Circuit Simulation of Film Resistor Laser Trimming with a Measuring Voltage Source
, Vyacheslav V. Chapkin 1, Oleg S. Seredin 2, Evgeny V. Zemlyakov 3 and Ekaterina Yu. Pozdeeva 3
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
the article requires some structural changes.
The objective of the paper is not well defined. A simple numerical application that illustrates the purpose of the work is missing.
At the end of the introduction it should be noted how the paper is divided.
In line 49 you say that we have n + 1 branches because besides the internal ones (n-1), you also consider the two from the bonding pads. Explain it in the paper.
Review Kirchhoff's name.
Explain E's contribution in section 3.4, what it should simulate.
Expand conclusions and bibliography
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The following comments need to be addressed before starting the actual review.
- There is NO literature review presented in the paper. Due to this, the research gap, aim of this work, comparison with existing literature, etc., are missing.
- There are only seven references, of which 2 of them are very weak, and 2 are authors' works.
- The manuscript can not be in the category of 'Article' in the present position.
- No numerical or pictorial analysis and no comparison with literature in the paper. Thus, no results and discussions section.
- With 2 Abbreviations, what is the need for that section?
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
My comment
- In abstract, what is the goal of this study ? The results should be mention in this section
- In the introduction part, authors should give some simple discussions to show the advantages and disadvantages of the existing results.
- Please mention the novelty and contribution of this paper in introduction.
- More comprehensive evaluations are needed for journal publication
- The authors have to further improve the technical writing and presentation of the paper.
- Refs are low
- Throughout the manuscript grammatical errors and typos should be thoroughly checked.
- Limitation of study should be added in Conclusion
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
the work has been modified and can be accepted
Reviewer 2 Report
I have no further comments. All my comments has been addressed.
Reviewer 3 Report
This form can be accepted
