Next Article in Journal
Research, Science Identity, and Intent to Pursue a Science Career: A BUILD Intervention Evaluation at CSULB
Next Article in Special Issue
Developing a Novel Model for ICT Integration in South African Education: Insights from TIMSS
Previous Article in Journal
Defining Rural: Rural Teachers’ Perspectives and Experiences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interactive Homework: A Tool for Parent Engagement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

(Up)Grading: A (Re)Humanizing Assessment Process with a Focus on Feedback

by
Stefanie D. Livers
1,*,
Kristin E. Harbour
2 and
Patrick L. Sullivan
3
1
School of Inclusive Teacher Education, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA
2
Department of Teacher Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
3
Department of Mathematics, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 646; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060646
Submission received: 28 April 2024 / Revised: 5 June 2024 / Accepted: 12 June 2024 / Published: 15 June 2024

Abstract

Researchers across two universities and three different mathematics education courses implemented their vision of a novel grading approach called (Up)grading. (Up)grading shifts the focus of assessment from grades to growth. Key features of implementing (Up)grading included (a) providing students with opportunities to reflect upon and grow from their learning experiences, and (b) giving them a voice in determining their course grade. The findings suggest that most students perceived (Up)grading as a positive experience in their learning and as an assessment approach. The features of (Up)grading students believed contributed to the positive experience included giving them opportunities to reflect on their work and learn from their mistakes, as well as targeted feedback, enabling them to independently move their thinking forward. Tensions in the process did arise, including students’ initial anxiety with the norm shift from grades to growth and instructors’ management of the flow of assignments.
Keywords: assessment; upgrading; rehumanizing practices; self-assessment assessment; upgrading; rehumanizing practices; self-assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Livers, S.D.; Harbour, K.E.; Sullivan, P.L. (Up)Grading: A (Re)Humanizing Assessment Process with a Focus on Feedback. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060646

AMA Style

Livers SD, Harbour KE, Sullivan PL. (Up)Grading: A (Re)Humanizing Assessment Process with a Focus on Feedback. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(6):646. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Livers, Stefanie D., Kristin E. Harbour, and Patrick L. Sullivan. 2024. "(Up)Grading: A (Re)Humanizing Assessment Process with a Focus on Feedback" Education Sciences 14, no. 6: 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060646

APA Style

Livers, S. D., Harbour, K. E., & Sullivan, P. L. (2024). (Up)Grading: A (Re)Humanizing Assessment Process with a Focus on Feedback. Education Sciences, 14(6), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop