Next Article in Journal
Mass Transfer Mechanism and Process Parameters in Glycerol Using Resonant Acoustic Mixing Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Losses in an Agave Liquor Production and Packaging System Using a Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Characterization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Fresh Cheese Added with Guabiroba Pulp

by
Leandro José de Oliveira Mindelo
1,
Ana Caroline Ferreira Carvalho
1,*,
Amanda Alves Prestes
1,
Karine Marafon
1,
Dayanne Regina Mendes Andrade
2,
Jefferson Santos de Gois
3,
Marcel Afonso Provenzi
4,
Marília Miotto
4,5,
Carolina Krebs de Souza
6,
Cristiane Vieira Helm
7,
Tatiana Colombo Pimentel
8 and
Elane Schwinden Prudêncio
1,5,*
1
Postgraduate Program in Food Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Trindade, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Food Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Jardim das Américas, Curitiba 82590-300, PR, Brazil
3
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Maracanã Campus, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, RJ, Brazil
4
Postgraduate Program in Food Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Itacorubi, Florianópolis 88034-001, SC, Brazil
5
Department of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Itacorubi, Florianópolis 88034-001, SC, Brazil
6
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blumenau, Blumenau 89030-000, SC, Brazil
7
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Florestas), Estrada da Ribeira, km 111, Guaraituba, Colombo 83411-000, PR, Brazil
8
Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Paraná, Paranavaí 87703-536, PR, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(9), 2844; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092844
Submission received: 8 August 2025 / Revised: 2 September 2025 / Accepted: 4 September 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Process Engineering)

Abstract

Fresh cheeses are dairy products that are highly valued by consumers, and they are frequently added with ingredients with functional properties. For the first time, this study aimed to characterize fresh cheeses added with guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%) by evaluating their physical–chemical properties, concentration of bioactive compounds, and in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Based on our previous studies, adding 10–15% guabiroba pulp to dairy products is enough to enhance their prebiotic activity, in addition to increasing the levels of bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and promoting an evident and natural orange color to the dairy product. Adding guabiroba pulp decreased the water activity, pH value, luminosity, and the products’ texture properties (firmness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and gumminess). At the same time, it increased the concentration of bioactive compounds (carotenoids, amino acids, phenolic compounds, and fatty acids), organic acids, sugars (sucrose and fructose), and antioxidant activity. Antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was observed for fresh cheese samples with guabiroba pulp addition. In conclusion, fresh cheeses with guabiroba pulp presented an improved concentration of bioactive compounds and functional properties, demonstrating that they are innovative products for the dairy industry.

1. Introduction

Cheese is one of the most popular dairy products consumed worldwide and has a high commercial value [1]. Fresh cheese shows excellent yield, is easily elaborated, and has a low cost [2]. Furthermore, it has been recognized as an excellent matrix for incorporating value-added ingredients obtained from fruit, improving their nutritional, functional, and technological properties by enhancing the profile of bioactive compounds and boosting their antioxidant properties [3]. In this way, dairy products with fruit-derived products may offer a range of health benefits due to their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties, which in turn are associated with controlling the development and progression of most chronic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer [4]
Fruits of the Myrtaceae family, such as Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg, popularly known as guabiroba, are considered functional fruits [5]. Guabiroba is a fruit species commonly found in the forests of the South, Southeast, and Central-West of Brazil, where the Cerrado biome predominates. It can also be found in Argentina and Uruguay [6].
Guabiroba stands out for its bioactive compound content, polyphenols, and carotenoids. Thus, the phytochemicals of guabiroba are elucidated regarding its high antioxidant activity, which is related to human health benefits when introduced into a dietary routine [7]. These properties of guabiroba make its pulp suitable for consumption in nature or food compositions; however, guabiroba pulp is not yet an ingredient used on a large commercial scale. Amorim et al. [4] reported that fruits and pulps contributing to Brazilian biodiversity remain rarely explored as ingredients by the food industry, presenting enormous potential for research and development of new products.
Guabiroba pulp has already been evaluated as a functional ingredient in fermented milk [8,9] and petit suisse cheese [10]. These results suggest that fresh cheese may also serve as an interesting matrix to incorporate guabiroba pulp. However, as the authors mention, no studies use this fruit pulp in fresh cheese.
Fresh cheeses have a high moisture content, which makes them more porous and capable of readily absorbing bioactive compounds. Thus, due to their structure, fresh cheeses can be formulated to incorporate several bioactive compounds, such as antioxidants, polyphenols, and carotenoids. In addition, cheese proteins (casein) and lipids would be excellent vehicles for the controlled release of bioactive compounds [3]. Finally, bioactive compounds can be effectively preserved in fresh cheeses since the production process usually involves lower temperatures than ripened cheeses, which could minimize the thermal degradation of temperature-sensitive substances, such as certain bioactive compounds. Therefore, we hypothesized that fresh cheeses could be an interesting option to include guabiroba pulp.
The present work sought to explore the use of guabiroba pulp as an ingredient in an innovative fresh cheese, with the purpose of verifying its influence on product quality and functionality. It was expected that incorporating different levels of pulp (5, 10, and 15%) could modify the physicochemical profile of the cheeses, and at the same time, increase the supply of bioactive compounds. To address this question, analyses were carried out to characterize the main physicochemical parameters, quantify bioactive metabolites, and examine in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial responses. In this way, the study aimed to establish whether the enrichment of fresh cheese with guabiroba pulp could represent a viable alternative for generating dairy products that combine technological quality with added nutritional and functional value.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Guabiroba fruits (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg) were collected in Irati (Paraná State, Brazil) (25°27′56″ S; 50°37′51″ W). The fruits were selected, sanitized, and subsequently processed in a pulp machine (model DES-20, Braesi, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil) to obtain the pulp, yielding 31% residue and 69% guabiroba pulp. The composition of the pulp was 1.4 g of protein/100 g, 7.5 g of total sugars/100 g, and 6.5 g of dietary fiber/100 g. The milk used in processing was pasteurized whole milk (Tirol®, Treze Tílias, SC, Brazil), with a composition of 3.2 g of proteins/100 g, 4.5 g of total sugars/100 g, and 4.7 g of carbohydrates/100 g. A commercial rennet (Ha-La, Chr. Hansen, Valinhos, Brazil) coagulated the milk. All chemicals used were of analytical grade.

2.2. Samples Preparation

Four cheese formulations were developed, with different percentages of guabiroba pulp added. The cheeses were produced in vats containing 10 L of pasteurized whole milk previously heated to 37 ± 1 °C, with the addition of commercial rennet (0.9 mL/L). This mixture (milk + rennet) was kept at 37 ± 1 °C for 40 min. The gel formed was delicately cut into cubes, the drained whey was removed, and the curd was drained. The fruit pulp was added to the cheese mass and mixed. The cheese curd containing the fruit pulp was placed in perforated circular containers (with an approximate capacity of 500 g) and kept refrigerated (5 ± 1 °C). The cheeses were salted (0.07%), placed in plastic bags, and stored and refrigerated during 24 h until the analyses were performed. The control sample had no addition, while the others contained 5%, 10%, and 15% of guabiroba pulp, called sample 0, sample 5, sample 10, and 15, respectively.

2.3. Physicochemical Analysis

The fresh cheese samples’ titratable acidity, pH, moisture, protein, and ash contents were determined according to the Analytical Standards Manual of Institute Adolfo Lutz [11]. Titrable acidity was expressed in g of lactic acid per 100 g of cheese. The pH was measured using a digital pH meter (Kasvi®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), calibrated with pH 4.0 and 7.0 buffer solutions, under ambient temperature conditions (Tecnaltec-7®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Moisture content (g/100 g) was evaluated by drying in a forced-air oven (TECNAL®, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) at 105 ± 1 °C until reaching a constant weight. The protein content (g/100 g) was quantified using the Kjeldahl method (TECNAL® equipment, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) by measuring the total nitrogen content multiplied by factor 6.38. The water activity (Aw) was measured instrumentally using an AquaLab meter (model CX-2, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA).
The color analyses of the fresh cheese samples were performed using a Minolta Chroma Meter CR-400 (Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) colorimeter, adjusted to operate with D65 lightning and a 10° observation angle. The colorimeter was calibrated with a white standard plate, and the CIELab color scale was used to measure the L*, a*, and b* parameters. The L* parameter ranges from 0 to 100, indicating luminosity (variation from black to white). The b* axis is the variation from yellow (+b*) to blue (−b*), and the a* axis shows the variation from red (+a*) to green (−a*). The total difference in color (ΔE*) between the measured values of each fresh cheese (5, 10, 15% of guabiroba pulp) with the control sample (cheese without guabiroba pulp) was determined as described in Equation (1).
Δ E = Δ L 2 + Δ a 2 + Δ b 2
where ΔL* is the difference in luminosity, Δa* represents the intensity of the red color, and Δb* is the intensity of the yellow color for each fresh cheese sample.

2.4. Texture Analysis

A TA-XT plus texturometer was used for the texture analysis of the samples (Stable Micro Systems, Texture Exponent software (Version 6.2), Surrey, UK). An aluminum probe of 25 mm diameter was used to compress the fresh cheese samples (50 mm diameter and 20 mm height). The measurements were made at 5 ± 1 °C, with a test speed of 1.0 mm/s and distance of 10.0 mm [12]. The data for force as a function of time were obtained for the two compression–decompression cycles using the TA-XT plus software (Version 6.2). The following parameters were obtained: firmness (N), elasticity (N.s), cohesiveness, and gumminess (N).

2.5. Total Phenolic Compounds

An amount of 0.5 g of the sample was weighed into a plastic centrifuge tube with a screw cap, to which 50 mL of boiling water was added. The tube was subjected to ultrasound treatment (Biovera®, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) for 30 min. After extraction, the solution was filtered through fast filtration paper (0.45 µm) into a 100 mL volumetric flask, and the volume was completed with distilled water. Total phenolic compounds (TPC) were determined using a colorimetric analysis with the Folin–Ciocalteau reagent, according to Singleton and Rossi [12] and Gan et al. [13] protocols, with adaptations. The reaction occurred in the dark, at room temperature, for 90 min, and absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a Shimadzu-1800 UV–VIS® spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). The results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) micrograms per 100 g of dry sample (µg GAE/100 g). The gallic acid calibration curve was constructed with concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 mg/L.

2.6. Carotenoid Content

Carotenoid content was analyzed according to Rodriguez-Amaya [14] with modifications. For carotenoid extraction, 1 g of the sample was weighed, and 20 mL of acetone was added into a Falcon® 50 mL tube. After vortex mixing (Biomixer®, Jacareí, São Paulo, Brazil), the tube with the mixture was subjected to ultrasound for 30 min. The extract was filtered using filter paper and a funnel. In a burette, 4 mL of petroleum ether was added, followed by the extract and 3 mL of ultrapure type 2 water. The burette was then left to stand until phase separation occurred. If separation did not happen, a few drops of NaOH solution were added, waiting for phase division. The lower and colorless phase was discarded, while the colored phase was kept in the burette. This colored phase was transferred to a volumetric flask, passing through a filter with sodium sulfate to eliminate any aqueous residue. The burette was washed with petroleum ether to avoid extract loss. Carotenoid levels were measured using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu®, Barueri, SP, Brazil), with the following wavelengths: 450 nm for β-carotene, 444 nm for α-carotene, 452 nm for β-cryptoxanthin, and 462 nm for λ-carotene.
The concentration of carotenoids was determined using the Lambert–Beer law, as shown in Equation (2).
A = ε × b × c
Relating absorbance (A) to the specific absorption coefficient (ε), concentration (c), and optical length (b).

2.7. Sugar Analysis

An ICS 3000 Ionic Chromatograph Dionex (San Donato Milanese, Italy) conducted chromatographic analyses of lactose, galactose, sucrose, glucose, and fructose. The chromatographic separation was performed with a CarboPac PA20 column (3 mm × 150 mm, Dionex) equipped with a guard column (CarboPac PA20, 3 mm × 30 mm, Dionex) according to the methodology proposed by Neri et al. [15], with some modifications. The following work condition was used: NaOH 5.0 × 10−2 mol/L as mobile phase, a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, a 35 min run at a column temperature of 30 ± 1 °C, and a volume of injection of 10 μL. As the Dionex technical manual recommended, sugar detection was performed using the time/potential waveform A. Sugar identification and quantification were performed using retention times. The related sugar calibration curve was performed.

2.8. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) Analysis

The gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis (Agilent®, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was determined in the fresh cheeses with guabiroba pulp addition (5, 10, 15%). According to Lima et al. [16], the sample extraction processes were first realized. After these processes, the samples containing the hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds were analyzed using gas chromatography coupled to an ion trap mass spectrometer in split mode (1:25). The samples were submitted to DB-5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) at a temperature of 250 ± 1 °C, using helium gas at 1.5 mL/min for transportation. The GC oven was set at 70 ± 1 °C, 1 min isotherm, and heated to 320 ± 1 °C at a rate of 8 °C/min, with a final 5 min isotherm. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive mode with electron impact ionization at 70 eV and ion source temperature at 200 ± 1 °C. The compounds were identified through the AMDIS® software using the Golm Metabolome Database reference collection [11] for hydrophilic compounds, and a library was built in the AMDIS software with samples analyzed for lipophilic compounds.

2.9. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant capacity was determined through the DPPH free radical method (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), following the procedure of Brand-Williams et al. [17]. The reaction was conducted in the dark, at room temperature, for 30 min. The absorbance was measured using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 515 nm, with results expressed as micrograms of Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) per 100 g (µg TEAC/100 g).
The ABTS+ 2,2′azinobis(3ethylbenzothiazoline6sulfonic acid) radical inhibition activity was performed according to Re et al. [18], using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 734 nm. The results were expressed as µg TEAC/100 g.

2.10. Multielement Profile

Multielement profile measurements were performed using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) (model iCAP 6000®, Thermo Analytical, Tewksbury, MA, USA). The analytes and respective monitored wavelengths were Al (308.215 nm), As (189.042 nm), Ca (422.673 nm), Cd (228.802 nm), Co (228.616 nm), Cr (283.563 nm), Cu (324.754 nm), Fe (238.204 nm), K (769.886 nm), Mg (279.553 nm), Mn (257.610 nm), Na (589.592 nm), P (214.914 nm), Pb (220.353 nm), S (182.034 nm), Se (196.090 nm), Sr (407.771 nm), and Zn (213.856 nm). The ICP-OES included a Miramist nebulizer (Burgener Research®, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and a cyclonic spray chamber. Operational parameters included radial vision, a pump rate of 50 rpm, a plasma gas flow of 12 L/min, radio frequency power of 1150 W, and an auxiliary gas flow rate of 1.0 L/min. Argon was the main and auxiliary gas, with a minimum purity of 99.95% (Air Liquide, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). Calibration curves were prepared for the analytes, with concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 2.5 mg/L for Al, As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Pb, Se, Sr, and Zn, and from 0.5 to 20 mg/L for Ca, K, Na, P, and S.
Sample preparation was conducted according to the methods described by Melo et al. [19]. In each experiment, 0.570 g of the cheese sample was weighed directly into Teflon® microwave vessels (Microwave Model Reaction System/Multiwave PRO®, Anton Paar, Graz, Austria). Subsequently, 1.58 mL of 14 mol/L HNO3 and 1.42 mL of ultrapure water were added. The vessels were sealed and subjected to the following temperature program: heating to 200 ± 1 °C for 8 min, holding at 200 ± 1 °C for 14 min, and cooling to 65 ± 1 °C for 23 min. The samples were then transferred to 50.0 mL polyethylene flasks, and ultrapure water was added up to 30 mL. Individual standard solutions with a concentration of 1000 mg/L of the analytes were used for the calibration curves.
The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were determined for each element based on calibration curve parameters. The results were expressed in μg/g of sample. The LOD values obtained were Al = 0.015 μg/g; As = 0.031 μg/g; Ca = 0.004 μg/g; Cd = 0.002 μg/g; Co = 0.006 μg/g; Cr = 0.005 μg/g; Cu = 0.001 μg/g; Fe = 0.007 μg/g; K = 0.017 μg/g; Mg = 0.0002 μg/g; Mn = 0.001 μg/g; Na = 0.003 μg/g; P= 0.019 μg/g; Pb = 0.021 μg/g; S = 0.070 μg/g; Se = 0.033 μg/g; Sr = 0.0001 μg/g; and Zn = 0.001 μg/g.
The LOQ values were Al = 0.047 μg/g; As = 0.094 μg/g; Ca = 0.013 μg/g; Cd = 0.008 μg/g; Co = 0.019 μg/g; Cr = 0.015 μg/g; Cu = 0.004 μg/g; Fe = 0.021 μg/g; K = 0.052 μg/g; Mg = 0.0007 μg/g; Mn = 0.003 μg/g; Na = 0.011 μg/g; P= 0.057 μg/g; Pb = 0.065 μg/g; S = 0.21 μg/g; Se = 0.10 μg/g; Sr = 0.0003 μg/g; and Zn = 0.004 μg/g.

2.11. Antimicrobial Activity

An amount of 3.0 ± 0.2 g of each fresh cheese sample (without control and with 5, 10, and 15% guabiroba pulp) was weighed and stored in Falcon® tubes, then homogenized with 3 mL of sterile distilled water with constant vortex agitation (Biomixer®, Jacareí, São Paulo, Brazil) for 5 min. The homogenized samples were filtered through filter paper and then filtered again through 0.22 µm thick filters to sterilize each extract. The pathogenic microorganism strains used were Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 to screen for activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. To ensure that the method has worked well and to compare the activity of the extract or isolated compound, a non-positive control of a standard antibiotic was included. The non-positive control was tested at the same concentration as the plant pulp.
The broth microdilution assay was performed using the incubation time and inoculum concentration parameters, according to the method described by De Bona et al. [20]. Traditional methods, such as broth dilution, also rely on visual assessment of bacterial growth to determine susceptibility. In the present study, the traditional method (broth dilution), with a visual readout, was used for potency characterization, as determined by MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) and MBC (minimum bactericidal concentration).
Additionally, pH neutralization is important because acidic or basic extracts can independently inhibit bacterial growth, thereby confounding the assessment of true antimicrobial activity. Therefore, standardized protocols often recommend adjusting the pH to neutral before testing.
Standardized inocula on the McFarland scale 0.5 (1 × 108 to 2 × 108 colonies-forming unit, CFU/mL) using brain–heart infusion broth (BHI) were prepared and reduced to an approximate concentration of 1 × 103 to 2 × 103 CFU/mL by serial dilution. One hundred microliters of the inoculum were added to a sterile microtube, and 100 µL of each extract was previously produced using fresh cheese samples. A control using only 100 µL of the inoculum and 100 µL of BHI was performed. Microtubes containing 1 × 103 to 2 × 103 CFU/mL were incubated for 6 h in a shaker-type incubator with 200 rpm rotation at 37 ± 1 °C. After incubation, the inocula in contact with the extract was diluted in sterile saline and plated on nutrient agar for colony counting. For microtubes containing 1 g of the sample plus the inoculum, plating was performed on Baird–Parker agar selective medium for S. aureus and tryptone bile glucuronide (TBX) agar selective medium for E. coli. The plates were incubated at 35 ± 1 °C in aerobic conditions for 18 ± 2 h. The results were expressed as a percentage of reduction (%) of S. aureus and E. coli, as in Equation (3).
R e d u c t i o n % = 100 × G L P C C G L P C S G L P C C
GLPCC is the growth log of a pathogen in the control cheese, and GLPCS is the growth log of a pathogen in the cheese sample (with 5, 10, or 15% guabiroba pulp).

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All cheese samples were produced in triplicate, which are biological replicates (independent cheese batches), and three parallel measurements were made for each replicate. Data analysis was performed using STATISTICA 13.3 software (TIBCO® Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. To determine significant differences (p < 0.05), analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD test (95% confidence level) were performed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical and Physical Analysis

Table 1 presents the physicochemical and colorimetric parameters of the fresh cheese samples without (Sample 0, control) and with guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%). The addition of guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%) practically did not influence (p > 0.05) the protein, moisture, ash, and titratable acidity contents in the modified fresh cheeses. Therefore, no effect was observed for gross chemical composition. On the other hand, the progressive increase in the guabiroba pulp content in the fresh cheese samples resulted in a decrease (p < 0.05) in the Aw values. Another decrease (p < 0.05) was verified for the pH value of the fresh cheese sample added with 15% guabiroba pulp. The lower pH values are related to the acidity in the guabiroba pulp, which only changed the pH values when added at the highest concentrations.
The parameters L*, a*, and b* are part of the CIE Lab* color space, a colorimetric system that describes all perceptible colors. It was observed that adding guabiroba pulp contributed to the decrease in the lightness values (L*) and the increase in the a* and b* values of the fresh cheese samples (p < 0.05). Thus, the increase in the guabiroba pulp content resulted in fresh cheeses with a darker yellow coloration (Figure 1).
Regarding the ∆E* parameter, it was possible to note that as the content of guabiroba pulp in the cheeses increased, the values for the color difference between the sample and the control were higher. According to Quintanilla et al. [21], ∆E* values between 1 and 3 are not perceptible to the human eye, while values above 3 are visible. Therefore, all fresh cheese samples had values greater than 3 for the color difference, indicating that the increased addition of guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%) resulted in greater visualization of the color difference.
The increase in the color parameters a* and b* can be explained by the high content of carotenoids generally found in guabiroba pulp [22]. The color of the fresh cheeses with guabiroba pulp may be interesting from the consumer point of view, as Tura et al. [23] stated that consumers prefer yellow cheeses, while El-Loly et al. [24] highlighted that the yellow-reddish color of some cheeses promoted a more attractive and appetizing appearance, which can enhance the overall taste of the cheese.
Table 1 also presents the results of the texture parameters of the modified fresh cheeses with and without the addition of guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%). Compared to the control cheese, it was observed that the firmness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and gumminess of the fresh cheese samples decreased with the addition of guabiroba pulp (p < 0.05). The impact was more pronounced for 10 and 15% addition for firmness and gumminess and for 15% addition for elasticity (p < 0.05). Fruit pulps promote a more marked hydration and a consequent weakness in the casein network [24,25]. Furthermore, fruit pulps may change the protein structure (casein network) [26,27], resulting in changes in firmness and gumminess, which are related properties [28], elasticity [27], and cohesiveness [29]. Elasticity may also be changed by new interactions between fruit pulp compounds and casein colloids [30]. Consumer preference for soft texture is a significant driver in the acceptance of fresh cheeses such as cottage cheese, petit suisse, and similar products. Studies consistently show that a soft texture is highly valued by consumers across different cheese types; texture is a key factor influencing purchase decisions [29,30]. Across various fresh cheese varieties, consumers consistently prefer a soft texture, often achieved using specific ingredients or processing methods. This preference is evident in cheeses, highlighting the importance of texture in product development and market success. Therefore, soft textures are interesting for consumer acceptance of fresh cheeses, demonstrating that adding guabiroba pulp could improve the texture properties.

3.2. Total Phenolic Compounds

The total phenolic compound results are shown in Figure 2A.
Adding guabiroba pulp increased (p < 0.05) the total phenolic compound content of the fresh cheese samples by 1.4 to 2.5 times. The impact was more pronounced for 10 and 15% addition (p < 0.05). The results are interesting, as dairy products with some bioactive compounds represent an up-and-coming line of research for the dairy industry when the objective is to increase functionality [31]. Previous studies have reported increased phenolic compounds concentration after adding fruit to cheeses [31,32,33]. However, this is the first study using guabiroba pulps.

3.3. Carotenoid Content

Table 2 shows the carotenoid content in the fresh cheese samples (control and with guabiroba pulp). In the control cheese, only β-carotene was found, which can be attributed to its presence in the whole milk used in its preparation [34]. This carotenoid comprises about 90% of the total carotenoids in cow’s milk, making it the predominant type found in whole milk [34].
The greater the amount of guabiroba pulp added (5, 10, 15%), the higher (p < 0.05) the content of carotenoids (α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, and λ-carotene) that is found in the fresh cheese samples. These results showed an improvement in the nutritional value of fresh cheeses using guabiroba pulp. β-carotene is the precursor of ligands necessary for nuclear receptors’ activity in regulating energy metabolism [35]. At the same time, β-carotene, α-carotene, and β-cryptoxanthin are significant contributors to vitamin A intake, often surpassing the contribution of retinol. This contribution is crucial for maintaining adequate vitamin A content for vision, immune function, and skin health [36].
The results of carotenoid content corroborated those of color parameters. Therefore, the color of the guabiroba added in cheeses may be associated with the higher concentration of β-carotene. β-carotene may impart an appealing color for food applications to be used as a food colorant. Therefore, it may be an excellent candidate as an ingredient, given the increasing concern of consumers on the use of artificial food colorants [35]. Furthermore, they may be associated with antioxidant activity, as carotenoids have the potential to act as a natural antioxidant [36].

3.4. Sugar Analysis

The sugar content in fresh cheese samples is shown in Table 3. The fresh cheeses presented lactose, galactose, glucose, sucrose, and fructose as sugars. Sugars are important because they are basic nutrients necessary for the human body [37]. Lactose is the primary sugar in milk, and consequently, in fresh cheeses [38]. Glucose plays a significant role in brain and muscle function [39]. Finally, fructose and sucrose play significant roles in foods as sweeteners, with fructose potentially offering benefits in glycemic control but posing risks to liver health when consumed in excess. Sucrose is a common dietary sugar with implications for energy intake and metabolic health, although its direct link to chronic disease is less clear when accounting for total caloric intake. Both sugars should be consumed in moderation, considering their metabolic effects and potential health impacts [40]. The present study’s results demonstrate the low sugar concentration in the products.
Adding guabiroba pulp to the fresh cheeses did not influence the lactose and glucose contents (p > 0.05). Increases in the sucrose (only for 10 and 15% guabiroba pulp addition) and fructose (all guabiroba added products) were reported (p < 0.05). Finally, decreases in galactose (only for 15% guabiroba pulp addition) were observed. The increases in sucrose and fructose contents may be associated with the sugar content in the fruit pulps [41]. The lower galactose content in the 15% product could be related to changes in the lactose degradation during processing in this product, as the added ingredient may impact the cheese manufacturing process [42].

3.5. Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Compound Determination

Table 4 presents the fresh cheeses’ acquired values of hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds. The increase in the guabiroba pulp increased (p < 0.05) the levels of hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds. The hydrophilic compounds with the highest increases after guabiroba pulp addition were from the following classes: organic acids (citric acid, quinic acid, malic acid, and dehydroascorbic acid), cyclitol (myo-inositol), amino acids (4-hydroxy-1-methyl-proline), and sugar acids (glucuronic acid and gluconic acid). The other classes were increased at lower expressivity.
Citric, quinic, malic, and dehydroascorbic acids are hydrophilic semi-volatile compounds in fruits and other foods that enhance nutritional value and functional properties [43]. Furthermore, they contribute to the flavor and preservation of foods, aid in nutrient absorption, and have potential therapeutic roles in managing conditions like diabetes [43]. At the same time, myo-inositol can improve metabolic parameters, potentially protecting the cardiovascular system, and cyclitol acts as a precursor for inositol triphosphate, which regulates hormones like insulin, contributing to its role in diabetes management [44]. The amino acid class represented by the hydrophilic compound 4-hydroxy-1-methyl-proline showed emphasis because this amino acid is involved in protein synthesis and may play a role in collagen stability [45], while glucuronic and gluconic acids support detoxification and metabolic processes [46].
The lipophilic compounds with the highest increases after guabiroba pulp addition were from the class fatty acids (octadecenoic (C18:1) and n-9-(Z)-hexadecenoic acid). The other classes were increased at a lower expressivity. Octadecenoic acid and its isomers are important as they can serve as precursors to essential fatty acids like linoleic acid, which is vital for maintaining cell membrane integrity and producing signaling molecules. The n-9-(Z)-hexadecenoic acid and its isomer is a predominant form of hexadecenoic acid found in human depot fat. It is part of a mixture of positional isomers that contribute to the overall fatty acid profile in the body, potentially influencing metabolic processes and energy storage. Both octadecenoic and hexadecenoic acids are part of a broader group of fatty acids that exhibit bioactive properties [47]. Therefore, adding guabiroba pulp to fresh cheeses enhances their potential health benefits and may improve the sensory properties of the products.

3.6. Antioxidant Activity

Figure 2B,C show the in vitro antioxidant capacity results using the DDPH and ABTS methods. By the DPPH method, it was observed that the fresh cheese samples containing 5, 10, and 15% of guabiroba pulp presented a gradual increase (p < 0.05) of 220, 238, and 268% in antioxidant activity when compared to the control sample (without the addition of guabiroba pulp), respectively. Similar behavior was also observed through the ABTS method, whose increases (p < 0.05) in antioxidant activity for fresh cheese samples added with 5, 10, and 15% of guabiroba pulp were 13, 28, and 48%, compared to the control sample. The total phenolic compounds of guabiroba (Campomanesia xanthocarpa) offer several health benefits, mainly due to their antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and hypotensive properties [7]. Fatty acids may have antioxidants, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities, which are crucial for preventing and managing various diseases [47]. Ingredients with antioxidant activities have attracted considerable attention as potential compounds to prevent or delay oxidative stress-related diseases [48]. Therefore, adding guabiroba to develop new products may reduce the use of chemical additives [7], and this presents an opportunity for future studies.
Therefore, our results demonstrate that the bioactive compounds of the guabiroba pulp were transferred to the cheeses during processing and positively impacted the products’ antioxidant activity. However, it is important to note that the increase in the antioxidant activity for the cheeses after guabiroba pulp addition in the present study was lower than those observed for yogurt [9] and fermented milk [41]. Fermented milk and yogurt retain more bioactive compounds than cheeses due to increased proteolytic activity and the microbial fermentation process that releases bioactive peptides [49]. Furthermore, some bioactive compounds may be lost in the whey during cheese processing.

3.7. Multielement Profile

Table 5 presents the minerals identified in the fresh cheeses. The minerals considered toxic to some extent are As (arsenic), Cd (cadmium), Pb (lead), Cr (chromium), and Al (aluminum). These minerals were found below the detection limit for all fresh cheese samples (with or without adding guabiroba pulp). As, Cd, and Pb are toxic minerals commonly found in dairy products, including cheeses [50,51,52]. Pb concentrations in cheese often exceed permissible limits, posing potential health risks to children, as it can adversely affect the nervous system and kidneys [53]. Therefore, continuous monitoring of these toxic elements ensures food safety and minimizes exposure to these toxic elements. Our results demonstrate that the addition of guabiroba pulp did not result in the inclusion of toxic minerals in the fresh cheeses.
Other minerals were also found below the limit of detection, such as Co (cobalt), Cu (copper), Fe (iron), Mn (manganese), and Se (selenium). These minerals have already been reported in cheeses [54], but they are not typically detected in fresh cheeses [50]. Their presence depends on the cheese type and manufacturing process [54]. This result demonstrates the importance of evaluating the chemical composition of each cheese variety.
In a general view, the addition of guabiroba pulp did not change the mineral composition of the fresh cheeses (p > 0.05). Therefore, Ca, Mg, P, S, and Zn content was maintained. Ca, Mg, and P are major minerals in fresh cheeses essential for various bodily functions [55]. S is also present in fresh cheeses, often as part of amino acids and proteins. At the same time, Zn is a trace element found in fresh cheeses, contributing to various enzymatic functions in the body [56]. Finally, the small contents of the mineral Sr in the cheese samples agree with the result observed by Herman-Lara et al. [55]. These authors affirmed that, while Sr can be present in some cheeses, it is not typically highlighted as a common mineral in fresh cheeses, suggesting it may be negligible in many fresh cheese varieties.
Only a slight decrease in K (after 15% guabiroba pulp addition) and increase in Na (for all products with guabiroba pulp) were noted (p < 0.05). Guabiroba pulp addition may have modified the interaction of Na in the cheese matrix, resulting in changes in the concentration of Na in the product. According to Tidona et al. [57], the variability in sodium content in fresh cheeses is primarily due to the multifaceted role of salt in cheese-making.
The sodium content in all cheeses was low (3.30–7.08 mg/g), representing less than the recommended daily intake. Therefore, although this mineral content was observed after guabiroba pulp addition, this increase would not affect consumer health. According to the WHO [58], Na is an essential nutrient for maintaining plasma volume, acid–base balance, transmission of nerve impulses, and normal cell function; sodium deficiency is extremely unlikely in healthy individuals [58]. However, excess sodium is linked to adverse health outcomes, including increased blood pressure [58].
Despite guabiroba pulp presenting a modest contribution concerning the multielement profile of the fresh cheeses produced, it was possible to note that this information is useful for dietary planning and understanding the nutritional profile of fresh cheeses, as well as the safety of consuming them about the presence of the main toxic minerals.

3.8. Antimicrobial Activity

Figure 3 shows the results for reducing Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in fresh cheese samples. A representative reduction (96–98%) of S. aureus in all samples containing guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%) was observed, while the reduction in E. coli was less pronounced, i.e., 21% and 33% for sample 5 and sample 15, respectively. However, for sample 10, the E. coli reduction result was of 0%.
The genus Staphylococcus is made up of 52 species. S. aureus is one of the species most regularly associated with human pathologies, and it causes nosocomial infections, such as pneumonia and other respiratory and cardiovascular infections [59]. Some strains of S. aureus produce enterotoxins that cause staphylococcal food poisoning, and the foods mainly involved are milk and dairy products [59,60]. E. coli is a major cause of diarrhea and is responsible for extraintestinal infections in humans and animals [61]. Fruit pulps and grains have demonstrated the ability to effectively inhibit S. aureus in dairy products, such as açaí pulp [62] and pinhão [63], while pineapple peel extract and pomegranate fruit exhibited antimicrobial activity against E. coli [64,65]. However, this is the first study to report on the antimicrobial activity of guabiroba-pulp-added fresh cheeses.
The antimicrobial activity of guabiroba pulp is mainly due to the presence of phenolic compounds and other bioactive compounds with antimicrobial activity. The mechanisms of action of phenolic compounds and other bioactive compounds on bacterial cells have been partially attributed to damage to the bacterial membrane, inhibition of virulence factors such as enzymes and toxins, and suppression of bacterial biofilm formation [61]. Furthermore, phenolic hydroxyl groups, which have a high affinity for proteins, and microbial enzyme inhibition may enhance the antibacterial effects [66]. However, in studies of Brazilian fruit pulps, some extracts with high phenolic content did not always correlate with antimicrobial activity, indicating that other factors, such as pH or salt, may be responsible for observed effects. The relationship between pulp addition; changes in physicochemical properties such as pH, water activity, and salt/mineral content; and observed antimicrobial outcomes is complex. It is crucial to distinguish whether the antimicrobial effects are due to these shifts or to specific bioactive compounds in the pulp. The addition of fruit pulps, such as blackberry or uvaia, often lowers the pH and water activity of the matrix, creating less favorable conditions for microbial survival. For example, uvaia pulp has a pH of 3.45, classifying it as acidic; however, its extracts did not show antimicrobial activity against the tested bacteria, suggesting that a low pH alone may not always be sufficient for antimicrobial effects, or that other factors are at play [67].
On the other hand, studies do not explicitly report the use of pH- or water-activity-matched controls (e.g., neutralized extracts or pH-matched matrices) to separate the effects of physicochemical changes from those of specific bioactives. This fact is a significant limitation, as it makes it difficult to attribute antimicrobial outcomes solely to pulp-derived compounds [68,69].

4. Conclusions

This study was the first to characterize fresh cheeses added with guabiroba pulp (5, 10, 15%). Guabiroba pulp changed the color (to a darker yellow) and reduced the products’ texture parameters properties (firmness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and gumminess). At the same time, it increased the concentration of bioactive compounds (carotenoids, amino acids, phenolic compounds, and fatty acids), organic acids, sugars (sucrose and fructose), and antioxidant activity. Antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was observed for fresh cheese samples with guabiroba pulp addition. In conclusion, fresh cheese with guabiroba pulp presented an improved concentration of bioactive compounds and functional properties, demonstrating an innovative product for dairy industries. However, while innovation is vital for the dairy industry, product readiness claims should be tempered unless supported by comprehensive sensory acceptability and stability data. Ongoing research, larger-scale consumer studies, and shelf-life determination of the product are essential to ensure that innovative products meet both industry standards and consumer expectations.

Author Contributions

L.J.d.O.M.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. A.C.F.C.: formal analysis, investigation, methodology. A.A.P.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation. K.M.: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. D.R.M.A.: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation. J.S.d.G.: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, visualization. M.A.P.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation. M.M.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation. C.K.d.S.: formal analysis, investigation, methodology. C.V.H.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. T.C.P.: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. E.S.P.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil) with financial support from [CNPq, 303069/2022-8], CAPES (Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Brazil—Finance Code 001) through the scholarship, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ). CKdS, JSdG, and ESP received a research grant from CNPq. JSdG received a research grant from UERJ (Programa Pró-Ciência).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Cristiane Vieira Helm was employed by the company Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Florestas). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The company had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Christaki, S.; Moschakis, T.; Kyriakoudi, A.; Biliaderis, C.G.; Mourtzinos, I. Recent advances in plant essential oils and extracts: Delivery systems and potential uses as preservatives and antioxidants in cheese. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 264–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Silva, T.C.M.; Ramos, G.L.P.A.; Prudêncio, E.S.; Pimentel, T.C.; Martins, C.C.; Corassin, C.H.; Freitas, M.Q.; Mársico, E.T.; Esmerino, E.A.; Barros, C.P.; et al. Functional Minas Frescal cheese with spore-forming Wezmannia coagulans GBI-30. Int. Dairy J. 2024, 156, 105993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Muñoz-Bas, C.; Muñoz-Tebar, N.; Viuda-Martos, M.; Sayas-Barberá, E.; Pérez-Alvarez, J.A.; Fernández-López, J. Application of date-coproducts for the fortification of fresh goat cheese: Effect on their nutritional, technological, physicochemical, microstructural, microbiological and sensory properties. Appl. Food Res. 2024, 4, 100619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amorim, I.S.; Amorim, D.S.; Godoy, H.T.; Mariutti, L.R.B.; Chisté, R.C.; Pena, R.S.; Bogusz Junior, S.; Chim, J.F. Amazonian palm tree fruits: From nutritional value to diversity of new food products. Heliyon 2024, 10, e24054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Almeida, M.M.B.; Souza, P.H.M.; Arriaga, Â.M.C.; Prado, G.M.; Magalhães, C.E.C.; Maia, G.A.; Lemos, T.L.G. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of fresh exotic fruits from northeastern Brazil. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 2155–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva, V.R.F.; Kempka, A.P. Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg: Therapeutic potential through a comprehensive review of biological activities and phenolic compound interactions. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 54, 1878–8181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prestes, A.A.; Helm, C.V.; Esmerino, E.A.; Silva, R.; Cruz, A.G.; Prudencio, E.S. Potential properties of guabiroba (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg) processing: A native Brazilian fruit. Adv. Food Technol. Nutr. Sci. 2022, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prestes, A.A.; Silveira, M.F.; Canella, M.H.M.; Helm, C.V.; Andrade, D.R.M.; Ferreira, A.L.A.; Amboni, R.D.M.C.; Fedrigo, I.M.T.; Hernández, E.; Prudencio, E.S. Whey block freeze concentration aiming a functional fermented lactic beverage with the addition of probiotic and guabiroba pulp (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg), a native Brazilian fruit. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 43, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prestes, A.A.; Verruck, S.; Vargas, M.O.; Canella, M.H.M.; Silva, C.C.; Barros, E.L.S.; Dantas, A.; Oliveira, L.V.A.; Maran, B.M.; Matos, M.; et al. Influence of guabiroba pulp (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg) added to fermented milk on probiotic survival under in vitro simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Messias, C.R.; Quast, L.B.; Alves, V.; Bitencourt, T.B.; Quast, E. Development of petit suisse cheese with native fruits: Blackberry (Morus nigra L cv. Tupy) and guabiroba (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg). J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2021, 9, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. IAL (Instituto Adolfo Lutz). Métodos Físico-Químicos Para Análise de Alimentos, 4th ed.; Instituto Adolfo Lutz: São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagent. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gan, Z.; Sun, H.; Wang, R.; Feng, B. A novel solid-phase extraction for the concentration of sweeteners in water and analysis by ion-pair liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1274, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. A Guide to Carotenoid Analysis in Foods; ILSI Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Neri, L.; Di Biase, L.; Sacchetti, G.; Di Mattia, C.; Santarelli, V.; Mastrocola, D.; Pittia, P. Use of vacuum impregnation for the production of high quality fresh-like apple products. J. Food Eng. 2016, 179, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lima, A.S.; Maia, D.V.; Haubert, L.; Oliveira, T.L.; Fiorentini, Â.M.; Rombaldi, C.V.; Silva, W.P. Action mechanism of araçá (Psidium cattleianum Sabine) hydroalcoholic extract against Staphylococcus aureus. LWT 2020, 119, 108884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Melo, M.M.; Ferreira, F.N.; Luna, A.S.; Langone, M.A.P.; Gois, J.S. Optimized eco-friendly sample preparation methods for determining major and minor elements in cheeses by ICP OES. Food Anal. Methods 2024, 17, 1402–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Bona, E.A.M.; Pinto, F.G.S.; Fruet, T.K.; Jorge, T.C.M.; Moura, A.C. Comparação de métodos para avaliação da atividade antimicrobiana e determinação da concentração inibitória mínima (CIM) de extratos vegetais aquosos e etanólicos. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2014, 81, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quintanilla, P.; Beltrán, M.C.; Molina, A.; Escriche, I.; Molina, M.P. Characteristics of ripened Tronchón cheese from raw goat milk containing legally admissible amounts of antibiotics. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 2941–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lima, R.C.; Carvalho, A.P.A.; Silva, B.D.; Torres Neto, L.; Figueiredo, M.R.S.; Chaves, P.H.T.; Almeida, A.E.C.C.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Green ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds of babassu (Attalea speciosa) mesocarp: Effects of solid-liquid ratio extraction, antioxidant capacity, and antimicrobial activity. Appl. Food Res. 2023, 3, 100331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tura, M.; Gagliano, M.A.; Soglia, F.; Bendini, A.; Patrignani, F.; Petracci, M.; Toschi, T.G.; Valli, E. Consumer perception and liking of parmigiano reggiano protected designation of origin (PDO) cheese produced with milk from cows fed fresh forage vs. dry hay. Foods 2024, 13, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. El-Loly, M.M.; Farahat, E.S.A.; Mohamed, A.G. Nutritional and functional evaluation of innovative processed cheese using papaya pulp. Clin. Nutr. Open Sci. 2024, 57, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hueso, D.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Fontecha, J.; Gómez-Cortés, P. Rheological characterization of commercial Burgos-type ultrafiltered fresh cheeses. LWT 2023, 190, 115525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Costa, M.P.; Frasão, B.S.; Silva, A.C.O.; Freitas, M.Q.; Franco, R.M.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) pulp, probiotic, and prebiotic: Influence on color, apparent viscosity, and texture of goat milk yogurts. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 5995–6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krentz, A.; García-Cano, I.; Jiménez-Flores, R. Functional, textural, and rheological properties of mixed casein micelle and pea protein isolate co-dispersions. JDS Commun. 2022, 3, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ali, M.B.; Murtaza, M.S.; Shahbaz, M.; Sameen, A.; Rafique, S.; Arshad, R.; Raza, N.; Akbar, Z.; Kausar, G.; Amjad, A. Functional, textural, physicochemical and sensorial evaluation of cottage cheese standardized with food grade coagulants. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, e33420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, T.; Wang, H.; Xu, P.; Yao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wei, Z.; Niu, X.; Shang, Y.; Zhao, D. Effect of grape seed proanthocyanidin on the structural and physicochemical properties of bread during bread fermentation stage. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 7, 100559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Acevedo-Correa, D.; Rodriguez-Meza, J.; Molinares-Brito, C.; Montero-Castillo, P.; Alcázar-Orozco, H. Evaluation of the effect of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) protein isolates on the bromatological, textural, and microstructural properties of fresh cheese. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 100691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Salehi, F. Quality, physicochemical, and textural properties of dairy products containing fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 4666–4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feiden, T.; Fernandes, I.A.; Valduga, E.; Zeni, J.; Steffens, J. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of enzymes and bioactive compounds from secondary artichoke flowers: A sustainable alternative for cheese production. Food Humanit. 2025, 4, 100495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hernández, H.; Le Romancer, R.; Nunes, M.C.; Prista, C.; Raymundo, A. Effects of addition of algae biomass on the structure, bioactivity and nutritional properties of Halloumi-like cheese. Algal Res. 2025, 85, 103874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chotyakul, N.; Pateiro-Moure, M.; Saraiva, J.A.; Torres, J.A.; Pérez-Lamela, C. Simultaneous HPLC–DAD quantification of vitamins A and E content in raw, pasteurized, and UHT cow’s milk and their changes during storage. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 238, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Habtegebriel, H.; Tazart, Z.; Farrugia, C.; Gatt, R.; Valdramidis, V. Storage stability and antioxidant activity of astaxanthin and beta-carotene as affected by the architecture of O/W emulsions of milk proteins. LWT 2024, 209, 116733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Olmedilla-Alonso, B.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E.; Beltrán-De-Miguel, B.; Estévez-Santiago, R. Dietary β-cryptoxanthin and α-carotene have greater apparent bioavailability than β-carotene in subjects from countries with different dietary patterns. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rybicka, I.; Gliszczyńska-Świgło, A. Sugars in dairy products of different flavours. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 114, 104933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Suri, S.; Kumar, V.; Prasad, R.; Tanwar, B.; Goyal, A.; Kaur, S.; Gat, Y.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, J.; Singh, D. Considerations for development of lactose-free food. J. Nutr. Intermed. Metab. 2019, 15, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nimgampalle, M.; Chakravarthy, H.; Devanathan, V. Glucose metabolism in the brain: An update. In Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  40. Park, S.; Fadhul, T.I.; Kahn, C.R.; Softic, S. 292-OR: High-fat diets containing sucrose and fructose, but not glucose, induce obesity and hepatic insulin resistance via accumulation of diacylglycerols. Diabetes 2023, 72, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Prestes, A.A.; Andrade, D.R.M.; Canella, M.H.M.; Haas, I.S.; Helm, C.V.; Gois, J.S.; Block, J.M.; Wanderley, B.R.S.M.; Amboni, R.D.M.C.; Cruz, A.G.; et al. The addition of concentrated cold-pressed guabiroba juice to yogurts: Effects on the physicochemical analyses, antioxidant activity, carotenoid content, total phenolic compounds, and mineral profile. Processes 2024, 12, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garde, S.; Ávila, M.; Gaya, P.; Arias, R.; Nuñez, M. Sugars and organic acids in raw and pasteurized milk Manchego cheeses with different degrees of late blowing defect. Int. Dairy J. 2012, 25, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jia, D.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L.; Huang, Q.; Huang, C.; Tao, J.; Qu, X.; Xu, X. Analysis of organic acid metabolism reveals citric acid and malic acid play major roles in determining acid quality during the development of kiwifruit (Actinidia eriantha). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 6055–6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Antonowski, T.; Osowski, A.; Lahuta, L.; Górecki, R.; Rynkiewicz, A.; Wojtkiewicz, J. Health-promoting properties of selected cyclitols for metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, G. Functional amino acids in nutrition and health. Amino Acids 2013, 45, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mehtiö, T.; Toivari, M.; Wiebe, M.G.; Harlin, A.; Penttilä, M.; Koivula, A. Production and applications of carbohydrate-derived sugar acids as generic biobased chemicals. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 904–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Morah, A.C.; Ene, A.C.; Ukairo, D.I.; Morah, F.C.; Ibeh, S.C.; Osuagwu, L.O. Identification of compounds and functional groups of n-hexane seed extracts of Citrullus lanatus and Elaeis guineensis using GC-MS and FT-IR. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 23, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oliveira, R.C.; Pereira, E.S.; Camargo, T.M.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Pereira, M.C.; Vinholes, J.; Dalmazo, G.O.; Vizzotto, M.; Nora, L. Biological activity and chemical composition of fruits, seeds and leaves of guabirobeira (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg-Myrtaceae): A review. Food Biosci 2021, 40, 100899. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mazorra-Manzano, M.A.; Robles-Porchas, G.R.; González-Velázquez, D.A.; Torres-Llanez, M.J.; Martínez-Porchas, M.; García-Sifuentes, C.O.; González-Córdova, A.F.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B. Cheese whey fermentation by its native microbiota: Proteolysis and bioactive peptides release with ACE-inhibitory activity. Fermentation 2020, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Crupi, R.; Lo Turco, V.; Gugliandolo, E.; Nava, V.; Potortí, A.G.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Di Bella, G.; Licata, P. Mineral composition in delactosed dairy products: Quality and safety status. Foods 2022, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Griboff, J.; Wunderlin, D.A.; Monferrán, M.V. Metals, As and Se determination by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in edible fish collected from three eutrophic reservoirs. Their consumption represents a risk for human health? Microchem. J. 2017, 130, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bilandžić, N.; Sedak, M.; Čalopek, B.; Đokić, M.; Varenina, I.; Kolanović, B.S.; Luburić, Đ.B.; Varga, I.; Hruškar, M. Dietary exposure of the adult Croatian population to meat, liver and meat products from the Croatian market: Health risk assessment. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 95, 103672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Almášiová, S.; Toman, R.; Pšenková, M.; Tančin, V.; Jančo, I. Toxic elements in sheep milk, whey, and cheese from the environmentally burdened area in eastern Slovakia and health risk assessment with different scenarios of their consumption. Toxics 2024, 12, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Deshwal, G.K.; Gómez-Mascaraque, L.G.; Fenelon, M.; Huppertz, T. Determination of minerals in soft and hard cheese varieties by ICP-OES: A comparison of digestion methods. Molecules 2023, 28, 3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Herman-Lara, E.; Bolívar-Moreno, D.; Toledo-López, V.M.; Cuevas-Glory, L.F.; Lope-Navarrete, M.C.; Barron-Zambrano, J.A.; Díaz-Rivera, P.; Ramírez-Rivera, E.J. Minerals multielement analysis and its relationship with geographical origin of artisanal Mexican goat cheeses. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Falcão, R.L.; Pinheiro, V.; Ribeiro, C.; Sousa, I.; Raymundo, A.; Nunes, M.C. Nutritional improvement of fresh cheese with microalga Chlorella vulgaris: Impact on composition, structure and sensory acceptance. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2023, 61, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tidona, F.; Zago, M.; Carminati, D.; Giraffa, G. The reduction of salt in different cheese categories: Recent advances and future challenges. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 859694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. WHO (World Health Organization). Sodium Reduction. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/salt-reduction (accessed on 20 January 2025).
  59. Abad, I.; Bailac, A.; Pérez, M.D.; Carramiñana, J.J.; Calvo, M.; Sánchez, L. Gastrointestinal digestion and technological treatments modify the antibacterial activity of lactoferrin supplemented dairy matrices against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. Dairy J. 2024, 153, 105899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abril, A.G.; Villa, T.G.; Barros-Velázquez, J.; Cañas, B.; Sanchez-Perez, A.; Calo-Mata, P.; Carrera, M. Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins and their detection in the dairy industry and mastitis. Toxins 2020, 12, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dubreil, J.D. Fruit extracts to control pathogenic Escherichia coli: A sweet solution. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dias-Souza, M.V.; Santos, R.M.; Ceravolo, I.P.; Cosenza, G.; Marçal, P.H.F.; Figueiredo, F.B. Euterpe oleracea pulp extract: Chemical analyses, antibiofilm activity against Staphylococcus aureus, cytotoxicity and interference on the activity of antimicrobial drugs. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 114, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fiebig, M.S.; Andrade, D.R.M.; Mindelo, L.J.O.; Gois, J.S.; Luna, A.S.; Provenzi, M.A.; Magalhães, W.L.E.; Miotto, M.; Helm, C.V.; Prudencio, E.S. Pinhão potential and their parts (failures, shells, and almonds) in the elaboration of yogurts containing açaí pulp: Physicochemical, nutritional, and functional properties, antimicrobial activity, and multi-elemental profile. Food Res. Int. 2024, 192, 114813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cahyani, E.D.; Munfarida, I.; Amrullah, A. Antibacterial activity of pineapple (Ananas comosus) fruit peel extract against Escherichia coli. Int. J. Life Sci. Agric. Res. 2024, 3, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Banu, K.S.; Manda, K. Antibacterial activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum) fruit peel extracts against antibiotic resistant gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2019, 12, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Miklasińska-Majdanik, M.; Kępa, M.; Wojtyczka, R.D.; Idzik, D.; Wąsik, T.J. Phenolic compounds diminish antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sganzerla, W.G.; Beling, P.C.; Ferrareze, J.P.; Komatsu, R.A.; Nunes, M.R.; Veeck, A.P.P. Nutritional, physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of uvaia pulp (Eugenia pyriformis Cambess). Commun. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gounari, Z.; Bonatsou, S.; Ferrocino, I.; Cocolin, L.; Papadopoulou, O.S.; Panagou, E.Z. Exploring yeast diversity of dry-salted naturally black olives from Greek retail outlets with culture dependent and independent molecular methods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2023, 398, e110225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gutiérrez, T.J. Active and intelligent films made from starchy sources/blackberry Pulp. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 2374–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fresh cheese formulations added with guabiroba pulp, where 0 = control sample (without guabiroba pulp); 5 = sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; 10 = sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and 15 = sample with 15% guabiroba pulp.
Figure 1. Fresh cheese formulations added with guabiroba pulp, where 0 = control sample (without guabiroba pulp); 5 = sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; 10 = sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and 15 = sample with 15% guabiroba pulp.
Processes 13 02844 g001
Figure 2. Results from (A) total phenolic compounds and in vitro antioxidant capacity by the (B) DPPH free radical method (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and (C) ABTS+ (2,2-casino-bis acid (3-ethylbenzothiazolin-6-sulfonic acid) radical inhibition activity. Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–c Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Results from (A) total phenolic compounds and in vitro antioxidant capacity by the (B) DPPH free radical method (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and (C) ABTS+ (2,2-casino-bis acid (3-ethylbenzothiazolin-6-sulfonic acid) radical inhibition activity. Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–c Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
Processes 13 02844 g002
Figure 3. Reduction (%) of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in fresh cheese samples added with 5% guabiroba pulp (Sample 5), 10% guabiroba pulp (Sample 10), and 15% guabiroba pulp (Sample 15) (n = 3).
Figure 3. Reduction (%) of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in fresh cheese samples added with 5% guabiroba pulp (Sample 5), 10% guabiroba pulp (Sample 10), and 15% guabiroba pulp (Sample 15) (n = 3).
Processes 13 02844 g003
Table 1. Physicochemical, texture, and colorimetric parameters of fresh cheese formulation samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Table 1. Physicochemical, texture, and colorimetric parameters of fresh cheese formulation samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Samples
051015
Physicochemical parameters
Protein (g/100 g)20.18 ± 0.70 a20.00 ± 0.70 a19.84 ± 0.40 a20.94 ± 1.60 a
Moisture (g/100 g)41.81 ± 0.70 ab40.77 ± 0.45 b40.77 ± 0.10 b42.69 ± 0.30 a
Ash (g/100 g)2.94 ± 0.04 b3.91 ± 0.53 a3.50 ± 0.10 a3.38 ± 0.06 a
Titratable acidity (g lactic acid/100 g)2.03 ± 0.70 a1.98 ± 0.10 a1.98 ± 0.03 a1.99 ± 0.03 a
Aw0.886 ± 0.002 a0.875 ± 0.002 b0.864 ± 0.004 c0.865 ± 0.019 c
pH5.83 ± 0.02 a5.84 ± 0.03 a5.87 ± 0.05 a5.76 ± 0.02 b
Colorimetric parameters
L*89.99 ± 0.50 a81.00 ± 0.80 b78.31 ± 0.30 c77.51 ± 1.60 c
a*4.21 ± 0.20 d9.71 ± 0.10 c11.83 ± 0.10 b15.35 ± 0.30 a
b*23.62 ± 0.40 d38.34± 0.40 c44.04 ± 0.30 b54.00 ± 1.10 a
∆E*-17.74 ± 0.50 c24.74 ± 0.10 b34.69 ± 1.30 a
Texture parameters
Firmness (N)7.94 ± 0.90 a4.92 ± 0.11 b3.29 ± 0.20 c3.18 ± 0.30 c
Elasticity (N.s)75.80 ± 0.19 a67.84 ± 0.17 b66.60 ± 0.41 b49.70 ± 0.30 c
Cohesiveness0.46 ± 0.06 a0.28 ± 0.04 b0.30 ± 0.20 b0.27 ± 0.02 b
Gumminess (N)3.65 ± 0.15 a1.37 ± 0.24 b1.02 ± 0.01 c0.89 ± 0.14 c
Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. L*: represents luminosity, ranging from 0 (black) to 100 (white). a*: represents the red color tone. b*: represents the yellow tone. ∆E*: represents the total difference in color between the measured values of each fresh cheese (5, 10, 15% of guabiroba pulp addition) with the control sample. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–d Within a row, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Carotenoid content of fresh cheese formulation samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Table 2. Carotenoid content of fresh cheese formulation samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Carotenoid Content Samples
051015
β-carotene (µg/g)74.84 ± 0.01 d77.85 ± 0.47 c155.70 ± 0.93 b158.70 ± 1.40 a
α-carotene (µg/g)<0.00127.51 ± 0.04 c55.03 ± 0.09 b82.54 ± 0.13 a
β-cryptoxanthin (µg/g)<0.00131.88 ± 0.05 c63.75 ± 0.80 b95.63 ± 0.14 a
λ-carotene (µg/g)<0.00120.50 ± 0.03 c40.99 ± 0.06 b61.49 ± 0.09 a
Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–c Within a row, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Sugar content in fresh cheese formulations samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Table 3. Sugar content in fresh cheese formulations samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Sugars ContentSamples
051015
Lactose (g/100 g)3.80 ± 0.20 a4.10 ± 0.10 a3.99± 0.10 a3.80 ± 0.10 a
Galactose (g/100 g)1.31 ± 0.10 a1.29 ± 0.10 a1.28 ± 0.10 a1.02 ± 0.10 b
Glucose (g/100 g)2.53 ± 0.90 a2.95 ± 0.40 a2.94 ± 0.40 a2.74 ± 0.40 a
Sucrose (g/100 g)1.12 ± 0.30 b1.24 ± 0.40 ab1.44 ± 0.10 a1.64 ± 0.30 a
Fructose (g/100 g) 0.55 ± 0.01 b1.13 ± 0.40 a1.37 ± 0.11 a1.71 ± 0.47 a
Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–b Within a row, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Content of the increase in hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds present in fresh cheese samples adding guabiroba pulp concerning the control sample.
Table 4. Content of the increase in hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds present in fresh cheese samples adding guabiroba pulp concerning the control sample.
ClassHydrophilic CompoundsContent (µg/g)
Sample 5Sample 10Sample 15
Amino acidGlutamic acid0.45 ± 0.05 c0.91 ± 0.10 b1.35 ± 0.10 a
4-amino-butanoic acid (GABA)1.40 ± 0.07 c2.80 ± 0.13 b4.20 ± 0.20 a
4-hydroxy-1-methyl-proline (dimer)19.10 ± 0.70 c38.00 ± 1.40 b57.15 ± 1.04 a
CyclitolMyo-inositol25.20 ± 2.25 c50.00 ± 2.30 b76.00 ± 2.79 a
Organic acidCitric acid44.70 ± 0.97 c90.01 ± 1.50 b135.01 ± 6.07 a
Dehydroascorbic acid2.75 ± 0.01 c5.04 ± 1.00 b8.31 ± 1.45 a
Glycolic acid0.42 ± 0.02 c0.84 ± 0.03 b1.30 ± 0.05 a
Lactic acid0.40 ± 0.03 c0.78 ± 0.06 b1.17 ± 0.17 a
Malic acid6.29 ± 0.09 c12.60 ± 0.09 b19.00 ± 0.09 a
Quinic acid10.81 ± 0.06 c21.50 ± 0.06 b33.01 ± 0.07 a
Shikimic acid0.40 ± 0.01 c0.73 ± 0.03 b1.10 ± 0.05 a
Succinic acid0.33 ± 0.01 c0.70 ± 0.01 b2.50 ± 0.02 a
Organic nitrogen1-pyrroline-3-hydroxy-5-carbocylic-acid0.91 ± 0.01 c1.80 ± 0.01 b2.71 ± 0.06 a
Sugar acidGalacturonic acid1.35 ± 0.06 c2.69 ± 0.02 b4.03 ± 0.04 a
Glyceric acid1.58 ± 0.01 c3.16 ± 0.01 b4.57 ± 0.01 a
Gluconic acid2.19 ± 0.01 c4.40 ± 0.01 b6.60 ± 0.08 a
Glucuronic acid5.58 ± 0.05 c12.01 ± 1.00 b16.75 ± 1.00 a
Sugar alcoholArabitol0.41 ± 0.04 c0.80 ± 0.09 b1.25 ± 0.13 a
ClassLipophilic compounds
AromaticBenzoic acid1.00 ± 0.03 c1.99 ± 0.09 b3.02 ± 0.09 a
Fatty acidn-9-(Z)-hexadecenoic acid7.27 ± 0.07 c15.00 ± 0.15 b22.00 ± 0.22 a
Oleic acid0.14 ± 0.01 c0.27 ± 0.03 b0.45 ± 0.05 a
Eicosanoic acid0.45 ± 0.02 c1.00 ± 0.02 b1.40 ± 0.02 a
Hexadecanoic acid0.58 ± 0.02 c1.17 ± 0.02 b1.75 ± 0.03 a
Octadecenoic (C18:1)21.48 ± 0.01 c43.00 ± 0.05 b64.45 ± 1.62 a
Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–c Within a row, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Multi-element profile of fresh cheese formulations samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Table 5. Multi-element profile of fresh cheese formulations samples added with guabiroba pulp.
Elements (mg/g)Samples
051015
Al<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
As<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Ca5.85 ± 0.75 ac6.09 ± 0.11 a5.47 ± 0.40 abc4.92 ± 0.50 c
Cd<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Co<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Cr<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Cu<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Fe<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
K1.00 ± 0.12 bc1.20 ± 0.02 a1.16 ± 0.04 ab1.01 ± 0.06 c
Mg0.22 ± 0.01 a0.30 ± 0.08 a0.24 ± 0.01 a0.23 ± 0.01 a
Mn<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Na3.30 ± 0.52 d6.59 ± 0.11 b7.08 ± 0.38 a4.59 ± 0.25 c
P4.39 ± 0.53 ab4.65 ± 0.25 a4.10 ± 0.29 ab3.86 ± 0.13 b
Pb<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
S1.89 ± 0.19 ab2.05 ± 0.10 a1.80 ± 0.15 b1.76 ± 0.02 b
Se<LOD<LOD<LOD<LOD
Sr0.003 ± 0.001 a0.004 ± 0.001 a0.003 ± 0.001 a0.003 ± 0.001 a
Zn0.03 ± 0.01 a0.03 ± 0.01 a0.03 ± 0.01 a0.03 ± 0.01 a
Sample 0 is the control sample (without guabiroba pulp); Sample 5 is the sample with 5% guabiroba pulp; Sample 10 is the sample with 10% guabiroba pulp; and Sample 15 is the sample with 15% guabiroba pulp. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–d Within a row, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05). LOD, limit of detection.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Oliveira Mindelo, L.J.; Carvalho, A.C.F.; Prestes, A.A.; Marafon, K.; Mendes Andrade, D.R.; de Gois, J.S.; Provenzi, M.A.; Miotto, M.; de Souza, C.K.; Helm, C.V.; et al. Chemical Characterization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Fresh Cheese Added with Guabiroba Pulp. Processes 2025, 13, 2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092844

AMA Style

de Oliveira Mindelo LJ, Carvalho ACF, Prestes AA, Marafon K, Mendes Andrade DR, de Gois JS, Provenzi MA, Miotto M, de Souza CK, Helm CV, et al. Chemical Characterization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Fresh Cheese Added with Guabiroba Pulp. Processes. 2025; 13(9):2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092844

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Oliveira Mindelo, Leandro José, Ana Caroline Ferreira Carvalho, Amanda Alves Prestes, Karine Marafon, Dayanne Regina Mendes Andrade, Jefferson Santos de Gois, Marcel Afonso Provenzi, Marília Miotto, Carolina Krebs de Souza, Cristiane Vieira Helm, and et al. 2025. "Chemical Characterization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Fresh Cheese Added with Guabiroba Pulp" Processes 13, no. 9: 2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092844

APA Style

de Oliveira Mindelo, L. J., Carvalho, A. C. F., Prestes, A. A., Marafon, K., Mendes Andrade, D. R., de Gois, J. S., Provenzi, M. A., Miotto, M., de Souza, C. K., Helm, C. V., Pimentel, T. C., & Prudêncio, E. S. (2025). Chemical Characterization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Antimicrobial Activity of a New Fresh Cheese Added with Guabiroba Pulp. Processes, 13(9), 2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop