Physiological and Biochemical Indicators of Urban Environmental Stress in Tilia, Celtis, and Platanus: A Functional Trait-Based Approach
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Structural and Water-Related Physiological Responses of Tree Species to Urban Stress
2.2. Photosynthetic and Fluorescence Responses of Tree Species to Urban Stress
2.3. Oxidative Stress Markers and Antioxidative Enzyme Activities of Tree Species to Urban Stress
2.4. Tree Health Risk Index of Tree Species to Urban Stress
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Sites and Plant Material
4.2. Photosynthesis-Related Parameters
4.3. Biochemical Stress Markers and Enzymatic Antioxidant Response
4.4. Tree Health Risk Index (THRI) Calculation
4.5. Data Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Core Writing Team, Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; p. 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyas, M.; Liu, Y.Y.; Shah, S.; Ali, A.; Khan, A.H.; Zaman, F.; Yucui, Z.; Saud, S.; Adnan, M.; Ahmed, N.; et al. Adaptation of functional traits and their plasticity of three ornamental trees growing in urban environment. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 286, 110248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Cescatti, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Song, L.; Li, J. Global enhanced vegetation photosynthesis in urban environment and its drivers revealed by satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 340, 109622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Barros Ruas, R.; Santana Costa, L.M.; Bered, F. Urbanization driving changes in plant species and communities—A global view. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2022, 38, e02243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cariñanos, P.; Ruiz-Peñuela, S.; Valle, A.M.; De la Guardia, C.D. Assessing pollination disservices of urban street-trees: The case of London-plane tree (Platanus × hispanica Mill. ex Münchh). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, H. An integrated approach considering physiologicaland biophysical-based indicators for assessing tolerance of roadside plantations of Alstonia scholaris towards urban roadside air pollution: An assessment of adaptation of plantations for mitigating roadside air pollution. Trees 2023, 37, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Kardos, L.; Chen, H.; Szabó, V. Investigating physiological responses and fine particulate matter retention of urban trees in Budapest. City Environ. Interact. 2024, 24, 100182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kisvarga, S.; Horotán, K.; Wani, M.A.; Orlóci, L. Plant responses to global climate change and urbanization: Implications for sustainable urban landscapes. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.; Leung, D.W.M. The morpho-physio-biochemical attributes of urban trees for resilience in regional ecosystems in cities: A mini-review. Urban Sci. 2022, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrianjara, I.; Cabassa, C.; Lata, J.C.; Hansart, A.; Raynaud, X.; Renard, M.; Nold, F.; Genet, P.; Planchais, S. Characterization of stress indicators in Tilia cordata Mill. as early and long-term stress markers for water availability and trace element contamination in urban environments. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 158, 111296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunetti, C.; Tattini, M.; Guidi, L.; Velikova, V.; Ferrini, F.; Fini, A. An integrated overview of physiological and biochemical responses of Celtis australis to drought stress. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 46, 126480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popek, R.; Przybysz, A.; Gawrońska, H.; Klamkowski, K.; Gawroński, S.W. Impact of particulate matter accumulation on the photosynthetic apparatus of roadside woody plants growing in the urban conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antenozio, M.L.; Caissutti, C.; Caporusso, F.M.; Marzi, D.; Brunetti, P. Urban air pollution and plant tolerance: Omics responses to ozone, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. Plants 2024, 13, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Guo, W.; Miao, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, S.; Li, L.; Ni, Y.; Tang, S.; Yang, L. Urban vegetation productivity under climate change and increasing urbanization: Insights from both urban-rural comparison and trend analysis for global cities. Urban For. Urban Green. 2025, 112, 128950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sato, H.; Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Complex plant responses to drought and heat stress under climate change. Plant J. 2024, 117, 1873–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borišev, M.; Župunski, M.; Arsenov, D.; Nikolić, N.; Tračak, S.; Pajević, S. Understanding beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) photosynthetic responses to microhabitat water deficit: A site-specific investigation. Eur. J. Forest Res. 2024, 143, 1611–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, D.; Schönbeck, L.; Shah, S.; Santiago, S.L. Leaf drought and heat tolerance are integrated across three temperate biome types. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.; Yadav, M.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, M. Assessing adaptation and mitigation potential of roadside trees under the influence of vehicular emissions: A case study of Grevillea robusta and Mangifera indica planted in an urban city of India. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swoczyna, T.; Kalaji, H.M.; Bussotti, F.; Mojski, J.; Pollastrini, M. Environmental stress—What can we learn from chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis in woody plants? A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1048582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehmood, Z.; Yang, H.-H.; Awan, M.U.F.; Ahmed, U.; Hasnain, A.; Luqman, M.; Muhammad, S.; Sardar, A.A.; Chan, T.-Y.; Sharjeel, A. Effects of air pollution on morphological, biochemical, DNA, and tolerance ability of roadside plant species. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkansah, F.K. Air pollution and plant responses: A study on morphological and anatomical changes in roadside trees along traffic-dense roads. BMC Environ. Sci. 2025, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Y.; Xu, X.; Huang, W.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Zhao, N.; Li, B.; Xu, C.; Lu, S. RGB imaging and irrigation management reveal water stress thresholds in three urban shrubs in northern China. Plants 2025, 14, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chauhan, A.; Pandey, G.; Singh, M.V.; Sethi, M.; Gururani, P.; Awasthi, A.; Chaube, S.; Lodh, A. Assessment of elevated road traffic pollution on roadside trees and vegetation in urban environments. Front. Environ. Sci. 2025, 13, 1657859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kościesza, M.; Korbik, M.; Jędrzejuk, A.; Swoczyna, T.; Latocha, P. Differences in tolerance of Alnus cordata (Loisel) Duby and Tilia × europaea L. ‘Pallida’ to environmental stress in the first year after planting in urban conditions. Forests 2025, 16, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, N.S.G.; Hahs, A.K.; Vesk, P.A. Urbanisation, plant traits and the composition of urban floras. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2015, 17, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, H.N.; Woo, S.Y.; Park, C.R. Physiological and biochemical responses of roadside trees grown under different urban environmental conditions in Seoul. Photosynthetica 2016, 54, 478–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Karim, R.; Arfin-Khan, M.A.S.; Saimun, S.R.; Sultana, F.; Mukul, S.A. How do leaf functional traits influence above-ground tree carbon in tropical hill forests of Bangladesh? Ecol. Indic. 2025, 117, 113131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poorter, H.; Niinemets, Ü.; Poorter, L.; Wright, I.J.; Villar, R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 565–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, X.; Li, P.; Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Hou, X.; Fan, D.; Yan, Z.; Du, E. Variations in the leaf economics spectrum, anatomical, ultrastructural, and stomatal traits of five tree species in the urban-rural air pollution environment. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 155, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yudina, L.; Sukhova, E.; Gromova, E.; Nerush, V.; Vodeneev, V.; Sukhov, V. A light-induced decrease in the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) can be used to estimate the energy-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching under heat stress and soil drought in pea, wheat, and pumpkin. Photosynth. Res. 2020, 146, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moustaka, J.; Moustakas, M. Early-stage detection of biotic and abiotic stress on plants by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging analysis. Biosensors 2023, 13, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zia, R.; Nawaz, M.S.; Siddique, M.J.; Hakim, S.; Imran, A. Plant survival under drought stress: Implications, adaptive responses, and integrated rhizosphere management strategy for stress mitigation. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 126626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, G.A.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.U.; Mittler, R.O. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potočić, N. Advances in forest ecophysiology: Stress response and ecophysiological indicators of tree vitality. Plants 2023, 12, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callow, D.; May, P.; Johnstone, D.M. Tree vitality assessment in urban landscapes. Forests 2018, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepúlveda, P.; Johnstone, D.M. A novel way of assessing plant vitality in urban trees. Forests 2019, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popa, A.M.; Onose, D.A.; Sandric, I.C.; Dosiadis, E.A.; Petropoulos, G.P.; Gavrilidis, A.A.; Faka, A. Using GEOBIA and vegetation indices to assess small urban green areas in two climatic regions. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales-Gallegos, L.M.; Martínez-Trinidad, T.; Hernández-de la Rosa, P.; Gómez-Guerrero, A.; Alvarado-Rosales, D.; Saavedra-Romero, L.d.L. Tree health condition in urban green areas assessed through crown indicators and vegetation indices. Forests 2023, 14, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhlgert, S.; Austic, G.; Zegarac, R.; Osei-Bonsu, I.; Hoh, D.; Chilvers, M.I.; Roth, M.G.; Bi, K.; TerAvest, D.; Weebadde, P.; et al. MultispeQ Beta: A tool for large-scale plant phenotyping connected to the open PhotosynQ network. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2016, 3, 160592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia. Climate Report 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.hidmet.gov.rs/data/klimatologija/ciril/2024.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2025).
- Hunt, R.E.; Daughtry, C.S.T. Chlorophyll meter calibrations for chlorophyll content using measured and simulated leaf transmittances. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genty, B.; Briantais, J.M.; Baker, N.R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1989, 990, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, D.M.; Johnson, G.; Kiirats, O.; Edwards, G.E. New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynth. Res. 2004, 79, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanazawa, A.; Kramer, D.M. In vivo modulation of nonphotochemical exciton quenching (NPQ) by regulation of the chloroplast ATP synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12789–12794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avenson, T.J.; Kanazawa, A.; Cruz, J.A.; Takizawa, K.; Ettinger, W.E.; Kramer, D.M. Integrating the proton circuit into photosynthesis: Progress and challenges. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye-binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amako, K.; Chen, G.X.; Asada, K. Separate assay specific for ascorbate peroxidase and guaiacol peroxidase and for chloroplastic and cytosolic isoenzymes of ascorbate peroxidase in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 1994, 35, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claiborne, A. Catalase activity. In Handbook of Methods for Oxygen Radical Research; Greenwald, A.R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1984; pp. 283–284. [Google Scholar]
- Kapetanović, I.M.; Mieyal, I.I. Inhibition of acetaminophen induced hepatotoxicity by phenacetin and its alkoxy analogs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1979, 209, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, L.S. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.R.; Kim, C.S.; Park, T.; Choi, Y.S.; Kyeong-Hwan Lee, K.H. Optimization of the ninhydrin reaction and development of a multiwell plate-based high-throughput proline detection assay. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 556, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devasagayam, T.P.A.; Boloor, K.K.; Ramarasma, T. Methods for estimating lipid peroxidation: An analysis of merits and demerits. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 40, 300–308. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 4.2.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2023; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Available online: http://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/ (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps, R package version 1.0.12. 2019. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/pheatmap.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2025).




| Tilia | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | ΦII | ΦNO | ΦNPQ | Fv′/Fm′ | gH+ | vH+ | LEF | qL |
| June | control | 0.570 ± 0.03 a | 0.239 ± 0.01 a | 0.189 ± 0.04 c | 0.732 ± 0.02 a | 201.600 ± 19.3 a | 0.105 ± 0.01 a | 59.379 ± 2.34 a | 0.439 ± 0.02 bc |
| urban | 0.488 ± 0.03 a | 0.226 ± 0.01 a | 0.278 ± 0.04 bc | 0.685 ± 0.02 a | 134.301 ± 11.73 b | 0.061 ± 0.01 ab | 20.493 ± 2.87 c | 0.505 ± 0.03 ab | |
| August | control | 0.503 ± 0.04 a | 0.108 ± 0.01 b | 0.384 ± 0.03 ab | 0.698 ± 0.01 a | 135.982 ± 18.87 b | 0.032 ± 0.00 b | 48.250 ± 2.87 b | 0.575 ± 0.01 a |
| urban | 0.298 ± 0.05 b | 0.215 ± 0.00 a | 0.497 ± 0.02 b | 0.432 ± 0.04 b | 56.018 ± 4.51 c | 0.068 ± 0.00 ab | 18.676 ± 1.43 c | 0.386 ± 0.02 c | |
| Two-way ANOVA | T | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | ** | ns |
| C | ** | ** | * | *** | *** | ns | *** | * | |
| TxC | ns | *** | ns | *** | ns | ** | * | *** | |
| Celtis | |||||||||
| T | C | ΦII | ΦNO | ΦNPQ | Fv′/Fm′ | gH+ | vH+ | LEF | qL |
| June | control | 0.581 ± 0.02 b | 0.263 ± 0.01 a | 0.155 ± 0.03 a | 0.753 ± 0.01 a | 224.308 ± 17.52 a | 0.047 ± 0.01 a | 39.086 ± 3.44 a | 0.482 ± 0.02 b |
| urban | 0.646 ± 0.00 ab | 0.230 ± 0.00 ab | 0.123 ± 0.00 a | 0.759 ± 0.00 a | 155.828 ± 15.20 b | 0.061 ± 0.01 a | 26.269 ± 2.55 b | 0.566 ± 0.02 ab | |
| August | control | 0.664 ± 0.00 a | 0.212 ± 0.00 b | 0.122 ± 0.00 a | 0.755 ± 0.00 a | 196.819 ± 13.86 ab | 0.055 ± 0.01 a | 19.810 ± 1.06 b | 0.648 ± 0.02 a |
| urban | 0.615 ± 0.01 ab | 0.240 ± 0.01 ab | 0.143 ± 0.01 a | 0.753 ± 0.00 a | 141.261 + 12.41 b | 0.058 ± 0.00 a | 7.465 ± 0.83 c | 0.540 ± 0.03 b | |
| Two-way ANOVA | T | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | *** | * |
| C | ns | ns | ns | ns | *** | ns | *** | ns | |
| TxC | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | *** | |
| Platanus | |||||||||
| T | C | ΦII | ΦNO | ΦNPQ | Fv′/Fm′ | gH+ | vH+ | LEF | qL |
| June | control | 0.674 ± 0.01 a | 0.226 ± 0.00 a | 0.121 ± 0.00 b | 0.771 ± 0.00 a | 290.222 ± 23.94 a | 0.053 ± 0.01 a | 14.618 ± 0.97 ab | 0.623 ± 0.02 a |
| urban | 0.642 ± 0.01 a | 0.225 ± 0.00 a | 0.126 ± 0.00 b | 0.754 ± 0.00 a | 234.226 ± 13.04 ab | 0.045 ± 0.00 a | 14.495 ± 0.67 ab | 0.594 ± 0.02 a | |
| August | control | 0.586 ± 0.00 b | 0.189 ± 0.00 b | 0.233 ± 0.01 a | 0.711 ± 0.01 b | 176.104 ± 16.91 b | 0.046 ± 0.00 a | 15.595 ± 1.07 a | 0.573 ± 0.01 a |
| urban | 0.527 ± 0.01c | 0.221 ± 0.00 a | 0.269 ± 0.02 a | 0.652 ± 0.01 c | 83.324 ± 9.43 c | 0.040 ± 0.00 a | 11.319 ± 0.96 b | 0.589 ± 0.02 a | |
| Two-way ANOVA | T | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ns |
| C | ** | * | ns | *** | *** | ns | * | ns | |
| TxC | ns | * | ns | * | ns | ns | * | ns |
| Tilia | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | TBARS | Proline | GSH | APX | CAT |
| June | control | 4.02 ± 0.40 c | 108.83 ± 7.65 c | 7.06 ± 0.42 b | 7.86 ± 0.80 c | 0.70 ± 0.03 b |
| urban | 6.75 ± 0.36 bc | 204.81 ± 23.13 b | 12.05 ± 1.53 b | 23.05 ± 1.42 b | 1.40 ± 0.17 b | |
| August | control | 9.86 ± 1.03 b | 153.03 ± 1.35 b | 6.58 ± 0.65 b | 28.53 ± 1.93 b | 2.23 ± 0.09 b |
| urban | 27.07 ± 2.00 a | 860.02 ± 11.11 a | 60.72 ± 2.88 a | 37.41 ± 1.51 a | 4.57 ± 0.78 a | |
| Two-way ANOVA | T | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns |
| C | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | |
| TxC | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Celtis | ||||||
| T | C | TBARS | Proline | GSH | APX | CAT |
| June | control | 4.89 ± 0.30 bc | 29.82 ± 2.44 b | 11.82 ± 0.37 c | 15.48 ± 2.16 b | 4.72 ± 0.26 ab |
| urban | 4.14 ± 0.35 c | 43.95 ± 1.02 b | 7.39 ± 1.10 c | 43.14 ± 7.92 a | 7.34 ± 2.07 a | |
| August | control | 7.20 ± 0.79 b | 214.95 ± 10.38 a | 30.81 ± 3.24 b | 15.21 ± 0.91 b | 2.20 ± 0.30 b |
| urban | 9.88 ± 0.64 a | 213.50 ± 16.82 a | 40.21 ± 2.00 a | 43.63 ± 7.92 a | 9.12 ± 0.25 a | |
| Two-way ANOVA | T | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns |
| C | ns | ns | ns | *** | ** | |
| TxC | * | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
| Platanus | ||||||
| T | C | TBARS | Proline | GSH | APX | CAT |
| June | control | 9.31 ± 1.08 c | 23.64 ± 4.14 c | 7.36 ± 0.78 b | 12.55 ± 1.00 b | 2.31 ± 0.71 ab |
| urban | 13.31 ± 1.42 bc | 80.18 ± 2.07 b | 7.64 ± 0.37 b | 22.27 ± 0.95 b | 0.64 ± 0.10 b | |
| August | control | 24.97 ± 1.56 b | 83.03 ± 3.33 b | 9.16 ± 0.24 ab | 14.36 ± 1.93 b | 3.38 ± 0.70 a |
| urban | 42.89 ± 5.21 a | 111.36 ± 9.76 a | 12.73 ± 1.65 a | 57.96 ± 4.89 a | 1.96 ± 0.20 ab | |
| Two-way ANOVA | T | *** | *** | ** | *** | * |
| C | ** | * | ns | *** | * | |
| TxC | * | *** | ns | *** | ns | |
| Parameter | Full Name | Functional Significance | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural and Water Status Indicators | |||
| SPAD | Relative Chlorophyll Content Index | Indicates chlorophyll concentration and nitrogen status | [41] |
| LTD | Leaf Temperature Differential | Proxy for transpiration efficiency and water stress | [39] |
| LT | Leaf Thickness | Influences photosynthetic capacity and water retention | [39] |
| Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters (PSII Performance) | |||
| ФII | Quantum Yield of Photosystem II | Efficiency of light used for photochemical reactions. | [42] |
| ФNO | Quantum Yield of Non-Regulated Energy Dissipation | Non-regulated energy loss, often linked to stress. | [39] |
| ФNPQ | Quantum Yield of Regulated Non-Photochemical Quenching | Protective heat dissipation; excess energy regulation, toward reducing damage to plants | [39] |
| Fv′/Fm′ | Ratio of Variable to Maximal Fluorescence (light-adapted) | Indicates PSII efficiency under actinic light | [42] |
| LEF | Linear Electron Flow | Total electron flow through PSII | [39] |
| qL | Redox status of PSII | fraction of PSII centers that are in the open state | [43] |
| ATP synthase activity and energy flux parameters linked to photophosphorylation | |||
| gH+ | Proton conductivity | Indicates ATP synthase activity and thylakoid proton flux | [44] |
| vH+ | Proton flux | Correlates with ATP synthesis rate. | [45] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Arsenov, D.; Borišev, M.; Nikolić, N.; Horak, R.; Pajević, S. Physiological and Biochemical Indicators of Urban Environmental Stress in Tilia, Celtis, and Platanus: A Functional Trait-Based Approach. Plants 2025, 14, 3451. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223451
Arsenov D, Borišev M, Nikolić N, Horak R, Pajević S. Physiological and Biochemical Indicators of Urban Environmental Stress in Tilia, Celtis, and Platanus: A Functional Trait-Based Approach. Plants. 2025; 14(22):3451. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223451
Chicago/Turabian StyleArsenov, Danijela, Milan Borišev, Nataša Nikolić, Rita Horak, and Slobodanka Pajević. 2025. "Physiological and Biochemical Indicators of Urban Environmental Stress in Tilia, Celtis, and Platanus: A Functional Trait-Based Approach" Plants 14, no. 22: 3451. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223451
APA StyleArsenov, D., Borišev, M., Nikolić, N., Horak, R., & Pajević, S. (2025). Physiological and Biochemical Indicators of Urban Environmental Stress in Tilia, Celtis, and Platanus: A Functional Trait-Based Approach. Plants, 14(22), 3451. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223451

