Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of VTH and RON Drifts during Switch-Mode Operation in Packaged SiC MOSFETs
Next Article in Special Issue
Reliability Analysis and Repair Activity for the Components of 350 kW Inverters in a Large Scale Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System
Previous Article in Journal
A Cost-Efficient MFCC-Based Fault Detection and Isolation Technology for Electromagnetic Pumps
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Lifetime Estimation of SiC Power MOSFETs for Motor Drive Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Study of the Single Event Effect in AlGaN/GaN HEMT Based on a Cascode Structure

1
National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
2
Institute of Astronomy and Space, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2021, 10(4), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040440
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 17 January 2021 / Accepted: 20 January 2021 / Published: 10 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and New Trends in Power Electronic Devices Reliability)

Abstract

:
An attractive candidate for space and aeronautic applications is the high-power and miniaturizing electric propulsion technology device, the gallium nitride high electron mobility transistor (GaN HEMT), which is representative of wide bandgap power electronic devices. The cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT is a common structure typically composed of a high-voltage depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT and low-voltage enhancement-mode silicon (Si) MOSFET connected by a cascode structure to realize its enhancement mode. It is well known that low-voltage Si MOSFET is insensitive to single event burnout (SEB). Therefore, this paper mainly focuses on the single event effects of the cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT using technical computer-aided design (TCAD) simulation and heavy-ion experiments. The influences of heavy-ion energy, track length, and track position on the single event effects for the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT were studied using TCAD simulation. The results showed that a leakage channel between the gate electrode and drain electrode in depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was formed after heavy-ion striking. The enhancement of the ionization mechanism at the edge of the gate might be an important factor for the leakage channel. To further study the SEB effect in AlGaN/GaN HEMT, the heavy-ion test of a cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was carried out. SEB was observed in the heavy-ion irradiation experiment and the leakage channel was found between the gate and drain region in the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. The heavy-ion irradiation experimental results proved reasonable for the SEB simulation for AlGaN/GaN HEMT with a cascode structure.

1. Introduction

As high-power and miniaturizing electric propulsion technology devises continue to develop, high-performance and high-reliability wide bandgap power electronic devices begin to play an important role in air and space vehicles. Gallium nitride high electron mobility transistors (GaN HEMT) are representative of wide bandgap power electronic devices and could be an attractive candidate for space and aeronautic applications due to their excellent electrical characteristics, such as high electron mobility, high breakdown voltage, and high thermal conductivity. To realize space and aeronautic applications, the radiation effect should be considered, including the total ionizing dose (TID) effect, single event effect (SEE), and the displacement damage dose (DDD) effect. Due to the existence of two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG), AlGaN/GaN HEMT, fabricated on AlGaN/GaN heterojunction, is in depletion mode. To ensure the reliability of the device in space applications, enhancement-mode devices can be adopted. The enhanced mode is mainly realized in AlGaN/GaN HEMT by the following: p-GaN [1,2], F ion implantation [3,4], MIS HEMT [5,6], and cascode structure [7,8]. The total ionizing dose and displacement damage effect on GaN HEMT have been studied by many researchers [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Because there is no gate dielectric layer in AlGaN/GaN HEMT, GaN HEMT is less sensitive to the TID effect. Additionally, some references [12,13] have shown that the DDD effect impacts the direct-current (DC) characteristics of the AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and the failure mechanisms have been basically studied. However, as one of the most important effects of space environment radiation, many studies focused on the enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT based on the p-GaN structure [15,16,17]. The SEE characteristics and AlGaN/GaN HEMT failure mechanisms based on the cascode structure are not clear. Therefore, in this paper, we focused on studying the SEE of the AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and analyzing the failure mechanism of the single event burnout (SEB) effect.
To study the radiation response and failure mechanism of the SEB effect for GaN HEMTs, TCAD simulation and heavy-ion irradiation experiments were carried out. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows.
Firstly, according to the circuit structure shown in Figure 1, the cascode structure of AlGaN/GaN HEMT, including the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT and Si MOSFET, were modeled. Because low-voltage Si MOSFET is not sensitive to the SEB effect, we focused on studying the SEE in the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. The simulation results showed that (1) the SEB effect of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT was influenced by heavy-ion energy and track position. Further, (2) a leakage channel between the gate electrode and drain electrode was observed after heavy-ion striking in depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT.
Heavy-ion irradiation experiments of the commercial cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT were conducted in an off-mode condition. The experimental results showed that (1) the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was burnt out under Vds = 50 V for Ge ions at LET = 28.5 MeV·cm2/mg (about 0.31 pC/μm). Moreover, it showed (2) a leakage channel between the gate electrode and the drain electrode in the depletion-mode, where AlGaN/GaN HEMT was formed after the heavy-ion striking.
Finally, the possible SEE failure mechanism was proposed. We proved that the enhancement of the impact ionization mechanism at the edge of the gate might be an important factor in the formation of the leakage channel.

2. Simulation Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 1, a high voltage depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT and a low voltage enhancement-mode silicon (Si) MOSFET were connected to form a high voltage enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT in the cascode structure. For the cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT circuit, the drain electrode of GaN HEMT served as the drain port and the gate electrode of Si MOSFET acted as the gate port. The source port of the device was formed by connecting the source electrode of Si MOSFET and the gate electrode of GaN HEMT. It is well known that the low voltage power MOSFETs are robust to the SEB effect [18,19,20]. Therefore, to investigate the mechanism of the SEB induced by heavy ion irradiation on cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT, we studied the SEB effect of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. TCAD simulation was carried out with the Sentaurus TCAD simulator.

2.1. Modeling

In the simulation, the generic model of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT supported by the foundry was adopted. According to previous reports [21,22,23], the architecture considered in the simulation is shown in Figure 2. The structure consisted of a Si substrate, a GaN buffer layer, an unintentional doped GaN channel layer, an unintentional doped AlGaN barrier layer, and a SiN passivation layer. The breakdown voltage of the simulated device was higher than 900 V. The breakdown, transfer, and output characteristics of the simulated structure are shown in Figure 3. The threshold voltage (Vth) of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT was approximately −2.5 V.
In the simulation, we used a heavy-ion model in Sentaurus software. The impact ionization model and drift-diffusion model were adopted. To simplify the simulation process, thermal equations (lattice heating) were not considered in this paper. The heavy-ion was vertical incidence on the device from the front side. The Gaussian track radius was 20 nm spatially.

2.2. Simulation Results and Discussion

2.2.1. SEB Characteristics of HMET

To trigger the device’s SEE effect, we adopted a track length of 10 μm and linear energy transfers (LET) of 1 pC/μm. The drain, source, and gate port of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT were biased at 400 V, 10 V, and 0 V, respectively (Vgs = −10 V, Vds = 390 V), which ensured that the device was in the off state. The transient drain, source, and gate currents are presented in Figure 4. The currents increased immediately after a heavy-ion struck the device. The drain current increased to about 2.5 mA, the gate current increased to about 1.5 mA, and the source current increased to about 1 mA. Approximately 1 ns after striking, the source current returned to 0.1 μA and the drain current and gate current reached 0.2 mA. The drain current and gate current were about 0.1 mA at 50 ns after striking. This indicated that a leakage channel between the gate electrode and the drain electrode in depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was formed.

2.2.2. Influence Factors of SEB

  • Heavy-ion energy
Heavy-ion energy, heavy-ion track length, and heavy-ion track position are important parameters that affect the single event effect of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Heavy-ion energy is related to the electron-hole pairs produced in the device. To study the influence of heavy-ion energy on the SEE of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT, simulation experiments with different LETs (10, 5, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.005, 0.001 pC/μm) were carried out. The track length (10 μm) and track position (close to the drain electrode) were adopted in the simulation. The transient drain currents after heavy ion impacts for different LETs were shown in Figure 5. The transient drain current increased with the LET increasing and reached a saturation value until the LET was higher than 0.1 pC/μm. It indicated that the electron-hole pairs generated in the AlGaN and GaN layers increased with the LET grew and reached the maximum at 0.1 pC/μm [16].
  • Heavy-ion track length
In addition to heavy-ion energy, the heavy-ion track length is also an important parameter. The impacts of heavy-ion with different track lengths were also studied. In the simulation, the heavy-ion energy (1 pC/μm) and track position (close to the drain electrode) were adopted and the track lengths were 2, 5, 10, and 15 μm. The transient drain currents after heavy ion impacts for different track lengths were shown in Figure 6. The amplitude of transient drain current almost kept constant under these simulation conditions. In these simulation conditions, the heavy-ion had passed through the GaN channel layer and reached the GaN buffer layer or the Si substrate layer. In other words, the heavy-ion had passed through the active region of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Therefore, the transient drain currents did not change with heavy-ion track length under these simulation conditions. These results indicated when the heavy-ion passed through the GaN channel layer and reached the GaN buffer layer, the heavy-ion track length had little effect on the SEE of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT.
  • Sensitive region of SEB
To localize the sensitive region of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT, different track positions of heavy-ion were studied. The heavy-ion energy (1 pC/μm) and track length (10 μm) were adopted in the simulation. The schematic of heavy-ion tracks on the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT is revealed in Figure 7. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion impact on different track positions are shown in Figure 8. The drain currents were about 0.1 mA at 50 ns after the heavy-ions striking at P7, P8, and P9, while the drain currents were lower than 10−8 A at 50 ns after the heavy-ions striking at P1 to P6. These indicated that a SEB current was triggered when the heavy-ion impact on the location of P7, P8, and P9. Moreover, the closer the track position is to the drain region, the more sensitive it is to the SEB device.

2.2.3. The Failure Mechanism of SEB

To understand the SEB mechanism, the cross-sections of the total current density after the heavy-ion impact on location P5 and P8 are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively. Figure 9a and Figure 10a show the initial states of the total current density before the heavy-ions striking. Figure 9b and Figure 10b show the total current density after the heavy-ions striking at P5 and P8 for 0.05 ns. After the heavy-ions striking, the total current density in the GaN buffer layer increased (from green to orange), indicating that the GaN buffer layer forming a leakage channel. Figure 9c and Figure 10c show the total current density after the heavy-ions strike at P5 and P8 for 50 ns. These showed that the leakage channel disappeared at 50 ns after the heavy-ions striking at P5, while it was still a leakage channel at 50 ns after the heavy-ions striking at P8.
After the heavy-ions strike the device, the electron-hole pairs were generated. Electrons flowed toward the drain under the high drain voltage and collected by the drain electrode. Holes were left in the GaN buffer layer, leading to the electrons injection of the source and gate electrode [16,24]. Thus, the large transient current was generated in the source, gate, and drain regions. The leakage channel of the GaN buffer layer was formed. The electron-hole pairs generated by heavy-ions decreased with time, leading to the leakage current reduced.
In order to further understand the SEB mechanism, the cross-sections of the impact ionization after the heavy-ion striking at P5 and P8 were studied. Figure 11a and Figure 12a were the initial value of the impact ionization before the heavy-ions struck. Figure 11b,c and Figure 12b,c show the impact ionization at 0.05 ns and 50 ns after the heavy-ions striking at P5 and P8. As shown in Figure 11, after the heavy-ions striking at P5, the impact ionization at the edge of the gate region decreased at 0.05 ns and the value was still low at 50 ns. As shown in Figure 12, after the heavy-ions striking at P8, the impact ionization at the edge of the gate region and the drain region increased at 0.05 ns and the value was still high at 50 ns. The electron-hole pairs were generated after the heavy-ion injected to the AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Then the generated electron-hole pairs drifted under the applied voltage. Electrons flowed toward the drain under the high drain voltage and collected by the drain electrode. Holes were left in the GaN buffer layer, leading to the electrons injection of the source, and gate electrode. The movement of the electron-hole pairs led to the changing of the potential distribution. When the heavy-ions struck at P5, which was close to the gate electrode, the electrons were injected from the source and gate electrode quickly. This process decreased the potential near the drain, which decreased the impact ionization at the edge of the gate region. When the heavy-ions struck at P8, which was close to the drain electrode, electrons were quickly collected by the drain and holes left in the GaN buffer layer accumulated. This process increased the potential near the drain, which enhanced the impact ionization at the edge of the gate region. The enhancing impact ionization increased the number of generated carriers, which increased the probability of electron tunneling of the gate region. This might be attributed to the burnout of the gate electron of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT after heavy-ion striking at P8.

3. Heavy-Ion Experimental Results and Discussion

3.1. Experiment Samples and Setup

To further study the phenomenon of the drain current increase obtained in the simulation section, a commercial GaN HEMT with a breakdown voltage of 900 V was chosen. The devices under test (DUTS) were commercial devices employing a cascode structure from transform (TP90H180PS). The radiation experiments were carried out on the heavy-ion accelerator of China Atomic Energy Research Institute, shown in Figure 13. In the heavy-ion radiation experiments, the device was biased at the off state. The source port and gate port were grounded (Vgs = 0 V). The drain port was biased at 50 V (Vds = 50 V). The heavy-ion parameters used in the irradiation experiment are shown in Table 1. For the heavy-ion irradiation with the flux of about 104 particle/cm2/s, the devices were irradiated to the fluence of 5 × 106 particle/cm2. The drain currents were monitored by Keithley 2470 during the heavy-ion irradiation. The drain current and gate current were measured by Keithley 2470 and 2450 after heavy-ion irradiation.

3.2. Experiment results and discussion

The transient drain currents during the heavy-ion irradiation are shown in Figure 14. When the drain port was biased at 50 V, the drain current quickly increased to 10 mA (current limitation), which took about 45 s at LET = 28.5 MeV·cm2/mg (about 0.31 pC/μm).
After heavy-ion irradiation, the drain current and gate current were measured (Vgs = 0 V), as shown in Figure 15. The drain leakage current increased to approximately 5 mA and the gate leakage current was less than 5 nA at Vds = 20 V, Vgs = 0 V. It indicated that a leakage channel was formed between the source port and drain port in the Cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Analyzing from Figure 1, the source port and drain port of the Cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs corresponded to the gate electrode and the drain electrode of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Therefore, a leakage channel was formed between the gate electrode and the drain electrode in the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT.
The picture of the DUT before and after heavy-ion irradiation is shown in Figure 16. Figure 16a shows the structure of the cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT under test and Figure 16b shows a picture of the device after heavy-ion irradiation. The left device was the low voltage enhancement-mode Si MOSFET and the right device was the high voltage depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. As shown in Figure 16b, the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was burnt out under Vds = 50 V for Ge ions at LET = 28.5 MeV·cm2/mg (about 0.31 pC/μm). The Si MOSFET was not sensitive to SEB. Moreover, it was found that the burned area of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was located at the gate electrode of the device, using layout photographing technology. A burnout area between the drain and gate was found on the surface of depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT from the heavy-ion experimental results, as shown in Figure 16b, which indicated the sensitive region was between the drain electrode and gate electrode.
Analyzing from the simulation results, the sensitive region of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was located near the drain. As shown in Figure 16b, the sensitive region was between the drain electrode and gate electrode. The results of the heavy-ion experiment proved reasonable of the SEB simulation for AlGaN/GaN HEMT with the cascode structure. In a word, the simulation and heavy-ion experimental results both indicated that a leakage channel between the gate electrode and the drain electrode in depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was formed after the heavy-ion striking. This may be the main failure mechanism leading to the SEB effect.

4. Conclusions

Single event effects on cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT were studied in this paper. To figure out the mechanism of single event effects, the simulation and experiment were carried out. The simulation results showed that the heavy-ion energy and track position influenced the SEB effect of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. When the heavy-ion passed through the GaN channel layer and reached the GaN buffer layer, the heavy-ion track length had little effect on the SEE of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. The sensitive region of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was located near the drain. When the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT was biased at Vgs = −10 V and Vds = 390 V, heavy-ion (LET = 0.1 pC/μm) struck near the drain and caused a leakage current between the gate electrode and drain electrode in the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Moreover, the heavy-ion irradiation experiments of a commercial cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT (TP90H180PS) were carried out. Experimental results showed that the drain current of the device increased to 10 mA (limiting by the instrument), which was about 45 s at LET = 28.5 MeV·cm2/mg (about 0.31 pC/μm) with Vds = 50 V. Analyzing from the cascode structure, the leakage channel was formed between the gate electrode and the drain electrode in the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. The picture of the DUT after heavy-ion irradiation indicated that the burning area was between the gate electrode and the drain electrode of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT. The results of the heavy-ion experiment proved reasonable for the SEB simulation of AlGaN/GaN HEMT with cascode structure. The enhancement of the impact ionization at the edge of the gate was revealed using simulation and it might be an important factor for SEB effect. It was very useful for the radiation-hardened technique for GaN HEMT design.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L.; data curation, Y.L.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, Q.C. and H.Y.; methodology, R.C.; project administration, R.C. and J.H.; writing—original draft, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Fast Support Project (Grant No. E11Z360101) and the Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology (Grant No. E039360101).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Efthymiou, L.; Longobardi, G.; Camuso, G.; Chien, T.; Chen, M.; Udrea, F. On the physical operation and optimization of the p-GaN gate in normally-off GaN HEMT devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 123502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hwang, I.; Choi, H.; Lee, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Ha, J.; Um, C.-H.; Hwang, S.-K.; Oh, J.; Kim, J.-Y.; et al. 1.6 kV, 2.9 mΩ cm2 normally-off p-GaN HEMT device. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Bruges, Belgium, 3–7 June 2012; pp. 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun, W.-W.; Zheng, X.-F.; Fan, S.; Wang, C.; Du, M.; Zhang, K.; Chen, W.-W.; Cao, Y.-R.; Mao, W.; Ma, X.-H. Degradation mechanism of enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs using fluorine ion implantation under the on-state gate overdrive stress. Chin. Phys. B 2015, 24, 017303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, H.; Wang, M.; Chen, K.J. Self-aligned enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs using 25 keV fluorine ion implantation. In Proceedings of the 68th Device Research Conference, South Bend, IN, USA, 21–23 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yatabe, Z.; Hori, Y.; Ma, W.-C.; Asubar, J.T.; Akazawa, M.; Sato, T.; Hashizume, T. Characterization of electronic states at insulator/(Al)GaN interfaces for improved insulated gate and surface passivation structures of GaN-based transistors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 53, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhao, Q.-T. Fabrication and Characterization of Enhancement-Mode High-κ LaLuO3-AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 3040–3046. [Google Scholar]
  7. Saito, W.; Saito, Y.; Fujimoto, H.; Yoshioka, A.; Ohno, T.; Naka, T.; Sugiyama, T. Switching controllability of high voltage GaN-HEMTs and the cascode connection. In Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, Bruges, Belgium, 3–7 June 2012; pp. 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, Z.; Huang, X.; Lee, F.C.; Li, Q. Simulation model development and verification for high voltage GaN HEMT in cascode structure. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Denver, CO, USA, 15–19 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun, X.; Saadat, O.I.; Chen, J.; Zhang, E.X.; Cui, S.; Palacios, T.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Ma, T.P. Total-Ionizing-Dose Radiation Effects in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and MOS-HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2013, 60, 4074–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, R.; Zhang, E.X.; McCurdy, M.W.; Wang, P.; Gong, H.; Yan, D.; Schrimpf, R.D.; Fleetwood, D.M. Dose-Rate Dependence of the Total-Ionizing-Dose Response of GaN-Based HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2019, 66, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aktas, O.; Kuliev, A.; Kumar, V.; Schwindt, R.; Toshkov, S.; Costescu, D.; Stubbins, J.; Adesida, I. 60Co gamma radiation effects on DC, RF, and pulsed I–V characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Solid State Electron. 2004, 48, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stocco, A.; Gerardin, S.; Bisi, D.; Dalcanale, S.; Rampazzo, F.; Meneghini, M.; Meneghesso, G.; Grünenpütt, J.; Lambert, B.; Blanck, H.; et al. Proton induced trapping effect on space compatible GaN HEMTs. Microelectron. Reliab. 2014, 54, 2213–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, B.-J.; Ahn, S.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.; Yang, G. Effects of proton irradiation and thermal annealing on off-state step-stressed AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2016, 34, 041231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ives, N.E.; Chen, J.; Witulski, A.F.; Schrimpf, R.D.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Bruce, R.W.; McCurdy, M.W.; Zhang, E.X.; Massengill, L.W. Effects of Proton-Induced Displacement Damage on Gallium Nitride HEMTs in RF Power Amplifier Applications. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2015, 62, 2417–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koehler, A.D.; Anderson, T.J.; Khachatrian, A.; Roche, N.J.-H.; Buchner, S.; Weaver, B.D.; Hobart, K.D.; Kub, F.J. (Invited) Displacement Damage and Single Event Effects in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. ECS Trans. 2017, 75, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zerarka, M.; Austin, P.; Bensoussan, A.; Morancho, F.; Durier, A. TCAD Simulation of the Single Event Effects in Normally-OFF GaN Transistors After Heavy Ion Radiation. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2017, 64, 2242–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zerarka, M.; Crepel, O. Radiation robustness of normally-off GaN/HEMT power transistors (COTS). Microelectron. Reliab. 2018, 90, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salame, C.-T.; Hoffmann, A.; Mialhe, P.; Charles, J.P.; Kerns, D.V.; Kerns, S.E. Size effect on seb cross-section of VDMOSFETs. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 2000, 152, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, Z.; Li, X.; Tan, K.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Fu, X. The Progress of SEB and SEGR Irradiation Hardening Technology for Power MOSFET. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Radiation Effects of Electronic Devices (ICREED), Beijing, China, 16–18 May 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Z.C.; Li, S.Y.; Liu, J.C.; Cao, Z.; Yang, S.Y. Measurements of the Cross Sections of the Single Event Burnout (SEB) for the Power MOSFET. At. Energy Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 395–398. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bulutay, C. Electron initiated impact ionization in AlGaN alloys. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2002, 17, L59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rowena, I.B.; Selvaraj, S.L.; Egawa, T. Buffer Thickness Contribution to Suppress Vertical Leakage Current With High Breakdown Field (2.3 MV/cm) for GaN on Si. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2011, 32, 1534–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Visalli, D.; Van Hove, M.; Srivastava, P.; Derluyn, J.; Das, J.; Leys, M.; DeGroote, S.; Cheng, K.; Germain, M.; Borghs, G. Experimental and simulation study of breakdown voltage enhancement of AlGaN/GaN heterostructures by Si substrate removal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 113501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Onoda, S.; Hasuike, A.; Nabeshima, Y.; Sasaki, H.; Yajima, K.; Sato, S.-I.; Ohshima, T. Enhanced Charge Collection by Single Ion Strike in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2013, 60, 4446–4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic of aluminium gallium nitride /gallium nitride high electron mobility transistor (AlGaN/GaN HEMT), based on the cascode structure.
Figure 1. The schematic of aluminium gallium nitride /gallium nitride high electron mobility transistor (AlGaN/GaN HEMT), based on the cascode structure.
Electronics 10 00440 g001
Figure 2. The schematic of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT.
Figure 2. The schematic of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT.
Electronics 10 00440 g002
Figure 3. The characteristics of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT: (a) the breakdown characteristic, (b) the transfer characteristic, and (c) the output characteristics.
Figure 3. The characteristics of the depletion-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMT: (a) the breakdown characteristic, (b) the transfer characteristic, and (c) the output characteristics.
Electronics 10 00440 g003aElectronics 10 00440 g003b
Figure 4. The transient drain, source, and gate currents after heavy-ion striking.
Figure 4. The transient drain, source, and gate currents after heavy-ion striking.
Electronics 10 00440 g004
Figure 5. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion striking with different linear energy transfers (LETs).
Figure 5. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion striking with different linear energy transfers (LETs).
Electronics 10 00440 g005
Figure 6. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion striking with different track lengths.
Figure 6. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion striking with different track lengths.
Electronics 10 00440 g006
Figure 7. The cross-section of AlGaN/GaN HEMT with different heavy-ion track positions.
Figure 7. The cross-section of AlGaN/GaN HEMT with different heavy-ion track positions.
Electronics 10 00440 g007
Figure 8. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion striking with different positions.
Figure 8. The transient drain currents after heavy-ion striking with different positions.
Electronics 10 00440 g008
Figure 9. The cross-sections of the total current density with time after the heavy-ion striking at P5: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking. The white line represented the depletion region.
Figure 9. The cross-sections of the total current density with time after the heavy-ion striking at P5: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking. The white line represented the depletion region.
Electronics 10 00440 g009
Figure 10. The cross-sections of the total current density with time after heavy-ion striking at P8: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking. The white line represented the depletion region.
Figure 10. The cross-sections of the total current density with time after heavy-ion striking at P8: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking. The white line represented the depletion region.
Electronics 10 00440 g010
Figure 11. The cross-sections of the impact ionization after the heavy-ion striking at P5: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking.
Figure 11. The cross-sections of the impact ionization after the heavy-ion striking at P5: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking.
Electronics 10 00440 g011aElectronics 10 00440 g011b
Figure 12. The cross-sections of the impact ionization after the heavy-ion striking at P8: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking.
Figure 12. The cross-sections of the impact ionization after the heavy-ion striking at P8: (a) before heavy-ion striking, (b) 0.05 ns after heavy-ion striking, and (c) 50 ns after heavy-ion striking.
Electronics 10 00440 g012aElectronics 10 00440 g012b
Figure 13. The heavy-ion accelerator of China Atomic Energy Research Institute.
Figure 13. The heavy-ion accelerator of China Atomic Energy Research Institute.
Electronics 10 00440 g013
Figure 14. The drain currents of the device at Vds = 50 V for Ge ions at LET = 28.5 MeV·cm2/mg (about 0.31 pC/μm).
Figure 14. The drain currents of the device at Vds = 50 V for Ge ions at LET = 28.5 MeV·cm2/mg (about 0.31 pC/μm).
Electronics 10 00440 g014
Figure 15. The gate and drain currents of the device after heavy-ion irradiation.
Figure 15. The gate and drain currents of the device after heavy-ion irradiation.
Electronics 10 00440 g015
Figure 16. (a) The cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT under test and (b) the picture of the device after heavy-ion irradiation.
Figure 16. (a) The cascode AlGaN/GaN HEMT under test and (b) the picture of the device after heavy-ion irradiation.
Electronics 10 00440 g016
Table 1. Heavy ions used in the experiment.
Table 1. Heavy ions used in the experiment.
Heavy-IonEnergy
(MeV)
LET(GaN)
(MeV·cm2/mg)
Strike in GaN
(μm)
74Ge11,20+21028.516.21
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; Chen, R.; Han, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Yang, H. The Study of the Single Event Effect in AlGaN/GaN HEMT Based on a Cascode Structure. Electronics 2021, 10, 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040440

AMA Style

Liang Y, Chen R, Han J, Wang X, Chen Q, Yang H. The Study of the Single Event Effect in AlGaN/GaN HEMT Based on a Cascode Structure. Electronics. 2021; 10(4):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Yanan, Rui Chen, Jianwei Han, Xuan Wang, Qian Chen, and Han Yang. 2021. "The Study of the Single Event Effect in AlGaN/GaN HEMT Based on a Cascode Structure" Electronics 10, no. 4: 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040440

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop