Next Article in Journal
Maintaining the Balance of Intestinal Flora through the Diet: Effective Prevention of Illness
Previous Article in Journal
The Meat Quality Characteristics of Holstein Calves: The Story of Israeli ‘Dairy Beef’
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nondestructive Detection of Weight Loss Rate, Surface Color, Vitamin C Content, and Firmness in Mini-Chinese Cabbage with Nanopackaging by Fourier Transform-Near Infrared Spectroscopy

1
College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
College of Food Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
3
College of Light Industry and Food Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
4
Institute of Agricultural Facilities and Equipment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(10), 2309; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102309
Submission received: 20 August 2021 / Revised: 22 September 2021 / Accepted: 24 September 2021 / Published: 29 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Future Food Analysis and Detection)

Abstract

:
A nondestructive optical method is described for the quality assessment of mini-Chinese cabbage with nanopackaging during its storage, using Fourier transform-near infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy. The sample quality attributes measured included weight loss rate, surface color index, vitamin C content, and firmness. The level of freshness of the mini-Chinese cabbage during storage was divided into three categories. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and the least squares support vector machine were applied to spectral datasets in order to develop prediction models for each quality attribute. For a comparative analysis of performance, the five preprocessing methods applied were standard normal variable (SNV), first derivative (lst), second derivative (2nd), multiplicative scattering correction (MSC), and auto scale. The SNV-PLSR model exhibited the best prediction performance for weight loss rate (Rp2 = 0.96, RMSEP = 1.432%). The 1st-PLSR model showed the best prediction performance for L* value (Rp2 = 0.89, RMSEP = 3.25 mg/100 g), but also the lowest accuracy for firmness (Rp2 = 0.60, RMSEP = 2.453). The best classification model was able to predict freshness levels with 88.8% accuracy in mini-Chinese cabbage by supported vector classification (SVC). This study illustrates that the spectral profile obtained by FT-NIR spectroscopy could potentially be implemented for integral assessments of the internal and external quality attributes of mini-Chinese cabbage with nanopacking during storage.

1. Introduction

Mini-Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris) originated in China, and is one of the most frequently consumed Brassica vegetables available in the market owing to its fresh appearance, high nutrient content, special texture, and the presence of vitamins and other valuable metabolites [1]. In general, as a cool-season leafy vegetable, mini-Chinese cabbage is grown in greenhouses. However, unlike other root vegetables and fruits such as tomato, carrot, and onion, mini-Chinese cabbage is typically harvested when it gets ripened with high moisture content, i.e., in the range between 90 and 95%. Nonetheless, it is highly susceptible to weight loss or spoilage, and thus is prone to quality deterioration during postharvest storage. Therefore, changes in quality of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage have been extensively investigated by several researchers [2,3]. The techniques used so far for quality assessments have included chemical analysis, preservation, and biological activity. Monitoring the quality attributes of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage and transport can be challenging for the vegetable industry. Currently, simple visual inspection and touch-based chemical/physical examination are the two most widely-used methods for determining the quality of fresh products. However, such methods have several weaknesses, e.g., they cannot be applied on a large scale. Although chemical analysis can provide details with high accuracy, it is usually time-consuming, requiring tedious sample preparation procedures, and cannot simultaneously evaluate the internal and external attributes [4,5,6]. For these reasons, the development of fast, sensitive, and nondestructive approaches to detect the quality attributes is of significant commercial interest.
It is noteworthy that vegetables without packing procedures are particularly prone to quality deterioration. Nanopacking, a packing procedure, can dynamically control environmental factors including oxygen and moisture concentration during storage [7]. Recently, a concept involving the application of nanocomposites was introduced into the food packaging industry, with the objective of extending loquat storage life [8], inhibiting browning and maintaining the quality of fresh-cut sugarcane [9], and maintaining the quality of green asparagus in storage [10]. Notably, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and phenolic compounds can play an active role in preventing cells in vegetables from suffering oxidative damage during storage [11]. Chemical components including soluble sugar and ascorbic acid act not only as nutrients, but also as antioxidants in vegetables [8]. However, the storage period of nanopackaging is quite complex, and the metabolic activity of vegetables can result in significant changes both chemically and physically, including enzyme activity, respiratory rate, weight loss, and surface color changes. The changes of nutritional composition which occur after nanopackaging are quite different from those that take place under the normal storage. Thus, it would be very interesting to monitor the quality attributes in food with nanopackaging during storage.
Nondestructive detection techniques for the determination of the internal and external quality attributes of vegetables have been widely studied in the food industry. The most commonly employed wavelength range in the near infrared (NIR) region is 780 to 2526 nm. The chemical bands originating from X–H (e.g., C–H, O–H, N–H) vibrations are strongly articulated in the NIR region. Moscetti et al. [12] devoted extensive research efforts and successfully developed NIR spectroscopy with chemometrics for the prediction of water activity (R2 = 0.91) and water content (R2 = 0.97) in organic carrot slices. Botros et al. [13] used NIR spectroscopy with chemometrics to successfully identify authentic cow milk powder. Literature studies [14,15] have also presented comparative analyses of the spectroscopy with various wavelength ranges for the prediction of chemical attributes in food composition. Giovenzana et al. [16] presented an overview of NIR spectroscopy applications for the assessment of vegetables, focusing on different aspects of the distribution process. Our previous study also demonstrated that imaging information in the NIR wavelength range was useful for predicting soluble sugar content in strawberries, with Rp2 of 0.807 [17]. While most recent studies using NIR spectroscopy have focused on intact fruit, evaluations of the freshness of vegetables during storage, especially when novel storage approaches (i.e., nanopackaging) are used, have not been widely reported. To the best of our knowledge, to date, the application of NIR spectroscopy for the nondestructive detection of quality attributes in mini-Chinese cabbage has never been investigated, and only minor research efforts have been focused on the motoring of the inspection of quality attributes in vegetables with nanopackaging. Given the advantages of NIR spectroscopy for the nondestructive evaluation of fresh agri-products, studies should better extend the detection application to include leafy vegetables and novel storage approaches.
The main objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to acquire the NIR spectral profiles for mini-Chinese cabbage with nanopackaging during storage; (2) to analyze the correlations between spectral profiles and the corresponding quality attributes in mini-Chinese cabbage during nanopackaging; (3) to develop prediction models based on NIR spectroscopy with chemometrics; and (4) to validate optimized pretreatments in the NIR dataset, providing the best results in predictions of freshness grade of mini-Chinese cabbage under nanopacking.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples and Preparation

Mini-Chinese cabbages (Brassica campestris. Var. Xialing), harvested after a 50 d growth period, were purchased from a local vegetable market in Nanjing, China (32°07′35″ N and 118°59′27″ E). Samples with uniform ripeness, shape, and surface color were selected. Then, the cabbages were immediately transported to the College of Food Science and Technology at Nanjing Agricultural University for precooling treatment (4 °C for 24 h). All 288 samples were washed with distilled water, and water from the surface was naturally evaporated at room temperature (25 °C) for 4 h. All samples were packed using nanopackaging bags and stored at a temperature of 20 ± 0.5 °C and relative humidity of 85 ± 5%. Polyethylene (PE) packaging bags (without nanopacking material) were used as a second group, and nonpackaged cabbages were used as the control. The total duration of the storage period was 15 days: (1) Six samples for nanopacking, PE-packing, and control (nonpacking) conditions (a total of 108 samples) were randomly selected every 3 d, and were used for physiochemical analysis; (2) another 180 samples with different freshness levels were selected to obtain the NIR spectral profiles, followed by chemometrics for analysis and the modeling of quality attributes.

2.2. Nanopacking Material

In this study, the method proposed by Li et al. [18] was used to prepare the nanopackaging material. Briefly, nanopower (30%, nano-Ag:nano-TiO2:nano attapulgite:nano-SiO2 = 6:7:5:2), linear low density PE (68%), and coupling reagents (2%) were uniformly blended using a high-speed mixer at a speed of 600 rpm for 1 h (Type: SK-1, Ronghua Instrument Co. Ltd., Changzhou, China). After cooling for 1–2 min, the mixture was cut into nanogranules. According to the mass ratio, 3.75% nanogranules, 3.75% antifogging agents, and 92.5% PE granules were mixed and stirred for 30 min, and prepared in a film with a thickness of 40 μm. Finally, all nanopackaging bags were cut with size of 40 cm · 15 cm size for use in the described storage method. The mechanical properties of the nanopacking material were tested using an electronic universal testing machine (Type: 3369, Instron Corp., Boston, MA, USA). The tensile strength of the nanopacking material was 20 MPa and the tensile elongation was 22.0%. The CO2 transmission rate for the nanopacking bags was measured according to the National standards of China (GB/T 1038-2000 Plastics film and sheeting determination of gas transmission differential pressure method), and determined to be 0.102 cm3/(m2·h·Pa).

2.3. FT-NIR Spectroscopy

The spectral profiles of mini-Chinese cabbage were acquired by FT-NIR spectroscopy (Antaris II, Thermo Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The system was equipped with a light source, a beam splitter, a InGaAs detector, and a data processing unit. A handheld fiber optic sampling probe (Scientific SabIR Fiber Optic Probe, Thermo Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with a bifurcated fiber bundle to irradiated the sample and collect the reflected/scattered light was used. NIR spectroscopy data were collected under diffuse reflection mode; the scanning range was set from 4000 to 10,000 cm−1 and the scanning resolution was 4 cm−1. To obtain a stable signal, the average spectrum after 32 scans was recorded as the sample spectrum.
Based on a study by Ibáñez et al. [19], measurements of NIR spectra were carried out at three different, equidistant points with 120° angle intervals for each sample. Previous works have demonstrated that FT-NIR can be used successfully to evaluate the quality attributes of vegetables [20,21]. While this work focuses on the quality attributes of mini-Chinese cabbage with nanopacking, and regression models for quality attribute determination in nanopacking using FT-NIR were developed, the spectral datasets in the control and PE-packing groups were not taken into consideration.

2.4. Quantitative Analysis of Surface Color, Weight Loss Rate, Vitamin C and Firmness

Color measurement in stored samples was determined using a Minolta Chroma Meter (type: CR-13, Konica Minolta Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and index values of L*, a*, and b* were obtained. Total color difference ΔE was calculated as following:
Δ E = ( L * L 0 * ) 2 + ( a * a 0 * ) 2 + ( b * b 0 * ) 2
where L0*, a0* and b0* are the original color indexes of the sample. Analyses were performed in triplicate, and mean values of L*, a*, b* and ΔE were calculated for data analysis.
Weight loss rate was determined using the following equation:
W R = O W W S O W × 100 %
where WR indicates weight loss rate, OW is the original weight of the sample, and WS is the weight of the sample after storage. Experiments were carried out in triplicate on each sample, and the mean value of weight loss rate was calculated for analysis.
Firmness was measured using a texture property analyzer (type: TA.XT Plus, Stable Micro System Inc., Surrey, British) [21]. A P6 cylindrical probe with a 6-mm dimeter was selected. The preparation rate of the probe was 5.00 mm/s and the measurement rate was 1.00 m/s. Penetration mode was used in this experiment, and the measured height was 6.00 mm. The maximum force (unit: N) in the pressing process was applied as the firmness value of the mini-Chinese cabbage. Experiments on each sample were carried out in triplicate, and the mean value of firmness was calculated for analysis.
Vitamin C (Vc) content was measured by the 2,6-dichloroindophenol titrimetric method [22] with some modifications. Mini-Chinese cabbage (5 g) was added to a metaphosphoric acid–acetic acid solution (50 mL, 5%). Then, the mixed solution was filtered and 10 mL of filtrate was titrated with 2,6-dichloroindophenol standard solution. Standard solutions with known concentration (0, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 mg/100 g) of ascorbic acid (analytical pure) in ultrapure water were used to obtain the standard curves. Experiments on each sample were carried out in triplicate and the mean value of Vc was calculated for data analysis; values were expressed as mg/100 g.

2.5. Freshness Levels Description

Applying the Chinese official analysis method (NY/T 943-2006: Grades and specifications of Chinese cabbage) with some modifications, the freshness levels of the cabbage were visually inspected and determined based on weight loss rate, L* value, and Vc content. The quality characteristics of cabbages during storage and the related specifications are presented in Table 1.

2.6. Data Processing

The methodology used in our previous study [17] was applied with some modifications for the present data analysis. Five preprocessing methods, namely, auto-scale, standard normal variable (SNV), multiplicative scattering correction (MSC), first derivative (1st), and second derivative (2nd), were utilized to compensate for baseline shifting, noise removal, uniform light scattering, etc. These methodologies were recommended for practical applications in [23].
In this study, the linear multivariate algorithm (partial least square regression, PLSR) and nonlinear multivariate algorithm (support vector regression, SVR) were used to build the regression models for predicting the quality attributes of the samples. Classification models for freshness level were developed using partial least square-discrimination analysis (PLS-DA) and supported vector classification (SVC). The dataset with 180 samples was divided in a ratio of 3:1 using the Kennard Stone algorithm [24]. Three quarters of the cabbages comprised the calibrated datasets, while remaining quarter was used in prediction optimization.

2.7. Evaluation of Models

Key parameters, namely coefficient of determination for calibration (Rc2), coefficient of determination for cross-validation (Rcv2), coefficient of determination for prediction (Rp2), root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSEP), and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) were considered. Additionally, the practical utility of the calibration models was further assessed using the ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD). Good prediction models exhibit high values of R2 and RPD but low values of RMSE [25]. The parameters were defined as follows:
R c 2 , R c v 2 , R p 2 = 1 i = 1 N ( y i y ¯ ) 2 i = 1 N ( y i y m ) 2
RMSEC , RMSECV , RMSEP = 1 N I = 1 N ( y i y ¯ ) 2
where N is the number of samples, yi and y ¯ are the measured and predicted values of the sample, and ym is the average value of all samples in the calibrated and predicted sets.
All FT-NIR data were collected using Thermo Scientific RESULT software. Multivariate statistical analysis with different preprocessing and regression methods were constructed and compared, respectively, using PLS_toolbox 7.5 (Eigenvector Reseatrch Inc., Manson, WA, USA) in Matlab (version: 2014a, the MathWork Inc., Natick, MA, USA). To avoid overfitting, validation samples were not used in the calibration and cross-validation steps [15]. The leave-one-out methodology, which does not waste data and is suitable for small numbers of samples, was utilized for optimal parameter selection.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significant difference of mean values among all groups during storage. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the SPSS software (version: 18.0, IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Data were expressed as average value ± standard deviation (SD). p < 0.05 was considered to represent a significant difference. All figures were depicted using the Origin software (version: 9.0, Origin Lab Co., Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Surface Color, Weight Loss Rate, Vitamin C and Firmness for Mini-Chinese Cabbage during Storage

The surface color indexes, i.e., L*, a*, and b*, are expressed in Figure 1. The L* and b* values of the exterior surface of the samples gradually became lower with storage period (Figure 1a,c), while a* showed a slight increase during storage (Figure 1b). Samples without packing (control group) showed a more obvious decreasing/increasing trend in the aforementioned curves than those subject to nanopacking and PE packing, i.e., the initial L* and b* values of 73.9 and 26.0 decreased to 64.0 and 13.0, respectively. However, limited declines were observed in the packing groups: L* was 67.0 and 70.0, and b* was 18.2 and 19.1 for PE-packing and nanopacking, respectively. Comparatively, L* showed the most sensitivity in early storage. After 6 d storage, L* was significantly different (p < 0.01) between the nanopacking and PE-packing samples, while nonsignificant differences were observed for a* and b*. Figure 1d reports the total color changes (ΔE) of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage from 0 to 15 d. An increasing trend among all groups during storage is evident. A significant difference was observed between the control and the packed samples at 3 d. After storage for 6 d, it was observed that the ΔE in the PE-packing group was significantly different for that of the nanopacking group. This result suggested nanopacking can effectively prolong the stability of the surface color of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage.
The changes of weight loss rate, firmness, and Vc are shown in Figure 2. The average weight loss rate of the samples was very predictable for the two packing groups; a ratio of 0.59 % was observed after 15 d storage in nanopacking, while that value was 1.34 % for the PE-packing group. Similar results were observed for firmness and Vc content; see Figure 2b,c. The firmness decreased in the nanopacking group (indicating that the texture of the cabbage had been well preserved) from 26.0 N to 20.0 N after 15 d storage. The average Vc contents decreased to 30.8 g/100 g, 40.0 g/100 g, and 45.0 g/100 g for control, PE-packing, and nanopacking samples, respectively, at the end of the storage period. The data showed that the packing type was significantly correlated with surface color, weight loss rate, firmness, and Vc, suggesting that the packing method is an important determinant of mini-Chinese cabbage preservation. During storage, cell water loss causes plasmolysis, which affects cell size and leads to decreased cell adhesion. Subsequently, intercellular spaces appear, and cell walls collapse, which can result in a decrease in firmness [26].
Mini-Chinese cabbage is highly perishable due to its high moisture content and the enzyme activities in fresh leaves after harvest, making it particularly susceptible to browning and the loss of nutrients during storage. Packing materials are play a key role in the storage of vegetables. In particular, nanopacking (with nano-Ag, nano-TiO2, and nano-SiO2) has been shown inhibit weight loss and color browning in mini-Chinese cabbage during storage. Similar results were also reported by Wang et al. [27], suggesting that packing bags containing nano-SiO2 can extend the shelf life of rice. Compared with PE packing, a greater accumulation of ROS induces damage to oxidative and membrane lipids, thereby preventing browning (lower L* value) and loss of Vc [28]. Low oxygen permeability can be achieved with nano-SiO2 packing materials, which can reduce enzyme activities and can prevent the oxidation of Vc [19]. Evaluating these chemical and physical changes is critical for determining the performance of nanopacking materials for use with fresh vegetables. Thus, the following quantitative predictions for physicochemical attributes after nanopacking treatment were made.

3.2. Spectral Analysis

As stated in Lambert-Beer law, using the ratio of the outgoing intensity of a light beam to the incoming intensity transmittance, the measured transmittance concentration can be converted to absorbance and expressed as L o g 1 R [29]. The values of relative reflectance spectra for individual mini-Chinese cabbage samples with nanopacking ranged from 4000 to 10,000 cm−1, as plotted in Figure 3a. Mean spectral curves in 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 d were calculated and are plotted in Figure 3b. The spectral profiles of the cabbages after different storage periods were found to be similar. The main absorption peaks were located at around 4600, 5170, 5900, 7900, and 8990 cm−1. NIR spectra remain the most comprehensive source of information about the aharmonicity of molecular vibrations [30]. These absorption wavenumbers are related to –CH, C=O, and –OH chemical bonds, which are the primary structural components of organic molecules [31]. A peak at around 4600 cm−1 is related to the –CH stretching [32]. The absorption peak found near 5170 cm−1 is mainly attributed to the C=O stretching and –OH bending. Notably, the prominence of the first overtone band of C=O stretching mode (5260–5130 cm−1) varies strongly among different molecular systems [30,33]. The combination band of –CH and –OH vibrations is positioned near 5900 cm−1. The spectrum of the cabbage displayed the second overtone of –CH at around 7900 cm−1. Finally, a strong absorption peak located at 8990 cm−1 was attributed to the second overtone of O–H stretching [34].
Figure 3b demonstrates that the spectral absorption of the samples with nanopackaging gradually weakened during 15 d storage at 20 °C. The results indicated that the difference in spectral profiles were possibly related to variations in the physiochemical properties in the samples during storage. As mentioned above, nanopacking can be utilized retain freshness in mini-Chinese cabbage. The abundance of hydrogen-containing chemical bands (i.e., high Vc and free water content) in samples forms the theoretical basis for obtaining information about the chemical structure in NIR analyses. In this study, the broad absorption peak at around 4600 cm−1 was closely related with –CH chemical bonds in Vc. The peaks at around 5170 and 8990 cm−1 were mainly due to the fact that the packaging treatment can inhibit the breathing and transpiration of the baby cabbage and reduce loss of water [35,36]. Further analyses were carried out using multivariate algorithms to evaluate the nondestructive and fast prediction models, which were subsequently tested.
Figure 4 shows the score plot of PC1 and PC2 derived from raw spectra for mini-Chinese cabbage at different freshness levels. PC1 accounted for the highest ratio, i.e., 89.07% in the raw data, while the PC2 accounted for 7.81%. The accumulative contribution ratio of PC1 and PC2 was higher than 95%, indicating that the features in these two were aggregative [37]. Since there were slight overlaps in the different freshness levels, an obvious separation trend could be observed in the samples. Similar result were observed in studies of the shelf-life of strawberries using visible and near infrared spectroscopy [38]. Raw spectral data obtained using FT-NIR usually present excellent resolution, and the acquired matrix often contains hundreds of wavelengths. Dimension reduction is essential to improve data analyses in terms of the number of calculations and robustness. In this work, a loading plot of the PCA results can be used to reveal the relationships among the FT-NIR spectra and quality attributes.

3.3. Prediction Performance of Surface Color and Quality Attributes Based on FT-NIR Dataset

In this section, details are presented of the multivariate chemometrics analysis used to predict the surface color and quality attributes of mini-Chinese cabbage via FT-NIR spectroscopy. The performance of linear and nonlinear regression models combined with five different pretreatment methods (namely SNV, 1st, 2nd, MSC, and Auto scale) was compared, and is summarized in Table 2 and Table 3. Prediction models using PLSR exhibited the best weight loss rate prediction, with the Rp2 values varying from 0.80 to 0.96, RMSEP from 1.332 to 1.564%, and RPD from 2.191 to 3.612, while the worst prediction accuracy was obtained from SVR models. Among the five pretreatment methods, the best predicted model based on the full wavebands of FT-NIR datasets achieved 0.96 of Rp2 and 3.612 of RPD by SNV-PLSR.
For firmness predictions, the PLSR models showed poor performance, with Rp2 values varying from 0.40 to 0.58, RMSEP from 2.578 to 2.695 N, and RPD from 1.128 to 2.342. Similar results for firmness predictions were observed for SVR models. The best result was obtained using Autoscale-SVR, with 0.60 of Rp2 and 2.205 of RPD, which indicated that the PLSR and SVR models are not suitable for nondestructive predictions of firmness in mini-Chinese cabbage. This may be attributable to the limited range of the changes of firmness in mini-Chinese cabbage subject to nanopacking.
Furthermore, to predict the Vc content, high performance was achieved, with Rp2 varying from 0.78 to 0.95 and RPD from 2.015 to 2.883 by PLSR, and Rp2 from 0.79 to 0.87 and RPD from 2.013 to 2.738 by SVR. The MSC-PLSR model exhibited the best performance among all of the constructed models for Vc predictions. These results are consistent with those of Liu et al. [39]. The predictive capacity of the surface color indexes (L*, a*, and b*) is presented in Table 2. The best predicted Rp2, RMSEP, and RPD for L* were, respectively, 0.82, 2.013, and 3.069 using MSC-SVR; for a*, the values were 0.73, 1.288, and 2.145, obtained using SNV-SVR; and b* 0.85, 1.264, and 2.432 using 1st-PLSR. These results are slightly better than those obtained by Balage et al. [40] in predictions of the attributes of pork samples, and similar to those reported by Li et al. [41] for assessments of the color indexes in plums subject to low-temperature storage.
According to the literature [39], an RPD should be greater than 2.0 for reasonable predictions, while a value of over 3.0 indicates reliable predictions. Thus, the models proposed in this study for weight loss rate and L* can be utilized for analytical purposes, and the prediction models for all attributes can be considered to be reliable. Moreover, SVM performed consistently better than PLS in predicting total soluble solids, Vc content, and titratable acid [39], which indicates that SVM is more capable of handling noisy and high-dimensional data. However, in this study, there was inefficient evidence to determine whether PLSR performed better or worse than SVR for quality attributes in mini-Chinese cabbage with nanopacking. An analysis and comprehensive comparison of the pretreatment methods indicated that SNV, MSC, and Auto scale performed best in terms of improving the model performance for weight loss ratio, Vc content, and firmness. The second model did not improve the prediction accuracy for all attributes, which is in good agreement with the results reported by Balage et al. [40]. In the present study, nanopacking positively correlated with reduced deterioration in the quality of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage. The speed of enzyme reaction and the breakdown of cell wall in the leaves were reduced, and thus, the surface color and tissue structure were preserved. Fresh cabbage contains more free water, and the physiological status of the microstructure results in stronger light scattering [41]. Thus, more light gets scattered (or reflected) backwards which can then be captured by the NIR detector.

3.4. Classification Performance of Freshness Levels Based on FT-NIR Dataset

According to the descriptions of freshness levels provided above for mini-Chinese cabbage subject to nanopacking storage, the classification models for different freshness levels were constructed based on full wavelength FT-NIR datasets. FT-NIR datasets comprised 180 samples, and were defined as independent variable X, while freshness level (measured using the reference methods presented in Section 2.6) was defined as classified or dependent variable Y. The classification results are presented in Table 4 and Table 5. In PLS-DA, accuracies of 82.1% for calibration and 79.9% for prediction were observed. The models obtained significantly higher accuracies, i.e., 89.6% for calibration and 88.8% for prediction, when SVC was applied. These demonstrations showed that FT-NIR spectroscopy could be successfully applied to classify the freshness level of mini-Chinese cabbage subject to nanopacking storage. Furthermore, the results indicated that the classification models based on SVC methods offer substantial potential to predict the freshness level of mini-Chinese cabbage. The model could be utilized for the further design of an online system for quality monitoring when nanopacking is applied.

3.5. Independent Test-Set Validation of Freshness Level in Mini-Chinese Cabbage

An external dataset with an additional 135 mini-Chinese cabbages was created using FT-NIR spectroscopy. Independent tests of freshness level were carried out based on the SVC models presented in Section 3.4 in order to verify the robustness of the model. The final results, dividing freshness levels into three categories, are summarized in Table 6. An accuracy of 82.2% was obtained for determinations of freshness levels in independent datasets. A decrease of 6.6% of the accuracy regarding freshness levels was found during external validation, indicating that the SVC model offers substantial potential for the evaluation of freshness of mini-Chinese cabbage.

4. Conclusions

This study described the use Fourier transform-near infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy with reflectance pattern to quantify the quality attributes of mini-Chinese cabbage. The results indicated that the proposed prediction model is suitable for evaluations of weight loss rate, surface color, and Vc, but not for firmness quantification, in mini-Chinese cabbage stored in nanopackaging. As such, we demonstrated that FT-NIR has the potential to be a useful tool for the evaluation of freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage subject to nanopacking. The consistent accuracy obtained by internal and external validation illustrated that the model is effective and robust. Further validation using a larger number of mini-Chinese cabbages from different batches is required.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L.; Data curation, S.C.; Investigation, D.Z. and C.D.; Methodology, J.W. and H.Z.; Project administration, P.L.; Supervision, K.T. and L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX(18)2028), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: U2003114), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (KYLH202003), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (20KJB550005) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) for financial support. We would like to express our gratitude to the Xia Fan for the assistance on experiment.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hu, L.; Yu, J.; Liao, W.; Zhang, G.; Xie, J.; Lv, J.; Xiao, X.; Yang, B.; Zhou, R.; Bu, R. Moderate ammonium:nitrate alleviates low light intensity stress in mini Chinese cabbage seedling by regulating root architecture and photosynthesis. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 186, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shawon, R.A.; Kang, B.S.; Lee, S.G.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, H.J.; Katrich, E.; Gorinstein, S.; Ku, Y.G. Influence of drought stress on bioactive compounds, antioxidant enzymes and glucosinolate contents of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). Food Chem. 2020, 308, 125657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Park, C.H.; Yeo, H.J.; Park, S.-Y.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Comparative Phytochemical Analyses and Metabolic Profiling of Different Phenotypes of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica Rapa ssp. Pekinensis). Foods 2019, 8, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. El-Mesery, H.S.; Mao, H.; Abomohra, A.E.F. Applications of non-destructive technologies for agricultural and food products quality inspection. Sensors 2019, 19, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wang, F.; Zhao, C.; Yang, G. Development of a Non-Destructive Method for Detection of the Juiciness of Pear via VIS/NIR Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometric Methods. Foods 2020, 9, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Adedeji, A.A.; Ekramirad, N.; Rady, A.; HamidiSepehr, A.; Donohue, K.D.; Villanueva, R.T.; Parrish, C.A.; Li, M. Non-Destructive Technologies for Detecting Insect Infestation in Fruits and Vegetables under Postharvest Conditions: A Critical Review. Foods 2020, 9, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hu, Q.; Fang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ma, N.; Zhao, L. Effect of nanocomposite-based packaging on postharvest quality of ethylene-treated kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) during cold storage. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, L.; Shao, S.; Madebo, M.P.; Hou, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jin, P. Effect of nano-SiO2 packing on postharvest quality and antioxidant capacity of loquat fruit under ambient temperature storage. Food Chem. 2020, 315, 126295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Feng, S. Impact of nano-CaCO3 -LDPE packaging on quality of fresh-cut sugarcane. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 3273–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. An, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Tang, J. Physical, chemical and microbiological changes in stored green asparagus spears as affected by coating of silver nanoparticles-PVP. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Erkan, M.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, C.Y. Effect of UV treatment on antioxidant capacity, antioxidant enzyme activity and decay in strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 48, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moscetti, R.; Haff, R.P.; Ferri, S.; Raponi, F.; Liang, P.; Massantini, R.; Monarca, D. Real-Time Monitoring of Organic Carrot (var. Romance) During Hot-Air Drying Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 2046–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Botros, L.L.; Jablonski, J.; Chang, C.; Bergana, M.M.; Wehling, P.; Harnly, J.M.; Downey, G.; Harrington, P.; Potts, A.R.; Moore, J.C. Exploring Authentic Skim and Nonfat Dry Milk Powder Variance for the Development of Nontargeted Adulterant Detection Methods Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 9810–9818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. de Oliveira, G.A.; Castilhos, F.; Renard, C.M.; Bureau, S. Comparison of NIR and MIR spectroscopic methods for determination of individual sugars, organic acids and carotenoids in passion fruit. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boughattas, F.; Le Fur, B.; Karoui, R. Mid infrared spectroscopy coupled with chemometric tools for qualitative analysis of canned tuna with sunflower medium. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 91, 103519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Giovenzana, V.; Beghi, R.; Civelli, R.; Guidetti, R. Optical techniques for rapid quality monitoring along minimally processed fruit and vegetable chain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 46, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Q.; Wei, K.; Xiao, H.; Tu, S.; Sun, K.; Sun, Y.; Pan, L.; Tu, K. Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Rapidly Detects the Decay of Postharvest Strawberry Based on Water-Soluble Sugar Analysis. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.; Li, F.; Wang, L.; Sheng, J.; Xin, Z.; Zhao, L.; Xiao, H.; Zheng, Y.; Hu, Q. Effect of nano-packing on preservation quality of Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill. var. inermis (Bunge) Rehd). Food Chem. 2009, 114, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ibáñez, G.; Cebolla-Cornejo, J.; Martí, R.; Roselló, S.; Valcárcel, M. Non-destructive determination of taste-related compounds in tomato using NIR spectra. J. Food Eng. 2019, 263, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Szigedi, T.; Lénárt, J.; Dernovics, M.; Turza, S.; Fodor, M. Protein content determination in Brassica oleracea species using FT-NIR technique and PLS regression. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 47, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caramês, E.T.S.; Alamar, P.D.; Pallone, J.A.L. Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity in Freeze-Dried Red Cabbage by FT-NIR and MIR Spectroscopy and Chemometric Tools. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 13, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brasil, I.; Gomes, C.; Puerta-Gomez, A.; Castell-Perez, M.; Moreira, R.G. Polysaccharide-based multilayered antimicrobial edible coating enhances quality of fresh-cut papaya. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nicolaï, B.M.; Beullens, K.; Bobelyn, E.; Peirs, A.; Saeys, W.; Theron, K.I.; Lammertyn, J. Nondestructive measurement of fruit and vegetable quality by means of NIR spectroscopy: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 46, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Q.; Sun, K.; Zhao, N.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Pan, L.; Tu, K. Information fusion of hyperspectral imaging and electronic nose for evaluation of fungal contamination in strawberries during decay. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 153, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iqbal, A.; Sun, D.-W.; Allen, P. Prediction of moisture, color and pH in cooked, pre-sliced turkey hams by NIR hyperspectral imaging system. J. Food Eng. 2013, 117, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, C.; Feng, L.; Pan, L.; Wei, K.; Liu, Q.; Tu, K.; Zhao, L.; Peng, J. Relationships between optical properties of peach flesh with firmness and tissue structure during storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 163, 111134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, F.; Hu, Q.; Mariga, A.M.; Cao, C.; Yang, W. Effect of nano packaging on preservation quality of Nanjing 9108 rice variety at high temperature and humidity. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cao, S.; Yang, Z.; Cai, Y.; Zheng, Y. Fatty acid composition and antioxidant system in relation to susceptibility of loquat fruit to chilling injury. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1777–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saeys, W.; Trong, N.N.D.; Van Beers, R.; Nicolaï, B.M. Multivariate calibration of spectroscopic sensors for postharvest quality evaluation: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 158, 110981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beć, K.; Huck, C.W. Breakthrough Potential in Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Spectra Simulation. A Review of Recent Developments. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cevoli, C.; Gori, A.; Nocetti, M.; Cuibus, L.; Caboni, M.F.; Fabbri, A. FT-NIR and FT-MIR spectroscopy to discriminate competitors, non compliance and compliance grated Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. Food Res. Int. 2013, 52, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, T.; Li, X.; Inagaki, T.; Yang, H.; Tsuchikawa, S. Noncontact evaluation of soluble solids content in apples by near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. J. Food Eng. 2018, 224, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Czarnecki, M.A.; Morisawa, Y.; Futami, Y.; Ozaki, Y. Advances in Molecular Structure and Interaction Studies Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9707–9744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beć, K.B.; Grabska, J.; Huck, C.W.; Czarnecki, M.A. Effect of conformational isomerism on NIR spectra of ethanol isotopologues. Spectroscopic and anharmonic DFT study. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 310, 113271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thiruvengadam, M.; Kim, S.-H.; Chung, I.-M. Exogenous phytohormones increase the accumulation of health-promoting metabolites, and influence the expression patterns of biosynthesis related genes and biological activity in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa spp. pekinensis). Sci. Hortic. 2015, 193, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, F.; Huang, H.; Ding, X.; Liu, J.; He, M.; Shan, Y.; Qu, H.; Jiang, Y. Effect of CPPU on postharvest attributes of Chinese flowering cabbage during storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 174, 111438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Q.; Zhou, D.; Tu, S.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, B.; Sun, Y.; Pan, L.; Tu, K. Quantitative Visualization of Fungal Contamination in Peach Fruit Using Hyperspectral Imaging. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shen, F.; Zhang, B.; Cao, C.; Jiang, X. On-line discrimination of storage shelf-life and prediction of post-harvest quality for strawberry fruit by visible and near infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Process Eng. 2018, 41, 12866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, C.; Yang, S.X.; Deng, L. Determination of internal qualities of Newhall navel oranges based on NIR spectroscopy using machine learning. J. Food Eng. 2015, 161, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Balage, J.M.; da Luz e Silva, S.; Gomide, C.A.; de Nadai Bonin, M.; Figueira, A.C. Predicting pork quality using Vis/NIR spectroscopy. Meat Sci. 2015, 108, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, M.; Lv, W.; Zhao, R.; Guo, H.; Liu, J.; Han, D. Non-destructive assessment of quality parameters in ‘Friar’ plums during low temperature storage using visible/near infrared spectroscopy. Food Control. 2017, 73, 1334–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bar charts of L* (a), a* (b), b* (c) and total color difference (d) of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage from 0 to 15 d. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Figure 1. Bar charts of L* (a), a* (b), b* (c) and total color difference (d) of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage from 0 to 15 d. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Foods 10 02309 g001
Figure 2. Bar charts of weight loss rate (a), firmness (b) and Vc (c) of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage from 0 to 15 d. ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Figure 2. Bar charts of weight loss rate (a), firmness (b) and Vc (c) of mini-Chinese cabbage during storage from 0 to 15 d. ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.
Foods 10 02309 g002
Figure 3. Relative reflectance spectra of mini-Chinese cabbage in nanopacking obtained using FT-NIR from 4000 to 10,000 cm−1. ((a) Individual sample; and (b) mean spectra during each storage period).
Figure 3. Relative reflectance spectra of mini-Chinese cabbage in nanopacking obtained using FT-NIR from 4000 to 10,000 cm−1. ((a) Individual sample; and (b) mean spectra during each storage period).
Foods 10 02309 g003
Figure 4. Loading plot of PC1 and PC2 derived from raw spectra for mini-Chinese cabbage at different freshness levels.
Figure 4. Loading plot of PC1 and PC2 derived from raw spectra for mini-Chinese cabbage at different freshness levels.
Foods 10 02309 g004
Table 1. Classification of freshness levels of mini-Chinese cabbage.
Table 1. Classification of freshness levels of mini-Chinese cabbage.
Freshness LevelsDescription
Level 1Surface without visible defects, smells fresh. Quality attributes including weight loss rate < 30%, L* > 71 and Vc content > 59 mg/100 g.
Level 2Surface with visible defect points or peculiar smells. Quality attributes including 30% ≤ weight loss rate < 50%, 68 < L* ≤ 71 and 47 < Vc content ≤ 59 mg/100 g.
Level 3Surface with visible defect areas and unpleasant smell. Quality attributes including weight loss rate ≥ 51%, L* ≤ 68 and Vc content ≤ 47 mg/100 g.
Note: if one item did not meet the requirement, the freshness level was decreased.
Table 2. Performance of the regression models for weight loss ratio, firmness and vitamin C content of individual mini-Chinese cabbages.
Table 2. Performance of the regression models for weight loss ratio, firmness and vitamin C content of individual mini-Chinese cabbages.
Quality
Attributes
PretreatmentModelCalibrationCross-ValidationPrediction
RC2RMSECRCV2RMSECVRp2RMSEPRPD
Weight loss rateSNVPLSR0.951.3340.921.3390.961.3323.612
1-st0.901.3400.861.5730.871.3602.191
2-nd0.821.6540.801.7320.801.5643.212
MSC0.881.3650.851.5370.881.3542.435
Autoscale0.861.5730.811.6910.841.4762.830
SNVSVR0.831.6430.801.7330.791.5902.700
1-st0.891.3780.871.5200.871.3592.191
2-nd0.851.5870.811.7200.831.4892.795
MSC0.871.5200.821.6470.851.4352.546
Autoscale0.871.4890.821.6490.851.4612.544
FirmnessSNVPLSR0.582.5420.502.7140.572.6061.437
1-st0.602.4030.512.7040.582.5782.066
2-nd0.572.6040.492.8210.442.7061.128
MSC0.512.7040.442.7810.512.6952.042
Autoscale0.452.7750.403.3050.402.7891.195
SNVSVR0.602.4630.512.8120.572.5981.608
1-st0.552.6710.482.9010.502.7012.159
2-nd0.582.5340.472.9530.492.7352.124
MSC0.562.6380.413.2170.482.7802.091
Autoscale0.602.4790.552.6710.602.4532.205
Vitamin CSNVPLSR0.903.2130.853.4740.863.432.727
1-st0.913.2310.843.4810.893.252.883
2-nd0.813.5000.754.0020.803.462.015
MSC0.903.1130.853.4740.953.192.681
Autoscale0.873.4530.744.1100.783.482.113
SNVSVR0.823.4960.744.0240.793.472.238
1-st0.863.4670.813.5000.873.242.513
2-nd0.883.4050.803.5570.873.252.512
MSC0.893.4360.813.5010.853.462.442
Autoscale0.903.2980.803.5570.823.312.379
Note: Underline indicates the best prediction performance.
Table 3. Performance of the regression models for surface color of individual mini-Chinese cabbages.
Table 3. Performance of the regression models for surface color of individual mini-Chinese cabbages.
Quality AttributesPretreatmentModelCalibrationCross-ValidationPrediction
RC2RMSECRCV2RMSECVRp2RMSEPRPD
L* SNVPLSR0.722.5710.682.8230.702.3242.458
1-st0.692.8030.623.0740.672.4152.258
2-nd0.742.4720.672.8540.712.1832.015
MSC0.772.3720.682.8230.722.0512.453
Autoscale0.652.7620.603.2270.602.9032.469
SNVSVR0.742.5860.642.9740.652.3721.541
1-st0.732.5940.652.9140.742.1342.445
2-nd0.682.9080.613.1460.602.9612.098
MSC0.842.0510.742.5860.822.0133.069
Autoscale0.802.1620.712.5840.752.1222.483
a* SNVPLSR0.751.2410.681.5860.721.3092.088
1-st0.701.4430.621.7330.681.5281.781
2-nd0.681.5870.611.7480.641.6911.332
MSC0.711.4010.621.7330.681.5281.781
Autoscale0.741.2870.671.5930.691.5011.855
SNVSVR0.771.0320.711.4030.731.2882.145
1-st0.721.3170.681.5570.701.4021.987
2-nd0.671.5940.601.7560.651.6251.501
MSC0.721.3170.671.5940.701.4021.987
Autoscale0.751.2430.681.5570.711.3882.051
b* SNVPLSR0.801.2110.711.3020.781.2781.943
1-st0.851.2040.721.2830.851.2642.432
2-nd0.791.2360.721.2890.721.3231.893
MSC0.811.2180.731.3010.731.3121.897
Autoscale0.681.3240.611.3740.671.4211.457
SNVSVR0.731.2780.611.3740.701.3761.541
1-st0.781.2450.621.3700.731.3561.896
2-nd0.781.2340.621.3700.751.3211.913
MSC0.801.2160.721.2890.741.3101.906
Autoscale0.771.2700.701.3110.711.3681.632
Note: Underline indicates the best prediction performance.
Table 4. Accuracy of classification models of freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage by PLS-DA.
Table 4. Accuracy of classification models of freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage by PLS-DA.
Models Freshness LevelsAccuracy/%
Calibration Level 1Level 2Level 3
Level 1401488.8
Level 2832571.1
Level 3233986.6
Total accuracy/%82.1
PredictionLevel 1131186.6
Level 2111373.3
Level 3031280.0
Total accuracy/%79.9
Table 5. Accuracy of classification models of freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage by SVC.
Table 5. Accuracy of classification models of freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage by SVC.
Models Freshness LevelsAccuracy/%
Calibration Level 1Level 2Level 3
Level 1431195.5
Level 2438384.4
Level 3144088.8
Total accuracy/%89.6
PredictionLevel 1141093.3
Level 2013286.6
Level 3021386.6
Total accuracy/%88.8
Table 6. External validation for freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage by SVC.
Table 6. External validation for freshness levels in mini-Chinese cabbage by SVC.
Models Freshness LevelsAccuracy/%
SVC Level 1Level 2Level 3
Level 1386184.4
Level 2734475.6
Level 3063986.7
Total accuracy/%82.2%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Q.; Chen, S.; Zhou, D.; Ding, C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, H.; Tu, K.; Pan, L.; Li, P. Nondestructive Detection of Weight Loss Rate, Surface Color, Vitamin C Content, and Firmness in Mini-Chinese Cabbage with Nanopackaging by Fourier Transform-Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Foods 2021, 10, 2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102309

AMA Style

Liu Q, Chen S, Zhou D, Ding C, Wang J, Zhou H, Tu K, Pan L, Li P. Nondestructive Detection of Weight Loss Rate, Surface Color, Vitamin C Content, and Firmness in Mini-Chinese Cabbage with Nanopackaging by Fourier Transform-Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Foods. 2021; 10(10):2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Qiang, Shaoxia Chen, Dandan Zhou, Chao Ding, Jiahong Wang, Hongsheng Zhou, Kang Tu, Leiqing Pan, and Pengxia Li. 2021. "Nondestructive Detection of Weight Loss Rate, Surface Color, Vitamin C Content, and Firmness in Mini-Chinese Cabbage with Nanopackaging by Fourier Transform-Near Infrared Spectroscopy" Foods 10, no. 10: 2309. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop