Next Article in Journal
Advances in Luminescent Materials: From Fundamental Photophysics to Emerging Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Boosted Photocatalytic Selective Oxidation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Diformylfuran in Pure Water over Amorphous MoS3-Modified Zn3In2S6 Nanoflowers
Previous Article in Journal
Remote Ligand Substitution in Imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline as a Strategy to Modulate Thermally and Aggregation-Driven Emission in Cu(I) Complexes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural, Electronic, and Thermoelectric Insights into the Novel K2OsCl3Ag3 and Rb2OsCl3Ag3 Perovskites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Fabrication Techniques for Infrared Detectors: A Comprehensive Review

1
Next Matter Nano Tech Lab, Nareks Company, 09900 Nazilli, Turkey
2
SP-EPT Lab, ASEPE Company, Industrial Park of Advanced Technologies, Tabriz 5364191686, Iran
3
Photonics and Nanocrystals Research Lab (PNRL), University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166614761, Iran
4
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
5
Institute for Inorganic and Materials Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Greinstraße 6, D-50939 Cologne, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2026, 14(6), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060153
Submission received: 21 April 2026 / Revised: 27 May 2026 / Accepted: 29 May 2026 / Published: 3 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Inorganic Semiconductor Materials, 4th Edition)

Abstract

The field of infrared (IR) photodetection is undergoing rapid development through the emergence of solution-processable nanoparticle (NP)-based materials and fabrication strategies. This review critically examines recent advances in fabrication approaches for NP-based IR detectors, emphasizing the relationship between synthesis, surface engineering, deposition processes, and device architecture in determining detector performance. Representative material platforms are discussed, including colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) such as PbS and HgTe, which enable tunable operation from the near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) to selected mid-wave (MWIR), long-wave (LWIR), and emerging very-long-wave infrared (VLWIR) regimes depending on material composition and operating conditions. Further platforms including plasmonic metal NPs, black phosphorus, and topological nanomaterials are evaluated for their unique mechanisms of optical enhancement and broadband response. Fabrication approaches including continuous-flow synthesis, ligand exchange, blade coating, inkjet printing, electrophoretic deposition, and other scalable solution-processing methods are analyzed with respect to their influence on film quality, charge transport, interface engineering, and integration compatibility. The review further compares major device architectures, including photoconductors, photodiodes, plasmonic absorbers, and phototransistors, using key performance metrics such as specific detectivity (D*), responsivity (R), response speed, and operating temperature, while emphasizing the importance of measurement conditions in cross-platform comparisons. Critical challenges including dark-current generation, 1/f noise, transport limitations associated with ligand chemistry, environmental instability of narrow-bandgap materials, manufacturability constraints, and toxicity considerations are also discussed. Emerging directions such as neuromorphic sensing, CMOS-compatible integration, and sustainable lead-free nanomaterials are highlighted. By linking nanoscale material design and fabrication processes to device-level performance, this review provides a framework for advancing NP-based IR technologies toward scalable and application-relevant sensing systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Overview of Infrared Photodetectors Based on Nanomaterials

Infrared detectors transform IR photons into measurable electrical signals. Traditional technologies, such as those that use mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) or III–V semiconductor heterostructures, provide high performance but face challenges related to high costs, complex fabrication processes (often necessitating molecular beam epitaxy), limited spectral tunability, and the requirement for cryogenic cooling [1,2,3]. In addition to costs, the inherent material characteristics of these solid, bulk semiconductors restrict their compatibility with flexible electronics and silicon-based readout circuits, leading to a need for approaches on new materials, specifically polymers [4] or NP based systems [5]. As illustrated in Figure 1, NP-based IR detectors offer significant advantages over traditional technologies, particularly in terms of solution-processability, tunable absorption, and compatibility with flexible substrates.
Among the conventional designs, metal–semiconductor–metal (MSM) photodetectors have been widely studied due to their simple planar structure, low intrinsic capacitance, and appropriateness for high-speed applications [6,7]. In a typical MSM device, interdigitated metal electrodes are placed on the semiconductor surface, forming back-to-back Schottky contacts. While they offer advantages in terms of ease of fabrication and speed, traditional MSM detectors often suffer from high dark currents (Idark) caused by Schottky barrier reduction and thermionic emission, which can limit their detectivity, especially in the IR range [8,9]. The Idark in an MSM detector is described by Equation (1).
Idark∝A*T2exp(−qϕB/ΚBT)
where A* is the Richardson constant, T is the temperature, and ϕB is the Schottky barrier height, q is the elementary charge and ΚB is the Boltzmann constant.
The operating principle of IR photodetectors is based on converting incident IR photons into measurable electrical signals through photon absorption, charge generation, separation, transport, and collection at the electrodes [8,9,10]. Depending on the detector architecture, this process may occur through photovoltaic, photoconductive, photogating, hot-electron, or photothermal mechanisms. In photovoltaic devices such as p–n and p–i–n photodiodes, absorbed photons generate electron–hole pairs that are separated by an internal electric field, producing photocurrent with low noise and fast response [11]. In photoconductors and phototransistors, illumination modulates the conductivity of the active layer under an applied bias, often enabling internal gain but introducing longer carrier lifetimes and increased 1/f noise [12,13,14]. In plasmonic NP systems, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) generates energetic carriers that can overcome Schottky barriers and contribute to photocurrent generation [15].
For NP-based detectors, these processes are strongly influenced by quantum confinement, surface chemistry, ligand coupling, and interparticle charge transport [16,17,18]. Unlike bulk semiconductors, where carrier motion occurs in continuous bands, NP-based solids consist of electronically coupled nanostructures in which charge transport proceeds through hopping or tunneling between neighboring particles. Consequently, detector performance depends not only on intrinsic material properties but also on synthesis conditions, surface passivation, and film assembly methods [19,20,21].
Engineering of NPs provides direct methods to adjust ϕB and decrease A* through manipulation of surface dipoles [1,10]. The utilization of NPs represents a considerable transformation, not only in materials but also in the re-evaluation of device architectures such as the MSM design. By employing quantum confinement in semiconductor NPs, for instance, colloidal quantum dots (CQDs), or localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) in metal NPs, the absorption spectrum can be precisely customized across the short-wave (SWIR), mid-wave (MWIR), and long-wave IR (LWIR) regions [11,12,13,14]. The bandgap energy (Eg) of a CQD is adjustable according to the Brus Equation (2).
Eg(QD) = Eg(bulk) + h2/8r(QD)2(1/me* + 1/mh*) − 1.786e2/ϵrϵ0r(QD)
where Eg(QD) is the band gap energy of the NP. Eg(bulk) is the band gap energy of the same material in bulk form. h is Planck’s constant, r(QD) is the radius of the spherical quantum dot, me* is the effective mass of the excited electron, and mh* is the effective mass of the electron hole. e is the elementary charge of an electron, ϵr is the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) of the semiconductor material, and ϵ0 is the vacuum permittivity.
The photon detection process in NP films can be summarized in four sequential stages (Figure 2): (i) photon absorption and exciton generation within the NP, (ii) exciton dissociation into free carriers, (iii) carrier transport across the NP network, and (iv) charge extraction at the contacts. Each stage contributes to overall detector performance metrics including responsivity (R), specific detectivity (D*), external quantum efficiency (EQE), response speed, and noise-equivalent power (NEP) [22,23,24]. Carrier transport efficiency is particularly sensitive to ligand length and trap density because long insulating ligands improve colloidal stability but reduce carrier mobility, whereas aggressive ligand exchange may increase conductivity at the expense of environmental stability [20,21,22]. Therefore, fabrication and surface engineering become central design variables rather than secondary processing steps.
Figure 2 summarizes the general operating framework of NP-based IR photodetectors and highlights the multiscale relationship between material properties and detector performance. The detection process begins with IR photon absorption within the nanostructured active layer, followed by the generation of photocarriers or plasmon-induced hot carriers, depending on the material system. These carriers then migrate through the NP network via transport mechanisms governed by interparticle coupling, ligand chemistry, trap states, and film morphology before being collected at the electrodes to generate photocurrent. The figure further emphasizes that optimization of each stage directly influences key device metrics including responsivity (R), specific detectivity (D*), response speed, and noise characteristics.
The integration of nanocrystal films into MSM configurations is particularly attractive, as the solution-processable, low-temperature deposition of NPs aligns perfectly with the planar geometry of MSM electrodes, thereby facilitating straightforward fabrication on flexible or unconventional substrates [16,17]. Furthermore, the nanoscale architecture and tailored surface states of NP-based films can be utilized to modify charge injection and transport dynamics at the substrate–NP interface, offering innovative solutions to tackle conventional MSM issues such as Idark [18,19]. For example, surface-ligand passivation with halides (I−, Br−) can reduce mid-gap trap-state densities from > 1017 cm−3 to < 1016 cm−3, effectively suppressing Shockley–Read–Hall recombination noise [20]. Thus, NPs can be synthesized in solution through scalable, cost-effective techniques, paving the way for versatile, large-area, and on-chip integrated photodetectors [21,22].
This review builds upon fundamentals in IR detector physics and material requirements [23,24] and will explore how advancements in NP synthesis and patterning of NPs in materials are revitalizing traditional device architectures. At the same time, the switch from traditional IR detectors to NP-based detectors will allow for reducing production costs.
Figure 3 provides a schematic overview linking NP materials, spectral selectivity strategies, fabrication methods, device architectures, and performance metrics, highlighting how nanoscale engineering controls both sensitivity and wavelength discrimination.

1.2. Spectral Selectivity in Nanoparticle-Based IR Photodetectors

Spectral selectivity, which is the ability of a photodetector to preferentially respond to a defined wavelength range while suppressing out-of-band signals, is an increasingly important characteristic for imaging, spectroscopy, environmental sensing, biomedical diagnostics, and multispectral detection systems [25,26,27]. Unlike conventional bulk semiconductor detectors, where selectivity is primarily determined by the intrinsic bandgap and external optical filters, NP-based IR photodetectors provide multiple routes to engineer wavelength discrimination directly within the active material and the device architecture. The direct way to wavelength selectivity is bandgap engineering through quantum confinement in semiconductor NPs and CQDs. By controlling NP size and composition, the absorption edge can be continuously shifted, allowing selective detection across near-infrared (NIR), short-wave infrared (SWIR), mid-wave infrared (MWIR), and long-wave infrared (LWIR) regions [15,28,29,30]. For example, reducing CQD dimensions increases quantum confinement and enlarges the effective bandgap, whereas larger particles extend absorption toward longer wavelengths. Additional selectivity can be achieved through optical cavities and resonant structures. Fabry–Perot cavities, distributed reflectors, plasmonic metasurfaces, and metamaterial absorbers enhance optical confinement at selected wavelengths and suppress undesired spectral contributions [31,32,33].
Such approaches are particularly attractive for compact multispectral systems because they reduce dependence on external optical filters. At the device level, heterostructure and multilayer engineering further improve selectivity by controlling carrier generation and extraction. Graded junctions, stacked NP absorbers, and spectrally selective transport layers enable wavelength-dependent carrier collection and broadband-to-narrowband response conversion [34,35,36]. More recently, patterned CQD arrays and printed heteropixel architectures have enabled filterless multispectral imaging and compact computational spectrometers [37]. Spectral selectivity can also emerge from anisotropic and polarization-sensitive materials, including black phosphorus and low-dimensional nanostructures, whose absorption depends on crystallographic orientation and incident polarization [38,39]. Combined with machine-learning-assisted spectral reconstruction and detector arrays, these approaches are extending NP-based IR detection from single-band sensing toward integrated spectroscopic and intelligent imaging platforms. Although enhanced selectivity generally improves functional capability, it often introduces trade-offs between bandwidth, absorption efficiency, fabrication complexity, and signal-to-noise ratio. Consequently, optimization of spectral selectivity should be considered together with responsivity (R), specific detectivity (D*), and manufacturability.

1.3. Literature Search and Selection Methodology

This review was prepared using a structured literature survey of peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, and selected review papers related to NP-based IR photodetectors. The literature search was primarily conducted using the Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect databases. Publications from approximately 2010 to early 2025 were considered, with emphasis on recent advances reported during the last five years. Keywords and combinations of terms used during the search included “nanoparticle infrared detector”, “colloidal quantum dot photodetector”, “HgTe CQD”, “PbS infrared photodiode”, “plasmonic infrared detector”, “solution-processed IR detector”, “SWIR photodetector”, “MWIR nanomaterials”, “surface passivation”, “IR detector fabrication”, “specific detectivity”, and “CMOS-compatible infrared imaging”.
The selection criteria prioritized studies experimentally reporting device performance evaluation, scalable fabrication strategies, or significant advances in material engineering, spectral tunability, noise reduction, and room-temperature operation. Additional emphasis was placed on publications presenting quantitative metrics such as specific detectivity (D*), responsivity (R), response time (τ), dark current (Idark), and operational wavelength range under clearly stated measurement conditions. Review articles were included primarily to provide historical context and identify emerging research trends. The comparison tables summarize representative “state-of-the-art” results selected based on a combination of reported device performance, relevance to NP-based IR detection, fabrication maturity, and citation impact. Because measurement conditions vary substantially across detector architectures and spectral regions, the reported values should be interpreted as representative benchmarks rather than directly comparable rankings.
In this review, IR detection is subclassified into near-infrared (NIR, 0.75–1.4 µm), short-wave infrared (SWIR, 1.4–3.0 µm), mid-wave infrared (MWIR, 3–5 µm), long-wave infrared (LWIR, 8–12 µm), and very-long-wave infrared (VLWIR, > 12 µm) if not further specified.

2. Key NP Materials Systems: Synthesis, Properties, and Metrics

2.1. Colloidal Quantum Dots (CQDs): Beyond Size Tunability

Lead sulfide (PbS) and lead selenide (PbSe) CQDs are particularly significant, as their band gaps can be adjusted from the visible spectrum to the MWIR by altering their size [25,26,27]. Recent advancements in their synthesis, such as the continuous-flow microreactor technique, have facilitated production of CQDs with remarkable uniformity and reproducibility between batches, which is essential for commercial focal plane arrays (FPAs) [28]. Furthermore, the introduction of mercury telluride (HgTe) CQDs has broadened the operational range of CQDs into the VLWIR (> 8 µm) at room temperature, due to the narrow bulk bandgap of HgTe CQDs [29,30]. A significant challenge for HgTe CQDs is the stabilization of the elemental Hg0 state; however, advanced synthesis techniques utilizing HgCl2 precursors in hexadecanethiol/oleylamine mixtures have enhanced oxidation resistance, achieving D* > 109 Jones at 10 µm and 300 K [29,30,31]. The quantum efficiency and absorption coefficients of these materials make them particularly beneficial for high-performance photodetectors, as detailed in system-level assessments [32]. The surfaces of CQDs are passivated with organic ligands, which are crucial for maintaining stability and promoting electronic transport, although they also pose challenges for the development of conductive films [33]. The balance between steric stabilization and charge transport is measured by the inter-dot coupling energy, which can range from < 1 meV for long-chain oleic acid to > 50 meV for short inorganic ligands such as arsenite, AsS33−, directly affecting film mobility [34].

2.2. Plasmonic Metal NPs: Engineering the Local Field

Au, Ag, and Al NPs exhibit notable localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), which can be tuned into the IR spectrum by altering their shape, size, and the dielectric environment surrounding them [35,36]. For IR applications, anisotropic structures such as Au nanorods, bipyramids, and hollow nanoshells are specifically designed [37,38,39]. The LSPR wavelength λmax for a nanorod is described by the relationship λmax∝aspect ratio × ϵm1/2, where ϵm represents the dielectric constant of the medium, enabling precise adjustments from 1 to 10 µm [37]. These NPs are primarily employed as sensitizers to enhance light absorption in adjacent semiconductor active layers or to create hot-carrier-based detectors [38,39]. In hot-electron detectors, the internal quantum efficiency (ηIQE) is frequently low (< 1%) due to swift electron–electron scattering. Nevertheless, the integration of a plasmonic nanostructure with an energy-selective electron acceptor, such as a TiO2 or graphene layer, can improve ηIQE by selectively extracting carriers with energies exceeding the Schottky barrier [40]. Their integration can be optimized through modeling techniques aimed at increasing photodetector responsivity and reducing noise [41].

2.3. Emerging Low-Dimensional and Hybrid Nanostructures

NPs made from narrow-bandgap materials, including graphene quantum dots (GQDs) [42], black phosphorus nanosheets [43], and topological insulator NPs like Bi2Se3 [44], are currently being studied for their unique carrier dynamics and extensive IR response. 2D black phosphorus (BP) features a direct bandgap that varies with layer thickness, ranging from 0.3 eV in bulk form to approximately 2.0 eV in monolayer form, thus providing an exceptional platform for broadband detection. Nonetheless, its susceptibility to environmental factors is being mitigated through in situ covalent functionalization using aryl diazonium salts, which enhances its operational lifespan in air from a few hours to several months while maintaining a high hole mobility of over 100 cm2/V·s [45]. Additionally, hybrid systems such as CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals integrated within a PbS CQD matrix have shown synergistic benefits: the perovskite effectively passivates surface traps in PbS, while the CQD matrix facilitates a conductive pathway, resulting in a fivefold increase in responsivity (R) compared to films composed of a single component [46].
Table 1 provides a comparative overview of the principal synthetic methodologies employed for producing NPs suitable for IR detector applications. The table categorizes synthesis approaches according to their reaction mechanisms, scalability, structural precision, and compatibility with IR-active materials. The hot-injection method remains the most widely adopted strategy for CQDs, offering exceptional size control and high crystallinity through rapid nucleation–growth separation at elevated temperatures [25,26,47]. However, its batch-based nature and sensitivity to precursor reactivity limit scalability. In contrast, continuous-flow or microreactor synthesis enables improved reproducibility and scalable production under precisely controlled laminar flow conditions, achieving narrower dispersity but requiring more complex instrumentation [48].
Cation-exchange techniques provide a powerful route for post-synthetic bandgap engineering and heterostructure formation via ion substitution within preformed nanocrystals [25,26,49,50]. This approach is particularly valuable for PbSe/CdSe and Cu2Se/PbSe systems, although it may introduce surface defects that influence electronic transport. Solvothermal and hydrothermal methods, performed under high-pressure autoclave conditions, offer ligand-free and relatively simple synthesis routes for layered or narrow-bandgap materials such as Bi2Se3 and BP nanosheets, albeit with broader size distributions (5–100 nm) [48,49]. For plasmonic and anisotropic nanostructures, seed-mediated growth allows precise control over morphology and aspect ratio (2–10), which is critical for tuning localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) into the IR regime [51]. Ligand-assisted reprecipitation provides a low-temperature, scalable pathway for the synthesis of perovskite nanocrystals (3–15 nm), though it typically sacrifices monodispersity [52]. Finally, metal chalcogenide complex-based colloidal synthesis enables improved stoichiometric control and reduced defect density in materials such as PbS and AgBiS2 at the expense of higher precursor costs [53,54].
Beyond colloidal synthesis approaches, epitaxial formation of nanostructures represents an important route for producing highly ordered IR-sensitive nanomaterials with superior crystallinity and interface quality. In contrast to solution-processed NP assembly, epitaxial growth forms nanostructures directly on crystalline substrates through controlled atom-by-atom deposition and strain-driven self-organization. Epitaxial nanostructure growth is a key method for making IR photodetectors when precise interfaces and semiconductor compatibility are needed. Unlike colloidal methods, it grows nanostructures directly on crystalline substrates using self-assembly modes (SK, VW, FM–see below), enabling highly uniform CQD and heterostructures such as GeSi, III–V, or GeSiSn. These structures offer low defect density, good carrier transport, low dark current, and reproducibility. However, the approach is complex and requires high thermal budgets and sophisticated equipment, limiting scalability. It remains ideal for high-performance, Si-compatible IR photodiodes and CQD arrays where uniformity and interface quality are critical [55].
Several epitaxial growth modes are relevant for IR photodetector production. The Frank–van der Merwe (FM) mode promotes layer-by-layer growth and is commonly used for smooth heterointerfaces. Volmer–Weber (VM)growth leads to island formation due to weak substrate interactions, while the Stranski–Krastanov (SK) mode combines initial wetting layers followed by spontaneous QD formation resulting from accumulated strain. The SK mechanism is particularly important for IR devices because it enables self-organized CQD with strong three-dimensional carrier confinement. Ge CQDs grown on silicon through SK epitaxy have shown extended absorption into the SWIR region while maintaining compatibility with complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) processing. More recently, GeSiSn CQD heterostructures have attracted attention because Sn incorporation reduces the bandgap and shifts optical absorption toward longer IR wavelengths. Compared with colloidal NP processing, epitaxial nanostructures generally provide lower defect densities, improved carrier mobility, and superior interface control, which reduce dark current and enhance specific detectivity (D*). However, these advantages come at the expense of increased fabrication complexity, higher thermal budgets, and reduced scalability relative to solution-processed methods.
Table 2 provides a comparative overview of the principal NP-based material platforms currently explored for IR photodetection, highlighting the relationships among spectral tunability, carrier transport, synthesis strategies, and device-level performance. The comparison reveals that different NP systems occupy distinct performance niches, with no single material simultaneously optimizing spectral range, mobility, environmental stability, and manufacturability. PbS/PbX2 (X = Cl, Br, I) CQDs remain the dominant platform for NIR and SWIR detection due to their exceptional bandgap tunability through quantum confinement, strong optical absorption, and compatibility with low-temperature solution processing [56]. Their reported specific detectivities (D*) exceeding 1013 Jones at 1.55 µm and room temperature position them among the highest-performing solution-processed IR materials. However, device performance is strongly limited by surface trap states and ligand-induced tunneling barriers, which increase 1/f noise and reduce carrier mobility. Consequently, ligand engineering and surface passivation remain central to further performance improvements.
HgTe CQDs extend detection into the mid-wave infrared (MWIR), long-wave infrared (LWIR), and very-long-wave infrared (VLWIR) regions (3–12 µm), enabling room-temperature operation in spectral regimes traditionally dominated by epitaxially grown HgCdTe detectors [29,30,31]. Despite their strategic importance for thermal imaging and spectroscopy, HgTe CQDs generally exhibit lower mobilities (10−3–10−1 cm2/V·s) and higher dark currents than PbS-based systems because of their narrow bandgap and increased susceptibility to oxidation and trap-assisted tunneling. This illustrates a recurring trade-off in NP-based IR detectors: extending spectral coverage toward longer wavelengths often comes at the expense of transport stability and noise performance.
Plasmonic Au and Ag NPs operate through localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), fundamentally differing from semiconductor CQDs that rely on interband absorption [35,37,47]. Their primary advantage lies in ultrafast carrier dynamics (< 100 fs) and strong local electromagnetic field enhancement. However, plasmonic enhancement frequently improves responsivity more effectively than detectivity because thermal noise and inefficient hot-electron extraction limit the achievable signal-to-noise ratio. As a result, plasmonic architectures are more attractive for ultrafast photonic applications than for ultra-sensitive imaging systems. Among emerging two-dimensional (2D) materials, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) offer high carrier mobility (~102 cm2/V·s), broadband operation, and excellent mechanical flexibility, supporting IR detection up to 10 µm with D* values approaching 1011 Jones [42,57]. Nevertheless, the intrinsically weak optical absorption of graphene-derived materials necessitates optical confinement or plasmonic enhancement strategies. BP nanosheets exhibit high mobilities (102–103 cm2/V·s) and unique in-plane anisotropy, enabling polarization-sensitive photodetection across the 1–8 µm range [43,45]. However, rapid ambient degradation and oxidation remain major obstacles to large-scale deployment.
CsPbX3 perovskite nanocrystals (X = I, Br, Cl) showed excellent defect tolerance, high absorption coefficients, and rapid photoresponse in the visible-to-NIR region [47]. Yet, unlike PbS CQDs, their long-term operational reliability is hindered by ion migration and thermal instability. Similarly, topological insulator NPs such as Bi2Se3 provide broadband IR absorption enabled by protected surface states, although current device performance remains limited by synthesis complexity and impurity-related scattering [58].
In addition to colloidal and solution-processed NP systems, Si-compatible nanostructured photodetectors represent an important class of IR detection technologies due to their compatibility with mature CMOS manufacturing infrastructure. In particular, heterostructures based on self-organized Ge QDs grown on Si substrates and GeSiSn heterostructure photodiodes have attracted increasing attention for extending silicon photonics into the IR region. Unlike colloidal systems that rely primarily on solution-phase assembly, these architectures employ nanoscale heterostructure engineering through epitaxial growth and strain-driven self-organization. GeSi quantum dots are typically synthesized via the Stranski–Krastanov growth mode, producing nanoscale islands with quantum confinement effects and modified electronic band structures. The resulting heterostructures support interband and intraband optical transitions that enable photodetection from the NIR to the SWIR regime while maintaining compatibility with silicon platforms. Ge quantum-dot photodetectors also benefit from reduced lattice mismatch relative to III–V systems and enable monolithic integration with Si readout electronics and photonic circuits. Beyond Ge QDs, GeSiSn heterostructure photodiodes have emerged as a promising route for extending detection toward longer IR wavelengths through bandgap engineering. Incorporation of Sn reduces the bandgap and can promote direct-bandgap behavior at sufficient concentrations, enabling enhanced absorption and improved carrier collection in the SWIR and MWIR regions. GeSiSn structures additionally provide opportunities to improve spectral selectivity and reduce thermal leakage currents through engineered confinement. However, challenges remain in controlling strain relaxation, defect density, Sn segregation, and thermal stability during growth and processing. Although GeSi and GeSiSn platforms generally do not yet match the broad spectral tunability achievable with HgTe CQDs, their compatibility with wafer-scale fabrication and silicon photonics makes them attractive candidates for future integrated IR imaging and spectroscopic systems.
While the primary focus of this review remains NP-enabled fabrication approaches, these Si-compatible nanostructured platforms illustrate complementary pathways for integrating nanoscale IR absorbers with scalable electronic and photonic technologies.

3. Advances in Fabrication and Integration Techniques

3.1. Synthesis and Surface Engineering: From Lab to Fab

Modern hot-injection and cation-exchange methods enable precise CQD size control within 5% for narrow spectral response [59,60]. Continuous-flow synthesis enhances scalability, with segmented-flow droplet reactors producing PbS CQDs that showed an 85 meV photoluminescence linewidth at 1500 nm for sharper detector cut-offs [61]. Advances in ligand engineering, such as replacing long-chain oleic acid with shorter alternatives like halides or hybrid perovskites, improved inter-dot coupling and carrier mobility, enhancing photoconductive gain and responsivity [62,63]. Solid-state ligand exchange using gaseous formic acid (HCOOH) created a conductive Pb-formate matrix, achieving film mobility of 16 cm2/V·s, three orders of magnitude higher than conventional materials [64,65]. In situ spectroscopic techniques (FTIR, XPS) are commonly employed to measure ligand exchange efficiency and correlate it with trap-state density [66,67]. As illustrated in Figure 4, NP synthesis and surface engineering jointly determine the structural and electronic properties of the active layer by controlling particle size, surface defects, and interparticle coupling, which ultimately govern IR detector performance.

3.2. Deposition and Patterning Techniques: Enabling Large-Area Electronics

For deposition and patterning of NPs, a number of methods are available.
  • Spin-coating and blade-coating: Remain the conventional techniques for laboratory-scale and proof-of-concept devices. Recent research highlights the importance of solvent engineering and meniscus-guided coating methods to produce more uniform and thicker films [68,69]. For IR absorbers that necessitate thick films (> 500 nm), blade-coating with solvent mixtures (such as octane:butyronitrile) that create a “stick-slip” motion can yield highly uniform, pinhole-free CQD layers, thereby decreasing pixel non-uniformity in arrays to below 5% [70].
  • Inkjet printing and 3D aerosol jet printing: Enable digital and additive patterning of NP-based inks, facilitating the monolithic integration of multispectral pixel arrays onto flexible substrates or readout circuits. This marks a significant progress towards the creation of low-cost focal plane arrays (FPAs) [71,72,73]. The capability of aerosol jet printing to concentrate NP aerosol stream allows for the direct writing of CQD patterns with approximately 10 µm linewidth onto pre-patterned Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) readout integrated circuits (ROICs), which is a crucial advancement towards heterogeneous integration [74].
  • Layer-by-Layer (LbL) assembly & electrophoretic deposition (EPD): Provide exceptional control over the thickness and composition of films. EPD, which employs an applied electric field to propel charged NPs to an electrode, is especially effective in forming dense, tightly packed films of large HgTe CQDs for LWIR detection, enhancing packing density by around 30% compared to spin-coating [29,30,75,76,77].
  • Spray pyrolysis & electrospray deposition: These are innovative techniques for large-area, conformal coatings. Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis, in which a precursor mist is pyrolyzed on a heated substrate, can deposit high-quality, doped CQD films in a single step, paving the way for direct in situ doping during deposition [78].
Table 3 compares the principal thin-film deposition and patterning techniques used for fabricating NP-based IR photodetectors, evaluating each method in terms of working principle, scalability, film uniformity, resolution, and throughput. The table highlights the trade-offs between laboratory simplicity, industrial scalability, and patterning precision that ultimately determine their suitability for large-area or CMOS-integrated IR systems.
Table 3 also compares representative deposition and patterning strategies used for NP-based IR detectors; however, their importance extends beyond manufacturability because each method directly influences film morphology, interfacial quality, and ultimately detector performance. Processing conditions affect active-layer thickness, ligand removal efficiency, defect density, contact resistance, surface roughness, pixel uniformity, and compatibility with readout electronics, all of which govern responsivity, dark current, response speed, and specific detectivity (D*). Spin-coating remains the dominant method for laboratory-scale device fabrication because centrifugal spreading produces highly uniform thin films with precise thickness control and good wafer-scale reproducibility [75,76]. These characteristics support reduced surface roughness and stable junction formation, contributing to lower leakage current and improved D*. However, spin-coated films often require repeated deposition and post-treatment cycles for thicker absorbers, while material waste and limited scalability restrict translation to industrial manufacturing.
Blade (bar) coating enables meniscus-controlled film formation and is better suited for large-area and roll-to-roll processing [78]. Compared with spin-coating, blade-coated layers offer improved material utilization and greater control over thick-film deposition, which is beneficial for IR absorbers requiring extended optical path lengths. Nevertheless, film thickness gradients and solvent-drying effects must be controlled because local non-uniformity can increase trap density and generate pixel-to-pixel performance variation in detector arrays. Digital additive methods, including inkjet printing and aerosol jet printing, establish a stronger link between fabrication and system integration. Inkjet printing allows localized deposition and mask-free patterning with resolutions of approximately 20–50 µm, enabling direct fabrication of multispectral pixels and focal plane arrays (FPAs) [71,72,73,74,79]. Device performance is strongly influenced by droplet coalescence, coffee-ring effects, and solvent evaporation kinetics, which determine local thickness, ligand distribution, and electrical continuity. Aerosol jet printing further improves pattern resolution (~10 µm) and permits direct writing onto three-dimensional and CMOS-compatible substrates [74,80]. This capability reduces alignment complexity and supports heterogeneous integration with ROIC platforms, although optimization of surface roughness and contact resistance remains necessary for reproducible operation. Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) produces dense NP assemblies through electric-field-driven assembly and is particularly attractive for MWIR/LWIR devices that require thick absorbing layers [81]. The dense morphology can improve optical absorption and reduce void formation; however, excessive compaction may hinder ligand exchange and carrier extraction, increasing recombination losses and limiting response speed. Spray pyrolysis provides a scalable route for conformal deposition over large areas and supports doped or compositionally graded films [77,82]. Although throughput is high, thermal processing conditions strongly influence grain growth, interface quality, and defect formation. Maintaining uniform morphology is especially important for preserving low dark current and ensuring high manufacturing yield. Overall, fabrication should be viewed as a performance-defining parameter rather than merely a processing step. Future progress will depend on co-optimization of synthesis, deposition, post-processing, and device architecture to simultaneously achieve high D*, low noise, array uniformity, ROIC compatibility, and scalable manufacturing.

3.3. Device Architecture Innovations: Engineering the Charge Pathway

Different applications allow us to define different materials with different demands.
  • Photoconductors: This represents the fundamental architecture. The gain (G) in a photoconductor is expressed as G = τ/τt, where τ denotes the carrier lifetime, and τt signifies the transit time. In films composed of NPs, τ is notably influenced by trap states. By incorporating a minor proportion of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) into a PbS CQD film, percolation pathways for holes can be established, which enhances τ and enables gains exceeding 104, albeit with a reduction in response speed [83].
  • Photodiodes: The incorporation of CQD films into p–n or p–i–n junctions leads to a significant decrease in Idark. A key advancement is the implementation of graded heterojunctions, where the size of the CQD (bandgap) is progressively altered throughout the depletion region. This configuration generates a built-in quasi-electric field that facilitates carrier separation, thereby minimizing the reverse bias required for complete depletion and consequently reducing tunneling Idark [84]. Heterojunctions that utilize materials such as graphene or ZnO are the subject of extensive research [85,86,87].
  • Plasmon-enhanced and metamaterial detectors: The integration of shaped Au nanorods or nanoantennae with CQD channels leads to significant enhancements in the local field. Metasurfaces, which are periodic arrangements of resonant elements, can be engineered to achieve perfect absorption at a designated IR wavelength within an ultra-thin (< λ/10) CQD layer, significantly improving quantum efficiency without elevating noise levels [88].
  • Phototransistors and gate-modulated devices: The use of an NP-based film as the channel material in a field-effect transistor (FET) configuration permits direct control of gain through the gate voltage. PbSe CQD FET photodetectors have shown ultrahigh gain (> 105) and low noise-equivalent power (NEP) by functioning in the subthreshold regime, where the conductivity of the channel is exponentially responsive to changes in photo-induced gate potential [25,26,89,90].
Beyond single-pixel photodetectors, recent studies have demonstrated the scalability of CQD architectures toward array-based IR sensing systems and integrated spectrometers. A notable example is the development of HgTe CQD homojunction photodiode arrays integrated with Fabry–Perot resonant cavities for SWIR spectroscopy applications [91]. In these architectures, p-type, intrinsic (i), and n-type CQD layers form a p-i-n homojunction structure that improves carrier collection efficiency and suppresses interfacial carrier loss compared with conventional heterojunction designs. The incorporation of resonant cavity structures further enhances optical absorption and spectral selectivity while maintaining room-temperature operation. Using this strategy, 256-channel CQD detector arrays covering the 1.4–2.5 µm spectral range with spectral reconstruction capability approaching 7 nm resolution have been reported, highlighting the potential of NP-based detector arrays for compact and low-cost integrated IR spectrometers [91].
Figure 5 schematically shows the fabrication of a photodetector using various techniques.
Table 4 provides a comparative overview of the principal device architectures employed in NP-based IR detectors, summarizing their operating mechanisms, key performance metrics, inherent advantages, and dominant noise or fabrication challenges. The table highlights how architectural design plays a decisive role in balancing responsivity (R), detectivity, speed, and system complexity. The photoconductor represents the simplest implementation, operating through photogenerated conductivity modulation under an applied bias. It typically delivers high R and photoconductive gain, making it attractive for proof-of-concept devices [16,92]. In both APD and SPAD architectures, spectral selectivity is generally governed by the absorber material and optical coupling design rather than the avalanche process itself; therefore, integration with wavelength-selective NP layers and resonant optical structures offers a route toward spectrally engineered high-gain IR detection.
However, performance is often limited by pronounced low-frequency 1/f noise and slow response times (τ) due to trap-mediated carrier dynamics in NPs. In contrast, the p–i–n photodiode relies on built-in electric field separation of photocarriers within a depletion region, enabling low Idark, fast response, and photovoltaic operation without external gain. Key parameters include specific detectivity (D*), external quantum efficiency (EQE), and responsivity (R). Although this architecture offers superior noise performance compared to photoconductors, it requires more complex fabrication and careful control of interface trap states to suppress recombination and tunneling currents [93,94]. Plasmonic hot-electron detectors exploit localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) to generate energetic carriers that overcome a Schottky barrier [95,96]. These devices exhibit ultrafast response times and enable sub-bandgap detection, making them attractive for high-speed and narrowband applications. However, their ηIQE is typically low, and thermal noise can limit detectivity. The hybrid heterojunction architecture integrates NPs with complementary materials such as graphene, ZnO, or perovskites, to engineer band alignment and facilitate efficient charge separation [46,97,104]. This design supports broadband and multifunctional detection, including extended spectral coverage and enhanced responsivity. The primary challenge lies in minimizing interfacial recombination and controlling defect states at heterogeneous interfaces. Phototransistor (FET)-based detectors incorporate NP-based films as the channel material within a field-effect geometry, enabling gate-modulated conductivity [98,99]. These devices can achieve extremely high gain and specific detectivity, particularly when operated in the subthreshold regime. Nevertheless, issues such as gate hysteresis, bias instability, and long-term reliability remain significant concerns. Finally, metamaterial absorber architectures use resonant cavity or metasurface designs to achieve near-unity absorption within ultra-thin NP layers [100,101]. Performance is often characterized by absorption percentage and quality factor (Q-factor). While these structures dramatically enhance light–matter interaction without increasing film thickness, they are typically narrowband and involve larger fabrication complexity.
Although NP synthesis and deposition methods are commonly discussed as independent processing steps, their influence extends directly to detector-level performance. Parameters including nanocrystal size dispersion, ligand composition, film thickness, packing density, and post-deposition treatment determine charge transport, optical absorption, dark current, and device reproducibility. Consequently, fabrication choices strongly influence specific detectivity (D*), responsivity (R), response speed, and manufacturability. Synthetic routes affect defect formation and surface chemistry at the nanocrystal level. For example, hot-injection synthesis typically produces highly monodisperse CQDs, reducing energetic disorder and improving carrier transport, whereas scalable continuous-flow approaches improve batch reproducibility and support industrial implementation. Surface ligand engineering further governs interparticle spacing and electronic coupling; shorter inorganic or mixed ligands generally improve mobility but may reduce environmental stability. Deposition and patterning methods additionally determine active-layer morphology and integration compatibility. Uniform coating methods reduce thickness variation and improve pixel-to-pixel consistency, while direct-write techniques facilitate monolithic integration with readout integrated circuits (ROICs). Therefore, fabrication optimization should be considered a central determinant of detector performance rather than merely a processing step.

4. Performance Benchmarks, Noise Analysis, and System Integration

HgTe CQD photodiodes now achieve D* > 1010 Jones at room temperature in the 3–5 µm MWIR range, approaching cooled MCT detector benchmarks [29,30,31,105,106,107]. For NP photodiodes, D* = R√AΔf/in, where R is responsivity, A is detector area, Δf is bandwidth, and in is the total noise current [108]. PbS CQD photodiodes exceed 1013 Jones in the SWIR (1–2 µm) [109,110]. Plasmonic hot-electron detectors offer ultrafast response times < 1 ps despite lower responsivity [111]. NP integration with silicon photonics and CMOS ROICs advances practical applications [112,113,114]. Direct inkjet printing of PbS CQD arrays onto CMOS ROIC wafers has produced 320 × 256 SWIR imaging systems with NETD < 50 mK [115]. The specific detectivity D∗ is a normalized sensitivity metric that accounts for detector area and measurement bandwidth, enabling comparison between devices of different geometries. In practice, reported D∗ values may vary substantially depending on whether the noise current is experimentally measured or estimated from dark-current-limited shot noise assumptions. Consequently, direct comparison between different studies should be approached cautiously unless measurement conditions, bandwidth, modulation frequency, and noise evaluation methodologies are explicitly specified.
Table 5 summarizes selected state-of-the-art performance metrics reported for representative NP-based IR photodetectors across different material systems, device architectures, and spectral regions. The comparison includes spectral coverage, specific detectivity (D*), responsivity (R), operating temperature, response time (τ), and structural configuration, offering a comprehensive benchmark of current technological capabilities. PbS CQD photodiodes operating in the SWIR (1–2 µm) showed detectivities exceeding 1011 Jones at room temperature, with responsivities ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 A/W and microsecond-scale response times [116]. Their implementation in p–n heterojunctions on silicon highlights compatibility with CMOS platforms and strong potential for low-cost imaging arrays.
HgTe CQD photodiodes extend detection from visible into the SWIR (< 2.8 µm), while maintaining room-temperature operation. With D* values on the order of 1011 Jones and microsecond response speeds [117,124]. Plasmonic Au/graphene/Au Schottky structures showed exceptionally high detectivity (2.4 × 1013 Jones) and ultrafast response of about 360 ns, although responsivity (R) remains relatively low (~10−3 A/W) [118]. These devices highlight the trade-off between speed and quantum efficiency inherent in hot-carrier-based architectures. Hybrid systems such as graphene–PbS CQD photoconductors achieve extraordinarily high R values (up to 107 A/W) due to photogating effects and internal gain mechanisms [119]. However, their response times are typically in the millisecond regime, reflecting gain–speed trade-offs. D* values around 1010 Jones indicate strong sensitivity but with higher noise contributions compared to photovoltaic architectures. The CsPbI3/PbS bulk heterojunction photodetector showed an exceptionally high reported specific detectivity approaching 4.5 × 1013 Jones at room temperature near 1.55 µm under low-bias operation [120]. However, this value should be interpreted cautiously because the detectivity was derived using dark-current-based noise estimation rather than direct experimental noise spectral measurements. In addition, the reported performance was obtained under optimized laboratory conditions and has not yet been broadly reproduced across independent studies. While the result highlights the strong potential of hybrid perovskite/CQD architectures for visible-to-SWIR photodetection, it currently represents an outlier rather than a universally established benchmark. The unusually high D* likely originates from the combined effects of efficient charge separation, suppressed recombination at the bulk heterojunction interface, and photoconductive gain mechanisms. Nevertheless, further studies employing standardized noise characterization protocols and statistically reproducible device datasets are required before direct comparison with mature HgTe or PbS CQD technologies can be made. For LWIR (8–18 µm) detection, HgTe CQD operating as photoconductors exhibit detectivity approaching 6.6 × 108 Jones at 80 K with microsecond response times, marking significant progress toward LWIR operation [121]. Finally, nanostructured PbSe–MoS2 perfect absorber architectures showed high responsivity (137.6 A/W) and detectivity (~7.7 × 1010 Jones) in the 2–3 µm range, leveraging resonant cavity enhancement to maximize absorption in ultra-thin active layers [122].
Cross-comparison of the reported performance metrics must be approached carefully because D*, R, and τ strongly depend on measurement wavelength, modulation frequency, detector area, applied bias, operating temperature, and noise extraction methodology. In several reports, detectivity values were estimated from shot-noise-limited Idark assumptions rather than measured noise spectra, which can significantly overestimate practical detector performance. Furthermore, architectures exhibiting extremely high R values often rely on photogating or trap-assisted gain mechanisms that inherently increase τ and 1/f noise. Consequently, direct ranking across photodiodes, photoconductors, phototransistors, and plasmonic detectors may be misleading unless measurement conditions are normalized. This highlights the need for standardized benchmarking protocols in NP-based IR photodetector research.
Figure 6 illustrates a representative architecture of an NP-based IR photodetector and highlights the sequential processes that convert incident IR radiation into an electrical signal. The device consists of an active NP layer deposited between charge-selective transport layers and contacted by top and bottom electrodes integrated on a supporting substrate. Incoming IR photons are absorbed within the NP film, where size-dependent electronic structure and quantum confinement enable tunable spectral sensitivity across different IR regions. Following photon absorption, electron–hole pairs are generated and separated either by an externally applied electric field or by the built-in potential of a junction structure. Efficient charge transport depends strongly on interparticle coupling, ligand chemistry, carrier mobility, and the density of trap states within the NP solid. Surface passivation and controlled ligand exchange are therefore essential to suppress recombination and reduce dark current (Idark). The extracted carriers are collected at the electrodes and converted into a measurable electrical output, typically characterized through responsivity (R), specific detectivity (D*), response time, and noise-equivalent power (NEP). The figure also emphasizes that device performance emerges from the coupling of multiple design levels, including NP material selection, surface engineering, film deposition quality, interface design, and device architecture, rather than from material properties alone. This multiscale interaction explains why fabrication strategy directly influences final detector sensitivity, selectivity, speed, and scalability.
Operating temperature is one of the most important variables governing IR detector performance because specific detectivity (D*), dark current (Idark), response speed, and noise mechanisms are strongly T-dependent. Although room-temperature operation is frequently highlighted as an advantage of NP-based detectors, direct comparison across detector platforms requires careful normalization with respect to spectral region, measurement conditions, and cooling requirements. In general, reducing operating temperature suppresses thermally generated carriers and decreases dark current, leading to improved D*. However, lower temperatures may also modify carrier mobility, trap occupancy, recombination dynamics, and response kinetics. In NP solids, transport frequently occurs through thermally activated hopping and tunneling mechanisms; therefore, excessive cooling may not always yield proportional performance improvements. For SWIR devices (~0.9–2.5 µm), PbS and related CQD photodiodes often achieve high room-temperature D* values (> 1011–1013 Jones) due to relatively low thermal carrier generation and favorable bandgap energies. In contrast, MWIR (3–5 µm) and LWIR (> 8 µm) operation requires narrower bandgap materials, making dark current increasingly dominant at room temperature and often necessitating cooling strategies. Comparison between NP-based detectors and conventional IR technologies such as HgCdTe (MCT) and III–V superlattice detectors should be interpreted carefully because performance depends strongly on spectral regime and operating temperature. For SWIR detection, room-temperature NP detectors increasingly approach practical performance levels required for imaging and spectroscopy while offering advantages in solution processability and CMOS compatibility. However, for MWIR and particularly LWIR applications, cooled MCT detectors continue to provide superior detectivity and lower noise under equivalent measurement conditions. For example, state-of-the-art cooled MCT focal plane arrays routinely achieve D* values exceeding 1011–1012 Jones in the MWIR and LWIR ranges under cryogenic operation, whereas room-temperature HgTe CQD systems typically report lower detectivity and narrower operating windows. Therefore, room-temperature NP detector operation should not be interpreted as a direct replacement of cooled MCT systems but rather as an alternative pathway for applications prioritizing cost, integration flexibility, compactness, and reduced system complexity.

5. Critical Challenges, Foundational Limits, and Emerging Frontiers

Despite the significant advancements outlined in earlier sections, the journey towards the broad commercialization of NP-based IR detectors is hindered by various interconnected scientific and engineering obstacles. A thorough examination of these challenges, based on recent scholarly work, is crucial for steering future investigations.

5.1. Material Stability Beyond Surface Passivation

The intrinsic instability of narrow-bandgap nanomaterials, especially HgTe CQDs and black phosphorus (BP), continues to be a major constraint. Although halide passivation greatly enhances the longevity of PbS CQDs [15], HgTe CQDs are prone to oxidation and decomposition through the reaction HgTe + O2 → Hg0 + TeO2, which compromises the crystal structure and optical characteristics [31]. Recent approaches have moved beyond static encapsulation. In situ development of conformal wider-bandgap shells (e.g., CdS on CdTe) via cation exchange forms quasi-type-II core/shell structures that protect the core while promoting charge extraction, prolonging operational lifespan by an order of magnitude [123]. However, these methods often introduce new interfacial defect states. In operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy is essential to link chemical degradation pathways with real-time device performance degradation [125]. Figure 7 presents a comparative overview of the principal performance metrics used to evaluate IR photodetectors and illustrates the multidimensional trade-offs that govern detector optimization. The figure highlights key parameters, including specific detectivity (D*), responsivity (R), response time (τ), noise-equivalent power (NEP), spectral selectivity, dark current (Idark), and operating temperature, emphasizing that detector performance cannot be assessed through a single metric alone.
Specific detectivity (D*) represents the ability of a detector to distinguish weak optical signals from noise and is strongly influenced by dark current and noise sources. Responsivity (R) quantifies the electrical output generated per unit optical input and reflects the efficiency of photon absorption, carrier generation, and collection. Response time characterizes the speed of detector operation and determines suitability for dynamic imaging and high-frequency sensing applications. NEP defines the minimum detectable optical signal and is inversely related to sensitivity. The figure further emphasizes that these parameters are interdependent and often involve competing trade-offs. For example, increasing internal gain can enhance R but may simultaneously increase response time and noise, while extending operation toward longer IR wavelengths often introduces higher Idark and reduced D*. Temperature also plays a critical role because lower operating temperatures suppress thermally generated carriers and improve D*, particularly in MWIR and LWIR detectors.

5.2. Dark Current (Idark) and Noise: Probing the Microscopic Origins

The Idark present in NP-based photodiodes consists of a combination of diffusion, generation-recombination (G–R), and trap-assisted tunneling (TAT) components. Although the p–i–n architecture mitigates diffusion current, TAT current, represented by ITAT∝exp (−Et/kT), where Et denotes the trap energy level, frequently prevails in mid-IR devices [126]. The design known as the “bulk barrier” or “graded heterojunction” [127] is a complex architectural solution. By manipulating a spatially varying composition, it establishes a progressively increasing electron affinity that functions as an energy filter, effectively obstructing one type of carrier and reducing TAT. Recent simulations that integrate density functional theory (DFT) with nonequilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) formalism have refined these graded profiles, forecasting a decrease in Idark by a factor of 100 in comparison to abrupt junctions [128]. Additionally, low-frequency 1/f noise, which is prevalent in disordered NP solids, has been directly associated with fluctuations in charge carrier numbers due to trapping and detrapping at interface states. Measurements of correlated noise and admittance spectroscopy indicate that ligand-exchange processes aimed at minimizing mid-gap states, for instance, utilizing metal chalcogenide complexes, are more effective than those that solely enhance mobility [129].

5.3. Charge Transport and Mobility

The mobility of carriers (μ) in a CQD solid is constrained by two primary factors: the tunneling barrier that exists between the dots, which is influenced by the inter-dot distance and the dielectric constant of the ligands, and the energetic disorder, which is determined by the distribution of sizes and the uniformity of surface traps. The quest for so-called mono-atomic ligands such as S2−, I−, or NH2− has proven to be revolutionary, as it has decreased the inter-dot spacing to less than 1 nm and facilitated band-like transport with mobilities surpassing 10 cm2/V·s for electrons [130]. Nevertheless, a new approach highlights the importance of mixed ligand shells [131]. In this work, a composite passivation layer that includes a short conductive ligand such as formate, HCOO−, to enhance transport, along with a longer, cross-linkable ligand such as mercaptopropionic acid, to provide mechanical stability, has resulted in films exhibiting high mobility (μ > 5 cm2/V·s) and remarkable durability against solvent processing [131]. To understand the charge percolation pathway in these hybrid solids, sophisticated techniques like conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) can be used to map the variations in the nanoscale conductivity [132].

5.4. Scalability and Uniformity: From Wafers to Webs

Transitioning from lab-scale spin-coating to high-throughput manufacturing is complex. Blade-coating and slot-die coating provide excellent thickness control over large areas [133], but maintaining uniformity in nanocrystal size and ligand coverage during continuous deposition remains difficult. Convergent synthesis methods, which more rigorously distinguish nucleation and growth phases, produce CQDs with narrower size distributions (< 4%) that resist Ostwald ripening, enhancing pixel-to-pixel uniformity in coated arrays [134]. Electrohydrodynamic jet printing achieves sub-micron resolution and prints high-viscosity NP inks for direct patterning of multilayer device stacks without masks [135]. Combining these deposition techniques with in-line optical spectroscopy for real-time process monitoring represents the next advancement in process control [136].

5.5. Emerging Frontiers: New Materials and Novel Concepts

Lead-free III–V colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) have attracted significant attention for near-infrared (NIR) to short-wave infrared (SWIR) photodetection applications [137]. Some examples have been studied for this purpose. AgBiS2 nanocrystals show broadband absorption but lower defect tolerance [138]. InAs CQDs offer SWIR tunability but suffer from high surface trap densities [139]. Cation-ordered double perovskites (e.g., Cs2AgBiBr6) provide stable, low-toxicity materials, though band gaps remain too wide for IR detection [140].
Neuromorphic computing: Memristive properties of certain NPs (e.g., perovskites under bias) enable devices integrating photodetection with synaptic plasticity, where photocurrent history influences conductance to facilitate image preprocessing (e.g., edge detection) at the sensor level [141,142].
Multispectral/polarimetric detection: Mixing NP inks enables multispectral pixels. Inkjet printing of different-sized CQDs (1.2, 1.5, and 2.0 µm) into single pixels has been achieved [143]. Anisotropic optical characteristics of aligned 2D nanosheets like BP permit filterless polarization detection [144,145].
Fundamental limits: As NP devices approach bulk semiconductor performance, questions emerge about ultimate detectivity limits from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and whether topological insulator NPs can utilize protected surface states for noiseless transport [146].
Table 6 summarizes the major scientific and technological barriers limiting the performance and commercialization of NP-based IR detectors, together with state-of-the-art mitigation strategies, their impact on device metrics, and critical future research directions. The table highlights that progress in this field requires coordinated advances in materials chemistry, device physics, and scalable integration technologies. Material stability remains one of the most pressing concerns. NP systems, particularly HgTe CQDs and halide perovskites, are vulnerable to oxidation, ligand desorption, and ion migration. Approaches such as inorganic shell growth, cross-linked or hybrid ligand systems, and atomic layer deposition (ALD) encapsulation have significantly improved environmental robustness, extending operational lifetimes from only a few hours to more than 1000 h under controlled conditions [144,145].
Deeper insight into degradation pathways via in operando characterization and predictive modeling is still required. Electronic noise (high Idark, 1/f noise, trap-assisted tunneling) fundamentally constrains D* [141]. Graded heterojunctions, bulk blocking layers, and trap-passivating ligands have reduced Idark by 2–3 orders of magnitude and lowered NEP. Future work should correlate microscopic defect states with macroscopic noise via advanced spectroscopy and DFT-based trap modeling. Charge transport limitations from low mobility and energetic disorder limit speed and sensitivity [147]. Mono-atomic/mixed ligand exchange, doping, and energy-level alignment have increased mobility from ~10−3 to > 10 cm2/V·s. However, spatial heterogeneity in transport requires nanoscale mapping (C-AFM, TEM-EELS). Scalability challenges include film non-uniformity, limited throughput, and insufficient pattern resolution for FPAs [148]. Slot-die coating, blade coating, Electrohydrodynamic printing, and convergent synthesis enable uniform films > 100 cm2 with < 5% pixel variation. Industrial adaptation requires in-line metrology and roll-to-roll integration. Pb/Hg toxicity drives development of Pb-free alternatives; Ag2Se/SiO2/Si heterojunctions show D* > 1010 Jones in SWIR [149]. Novel functionality expansion via multispectral inkjet printing and neuromorphic NP-based devices enables hyperspectral imaging and in-sensor preprocessing [150]. Future advances require co-design, integrating materials development, device engineering, and computational algorithms.
Table 7 presents a strategic roadmap outlining emerging research priorities aimed at advancing NP-based IR detectors beyond current performance and integration limits. The table connects specific research focus areas with their technological goals, enabling approaches, anticipated performance impact, and remaining technical challenges. A central priority is stable surface chemistry, where the goal is to extend operational lifetime under ambient conditions [151]. Emerging strategies such as dynamic ligand exchange and self-healing surface passivation layers aim to provide more than a tenfold improvement in air stability. However, preserving high electrical conductivity while implementing robust passivation remains a major challenge, as stronger surface binding often reduces carrier mobility.
In the area of noise suppression, efforts focus on reducing the noise-equivalent power (NEP) and increasing specific detectivity (D*). Defect-engineered CQDs combined with advanced, noise-filtered readout circuits are projected to enable room-temperature detectivities exceeding 1013 Jones [152]. Yet, interface charge trapping and defect-induced fluctuations continue to limit low-frequency noise performance. Quantum transport and tunneling control represent another frontier, targeting band-like carrier transport in NPs. Mixed ligand strategies techniques seek to reduce energetic disorder and increase carrier mobility beyond 10 cm2/V·s [153]. Achieving this requires overcoming structural disorder and maintaining long-range electronic coupling across the NP assemblies. Scalable manufacturing is essential for commercialization. Transitioning from batch processing to roll-to-roll production with in-line metrology and robotic ink formulation promises low-cost, large-area IR sensor fabrication [154]. However, film homogeneity and reproducibility across industrial scales remain primary technical barriers.
Figure 8 depicts a roadmap of the evolution of NP-based IR detection technologies from early proof-of-concept demonstrations to future intelligent sensing platforms. The timeline highlights the transition from fundamental material exploration toward system-level integration and application-oriented development within about 20 years.
The first stage (early exploration in the years 2000–2010) focused primarily on demonstrating the feasibility of NP photoconductors for IR detection, establishing the foundational concepts of solution-processable photodetectors. The second stage (material advances, 2010–2016) emphasized improvements in NP synthesis, composition control, and surface stabilization, particularly for colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) such as PbS and HgTe, enabling enhanced optical absorption, spectral tunability, and environmental stability. The third phase (device engineering, 2016–2020) marked the emergence of advanced architectures, including heterojunction photodiodes, PIN structures [124], and phototransistors designed to improve carrier extraction, reduce dark current, and enhance specific detectivity (D*). Subsequently, the array & imaging stage (2020 to present) reflects the shift toward scalable device integration, including focal plane arrays (FPAs), multispectral imaging systems, and compact spectrometer platforms based on NP detector arrays. Finally, the roadmap projects future directions toward Intelligent & Integrated Systems, where NP-based IR detectors are expected to combine with artificial intelligence, heterogeneous electronics integration, neuromorphic sensing concepts, and multifunctional imaging platforms. Overall, the figure shows how progress across materials, fabrication, device design, and system integration collectively drives the transition of NP-based IR detectors from laboratory-scale research to practical sensing technologies.
Driven by environmental regulations such as the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) [155,156], lead-free alternatives such as AgBiS2, Ag2Se, InAs, and perovskite derivatives are being explored. Although these materials demonstrated competitive detectivity (D* > 1010 Jones in some SWIR devices), they face challenges including lower carrier mobility, higher defect densities, and limited spectral tunability compared to Pb/Hg-based CQDs. Achieving high performance while maintaining RoHS compliance remains a key research direction [156,157].
Emerging paradigms such as neuromorphic and intelligent sensing aim to integrate detection and signal processing. Perovskite memristive pixels and optoelectronic synapses offer real-time edge computing at the sensor level [104,157]. Challenges remain in scalability, reproducibility, and system-level integration. Multispectral and polarimetric systems using printed heteropixel arrays and anisotropic 2D NPs enable filterless multispectral and polarization-sensitive detection [158], though minimizing pixel crosstalk and maintaining spectral selectivity are ongoing priorities.
Figure 9 summarizes the future outlook and remaining challenges for NP-based IR detection technologies by presenting the balance between technological opportunities and the barriers that must be overcome for large-scale implementation. The left side highlights emerging opportunities, including the development of lead-free and environmentally friendly nanomaterials, scalable large-area and solution-based fabrication routes, integration with CMOS platforms and flexible electronics, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) for computational imaging and intelligent signal processing. These advances are expected to expand the application space of NP-based IR detectors into areas such as the Internet of Things (IoT), wearable sensing, space technologies, biomedical diagnostics, and compact spectroscopic systems. The right side illustrates the principal challenges limiting commercialization and widespread adoption. These include carrier trapping and associated low-frequency (1/f) noise, environmental instability and oxidation of sensitive nanomaterials, difficulties in achieving high device uniformity and reproducibility over large areas, limitations associated with forming low-resistance and stable electrical contacts, and the need for cost-effective manufacturing processes. Together, these factors emphasize that future progress will require coordinated optimization across materials design, fabrication processes, device engineering, and system-level integration to achieve high-performance, scalable, and reliable IR detection technologies.

5.6. Critical Analysis of Performance Trade-Offs in NP-Based IR Detectors

One of the central trade-offs in NP-based IR photodetectors is the inverse relationship between photoconductive gain and response speed. Photoconductors and phototransistors often achieve exceptionally high responsivity through photogating effects and long carrier lifetimes associated with trap-mediated charge separation. In graphene–CQD hybrids, for example, trapped carriers can modulate channel conductivity for extended durations, producing internal gain values exceeding 106–107. However, these same long-lived trap states slow carrier recombination dynamics and increase response times from the microsecond to millisecond regime. Consequently, devices optimized for ultrahigh gain often exhibit limited modulation bandwidth and poor suitability for high-frame-rate imaging applications. In contrast, photovoltaic architectures such as p–i–n photodiodes typically sacrifice gain to achieve lower noise and faster operation. This trade-off highlights the importance of balancing gain mechanisms with carrier extraction kinetics depending on the target application.

5.6.1. Gain–Bandwidth Trade-Off in Photoconductive Architectures

The relationship between surface chemistry and electronic noise remains one of the defining challenges in CQD-based IR detectors. Surface ligands are essential for colloidal stability and solution processability, yet long organic ligands introduce tunneling barriers that reduce carrier mobility and increase energetic disorder. Incomplete ligand exchange additionally creates surface trap states that promote carrier trapping/detrapping processes, which are widely recognized as the origin of 1/f noise in NP solids. Although shorter inorganic or hybrid ligands improve charge transport, aggressive ligand removal can simultaneously increase surface defect density and compromise environmental stability. As a result, optimization of ligand chemistry requires balancing conductivity, passivation quality, and long-term device reliability. Recent strategies involving mixed-ligand systems, atomic ligands, and inorganic shell passivation have demonstrated reduced dark current and suppressed low-frequency noise, but the microscopic correlation between defect states and noise spectra remains insufficiently understood.

5.6.2. Plasmonic Enhancement: Responsivity (R) Versus Detectivity (D*)

Plasmonic nanostructures significantly enhance local electromagnetic fields and optical absorption through localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). While this enhancement frequently increases responsivity (R), it does not necessarily translate into proportional improvements in specific detectivity (D*). In many plasmonic hot-electron devices, optical gain is accompanied by increased thermal noise, Schottky leakage current, or nonequilibrium carrier scattering losses. Consequently, devices exhibiting strong R enhancement may still possess moderate D* values if the associated noise current is also increased. Furthermore, plasmonic enhancement is often highly wavelength- and geometry-dependent, limiting broadband performance. Therefore, the practical value of plasmonic architectures depends not only on field enhancement magnitude but also on whether noise generation and carrier extraction efficiencies can be simultaneously controlled.

5.6.3. Limitations of Hot-Electron Internal Quantum Efficiency

Despite strong local-field enhancement in plasmonic nanostructures, the internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of hot-electron IR detectors generally remains low. This limitation originates from several competing ultrafast processes. Following plasmon excitation, most absorbed energy rapidly dissipates through electron–electron and electron–phonon scattering before energetic carriers can overcome the Schottky barrier. In addition, only a small fraction of generated hot carriers possess both sufficient energy and appropriate momentum for successful injection across the metal–semiconductor interface. Momentum mismatch, interfacial defects, and short carrier mean free paths further reduce collection efficiency. Consequently, although plasmonic devices achieve ultrafast temporal response, their conversion efficiency remains substantially lower than that of conventional semiconductor photodiodes.

5.6.4. Practical Challenges in Neuromorphic NP-Based IR Detectors

Neuromorphic NP-based photodetectors represent an emerging direction that combines sensing, memory, and signal preprocessing within a single device platform. Although proof-of-concept demonstrations have shown optoelectronic synaptic behavior and wavelength-selective memory effects, several practical limitations remain unresolved. Device endurance under repeated switching cycles is often limited by ion migration, trap-state evolution, or structural degradation. Retention times and conductance linearity also vary substantially between devices, complicating reliable analog signal processing. Furthermore, significant device-to-device variability arising from stochastic nanomaterial assembly and interface disorder currently limits large-scale reproducibility. As a result, neuromorphic NP-based detectors remain at an early exploratory stage, and substantial advances in materials uniformity, defect engineering, and fabrication control are necessary before practical deployment in edge-computing imaging systems becomes feasible.
Overall, these trade-offs show that optimization of NP-based IR detectors cannot rely on maximizing a single performance metric. Improvements in responsivity, gain, spectral range, or speed are frequently coupled to penalties in noise, stability, reproducibility, or manufacturability. Future progress therefore requires co-design strategies integrating materials chemistry, interface engineering, device physics, and system-level considerations rather than isolated optimization of individual parameters.

5.7. Environmental, Stability, and Manufacturability Considerations for NP-Based IR Detectors

Although PbS and HgTe CQDs remain the benchmark materials for high-performance NP-based IR photodetectors, their practical deployment raises important concerns beyond detector performance alone. Lead- and mercury-containing systems provide excellent spectral tunability, mature colloidal synthesis routes, and currently deliver the highest room-temperature specific detectivity (D*) across SWIR to LWIR regimes. However, these materials face increasing challenges related to environmental impact, long-term stability, and large-scale manufacturability. From an environmental and regulatory perspective, both Pb- and Hg-based CQDs are subject to restrictions associated with hazardous substances and electronic waste regulations, including RoHS-related considerations for commercial deployment. Encapsulation strategies and sealed-device architectures can reduce direct exposure risks, but they introduce additional fabrication complexity, increase cost, and may complicate recycling and end-of-life processing. Material stability is another major limitation. PbS CQDs commonly suffer from oxidation and ligand desorption, which generate surface trap states and increase dark current over time. HgTe CQDs are particularly sensitive to air and moisture exposure. Encapsulation approaches based on atomic layer deposition (ALD), inorganic shell growth, and cross-linked ligand networks improve operational lifetime but often introduce transport penalties through increased carrier barriers or reduced mobility. Manufacturability also remains challenging. High-performing CQD devices typically require tightly controlled ligand exchange, oxygen-free processing, and multilayer deposition protocols to maintain reproducibility across large areas. These requirements complicate wafer-scale integration and may reduce fabrication yield compared with mature epitaxial semiconductor technologies.
Lead-free alternatives including AgBiS2, Ag2Se, InAs, Si-compatible nanostructures, and perovskite-derived materials are being actively explored to improve sustainability and regulatory compliance. Nevertheless, these systems generally remain behind PbS and HgTe in detector performance. Their lower performance is attributed to a combination of (i) reduced carrier mobility due to less favorable band transport pathways, (ii) higher defect and trap densities that increase recombination and noise, (iii) more limited bandgap tunability restricting spectral coverage into MWIR/LWIR regions, and (iv) less mature surface passivation chemistries that hinder efficient charge extraction. As a result, while several lead-free systems already showed D* values exceeding 1010 Jones in SWIR operation, they have not yet consistently matched the combination of detectivity, stability, and spectral breadth achieved by optimized PbS and HgTe platforms.
Future progress will likely depend not only on discovering alternative compositions but also on developing defect-tolerant electronic structures, improved ligand chemistries, and scalable encapsulation methods that preserve both environmental compatibility and device performance.

6. Conclusions and Outlook

This thorough review has attempted to trace the transformative evolution of NP-based technologies, transitioning from laboratory curiosities to promising candidates in the realm of IR detection. We have elaborated on how colloidal quantum dots (CQDs), plasmonic metal NPs, and novel low-dimensional materials, through precise synthetic control, provide unmatched spectral tunability ranging from the short-wave to the very-long wavelength IR, an achievement that traditional bulk semiconductors cannot replicate. In addition to materials, the review has rigorously examined the collaborative advancement of fabrication techniques, encompassing high-precision continuous-flow synthesis, atomic-scale ligand engineering, and scalable deposition methods such as blade-coating and additive digital printing. These innovations collectively facilitate the design of advanced device architectures ranging from low-noise photodiodes and ultrafast plasmonic detectors to gate-tunable phototransistors that are expanding the limits of responsivity, detectivity, and operational speed.
Nevertheless, the journey towards widespread technological adoption and the market displacement of established technologies is not solely an engineering challenge; it signifies a fundamental frontier in materials science. The primary limitations, such as environmental instability of narrow-gap nanocrystals, the ongoing trade-off between charge transport and trap-state density, and the integration gap with metal–oxide–semiconductors (CMOS), are intricately linked to the nanoscale physics of surfaces, interfaces, and disorder [159]. Consequently, future advancements necessitate a paradigm shift from empirical optimization to predictive, physics-informed design. This involves utilizing first-principles calculations and machine learning to identify new, stable material compositions and surface passivating agents (ligands) [97,111], employing in situ and in operando spectroscopic tools to trace degradation pathways in real-time [96], and creating multiscale models that relate atomic-scale defects to macroscopic device noise [80,98]. The primary objective is to create NP solids not merely as random assemblies but as meticulously engineered “meta-materials” that possess specific charge transport and optoelectronic characteristics. The future perspective goes beyond mere incremental enhancements in performance. We foresee the integration of NP-based IR detectors with various technological advancements, such as heterogeneous integration with silicon photonics for on-chip spectroscopy [108,109], neuromorphic engineering aimed at developing sensors with built-in preprocessing capabilities for edge computing [92,112], and the creation of sustainable, heavy-metal-free active materials to tackle environmental and regulatory issues [110]. The unique solution-processability and flexibility of NPs make them particularly suitable for applications in wearable health monitoring, distributed environmental sensor networks, and lightweight, low-power imaging systems for autonomous vehicles and drones.
In conclusion, the field is at a pivotal moment. The upcoming years will not be characterized by the question of whether NP-based IR detectors can function but rather by the efficiency and reliability of their manufacturing and integration into larger systems. Future success will depend on ongoing, interdisciplinary collaboration among chemists, physicists, materials scientists, and engineers. By adopting a co-design approach that connects material properties, device architecture, and fabrication processes from the beginning, the aspiration for high-performance, low-cost, and versatile IR sensing, previously limited to high-end defense and scientific applications, can transform into a widespread reality, opening new avenues in safety, health, and our comprehension of the world.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

Schematic and conceptual figures presented in this review were generated using ChatGPT (GPT-5, OpenAI) with its integrated AI-based image generation tool. The figures were designed to visually summarize concepts and fabrication pathways discussed in the text. All illustrations were subsequently manually modified by the authors to ensure scientific accuracy, clarity, and originality. No part of the figures is thus subject to copyright issues. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication. The authors also thank all collaborators and colleagues who contributed through technical discussions and manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

Mahboubeh Dolatyari and Ali Rostami were employed by Nareks Company and ASEPE Company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Argirusisyap, N.; Achilleos, A.; Alizadeh, N.; Argirusis, C.; Sourkouni, G. IR Sensors, Related Materials, and Applications. Sensors 2025, 25, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Bansal, S.; Jain, A.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, P.R.; Prakash, K.; Soliman, M.S.; Islam, M.S.; Islam, M.T. Optoelectronic performance prediction of HgCdTe homojunction photodetector in long wave infrared spectral region using traditional simulations and machine learning models. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Sharma, R.; Henderson, L.N.; Sankar, P.; Tresa, M.M.; Oyeku, O.P.; Perez, E.; Thomas, J. Recent Advancements in Nanomaterials for Near-Infrared to Long-Wave Infrared Photodetectors. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2401821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Lim, J.W. Advances in Polymeric Semiconductors for Next-Generation Electronic Devices. Polymers 2025, 17, 3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Kant, K.; Beeram, R.; Cao, Y.; dos Santos, P.S.S.; González-Cabaleiro, L.; García-Lojo, D.; Guo, H.; Joung, Y.; Kothadiya, S.; Lafuente, M.; et al. Plasmonic nanoparticle sensors: Current progress, challenges, and future prospects. Nanoscale Horiz. 2024, 9, 2085–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Kumar, M.; Seo, H. Ultrafast Photodetectors for Secure Communication, Logic Processing, and Machine Learning-Assisted Optical Material Classification. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2025, 13, e01088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Rostami, A.; Dolatyari, M.; Amini, E.; Rasooli, H.; Baghban, H.; Miri, S. Sensitive, Fast, Solution-Processed Ultraviolet Detectors Based on Passivated Zinc Oxide Nanorods. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 554–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Robinson, S.; Jia, Y. A Novel Design of MSM Photodetector and the Investigation of Two-Top Contacts Spacing Effects on Detection Speed and Transient Response. Adv. Eng. Intell. Syst. 2022, 1, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sang, L.; Liao, M.; Sumiya, M. A Comprehensive Review of Semiconductor Ultraviolet Photodetectors: From Thin Film to One-Dimensional Nanostructures. Sensors 2013, 13, 10482–10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Ganesh, K.M.; Bhaskar, S.; Cheerala, V.S.K.; Battampara, P.; Reddy, R.; Neelakantan, S.C.; Reddy, N.; Ramamurthy, S.S. Review of Gold Nanoparticles in Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Technology: Effect of Shape, Hollow Nanostructures, Nano-Assembly, Metal–Dielectric and Heterometallic Nanohybrids. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Yan, N.; Qiu, Y.; He, X.; Tang, X.; Hao, Q.; Chen, M. Plasmonic Enhanced Nanocrystal Infrared Photodetectors. Materials 2023, 16, 3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Ilyas, N.; Li, D.; Song, Y.; Zhong, H.; Jiang, Y.; Li, W. Low-Dimensional Materials and State-of-the-Art Architectures for Infrared Photodetection. Sensors 2018, 18, 4163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Sargent, E.H. Infrared Quantum Dots. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Kim, G.; Choi, D.; Eom, S.Y.; Jung, E.D.; Lee, J.H.; Rehl, B.; Kim, S.Y.; Hoogland, S.; Sargent, E.H.; Jeong, K.S. Extended Short-Wavelength Infrared Ink by Surface-Tuned Silver Telluride Colloidal Quantum Dots and Their Infrared Photodetection. ACS Mater. Lett. 2024, 6, 4988–4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Lee, H.K.; Park, T.; Yoo, H. Device Applications Enabled by Bandgap Engineering Through Quantum Dot Tuning: A Review. Materials 2024, 17, 5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Alzakia, F.I.; Tan, S.C. Liquid-Exfoliated 2D Materials for Optoelectronic Applications. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Dolatyari, M.; Rostami, A.; Mathur, S.; Klein, A. UV/IR Dual-Wavelength Photodetector Design Based on ZnO/PMMA/PbSe Nanocomposites. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2018, 17, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Xiao, B.; Rutherford, G.N.; Sharma, A.P.; Pradhan, S.K.; Bonner, C.E.; Bahoura, M.J. Surface Modification and Charge Injection in a Nanocomposite of Metal Nanoparticles and Semiconductor Oxide Nanostructures. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Comanescu, C. Recent Advances in Surface Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles. Coatings 2023, 13, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Bae, W.K.; Joo, J.; Padilha, L.A.; Won, J.; Lee, D.C.; Lin, Q.; Koh, W.K.; Luo, H.; Klimov, V.I.; Pietryga, J.M. Highly effective surface passivation of PbSe quantum dots through reaction with molecular chlorine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20160–20168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Gurbandurdyyev, B.; Annamuradov, B.; Er, S.B.; Gross, B.; Er, A.O. Advances in Pulsed Liquid-Based Nanoparticles: From Synthesis Mechanism to Application and Machine Learning Integration. Quantum Beam Sci. 2025, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Gundepudi, K.; Neelamraju, P.M.; Sangaraju, S.; Dalapati, G.K.; Ball, W.B.; Ghosh, S.; Chakrabortty, S. A review on the role of nanotechnology in the development of near-infrared photodetectors: Materials, performance metrics, and potential applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 13889–13924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Kinch, M.A. Fundamental physics of infrared detector materials. J. Electron. Mater. 2000, 29, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Bianconi, S.; Mohseni, H. Recent advances in infrared imagers: Toward thermodynamic and quantum limits of photon sensitivity. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2020, 83, 044101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Dolatyari, M.; Rostami, A.; Mathur, S.; Klein, A. Trap engineering in solution-processed PbSe quantum dots for high-speed MID-infrared photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 5658–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Zhao, X.; Ma, H.; Cai, H.; Wei, Z.; Bi, Y.; Tang, X.; Qin, T. Lead Chalcogenide Colloidal Quantum Dots for Infrared Photodetectors. Materials 2023, 16, 5790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Palosz, W.; Trivedi, S.; Jensen, J.L.; Jensen, J. Infrared photoconductive detectors based on PbSe colloidal quantum dots responsive up to 3.3 μm. Opt. Mater. Express 2025, 15, 1214–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Bugay, C.A.; Caballas, M.C.; Mercado, S.B.; Rubio, J.F.; Serote, P.K.; Villarte, P.N.; Rubi, R.V.C. A Review of Microreactors for Process Intensification. Eng. Proc. 2024, 67, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Qin, Y.; Guo, T.; Liu, J.; Lin, T.; Wang, J.; Chu, J. Colloidal Quantum Dots in Very-Long-Wave Infrared Detection: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 19137–19144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Yang, J.; Caillas, A.; Feng, J.; Zhang, H.; Shen, X.; Saha, S.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. Long-Wave Infrared HgTe Quantum Dot Photoconductors with Optical Enhancement. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 17874–17883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Liu, Z.; Wang, P.; Dong, R.; Gong, W.; Li, J.; Dai, D.; Yan, H.; Zhang, Y. Mid-Infrared HgTe Colloidal Quantum Dots In-Situ Passivated by Iodide. Coatings 2022, 12, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Dortaj, H.; Dolatyari, M.; Zarghami, A.; Alidoust, F.; Rostami, A.; Matloub, S.; Yadipour, R. High-speed and high-precision PbSe/PbI2 solution process mid-infrared camera. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Siahsar, M.; Jabbarzadeh, F.; Dolatyari, M.; Rostami, G.; Rostami, A. Fabrication of highly sensitive and fast response MIR photodetector based on a new hybrid graphene structure. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 238, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Safdari, S.; Soltani, M.; Rashedi, G. The effect of inter-dot Coulomb interaction on the charge and energy transport properties of a five-terminal system consisting of three Coulomb-coupled quantum dots. Nanotechnology 2023, 34, 465001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Shakhgildyan, G.; Avakyan, L.; Atroshchenko, G.; Vetchinnikov, M.; Zolikova, A.; Ignat’eva, E.; Ziyatdinova, M.; Subcheva, E.; Bugaev, L.; Sigaev, V. Ultra-Broadband Plasmon Resonance in Gold Nanoparticles Precipitated in ZnO-Al2O3-SiO2 Glass. Ceramics 2024, 7, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Mcoyi, M.P.; Mpofu, K.T.; Sekhwama, M.; Mthunzi-Kufa, P. Developments in Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance. Plasmonics 2025, 20, 5481–5520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Gu, X.; Timchenko, V.; Heng Yeoh, G.; Dombrovsky, L.; Taylor, R. The Effect of Gold Nanorods Clustering on Near-Infrared Radiation Absorption. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J. Carrier Blocking Layer Materials and Application in Organic Photodetectors. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Phengdaam, A.; Phetsang, S.; Jonai, S.; Shinbo, K.; Kato, K.; Baba, A. Gold nanostructures/quantum dots for the enhanced efficiency of organic solar cells. Nanoscale Adv. 2024, 6, 3494–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Xiao, L.; Yan, S.; Chen, T.; Wang, J.; Shi, Y. Enhancing Hot Electron Injection in Plasmonic Photodetectors through Roughened Interfaces. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Schuler, S.; Muench, J.E.; Ruocco, A.; Balci, O.; Thourhout, D.V.; Sorianello, V.; Romagnoli, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Goykhman, I.; et al. High-responsivity graphene photodetectors integrated on silicon microring resonators. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Jabbarzadeh, F.; Siahsar, M.; Dolatyari, M.; Rostami, G.; Rostami, A. Modification of graphene oxide for applying as mid-infrared photodetector. Appl. Phys. B 2015, 120, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Smith, L.S.; Haidari, H.; Amsalu, A.; Howarth, G.S.; Bryant, S.J.; Walia, S.; Elbourne, A.; Kopecki, Z. Black Phosphorus Nanoflakes: An Emerging Nanomaterial for Clinical Wound Management and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Alemi, A.; Babalou, A.; Dolatyari, M.; Klein, A.; Meyer, G. Hydrothermal Synthesis of NdIII Doped Bi2Se3 Nanoflowers and their Physical Properties. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2009, 635, 2053–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Zhang, M.; Yang, L.; Wu, X.; Wang, J. Black Phosphorus for Photonic Integrated Circuits. Research 2023, 6, 0206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Hu, L.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, S.; Zheng, J.; Guan, X.; Patterson, R.; Kim, J.; Shi, L.; Lin, C.H.; Lei, Q.; et al. Flexible and efficient perovskite quantum dot solar cells via hybrid interfacial architecture. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Wang, Y.P.; Li, H.C.; Huang, Y.C.; Tan, C.S. Synthesis and Applications of Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals in Optoelectronics. Inorganics 2023, 11, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Bojang, A.A.; Wu, H.-S. Design, Fundamental Principles of Fabrication and Applications of Microreactors. Processes 2020, 8, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Gariano, G.; Lesnyak, V.; Brescia, R.; Bertoni, G.; Dang, Z.; Gaspari, R.; De Trizio, L.; Manna, L. Role of the Crystal Structure in Cation Exchange Reactions Involving Colloidal Cu2Se Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9583–9590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. De Trizio, L.; Manna, L. Forging Colloidal Nanostructures via Cation Exchange Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10852–10887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Sajanlal, P.R.; Sreeprasad, T.S.; Samal, A.K.; Pradeep, T. Anisotropic nanomaterials: Structure, growth, assembly, and functions. Nano Rev. 2011, 2, 5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Nath, P.; Ray, A. One-step synthesis of highly fluorescent perovskite nanocrystals in antisolvent for bioimaging. Nano Express 2024, 5, 015016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Brutchey, R.L. Diorganyl Dichalcogenides as Useful Synthons for Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2918–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Deshmukh, S.D.; Ellis, R.G.; Sutandar, D.S.; Rokke, D.J.; Agrawal, R. Versatile Colloidal Syntheses of Metal Chalcogenide Nanoparticles from Elemental Precursors using Amine-Thiol Chemistry. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 9087–9097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Aqua, J.-N.; Berbezier, I.; Favre, L.; Frisch, T.; Ronda, A. Growth and Self-Organization of SiGe Nanostructures. Phys. Rep. 2013, 522, 59–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Zhang, C.; Han, D.; Zhang, X. PbS Colloidal Quantum Dots: Ligand Exchange in Solution. Coatings 2024, 14, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Kalluri, A.; Dharmadhikari, B.; Debnath, D.; Patra, P.; Kumar, C.V. Advances in Structural Modifications and Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots for Biomedical Applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 21358–21376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Belec, B.; Kostevšek, N.; Pelle, G.D.; Nemec, S.; Kralj, S.; Bergant Marušič, M.; Gardonio, S.; Fanetti, M.; Valant, M. Silica Coated Bi2Se3 Topological Insulator Nanoparticles: An Alternative Route to Retain Their Optical Properties and Make Them Biocompatible. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. He, H.; Deng, S.; Liu, Y. Environmentally friendly synthesis of quantum dots and their applications in diverse fields from the perspective of environmental compliance: A review. Discov. Nano 2025, 20, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Hao, Q.; Ma, H.; Xing, X.; Tang, X.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, X.; Chen, M. Mercury Chalcogenide Colloidal Quantum Dots for Infrared Photodetectors. Materials 2023, 16, 7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Sukharevska, N.; Bederak, D.; Goossens, V.M.; Momand, J.; Duim, H.; Dirin, D.N.; Kovalenko, M.V.; Kooi, B.J.; Loi, M.A. Scalable PbS Quantum Dot Solar Cell Production by Blade Coating from Stable Inks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5195–5207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Hills-Kimball, K.; Yang, H.; Cai, T.; Wang, J.; Chen, O. Recent Advances in Ligand Design and Engineering in Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Deng, C.; Huang, Q.; Fu, Z.; Lu, Y. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots toward High and Stable Photoluminescence. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Peng, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Dong, A.; Liang, Z. Solid-State Ligand-Exchange Fabrication of CH3NH3PbI3 Capped PbS Quantum Dot Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. You, H.R.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, Y.; Choi, J. Recent Research Progress in Surface Ligand Exchange of PbS Quantum Dots for Solar Cell Application. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Kloprogge, J.T. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Study of Layered Double Hydroxides with Different Exchangeable Anions. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Al-Amin, K.; Kawsar, M.; Mamun, M.T.R.B.; Sahadat Hossain, M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic technique for analysis of inorganic materials: A review. Nanoscale Adv. 2025, 7, 6677–6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Gu, X.; Shaw, L.; Gu, K.; Toney, M.F.; Bao, Z. The meniscus-guided deposition of semiconducting polymers. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Butt, M.A. Thin-Film Coating Methods: A Successful Marriage of High-Quality and Cost-Effectiveness—A Brief Exploration. Coatings 2022, 12, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Fan, J.Z.; Vafaie, M.; Bertens, K.; Sytnyk, M.; Pina, J.M.; Sagar, L.K.; Ouellette, O.; Proppe, A.H.; Rasouli, A.S.; Gao, Y.; et al. Micron Thick Colloidal Quantum Dot Solids. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 5284–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Valayil Varghese, T.; Eixenberger, J.; Rajabi-Fakoor, F.; Lazouskaya, M.; Francis, C.; Burgoyne, H.; Wada, K.; Subbaraman, H.; Estrada, D. Multijet Gold Nanoparticle Inks for Additive Manufacturing of Printed and Wearable Electronics. ACS Mater. Au 2023, 4, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Werum, K.; Mueller, E.; Keck, J.; Jaeger, J.; Horter, T.; Glaeser, K.; Buschkamp, S.; Barth, M.; Eberhardt, W.; Zimmermann, A. Aerosol Jet Printing and Interconnection Technologies on Additive Manufactured Substrates. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2022, 6, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Gohel, A.; Gratuze, M.; Ketabi, M.; Izquierdo, R. Direct-Write Printing for Flexible and 3D Electronics: Aerosol Jet vs. Micro Dispensing. Micromachines 2025, 16, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Ma, T.; Li, Y.; Cheng, H.; Niu, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Li, A.; Jiang, X.; Park, D.; Zhang, K.; Yi, C. Enhanced aerosol-jet printing using annular acoustic field for high resolution and minimal overspray. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Punde, A.L.; Shah, S.P.; Hase, Y.V.; Waghmare, A.D.; Shinde, P.S.; Bade, B.R.; Pathan, H.M.; Prasad, M.; Patole, S.P.; Jadkar, S. Self-Biased Photodetector Using 2D Layered Bismuth Triiodide (BiI3) Prepared Using the Spin Coating Method. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 30157–30166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Walker, J.; Koutsos, V. Spin Coating of Silica Nanocolloids on Mica: Self-Assembly of Two-Dimensional Colloid Crystal Structures and Thin Films. Coatings 2023, 13, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Falcony, C.; Aguilar-Frutis, M.A.; García-Hipólito, M. Spray Pyrolysis Technique; High-K Dielectric Films and Luminescent Materials: A Review. Micromachines 2018, 9, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Kim, Y.Y.; Yang, T.Y.; Suhonen, R.; Kemppainen, A.; Hwang, K.; Jeon, N.J.; Seo, J. Roll-to-roll gravure-printed flexible perovskite solar cells using eco-friendly antisolvent bathing with wide processing window. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Acosta, C.; Flynn, W.P.; Santillan, L.; Garnsey, S.; Bhalla, A.S.; Guo, R. The Performance Characterization of a Drop-on-Demand Inkjet-Printed Gold Film Under the Temperature Conditions for Airborne Equipment. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Vlnieska, V.; Gilshtein, E.; Kunka, D.; Heier, J.; Romanyuk, Y.E. Aerosol Jet Printing of 3D Pillar Arrays from Photopolymer Ink. Polymers 2022, 14, 3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Boccaccini, A.R.; Keim, S.; Ma, R.; Li, Y.; Zhitomirsky, I. Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7, S581–S613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Saleem, A.; Zhang, Y.; Usman, M.; Haris, M.; Li, P. Tailored architectures of mesoporous carbon nanostructures: From synthesis to applications. Nano Today 2022, 46, 101607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Maulu, A.; Navarro-Arenas, J.; Rodríguez-Cantó, P.J.; Sánchez-Royo, J.F.; Abargues, R.; Suárez, I.; Martínez-Pastor, J.P. Charge Transport in Trap-Sensitized Infrared PbS Quantum-Dot-Based Photoconductors: Pros and Cons. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Wang, Y.; Hu, H.; Yuan, M.; Xia, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Yang, J.; Xu, S.; Shi, Z.; He, J.; et al. Colloidal PbS Quantum Dot Photodiode Imager with Suppressed Dark Current. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 58573–58582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Haghighatzadeh, A. Z-scheme reduced graphene oxide-ZnO/AgBr nano/hetero-junctions: Modeling of charge transfer mechanism and synergistically improved third-order nonlinear optical responses. Appl. Phys. A 2025, 131, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Bansal, S.; Kumar, S.; Jain, A.; Rohilla, V.; Prakash, K.; Gupta, A.; Ali, T.; Alenezi, A.M.; Islam, M.S.; Soliman, M.S.; et al. Design and TCAD analysis of few-layer graphene/ZnO nanowires heterojunction-based photodetector in UV spectral region. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 7762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Jing, C.; Deng, Z.; Cui, H. A Graphene–Molybdenum Disulfide Heterojunction Phototransistor. Crystals 2026, 16, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Swett, D.W. Near Zero Index Perfect Metasurface Absorber using Inverted Conformal Mapping. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Han, J.; Huang, K.; Su, X.; Xiao, X.; Gong, X.; Wang, H.; Cao, J. Carbon Nanotube Transistor with Colloidal Quantum Dot Photosensitive Gate for Ultrahigh External Quantum Efficiency Photodetector. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 9510–9520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Adinolfi, V.; Kramer, I.J.; Labelle, A.J.; Sutherland, B.R.; Hoogland, S.; Sargent, E.H. Photojunction field-effect transistor based on a colloidal quantum dot absorber channel layer. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Yan, N.; Shi, F.; Xue, X.; Zhang, K.; Huo, C.; Chen, M. Cavity-Enhanced Infrared Quantum Dot Homojunction Arrays. Photonics Res. 2025, 13, 1497–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Zhang, Y.; Hellebusch, D.J.; Bronstein, N.D.; Ko, C.; Ogletree, D.F.; Salmeron, M.; Alivisatos, A.P. Ultrasensitive photodetectors exploiting electrostatic trapping and percolation transport. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Wang, H.; Zhou, C.; Li, P.; Yang, L.; Ma, J.; Akaike, R.; Miyake, H.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y. High-sensitivity and fast-response solar-blind photodetectors via band offset engineering for motion tracking. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Wei, Y.; Lan, C.; Zhou, S.; Li, C. Recent Advances in Photodetectors Based on Two-Dimensional Material/Si Heterojunctions. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Lei, D.; Su, D.; Maier, S.A. New insights into plasmonic hot-electron dynamics. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Zhai, A.; Zhao, C.; Pan, D.; Zhu, S.; Wang, W.; Ji, T.; Li, G.; Wen, R.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, Y.; et al. Organic Photodetectors with Extended Spectral Response Range Assisted by Plasmonic Hot-Electron Injection. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Li, T.; Wu, H.; Hao, Y.; Ma, F.; Zhu, P.; Li, Z.; Li, F.; Yu, J.; Liu, M.; Lei, C.; et al. High-Performance Broadband Photodetectors Combining Perovskite and Organic Bulk Heterojunction Bifunctional Layers. Crystals 2024, 14, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Shin, J.; Yoo, H. Photogating Effect-Driven Photodetectors and Their Emerging Applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Chen, Y.-T.; Sarangadharan, I.; Sukesan, R.; Hseih, C.-Y.; Lee, G.-Y.; Chyi, J.-I.; Wang, Y.-L. High-field modulated ion-selective field-effect-transistor (FET) sensors with sensitivity higher than the ideal Nernst sensitivity. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Bhattarai, K.; Silva, S.; Song, K.; Urbas, A.; Lee, S.J.; Ku, Z.; Zhou, J. Metamaterial Perfect Absorber Analyzed by a Meta-cavity Model Consisting of Multilayer Metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Wang, J.; Lang, T.; Hong, Z.; Xiao, M.; Yu, J. Design and Fabrication of a Triple-Band Terahertz Metamaterial Absorber. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Jin, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, Q.; Yi, X.; Tao, X.; Craig, A.; Modak, M.; Marshall, A.; Xu, Y.; et al. A Study of the Avalanche Multiplication and Excess Noise in AlxIn1–xAsγSb1–γ Avalanche Photodiodes Lattice-Matched to GaSb. ACS Photonics 2026, 13, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Jiang, J.; Jia, J.; Zhao, T.; Liang, K.; Yang, R.; Han, D. Recovery Time of Silicon Photomultiplier with Epitaxial Quenching Resistors. Instruments 2017, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Pecunia, V.; Anthopoulos, T.D.; Armin, A.; Bouthinon, B.; Caironi, M.; Castellanos-Gomez, A.; Chen, Y.; Cho, K.; Clegg, C.; Fang, X.; et al. Guidelines for Accurate Evaluation of Photodetectors Based on Emerging Semiconductor Technologies. Nat. Photonics 2025, 19, 1178–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Xia, K.; Gao, X.D.; Fei, G.T.; Xu, S.H.; Liang, Y.F.; Qu, X.X. High-Performance Visible to Mid-Infrared Photodetectors Based on HgTe Colloidal Quantum Dots under Room Temperature. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 23717–23723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.; Hao, Q. Advances of Sensitive Infrared Detectors with HgTe Colloidal Quantum Dots. Coatings 2020, 10, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Xu, Y.; Xue, X.; Wu, L.; Gan, Z.; Chen, M.; Hao, Q. Multiband Infrared Photodetection Based on Colloidal Quantum Dot. Photonics 2026, 13, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Barthold, P.; Hohls, F.; Maire, N.; Pierz, K.; Haug, R.J. Enhanced shot noise in tunneling through a stack of coupled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 246804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Liu, J.; Liu, P.; Shi, T.; Ke, M.; Xiong, K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Li, H.; et al. Flexible and broadband colloidal quantum dots photodiode array for pixel-level X-ray to near-infrared image fusion. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Kwon, J.; Ha, Y.; Choi, S.; Jung, D. Development of a Highly Reliable PbS QDs-Based SWIR Photodetector Based on Metal Oxide Electron/Hole Extraction Layer Formation Conditions. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Zhou, L.; Huang, Q.; Xia, Y. Plasmon-Induced Hot Electrons in Nanostructured Materials: Generation, Collection, and Application to Photochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 8597–8619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Tian, W.; Wang, Y.; Dang, H.; Hou, H.; Xi, Y. Photonic Integrated Circuits: Research Advances and Challenges in Interconnection and Packaging Technologies. Photonics 2025, 12, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N.; Butt, M.A. Advancement in Silicon Integrated Photonics Technologies for Sensing Applications in Near-Infrared and Mid-Infrared Region: A Review. Photonics 2022, 9, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  114. Mekawey, H.; Elsayed, M.; Ismail, Y.; Swillam, M.A. Optical Interconnects Finally Seeing the Light in Silicon Photonics: Past the Hype. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Du, J.; Zhao, X.; Su, J.; Li, B.; Duan, X.; Dong, T.; Lin, H.; Ren, Y.; Miao, Y.; Radamson, H.H. Review of Short-Wavelength Infrared Flip-Chip Bump Bonding Process Technology. Sensors 2025, 25, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Xu, K.; Xiao, X.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, X.; Wei, Q.; Chen, H.; Deng, Z.; Huang, J.; Chen, B.; Ning, Z. Inverted Si: PbS Colloidal Quantum Dot Heterojunction-Based Infrared Photodetector. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 15414–15421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Qian, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, K.; Huo, C.; Li, Y.; Yan, N.; Shi, F.; Peng, X.; Chen, M. Si-HgTe Quantum Dot Visible-Infrared Photodetector. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Wang, L.; He, S.J.; Wang, K.Y.; Luo, H.H.; Hu, J.G.; Yu, Y.Q.; Xie, C.; Wu, C.Y.; Luo, L.B. Dual-plasmonic Au/graphene/Au-enhanced ultrafast, broadband, self-driven silicon Schottky photodetector. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 505203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Sun, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Tai, G.A.; Lau, S.P.; Yan, F. Infrared photodetectors based on CVD-grown graphene and PbS quantum dots with ultrahigh responsivity. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5878–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Saleem, M.I.; Yang, S.; Batool, A.; Sulaman, M.; Veeramalai, C.P.; Jiang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Tang, L.; Zou, B. CsPbI3 Nanorods as the Interfacial Layer for High-Performance, All-Solution-Processed Self-Powered Photodetectors. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 75, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Xue, X.; Hao, Q.; Chen, M. Very Long Wave Infrared Quantum Dot Photodetector up to 18 μm. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Kundu, B.; Özdemir, O.; Dalmases, M.; Kumar, G.; Konstantatos, G. Hybrid 2D-QD MoS2-PbSe Quantum Dot Broadband Photodetectors with High-Sensitivity and Room-Temperature Operation at 2.5 μm. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2101378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Vale, B.R.C.; Silva, F.O.; Carvalho, M.S.; Raphael, E.; Ferrari, J.L.; Schiavon, M.A. Water-Soluble CdTe/CdS Core/Shell Semiconductor Nanocrystals: How Their Optical Properties Depend on the Synthesis Methods. Crystals 2016, 6, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Xue, X.; Chen, M.; Luo, Y.; Qin, T.; Tang, X.; Hao, Q. High-Operating-Temperature Mid-Infrared Photodetectors via Quantum Dot Gradient Homojunction. Light Sci. Appl. 2023, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Mazzaro, R.; Piccioni, A.; Salvi, M.; Vecchi, P.; Mazzanti, M.; Caramori, S.; Boscherini, F.; Pasquini, L. Operando x-ray absorption spectroscopy unveils light-driven redox dynamics at the semiconductor/cocatalyst interface. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadx8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Racko, J.; Mikolášek, M.; Granzner, R.; Breza, J.; Donoval, D.; Grmanová, A.; Harmatha, L.; Schwierz, F.; Fröhlich, K. Trap-assisted tunnelling current in MIM structures. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 2011, 9, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Li, W.G.; Wang, X.D.; Feng, L.J.; Wei, Z.F.; Xu, Y.F.; Chen, H.Y.; Kuang, D.B. A Laminar MAPbBr3/MAPbBr3−xIx Graded Heterojunction Single Crystal for Enhancing Charge Extraction and Optoelectronic Performance. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 5670–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Tamersit, K.; Ramezani, Z.; Amiri, I.S. Improved performance of sub-10-nm band-to-band tunneling n-i-n graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistors using underlap engineering: A quantum simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 160, 110312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Kumar, J.; Shrivastava, M. Role of Chalcogen Defect Introducing Metal-Induced Gap States and Its Implications for Metal-TMDs’ Interface Chemistry. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 10176–10184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Cuadra, L.; Salcedo-Sanz, S.; Nieto-Borge, J.C. Carrier Transport in Colloidal Quantum Dot Intermediate Band Solar Cell Materials Using Network Science. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  131. Heyne, B.; Arlt, K.; Geßner, A.; Richter, A.F.; Döblinger, M.; Feldmann, J.; Taubert, A.; Wedel, A. Mixed Mercaptocarboxylic Acid Shells Provide Stable Dispersions of InPZnS/ZnSe/ZnS Multishell Quantum Dots in Aqueous Media. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Liang, X.; Liu, H.; Fujinami, S.; Ito, M.; Nakajima, K. Simultaneous Visualization of Microscopic Conductivity and Deformation in Conductive Elastomers. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 3438–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  133. Duarte, V.C.M.; Andrade, L. Recent Advancements on Slot-Die Coating of Perovskite Solar Cells: The Lab-to-Fab Optimisation Process. Energies 2024, 17, 3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Khayal, A.; Dawane, V.; Amin, M.A.; Tirth, V.; Yadav, V.K.; Algahtani, A.; Khan, S.H.; Islam, S.; Yadav, K.K.; Jeon, B.-H. Advances in the Methods for the Synthesis of Carbon Dots and Their Emerging Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Bi, S.; Wang, R.; Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Tan, D.; Shi, B.; Jiang, C.; He, Z.; Asare-Yeboah, K. Recent Progress in Electrohydrodynamic Jet Printing for Printed Electronics: From 0D to 3D Materials. Coatings 2023, 13, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Mishra, A.; Aghaee, M.; Tamer, I.M.; Budman, H. Spectroscopic Advances in Real Time Monitoring of Pharmaceutical Bioprocesses: A Review of Vibrational and Fluorescence Techniques. Spectrosc. J. 2025, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Xia, P.; Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Gulsaran, A.; Zhang, Y.; Vafaie, M.; Imran, M.; Najarian, A.M.; Liu, Y.; Ban, H.; et al. Improved Facet and Edge Passivation in Near-Infrared III-V Colloidal Quantum Dot Photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2419020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  138. Ju, M.G.; Dai, J.; Ma, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, X.C. AgBiS2 as a low-cost and eco-friendly all-inorganic photovoltaic material: Nanoscale morphology-property relationship. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 2, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Zeiske, S.; Ban, H.W.; Li, X.; Deng, B.; López-Arteaga, R.; Kazianga, U.H.; Han, M.G.; Kim, T.-G.; Chen, B.; Sargent, E.H. Revealing Additional Size-Dependent Defect Suppression Channels Governing Detectivity in InAs Colloidal Quantum Dot Photodiodes. Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 16862–16868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Maietta, I.; Otero-Martínez, C.; Fernández, S.; Sánchez, L.; González-Fernández, Á.; Polavarapu, L.; Simón-Vázquez, R. The Toxicity of Lead and Lead-Free Perovskite Precursors and Nanocrystals to Human Cells and Aquatic Organisms. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2415574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  141. Sun, Z.; Zhao, X.; Si, H.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, Y. Biomimetic Synapses Based on Halide Perovskites for Neuromorphic Vision Computing: Materials, Devices, and Applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2026, 18, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. De Boer, J.J.; Alvarez, A.O.; Schmidt, M.C.; Ehrler, B. In-sensor computing with halide perovskite-based optoelectronic reservoir networks. Device 2026, 4, 101000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Yi, H.; Zhou, M.; Xie, H.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, F.; Shen, J.; Shen, J. Physics-Driven Computational Multispectral Imaging for Accurate Color Measurement. Sensors 2025, 25, 5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  144. Bu, Y.; Ye, T.; Wang, R.; Zhou, J.; Deng, J.; Zhen, Y.; Shi, M.; Jing, W.; Xin, R.; Zhang, Y.; et al. High discrimination infrared polarimetry via intrinsic anisotropic photogating in black phosphorus meta-polarization detectors. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 10137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  145. Han, J.; Fu, Z.; Wei, J.; Han, S.; Deng, W.; Hu, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yu, H.; Gou, J.; et al. 2D materials-based next-generation multidimensional photodetectors. Light Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  146. Gao, J.; Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Han, J.; Gao, M.; Wu, J.; Chen, Q.; Yu, D.; Wang, E.; Zhu, F. Mitigating Dark Current in Photomultiplication Organic Photodetectors via the Charge Trap Gradient Bulk Heterojunction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 52426–52434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  147. Li, P.; Lu, Z.-H. Interface Engineering in Organic Electronics: Energy-Level Alignment and Charge Transport. Small Sci. 2020, 1, 2000015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Jeong, T.-J.; Yu, X.; Harris, T.A.L. Scaled Production of Functionally Gradient Thin Films Using Slot Die Coating on a Roll-to-Roll System. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 9264–9274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Shi, W.; Guo, R.; Tian, G.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Cui, D.; Wen, J.; Liu, D.; et al. Self-powered Ag2Se/SiO2/Si heterojunctions for ultrafast broadband high-sensitivity photodetection. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 520, 166076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  150. Wang, F.; Fang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.J. 2D computational photodetectors enabling multidimensional optical information perception. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 6791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Ma, J.; Yang, S.; Yang, Z.; He, Z.; Du, Z. Functional Nanomaterials for Advanced Bioelectrode Interfaces: Recent Advances in Disease Detection and Metabolic Monitoring. Sensors 2025, 25, 4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  152. Rogalski, A.; Hu, W.; Wang, F.; Martyniuk, P. Performance of Low-Dimensional Solid Room-Temperature Photodetectors: Critical View. Materials 2024, 17, 4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  153. Baskoutas, S. Advanced Nanomaterials for Quantum Technology, Sensor and Health Therapy Applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  154. Kong, L.; Wang, S.; Su, Q.; Liu, Z.; Liao, G.; Sun, B.; Shi, T. Printed Two-Dimensional Materials for Flexible Photodetectors: Materials, Processes, and Applications. Sensors 2025, 25, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  155. Huang, Y.T.; Nodari, D.; Furlan, F.; Zhang, Y.; Rusu, M.; Dai, L.; Andaji-Garmaroudi, Z.; Darvill, D.; Guo, X.; Rimmele, M.; et al. Fast Near-Infrared Photodetectors Based on Nontoxic and Solution-Processable AgBiS2. Small 2024, 20, 2310199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  156. Li, Z.; Han, H.; Chao, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, G.; Huang, W. Recent Advances of AgBiS2: Synthesis Methods, Photovoltaic Device, Photodetector, and Sensors. Electromag. Sci. 2025, 3, 0090451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. Feng, W.; Qin, T.; Tang, X. Advances in Infrared Detectors for In-Memory Sensing and Computing. Photonics 2024, 11, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  158. Tang, Q.; Zhong, F.; Li, Q.; Weng, J.; Li, J.; Lu, H.; Wu, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Deng, K.; et al. Infrared Photodetection from 2D/3D van der Waals Heterostructures. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  159. Zha, J.; Luo, M.; Ye, M.; Ahmed, T.; Yu, X.; Lien, D.-H.; He, Q.; Lei, D.; Ho, J.C.; Bullock, J.; et al. Infrared Photodetectors Based on 2D Materials and Nanophotonics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2111970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Comparison of traditional (bulk or epitaxial) and NP-based IR detectors.
Figure 1. Comparison of traditional (bulk or epitaxial) and NP-based IR detectors.
Inorganics 14 00153 g001
Figure 2. General operating principles of NP-based IR photodetectors: (1) absorption of incident IR photons by nanostructured active materials; (2) generation of excited carriers (electron–hole pairs or hot carriers); (3) carrier transport through the NP film via hopping, tunneling, or percolation pathways; (4) charge separation and collection at electrodes driven by built-in fields or external bias; and (5) conversion into measurable electrical output. The lower panel summarizes major factors affecting each stage, including bandgap engineering, ligand chemistry, trap density, contact design, and resulting performance metrics such as responsivity (R), specific detectivity (D*), response time (τ), and dark current (Idark).
Figure 2. General operating principles of NP-based IR photodetectors: (1) absorption of incident IR photons by nanostructured active materials; (2) generation of excited carriers (electron–hole pairs or hot carriers); (3) carrier transport through the NP film via hopping, tunneling, or percolation pathways; (4) charge separation and collection at electrodes driven by built-in fields or external bias; and (5) conversion into measurable electrical output. The lower panel summarizes major factors affecting each stage, including bandgap engineering, ligand chemistry, trap density, contact design, and resulting performance metrics such as responsivity (R), specific detectivity (D*), response time (τ), and dark current (Idark).
Inorganics 14 00153 g002
Figure 3. Design landscape of NP-based IR detectors. The overview links materials → fabrication → devices → performance.
Figure 3. Design landscape of NP-based IR detectors. The overview links materials → fabrication → devices → performance.
Inorganics 14 00153 g003
Figure 4. Schematic of NP synthesis and surface engineering.
Figure 4. Schematic of NP synthesis and surface engineering.
Inorganics 14 00153 g004
Figure 5. Deposition and patterning techniques for the fabrication of photodetectors.
Figure 5. Deposition and patterning techniques for the fabrication of photodetectors.
Inorganics 14 00153 g005
Figure 6. Typical NP base IR detector architectures.
Figure 6. Typical NP base IR detector architectures.
Inorganics 14 00153 g006
Figure 7. Key performance metrics for IR detectors.
Figure 7. Key performance metrics for IR detectors.
Inorganics 14 00153 g007
Figure 8. Evolution of NP-based IR detection technologies.
Figure 8. Evolution of NP-based IR detection technologies.
Inorganics 14 00153 g008
Figure 9. Future outlook and challenges.
Figure 9. Future outlook and challenges.
Inorganics 14 00153 g009
Table 1. Synthesis strategies for nanomaterials used in IR detection.
Table 1. Synthesis strategies for nanomaterials used in IR detection.
Synthesis StrategyPrincipleRepresentative MaterialsKey AdvantagesMain LimitationsTypical Feature SizeTypical ApplicationsRefs.
Hot-Injectionrapid precursor injection at elevated temperature to separate nucleation and growthPbS, PbSe, CsPbX3excellent size control; high crystallinitybatch-to-batch variation; precursor sensitivity2–10 nmCQD photodiodes, SWIR detectors[25,26,47]
Continuous-Flow/Microreactorflow-based synthesis with controlled residence time and heat transferPbSscalable; reproducible; precise thermal controlmore complex equipment3–8 nmlarge-scale CQD production[48]
Cation Exchangepartial/complete ion replacement in preformed nanocrystalsPbSe, CdSe, Cu2Seenables composition tuning and heterostructuressurface defects may formTunablebandgap engineering; heterojunction devices[25,26,49,50]
Solvothermal/Hydrothermalhigh-pressure reaction in sealed reactorBi2Se3, BP nanosheetssimple processing; ligand-free synthesisbroader size distribution5–100 nmbroadband IR absorbers[43,44]
Seed-Mediated Growthcontrolled growth on pre-existing seedsAu, Agshape and aspect-ratio controlcomplex growth kineticsaspect ratio 2–10plasmonic IR structures[51]
Ligand-Assisted Precipitationrapid crystallization using precursor–antisolvent interactionPerovskite nanocrystalslow-temperature and scalablelimited monodispersity3–15 nmsolution-processed photodetectors[52]
Colloidal Synthesis via Metal Chalcogenide Precursorscontrolled reaction of metal and chalcogen precursorsPbS, AgBiS2improved stoichiometry and reduced defectshigher precursor cost4–10 nmhigh-quality CQD films[53,54]
Epitaxial Nanostructure Growth (SK/VW/FM)strain- or surface-driven crystal growth on lattice-engineered substratesGe/Si QDs, GeSiSn QDs, III–V QDsexcellent crystallinity; low defect density; precise interfaces; CMOS compatibilityhigh equipment cost; limited throughput; thermal constraintsself-assembled QDs (typically 5–50 nm)Si-compatible IR photodiodes, QD detectors, integrated photonics[55]
Table 2. Nanomaterial systems for IR detection.
Table 2. Nanomaterial systems for IR detection.
MaterialTypeTunable Range (µm)Key AdvantagesKey ChallengesPrimary Synthesis RouteTypical Mobility (cm2/V·s)Performance record (D*, Jones)Refs.
PbS/PbX2 CQDssemiconductor0.8–4.0good tunability, high absorptionsurface traps, ligand resistivityhot-injection10−2–101> 1013 at 1.55 µm, 300 K[56]
HgTe CQDssemiconductor3–12room-T VLWIR operationoxidation, stabilitymodified hot-injection10−3–10−12 × 1010 at 5 µm, 300 K[29,30,31]
Au/Ag NPsplasmonic metal1–10strong LSPR, ultrafast responselow R, costseed-mediated growthN/A (Metal)N/A (speed <100 fs)[35,37,40]
Graphene QDs2D< 10high mobility, flexibilitylow absorptiontop-down etching~1021011 at 1.5 µm, 300 K[42,57]
BP nanosheets2D semiconductor1–8anisotropy, high mobilityambient instabilityliquid exfoliation102–1031011 at 3.4 µm, 300 K[43,45]
CsPbX3 nanocrystalsperovskite< 1.8high defect tolerance, fast responseion migration, thermal stabilityligand-assisted reprecipitation, hot-injection10−4–10−2109 at
1.5 µm, 300 K
[47]
Bi2Se3 NPstopological insulator2–8topological surface statescomplex synthesis, impuritiescoll. synthesisN/A109 at 4 µm, 300 K[58]
Table 3. Deposition and patterning techniques.
Table 3. Deposition and patterning techniques.
MethodPrincipleScalabilityFilm UniformityResolutionThroughputBest ForRefs.
Spin-Coatingcentrifugal forcelab-scalehigh (thin)wafer-scalehighR&D, test structures[76,77]
Blade/Bar-Coatingmeniscus guidancepilot-lineexcellent (thick)mm scalevery highlarge-area flexible substrates[78]
Inkjet Printingdrop-on-demandhighmoderate20–50 µmmediummultispectral pixel patterning[71,72,73,74,79]
Aerosol Jet Printingfocused aerosol streamhighgood~10 µmmediumdirect write on 3D/CMOS[74,80]
Electrophoretic Deposition (EPD)electric field-drivenmediumvery high (dense)electrode-definedmediumdense LWIR films[81]
Spray Pyrolysisin situ reaction from the misthighmoderatecm scalehighconformal, doped films[77,82]
Table 4. Device Architectures and Their Key Characteristics.
Table 4. Device Architectures and Their Key Characteristics.
ArchitectureOperating MechanismKey MetricsSelectivity MechanismAdvantagesKey Challenges/Noise MechanismRefs.
Photoconductorconductivity modulationR, gain, NEPbandgap-controlled absorptionsimple, high gainhigh 1/f noise, low speed[16,92]
Photodiode (p–i–n)built-in field separationD*, R, EQE, Idarkjunction + optical cavitylow noise, fast, photovoltaiccomplex fabrication, interface traps[93,94]
Plasmonic Hot-Electronhot carrier injectionτ, ηIQEresonance wavelengthultrafast, sub-bandgapvery low ηIQE, thermal noise[95,96]
Hybrid Heterojunctionband alignment engineeringR, spectral rangeband alignmentbroadband, multifunctionalinterface recombination[46,97]
Phototransistor (FET)gate-modulated conductivitygain, NEP, specific detectivitygate-tunable spectral responsetunable gain, very high sensitivitygate hysteresis, stability[98,99]
Metamaterial Absorberresonant cavity enhancementabsorption %, Q-factorresonant spectral filteringnear-unity absorption in an ultra-thin layernarrowband, complex fabrication[100,101]
Avalanche Photodiode (APD)impact ionization and internal carrier multiplication under reverse biasgain (M), D*, bandwidth, excess noise factorprimarily determined by absorber bandgap and optical filtering ainternal gain, high sensitivity, fast detectionMultiplication noise, high bias voltage, temperature sensitivity[102]
Single-Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD)/Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM)Geiger-mode avalanche triggering from single-photon eventsphoton detection efficiency (PDE), timing jitter, dark count ratedefined by absorber spectral response bsingle-photon sensitivity, ultralow signal detectionafterpulsing, dark counts, dead time[103]
a Can be extended using hybrid NP absorbers, resonant cavities, or wavelength-selective heterostructures. b Enhanced through optical filters, cavity engineering, wavelength conversion layers, or NP-assisted spectral tuning.
Table 5. Selected performance metrics of NP-based IR detectors.
Table 5. Selected performance metrics of NP-based IR detectors.
Material/StructureSpectral Range (µm)Peak Wavelength (µm)D* (Jones) aR (A/W)Bias Voltage (V)Operation T (K)Response TimeArchitectureRef.
PbS CQD Photodiode1–21.54> 10110.2–1.2−0.5300µsp–n on Si heterojunction[116]
HgTe CQD Photodiode< 2.81.5510110.240.6300µsp–i–n on Si[117]
Au/graphene/Au< 1.331.332.4 × 101310−30300360 nsplasmonic Schottky[118]
Graphene–PbS CQD Hybrid1.45–1.591.5510101075300Msphotoconductor[119]
CsPbI3/PbS< 1.71.554.5 × 101311.120.53300Msbulk heterojunction[120]
Modified HgTe CQD8–18186.6 × 1080.3380µsMSM-photoconductor[121]
PbSe-MoS22–337.7 × 1010137.61300Msbroadband absorber[122]
HgTe CQD Homojunc. array with Fabry–Perot Cavity1.4–2.52.54.64 × 10110.541300µs56-channel CQD spectrometer array[123]
a The reported D* values were derived under different specific experimental conditions and calculated using dark-current-limited noise assumptions rather than direct noise spectral measurements. Therefore, direct comparison with detectors characterized using measured noise spectra should be treated cautiously.
Table 6. Current challenges and mitigation strategies.
Table 6. Current challenges and mitigation strategies.
Challenge CategorySpecific IssueCurrent Mitigation StrategiesPerformance ImpactKey Research NeedsRefs.
Material stabilityoxidation, ligand desorption, and ion migration (perovskites)inorganic shells, cross-linked ligands, and ALD encapsulationextends operational lifetime from h to > 1000 hin operando degradation studies; predictive stability models[144,145]
Electronic noisehigh Idark, 1/f noise, trap-assisted tunnelinggraded heterojunctions, bulk barriers, trap-passivating ligandsreduces Idark by 2–3 orders of magnitude; lowers NEPcorrelated noise-defect spectroscopy; DFT modeling of trap states[146]
Charge transportlow mobility, energetic disorderatomic/mixed ligand exchange, doping, energy-level alignmentincreases μ (mobility) from 10−3 to > 10 cm2/V·snanoscale mapping of transport[147]
Scalabilityfilm non-uniformity, low throughput, and pattern resolutionslot-die/blade coating, electrohydrodynamic printing, convergent synthesisenables uniform films > 100 cm2; < 5% pixel variationin-line metrology; roll-to-roll process integration[148]
Next-gen. materialsPb/Hg toxicity, stability, and scalability challenges; limited transport performance in lead-free alternativesAg2Se/SiO2/Si heterojunctionD* > 1010 Jones for some Pb-free materials in SWIRdiscovery of new narrow-gap, defect-tolerant compositions[149]
Novel functionalitysingle-band spectral response, limited processingmultispectral inkjet printing, neuromorphic device designenables hyperspectral and pre-processed imagingco-design of materials, devices, and algorithms[150]
Table 7. Future research directions and opportunities for NP-based IR detectors.
Table 7. Future research directions and opportunities for NP-based IR detectors.
Research Focus AreaStrategic GoalEmerging Approach/TechnologyExpected ImpactKey ChallengesRefs.
Stable surface chemistryextend operational lifetimedynamic ligand exchange; self-healing surface layers> 10× stability in airmaintaining conductivity after passivation[151]
Noise suppressionlower NEP and improve D*defect-engineered CQDs, noise-filtered readout circuitsD* > 1013 Jones at 300 Kinterface charge trapping[152]
Quantum transport and tunneling controlband-like transportmixed ligand strategiesμ > 10 cm2/V·sstructural disorder[153]
Scalable manufacturingtransition to roll-to-rollin-line metrology; robotic ink formulationlow-cost, large-area IR sensorsfilm homogeneity[154]
Lead-free alternativesenvironmental safetyAgBiS2, InAs, perovskite derivativessustainable, RoHS-compliant detectors alow mobility, narrow range[155,156]
Neuromorphic/intelligent sensingcombine detection + processingperovskite memristive pixels, optoelectronic synapsesReal-time edge computingscalability, reproducibility[104,157]
Multispectral/polarimetric systemsenhance imaging functionalityprinted heteropixels, anisotropic 2D NPsfilterless multispectral, polarimetric imagingcrosstalk, spectral selectivity[158]
a RoHS = Restriction of Hazardous Substances.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dolatyari, M.; Rostami, A.; Klein, A. Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Fabrication Techniques for Infrared Detectors: A Comprehensive Review. Inorganics 2026, 14, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060153

AMA Style

Dolatyari M, Rostami A, Klein A. Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Fabrication Techniques for Infrared Detectors: A Comprehensive Review. Inorganics. 2026; 14(6):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dolatyari, Mahboubeh, Ali Rostami, and Axel Klein. 2026. "Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Fabrication Techniques for Infrared Detectors: A Comprehensive Review" Inorganics 14, no. 6: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060153

APA Style

Dolatyari, M., Rostami, A., & Klein, A. (2026). Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Fabrication Techniques for Infrared Detectors: A Comprehensive Review. Inorganics, 14(6), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop