Next Article in Journal
The Interaction between the Gut Microbiome and Bile Acids in Cardiometabolic Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Beneficial Effects of the Consumption of Hot-Water Extracts of Thinned Immature Mangos (Mangifera indica “Irwin”) on the Hypertriglyceridemia of Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Yeast Protein as an Easily Accessible Food Source
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Alaska Pollock Protein Attenuates the Experimental Colitis Induced by Dextran Sulfate Sodium via Regulation of Gut Microbiota and Its Metabolites in Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/metabo12010064
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unlike Glycerophosphocholine or Choline Chloride, Dietary Phosphatidylcholine Does Not Increase Plasma Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Levels in Sprague-Dawley Rats

by
Bungo Shirouchi
1,*,
Ayano Fukuda
1 and
Taiki Akasaka
2
1
Department of Nutrition Science, Faculty of Nursing and Nutrition, University of Nagasaki, Siebold, 1-1-1 Manabino, Nagayo-cho, Nishi-Sonogi-gun, Nagasaki 851-2195, Japan
2
Center for Advanced Instrumental and Educational Supports, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2022, 12(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12010064
Submission received: 17 December 2021 / Revised: 7 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 January 2022 / Published: 11 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevention and Alleviation of Metabolic Syndrome with Food Factors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Choline, betaine, and L-carnitine are transformed into trimethylamine (TMA) by gut microbiota, absorbed into the liver, and oxidized into trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) by flavin-containing monooxygenases. Elevated TMAO levels may negatively affect human health. As phosphatidylcholine (PC) is the main source of dietary choline, its intake or PC-rich foods may be harmful to human health; however, quantitative comparative information among dietary choline compounds (PC, glycerophosphocholine [GPC], and choline chloride [CC]) regarding in vivo generation of TMAO is lacking. Here, we compared the effects of PC, GPC, and CC on plasma TMAO levels in rats. Furthermore, we investigated their effects on gut microbiota at the genus level. Dietary PC did not affect plasma TMAO levels, whereas dietary GPC and CC significantly increased them. At the genus level, plasma TMAO levels were significantly negatively correlated with relative abundances of Anaerotruncus, Actinomyces, Enterococcus, Dialister, Clostridium XIVa, and Granulicatella; they were significantly positively correlated with that of Coprobacter. Moreover, the relative abundances of Anaerotruncus and Coprobacter were found to predict plasma TMAO levels. Therefore, dietary PC, unlike GPC or CC, does not increase plasma TMAO levels in rats. Furthermore, several gut microbes are associated with changes in plasma TMAO levels in rats fed with choline compounds.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Phospholipids (PLs) are constituents of cell membranes; they are present at various concentrations in lipid-containing foods. In humans, PL intake is estimated to be 3–6 g·d−1, which amounts to approximately 10% of the total dietary lipid intake [1]. Growing evidence indicates that dietary PLs have beneficial effects, including the prevention of dyslipidemia, fatty livers, and cardiovascular disease, compared with dietary triglycerides (TGs) [2,3,4]. Glycerophospholipids (GPLs), which are classified together with sphingophospholipids as PLs, are composed of hydrophobic (e.g., fatty acids) and hydrophilic (e.g., choline, ethanolamine, inositol, or serine) components; this composition may be responsible for their physiological function. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) constitutes the majority of dietary GPLs [1]; it is also an established source of choline, which is a water-soluble vitamin-like essential nutrient [5]. Numerous studies have suggested that dietary PC exerts a protective effect against cardiovascular disease (CVD) by improving the blood lipid profile [2,3,4]. In contrast with previous studies, independent of improving the blood lipid profile, a recent study has suggested that dietary PC may increase the risk of CVD through its metabolites, such as choline [6]. Dietary choline, betaine, and L-carnitine can all undergo catabolism by gut microbiota to form trimethylamine (TMA), which is absorbed and then rapidly oxidized into trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) in the liver by flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMOs) [7,8,9]. Elevated circulating levels of TMAO are considered to have negative effects on human health; they are a risk factor for CVD, colorectal cancer, and chronic kidney disease [6,10,11,12]. Based on the above-mentioned studies into TMAO, the intake of PC or PC-rich foods has been suggested to be harmful to human health. On the other hand, choline in PC has been reported to be absorbed more efficiently than free choline [13,14], suggesting that choline in PC may be less susceptible to catabolism by gut microbiota than free choline. Taken together, the question as to whether dietary PC exerts a beneficial effect on CVD remains unclear. In addition, there is currently a lack of quantitative comparative information among dietary choline compounds (PC, glycerophosphocholine [GPC], and choline chloride [CC]) regarding the in vivo generation of TMAO (Figure 1).
The conversion of TMA by gut microbiota in the host is an important part of choline metabolism regarding in vivo TMAO generation. The key step in the microbial catabolism of choline is the cleavage of the C-N bond, which is catalyzed by the glycyl radical enzyme choline TMA-lyase (CutC) along with its activating enzyme (CutD), under an anaerobic environment. This results in the production of acetaldehyde and TMA [15,16]. The extent of the conversion of choline (and related substances) into TMA depends on the type of gut microbiota in the host. Therefore, although there is a growing understanding of microbial choline catabolism, it is difficult to obtain quantitative comparative information among the conversion of different dietary choline compounds into TMAO, via the oxidation of TMA, in human intervention studies.
Therefore, to explore the abilities of different types of choline compounds (PC, GPC, and CC) to be converted into TMAO, here we investigated whether plasma TMAO levels increased in rats that were fed these three types of choline compounds. In addition, we evaluated the effects of dietary intake on the gut microbiota of rats.

2. Results and Discussion

Here, to explore the abilities of different types of choline compounds (PC, GPC, and CC) to be converted into TMAO, we investigated whether plasma TMAO levels increased in rats that were fed three types of choline compounds. In addition, we investigated the effects of dietary intake on the gut microbiota of rats.

2.1. Effects of Dietary PC, GPC, and CC on the Growth and Metabolic Parameters in SD Rats

There was no difference in food intake, liver weight, weights of mesenteric and abdominal WATs, or soleus muscle weight (Table 1). The epididymal WAT weight in the CC group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Table 1), while the perirenal WAT weight in the GPC group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Table 1). In addition, the GPC and CC groups had significantly lower liver PL contents than the control group (Table 1). PL-derived choline is absorbed in the small intestine more efficiently than free forms of choline [13,14], resulting the former having a higher bioavailability. PC, which is synthesized from choline, is known to constitute the outer layer of the cell membrane lipid bilayer [5]. Therefore, changes in the morphometric and metabolic parameters of normal SD rats fed with GPC or CC may have contributed to the low bioavailability observed for choline derived from these sources.

2.2. Effects of Dietary PC, GPC, and CC on Plasma TMAO Levels and mRNA-rElated TMAO Generation in Livers of SD Rats

Plasma TMAO levels were significantly higher in the GPC and CC groups than in the control and PC groups (Figure 2). As mentioned above, PL-derived choline is absorbed more efficiently in the small intestine than free forms of choline [13,14], suggesting that it is difficult to convert PC-derived choline into TMA in the large intestine, and that it does not increase plasma TMAO levels. Our results are supported by the findings of a previous study, which reported that choline bitartrate yielded a plasma TMAO incremental area under the curve (iAUC) that was three times greater than that obtained with no choline and PC in healthy men [17]. Our present study is the first to report that dietary GPC increases plasma TMAO levels, in addition to dietary CC. Using the online lipophilicity/aqueous solubility calculation software (ALOGPS 2.1) [18], here we compared the octanol-water partition coefficients (logP) of CC, GPC, and 1-parmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (which is the main molecular species of soybean PC), and their values were as follows: CC: −3.59, GPC: −2.56, and 1-parmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine: 5.48. The large intestine has three primary functions: the absorption of water and electrolytes, the production and absorption of vitamins, and the formation and propulsion of feces toward the rectum for elimination [19]. Therefore, here we propose that dietary GPC and CC increase plasma TMAO levels by facilitating their transition to the large intestine, by means of their physicochemical properties (which are related to water behavior in the large intestine); they are then fermented by gut microbiota.
To further examine the effects of dietary choline compounds on plasma TMAO levels, we analyzed mRNAs related to TMAO generation in the liver. It has been reported that plasma TMAO levels shown a significant positive correlation (R = 0.80, p <0.001) with hepatic Fmo3 mRNA levels in mice, and a trend toward positive association (R = 0.49, p = 0.07) with hepatic FMO3 mRNA levels in humans [6]. Adult human liver mRNA exhibits high FMO3 expression and extremely low FMO1 expression [20]; in contrast, rat livers exhibit moderate FMO1 protein expression [20]. Based on this information, here we measured the mRNA levels of two Fmo isoforms (Fmo1 and Fmo3) in the livers of SD rats. As shown in Table 1, dietary choline compounds did not affect hepatic Fmo1 and Fmo3 mRNA levels, suggesting that changes in plasma TMAO levels depend on the fecal amounts and plasma levels of TMA as a substrate; that is, they may vary due to the changes in the gut microbiota of rats.

2.3. Effects of Dietary PC, GPC, and CC on Gut Microbiota in SD Rats: Identification of Gut Microbes Associated with Changes in Plasma TMAO Levels

To gain additional insight into the reason why dietary PC does not affect plasma TMAO levels, whereas dietary GPC and CC both increase it, here we evaluated fecal microbiota in rats using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Figure 3 shows the α and β diversity results of the fecal microbiota. The rarefaction curves based on the α Chao 1 and Shannon diversity indices demonstrated good sequencing depth, as plateaus were reached in all samples after approximately 30,000 reads (Figure 3a,b). Box plots based on the α Chao 1 (Figure 3c) and Shannon (Figure 3d) diversity indices at the genus level showed that there were no significant differences among the four groups. Figure 3e shows the PCoA plot based on the weighted UniFrac distance at the genus level. The fecal microbiota structure of the PC group tended to differ (p = 0.064) from that of the GPC group. Moreover, the fecal microbiota structure of the GPC group differed from that of the CC group (p = 0.046). The taxonomic assignment at the genus level identified a total of 176 bacterial genera. Furthermore, the 27 dominant microbes (with relative mean abundances of >0.5%) accounted for ~95% of the total abundance (Figure 4a). The heatmap and the hierarchical clustering dendrogram of gut microbiota composition at the genus level both clearly show that the gut microbiota profiles of the PC and GPC groups differed; this difference was driven by the relative abundance of Akkermansia (Figure 4b). Regarding the relative abundances of each microbe at the genus level among the four groups, the PC group had significantly higher relative abundances of Akkermansia (Figure 5a) and Anaerotruncus (Figure 5b) than the GPC group. The PC group, meanwhile, had a significantly higher relative abundance of Asaccharobacter (Figure 5c) than the control group, and a lower relative abundance of Parasporobacterium (Figure 5f). Moreover, the PC group had a significantly lower relative abundance of Roseburia (Figure 5d) than the CC group. Furthermore, the CC group had significantly higher relative abundances of Holdemania (Figure 5e) and Coprobacter (Figure 5g) than the control group. A previous study into ApoE−/− mice showed that the oral supplementation of Akkermansia muciniphila attenuated atherosclerotic lesions by ameliorating metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation by restoring the gut barrier function [21]. Furthermore, several studies conducted on human subjects have demonstrated the beneficial effects of A. muciniphila against obesity, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension [22,23,24,25]. Taken together, we suggest that the beneficial effects of dietary PC are partly attributable to the resulting increase in the relative abundance of A. muciniphila in the gut microbiota.
As shown in Figure 6, we found a positive association between plasma TMAO levels and the relative abundance of Coprobacter; we also discovered inverse associations between plasma TMAO levels and the relative abundances of Anaerotruncus, Actinomyces, Enterococcus, Dialister, Clostridium XIVa, and Granulicatella. Anaerotruncus, Enterococcus, Dialister, Clostridium XIVa, and Granulicatella belonging to the Firmicutes phylum, Actinomyces to the Actinobacteria phylum, and Coprobacter to the Bacteroidetes phylum, respectively. Although several species belonging to the Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria phyla can potentially produce TMA (TMA is the precursor of TMAO) [26], the taxonomic levels of family and genus in the species described above were different from those of the seven microbes found in this study. A significant negative correlation has been discovered between the relative abundances of Anaerotruncus (at the genus level) and Enterococcus gallinarum (at the species level) and fecal TMA levels [27]. This supports our findings, to some extent. During the conversion of choline to TMA by gut microbiota in the host, the key step in the microbial catabolism of choline is the cleavage of its C-N bond; this step is catalyzed by CutC and CutD [15,16]. Therefore, it is possible that Anaerotruncus and Enterococcus act on TMA-producing bacteria to indirectly suppress TMA production. Alternatively, they could produce active substances that suppress the activities of CutC and CutD, thereby directly suppressing TMA production in the gut. However, no previous studies have obtained findings that support our results for the five microbes that were found to correlate with plasma TMAO levels. Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism by which the observed changes in the relative abundances of these five microbes lead to changes in plasma TMAO levels. In addition to the changes in TMA production through the changes in the gut microbiota by dietary GPC and CC, it is desirable to examine whether they affect hepatic FMO1 and FMO3 protein levels.
Here, we tried to identify predictors of plasma TMAO levels using stepwise multiple regression analysis; we identified seven microbes that were correlated with plasma TMAO levels. As a result, we obtained a good multiple regression model for plasma TMAO levels, with adjusted R2 values of >0.5 (Table 2). This model showed VIF values of <5 and a Durbin–Watson ratio close to 2. The adjusted R2 value of this model was 0.656 (p < 0.001), and the relative abundances of Anaerotruncus and Coprobacter (in decreasing order of absolute value of β coefficient) both contributed to plasma TMAO levels (Table 2). Furthermore, using OPLS-DA, we attempted to search for gut microbes that could help to distinguish between the low (control and PC groups) and high (GPC and CC groups) TMAO groups. As shown in Figure 7a, the low and high TMAO groups were clearly divided into two groups, and the variables with VIP > 2.0 were (in decreasing order) Anaerotruncus, Thermotalea, and Coprobacter (Figure 7b,c). In particular, Anaerotruncus and Coprobacter were located at both ends of the OPLS-DA-corresponding S-plot, and so were considered to contribute strongly to discriminating between the two groups. This finding was consistent with the results of the multiple regression analysis. According to the previous report [26], however, TMA production potential appears to be absent in the microbes belonging to the Bacteroidetes phylum. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate whether Coprobacter belonging to the Bacteroidetes phylum can generate TMA from GPC and CC.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Animals and Diets

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of the University of Nagasaki, Siebold, and Law no. 105, and Notification no. 6 of the Government of Japan. The animal protocol in this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Nagasaki, Siebold (authorization no. R02-10). Five-week-old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (Jcl:SD) were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Osaka, Japan). The rats were housed individually in metal cages, in an air-conditioned room at 22 ± 1 °C with 55 ± 5% humidity, under a 12 h light-dark cycle. After an eight-day adaptation period on a powder chow diet (CE-2; CLEA Japan, Inc.), 20 rats were assigned to one of four groups: control, PC, GPC, and CC (n = 5 per group). Experimental diets were prepared according to the AIN-76 formula containing a high sucrose content [28], with several modifications. The details of the experimental diet composition are presented in Table 3. The rats were allowed free access to the diet and water for four weeks. Feces were collected for 48 h during the adaptation period, and at the end of the experiment. At the end of the four-week feeding period and after a 6 h starvation period, blood was collected from the abdominal vein of each rat using a syringe. The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing plasma was prepared by centrifugation at 1200 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The liver, soleus muscle, and abdominal (epididymal, perirenal, and mesenteric) white adipose tissues (WATs) were immediately excised and weighed within 4 h. The collected samples were stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

3.2. Analysis of Plasma Biochemical Parameters

Plasma levels of TG, total cholesterol, PLs, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), and glucose were measured using commercial enzyme assay kits (TG E-test, Wako; Cholesterol E-test, Wako; Phospholipid C-test, Wako; NEFA C-test, Wako; Glucose CII-test, Wako; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Osaka, Japan).

3.3. Analysis of Hepatic Phospholipids Contents

Total lipids from the liver were extracted using the Bligh and Dyer method [29], with slight modifications. Briefly, frozen liver tissue was homogenized with 0.1 M KCl solution and mixed with methanol (containing 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene) and chloroform at a ratio of 1:1:1. The homogenate was centrifuged at 880× g for 15 min at room temperature. The lower organic phase containing the extracted lipids was collected three times and then dried under nitrogen gas. The extracted lipids were dissolved in 2-propanol. Hepatic PL content was then measured according to the method of Rouser et al. [30].

3.4. Analysis of Plasma TMAO Levels

Sample preparation for the quantitative analysis of TMAO in plasma was performed according to the method described by Ufnal et al. [31]. Plasma TMAO levels were measured using liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS; LCMS-8050; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The LC-MS conditions were as follows: solvent A, 0.2% aqueous formic acid; solvent B, methanol with 0.2% formic acid; column, Discovery HS F5-3 (Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA); column temperature, 40 °C; flow rate, 0.3 mL·min−1; gradient program, 0–2 min: %B = 0, 2–6 min: %B = 0–15 gradient, 6–6.5 min: %B = 15–100 gradient, 6.5–9.5 min: %B = 100, and 9.5–10 min: %B = 100–0 gradient. MS spectra were obtained in the electrospray ionization (ESI) positive ion mode. The temperatures of the ESI interface, desolvation line, and heat block were 300, 250, and 400 °C, respectively. Nebulizer, heating, and drying nitrogen gas flows were set to 3.0, 10, and 10 L·min−1, respectively. A multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transition of m/z 76.08 > 58.1 was used. The dwell time was set at 10 ms for the transition.

3.5. Analysis of Hepatic Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Levels

Total RNA was extracted from frozen liver tissue using RNAzol® RT reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA); it was then converted into complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time) (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed in a final volume of 20 µL, which contained SYBR Green (THUNDERBIRD® SYBR® qPCR Mix; Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), 0.3 µM of each primer (Fasmac Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan), and 20 ng of cDNA; a real-time PCR system was used (LightCycler®96; Nippon Genetics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The reaction conditions were as follows: hot start at 95 °C for 60 s, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 45 s. Relative mRNA levels were determined using the ΔΔCT method [32], using β-Actin (Actb) as a normalization control. The primers used were as follows: flavin-containing dimethylaniline monooxygenase 1 (Fmo1, forward: 5′-AGAGACACAAGCTCGATGGG-3′, reverse: 5′-GCACAAGCCAAATCCGCTAT-3′), Fmo3 (forward: 5′-AGGAGCCAGGAACATGGAAAG-3′, reverse: 5′-GGAGCTTATGATGACCTGCTGA-3′), and Actb (forward: 5′-TCAGGTCATCACTATCGGCA-3′, reverse: 5′-TCATGGATGCCACAGGATTC-3′).

3.6. Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Rats Fed Each Choline Compound

DNA extraction was conducted according to a previously described method [33]. DNA was extracted using an automated DNA isolation system (GENE PREP STAR PI-480 KURABO, Japan). The V3-V4 regions of bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were amplified using the Pro341F/Pro805R primers and dual-index method [33,34]. Barcoded amplicons were paired-end sequenced on a 2×284-bp cycle using the MiSeq system with MiSeq Reagent Kit version 3 (600 cycle) chemistry. Paired-end sequencing reads were merged using the fastq-join program (Expression Analysis, a Quintiles Company, Durham, NC, USA), with default settings [35]. Only joined-reads that had a quality value score of ≥20 for more than 99% of the sequence were extracted; this was performed using the FASTX-Toolkit [36]. The chimeric sequences were deleted using usearch6.1 (https://drive5.com/usearch/, accessed on 18 March 2021) [37,38]. Sequence analysis of the sequence reads was performed manually using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Multiclassifier tool v. 2.11, which is available from the RDP website (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/classifier/, accessed on 18 March 2021) [39]. Bacterial and Archaeal species identification from sequences was performed using the Metagenome@KIN v. 2.2.1 analysis software (World Fusion, Tokyo, Japan) and the TechnoSuruga Lab Microbial Identification database DB-BA v. 13.0 (TechnoSuruga Laboratory, Shizuoka, Japan), with a homology of ≥97% [40]. The joined amplicon sequence reads were processed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology version 2 (QIIME2) v. 2020.6 (https://qiime2.org/, accessed on 18 March 2021) [41]. Sequences with quality value scores of <33 and chimeric sequences were filtered using Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2 (DADA2) denoise-single plugin v. 2017.6.0 (https://benjjneb.github.io/dada2/index.html, accessed on 18 March 2021) [42]. Taxonomy was assigned using the Greengenes database v. 13.8 (http://greengenes.lbl.gov, accessed on 18 March 2021), based on an average percent identity of 99% [43], by training a Naive Bayes classifier using the q2-feature-classifier plugin (https://github.com/qiime2/q2-feature-classifier, accessed on 18 March 2021). Alpha diversity indices (Chao1 and Shannon indices) at the genus level were calculated using the alpha-rarefaction plugin. Beta diversity at the genus level was visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA); it was analyzed using weighted UniFrac distance using the core-metrics-phylogenetic plugin. Heatmap and hierarchical clustering at the genus level were shown using the feature-table heatmap plugin.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

All values except for fecal microbiota data are expressed herein as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All data were analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test as a normality test. When the data were recognized as having a non-normal distribution, they were normalized by logarithmic transformation and then re-analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Parametric tests were used for further statistical analysis, because the normality of all data was confirmed. Comparisons among the four groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post hoc test. Data of fecal microbiota at the genus level are expressed herein using box and whisker plots. The statistical significances of the Chao1 and Shannon indices, based on the relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level among the four groups, were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The statistical significance of the weighted UniFrac distance, based on the relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level among the four groups, was assessed by the analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) test. The relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by the Steel–Dwass multiple comparison post hoc test. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine the significances of the associations between plasma TMAO levels and the relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to explore the determinants (relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level) of plasma TMAO levels. Fecal microbiota that were found to be significantly correlated with plasma TMAO levels were included as predictors in the original model. A p value of <0.01 and an adjusted R2 value of >0.5 were considered to imply significance for the purpose of regression analysis. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to detect multicollinearity between the independent variables of the model [44]. A VIF of <5 was considered acceptable. The Durbin–Watson ratio was used to detect the presence of autocorrelation in the model. A Durbin–Watson ratio close to 2 was considered acceptable. The normality of the residuals in the multiple regression model was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Blood TMAO levels have also been used as biomarkers for coronary artery disease; they are considered to be low risk at concentrations of <6.2 µM [45]. Therefore, we divided the rats into two groups (low and high TMAO groups), with 6.2 µM as the cut-off value; we then performed orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) based on the relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level. Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using EZR, which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 4.0.4) [46], and SPSS v. 28 software for Windows (IBM Japan, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). OPLS-DA was performed using the free web-based software MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (accessed on 13 December 2021) [47].

4. Conclusions

In summary, our results clearly indicate that dietary PC, unlike GPC and CC, does not increase plasma TMAO levels in rats. We identified several gut microbes that were associated with changes in plasma TMAO levels in rats that were fed choline compounds. Among these, the relative abundances of Anaerotruncus and Coprobacter may have large effects on changes in plasma TMAO levels. Our data will be valuable as additional baseline data, and for the quantitative comparison of dietary choline compounds regarding in vivo TMAO production.

Author Contributions

B.S. wrote the manuscript, contributed to the study design, and supervised the study. B.S., A.F. and T.A. participated in the experimental work, and collected and analyzed the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Kieikai Research Foundation Grant Number 2020S037 (to B.S.) and JSPS Kakenhi Grant Number 20K11582 (to B.S).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of the University of Nagasaki, Siebold, and Law no. 105 and Notification no. 6 of the government in Japan. The animal protocol in this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Nagasaki, Siebold (authorization no. R02-10).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to have not set up a public archive platform for data sharing.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yuri Kawahara, Yukiko Shiota, Kae Nishihara, Fuminori Sueyoshi, and Kae Inagaki of University of Nagasaki, Siebold for providing technical assistance with rat dissection. The authors also thank TechnoSuruga Laboratory Co., Ltd. (Shizuoka, Japan) for the gut microbiome analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shirouchi, B.; Yamanaka, R.; Tanaka, S.; Kawatou, F.; Hayashi, T.; Takeyama, A.; Nakao, A.; Goromaru, R.; Iwamoto, M.; Sato, M. Quantities of Phospholipid Molecular Classes in Japanese Meals and Prediction of Their Sources by Multiple Regression Analysis. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2018, 64, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Cohn, J.S.; Wat, E.; Kamili, A.; Tandy, S. Dietary Phospholipids, Hepatic Lipid Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2008, 19, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Küllenberg, D.; Taylor, L.A.; Schneider, M.; Massing, U. Health Effects of Dietary Phospholipids. Lipids Health Dis. 2012, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, T.T.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.M.; Xue, C.H. Health Benefits of Dietary Marine DHA/EPA-Enriched Glycerophospholipids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2019, 75, 100997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeisel, S.H.; da Costa, K.A. Choline: An Essential Nutrient for Public Health. Nutr. Rev. 2009, 67, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, Z.; Klipfell, E.; Bennett, B.J.; Koeth, R.; Levison, B.S.; Dugar, B.; Feldstein, A.E.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Chung, Y.M.; et al. Gut Flora Metabolism of Phosphatidylcholine Promotes Cardiovascular Disease. Nature 2011, 472, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Al-Waiz, M.; Mikov, M.; Mitchell, S.C.; Smith, R.L. The Exogenous Origin of Trimethylamine in the Mouse. Metabolism 1992, 41, 135–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lang, D.H.; Yeung, C.K.; Peter, R.M.; Ibarra, C.; Gasser, R.; Itagaki, K.; Philpot, R.M.; Rettie, A.E. Isoform Specificity of Trimethylamine N-Oxygenation by Human Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase (FMO) and P450 Enzymes: Selective Catalysis by FMO3. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1998, 56, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, Z.L.; Zhang, L.Y.; Jiang, X.M.; Xue, C.H.; Chi, N.; Zhang, T.T.; Wang, Y.M. Effects of Dietary Choline, Betaine, and L-Carnitine on the Generation of Trimethylamine-N-Oxide in Healthy Mice. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tang, W.H.; Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Koeth, R.A.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Hazen, S.L. Intestinal Microbial Metabolism of Phosphatidylcholine and Cardiovascular Risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bae, S.; Ulrich, C.M.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Malysheva, O.; Bailey, L.B.; Xiao, L.; Brown, E.C.; Cushing-Haugen, K.L.; Zheng, Y.; Cheng, T.Y.; et al. Plasma Choline Metabolites and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 7442–7452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Tang, W.H.; Wang, Z.; Kennedy, D.J.; Wu, Y.; Buffa, J.A.; Agatisa-Boyle, B.; Li, X.S.; Levison, B.S.; Hazen, S.L. Gut Microbiota-Dependent Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Pathway Contributes to Both Development of Renal Insufficiency and Mortality Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Fernstrom, M.H. Lecithin, Choline, and Cholinergic Transmission. Nutr. Pharmacol. 1981, 4, 5–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smolders, L.; de Wit, N.J.W.; Balvers, M.G.J.; Obeid, R.; Vissers, M.M.M.; Esser, D. Natural Choline From Egg Yolk Phospholipids Is More Efficiently Absorbed Compared With Choline Bitartrate; Outcomes of a Randomized Trial in Healthy Adults. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Craciun, S.; Balskus, E.P. Microbial Conversion of Choline to Trimethylamine Requires a Glycyl Radical Enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012, 109, 21307–21312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bodea, S.; Funk, M.A.; Balskus, E.P.; Drennan, C.L. Molecular Basis of C-N Bond Cleavage by the Glycyl Radical Enzyme Choline Trimethylamine-Lyase. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cho, C.E.; Aardema, N.D.J.; Bunnell, M.L.; Larson, D.P.; Aguilar, S.S.; Bergeson, J.R.; Malysheva, O.V.; Caudill, M.A.; Lefevre, M. Effect of Choline Forms and Gut Microbiota Composition on Trimethylamine- N-Oxide Response in Healthy Men. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tetko, I.V.; Tanchuk, V.Y. Application of Associative Neural Networks for Prediction of Lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 Program. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Azzouz, L.L.; Sharma, S. Physiology, Large Intestine. Physiol. Large Intest. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Novick, R.M.; Mitzey, A.M.; Brownfield, M.S.; Elfarra, A.A. Differential Localization of Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase (FMO) Isoforms 1, 3, and 4 in Rat Liver and Kidney and Evidence for Expression of FMO4 in Mouse, Rat, and Human Liver and Kidney Microsomes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 329, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Li, J.; Lin, S.; Vanhoutte, P.M.; Woo, C.W.; Xu, A. Akkermansia muciniphila Protects Against Atherosclerosis by Preventing Metabolic Endotoxemia-Induced Inflammation in Apoe−/− Mice. Circulation 2016, 133, 2434–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Dao, M.C.; Everard, A.; Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Sokolovska, N.; Prifti, E.; Verger, E.O.; Kayser, B.D.; Levenez, F.; Chilloux, J.; Hoyles, L.; et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and Improved Metabolic Health During a Dietary Intervention in Obesity: Relationship With Gut Microbiome Richness and Ecology. Gut 2016, 65, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yassour, M.; Lim, M.Y.; Yun, H.S.; Tickle, T.L.; Sung, J.; Song, Y.M.; Lee, K.; Franzosa, E.A.; Morgan, X.C.; Gevers, D.; et al. Sub-Clinical Detection of Gut Microbial Biomarkers of Obesity and type 2 Diabetes. Genome Med. 2016, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Li, J.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Tao, J.; Tian, G.; Wu, S.; Liu, W.; Cui, Q.; Geng, B.; et al. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Contributes to the Development of Hypertension. Microbiome 2017, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Depommier, C.; Everard, A.; Druart, C.; Plovier, H.; Van Hul, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Raes, J.; Maiter, D.; Delzenne, N.M.; et al. Supplementation With Akkermansia muciniphila in Overweight and Obese Human Volunteers: A Proof-of-Concept Exploratory Study. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Falony, G.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Raes, J. Microbiology Meets Big Data: The Case of Gut Microbiota-Derived Trimethylamine. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 69, 305–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, H.; Yanpeng, A.; Hao, F.; Wang, Y.; Tang, H. Correlations of Fecal Metabonomic and Microbiomic Changes Induced by High-Fat Diet in the Pre-Obesity State. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. American Institute of Nutrition. Report of the American Institute of Nurtition Ad hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies. J. Nutr. 1977, 107, 1340–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rouser, G.; Siakotos, A.N.; Fleischer, S. Quantitative Analysis of Phospholipids by Thin-Layer Chromatography and Phosphorus Analysis of Spots. Lipids 1966, 1, 85–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ufnal, M.; Jazwiec, R.; Dadlez, M.; Drapala, A.; Sikora, M.; Skrzypecki, J. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide: A Carnitine-Derived Metabolite That Prolongs the Hypertensive Effect of Angiotensin II in Rats. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Takahashi, S.; Tomita, J.; Nishioka, K.; Hisada, T.; Nishijima, M. Development of a Prokaryotic Universal Primer for Simultaneous Analysis of Bacteria and Archaea Using Next-Generation Sequencing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105592. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hisada, T.; Endoh, K.; Kuriki, K. Inter- and Intra-Individual Variations in Seasonal and Daily Stabilities of the Human Gut Microbiota in Japanese. Arch. Microbiol. 2015, 197, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Aronesty, E. Comparison of Sequencing Utility Programs. TOBIOIJ 2013, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gordon, A.; Hannon, G.J. FASTQ/A Short-Reads Preprocessing Tools (2 February 2020-Version 0.0.13). Available online: http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/ (accessed on 18 March 2021).
  37. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME Allows Analysis of High-Throughput Community Sequencing Data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Edgar, R.C.; Haas, B.J.; Clemente, J.C.; Quince, C.; Knight, R. UCHIME Improves Sensitivity and Speed of Chimera Detection. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2194–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naive Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences Into the New Bacterial Taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kasai, C.; Sugimoto, K.; Moritani, I.; Tanaka, J.; Oya, Y.; Inoue, H.; Tameda, M.; Shiraki, K.; Ito, M.; Takei, Y.; et al. Comparison of the Gut Microbiota Composition Between Obese and Non-Obese Individuals in a Japanese Population, as Analyzed by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism and Next-Generation Sequencing. B.M.C. Gastroenterol. 2015, 15, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, Interactive, Scalable and Extensible Microbiome Data Science Using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference From Illumina Amplicon Data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. DeSantis, T.Z.; Hugenholtz, P.; Larsen, N.; Rojas, M.; Brodie, E.L.; Keller, K.; Huber, T.; Dalevi, D.; Hu, P.; Andersen, G.L. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S RRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible With ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5069–5072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Akinwande, M.O.; Dikko, H.G.; Samson, A. Variance Inflation Factor: As a Condition for the Inclusion of Suppressor Variable(S) in Regression Analysis. Open J. Stat. 2015, 05, 754–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cleveland Clinic. Blood Tests to Determine Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. Available online: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/16792-blood-tests-to-determine-risk-of-coronary-artery-disease (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  46. Kanda, Y. Investigation of the Freely Available Easy-to-Use Software “EZR” for Medical Statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013, 48, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. MetaboAnalyst 5.0—User-Friendly, Streamlined Metabolomics Data Analysis. Available online: https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/home.xhtml (accessed on 13 December 2021).
Metabolites 12 00064 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of phosphatidylcholine (PC), glycerophosphocholine (GPC), and choline chloride. “R” represents hydrocarbon groups.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of phosphatidylcholine (PC), glycerophosphocholine (GPC), and choline chloride. “R” represents hydrocarbon groups.
Metabolites 12 00064 g001
Metabolites 12 00064 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of dietary choline compounds on plasma TMAO levels in rats. Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5 per group). a,b Different letters show significant differences at p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post hoc tests.
Figure 2. Effects of dietary choline compounds on plasma TMAO levels in rats. Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5 per group). a,b Different letters show significant differences at p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post hoc tests.
Metabolites 12 00064 g002
Metabolites 12 00064 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of dietary choline compounds on diversity of fecal microbiota. (a,b) Bacterial rarefaction curves based on the α Chao 1 and Shannon diversity indices at the genus level, respectively. (c,d) Boxplots based on the α Chao 1 and Shannon diversity indices at the genus level, respectively. (e) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based weighted UniFrac distance in β diversity at the genus level.
Figure 3. Effects of dietary choline compounds on diversity of fecal microbiota. (a,b) Bacterial rarefaction curves based on the α Chao 1 and Shannon diversity indices at the genus level, respectively. (c,d) Boxplots based on the α Chao 1 and Shannon diversity indices at the genus level, respectively. (e) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based weighted UniFrac distance in β diversity at the genus level.
Metabolites 12 00064 g003
Metabolites 12 00064 g004a 550Metabolites 12 00064 g004b 550
Figure 4. (a) Effects of dietary choline compounds on relative abundance of fecal microbiota at the genus level. The 27 dominant microbes with relative mean abundances of >0.5% are shown. Microbes with relative mean abundances of <0.5% are summed into “others.” (b) Heatmap and hierarchical clustering dendrogram of gut microbiota composition at the genus levels.
Figure 4. (a) Effects of dietary choline compounds on relative abundance of fecal microbiota at the genus level. The 27 dominant microbes with relative mean abundances of >0.5% are shown. Microbes with relative mean abundances of <0.5% are summed into “others.” (b) Heatmap and hierarchical clustering dendrogram of gut microbiota composition at the genus levels.
Metabolites 12 00064 g004aMetabolites 12 00064 g004b
Metabolites 12 00064 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of dietary choline compounds on relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level. (a–g) Relative abundances of Akkermansia, Asaccharobacter, Anaerotruncus, Roseburia, Holdemania, Parasporobacterium, and Coprobacter, respectively. Data are represented as box plots with outliers (shown as white circles) (n = 5 per group). a,b Different letters show significant difference at p < 0.05 using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Steel–Dwass multiple comparison post hoc tests.
Figure 5. Effects of dietary choline compounds on relative abundances of fecal microbiota at the genus level. (a–g) Relative abundances of Akkermansia, Asaccharobacter, Anaerotruncus, Roseburia, Holdemania, Parasporobacterium, and Coprobacter, respectively. Data are represented as box plots with outliers (shown as white circles) (n = 5 per group). a,b Different letters show significant difference at p < 0.05 using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Steel–Dwass multiple comparison post hoc tests.
Metabolites 12 00064 g005
Metabolites 12 00064 g006 550
Figure 6. Top 10 gut microbes correlated with logarithmic-transformed TMAO plasma levels. Asterisk shows significant difference at p < 0.05. “LN” indicates a natural logarithm.
Figure 6. Top 10 gut microbes correlated with logarithmic-transformed TMAO plasma levels. Asterisk shows significant difference at p < 0.05. “LN” indicates a natural logarithm.
Metabolites 12 00064 g006
Metabolites 12 00064 g007 550
Figure 7. OPLS-SA of low and high TMAO groups, based on fecal microbiota at the genus level. (a) OPLS-DA score plot, (b) its corresponding S-plot, and (c–e) characteristic gut microbes that can discriminate between the low and high TMAO groups (normalized data are represented as box plots with each and mean values as shown black and yellow squares, respectively). Variables with a variable importance of projection (VIP) of >2.0 are highlighted with green or red filled circles.
Figure 7. OPLS-SA of low and high TMAO groups, based on fecal microbiota at the genus level. (a) OPLS-DA score plot, (b) its corresponding S-plot, and (c–e) characteristic gut microbes that can discriminate between the low and high TMAO groups (normalized data are represented as box plots with each and mean values as shown black and yellow squares, respectively). Variables with a variable importance of projection (VIP) of >2.0 are highlighted with green or red filled circles.
Metabolites 12 00064 g007
Table
Table 1. Effects of diets containing choline compounds on morphometric and metabolic parameters in rats.
Table 1. Effects of diets containing choline compounds on morphometric and metabolic parameters in rats.
ControlPCGPCCC
Initial body weight (g)203 ± 5206 ± 2206 ± 2205 ± 4
Final body weight (g)420 ± 10432 ± 4422 ± 10428 ± 7
Food intake (g·d−1)24.4 ± 0.624.2 ± 0.424.5 ± 0.124.2 ± 0.5
Organ weights (g per 100 g of body weight)
Liver4.15 ± 0.174.41 ± 0.14.15 ± 0.274.23 ± 0.12
Soleus muscle1.04 ± 0.071.08 ± 0.061.07 ± 0.031.01 ± 0.03
White adipose tissue (WAT) weights (g per 100 g of body weight)
Epididymal1.75 ± 0.10 a1.56 ± 0.05 ab1.45 ± 0.09 ab1.4 ± 0.07 b
Perirenal2.26 ± 0.17 a1.69 ± 0.15 ab1.52 ± 0.21 b1.77 ± 0.19 ab
Mesenteric1.32 ± 0.121.19 ± 0.061.09 ± 0.081.05 ± 0.1
Abdominal *5.33 ± 0.364.44 ± 0.194.07 ± 0.354.21 ± 0.34
Plasma levels
TG (mg·dL−1)189 ± 36227 ± 27164 ± 44211 ± 50
NEFA (mEq·dL−1)0.404 ± 0.0320.384 ± 0.0190.363 ± 0.0530.388 ± 0.02
Total cholesterol (mg·dL−1)77.3 ± 7.976.3 ± 793.5 ± 1076.9 ± 3.4
PL (mg·dL−1)138 ± 30104 ± 11149 ± 24117 ± 18
Glucose (mg·dL−1)259 ± 32232 ± 9237 ± 15241 ± 13
Liver PL contents (mg per whole liver)476 ± 33 a409 ± 20 ab358 ± 18 b378 ± 13 b
mRNA levels of enzymes related to TMA metabolism in the liver
 Fmo1 (arbitrary unit)1 ± 0.211.38 ± 0.21.04 ± 0.191.03 ± 0.26
 Fmo3 (arbitrary unit)1 ± 0.160.894 ± 0.1590.798 ± 0.1580.737 ± 0.107
Feces
 Weight (wet g·d−1)2.32 ± 0.112.2 ± 0.122.3 ± 0.162.26 ± 0.14
* Abdominal WAT weights were calculated by adding the weights of epididymal, perirenal, and mesenteric WAT. Values are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM; n = 5 per group). a,b Different superscript letters show significant differences at p < 0.05, as determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison post hoc tests.
Table
Table 2. Best predictors of variations in plasma TMAO levels from stepwise forward regression analysis.
Table 2. Best predictors of variations in plasma TMAO levels from stepwise forward regression analysis.
Response VariablePredictor Variable
(Fecal Microbe)		β Coefficientp ValueVIFDurbin-Watson RatioNormality of
Unstandardized
Residual		Adjusted R2
LN plasma TMAOAnaerotruncus−0.725p < 0.0011.0001.393Yes0.656
(p < 0.001)
Coprobacter0.401p < 0.011.000
“Yes” indicates normal distribution of residual. “LN” indicates a natural logarithm. VIF, variance inflation factor.
Table
Table 3. Composition of experimental diets.
Table 3. Composition of experimental diets.
ControlPCGPCCC
Ingredients(g·kg−1 diet)
Sucrose479474472.364475.398
Casein200200200200
β-Cornstarch150150150150
Cellulose50505050
Soybean oil a70557070
Soybean PC b---20------
GPC c------6.636---
Choline chloride (CC) d---------3.602
Mineral mixture (AIN-76)35353535
Vitamin mixture (AIN-76)10101010
DL-Methionine3333
Choline bitartrate2222
Cholesterol1111
(mmol·kg−1 diet)
Total choline7.933.733.733.7
Total fatty acids237.6238.3237.6237.6
a Average M.W. = 884; Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan. b The purity of PC was ≥94% (average M.W. = 775.04; EMD Millipore Corp., Darmstadt, Germany). c The purity of GPC was ≥98% (M.W. = 257.22; Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). d The purity of CC was ≥98% (M.W. = 139.62; Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shirouchi, B.; Fukuda, A.; Akasaka, T. Unlike Glycerophosphocholine or Choline Chloride, Dietary Phosphatidylcholine Does Not Increase Plasma Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Levels in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Metabolites 2022, 12, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12010064

AMA Style

Shirouchi B, Fukuda A, Akasaka T. Unlike Glycerophosphocholine or Choline Chloride, Dietary Phosphatidylcholine Does Not Increase Plasma Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Levels in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Metabolites. 2022; 12(1):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12010064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shirouchi, Bungo, Ayano Fukuda, and Taiki Akasaka. 2022. "Unlike Glycerophosphocholine or Choline Chloride, Dietary Phosphatidylcholine Does Not Increase Plasma Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Levels in Sprague-Dawley Rats" Metabolites 12, no. 1: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12010064

APA Style

Shirouchi, B., Fukuda, A., & Akasaka, T. (2022). Unlike Glycerophosphocholine or Choline Chloride, Dietary Phosphatidylcholine Does Not Increase Plasma Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Levels in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Metabolites, 12(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12010064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop