Next Article in Journal
Sequential Deep Learning with Feature Compression and Optimal State Estimation for Indoor Visible Light Positioning
Next Article in Special Issue
A Ring-Assisted Asymmetric Mach–Zehnder Interferometer for High-Sensitivity and Stable On-Chip Temperature Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Pump-Enhanced Idler-Resonant 1626 nm Optical Parametric Oscillator
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quasi-BIC Terahertz Metasurface-Microfluidic Sensor for Organic Compound Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual-Resonance Plasmonic Nanocavity with Differential Thermo-Optic Response for Enhanced Fiber-Optic Thermal Flowmeters

1
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Glass Materials, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
School of Physics and Mechanics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3
China Special Equipment Inspection & Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2026, 13(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13020210
Submission received: 31 December 2025 / Revised: 6 February 2026 / Accepted: 20 February 2026 / Published: 23 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Optical Sensors and Applications)

Abstract

Optic-fiber-based thermal flowmeters have the merits of compact size and high sensitivity, which typically require two light beams separately acting as a pump for heating the sensing unit and a probe for sensing temperature with the variation of external flow. Here, we propose a metallic nanostructure with multiple plasmonic resonance modes for the application of an optic-fiber-based thermal flowmeter. The optical properties of a nanostructure comprised of a double-width gold grating, a poly (methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) layer, and a gold film are numerically simulated in the spectral range of 600–1800 nm. The optical resonances of different modes are systematically investigated with the variation of the structural parameters. Interestingly, two optical resonance modes with distinct spectral shift under the same temperature variation, i.e., 21.34 pm/°C vs. 269.2 pm/°C, are obtained after the strategic optimization of the nanostructure. Finally, the sensitivity of the flowmeter with the proposed nanostructure is investigated by adopting the low-temperature sensitivity mode for optical pumping and the high-temperature sensitivity mode for temperature sensing, proving its significant potential as an optic-fiber-based thermal flowmeter.

1. Introduction

Flow velocity measurement is of paramount importance in diverse fields, including industrial process control, such as chemical engineering, petroleum, and power industries [1], environmental monitoring, such as river and ocean current measurement [2], and biomedical engineering, for example, blood flow measurement [3]. Fiber-optic thermal flowmeters, a promising category within fiber-optic flow sensing technologies, enable precise flow velocity measurement by leveraging the dynamic thermal equilibrium between fluid flow and the sensor surface. Based on structural differences, these flowmeters are primarily categorized into two types: those utilizing Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) and those based on Fabry-Perot (F-P) resonators [4]. In FBG-based designs, the heating and sensing modules are physically separated. Due to the inherently slow thermal conduction process, external temperature changes must propagate through the cladding to reach the sensing region in the fiber core. This separation results in extended response times and significant thermal losses. To address these limitations, researchers have developed thermal flowmeters based on F-P resonators. This integrated design combines the heating and sensing functions within a single unit, effectively reducing response times and minimizing thermal conduction losses.
Research on fiber-optic F-P cavity-based thermal flow sensing continues to advance, with its core principle relying on the photothermal effect and convective heat transfer for measurement. Liu et al. pioneered a silicon-based F-P cavity flowmeter, exploiting the differential absorption of silicon at 635 nm (heating) and 1550 nm (sensing) wavelengths [5]. For microfluidic applications, Li et al. innovatively employed a silver nanoparticle solution-filled microcavity as a localized heat source, constructing a miniaturized fiber-tip flow sensor with a volume of only 2 mm3 [6]. Further advancing the field, Li et al. developed an integrated F-P cavity probe by filling a hollow-core fiber (HCF) with Fe3O4-PDMS composite material [7]. Building on this, Sun et al. developed a PbS quantum dots-doped photoresist plano-concave cavity fiber probe for microflow sensing, utilizing 980 nm heating and C-band interference [8]. F-P cavity-based sensing techniques universally necessitate the integration of light-absorbing materials within the cavity to ensure effective pump light absorption and photothermal conversion. However, most nanomaterial-based absorbers exhibit inherent toxicity, presenting a potential biocompatibility risk in biomedical implementations.
To address this biocompatibility challenge, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors offer a powerful alternative. SPR sensors provide a powerful alternative to F-P cavities, leveraging metallic nanostructures to achieve both high-sensitivity refractive index sensing and efficient, biocompatible photothermal conversion without requiring additional toxic agents [9]. Building on this platform, Schneider et al. demonstrated that the resonant modes and light-matter interactions in photonic/plasmonic nanostructures can be precisely engineered through structural parameters, such as grating period and layer thickness, enabling functional customization [10]. Complementing this, Baffou and Quidant highlighted the thermo-plasmonic effect in noble metals, revealing that localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) mediated heating can be spatially controlled and, crucially, that the distinct temperature sensitivities of different resonant modes—governed by their electric field distributions—provide a fundamental mechanism for decoupling sensing and heating functionalities within a single integrated nanostructure [11].
Here, we propose a novel design of nano-resonance structure comprised of a double-width gold grating, a dielectric layer, and a gold layer for a fiber-optic thermal flowmeter, which takes advantage of the exceptional sensitivity to refractive index changes [9] and the efficient photothermal conversion of plasmonic effects [12,13]. The key feature of this design is the pronounced difference in temperature sensitivity between its distinct resonant modes. Utilizing a finite element simulation platform, we systematically investigated the influence of critical structural parameters on the reflection spectra and the electric field distribution, such as the grating period (P), the grating width ratio (w1/w2), the grating height (h1), and the dielectric layer height (h2). Simulation results demonstrate a marked difference in temperature sensitivity between the resonant modes. Exploiting this differential sensitivity enables effective minimization of the impact on pump light heating efficiency from external flow velocity variations and maximization of the signal variation in probe light. This study lays the essential theoretical groundwork for subsequent device fabrication and experimental validation.

2. Research Methods and Discussion

2.1. Theoretical Models and Simulation Calculations

The operating principle and structural design of the proposed SPR-based fiber-optic thermal flowmeter are illustrated in Figure 1a. Since gold nanostructures have been successfully fabricated in prior work using a preparation scheme demonstrating the experimental feasibility [14], we primarily focus on the sensing mechanism and the structure design of the flowmeter. Conventional all-fiber thermal flowmeters typically require two light sources: a pump source serving as the heating mechanism to establish an initial temperature baseline in the sensor and an interrogation source to detect flow-induced shifts in the reflection spectrum. Typically, a single-frequency near-infrared laser, such as 980 nm or 1064 nm, serves as the pump source, while a broadband light source and a single-frequency laser function as the light source in a wavelength-based and intensity-based interrogation scheme, respectively. The pump laser source first irradiates the nanostructured sensing region with light at a specific wavelength for the excitation of the optical resonance mode, which propagates through the resonant cavity and undergoes energy conversion into heat due to ohmic losses in the metallic cavity. This process elevates the temperature of the sensing unit, which is kept constant after reaching thermal equilibrium with the external environment. With the presence of flow in the external medium, there is a temperature difference between the sensor and its surrounding environment, resulting in heat transfer. Since the nanostructure is comprised of three layers with a nanometer thick, the heat conduction among each layer is fast to obtain a thermal equilibrium. Crucially, the resultant temperature change induces both thermal expansion and an alteration in the thermo-optic coefficient of the polymer dielectric (i.e., PMMA) layer. Consequently, these combined effects lead to a spectral shift in the reflection spectrum of the sensing unit. This optical energy is converted to thermal energy, elevating the local temperature to a predetermined setpoint and establishing a stable thermal baseline for subsequent flow detection [1]. When external fluid flows across the heated sensing region, convective heat exchange occurs. Higher flow velocities enhance heat dissipation from the sensor surface, resulting in significant temperature reduction within the sensing region. Conversely, lower flow velocities yield minimal thermal variation. Temperature-dependent changes in the optical properties of the structure induce a corresponding wavelength shift in the reflected spectrum, with the magnitude of this shift exhibiting a monotonic correlation with temperature variation. By quantifying the spectral shift magnitude via demodulation instrumentation and applying the calibrated chain of correlations from spectral shift to temperature change to flow velocity, the actual fluid flow velocity can be precisely determined.
The all-fiber thermal flowmeter developed in this study operates in the microflow regime. Within this range, wavelength shifts induced by fluid pressure effects are negligible. Consequently, spectral drift arising from thermal exchange between the external fluid and the sensor dominates the response [15,16]. We now analyze heat conduction between the sensor and its environment. Heat transfer at the solid-fluid interface must satisfy the thermal conductivity differential equation derived from the conservation of energy and Fourier’s Law [4,17]:
ρ C P T t + u T + q = Q q = k T
where C P denotes the specific heat capacity (J/(kg·K)), ρ represents the density of thermosensitive materials (kg/m3), T is the temperature (K), u is fluid velocity vector (m/s), Q is the heat flux per unit volume (W/m3), q is the heat exchange on the probe surface, and k is the thermal conductivity of thermosensitive materials (W/(m·K)).
During operation, the gold nanostructure absorbs incident pump laser power and generates heat, elevating the PMMA layer temperature. This shifts the cavity resonance toward longer wavelengths (redshift). Subsequent microfluidic flow extracts heat from the cavity, generating a flow-dependent blueshift in the resonance wavelength. This heat loss can be modeled as [18,19]:
H l o s s = ( A + B v ) ( T v T 0 )
H l o s s = P φ a P M M A
where v is the microfluidic flow rate, T v denotes the temperature of the sensing probe at airflow velocity of v , T 0 is the external fluid temperature, and H l o s s is the heat loss due to fluid flow. When the fluctuations of fluid temperature and thermophysical property parameters are small, A and B are usually defined as constants, which are mainly related to the probe structure. P is the energy of the pump laser input into the optical fiber, φ is the coupling efficiency of the probe structure at thermal equilibrium, and a P M M A is the absorption efficiency of the plasmonic nanocavity for laser energy at thermal equilibrium. The relationship equation between probe temperature and flow velocity can be derived as [19]:
T v = P φ a P M M A A + B v + T 0
When a guided wave propagates laterally within the intermediate dielectric layer, reflection occurs at the interface due to the difference in effective refractive indices between the Au-PMMA-Au region and the Au-PMMA-Air region within the intermediate layer. Optical resonance emerges when the total phase shift accumulated during the propagation of a guided wave reaches an integer multiple of 2π. Thus, we have [20,21,22]:
λ Φ n T , L T 2 m π
where Φ is the phase of light after passing through the medium. λ represents the wavelength of the optical resonance; n T and L T , respectively, denote the refractive index of the medium and the cavity length of the resonant cavity at the corresponding temperature. m represents the series of different resonance orders. Variations in refractive index and thickness can induce a change in the optical path length within the resonant cavity. When the temperature of the dielectric layer alters through heat transfer, the optical path of the resonant cavity changes. This shift causes displacement of the resonance peaks, thereby revealing the relationship between peak shift and flow rate:
Δ λ Δ Φ n T , L T 2 m π P φ a P M M A A + B v

2.2. Simulation Analysis

The sensitive region incorporates a nanostructured optical cavity positioned at the fiber end face, as illustrated in Figure 1a,b. This architecture utilizes a multilayer subwavelength photonic configuration: The layer adjacent to the fiber facet comprises a metallic gold grating with a thickness h1 = 200 nm. This grating layer features a periodic array with period P = 950 nm, composed of two distinct resonant grating elements exhibiting precisely controlled width differentials—a primary element with width w1 = 500 nm and a secondary element with width w2 = 310 nm, to facilitate dual-frequency coupling. The width of the air gap between different gold strips is kept equal. Directly above the grating layer resides a dielectric spacer layer of PMMA, with a thickness h2 = 160 nm. The topmost layer constitutes a gold Au mirror layer of thickness h3 = 100 nm.
The inherent symmetry of the designed structure was leveraged to enhance computational efficiency, utilizing a two-dimensional (2-D) model simulated using finite element simulation software. As shown in Figure 1c, periodic boundary conditions were applied to the left and right sides of the 2-D structure, while perfectly matched layers (PMLs) were implemented at the top and bottom boundaries to suppress boundary-induced reflections. For simulations, the refractive index of the PMMA spacer layer was set to 1.49 [15], and the dielectric constant of gold was adopted from the experimental data reported by Johnson and Christy [16].
Under transverse magnetic (TM) polarization excitation, the reflection spectrum response of the nano-resonator at the fiber end face is presented in Figure 2a. Numerical simulations reveal that the structure exhibits pronounced multi-order resonant characteristics across the broad spectral range of 600–1800 nm, featuring three distinct resonance peaks at wavelengths λ1 = 1522.5 nm, λ2= 1446.3 nm, and λ3 = 958.1 nm. Mode-field analysis demonstrates that these resonances correspond to dual-path interference effects between SPR at the metal-dielectric interface and metal-dielectric-metal waveguide modes [21,22]. This multifrequency resonance phenomenon originates from the strong dependency relationship between the phase accumulation of TM0 modes and the geometric parameters within the composite waveguide structure. The resonant mode near 980 nm exhibits a broader full-width at half-maximum (FWHM), with a reflection dip of approximately 0.1. Given that the 100-nm-thick gold mirror layer effectively eliminates optical transmission, the optical nanocavity achieves high optical absorption near 980 nm. This enables efficient plasmonic-thermal heating when illuminated by a pump laser source at this wavelength. Conversely, the resonant mode around 1550 nm displays a narrower linewidth, indicating a higher quality factor (Q-factor) and a greater extinction ratio. This combination confirms superior intensity-demodulation sensitivity and a wide linear dynamic range, establishing its suitability as a probe wavelength for demodulating flow-rate variations. When the structure is illuminated by TE light, no obvious resonance mode is observed in the wavelength range of 800–1800 nm.
The waterfall plots depicting interference peak positions versus grating period variations, as shown in Figure 2b, further reveal distinct modal behaviors. Among the three modes (ordered right-to-left), Mode I and Mode II exhibit characteristic redshifts with increasing period. Conversely, Mode III demonstrates an initial blueshift followed by a redshift. Figure 2d identifies Mode II as a Bloch mode [23], evidenced by its electric field distribution where energy predominantly localizes within the substrate of the fiber, failing to penetrate the resonant cavity. This confinement renders the Bloch mode unsuitable for both functions of pumping and demodulation. Figure 2c,e demonstrate that the electric fields of Modes III and I are strongly concentrated within the dielectric layer, exhibiting lateral propagation along the intermediate space, a hallmark of TM modes in nanocavity structures. When TM-polarized light is incident on the slits of a metallic grating, surface plasmons are excited. These plasmons couple through the grating slits into the intermediate dielectric layer, propagating within it as the TM0 surface mode. In the waveguide structure formed by the gold film/dielectric layer/gold grating, the TM0 mode waves excited by different slits propagate laterally. Interference between these co-propagating waves within the shared waveguide gives rise to resonances of different orders [22,24]. the fundamental TM0 mode resonance corresponds to two bright fringes within a single grating period, while the second-order TM0 mode resonance corresponds to four bright fringes across the intermediate dielectric layer. Based on this criterion, Mode I is unambiguously identified as the fundamental TM0 mode. Electric-field analysis confirms that both Modes I and III are, respectively, supported by the two distinct-width gratings. Notably, Mode III exhibits hybrid characteristics, combining fundamental TM0-like propagation with strong LSPR features evident in intense electric field enhancements at grating corners.

2.3. Parametric Sweep Analysis

Building upon the simulated reflection spectra and resonant mode characteristics of the optical nanocavity, we systematically investigated the influence of critical geometric parameters on resonance wavelengths through parametric sweeps. This analysis elucidates the underlying physical mechanisms governed by surface plasmon polariton (SPP) dynamics. Comprehensive simulations were performed on the following key parameters: Period (P), Spacer layer height (h2), Wide-grating width (w1), Narrow-grating width (w2), and Grating thickness (h1).

2.3.1. Grating Period (P)

Under fixed structural parameters (h1 = 200 nm, h2 = 160 nm, w1 = 500 nm, and w2 = 310 nm) for the optical nanocavity, Figure 3a illustrates the tuning behavior of resonance wavelengths versus grating period P. Simulation results demonstrate that as P increases from 900 nm to 1060 nm, the two dominant resonant modes exhibit near-linear synchronous redshift trends. This synchronized redshift phenomenon stems from the coupling mechanism between SPPs and dielectric waveguide modes in the composite waveguide structure. The increased period shifts the wavevector-matching condition for a given SPP order toward longer wavelengths.

2.3.2. Dielectric Spacer Height (h2)

Under fixed key parameters (P = 950 nm, h1 = 200 nm, w1 = 500 nm, and w2 = 310 nm) of the nanocavity, the spacer thickness h2 exhibits pronounced nonlinear tuning behavior over the optical resonance characteristic in Figure 3b. Analysis of the waterfall plot in Figure 3c, depicting interference peak positions versus spacer thickness variations, reveals that Bloch mode positions remain invariant with changing dielectric layer thickness, consistent with theoretical predictions that Bloch modes depend solely on grating periodicity. The hybrid mode wavelength remains constant below 180 nm spacer thickness but redshifts significantly with further increases, while the fundamental TM0 mode exhibits a blueshifting trend. This diametrically opposed tuning behavior originates from the reduced effective index, Neff, of the dielectric waveguide under increasing spacer thickness. The equivalent refractive index of the guided mode in the composite waveguide structure satisfies the relationship equation:
β = k 0 N e f f
Here, β represents the propagation constant, and k 0 = 2 π / λ is the wave number in a vacuum [22]. The diminished Neff decreases the phase accumulation of the guided wave during optical excitation, reducing the total accumulated phase shift and thereby inducing blueshifting of the fundamental TM0 resonance. Conversely, the hybrid mode’s non-monotonic spectral evolution fundamentally deviates from this behavior, providing conclusive evidence that it is not a pure second-order TM0 mode but rather a quintessential hybrid resonant mode incorporating LSPR characteristics.

2.3.3. Wide-Grating Width (w1)

Under fixed core parameters of the optical nano-cavity (P = 950 nm, h1 = 200 nm, h2 = 160 nm, and w2 = 310 nm), the tuning characteristics of wide-grating width (w1) on the optical resonance are illustrated in Figure 3d. Simulation results indicate that as w1 increases from 470 nm to 530 nm, Mode I exhibits a slight redshift while Mode III undergoes a blueshift. According to the theoretical framework for optical nano-cavities, increasing the width of the wide-grating (w1) reduces the slit width, enhancing the near-field confinement of SPPs. This stronger confinement and the increased wide-grating width extend the effective propagation path of SPPs within the cavity, thereby increasing their accumulated phase shift. Consequently, the transmission phase of surface plasmon waves excited by incident light within the cavity increases, leading to overall phase accumulation that causes the redshift of the first-order TM0 resonance mode peak. Meanwhile, electric field distributions reveal that the hybrid resonance mode is primarily supported by the narrow-grating, explaining the minimal variation observed in its resonance peak.

2.3.4. Narrow-Grating Width (w2)

Under fixed core parameters of the optical nano-cavity (P = 950 nm, h1 = 200 nm, h2 = 160 nm, and w1 = 500 nm), the tuning characteristics of narrow-grating width (w2) on the optical resonance wavelengths exhibit an asymmetric redshift behavior, as shown in Figure 3e. Simulation results demonstrate that both the fundamental TM0 mode and the hybrid mode undergo redshifts as w2 increases from 200 nm to 300 nm. Similarly, this synchronous redshift of the dual resonance peaks originates from SPP-dielectric waveguide mode coupling within the composite structure, where accumulated propagation phase increases induce spectral redshift in both the fundamental TM0 mode and the hybrid mode. Critically, while this coupling mechanism governs both modes, the hybrid mode—primarily confined to the narrow-grating—exhibits substantially larger resonance shifts than the TM0 mode under narrow-grating width variations. This enhanced sensitivity stems directly from its strong LSPR character.

2.3.5. Grating Thickness (h1)

Under fixed key parameters of the optical nano-cavity (P = 950 nm, h2 = 160 nm, w1 = 500 nm, and w2 = 310 nm), the tuning effect of metal grating thickness h1 on the resonance wavelengths exhibits a differential redshift behavior, as shown in Figure 3f. Simulation results reveal that as h1 increases from 150 nm to 250 nm, Mode I redshifts slightly while Mode III undergoes a significant redshift. This phenomenon can be thoroughly explained by the surface plasmon skin effect [25,26] and transport theory of SPPs [22,27]. The thickness of the grating modulates the phase of propagating SPPs within the slit. By controlling the grating thickness, distinct phase retardations can be achieved; thus, increasing the height of the metal grating (h1) elongates the transmission path of surface plasmon waves within the slit between gratings excited by incident light and enhances the lateral confinement of the field. The increased transmission path thereby leads to a larger transmission phase shift, resulting in redshifts for both Mode I and Mode III. Concurrently, based on LSPR theory, LSPR is more strongly influenced by metal grating thickness. Consequently, the redshift magnitude of the hybrid mode is substantially greater than that of the fundamental TM0 mode.

2.4. Temperature-Sensitive Property

Multiphysics simulations coupling fluid dynamics and heat transfer can effectively describe fluid flow and thermal convection phenomena, as described elsewhere [28,29,30]. However, for the specific hot-wire anemometer under investigation, the range of temperature variation within the sensor is relatively constrained, and the nanometer thickness of each layer ensures the rapid thermal conduction to reach a thermal equilibrium. Here, heat exchange in the time domain among different components is ignored in our simulation, which permits a simplification of the model to focus on the thermal sensing mechanism. Within this constrained temperature fluctuation regime, Equations (4) and (6) establish the relationships between temperature and flow velocity, and flow velocity and spectral variations, respectively. The systematic analysis above comprehensively investigates how key structural parameters govern the resonant wavelength positions in the optical nanocavity. Results demonstrate that each parameter enables precise spectral manipulation of the resonant modes through controlled wavelength shifts in magnitude and direction. Consequently, targeted adjustment of these parameters facilitates active resonance wavelength control, establishing a foundation for optimizing the sensing performance of this architecture. Integrating the above analysis with the thermo-optic coefficient and coefficient of thermal expansion of the PMMA material, which are dn/dT = −1.3 × 10−4 K−1 and dh/dT = 2.2 × 10−4 K−1 [14], we simulate and calculate the temperature sensitivity of the two primary resonant modes for comparison. The coefficient of thermal expansion of gold and the silicon dioxide substrate are 1.4 × 10−5 K−1 and 2.4 × 10−7 K−1 [31,32] and are smaller by one and two orders of magnitude, compared to that of PMMA. It should be noticed that the thermal deformation exhibits distinct temperature-dependent behavior divided at 102 °C; the deformation rate above this critical temperature demonstrates a substantially steeper slope than that below it [33,34]. Therefore, the temperature range of our simulation is set below 100 °C to ensure the stability of PMMA.
The core objective of this study focuses on suppressing the resonance shift at the heating wavelength while maximizing drift at the sensing wavelength. Parametric sweeps (Figure 3) revealed minimal influence of period (P), spacer thickness (h2), and wide-grating width (w1) on hybrid mode drift, prompting dedicated sensitivity simulations shown in Figure 4a–c. Bar graphs denote absolute sensitivities, while line plots represent sensitivity ratios of sensing-to-heating wavelength. Regarding period variations (Figure 4a), sensing sensitivity decreased monotonically with increasing P, whereas heating sensitivity exhibited a non-monotonic behavior (initial decrease followed by an increase), with a minimum at P = 1040 nm. Crucially, the sensitivity ratio peaked at 12.22 at this optimal period. As shown in Figure 4b for spacer thickness, sensing sensitivity generally decreased with larger h2, while heating sensitivity again showed non-monotonic variation, minimizing at h2 = 140 nm where the sensitivity ratio reached its maximum of 11.72. In contrast, Figure 4c demonstrates that w1 variations exhibited distinct tuning characteristics: heating sensitivity attained its minimum at w1 = 480 nm, concurrently yielding a peak sensitivity ratio of 11.25. These parameter-specific extrema collectively reveal targeted optimization pathways for dual-wavelength control.
Employing the parameter set optimized for maximum sensing-to-heating sensitivity ratios, P = 1040 nm, spacer thickness h2 = 140 nm, and primary grating width w1 = 480 nm, with fixed h1 = 200 nm and w2 = 310 nm, Figure 4d plots the temperature-dependent spectral shifts of the fundamental TM0 mode, hybrid mode, and Bloch mode resonances. Both fundamental TM0 and hybrid modes exhibit redshift with decreasing temperature due to the synergistic thermo-optic and thermal expansion effects. Under varying flow rates, the external sensing temperature decreases from 100 °C to 30 °C. The resulting sensitivity curves constitute absolute quantitative predictions of system performance. As quantified in Figure 4f, the fundamental TM0 resonance demonstrates superior temperature sensitivity of 269.2 pm/°C, exceeding the hybrid mode’s sensitivity of 21.34 pm/°C by a factor of 12.61. When utilizing the 980 nm pump wavelength targeting the hybrid mode and the single-frequency laser in the optical communication band as the probe wavelength targeting the fundamental TM0 mode, spectral shifts induced by flow perturbations elicit significantly weaker temperature responses in the pump channel corresponding to the hybrid mode compared to the probe channel. Consequently, the plasmonic heating efficiency at the pump wavelength remains minimally affected by ambient temperature fluctuations during flow sensing.

2.5. Demodulation Scheme

Spectral shift demodulation provides direct quantification of environmental changes in fiber sensors with relatively simple implementation, making it the predominant approach in most all-fiber thermal flowmeters for extracting flow-rate information. However, given the high cost and integration challenges of optical spectrum analyzers in practical applications, intensity demodulation by adopting a single-frequency laser offers a viable alternative. In traditional dynamic signal sensing based on an intensity demodulation scheme, optimal sensitivity is achieved by setting the laser wavelength at the phase quadrature point (Q-point), as illustrated in Figure 5a. This operating point delivers theoretically maximum sensitivity. Through adaptive bias control that confines Q-point drift within predetermined limits, stable wavelength resolution detection can be maintained under dynamic conditions.
This study employs the B-point as the initial operating position, as shown in Figure 5b. A decrease in temperature induces a spectral redshift, causing the operating point to migrate along the response curve. After delivering the heating laser with a central frequency identical to the reflection dip of the hybrid mode of the nanocavity, benefiting the optical absorption of the sensing unit, the reflection spectrum of the sensing mode of the fundamental TM0 resonance mode will experience a redshift. When the sensing laser wavelength is set at the B-point of the reflection spectrum, environmental flow variation induces the temperature reduction and spectrum shift, which produces the optical power variations of the reflected sensing laser. It should also be noted that the optical power of the sensing laser should be low enough to minimize the heating effect in the nanocavity. Under 100 μW incident power of sensing laser, Figure 5c plots the reflected power variation (ΔP) relative to the B-point reference baseline. Critically, ΔP demonstrates excellent linearity within the operational segment AB, and demodulation sensitivity is greatly dependent on the spectral slope or Q-factor of the sensing resonance mode, whereas substantial linearity degradation occurs outside this range (left of A or right of B). This approach simultaneously ensures sufficient sensitivity for flow-rate demodulation while significantly extending the effective dynamic range, thereby enhancing sensor applicability and operational stability across diverse flow conditions.
Moreover, by leveraging the temperature-dependent shifts of both resonant modes, we can achieve sensitivity amplification by fixing the pump wavelength at a strategic position on the rising edge of the hybrid mode resonance, as shown in Figure 5d. This configuration establishes a positive feedback mechanism: When flow-induced cooling redshifts the reflection spectrum, the pump wavelength, 1initially positioned at point a3, experiences increased reflectivity, migrating to point a1. This increased reflectivity reduces the optical power absorbed for heating, thereby diminishing plasmonic heating efficiency. The resulting thermal deficit further exacerbates sensor cooling, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that dramatically amplifies flow-response sensitivity.
It is also necessary to mention that the noise of the sensing system is critical to the detection accuracy in the optical intensity-based demodulation scheme during its practical application. The fluctuation of the pump laser will induce the thermal drift and temperature variation in the fiber sensor, producing the reflectivity variation at the probe wavelength. Therefore, the intensity fluctuations of the pump and probe lasers can be regarded as the primary noise source, compared to the noise from the photodetector. Since the proposed nanostructure is comprised of gold and PMMA, the long-term stability of the sensor will be dependent on the polymer layer. Aging treatment of the sensor is necessary before practical application for improving its structural and optical stability.

3. Conclusions

Through systematic investigation, this work develops a nanostructured optical cavity integrated at the optical fiber terminus. Its core innovation lies in the strategic exploitation of diametrically opposed thermo-optic responses between two resonant modes: the fundamental TM0 mode exhibits extreme temperature sensitivity, while the hybrid mode demonstrates relative insensitivity. We leverage this dichotomy through functional decoupling— the thermally stable hybrid mode efficiently absorbs pump light for plasmonic heating, while the high-sensitivity TM0 mode enables robust optical communication-band probe-based flow sensing. This division effectively isolates temperature-induced noise during flow measurements. Remarkably, positioning the pump wavelength at a strategic rising-edge location of the hybrid mode resonance triggers a self-reinforcing signal amplification mechanism. Coupled with a readily integrable dynamic intensity-demodulation scheme, this design enables practical realization of miniaturized all-fiber thermal flowmeters with enhanced sensitivity and operational stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C. and H.L.; methodology, Y.C., L.S. and H.L.; validation, Y.C. and L.S.; formal analysis, Y.C.; investigation, Y.C.; data curation, Y.C. and L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C.; writing—review and editing, H.L., D.Y., M.L., M.-Y.L., X.W., S.D., S.L. and H.G.; supervision, H.L., M.L., M.-Y.L., X.W., S.D., S.L. and H.G.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. and D.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants NSFC 12574515, 62075174, 62304161, 62204180, and in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grants WUT 104972025KFYjc0078, Science and Technology Program of CSEI 2025key03.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gupta, H.; Arumuru, V.; Jha, R. Industrial fluid flow measurement using optical fiber sensors: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 7130–7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zou, J.; Liu, Y. Development of an acoustic doppler flow profiler and flow testing. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2024; Volume 2756, p. 012019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Roriz, P.; Frazão, O.; Lobo-Ribeiro, A.B.; Santos, J.L.; Simões, J.A. Review of fiber-optic pressure sensors for biomedical and biomechanical applications. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013, 18, 050903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, J.; Dong, X.; Xu, P.; Lv, D.; Yang, J.; Qin, Y. Optical fiber thermal anemometer with light source-heated Fabry–Perot interferometer. J. Light. Technol. 2022, 40, 3010–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, G.; Hou, W.; Qiao, W.; Han, M. Fast-response fiber-optic anemometer with temperature self-compensation. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 13562–13570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Uddin, N.; Liu, G.; Sheng, Q.; Han, M. Constant temperature operation of fiber-optic hot-wire anemometers. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 2578–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.; Qu, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Qu, S. Novel fiber-tip micro flowmeter based on optofluidic microcavity filled with silver nanoparticles solutions. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 4615–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, R.; Li, M.; Wen, X.; Li, M.-Y.; Deng, S.; Liu, S.; Lu, H. Quantum Dot-Based Optical Fiber Sensor for Flow Velocity Sensing at Low Initial Temperatures. Sensors 2025, 25, 2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Homola, J. Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 462–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schneider, K.; Welter, P.; Baumgartner, Y.; Hahn, H.; Czornomaz, L.; Seidler, P. Gallium phosphide-on-silicon dioxide photonic device. J. Light. Technol. 2018, 36, 2994–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baffou, G.; Quidant, R. Thermo-plasmonics: Using metallic nanostructures as nano-sources of heat. Laser Photonics Rev. 2013, 7, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, J.; Ye, Z.; Yang, F.; Yin, Y. Plasmonic nanostructures for photothermal conversion. Small Sci. 2021, 1, 2000055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, M.; He, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhu, J. Synthesis and solar photo-thermal conversion of Au, Ag, and Au-Ag blended plasmonic nanoparticles. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 127, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guan, Z.; Jia, X.; Li, M. Nanoresonator Integrated Fiber Optics Sensor for Pressure Immune Temperature Sensing Application. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 6880–6885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sultanova, N.; Kasarova, S.; Nikolov, I. Dispersion properties of optical polymers. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2009, 116, 585–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Johnson, P.B.; Christy, R.-W. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Yan, G.; Zhang, L.; He, S. Microfluidic flowmeter based on micro “hot-wire” sandwiched Fabry-Perot interferometer. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 9483–9493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Dong, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ni, K.; Cheng, J.; Chen, Z. Hot-wire anemometer based on silver-coated fiber Bragg grating assisted by no-core fiber. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 2458–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Dong, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Cheng, J.; Chen, Z. Optical fiber anemometer using silver-coated fiber Bragg grating and bitaper. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2014, 214, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prabowo, B.A.; Purwidyantri, A.; Liu, K.-C. Surface plasmon resonance optical sensor: A review on light source technology. Biosensors 2018, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, Y.; Bai, P.; Zhou, X.; Akimov, Y.; Png, C.E.; Ang, L.K.; Knoll, W.; Wu, L. Optical refractive index sensors with plasmonic and photonic structures: Promising and inconvenient truth. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shi, H.; Wang, C.; Du, C.; Luo, X.; Dong, X.; Gao, H. Beam manipulating by metallic nano-slits with variant widths. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 6815–6820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Takakura, Y. Optical resonance in a narrow slit in a thick metallic screen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 5601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Snyder, A.W.; Love, J.D. Optical Waveguide Theory; Chapman and hall London: London, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  25. Raether, H. Surface plasmons on gratings. In Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Surfaces and on Gratings; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 91–116. [Google Scholar]
  26. Barnes, W.L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T.W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 2003, 424, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Born, M.; Wolf, E. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bahrami, M.; Eskandari, M.; Fathi, D. Thermal Analysis of a Plasmonic Perovskite Solar Cell: Using Coupled Opto-Electro-Thermal (OET) Modeling. Int. J. Energy Res. 2024, 2024, 3921832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qiu, G.; Gai, Z.; Tao, Y. Dual-functional plasmonic photothermal biosensors for highly accurate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 detection. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 5268–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khorrami, Y.; Fathi, D. Broadband thermophotovoltaic emitter using magnetic polaritons based on optimized one-and two-dimensional multilayer structures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nix, F.; MacNair, D. The thermal expansion of pure metals: Copper, gold, aluminum, nickel, and iron. Phys. Rev. 1941, 60, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsou, C.; Huang, Y.-S.; Li, H.-C.; Lai, T.-H. Determination of thermal expansion coefficient of thermal oxide. Sens. Mater. 2005, 17, 441–451. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hajduk, B.; Bednarski, H.; Jarka, P. Thermal and optical properties of PMMA films reinforced with Nb2O5 nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Banerjee, S.; Neyts, E.C.; Asselberghs, I. Reactive plasma cleaning and restoration of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2021, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illumination of the sensor probe. (b) Structural model of the optical nano-cavity with key parameters. (c) Simulation model diagram. (The region enclosed by the dashed rectangle represents the simulation region).
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illumination of the sensor probe. (b) Structural model of the optical nano-cavity with key parameters. (c) Simulation model diagram. (The region enclosed by the dashed rectangle represents the simulation region).
Photonics 13 00210 g001
Figure 2. (a) Simulated reflectance spectrum of a typical optical nano-resonator under TM (TE) light excitation. (b) Two-dimensional graph showing the variation of reflectivity with period for different modes. (c) Electric field distribution of Mode III. (d) Electric field distribution of the Bloch mode II. (e) Electric field distribution of Mode I.
Figure 2. (a) Simulated reflectance spectrum of a typical optical nano-resonator under TM (TE) light excitation. (b) Two-dimensional graph showing the variation of reflectivity with period for different modes. (c) Electric field distribution of Mode III. (d) Electric field distribution of the Bloch mode II. (e) Electric field distribution of Mode I.
Photonics 13 00210 g002
Figure 3. Resonance peak positions for the three modes with the variation of: (a) period and (b) dielectric layer thickness. (c) Two-dimensional graph showing the reflectivity varying with the thickness of the dielectric layer in different modes. Resonance peak positions for the three modes with the variation of: (d) wide-grating width, (e) narrow-grating width, and (f) grating thickness.
Figure 3. Resonance peak positions for the three modes with the variation of: (a) period and (b) dielectric layer thickness. (c) Two-dimensional graph showing the reflectivity varying with the thickness of the dielectric layer in different modes. Resonance peak positions for the three modes with the variation of: (d) wide-grating width, (e) narrow-grating width, and (f) grating thickness.
Photonics 13 00210 g003
Figure 4. Variation of thermal sensitivity, sensing sensitivity, and their ratio with (a) period, (b) dielectric layer thickness, (c) wide grating width, and (d) Temperature sensitivity at the point of maximum thermal-to-sensing sensitivity ratio (achieved over parameter sweep). (e) Magnified view near 968 nm. (f) Temperature sensitivity fitting results.
Figure 4. Variation of thermal sensitivity, sensing sensitivity, and their ratio with (a) period, (b) dielectric layer thickness, (c) wide grating width, and (d) Temperature sensitivity at the point of maximum thermal-to-sensing sensitivity ratio (achieved over parameter sweep). (e) Magnified view near 968 nm. (f) Temperature sensitivity fitting results.
Photonics 13 00210 g004
Figure 5. (a) Intensity demodulation schematic diagram. (The solid line from point A to point B is defined as the spectral region for optical intensity demodulation. Point Q denotes the location within this region where the spectral slope attains its maximum value.) (b) The result of demodulating the variation in intensity with respect to temperature. (c) Output power, defined as the product of reflectance and incident power (fixed at 100 μW), exhibits a linear relationship with temperature. (d) Schematic diagram of the sensitization effect during the sensing process (Points a1, a2, and a3 represent the reflectivity at the same wavelength under different temperature, indicating the slight variation of optical absorption for optical heating).
Figure 5. (a) Intensity demodulation schematic diagram. (The solid line from point A to point B is defined as the spectral region for optical intensity demodulation. Point Q denotes the location within this region where the spectral slope attains its maximum value.) (b) The result of demodulating the variation in intensity with respect to temperature. (c) Output power, defined as the product of reflectance and incident power (fixed at 100 μW), exhibits a linear relationship with temperature. (d) Schematic diagram of the sensitization effect during the sensing process (Points a1, a2, and a3 represent the reflectivity at the same wavelength under different temperature, indicating the slight variation of optical absorption for optical heating).
Photonics 13 00210 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, M.; Li, M.-Y.; Wen, X.; Deng, S.; Liu, S.; Gao, H.; Lu, H.; Yao, D. Dual-Resonance Plasmonic Nanocavity with Differential Thermo-Optic Response for Enhanced Fiber-Optic Thermal Flowmeters. Photonics 2026, 13, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13020210

AMA Style

Cao Y, Sun L, Li M, Li M-Y, Wen X, Deng S, Liu S, Gao H, Lu H, Yao D. Dual-Resonance Plasmonic Nanocavity with Differential Thermo-Optic Response for Enhanced Fiber-Optic Thermal Flowmeters. Photonics. 2026; 13(2):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13020210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Yekun, Lei Sun, Min Li, Ming-Yu Li, Xiaoyan Wen, Shuo Deng, Sisi Liu, Hongyun Gao, Haifei Lu, and Dengzun Yao. 2026. "Dual-Resonance Plasmonic Nanocavity with Differential Thermo-Optic Response for Enhanced Fiber-Optic Thermal Flowmeters" Photonics 13, no. 2: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13020210

APA Style

Cao, Y., Sun, L., Li, M., Li, M.-Y., Wen, X., Deng, S., Liu, S., Gao, H., Lu, H., & Yao, D. (2026). Dual-Resonance Plasmonic Nanocavity with Differential Thermo-Optic Response for Enhanced Fiber-Optic Thermal Flowmeters. Photonics, 13(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13020210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop