Next Article in Journal
Molecular Evaluation of Vitality and Survival Rate of Dormant Kyoho Grape Seedlings: A Step toward Molecular Farming
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Environmental Background of an Invasive Plant Species (Asclepias syriaca) for the Future: An Application of LUCAS Field Photographs and Machine Learning Algorithm Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms of Plant Tolerance to RNA Viruses Induced by Plant-Growth-Promoting Microorganisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Release from Above- and Belowground Insect Herbivory Mediates Invasion Dynamics and Impact of an Exotic Plant
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/plants8120576
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Can Cynodon dactylon Suppress the Growth and Development of the Invasive Weeds Tagetes minuta and Gutenbergia cordifolia?

by
Issakwisa B. Ngondya
1,*,
Anna C. Treydte
1,2,
Patrick A. Ndakidemi
1 and
Linus K. Munishi
1
1
Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Management, School of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha PO Box 447, Tanzania
2
Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics, Hans-Ruthenberg Institute, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2019, 8(12), 576; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120576
Submission received: 22 October 2019 / Revised: 7 November 2019 / Accepted: 12 November 2019 / Published: 6 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Invasive Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Approaches to managing invasive plants is challenging, particularly in protected areas where conventional methods, such as chemical herbicide applications are limited. We studied the effects of varying densities of Cynodon dactylon on the growth and development of the invasive weeds Tagetes minuta and Gutenbergia cordifolia in northern Tanzania. We conducted pot and field plot experiments following a completely randomized block design that was replicated three times. Increasing densities of C. dactylon significantly reduced growth, leaf total chlorophyll, biomass and significantly increased leaf anthocyanin of both T. minuta and G. cordifolia invasives. Our results further showed that the critical density of C. dactylon to suppress the two invasive species is ≥ 8 plants/m2. We suggest that C. dactylon can successfully be used as an alternative eco-friendly and sustainable approach for managing invasive weeds, such as T. minuta and G. cordifolia. This management technique can additionally improve forage production and biomass for wild and domestic herbivores in the affected areas.

1. Introduction

For many decades, weed management in both farmlands and rangelands has mainly been employed through chemical herbicide applications [1]. This chemical control of invasive weeds has become a normal practice, but it often has been associated with a consecutive evolution of resistant weeds, and hence, further proliferated the problem of weed control [2]. Weed resistance to chemical herbicides is becoming a serious and increasingly challenging issue, further being fueled by heavy reliance on chemical herbicides. Likewise, rising concerns on environmental safety and increasing costs associated with chemical herbicides have highlighted the need for alternative tools that can be used to suppress invasive species. These management strategies need to replace chemical herbicides and be able to reduce the increasing weed resistance, environmental pollution and associated costs.
Management of invasive weeds in protected ecosystems poses great challenges as herbicides, which often have proven successful in farmlands are not recommended for protected areas. Herbicides often have strong negative effects on other native flora and fauna [3,4], while traditional methods of controlling weeds, such as mechanical uprooting, cultivation and burning [5,6] are labor-intensive and costly. Prior to the late 1800s only mechanical control of weeds was used in agriculture [1], but recently, weed control mechanisms, such as biological control and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) have been recommended to complement and improve the traditional control methods [7]. Biological control of weeds, i.e., using living organisms, is aimed at improving ecosystems and reducing the competitive ability of target weed species so as to reduce stress on native plant communities and associated herbivores [8].
Although alternative management options, such as uprooting and mowing are often opted for, they are labor-demanding, and only a short term remedy as many invasive plant seeds remain in the soil seed bank. We propose that plant density-dependent competitive interactions can be used to suppress invasives, particularly the problematic weeds T. minuta and G. cordifolia. This natural suppression can even help in the restoration of previously invaded ecosystems, particularly grazing areas, by providing healthy forage vegetation for mammalian herbivores. As a low-cost, low-impact management technique, plant-plant competition has been reported to be effective in some restoration projects [9].
We aimed at utilizing C. dactylon as a competitor, due to its agronomic value as a forage species [10]. Also, this species was found to be highly competitive in previous studies [11], due to its ability to form deep roots [10], and its ability to grow on soils with a wide range of pH [12]. We studied the density-dependent competitive effect of C. dactylon on growth parameters and leaf pigments of two species, i.e., T. minuta and G. cordifolia, which have recently invaded protected lands of Tanzania. We set up screen house and field plot experiments by varying C. dactylon densities and hypothesized that this species would suppress the two weeds by reducing their growth and development. Our study might pave the way for the application of C. dactylon as a management tool to suppress T. minuta and G. cordifolia in invaded rangelands and to improve pasture production and environmental sustainability.

2. Results

2.1. Invasive Plant Growth Parameters

We observed a general decrease in G. cordifolia and T. minuta vigor with an increasing density of C. dactylon plants (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The mean number of vegetative branches, panicles and leaf area of both T. minuta and G. cordifolia species differed significantly across the five C. dactylon treatments (Table 1 and Table 2) and was over four times higher in control pots/plots than in pots/plots with C. dactylon at densities of >8 individuals per pot/plot (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The mean number of leaves and plant height differed significantly in T. minuta (p < 0.05), being half as many and shorter in pots/plots with ≥ 8 C. dactylon per pot/plot compared to those of the control. No significant difference was observed for G. cordifolia (p > 0.05) (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Mean shoot diameter and shoot biomass differed significantly across the five C. dactylon density treatments in both T. minuta and G. cordifolia (p < 0.05). T. minuta and G. cordifolia in pots/plots with C. dactylon density ≥ 8 per pot/plot had half the diameter and were half as heavy as shoots/biomass in control pots/plots. Mean root biomass and root length differed significantly only in T. minuta (p < 0.05), but not in G. cordifolia (p > 0.05) (Figure 5 and Figure 6). T. minuta root weight in pots/plots with C. dactylon density ≥ 8 per pot/plot were over four times lighter in weight and half the length compared to roots of T. minuta in control pots/plots (Table 1 and Table 2).

2.2. Leaf Pigmentations

In both T. minuta and G. cordifolia, total leaf chlorophyll content differed significantly across the five C. dactylon density treatments (p < 0.05) (Figure 7; Table 1 and Table 2). T. minuta and G. cordifolia in control pots/plots had three times higher leaf chlorophyll contents than T. minuta and G. cordifolia in pots/plots with C. dactylon density ≥ 8 per pot or plot.
Leaf anthocyanin concentrations differed significantly across the five C. dactylon treatments in both T. minuta and G. cordifolia (p < 0.05) (Figure 8; Table 1 and Table 2). T. minuta and G. cordifolia leaf anthocyanin in pots/plots with C. dactylon density ≥ 8 per pot/plot were twice as high as those of T. minuta and G. cordifolia in control pots/plots.

3. Discussion

3.1. C. dactylon Effects on Invasive Plants Growth Parameters

Our experiments showed that increasing densities of C. dactylon affected T. minuta and G. cordifolia growth negatively both in field trials (plot experiments), i.e., under a semi-controlled environment, as well as in the screen house trials (pot experiments). Increasing densities of C. dactylon decreased invasive plant height, shoot diameter, shoot biomass, leaf area, root biomass, the number of vegetative branches, leaves and root length. This was strongly visible for T. minuta, while in G. cordifolia, only shoot diameter, shoot biomass, the number of vegetative branches and leaf area was negatively affected. These growth parameters are crucial to the growth and overall fitness of a plant [pers. Obs.]. Plant height, leaf area, and number of leaves, for instance, are responsible for catching up to a recommended 95% of the incoming solar radiation for photosynthesis [13,14]. In addition, large shoot diameters and high biomass aid in stress tolerance towards, e.g., trampling by animals and wind destruction [15]. The number of panicles per plant determines the number of seeds deposited in the soil, which is crucial for invasion success of most weeds [16]. We observed a significant reduction in the number of T. minuta and G. cordifolia panicles with increasing density of C. dactylon, which suggests that C. dactylon, can potentially reduce the invasive seed number and deposition. This highlights the great potential of this technique for managing weeds in affected areas [16,17]. The fact that the negative effects of C. dactylon were strongly visible in T. minuta versus G. cordifolia may be due to T. minuta’s shorter and lighter roots compared to those of G. cordifolia [pers. obs]. Possibly, G. cordifolia’s greater root weight and length render this species less prone to suppression by competition compared to T. minuta. This has also been found for other species that had large root biomass. As predicted, the negative competitive effects were more pronounced with increasing densities of C. dactylon. C. dactylon has been reported to be a very strong competitor to most crops [11], likely due to increased competition for available nutrients and space. Competitiveness of C. dactylon has been associated with its stoloniferous nature and its ability to develop deep roots [4] that can easily outcompete other plant species. While monocultures from invasive plants have been reported to not only suppress other native species [18], but also to deteriorate soil health [19] intercrops were shown to be mostly facilitative in nature, especially in maize-legume combinations [20,21]. In our study, inter-planting of C. dactylon/T. minuta and of C. dactylon/G. cordifolia reduced invasive growth performance of the two invasive species, hence, highlighting the potential for utilizing C. dactylon as a suppressor for the two invasive plants.

3.2. C. dactylon Effects on Invasive Plants Leaf Pigmentations

As C. dactylon density increased, leaf chlorophyll content dropped for both T. minuta and G. cordifolia. This could be due to the weed species’ reduced access to water, nutrients and space. For example, as Nitrogen becomes less available to a particular plant, its chlorophyll production is reduced [22,23], and consecutively, its ability to conduct photosynthesis. Hence, in our study, the increase in C. dactylon density might have exerted enough stress to affect the chlorophyll productivity of the two invasives. Leaf chlorophyll content has been linked to plant health status [24] as it is associated with energy production, and hence, important for other metabolic activities [24]. Plants with reduced chlorophyll amount and photosynthetic capacity [23] also possess flowers with accelerated abscission [25], which reduces the chances of dispersal by pollinators. Reduced dispersal of the two invasives will lower the ability of the species to invade as a monoculture, which has been proven to be devastating in an invaded ecosystem [12,18].
We observed an increasing anthocyanin concentration in T. minuta and G. cordifolia with increasing numbers of C. dactylon. Anthocyanins, which are a small group of flavonoid pigments, form red-blue coloration in most plants that indicates elevated stress levels [26]. The increase of anthocyanin levels in plant leaves under increasing C. dactylon densities in this study can be linked to the increasing level of competition [27], specifically for nutrients and space. This is in line with [28] who argued that anthocyanin induction and/or accumulation in plant tissue could be associated with nitrogen and/or phosphorus deficiency. It is a known fact that the rate of photosynthesis is directly proportional to plant’s chlorophyll content [29], anthocyanin pigments reduce a plant’s chlorophyll content, thereby negatively affecting photosynthesis. Therefore, we propose that if C. dactylon can be sown in areas invaded by T. minuta and G. cordifolia can potentially be used as an environmentally friendly invasive species management approach. As C. dactylon is also a valuable forage grass, its inclusion into rangelands not only suppresses invasives in the long term, but also enhances fodder quality of previously degraded rangelands, act as a cover crop, reduce soil erosion and can improve soil quality by enhancing the organic matter content.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area Location and Climate

Both screen house and plot experiments were conducted within the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST) main campus (Tengeru) located at 3°24’05.44”S, 36°47’43.24”E in Northern Tanzania. The area’s mean annual temperature and precipitation are 19.5 °C and 90 mm, respectively [30]

4.2. Study Species

We selected C. dactylon as a suppressor species as it has been reported to successfully escape from stresses like invasion and drought by creeping away from invaded areas through stolones and by developing a deep root system [10]. This species can grow on soils with a wide range of pH, survive flooding [12], and can grow twice as large in mixed cultures than in monoculture [31]. The plant has further been reported to be highly competitive over most crops [11], which highlights its importance as a potential fodder grass for management of invasive weeds.
T. minuta is an unpalatable exotic invasive plant native to Mexico [32,33]. The species has escaped cultivation in most nations and is considered a noxious weed in various parts of southern Africa [34]. This species has been introduced and became a weed in most rangelands and farmlands of Tanzania [35]. Its seeds and leaves produce some secondary products, which makes it unpalatable to most herbivores [36]. According to [37], T. minuta root exudates contain a polyacetylene derivative (thiophene), which can kill root knot nematodes [38]. Therefore, this invasive can possibly affect the growth and development of leguminous pastures that are crucial for improving soil nitrogen in otherwise nutrient-poor tropical and sub-tropical soils.
G. cordifolia, on the other hand, is an unpalatable annual plant native to Africa (pers. com). Its leaves and flowers are allergenic and toxic to animals as they contain a chemical sesquiterpene lactone [39,40] that alters the microbial composition of the rumen, thereby, affecting overall metabolic functioning [39]. In Kenya, the plant has already been reported to be an invasive weed in most farmlands [41,42]; whereas, in Tanzania, the species seems to have invaded and dominated more than half of the Ngorongoro crater floor (250 km2) in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, a UNSESCO World Heritage site [43], and most parts of the Serengeti ecosystem (pers. obs).

4.3. Experimental Design

We selected our study species during a field survey in the year 2015/16 to assess the effect of invasion status of T. minuta and G. cordifolia on the diversity and abundance of native plant species in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area [44]. The results of this survey indicated that C. dactylon was the most abundant and coexisting native grass species that grew together with the two invasive species, T. minuta and G. cordifolia. Despite its ability to compete with T. minuta and G. cordifolia C. dactylon has been ranked as one of the best forage species utilized by herbivores, due to its high pasture agronomic values [45]. This prompted us to select C. dactylon as competitor species and assessed its effects on growth parameters and leaf pigments of T. minuta and G. cordifolia in both screen house and field plot experiments. We followed a common garden design by varying C. dactylon densities during the rainy season (February- May 2016). The minimum and maximum mean monthly temperatures during experiment time were 15.3 °C and 25.2 °C, respectively. We hypothesized that C. dactylon could suppress the two weeds, and therefore, reduce their growth and development through suppression of the studied parameters.
Both T. minuta and G. cordifolia seeds were collected from the Ngorongoro Crater within the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA). The collected T. minuta and G. cordifolia seeds were sown separately both in pots (screen house) and in plots (field), and in combination with C. dactylon following a simple additive design [46] in early 2016. Clay-loam soil was used in both experiments, which is similar to the Ngorongoro Crater’s soil, where the previous field survey [44] had been carried out. In the screen house, both weed species T. minuta and G. cordifolia were grown in combination with C. dactylon in pots of 0.15 m height × 0.56 m diameter and plots of 0.50 m × 0.50 m in the field (Figure 9).
Based on the used pot and plot size, density proportions of sown weeds (T. minuta and or G. cordifolia) versus C. dactylon were as follows: 2:0 (weed: C. dactylon), 2:4, 2:6, 2:8 and 2:10, whereby 2:0 was used as control and each treatment was replicated three times (Figure 10). A total of 30 pots (five densities, three replications and two species) and 30 plots (five densities, three replications and two species) were used in this study. The interaction between T. minuta, G. cordifolia and C. dactylon under uniform conditions (space, moisture and nutrients) was studied using a completely randomized design. Seeds of T. minuta, G. cordifolia and C. dactylon were sown at a spacing of ≥ 2 cm apart. During the first two weeks, 100% of planted seeds germinated. During this period, pots/plots were irrigated with water ad-libitum to ensure seedling establishment. After successful establishment, plants in all pots/plots were irrigated with 0.5 l of water daily, and watering ceased at anthesis, which marked the end of the vegetative growth phase (meristematic and elongation growth) of both weed species (at nine weeks).

4.4. Growth Parameters Measured

The number of vegetative branches, leaves, panicles, and seedling height and shoot diameter was measured as growth parameters indicating the fitness of the two invasive plants. Parameters were measured at the end of the plant’s vegetative growth phase. In this study, the number of weeds per pot/plot was considered as the entire population, 100% of which was sampled (two plants per pot/plot). The number of vegetative branch leaves and panicles were counted for each plant. Plant height was measured using a meter ruler, while shoot diameter was measured using vernier calipers at a height of 5 cm above the ground. The total number of leaves in all pots/plots under the same treatment was considered as a population. Of this, about 30% of leaves were randomly sampled for leaf area determination. Leaf area was determined using java based image processing software Image J [47]. T. minuta and G. cordifolia root lengths were measured using a meter ruler. Young leaves from the top-most part of the plant were sampled randomly per pot for chlorophyll determination, while mature leaves were randomly sampled for anthocyanin level determination.
During the 9th week, (the end of vegetative growth phase), both T. minuta and G. cordifolia were harvested (uprooted), washed, placed into paper bags and dried at 80 °C for 48 h [48]. Shoot and root material was separated and weighed to obtain the total above/below ground dry biomass [48].

4.5. Measurement of Leaf Pigments

Leaf chlorophyll content has been linked to plant health status [24], and therefore, represents a crucial parameter to be assessed during plant growth and development. Leaf chlorophyll of T. minuta and G. cordifolia plants was extracted according to [3], with some modifications—50 mg of fresh leaves of 2.25 cm2 were immersed in 4 ml of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) and incubated at 65 °C for 12 h. The extract was transferred to glass cuvettes for absorbance determination. The absorbance of blank liquid (DMSO) and samples were determined under 2000 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (UNICO®) at 663 nm and 645 nm [3], and the total leaf chlorophyll (total Chl) calculated according to [49] using the following equation:
Total Chl = 0.0202A663 + 0.00802A645
where A663 and A645 are absorbance readings at 663 nm and 645 nm respectively.
A bioassay of anthocyanin levels in leaves of T. minuta and G. cordifolia was performed as described by [50]. Leaves of T. minuta and G. cordifolia were oven-dried at 60 °C for 48 h, weighed, and ground into a fine powder. Then, 0.10 g of leaf powder was weighed and mixed with 10 ml of acidified methanol prepared from a ratio of 79:20:1 MeOH:H2O:HCl. The mixture was incubated for 72 h in darkness for auto-extraction and filtered through Whatman paper Number 2. The extract was transferred to glass cuvettes for absorbance determination. The absorbance of acidified methanol as standard and that of samples were determined under a 2000 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (UNICO®) at 530 nm and 657 nm and expressed as Abs g.DM-1 [50]. Anthocyanin concentration in leaf extracts was calculated using the following equation [50]:
Anthocyanin concentration = A530 − 1/3A657,
where A530 and A657 are absorbance readings at 530 nm and 657nm, respectively

4.6. Data Analysis

Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was performed on the number of vegetative branches, leaves, panicles, plant height, shoot diameter, root length, leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll content, leaf anthocyanin concentration, and shoot and root biomass of T. minuta and G. cordifolia. For all data that passed normality test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out whilst for non-normally distributed data, a Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. For both invasive weed species, one-way ANOVA was performed on the number of vegetative branches, number of panicles, leaf area, shoot diameter, leaf total chlorophyll and leaf anthocyanins concentration versus varying density of C. dactylon. Kruskal-Wallis test was carried out on the number of leaves, plant height, root biomass, shoot biomass and root length per plant. Pearson’s Product Moment and Spearman correlations were also performed on normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. The resulting means were separated by the Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD). The statistical software used was STATISTICA version 8, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

We found a shorter plant height, smaller shoot diameter, smaller leaf area and lower shoot biomass of T. minuta and G. cordifolia under higher C. dactylon densities, which significantly reduced the vigor of both invasive species. Moreover, reduced leaf total chlorophyll and increased anthocyanin levels in leaves likely affected the photosynthetic ability of both invasive species. Hence, in this study, we highlight the ability of C. dactylon to suppress T. minuta and G. cordifolia under controlled conditions. Furthermore, our results showed that the critical density of C. dactylon to suppress the two invasive species is ≥ 8 plants/m2. Our findings are important in developing alternative eco-friendly ways to suppress weeds, particularly in rangelands and protected areas where conventional methods, such as chemical applications must be limited.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.N., P.A.N. and L.K.M.; Formal analysis, I.B.N. and L.K.M.; Investigation, I.B.N., A.C.T., P.A.N. and L.K.M.; Methodology, I.B.N.; Supervision, A.C.T., P.A.N. and L.K.M.; Writing—original draft, I.B.N.; Writing—review and editing, I.B.N., A.C.T., P.A.N. and L.K.M.

Funding

The Government of Tanzania (GOT) through the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST): 02020811-048-4001-F01503-B02.

Acknowledgments

Much appreciation is expressed to all laboratory technicians of the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology for facilitating the conduction of the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bell, C. A Historical View of Weed Control Technology. Available online: http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=17593 (accessed on 2 February 2017).
  2. Holt, J.S.; Lebaron, H.M. Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 1990, 4, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hiscox, J.; Israelstam, G. A Method for the Extraction of Chlorophyll from Leaf Tissue without Maceration. Can. J. Bot. 1979, 57, 1332–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Horowitz, M. Competitive Effects of Cynodon dactylon, Sorghum halepense and Cyperus rotundus on Cotton and Mustard. Exp. Agric. 1973, 9, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Altieri, M.A.; Liebman, M. Weed Management in Agro Ecosystems: Ecological Approaches; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  6. FAO. Improving Weed Management. In Proceedings of the FAO/IWSS Expert Consultation on Improving Weed Management in Developing Countries, Rome, Italy, 6–10 September 1982. [Google Scholar]
  7. Altieri, M.A. Biodiversity and Pest Management in Agro Ecosystems; Food Products, CRC Press: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  8. Poorter, M.; Pagad, S.; Ullah, M. Invasive Alien Species and Protected Areas: A Scoping Report, Part I; The Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP): Narobi, Kenya, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Benayas, J.M.; Fernández, A.; Aubenau, A. Clipping Herbaceous Vegetation Improves Early Performance of Planted Seedlings of the Mediterranean Shrub Quercus Coccifera. Web Ecol. 2007, 7, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Burton, G.; Hanna, W. Bermuda Grass. In Forages the Science of Grassland Agriculture; Heath, M., Barnes, R., Metcalfe, D., Eds.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  11. Juraimi, A.; Drennan, D.; Anuar, N. Competitive Effect of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. on Four Crop Species, Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], Maize (Zea mays), Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Faba Bean [Vicia faba (L.)]. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2005, 4, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cannell, M.G.R. Environmental Impacts of Forest Monocultures: Water Use, Acidification, Wildlife Conservation, and Carbon Storage. New For. 1999, 17, 239–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Browgram, R. Effects of Intensity of Defoliation on Regrowth of Pasture. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1956, 7, 377–387. [Google Scholar]
  14. Falster, D.S.; Westoby, M. Plant Height and Evolutionary Games. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, L.; Sofia, M.A.; Fei-hai, Y.; Ming Dong, N.; Anten, P.R.; Marinus, J.A. Effects of Trampling on Morphological and Mechanical Traits of Dryland Shrub Species Do Not Depend on Water Availability. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dekker, J. Soil Weed Seed Banks and Weed Management. J. Crop Prod. 2011, 2, 139–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buhler, D.D.; Hartzler, R.G.; Forcella, F. Weed Seed Bank Dynamics: Implications to Weed Management. J. Crop Prod. 1997, 1, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martina, J.P.; Von Ende, C.N. Correlation of Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris Arundinacea: Poaceae) Abundance in Northern Illinois (USA). Am. Midl. Nat. 2008, 160, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marais, A.; Hardy, M.; Booyse, M.; Botha, A. Effects of Monoculture, Crop Rotation, and Soil Moisture Content on Selected Soil Physicochemical and Microbial Parameters in Wheat Fields. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 2012, 593623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, F.; Li, L. Using Competitive and Facilitative Interactions in Intercropping Systems Enhances Crop Productivity and Nutrient-Use Efficiency Using Competitive and Facilitative Interactions in Intercropping Systems Enhances Crop Productivity and Nutrient-Use Efficiency. Plant Soil 2003, 248, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Z.; Xin, J.; Xing-Guo, B.; Xiao-Fei, L.; Jian-Hua, Z. Intercropping Enhances Productivity and Maintains the Most Soil Fertility Properties Relative to Sole Cropping. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhao, D.; Raja, R.; Vijaya, G.; Reddy, V.R. Nitrogen Deficiency Effects on Plant Growth, Leaf Photosynthesis, and Hyperspectral Reflectance Properties of Sorghum. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boussadia, O.; Steppe, K.; Zgallai, H.; Ben El Hadj, S.; Braham, M.; Lemeur, R.; Van Labeke, M.C. Effects of Nitrogen Deficiency on Leaf Photosynthesis, Carbohydrate Status and Biomass Production in Two Olive Cultivars ‘Meski’ and ‘Koroneiki’. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 123, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pavlovik, D.; Nikolic, B.; Durovic, S.; Waisi, H.; Andelikovic, A.; Marisavljevic, D. Chlorophyll as a Measure of Plant Health: Agro-Ecological Aspects. Pestic. Phytomed. (Belgrade) 2014, 29, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saifuddin, M.; Hossain, A.; Normaniza, O. Impacts of Shading on Flower Formation and Longevity, Leaf Chlorophyll and Growth of Bougainvillea Glabra. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2010, 9, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Neill, S. The Functional Role of Anthocyanins in Leaves. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mahmoodzadeh, H.; Mahmoodzadeh, M. Allelopathic Effects of Cynodon dactylon L. on Germination and Growth of Triticum aestivum. Ann. Biol. Res. 2013, 5, 118–123. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chalker-Scott, L. Environmental Significance of Anthocyanins in Plant Stress Responses. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Emerson, B.R. The Relation between Maximum Rate of Photo- Synthesis and Concentration of Chlorophyll. J. Gen. Phys. 1929, 12, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Climate-data.org. Available online: https://en.climate-data.org/africa/tanzania/arusha/tengeru-205827/ (accessed on 19 October 2019).
  31. Cohn, E.J.; Van Auken, O.W.; Bush, J.K. University of Notre Dame Competitive Interactions between Cynodon dactylon and Acacia smallii Seedlings at Different Nutrient Levels. Am. Midl. Nat. 1989, 121, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Soule, J. Medicinal and beverage uses of Tagetes (Tageteae: Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 1993, 80, 177. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hulina, N. Wild Marigold—Tagetes minuta L. New Weed on the Island of Hvar, and New Contribution to the Knowledge of Its Distribution in Dalmatia (Croatia). Agric. Conspec. Sci. (ACS) 2008, 73, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wells, M.; Balsinhas, A.; Joffe, H.; Engelbrecht, M.; Harding, G.; Stirton, H. A Catalogue of Problem Plants in Southern Africa: Incorporating the National Weed List of Southern Africa (Memoirs van die Botaniese Opname van Suid-Afrika); Botanical Research Institute: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  35. USAID-Tanzania. A Report on Tanzania Environmental Threats and Opportunities Assessment; US Department of Agriculture Forest Service—International Programs: Washington, WA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  36. Martinez-Ghersa, M.A.; Ghersa, C.M.; Benech-Arnold, R.L.; Donough, R.M.; Sanchez, R.A. Adaptive traits regulating dormancy and germination of invasive species. Plant Species Biol. 2000, 15, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meissner, E.; Ruth, N. Allelopathic influence of Tagetes-and Bidens-infested soils on seedling growth of certain crop species. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 1986, 3, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Winoto-Suatmadji, R. Studies on the Effect of Tagetes Species on Plant Parasitic Nematodes; H.W. Wageningen: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  39. Amorim, M.; Helena, R.; Rui, M.; Da Costa, G.; Carlos, L.; Margarida, M.; Bastos, S.M. Sesquiterpene Lactones: Adverse Health Effects and Toxicity Mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2013, 43, 559–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zdero, C.; Bohlmann, F.; Word, K. Germacranolides from Gutenbergia. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 2706–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Anderson, P.K.; Morales, F.J. Whitefly and Whitefly-Borne Viruses in the Tropics: Building a Knowledge Base for Global Action; CIAT, Agricultural Pests: Arusha, Tanzania, 2005; p. 351. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gharabadiyan, F.; Jamali, S.; Yazdi, A.; Hadizadeh, M.; Eskandari, A. Weed hosts of root-knot nematodes in tomato fields. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2012, 52, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. UNESCO. Information Presented to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee; World Heritage Center: Paris, France, 2001; Available online: http://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/2490 (accessed on 22 March 2016).
  44. Ngondya, I.B. Ecological Effects of Selected Invasive Plants and Their Nature Based Management Approaches. Ph.D. Thesis, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  45. Heshmati, G.A.; Pessarakli, M. Threshold Model in Studies of Ecological Recovery in Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) Under Nutrient Stress Conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2011, 34, 2183–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kelty, M.; Cameron, I. Plot Design for the Analysis of Species Interactions in Mixed Stands. Common Wealth For. Rev. 1995, 744, 322–332. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schneider, C.; Rasband, W.; Eliceiri, K. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. SERAS. Standard Operating Procedures No. 2034: Plant Biomass Determination. Available online: https://clu-in.org/download/ert/2034-R00.pdf (accessed on 19 October 2019).
  49. Arnon, D.I. Copper Enzymes in Isolated Chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Makoi, J.H.J.R.; Bambara, S.; Ndakidemi, P.A. Rhizosphere Phosphatase Enzyme Activities and Secondary Metabolites in Plants as Affected by the Supply of ‘Rhizobium’, Lime and Molybdenum in ‘Phaseolus vulgaris’ L. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2010, 4, 590–597. [Google Scholar]
Plants 08 00576 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of increasing densities of Cynodon dactylon plant individuals on Tagetes minuta vigor (C = C. dactylon and T = T. minuta, numbers represent proportions of sown C. dactylon and T. minuta, whereby C0T2 was the control).
Figure 1. Effects of increasing densities of Cynodon dactylon plant individuals on Tagetes minuta vigor (C = C. dactylon and T = T. minuta, numbers represent proportions of sown C. dactylon and T. minuta, whereby C0T2 was the control).
Plants 08 00576 g001
Plants 08 00576 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of increasing densities of C. dactylon on G. cordifolia vigor (C = C. dactylon and G = G. cordifolia, numbers represent proportions of sown C. dactylon and T. minuta, where C0G2 was a control).
Figure 2. Effects of increasing densities of C. dactylon on G. cordifolia vigor (C = C. dactylon and G = G. cordifolia, numbers represent proportions of sown C. dactylon and T. minuta, where C0G2 was a control).
Plants 08 00576 g002
Plants 08 00576 g003 550
Figure 3. C. dactylon varying density effects on the number of vegetative branches, plant height, leaf area, and number of leaves of T. minuta and G. cordifolia in a screen house (pot) experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10 individuals per pot, while the number of weeds per pot remained constant at two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Figure 3. C. dactylon varying density effects on the number of vegetative branches, plant height, leaf area, and number of leaves of T. minuta and G. cordifolia in a screen house (pot) experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10 individuals per pot, while the number of weeds per pot remained constant at two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Plants 08 00576 g003
Plants 08 00576 g004 550
Figure 4. C. dactylon varying density effects on the number of vegetative branches, plant height, leaf area, and number of leaves of T. minuta and G. cordifolia in the field plot experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per plot was two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Figure 4. C. dactylon varying density effects on the number of vegetative branches, plant height, leaf area, and number of leaves of T. minuta and G. cordifolia in the field plot experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per plot was two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Plants 08 00576 g004
Plants 08 00576 g005 550
Figure 5. C. dactylon varying density effects on mean (±SE) shoot diameter, shoot biomass, root biomass, and root length of T. minuta and G. cordifolia intercrops in a screen house (pot) experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per plot was two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Figure 5. C. dactylon varying density effects on mean (±SE) shoot diameter, shoot biomass, root biomass, and root length of T. minuta and G. cordifolia intercrops in a screen house (pot) experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per plot was two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Plants 08 00576 g005
Plants 08 00576 g006 550
Figure 6. C. dactylon varying density effects on mean shoot diameter, shoot biomass, root biomass, and root length of T. minuta and G. cordifolia intercrops in field plot experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per plot was two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Figure 6. C. dactylon varying density effects on mean shoot diameter, shoot biomass, root biomass, and root length of T. minuta and G. cordifolia intercrops in field plot experiment. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per plot was two. Bars with dissimilar letters indicate significant differences in the means by Fisher LSD at p = 0.05.
Plants 08 00576 g006
Plants 08 00576 g007 550
Figure 7. Mean (±SE) total leaf chlorophyll content of T. minuta and G. cordifolia planted with various C. dactylon densities (a) in the screen house and (b) field plot experiments. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per pot/plot was two.
Figure 7. Mean (±SE) total leaf chlorophyll content of T. minuta and G. cordifolia planted with various C. dactylon densities (a) in the screen house and (b) field plot experiments. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per pot/plot was two.
Plants 08 00576 g007
Plants 08 00576 g008 550
Figure 8. Mean (±SE) total leaf anthocyanins of T. minuta and G. cordifolia planted with various C. dactylon densities (a) in the screen house and (b) field plot experiments. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per pot/plot was two.
Figure 8. Mean (±SE) total leaf anthocyanins of T. minuta and G. cordifolia planted with various C. dactylon densities (a) in the screen house and (b) field plot experiments. C. dactylon densities ranged from 0 to 10, while the number of weeds per pot/plot was two.
Plants 08 00576 g008
Plants 08 00576 g009 550
Figure 9. Pots (a) and plots (b) used in both screen house and field experiments, respectively, at the NM-AIST.
Figure 9. Pots (a) and plots (b) used in both screen house and field experiments, respectively, at the NM-AIST.
Plants 08 00576 g009
Plants 08 00576 g010 550
Figure 10. Experimental pot/ plots layout. Different ratios represent proportions of sown weeds (2) to the suppressor C. dactylon (0, 4, 6, 8 and 10).
Figure 10. Experimental pot/ plots layout. Different ratios represent proportions of sown weeds (2) to the suppressor C. dactylon (0, 4, 6, 8 and 10).
Plants 08 00576 g010
Table
Table 1. Effects of increasing densities of C. dactylon on T. minuta and G. cordifolia growth parameters and leaf pigmentation in the screen house experiment.
Table 1. Effects of increasing densities of C. dactylon on T. minuta and G. cordifolia growth parameters and leaf pigmentation in the screen house experiment.
ParametersT. minutaG. cordifolia
MSFHPMSFHP
Veg. branches per/plant--10.00.03464.4-0.02
Plant height (cm)173232.2-<0.014521.9-0.18
Leaf area (mm2)--12.20.0112136.6-0.01
No. of leaves/plant16223.9-<0.01121.3-0.33
Shoot diameter (mm)1921.6-0.0188.2-<0.01
Shoot biomass (g)--11.70.02--11.10.02
Root biomass (g)--12.20.01--1.30.86
Root length (cm)1425.2-0.02441.9-0.17
No. of panicles/plant52668.7-3.1 × 10−720137.3-5.6 × 10−6
Chlorophyll (unit?)0.03116.6-<0.01--13.20.01
Anthocyanins (Abs g.DM−1)--11.70.020.012.5-0.11
*MS = Mean square, F = F-value, H = Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P = p-value.
Table
Table 2. Effects of increasing densities of C. dactylon on T. minuta and G. cordifolia growth parameters and leaf pigmentation in the field plot experiment.
Table 2. Effects of increasing densities of C. dactylon on T. minuta and G. cordifolia growth parameters and leaf pigmentation in the field plot experiment.
ParametersT. minutaG. cordifolia
MSFHPMSFHP
Veg. branches per/plant37965.1-<0.0118414.3-<0.01
Plant height (cm)141413.3-0.014801.7-0.22
Leaf area (mm2)43,487,85731.4-<0.01--12.30.02
No. of leaves/plant20617.4-<0.01677.9-0.01
Shoot diameter (mm)3538.7-<0.019.732.8-<0.01
Shoot biomass (g)--13.50.01--10.50.03
Root biomass (g)--13.20.01--7.00.13
Shoot biomass (g)--13.50.01--10.50.03
Root length (cm)25013.8-<0.0154.82.8-0.08
No. of panicles/plant43941.6-3.3 × 10−6--12.80.01
Chlorophyll (..)--13.00.01--13.50.01
Anthocyanins ( Abs g.DM−1)0.067628.7-<0.010.02412.5-0.01
*MS = Mean square, F = F-value, H = Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P = p-value.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ngondya, I.B.; Treydte, A.C.; Ndakidemi, P.A.; Munishi, L.K. Can Cynodon dactylon Suppress the Growth and Development of the Invasive Weeds Tagetes minuta and Gutenbergia cordifolia? Plants 2019, 8, 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120576

AMA Style

Ngondya IB, Treydte AC, Ndakidemi PA, Munishi LK. Can Cynodon dactylon Suppress the Growth and Development of the Invasive Weeds Tagetes minuta and Gutenbergia cordifolia? Plants. 2019; 8(12):576. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120576

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ngondya, Issakwisa B., Anna C. Treydte, Patrick A. Ndakidemi, and Linus K. Munishi. 2019. "Can Cynodon dactylon Suppress the Growth and Development of the Invasive Weeds Tagetes minuta and Gutenbergia cordifolia?" Plants 8, no. 12: 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120576

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop