Next Article in Journal
Parental Knowledge of Appendicitis and Preference for Operative or Non-Operative Treatment at a United Kingdom Children’s Hospital
Next Article in Special Issue
Body Composition in Adolescent PKU Patients: Beyond Fat Mass
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into Microbiome and Metabolic Signatures of Children Undergoing Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multidisciplinary Treatment for Childhood Obesity: A Two-Year Experience in the Province of Naples, Italy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Is the Leptin/Adiponectin Ratio a Better Diagnostic Biomarker for Insulin Resistance than Leptin or Adiponectin Alone in Adolescents?

Children 2022, 9(8), 1193; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081193
by César Agostinis-Sobrinho 1,*, Sofia E. de Castro Ferreira Vicente 1, Sigute Norkiene 1, Alona Rauckienė-Michaelsson 1, Justina Kievisienė 1, Viney Prakash Dubey 1, Arturas Razbadauskas 1, Luís Lopes 2,3 and Rute Santos 2,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Children 2022, 9(8), 1193; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081193
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 29 July 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Metabolic Disorders in Adolescence Update)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is a beautiful and significant study highlighting the use of LA ratio as an important biomarker for predicting IR in adolescents.

Title can be improved and needs to be more suggestive. may be say - Leptin/Adiponectin ratio as a better biomarker for prediction of IR in adolescents.

Abstract, introduction and methods are fine.

In results section- there are table-3 and 4. There is no description for those tables and also they are not cited anywhere in the paper.

Discussion is well written.

Author Response

Reviewer #1:

It is a beautiful and significant study highlighting the use of LA ratio as an important biomarker for predicting IR in adolescents.

Authors: Thank you for the positive feedback regarding our study, as well as the constructive input.

Title can be improved and needs to be more suggestive. may be say - Leptin/Adiponectin ratio as a better biomarker for prediction of IR in adolescents.

Authors: Thank you. We changed it for: “Is the leptin/adiponectin ratio a better diagnostic biomarker for insulin resistance than leptin or adiponectin alone in adolescents?”

Abstract, introduction and methods are fine.

Authors: Thank you

In results section- there are table-3 and 4. There is no description for those tables and also they are not cited anywhere in the paper.

Authors: Thank you for point this out. This was emended.

Discussion is well written.

Authors: Thank you

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present a cross-sectional study on the predictive power of leptin, adiponectin and L/A ratio for insulin resistance in children under consideration of major confounders.

The overall rationale of the paper is clear and is introduced orderly and transparently.

The methods are mainly well described. Please specify the medical exclusion criteria, as some diagnosis might have been accepted (dyslipoproteinemia, allergies, ...), while others were certainly deemed worth excluding (severe diseases of internal organs...).

Results: Presented very clearly; robust statistics; overall plausible findings.

Table 1: Asterisks of different size still have the same meaning? Please clarify.

Discussion: No need for changes.

Excellent work!

Author Response

Reviewer #2:

The authors present a cross-sectional study on the predictive power of leptin, adiponectin and L/A ratio for insulin resistance in children under consideration of major confounders.The overall rationale of the paper is clear and is introduced orderly and transparently.

Authors: Thank you for the positive feedback.

The methods are mainly well described. Please specify the medical exclusion criteria, as some diagnosis might have been accepted (dyslipoproteinemia, allergies, ...), while others were certainly deemed worth excluding (severe diseases of internal organs...).

Authors: Done. Thank you

Results: Presented very clearly; robust statistics; overall plausible findings.

Authors: Thank you

Table 1: Asterisks of different size still have the same meaning? Please clarify.

Authors: This was a formatting error. We amended. Thank you

Discussion: No need for changes.

Authors: Thank you

Excellent work!

Authors: Thank you

Back to TopTop