Copper-64: An Optimal Radionuclide for the Routine Preparation of PET Imaging Radiotracers from GMP-Lyophilized Gelatin-NOTA-Peptide Kits
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Kit Formulation and 64Cu Labeling
2.2. Kit Formulations Under GMP Conditions and 64Cu Labeling
2.3. Preclinical Evaluation of 64Cu Radiopharmaceuticals
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Preparation of GMP-Lyophilized Gelatin-NOTA-Peptide Kits
3.2. Quality Control and Stability
3.3. Radiochemical Labeling
3.4. Radiopharmaceutical Quality Control
3.5. Cell Culture
3.6. Saturation Binding Evaluation
3.7. In Vitro Evaluation of 64Cu-UBI Uptake in Bacteria
3.8. Conjugation of Peptides with Cy5-NH2
3.9. Specific Uptake of the Peptides In Vitro
3.10. Immunocytochemistry
3.11. Molecular Imaging and Biodistribution
3.12. Inflammation and Infection Induction in Mice
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Cy5 | Cyanine 5 |
| FAP | Fibroblast activation protein |
| iFAP | Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor |
| GMP | Good Manufacturing Practices |
| HPLC | High-performance liquid chromatography |
| PD-L1 | Programmed death ligand 1 |
| iPD-L1 | Programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor |
| SSTR2 | Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 |
Appendix A
| Parameters | Specification | Average of Three Production Batches | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iPSMA | TOC | iPDL1 | iFAP | UBI | ||
| Formulation for freeze-drying | ||||||
| pH of the final mixture | 2.5–3.5 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| Volume (determined by weight) (g) | 2.0 | 1.997–2.006 | 2.003–2.010 | 2.003–2.010 | 1.998–2.005 | 1.996–2.004 |
| Filter integrity (bubble point test) | >56 psi | 79.10 ± 0.37 | 78.99 ± 0.41 | 79.25 ± 0.33 | 79.85 ± 0.12 | 79.19 ± 0.22 |
| 1 M Sodium acetate buffer solution | ||||||
| pH of the buffer | 4.5–5.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.0 |
| Buffer volume (determined by weight) (g) | 1.4985–1.5015 (1.5 ± 0.1%) | 1.501–1.509 | 1.501–1.512 | 1.502–1.511 | 1.502–1.508 | 1.500–1.512 |
| Filter integrity (bubble point test) | >56 psi | 77.10 ± 0.74 | 79.14 ± 0.29 | 78.42 ± 0.61 | 78.16 ± 0.47 | 79.18 ± 0.36 |
| Environmental monitoring | ||||||
| ISO-5 | ||||||
| Viable particles (CFU) | Sedimentation ≤ 1 m3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Contact ≤ 1 per plate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Air ≤ 5 per plate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total particles/m3 | 0.5 µm ≤ 3520 | 1–2 | 0 | 0 | 1–2 | 0 |
| 5.0 µm ≤ 29 | 1 | 1–2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| ISO-6 | ||||||
| Viable particles (CFU) | Sedimentation ≤ 10 m3 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Contact ≤ 5 per plate | 0–1 | 1–2 | 1–2 | 0–2 | 0–1 | |
| Air ≤ 5 per plate | 1–3 | 2–3 | 1–2 | 1–3 | 1–2 | |
| Total particles/m3 | 0.5 µm ≤ 35,200 | 651 ± 102 | 702 ± 87 | 515 ± 52 | 589 ± 68 | 593 ± 49 |
| 5.0 µm ≤ 293 | 18 ± 4 | 17 ± 8 | 21 ± 6 | 20 ± 5 | 19 ± 8 | |
| Standard Parameters | Specification Compliant | Test Method |
|---|---|---|
| Endotoxin level | ≤10 EU/g | LAL assay 1 |
| Molecular weight | ≤6500 Daltons | Rousselot |
| pH (1%, 55 °C) | 4.0–5.5 | EP, USP |
| Loss on drying | ≤7.0% | EP, USP |
| Conductivity | ≤1000 μS.cm−1 | EP, USP |
| Residue limits | ||
| Iron | ≤30 ppm | EP, USP |
| Chromium | ≤10 ppm | EP, USP |
| Zinc | ≤30 ppm | EP, USP |
| Arsenic | ≤0.8 ppm | EP, USP |
| Heavy metals | ≤20 ppm | EP, USP |
| Sulfites (SO2) | ≤20 ppm | EP, USP, JP |
| Peroxides | ≤10 ppm | EP, USP |
| Microbial limits | Specifications | Test Method |
| Total aerobic microbial count-TAMC | ≤100 CFU/g | EP, USP |
| Total yeasts and molds-TYMC | ≤10 CFU/g | EP, USP |
| Salmonella | Absence in 10 g | EP, USP |
| E. coli | Absence in 1 g | EP, USP |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Absence in 1 g | EP, USP |
References
- Thieme, S.; Walther, M.; Pietzsch, H.J.; Henniger, J.; Preusche, S.; Mäding, P.; Steinbach, J. Module-assisted preparation of 64Cu with high specific activity. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012, 70, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazari, P.P.; Singh, S.; Panchal, K.; Kumar, N.; Chaturvedi, S.; Singh, H. Production and Quality control of Cyclotron produced Copper-64: A Validation study for the use of 64CuCl2 as a radiochemical precursor for radiolabeling of ligands. J. Nucl. Med. 2025, 66, 252258. [Google Scholar]
- Jauregui-Osoro, M.; De Robertis, S.; Halsted, P.; Gould, S.M.; Yu, Z.; Paul, R.L.; Marsden, P.K.; Gee, A.D.; Fenwick, A.; Blower, P.J. Production of copper-64 using a hospital cyclotron: Targetry, purification and quality analysis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2021, 42, 1024–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delpassand, E.S.; Ranganathan, D.; Wagh, N.; Shafie, A.; Gaber, A.; Abbasi, A.; Kjaer, A.; Tworowska, I.; Núñez, R. 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT for Imaging Patients with Known or Suspected Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of the First U.S. Prospective, Reader-Masked Clinical Trial. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braune, A.; Oehme, L.; Freudenberg, R.; Hofheinz, F.; van den Hoff, J.; Kotzerke, J.; Hoberück, S. Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution between 18F, 68Ga, and 64Cu phantom measurements using a digital Biograph Vision PET/CT. EJNMMI Phys. 2022, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubíček, V.; Böhmová, Z.; Ševčíková, R.; Vaněk, J.; Lubal, P.; Poláková, Z.; Michalicová, R.; Kotek, J.; Hermann, P. NOTA Complexes with Copper(II) and Divalent Metal Ions: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 3061–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubinec, J.; Širůčková, V.; Havlíčková, J.; Kotek, J.; Kubíček, V.; Lubal, P.; Hermann, P. Complexes of NOTA-Monoamides with CuII Ions: Structural, Equilibrium, and Kinetic Study. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 19, e202200173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Hong, H.; Engle, J.W.; Bean, J.; Yang, Y.; Leigh, B.R.; Barnhart, T.E.; Cai, W. Positron emission tomography imaging of CD105 expression with a 64Cu-labeled monoclonal antibody: NOTA is superior to DOTA. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Pan, Y.; Wen, H.; Xu, X.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, G.; et al. Comparison of 64Cu-DOTA-PSMA-3Q and 64Cu-NOTA-PSMA-3Q utilizing NOTA and DOTA as bifunctional chelators in prostate cancer: Preclinical assessment and preliminary clinical PET/CT imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2025, 52, 2792–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shabsigh, M.; Solomon, L.A. Peptide PET Imaging: A Review of Recent Developments and a Look at the Future of Radiometal-Labeled Peptides in Medicine. Chem. Biomed. Imaging 2024, 2, 615–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiliding Marine Biotech Co., Ltd. Method for Removing Heavy Metal Ions by Using Gelatin. CN104946138A; Publication date 30 September 2015, Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN104946138A/en (accessed on 1 February 2026).
- Mikhailov, O.V. Gelatin as It Is: History and Modernity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferro-Flores, G.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Ocampo-García, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Orocio-Rodríguez, E.; Davanzo, J.; García-Pérez, F.O. Clinical translation of a PSMA inhibitor for 99mTc-based SPECT. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2017, 48, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trujillo-Benítez, D.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Ocampo-García, B.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Bravo-Villegas, G.; Morales-Ávila, E.; Cruz-Nova, P.; Díaz-Nieto, L.; García-Quiroz, J.; et al. Design, Synthesis and Preclinical Assessment of 99mTc-iFAP for In Vivo Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) Imaging. Molecules 2022, 27, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferro-Flores, G.; Ocampo-García, B.; Cruz-Nova, P.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Bravo-Villegas, G.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Michel-Sánchez, E.; García-Pérez, O.; Lara-Almazán, N.; et al. 99mTc-Labeled Cyclic Peptide Targeting PD-L1 as a Novel Nuclear Imaging Probe. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina-García, V.; Ocampo-García, B.E.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.L.; Aranda-Lara, L.; García-Becerra, R.; Ordaz-Rosado, D.; Melendez-Alafort, L. A freeze-dried kit formulation for the preparation of Lys(27)(99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC)-Exendin(9-39)/99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-Tyr3-Octreotide to detect benign and malignant insulinomas. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferro-Flores, G.; Arteaga de Murphy, C.; Pedraza-López, M.; Meléndez-Alafort, L.; Zhang, Y.M.; Rusckowski, M.; Hnatowich, D.J. In vitro and in vivo assessment of 99mTc-UBI specificity for bacteria. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paterson, B.M.; Donnelly, P.S. Macrocyclic bifunctional chelators and conjugation strategies for copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals. In Insights from Imaging in Bioinorganic Chemistry: Advances in Inorganic Chemistry; van Eldik, R., Hubbard, C.D., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 223–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, X.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, B.; Deng, S.; Wu, Y. 64Cu-based Radiopharmaceuticals in Molecular Imaging. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 18, 1533033819830758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faivre-Chauvet, A.; Bourdeau, C.; Bourgeois, M. Radiopharmaceutical good practices: Regulation between hospital and industry. Front. Nucl. Med. 2022, 2, 990330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bal, W.; Christodoulou, J.; Sadler, P.J.; Tucker, A. Multi-metal binding site of serum albumin. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1998, 70, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tudoroiu-Cornoiu, M.R.; Chilug, E.L.; Cocioabă, D.; Băruţă, S.; Şerban, R.; Ion, A.C.; Niculae, D. Assessment of chromatography separation parameters in the quality control of copper-64-labeled neurotensin-like peptides. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2024, 333, 5531–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, M.A.; Mathias, C.J. Synthesis and formulation of [64Cu]Cu-PTSM for PET perfusion imaging in small animal models. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2022, 182, 110119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amraee, N.; Alirezapour, B.; Hosntalab, M.; Hadadi, A.; Yousefnia, H. Development of [64Cu]Cu-NODAGA-RGD-BBN as a Novel Radiotracer for Dual Integrin and GRPR-targeted Tumor PET Imaging. Curr. Radiopharm. 2025, 18, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, A.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.K.; Lee, H.B.; Han, W. Impact of PD-L1 upregulation on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer using a 4T1 murine model. Int. J. Oncol. 2025, 67, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, A.M.; Wong, Y.H. Activation of nuclear factor {kappa}B by somatostatin type 2 receptor in pancreatic acinar AR42J cells involves G{alpha}14 and multiple signaling components: A mechanism requiring protein kinase, C.; calmodulin-dependent kinase, I.I.; ERK, and c-Src. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 34617–34625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baird, S.K.; Rigopoulos, A.; Cao, D.; Allan, L.; Renner, C.; Scott, F.E.; Scott, A.M. Integral membrane protease fibroblast activation protein sensitizes fibrosarcoma to chemotherapy and alters cell death mechanisms. Apoptosis 2015, 20, 1483–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kranzbühler, B.; Salemi, S.; Umbricht, C.A.; Deberle, L.M.; Müller, C.; Burger, I.A.; Hermanns, T.; Sulser, T.; Eberli, D. Concentration-dependent effects of dutasteride on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression and uptake of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in LNCaP cells. Prostate 2019, 79, 1450–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardinale, J.; Schäfer, M.; Benešová, M.; Bauder-Wüst, U.; Leotta, K.; Eder, M.; Neels, O.C.; Haberkorn, U.; Giesel, F.L.; Kopka, K. Preclinical Evaluation of 18F-PSMA-1007, a New Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand for Prostate Cancer Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butakova, N.S.; Uspenskaia, A.A.; Zyk, N.Y.; Petrov, S.A.; Popovicheva, K.A.; Lunev, A.S.; Petrosova, K.A.; Mitrofanov, I.A.; Ivashkovskaya, M.N.; Evteev, S.A.; et al. A series of conjugates based on prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands with the chelating agent DOTA: Synthesis, radiolabeling, and biological activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2026, 303, 118433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, H.; Qi, X.; Fu, H.; Xu, J.; Zheng, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hua, H.; Xu, W.; Xu, Z.; et al. Imaging diagnosis and efficacy monitoring by [89Zr]Zr-DFO-KN035 immunoPET in patients with PD-L1-positive solid malignancies. Theranostics 2024, 14, 392–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begum, N.J.; Glatting, G.; Eiber, M.; Beer, A.J.; Kletting, P. An in silico study on the effect of the radionuclide half-life on PET/CT imaging with PSMA-targeting radioligands. Nuklearmedizin 2021, 60, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zia, N.A.; Cullinane, C.; Van Zuylekom, J.K.; Waldeck, K.; McInnes, L.E.; Buncic, G.; Haskali, M.B.; Roselt, P.D.; Hicks, R.J.; Donnelly, P.S. A Bivalent Inhibitor of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Radiolabeled with Copper-64 with High Tumor Uptake and Retention. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 14991–14994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Test | Specification | Test Method (EP, USP) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radioactive concentration/activity per vial | 925 ± 50 MBq/mL | Ionization chamber | 925 ± 41 MBq/mL |
| Specific activity | ≥3.7 GBq/μg Cu | Gamma-ray spectrometry with HPGe detector/ICP-MS | 3.7 GBq/µg Cu |
| Identity of 64Cu | 511 keV and 1345 keV | Gamma-ray spectrometry with HPGe detector | Complies |
| Radionuclidic purity at EOB | ≥99% | Gamma-ray spectrometry with HPGe detector | 99.96 ± 0.03 |
| Chemical purity | Co, Ni ≤ 0.1 µg/GBq Pb ≤ 0.5 µg/GBq Fe, Zn ≤ 1.0 µg/GBq | ICP-MS/ Ionization chamber | Ni 0.002 µg/GBq Co < 0.001 µg/GBq Pb < 0.002 µg/GBq Zn 0.043 µg/GBq Fe 0.012 µg/GBq |
| Radiochemical purity | ≥98% | Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using silica gel-coated plates as stationary phase and methanol as mobile phase. | 98.8 ± 0.6% |
| Sterility test | Sterile | Sterility test | Sterile |
| Bacterial endotoxin level | <20 EU/mL | LAL bacterial endotoxin test | Complies |
| Parameters | Specification FEUM * | Average of Three Production Batches | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64Cu-iPSMA | 64Cu-TOC | 64Cu-iPDL1 | 64Cu-iFAP | 64Cu-UBI | ||
| Appearance | Limpid solution | Limpid solution | Limpid solution | Limpid solution | Limpid solution | Limpid solution |
| Color | Colorless | Colorless | Colorless | Colorless | Colorless | Colorless |
| pH | 4.0–6.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 |
| Sterility | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Bacterial endotoxins | <175 UE/V | <0.625 UE/V | <0.625 UE/V | <0.625 UE/V | <0.625 UE/V | <0.625 UE/V |
| Radiochemical purity | >97% | 99.1 ± 0.6% | 98.5 ± 0.4% | 98.9 ± 0.8% | 98.7 ± 0.6% | 99.0 ± 0.5% |
| Radiochemical purity at 24 h | >97% | 98.8 ± 0.4% | 99.0 ± 0.6% | 98.5 ± 0.9% | 98.1 ± 0.5% | 98.7 ± 0.4% |
| Radiochemical purity after 1 h in human serum at 37 °C. | >97% | 98.3 ± 0.7% | 98.7 ± 0.5% | 98.8 ± 0.3% | 98.3 ± 0.7% | 98.2 ± 0.6% |
| Radioligand | Kd (nM) (95% CI) | Bmax (nM) (95% CI) | Biodistribution (Tissue, % ID/g at 2 h) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung | Kidney | Intestine | Liver | Spleen | Tumor | |||
| 64Cu-iPDL1 | 4.39 (3.35 to 5.77) | 1.91 (1.82 to 2.02) | 0.53 ± 0.21 | 29.36 ± 3.22 | 0.69 ± 0.34 | 4.18 ± 1.53 | 0.94 ± 0.27 | 7.43 ± 1.77 |
| 64Cu-iPSMA | 0.46 (0.38 to 0.57) | 3.64 (3.44 to 3.83) | 0.23 ± 0.11 | 21.72 ± 2.31 | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 2.83 ± 1.19 | 0.63 ± 0.17 | 8.17 ± 1.52 |
| 64Cu-TOC | 1.11 (0.65 to 1.87) | 2.83 (2.64 to 3.02) | 0.24 ± 0.16 | 28.57 ± 2.38 | 2.49 ± 0.64 | 3.71 ± 0.94 | 0.56 ± 0.13 | 6.67 ± 2.14 |
| 64Cu-iFAP | 3.06 (2.31 to 4.07) | 2.87 (2.73 to 3.02) | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 8.66 ± 1.45 | 0.23 ± 0.11 | 1.09 ± 0.21 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 5.81 ± 1.27 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Azorín-Vega, E.; Ocampo-García, B.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Lara-Almazán, N.; Herrera-García, C.; Meléndez-Alafort, L.; Ferro-Flores, G. Copper-64: An Optimal Radionuclide for the Routine Preparation of PET Imaging Radiotracers from GMP-Lyophilized Gelatin-NOTA-Peptide Kits. Inorganics 2026, 14, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060146
Luna-Gutiérrez M, Azorín-Vega E, Ocampo-García B, Jiménez-Mancilla N, Santos-Cuevas C, Lara-Almazán N, Herrera-García C, Meléndez-Alafort L, Ferro-Flores G. Copper-64: An Optimal Radionuclide for the Routine Preparation of PET Imaging Radiotracers from GMP-Lyophilized Gelatin-NOTA-Peptide Kits. Inorganics. 2026; 14(6):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060146
Chicago/Turabian StyleLuna-Gutiérrez, Myrna, Erika Azorín-Vega, Blanca Ocampo-García, Nallely Jiménez-Mancilla, Clara Santos-Cuevas, Nancy Lara-Almazán, Cintya Herrera-García, Laura Meléndez-Alafort, and Guillermina Ferro-Flores. 2026. "Copper-64: An Optimal Radionuclide for the Routine Preparation of PET Imaging Radiotracers from GMP-Lyophilized Gelatin-NOTA-Peptide Kits" Inorganics 14, no. 6: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060146
APA StyleLuna-Gutiérrez, M., Azorín-Vega, E., Ocampo-García, B., Jiménez-Mancilla, N., Santos-Cuevas, C., Lara-Almazán, N., Herrera-García, C., Meléndez-Alafort, L., & Ferro-Flores, G. (2026). Copper-64: An Optimal Radionuclide for the Routine Preparation of PET Imaging Radiotracers from GMP-Lyophilized Gelatin-NOTA-Peptide Kits. Inorganics, 14(6), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics14060146

