Correction: Salas-Pilco et al. Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 569
Author(s) and Year | Country/ Region | Goals and Objectives | Participants | Data Sources | Techniques | Tools | Ethical Procedures | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bao et al. (2021) [31] | China | To visualize students’ behaviors and interactions. | 35 PSTs |
| LA dashboard |
| n.d. | The KBSD tool has the potential to assist teachers in detecting learning problems. The most common strategy was cross-group; the interventions involved cognitive guidance, scaffold instruction, and positive evaluation. |
Benaoui and Kassimi (2021) [32] | Morocco | Perceptions of PSTs’ digital competence. | 291 PSTs |
| AI machine learning |
| n.d. | PSTs felt competent when using digital technologies daily, but they did not feel competent in digital content creation and problem solving. This might be due to the predominance of theoretical knowledge at the expense of real practice in teaching training. |
Chen (2020) [33] | China | To investigate whether visual learning analytics (VLA) has a significant influence on teachers’ beliefs and self-efficacy when guiding classroom discussions. | 46 ISTs |
| LA visual learning analytics (VLA) |
| n.d. | The VLA approach to video-based teacher professional development had significant effects on teachers’ beliefs and self-efficacy, and influenced their actual classroom teaching behavior. |
Cutumisu and Guo (2019) [34] | Canada | To determine PSTs’ knowledge of and attitudes toward computational thinking through the automatic scoring of short essays. | 139 PSTs |
| AI machine learning |
| PSTs provided informed consent | Topics that emerged from PSTs’ reflection included assignment (66.7%), skill (11.6%), activity 10.1%), and course (6.5%). |
Fan et al. (2021) [35] | China | To reveal links between learning design and self-regulated learning. | 7030 PSTs, 1758 ISTs |
| LA |
| n.d. | Four meaningful learning tactics were detected with the EM algorithm: search (lectures), content and assessment (case-based or problem-based), content (project-based), and assessment. |
Hayward et al. (2020) [36] | Canada | To explore PSTs’ engagement with models of universal design for learning and blended learning concepts. | 197 PSTs |
| LA |
| n.d. | The feature regularity of access had a moderate relationship with student engagement. High achievers tended to have a set of strategies. |
Hsiao et al. (2019) [37] | China Taiwan | To assess the qualities of pre-service principals’ video-based oral presentations through automatic scoring. | 200 pre-service principals |
| AI machine learning |
| n.d. | The SVM classifier had the best accuracy (55%). It was found that human experts can potentially suffer undesirable variabilities over time, while automatic scoring remains robust and reliable over time. |
Ishizuka and Pellerin (2020) [38] | Japan | To assess real-time activities in second language classrooms. | 4 PSTs |
| AI |
| n.d. | The integration of AI mobile COLT analysis has strong potential to follow-up PSTs’ progress throughout their practicum. |
Jensen et al. (2020) [39] | USA | To provide automated feedback on teacher discourse to enhance teacher learning. | 16 ISTs |
| AI machine learning |
| n.d. | The RF classifier had 89% accuracy, generating automatic measurement and feedback of teacher discourse using self-recorded audio data from classrooms. |
Karunaratne and Byungura (2017) [40] | Rwanda | To track in-service teachers’ behavior in an online course of professional development. | 61 ISTs |
| LA visual learning analytics |
| n.d. | Half of the registered teachers never accessed the course. Most of the teachers were actively engaging in the virtual learning environment’s activities. |
Kasepalu et al. (2021) [41] | Estonia | Teachers’ perceptions of collaborative analytics using a dashboard based on audio and digital trace data. | 21 ISTs |
| LA dashboard |
| Consent forms were filled out by ISTs and their students | New information enhances teachers’ awareness, but it seems that the dashboard decreases teachers’ actionability. Therefore, a guiding dashboard could possibly help less experienced teachers with data-informed assessment. |
Kelleci and Aksoy (2020) [42] | Turkey | To examine PSTs’ and ISTs’ experiences using an AI-based-simulated virtual classroom. | 16 PSTs, 2 ISTs |
| AI simulation |
| Ethical approval from the institution | The SimInClasssimulation was effective in providing clear directions and giving feedback. PSTs suggested that the simulation should give clues as to correct solutions. |
Kilian et al. (2020) [43] | Germany | To predict PSTs’ dropout for a mathematics course and identify risk groups. | 163 PSTs |
| AI machine learning |
| PSTs provided written informed consent | Risk level 1: score ≤ 12 (highest risk), GPA > 2.1; risk level 2: score ≤ 12 (high risk), GPA ≤ 2.1; risk level 3: score > 12 (moderate), 1.6 < GPA ≤ 2. |
Kosko et al. (2021) [44] | USA | To examine PSTs’ professional noticing of students through video and ML. | 6 PSTs, subsample of 70 PSTs |
| AI machine learning |
| n.d. | PSTs’ actions relevant to pedagogical content-specific noticing could be detected by AI algorithms. PSTs’ behavior may have been due to professional knowledge rather than experience. |
Lucas et al. (2021) [45] | Portugal | To measure teachers’ digital competence and its relation to personal and contextual factors. | 1071 ISTs |
| AI machine learning |
| (Voluntary and anonymous teachers) | For personal factors, FFTrees had an accuracy of 81%, while for contextual factors it was 66%. For digital competence, the important personal factors were the number of digital tools used, ease of use, confidence, and openness to new technology. The contextual factors included students’ access to technology, the curriculum, and classroom equipment. |
Michos and Hernández-Leo (2018) [46] | Spain | To support community awareness to facilitate teachers’ learning design process using a dashboard with data visualizations. | 23 PSTs, 209 ISTs |
| LA dashboard |
| n.d. | The ILDE dashboard can provide an understanding of the social presence in the community of teachers. Visualization was the most commonly used feature. There were time constraints. |
Montgomery et al. (2019) [47] | Canada | To examine the relationships between self-regulated learning behaviors and academic achievements. | 157 PSTs |
| LA |
| n.d. | 84.5% of PTSs’ access to the platform took place off-campus. The strongest predictors for student success were the access day of the week and access frequency. |
Newmann et al. (2021) [48] | Germany | To support PSTs’ self-study using chatbots as a tool to scale mentoring processes. | 19 PSTs |
| AI NLP |
| n.d. | Promising results that bear the potential for digital mentoring to support students. |
Post (2019) [49] | USA | To challenge PSTs to analyze and interpret data on students’ online behavior and learning. | n.d. PSTs |
| LA |
| n.d. | PSTs lacked media literacy skills. Online assignments promoted student-centered learning and critical thinking. The prevalence of multitasking was highlighted. |
Pu et al. (2021) [50] | Malaysia | To design a service-learning-based module training AI subjects (SLBM-TAIS). | 60 PSTs |
| AI |
| n.d. | The SLBM-TAIS was effective in training PSTs to teach AI subjects to primary school students. The SLBM-TAIS module influences situational knowledge, teaching strategies, and both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. |
Sasmoko et al. (2019) [51] | Indonesia | To determine teacher engagement using artificial neural networks. | 10,642 ISTs |
| AI machine learning (ANN) |
| Not applicable | The ANN classification accuracy was 97.65%, proving the reliability of the instruments and websites; however, this still requires further testing in terms of both ease of use and trials with diverse data. |
Sun et al. (2019) [52] | China | To investigate changes in PSTs’ concept of engagement, analyzing data recorded during PSTs’ discussions via an MOOC platform. | 53 PSTs |
| LA |
| n.d. | The most frequent discussion behaviors were evaluated (31.52%) and analyzed (27.77%). PSTs with an analytical style implemented multiple strategies for learning. |
Vazhayil et al. (2019) [53] | India | To introduce AI literacy and AI thinking to in-service secondary school teachers. | 34 ISTs |
| AI |
| 15 ISTs consented to recorded video testimonials | 77% appreciated peer teaching, 41% preferred the game-based approach, and 24% were concerned about internet access. The best strategy was embracing creative freedom and peer teaching to boost learners’ confidence. |
Wulff et al. (2020) [54] | Germany | To employ AI algorithms for classifying written reflections according to a reflection-supporting model. | 17 PSTs |
| AI natural language processing |
| PSTs provided informed consent | The multinomial logistic regression was the most suitable classifier (0.63). Imprecise writing was a barrier to accurate computer-based classification. |
Yang et al. (2020) [55] | China | To enhance self-directed reflective assessment (SDRA) using LA. | 47 PSTs |
| LA |
| Ethical approval was obtained from the hosting institution | SDRA fostered PSTs’ collective empowerment, as reflected by their collective decision making, synthesis of ideas, and “rising above” ideas. |
Yilmaz and Yilmaz (2020) [56] | Turkey | To examine PSTs’ perceptions of personalized recommendations and feedback based on LA. | 40 PSTs |
| LA |
| (Voluntary participation) | LA helped to identify learning deficiencies, provided self-assessment and personalized learning, improved academic performance, and instilled a positive attitude toward the course. |
Yoo and Rho (2020) [57] | Korea | To determine ISTs’ training and professional development using ML. | 2933 ISTs, 177 principals |
| AI machine learning |
| Not applicable | Identified 18 predictors of ISTs’ professional development. Found 11 new predictors related to ISTs’ pedagogical preparedness, feedback, and participation. |
Zhang J. et al. (2021) [58] | China | To build an intelligent assessment system of PSTs teaching competency. | 240 PSTs |
| AI machine learning |
| n.d. | The trained model can be used to evaluate PSTs’ competency on a large scale, its relative error was small between 0–0.2. |
Zhang S. et al. (2021) [59] | China | To automatically detect the discourse characteristics of in-service teachers from online textual data. | 1834 ISTs |
| AI natural language processing |
| Ethical approval from the institution | New and relevant information was posted at the beginning of the online discourse. Cluster analysis showed three different posts: relevant topic with new information, another with little new information, and a less relevant topic with little new information. |
Zhao et al. (2021) [60] | China | To improve the outdoor learning experience and build a learning resource based on ontology information retrieval. | 38 PSTs |
| AI vision-based mobile augmented reality (VMAR) |
| n.d. | PSTs perceived the usability as good; it was preferred by younger users, and had a positive impact on learning. The average precision of retrieval based on keywords (97.46%) and ontology (90.85%) signified good performance. |
Reference
- Salas-Pilco, S.Z.; Xiao, K.; Hu, X. Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Salas-Pilco, S.Z.; Xiao, K.; Hu, X. Correction: Salas-Pilco et al. Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 569. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090897
Salas-Pilco SZ, Xiao K, Hu X. Correction: Salas-Pilco et al. Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 569. Education Sciences. 2023; 13(9):897. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090897
Chicago/Turabian StyleSalas-Pilco, Sdenka Zobeida, Kejiang Xiao, and Xinyun Hu. 2023. "Correction: Salas-Pilco et al. Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 569" Education Sciences 13, no. 9: 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090897
APA StyleSalas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2023). Correction: Salas-Pilco et al. Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 569. Education Sciences, 13(9), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090897