Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Weight and Two-Particle Search Algorithm to Optimize Aero-Stealth Performance of a Backward Inclined Vertical Tail
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Evaluation of an Enhanced Virtual Reality Flight Simulation Tool for Airships
Previous Article in Journal
Safety and Efficiency Evaluation Model for Converging Operation of Aircraft and Vehicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Influence of Stratospheric Airship’s Key Parameter Perturbation on Motion Mode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thrust-Based Stabilization and Guidance for Airships without Thrust-Vectoring

by
Carlo E.D. Riboldi
1,* and
Alberto Rolando
2
1
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy
2
PACE Aerospace & IT GmbH, 14059 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2023, 10(4), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10040344
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 2 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mission Analysis and Design of Lighter-than-Air Flying Vehicles)

Abstract

The concept of thrust-based control without the employment of thrust-vectoring (TVC), already introduced in a previous work by the authors, is further developed in conjunction with an appropriate control suite, tasked with both artificial stabilization and beam-tracking navigation functions. In the paper, the fully non-linear mathematical model employed for testing the controllers in a virtual environment is outlined. Then a comparative approach is adopted in the analysis, where a standard tail-back airship with deflectable aerodynamic surfaces is employed as a baseline, and the performance of a four-thrusters layout with a thrust-based control and no TVC is assessed with respect to it. Featured test cases in forward flight include short climbs, abrupt turns, and multi-checkpoint navigation. The research supports the feasibility and adequate performance of the proposed thrust-based airship layout and control, and presents a critical analysis of the pros and cons with respect to the considered baseline airship configuration featuring standard aerodynamic control.
Keywords: flight dynamics; airship; high-altituda airship (HAA); unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); autonomous flight; lighter-than-air (LTA); stability augmentation system (SAS); thrust-based stabilization; guidance; navigation; thrust-based guidance; control surfaces; airship design; control design; thrust vector control (TVC) flight dynamics; airship; high-altituda airship (HAA); unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); autonomous flight; lighter-than-air (LTA); stability augmentation system (SAS); thrust-based stabilization; guidance; navigation; thrust-based guidance; control surfaces; airship design; control design; thrust vector control (TVC)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riboldi, C.E.D.; Rolando, A. Thrust-Based Stabilization and Guidance for Airships without Thrust-Vectoring. Aerospace 2023, 10, 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10040344

AMA Style

Riboldi CED, Rolando A. Thrust-Based Stabilization and Guidance for Airships without Thrust-Vectoring. Aerospace. 2023; 10(4):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10040344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riboldi, Carlo E.D., and Alberto Rolando. 2023. "Thrust-Based Stabilization and Guidance for Airships without Thrust-Vectoring" Aerospace 10, no. 4: 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10040344

APA Style

Riboldi, C. E. D., & Rolando, A. (2023). Thrust-Based Stabilization and Guidance for Airships without Thrust-Vectoring. Aerospace, 10(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10040344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop