Previous Article in Journal
Technology-Enhanced Serial Concept Mapping in a Human–Computer Interaction Course: Feasibility, Pedagogical Utility, and Learning-Related Gains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reducing Sex Differences in Cardiac Anatomy Visualization: 3D-Printed Heart Models Align Spatial Learning Outcomes in Echocardiography Training
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of AI and Robotics-Based Practices in Contemporary STEM Teaching: A Scoping Review

Department of Education, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 1008; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071008 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 April 2026 / Revised: 11 June 2026 / Accepted: 23 June 2026 / Published: 25 June 2026

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) resources and robotics tools in education is considered vital for interdisciplinary fields to enhance the quality of the teaching and learning process. It also helps transform assessment techniques and revolutionize the whole pedagogical setting of science teacher education, in particular, AI and robotics integration in the teaching of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects’ courses at the primary level. In this study, a scoping review was conducted involving seventeen peer-reviewed research papers published from 2021 to 2025. Efforts are being made to find the current perceptions and practices of preservice teachers (PSTs) at the primary level (Years 1–6; ages 6–12 in the Australian context) regarding the use of AI and robotics resources, for example, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), foundational robotics and AI-driven robotics in teaching STEM subjects. Findings indicate that there was a significant gap in primary PSTs’ perspectives regarding their pedagogical practices to integrate STEM. As such, this influences future teachers’ knowledge, understanding, AI acceptance, and attitude toward the integration of smart AI and robotics resources in STEM classrooms. Policymakers and teachers’ education providers should align advanced technological AI resources and robotics applications with STEM curriculum guidelines and preservice teachers’ professional training programs within primary school education.
Keywords: integrated STEM; artificial intelligence; integration; progressive technology; primary science education; robotics tools; preservice teacher integrated STEM; artificial intelligence; integration; progressive technology; primary science education; robotics tools; preservice teacher

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ameer, B.; Ng, A.; Kewalramani, S. Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of AI and Robotics-Based Practices in Contemporary STEM Teaching: A Scoping Review. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071008

AMA Style

Ameer B, Ng A, Kewalramani S. Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of AI and Robotics-Based Practices in Contemporary STEM Teaching: A Scoping Review. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(7):1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ameer, Bushra, Andrea Ng, and Sarika Kewalramani. 2026. "Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of AI and Robotics-Based Practices in Contemporary STEM Teaching: A Scoping Review" Education Sciences 16, no. 7: 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071008

APA Style

Ameer, B., Ng, A., & Kewalramani, S. (2026). Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of AI and Robotics-Based Practices in Contemporary STEM Teaching: A Scoping Review. Education Sciences, 16(7), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop