Effect of Integrated Fertilizer Management on Seed Oil Content, Protein and Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Under Rainfed Conditions in Hungary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Effect of Fertilizer Treatment and Year on Oil and Protein Content
2.2. Effect of Fertilizer Treatment and Year on Fatty Acid Composition
2.2.1. Monounsaturated Fatty Acids
2.2.2. Saturated Fatty Acids
2.2.3. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
2.3. Effect of Fertilizer Treatment and Year on Oil Stability
2.4. Overall Impact of Fertilizer Treatments on Fatty Acid Composition Across Years
2.5. AMMI PCA of Treatment Effects on Fatty Acid Composition over Three Years
3. Discussion
3.1. Impact of Fertilizer Applications on the Nutritional Composition (Oil and Protein) of Sunflower Seeds
3.2. Effect of Fertilizer Treatment on the Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Oil
3.3. Integrated Interpretation of Oil-Related Responses to Fertilizer Treatment
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Meteorological Data of the Experimental Period
4.2. The Studied Crop
4.3. Details of Treatments
4.4. Details of the Collection of Experimental Data
4.5. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Adeleke, B.S.; Babalola, O.O. Oilseed crop sunflower (Helianthus annuus) as a source of food: Nutritional and health benefits. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 4666–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Masvodza, D.R.; Gasura, E.; Zifodya, N.; Sibanda, P.; Chisikaurayi, B. Genetic diversity analysis of local and foreign sunflower germplasm (Helianthus annuus) for the national breeding program: Zimbabwe. J. Cereals Oilseeds 2015, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Futó, Z. The effect of fertilization and plant protection in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production. Acta Agrar. Debr. 2019, 2, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vígh, T.; Kerekes, G.; Hoffmann, R.; Kazinczi, G. Herbicid toleráns napraforgó hibridek kaszattermésének alakulása különböző herbicidkezelések hatására. Agrártud. Közlemények 2010, 39, 121–125. [Google Scholar]
- OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2026–2035; OECD Publishing: Paris, France; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Forleo, M.B.; Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Coaloa, D.; Pari, L. The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3138–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Harsányi, E.; Bashir, B.; Alsilibe, F.; Alsafadi, K.; Alsalman, A.; Széles, A.; Rahman, M.H.U.; Bácskai, I.; Juhász, C.; Ratonyi, T.; et al. Impact of agricultural drought on sunflower production across Hungary. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- FAO. FAOSTAT: Crops and Livestock Products; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2022; Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 31 July 2026).
- Potori, N.; Stark, A. Do crude oil prices influence new crop sunflower seed futures price discovery in Hungary? Stud. Agric. Econ. 2015, 117, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Arshad, M.; Jan, S.; Awan, S.; Azam, S.; Khalid, S.; Khan, M.A. Investigation of genetic divergence in newly developed local sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 32, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hussain, M.; Farooq, S.; Hasan, W.; Ul-Allah, S.; Tanveer, M.; Farooq, M.; Nawaz, A. Drought stress in sunflower: Physiological effects and its management through breeding and agronomic alternatives. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 201, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hussain, R.A.; Ahmad, R.; Nawaz, F.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Waraich, E.A. Foliar NK application mitigates drought effects in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hamza, M.A.M.; Abd-Elhady, E.S.E. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilization on vegetative growth and volatile oil of marjoram (Majorana hortensis L.) plant. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Eng. Mansoura Univ. 2010, 1, 839–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dambale, A.S.; Ghotmukale, A.K.; Khandekar, S.D.; Suryawanshi, S.B.; Suryavanshi, V.P.; Shinde, R.S. Influence of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, quality and economics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 6, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar]
- Janmohammadi, M.; Amanzadeh, T.; Sabaghnia, N.; Ion, V. Effect of nano-silicon foliar application on safflower growth under organic and inorganic fertilizer regimes. Bot. Lith. 2016, 22, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Buriro, M.; Rais, N.; Solangi, A.W.; Soomro, A.; Gandahi, A.W.; Kashani, S. Impact of organic and inorganic manures on sunflower yield and yield components. Sci. Int. 2015, 27, 3267–3270. [Google Scholar]
- Khodaei-Joghan, A.; Gholamhoseini, M.; Agha-Alikhani, M.; Habibzadeh, F.; Sorooshzadeh, A.; Ghalavand, A. Response of sunflower to organic and chemical fertilizers in different drought stress conditions. Acta Agric. Slov. 2018, 111, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kumar, S.; Ekta, N.; Shailaja, P.; Sandeep, K.; Pankaj, B.; Bengia, M. Effect of organic manures and bio-fertilizers on growth, yield, quality and economics of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck) cv. Green Head under high-hill conditions of Uttarakhand. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Res. 2017, 7, 96–100. [Google Scholar]
- Elankavi, S. Effect of integrated nutrient management practices on soil fertility and yield of sunflower in Cauvery deltaic region of Tamil Nadu. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 1149–1151. [Google Scholar]
- Ramesh, S. Productivity and economics of sunflower in response to different vermicompost from various organic sources under Cauvery delta region of Tamil Nadu. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. 2018, 5, 380–384. [Google Scholar]
- Sefaoğlu, F. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers or their combinations on yield and quality components of oil seed sunflower in a semi-arid environment. Turk. J. Field Crops 2021, 26, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sanasam, D.; Geetha, K.N. Site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) in groundnut–sunflower cropping system. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2016, 8, 40838–40842. [Google Scholar]
- Mukherjee, A.K.; Tripathi, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Mallick, R.B.; Banerjee, A. Effect of integrated nutrient management in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) on alluvial soil. Curr. Sci. 2019, 117, 1364–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Raj, A.; Mallick, R.B. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, productivity, quality and nutrient uptake of irrigated yellow sarson (Brassica campestris L. var. yellow sarson) in older alluvial soil of West Bengal. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2017, 9, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Choudhary, A.; Singh, V.; Kumar, N. Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to different levels of sulphur and sulphur oxidizing biofertilizer (Thiobacillus thiooxidans). Res. Environ. Life Sci. 2017, 10, 84–86. [Google Scholar]
- Younas, T.; Umer, A.; Gondal, A.H.; Aziz, H.; Shehzad, K.M. A comprehensive review on impact of microorganisms on soil and plant. J. Bioresour. Manag. 2022, 9, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Sayed, S.E.; Hellal, F.; Basha, D.M.A.; Mahmoud, S.A. Influence of poultry manure and potassium on growth and yield of sunflower grown under water stress conditions. J. Glob. Ecol. Environ. 2022, 15, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Waghmare, P.S.; Suryavanshi, V.P.; Gawande, R.S.; Sawant, D.S.; Kokate, A.P. Effect of zinc sulphate and ferrous sulphate on growth and yield of sunflower. Pharma Innov. J. 2022, 11, 1334–1336. [Google Scholar]
- Popoola, O.P.; Adesanya, K.K.; Olawale, O.A.; Ayanrinde, A.W. Factorial analysis on the effect of NPK fertilizer, micronutrients and N-placement on the growth and yield of sunflower. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. 2016, 4, 2347–6532. [Google Scholar]
- Akbari, P.; Ghalavand, A.; Modarres Sanavy, A.M.; Agha Alikhani, M. The effect of biofertilizers, nitrogen fertilizer and farmyard manure on grain yield and seed quality of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). J. Agric. Technol. 2011, 7, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
- Babar, B.H.; Ijaz, B.; Nawaz, M.; Gill, A.N.; Jian, W.; Haq, M.Z.U.; Aslam, M.T.; Hassan, M.U.; Gurlee, S.; Alharbi, S.A.; et al. Effects of potassium and boron fertilization on sunflower yield, oil content, and quality. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2024, 84, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, S.; Duan, Y.; Guo, T.; Zhang, P.; He, P.; Kaushik, M. Sunflower response to potassium fertilization and nutrient requirement estimation. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 2802–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zamani, S.; Naderi, M.R.; Soleymani, A.; Nasiri, B.M. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) biochemical properties and seed components affected by potassium fertilization under drought conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mirzakhani, M.; Ardakani, M.R.; Rejali, F.; Rad, A.H.S.; Miransari, M. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) oil content and yield components as affected by co-inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum and Glomus intraradices at various N and P levels in a dry climate. In Use of Microbes for the Alleviation of Soil Stresses; Miransari, M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 153–164. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafavi, S.R.; Pirdashti, H.; Ramzanpour, M.R.; Andarkhor, A.A.; Shahsavari, A. Effect of mycorrhizae, Thiobacillus and sulfur nutrition on the chemical composition of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seed. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 11, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Javaid, A.; Bajwa, R. Field evaluation of effective microorganisms (EM) application for growth, nodulation, and nutrition of mung bean. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2011, 35, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kleiber, T.; Siwulski, M. The studies on applying of effective microorganisms (EM) and CRF on nutrient contents in leaves and yielding of tomato. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2014, 13, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
- Khaeim, H. The Impact of Drought and Temperature Stress on Wheat and Maize. Ph.D. Thesis, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Amanullah; Khan, M.W. Interactive effect of potassium and phosphorus on grain quality and profitability of sunflower in northwest Pakistan. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Esmaeilian, Y.; Sirousmehr, A.R.; Asghripour, M.R.; Amiri, E. Comparison of sole and combined nutrient application on yield and biochemical composition of sunflower under water stress. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 214–220. [Google Scholar]
- Cakmak, I. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Blumenthal, J.M.; Baltensperger, D.D.; Cassman, K.G.; Mason, S.C.; Pavlista, A.D. Importance and effect of nitrogen on crop quality and health. In Nitrogen in the Environment: Sources, Problems and Management, 2nd ed.; Hatfield, J.L., Follett, R.F., Eds.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 51–70. [Google Scholar]
- Ray, J.D.; Fritschi, F.B.; Heatherly, L.G. Large applications of fertilizer N at planting affects seed protein and oil concentration and yield in the Early Soybean Production System. Field Crops Res. 2006, 99, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Flagella, Z.; Rotunno, T.; Tarantino, E.; Di Caterina, R.; De Caro, A. Changes in seed yield and oil fatty acid composition of high oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids in relation to the sowing date and the water regime. Eur. J. Agron. 2002, 17, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghaffari, M.; Shariati, F. Genetic analysis of sunflower fatty acids under optimum and water stressed conditions. Helia 2023, 46, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Flagella, Z.; Rotunno, T.; Di Caterina, R.; Di Simone, G.; De Caro, A. Effect of supplementary irrigation on seed yield and oil quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) grown in a sub-arid environment. In Proceedings of the XV International Sunflower Conference, Toulouse, France, 12–15 June 2000; pp. 139–144. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, Q.; Ashraf, M.; Anwar, F. Physico-chemical attributes of seed oil from drought stressed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. Grasas Aceites 2009, 60, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alzamel, N.M.; Taha, E.M.M.; Bakr, A.A.A.; Loutfy, N. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil properties, growth yield, and physiochemical properties of sunflower seeds and oils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, X.; Gao, Y.; Ma, X.; Wu, B.; Yan, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, P.; Wen, M.; Wang, H.; et al. Effect of different types of organic manure on oil and fatty acid accumulation and desaturase gene expression of oilseed flax in the dry areas of the Loess Plateau of China. Agronomy 2024, 14, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Salama, Z.; Taie, H.; El-Baz, F.K. Increasing omega 6, omega 9 fatty acids and oil contents in black sesame seed by biofertilizer and micronutrients application. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2015, 31, 256–261. [Google Scholar]
- Shoghi-Kalkhoran, S.; Ghalavand, A.; Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M.; Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A.; Akbari, P. Integrated fertilization systems enhance quality and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2013, 15, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar]
- Tekaya, M.; Mechri, B.; Bchir, A.; Attia, F.; Cheheb, H.; Daassa, M.; Hammami, M. Enhancement of antioxidants in olive oil by foliar fertilization of olive trees. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2013, 90, 1377–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hussain, M.H.; Hassoon, A.S. Direct measurement of fatty acid composition of sunflower and variation of the fatty acids distribution with different treatments of fertilizer using HPLC technique. Res. Crops 2018, 19, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmad, R.; Jabeen, N. Demonstration of growth improvement in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by the use of organic fertilizers under saline conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 1373–1384. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.P.; Shi, H.B.; Zhu, K.; Zheng, Q.; Xu, Z. The quality of sunflower seed oil changes in response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 2499–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zheljazkov, V.D.; Vick, B.A.; Baldwin, B.S.; Buehring, N.; Astatkie, T.; Johnson, B. Oil content and saturated fatty acids in sunflower as a function of planting date, nitrogen rate, and hybrid. Agron. J. 2009, 101, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- MSZ EN ISO 665:2020; Oilseeds—Determination of Moisture and Volatile Matter Content. Hungarian Standards Institution: Budapest, Hungary, 2020.
- MSZ ISO 6496:2001; Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Moisture and Other Volatile Matter Content. Hungarian Standards Institution: Budapest, Hungary, 2001.
- MSZ EN ISO 5983-2:2009; Animal Feeding Stuffs—Determination of Nitrogen Content and calculation of crude protein content—Part 2: Block Digestion and Steam Distillation Method. Hungarian Standards Institution: Budapest, Hungary, 2009.
- MSZ ISO 7009:1983; Determination of the Oil Content of Oil Seeds. Hungarian Standards Institution: Budapest, Hungary, 1983.
- MSZ EN ISO 12966-2:2011; Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils—Gas Chromatography of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters—Part 2: Preparation of Methyl Esters of Fatty Acids. Hungarian Standards Institution: Budapest, Hungary, 2011.
- RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; Posit Software, PBC: Boston, MA, USA, 2024; Available online: https://posit.co/ (accessed on 31 July 2026).
- de Mendiburu, F. agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, R package version 1.3-7. 2023. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae (accessed on 18 August 2026).




| C20:1 | C18:1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Year | Eicosenoic Acid | Oleic Acid |
| CONTROL | 2022 | 0.26 ± 0.00 A*bc | 70.92 ± 0.122 B*bc |
| CONTROL | 2023 | 0.14 ± 0.01 A*a | 28.5 ± 3.649 C*a |
| CONTROL | 2024 | 0.273 ± 0.012 A*a | 84.25 ± 2.659 A*a |
| EM-1 | 2022 | 0.207 ± 0.003 B*d | 57.84 ± 2.667 B*cd |
| EM-1 | 2023 | 0.14 ± 0.00 C*a | 28.493 ± 4.294 C*a |
| EM-1 | 2024 | 0.273 ± 0.006 A*a | 87.187 ± 1.315 A*a |
| GOIM | 2022 | 0.26 ± 0.00 bc | 73.05 ± 0.182 B*a |
| GOIM | 2023 | 0.15 ± 0.00 a | 30.397 ± 1.438 C*a |
| GOIM | 2024 | 0.26 ± 0.00 a | 85.2 ± 1.389 A*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2022 | 0.267 ± 0.006 A*b | 79.653 ± 1.758 B*ab |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2023 | 0.14 ± 0.00 B*a | 29.02 ± 3.222 C*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2024 | 0.27 ± 0.01 A*a | 86.243 ± 1.563 A*a |
| K | 2022 | 0.28 ± 0.00 A*a | 76.25 ± 0.885 B*a |
| K | 2023 | 0.14 ± 0.00 B*a | 28.21 ± 3.575 C*a |
| K | 2024 | 0.273 ± 0.012 A*a | 85.987 ± 1.392 A*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2022 | 0.255 ± 0.005 A*c | 73.95 ± 1.09 A*ab |
| K+EM-1 | 2023 | 0.14 ± 0.00 A*a | 28.36 ± 4.233 B*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2024 | 0.247 ± 0.032 A*a | 81.327 ± 9.749 A*a |
| K+GOIM | 2022 | 0.208 ± 0.003 B*d | 57.89 ± 1.137 B*d |
| K+GOIM | 2023 | 0.143 ± 0.006 C*a | 29.4 ± 1.532 C*a |
| K+GOIM | 2024 | 0.277 ± 0.006 A*a | 86.76 ± 1.075 A*a |
| p values | T | 0.16 | <0.001 |
| p values | Y | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| p values | T × Y | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| C14:0 | C16:0 | C17:0 | C18:0 | C20:0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Year | Myristic Acid | Palmitic Acid | Margaric Acid | Stearic Acid | Arachidic Acid |
| CONTROL | 2022 | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a | 4.703 ± 0.257 A*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 A*a | 2.81 ± 0.165 B*ab | 0.315 ± 0.005 AB*b |
| CONTROL | 2023 | 0.043 ± 0.006 A*a | 5.463 ± 0.492 A*a | 0.04 ± 0.01 A*a | 3.82 ± 0.562 A*a | 0.287 ± 0.032 B*a |
| CONTROL | 2024 | 0.0267 ± 0.006 B*a | 3.87 ± 0.147 B*a | 0.027 ± 0.006 A*a | 2.82 ± 0.175 B*a | 0.347 ± 0.015 A*a |
| EM-1 | 2022 | 0.033 ± 0.003 AB*a | 4.588 ± 0.296 A*a | 0.032 ± 0.006 A*a | 3.227 ± 0.236 AB*ab | 0.31 ± 0.022 AB*b |
| EM-1 | 2023 | 0.043 ± 0.006 A*a | 5.477 ± 0.573 AB*a | 0.037 ± 0.006 A*a | 3.70 ± 0.477 A*a | 0.273 ± 0.029 B*a |
| EM-1 | 2024 | 0.023 ± 0.006 B*a | 3.7 ± 0.07 B*a | 0.027 ± 0.006 A*a | 2.753 ± 0.031 B*a | 0.347 ± 0.015 A*a |
| GOIM | 2022 | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a | 4.25 ± 0.036 B*a | 0.04 ± 0.00 A*a | 2.94 ± 0.026 B*a | 0.337 ± 0.006 AB*ab |
| GOIM | 2023 | 0.04 ± 0.00 A*a | 5.28 ± 0.147 A*a | 0.043 ± 0.006 A*a | 4.03 ± 0.171 A*a | 0.31 ± 0.017 B*a |
| GOIM | 2024 | 0.023 ± 0.006 B*a | 3.82 ± 0.036 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a | 3.013 ± 0.188 B*a | 0.377 ± 0.031 A*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2022 | 0.03 ± 0.00 A*a | 3.983 ± 0.119 B*a | 0.04 ± 0.00 A*a | 3.0733 ± 0.085 AB*ac | 0.367 ± 0.025 A*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2023 | 0.04 ± 0.01 A*a | 5.417 ± 0.477 A*a | 0.037 ± 0.006 AB*a | 3.775 ± 0.605 A*a | 0.283 ± 0.032 B*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2024 | 0.023 ± 0.006 A*a | 3.753 ± 0.064 B*a | 0.027 ± 0.006 B*a | 2.723 ± 0.178 B*a | 0.337 ± 0.023 AB*a |
| K | 2022 | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a | 4.19 ± 0.046 B*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 A*a | 2.71 ± 0.05 B*b | 0.33 ± 0.01 A*ab |
| K | 2023 | 0.043 ± 0.006 A*a | 5.453 ± 0.493 A*a | 0.04 ± 0.01 A*a | 4.10 ± 0.435 A*a | 0.313 ± 0.023 A*a |
| K | 2024 | 0.027 ± 0.006 B*a | 3.87 ± 0.147 B*a | 0.023 ± 0.006 A*a | 2.63 ± 0.193 B*a | 0.33 ± 0.017 A*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2022 | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a | 4.53 ± 0.346 AB*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a | 2.817 ± 0.025 B*ac | 0.32 ± 0.01 A*b |
| K+EM-1 | 2023 | 0.043 ± 0.006 A*a | 5.727 ± 0.585 A*a | 0.04 ± 0.00 A*a | 3.757 ± 0.295 A*a | 0.303 ± 0.015 A*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2024 | 0.023 ± 0.006 B*a | 4.003 ± 0.481 B*a | 0.027 ± 0.006 B*a | 2.843 ± 0.289 B*a | 0.33 ± 0.02 A*a |
| K+GOIM | 2022 | 0.03 ± 0.005 B*a | 4.555 ± 0.203 B*a | 0.037 ± 0.008 AB*a | 3.287 ± 0.308 B*a | 0.318 ± 0.019 B*b |
| K+GOIM | 2023 | 0.04 ± 0.00 A*a | 5.337 ± 0.242 A*a | 0.047 ± 0.006 A*a | 4.033 ± 0.155 A*a | 0.303 ± 0.006 B*a |
| K+GOIM | 2024 | 0.02 ± 0.00 C*a | 3.693 ± 0.076 C*a | 0.027 ± 0.006 B*a | 2.797 ± 0.042 B*a | 0.353 ± 0.006 A*a |
| p values | T | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.05 |
| p values | Y | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| p values | T × Y | 0.98 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.009 | 0.04 |
| C18:2 | C18:3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Year | Linoleic Acid | α-Linolenic Acid |
| CONTROL | 2022 | 19.32 ± 0.306 B*bc | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*b |
| CONTROL | 2023 | 60.327 ± 3.827 A*a | 0.055 ± 0.005 A*a |
| CONTROL | 2024 | 6.333 ± 2.389 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a |
| EM-1 | 2022 | 32.075 ± 2.735 B*ab | 0.043 ± 0.006 A*a |
| EM-1 | 2023 | 60.523 ± 4.308 A*a | 0.05 ± 0.00 A*a |
| EM-1 | 2024 | 3.627 ± 1.342 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a |
| GOIM | 2022 | 17.29 ± 0.262 B*d | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*b |
| GOIM | 2023 | 58.317 ± 1.25 A*a | 0.055 ± 0.005 A*a |
| GOIM | 2024 | 5.167 ± 1.677 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2022 | 10.683 ± 1.38 B*e | 0.04 ± 0.00 B*ab |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2023 | 59.93 ± 3.402 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2024 | 4.67 ± 1.333 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a |
| K | 2022 | 14.29 ± 1.042 B*de | 0.037 ± 0.006 B*ab |
| K | 2023 | 60.27 ± 3.543 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.00 A*a |
| K | 2024 | 4.84 ± 1.569 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2022 | 16.347 ± 0.897 B*cd | 0.04 ± 0.00 B*ab |
| K+EM-1 | 2023 | 60.1967 ± 3.966 A*a | 0.055 ± 0.005 A*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2024 | 9.343 ± 9.179 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 C*a |
| K+GOIM | 2022 | 31.978 ± 1.28 B*a | 0.045 ± 0.005 B*a |
| K+GOIM | 2023 | 59.297 ± 1.415 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.00 A*a |
| K+GOIM | 2024 | 4.027 ± 0.974 C*a | 0.03 ± 0.00 C*a |
| p values | T | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| p values | Y | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| p values | T × Y | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | Year | SFA | MUFA | PUFA | PUFA ω-6 | PUFA ω-3 | MUFA/PUFA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL | 2022 | 9.14 ± 0.13 B*bc | 71.18 ± 0.19 B*c | 19.68 ± 0.31 B*bc | 19.65 ± 0.33 B*b | 0.03 ± 0.00 B*cd | 3.62 ± 0.07 A*b |
| CONTROL | 2023 | 10.92 ± 0.28 A*a | 28.69 ± 3.65 C*a | 60.39 ± 3.83 A*a | 60.33 ± 3.83 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a | 0.48 ± 0.09 B*a |
| CONTROL | 2024 | 8.93 ± 0.28 B*a | 84.67 ± 2.67 A*a | 6.40 ± 2.40 C*a | 6.33 ± 2.39 C*a | 0.06 ± 0.02 AB*a | 14.42 ± 4.79 AB*a |
| EM-1 | 2022 | 9.72 ± 0.06 B*ab | 58.14 ± 2.65 B*d | 32.14 ± 2.73 B*a | 32.08 ± 2.74 B*a | 0.05 ± 0.01 A*a | 1.82 ± 0.23 A*c |
| EM-1 | 2023 | 10.74 ± 0.09 A*a | 28.68 ± 4.287 C*a | 60.58 ± 4.319 A*a | 60.523 ± 4.308 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a | 0.48 ± 0.102 B*a |
| EM-1 | 2024 | 8.7 ± 0.106 C*a | 87.60 ± 1.31 A*a | 3.71 ± 1.34 C*a | 3.63 ± 1.34 C*a | 0.073 ± 0.058 A*a | 25.95 ± 9.85 AB*a |
| GOIM | 2022 | 9.25 ± 0.10 B*abc | 73.42 ± 0.18 B*bc | 17.33 ± 0.27 B*bc | 17.29 ± 0.26 B*bc | 0.03 ± 0.00 C*c | 4.24 ± 0.07 A*a |
| GOIM | 2023 | 11.03 ± 0.31 A*a | 30.59 ± 1.45 C*a | 58.37 ± 1.26 A*a | 58.32 ± 1.25 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a | 0.53 ± 0.04 B*a |
| GOIM | 2024 | 9.19 ± 0.32 B*a | 85.60 ± 1.38 A*a | 5.21 ± 1.68 C*a | 5.17 ± 1.68 C*a | 0.04 ± 0.01 B*a | 18.04 ± 7.47 AB*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2022 | 9.24 ± 0.377 B*abc | 80.04 ± 1.75 B*a | 10.72 ± 1.38 B*d | 10.68 ± 1.38 B*d | 0.04 ± 0.00 B*b | 7.56 ± 1.08 A*ab |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2023 | 10.8 ± 0.20 A*a | 29.21 ± 3.21 C*a | 59.99 ± 3.41 A*a | 59.93 ± 3.40 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a | 0.49 ± 0.08 B*a |
| GOIM+EM-1 | 2024 | 8.64 ± 0.32 B*a | 86.65 ± 1.58 A*a | 4.71 ± 1.33 C*a | 4.67 ± 1.33 C*a | 0.04 ± 0.00 B*a | 19.36 ± 5.13 A*a |
| K | 2022 | 9.02 ± 0.16 B*c | 76.65 ± 0.89 B*ab | 14.33 ± 1.05 B*cd | 14.29 ± 1.04 B*cd | 0.04 ± 0.01 B*bc | 5.37 ± 0.47 A*ab |
| K | 2023 | 11.27 ± 0.21 A*a | 28.40 ± 3.56 C*a | 60.33 ± 3.55 A*a | 60.27 ± 3.54 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a | 0.47 ± 0.09 B*a |
| K | 2024 | 8.65 ± 0.19 B*a | 86.41 ± 1.38 A*a | 4.94 ± 1.53 C*a | 4.84 ± 1.57 C*a | 0.097 ± 0.090 AB*a | 18.58 ± 5.18 A*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2022 | 9.27 ± 0.30 B*abc | 74.35 ± 1.10 B*bc | 16.39 ± 0.90 B*bc | 16.35 ± 0.90 B*bc | 0.04 ± 0.00 B*b | 4.55 ± 0.33 A*ab |
| K+EM-1 | 2023 | 11.18 ± 0.27 A*a | 28.56 ± 4.23 C*a | 60.26 ± 3.97 A*a | 60.20 ± 3.97 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.01 A*a | 0.48 ± 0.1 B*a |
| K+EM-1 | 2024 | 8.91 ± 0.65 B*a | 81.71 ± 9.79 A*a | 9.38 ± 9.18 C*a | 9.34 ± 9.18 C*a | 0.04 ± 0.00 B*a | 18.53 ± 17.57 AB*a |
| K+GOIM | 2022 | 9.78 ± 0.15 B*a | 58.19 ± 1.14 B*d | 32.03 ± 1.29 B*a | 31.98 ± 1.28 B*a | 0.05 ± 0.01 B*a | 1.82 ± 0.11 B*c |
| K+GOIM | 2023 | 11.05 ± 0.14 A*a | 29.59 ± 1.53 C*a | 59.36 ± 1.42 A*a | 59.30 ± 1.42 A*a | 0.06 ± 0.00 A*a | 0.50 ± 0.04 C*a |
| K+GOIM | 2024 | 8.76 ± 0.11 C*a | 87.17 ± 1.06 A*a | 4.07 ± 0.97 C*a | 4.03 ± 0.97 C*a | 0.04 ± 0.00 C*a | 22.25 ± 5.13 A*a |
| p values | T | 0.18 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| p values | Y | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| p values | T × Y | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.03 | 0.008 |
| Year | Month | Average Temperature °C | Average Humidity (%) | Rainfall (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | May | 17.6 | 61.86 | 29.5 |
| 2022 | June | 22.5 | 58.12 | 41.1 |
| 2022 | July | 23.7 | 48.58 | 25.0 |
| 2022 | August | 23.8 | 61.14 | 29.5 |
| 2022 | September | 15.1 | 76.81 | 84.6 |
| 2023 | May | 15.92 | 73.21 | 78.3 |
| 2023 | June | 19.77 | 69.81 | 48.6 |
| 2023 | July | 22.82 | 66.44 | 29.0 |
| 2023 | August | 22.26 | 71.26 | 113.7 |
| 2023 | September | 19.92 | 69.41 | 6.3 |
| 2024 | May | 17.41 | 67.56 | 37.7 |
| 2024 | June | 21.47 | 71.83 | 65.1 |
| 2024 | July | 24.72 | 61.84 | 23.1 |
| 2024 | August | 24.59 | 62.46 | 33.3 |
| 2024 | September | 17.83 | 68.42 | 82.8 |
| Replication I | Replication II | Replication III |
|---|---|---|
| CONTROL | K+EM-1 | GOIM |
| POTASSIUM K | GOIM | GOIM+EM-1 |
| GOIM | EM-1 | K+GOIM |
| EM-1 | POTASSIUM K | CONTROL |
| K+GOIM | CONTROL | K+EM-1 |
| K+EM-1 | GOIM+EM-1 | EM-1 |
| GOIM+EM-1 | K+GOIM | POTASSIUM K |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Sghaier, A.H.; Tarnawa, Á.; Khaeim, H.; Varga, A.; Huynh, K.A.; Khalid, N.B.; Kunos, V.; Kende, Z. Effect of Integrated Fertilizer Management on Seed Oil Content, Protein and Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Under Rainfed Conditions in Hungary. Plants 2026, 15, 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172602
Sghaier AH, Tarnawa Á, Khaeim H, Varga A, Huynh KA, Khalid NB, Kunos V, Kende Z. Effect of Integrated Fertilizer Management on Seed Oil Content, Protein and Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Under Rainfed Conditions in Hungary. Plants. 2026; 15(17):2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172602
Chicago/Turabian StyleSghaier, Asma Haj, Ákos Tarnawa, Hussein Khaeim, András Varga, Kiet Anh Huynh, Noriza Binti Khalid, Viola Kunos, and Zoltán Kende. 2026. "Effect of Integrated Fertilizer Management on Seed Oil Content, Protein and Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Under Rainfed Conditions in Hungary" Plants 15, no. 17: 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172602
APA StyleSghaier, A. H., Tarnawa, Á., Khaeim, H., Varga, A., Huynh, K. A., Khalid, N. B., Kunos, V., & Kende, Z. (2026). Effect of Integrated Fertilizer Management on Seed Oil Content, Protein and Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Under Rainfed Conditions in Hungary. Plants, 15(17), 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15172602

