||||
Low environmental impact | 0.89 | ||||||
Low cost | 0.58 | ||||||
Pasta factory | 0.62 | ||||||
More info | 0.83 |
n | Label of Consumers Profiles | % | Edu | Food Consumption Attitudes | Pasta Consumption Attitudes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health Aspects | Food Neophobia | Food Technology Neophobia | Type of Pasta | Italian Pasta Tradition | Attributes of Pasta | Functional Pasta | ||||
1 | Healthy and traditional consumer | 7.71 | 0.74 | 7.36 | 4.55 | 4.09 | 1.10 | 7.36 | 6.83 | 5.80 |
2 | Refractory consumer | 5.56 | 0.58 | 5.29 | 3.15 | 2.20 | 1.07 | 3.89 | 4.87 | 5.55 |
3 | Neophobic and traditional consumer | 4.75 | 0.51 | 2.29 | 6.86 | 3.18 | 1.35 | 7.14 | 7.34 | 6.31 |
4 | Healthy, technophobic, and traditional consumer | 43.23 | 0.60 | 8.39 | 4.59 | 6.51 | 1.10 | 8.70 | 8.34 | 7.33 |
5 | Healthy and expert consumer | 28.10 | 0.94 | 8.73 | 5.62 | 6.03 | 0.44 | 3.16 | 9.38 | 8.02 |
6 | Neophobic and critical consumer | 3.64 | 0.11 | 4,23 | 8.28 | 5.43 | 0.71 | 3.87 | 5.67 | 3.14 |
7 | Neophobic consumer | 7.01 | 0.28 | 2.84 | 8.73 | 3.08 | 1.10 | 2.71 | 2.34 | 2.29 |
The whole sample | 100.00 | 0.90 | 6.58 | 5.17 | 4.41 | 1.07 | 6.67 | 6.68 | 6.77 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Stefanoni, W.; Pari, L. Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods 2021, 10, 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803
Palmieri N, Suardi A, Stefanoni W, Pari L. Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods. 2021; 10(4):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803
Chicago/Turabian StylePalmieri, Nadia, Alessandro Suardi, Walter Stefanoni, and Luigi Pari. 2021. "Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy" Foods 10, no. 4: 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803
APA StylePalmieri, N., Suardi, A., Stefanoni, W., & Pari, L. (2021). Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods, 10(4), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040803