Next Article in Journal
Automated and Intelligent System for Monitoring Swimming Pool Safety Based on the IoT and Transfer Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Compact Double Notch Coplanar and Microstrip Bandstop Filters Using Metamaterial—Inspired Open Ring Resonators
Previous Article in Journal
Light-Load Efficiency Optimization for an LCC-Parallel Compensated Inductive Power Transfer Battery Charger
Previous Article in Special Issue
D-Band Frequency Tripler Module Using Anti-Parallel Diode Pair and Waveguide Transitions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

H-Band InP HBT Frequency Tripler Using the Triple-Push Technique

Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2020, 9(12), 2081; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122081
Submission received: 3 November 2020 / Revised: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 3 December 2020 / Published: 6 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RF, Microwave and Millimeter Wave Devices and Integrated Systems)

Abstract

:
A broadband H-band (220 GHz–325 GHz) frequency tripler using the triple-push technique is presented in 250-nm InP heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBT) technology. It consisted of three identical unit-cell multipliers, which were individually pumped by the W-band input signals with 120° phase difference. For this purpose, a 120° 3-way power divider was proposed using the 1:2 and 1:1 Lange couplers with 30° phase delay lines. The fundamental and 2nd harmonic signals of each unit-cell multiplier were added out-of-phase at the output, allowing an effective harmonic suppression. On the contrast, the 3rd harmonic components were combined in-phase at the output, so that the entire circuit successfully did the function of the frequency multiplier-by-3. The fabricated frequency tripler exhibited a broadband output power of −7.4 ± 1.4 dBm from 225 GHz to 330 GHz at an input power of 9.6 ± 0.8 dBm, with an average conversion gain of −16.8 dB.

1. Introduction

Recently, there has been extensive research developing sub-millimeter-wave and terahertz (THz) oscillator and power amplifier integrated circuits (ICs) using advanced transistor technologies [1,2,3,4]. Frequency multipliers are also widely used to generate THz frequency signals in ICs. They allow wide tuning range and low phase noise performance, compared to the fundamental oscillators at THz frequencies [5]. Active H-band (220 GHz–325 GHz) frequency multipliers have been reported in the form of IC using high-speed transistor technologies, such as GaAs metamorphic high electron mobility transistors (mHEMTs) or InP HEMTs and SiGe or InP heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs) [6,7,8]. They can offer highly-integrated and low-cost THz signal sources, because they can be integrated with other circuits in the same semiconductor process [7].
In H-band, the low-order frequency multipliers, such as doublers, are usually designed to achieve high output power and high conversion gain [6,7]. The H-band frequency doubler was designed in 90-nm SiGe HBTs in [6], which consists of the balun and common-emitter pair. It exhibits an output power of about 0.5 dBm for an input power of 16 dBm–17 dBm from 200 GHz to 245 GHz. A higher-order (>2) multiplier in a single stage can reduce the input frequency and chip size. However, it results in low output power with low conversion gain. The H-band frequency tripler was designed in a single common-source configuration using 35-nm mHEMTs, providing an average output power of −6 dBm for an input power of 6 dBm over a frequency range of 235 GHz–285 GHz [8].
In this paper, we present the H-band broadband frequency tripler in 250-nm InP HBT technology. The triple-push technique was applied in order to obtain high output power at 3rd harmonic component, as well as sufficient fundamental and 2nd harmonic suppression. In addition, a W-band 3-way power divider was proposed, using the 1:2 and 1:1 Lange couplers with phase delay lines. Input and output matching networks were designed to allow for high output power and high conversion gain with sufficient spurious rejection. Full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulations were performed to design all the passive components, such as microstrip lines, Lange couplers, and capacitors.

2. Design of H-Band Frequency Tripler

Figure 1 illustrates the operating principle of the proposed frequency tripler using the triple-push technique. A 120° 3-way power divider generated three signals with equal amplitude and 120° phase difference from the input signal at a frequency of f 0 , that is, v i , k ( t ) = V i cos ( ω 0 t 120 ° ( k 1 ) ) , where k = 1 ,   2 ,   3 , ω 0 = 2 π f 0 , and 120° is equal to 2 π / 3 radians. Unit-cell multipliers implemented by a transistor, as shown in Figure 1b, produced output currents at various harmonic frequencies or i o , k ( t ) = n = 1 a k v i , k n , where a k represents the n th-order nonlinearity of the transistor. The total output current was a sum of three output currents, i o ( t ) = k = 1 3 i o , k ( t ) . The n th harmonic components of i o ( t ) were given as k = 1 3 I o cos n ( ω 0 t 120 ° ( k 1 ) ) , which is 0 for n = 1 , 2 and 3 I o cos 3 ω 0 t , for n = 3 . This result implies that the three output currents at the fundamental and 2nd harmonic frequencies were added with 120° phase differences, leading to signal cancellation. In contrast, the three currents at the 3rd harmonic frequency ( 3 f 0 ) were combined in phase at the output. Therefore, this triple-push technique allowed for power combining at 3 f 0 , leading to high output power. It also effectively suppressed the signals at f 0 and 2 f 0 (and 4 f 0 and 5 f 0 as well), simplifying or removing the output band-pass filters.
The unit-cell multiplier shown in Figure 1b was designed using the common-emitter HBT with an emitter length of 6 μm. It was biased at the base-emitter voltage around 0.7 V. The input matching network was designed to provide conjugate match at the input frequency ( f 0 ). The combining line at the collector was used to present reactive impedances at f 0 and 2 f 0 , where the combining node A was virtually short-circuited. The output matching network was designed to present a load impedance at 3 f 0 to obtain high output power. The coupled line was employed in the output matching network to further suppress the fundamental and second harmonic components.
A W-band 120° 3-way power divider was required at the input, generating three input signals with 120° phase differences. It was designed by using the 1:2 and 1:1 Lange couplers with phase delay lines, with an electrical length of 30° at f 0 (~ 90 GHz), as illustrated in Figure 1a. The ratio, 1:2 and 1:1, indicates the power division ratio between the coupled and through ports. These passive components were implemented in the form of inverted microstrip lines, using four frontside metal layers (M1–M4) on the 75 μm-thick InP substrate. The bottom metal layer M1 was used as a signal line and the third metal layer M3 was used as a ground plane. Each metal layer had about 1 μm-thickness, except for the 3 μm-thick M4 (top metal layer). The 1 μm-thick dielectric layers were placed between metal layers. The coupled lines in the Lange couplers were implemented in the M1 layer, where the M3 ground plane was removed (M3 opening in Figure 2a) in order to increase the coupling factor. On the contrary, the M3 opening was partially connected to reduce the coupling factor in the 1:2 Lange coupler. The 30°-long inverted microstrip lines were inserted to accomplish 120° phase delay, together with 90° phase shift by the Lange coupler. The Lange couplers and phase delay lines were meandered in order to reduce the circuit size.
EM simulations were carried out using Advanced Design System (ADS) Momentum from Keysight Technologies to optimize the dimensions of the power dividers, and the results are given in Figure 2b,c. The designed power divider exhibited almost equal power division and 120° phase difference between three output ports, with good return loss at the center frequency around 90 GHz. The phase error increased as the frequency deviated from the center frequency, which may have limited the bandwidth performance of the frequency tripler. Return loss and isolation were better than 14 dB in the entire W-band.
The EM simulation was also performed for the input matching network, combining lines and output matching network, to optimize the performance of the tripler. The designed tripler exhibited a maximum conversion gain of −10.2 dB at an input power of 3.5 dBm at f 0 = 90 GHz, as shown in Figure 3a. Figure 3b shows the output power at each harmonic frequency at an input power of 3.5 dBm. It achieves a wideband performance with output power greater than −9.1 dBm (conversion gain >−12.6 dB) at 75 GHz–105 GHz (3 dB bandwidth of conversion gain). It also shows that the fundamental and 2nd harmonic components were sufficiently suppressed by more than 30 dB from 87 to 93 GHz, compared to the 3rd harmonic component, due to the phase cancellation by the triple-push technique.

3. Experimental Results

Figure 4 shows the fabricated H-band frequency tripler in Teledyne Scientific’s 250-nm InP HBT process, which offers high-speed transistors with maximum oscillation frequency (fmax) around 700 GHz [2]. The chip size was 790 μm × 535 μm, including direct current (DC) and radio frequency (RF) pads. The performance of the frequency tripler was measured by on-wafer probing, as illustrated in Figure 5. The W-band signal (75 GHz–110 GHz) was generated by the frequency multiplier-by-6 module and applied to the chip by a WR-10 waveguide probe. The H-band output power was measured by using a WR-3.4 waveguide probe (by GGB Industries, Inc. (Naples, FL, USA)) and a H-band power meter (PM5 by Virginia Diodes, Inc. (Charlottesville, VA, USA)). The loss of each component in the measurement setup (such as the probes and waveguide sections) was measured and calibrated out.
Figure 6 shows the measured output power and conversion gain of the frequency tripler as a function of output frequency at an input power around 9.6 dBm. Measured output power was between −8.8 dBm and −6.0 dBm at 225 GHz–330 GHz, where the conversion gain was between −18.7 dB and −14.8 dB. Figure 7 shows the measured output power and spectrum at an input frequency of 91 GHz. As shown in Figure 7a, there was a discrepancy in the measured and simulated output powers, for example, there was about 6 dB difference at high input power. It was believed to be caused by the inaccurate non-linear model of the transistor at very high frequency provided by the process company. The output spectrum was also on-wafer, measured by down-converting the tripler output signal to low frequency using the H-band 2nd harmonic mixer, D-band power source (frequency multiplier-by-12 module) for local oscillator (LO), and spectrum analyzer. Figure 7b shows the measured down-converted spectrum around 3.0 GHz with a span of 2 GHz, showing a spurious-free output spectrum. Table 1 compares the performance of active frequency multipliers reported in the H-band, showing that the frequency tripler designed in this work exhibited a comparable output power and conversion gain with excellent bandwidth performance.

4. Conclusions

We designed an H-band frequency tripler IC using the triple-push technique in the 250-nm InP HBT technology. The 3-way power divider was proposed to generate W-band input signals with a 120° phase difference. The triple-push technique allowed the frequency tripler with a 3rd harmonic power combination and sufficient suppression of fundamental and second harmonic power. The measurement shows that the designed tripler presented a broadband output power performance in H-band. Therefore, the designed frequency tripler IC can be effectively applied for H-band signal generation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J. and W.C.; methodology, J.C.; software, J.C.; validation, J.K. and W.C.; formal analysis, J.J.; investigation, J.C.; resources, J.J.; data curation, J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.; writing—review and editing, J.J.; visualization, J.K.; supervision, J.J.; project administration, J.J.; funding acquisition, J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by the Institute for Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant, funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2016-0-00185, Development of ultra-wideband terahertz CW spectroscopic imaging systems based on electronic devices). This work was also partly supported by a grant to the Terahertz Electronic Device Research Laboratory, funded by Defense Acquisition Program Administration and by the Agency for Defense Development (UD180025RD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Samoska, L. An Overview of Solid–state Integrated Circuit Amplifiers in the Submillimeter-Wave and THz Regime. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Seo, M.; Urteaga, M.; Hacker, J.; Young, A.; Griffith, Z.; Jain, V.; Pierson, R.; Rowell, P.; Skalare, A.; Peralta, A.; et al. InP HBT IC Technology for Terahertz Frequencies: Fundamental Oscillators Up to 0.57 THz. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2011, 46, 2203–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Eriksson, K.; Gunnarson, S.E.; Vassilev, V.; Zirath, H. Design and Characterization of H-Band (220–325 GHz) Amplifiers in a 250-nm InP DHBT Technology. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, J.; Jeon, S.; Kim, M.; Urteaga, M.; Jeong, J. H-band Power Amplifier Integrated Circuits Using 250-nm InP HBT Technology. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lewark, U.J.; Tessmann, A.; Wagner, S.; Leuther, A.; Zwick, T.; Kallfass, I. 255 to 330 GHz Active Frequency Tripler MMIC. In Proceedings of the Integrated Nonlinear Microwave and Millimetre-Wave Circuits, Dublin, Ireland, 3–4 September 2012; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lin, H.C.; Rebeiz, G.M. A 200–245 GHz Balanced Frequency Doubler with Peak Output Power of +2 dBm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Monterey, CA, USA, 13–16 October 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ojefors, E.; Heinemann, B.; Pfeiffer, U.R. A 325 GHz Frequency Multiplier Chain in a SiGe HBT Technology. In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, Anaheim, CA, USA, 23–25 May 2010; pp. 91–94. [Google Scholar]
  8. Grotsch, C.M.; Wagner, S.; Leuther, A.; Meier, D.; Kallfass, I. Ultra-Broadband Frequency Multiplier MMICs for Communication and Radar Applications. In Proceedings of the 13th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference, Madrid, Spain, 23–25 September 2018; pp. 113–116. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Designed H-band frequency tripler based on the triple-push technique. (a) Entire tripler; (b) unit-cell multiplier.
Figure 1. Designed H-band frequency tripler based on the triple-push technique. (a) Entire tripler; (b) unit-cell multiplier.
Electronics 09 02081 g001
Figure 2. Designed 120° 3-way power divider. (a) Layout; (b) simulated insertion and return loss; (c) simulated phase difference between output ports.
Figure 2. Designed 120° 3-way power divider. (a) Layout; (b) simulated insertion and return loss; (c) simulated phase difference between output ports.
Electronics 09 02081 g002aElectronics 09 02081 g002b
Figure 3. Simulated performance of the designed frequency tripler. (a) Output power as a function of input power at f 0 = 90 GHz; (b) output power as a function of frequency at an input power of 3.5 dBm.
Figure 3. Simulated performance of the designed frequency tripler. (a) Output power as a function of input power at f 0 = 90 GHz; (b) output power as a function of frequency at an input power of 3.5 dBm.
Electronics 09 02081 g003
Figure 4. Photograph of the fabricated H-band frequency tripler integrated circuit (IC).
Figure 4. Photograph of the fabricated H-band frequency tripler integrated circuit (IC).
Electronics 09 02081 g004
Figure 5. Photograph of the fabricated H-band frequency tripler IC.
Figure 5. Photograph of the fabricated H-band frequency tripler IC.
Electronics 09 02081 g005
Figure 6. Measured output power and conversion gain of the frequency tripler at an input power around 9.6 dBm.
Figure 6. Measured output power and conversion gain of the frequency tripler at an input power around 9.6 dBm.
Electronics 09 02081 g006
Figure 7. Measured output power at the output frequency of 273 GHz. (a) Output power versus input power; (b) output spectrum (after frequency down-conversion, using a harmonic mixer).
Figure 7. Measured output power at the output frequency of 273 GHz. (a) Output power versus input power; (b) output spectrum (after frequency down-conversion, using a harmonic mixer).
Electronics 09 02081 g007
Table 1. Comparison of active frequency multipliers reported in H-band.
Table 1. Comparison of active frequency multipliers reported in H-band.
ReferenceMultiplication FactorOutput Frequency
(GHz)
Output Power (dBm)Input Power
(dBm)
Technology
[6]Doubler200–245016.590 nm SiGe HBT
[7]Doubler317–328−8 (peak)-130 nm SiGe HBT
[5]Tripler255–330−8.8935 nm GaAs mHEMT
[8]Tripler235–285−6635 nm GaAs mHEMT
This workTripler225–330−7.49.6250 nm InP HBT
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, J.; Choi, J.; Kim, J.; Choe, W. H-Band InP HBT Frequency Tripler Using the Triple-Push Technique. Electronics 2020, 9, 2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122081

AMA Style

Jeong J, Choi J, Kim J, Choe W. H-Band InP HBT Frequency Tripler Using the Triple-Push Technique. Electronics. 2020; 9(12):2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Jinho, Jisu Choi, Jongyoun Kim, and Wonseok Choe. 2020. "H-Band InP HBT Frequency Tripler Using the Triple-Push Technique" Electronics 9, no. 12: 2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop