Next Article in Journal
Spray Characteristics of Alternative Aviation Fuel Blends
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Wake Shapes on High-Lift System Aerodynamic Predictions
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Electron Pre-Sheath Model for TSS-1R Current Enhancement Computations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Continuation Methods for Nonlinear Flutter
Open AccessArticle

Design and Performance of Modular 3-D Printed Solid-Propellant Rocket Airframes

1
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, OKT N274, 301 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
2
Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, University of Alabama in Huntsville, OKT N143, 301 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Konstantinos Kontis
Aerospace 2017, 4(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace4020017
Received: 23 February 2017 / Revised: 18 March 2017 / Accepted: 20 March 2017 / Published: 23 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Aerospace)
Solid-propellant rockets are used for many applications, including military technology, scientific research, entertainment, and aerospace education. This study explores a novel method for design modularization of the rocket airframes, utilizing additive manufacturing (AM) technology. The new method replaces the use of standard part subsystems with complex multi-function parts to improve customization, design flexibility, performance, and reliability. To test the effectiveness of the process, two experiments were performed on several unique designs: (1) ANSYS CFX® simulation to measure the drag coefficients, the pressure fields, and the streamlines during representative flights and (2) fabrication and launch of the developed designs to test their flight performance and consistency. Altitude and 3-axis stability was measured during the eight flights via an onboard instrument package. Data from both experiments demonstrated that the designs were effective, but varied widely in their performance; the sources of the performance differences and errors were documented and analyzed. The modularization process reduced the number of parts dramatically, while retaining good performance and reliability. The specific benefits and caveats of using extrusion-based 3-D printing to produce airframe components are also demonstrated. View Full-Text
Keywords: modular design; aircraft design; solid-propellant rocket; design of experiments; additive manufacturing; fused deposition modeling modular design; aircraft design; solid-propellant rocket; design of experiments; additive manufacturing; fused deposition modeling
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernandez, R.N.; Singh, H.; Messimer, S.L.; Patterson, A.E. Design and Performance of Modular 3-D Printed Solid-Propellant Rocket Airframes. Aerospace 2017, 4, 17.

AMA Style

Hernandez RN, Singh H, Messimer SL, Patterson AE. Design and Performance of Modular 3-D Printed Solid-Propellant Rocket Airframes. Aerospace. 2017; 4(2):17.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernandez, Rachel N.; Singh, Harpreet; Messimer, Sherri L.; Patterson, Albert E. 2017. "Design and Performance of Modular 3-D Printed Solid-Propellant Rocket Airframes" Aerospace 4, no. 2: 17.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop