Next Article in Journal
On the Prediction of Evaporation in Arid Climate Using Machine Learning Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Coupled Neural–Glial Dynamics and the Role of Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Nadarajah–Haghighi Lomax Distribution and Its Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Physics Inverse Homogenization for the Design of Innovative Cellular Materials: Application to Thermo-Elastic Problems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Benchmarking Regridding Libraries Used in Earth System Modelling

Math. Comput. Appl. 2022, 27(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca27020031
by Sophie Valcke *, Andrea Piacentini and Gabriel Jonville
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Math. Comput. Appl. 2022, 27(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca27020031
Submission received: 19 January 2022 / Revised: 22 March 2022 / Accepted: 26 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find my comments and suggestions for the authors in the attached PDF.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a nice manuscript presenting the work done to benchmark the quality of four regridding libraries commonly used in ESMs. This work is very useful to ESM’s developers. Overall, it is clearly written and well organized. The manuscript gives a comprehensive and useful introduction to the four regridding libraries. This manuscript should be acceptable for publication in MCA after minor changes mentioned below.

 

General comments

 

  1. In section 2.2, the compiler version used to calculate the regridding weights in different libraries should be described. Could you give an example to show the differences of regridding weights generated in different platforms?

 

  1. When running coupled model, some coupling fields, such as sea surface temperature, with missing value over land need to regrid from ocean model grids to atmosphere model grids. In this case, the anomalous values may be occurred near the coast after regridding. Could you address this case in your paper?

 

  1. What do you think about the vertical interpolation? Do you plan to benchmark the vertical regridding libraries in the future?

 

 

Specific comments.

 

  1. Line 13: I think “ECMWF” should be “ESMF”.

 

  1. Line 126: What’s “CANGA” stands for? The full name should be given.

 

  1. I recommend you give the schematic figures of different grids mentioned in section 2.1.1.

 

  1. Figure 16: The location of the red circles in three panels are not the same.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop