Next Article in Journal
A Novel Framework to Detect Irrelevant Software Requirements Based on MultiPhiLDA as the Topic Model
Previous Article in Journal
Using Random Ordering in User Experience Testing to Predict Final User Satisfaction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Factors Influencing the Use of Digital Marketing by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises during COVID-19

Informatics 2022, 9(4), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040086
by Maria Camila Bermeo-Giraldo 1, Alejandro Valencia-Arias 2,3,*, Javier D. Ramos de Rosas 4, Martha Benjumea-Arias 3 and Juan Amilcar Villanueva Calderón 5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Informatics 2022, 9(4), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040086
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 8 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study is interest to SMEs and readers. Data sources and methods used in the research are suitable to answer the questions. The results are identical to what we know. There are two main limitations need to be revised as follows. 1) in discussion part, the mechanism of the regressions need to be analized. 2) The writtings need to be reviseds.

Author Response

October 07, 2022

 

Dear Antony Bryant

Editor-in-Chief

Informatics

 

Kind regards

Thank you for the opportunity to revise the paper. We understand the reviewer's comments and we strove to resolve your doubts and concerns. The comments helped us improve the quality of the article and enriched the discussion about it, offering us points of view that we had not considered in the initial version. The following changes were made, properly marked with red letters in the article:

Reviewer

Comment

Response

Reviewer #1

1) in discussion part, the mechanism of the regressions need to be analized.

In the discussion section, the issue of regression mechanism is analyzed as a limitation of the study and a proposal for future work. Lines 472-482.

Reviewer #1

2) The writtings need to be reviseds.

The writing has been fully revised in style, wording and grammar by the translation agency.

 

Thanks in advance for considering the paper for the journal,

 

Sincerely yours,

 

The authors

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

First of all I want to thank you for the opportunity to review this article, with such an interesting topic. Although the article is well structured, I have some comments for improvement before being published.

Abstract:

I advise the authors to add what the main implications of their study are. They also have to correct one of the last sentences that begin with: “As limitations in the, the hypotheses”

Introduction:

Authors should refer to the methodology, and especially what will be done for the first time, so that they can then develop their contributions. 

Research Design

In this section authors can describe why they choose Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).

Conclusion

This section is not complete. I suggest they refer to the limitations of their study.

 

Author Response

Medellín, October 07, 2022

 

Dear Erica Wang

Section Managing Editor

Informatics Editorial Office

Kind regards

According to the review of our article by the Reviewer 2, the following changes were made, properly marked with red letters in the article:

Reviewer

Comment

Response

 

Abstract:

I advise the authors to add what the main implications of their study are. They also have to correct one of the last sentences that begin with: “As limitations in the, the hypotheses”

The main implications of the study are included in the abstract.  Correct the sentence "As limitations in the “hypotheses".

 

Reviewer #2

 

Introduction:

Authors should refer to the methodology, and especially what will be done for the first time, so that they can then develop their contributions. 

A paragraph is included that refers to the methodology to be used in the study and then if it gives way to the contributions of the research

Reviewer #2

 

Research Design

In this section authors can describe why they choose Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).

A description of the choice of AFE in the study and its contribution to the study is included.

Reviewer #2

 

Conclusion

This section is not complete. I suggest they refer to the limitations of their study.

The section conclusion is completed by including a paragraph on the limitations of the study.

Reviewer #2

 

We look forward to your comments and hope to hear from you soon.

Thank you very much

 

_

The authors

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop