Next Article in Journal
Dynamics of the Femtosecond Mid-IR Laser Pulse Impact on a Bulk Silicon
Next Article in Special Issue
Direct Laser Writing of Diffractive Structures on Bi-Layer Si/Ti Films Coated on Fused Silica Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Performance Analysis of Femtosecond-Laser-Written Diode-Pumped Pr:LiLuF4 Visible Waveguide Lasers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Point-by-Point Induced High Birefringence Polymer Optical Fiber Bragg Grating for Strain Measurement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fiber-Fed 3D Printing of Germanate Glass Optics

1
Wyant College of Optical Sciences, The University of Arizona, 1630 E University Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2
Advalue Photonics Inc., 2700 E Bilby Rd., Tucson, AZ 85706, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(4), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10040378
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 27 March 2023 / Published: 29 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Direct Laser Writing for Photonic Applications)

Abstract

:
In recent years, 3D printing glass optics has gained massive attention in industry and academia since glass could be an ideal material to make optical elements, including the lens. However, the limitation of materials and printing methods has prevented 3D printing glass optics progress. Therefore, we have developed a novel printing strategy for germanate glass printing instead of pure silica. Moreover, compared with traditional multi-component quartz glass, germanate glass has unmatched advantages for its mid-infrared (MIR) transparency and outstanding visible light imaging performance. Furthermore, compared with non-oxide glass (fluoride glass and chalcogenide glass), germanate glass has much better mechanical, physical, and chemical properties and a high refractive index. Germanate glass has been widely applied in remote sensing, ranging, environmental detection, and biomedical detection. However, it is difficult to shape, cast, polish, and grind for optical and photonics applications such as imaging optics and laser-collimation optics. These drawbacks have made germanate glass inaccessible to complex optical elements and greatly increased their cost. In this report, we use germanate glass fibers with a diameter of 125 µm based on fiber-fed laser heating technology to fabricate an mm-size optical application. In this paper, we combine the fiber-fed laser heating technology with an optimized temperature control process to manufacture high-precision optical elements. Germanate glass optics can be printed with excellent visible light and IR transparency and a smooth surface with roughness under 4 nm. By optimizing the layer-by-layer 3D printing process and the thermal feedback in the printing process, we avoid cracks and minimize surface deformation. This work shows the possibility of the mm-size glass optical elements 3D printing and widens its application for IR optics.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, 3D printing technology has started to release its potential in manufacturing and more modern functionalities such as biomedical [1], automotive and aerospace [2], and construction [3] are being developed. Three-dimensional printing optics has become a possible solution for complex geometrical optics. Polymer-optics 3D printing has been substantially researched and developed [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, 3D printing glass optics still faces challenges from manufacturing accuracy, shrinkage, and material limitation [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The most common approaches for glass 3D printing, including direct printing, transparent inorganic glass optics with laser sintering, fused filament deposition, direct ink writing (DIW), stereolithography (STL), projection microstereolithography (PµSL), or two-photon stereolithography (TPSL), have generally not achieved the quality required for optical applications [4,5,6,8,9,13,15,16,17,18,25,26,27,28,29]. These approaches have been limited by shrinkage, the burning out of organic components and high-temperature sintering, defects (bubbles, hidden layers, etc.), and material limitations. These have prevented inorganic glass from becoming a reliable material for modern optic printing. Although the solvent-free, silica precursor, and two-photon polymerization process have highly decreased the shrinkage and deformation through pyrolysis to avoid the sintering process [13,25,27]. The challenge of printing glass optics into mm-size remains due to the time consumption from its direct laser writing (DLW) process, such as two-photon polymerization (TPP) or two-step polymerization (TSP) [11,30,31,32,33].
In addition, it is extremely tough to develop different glass materials to fit different optical properties such as the refractive index, abbe number, and transmittance. Fused glass filament deposition of inorganic glass fiber also suffers from low print resolution due to the size of the filament, and the CO2 laser-induced temperature variation highly increases the difficulties in controlling the layer thickness. Meanwhile, the glass fiber feeding process and translation stage movement may suffer from changes in the glass viscosity, which can stimulate adverse effects in each layer [15,16,17].
In this paper, we resolve the limitation of material by using germanate glass instead of silica and manufacture an accurate spherical lens with a diameter from millimeter size to centimeter size and prove the possibility of printing a complex aspherical lens. We develop a germanate glass fiber-fed laser-melting method with the temperature keeping and feedback system (GFLFS) to control a stable layer thickness for the input germanate glass fiber (GGF). Printing is carried out by laser melting and feeding germanium glass fiber on the germanate glass slide with a CW CO2 laser. We demonstrate that the germanate glass lens can be printed accurately with a peak to valley <600 nm and a surface roughness lower than 4 nm. Furthermore, the printed lens can collimate 632.8 nm and 1.7 µm laser beams. Simultaneously, the printed lens is used to make a microscopy system and proves the potential for biomedical imaging. Germanate glass, a popular near infrared glass fiber material, is also a great choice for visible light and IR imaging optics, which has a large refractive index, n = 1.6555 at 589 nm wavelength and n = 1.6399 at 1 µm wavelength, showing that it is suitable for visible, NIR, SWIR, and MWIR applications [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].

2. Materials and Methods

Figure 1a is the layout of the GFLFS platform. A CW CO2 laser (λ = 10.6µm) melts the fed GGF and prints the structure on the germanate glass substrate. Figure 1b shows that the GGF feeding process, and the prepared GGF feeding speed can be highly controlled through the aluminum feeding tube. The substrate is fixed on the temperature control system with a temperature feedback circuit in Figure 1a. Figure 1c,d show the top view and the side view of the schematic diagram set on the insulation system in Figure 1a. Instead of using a simple heating plate, we built a ceramic insulation material bulk to improve the temperature control accuracy and decrease the thermal expansion difference between the printed lens and the substrate. The substrate is pre-manufactured with the same diameter as the designed lens. We also can cut the substrate to fit the lens diameter if we print more than one lens per substrate.
Figure 2a shows the glass lens manufacturing process. As Figure 2c shows, the temperature control strategy mainly divides into 4 parts: pre-heating, printing, stress releasing, and cooling. The substrate is pre-heated to Tg (~450 °C) in ~30 min, and then we print the lens structure layer-by-layer (Figure 2b). After the lens printing, to alleviate the residual inner stresses and to avoid cracking (Figure 2f), the temperature is increased to ~500 °C by 10 °C/min for 30 min for a 5 mm-diameter lens and slowly decreased to 30 °C below Tg (2 °C/min) for 30 min. Finally, the temperature is cooled down to room temperature by 2 °C/min.
It should be noted that the time of the printing process is determined by the lens size and printing resolution. We manufacture the lenses with GGF with different diameters (125 µm and 150 µm). Figure 2d shows the printing process with the fixed parameters, 0.15 mm/s feeding speed and 0.15 mm/s translation moving speed. The laser focal spot diameter is around 0.8 mm. We use an external voltage board to switch and control the laser power by changing the voltage, amplitude, and frequency. The manufacturing laser power range has been optimized to set the manufacturing window from 16 W to 41 W to avoid cracks in the printing process. Figure 2d shows an example of the optimized printed glass curve performance. The layer thickness and diameter were analyzed based on the default parameters. The feeding volume (FV) per second can be simplified as a cylinder. In the printing process, FV depends on the feeding speed (FS) and the diameter of the glass fiber (D).
F V = π D 2 / 4 × F S s 1
Although FV is stable for constant fiber diameter and feeding speed, the different input power will change the aspect ratio (AR) of its cross-section.
A R = h e i g h t / d i a m e t e r
Figure 2e shows the relationship between the height and diameter of the printed single line for different laser powers. The height of the printed line decreased for different laser powers, and the diameter increased simultaneously, meaning that the axis printing resolution can be controlled by the laser power or the diameter of the fed glass fiber.

3. Fabrication Results

Additionally, the temperature control time is positively proportional to the diameter and the sag height of the lenses. For example, it takes around 35 min for the 3 mm sag and 5 mm-diameter lens. Figure 3a shows a 5 mm-diameter plano-convex spherical lens printing process and the clear lens after thermal treatment. Figure 3c shows two manufactured plano-convex germanate glass lenses with the same parameters, where the lenses are 3.75 mm in diameter and 5.15 mm radius of curvature. The surface profile was detected by a white-light interferometer (Figure 3d). Surface deviation from the ideal lens surface in the central region was less than ± 300 nm (Figure 3e). RMS surface roughness (Sq) was less than 1 nm (Figure 3f). The fabricating method proves reliability and allows the possibility for excellent surface performance manufacturing.

4. Experiment Results

Considering the excellent transmittance in visible and infrared bandwidth of germanate glass, the transmission measurement from 1.5 µm to 5.5 µm is shown in Figure 4b. The germanate glass thick plate (3.6 mm thickness) shows a high transmission, nearly 90% in the range of 1.5 µm to 3.5 µm, and transmission >70% at 4 µm. Then, we developed the laser collimator, which has become an available application to evaluate its performance. Figure 4a shows the designed laser-collimating system, including the multimode fiber mount, lens mount, and adjustable part. The assembled printed germanate glass lens can adjust the distance between the lens and the fiber output end. It can flexibly control the diverse angle of the collimated IR (wavelength ~1.7 µm) laser beam. We can clearly observe a collimated circle-like beam pattern on the IR card. Figure 4c shows the designed single-mode fiber (SMF) for a 632.8 nm laser. Multimode fiber and SMF mount were manufactured by the commercial 3D printer using plastic material. The collimated 632.8 nm laser beam has been appropriately demonstrated to propagate through the interference pattern in Figure 4d.
Therefore, the laser collimator can also be utilized for IR and visible wavelength laser beams. The detected laser divergence dimension of 632.8 nm and 1.7 µm laser beams, as shown in Figure 5a,b, offers an available specification for industrial possibilities.
Further analyzing the glass 3D printing performance of the lens, we designed a microscope system for a cell phone camera. Figure 6a shows the experiment setup, and we set the optical system in front of the cell phone camera. Figure 6b shows the image of the USAF 1951 resolution target by the printed glass objective. The 6th term from the 6th group (the highest resolution of the target) of the target has been captured clearly, at 114 lp/mm. The system can be used to test the bio-sample. Figure 6c shows the image of onion pulp cells. The outline of each cell is observed.
Furthermore, we printed the aspherical donut-shape-like lens in Figure 7b. The diameter of the lens is ~4 mm, and the thickness is ~2 mm. From its center to the edge-side of the printed lens, the bent image explains the capability of its radius of curvature distribution. As the side view of the designed printing strategy shows in Figure 7a, the a, b, and c curves are convex, concave, and convex. Like spherical lens printing, the printing resolution is also controlled by layer thickness. The printed non-spherical lens further demonstrates the manufacturing flexibility of our proposed method.

5. Conclusions and Discussion

We developed the laser-heat germanate glass optics 3D printing method using the optimized temperature feedback circuit fiber-fed system. The proposed method was not only used for printing the single spherical lens but for the multi-lens microscopy imaging system build and the continuous surface manufacturing. The surface roughness is lower than 1 nm, and the surface deviation peak-to-valley (PV) value is lower than 600 nm (±300 nm), which meets the commercial standard for imaging optics and pioneers the accurate millimeter size glass imaging optics printing. Compared to the 3D-printed glass optics through the methods such as two-photon polymerization, direct laser writing, direct ink writing, glass deposition, and glass filament feeding, we upgraded the available glass optics printing method for “Macro” optical elements, including laser collimator and microscope without the shrinkage and cracks. Moreover, we have created new potential for germanate glass and its excellent properties, such as thermal stability, mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and imaging performance in visible light, NIR, and MIR regions. Moreover, instead of pure silica, we utilized complex doped glass to break through the material limitation by its different refractive index and transmittance. We believe that the reported research not only paves the way for low-cost fabrication of complex IR glass optical systems for imaging applications but also develops the heating strategy for glass additive manufacturing, including preheating, the printing process, and inner stress-releasing corresponding to the glass transition temperature (Tg).
The proposed printing method and laser heating process for printing precise optical elements still face major limitations in the complex optical imaging system. Double-let lens manufacturing needs an accurate optical axis alignment for up-surface and down-surface. Additionally, the 3D printing process will print millimeter-size components and centimeter-size optics for more imaging optics with larger apertures, such as camera lenses, especially the infrared (IR) camera lens, significantly reducing the cost. Figure 8a,b demonstrate a manufactured plano-convex germanate visible-IR lens with around 20 mm diameter and more positive lenses with different sag heights and diameters. It should be mentioned that the micro-bubbles mainly cause defects inside the lens during the fiber-feeding process, which can be highly decreased by optimizing the temperature control and feeding stability. The OCT system will detect the uniformity of the refractive index inside the lens.
With outstanding properties in resolution, dimension, and cost, we expect that the GFLFS system will have a variety of applications in astronomy, remote sensing, surveillance, biotechnology, medical diagnosis, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, oil and gas detection, machine vision, etc., from visible to IR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.H., T.L., S.J. and R.L.; methodology, Z.H., T.L.; software, Z.H. and S.J.; validation, Z.H., S.J. and R.L.; formal analysis, Z.H.; investigation, Z.H., S.J. and R.L.; resources, S.J., T.L. and R.L.; data curation, Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, Z.H.; supervision, all authors.; project administration, S.J.; funding acquisition, S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by USAF/AFMC, grant number AFRL-2023-0530.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dey, M.; Ozbolat, I.T. 3D bioprinting of cells, tissues and organs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Duda, T.; Raghavan, L.V. 3D Metal Printing Technology. IFAC-Pap. 2016, 49, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hager, I.; Golonka, A.; Putanowicz, R. 3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction? Procedia Eng. 2016, 151, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kang, W.; Hong, Z.; Liang, R. 3D printing optics with hybrid material. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 1809–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liang, R.; Hong, Z. Laser-Assisted Additive Manufacture of Optics Using Thermally Curable Materials. U.S. Patent Application No. 16/484,310, 30 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, Z.; Hong, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Hao, Q.; Liang, R. Thermal effects in single-point curing process for pulsed infrared laser-assisted 3D printing of optics. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 7, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Assefa, B.G.; Pekkarinen, M.; Partanen, H.; Biskop, J.; Turunen, J.; Saarinen, J. Imaging-quality 3D-printed centimeter-scale lens. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 12630–12637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Liu, W.; Dong, B.; Lee, J.; Ware, H.O.T.; Zhang, H.F.; Sun, C. High-speed 3D printing of millimeter-size customized aspheric imaging lenses with sub 7 nm surface roughness. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hong, Z.; Liang, R. IR-laser assisted additive freeform optics manufacturing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Takada, K.; Sun, H.-B.; Kawata, S. Improved spatial resolution and surface roughness in photopolymerization-based laser nanowriting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 071122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cumpston, B.H.; Ananthavel, S.P.; Barlow, S.; Dyer, D.L.; Ehrlich, J.E.; Erskine, L.L.; Heikal, A.A.; Kuebler, S.M.; Lee, I.Y.S.; McCord-Maughon, D.; et al. Two-photon polymerization initiators for three-dimensional optical data storage and microfabrication. Nature 1999, 398, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mader, M.; Schlatter, O.; Heck, B.; Warmbold, A.; Dorn, A.; Zappe, H.; Risch, P.; Helmer, D.; Kotz, F.; Rapp, B.E. High-throughput injection molding of transparent fused silica glass. Science 2021, 372, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hong, Z.; Ye, P.; Loy, D.A.; Liang, R. Three-dimensional printing of glass micro-optics. Optica 2021, 8, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Datsiou, K.C.; Saleh, E.; Spirrett, F.; Goodridge, R.; Ashcroft, I.; Eustice, D. Additive manufacturing of glass with laser powder bed fusion. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 4410–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hostetler, J.M.; Johnson, J.E.; Goldstein, J.T.; Bristow, D.A.; Landers, R.G.; Kinzel, E.C. Fiber-Fed Printing of Free-Form Free-Standing Glass Structures. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 13–15 August 2018; pp. 994–1002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nguyen, D.T.; Meyers, C.; Yee, T.D.; Dudukovic, N.A.; Destino, J.F.; Zhu, C.; Duoss, E.B.; Baumann, T.F.; Suratwala, T.; Smay, J.E. 3D-printed transparent glass. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, J.; Gilbert, L.J.; Qu, C.; Landers, R.G.; Bristow, D.A.; Kinzel, E.C. Additive manufacturing of transparent soda-lime glass using a filament-fed process. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 139, 061006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kotz, F.; Arnold, K.; Bauer, W.; Schild, D.; Keller, N.; Sachsenheimer, K.; Nargang, T.M.; Richter, C.; Helmer, D.; Rapp, B.E. Three-dimensional printing of transparent fused silica glass. Nature 2017, 544, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, J.; Gilbert, L.J.; Bristow, D.A.; Landers, R.G.; Goldstein, J.T.; Urbas, A.M.; Kinzel, E.C. Additive manufacturing of glass for optical applications. In Laser 3D Manufacturing III; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2016; pp. 123–131. [Google Scholar]
  20. Klein, J.; Stern, M.; Franchin, G.; Kayser, M.; Inamura, C.; Dave, S.; Weaver, J.C.; Houk, P.; Colombo, P.; Yang, M. Additive manufacturing of optically transparent glass. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2015, 2, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fateri, M.; Gebhardt, A. Selective laser melting of soda-lime glass powder. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2015, 12, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luo, J.; Pan, H.; Kinzel, E.C. Additive manufacturing of glass. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2014, 136, 061024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khmyrov, R.; Grigoriev, S.; Okunkova, A.; Gusarov, A. On the possibility of selective laser melting of quartz glass. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Marchelli, G.; Prabhakar, R.; Storti, D.; Ganter, M. The guide to glass 3D printing: Developments, methods, diagnostics and results. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2011, 17, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hong, Z.; Ye, P.; Loy, D.A.; Liang, R. High-Precision Printing of Complex Glass Imaging Optics with Precondensed Liquid Silica Resin. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2105595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xiao, Y.; Hong, Z.; Zhao, G.C.H.; Liang, R.; Lucas, P.; Hao, Q. Thermal studies of three-dimensional printing using pulsed laser heating. ES Mater. Manuf. 2018, 1, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hong, Z.; Sun, Y.; Ye, P.; Loy, D.A.; Liang, R. Bio-inspired Compact, High-resolution Snapshot Hyperspectral Imaging System with 3D Printed Glass Lightguide Array. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2209.07777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eckel, Z.C.; Zhou, C.; Martin, J.H.; Jacobsen, A.J.; Carter, W.B.; Schaedler, T.A. Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics. Science 2016, 351, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lezal, D.; Pedlikova, J.; Kostka, P.; Bludska, J.; Poulain, M.; Zavadil, J. Heavy metal oxide glasses: Preparation and physical properties. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2001, 284, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hahn, V.; Messer, T.; Bojanowski, N.M.; Curticean, E.R.; Wacker, I.; Schröder, R.R.; Blasco, E.; Wegener, M. Two-step absorption instead of two-photon absorption in 3D nanoprinting. Nat. Photonics 2021, 15, 932–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gissibl, T.; Thiele, S.; Herkommer, A.; Giessen, H. Two-photon direct laser writing of ultracompact multi-lens objectives. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, S.; Luo, T. Thulium and/or Holmium Doped Germanosilicate Glasses for Two Micron Lasers. U.S. Patent No. 8,467,423, 18 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  33. Farsari, M.; Chichkov, B.N. Two-photon fabrication. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 450–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, P.; Ng, A.K.L.; Dowler, A.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H. Development of low-loss lead-germanate glass for mid-infrared fiber optics: II. preform extrusion and fiber fabrication. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 833–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Q.; Chen, G.; Zhang, G.; Qiu, J.; Chen, D. Spectroscopic properties of Ho 3+/Yb 3+ codoped lanthanum aluminum germanate glasses with efficient energy transfer. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 113102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, J.; Yao, Z.; Zong, J.; Jiang, S. Highly efficient high-power thulium-doped germanate glass fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32, 638–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, J.; Jiang, S.; Luo, T.; Geng, J.; Peyghambarian, N.; Barnes, N.P. Efficient thulium-doped 2-μm germanate fiber laser. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2006, 18, 334–336. [Google Scholar]
  38. Walsh, B.M.; Barnes, N.P.; Reichle, D.J.; Jiang, S. Optical properties of Tm3+ ions in alkali germanate glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 5344–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bayya, S.S.; Chin, G.D.; Sanghera, J.S.; Aggarwal, I.D. Germanate glass as a window for high energy laser systems. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 11687–11693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bayya, S.S.; Sanghera, J.S.; Aggarwal, I.D.; Wojcik, J.A. Infrared transparent germanate glass-ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 3114–3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Lincoln, J.; Brocklesby, W.; Deol, R.; Mackechnie, C.; Pearson, A.; Tropper, A.; Hanna, D.; Payne, D. Fabrication and optical properties of lead-germanate glasses and a new class of optical fibers doped with Tm3+. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 73, 8066–8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dumbaugh, W.H. Infrared transmitting germanate glasses. In Emerging Optical Materials; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 1982; pp. 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  43. Geng, J.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, S. High-spectral-flatness mid-infrared supercontinuum generated from a Tm-doped fiber amplifier. Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, 834–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Printing system and printing process. (a) Schematic diagram of the 3D printing system including fiber-fed system, laser-melting system and temperature control system; (b) The fiber-feeding process including the aluminum tube and GGF; (c,d) The top view and side view of the schematic diagram of self-build ceramic insulation material bulk.
Figure 1. Printing system and printing process. (a) Schematic diagram of the 3D printing system including fiber-fed system, laser-melting system and temperature control system; (b) The fiber-feeding process including the aluminum tube and GGF; (c,d) The top view and side view of the schematic diagram of self-build ceramic insulation material bulk.
Photonics 10 00378 g001
Figure 2. (a) The diagram of glass lens fabrication process; (b) The diagram of layer-by-layer printing process; (c) The strategy of temperature control during the manufacturing process; (d) The example for line printing and the optimized smooth printed glass line (scale bar: 100 µm); (e) The printing resolution with a staple feeding and stage moving speed at 0.15 mm/s; (f) The crack surface and smooth surface comparison.
Figure 2. (a) The diagram of glass lens fabrication process; (b) The diagram of layer-by-layer printing process; (c) The strategy of temperature control during the manufacturing process; (d) The example for line printing and the optimized smooth printed glass line (scale bar: 100 µm); (e) The printing resolution with a staple feeding and stage moving speed at 0.15 mm/s; (f) The crack surface and smooth surface comparison.
Photonics 10 00378 g002aPhotonics 10 00378 g002b
Figure 3. (a) The lens with 5 mm-diameter printing process; (b) The manufactured plano-convex lens after fully stress releasing; (c) The image of two printed glass lenses with same surface curvature, thickness and diameter; (d) The surface profile of the printed lens in (c); (e) Surface deviation of the printed lens in (c); (f) The surface roughness of the printed lens in (c). ((d,f) detected by Zygo Newview 8300 optical white light interferometer).
Figure 3. (a) The lens with 5 mm-diameter printing process; (b) The manufactured plano-convex lens after fully stress releasing; (c) The image of two printed glass lenses with same surface curvature, thickness and diameter; (d) The surface profile of the printed lens in (c); (e) Surface deviation of the printed lens in (c); (f) The surface roughness of the printed lens in (c). ((d,f) detected by Zygo Newview 8300 optical white light interferometer).
Photonics 10 00378 g003aPhotonics 10 00378 g003b
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the designed mount for laser collimator including multimode fiber mount, lens mount and the side-view of the manufactured laser collimator and the laser fiber; (b) The collimated 1710 nm wavelength laser beam performance on the IR card; (c) The design of the collimator structure for single-mode fiber and the single-mode fiber with the mounted collimator; (d) The beam spot after collimating the fabricated collimator and the inference by the shear plate.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the designed mount for laser collimator including multimode fiber mount, lens mount and the side-view of the manufactured laser collimator and the laser fiber; (b) The collimated 1710 nm wavelength laser beam performance on the IR card; (c) The design of the collimator structure for single-mode fiber and the single-mode fiber with the mounted collimator; (d) The beam spot after collimating the fabricated collimator and the inference by the shear plate.
Photonics 10 00378 g004aPhotonics 10 00378 g004b
Figure 5. (a) The divergence dimension performance of 632.8 nm laser beam; (b) The divergence dimension performance of 1.7 µm laser beam.
Figure 5. (a) The divergence dimension performance of 632.8 nm laser beam; (b) The divergence dimension performance of 1.7 µm laser beam.
Photonics 10 00378 g005
Figure 6. (a) The designed microscopy layout and the diagram of the experiment set up; (b) The image of 1951 USAF resolution target. (c) The image of onion pulp cells.
Figure 6. (a) The designed microscopy layout and the diagram of the experiment set up; (b) The image of 1951 USAF resolution target. (c) The image of onion pulp cells.
Photonics 10 00378 g006
Figure 7. (a) The design of the donut-shape lens and layer-by-layer printing strategy; (b) donut-shape lens showing ray bending; (c) The images of the donut-shape lens on the caliper and desk.
Figure 7. (a) The design of the donut-shape lens and layer-by-layer printing strategy; (b) donut-shape lens showing ray bending; (c) The images of the donut-shape lens on the caliper and desk.
Photonics 10 00378 g007
Figure 8. (a) The manufactured germanate glass lens with (20 ± 0.01) mm diameter; (b) The manufactured spherical lenses. (Scale bar: 5 mm).
Figure 8. (a) The manufactured germanate glass lens with (20 ± 0.01) mm diameter; (b) The manufactured spherical lenses. (Scale bar: 5 mm).
Photonics 10 00378 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, Z.; Luo, T.; Jiang, S.; Liang, R. Fiber-Fed 3D Printing of Germanate Glass Optics. Photonics 2023, 10, 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10040378

AMA Style

Hong Z, Luo T, Jiang S, Liang R. Fiber-Fed 3D Printing of Germanate Glass Optics. Photonics. 2023; 10(4):378. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10040378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Zhihan, Tao Luo, Shibin Jiang, and Rongguang Liang. 2023. "Fiber-Fed 3D Printing of Germanate Glass Optics" Photonics 10, no. 4: 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10040378

APA Style

Hong, Z., Luo, T., Jiang, S., & Liang, R. (2023). Fiber-Fed 3D Printing of Germanate Glass Optics. Photonics, 10(4), 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10040378

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop