Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Photocatalytic Performances and Mechanistic Insights for Novel Ag-Bridged Dual Z-Scheme AgI/Ag3PO4/WO3 Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Italian Contribution to the Recent Growth of the Luminescent 1,3-Bis(Pyridin-2-yl)benzene Platinum(II) Complex Family
Previous Article in Special Issue
Redox Mediators for Li2CO3 Decomposition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure and Electrochemical Properties of Pure and Vanadium-Doped Li4Ti5O12 Nanoflakes for High Performance Supercapacitors

by
Mudda Deepak
1,
Obili M. Hussain
1,* and
Christian M. Julien
2,*
1
Thin Films Laboratory, Physics Department, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India
2
Institut de Minéralogie, de Physique des Matériaux et Cosmologie (IMPMC), Sorbonne Université, UMR-CNRS 7590, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2025, 13(7), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13070223
Submission received: 22 May 2025 / Revised: 28 June 2025 / Accepted: 29 June 2025 / Published: 1 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Research on Electrochemical Energy Storage Materials)

Abstract

Nanostructured binary metal oxides have demonstrated the potential for increased electrochemical performance due to their structural stability, electronic conductivity, and various oxidation states. The Li4Ti5O12 was successfully synthesized via a hydrothermal procedure at different reaction periods (12, 18, and 24 h), and its microstructural and supercapacitive characteristics were studied. The XRD and XPS studies confirm the formation of Li4Ti5O12 in pure phase when synthesized at 24 h (LTO@24) of reaction time. FESEM and HRTEM images reveal nanoflake surface morphology. Both LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 nanoflakes exhibited impressive electrochemical performance, with specific capacitance values of 357 and 442 F g−1, respectively, at 1 A g−1. The V-LTO@24 showed remarkable supercapacitor properties, demonstrating excellent rate capability and cycleability that surpass those of pure LTO@24.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The fast-increasing energy crunch and depletion of fossil fuel resources have prompted researchers to investigate efficient energy storage systems such as batteries and supercapacitors. Batteries are the most utilized energy devices owing to their high energy capacity, whereas capacitors remain the preferred choice even to date when considerable energy is required at high power. In recent times, supercapacitors have been observed as a fabulous consideration owing to their high energy density, excellent reversibility, rapid charge/discharge capability, and extended cycle life [1,2,3,4]. However, they have been encountering performance degradation and diminutive cycle stability for long-term current solutions [5,6]. The development of flexible, lightweight, environmentally friendly, and efficient energy storage devices with high energy and power densities mainly depends on the fabrication of suitable electrode material with required properties and is one of the key issues of current research [7,8,9].
Transition-metal oxides (TMOs) have been extensively considered as electrode materials due to their superior physicochemical properties, such as multiple valences, fast ion/electron transport, and good structural stability as electrodes in high-efficiency lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and supercapacitors (SCs). Though these TMOs elude the formation of Li dendrites, numerous challenges such as poor intrinsic electrical conductivity, significant volume alteration during intercalation, voltage lapses between charge–discharge and electrode decomposition are yet to be addressed [10,11,12]. Many transition-metal oxides (TMOs), such as MnO2, Co3O4, MoO3, LiCoO2, LiMn2O4, NiCoO2, MnCoO2, Mn(OH)2, Ni(OH)2, Li2TiO3, etc., have been commercially employed in LIBs and supercapacitors [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Among TMOs, lithium titanate (LTO) epitomizes the solid solution Li3+xTi6−xO12 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) family with a crystal structure that belongs to the Fd 3 ¯ m space group. Part of Li+ are located at 8a Wyckoff sites and all Ti-ions and another part of Li+ are positioned at 16d sites at a ratio of Li:Ti = 1:5, whereas oxygen-ions inhabit the 32e sites and hence LTO can be chemically designated as Li3(8a)[LiTi54+](16d)O12(32e). The spinel lithium titanate (LTO) is a potential anode material that can replace graphite because it provides a high voltage of 1.55 V against Li insertion, high power density (~10 kW kg−1), and outstanding structural stability with zero strain during intercalation. In addition, excellent pseudo-capacitive behavior, a Faradaic process, has been identified in some modified LTO to transcend the limit of theoretical capacity by improving the lithium-ion storage, providing high power and energy densities over a varied temperature range. However, the poor electronic conductivity due to a dearth of electrons in the 3d orbital of Ti and the low Li diffusion coefficient impede the electrochemical performance of LTO for practical use in LIBs and SCs [22,23,24,25]. The pseudocapacitive behavior of LTO may be significantly enriched by employing synergistic effects of multiple modifications by creating additional active sites. Intensive investigations have been made over the past one decade to improve reversible specific capacity and superior rate capability by adopting several strategies such as morphological engineering by optimizing the size and shape of nanoparticles, doping with a suitable metallic or non-metallic ions, formation of nano composite with carbonaceous materials (CNTs/rGO), heterogeneous phase control, etc. Several researchers synthesized LTO in various compositions and nano-structural designs utilizing various fabrication techniques to enhance the electrochemical performance for utilization in high-efficiency energy storage devices. Further, attempts were also made to improve the electrical conductivity of Li4Ti5O12 by doping with a suitable transition metal cation into Li or Ti sites [26,27].
Among the potential dopants, vanadium is distinguished as a noteworthy contender owing to its superior electrical conductivity and redox properties. Vanadium oxides have been extensively researched as electrochemical energy storage materials for supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries due to their capacity for redox intercalation, attributed to the diverse oxidation states of vanadium (+2, +3, +4, and +5). V is an exceptionally suitable dopant for LTO, as it maintains the integrity of its phase and lattice parameters because of the compatibility between the ionic radii of Ti4+ and V5+ [8]. Multiple reports discussed the utility of LTO and vanadium-doped LTO in the context of Li-ion batteries and hybrid supercapacitors [28,29]. A detailed review on advanced pseudocapacitive lithium titanate towards next-generation energy storage devices was reported by Ge et al. [23]. Several researchers reported the synthesis of LTO in typical surface morphologies, including nanoparticles, nanowires, and nanosheets, and demonstrated notable pseudocapacitive contributions. Batsukh et al. [30] synthesized LTO materials via the solid-state method and reported a maximum specific capacitance of 3.59 F g−1. Tian et al [31] synthesized LTO consisting of ultrafine nanowires by ion exchange process in a liquid phase environment and demonstrated a specific capacity of ~178 mAh g−1 at 200 mA g−1 even after 2500 cycles. Xing et al [26] synthesized Li4Ti5O12–graphene hybrid micro/nanostructures and pine needles by an effective hydrothermal process and demonstrated specific capacitances of 706 F g−1 and 314 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, respectively, with cycle retention of 90%. Lee et al [32] fabricated asymmetric hybrid supercapacitors using Li4Ti5O12 as an electrode and reported a high specific capacitance of 63 F g−1.
The current research work involves the synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes by the hydrothermal technique at various reaction times and optimized with respect to the microstructural properties. The synthesized Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes at a reaction period of 24 h demonstrated exceptional electrochemical performance with a specific capacitance of 357 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1. For further enhancement of electrical conductivity and hence the specific capacitance, the Li4Ti5O12 is doped with vanadium and reported 442 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 current density with admirable rate capability and cycle stability.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Studies of Pristine Li4Ti5O12Nanoflakes

2.1.1. XRD Analysis

The XRD analysis was employed to confirm the crystalline structure and phase purity of the hydrothermally synthesized Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes. Figure 1 illustrates the XRD spectra of Li4Ti5O12 nanopowders synthesized at various reaction time periods. The XRD spectra of Li4Ti5O12 synthesized for 12 and 18 h displayed an additional minor anatase (A) and rutile (R) phase of TiO2 at 2θ = 25.30° (JCPDS card 21-1272) and 2θ = 27.47° (JCPDS card 12-1276), respectively, alongside the Li4Ti5O12 phase. This phenomenon may be attributed to inadequate reaction times, leading to incomplete phase transformation and the presence of residual TiO2 [33,34]. By extending the reaction time to 24 h, the XRD reflections associated with the TiO2 phases are no longer present, while peaks corresponding to the cubic spinel Li4Ti5O12 phase emerged. The spectrum showed predominantly (111) orientation at a 2θ value of 18.30° along with the other diffraction peaks corresponding to the planes of the cubic spinel Li4Ti5O12 structure with the Fd 3 ¯ m space group (JCPDS card 49-0207) [35,36,37]. The results indicate that the product progressively converted to the pure cubic spinel Li4Ti5O12 by the extension of reaction time to 24 h.
The Debye–Scherrer formula was used to estimate the crystallite size (L) of the as-produced samples using all XRD reflections:
L = k λ β cos θ ,
where θ is the Bragg angle, β is the full width at half-maximum, λ is the wavelength of X-ray radiation, and k is equal to 0.9. Additionally, dislocation density (δ), microstrain (ε), and unit volume (V) values are calculated (see Table 1) based on the following relations [35,38]:
δ = 1 L 2 ,
ε = β   c o s θ 4 ,
V = a3,
d = a h 2 + k 2 + l 2 ,
The results in Table 1 show that the size of the crystallites increases as the hydrothermal reaction time increases from 12 to 24 h. The unit cell volume of LTO synthesized at 24 h and the estimated lattice parameter value a deduced from Equations (4) and (5) are in good agreement with the reported value [39,40,41]. Nanoparticles of smaller crystallites have a higher surface area-to-volume ratio, which is important for strengthening the electrode/electrolyte interface, facilitating quicker ion diffusion, and increasing the material’s charge storage capacity.

2.1.2. Surface Morphology Analysis

The surface morphological features of the material are an essential aspect that is intricately linked to the specific surface area, diffusion pathways, surface-to-volume ratios, and consequently, the performance of supercapacitors. The surface microstructure of hydrothermal-synthesized Li4Ti5O12 nanoparticles is characterized using FE-SEM. Figure 2 presents the SEM micrographs of Li4Ti5O12 nanoparticles at various magnifications, prepared through the hydrothermal method at different reaction times. The influence of reaction time on surface morphology is distinctly evident in the SEM micrograph. Figure 2a,b show the SEM images of the Li4Ti5O12 sample synthesized at 12 h. The SEM images demonstrate the formation of interconnected nanoflakes forming three-dimensional flower-like structures. In high magnification SEM images, the assembly of nanoparticles with nanoflake-like structures having a rough surface, non-uniform size, and thinner nanoflakes with uneven edges may be due to the short hydrothermal reaction times. The surface morphology was seen to alter when reaction time varied from 12 to 18 h. The formation of nanoflakes of varied sizes with well-defined edges is observed at a reaction time of 18 h, as seen in Figure 2c,d. Furthermore, prolonging the reaction period to 24 h resulted in the formation of a well-defined, smooth surface with assembly of relatively uniform length of the nanoflakes, which were about 60 nm long and 20 nm wide, as shown in Figure 2e,f. Because of the prolonged reaction time, the flakes became firmly packed together and eventually formed a micro-network. These results indicate that the reaction time plays a pivotal on the surface morphology of nanostructures. The dimensional nanoflakes have a porous nature and a good surface area. This type of structure significantly minimizes the resistance associated with electrolyte penetration and diffusion, while facilitating rapid ion and electron transfer. Additionally, it offers an ample effective area for interactions between electrolyte ions and active materials, enhancing Faradaic reactions during the electrochemical process [42,43,44,45].
HRTEM is used as a representative to further characterize the shape and structure of the Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes. Figure 3 displays the typical TEM micrographs for the 24 h sample. The TEM image in Figure 3a demonstrates structural characteristics of Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes, which are consistent with the observations of the SEM data. The Fourier transformation (FFT) derived from the HRTEM image of nanoflakes distinctly reveals a symmetrical pattern, as exemplified in the inset of Figure 3b. The measured interplanar distance (d-spacing) of 0.48 nm corresponds to the (111) crystallographic plane of the Li4Ti5O12 spinel structure. Figure 3c shows the selected area electron diffraction pattern with the indexed diffraction planes of (111), (222), (331), and (531) corresponding to the cubic spinel Li4Ti5O12 structured phase, indicating the polycrystalline nature of Li4Ti5O12. HRTEM pictures shown in Figure 3b,c confirm the phase purity of the produced Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes.

2.1.3. XPS Analysis

The XPS measurements were piloted to analyze the chemical composition and metal oxidation states of Li4Ti5O12@24 nanoflakes, as shown in Figure 4. The presence of Li, Ti, and O elements is confirmed by the XPS survey spectrum presented in Figure 4a. The Li 1s core level XPS spectrum shown in Figure 4b in the low binding energy region displays a Li 1s peak at 54.8 eV, which is attributed to the Li-O bond. The Ti 2p core level XPS spectrum, as illustrated in Figure 4c, displays a distinct set of Ti 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 lines doublet peaks at about 464.7 and 459 eV, respectively, which are indicative of the Ti4+ state. The O 1s peak at about 530.4 eV corresponds to metal–oxygen bonds and is shown in Figure 4d. The presence of core-level binding energy peaks is almost similar to the reported values and confirms the phase purity and chemical purity of the LTO spinel phase [26].

2.1.4. Electrochemical Analysis

The electrochemical properties of Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes synthesized by a hydrothermal method were carried out by a three-electrode system in 1 mol L−1 KOH aqueous electrolyte, and the data is shown in Figure 5. The C measurements were conducted at different scan rates from 1 to 50 mV s−1 in the potential range of −0.3–0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl. The CV plots of LTO electrodes exhibited a couple of well-defined oxidation/reduction peaks attributed to the reversible faradic reactions. The marginal shift towards a lower potential of the cathodic peak and shift of the anodic peak towards a higher potential with scan rate has been observed from CV plots (Figure 5a). The polarization value, which is the difference between the cathodic and anodic peaks, is observed to be decreased with the increasing scan rate, representing the fast kinetics and reversibility in the electrode, and the redox process is governed by Ti+3/Ti+4. The increased voltametric currents in association with the marginal shift in the peak potential by increasing the scan rate indicate outstanding rate performance and electrochemical reversibility. The flake-like morphology of the LTO@24 electrode supports fast electron/ion transfer between the electrode and electrolyte, and hence, increases the total amount of charge storage due to the contributions of both capacitive and intercalation/deintercalation mechanisms. Additionally, the total charge accumulated in the LTO electrode as a result of the redox reaction was determined using the area under the current-voltage curve at a constant scan rate. The specific capacitance Cs of the electrode at each scan rate was calculated using the subsequent Equation (6) [46]:
C s = 1 m ν V V a V c I V d V ,
where ν is the potential scanning rate, m denotes the mass of active electrode material, and ΔV = VcVa represents the potential window for the discharging process. The estimated specific capacity values of LTO@12 and LTO@18 form CV plots (CV plots are provided in Figures S1 and S2 (Supplementary Materials file)) are 50 and 91 F g−1, respectively, at 1 mV s−1. The lower value of specific capacities is because of the presence of additional phases and the formation of small nanoflakes with different sizes and uneven edges due to short hydrothermal reaction time periods. The specific capacities of the LTO@24 electrode were determined to be 123, 92, 80, 64, and 57 F g−1at scan rates of 1, 5, 10, 30, and 50 mV s−1, respectively. The area enclosed by the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves is observed to be directly proportional to their specific capacitance. The sharp decrease in specific capacitance at higher scan rates is due to limited ion diffusion and charge transfer kinetics, which restricts the ability to fully utilize its surface area for charge storage, whereas the specific capacitance is higher due to the availability of sufficient time for ion diffusion into the electrode, allowing greater charge accumulation. The anodic and cathodic peak currents are observed to be increasing linearly with the square root of the scan rate, indicating that the redox reaction mechanism mainly belongs to diffusion-controlled and partly capacitive-controlled.
The GCD measurements were conducted under identical experimental circumstances for the LTO@24 nanoflake electrodes from −0.3 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl at various current densities ranging from 1 to 5 A g−1, and the findings are presented in Figure 5b. The non-linear behavior of the plots results from fast faradic redox reactions in the LTO@24 electrodes. The specific capacitance Cs can be determined using the following Equation (7) [46,47]:
C s = I t m V ,
where I is the discharge current, m is the mass of the active material, ΔV is the potential window, and ∆t is the discharge time. The estimated specific capacities of LTO@12 and LTO@18 (from the GCD plots shown in Figures S1 and S2) are 67.0 and 97.8 F g−1 at 1 A g−1. According to the data shown in Figure 5, the determined specific capacities of the LTO@24 nanoflakes electrode are 357, 128, 107, 85, and 45 F g−1at current densities of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 A g−1, respectively. The non-linear dependent-current responses with good symmetry at a given current density in GCD behavior indicate the Faradaic property of the electrode material. The GCD plateau demonstrates various regions: a large initial voltage drop, because of the internal resistance, a time-dependent linear deviation potential corresponding to double layer capacitance, and a marginal slope variation related to the time variation of charge transfer reaction. The voltage plateaus observed from GCD confirm the electrochemical behavior, which underwent an intercalation/deintercalation battery-type mechanism, represent a longer discharge time and high specific capacitance at lower current densities. It is evident that specific capacitance decreases as current density escalates. The observed decrease in capacitance can be ascribed to the restricted duration for electrolyte ions to infiltrate the active material when subjected to elevated current densities [48,49]. The electrochemical studies clearly demonstrate that the flake-like morphological features of the LTO@24 electrode played a key role in delivering a significant specific capacitance.
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were conducted prior to and after 2000 cycles, across a frequency spectrum of 1 Hz to 100 kHz, to assess electron transfer characteristics. The Nyquist plots illustrated in Figure 5c demonstrate a semicircular arc alongside and a linear segment in the low-frequency range, which indicates capacitive behavior and a rapid ion diffusion mechanism within the electrode. The solution resistance (Rs) and charge transfer resistance (Rct) were estimated from the intercept and from the diameter of the semicircle, respectively. The analogous electrical circuit is depicted in Figure 5e. The results of the EIS fitting are listed in Table S1. The Rs values are recorded at 0.7 and 0.8 Ω prior to and following cycling, whereas the Rct values show an increase from 2.18 to 4.8 Ω. The analysis demonstrates that the distinctive structure of Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes has the potential to enhance the faradaic active sites.
Figure 5d illustrates the long-cycle performance and Coulombic efficiency of the LTO@24. The cyclic stability holds significant importance for supercapacitor applications; therefore, an extensive examination of long-term cycling performance was conducted at a current density of 5 A g−1. Additionally, the Coulombic efficiency (η) value was derived from the subsequent Equation (8) [50]:
η = t d t c × 100 ,
In this context, td and tc denote the times associated with discharge and charge, respectively. The η values remain remarkably stable at approximately 98.5% for the entire 2000 cycle duration, signifying the exceptional electrochemical reversibility.

2.2. Vanadium-Doped Li4Ti5O12 (V-LTO@24)

The vanadium-doped Li4Ti5O12 (V-LTO@24) nanopowder was prepared under similar conditions as mentioned in Section 3.3 at low concentration (0.02 mol.%), and the microstructural and electrochemical properties.

2.2.1. Structural Studies

Figure 6a presents the X-ray diffraction spectra of V-LTO@24 (Li4Ti5−xVxO12; x = 0.02 mol.%) compared with pure LTO@24. No undesired impurities or new phases were observed at a lower concentration of vanadium dopant (x = 0.02), thereby affirming the successful incorporation of the vanadium ion into the lattice of Li4Ti5O12 without the emergence of any additional phases, confirming the pure cubic spinel phase. Moreover, upon magnifying the peak location of the (111) plane, as seen in Figure 6b, the diffraction peak of the V-LTO@24 nanoflakes exhibits a minor shift towards a higher angle, suggesting that the doping of V has infiltrated the lattice structure of LTO nanoflakes.
The estimated crystallographic parameters of LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 are listed in Table 1. The results show that the lattice parameter of V-LTO@24 (a = 8.340 Å) is lower compared to that of LTO@24. This reduction suggests that V doping has induced a lattice shrinkage in the material. Such a phenomenon can be attributed to the substitution of Ti4+ ions (ri = 0.605 Å) by smaller V5+ ions (ri = 0.54 Å) within the spinel lattice structure of Li4Ti5O12. The relatively close ionic radii facilitate the incorporation of V5+ into the Ti4+ sites with minimal distortion to the overall crystal framework. The replacement of Ti4+ with the smaller V5+ ions leads to a slight contraction of the lattice. However, the doping has significantly influenced the electrical conductivity of the host material. The measured electrical conductivity of V-LTO@24 is 3.4 × 10 −4 S cm−1, which is observed to be one order less than that of pure LTO@24 (8.2 × 10−6 S cm−1). Such structural and electrical modifications can directly impact the electrochemical properties, potentially enhancing the material’s performance in supercapacitor applications, as supported by the previous literature [28,29].

2.2.2. Surface Morphology

The surface morphological features of V-LTO@24 are shown in Figure 7. The nanoflakes evidently aggregate to create a three-dimensional nanoflower-like structure. Nonetheless, upon vanadium introduction into LTO@24, an effect of doping was noted on the surface morphology. The addition of vanadium resulted in a tighter packing of nanoflakes and the emergence of micro-network-like structures from the recrystallisation of initially formed nanoflakes. The vertically orientated arrays cross and interpenetrate, porous network-like heterostructures offer significantly elevated active surface sites, and is advantageous for enhancing the electrochemical reactions.

2.2.3. Electrochemical Analysis of V-LTO@24

Figure 8 presents the comprehensive electrochemical performance of V-LTO@24 electrodes. Figure 8a illustrates the CV curves of V-LTO@24 at scan rates varying from 1.0 to 50 mV s−1 within a potential range of −0.3 to 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl. The CV plots reveal a distinct difference between pure LTO@24 and V-LTO@24, highlighting the influence of vanadium doping on electrochemical properties. All the cyclic voltammetry curves display a pair of broad redox peaks with subsidized intensity and enhanced polarization value. Moreover, the V-LTO@24 exhibited more current density due to the negative impact on the redox lithiation process, which may be due to the substitution of V+5 in the less electroactive Ti+4 centers that donate the electrons to the conduction band. This leads to the enhancement of the capacitive-controlled transport mechanism. Notably, V-LTO@24 exhibited a substantially larger enclosed integral area as compared to LTO@24, indicating the greater ability to store and release charges during the electrochemical cycling, reflecting enhanced electrochemical activity. The specific capacitance (SC) values of V-LTO@24 nanostructures were found to be 413, 188, 135, 83, and 66 F g−1at scan rates of 1, 5, 10, 30, and 50 mV s−1, respectively. With an increase in scan rate, the region beneath the redox peaks expands, and the anodic peaks show a shift towards more positive potentials, whilst the cathodic peaks shift towards negative potentials, indicating an improvement in current responsiveness. As the scan rate increased, a gradual decrease in specific capacitance was observed.
The capacitive performance of the synthesized V-LTO@24 electrodes was thoroughly assessed by recording galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) data and is shown in Figure 8b. An in-depth examination of these curves demonstrated the outstanding capacitive properties of the V-LTO@24 electrodes. The estimated specific capacitances were found to be 442, 285, 171, 142, and 77 F g−1 at current densities of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 A g−1, respectively. The results demonstrate the remarkable rate capability and strong electrochemical performance of the V-LTO@24 electrodes across a broad spectrum of current densities. Additionally, all GCD curves demonstrate a clear potential plateau and remarkable symmetry, affirming the high Coulombic efficiency and exceptional reversibility of the faradaic redox reactions involved.
The electrical properties of the V-LTO@24 electrode were further investigated through EIS measurements over a frequency range from 1 Hz to 100 kHz. This analysis provides critical insights into the electrode’s ability to efficiently facilitate charge transfer and maintain stable performance across different frequencies. Figure 8c shows the Nyquist plot with the equivalent circuit for the 1st and 2000th cycle. Results of the EIS fitting using the equivalent circuit model in Figure 5e (including Rs, Rct, Cdl, and W elements) are listed in Table S2. The solution resistance (Rs) and charge transfer resistance (Rct) values were found to increase from 0.38 to 0.5 Ω and from 0.6 to 0.9 Ω, respectively, and hence the decrease in specific capacitance with the number of cycles.
The cycle performance of the V-LTO@24 electrode evaluated using GCD profiles is shown in Figure 8d. The results revealed that 90% of the initial capacitance was retained after 2000 cycles at a current density of 5 A g−1, with a remarkable Coulombic efficiency of 99.8%. This indicates the excellent cyclic stability of the V-LTO@24 electrode. The superior electrochemical behavior of the V-LTO@24 electrode, compared to pure LTO nanoflakes, can be attributed to the aggregation of vanadium-doped LTO into a micro-network structure. The vanadium doping, along with the unique structure, not only improves the overall conductivity but also enhances the mechanical stability of the electrode during long-term cycling. The vanadium doping enhances the electrochemical reactivity, facilitates better ion diffusion, and minimizes structural degradation, which ultimately leads to better cycle stability and performance compared to pure LTO nanoflakes.

2.3. Charge Storage Mechanism in LTO-Based Electrodes

The variation of specific capacitance of the LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes collected at different scanning rates is shown in Figure 9. The decay of specific capacitance Cs is assigned to the presence of inner active sites that cannot completely sustain redox transitions at higher scanning rates [51].
The reaction kinetics and charge storage mechanism in both hydrothermally prepared LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes were critically analyzed from cyclic voltammetry measurement data. The total contribution to capacitance arises from processes that are both diffusion-controlled and capacitive-controlled. Moreover, the kinetic reversibility of the electrode materials is clarified by the evident linear correlation between the peak current (ip) and the scan rate (ν) in the CV curves, adhering to a power–law relationship, as described in Equations (9) and (10) [52]:
ip = aνb,
log(ip) = log(a) + b log(ν),
where ‘a’ and ‘b’ parameters are modifiable. The slope b from the log(ip) and log(ν) of the plot indicates the charge storage kinetics of the ions. The value of b equal to 1.0 suggests the capacitive process as a dominant process, whereas the value of b equal to 0.5 suggests the diffusion control process as a dominating process. The estimated “b” values from the anodic peaks of the LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes are found to be 0.53 and 0.56, respectively (Figure 10a,c), indicating that the charge storage process is primarily governed by a diffusion-controlled battery-type behavior. The relative contributions of diffusion and surface capacitive processes to the total capacitance were examined via Cottrell’s equation [53]:
ip(ν) = k1ν + k2ν1/2,
where k1 and k2 are constants for specific sweep rates, ip(ν) denotes the peak current at a given potential value, and k1ν and k2ν1/2 are terms which stand for the capacitance-controlled and diffusion-controlled processes, respectively. The above Equation (11) can be expressed as
ip(ν) ν−1/2 = k1 ν1/2 + k2.
By only graphing the correlation between ip and ν, we may ascertain the slope k1. By determining the k1 value at varying voltages across different scan rates [54,55,56], the relative contributions of the battery-type (diffusion-controlled) and capacitive-type (surface-controlled) behaviors for LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes are illustrated in Figure 10b,d. The LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes clearly demonstrate a more significant level of diffusion-controlled charge storage at all scan rates. Additionally, it has been noted that the ratio of capacitive participation across all electrodes progressively rises from lower to higher scan speeds, which can be explained by the restricted time for ions to diffuse into the internal structure of the electroactive materials.
Detailed in-depth studies of electrochemical behavior and fundamental mechanisms of the V-LTO@24 electrode uncovered several critical factors that showed enhanced supercapacitive performance, especially regarding ion transport, electron transfer processes, and microstructure. The distinctive morphology of the V-LTO@24 structure, featuring aggregated nanoflakes in a micro-network-like arrangement, is characterized by a large surface area that enhances ion transport efficiency. This configuration facilitates greater ion adsorption and desorption throughout electrochemical reactions and hence increased charge (or energy) storage within the electrode, thereby improving the specific capacitance. In addition, the successful substitution of Ti+4 with V+5 in LTO not only improved the electrical conductivity but also improved the surface charge storage kinetics of the capacitive process at all scan rates relative to the pure LTO electrode, which favored enhanced specific capacitance and cycle stability for V-LTO@24. Furthermore, the specific capacitance and cycling stability of the LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 materials were compared with those of previously reported LTO-based electrodes, as presented in Table 2. The results demonstrate its superior electrochemical performance in a three-electrode system compared to the earlier LTO-based electrodes.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The chemicals used during synthesis were lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LIOH.H2O USA), titanium(IV) butoxide (C16H36O4Ti, ≥97% Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), ammonium metavanadate (NH4VO3, 99%, SDFCL), ethanol (C2H6O), and DI water. No additional purification procedures were implemented; all compounds were utilized entirely as received.

3.2. Preparation of Li4Ti5O12Nanomaterial

Nanostructured Li4Ti5O12 samples were synthesized utilizing the hydrothermal technique (see Scheme 1). In a typical synthesis method, 4.2 mM of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LiOH·H2O) is dissolved in 40 mL of deionized water to make solution 1, while 5 mM of titanium(IV) butoxide is dissolved in 40 mL of ethanol to create solution 2. Both solutions are stirred continuously for 30 min separately. Subsequently, solution 1 is added dropwise to solution 2 while under magnetic stirring. The homogenous solution is poured into a 100 mL autoclave. The temperature of the autoclave was maintained at 180 °C. The samples were prepared at various reaction durations (τ = 12, 18, and 24 h). The acquired material was purified and washed four times with distilled water and ethanol to ensure the solution was free of impurities. The resultant precipitate was dried at 80 °C for 5 h. Further, the final products were calcinated at 500 °C for 6 h, at a rate of 3 °C per minute, to yield Li4Ti5O12nanopowders (hereinafter referred to as LTO@τ).

3.3. Preparation of V-LTO@24 (Li4Ti5−xVxO12)

A similar methodology has been adopted for the preparation of vanadium-doped Li4Ti5O12 nanomaterial. This involved the addition of stoichiometric amounts of ammonium meta vanadate at a concentration of 0.02% mol L−1, while maintaining a hydrothermal reaction time of 24 h. The products were subjected to calcination in a muffle furnace at 500°C for a duration of 6 h to obtain the final products, designated as V-LTO@24.

3.4. Material Characterizations

The structure of the synthesized Li4Ti5O12 was studied using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, MiniFlex II, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.540598 Å). The microstructure and surface morphology of all synthesized Li4Ti5O12 powder were analyzed employing a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Merlin Compact, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM, Tecnai G2 F30, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The elemental composition data were explored using X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS–NOVA, Kratos). The evaluation of the electrochemical properties of the synthesized materials was performed via cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge and discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) utilizing an electrochemical workstation CHI 608C (Instrument Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). EIS data were collected over a frequency range of 1 Hz–100 kHz.

3.5. Li4Ti5O12Electrode Preparation

Electrochemical evaluations were piloted at room temperature using a three-electrode setup, with Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and platinum as the counter electrode. Ni foam, which underwent cleaning with 6 mol L−1 HCl, deionized water, and 100% ethanol for 20 min each under ultrasonication to eliminate the surface layer, followed by drying at 80 °C for 10 h and was utilized as the base for the preparation of the working electrode. Subsequently, the composite comprising active material LTO@24 (80%), activated carbon black (10%), and PVDF binder (10%) was suspended in 0.5 mL of NMP solution. Activated material slurry is applied to Ni foam (area: 0.7 × 1 cm2) using a drop-casting technique and then dried at 80 °C for 8 h. A 1 mol L−1 KOH solution served as the electrolyte for all experiments.

4. Conclusions

Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes were synthesized at varying reaction durations employing a simple, inexpensive hydrothermal process. The XRD spectra validate the pure phase of Li4Ti5O12 nanocomposite when synthesized at a 24 h hydrothermal reaction time. The results from SEM and TEM indicate that the LTO@24 exhibits a morphology characterized by nanoflakes with a uniform length of approximately 60 nm, a width of ~20 nm, and a relatively smooth surface. The distinct nanostructures offer an extensive surface area and minimized diffusion length, making them exceptional candidates for energy storage and conversion systems. The electrochemical investigations were conducted on the LTO@24 nanoflakes electrode using CV, GCD, and EIS experiments using a 1 mol L−1 KOH aqueous solution. The CV curves with marked oxidation and reduction peaks reveal the pseudocapacitive nature of the LTO electrode and demonstrate an impressive specific capacitance of 357 F g−1at the current density of 1 A g−1, with 84% cycle stability and 98.5% Coulombic efficiency. Moreover, the vanadium-doped LTO@24 nanoflakes synthesized under similar conditions demonstrate an excellent specific capacitance of 442 F g−1at 1 A g−1 current density, along with 90% cycle stability and a Coulombic efficiency of 99.8%. The LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes clearly show a more significant level of diffusion-controlled charge storage at all scan rates, with significant capacitance, and are found to be suitable electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics13070223/s1, Figure S1: (a) CV curves of LTO@12 and (b). GCD curves of LTO@12; Figure S2: (a) CV curves of LTO@18 and (b). GCD curves of LTO@18; Table S1: ESI fitting parameters of the LTO@24 nanoflakes electrodes in three-electrode system; Table S2: ESI fitting parameters of the V-doped LTO@24 nanoflakes electrodes in three-electrode system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.M.H.; formal analysis, M.D.; investigation, M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D. and O.M.H.; writing—review and editing, C.M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Peng, X.; Peng, L.; Wu, C.; Xie, Y. Two dimensional nanomaterials for flexible supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3303–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, H.; Casalongue, H.S.; Liang, Y.; Dai, H. Ni(OH)2nanoplates grown on graphene as advanced electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7472–7477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shahid, M.; Katugampalage, T.R.; Khalid, M.; Ahmed, W.; Kaewsaneha, C.; Sreearunothai, P.; Opaprakasit, P. Microwave assisted synthesis of Mn3O4nanograins intercalated into reduced graphene oxide layers as cathode material for alternative clean power generation energy device. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, H.; Tao, Y.; Zheng, X.; Luo, J.; Kang, F.; Cheng, H.M.; Yang, Q.H. Ultra-thick graphene bulk supercapacitor electrodes for compact energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3135–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lv, W.; Li, Z.; Deng, Y.; Yang, Q.H.; Kang, F. Graphene-based materials for electrochemical energy storage devices: Opportunities and challenges. Energy Storage Mater. 2016, 2, 107–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, J.; Luo, B.; Li, H. A review on the conventional capacitors, supercapacitors, and emerging hybrid ion capacitors: Past, present, and future. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2022, 3, 2100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Dong, S.; Ding, B.; Wang, Y.; Hao, X.; Dou, H.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, X. Pseudocapacitive materials for electrochemical capacitors: From rational synthesis to capacitance optimization. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017, 4, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pallavolu, M.R.; Nallapureddy, J.; Nallapureddy, R.R.; Neelima, G.; Yedluri, A.K.; Mandal, T.K.; Pejjai, B.; Joo, S.W. Self-assembled and highly faceted growth of Mo and V doped ZnOnanoflowers for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 886, 161234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mai, L.Q.; Yang, F.; Zhao, Y.L.; Xu, X.; Xu, L.; Luo, Y.Z. Hierarchical MnMoO4/CoMoO4heterostructured nanowires with enhanced supercapacitor performance. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A. Fabrication of Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) as anode material for Li-ion batteries. Micromachines 2024, 15, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, L.; Chen, G.Z. Supercapatteries as high-performance electrochemical energy storage devices. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2020, 3, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raut, B.; Ahmed, M.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Rahman Khan, M.M.; Bari, G.A.R.; Islam, M.; Nam, K.W. Battery-type transition metal oxides in hybrid supercapacitors: Synthesis and applications. Batteries 2025, 11, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Devadas, A.; Baranton, S.; Napporn, T.W.; Coutanceau, C. Tailoring of RuO2 nanoparticles by microwave assisted “Instant method” for energy storage applications. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 4044–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A. Nanostructured MnO2 as electrode materials for energy storage. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gunasekaran, S.S.; Gopalakrishnan, A.; Subashchandrabose, R.; Badhulika, S. Phytogenic generation of NiO nanoparticles as green-electrode material for high performance asymmetric supercapacitor applications. J. Energy Storage 2021, 37, 102412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haritha, B.; Deepak, M.; Hussain, O.M.; Julien, C.M. Morphological engineering of battery-type cobalt oxide electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. Physchem 2025, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nunna, G.P.; Merum, D.; Ko, T.J.; Choi, J.; Hussain, O.M. High-performance MoO3supercapacitor electrodes: Influence of reaction parameters on phase, microstructure, and electrochemical properties. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 5973–5987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.C.; Liu, Z.D.; Zeng, C.H.; Luo, J.W.; Deng, Y.D.; Cui, X.Y.; Chen, Y.N. High-voltage LiCoO2 cathodes for high-energy-density lithium-ion battery. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 3946–3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abou-Rjeily, J.; Bezza, I.; Laziz, N.A.; Autret-Lambert, C.; Sougrati, M.T.; Ghamouss, F. High-rate cyclability and stability of LiMn2O4 cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries from low-cost natural β− MnO2. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 26, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borhani-Haghighi, S.; Kieschnick, M.; Motemani, Y.; Savan, A.; Rogalla, D.; Becker, H.W.; Meijer, J.; Ludwig, A. High-throughput compositional and structural evaluation of a Lia(NixMnyCoz)Or thin film battery materials library. ACS Comb. Sci. 2013, 15, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lakshmi-Narayana, A.; Hussain, O.M.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Transport properties of nanostructured Li2TiO3 anode material synthesized by hydrothermal method. Sci 2019, 1, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ohzuku, T.; Ueda, A.; Yamamoto, N. Zero-strain insertion material of Li[Li1/3Ti5/3]O4 for rechargeable lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1995, 142, 1431–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ge, H.; Xie, L.; Wang, C.; Pan, R.; Huang, B.; Sun, Z.; Cao, X.; Yang, T.; Wu, G. Advanced pseudocapacitive lithium titanate towards next-generation energy storage devices. J.Energy Chem. 2025, 103, 773–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, C.; Ji, X.; Weng, S.; Li, R.; Huang, X.; Zhu, C.; Xiao, X.; Deng, T.; Fan, L.; Chen, L.; et al. 50C fast-charge Li-ion batteries using a graphite anode. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2206020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Su, J.; Liu, N.; Gao, Y. Revealing the phase-transition dynamics and mechanism in a spinel Li4Ti5O12 anode material through in situ electron microscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 20874–20881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xing, L.L.; Wu, X.; Huang, K.J. High-performance supercapacitor based on three-dimensional flower-shaped Li4Ti5O12-graphene hybrid and pine needles derived honeycomb carbon. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 529, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, B.; Yoon, J.R. Preparation and characteristics of Li4Ti5O12 with various dopants as anode electrode for hybrid supercapacitor. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 1350–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saxena, S.; Sil, A. Role of calcination atmosphere in vanadium doped Li4Ti5O12 for lithium ion battery anode material. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 96, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khairy, M.; Bayoumy, W.A.; Qasim, K.F.; El-Shereafy, E.; Mousa, M.A. Ternary V-doped Li4Ti5O12-polyaniline-graphene nanostructure with enhanced electrochemical capacitance performance. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 271, 115312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Batsukh, I.; Lkhagvajav, S.; Adiya, M.; Galsan, S.; Bat-Erdene, M.; Myagmarsereejid, P. Investigation of structural, optical, and electrochemical properties of niobium-doped Li4Ti5O12 for high-performance aqueous capacitor electrode. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 26313–26321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tian, Q.; Chen, P.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, L. Achievement of significantly improved lithium storage for novel clew-like Li4Ti5O12 anode assembled by ultrafine nanowires. J. Power Sources 2017, 350, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.M. Improved performances of hybrid supercapacitors using granule Li4Ti5O12/activated carbon composite anode. Mater. Lett. 2018, 228, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Putjuso, T.; Putjuso, S.; Karaphun, A.; Swatsitang, E. Influence of Li concentration on structural, morphological and electrochemical properties of anatase-TiO2 nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khanna, S.; Marathey, P.; Paneliya, S.; Chaudhari, R.; Vora, J. Fabrication of rutile–TiO2 nanowire on shape memory alloy: A potential material for energy storage application. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 50, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chandra Sekhar, J.; Merum, D.; Hussain, O.M. Microstructural and supercapacitive performance of cubic spinel Li4Ti5O12nanocomposite. Eur. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 5, 222–233. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xing, L.L.; Huang, K.J.; Cao, S.X.; Pang, H. Chestnut shell-like Li4Ti5O12 hollow spheres for high-performance aqueous asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sha, Y.; Zhao, B.; Ran, R.; Cai, R.; Shao, Z. Synthesis of well-crystallized Li4Ti5O12nanoplates for lithium-ion batteries with outstanding rate capability and cycling stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 13233–13243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kalawa, O.; Sichumsaeng, T.; Kidkhunthod, P.; Chanlek, N.; Maensiri, S. Ni-doped MnCo2O4 nanoparticles as electrode material for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 4869–4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aldon, L.; Kubiak, P.; Womes, M.; Jumas, J.C.; Olivier-Fourcade, J.; Tirado, J.L.; Corredor, J.I.; Pérez Vicente, C. Chemical and electrochemical Li-insertion into the Li4Ti5O12 spinel. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 5721–5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, G.; Fang, H.; Zhao, H.; Li, G.; Yang, Y.; Li, L. Ball milling-assisted sol–gel route to Li4Ti5O12 and its electrochemical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 470, 544–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zaghib, K.; Simoneau, M.; Armand, M.; Gauthier, M. Electrochemical study of Li4Ti5O12 as negative electrode for Li-ion polymer rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 1999, 81, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shinde, S.K.; Jalak, M.B.; Ghodake, G.S.; Maile, N.C.; Kumbhar, V.S.; Lee, D.S.; Fulari, V.J.; Kim, D.Y. Chemically synthesized nanoflakes-like NiCo2S4 electrodes for high-performance supercapacitor application. Appl. Surface Sci. 2019, 466, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xia, H.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, J. Recent progress on two-dimensional nanoflake ensembles for energy storage applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018, 10, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Le, P.A.; Le, V.Q.; Tran, T.L.; Nguyen, N.T.; Phung, T.V.B.; Dinh, V.A. Two-dimensional NH4V3O8nanoflakes as efficient energy conversion and storage materials for the hydrogen evolution reaction and supercapacitors. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 25433–25442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pawar, S.M.; Kim, J.; Inamdar, A.I.; Woo, H.; Jo, Y.; Pawar, B.S.; Cho, S.; Kim, H.; Im, H. Multi-functional reactively-sputtered copper oxide electrodes for supercapacitor and electro-catalyst in direct methanol fuel cell applications. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, J.; Song, D.; Pu, T.; Li, J.; Huang, B.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C.; Xie, L.; Chen, L. Two-dimensional porous ZnCo2O4 thin sheets assembled by 3D nanoflake array with enhanced performance for aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Naresh, B.; Kuchi, C.; Rajasekhar, D.; Reddy, P.S. Solvothermal synthesis of MnCo2O4 microspheres for high-performance electrochemical supercapacitors. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 640, 128443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saraf, M.; Natarajan, K.; Mobin, S.M. Emerging robust heterostructure of MoS2–rGO for high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 16588–16595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sheokand, S.; Kumar, P.; Jabeen, S.; Samra, K.S. 3D highly porous microspherical morphology of NiO nanoparticles for supercapacitor application. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2023, 27, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shaik, D.P.; Kumar, M.S.; Reddy, P.N.K.; Hussain, O.M. High electrochemical performance of spinel Mn3O4 over Co3O4nanocrystals. J. Molecular Struct. 2021, 1241, 130619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pawar, S.M.; Inamdar, A.I.; Gurav, K.V.; Jo, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.H.; Im, H. Effect of oxidant on the structural, morphological and supercapacitive properties of nickel hydroxide nanoflakes electrode films. Mater. Lett. 2015, 141, 336–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xi, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Lv, H.; Sun, H.; Zhai, S.; An, Q. Construction of CuO/Cu-nanoflowers loaded on chitosan-derived porous carbon for high energy density supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 630, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Merum, D.; Nallapureddy, R.R.; Pallavolu, M.R.; Mandal, T.K.; Gutturu, R.R.; Parvin, N.; Banerjee, A.N.; Joo, S.W. Pseudocapacitive performance of freestanding Ni3V2O8nanosheets for high energy and power density asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 5561–5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pallavolu, M.R.; Banerjee, A.N.; Joo, S.W. Battery-type behavior of Al-doped CuO nanoflakes to fabricate a high-performance hybrid supercapacitor device for superior energy storage applications. Coatings 2023, 13, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ajay, A.; Paravannoor, A.; Joseph, J.; Anopp, A.V.; Nair, S.V.; Balakrishnan, A. 2 D amorphous frameworks of NiMoO4 for supercapacitors: Defining the role of surface and bulk controlled diffusion processes. Appl. Surface Sci. 2015, 326, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hussain, M.N.; Inayat, A.; Ansir, R.; Naveed, A.; Abbas, S.M.; Haider, A.; Shah, S.M. Probing the synergy of Ni(OH)2/NiO nanoparticles supported on rGO for battery-type supercapacitors. Energy Technol. 2024, 12, 2300854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gao, L.; Huang, D.; Shen, Y.; Wang, M. Rutile-TiO2decorated Li4Ti5O12nanosheet arrays with 3D interconnected architecture as anodes for high performance hybrid supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 23570–23576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ni, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, H.; Gao, L. A high-performance hybrid supercapacitor with Li4Ti5O12-C nano-composite prepared by in situ and ex situ carbon modification. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2012, 16, 2791–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zuo, W.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, J. Directly grown nanostructured electrodes for high volumetric energy density binder-free hybrid supercapacitors: A case study of CNTs//Li4Ti5O12. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gangaja, B.; Nair, S.V.; Santhanagopalan, D. Interface-engineered Li4Ti5O12–TiO2 dual-phase nanoparticles and CNT additive for supercapacitor-like high-power Li-ion battery applications. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 095402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD pattern of Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes synthesized hydrothermally at various time periods. Marks ■ and 🞾 indicate the presence of the A-TiO2 and R-TiO2 phases, respectively.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of Li4Ti5O12 nanoflakes synthesized hydrothermally at various time periods. Marks ■ and 🞾 indicate the presence of the A-TiO2 and R-TiO2 phases, respectively.
Inorganics 13 00223 g001
Figure 2. FESEM images of Li4Ti5O12 synthesized at different reaction time periods: (a,b) 12 h, (c,d) 18 h, and (e,f) 24 h ((a,c,e) low magnification scale µm, (b,d,f) high magnification, scale 100 nm).
Figure 2. FESEM images of Li4Ti5O12 synthesized at different reaction time periods: (a,b) 12 h, (c,d) 18 h, and (e,f) 24 h ((a,c,e) low magnification scale µm, (b,d,f) high magnification, scale 100 nm).
Inorganics 13 00223 g002
Figure 3. Microstructural features of LTO@24: (a) TEM image, (b) HRTEM image showing the lattice fringe width of 0.48 nm, and (c) SAED pattern.
Figure 3. Microstructural features of LTO@24: (a) TEM image, (b) HRTEM image showing the lattice fringe width of 0.48 nm, and (c) SAED pattern.
Inorganics 13 00223 g003
Figure 4. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectra of LTO@24, (bd) high-resolution XPS survey spectra of Li 1s, Ti 2p, and O 1s, respectively.
Figure 4. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectra of LTO@24, (bd) high-resolution XPS survey spectra of Li 1s, Ti 2p, and O 1s, respectively.
Inorganics 13 00223 g004
Figure 5. Electrochemical characteristics of the LTO@24 nanoflakes. (a) Cyclic voltammetry curves recorded at different scan rates. (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves carried out at different current densities of 1–5 A g−1 in the potential range from −0.3 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl. (c) Nyquist plots before and after long-term cycling. Inset shows the equivalent circuit model. (d) Cycling stability performed at a current density of 5 A g−1. (e) Equivalent circuit model used for the EIS fitting.
Figure 5. Electrochemical characteristics of the LTO@24 nanoflakes. (a) Cyclic voltammetry curves recorded at different scan rates. (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves carried out at different current densities of 1–5 A g−1 in the potential range from −0.3 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl. (c) Nyquist plots before and after long-term cycling. Inset shows the equivalent circuit model. (d) Cycling stability performed at a current density of 5 A g−1. (e) Equivalent circuit model used for the EIS fitting.
Inorganics 13 00223 g005
Figure 6. (a) XRD pattern of LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 and (b) expanded XRD spectrum in the vicinity of the (111) reflection.
Figure 6. (a) XRD pattern of LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 and (b) expanded XRD spectrum in the vicinity of the (111) reflection.
Inorganics 13 00223 g006
Figure 7. FESEM images for V-LTO@24 nanoflakes at different magnifications: (a) 1 µm scale, (b) 100 nm scale.
Figure 7. FESEM images for V-LTO@24 nanoflakes at different magnifications: (a) 1 µm scale, (b) 100 nm scale.
Inorganics 13 00223 g007
Figure 8. Electrochemical characteristics of the V-LTO@24 nanoflake electrode. (a) CV curves at different scan rates from 1 to 50 mV s−1. (b) GCD profiles at different current densities. (c) Nyquist plots of before (black after (red curve) long-term cycling. (d) Cycle stability and Coulombic efficiency at current curve and density of 5 A g−1 over 2000 cycles.
Figure 8. Electrochemical characteristics of the V-LTO@24 nanoflake electrode. (a) CV curves at different scan rates from 1 to 50 mV s−1. (b) GCD profiles at different current densities. (c) Nyquist plots of before (black after (red curve) long-term cycling. (d) Cycle stability and Coulombic efficiency at current curve and density of 5 A g−1 over 2000 cycles.
Inorganics 13 00223 g008
Figure 9. Specific capacitance (Cs) calculated from the CV measurements as a function of scan rate.
Figure 9. Specific capacitance (Cs) calculated from the CV measurements as a function of scan rate.
Inorganics 13 00223 g009
Figure 10. (a,b) Plots of log(ip) vs. log(ν)of LTO@24 electrode at different scan rates. (c,d) Plots of log(ip) vs. log(ν) V-LTO@24 electrode at different scan rates.
Figure 10. (a,b) Plots of log(ip) vs. log(ν)of LTO@24 electrode at different scan rates. (c,d) Plots of log(ip) vs. log(ν) V-LTO@24 electrode at different scan rates.
Inorganics 13 00223 g010
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the LTO synthesis via the hydrothermal method.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the LTO synthesis via the hydrothermal method.
Inorganics 13 00223 sch001
Table 1. The crystallographic parameters of LTO nano powder samples synthesized under various conditions.
Table 1. The crystallographic parameters of LTO nano powder samples synthesized under various conditions.
SampleCrystallite Size
(nm)
Dislocation Density
(δ)
Microstrain
(rd)
Lattice Parameter
(Å)
Unit Volume
3)
LTO@12118.27652 × 10150.0099338.4117(0)595.18
LTO@18126.98751 × 10150.0088998.4018(2)593.08
LTO@24136.31196 × 10150.008278.3671(8)585.76
V-LTO@2411.87.7152 × 10150.00888.3401(2)580.11
Table 2. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of hydrothermally prepared LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes with other LTO-based electrodes recently reported in the literature.
Table 2. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of hydrothermally prepared LTO@24 and V-LTO@24 electrodes with other LTO-based electrodes recently reported in the literature.
SampleCapacitanceRetention Over CyclingRef.
V-doped LTO179 mAh g−1 @ 1C95% (300)[29]
Granule-LTO powders63 F g−1 @ 0.5 A g−192.8% (7000) @ 3 A g−1[32]
SSR synthesized nano-LTO265 F g−1 @ 0.5 A g−181% (5000) @ 0.5 A g−1[35]
R-TiO2 decorated LTO143 mAh g−1 @30C92.3% (3000)[57]
3D chestnut shell-like LTO653 F g−1 @ 1 A g−188.5% (4000)[36]
C-modified LTO83 F g−1 @ 2C84% (9000) @0.98 A g−1[58]
LTO nanowire125 F g−1 @ 0.55 mA cm−295% (400) @ 0.4 mA cm−2[59]
LTO–TiO2 nanoparticles174 mAh g−1 @ 2 A g−185% (3000) @ 2 A g−1[60]
Hydrothermal LTO@24 357 F g−1 @ 1 A g−198.5% (2000) @ 5 A g−1this work
Hydrothermal V-LTO@24442 F g−1 @ 1 A g−199.8% (2000) @ 5 A g−1this work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deepak, M.; Hussain, O.M.; Julien, C.M. Microstructure and Electrochemical Properties of Pure and Vanadium-Doped Li4Ti5O12 Nanoflakes for High Performance Supercapacitors. Inorganics 2025, 13, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13070223

AMA Style

Deepak M, Hussain OM, Julien CM. Microstructure and Electrochemical Properties of Pure and Vanadium-Doped Li4Ti5O12 Nanoflakes for High Performance Supercapacitors. Inorganics. 2025; 13(7):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13070223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deepak, Mudda, Obili M. Hussain, and Christian M. Julien. 2025. "Microstructure and Electrochemical Properties of Pure and Vanadium-Doped Li4Ti5O12 Nanoflakes for High Performance Supercapacitors" Inorganics 13, no. 7: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13070223

APA Style

Deepak, M., Hussain, O. M., & Julien, C. M. (2025). Microstructure and Electrochemical Properties of Pure and Vanadium-Doped Li4Ti5O12 Nanoflakes for High Performance Supercapacitors. Inorganics, 13(7), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13070223

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop