Next Article in Journal
ViolenceNet: Dense Multi-Head Self-Attention with Bidirectional Convolutional LSTM for Detecting Violence
Next Article in Special Issue
Analyzing TCP Performance in High Bit Error Rate Using Simulation and Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
GaN-Based PCSS with High Breakdown Fields
Previous Article in Special Issue
Minimum Distance Optimization with Chord Edge Growth for High Girth Non-Binary LDPC Codes
 
 
Article

Physical Layer Latency Management Mechanisms: A Study for Millimeter-Wave Wi-Fi

ESAT-WaveCore, Ghent Technology Campus, KU Leuven, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Nurul I. Sarkar
Electronics 2021, 10(13), 1599; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10131599
Received: 31 May 2021 / Revised: 28 June 2021 / Accepted: 29 June 2021 / Published: 3 July 2021
Emerging applications in fields such as extended reality require both a high throughput and low latency. The millimeter-wave (mmWave) spectrum is considered because of the potential in the large available bandwidth. The present work studies mmWave Wi-Fi physical layer latency management mechanisms, a key factor in providing low-latency communications for time-critical applications. We calculate physical layer latency in an ideal scenario and simulate it using a tailor-made simulation framework, based on the IEEE 802.11ad standard. Assessing data reception quality over a noisy channel yielded latency’s dependency on transmission parameters, channel noise, and digital baseband tuning. Latency in function of the modulation and coding scheme was found to span 0.28–2.71 ms in the ideal scenario, whereas simulation results also revealed its tight bond with the demapping algorithm and the number of low-density parity-check decoder iterations. The findings yielded tuning parameter combinations for reaching Pareto optimality either by constraining the bit error rate and optimizing latency or the other way around. Our assessment shows that trade-offs can and have to be made to provide sufficiently reliable low-latency communication. In good channel conditions, one may benefit from both the very high throughput and low latency; yet, in more adverse situations, lower modulation orders and additional coding overhead are a necessity. View Full-Text
Keywords: physical layer; latency; millimeter-wave; Wi-Fi; WiGig; IEEE 802.11ad; time-critical applications; Pareto optimality physical layer; latency; millimeter-wave; Wi-Fi; WiGig; IEEE 802.11ad; time-critical applications; Pareto optimality
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Marinšek, A.; Delabie, D.; De Strycker, L.; Van der Perre, L. Physical Layer Latency Management Mechanisms: A Study for Millimeter-Wave Wi-Fi. Electronics 2021, 10, 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10131599

AMA Style

Marinšek A, Delabie D, De Strycker L, Van der Perre L. Physical Layer Latency Management Mechanisms: A Study for Millimeter-Wave Wi-Fi. Electronics. 2021; 10(13):1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10131599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marinšek, Alexander, Daan Delabie, Lieven De Strycker, and Liesbet Van der Perre. 2021. "Physical Layer Latency Management Mechanisms: A Study for Millimeter-Wave Wi-Fi" Electronics 10, no. 13: 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10131599

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop