Next Article in Journal
Modular Multi-Task Learning for Emotion-Aware Stance Inference in Online Discourse
Next Article in Special Issue
EpilepsyNet-XAI: Towards High-Performance and Explainable Multi-Phase Seizure Analysis from EEG Features
Previous Article in Journal
Supervised Focused Feature Network for Steel Strip Surface Defect Detection
Previous Article in Special Issue
New High-Speed Arithmetic Circuits Based on Spiking Neural P Systems with Communication on Request Implemented in a Low-Area FPGA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications

1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of IT Convergence, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
2
Department of AI and Software, College of IT Convergence, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(20), 3286; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13203286
Submission received: 3 September 2025 / Revised: 5 October 2025 / Accepted: 11 October 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methods, Analysis and Applications in Computational Neuroscience)

Abstract

Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool in computational neuroscience, enabling the modeling of complex neural processes and supporting data-driven insights into brain function. However, the non-transparent nature of many deep learning models limits their interpretability, which is a significant barrier in neuroscience and clinical contexts where trust, transparency, and biological plausibility are essential. This review surveys structured explainable deep learning methods, such as saliency maps, attention mechanisms, and model-agnostic interpretability frameworks, that bridge the gap between performance and interpretability. We then explore explainable deep learning’s role in visual neuroscience and clinical neuroscience. By surveying literature and evaluating strengths and limitations, we highlight explainable models’ contribution to both scientific understanding and ethical deployment. Challenges such as balancing accuracy, complexity and interpretability, absence of standardized metrics, and scalability are assessed. Finally, we propose future directions, which include integrating biological priors, implementing standardized benchmarks, and incorporating human-intervention systems. The research study highlights the position of explainable deep learning, not only as a technical advancement but represents it as a necessary paradigm for transparent, responsible, auditable, and effective computational neuroscience. In total, 177 studies were reviewed as per PRISMA, which provided evidence across both visual and clinical computational neuroscience domains.
Keywords: explainable deep learning; computational neuroscience; visual attention; clinical applications; neural networks explainable deep learning; computational neuroscience; visual attention; clinical applications; neural networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mehmood, A.; Mehmood, F.; Kim, J. Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications. Mathematics 2025, 13, 3286. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13203286

AMA Style

Mehmood A, Mehmood F, Kim J. Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications. Mathematics. 2025; 13(20):3286. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13203286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mehmood, Asif, Faisal Mehmood, and Jungsuk Kim. 2025. "Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications" Mathematics 13, no. 20: 3286. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13203286

APA Style

Mehmood, A., Mehmood, F., & Kim, J. (2025). Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications. Mathematics, 13(20), 3286. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13203286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop